PHYSICS 111 LAB Physics Department Experiment 9

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PHYSICS 111 LAB Physics Department Experiment 9 PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PHYSICS 111 LAB Physics Department Experiment 9 Radioactivity ABSOLUTELY NO EATING OR DRINKING IN THE LAB 1. Background Information 1.1 Radioactivity The atoms making up matter are generally stable, but some of them are spontaneously transformed by emitting radiation (and therefore energy). This is called radioactivity. It was first discovered by Henri Becquerel in 1896, who showed that the radiation spontaneously emitted by Uranium made an imprint on photographic film and made air conduct electricity. Pierre and Marie Curie discovered two other elements, polonium and radium, that emitted similar radiations. The three shared the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1903 for their discoveries. Atomic nuclei are composed of protons and neutrons, which are in turn made up of quarks. Isotopes of a given element contain the same number of protons (and therefore electrons), but differ in the number of neutrons. Heavy, unstable nuclei are transformed into lighter, stable nuclei by radioactive emission. There are three types of radiation, corresponding to three types of radioactivity: • Alpha radioactivity corresponds to the emission of a helium nucleus (two protons + two neutrons), called an alpha-particle. • Beta radioactivity corresponds to the transformation in the nucleus of i) a neutron into a proton and an electron (β- radioactivity) or ii) a proton into a neutron and an anti- electron or positron (β+ radioactivity). This latter type of beta radioactivity appears only in artificial radioactive nuclei produced by nuclear reactions. • Gamma radioactivity unlike the other two types does not correspond to a transformation from one element to another. Rather, it results in the emission by the nucleus of electromagnetic radiation. This type of radioactivity can occur by itself, or together with alpha or beta radioactivity. Alpha and beta radiations, as well as electromagnetic radiation such as gamma rays and X-rays and some ultraviolet rays are said to be ionizing. That is, they have enough energy to eject one or more electrons from atoms or molecules in the irradiated medium. The activity of a radioactive body is measured in Becquerels: One Becquerel corresponds to the disintegration of one atomic nucleus per second. As unstable atoms are transformed, the radioactivity of the sample containing them decreases. The time it takes for this activity to decrease by half is called the half-life. The half-life is characteristic of a particular isotope and may range from fractions of a second to billions of years. For example: Polonium-214 0.164 s Oxygen-15 2 minutes Carbon-14 5730 years Uranium-238 4.5 billion years Natural radioactivity has been present since the beginning of the Universe, as radioactive atoms undergo series of transformations, which convert them to the final stable nuclei. The natural sources of radiation on Earth are mostly radium, uranium and thorium, present in soil and rocks, as well as radon gas produced from the decay of uranium in soil. Artificial (man-made) radioactivity is the same phenomenon as natural radioactivity, however the emitting nuclei are produced in the lab by bombarding an element with alpha-particles, for example. Some measures of background radioactivity are: 1 liter of milk ~ 60 Bq 5-yr old child ~ 600 Bq 70 kg adult ~ 10,000 Bq (Potassium-40 is one source of radioactivity in the human body). 1 g radium ~ 37 billion Bq Another unit of radioactive decay is the Curie. One curie equals 3.7×1010 radioactive decays per second. So one curie is a lot of radiation, and 1 Becquerel is not very much. Note that measurements in Curies or Becquerels do not tell you what sort of radiation is involved, or how much energy is carried by the emitted particles. They only tell you how many particles are emitted, on average, in a given amount of time. (How do these compare with the activity of your radioactive sources?) 1.2 Cosmic Rays At the start of the 20th century, scientists were puzzled by the fact that there seemed to be more radiation in the environment than they could account for from known sources of natural background radioactivity. The puzzle was solved in 1912 by a German scientist, Victor Hess (Nobel Prize 1936), who went up in a hot-air balloon to 17,500 ft (without oxygen) and observed (using a gold-leaf electroscope) that the amount of radiation increased as his balloon climbed, despite the fact his distance to radiation sources on Earth was increasing. Thus, it was determined that the radiation was from outer space, and it was dubbed “Cosmic Rays”. We know from measurements made on board satellites and high altitude balloons that the vast majority of cosmic rays are protons (nuclei of hydrogen atoms). Other heavier atomic nuclei, extending all the way up to uranium, as well as electrons, are also present. A very small fraction (0.1 percent) of cosmic rays are photons (in the form of gamma rays). Some of the particles comprising cosmic rays originate from the Sun, but most come from sources outside the solar system and are known as galactic cosmic rays (GCRs). Cosmic ray particles that arrive at the top of the Earth’s atmosphere are called primaries; their collisions with atmospheric nuclei give rise to other particles known as secondaries. From the early 1930s to the 1950s, before the advent of powerful particle accelerators, cosmic rays played a critical role in studying the atomic nucleus and its components, for they were the only source of high- energy particles. Short-lived subatomic particles were discovered through cosmic ray collisions (pions and muons). At present, the most energetic cosmic rays contain particles with energies far beyond those attainable under laboratory conditions. Today cosmic rays are studied to learn about their sources, the mechanism by which they are accelerated to such high energies and the distribution of matter traversed by them - they are one of the few things we can measure which originate outside our own solar system. 1.3 Wilson’s Cloud Chamber In 1927, Charles Thomson Rees Wilson was co-recipient of the Nobel Prize in Physics for his discovery of a method for making visible the tracks followed by electrically charged particles. Wilson’s method was based on the formation of clouds, which develop when sufficiently moist air is suddenly expanded. The refrigeration caused by the expansion causes the temperature to sink below the dew-point (supercooling), and the vapor is condensed into small drops, which form together visible clouds. In the first stage of condensation, a droplet is formed around a “nucleus”. Electrically charged particles can act as a nucleus in the formation of drops, as they attract other nearby atoms. Ionizing radiation from radioactive sources or cosmic rays, when traveling through a container of supercooled gas, leaves behind a track of charged ions, which is marked by the formation of droplets. Some of the important achievements using the Wilson chamber were the discovery of the positron (anti-matter partner of the electron, positively charged), and demonstration of the recoil of an electron and an X-ray photon. 2. The Cloud Chamber 2.1 Setting it up The chamber consists of a glass (or plastic) dish with a square glass top. The dish rests on a flat bed of finely chopped dry ice. Do not press the dish to force contact with the ice. Simply let the dish rest on top of the ice layer. The dry ice is spread over the insulating acoustic tile. A spot-light is positioned to one side so that the strong white light will illuminate the cloud tracks formed by the radioactive particles. Be careful not to “burn” yourself with the dry ice. Take a handful of it (using the gloves) and spread it evenly over the tile, about 1 cm deep. Lay the glass dish on top of the ice, and pour in the contents of the alcohol bottle. This dye will provide a dark background. Make sure the bottom of the dish is covered uniformly with the alcohol. Lay the glass plate over the top of the dish, be sure that the light from the lamp passes through the heat-absorbing glass which fits in the wooden stand. Adjust the cardboard light shield so that the light only passes into the vessel and does not shine on the top glass plate. Your final set-up looks like the figure below. 2.2 How it works The methanol in the dish bottom is wicked up the sides by the felt cloth and evaporated. As the evaporated methanol approaches the cold surface of the methanol on the bottom, it becomes supercooled and wants to condense. It will do so around nucleation centers, such as dust, or in our case, ions charged by the passage of ionizing radiation. When a charged particle passes through the methanol vapor, it leaves a trail of ions and electrons. The methanol condenses around the ions, forming a visible trail. (Note that the supercooling in our chamber is not achieved through expansion of the gas, as in the Wilson chamber). 2.3 Track-Watching Without a radioactive source Are you able to see these cosmic ray tracks? e µ ν ν • A track which goes straight, then kinks off to the left or right sharply is a “muon” decay. A muon is a “heavy cousin” of an electron, and decays into an electron (which leaves a track in the chamber) and neutrinos (which do not leave tracks in the chamber because they do not interact with the gas). µ µ e • Three tracks meeting at a single point correspond to an incoming cosmic ray (one track), which hits an atomic electron, with the electron and the outgoing cosmic track making up the two other tracks.
Recommended publications
  • 8.701 Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Recitation 19
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics Course: 8.701 { Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Term: Fall 2020 Instructor: Markus Klute TA : Tianyu Justin Yang Discussion Problems from recitation on December 1st, 2020 Problem 1: Bubble Chamber Carl David Anderson discovered positrons in cosmic rays. The picture below shows a cloud chamber image produced by Anderson in 1931. The cloud chamber is positioned in a magnetic field of 1:5 T with field lines pointing into the plane of the paper. A cosmic ray particle enters the chamber from below and leaves a circular track. There is a 6 mm thick lead plate in the cloud chamber visible as a horizontal line. The radius of curvature is 15:5 cm before and 5:3 cm after the passage through the lead plate. 1 Figure 1: Cloud-chamber image of a positron. This image is in the public domain. a) Estimate the momentum of the particle before and after the passage through the lead plate. What is the charge of the particle? b) Compare the energy loss during the passage through the lead plate for a proton, a pions, and an electron. For the energy loss calculation, you can use the approximate Bethe formula below and assume constant energy loss. dE Z 1 m γ2 β2 c2 = −4 π N r2 m c2 z 2 ·· ln e (1) A e e 2 dX Ion A β I Explain why this is sufficient to exclude the proton and pion hypothesis. The con- 23 −1 −12 A s stants in the equation are NA = 6; 022 × 10 mol , 0 = 8; 85 × 10 V m , me = e2 511 keV, re = 2 , Z = 82, A = 207, and I = 820 eV, the ionisation energy in (4 π0)me c lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Chamber Experiment
    Cloud chamber experiment Teachers notes Adapted from “Science, Society and America’s Nuclear Waste – Ionising Radiation” by US Department of Energy, July 1995. Page 1 of 8 Adapted from “Science, Society and America’s Nuclear Waste – Ionising Radiation” by US Department of Energy, July 1995. Page 1 of 8 Purpose: The Cloud Chamber experiment illustrates that though radiation cannot be detected with the senses, it is possible to observe the result of radioactive decay. Concepts: 1. Radiation cannot be detected directly by using our senses, but can be indirectly detected. Duration of Lesson: One 50-minute class period. Objectives: As a result of the participation in the Cloud Chamber experience, the student will be able to: 1. Describe that as charged particles pass through the chamber, they leave an observable track much like the vapour train of a jet plane; and 2. Conclude that what he/she has observed is the result of radioactive decay. Optional Objectives: 1. Through measurement of tracks in the Cloud Chamber, the student will be able to determine which type of radiation travels furthest from its source. 2. By holding a strong magnet next to the Cloud Chamber, the student will be able to deduce what effect, if any, a magnet has on radiation. 3. By wrapping the source alternatively in paper, aluminium foil, plastic wrap and cloth, the student will be able to conclude what effect, if any, shielding has on radiation. Skills: Drawing conclusions, measuring, note-taking, observing, deductive reasoning, working in groups. Vocabulary: Alpha particle, beta particle, gamma ray. Materials: Activity Sheets The Cloud Chamber Background Notes Safe Use of Dry Ice Cloud Chamber Suggested Procedure: Adapted from “Science, Society and America’s Nuclear Waste – Ionising Radiation” by US Department of Energy, July 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Radiation: the Patterns They Produce in a Cloud Chamber
    430 THEAMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER the National Bureau of Standards available from No. 51, Radiological Monitoring Methods and the Superintendent of Documents, Government Instruments, $.20. Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C., at the prices No. 69, Maximum Permissible Body Burdens and indicated. Maximum Permissible concentrations of No. 42, Safe Handling of Radioactive Isotopes, Radionucleides in Air and in Water for $.20 Occupational Exposure, $.35. No. 48, Control and Removal of Radioactive No. 80, A Manual of Radioactivity Procedures, Contamination in Laboratories, $.15. $.50. Types of Radiation-the PatternsThey Produce in a CloudChamber Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/27/6/430/21573/4441004.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 * C. T. Lange, ClaytonHigh School, Clayton,Missouri, and Glen Farrell,Holt, Rinehartand Winston,San Francisco,California A description of the practical uses of a cloud chamber is followed by the instructions for the building and use of an inexpensive cloud chamber in the classroom. Introduction a biologist, yet we can use it to help build a Every minute of the day, whether we basic understanding of the nature and prop- realize it or not, we are being pelted by an erties of ionizing radiations. The cloud invisible stream of very high energy particles chamber was the tool which Rutherford used known as cosmic rays. The number of these to study transmutation of one element to striking our body is about one thousand per another. He observed that nitrogen atoms minute. We also are being subjected to the under alpha particle bombardment were alpha, beta, and gamma radiations from changed into oxygen and hydrogen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Donald A. Glaser Papers, 1943-2013, Bulk 1949-2003
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8n01cbt No online items Finding Aid for the Donald A. Glaser Papers, 1943-2013, bulk 1949-2003 Bianca Rios and Mariella Soprano California Institute of Technology. Caltech Archives ©2017 1200 East California Blvd. Mail Code B215A-74 Pasadena, CA 91125 [email protected] URL: http://archives.caltech.edu/ Finding Aid for the Donald A. 10285-MS 1 Glaser Papers, 1943-2013, bulk 1949-2003 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: California Institute of Technology. Caltech Archives Title: The Donald A. Glaser papers creator: Glaser, Donald Arthur Identifier/Call Number: 10285-MS Physical Description: 15.97 Linear feet (41 boxes) Date (inclusive): 1918-2016, bulk 1949-2003 Abstract: Donald Arthur Glaser (1926 – 2013) earned his PhD in Physics and Mathematics from the California Institute of Technology in 1950 and won the 1960 Nobel Prize in Physics for his invention of the bubble chamber. He then changed his research focus to molecular biology and went on to co-found Cetus Corporation, the first biotechnology company. In the 1980s he again switched his focus to neurobiology and the visual system. The Donald A. Glaser papers consist of research notes and notebooks, manuscripts and printed papers, correspondence, awards, biographical material, photographs, audio-visual material, and born-digital files. Conditions Governing Access The collection is open for research. Researchers must apply in writing for access. General The collection is fully digitized and will be made available online by the beginning of 2018. Conditions Governing Use Copyright may not have been assigned to the California Institute of Technology Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Track Cosmic Rays in a Cloud Chamber 1 Track Cosmic Rays in a Cloud Chamber
    Track Cosmic Rays in a Cloud Chamber 1 Track Cosmic Rays in a Cloud Chamber A cloud chamber is a tool that reveals the path of cosmic rays or other energetic charged particles. Because it permits us to measure the track of these particles in three dimensions, even when they are deflected by magnetic fields, the cloud chamber was important in research during the 1930's that started our exploration of the nature of cosmic rays and fundamental particles. For example, in 1932 Carl Anderson discovered the positron in photographs of cosmic rays through cloud chambers. The positron is the antiparticle for an electron, and it is equally well described as an electron traveling backward in time! Anderson won the Nobel Prize for this in 1936, and a year later he discovered the muon, the electron's heavy cousin. Showers of cosmic rays produced in the cascade from the primary's interaction with the atmosphere contain electrons, positrons, and muons. How They Work The early cloud chambers were pulsed. Water or some other condensible gas in a closed chamber was suddenly cooled by expanding it rapidly. This produced a supersaturated vapor, but when charged particles passed through it, a cloud would form along the particle track if the conditions were just right. By 1950 a diffusion cloud chamber was developed which operated continuously. It is simple to make and operate, and for several years it was used to investigate fundamental particles and cosmic rays. Our diffusion cloud chamber is a replica of this design. It is a an insulated metal box about 15 inches on a side.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Chambers Nuclear Chemistry SCIENTIFIC
    Cloud Chambers Nuclear Chemistry SCIENTIFIC Introduction Condensation trails in a cloud chamber provide evidence of the passage of charged radioactive particles. Concepts • Radioactivity • Radioactive decay Materials Cloud chamber Beral-type pipet or medicine dropper Blotting paper viewer Strong light source (projector or flashlight) Radioactive source (lantern mantle) Dry ice, flat, 6 × 6 Ethyl alcohol, denatured Safety Precautions This activity requires the use of hazardous components and/or has the potential for hazardous reactions. The radiation level produced by the radioactive source is very low (less than 0.1 µCi). Therefore, no special safety precautions need to be taken. However, it is still recommended that you wash your hands after handling the mantles and avoid inhaling mantle dust. Dry ice should be handled only with insulated gloves. Ethyl alcohol is toxic by ingestion and poses a fire hazard. Wear chemical splash goggles while performing the demonstration. Please review current Safety Data Sheets for additional safety, handling, and disposal information. Procedure 1. Using the Beral-type pipet or medicine dropper, soak the blotting paper inside the chamber with the ethyl alcohol. Add enough ethyl alcohol so that there is a thin layer on the bottom of the chamber. 2. Place the lid on the chamber. 3. Place the cloud chamber on a flat piece of dry ice. 4. Partially insert the radioactive source (the The Cloud Chamber lantern mantle) into the hole in the side Cloud Chamber Window of the cloud chamber. This can be done Light by pushing the white side of the lantern Chamber Lid mantle through the hole with your hands.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald A. Glaser
    DONALD A. GLASER Elementary particles and bubble chambers Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1960 It is a very great honor and privilege that I have this opportunity to describe to you the invention, development, and uses of bubble chambers for study- ing elementary particles. From the earliest beginning of serious scientific thought up to the present day, men have tried to understand the properties of matter by imagining it to be built up out of a small number of basic irreducible elements. Ac- cording to current scientific ideas, these irreducible elements are actually sub- microscopic particles which are supposed to be indivisible and therefore not made up out of yet smaller particles. We imagine all matter to be agglom- erations of molecules built up from atoms which are, in turn, constructed from electrons, protons, and neutrons. These three particles have definite masses, spins, electric charges, magnetic moments, and other properties. All electrons are supposed to be identical and so are all protons and all neutrons. During the last twenty years a number of other apparently indivisible par- ticles have been discovered so that now there are thirty of them altogether. Although a few of these thirty have not yet been observed experimentally, they are included in the list because the theoretical expectation of their exist- ence is very strong and it seems virtually certain that they will be observed during the next few years. Some of the thirty elementary particles were found experimentally, only after theoretical arguments had predicted their existence and the conditions required for creating and observing them. Others were discovered more or less accidentally before we had any theoretical ideas about them or their properties.
    [Show full text]
  • DIY Cloud Chamber UW Science Expeditions UW Medical Physics
    Lesson Plan: DIY Cloud Chamber UW Science Expeditions UW Medical Physics Grade Level: All ages (adult supervision and aid required) Length/Time: 30 minutes (overnight prep) Location: At your home! Safety: Adult supervision and aid is required for this activity. If using dry ice: Dry, insulated gloves or mittens to handle dry ice. Dry ice should not be handled directly as it can cause burns. Safety glasses (or other protective eye wear) and an apron. Learning Objectives: • Radiation is all around us all the time • Radiation can be and is used effectively in medicine • Medical Physicists help doctors diagnose and treat diseases through imaging and therapy that uses radiation • We can measure/detect radiation Prep work required: • Prepare frozen salt water solution: combine about 2/3 c salt and 1 ¾ c hot water, stir until well combined. Transfer to freezer bag or plastic container to be placed in the freezer. Wrap in aluminum foil. Lay flat in freezer. Freeze overnight preferably. • Prepare radon balloon: Inflate balloon. Rub it against your hair to make it staticky! Suspend in basement or crawl space for ~1 hour. Materials: Item Quantity Salt 2/3 c Isopropyl alcohol (>90%) A few tsp Aluminum foil Clear container with lid (wide opening is best!) Sponge/felt or other absorbent material Container to freeze salt water solution in Black paper or marker to cover the inside of the lid Strong glue/tape/adhesive Small bowl with hot water or handwarmers Flashlight (phone flashlight works) Dark room/space Balloon (optional) Alternate materials Dry ice (can be found at Hy-Vee) Ethanol (>90%) A few tsp Baking tray Procedure: Construct chamber: • Determine which side of your clear container will be the top and bottom of your cloud chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Chamber
    CLOUD CHAMBER Do-it-yourself manual [email protected] 2/21/17 S’Cool LAB Contents 1. INTRODUCTION: BUILD YOUR OWN PARTICLE DETECTOR! .................................................................... 2 2. HISTORY OF CLOUD CHAMBERS ............................................................................................................... 2 3. SHOPPING LIST 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 3 3. SHOPPING LIST 2 ........................................................................................................................................ 4 4. STEP BY STEP INSTRUCTIONS .................................................................................................................... 5 4. HOW DOES THE CLOUD CHAMBER WORK? .............................................................................................. 7 5. WHAT CAN YOU SEE? ................................................................................................................................. 8 6. TROUBLESHOOTING AND FAQ ................................................................................................................. 9 7. MORE ABOUT CLOUD CHAMBERS ............................................................................................................ 10 8. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION / IDEAS ..................................................................................................... 11 9. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CLOUD CHAMBER STUDIES in COSMIC RAYS at an ALTITUDE of 30,000 FEET Thesis by Raymond Voiles Adams, Jr. in Partial Fulfillment Of
    CLOUD CHAMBER STUDIES IN COSMIC RAYS AT AN ALTITUDE OF 30,000 FEET Thesis by Raymond Voiles Adams, Jr. In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 1948 ACKNOWLEDGEivlENT This rese~rch was supported in part by the Office of Naval Research through Contract N6onr-102 Task Order No. III with the California Institute of Technology, and in part by the National Research Council through the grant of a Predoctoral Fellowship. The construction of the apparatus, and its operation under the trying conditions of high altitude flight and the rigors of life at Inyokern were shared with Dr. Paul E. Lloyd and Mr. R. Ronald Rau, without whom these data could not have been obtained. I wish to thank Mr. Aaron J. Seriff for his aid in measuring the photogTaphs. I am also indebted for the willing cooperation of the many officers and men of the U. S. Air Forces, of the Naval Ordnance Test Station at Inyokern, and of the Office of Naval Research who participated in the operational part of the project. In particular, it is a pleasure to acknowledge the untiring work of Staff Sergeant David Burns, crew chief of B-29 No. 521857. In conclusion, the writer wishes to express his deep appreciation to Professor Carl D. Anderson for his guidance, his continued interest, and his many helpful discussions. ABSTRACT Cloud chamber observations of cosmic rays have been made in a B-29 aircraft, flying at altitudes of 30,000 ft. A 17-cm cloud chamber in a magnetic field of 7500 gauss was employed.
    [Show full text]
  • Carl David Anderson
    Carl David Anderson LISTED IN Physicists FAMOUS AS Physicist NATIONALITY American Famous American Men BORN ON 03 September 1905 AD Famous 3rd September Birthdays ZODIAC SIGN Virgo Virgo Men BORN IN New York City, New York, USA DIED ON 11 January 1991 AD PLACE OF DEATH San Marino, California, USA FATHER Carl David Anderson MOTHER Emma Adolfina Ajaxson SPOUSE: Lorraine Bergman CHILDREN Marshall and David DISCOVERIES / INVENTIONS Discovery Of The Positron, Discovery Of The Muon AWARDS: Nobel Prize in Physics (1936) Elliott Cresson Medal (1937) Carl David Anderson was a renowned American physicists, who is best remembered for the discovery of positron in 1932. Born to Swedish immigrant parents, Anderson showed a knack for science from an early age. After completing his preliminary education, he enrolled at the California Institute of Technology for higher studies. His association with the institution remained life-long as first he earned his academic degrees from the same and later continued his research work at it. It was during his academic and research career at Caltech that he began his cosmic ray studies which eventually led to the discovery of positron. The discovery was important for the advancement of physics as positron became the first antimatter to be discovered. Later on, he carried out further research that led to the discovery of muon, a subatomic particle. For his discovery of positron, he was conferred with the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1936. Additionally, he was honoured with several other scientific awards as well. Career Completing his doctoral studies, he started working as a research fellow at the California Institute of Technology which he continued for three years from 1930 to 1933 Meanwhile it was in 1930 that together with Professor Robert Millikan he began the cosmic ray studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Carl David Anderson Biographical Memoir
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES C A R L D A V I D A NDERSON 1905—1991 A Biographical Memoir by WILLIAM H. PICKERING Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1998 NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS WASHINGTON D.C. CourtesyofInstituteArchives,CaliforniaInstituteofTechnology,Pasadena CARLDAVIDANDERSON September3,1905–January11,1991 BYWILLIAMH.PICKERING ESTKNOWNFORHISdiscoveryofthepositiveelectron, Borpositron,CarlDavidAndersonwasawardedthe NobelPrizeinphysicsin1936atagethirty-one.Thedis- coveryofthepositronwasthefirstofthenewparticlesof modernphysics.Electronsandprotonshadbeenknown andexperimentedwithforaboutfortyyears,anditwas assumedthatthesewerethebuildingblocksofallmatter. Withthediscoveryofthepositron,anexampleofanti- matter,allmanneroftheoreticalandexperimentalpossi- bilitiesarose.TheRoyalSocietyofLondoncalledCarl’s discovery“oneofthemostmomentousofthecentury.” BornonSeptember3,1905,inNewYorkCity,Carlwas theonlysonofSwedishimmigrantparents.Hisfather,the seniorCarlDavidAnderson,hadbeenintheUnitedStates since1896.WhenCarlwassevenyearsold,thefamilyleft NewYorkforLosAngeles,whereCarlattendedpublic schoolsandin1923enteredtheCaliforniaInstituteof Technology.Caltechhadopeneditsdoorsin1921with RobertA.Millikan,himselfaNobellaureate,aschiefex- ecutive.TogetherwithchemistArthurA.Noyesandas- tronomerGeorgeElleryHale,Millikanestablishedthehigh standardofexcellenceandthesmallstudentbodythat todaycontinuestocharacterizeCaltech.
    [Show full text]