South African Journal of Botany 2002, 68: 497–517 Copyright © NISC Pty Ltd Printed in South Africa — All rights reserved SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY ISSN 0254–6299
Vegetation ecology of Sekhukhuneland, South Africa: Kirkia wilmsii–Terminalia prunioides Closed Mountain Bushveld
SJ Siebert1,2*, AE van Wyk1 and GJ Bredenkamp1
1 Department of Botany, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa 2 Present address: SABONET, c/o National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, South Africa * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]
Received 2 April 2002, accepted in revised form 16 September 2002
A hierarchical classification, description, and ecological sub-associations. Many new syntaxa are described and and floristic interpretations are presented on one of the ecologically interpreted. For each of the plant commu- six major vegetation types of the Sekhukhuneland nities the floristic richness, endemism and conservation Centre of Plant Endemism, namely the Kirkia status was determined. A selected set of environmental wilmsii–Terminalia prunioides Closed Mountain factors is provided to aid with the delimitation of plant Bushveld. Relevés were compiled in 103 stratified ran- communities. The floristic information, proposed classi- dom plots. A TWINSPAN classification, refined by fication, general description and vegetation key, can be Braun-Blanquet procedures, revealed 20 plant commu- used for the identification of conservation areas, land- nities, which are divided into five associations and 20 use planning and further research.
Introduction
Plant communities of the Kirkia wilmsii–Terminalia prunioides Combretum hereroense–Grewia vernicosa Open Mountain Closed Mountain Bushveld [CMB] (Siebert et al. 2002) are Bushveld. This was a marginal division, with both savanna described in this contribution and form part of a comprehen- vegetation types sharing the majority of their species and sive vegetation and floristic survey of the Sekhukhuneland occurring in the same terrain types on mountain/hill slopes Centre of Plant Endemism [SCPE]. This paper characteris- and in valleys of the central region of the SCPE. The division es and interprets the vegetation units and the associated of the two vegetation types is based on the significant occur- habitats of the CMB, and provides an assessment of the rence of preferential species, which are listed in Table 1 plant diversity, endemism and threatened taxa of the various together with significant non-preferential ones. plant communities. A vegetation key is presented to assist The methodology for the analyses of vegetation data and with the easy identification of the syntaxa of the CMB in the refinement of the classification follows Siebert et al. (2002b). region. Habitat data are provided to aid with future, more Floristic and habitat data of the CMB was obtained from 103 comprehensive ecological analysis. The background and stratified random sample plots. A multivariate approximation objectives of the research are provided elsewhere (Siebert (TWINSPAN) (Hill 1979) of the vegetation, based on the et al. 2002b). floristic data set, was used to distinguish several vegetation types. Braun-Blanquet procedures were used to further Study Area refine the resultant classification in the MEGATAB computer programme (Hennekens 1996). The study area comprises the central part of the SCPE (Figure 1); the Sekhukhuneland Centre is defined and dis- Results and Discussion cussed in Siebert et al. (2002a). The study area is discussed in Siebert et al. (2002b). Note that the extent of occurrence An analysis of the Kirkia wilmsii–Terminalia prunioides of the CMB differs slightly from that of the Open Mountain Closed Mountain Bushveld resulted in the identification of Bushveld [OMB]. four major vegetation units and 20 plant communities, which are grouped as five associations and 20 sub-associations Methods (Table 2). These were subsequently hierarchically classified, described and interpreted. Approximately 600 (30%) of the The final TWINSPAN division of the main table (415 relevés) SCPE’s approximately 2 000 known plant taxa were record- of Siebert et al. (2002), separated the Kirkia wilmsii– ed during the survey of the CMB, with only the most con- Terminalia prunioides Closed Mountain Bushveld from the spicuous and dominant taxa presented in Table 2. The dis- 498 Siebert, Van Wyk and Bredenkamp
UNTAINS T MO OR DRAKENSBERG DPO TRY S Olifants River Lebowakgomo Potlake Nature Reserve LIMPOPO
Olifants River Penge
L
E Lepellane River O
L
O
M Spekboom River O Burgersfort
U N
SOUTH AFRICA Limpopo T A
Sekhukhune I Steelpoort
N Mpumalanga S North West Gauteng Jane Furse Free KwaZulu- State Natal Spekboom River Northern Cape Steelpoort River
Eastern Cape E N Western Cape U H K
lpRiverKlip U
H
K Groblersdal E Lydenburg S
A
A
H T
STEENKAMPSBERG
Olifants River Steelpoort River
Stoffberg Dullstroom
= Study Area MPUMALANGA 020 200kmkm
Figure 1: Extent of occurrence of the Closed Mountain Bushveld of the Sekhukhuneland Centre of Plant Endemism in Limpopo (Northern Province) and Mpumalanga, South Africa South African Journal of Botany 2002, 68: 497–517 499
Table 1: Preferential species for each of the two Mountain Bushveld types expressed as a percentage of the total number of revelés (n) in each data set
Species OMB (n = 91) CMB (n = 103) Correlation (r) Difference Preferential species for OMB: 0.73* Vitex obovata subsp. wilmsii 73.6% 3.9% 69.7% Tinnea rhodesiana 60.4% 11.7% 48.7% Brachylaena ilicifolia 48.4% 3.9% 44.5% Themeda triandra 76.9% 34.0% 42.9% Euclea crispa 44.0% 2.9% 41.1% Berkheya insignis 34.1% 0% 34.1% Gnidia caffra 34.1% 1.0% 33.1% Diheteropogon amplectens 36.3% 3.9% 32.4% Senecio latifolius 30.8% 0% 30.8% Orthosiphon fruticosus 31.9% 2.9% 29.0% Preferential species for CMB: 0.961** Panicum maximum 26.4% 70.9% 44.5% Dichrostachys cinerea 15.4% 54.4% 39.0% Terminalia prunioides 26.4% 56.3% 29.9% Grewia flava 4.4% 33.0% 28.6% Boscia albitrunca 6.6% 35.0% 28.4% Sarcostemma viminale 4.4% 31.1% 26.7% Rhus engleri 2.2% 28.2% 26.0% Commiphora mollis 3.3% 29.1% 25.8% Euclea divinorum 2.2% 26.2% 24.0% Acacia nigrescens 3.3% 26.2% 22.9% Non-preferential species: 0.813** Corbichonia decumbens 22.0% 22.3% 0.3% Indigofera hilaris 24.2% 22.3% 1.9% Petalidium oblongifolium 23.1% 26.2% 3.1% Jasminum multipartitum 20.9% 17.5% 3.4% Heteropogon contortus 54.9% 48.5% 6.4% Psiadia punctulata 29.7% 36.9% 7.2% Aloe cryptopoda 24.2% 32.0% 7.8% Leucas capensis 20.9% 12.6% 8.3% Raphionacme galpinii 24.2% 15.5% 8.7% Pellaea calomelanos 36.3% 26.2% 10.1%
*Significant positive correlation **Highly significant positive correlation tribution of 41 Sekhukhuneland Centre endemic/near- sum sericeae endemic (Siebert 1998) and Red Data List (Hilton-Taylor 1.6 Enneapogono scoparii–Kirkietum wilmsii karomieto- 1996) taxa among various plant communities is also indicat- sum speciosae ed in Table 2. 1.7 Enneapogono scoparii–Kirkietum wilmsii nuxietosum congestae Classification II.Urochloo mosambicencis–Eucleion divinorum Plant communities of the Kirkia wilmsii–Terminalia 2.Enneapogono cenchroidis–Acacietum leiorachidis prunioides Closed Mountain Bushveld recognised for the 2.1 Enneapogono cenchroidis–Acacietum leiorachidis SCPE are classified as follows (Figure 2): rhigozetosum obovati I. Enneapogono scoparii–Kirkion wilmsii 2.2 Enneapogono cenchroidis–Acacietum leiorachidis 1.Enneapogono scoparii–Kirkietum wilmsii maeruetosum angolensis 1.1 Enneapogono scoparii–Kirkietum wilmsii cleroden- 2.3 Enneapogono cenchroidis–Acacietum leiorachidis dretosum glabri bolusanthetosum speciosae 1.2 Enneapogono scoparii–Kirkietum wilmsii solanetosum 2.4 Enneapogono cenchroidis–Acacietum leiorachidis incani gardenietosum volkensii 1.3 Enneapogono scoparii–Kirkietum wilmsii bridelieto- 3.Fingerhuthio africanae–Boscietum foetidae sum mollis 3.1 Fingerhuthio africanae–Boscietum foetidae elaeoden- 1.4 Enneapogono scoparii–Kirkietum wilmsii lanneetosum dretosum transvaalensis discoloris 3.2 Fingerhuthio africanae–Boscietum foetidae aloetosum 1.5 Enneapogono scoparii–Kirkietum wilmsii munduleto- globuligemmae 500 Siebert, Van Wyk and Bredenkamp Phytosociological table of the Closed Mountain Bushveld of the Sekhukhuneland Centre Plant Endemism of the Closed Mountain 2: Phytosociological table Table South African Journal of Botany 2002, 68: 497–517 501 Table 2 cont. Table 502 Siebert, Van Wyk and Bredenkamp Table 2 cont. Table South African Journal of Botany 2002, 68: 497–517 503 III +.+R.+...... II ...... 1+.....+...... ++..+...... ++++. + ....1+.+...R+..R+...... RRRRRR+ 1 . + +R . . + +R+ + + . . RR ++++. . .A1 ++++. +. +++++++A1++1 . 1+R1+1 . +++R. +. . 11 .....++.....++.+1.1+++.+.+..+..+....++++RR.....R...... +R+.+...... 1.1...+...+.++.....+.+...... ++... I ++++++. + ++++. . . + ...... ++.+...... +.++...... +R...R..+.+...... +R+.+ ...... 1 ...... R...... +.+.+...... R..+R...... R..+1.111+...... +..+.+1.+++.+++.+111 .....R..+.+.+11R+++++++++++..+++.+.R....R...+R..+R.+.R.+.+++R...... +R+...... R.R.+...... 1B.1B+11A.11AA1AA.++...+1+.+..1.+A.1ABB.+.+.1.1.+1.....1...+...... 1...... ++...+...R+..+....+1...... +...R.R+++....R.++R+.R...... R.+...... ++RR..+R.....+...... RR...... ++..++...... R....R.R....+...111.+....+.+A...... +++.+1.+...... +++.+.+...... ++...... R...... ++.+.+.+..+R.+...... R.R+...... R...... +1+..+....+.+R...... R...... R..R++++..R+++...... +.R..+..R+R+...... 1R.R.+.1+.+...... +R+.+R...... R+....++...R1+.R.+...... +.+R.+R...... R++1R++...... +...... R...... +.R++.+..++...... R...... 1++++...... ++R+.R...... RR.R...... ++R+...... +.R...... 1+..A+.RR1R+.+...... RR...... ++R.+...... ++.++...... +...+...... +R.+.+1+..++R...... +...... +.1++...... +..+...... R...... +....R.....+R.+..R.R.++++...... +...+.R...... +...... +.R1R..++.+.+...... R.R...+.+...... +....+....R...... +.R+..+..+.+...... R+R.R+.R1..R...... ++R..R+.+++R.R...... R...R.....+...+RR.+..+.+....+...... R..R.+11+1+...... +....+.+...... +.AA.+...... +...... +R.11...... 1R.1.++++.+.1...... RR..R...... R...... ++R..+R....+R...... R.R...... R...... +.++.+..+++...... +..+...... +...+.....+R...... +...... ++..+1+1+.R1++.+++...... +R..+R+...+.+...... R...... R...... R...... R...... R.....+...... ++++.1....R+...... +..+...... +AR+R.++1+A.1...... 1. 1.123456 71 1. 23412 1. 3 1. 412312 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 2. 3. 3. 3. 3. 4. 4. 4. 5. 5. Melino nerviglumis–Euphorbietum tirucalli Fingerhuthio africanae–Boscietum foetidae aloetosum globuligemmae Fingerhuthio africanae–Boscietum foetidae sesamothamnetosum lugardii Fingerhuthio africanae–Boscietum foetidae euphorbietosum ingentis ) [$] t s [K;$] g g s ) [$] t f W13239 f f g g g f P4 f t f t f t f f f leiorachis f g g f [#] f f s s g f f g f t g t t f f f f (form: f f t var. s t (form: f f Table 2 cont. Table Indigofera circinnata Ammocharis coranica Erythrina lysistemon Alliance Acacia senegal Grewia flavescens Indigofera hilaris Association Sub-association Species group Q Chaetacanthus costatus Species group U Eragrostis lehmanniana Acacia luederitzii Aloe globuligemma Elephantorrhiza praetermissa Barleria saxatilis Themeda triandra Andropogon schirensis Species group R: Diagnostic species for Barleria prionitis Kleinia longiflora Acacia karroo Eragrostis pseudosclerantha Pearsonia uniflora Dicliptera fruticosa Acacia gerrardii Aloe greatheadii Schmidtia pappophoroides Hibiscus micranthus Melhania rehmannii Cadaba natalensis Species group S Albizia anthelmintica Species group V: Diagnostic species for Holubia saccata Maerua juncea Felicia mossamedensis Cleome hirta Sporobolus nitens Sesamothamnus lugardii Pogonarthria squarrosa Seddera suffruticosa Aristida rhiniochloa Blepharis saxatilis Lepidagathis scabra Dyschoriste fischeri Acacia grandicornuta Species group T: Diagnostic species for Euphorbia ingens Eleusine coracana Ptycholobium contortum Hippocratea longipetiolata Species group W: Diagnostic species for Schkuhria pinnata Senna italica Dicoma tomentosa Melinis nerviglumis Ledebouria marginata Euphorbia tirucalli 504 Siebert, Van Wyk and Bredenkamp # ! ! ! " Table 2 cont. Table H ; : J 7 K <