View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of North Carolina School of Law NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 80 | Number 2 Article 7 1-1-2002 A Dead Senator on the Ballot: Should the Successor's Appointment be Preordained Jennifer A. Dominguez Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jennifer A. Dominguez, A Dead Senator on the Ballot: Should the Successor's Appointment be Preordained, 80 N.C. L. Rev. 692 (2002). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol80/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. A Dead Senator on the Ballot: Should the Successor's Appointment be Preordained? The 2000 presidential election revealed glaring improprieties in the methods available to Americans for choosing their leaders., With attention focused on Florida's confusing ballot, the variety of standards used to count "hanging chads," and claims of disenfranchisement, the presidential election's irregularities overshadowed other election problems entirely Before the tumultuous contest to determine the winners of the electoral college vote even began, however, the death of United States Senate candidate and Missouri Governor Mel Carnahan3 raised the question of whether a deceased person could be elected to the Senate.4 For some observers, concerns mounted when the newly elevated Governor' announced that he would appoint Carnahan's widow, Jean 1.