Accrual Duration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Accrual Duration Accrual duration Ilia D. Dichev Emory University December 15, 2016 Abstract: Accrual duration can be defined as the length of time between an accrual and its associated cash flow. This paper argues that accrual duration is a key factor in understanding the discretion in accruals. The function of accruals is to shift the recognition of associated cash flows across time, usually working in pairs of opening/closing accruals. By design, one side of the accrual pair shifts the recognition of the associated cash flow away from the period in which it occurs by recording an accrual with the same magnitude but the opposite sign in the same period. Thus, such zero-duration accruals are non-discretionary because the timing and magnitude of the associated cash flow pin down the timing and the magnitude of the concurrent accrual. The other side of the accrual pair shifts the recognition of the associated cash flow into some other time period(s), which involves using forward-looking estimates over the duration of the accrual, and therefore some discretion. In addition, accruals that have longer duration are more discretionary because longer horizons of estimation allow more discretion with respect to their timing and magnitude. Summarizing, accrual duration and accrual discretion are inextricably linked by the fundamentals of the accrual process. The study concludes with some thoughts on how to practically use accrual duration as a measure of accrual discretion. I appreciate helpful comments from Hal White, Valeri Nikolaev, Frank Zhang, Joseph Gerakos, Jim Leisenring, Yin Wang, Xiao Tian, and workshop participants at Rice University, INSEAD, ESSEC (Paris), University of Zurich, Tilburg University, Washington University, University of Miami, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Chinese University of Hong Kong, UC – Berkeley, University of Tokyo, Kobe University, University of Melbourne, University of New South Wales, and Columbia University. Contact: Ilia Dichev [email protected] (404) 727-9353 1. Introduction Recording accruals is at the heart of accounting, and thus there has been much interest in their function and characteristics. A major theme in this interest is that there is considerable discretion in recording accruals, and understanding the nature of this discretion is a key to understanding the utility and cost of using accruals. More specifically, a prominent idea in this literature is that accruals can be usefully split into discretionary and non-discretionary components. The motivation is that non-discretionary accruals are driven by fundamentals like business activity and growth, while discretionary accruals are more subjective, and therefore more prone to managerial biases and manipulation.1 The volume of the discretionary accrual literature is substantial. Studies using discretionary accrual ideas or techniques certainly number in the dozens, and likely in the hundreds (Dechow, Ge, and Schrand 2010 and Francis, Olsson, Schipper 2008). While this sustained effort has produced a number of insights, the leading discretionary accrual models have been criticized as inadequate, and even misleading (Dechow, Sloan and Sweeney 1995, Ball 2013). Prompted by such criticisms, this study develops a new approach to identifying the discretion in accruals. The linchpin of this approach is closer attention to how accounting works, with a special emphasis on the mechanism and manifestations of accrual discretion. The main idea about the mechanism of accrual discretion is that recording accruals involves using forward- looking estimates, and it is the quality of these estimates that determines the benefits and the costs of using accruals. The manifestation of accrual discretion is in shifting the recognition of cash flows as components of income across time. Note that since income trues up to the corresponding cash flows, ultimately the only thing that accruals do is re-shuffle the timing of the recognition of cash flows over time. The implication is that both the benefits and the costs of 1 Many studies also use the term “abnormal accruals,” with a similar meaning. 1 accruals relate to timing, where the benefits of using accruals relate to recognizing cash flows into the “right” periods, while the costs of using accruals relate to recognizing cash flows into the “wrong” periods. For example, the benefit of the Accounts Receivable accrual is the more timely recognition of income (Revenue) at the time of sale as opposed to waiting for cash collections from customers. The cost of the Accounts Receivable accrual is that income may be allocated in the “wrong” way, for example the Accounts Receivable may be recorded too early or it may be overstated at inception which could necessitate restatements or write-downs later on. As developed in more detail further on, such recording of income into the “wrong” periods represents timing errors, which introduces noise into the measurement of income. The difficulty in implementing these ideas is that the main theoretical constructs, forward-looking estimates and timing errors, are not readily observable. To address this difficulty, the study looks more closely into the fundamentals of recording accruals. As is well- known, accruals work in pairs, i.e., the recognition of a cash flow in a period different from when it occurs is accomplished by recording a combination of an opening and a closing accrual. Notice that by design one side of this accrual pair coincides in time with the associated cash flow, while the other side occurs in a different period. The point is that shifting of the recognition of a cash flow is a two-step process, it is a shifting of a cash flow amount away from some period and into another period.2 Using the Accounts Receivable example to clarify the difference in the function and characteristics of these two steps, notice that when cash comes in from customers, the closing 2 For deferrals, the shifting away step comes with the opening accruals (e.g., the capitalization of PPE and Inventory at inception), and the shifting into another period step comes with the closing accruals (recoding the expense of Depreciation and Cost of Goods Sold). For accruals proper, the order of the two steps is reversed – the shifting into another period step comes with the opening accruals (e.g., the recognition of income at the inception of Accounts Receivable and the recognition of expense at the inception of Warranty Payable), and the shifting away step comes with the closing accrual (the extinguishment of Accounts Receivable with cash collections and Warranty Payable with cash payments). 2 accrual of Accounts Receivable is merely a matter of bookkeeping rather than discretion. For example, if $100 of cash comes in, the Accounts Receivable has to be reduced by $100, there is no other way to record the collection. In other words, shifting the recognition of a cash flow away from a period is accomplished by recording an accrual with the same magnitude and the opposite sign in the same period. Thus, such accruals are non-discretionary because the timing and the magnitude of the concurrent cash flow pin down the timing and magnitude of the associated accrual. In contrast, the opening accrual for Accounts Receivable is discretionary because it can be recorded sooner or later, and at larger or smaller amounts depending on estimates about satisfying the revenue recognition criterion and the future cash collections from customers. For deferrals like PPE and Inventory the sequence is reversed, the opening accrual is non- discretionary because it is merely the deferral of a known cash flow at a known time, and it is the allocation of these costs to later periods as depreciation or cost of goods sold where the discretion resides. The unifying point for deferrals and accruals proper is that recording accruals away from the periods of their associated cash flows always involves using some kind of forward-looking estimates (e.g., projected cash flows, useful lives) and therefore it is these accruals only that embody the notion of discretion in accounting. This intuition can be formalized and extended by introducing the notion of accrual duration. Accrual duration can be defined as the length of time between an accrual and its associated cash flow. The idea is that accrual duration captures the horizon of accrual estimation, and is therefore closely related to the discretion of accruals. Specifically, accruals that are concurrent with their associated cash flows have zero duration, and also have zero discretion because there is no estimation involved – as discussed earlier, the timing and 3 magnitude of the cash flow pin down the timing and magnitude of its associated concurrent accrual. But recording the other side of the relevant accrual pair involves estimation of future events, and is thus discretionary in timing and magnitude. Note also that accruals that have longer duration are more discretionary because estimation is unavoidably less certain over longer horizons. For example, recording the opening accrual for a 10-month Accounts Receivable is likely to be more discretionary than that for a one-month receivable. Summarizing, accrual duration and accrual discretion are inextricably linked by the fundamentals of the accrual process. The paper concludes with a discussion of the pros and cons of the accrual duration approach, and offers some observations on its possible empirical applications. The major attraction of this approach is that it applies to virtually all possible accruals. The major difficulty in implementation is the identification of the associated cash flows and accruals because current financial reporting provides only a patchwork of the necessary data. When the associated accruals and cash flows are available (e.g., for PPE, revenue accruals), it is possible to derive estimates of discretionary accruals using exact algebraic derivations, avoiding the vexing statistical and validity issues that plague existing discretionary accrual models. Absence of clean data necessitates reverting to statistical estimation, either at the level of individual or aggregate accruals.
Recommended publications
  • Primer on Accrual Accounting
    GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD PRIMER ON ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING Compiled by GASAB Secretariat O/o the Comptroller and Auditor general of India 10, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110002 Accrual Accounting It is a system of accounting in which transaction are entered in the books of accounts, when they become due. The transactions are recognised as soon as a right to receive revenue and/or an obligation to pay a liability is created. The expenses are recognised when the resources are consumed and incomes are booked when they are earned. Therefore, the focus is on the recording of flow of resources i.e. labour, goods, services and capital., the related cash flow may take place after some time (of event) or it may or may not take place in the same accounting period. Cash Accounting In this system of accounting transactions are recorded when there is actual flow of cash. Revenue is recognised only when it is actually received. Expenditure is recognised only on the outflow of cash. No consideration is given to the “due” fact of the transaction. This system of accounting is simple to understand and as such needs less skill on the part of the accountant. Its whole focus is on cash management. The recognition trigger is simply the flow of cash. Budgetary and legislative compliance is easier under this system. Limitations of cash system of accounting The limitations of cash based accounting are: - It does not provide the complete picture of the financial position i.e. information on assets and liabilities are not available for fixed assets (land, building, machineries, defence, heritage assets etc.) - No information about capital work-in-progress like dams, power plants, roads and bridges etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Accrual Vs. Cash Accounting
    Accrual vs Cash One of the first steps in setting up an accurate accounting system is selecting a method of recording transactions. The two most common methods are the cash basis of accounting and the accrual basis of accounting. This article highlights the differences between these methods, and presents considerations when choosing which method is right for your organization. Cash Method Accrual Method The cash method is the simplest option, and replicates The more complex accrual method is what is required by checkbook accounting used in personal finances. Income Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). If your and expenses are recognized when the cash is transferred. organization plans to go through a financial statement au- Revenue is recorded when funds are received and expens- dit or review, it is highly recommended that the organiza- es are recorded when bills are paid, regardless of when tion adopt the accrual method so that it is in conformance the transaction was entered into between the organiza- with GAAP. Lending and funding sources also often re- tion and the donor/customer or vendor. As a result, the quire financial information be submitted using the accrual balance sheet of a cash basis organization only contains method. This method records income when it is earned cash and net assets. Receivables, prepaid expenses, paya- and expenses when they are incurred. As a result, income bles and deferred revenue are all accrual concepts ignored and all of the costs incurred in the process of earning the when using the cash method. The benefits of this method revenue are matched and recorded in the same fiscal peri- are the simplicity and a clear sense of cash flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Accrual Accounting for Ohio's Rural Transit Systems
    Guide to Accrual Accounting for Ohio’s Rural Transit Systems March 2009 Prepared For The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) Office of Transit Prepared By Table of Contents Page No. Section 1 – Why Accrual Accounting 1 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Requirement 1 Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) Requirement 2 Cash vs. Accrual Accounting 3 Good Business Practice 6 Recap – Why the Accounting Method Matters 7 Section 2 – Basic Accounting Principles 8 Overview 8 Bookkeeping vs. Accounting 10 Accounting Equation (Assets = Liabilities + Owner’s Equity) 11 Revenue Recognition and Matching Principles 13 Chart of Accounts – Normal Balances 14 Debits and Credits 16 Accounting Cycle 18 o Record (Journalize) Transactions 18 o Post Journal Entries to Ledger Accounts 25 o Prepare a Trial Balance 28 o Make Adjusting Entries & Prepare Adjusted Trial Balance 29 o Prepare Financial Statements 32 o Journalize & Post Closing Entries & Prepare Closing Trial 40 Balance Section 3 – Ohio Rural Transit Systems & ODOT Quarterly 41 Invoice Report Revenue Transactions 41 o Transportation Revenues 41 o Non-Transportation Revenues 42 Expense Transactions 43 o Labor (Wages) 43 o Fringe Benefits 44 o Services 44 o Materials & Supplies 45 o Utilities 45 o Casualty & Liability Costs 46 o Taxes 46 o Purchased Transportation Services 46 o Miscellaneous Expenses 46 o Interest Expense 47 i o Leases & Rentals 47 o Depreciation 47 o Other Costs 47 Section 4 – Accrual Accounting Options 48 Manual Systems 48 Off-the-Shelf Software 48 Conversion of Cash Data to Accrual Format at End of Each 49 Quarter Professional Assistance 49 Section 5 – Exhibits & Samples 50 ODOT Chart of Accounts 50 Steps for Completing the ODOT Quarterly Invoice 50 Accrual Accounting - Class Exercise 58 ii Section One – Why Accrual Accounting Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Requirement For calendar year 2008 and beyond, the FTA began to require all transit systems (urban and rural) to report data using the accrual method of accounting.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Management: Cash Vs. Accrual Accounting Danny Klinefelter, Dean Mccorkle and Steven Klose*
    EAG- 036 February 2017 Risk Management Series Financial Management: Cash vs. Accrual Accounting Danny Klinefelter, Dean McCorkle and Steven Klose* Selecting a record-keeping system is an A business can be going broke and still generate important decision for agricultural producers. a positive cash basis income for several years The system should help with decision making in a by building accounts payable (accruing but not risky environment and calculate taxable income. paying expenses), selling assets, and not replacing Most producers keep their records with the cash capital assets as they wear out. receipts and disbursements method or with an However, most farmers and ranchers use accrual method. cash basis accounting because: 1) the accounting Either method should be acceptable for principles of an accrual system can be complex; calculating taxable income (except for corporate 2) given the cost of hiring accountants to keep taxpayers who have revenues exceeding their records, accrual accounting is more $25,000,000). However, it is not acceptable to keep expensive; and 3) cash basis accounting is more books throughout the year using one method flexible for tax planning. of accounting and then convert at year-end to another method, solely because the second Getting the Best of Both Systems method might compute taxable income more There is a process by which cash basis income favorably. and expense data can be adjusted to approximate The main difference between accrual basis and accrual income. This can be very beneficial to cash basis accounting is the time at which income producers, giving them the simplicity and tax and expenses are recognized and recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Valuation Recasting the Financial Statements by Leonard M
    BUSINESS VALUATION RECASTING THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BY LEONARD M. FRIEDMAN, CPA/ABV CBV When someone asks me why a forensic valuation of a company in a litigation setting costs so much money it is because very few litigants are going to be honest about their business operations in terms of unreported income, personal expenses, etc. It is understandable because the business owner has a motive to minimize the value of the business. Therefore, a fair amount of forensic digging needs to be performed. Whenever I hear from a non-titled spouse or their attorney that the business owner is doing this and that to cheat the government (or them) and cashing checks and not depositing them, etc., I always warn them that these types of investigations cost significantly more money than a straight valuation and that the costs relative to the value may be prohibitive. Unfortunately, reality sometimes hurts. Those attorneys that work with me know I try to avoid adding unnecessary costs to an assignment, but once we start down the path of looking for significant fraud, the costs start to mount. Very few active closely held businesses do not have expenses on the financial statements that are either non- recurring or non-operating and are for the benefit of the owners or their families. In other words, there is generally a significant amount of hidden compensation. The financial statements almost always need to be adjusted to reflect true owners’ income, without which a fair value cannot be estimated. This article is not designed to belabor the tax implications of some of the creative ways owners compensate themselves but rather adjust the financial statements to present them in a more normalized and comparative manner in order to determine the income that is used to value the company.
    [Show full text]
  • Accrual and Deferral Handout
    Name Principles of Financial Accounting I Adjusting the Accounts "Cash" Basis vs. "Accrual" Basis: Cash Accrual Revenue Expenses Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) require using the basis. Why make Adjusting Journal Entries?____________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ Recall previous "promises." New Promise: Every adjusting entry will have ______________________ Balance Sheet and one_________________________________________________________ effect. INCOME STATEMENT attempts to accomplish: ____________________________________________ ESSENTIALS OF CONCEPT 1. 2. 3. I. Identifying accounts to be adjusted: Accruals and Deferrals A. Perhaps the best way to distinguish deferrals and accruals is the timing of cash changing hands: CA$H accruals deferrals cash AFTER event cash BEFORE event Deferrals have been recorded; accruals have not. B. Definitions An ACCRUAL is an expense or a revenue . Examples of accruals: Expense: Revenue: Copyright © 1999 by M. Ray Gregg. All Rights reserved. A DEFERRAL is a already paid or of a revenue . Examples of deferrals: Expense: Revenue: II. Accruals A. Expenses 1. Example Salaries increase as employees work each day, yet, for convenience, salaries are recorded when . Since the cash is paid the event, salaries are an example of . The adjusting entry necessary when payday and the end of the fiscal period are on different days would be: 2. Decision tree conclusion If this is the entry required for this , other accrued expense items must follow a similar format: B. Revenue 1. Example Your CPA firm is auditing a client's records; the engagement begins in mid-November and lasts through the end of February. Each day as work is being performed, revenue is earned. Since the cash will not be collected until completion of the engagement (after the event), this is an example of .
    [Show full text]
  • Cash and Accrual Measures in Federal Budgeting
    CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE Cash and Accrual Measures in Federal Budgeting Cash Accrual • Federal Most federal activities, including: employees’ • Interest on federal debt retirement • Capital investments • Federal credit programs benefits • Insurance programs • Capital leases and lease- • Social insurance programs purchase agreements Fair Value • Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac • Troubled Asset Relief Program • Contributions to the IMF JANUARY 2018 www.cbo.gov/publication/53461 Contents Summary 1 What Roles Do Cash and Accrual Measures Play in the Federal Budget Process? 1 What Are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Cash and Accrual Measures? 2 What Are the Criteria for Assessing Information Provided by Cash and Accrual Measures? 2 What Are Potential Approaches for Selectively Expanding the Use of Accrual and Other Long-Term Measures in the Federal Budget Process? 2 Overview of the Federal Budget Process 3 BOX 1. THE FEDERAL BUDGET PROCESS AND BUDGET ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES 4 An Illustration of Cash Versus Accrual Measures 5 The Role of Cash and Accrual Measures in the Federal Budget Process 6 Accrual-Based Budgetary Treatment 6 BOX 2. ILLUSTRATING ALTERNATIVE BUDGETARY TREATMENTS: ESTIMATING THE SAVINGS FROM LIMITING FORGIVENESS OF GRADUATE STUDENT LOANS 10 BOX 3. ACCOUNTING FOR MARKET RISK IN ACCRUAL-BASED ESTIMATES 14 Other Measures Used in the Federal Budget Process 16 Advantages and Disadvantages of Cash and Accrual Measures 18 BOX 4. INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH ACCRUAL BUDGETING: WHAT ARE THE LESSONS? 20 Expanding the Use of Accrual Measures in the Federal Budget and Budget Process 22 Criteria for Assessing Information Provided by Cash and Accrual Measures 22 Approaches to Expanding the Use of Accrual and Other Long-Term Measures in the Federal Budget Process 26 About This Document 29 Tables 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Publication 538, Accounting Periods and Methods
    Userid: CPM Schema: tipx Leadpct: 100% Pt. size: 10 Draft Ok to Print AH XSL/XML Fileid: … ons/P538/201901/A/XML/Cycle04/source (Init. & Date) _______ Page 1 of 21 15:46 - 28-Feb-2019 The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. Department of the Treasury Contents Internal Revenue Service Future Developments ....................... 1 Publication 538 Introduction .............................. 1 (Rev. January 2019) Photographs of Missing Children .............. 2 Cat. No. 15068G Accounting Periods ........................ 2 Calendar Year .......................... 2 Fiscal Year ............................. 3 Accounting Short Tax Year .......................... 3 Improper Tax Year ....................... 4 Periods and Change in Tax Year ...................... 4 Individuals ............................. 4 Partnerships, S Corporations, and Personal Methods Service Corporations (PSCs) .............. 5 Corporations (Other Than S Corporations and PSCs) .............................. 7 Accounting Methods ....................... 8 Cash Method ........................... 8 Accrual Method ........................ 10 Inventories ............................ 13 Change in Accounting Method .............. 18 How To Get Tax Help ...................... 19 Future Developments For the latest information about developments related to Pub. 538, such as legislation enacted after it was published, go to IRS.gov/Pub538. What’s New Small business taxpayers. Effective for tax years beginning
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on the Relationship Between Analysts' Cash Flow Forecasts
    sustainability Article A Study on the Relationship between Analysts’ Cash Flow Forecasts Issuance and Accounting Information: Evidence from Korea Hyun Min Oh 1 and Ho young Shin 2,* 1 Department of Accounting, College of Social Sciences, Sunchon National University, Jeonnam 57922, Korea; [email protected] 2 School of Business, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 18 May 2019; Accepted: 17 June 2019; Published: 20 June 2019 Abstract: This study analyzes the relationship between the future cash flow forecast information provided by financial analysts and accounting information. We examine whether the joint issuance of financial analyst earnings forecasts and cash flow forecasts from 2011 to 2015 contributes to the information usefulness of Korean listed firms. The empirical results of this study are as follows. First, the issuance of analysts’ cash flow forecasts and earnings forecast accuracy were significant positive values. Cash flow forecast accuracy and earnings forecast accuracy were significant positive values. Second, the issuance of analysts’ cash flow forecasts and buy–sell bid spread are significant negative values. These results show that the information asymmetry between the manager and the investor can be reduced based on the rich information environment. This study suggests that cash flow forecasting information of financial analysts provides important evidence for capital market participants because it provides evidence that capital market participants’ information can be used as useful information for economic decision-making. These results show the sustainability of a firm from the viewpoint of a financial analyst who acts as an intermediary and external supervisor in the capital market.
    [Show full text]
  • A Roadmap to the Preparation of the Statement of Cash Flows
    A Roadmap to the Preparation of the Statement of Cash Flows May 2020 The FASB Accounting Standards Codification® material is copyrighted by the Financial Accounting Foundation, 401 Merritt 7, PO Box 5116, Norwalk, CT 06856-5116, and is reproduced with permission. This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication. The services described herein are illustrative in nature and are intended to demonstrate our experience and capabilities in these areas; however, due to independence restrictions that may apply to audit clients (including affiliates) of Deloitte & Touche LLP, we may be unable to provide certain services based on individual facts and circumstances. As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte & Touche LLP, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Deloitte Tax LLP, and Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP, which are separate subsidiaries of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of our legal structure. Copyright © 2020 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Publications in Deloitte’s Roadmap Series Business Combinations Business Combinations — SEC Reporting Considerations Carve-Out Transactions Comparing IFRS Standards and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Cash Versus Accrual Basis of Accounting: an Introduction
    Cash Versus Accrual Basis of Accounting: An Introduction Raj Gnanarajah Analyst in Financial Economics December 12, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43811 c11173008 . Cash Versus Accrual Basis of Accounting: An Introduction Summary This report introduces two general methods of accounting—the cash basis method and accrual basis method. The choice of accounting method determines the timing of the recognition of revenue and expenses. Under cash basis accounting, revenue and expenses are recorded when cash is actually paid or received. Under accrual basis accounting, revenue is recorded when it is earned and expenses are reported when they are incurred. Understanding the differences between these two accounting methods could be helpful to Congress as it considers reforming the tax system and changing the federal government’s financial reporting requirements. Currently with certain exceptions, the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) requires some companies with gross receipts in excess of $5 million to use accrual basis, instead of cash basis, of accounting to determine their tax liabilities. The IRC’s requirement to use the accrual method, arguably, ensures that revenue and the expenses incurred to generate that revenue are realized in the same year. Types of companies that may be excepted from using accrual basis of accounting for income taxes are sole proprietors and certain qualified personal service corporations (PSCs) in such fields as health, law, engineering, accounting, performing arts, and consulting firms, as well as farms that are not corporations or do not have a corporate partner. Some Members of Congress have put forth proposals to revise the circumstances under which certain companies are able to use cash method.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting for Statement of Cash Flows
    Revised Summer 2016 Chapter Review ACCOUNTING FOR STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS Key Terms and Concepts to Know Statement of Cash Flows • Reports the sources of cash inflows and cash outflow during an accounting period. • Inflows and outflows are divided into three sections or categories based on the underlying cause or nature of the cash flows: o Operating Activities o Investing Activities o Financing Activities • Cash forms a fourth section at the bottom of the statement in which the beginning cash balance is added to the total of the three sections to determine the ending balance for cash. • Cash is separated because the statement explains the changes in the cash balance during the period. Transactions Not Affecting Cash • At times, companies enter into investing and financing transactions that do not involve cash, such as issuing common stock to purchase land. • These transactions are not reported on the statement of cash flows because they do not provide or use cash. • Instead, they are reported in a separate section or note that is presented after the ending cash balance. Free Cash Flow • Cash flows from operating activities is available to the company is use, but not without some reservations. • The company must invest in new fixed assets to maintain the current level of operations (think of this as nothing lasts forever and therefore someday must be replaced) • The company must also satisfy current stockholders (owners) by maintaining the current dividend payout. • Therefore Free Cash Flow = Cash from Operating Activities – “maintenance” capital expenditures – cash dividends Page 1 of 24 Revised Summer 2016 Chapter Review Key Topics to Know Overview The Statement of Cash Flows explains the changes in the balance sheet during an accounting period from the perspective of how these changes affect cash.
    [Show full text]