DOCSLIB.ORG

Ocm76803102.Pdf (3.392Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ocm76803102.Pdf (3.392Mb) I Coastal Nitrogen Loading Project Final Report April, 2002 prepared by Cape Cod Commission Water Resources Office Nauset Marsh/ Town Cove 1 I . I I I Coastal Nitrogen Loading Report I Project 99-03/604 FINAL REPORT I Centerville River/East Bay, Nauset Harbor/Town Cove, Popponesset Bay, and Herring River, Harwich I Prepared by: Cape Cod Commission I Eduard M. Eichner, Water Scientist/Project Manager Thomas C. Cambareri, Water Resources Program Manager Ben Smith, GIS Analyst Van Morrill, Project Assistant I Gary Prahm, GIS Program Manager I Margo Fenn, Executive Director Prepared for: I MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION I AND U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY I REGION I MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTALAFFAIRS I Robert Durand, Secretary DEPARTMENTOF ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION Lauren Liss, Commissioner BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION I Cynthia Giles, Assistant Commisaiorier DIVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES I Michael Rotondi, Director June, 2002 This project has been financed partially with Federal Funds from the Environmental I Protection Agency {EPA) to the Department of Environmental Protection {DEP) under a S604b Competitive Grant. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of EPA or of DEP, nor does mention of trade names or commercial I products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. I I I I Table of Contents I Final Report Coastal Nitrogen Loading Project I June2002 Page I I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 II. GENERAL EVALUATION PROCESS ............................................................................... 2 I A. NITROGEN LOADING LIMITS AND FLUSHING STUDIES .............••......................•..................... 3 i. Flushing Study Characteristics ................................................................... ; ........................... 3 ii. Nitrogen Loading Limits ....................................................................................................... 4 I iii. Current Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................... 5 B. WATERSHED DELINEATION ..................•.•...................................................•........................... 8 C. LAND USE AND NITROGEN LoADJNG ANALYSIS ..•................................•....•..•.•...........•........•. 9 I D. DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES .....•........................ 12 III. CENTERVILLE RIVER/EAST BAY SYSTEM ............................................................. 14 I A. FLUSHING STUDY, CRITICAL LoADS, AND EXISTING AND BUILDOUTNJTROGEN LOADS .... 14 B. POTENTIAL MANAGEMENT STRA TEGJES ....................................................•......................... 19 i. Scudder Bay, Scudder Bay/Bumps River, Centerville River - East/Centerville River, and Scudder I Bay/Bumps River/Centerville River/Centerville River-East/Centerville River-West subwatersheds 19 ii. Phinneys Bay ...................................................................................................................... 21 iii. Whole Centerville River/East Bay system ............................................................................ 22 I C. NEXT STEPS/DISCUSSION/RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................... 23 IV. NAUSET HARBOR/fOWN COVE SYSTEM ................................................................ 25 I A. FLUSHING STUDY, CRITICAL LOADS, AND EXISTING AND BUILDOUT NITROGEN LOADS ..... 25 B. POTENTIAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR SALT POND ............................................•....... 30 C. NEXT STEPS/DISCUSSION/RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................... 31 I V. HERRING RIVER, HARWICH ......................................................................................... 34 A. INITIAL WATER QUALITY EVALUATION ............................................................................... 34 B. NITROGEN LoADING ANALYSIS ........................................................................................... 38 I C. NEXT STEPS/DISCUSSION/RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................... 39 VI. POPPO NESSET BAY ......................................................................................................... 41 I A. COORDINATION AMONG MANY PROJECTS ........................................................................... 41 B. PRELIMINARY NITROGEN LOADING ANALYSIS .................................................................... 43 C. NEXT STEPS/DISCUSSIONIRECOMMENDA TIONS ................................................................... 46 I VII. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................ 47 I VIII. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 49 I I I I List of Figures I Final Report Coastal Nitrogen Loading Project I June 2002 ~e Figure I. Four Step Approach to Nitrogen Management of Coastal Waters 2 Figure 2. Local vs. System Residence Time 4 I Figure 3. Centerville River/East Bay System Watersheds 15 Figure 4. Existing Nitrogen Loading (Centerville River/East Bay System) 17 Figure 5. Buildout Nitrogen Loading (Centerville River/East Bay System) 18 I Figure 6. Nauset Harbor/Town Cove System Watersheds 26 Figure 7. Existing and Buildout Nitrogen Loading (Nauset Harbor/Town Cove System) 28 I Figure 8. Nitrogen Loading within the Salt Pond Watershed 30 Figure 9. Nitrogen Fluxes (kg/yr) in Town Cove (Teal, et al., 1983) 32 Figure 10. Herring River System Watersheds 35 Figure 11. Herring River Monitoring Locations 36 Figure 12. Popponesset Bay Subwatersheds 42 I List of Tables Final Report I Coastal Nitrogen Loading Project June2002 I Page Table I. 1991 Buzzards Bay Project Recommended Nitrogen Loading Limits 6 Table 2. Current BBP Recommended Coastal Embayment Nitrogen Loading Limits 7 Table 3. Technical Bulletin 91-001 Nitrogen Loading Factors II I Table 4. Residence Times and Volumes in the Centerville River/East Bay Embayment System 14 Table 5. Critical and Watershed Nitrogen Loads in the Centerville River/East Bay Embayment 16 System I Table 6. Selected Potential Nitrogen Management Options Reviewed (Scudder Bay watershed) 20 Table 7. Selected Nitrogen Management Options Reviewed (Bumps River/Scudder Bay combined 20 watershed) Table 8. Selected Nitrogen Management Options Reviewed (Centerville R East/Centerville River) 21 I Table 9. Selected Nitrogen Management Options Reviewed (Centerville River/Scudder 21 Bay/Bumps River/Centerville River East/Centerville River West) Table 10. Selected Nitrogen Management Options Reviewed (Phinneys Bay) 22 I Table 11. Selected Nitrogen Management Options Reviewed (Whole Centerville River/East Bay 23 System) Table 12. Residence Times and Volumes in the Nauset Harbor/Town Cove Embayment System 25 Table 13. Critical and Watershed Nitrogen Loads in the Nauset Harbor/Town Cove Embayment 29 I System Table 14. Selected Potential Nitrogen Management Options Reviewed (Salt Pond watershed) 31 Table 15. .Measured and Project Strearnflow Measurements in Herring River System, Harwich 37 I Table 16. Watershed Nitrogen Loads in the Herring River System (Harwich, MA) 38 Table 17. Preliminary Nitrogen Loads in the Popponesset Bay Watershed 45 I I I I Executive Summary I Most coastal embayments on Cape Cod are degraded by impacts from existing development within their watersheds. Future development will further strain these ecosystems. Creating solutions to restore and protect these ecosystems requires a better understanding of how each individual embayment functions. Analyses need I to be completed to answer questions like: I) how big is the watershed?, 2) what are the nutrient loads coming from the watershed?, and 3) can the tides flush out the nitrogen quicker than it is coming in? Answers to these questions and others will help to provide the basis for developing options to restore or preserve coastal I ecosystems. This report documents nitrogen loading assessments completed by the Cape Cod Commission for the I Centerville River/East Bay coastal system in Barnstable, the Town Cove/Nauset Marsh system in Orleans and Eastham, the Herring River system in Harwich, and the Popponesset Bay system in Mashpee and Barnstable. These assessments are part of an overall effort by the Cape Cod Commission, the state Department of I Environmental Protection, and a number of other agencies and organizations to develop basic information for all of the coastal systems surrounding Cape Cod. Similar previous assessments are currently being used in town comprehensive wastewater assessments and citizen board discussions about appropriate development. I These efforts can also be used as first steps in the process of developing water quality protection standards under the state and federal Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) provisions of the Clean Water Act. The Massachusetts Estuaries Project (MEP), which is being led by DEP and UMASS-Dartrnouth School of Marine I Science and Technology (SMAST), will take the next step forward by combining watershed information similar to analyses presented in this report with embayment-specific water quality and ecosystem information I through the use of embayment-specific models. The assessment of the four systems
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adaptive Sports and Active Recreation Resource Guide
    Adaptive Sports and Active Recreation Resource Guide: Massachusetts Organizations and programs providing sports and active recreation opportunities for children and youth with special needs Updated May 2015 Introduction Community-based sports and active recreation activities are beneficial to children on many levels. They provide children with an opportunity to exercise, improve fitness, increase self-esteem, and to make friends. This Guide provides a sample of programs and opportunities primarily in Massachusetts (some New England area). If you know of other recreation programs that should be included in this Guide please contact Maria Fragala-Pinkham, PT, DPT, MS at [email protected] or (617) 254-3800 dial 1 at prompt then x2280. This Guide was originally developed in 2005 and is updated periodically. For the most up to date version of this Guide, please refer Franciscan Hospital for Children’s website at franciscanhospital.org/recguide. Thanks to the following individuals who contributed to the initial development of this Guide: Rachel Buonopane, PT; Shelley Goodgold, PT; Jennifer Cardella, OT; Megan Boyce, OT; Christine Peters, OT. The development of this resource was originally funded as part of fitness project grants from the Deborah Monroe Noonan Foundation and the John W. Alden Trust. Table of Contents Active Recreation and Sports Programs-----------------------------------------------------------3-8 Multisport Programs----------------------------------------------------------------------------------3-6 Special Olympics----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Formation and Degradation of Barrier Spits in Areas with Low Rates of Littoral Drift*
    Marine Geology, 49 (1982) 257-278 257 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam- Printed in The Netherlands RAPID FORMATION AND DEGRADATION OF BARRIER SPITS IN AREAS WITH LOW RATES OF LITTORAL DRIFT* D.G. AUBREY and A.G. GAINES, Jr. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543 (U.S.A.) (Received February 8, 1982; revised and accepted April 6, 1982) ABSTRACT Aubrey, D.G. and Gaines Jr., A.G., 1982. Rapid formation and degradation of barrier spits in areas with low rates of littoral drift. Mar. Geol., 49: 257-278. A small barrier beach exposed to low-energy waves and a small tidal range (0.7 m) along Nantucket Sound, Mass., has experienced a remarkable growth phase followed by rapid attrition during the past century. In a region of low longshore-transport rates, the barrier spit elongated approximately 1.5 km from 1844 to 1954, developing beyond the baymouth, parallel to the adjacent Nantucket Sound coast. Degradation of the barrier spit was initiated by a succession of hurricanes in 1954 (Carol, Edna and Hazel). A breach opened and stabilized near the bay end of the one kilometer long inlet channel, providing direct access for exchange of baywater with Nantucket Sound, and separating the barrier beach into two nearly equal limbs. The disconnected northeast limb migrated shorewards, beginning near the 1954 inlet and progressing northeastward, filling the relict inlet channel behind it. At present, about ten percent of the northeast limb is subaerial: the rest of the limb has completely filled the former channel and disappeared. The southwest limb of the barrier beach has migrated shoreward, but otherwise has not changed significantly since the breach.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-16 A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts Part 2. Cape Cod and the Islands K. E. Reback, P. D. Brady, K. D. McLaughlin, and C. G. Milliken Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Department of Fish and Game Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Commonwealth of Massachusetts Technical Report Technical May 2004 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-16 A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts Part 2. Cape Cod and the Islands Kenneth E. Reback, Phillips D. Brady, Katherine D. McLauglin, and Cheryl G. Milliken Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Southshore Field Station 50A Portside Drive Pocasset, MA May 2004 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Paul Diodati, Director Department of Fish and Game Dave Peters, Commissioner Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Ellen Roy-Herztfelder, Secretary Commonwealth of Massachusetts Mitt Romney, Governor TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 2: Cape Cod and the Islands Acknowledgements . iii Abstract . iv Introduction . 1 Materials and Methods . 1 Life Histories . 2 Management . 4 Cape Cod Watersheds . 6 Map of Towns and Streams . 6 Stream Survey . 8 Cape Cod Recommendations . 106 Martha’s Vineyard Watersheds . 107 Map of Towns and Streams . 107 Stream Survey . 108 Martha’s Vineyard Recommendations . 125 Nantucket Watersheds . 126 Map of Streams . 126 Stream Survey . 127 Nantucket Recommendations . 132 General Recommendations . 133 Alphabetical Index of Streams . 134 Alphabetical Index of Towns . .. 136 Appendix 1: List of Anadromous Species in MA . 138 Appendix 2: State River Herring Regulations . 139 Appendix 3: Fishway Designs and Examples . 140 Appendix 4: Abbreviations Used . 148 ii Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the following people for their assistance in carrying out this survey and for sharing their knowledge of the anadromous fish resources of the Commonwealth: Brian Creedon, Tracy Curley, Jack Dixon, George Funnell, Steve Kennedy, Paul Montague, Don St.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWN of MASHPEE BLUE PAGES a Citizens’ Guide to Protecting Cape Cod Waters
    TOWN OF MASHPEE BLUE PAGES A Citizens’ Guide to Protecting Cape Cod Waters Shannon Cushing, Grade 11 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements This information is reprinted from the Island Blue Pages, courtesy of the Martha’s Vineyard Shellfish Group and the WampanoagThis information Tribe ofis Aquinnah.reprinted from For the a complete Island Blue version Pages of, courtesy the Island of theBlue Martha’s Pages, visit Vineyard the website Shellfish www.islandbluepages.org Group and the . or contactWampanoag tbe Martha’s Tribe Vineyardof Aquinnah. Shellfish For a Groupcomplete at 508version-693-0391. of the TheIsland Island Blue BluePages Pages, visit isthe an website adaptation, www.islandbluepages.org with permission, of the. or Pugetcontact Soundbook tbe Martha’s, a game Vineyard plan for Shellfish maintaining Group the at health508-693-0391. of our sister The Island estuary Blue on Pagesthe West is an Coast. adaptation, To learn with more permission, about the of the Puget Soundbook, a game plan for maintaining the health of our sister estuary on the West Coast. To learn more about the original project and the inspiration for the Blue Pages, visit www.forsea.org/pugetsoundbook/ original project and the inspiration for the Blue Pages, visit www.forsea.org/pugetsoundbook/ Thanks to Jim Kolb and Diane Bressler, the creators of the Puget Soundbook, which continues to inspire us with its words and Thanks to Jim Kolb and Diane Bressler, the creators of the Puget Soundbook, which continues to inspire us with its words and illustrations. illustrations. The Town of Mashpee, with permission, undertook the task of adapting the Orleans Blue Pages to reflect conditions specific to The Town of Mashpee, with permission, undertook the task of adapting the Orleans Blue Pages to reflect conditions specific to Mashpee.
    [Show full text]
  • 79 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 89-298-OCT. 27, 1965 1073 Public Law 89-298 Authorizing the Construction, Repair, and Preservation of Cert
    79 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 89-298-OCT. 27, 1965 1073 Public Law 89-298 AN ACT October 27, 1965 Authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works ^ ' ^-'°°] on rivers and harbors for navigation, flood control, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assemhled, pubiic v/orks •' xj 1 projects. Construction TITIvE I—NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES WATER and repair, SUPPLY SEC. 101. (a) Congress hereby recognizes that assuring adequate supplies of water for the great metropolitan centers of the United States has become a problem of such magnitude that the welfare and prosperity of this country require the Federal Government to assist in the solution of water supply problems. Therefore, the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is authorized to cooperate with Federal, State, and local agencies in preparing plans in accordance with the Water Resources Planning Act (Public Law 89-80) to meet the long-range water needs of the northeastern ^"^®' P- 244. United States. This plan may provide for the construction, opera­ tion, and maintenance by the United States of (1) a system of major reservoirs to be located within those river basins of the Northeastern United States which drain into the Chesapeake Bay, those that drain into the Atlantic Ocean north of the Chesapeake Bay, those that drain into Lake Ontario, and those that drain into the Saint Lawrence River, (2) major conveyance facilities by which water may be exchanged between these river basins to the extent found desirable in the national interest, and (3) major purification facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Swan Pond River Swan Pond River Swan Pond River Stage Harbor Provincetown Harbor Provincetown Harbor
    Bourne Falmouth Sandwich Mashpee Barnstable Yarmouth Dennis Harwich Brewster Chatham Orleans Eastham Wellfleet Truro Provincetown WAQUOIT BAY WAQUOIT BAY WAQUOIT BAY PARKERS RIVER PARKERS RIVER SWAN POND RIVER SWAN POND RIVER SWAN POND RIVER STAGE HARBOR PROVINCETOWN HARBOR PROVINCETOWN HARBOR Childs River | 71% Childs River | 5% Childs River | 24% Lewis Pond | 100% Swan Pond River | 96% Swan Pond River | 1% Swan Pond River | 3% Little Mill Pond | 100% Provincetown Harbor | 7% Provincetown Harbor | 93% Quashnet River | 22% Quashnet River | 17% Quashnet River | 61% Lower Parkers River | 100% Swan Pond River North | 100% Mill Pond | 100% Eel Pond West | 95% Eel Pond West | 4% Eel Pond West | 1% Seine Pond | 100% Swan Pond River South | 100% Mitchell River | 100% Hamblin Pond & Red Brook | 31% Hamblin Pond & Red Brook | 69% Upper Parkers River | <1% Upper Parkers River | >99% Oyster Pond | 100% Waquoit Bay | 82% Waquoit Bay | 18% Oyster River | 100% WELLFLEET HARBOR WELLFLEET HARBOR WELLFLEET HARBOR Eel Pond East | 100% RUSHY MARSH BASS RIVER BASS RIVER BASS RIVER Stage Harbor | 100% Wellfleet Harbor | 11% Wellfleet Harbor | 88% Wellfleet Harbor | 2% Eel Pond South | 100% Rushy Marsh Pond | 100% Bass River Lower | 59% Bass River Lower | 41% Jehu Pond Great River | 100% Bass River Middle | 67% Bass River Middle | 33% Bass River Middle | <1% SULFUR SPRINGS ROCK HARBOR ROCK HARBOR PAMET RIVER Little River | 100% Dinah’s Pond | 100% Bucks Creek | 100% Rock Harbor | 79% Rock Harbor | 21% Pamet River | 100% Sage Lot Pond | 100% Follins Pond |
    [Show full text]
  • E. Fisheries and Wildlife
    E. Fisheries and Wildlife Until recent decades, the vast majority of Mashpee’s territory was the domain not of man, but of beast. Our woods were only occasionally broken by a roadway, or a few homes, or a farmer’s fields. The hunting was good. Our clear lakes were famous for their fishing. Our streams flowed clean to pristine coastal bays teeming with fish and shellfish that helped feed and support many families. Much has changed with the explosive development of the last fifty years, and much of our wildlife has disappeared along with the natural habitat that supported it. However, much remains for our enjoyment and safekeeping. In this section we will look at Mashpee’s fish and shellfish, its mammals, birds and insects, important wildlife movement corridors and those species living in our town which are among the last of their kind. 1. Finfish Mashpee hosts four types of fin fisheries: fresh water ponds, rivers and streams, estuaries and coastal ponds and the open ocean. Our four large ponds provide some of the best fishing in the state. 203-acre Ashumet Pond, 317- acre Johns Pond and 729-acre Mashpee-Wakeby Pond are all cold water fisheries stocked with brown, brook and rainbow trout. In the last century, such famous anglers as Daniel Webster, President Grover Cleveland and the famous actor Joseph Jefferson looked forward to their fishing expeditions to Mashpee, while local residents looked forward to the income provided serving as guides to those and other wealthy gentlemen. Ashumet and Johns Ponds are also noted for their smallmouth bass, while Mashpee-Wakeby provides not only the smallmouth, but also chain pickerel, white perch and yellow perch.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWN of BARNSTABLE 2002 Annual Report
    TOWN OF BARNSTABLE 2002 Annual Report BARNSTABLE TOWN COUNCIL APRIL 18, 2002 FRONT ROW: ROYDEN RICHARDSON, PRECINCT 4; GARY BROWN, PRECINCT 8; GARY BLAZIS, PRESIDENT, PRECINCT 10; RICHARD CLARK, PRECINCT 1, BACK ROW: GREGORY MILNE, PRECINCT 9; RICHARD ELRICK, PRECINCT 2; CARL RIEDELL, PRECINCT 5; JANET JOAKIM, PRECINCT 6; AUDREY LOUGHNANE PRECINCT 11; RICHARD BARRY, PRECINCT 7; ROBERT JONES, VICE PRESIDENT, PRECINCT 3 David Hansen, Photography ON THE COVER: Mercy Otis Warren, W., Barnstable, MA Iyanough, (Iyanno, Iannis) Statue Patriot, Poet, Historian, Champion of Liberty Sachem of Mattachiest Tribe of Advocate – Bill of Rights, 1728-1814 Cummaquid, Barnstable, MA – Circa 1620 Statue- Superior Court, Barnstable Statue – Main Street, Hyannis Sculptor: David Lewis Sculptor: David Lewis James Otis Jr., W. Barnstable, MA Firefighters Memorial Revolutionary Patriot, 1725-1783 Centerville Fire Dept. Advocate, Orator, Statesman Centerville, MA Statue- Superior Court, Barnstable Dedicated – Oct. 10, 2002 Sculptor: David Lewis Sculptor: David Lewis IN MEMORIAM TOWN OF BARNSTABLE John P. “Mitch” Mitchell Gloria Urenus 1925 - 2002 1927 - 2002 Bismore Park Harbormaster Zoning Enforcement Officer – Building Dept. Kevin Heap William Doiron 1945 – 2002 1943 - 2002 Programmer Analyst – I. S. Dept. General Forman – Highway Dept. Robert J. Smith, Jr. To his years of service OSTERVILLE ROTARY CLUB,SALVATION ARMY,CHAIRMAN BOARD OF TRUSTEES CAPE COD ACADEMY,CAPE COD CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC,NEW SCHOOL OF CAPE COD OSTERVILLE LIBRARY, BARNSTABLE SOLDIERS & SAILORS MEMORIAL ASSOC. FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST, JANE ESHBAUGH COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARDS COMMITTEE, OSTERVILLE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, OSTERVILLE BUSINESS & PROF. ASSOC. 2 TOWN OF BARNSTABLE Barnstable County POPULATION LOCATION Year Round 48,500 Seasonal 145,500+/- Eastern Massachusetts, located on the bicep of the Cape Cod arm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Peninsula Reporter – February 2021
    PENINSULA News from the Peninsula Council at New Seabury, Cape Cod • at New Seabury • Reporter Volume 49 Number 4 February 2021 our mission To provide for the maintenance, preservation and enhancement of New Seabury’s environmental setting and promote the safety and welfare of the homeowners’ investments. FEBRUARY 2021 1 Photo By: Kent Earle Hello Neighbors! I would like to introduce myself to those of you who I have not had the pleasure of meeting yet. My name is Roberto DaCosta and I am the Manager at 95 Shore. I have worked at the Club for almost 2 years and look forward to many more. I previously was working in Florida at Pelican At The Club at New Seabury Bay where I was the Clubhouse Manager. My family and I are enjoying our journey on the Cape and hope to meet more of you Februay Hours of Operation soon. We have some exciting things happen- Thursday 4:00pm - 8:00pm ing over at the Club! We are pleased to Friday - Saturday 12:00pm - 8:00pm announce that 95 Shore is offering curb- Sunday 12:00pm - 6:00pm side take-out for non-members of the Club from Thursday through Sunday. Photos By: Kent Earle Our Chef prepares some exciting specials every week. To view our menu you can head to our website, www. newseabury.com which our Chef is always changing! To place an order you can call 95 Shore at 508-539- 8322 Option 1. If you have any questions you can reach me at [email protected] or 508-539-8322 ext.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Mashpee National Wildlife Refuge
    HOW WE GOT HERE: The History of the Mashpee National Wildlife Refuge By the Friends of the Mashpee National Wildlife Refuge The Mashpee National Wildlife Refuge encompasses nearly 6,000 acres that protects important natural areas and a great diversity of wildlife habitat. Established in 1995, this unique refuge is owned by federal, state, town, and private conservation groups who share a common goal of conserving nature for the continued benefit of wildlife and people. PREFACE National Wildlife Refuges are valuable assets in a variety • Located in the towns of Mashpee and Falmouth, of ways. They provide a window into past cultures and with 6000 acres, it is the Cape’s second largest open, untouched landscapes while preserving these resources accessible conservation land, behind only the National well into the future, furthering the continuum. Refuges Seashore. sustain necessary wildlife habitats and resources critical in their seasonal needs for foraging, raising young, • It was named after the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, and avoiding predators to live yet another day. These “the people of the first light.” preserved landscapes purify water and air providing yet another valuable service. Likewise, for humans, refuges • It is unique within the National Wildlife Refuge offer solitude in our daily lives and, as the name implies, System in that it is the ONLY refuge that is managed are a great place to view wildlife too. cooperatively by eight conservation landowners and the Friends organization: a consortium of federal, state, I grew up in Minnesota, where we often headed to a tribal, private, & nonprofit. It’s the model for future local refuge in the spring to witness one of the most refuges.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Estuaries Project
    Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for Popponesset Bay, Mashpee and Barnstable, Massachusetts University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Massachusetts Department of School of Marine Science and Technology Environmental Protection FINAL REPORT – SEPTEMBER 2004 Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for Popponesset Bay, Mashpee and Barnstable, Massachusetts FINAL REPORT – SEPTEMBER 2004 Brian Howes Roland Samimy David Schlezinger Sean Kelley John Ramsey Jon Wood Ed Eichner Contributors: US Geological Survey Don Walters, and John Masterson Applied Coastal Research and Engineering, Inc. Elizabeth Hunt and Trey Ruthven Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Charles Costello and Brian Dudley (DEP project manager) SMAST Coastal Systems Program Paul Henderson, George Hampson, and Sara Sampieri Cape Cod Commission Brian DuPont Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for Popponesset Bay, Mashpee and Barnstable, Massachusetts Executive Summary 1. Background This report presents the results generated from the implementation of the Massachusetts Estuaries Project’s Linked Watershed-Embayment Approach to the Popponesset Bay System a coastal embayment within the Towns of Mashpee and Barnstable, Massachusetts. Analyses of the Popponesset Bay System was performed to assist the Towns with up-coming nitrogen management decisions associated with the Towns’ current and future wastewater planning efforts, as well as wetland restoration, anadromous fish runs, shell fishery, open-space, and harbor maintenance programs. As part of the MEP approach, habitat assessment was conducted on the embayment based upon available water quality monitoring data, historical changes in eelgrass distribution, time-series water column oxygen measurements, and benthic community structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife 2018 Annual Report 147 Annual Report 2018 Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife Jack Buckley Director (July 2017–May 2018) Mark S. Tisa, Ph.D., M.B.A. Acting Director (May–June 2018) 149 Table of Contents 2 The Board Reports 6 Fisheries 42 Wildlife 66 Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program 82 Information & Education 95 Archivist 96 Hunter Education 98 District Reports 124 Wildlife Lands 134 Federal Aid 136 Staff and Agency Recognition 137 Personnel Report 140 Financial Report Appendix A Appendix B About the Cover: MassWildlife staff prepare to stock trout at Lake Quinsigamond in Worcester with the help of the public. Photo by Troy Gipps/MassWildlife Back Cover: A cow moose stands in a Massachusetts bog. Photo by Bill Byrne/MassWildlife Printed on Recycled Paper. ELECTRONIC VERSION 1 The Board Reports Joseph S. Larson, Ph.D. Chairperson Overview fective April 30, 2018, and the Board voted the appoint- ment of Deputy Director Mark Tisa as Acting Director, The Massachusetts Fisheries and Wildlife Board con- effective Mr. Buckley’s retirement. The Board -mem sists of seven persons appointed by the Governor to bers expressed their gratitude and admiration to the 5-year terms. By law, the individuals appointed to the outgoing Director for his close involvement in develop- Board are volunteers, receiving no remuneration for ing his staff and his many accomplishments during his their service to the Commonwealth. Five of the sev- tenure, not only as Director but over his many years as en are selected on a regional basis, with one member, Deputy Director in charge of Administration, primarily by statute, representing agricultural interests.
    [Show full text]