“At first it may appear to be superfluous to add another comprehensive book to the extraordinarily great number of works that have been published in the last fifty years about . “- , 1913 Introduction: Thesis: Methodology: The origins of the LGBT rights movement did not This examination reveals that, despite stereotypes of Victorian My research process focused on examining numerous begin in 1969 with New York’s Stonewall Inn riots. morality, this small group of intellectuals created spaces for open memoirs, political tracts, and medical studies related to discussion of sexuality. This in turn set the terms for an homosexuality and sexual reform movements in . A century before the fields of “LGBT Studies” examination of LGBTQ identities and experiences in the century to emerged, an interdisciplinary community of historians, come about the origins, legal rights, history, and appropriate lawyers, medical doctors and political activists were terminology. already studying homosexuality.

John Addington Symonds (1840-1893) Edith Lees Ellis (1861-1916) and (1844-1929) Magnus Hirschfeld (1868-1935) (1859-1939) Important Works: Yearbook for Important Works: A Problem in Modern Important Works: Homogenic Love Sexual Intermediates (1899- Ethics (1896), A Problem in Greek Ethics Important Works: Studies in the and Its Place in a Free Society 1923), Transvestites: The Erotic (1883), Memoirs (published in 1984). Psychology of Sex (H. Ellis, 1897) , Three (1894), The Intermediate Sex: A Modern Seers (E. Ellis, 1910), A New Study of Some Transitional Types of Urge to Cross-Dress (1910), The Homosexuality of Men and •Ethical and philosophical arguments Horizon in Life and Love (E. Ellis, Men and Women (1912), published in 1921), My Life (H. Ellis, Intermediate Types Among Women (1913), Men and Women: The World Journey of a •Collaborated with Havelock Ellis on 1939) Primitive Folk: A Study in Social Sexologist (1935), the first edition of the “sexual Evolution (1914) (published in 1938) inversion” volume of Studies in the •Like Symonds, the Ellises struggled Psychology of Sex. with their personal and professional •Appealed to social justice as road constructions of sexuality, especially to a more equal society •Organized around overturning sodomy laws in Germany •Memoirs reveal personal conflict when Edith came out to her husband as between idealized notions of love a early in their . •Wrote and distributed political •Started the Scientific between men, physical sexuality, and and philosophical works in Humanitarian Committee (the social duty. •Edith Ellis was a professional socialist community known as the “Sheffield lecturer who also wrote widely on Socialists” first modern “gay rights” organization) and the Institute •Many of his more controversial works sexual reform. for Sexual Research (which were burned by family and friends after •Lived semi-openly with partner provided services and his death. •Havelock Ellis used psychological George Merrill. Their relationship research to promote greater social inspired E.M. Forster’s Maurice, education on a variety of issues understanding of sexual diversity. about love between two men of pertaining to sexuality and different classes. gender identity). Conclusion: Implications for LGBT Studies Today: Although many of the medical conclusions reached by these individuals regarding sexuality have since Contemporary LGBT studies and activists still grapple with similar issues: been discredited, their writings remain valuable as a record of the development of notions of sexuality as a form of personal identity, rather than an individual choice or set of behaviors. They also reveal how .Medical and social are still important in searching for the personal experiences and privileges limited the scope and audience for their research. origins of homosexuality. .Privilege (class, sex, race, cisgender, etc.) continues to play a role in Issues of class and race were minimized or over-generalized in many of these studies, despite the whose voices and experiences are valued. supposed universal approach of sexological research. Likewise, most early perspectives on lesbian .Appropriate terminology continues to be debated. experiences were written by men, with Edith Lees Ellis serving as a rare exception to the rule. The ties .Western ideas and cultures are still considered the “standard” for between discourses on sexuality and the medical profession, although necessary for scholars like LGBT history and experiences Hirschfeld and the Ellises to publish their findings, kept homosexuality classed as a mental disease for .The legal status of LGBT individuals and couples continues to be a matter decades to come. of intense political and social discussion.

Sponsored by the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Undergraduate Research Program