Omega-Minus Plus 25 Years

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Omega-Minus Plus 25 Years Omega-minus plus 25 years Authors of the 'Eightfold Way' - Murray Gell-Mann (right) and Yuvai Ne'eman. (Photos Kathleen Blumenfeld) A quarter of a century ago, in February 1964, the world learned that particle physicists had found the omega-minus particle, setting the stage for a new era in our understanding of the components of the atomic nucleus. Particle physics had hit the head­ lines before and has done so many times since, but the dramatic di­ scovery by a Brookhaven bubble chamber team of a particle whose exact properties had been pre­ dicted by seemingly simple chalk- and-blackboard arguments was es­ pecially romantic. In the 1920s, physicists had strived to explain all the underlying structure of matter in terms of just two particles, the proton - the hea­ vy constituent of the atomic nu­ cleus - and the light electrons or­ biting round the nucleus or given The underlying mathematical the proton, the neutron and the off in beta decay. When the neu­ ideas were further developed in the strange lambda. No real physics tron - the electrically neutral com­ mid-50s by C.N. Yang and R. Mills followed, but the seeds of an idea ponent of the nucleus - was dis­ (and independently by R. Shaw) had been sown. covered by James Chadwick at who explored how the formalism In 1961 Murray Gell-Mann at Cambridge in 1932, understanding of abstract isospaces depended Caltech and Yuval Ne'eman at Lon­ <*6ok a step backwards. also on space and time (gauge the­ don's Imperial College realized that Then Werner Heisenberg ory). many particles could be grouped pointed out that the proton and the At around this time, it was be­ into octets - 'the eightfold way' - neutron, apart from their electric coming clear that the subnuclear characteristic of a special form of charge, were otherwise quite simi­ world had many other denizens - symmetry under three-dimensional lar - both lived inside nuclei and particles created in high energy col­ rotations (SU3). The symmetry both weighed about 900 MeV. lisions but which did not normally also had other multiplets but at the Perhaps, suggested Heisenberg, live inside the nucleus. Why were time these could not be filled up they were the two possible quan­ there so many particles? To make with particles. tum states of a single entity - the some order out of the chaos, Mur­ The usefulness of the SU3 octet nucleon - inhabiting some abstract ray Gell-Mann and Kazuhiko Nishiji- pattern had been noticed before in two-dimensional 'isospace'. A new ma proposed a new quantum num­ attempts to find write down the al­ quantity - 'isospin' - was intro­ ber - 'strangeness'. Some of the gebra of carrier particles transmit­ duced to describe quantum sym­ particles with approximately equal ting the nuclear forces, but Gell- metries in this space, analogous to masses appeared to fall into neat Mann and Ne'eman saw that the spin, the label that emerged from multiplets. These could be grouped neat octets fitted other particles quantum physics in ordinary space in turn into larger families, hinting too. and time. at some deeper symmetry hidden (By this time Gell-Mann was well The nucleon is an isospin doub­ underneath. known in the field, having devel­ let, while the pion, with three elec­ Many attempts were made. In oped with Nishijima the idea of trical charge options (positive, ne­ the late 50s Shoichi Sakata toyed strangeness, and with Richard gative and neutral), is classified as with the idea of explaining the rash Feynman some important links in an isospin triplet. of particles in terms of just three - our understanding of the weak CERN Courier, March 1989 1 |\ Partout ou I'ceil ne peut acceder- TRANSITION JUNCTIONS V Inspection opt/que sans FOR CRYOGENIC, VACUUM, NUCLEAR AND SPACE APPUCATIONS destruction; TeKZ video-endoscope2000 Reproduction THEY HAVETHE TOTALLY RELIABLE BIMETALIC brillante, SAME MECHANICAL TRANSITION JUNCTIONS pouvoir de dissolution CHARACTERISTICS FOR TUBULAR ASSEMBLIES eleve. AS THE ALUMINUM UP TO 0 600 MM (24") TUBE AND CAN ALSO 10"y atm. cmJ. S BE FABRICATED 10 M Pa TO ANY MATERIAL 0 to 573 K SPECIFICATIONS UNDER RADIATION * COMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE CALL OR WRITE FOR DOCUMENTATION Camera micro-chip THEVENET CLERJOUNIE • DEPARTEMENT JONCTIONS TC CONTACT: M. ARMAND PI NET, CONSULTING ENGINEER TECHNOKONTROLL AG 22, AVENUE FRANKLIN-ROOSEVELT • 69517 VAULX-EN-VELIN CEDEX FRANCE • TELEPHONE: (7) 849.54.64 • TELEX380544F I hJ* 8049 Zurich, Imbisbiihlstr. 144,Tel. 01 341 56 33 2 CERN Courier, March 1989 nuclear force. Ne'eman, a promi­ triangle, he wrote down its mass, gammas pointed back to a com­ nent Israeli army officer, had come heavier than any particle ever seen mon origin. By careful measure­ to London in a diplomatic role, and before. ment and calculation, the team un­ put his multifarious talents to addi­ At Brookhaven, a new 80-inch ravelled the complex series of de­ tional use in Abdus Salam's school, bubble chamber was being readied cays, finally backtracking to a parti­ where Salam, with J.C. Ward, was at the Alternating Gradient Synch­ cle carrying minus three units of working on particle classification rotron (AGS). This was the highest strangeness, and with a mass of schemes.) energy accelerator in the world at 1686 MeV, almost right on top of At an international conference at the time and Leon Lederman, Jack Gell-Mann's blackboard prediction! •1ERN in 1962, Bernard Gregory of Steinberger and Mel Schwartz had The commissioning of the bub­ Trance's Ecole Polytechnique and just used it to provide the world's ble chamber had not been plain George Snow of Maryland summar­ first beam of neutrinos. However sailing. As it had only one window, ized the status of the physics of when it came to finding new parti­ special reflectors had to be used the new strange particles. After cles, the physicists using Luis Al­ so that the tracks could be both il­ Snow's talk, Murray Gell-Mann varez' bubble chambers at Berkeley luminated and photographed from went to the blackboard and were still the acknowledged ex­ the same side. Early in the run, pointed out the appealing regulari­ perts. some of these reflective 'coat han­ ties inside a then hypothetical In December 1963, Brookhav- gers' had come adrift and fallen on decuplet of heavier cousins of the en's new bubble chamber came the window. As well as obscuring nucleon. into action, and a team of more some of the field of view, these The decuplet was in the form of than thirty physicists took up Gell- could have damaged the window, a triangle drawn in a grid of isospin Mann's challenge. In January 1964, and with 1,000 explosive litres of and strangeness quantum num­ after looking at 50,000 photo­ liquid hydrogen inside, the future of bers. Nine of the grid points could graphs, they stumbled on a shot the experiment hung in the balance. be filled by known particles - a showing a pion carrying a lot of After gingerly testing the chamber quartet at the base, with a triplet transverse momentum, with a with a few expansions, team leader and a doublet above, but the apex strange particle produced some di­ Ralph Shutt decided to continue. of the triangle was empty. Gell- stance away from the primary colli­ The omega-minus showed that Mann predicted a new negatively- sion. Looking closer, they spotted SU3 symmetry was behind the charged particle carrying three units the spirals of not one, but two of neat particle families. But why of strangeness, and even gave it a the characteristic electron-positron SU3? What parentage was behind name, the omega-minus. Extrapo­ pairs of a high energy gamma ray such large families of eight and lating from the mass patterns in the (photon). Moreover these two ten? Even before the omega-minus CERN Courier, March 1989 3 The complete Brookhaven 1964 bubble chamber picture. About a quarter of the chamber was invisible due to an illumination problem. appeared, Gell-Mann, and indepen­ chanism, at least on paper. It took another ten years of pain­ dently George Zweig, working at (As often happens in physics, staking work to find the tiny grains CERN, showed how the eights and ideas born in one context can lead of matter hidden deep inside the tens followed naturally from triplets to useful spinoff in another. The nucleon and show that they be­ of more basic entities - termed gauge theory groundwork devel­ haved like quarks. However they 'quarks' by Gell-Mann. oped in parallel with isospin and steadfastly refuse to come out into In the same way that the Per­ the eightfold way went on to pay the open, staying locked inside iodic Table of elements paved the handsome dividends in the formula­ their nucleon prisons. To see free way for our present picture of the tion of the 'electroweak' unification quarks, physicists probably need tqi atom, so Gell-Mann and Ne'eman's of the 1960s, showing how the recreate the conditions of the Big octets had hinted that subnuclear weak nuclear force and electro- Bang which started it all off. particles had some internal me­ magnetism have a common origin.) World science The World Laboratory and the free circulation of information and cal (seismology, volcanology, ) Third World Academy of Sciences researchers. The bottom line is an and environmental (climate, pollu­ are examples of ambitious new glo­ impressive list of ongoing multidis- tion, ) monitoring and modelling, bal ventures using the established ciplinary projects, with a wide geo­ together with computer projects in broad base of science and technol­ graphical spread. the education and health areas.
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Strangeness in Ultrarelativistic Nuclear
    HUTFT THE ROLE OF STRANGENESS IN a ULTRARELATIVISTIC NUCLEAR COLLISIONS Josef Sollfrank Research Institute for Theoretical Physics PO Box FIN University of Helsinki Finland and Ulrich Heinz Institut f ur Theoretische Physik Universitat Regensburg D Regensburg Germany ABSTRACT We review the progress in understanding the strange particle yields in nuclear colli sions and their role in signalling quarkgluon plasma formation We rep ort on new insights into the formation mechanisms of strange particles during ultrarelativistic heavyion collisions and discuss interesting new details of the strangeness phase di agram In the main part of the review we show how the measured multistrange particle abundances can b e used as a testing ground for chemical equilibration in nuclear collisions and how the results of such an analysis lead to imp ortant con straints on the collision dynamics and spacetime evolution of high energy heavyion reactions a To b e published in QuarkGluon Plasma RC Hwa Eds World Scientic Contents Introduction Strangeness Pro duction Mechanisms QuarkGluon Pro duction Mechanisms Hadronic Pro duction Mechanisms Thermal Mo dels Thermal Parameters Relative and Absolute Chemical Equilibrium The Partition Function The Phase Diagram of Strange Matter The Strange Matter Iglo o Isentropic Expansion Trajectories The T ! Limit of the Phase Diagram
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
    Quantum Mechanics_quantum chromodynamics (QCD) In theoretical physics, quantum chromodynamics (QCD) is a theory ofstrong interactions, a fundamental forcedescribing the interactions between quarksand gluons which make up hadrons such as the proton, neutron and pion. QCD is a type of Quantum field theory called a non- abelian gauge theory with symmetry group SU(3). The QCD analog of electric charge is a property called 'color'. Gluons are the force carrier of the theory, like photons are for the electromagnetic force in quantum electrodynamics. The theory is an important part of the Standard Model of Particle physics. A huge body of experimental evidence for QCD has been gathered over the years. QCD enjoys two peculiar properties: Confinement, which means that the force between quarks does not diminish as they are separated. Because of this, when you do split the quark the energy is enough to create another quark thus creating another quark pair; they are forever bound into hadrons such as theproton and the neutron or the pion and kaon. Although analytically unproven, confinement is widely believed to be true because it explains the consistent failure of free quark searches, and it is easy to demonstrate in lattice QCD. Asymptotic freedom, which means that in very high-energy reactions, quarks and gluons interact very weakly creating a quark–gluon plasma. This prediction of QCD was first discovered in the early 1970s by David Politzer and by Frank Wilczek and David Gross. For this work they were awarded the 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics. There is no known phase-transition line separating these two properties; confinement is dominant in low-energy scales but, as energy increases, asymptotic freedom becomes dominant.
    [Show full text]
  • Scaling Laws in Particle Physics and Astrophysics
    SCALING LAWS IN PARTICLE PHYSICS AND ASTROPHYSICS RUDOLF MURADYAN Dedicated to the Golden Jubilee (1961-2011) of publication of the article by Geoffrey Chew and Steven Frautschi in Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 394, 1961, where a celebrated scaling law J m2 has been conjectured for spin/mass dependence of hadrons. G. Chew S. Frautschi 1. INTRODUCTION: WHAT IS SCALING? Any polynomial power law f() x c xn , where constant c has a dimension dim f dimc (dimx )n exhibits the property of scaling or scale invariance. Usually n is called scaling exponent. The word scaling express the fact that function f is shape-invariant with respect to the dilatation transformation x x f ( x) c ( x)n n f() x and this transformation preserves the shape of function f . We say, following Leonhard Euler, that f is homogeneous of degree “n” if for any value of parameter f ( x) n f() x . Differentiating this relation with respect to and putting 1we obtain simple differential equation x f() x n f() x solution of which brings back to the polynomial power scaling law. There are tremendously many different scaling laws in Nature. The most important of them can be revealed by Google search of scaling site:nobelprize.org in the official site of Nobel Foundation, where nearly 100 results appears. Ten of them are shown below: 1. Jerome I. Friedman - Nobel Lecture 2. Daniel C. Tsui - Nobel Lecture 3. Gerardus 't Hooft - Nobel Lecture 4. Henry W. Kendall - Nobel Lecture 5. Pierre-Gilles de Gennes - Nobel Lecture 6. Jack Steinberger - Nobel Lecture 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Strange Particle Theory in the Cosmic Ray Period R
    STRANGE PARTICLE THEORY IN THE COSMIC RAY PERIOD R. Dalitz To cite this version: R. Dalitz. STRANGE PARTICLE THEORY IN THE COSMIC RAY PERIOD. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1982, 43 (C8), pp.C8-195-C8-205. 10.1051/jphyscol:1982811. jpa-00222371 HAL Id: jpa-00222371 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00222371 Submitted on 1 Jan 1982 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE Colloque C8, suppldment au no 12, Tome 43, ddcembre 1982 page ~8-195 STRANGE PARTICLE THEORY IN THE COSMIC RAY PERIOD R.H. Dalitz Department of Theoretical Physics, 2 KebZe Road, Oxford OX1 3NP, U.K. What role did theoretical physicists play concerning elementary particle physics in the cosmic ray period? The short answer is that it was the nuclear forces which were the central topic of their attention at that time. These were considered to be due primarily to the exchange of pions between nucleons, and the study of all aspects of the pion-nucleon interactions was the most direct contribution they could make to this problem. Of course, this was indeed a most important topic, and much significant understanding of the pion-nucleon interaction resulted from these studies, although the precise nature of the nucleonnucleon force is not settled even to this day.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of a Strange Particle
    10 extraordinary papers Within days, Watson and Crick had built a identify the full set of codons was completed in forensics, and research into more-futuristic new model of DNA from metal parts. Wilkins by 1966, with Har Gobind Khorana contributing applications, such as DNA-based computing, immediately accepted that it was correct. It the sequences of bases in several codons from is well advanced. was agreed between the two groups that they his experiments with synthetic polynucleotides Paradoxically, Watson and Crick’s iconic would publish three papers simultaneously in (see go.nature.com/2hebk3k). structure has also made it possible to recog- Nature, with the King’s researchers comment- With Fred Sanger and colleagues’ publica- nize the shortcomings of the central dogma, ing on the fit of Watson and Crick’s structure tion16 of an efficient method for sequencing with the discovery of small RNAs that can reg- to the experimental data, and Franklin and DNA in 1977, the way was open for the com- ulate gene expression, and of environmental Gosling publishing Photograph 51 for the plete reading of the genetic information in factors that induce heritable epigenetic first time7,8. any species. The task was completed for the change. No doubt, the concept of the double The Cambridge pair acknowledged in their human genome by 2003, another milestone helix will continue to underpin discoveries in paper that they knew of “the general nature in the history of DNA. biology for decades to come. of the unpublished experimental results and Watson devoted most of the rest of his ideas” of the King’s workers, but it wasn’t until career to education and scientific administra- Georgina Ferry is a science writer based in The Double Helix, Watson’s explosive account tion as head of the Cold Spring Harbor Labo- Oxford, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Lecture by Toshihide Maskawa
    WHAT DOES CP VIOLATION TELL US? Nobel Lecture, December 8, 2008 by Toshihide Maskawa Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto 603-8555, Japan. I would first like to thank the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and the Nobel Foundation for awarding me this honour, of which I had never even dreamt. I was born in 1940, the son of a furniture craftsman in the city of Nagoya, in Japan. My father wanted to change his job and was taking a correspondence course to become an electrical engineer, while he was a trainee furniture craftsman. However, he told me that he could not really understand sine and cosine, since he had not received a basic education. Eventually, though, he did manage a small furniture factory employing a few craftsmen and worked there himself. But this came to nothing because of the War, that reckless and miserable war which our country caused. After the War, he displayed in front of his house the door hinges, wood screws and other pieces of furniture, which remained at hand. They sold quite well. Getting a taste for selling, he became a merchant dealing with sugar as an ingredient for cakes. He still wanted to boast of his knowledge of electricity, but he could not find anyone suitable to explain it to. One day, though, he found a good tar- get: his son. In those poor days after the war, almost all the houses were without bath- rooms and so people went to the public bath. On his way to and from the public bath, he boasted of his knowledge: Why do three-phase current mo- tors rotate? Why don’t the solar and lunar eclipses occur every month? He explained proudly that it was because of the revolution planes of the earth around the sun, and of the moon around the earth, which are tilted at an angle of 5 degrees.
    [Show full text]
  • Negative Strange Quark-Chemical Potential a Necessary and Sufficient Observable of the Deconfinement Phase Transition in a Finite-Baryon Equilibrated State*
    Negative strange quark-chemical potential A necessary and sufficient observable of the deconfinement phase transition in a finite-baryon equilibrated state* Apostolos D. Panagiotou and Panayiotis Katsas University of Athens, Physics Department Nuclear & Particle Physics Division Panepistimiopolis, GR-157 71 Athens, Hellas Abstract We consider the variation of the strange quark-chemical potential in the phase diagramme of nuclear matter, employing the order parameters and mass-scaled partition functions in each domain and enforcing flavour conservation. Assuming the region beyond the hadronic phase to be described by massive, correlated and interacting quarks, in the spirit of lattice and N−J-L calculations, we find the strange quark-chemical potential to attain large negative values in this domain. We propose that this change in the sign of the strange quark- chemical potential, from positive in the hadronic phase to negative in the partonic, to be a unique, concise and well-defined indication of the quark-deconfinement phase transition in nuclear matter. We propose also that, for a chemically equilibrated state in the deconfined region, which follows an isentropic expansion to hadronization via a second order phase transition, the fugacities of the equilibrated quark flavours, once fixed in the primordial state, remain constant throughout the hadronization process. PACS codes: 25.75.+r,12.38.Mh,24.84.+p Key words: Quark-chemical potential, phase transition, deconfined quark matter, HG, QGP e-mail: [email protected] * Work supported in part by the Research Secretariat of the University of Athens. 1. Introduction It is generally expected that ultra-relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions will provide the basis for strong interaction thermodynamics, which will lead to new physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Hep-Ph/0703178V1 16 Mar 2007 Eta Eorn Huddcyt Htn I H Following the Via Photons to Decay Should S Mesotrons Force
    FERMILAB-CONF-07-48-T Mesotron Decays and the Role of Anomalies William A. Bardeen Theoretical Physics Department Fermilab, MS 106, P.O. Box 500 Batavia, IL 60510, USA March 15, 2007 Puzzles associated with Yukawa’s mesotron theory of nuclear interactions led to the dis- covery of “anomalies” in quantum field theory. I will discuss some of the remarkable conse- quences of these anomalies in the physics of elementary particles. In 1935 Hideki Yukawa postulated that nuclear forces were ascribed to a new massive scalar field that coupled to neutrons to protons. To explain the saturation of the nuclear forces, the new mesotrons were required to have a mass of order 200 me, and a coupling a few times larger than that associated with the electric charge. The terms mesotron was used to describe a particle of intermediate mass, much heavier than the light electron and much lighter than the neutron and proton, the constituents of the atomic nucleus. Indeed, in 1937, a new meson of intermediate mass was discovered as the dominant part of the hard component of cosmic rays. It was natural to associate this meson with the field that Yukawa had proposed to explain the nuclear force. Shoichi Sakata played an important role in the struggle to understand the physics of the new Yukawa mesotrons and their relation to the new mesons seen in cosmic rays. arXiv:hep-ph/0703178v1 16 Mar 2007 Early estimates of the lifetime of the mesotron were based on Fermi’s theory of β-decay. These estimates, in the range of 10−8 to 10−7 sec, were considerably shorter than the lifetime observed for the cosmic ray mesons, ∼2 10−6 sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Mass and Mixing – the Beginning and Future –
    Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplement Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplement 00 (2012) 1–4 Neutrino mass and mixing – The beginning and future – M. Kobayashi High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan Abstract The early history of neutrino mixing will be discussed with a focus on the birth of the MNS theory. Keywords: two neutrinos, MNS matrix 1. Sakata Model Another important aspect of the Sakata model is the fact that the weak interactions of hadrons can be ex- The first evidence of strange particles was found in plained by two types of transitions among the funda- cosmic ray events in 1947. Much progress in under- mental triplets: standing these particles was made in the early 1950’s, in particular after the operation of accelerators started. p The discovery of strange particles made it difficult to ↑↓-& . (1) regard all of the known hadrons as fundamental objects n Λ since there were so many. This pattern of the weak interaction is similar to the In 1956, Sakata proposed a model known as the weak interaction of the leptons, Sakata model [1], in which all the hadrons, both strange and non-strange, are composite states of a fundamental ν triplet formed from the proton, the neutron, and the Λ ↑↓-& . (2) particle. e µ Shoichi Sakata was born in 1911. He was a collabora- tor of Yukawa for some time. He was appointed profes- At that time the neutrino was thought to consist of a sor of Nagoya University when its physics department single species. This similarity of the weak interaction was established in 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • Charged Current Events with Neutral Strange Particles in High-Energy Antineutrino Interactions
    Nuclear Physics B177 (1981) 365-381 O North-Holland Publishing Company CHARGED CURRENT EVENTS WITH NEUTRAL STRANGE PARTICLES IN HIGH-ENERGY ANTINEUTRINO INTERACTIONS V.V. AMMOSOV, A.G. DENISOV, P.F. ERMOLOV, G.S. GAPIENKO, V.A. GAPIENKO, V.I. KLUKHIN, V.I. KORESHEV, P.V. PITUKHIN, V.I. SIROTENKO, E.A. SLOBODYUK, Z.V. USUBOV and V.G. ZAETZ Institute of High Energy Physics, Serpukhov, U$SR J.P. BERGE, D. BOGERT, R. ENDORF 1, R. HANFT, J.A. MALKO, G.I. MOFFATT 1, F.A. NEZRICK, R. ORAVA and J. WOLFSON Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA V.I. EFREMENKO, A.V. FEDOTOV, P.A. GORICHEV, V.S. KAFTANOV, G.K. KLIGER, V.Z. KOLGANOV, S.P. KRUTCHININ, M.A. KUBANTSEV, I.V. MAKHLJUEVA, V.I. SHEKELJAN and V.G. SHEVCHENKO Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, MosCow, USSR J. BELL, C.T. COFFIN, B.P. ROE, A.A. SEIDL, D. SINCLAIR and E. WANG University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, USA Received 23 May 1980 (Revised 5 August 1980) The results of a study of strange particle production in charged current 77,N interactions in the Fermilab 15 ft bubble chamber filled with a heavy Ne-H2 mixture are presented. Production rates and average multiplicities of K°'s and A's as functions of W 2 and Q2 are given. The experimental data agree well with the quark-parton model predictions if a yield of 0.06 + 0.02 of K°'s and A's from charm production is included. Upper limits for D-meson production are given and the shape of the charmed quark fragmentation function is discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrophysical Relevance of Strange Quarks
    Available online a t www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com Scholars Research Library Archives of Physics Research, 2010, 1 (3):89-110 (http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html) ISSN 0976-0970 CODEN (USA): APRRC7 Astrophysical relevance of Strange Quarks Navjot Hothi† and Shuchi Bisht * Department of Physics, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttrakhand, India ______________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT In this contribution, peculiarities in the nature of strange quarks in relevance to astrophysics are investigated. The absolute stability of strange quark matter is a viable possibility and immensely affects physics at the astrophysical scale. Relativistic heavy-ion reactions offer a stage to produce this exotic state of matter and we have discussed the enhanced production of strange particles during these reactions within the framework of quark-gluon plasma (QGP) along with its observable implications. The role of strangeness for compact star phenomenology is explored. Emphasis is laid upon the possibility of existence of a third family of strange quark stars and its study help in revealing a number of unexplored features of the cosmos. Bag model parameters have been used to determine some integral parameters for a sequence of strange stars with crust and strange dwarfs constructed out of strange quark matter crust. A comparative analysis is performed between the strange and neutron stars and the strange and white dwarfs based upon these intrinsic parameters and paramount differences are observed. PACS numbers: 12.38.Mh, 25.75.Nq, 14.65.-q, 97.60.Jd, 26.60.-c Keywords: strangeness, strange stars, quark-gluon plasma, deconfinement. ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION The last few years witnessed the inclusion of strangeness as another degree of freedom in astrophysical systems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eightfold
    THE EIGHTFOLD WAY 1 Jonathan L. Rosner The Eightfold Way is the name coined by Murray Gell-Mann (1961) to de- scribe a classification scheme of the elementary particles devised by him and Yuval Ne’eman (1961). The name, adopted from the Eightfold Path of Bud- dhism, refers to the eight-member families to which many sets of particle belong. In the 1950s Gell-Mann and Kazuo Nishijima invented a scheme to explain a “strange” feature of certain particles; they appeared to be easily produced in cosmic-ray and accelerator reactions, but decayed slowly, as if something were hindering their decays. These particles were assumed to carry a property known as strangeness which would be preserved in production but could be changed in decays. Two examples of plots of electric charge (in units of the fundamental charge |e|) versus strangeness for particles known in the late 1950s are the following: Mesons: Baryons: Strangeness: Particle: Strangeness: Particle: 1 K0 K+ 0 n p 0 π− π0 π+ −1 Σ− Σ0, Λ Σ+ −1 K− K¯ 0 −2 Ξ− Ξ0 arXiv:hep-ph/0109241v2 15 Oct 2001 Charge: −1 0 1 Charge: −1 0 1 Mesons include the π particles, known as pions, whose existence was pro- posed by Hideki Yukawa in 1935 to explain the strong nuclear force, and the K particles (also known as kaons), discovered in cosmic radiation in the 1940s. Pions and kaons weigh about one-seventh and one-half as much as protons, re- spectively. Baryons (the prefix bary- is Greek for heavy) include the proton p, the neutron n, and heavier relatives Λ (lambda), Σ (sigma), and Ξ (xi), collec- tively known as hyperons and discovered in the 1940s and 1950s.
    [Show full text]