1
UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY
The Memetic Self: Understanding the Self Using a Visual
Mapping Technique
by
Lloyd Hawkeye Robertson
A THESIS
SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL
FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY
CALGARY, ALBERTA
JANUARY, 2009
© Lloyd Hawkeye Robertson 2009 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition
395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada
Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-49622-0 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-49622-0
NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats.
The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation. reproduced without the author's permission.
In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne Privacy Act some supporting sur la protection de la vie privee, forms may have been removed quelques formulaires secondaires from this thesis. ont ete enleves de cette these.
While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires in the document page count, aient inclus dans la pagination, their removal does not represent il n'y aura aucun contenu manquant. any loss of content from the thesis. Canada Mapping the memetic self
PERMISSIONS
In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy from the University of Calgary, I agree that the libraries of this university may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my thesis work or, in her absence, by the Head of the Department of Applied Psychology or the Dean of the College of Graduate Studies and Research. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Calgary in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to:
Head of the Department of Applied Psychology University of Calgary Calgary, Alberta, Canada
11 Mapping the memetic self
ABSTRACT
This study examines how the self may be represented visually, taking into account temporality and empowerment over self change. A diverse sample of eleven volunteers participated in co-constructing visualizations or maps of themselves during a series of interviews over a nine month period. The resultant maps consisted of units of interlocking culture called memes, plus themes that emerged from the data. The maps resonated with 10 of the 11 participants. Analysis of the maps supported the conceptualizations of William James, in that the self includes elements of constancy, volition, and uniqueness. The analysis of the memetic maps also supported Alfred Adler's view that the self includes a need for production, intimacy, and social interest. An additional necessary emotive component to the self was postulated.
Implications for the use of this mapping technique in the theoretical understanding of the self and in counselling psychology are discussed.
in Mapping the memetic self
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A short four years ago Dr. Nancy Arthur introduced herself to me as my "temporary" faculty advisor with the suggestion that I would want to select a permanent research supervisor after I learned my way around the University of Calgary. Nancy, I am honoured that you agreed to become my permanent research supervisor. Without your guidance and nurturing encouragement, my task would have been arduous indeed.
Dr. Marilyn Samuels supervised my practicum at the International Student Center and the
Native Center on campus before agreeing to be on my supervisory committee. Thank you,
Marilyn, for agreeing to partially delay your retirement to do this. Your support and suggestions were always appreciated; and I intend to follow your latest suggestion to offer training to others on my self-mapping technique.
I still have an early e-mail from Dr. Tom Strong pointing to serious philosophical differences between us, but still he agreed to serve on my committee. Tom, I was never able to completely convince you as to the efficacy of a memetic perspective, but your detailed questions forced me to review, research and strengthen my arguments. The comprehensiveness of my thesis I owe to you.
This adventure began with discussions my cousin, Lonna Kirkpatrick, and I had on the application of the concept of the meme to psychology. It was Lonna who suggested that I should obtain my PhD at the University of Calgary. I would also like to thank my sister, Sharon
Romanow, who forgave me for not applying to the University of Manitoba and who helped me with the final edit of this paper. Thanks, as well, to all my family who showed an interest in my work, provided places for me stay, and sustained my spirit with encouragement. Mapping the memetic self
Thank you to my friend and former partner, Millie Goulet, who loaned me her laptop when mine crashed and was always ready to discuss the nature of the self, especially with respect to aboriginal people. I would also like to give a special thanks to elders Clarence DeBruyne,
Louisa Sanderson and Mike Mercredi who struggled to understand what I was up to, and made suggestions on how this research might be useful to our community.
I would like to thank the Alberta ACADRE Network and the Saskatchewan Health
Bursary Program for their financial support. I would also like to thank Bill Mussel and the
Native Mental Health Association for helping me develop my ideas by accepting conference presentations on precursors to this study with respect to suicide and community development.
The N.M.H. A. was also the first professional association to accept a presentation on the results of this research. Your personal encouragement and the support of your family has been appreciated, Bill.
Most importantly, I would like to thank the participants to this research who shared intimate details of their lives so that we could better understand how selves are structured and how those structures may be represented. I marvelled to my teen-aged daughter, Teela, that you are such a wonderfully diverse and insightful group of individuals. After I recounted something from each of your stories she said, "Dad, everyone has a fascinating story if you listen so that they can get it out."
I hope I have listened well.
v Mapping the memetic self
VI Mapping the memetic self
CONTENTS
THE MEMETIC SELF i
PERMISSIONS ii
ABSTRACT iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
CONTENTS Error! Bookmark not defined.
TABLE OF FIGURES xv
CHAPTER1: THE PROBLEM OF SELF 1
The Call of this Research: An Overview 2
The Domain of Inquiry 4
The Purpose of this Study 5
The Potential Significance of this Study 6
Research Questions 7
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 8
Current Perspectives on the Self 9
The Stable Self 10
The Adlerian Self 11
A Quantitative Study Into the Stability of Self 17
Self-Stability in Counselling 18
Implications of Studies Into the Stable Self 21
The Neurological Self 22
The Feeling of Me 23
Split Brains and Split Selves 24
vii Mapping the memetic self
Measuring Brain Activity 26
Limits to the Interpretations of the Neurological Data 27
The Self in Society 29
The Constructivist Self 29
The Socially Constructed Self 33
The Social Constructionist Alternative 39
Situating the Self Through Mapping 50
Directions Provided by Considerations of the Self in Society 60
Composite Models of the Self. 60
The Objective and Subjective Self 62
Research Into the Jamesian Model of Self 63
Combining James with Social Construction 69
The Memetic Self 70
The Qualities of Memes as Units of Culture 70
The Self as a Complex of Memes 72
Selected Studies Using the Concept of the Meme 74
An Evolutionary Account of Self 80
Cultural Relativism with Respect to the Self 88
Critiques of Modernity 89
The Buddhist Experience of Self 91
Examinations of the Self in Selected Collectivist Cultures 93
A Comparison of Inuit and Western Approaches to Counselling 95
Unresolved Issues Flowing From the Literature 97
viii Mapping the memetic self
CHAPTER 3: METHOD 101
General Methodological Considerations 101
Conceptual Framework 106
Trialling the Proposed Research Method 108
Selection of the Participant Population Ill
Data Collection, Analysis and Management 113
Preparation and Refinement of Memetic Maps 114
Ethical Considerations 117
CHAPTER 4: INDIVIDUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF EACH SELF 118
Tina 118
Tina's First Interview 118
Tina's Second interview 123
Tina's Third Interview 128
Trevor 129
Trevor's First Interview 129
Trevor's Second Interview 135
Trevor's Third Interview 139
John Blonde 140
John Blonde's First Interview 141
John Blonde's Second Interview 145
John Blonde's Third Interview 150
Judy 151
Judy's First Interview 151
ix Mapping the memetic self
Judy's Second Interview 155
Judy's Third Interview 159
Pangloss 159
Pangloss' First Interview 160
Pangloss' Second Interview 166
Pangloss' Third Interview 171
Fredelle 173
Fredelle's First Interview 174
Fredelle's Second Interview 177
Fredelle's Third Interview 180
Chantelle 183
Chantelle's First Interview 183
Chantelle's Second Interview 187
Chantelle's Third Interview 191
Magdelynn 193
Magdelynn's First Interview 193
Magdelynn's Second Interview 198
Magdelynn's Third interview 202
Brent 204
Brent's First Interview 204
Brent's Second Interview 209
Brent's Third Interview 214
Nick 217
x Mapping the memetic self
Nick's First Interview 217
Nick's Second Interview 220
Nick's Third Interview 224
Maomao 226
Maomao's First Interview 226
Maomao's Second Interview 231
Maomao's Third Interview 234
CHAPTER 5: COLLECTIVE RESULTS 235
Data Related to the Research Questions 236
Resonance of the Memetic Mapping Process with Felt Experience 236
Transitions Impacting on the Self Prior to the Commencement of this Study 239
Changes to Selves Over the Period of the Study 249
Self-empowerment from Memetic Map Building 251
Common Themes in Self-construction Between Participants 253
Central Aspects to Self: Animation, Remembering and Feeling 254
The Jamesian Objective Self 258
The Participant Experience of Self-constancy 259
The Need for Feedback in Self-construction and Maintenance 262
Family, Community and Individuation 264
The Sense of Being Human 266
Human Happiness and Transcendental Goals 268
Judge, Jury and Executioner 271
Chapter Summary 272
xi Mapping the memetic self
CHAPTER 6: DISCUSSION 274
Participant Cognitions, Feeling and Insights 275
Constancy, Community and Memory in the Maintenance of the Self 275
Constancy, Distinctness and Volition 279
The Emotional Base of the Self 283
The Self as a Narrative 285
Implications of This Research On Our Understanding of Self 287
The Jamesian Self 288
The Adlerian Self 291
Building on the Work of James and Adler 293
Benefits of Using a Memetic Approach in Mapping the Self 294
Implications of the Results to Counselling 298
The Self in Community 302
A Culturally Inclusive Self Paradigm 303
Limitations 306
Recommendations for Future Research 311
Summary and Conclusions 313
REFERENCES 317
APPENDIX A: QUESTIONS USED BY KWIATKOWSKA 342
APPENDIX B: SELECTED QUESTIONS FROM DAMON & HART (1988) 343
APPENDIX C: A SAMPLE OF OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS USED IN THIS STUDY 345
APPENDIX D: EXPLORE YOUR 'SELF' 346
APPENDIX E: THE RECRUITMENT SCRIPT 347
xii Mapping the memetic self
APPENDIX F: CONSENT FORM 349
APPENDIX G: NOTES FOR TINA SHOWING DEFINING MEMES 352
Sample Segmentation and Coding For the Meme "Mother" 352
Memes Identified in Tina's Self 356
Memes Added After the Second Interview 361
APPENDIX H: NOTES FOR TREVOR SHOWING DEFINING MEMES 363
Memes Added Following the Second Interview 370
APPENDIX I: NOTES FOR JOHN BLONDE SHOWING SELF-DEFINING MEMES 371
Memes Added Following the Second Interview 376
APPENDIX J: NOTES FOR JUDY SHOWING SELF-DEFINING MEMES 378
Memes Added After the Second Interview 384
APPENDIX K: NOTES FOR PANGLOSS SHOWING SELF-IDENTIFYING MEMES 385
Memes Added After the Second Interview 395
Appendix L: NOTES FOR FREDELLE SHOWING SELF-DEFINING MEMES 396
Memes Added After the Second Interview 401
Memes Added After the Third Interview 402
APPENDIX M: NOTES FOR CHANTELLE SHOWING SELF-DEFINING MEMES 403
New memes added after the second interview 409
APPENDIX N: NOTES FOR MAGDELYNN SHOWING SELF-DEFINING MEMES 410
Memes added after the 2nd interview 418
APPENDIX O: NOTES FOR BRENT SHOWING SELF-DEFINING MEMES 419
New memes added as a result of our second interview 425
New memes added as a result of Brent's third interview 426
xiii Mapping the memetic self
APPENDIX P: NOTES FOR NICK SHOWING SELF-DEFINING MEMES 427
New memes added after the second interview 431
Memes added after the third interview 431
APPENDIX Q: NOTES FOR MAOMAO SHOWING SELF-DEFINING MEMES 432
New memes that resulted from second interview 437
Endnotes 438
xiv Mapping the memetic self
TABLE OF FIGURES
Figure 1. A graphic representation of the conceptual framework informing this study showing the
process of making the implicit self explicit, mapping that self and relating the map back to
the co-researcher's lived experience 107
Figure 2. A memetic map of the self of a university student displaying relational forces between
memes and the number of times (in brackets) each meme was referenced during the
interview 108
Figure 3: Memetic map of the self of a university student with memos attached to two memes
indicating the structure of those memes 109
Figure 4: Memetic map of Tina resulting from the segmentation and coding of her initial
interview showing the number segments coded for each meme (in brackets) 120
Figure 5: Revised Memetic map of Tina resulting from her second interview 126
Figure 6: Memetic map of Trevor resulting from the segmentation and coding of his initial
interview showing the number segments coded for each meme (in brackets) 130
Figure 7: Revised memetic map of Trevor resulting from his second interview 137
Figure 8: Memetic map of John Blonde resulting from the segmentation and coding of his initial
interview showing the number segments coded for each meme (in brackets) 142
Figure 9: Amended memetic self-map of John Blonde following his second interview 146
Figure 10: Memetic map of Judy resulting from the segmentation and coding of her initial
interview showing the number segments coded for each meme (in brackets) 152
Figure 11: Revised memetic map of Judy resulting from her second interview 156
Figure 12: Memetic map of Pangloss resulting from the segmentation and coding of his initial
interview with the number segments coded for each meme in brackets 161
xv Mapping the memetic self
Figure 13: Revised memetic self-map of Pangloss with amendments flowing from his second
interview 168
Figure 14: Memetic map of Fredelle resulting from the segmentation and coding of her initial
interview with the number segments coded for each meme in brackets 175
Figure 15: Revised memetic self-map of Fredelle with amendments flowing from her second
interview 179
Figure 16: Revised memetic map of Fredelle with amendments flowing from her third interview
181
Figure 17: Memetic map of Chantelle resulting from the segmentation and coding of her initial
interview with the number segments coded for each meme in brackets 185
Figure 18: Revised memetic self-map of Chantelle with amendments flowing from her second
interview 189
Figure 19: Memetic map of Magdelynn resulting from the segmentation and coding of her initial
interview with the number segments coded for each meme in brackets 195
Figure 20: Revised memetic self-map of Magdelynn with amendments flowing from her second
interview 200
Figure 21: Revised memetic self-map of Magdelynn with amendments flowing from her third
interview 203
Figure 22: Memetic map of Brent resulting from the segmentation and coding of his initial
interview with the number segments coded for each meme in brackets 205
Figure 23: Revised memetic self-map of Brent with amendments flowing from his second
interview 211
xvi Mapping the memetic self
Figure 24: Revised memetic self-map of Brent with amendments flowing from his third
interview 216
Figure 25: Memetic map of Nick resulting from the segmentation and coding of his initial
interview with the number segments coded for each meme in brackets 218
Figure 26: Revised memetic self-map of Nick with amendments flowing from his second
interview 221
Figure 27: Revised memetic self-map of Nick with amendments flowing from his second
interview 225
Figure 28: Memetic map of Maomao resulting from the segmentation and coding of her initial
interview with the number segments coded for each meme in brackets 228
Figure 29: Revised memetic self-map for Maomao with amendments flowing from her second
interview 233
Figure 30: Four levels of cultural organization with random memes flowing between each level
277
xvii Mapping the Memetic Self
CHAPTER 1: THE PROBLEM OF SELF
Theorists have discussed self-concept (Adler, 1927/1957; Meador & Rogers, 1979;
Vleioras & Bosnia, 2005), self-esteem (Brave Heart, 2003; Ellis, 1979; Lent, 2004), self- actualization (Maslow, 1987; Peck, 1978; Ventis, 1995) and even self-validation (Ishiama,
1995). Eric Erikson (as cited in Corey & Corey, 2003) said, "The ability to form intimate relationships depends largely on having a clear sense of self (p. 98). William Bridges (1980,
2001) tied his theory of adult transition to changes in this "self. Despite its central importance to psychology, little has been done to detail and map the concept of self in individuals.
This research is an attempt to make conscious the self that lies at the core of constructs such as self-concept, self-esteem, and self-actualization. Specifically, it involved the exploration of the felt selves of a group of participants and the experience of these participants in the process of mapping and applying these self-maps to their lived experiences. Participants in this research were invited to share who they were in rich detail. Units of culture were identified from transcripts of their conversations and these units, called memes, were graphically displayed on
"maps," which were then reviewed by these same participants for resonance. It was hoped that this research would add to our knowledge of the nature and structure of the self, and that it would provide a bridge uniting theory with practise. It was also hoped that the methods used in this research could be adapted by counsellors to assist them in visualizing the dynamics present in the change effort required by individual clients. The use of memetic maps may enable clients to see themselves in new ways that can empower them to make decisions to effect change, thus engaging them in the change process.
1 2
The Call of this Research: An Overview
My interest in this field of study flowed from my professional involvement with a suicidal girl in northern Saskatchewan. This girl had been referred to me by another therapist who had used cognitive-behavioral therapy with little positive effect. She had also been prescribed antidepressant medication, but this too had proven ineffective. Cognitive-behavioral therapy has proven efficacy with respect to the treatment of unipolar depression and post traumatic stress (Devilly & Spence, 1999; Dozois, 2002; Warwar & Greenberg, 2000), but the nature of the therapeutic relationship can affect outcomes (Horvath & Symonds, 1991; Hyer,
Kramer, & Sohnle, 2004; Ryum & Stiles, 2005), therefore, I also attempted a cognitive- behavioral intervention with this youth. She was cooperative and participated in both therapy and behavioral "homework" assignments with little effect. I used Eye Movement Desensitization and
Reprocessing on early childhood events that which she stated were traumatic, with little change in her suicide risk profile. Finally, using a notion proposed by Blackmore (1999) of the self consisting of units of culture called memes, and combining that suggestion with my own background in lifeskills coaching, I suggested to this youth that we prepare a self-map of herself using a modification of a lifeskills exercise called "ten persons I am." She was asked to name and prioritize ten roles that she played (e.g. daughter, lover, student), ten things she believed to be true, ten things she liked about herself and ten things she would change about herself if she could. The items from each column that overlapped were coalesced and the remaining items were placed on a large sheet of paper displaying those that were related to each other. We found that one item, "depressed person," was core to who she was with the largest number of links to other items. I called those items memes. We set about establishing a new core, "human rights activist," which united some memes (e.g. kid's rights, animal rights) that had led to outbursts 3 fuelled by her anger. We then developed a plan whereby she would shift some memes (e.g writer, angry person) from a depressed person focus to a human rights focus. We set about eliminating other memes that surrounded "depressed person", such as "ugly." Over the course of about seven months, the new core we had developed became increasingly central to her self definition while those memes surrounding and presumably supporting her "depressed person" meme became fewer in number. We were then able to eliminate "depressed person" from her identity and reframe it as an emotional state that may sometimes affect us without it being who we are. She subsequently scored within the non-clinical range on a standardized test of suicide risk and therapy was terminated. A year later, her mother called to say that the youth was doing well in her new school with new friends and had a grade point average in the 90s.
This intervention was not well-grounded in theory. In a sense, it involved a desperate act of a therapist who had tried what he knew without effect and did not believe he could, in good conscience, re-refer this girl once again. I had little idea about the structure of the self. I used the term "meme" without understanding its structure or how one meme might be able to exert an attractive force on another, and I suspected my method of mapping was inadequate: too directive and idiosyncratic. I understood, however, that the self is central to whom we are and my previous training in psychology and social work had given little concrete grounding in this concept. I was inspired to undertake this research and began applying to universities with that goal in mind. I set out to answer two fundamental questions: "Can this self be mapped in a way that has meaning for those engaged in the mapping process?" and "May this process lead to increased self- understanding and empowerment?" It was hoped that the answers to these questions would increase our understanding of how the self is structured in the minds of individuals, thereby providing psychologists with another tool to better understand and assist their clients. 4
The Domain of Inquiry
Practical context. It was hoped that the tool of memetic self-mapping, when developed sufficiently, would enable counsellors to visualize the dynamic process needed to effect client change. As a form of psycho-education, it was to allow clients to see themselves in a way that could empower them in effecting self change.
Theoretical context. This research united elements of neuro-psychology, social constructionism, Adlerian Psychotherapy, and cognitive-behavioral thought in its model of how the self is constructed. These approaches were seen as complimentary, each describing the phenomena from a different perspective. Although this paper used the following practical definition of the self while examining these perspectives, the method used (transcendental realism) allowed for the modification and elaboration of such definitions during the course of the research:
By 'self we commonly mean the particular being any person is, whatever it is about each
of us that distinguishes you or me from others, draws the parts of our existence together,
persists through changes, or opens the way to becoming who we might or should be.
(Seigel, 2005, p. 3)
Social context. In line with the theoretical context of this study, the self was viewed as the core of a worldview that may be presented as "individual culture". This individual culture is embedded within family, community and societal cultures; thus, this study sought to advance our knowledge of how cultures impact on the self with resultant increases in multicultural understanding and the dynamics inherent in the acculturation process.
Research context. The assumption of the method used in this research is that there is a reality independent of one's interpretations. Research is a process of approximating that reality 5 by testing hypotheses, inducing patterns from data, understanding phenomena through rich descriptions, and fusing our knowledge with those of others to develop syntheses. The beginning of such research is recognizing subjectivity and contextual effects that are embedded within interpretation. This research may be viewed as an exploratory and interpretive study with the goals of describing, with the aid of a mapping technique, the participant experience of self, and relating that experience to existing theoretical understandings.
Discursive/linguistic context. Richard Dawkins (1976) defined the term "meme" as an elemental unit of culture that is capable of being transferred from one brain to another. Robles-
Diaz-de-Leon (2003) elaborated a certain architecture for the meme that includes constructive, affective and behavioral components. It is within this linguistic context that this research is situated, and in my opinion, it is this formulation that allows for the possibility of mapping the self with some hope for trustworthiness and authenticity. In short, the richness inherent in the concept of the meme gives us the potential for producing self-maps that have sufficient depth as to resonate with those for whom those maps are produced. "Resonation," in this context, refers to a feeling that a individual graphic representation or "map" corresponds closely or harmoniously with who they were.
The Purpose of this Study
This study had three main purposes:
1) To develop an understanding of how the self of participants may be represented
visually in a way that resonates with them;
2) To assess how child and adult transitions may be reflected in current maps of the self;
and, 6
3) To better understand whether the participants in the study experienced a sense of
empowerment as a result of the process.
These three purposes were united in this study to reflect the dynamic nature of the self.
A map may be seen as a static representation in a moment of time, the utility of which may be determined by contextual flow between past and anticipated future events. Thus, the self-map envisioned in this research was a momentary representation of an evolving dynamic. By examining past self-transitions and feelings of empowerment associated with possible future transitions, we sought to situate individual self-maps temporally with some sense of their potential utility.
The Potential Significance of this Study
It was envisioned that with the success of this study, counsellors would be able to avail themselves of an additional psycho-educational tool to empower clients in their self-change efforts. While considering their transitional history that led to a current self, clients may be empowered to engage in the consideration of possible future selves. The potential for memetic self-mapping extends beyond counselling to examining similarities and differences in self- definition between genders, cultures, and minority groupings. Of particular interest, for multicultural counsellors, is the assessment of cross-cultural differences in self-definition between individualist and collectivist cultures. Thus, while this study has the practical goal of developing a system of visually representing the self, it must be grounded in current theoretical understandings with the corollary that some understandings may be supported, privileged or extended as a result of this research. 7
Research Questions
My major research question was, "How do people experience co-constructing maps of their self-identity using a memetic process?" Four sub-questions flowed from this general question:
1) What cognitions, feelings and new insights, if any, present during the co-construction
of self-maps?
2) What cognitions, feelings and new insights, if any, present on the completion and
review of these maps?
3) How do participants in this process relate the co-construction of their self-maps to
childhood and adult transitions they may have experienced?
4) What feelings as may relate to empowerment or lack of empowerment, present during
a discussion of the felt meaning of these memetic self maps? 8
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW
Descartes is frequently seen as the father of both modern science and contemporary understandings of the self (Seigel, 2005; Taylor, 1989). Cartesian dualism with its separation of the body from the mind or soul (Descartes, 1643/1990), was firmly grounded in the traditions of the Roman Catholic Church which, in turn, built on classical Greek philosophy (Doherty, 1999;
Wilson, 1997). Both Aristotelian and Platonic schools equated the self with the soul or mind which was, in turn, seen as a spiritual force animating a physical being (Hutcheon, 1996; Seigel,
2005; Taylor, 1989). The Aristotelian man had vegetative, sensitive and intellectual souls, which collectively corresponds to our modern idea of self with its bodily, relational and cognitive elements. Platonic souls, however, were unidimensional spirits from a higher world trapped in bodies of matter (Doherty, 1999). Descartes( 1643/1990) reasoned that this soul could observe the world with detached disinterest because it was not of the world, it was of God. Thus,
Cartesian dualism separated the mind from the world on both logical and religious grounds
(Pickering & Skinner, 1990). Descartes (1643/1990) held that the body was subject to the laws of nature and could be studied scientifically while the soul or mind was beyond scientific study.
Although Charles Taylor (1989) argued that the Platonic "Ideas" are qualitatively different from the Cartesian "ideas," both Plato and Descartes viewed the mind or soul as the activating and animating agent in a duality.
Western thought subsequent to Descartes divided "soul" from "mind," with the term
"soul" referring to a religious entity beyond the scope of science, while the study of the "mind" was deemed to be the realm of psychology (Hutcheon, 1996; James, 1890). The self then became understood as a psychological representation of who we are, although the existence of indexical pronouns suggests that people developed mental representations of themselves much earlier (Gazzaniga, 2000; Harre, 1989; Jaynes, 1976). As James (1890) surmised, "The thought is the thinker... for if my thinking is confused, I am confused: if my thought is blocked, I am blocked"
(p. 401).
This review focuses on psychological perspectives of the self from the time of James.
Current perspectives are grouped within the categories of stable, neurological, constructivist, behaviourist, and social constructionist selves. This is followed by the attempt to develop a comprehensive or composite model of the self grounded in the work of William James. A memetic perspective is examined for its compatibility to unite with various perspectives in forming an integrated conceptualization of the self. This is followed by an examination of attempts to represent or "map" the self within context. The chapter concludes with the examination of the multicultural implications of considering the self to be a cultural construct.
Current Perspectives on the Self
Rom Harre (1991) despaired at the difficulties inherent in the study the self:
"The self that manages and monitors its own actions and thoughts is never disclosed as
such to the person whose Self it is. It is protected from even the possibility of being
studied empirically by its very nature. Whenever it tries to catch a glimpse of itself it
must become invisible to itself, since it is that very self which would have to catch that
very glimpse. It is known only through reason. It is never presented in experience." (pp.
52-53)
The purpose of this review is not to trace the philosophical debates involving dualism and monism that have their roots in early Greek thought, but to review research into the self during the modern era. Much of that research draws on the work of William James (1892/1999), who made a seemingly secular reply to the dualism of Descartes (1643/1990) by postulating the 10 complementary existence of an objective "me" coupled with a subjective "I" in a singular self.
The Jamesian "I" and "me" were seen to be different sides of a unitary self that could at once observe and be observed. James' (1892/1999) notion that the subjective "I" includes elements of continuity, distinctness and volition has become the basis of much research into the self (Damon
& Hart, 1988; Kwiatkowska, 1990; Leary & Tangney, 2003). Since the Jamesian self includes that which may be seen to be me, and that which Harre (1991) had difficulty seeing, it remains an encompassing definition, and it provides a framework within which modern perspectives of the self may be situated. Another theorist whose ideas about the structure of the self have also affected modern conceptualizations of the self is Alfred Adler, and we begin with his model of a self whose stability may need to be challenged.
The Stable Self
The idea that the self exhibits stability has received considerable support (Blustein &
Noumair, 1996; Corey & Corey, 2003; Jopling, 2000; Savickas, 2001). One of the fundamental principals of Adlerian psychotherapy is that this inherent stability must be challenged in therapy
(Dinkmeyer, Pew, & Dinkmeyer, 1979; Mosak, 1979; Thomas & Marchant, 1993). A characteristic, like stability, cannot be discussed without reference to that which is stable or open to change; therefore, it is necessary to discuss Adler's conceptualization of the self as a totality.
This is followed by two investigations into the stability of the self. Kwiatkoska (1990) tested the notion that the selves of children entering school would exhibit decreased self-stability due to this transition. Bridges (1980, 2001) returned to the theme that self-stability was problematic in dealing with adult transitions. 11
The Adlerian Self
The indivisible individual. Adler called his school of thought "Individual Psychology", from the Latin word "individuum", meaning the indivisible individual. He referenced western philosophic thought in describing his view of the self:
Individual psychology goes beyond the views of philosophers like Kant and the newer
psychologists and psychiatrists who have accepted the idea of the totality of the human
being. Very early in my work, I found him to be a unity! The foremost task of Individual
Psychology is to prove this unity in each individual - in his thinking, feeling, acting; in
his so-called conscious and unconscious - in every expression of his personality. (Adler,
1967, p. 69)
In the Adlerian view, the self is best understood as a working and stable unity. Dividing this self into conceptual subcategories, in effect creating multiple selves, is not useful as such sub-categorization leads to a pseudo-dynamic masking the direction of that unity. Therapy, from this perspective, is more about assisting individuals to reach their potential than it is about balancing unconscious forces and neurotic tendencies.
Once the client understands that his actions, cognitions and feelings are consistent with an underlying unitary belief system, then that system is challenged in therapy. The self consisting of "the convictions I have about who I am" (Adler as quoted in Mosak, 1979 p. 58) was considered to be core to the client's "worldview," and both self and worldview exhibited stability over time. Adler (1927/1957) declared that the "secret goal" of childhood, which involved the child compensating for being in an inferior position, was identical with his attitude in maturity;
"In short, it was proven with astonishing clarity that, from the standpoint of psychic movements, 12 no change had taken place" (p. 17). An adult self is recognizable from its childhood antecedents with a resultant sense of continuity.
The drive for perfection. There is, according to Adler (1967), an innate process of striving for perfection that may be used to engage the client in developmental transitions of the self. It was this declaration, that human beings are born with a teleological impulse, that led Albert Ellis to proclaim Adler as "one of the first humanistic psychologists" (Mosak, 1979 p. 51). This belief is also one of the most difficult for Adler to defend. There clearly are individuals who do not appear to be striving for perfection. To Adler these individuals are discouraged. Therapy is a process of encouragement that allows the client to regain this sense of striving which, in practical terms, means having the confidence to become the best that they can be.
The insecure individual. Adler (1927/1957) identified four motivations that lead to mistaken goals exhibited by insecure or discouraged individuals: attention, power, revenge and withdrawal. People whose motivation for behavior is attention getting have the belief that they are only important when they are noticed by others. It was painful for such individuals to be not noticed as children. They may have engaged in annoying or disruptive behaviors to gain the attention they crave. The behaviors may cease, briefly, with correction, but even punishment is acknowledgement of existence, hence the behaviors begin anew. Adults have different ways of satisfying a need for attention; however, the goal remains the same. It was this dynamic that led
Adler to declare that the "secret goal" of childhood remains as the individual matures to adulthood. Similarly, the goal of people motivated by power is the feeling of security obtained by having power over others. Those whose motivation is revenge 'know' that they have significance when they engage in vengeful acts for real or imagined wrongs. 13
Adler's fourth insecure motivation, withdrawal, appears to be unlike the other three in that the goal of such an individual is not to establish significance but to become invisible. As
Adler's student, Rudolph Driekurs, put it, "The seemingly stupid child is frequently a discouraged child who uses stupidity as a means of avoiding any effort whatsoever" (1964 p.
63). Recognizing this inconsistency in Adler's model Driekurs reframed "Withdrawal" to
"Display of Inadequacy" with the suggestion that the discouraged individual is activity showing his inabilities to lessen performance anxiety and to force others to do for them (pp. 63-65). While this reframing of Adler is clever, and can demonstrably be seen to apply to some individuals, it fails to account for the possibility that there may be some who genuinely want to withdraw from society without the hope that others will do for them.
The therapeutic process. Psychotherapy, as opposed to mere counselling, necessarily includes a review of childhood experiences to produce insight into the client's "secret goal"
(Driekurs, 1964; Mosak, 1979). Rational and behavioral means are then used to assist the client to a more self-secure level of functioning. Sometimes a client's "secret goal," when it is consciously understood, can be incorporated into a socially useful plan. For example, a person whose belief had been that significance is achieved only when one is noticed could become an entertainer. On the other hand, the goal of therapy is help ensure that self-significance is achieved whether the individual receives attention or not.
Adler took the position that the client is the expert on his or her self (Ansbacher &
Ansbacher, 1956). Behavioral 'homework' assignments given to the client were viewed as the collaborative effort of at least two experts working together - the therapist who was understood to have some expertise in the change process and the client. Later, the two experts evaluate the results of behavioral intervention and jointly plan subsequent experiments to further conscious 14 goals based on the secure motivations exhibited by the client's ideal self. In the end, the client must gauge success because only the client can be responsible for change.
The self in gestation. To understand the individual, we must understand the family that nurtured the developing self of that individual. The family atmosphere may, for example, be authoritarian, rejective or inconsistent. Trauma may have occurred. Alternatively, families may be supportive, loving and nurturing. It is not so much the actual events that affect the child's self- definition, but the child's interpretation of those events:
But, although children may be good observers, they are often very poor interpreters; that
is, they come to conclusions about themselves and life that are based on faulty judgments.
As they create their guidelines and establish their blueprints for the future, children tend
to operate with an 'only if absurdity. For example, a child may conclude 'Only if I am
pleasing (or in control, or comfortable, or good, or competent, or right), can I really
belong.' (Dinkmeyer et al., 1979 p. 19)
A child is in an inferior position, and the child's goal is to compensate for that weakness by establishing a role within the family. An oldest child, reared in an authoritarian family that emphasizes educational achievement, will likely attempt to embody those values. The second oldest will be forced to find a niche not already occupied by the oldest. If the second oldest believes the situation is not fair, s/he may pursue the goal of bringing forth awareness of injustice, or the child may rebel. These goals of childhood tend to become fixed patterns as life goals. These goals, in turn, are situated within a general framework for understanding reality
Adler called "worldview".
Adler answered the observation that children growing up in the same family have different personalities with the astute observation that they really do not grow up in the same 15 family (1929 pp. 192-196). The oldest child is in a family where he or she had been an only child. The second oldest is never in that situation. Adler observed that oldest children tend to be more achievement orientated and conservative, while second oldest children tend to be more rebellious with respect to the family constellation. Often the eldest and the third eldest will form alliances against the middle child. The youngest tends to be in the "most favoured" position and may become manipulative.
Research has supported Adler's theory of birth order with respect to the intergenerational transmission of values (Kulik, 2004), gender (Koch, 1956), and Myers-Briggs typology
(Stansbury & Coll, 1998). Frank Sulloway demonstrated that later-born scientists were "7.3 times more likely to support scientific innovation than was his own eldest sibling" (1996 p. 51).
He also demonstrated that while members of scientific elites tended to be firstborn, those that led
Kuhnian paradigm shifts in science were usually laterborn.
The relativistic subjectivity ofworldview. Although we may engage in reality testing with varying degrees of success, our perception of the world and of our place in it is necessarily imperfect. Our worldview acts as a cognitive filter through which our experiences are mediated;
"...the facts of one's life are not as important as one's perception of those facts. It is assumed that each individual perceives the world in a unique fashion" (Adler quoted in Thomas & Marchant,
1993 p. 8).
Adler believed that all behavior is purposeful. By understanding the client's worldview, we come to understand the purpose of his or her behavior. A worldview that is faulty is defined as one that leads to self-defeating behaviors. Once the client's worldview and associated mistaken behaviors and goals are brought into the client's consciousness, change can begin to happen. It is this relativistic aspect of self that allows for its re-engineering. An individual who 16 lacks a feeling of self-efficacy, for example, can reframe his or her self-definition to recognize a greater sense of empowerment. This self construction is not entirely internal, but appears to depend on interaction with others (Jopling, 2000; Martin & Sugarman, 2001).
As we have seen, Adler viewed the self as a unity, comprised of biological and cultural factors, and mental health, ultimately, manifests itself in social interest (Mosak, 1979). Social interest stemmed from our relative weakness as individuals. We are dependant on the collectivity to thrive; therefore it is in our interest to promote the collective well-being (Adler, 1967). The remaining two pillars of Adlerian holism are work and intimacy. Work is defined as doing things that have utility as defined by our selves. We need to take pride in what we do. Intimacy includes recognizing emotion in our selves and being able to communicate that emotion to trusted others.
Limitations of Adler's approach. Adler's concept of the self has been summarized as: a
"highly personalized, subjective system through which a person interprets or gives meaning to his experiences.... he is a self-conscious individual, who is capable of planning and guiding his actions with full awareness of their meaning for his own self-realization" (Hamachek, 1971, p.
50). Adler based his understanding of the self on his own experience as a therapist. Without denying this experience, it may be that he was looking for early determinants of 'soul life' because he was heavily influenced by his own unhappy childhood. His conviction of a childhood-determined structure, coupled with the act of looking for evidence covering a temporal distance of years, almost guaranteed finding such evidence. Hence, we cannot be sure from Adler's (1927/1957, 1929, 1967) testimony how universal his findings are, nor can we be certain with respect to generalizations he made with respect to his own clients. The structure of the Adlerian self, including the key element of self-stability, requires confirmation and possible extension from further research. 17
A Quantitative Study Into the Stability of Self
Kwiatkowska (1990) hypothesized that the onset of elementary school education would challenge two dimensions that underlie the sense of personal identity: continuity and distinctiveness. She hypothesized that the selves of children entering school would display instability as compared to the selves of pre-school children. Her terminology displays the relatedness between Jamesian "continuity" and the Adlerian notion of self-stability. The research is included in this discussion because it speaks to that stability and not to the more comprehensive Jamesian model presented later in this chapter.
Recognizing epistemological dangers inherent in forced choice instruments,
Kwiatkowska developed a semi-structured interview format using open-ended questions (see appendix A) to assess self-concept in 102 six and eight year-olds. Responses were coded for those that indicated self-concept change, self-concept stability, self-concept change and stability, and no response. Using the z statistic, the null hypothesis was not rejected for either the
'change' or the 'stability' categories but older children were more likely (to a .05 level of confidence) to indicate both options in one answer. The answers were then re-coded for those that indicated the child was the same as others, and those that were different. The null hypothesis was rejected with respect to the older children who more likely to indicate a difference between themselves and their peers (z=2.97, p<.01). The study also measured self-esteem by having children pick a circle in a column of circles, totalling the numbers who picked each circle and using correlational (t-scores) comparing the two groups. It was concluded that self-esteem decreased with age (t=2.444, p<.02).
By including continuity and distinctness in her study, Kwiatkowska (1990) avoided the problem of self-concept studies that focus on only the most measurable aspect of the self, the 18
Jamesian 'me' (Katona-Sallay, 1990; Oosterwegel & Oppenheimer, 1990). Finally, her findings side-stepped the frequent charge of postmodernists that quantitative scientific findings are inherently subjective (Gergen, 2001; Neimeyer, 1995; Strong, 2002) - the results were contrary to her expectations. She found that despite the personal turmoil of leaving a home environment the elementary children maintained and even enhanced a stable sense of self.
Kwiatkowska's (1990) method was not without limitations. She avoided the usual paper- and-pencil self-esteem instruments by having the children select a circle from a column of five circles to represent themselves. She reasoned that children who selected uppermost circles would have higher self-esteem than those who selected circles lower in the column. The assumption that 'up' is better is an individual one and separates a global concept (self-esteem) from the contexts in which that concept may be applied. The statistical analysis literally indicates that the older children were more likely to pick a lower circle in the context of the interview, the meaning of which is a matter of interpretation. Her method of analyzing the open-ended questions used in her study involved counting answers that she placed into one of four categories without measuring the strength, quality, or direction of those answers. The responses "I always like a joke" and "I behave better than most children" were equally indicative of stability in this study.
While we may agree this study demonstrates that something associated with the self was stable, we are left unsure as to how that something corresponds to a total self even at the level of childhood development.
Self-Stability in Counselling
Stability of the self in vocational counselling. In his work with adults at the level of career and vocational counselling, Savikas (2001) noted a self-stability with respect to dispositions which represent a "core structure" that "influences construing and interpreting the world" (p. 19
306). He offered Holland's (1997) RIASEC model of personality types as "a practical structure for identifying the personalogical and vocational results of an individual's efforts at self- organization" (p. 306), and suggested that these personality types have shown longitudinal stability in his field. Trait research such as that advanced by Holland (1997) and Savikas (2001) begins from premise that the self is a collection of personality characteristics such as shrewdness and friendliness that are based in genetic inheritance and life experience. Edley (1993) identified the trait perspective with an enduring self and contrasted it with an identity perspective where the self is defined according to one's roles. Thus, the stability that Savikas (2001) reported was based on one perspective and other perspectives are possible.
An ethno-graphic account of personal transition. Bridges (2001) saw the stability of the self as a problem. He had become expert in transitions while working with clients, and developed the idea that transitions involve the feeling of being in limbo, in a "neutral zone," while "a new self is gradually being formed" (p. 3) and this feeling leads people to resist beneficial transitions.
He reported, however, that he did not really 'know' transitions until he experienced the infidelity of his wife, and her subsequent death.
The only way you acquire this kind of knowledge - which is called 'wisdom' to
distinguish it from that which is acquired in the ordinary way - is to have gone through a
profound life-transition, or rather to go through a number of them in the process of aging.
Only after you have done that do you see the old world with new eyes and understand it
in depth, (p. 183)
Bridges (2001) proposed a three-stage model of transition, beginning with an ending, living through a neutral zone, and ending with a new beginning. He further postulated that transitions can be developmental, in the sense that the individual makes a conscious decision to change his or her self in some ways, or they may be reactive to an unforeseen crisis or events where the direction of self-change is imposed by circumstance. He predicted that in those reactive cases the individual will tend toward minimal change to maintain the stability of the self.
He suggested to his clients that they resist the tendency to self-stability:
I had always told my clients that if you let go of only the external (the person and the
relationship itself), but didn't let go of the internal associations that had come to cluster
around it, you would just find another person or relationship and attach the same homes,
fears, dreams, and beliefs to that one. That way, you would go through a change but not a
transition-and you could count on ending up right back where you started.(p.59)
Bridges (2001) suggested that people in transitional situations would be advised to let go of their subjective realities and identities so as to create more effective worldviews and selves.
Transitions take longer than change because the former involves the development of "a replacement reality and a new self (Bridges, 2001 p. 3).Once we have said goodbye to our old self, we will be in a neutral zone, a condition similar to grieving, while the new self is being constructed. "The most significant transitions involve a time in hell" (Bridges, 1980 p. 156).
Elders, who have achieved wisdom by having gone through the transitional processes themselves, may serve as guides to others.
The notion that transitions involve a change to the self would resonate with those
Adlerians (Mosak, 1979) who draw a similar distinction between therapy and counselling: therapy involves a change to the self, while counselling involves changes to behavior without more fundamental changes to the individual. Bridges' observation that people often "prefer to make changes so they won't have to make transitions" (2001 p. 17), might also find some favor 21 with Adlerian therapists, although Bridges (2001) seems to be suggesting total self change while in Adlerian therapy the changes to the self are more incremental.
Implications of Studies Into the Stable Self
Subjective and anecdotal experience whether explicit, as in the form of auto-ethnography, or implicit as in Adler's (1927/1957) research, may become narrowly focussed with the researcher coming to identify with a particular viewpoint to the exclusion of other equally valid interpretations. Essentially, this type of reporting leaves us unsure as to what we have. We cannot know whether the experience is generalizable, nor can we know what elements in the experience produced what effect. For example, it may be that the Adlerian success in psychotherapy has little to do with the discussion of birth order and much to do with the process in which the discussion is embedded.
All of the research reviewed in this short selection into the stable self, whether qualitative or quantitative, has been partial and open to subjective perceptual limitations. It has been suggested that auto-ethnographies have value if they resonate in some way with readers
(Bochner, 1997; Ellis & Bochner, 2000). Similarly, we have the testimony of numerous clients who have reported that they feel helped by Adlerian psychotherapy (Mosak, 1979; Wampold,
2000) regardless of the mechanism involved. Still, results that are counter-intuitive, such as those reported in the Kwiatkoska (1990) study, can be powerful and research should allow for such
'surprises'.
A self that exhibits sufficient stability may be mapped in the manner proposed by this research, and transitional changes to that self may also be noted. The proposal to explore participant's experience of self-mapping, with a focus on incorporating personal recollections of transitions, allows for the examination of questions of self-stability beyond that afforded by 22 personal anecdotal methods while avoiding the constraining influence of prior categorization common to quantitative methods.
The Neurological Self
Wilder Penfield (1975/1990) was the Montreal neurosurgeon who first demonstrated that stimulation of particular areas of the neocortex can lead to motor activity, while the stimulation of other "interpretive" areas leads to "the sequential record of consciousness, a record that had been laid down during the patient's earlier experience" (p. 119). Penfield noted that irrespective of the area of neocortical stimulation and the result, the patient, lacking agency, also lacked the sense that his or her self was involved in the process:
"When I have caused a conscious patient to move his hand by applying an electrode to
the motor cortex of one hemisphere, I have often asked him about it. Invariably his
response was: I didn't do that. You did.'... When I caused the record of the stream of
consciousness to run again and so presented to him the record of his past experience, he
marvelled that he should be conscious of the past as well as the present.... He assumed at
once that somehow the surgeon was responsible for the phenomenon, but he recognized
the details of his own past experience." (p. 123)
Penfield (1975/1990) failed to find the (Jamesian 'I') self located anywhere in the brain.
He concluded, "There is no place in the cerebral cortex where electrical stimulation will cause a patient to believe or decide" (p 124). While memory may be stimulated, and self-concept resides in memory, and while Penfield's patients were conscious that they were recounting their personal memories, it was still not 'they' who were, in some important sense, 'doing it'. Computer-like, they were a mechanism subject to the will of an operator. Penfield's (1975/1990) quest to find the location of the self somewhere in the brain reminds us of Descarte's (1643/1990) belief that 23 the soul is located in the thalamus. Both failed to visualize the possibility that the self, soul or mind may not be a physical thing in a location but a process or product of mental activity.
The Feeling of Me
The neurological self research of Damasio (1999) involved careful observations taken while working with patients who suffered from Alzheimer's, epilepsy, akinetic mutism, and anosognosia. His observation that "Consciousness may be separated from wakefulness and low- level attention but it cannot be separated from emotion" (pp. 15-16) was based on observations of patients in care without controlled conditions. His observation that there are two types of self, an autobiographical self necessary for reflective thinking, and an emotion-based "proto-self," that is "a transient entity that is ceaselessly re-created for each and every object with which the brain interacts" (p. 17) is an interpretation of the behaviors of a unique set of people. Damasio's
(1999) answer to the question "Why do we have a self?" is that it is not essential for life but that a knowing self "is good for extending the mind's reach and, in so doing, improving the life of the organism whose mind has that higher reach" (pp. 302 - 303), is based on his own reflectivity and not on that of his patients who exhibited little of this quality.
Neurological research is often thought to be quantitative and Damasio's (1999) identification of four neural centers (two limbic and two neocortical) by which the body unconsciously maps out its states falls within this tradition. His suggestions that this mapping creates a "proto-self, a feeling of a "me" and a "not me", and that this moment-to-moment feeling necessitates self-definition are experientially based interpretations, not unlike the process used by Adler (1927/1957) in developing his theories. Damasio's statement, "You know that you exist because the narrative exhibits you as protagonist in the act of knowing," (p. 172) has a qualitative ring to it. 24
Bjorklund & Blasi (2005) provided support for Damasio's position by noting that theory
of mind develops at about the same time and in the same sequence in most children around the
world. They reasoned, "This relatively narrow age range and its likely universality are consistent
with the domain-specificity perspective of Evolutionary Psychology, supporting the existence of
a series of highly specialized modules that develop over the preschool years" (pp. 840-841
Within the tradition of Western philosophical thought, Damasio's (1999) proto-self is a neurological analogue of Kant's "transcendental self - that which must have prior existence so that self-recognition can occur in the mirror of experience. Kant (in Seigel, 2005) called the
structure that results from this experience the "empirical self, while Damasio referred to it as an
"autobiographical self based on a personal narrative. Both turned Descartes (1643/1999) on his head in that the latter viewed the cogito and self as functions of a soul that came to inhabit and direct a physical body, while the former viewed the conscious self to be the result of the activity of that same body.
Split Brains and Split Selves
Gazzaniga (2000) reviewed a series of experiments in which he was involved that were based on the severing of the corpus callosum in adult subjects. This allowed the experimenters to communicate visually with each hemisphere without the other hemisphere being aware of that communication. In one such experiment, conducted with fellow neurosurgeon Roger Sperry, the patient's left hemisphere was shown a chicken and his right hemisphere was shown a snow fall.
Each hemisphere was asked to select a picture from a group of pictures that went with what they saw. The left hemisphere picked a claw and the right picked a snow shovel. When presented with both choices and asked why he made those choices patient P.S. stated, "Oh, that's simple.
The claw goes with the chicken and you need a shovel to clean out the chicken shed." (Gazzaniga, 2000, Studies on Consciousness, para. 5). The patient's left hemisphere did not have to integrate snow into its explanation because it was not aware of the card showing a snowfall.
Similar experiments with three other patients showed a left hemispheric ability narrate a plausible story from disconnected pieces of information.
Pinker (2002) concluded this research demonstrated that each hemisphere generates a
"self," with the left weaving a coherent but often false account of behavior. He described the unified self as an "illusion", and said that Gazzaniga and Sperry had "literally cut the self in two" with each hemisphere exercising "free will without the other one's advice or consent". He added,
"Even more disconcertingly, the left hemisphere constantly weaves a coherent but false account of the behavior chosen without its knowledge by the right," and he generalized the results suggesting, "The conscious mind - the self or soul - is a spin doctor, not the commander in chief." (p. 43).
Gazzaniga (2000) offered an interpretation of his results that differed from Pinker's
(2002). He described the left hemisphere as "a device that begins by asking how one thing relates to another", and suggests that such a device "cannot help but give birth to the concept of self.
Surely one question the device would ask is, "Who is solving all these problems? Let's call it
'me'-and away it goes!" (Implications, para. 16). No selves were severed in this research because the self is a product of left hemispheric activity.
In a related experiment, Wolford, Miller & Gazzaniga (2000) flashed pictures of red and green cards at left and right hemispheres of two patients who had their corpus callosi severed in treatment for epilepsy. The trials were conducted in five blocks of 100 trials each with 75% of the cards flashed being red. Patients were told that the cards would appear in random order, and that they should try to predict the next card. Patient J.W.'s right hemispheric guesses varied 1.38 26 standard deviations from the pattern presented in the previous set to a 95% confidence. The criterion for the left hemisphere was 0.651 +/- 0.036. For patient V.P., the criterion for the right hemisphere was -1.83 +/- 0.25 and the left was -0.31 +/- 0.033. In summary, both came close to matching the pattern previously shown with the left hemisphere while their right hemispheres tended to repeat the same answer. In the authors' interpretation, the right hemispheres chose a strategy of picking the red cards ensuring a 75% success rate while the left hemispheres adopted a strategy of finding a pattern even though they had been told there was no pattern. Gazzaniga's
(2000) further interpretation was that the self results from a left hemispheric attempt at interpretation. His data, however, is somewhat more limited in its scope. Two individuals who suffer from epilepsy were shown to respond differently to a two-choice predictive matching task when using their left as opposed to their right hemispheres. Gazzaniga's further interpretation is an extrapolation that is consistent with the data, but its relevance to people whose corpus callosi are not severed is a matter of interpretation.
Measuring Brain Activity
Using positron emission tomography, Craik, Moroz, Moscovitch, Stuss, Winocur, et. al.,
(1999) demonstrated how trait adjectives referenced under four separate PET scan conditions resulted in a unique pattern of neocortical activation under self-referencing conditions. While this experiment involved whole-brained individuals, it cannot show that the pattern of neocortical activation actually is the self.
Also using a PET scan technology, Schwartz & Begley (2002) found that "thinking about moving produced brain changes comparable to those triggered by actually moving" (p. 217).
They inferred that physical changes in brain depend on attention focussed on a particular activity, and not necessarily the physical performance of that activity. They concluded, "The role of attention throws into stark relief the power of mind over brain, for it is a mental state
(attention) that has the ability to direct neuroplasticity" (p. 339).
By measuring electromyogram changes in subjects, Libet (1985) found that an act, as measured by muscle tenseness, typically begins approximately 250 milliseconds before the decision to act, as measured by cerebral activity, is made. Libet concluded, "There is no separate self jumping into the synapses and starting things off. My brain does not need me" (p. 226).
Libet (1999) left room for free will, however, by suggesting that the self still has time
(approximately 150 milliseconds) to veto an act once the process has started. An interpretation of
Libet's work was offered by Susan Blackmore (1999):
The implication is that consciousness does not direct the action. Conscious awareness
comes all right, but not in time. The hand is removed from the flame before we
consciously feel the pain. We have whacked the tennis ball back before we can be
conscious of it coming towards us. We have avoided the puddle before we were
conscious of its existence. Consciousness follows on later. Yet we still feel that T
consciously did these things, (p. 227)
Limits to the Interpretations of the Neurological Data
Penfield (1975/1990) could not find any one area in the neocortex that triggered a sense of self, and when movement or memories were triggered by neocortical stimulation the patient invariably reported that he or she was not doing the moving or remembering, it was the physician who was "doing it" (p. 119). This does not preclude the possibility that the self exists elsewhere1. An interpretation of his experiments is that a sense of willing is tied to the sense of self and that self does not reside in any one location in the brain. 28
Damasio's (1999) theory that the self is an autobiographical construct grounded to the body by emotion is consistent with Penfield's work, but his theory is an interpretation of what is normal by observing patients who are abnormal with respect to the self, and therefore cannot preclude other possible interpretations. The work of Gazzaniga (2000) and his various confederates faces a similar limitation. People do not normally walk around with severed corpus callosi and even if the suggestion that the self is a result of left hemispheric activity is correct, there is no way of knowing whether the self so produced is the same in individuals with unsevered brains. While it has been established that the self imputes after-the-fact intentionality in certain laboratory conditions (Gazzaniga, 2000; Libet, 1985; Wolford et al., 2000), there can be no certainty that this applies to all conditions. It is possible, for example, that the self is capable of before-the-fact intentionality when engaged in reflectivity.
In summation, the neurological research cited supports the notion that the self does not reside as a homunculus somewhere in the brain and may exist as a result of brain activity. Such a view would be consistent with Adler's definition that "The self is the convictions I have about who I am." (as quoted in Mosak, 1979, p. 58). On the other hand, the research also supports the interpretation that the stability of the self may be an illusion, an after-the-fact interpretative rationalization. In any case, the characteristics of a self that exists outside of the brain are beyond the reach of neuroscience.
This proposed research called for an examination of that self that exists in mental operations beyond the normal reach of neuroscience but remains bound by physical and genetic limitations inherent to the human condition. The notion that autobiographical construction may, indeed, be grounded in left-hemispheric interpretation is compatible with the approach used, but such a mental construct would be bounded by the societies in which interpretive selves emerged. 29
The Self in Society
White (1969/1990) said, "Culture is the name of a flow of things and events dependent upon symboling considered in an extra-somatic context.... this means that we must have a new science: a science of culture rather than a science of psychology if we are to understand the determinants of human behavior" (p. 182). This section deals with differing perspectives that situate the self within culture. Constructivists (Neimeyer, 1995; Snow & Anderson, 2003;
Torres, 1990) have emphasized the role the individual has in constructing this self from a menu of possibilities provided by society. Classical behaviorists (Chambless & Goldstein, 1979;
Johnson-Laird, 1988/1990) have taken the apparently opposite view that the self is constructed by the cultural environment surrounding it. Social Constructionists (Shotter, 1997; Wortham,
2001) have emphasized a relational perspective wherein our selves create and are created by culture. We conclude with a survey of attempts to map the self in society (Hartman, 1995;
Lewin, 1943), and these attempts largely flow from constructivist, behavioral or social constructionist perspectives. This section concludes with a discussion of the implications a cultural self would have for cross-cultural perspectives.
The Constructivist Self
Another way of saying the self is the result of left hemispheric brain activity is that we interpret our selves into being. A number of writers, independent of neuroscience, have suggested that we interpretively construct our selves in the form of a narrative (Botella &
Herrero, 2000; Hoyt, 2002; Wortham, 2001). Savickas (2001) elegantly combined narrative, plot, self-reflectivity, agency, and continuance in one schema:
These internalized narratives of the self usually include reflective descriptions about how
the individual adapted to tasks and traumas. These narratives do more than explain where 30
individuals have been and who they hope to become. By constructing a plot, the
narratives address the question of 'Who am I?' The plot explains how they are agentic and
to whom they feel connected. These stories of competence and connection impose a
narrative structure on lived experience, one that explains the purpose and meaning of
life.... The narratives...provide a purposeful self-history that explains how the self of
yesterday became the self of today and will become the anticipated self of tomorrow, (pp.
309-310)
While grounded in his experience in vocational counselling, the Savickas (2001) model has not been tested outside that context. It is not a study per se, but a result of his own reflectivity with unknown applicability beyond his field. Its strength as an interpretation is consistent with existing research, including research which points to an element of stability within self, and to neurological connectivity. It combines two qualities of the Jamesian T (agency and constancy) with autobiographical narrative. Not all constructivist research has been so inclusive.
The main goal of Torres (1990) study of 60 middle class Madrid children was "to describe the course by which children become progressively able to consciously understand themselves and to encode their own characteristics" (p. 32). Torres had children (age 5-9) play a
'hide and seek game' involving dolls and a cardboard house while they related themselves to the game. Self-descriptors were recorded and categorized. Torres observed that psychological characteristics were included in the self-descriptions of older children but this did not correspond with a simultaneous reduction in the use of physical descriptors.
A weakness the qualitative Torres (1990) study shares with many quantitative studies into self-concept (Katona-Sallay, 1990; Oosterwegel & Oppenheimer, 1990), is it focuses exclusively on what James (1892/1999) called the objective self (the Jamesian 'me'). The self as a totality 31 may exhibit different qualities. Further, the observations made may be valid only in the context of the game the researcher had the children play. Finally, the observation, that older children made more psychological self-descriptors than younger children, was not backed by a statistical analysis and, in any case, may be relevant only to the cultural context within which the children were raised. In addition, the Torres (1990) study fails to speak to the possibility that the children were not self-constructing at all; perhaps it was their cultural environment doing the constructing.
Snow & Anderson (2003) tackled this issue of self-construction at variance with the cultural environment, in a study of how people at the bottom of the status system in U.S.
America, the homeless, construct their selves. They engaged in a four-month ethnographic study that revealed a tendency to assert individual identities, in opposition to the social identities attributed to them by a largely unsympathetic public. To construct these identities, homeless people would distance themselves from other homeless, define themselves as part of subgroups that had some unique history (e.g. the "hippie tramps"), embrace 'street honor' (e.g. giving up a job if it meant giving up street friends), embellish personal histories, and/or engage in personal fantasies. The researchers kept statistics on the coping mechanisms used by subgroups of homeless (outsiders, straddlers, recent dislocates) in developing comparisons. For example, the recent dislocates were more likely to distance themselves from all homeless, while straddlers and outsiders would distance themselves from specific groups of homeless (X = 41.88, df = 6, p
<.001). Combining their qualitative observation with such statistical comparisons, Snow &
Anderson (2003) concluded "Many of the homeless are active agents in the construction and negotiation of identities as they interact with others. They do not, in other words, passively accept the social identities their appearance sometimes exudes or into which they are cast" (p. 32
156). The researchers viewed the results as a challenge to Maslow's hierarchy of needs: "Our observations suggest that the salience of such cognitive concerns is not necessarily contingent on the prior satisfaction of physiological survival requisites. Instead, such needs appear to coexist, even at the most rudimentary levels of human existence" (p. 157).
While we cannot know how much impact the researchers had on the homeless they studied, or the amount of embellishment that was prompted by their presence, their use of comparative statistics lends credence to their interpretation. For example, their observation that half the recently dislocated homeless engaged in fantasy while only 10% of the long-term homeless did, lends support to the idea that these homeless were sharing something of their felt selves with the researchers and that they were not responding according to some researcher-set pattern. While Snow & Anderson (2003) built a convincing case that the homeless constructed selves at variance with the 'othering' imposed on them by the macro-society, they did not address the issue of how much of this apparent self-construction resulted from sub-cultural norms. It may not be that the individual self-constructs so much as identifies with a construction provided by a subgroup that in turn filters out competing constructions.
Demonstrating that self-construction has applications to counselling psychology,
Charmaz (1990) used a method she called constructivist grounded theory to study social psychological themes that cut across diverse chronic illnesses. She reported that patients were helped by operationalizing a dialectical self that monitored and externalized messages from the physical self.
It is as if dialogue and negotiation with ultimate validation of the physical self takes
place.... The development of the dialectical self illuminates the active stance that some 33
people take toward their illnesses and their lives. In short, the dialectical self helps people
to keep illness in the background of their lives, (pp. 1171-1172)
Charmaz (1990, 2000) used two definitions of the word 'self in finding dual selves. Like
Pinker (2002), she ascribed a self to an entity (in Pinker's case, the right hemisphere, in
Charmaz's case, the physical body) that does not evidence consciousness. The self of consciousness she labels 'dialectical', and it is this self that gets revised with the help of a therapist.
Self-construction is not entirely an internal or intentional process, but appears to depend on interaction with others (Gergen, 1996; Jopling, 2000; Martin & Sugarman, 2001). The constructivists cited in this paper assume agency without consideration of its limits or from whence it comes. It could be that they assume agency to be a quality of being. If it were true that we were born with an agentic self then that self should have a location such as Descarte's
(1643/1990) pineal gland. Yet, neurological research has failed to find such an agentic self. If the self is a product of our thinking then it, along with the component of agency, is tied to our experiential base and our culture in some ways. This realization led to a renewed examination of the role of culture in the creation and maintenance of the self. Similar to the Adlerians who believe that psychotherapy is a process of assisting the client to change their selves (Mosak,
1979), constructivists believe that we create our selves from a menu of possibilities. The reverse of the constructionist perspective is one that considers self-creation to be illusion: classical behaviorism.
The Socially Constructed Self
"Individuals are moulded to a pattern over which they had no control" (Michel Foucault quoted in Seigel, 2005 p. 624). 34
In 1965, Kenneth Gergen (1996) discovered that he was able to manipulate the self- esteem of university students. Shocked by the implication that the self has no voluntary agency, he ran from quantitative research. His concern that this doctoral research supported the idea that the self is a mere repository of others' attitudes is based on at least two overgeneralizations: 1) that a measure of social effect on one aspect of self, self-concept, translates into a rule about the total self; and, 2) that the context of his research (university students in controlled conditions with a subject matter that was not necessarily seen by them as fundamental or "core" to themselves) did not impact on the results. From this foundation Gergen (1996) made a further assumption, that the method of quantitative research constrains results to support deterministic interpretations.
Classical behaviorists take a deterministic view with respect to social construction:
"Every behavior is considered to be completely determined by antecedent factors, leaving no room for cherished philosophical notions such as free will" (Chambless & Goldstein, 1979, p.
232). With this view "The self represents a functionally unified system of responses" (p. 238), which, using the concept of self as explored in this paper, means no self at all. Are behaviorists merely selfless entities conditioned to utter environmentally determined responses? Chambless &
Goldstein (1979) side-step this question by asserting that none of us will ever know what reality is, which if literally true (thus dismissing the notion of approximate objective reality), would mean that none of us have any basis for making any such propositions. Even though we may not have the logical basis to make truth statements, "The contingencies necessary for self-descriptive behavior are arranged by the community" (B.F. Skinner, 1957, quoted in Hutcheon, 1996, p.
410). The self is a culturally constructed entity. Morality, in Skinner's view, is that part of this unified system that forgoes current reinforcers to avoid future aversive consequences or accepts current aversive consequences for the sake of a future reinforcer.
Stem completion to measure self-esteem. The idea that forced-choice and semantic differential scales constrain the answers of those whose self-concepts are to be measured is well recognized in the literature (Damon & Hart, 1988; Kwiatkowska, 1990). Recognizing the danger of imposing a such a paradigm on research subjects, Smollar & Youniss (1985) used stem completion to assess contextually specific self-esteem. Eighty subjects divided equally in four age groups completed sentences like "When I am with my close friend of the same sex (mother, father) I am ." Responses to these open-ended questions were then coded using a system of content analysis that allowed new codes to emerge from the data. The resultant eight categories: 1) content; 2) extroverted; 3) sociable/cooperative; 4) intimate / sensitive; 5) spontaneous; 6) capable/serious; 7) hostile / withdrawn; 8) anxious met with an inter-rater agreement of 0.94. Following a statistical analysis that included correlations between categories, context and age of the subjects, along with an analysis of variance, the researchers concluded that preadolescents reported changes in self with regard to increases in sociability and cooperation while late adolescents and young adults indicated increases in intimacy and sensitivity. They concluded, "Within the context of close-friend relations, conceptions of self undergo a qualitative change from preadolescence to adolescence. The self-concept of the adolescent incorporates a view of self as an intimate, sensitive, and spontaneous being" (p. 254).
Self-concept in parental contexts showed differences: "The close-friend relation is clearly differentiated from parent-child relations by the relatively high frequency of descriptions of self as intimate/sensitive and spontaneous and the relatively low frequency of descriptions of self as capable/serious, hostile/withdrawn, and anxious" (p. 257). It is not surprising that many adolescents would complete the stem "When I am with a close friend I am..." differently than "When I am with my mother I am...." This result could be interpreted to suggest that self-concept, like Gergen's (1996) self-esteem, is manipulated by those around us. On the other hand, the structure of the stems chosen for completion suggests a definition of self-concept that will change with context and also constrains the result. A stem such as, "When I am with my friend, my mother or my father, I am..." would likely have resulted in different responses. It may be the definitions of self-esteem and self-concept are sufficiently fluid that research into these concepts is invariably constrained by the paradigm from which the researcher operates. Participants in the research then respond with that part of their selves most appropriate to the researcher's definition.
Self efficacy. The concept of self-efficacy implies an individual sense of empowerment over environmental constraints (Bandura, 1991, 1999; Wiedenfeld et al, 1990). Caprara et al.
(1998) tested the hypothesis that perceived self-efficacy to resist peer pressure for high-risk activities is related to transgressive conduct. They surveyed 324 adolescents (aged 14-18 yrs) rating their self-regulatory efficacy, openness of communication with parents, and their involvement in delinquent conduct and substance abuse. The researchers used "structural equation modeling" to conclude that a high sense of efficacy served to ward off negative peer influences and this was accompanied by increased open communication with parents.
The method used by Caprara et al. (1998) involving the administration of five efficacy- based questions such as "How well can you resist peer pressure to drink beer, wine, or liquor?" were answered by adolescents 14 to 18 years of age according to a five point self-rating scale.
They were also administered seven questions, again using a five-point self-rating scale, with respect to how they kept their parents informed of their activities. Transgressive behaviors were 37 measured by using the Delinquency Subscale of the Achenbach and Edelbrock (1978) Child
Behavior Checklist. Substance abuse was measured on a two-point self-disclosure scale. The researchers developed a matrix by computing correlational coefficients for each of six variables: self-efficacy, openness (male), openness (female), monitoring, delinquency, and substance abuse. A negative correlation (-.54, p<.001) was found between self-efficacy and delinquency, while a positive correlation (.45, p<.001) was found between delinquency and substance abuse.
"Structural Equation Monitoring" involved combining measured variables with significant positive correlations to form "latent variables". Thus, delinquency and substance abuse were combined to form a latent variable labelled "antisocial", and male and female communication with mother and father were combined to form "communication". Perceived self-efficacy had a correlation of -.68 (male) and -.48 (female) with the latent variable "antisocial". Communication was positively correlated with perceived self-efficacy (.39, .36) but negatively correlated with
"antisocial."
The concepts of delinquency and even self-efficacy are diffuse, fluid and culturally driven. As Lent (2004) suggested, judgments of well-being and pathology are, ultimately, socially constructed. On the other hand, had the subjects in the Caprara et. al. (1998) study who scored higher on the delinquency measure, operated from a conscious conceptualization of delinquency at variance from that of the dominant cultural society, then their sense of self- efficacy could be expected to be at least as high as those who measured low on the delinquency scale. This consideration lends support to the notion that within the context of the culture in which the study was framed, self-efficacy is linked to more open communication and pro-social behaviors in youth. In any case, the Caprara (1998) study belies Gergen's (1996) fear that quantitative research necessarily implies a deterministic result. However, at least one constraint 38 is evident in the research cited: Quantitative research must focus on something specific that is measurable. This suggests potential difficulties in viewing the self as a unified whole, and in determining relationships between various parts, all with an eye to cultural relativity.
Applied behaviorism. Behavioral conditioning in the form of classical and operant conditioning has been used in the treatment of performance anxiety (Rodebaugh & Chambless,
2004), alcoholism (Trimpey, 1996), trauma (Devilly & Spence, 1999; Gerrity & Solomon, 2002), and conduct problems (Bloomquist & Schnell, 2002). Adlerians take advantage of a similar process by allowing for "homework assignments" that have the effect of conditioning clients to new habituations (Dinkmeyer et al., 1979; Driekurs, 1964). This conditioning process is supplemented with a collaborative cognitive approach. On the other hand, Warwar & Greeberg
(2000), following their review of the literature, concluded that behavioral techniques by themselves may be as effective as combined cognitive-behavioral techniques. This interpretation would imply that a self, capable of higher order cognitive thought, is not needed, at least for those conditions for which a purely behavioral approach has shown efficacy. Vygotsky (in
Wertsch, 1988) may have resolved this issue by positing the emergence of a new psychological process, in this case the development of cognitive processes above those that may be explained by a behavioristic model, necessitated new explanatory principles that operate at the new level of development. Thus, behavioral techniques should be effective for those conditions that are themselves a result of conditioning, and it would be expected that cognitive methods would be less effective for those specific conditions. Conversely, behavioral means may not be as effective in dealing with those conditions for which cognitive thought involving a sense of self emerged. 39
The Social Constructionist Alternative
While James (1892/2003) said, "Man has as many social selves as there are individuals who recognize him" (p. 122), it was George Herbert Mead (1934/2003) who suggested that both the self-as-object and the self-as-subject owed their existence to social construction:
The individual experiences himself...indirectly, from the particular standpoints of other
individual members of the same social group, or from the generalized standpoint of the
social group as a whole to which he belongs. For he enters his own experience as a self or
individual, not directly or immediately, not by becoming a subject to himself, but only in
so far as he first becomes an object of himself just as other individuals are objects to him
or in his experience; and he becomes an object to himself only by taking the attitudes of
other individuals toward himself within a social environment or context of experience
and behavior in which both he and they are involved (p. 126).
Research into self-efficacy (Bandura, 1999; Bandura, Barbaranelli, Caprara, & Pastorelli,
2001; Wiedenfeld et al., 1990; Witkiewitz & Marlatt, 2004) failed to conclusively settle the determinism vs. free will debate. Self-efficacy may be, in Shelly Taylor's (1989) words, "a positive self-enhancing illusion" that promotes mental health and pro-social (but culturally determined) behavior (p. 7). Gergen (1996) declared the issue to be ideological, and he favored an ideology of communalism, interdependence, and participatory decision-making favored by constructionists.
Constructionism has been seen as an alternative to behaviorism in the educational context
(McCowan, 1996). We construct meaning from what is known and this "makes students active participants in knowledge construction" (p. 405). The argument becomes somewhat circular when applied to the concept of the self. We select beliefs about our selves from a menu provided by culture, and these beliefs are compatible with 'what is known', that is existing knowledge about our selves. The self is both created by and the creator of culture (Blustein & Noumair,
1996; Shotter, 1997).
This interdependent self extends the constructivist position by providing an explanation as to why some humans cling to negative self-definitions that bring them emotional distress instead of simply constructing better selves. It also provides an explanation as to why many humans subsume their selves to the will of religious or ideological collectivities (Fromm, 1969;
Goldhagan, 1996; Grosswiler, 1998). Eric Hoffer (1966) suggested the core of this tendency has to do with negative self-definition: "The frustrated follow a leader less because of their faith that he is leading them to a promised land than because of their immediate feeling that he is leading them away from their unwanted selves" (p. 110) Tom Strong (2000) recognized this social constructionist "dark side," of "selves at the mercy of their social circumstances" (p. 82). The self is a relational construction that is context specific and is negotiated between the individual and the "other" (Botella & Herrero, 2000; Haley, 2002; Shotter, 1997; Strong & Zeman, 2005).
In such a view the self would not necessarily exist within the individual. "As Tappan (1999) has argued, 'the self is situated neither psychologically or socially, but dialogically - as a function of the linguistically mediated exchanges between persons and the social world that are the hallmark of lived human experience" (Neimeyer, 2002, p. 52).
Wilcke (2002) commended hermeneutic phenomenology to social work research, and reviewed her own research involving refugee women from the former Yugoslav province of
Bosnia and Herzgovena. From Husserl, she attempted to gain a "glimpse the phenomenon in its immediacy as it is experienced before the phenomenon has been overlaid with explanations as to causes or origins" (Historical Background, para. 1). From Heidegger, she sought a method of 41 interpretation which anticipates the future while encompassing the person's past and present seeking to understand "a totality of meaning in all its relations"(Hermeneutic Circle, para. 2).
Avoiding constraints using hermeneutics. Wilke's (2002) respondents included 10 refugee women over the age of 18. She transcribed a taped interview with each in which they were asked open-ended questions such as "What is the experience of a woman refugee from the former Yugoslavia?" and "What helped you survive the experience?" The questions were used as guideposts with interviews individualized according to the experience and interests of the interviewee. Transcriptions were organized into clusters of meanings and were reviewed with the research participants, in the fashion of the hermeneutic circle, in a second series of interviews which sought to deepen the researcher's understandings. With deepened understanding, she sought to tell their stories. She focused particularly on the image of one young mother who left her home, infant under one arm and umbrella in the other (because it was raining) intent on visiting a relative for a few days, never to return. She noted that some of the respondents did not define themselves as refugees, and the research method used did not constrain them to respond from that perspective. Instead, the method allowed respondents to present themselves as people living full and complex lives.
While this research is true to the notion that the self is a narrative defined according to our unique histories, and while it offers the insight that the 'othering' of the researcher (in this case defining these women as refugees) is not necessarily the self-definition of the participant, little is offered that is generalizable. We are left with interesting stories of unknown utility.
Rennie (2000) suggested that too much caution expressed as reluctance to give rein to subjectivity can result in 'missing' the life of the experience under study, while giving undue rein 42 expresses the life of the analyst more than that of the respondents. It may be that Wilke (2002) exercised undue caution.
The Heideggerian controversy. The Heideggerian self "cannot stand outside one's pre- understandings and historicality of one's experience" (Laverty, 2003, p. 14). Interpretation gives life a narrative structure. "In the hermeneutic view, a basic fact about humans is that they care about whether their lives make sense and what their lives are amounting to" (Richardson &
Fowers, 1997, p. 282). Since there can never be any one correct interpretation (Patton, 2002), the challenge is to "enlarge the scope of our interpretation" (Packer, 1989, p. 106). "One engages in a hermeneutic approach to data in order to derive a better understanding of the context that gives it meaning" (Rudestam & Newton, 2001, p. 40). Although the hermeneutic approach has received considerable support as a research method, the philosophy Heidegger's espoused has not been without controversy.
For Heidegger, modern mankind lives in an insipid, deteriorated condition (Habermas,
2005). He taught that phenomenology as hermeneutics is the process of self-understanding that is possible for 'Dasein', a true ontological being as opposed to the self of modernity (Johnson,
2000). Twentieth century German fascism, he believed, would help address the resultant
"spiritual crisis of the times" (p. 7). For Heidegger truth is relative; it is only present within a finite historical context (Johnson, 2000). The hermeneutic circle is a spiral of deepening understanding as one proceeds through repeated cycles of induction and deduction or, as Rennie
(2000) suggests, induction and abduction. For Heidegger, the liberation of the self cannot be accomplished through intelligent thought:
Intelligent calculation is oriented towards objects and places them at man's disposal. Its
levelling grasp brings all things down to one level: extension and number are its predominant dimensions. For this thinking, "ability" no longer means extravagant
expenditure out of lofty abundance, but the sweaty performance of a routine. This
thinking, which follows the laws of traditional logic, cannot understand the question
about Being [Nach dem Sein], let alone develop it, because logic is itself grounded in an
answer to the question about what it is [nach dem Seienden], an answer that closes off
Being from the very outset. [...] The degeneration of thinking to intelligence can only be
overcome by thinking that is more primordial, (quoted in Habermas, 2005, para 4)
Thus, for Heidegger, intelligent thought is degenerate, as is modernity. In a speech given as rector to the university at Freiberg he declared, "Revolutionary reality is not something that exists already (etwas Vorhandenes), but, by its essence, something that has still to develop, something in gestation" (quoted in Joris, 1989 II, para. 16). This new reality involved the
German people "finally coming into their historical destiny, totally inside of and guided by the state" (para. 18).
There has been considerable debate with respect to the connection between Heidegger's hermeneutics and his fascism (Habermas, 2005; Johnson, 2000; Joris, 1989). On one extreme it could be argued that the ideology led to the methodology or vice versa; on the other hand, it could be argued that Heidegger's fascism was a personal 'quirk' with no connection to his methodology. In his own hermeneutic textual analysis of Nazi and pre-Nazi documents,
Goldhagen (1996) concluded that anti-Semitic fascism was not an aberration in Germany, but was a reflection of long-standing cultural norms grounded in religiously held values. Irrespective of the extremes, it can be seen that the relativism inherent within hermeneutics failed to guard against the fascism that was part of Heidegger's relational and contextual being. If the self were socially constructed, this would be an example of its 'dark side'. Voicing a similar concern about the relativism inherent in the hermeneutic approach,
Doen (1998) said, "The great systems of thought like religions, ideologies and philosophies, come to be regarded as 'social constructions of reality.' these systems may be useful, even respected as profoundly true, but true in a new, provisional, postmodern way" p. 381. He warned that a problem with relativism is that account of 28 million aboriginals killed as a result of U.S.
American colonial expansion, "can no longer be taken as objective truth" (p. 382), thus aiding the colonizers.
Narrative analysis in social construction. Patton (2002) delineated a progression between hermeneutic inquiry and narrative analysis: "Hermeneutics originated in the study of written texts. Narrative analysis extends the idea of text to include in-depth interview transcripts, life history narratives, historical memoirs, and creative non-fiction" (p. 115). Narrative analysis shares with hermeneutics assumptions of relativity with respect to our constructions of reality and the need to imbed interpretations in context. Discourse analysis emphasizes the negotiated meaning co-constructed by two or more actors working collaboratively. Typically, conversations are recorded verbatim with notes taken on what is said, how it is said, what is not said, affect, and other indicators of meaning.
According to Shotter (1997), the self is the product of an inner dialogue relying on the structure of discursive practices within the framework provided by culture. "It is only in the personal relation of persons that personal existence comes into being" (p. 122). For researchers in the narrative tradition we are the beliefs, arranged in the form of a personal story, that we hold to be true for our selves, and these are a product of our interactions with each other. As such, we operate within the constraints of our social interactions, in effect we negotiate our selves with those around us. Polkinghorn (1995) said, Plots function to compose or configure events into a story by: (a) delimiting a temporal
range which marks the beginning and end of the story, (b) providing criteria for the
selection of events to be included in the story, (c) temporally ordering events into an
unfolding movement culminating in a conclusion, and (d) clarifying or making explicit
the meaning events have as contributors to the story as a unified whole, (p. 7)
Gubrium & Holstein (1998) state that the material from which personal stories are constructed are provided by culture, and that the stories change dependent on context. They note, for example, that institutions have their own agendas and preferred plot lines, but they insist that the individual continues to exercise agency in choosing the particular story that fits with him or her in any given context.
In narrative analysis, the researcher develops or discovers a plot that displays linkage between data elements. Events are configured to show how they advance a plot, but the plot remains an interpretation. Polkinghorn (1995) warns, "Researchers engaged in narrative analysis need to be attuned to their contributions to the constructive aspects of their research and to acknowledge these in their write-ups" (p. 19).
According to Widdicombe (1998), power, knowledge production, and institutional practise work together to produce multiple discourses with the resultant self in constant flux.
"Conversation analysis implicates a thoroughly social view of selves embedded in social action and interaction" (p. 203). Edwards (1998) explains how conversation analysts view self categorization:
Self categorizations, like categorizations of other people and of everything else, are
discursive actions done in talk, and performative of talk's current business. So the best
way to examine them is to find how they are used, and what kinds of discursive business they do, on and for the occasions when they are deployed. Further, there is no
explanatory primacy given to self categorizations, as a psychological starting point for
how everyone sees the world, (p. 17)
Widdicombe (1998) states that categories are inference-rich and as such must be evaluated within individual and group contexts. "Social identities cannot simply be assumed; instead, we need to be sensitive to ways that group membership and non-membership are negotiated, rejected or achieved" (p. 70). Zimmerman (1998), in studying the role of social identities in communication, reproduced a transcript of an attempted conversation between a caller and a professional complaint-taker where the caller refused to take on the role of client and the complaint-taker refused to give up the role of professional. When neither proved willing to give up the script associated with their chosen role, discourse proved impossible. Zimmerman concluded, "Discourse identities furnish the focus for the type of discourse activity projected and recognized by participants, what they are doing interactionally in a particular spate of talk" (p.
92).
Hopper (2003) revealed how we may conform to roles, and the identities associated with those roles, given to us by society. He transcribed and analyzed interviews with 30 recently divorced individuals. He attempted to piece together a longitudinal component to the study by extrapolation of information gathered during interviews by: 1) noting historical accounts; and 2) comparing people who were at different stages of their divorce temporally. He found, prior to the decision to divorce, roles were confused with both parties frequently voicing similar concerns.
When one person made the decision to divorce, the discourse changed, "Whatever the specifics of their situations, initiators generally articulated a vocabulary of individual needs and non- 47 initiating partners invoked a vocabulary of familial commitment... The two vocabularies emerged only after the decision to divorce was made" (pp. 258-259).
Both parties typically selected certain information and interpreted other information to substantiate their position. The initiators of divorce presented a narrative that made their decision seem legitimate and inevitable. The non-initiators invoked a moral vocabulary of opposition which made the divorce painful and contentious. Hopper concluded, "The motives-as-rhetoric thesis begins to suggest that the course-of-relations stories divorcing people tell are also defining rhetorics; as such, developmental views of divorce may be artefacts of the ways in which divorcing people make sense out of chaos and ambiguity" (p. 257).
Wortham (2001) suggests that a self emerges as a person adopts characteristic positions with respect to others, "While telling their stories, autobiographical narrators often enact a characteristic type of self, and through such performances they can become that type of self" (p. xii). Using textual transcriptions of discussions, interviews, and newscasts, Wortham (2001) analyzed a class in Spartan history, the autobiographical story of a woman named Jane, and the news coverage Dan Rather gave U.S. president George Bush with respect to alleged inconsistencies in Bush's account of his reasons for going to war against Iraq. Wortham (2001) said a teacher in the Spartan history class "spoke with the voice of a (modern) welfare critic" (p.
38) in defending the custom of leaving sickly babies to die outside Sparta; Jane had two selves - one passive and vulnerable, the other active and assertive; and Rather made Bush speak with the voice of a criminal defendant. Alternate interpretations are possible. The class transcript indicates that the teacher in question was attempting to speak with the voice of an ancient
Spartan leader. Jane, from her teenage years to midlife, consistently presented herself first as a victim and then as an assertive individual in stressful situations. An Adlerian interpretation that 48 she had one self that exercised two favoured coping strategies based on her worldview is also plausible. Finally, if in fact Bush was less than forthright about his adventures in Iraq, then his defensiveness when questioned was to some degree his own voice.
The research reviewed in this section is respectful of peoples' contexts and views. Three studies (Zimmeran, 1998; Hopper, 2003; Wortham, 2001) convincingly related roles to context or location, but failed to distinguish between roles and self. This removes the Jamesian subjective self, particularly the elements of continuity and distinctness, from consideration constraining the research accordingly. Further, Wortham (2001) failed to give evidence as to why his interpretations should be favored. If there is no objective reality, then there can be no such evidence.
Philosophical problems associated with social constructionism. The Adlerian self shares much with social constructionism; it is co-constructed between the individual and his environment beginning in the family constellation but extending through community and societal influences. Alder was, perhaps, the first to recognize the relativistic nature of this societal influence. In his debate with Freud, for example, he suggested that female feelings of inferiority were not tied to "penis envy", but to the patriarchal culture of his time in which women were undervalued (Mosak, 1979 p. 49). It is this relativistic aspect of self that allows for its re- engineering. An individual who is lacking in feelings of self-efficacy, for example, can reframe his or her self-definition to recognize a greater sense of empowerment. Adler (1927/1957) agreed with those who have suggested that self construction is not entirely internal, but depends on interaction with others (Jopling, 2000; Martin & Sugarman, 2001). Despite the utility of a social constructivist position, some theoretic problems have remained unresolved. 49
Social constructionism provides an answer to the constructivist dilemma as to why people would construct, and then cling to, dysfunctional selves. Concomitantly it attempts to reply to the notion that we are socially determined. There is an unresolved tension in social constructionism between the unfettered free will implied in constructivism and the determinism implied in behaviourism. Richardson and Fowers (1997) seem to be speaking of constructionism when they suggest that postmodernism sets forth the "ultimately implausible view" that the self is
"determined by historical influences", yet is "radically free to reinterpret both itself and social reality, for it own self-invented purposes" (p. 280).
Zimmerman concluded, "Discourse identities furnish the focus for the type of discourse activity projected and recognized by participants, what they are doing interactionally in a particular spate of talk" (p. 92). Such a dialogic self, situated in relationships that are "ours, not just mine" (Shotter, 1989, p. 144), would lack stability. There would be as many selves as the roles and contexts in which we find ourselves. Further, as Foucault has noted, inequality characterizes the relationships between individuals and between classes of individuals (Foucault,
1982/1997; Foucault, Becker, Fornet-Betancourt, & Gomez-Muller, 1984/1997). The negotiation of selves, in such situations, has to be one-sided leading to an effective convergence of behaviorist and social constructionist positions. "Not so," they reply with metaphors that are difficult to visualize: "In a postmodern world the self s story forges ahead, but also follows in its own wake" (Holstein & Gubrium, 2000, p. 215). Shotter (1975) paraphrased James in stating that the self has a "strange dual nature, as both agent and other in action" (p. 93). Harre (1989) complained that the Cartesian homunculus keeps re-appearing and located the source of that reappearance in indexical pronouns. Seigal (2005) suggests, with more than a hint of irony, that constructionists are inferring a Cartesian-like dualism: Anyone who pictures the self as tightly wrapped up in the cocoon of its social or cultural
relations necessarily locates the consciousness that can theorize such containment outside
it, thus simultaneously calling forth a different kind of self, ready to take free light on
wings whose anatomy descends from pure reflectivity, however much it has been pre-
configured as life or some mysterious absent presence, (pp. 649-650)
Richardson and Fowers (1997) echoed that postmodernism sets forth the "ultimately implausible view" that the self is "determined by historical influences", yet is "radically free to reinterpret both itself and social reality, for it own self-invented purposes" (1997 p. 280).
Acknowledging the influence of culture while assuming, in constructivist fashion, agency within that culture has led to a contradiction. Tittle (1996) summarily asked, "By the time one can choose, it might be argued, one already has an identity....Who is the self that chooses to revise?
From what position of power and privilege are the alternatives understood?" (p. 10). A viable model for researching the self must go beyond equating the self with the roles we play and include consideration of the Jamesian T.
Situating the Self Through Mapping
The literature reviewed in this paper was grouped into seven major overlapping perspectives by which the self may be understood. The picture emerged of a self that is complex and difficult to understand as a totality. Commenting on the problem of system complexity in the field of social work Hartman (1995) explained:
In dealing with almost continual information overload, cognitive processes tend to
operate analytically: to partialize, to abstract parts from wholes, to reduce, and to
simplify. Although this makes data more manageable, it does damage to the complexity
inherent in reality. Ways of conceptualizing causation have tended to be particularly 51
reductionist as reality is arranged in chains of simple cause and effect reactions. Such
linear views reflect the limitations of thought and language rather than the nature of the
real world, where human events are the result of transactions among multiple variables.
(p.112)
Hartman (1995) advocated drawing a map or a graphic representation in which the interrelated parts could be understood holistically. Similarly, Miles & Huberman (1994) suggested that conceptual frameworks in qualitative research be displayed graphically, as opposed to textually, allowing the researcher "to work with all the information at once" (p. 22).
This section reviews attempts to display complex data related to the exploration of the individual.
Mapping determinants of behavior. In a text outlining "field theory," Kurt Lewin (1931) focussed on play, emotion, speech, and expression as environmental and psychological indicators that allowed for the prediction of behavior in children. Weighted vectors were produced showing the influence of external and internal factors that would produce a response. Lewin said that if the factors were sufficiently known and mapped as part of a dynamic process, behavior could be accurately predicted. Social facts were regarded as real as physical facts, and negative and positive valence was assigned to items based on what Lewin (1931) termed "psychological field forces" (p. 94). His theory was not met without controversy and 18 months after the publication of this text Lewin (1933) replied to a competing conceptualization:
A main conceptual difference between our theories is, I think, that Tolman, starting from
situations with comparatively few degrees of freedom, is basing the general theory of
psychological movements on the idea of choice between paths with different subordinate
demand-values. I, on the other hand, starting from free-field situations, use as a basis the concept of force or force-field, characterized through vectors .... Above all, the task of
analysis, for me, seems not to be to find 'mechanisms' 'behind' the psychobiological field,
but to determine the dynamical facts of the psychobiological field in such a way that one
can derive logically all of the possibilities of actual behavior, (p. 319)
Lewin (1933) did not speculate on unconscious drives or forces which determine the psychological make-up of the individual; he was more interested in assessing the present psychology of the individual and mapping vectors which illustrate the interplay between that psychology and the surrounding environment. Knowledge about the psychological and environmental forces, and the interplay between the two, allow for the determination of possible behavioral responses. It was not clear whether Lewin modified his stance from predicting behavior (1931) to deriving logical possible behaviors (1933) because of the complexity of the variables which made up such predictions or due to some element of non-logical randomness inherent within the individual.
Lewin (1943) declared that field theory was not properly a theory at all because it was not falsifiable. He explained, "Field theory is probably best characterized as a method: namely, a method of analyzing causal relations and of building scientific constructs" (p. 294). The recognition of the necessity of a fair representation of the multitude of interdependent factors was said to be a step in the method of field theory. This complexity was magnified by having to take into account the psychological past, present and future of the individual:
It is important to realize that the psychological past and the psychological future are
simultaneous parts of the psychological field existing at a given time t. The time
perspective is continually changing. According to field theory, any type of behavior 53
depends upon the total field, including the time perspective at that time, but not, in
addition, upon any past or future field and its time perspectives, (p. 303)
Lewin found that the complexity he envisioned resulted in more dimensions than could be adequately represented diagrammatically. Mathematics is not so constrained and he attempted to find formulae that would represent his multi-dimensional perspective:
The field theoretical principle of contemporaneity in psychology then means that the
behavior b at the time t is a function of the situation S at the time t only (S is meant to
include both the person and his psychological environment), bl = F(Sl). (Lewin, 1943, p.
297)
"F" in this formula represents the social and psychological fields that the individual brings to a situation "S" at any given moment in time "t." To determine the properties of any given field one must take into account the history and present functioning of the individual as may be determined by diagnostic testing. The psychological past and the anticipated psychological future are simultaneous parts of the psychological field at any given moment in time.
The individual sees not only his present situation; he has certain expectations, wishes,
fears, daydreams for his future. His views about his own past and that of the rest of the
physical and social world are often incorrect, but nevertheless constitute, in his life space,
the 'reality-level' of the past. (p. 303)
Further, "t" does not represent the field or situation at a particular moment as, "The adequate description of a situation at a moment is impossible without observation of a certain time-period" (p.300). Therefore, "t" must be calculated using vectors that show the velocity and direction of change over time. He suggested that a change at point "x" could be calculated from the formula dx/dt where "d" represents the differential and consideration of "t" must include the two points of time between which the differential is observed.
Allport (1947) said that Lewin took a "middle course" in the nature vs. nurture debate by incorporating both personality and environment into a situational field as viewed by the participants themselves. In this model, cultural effects are decisive in conduct, "but only in so far as these categories of social structure are actually transmuted into effective forces with the behavioral environment, through the needs and perceptual processes of the individual" (p. 5).
Kariel (1956) said that Lewin's "obvious humanitarian interest bore no relation to his methodology" (p. 281). Although Lewin was committed to liberal democracy in the workplace, the classroom, and society at large, his method showed how democratic institutions could be more effective in controlling the individual's behavior than autocratic ones:
He (Lewin) committed himself to the increasingly familiar experimental approach that
values a power field with functionally related and thoroughly interdependent
components. Using this field as model, he graded existing social orders as to the degree
of integration of their parts-designation the most fully integrated as democratic. The
maintenance of a democratic field requires leadership qualities which will create a mood
by which consensus and maximum productive co-operation are achieved. To exalt this
function of leadership is to disparage institutions for the adjustment of interests which
liberal-democratic theory has traditionally supported, (p. 281)
Kariel's (1956) concern was that at its core, Lewin's methodology was deterministic with behavior dependant on environmental and psychological forces. In principle, such methods could be used to implant a pre-determined result in a situation that appeared democratic. This appeared to be just such a result when Lewin and Lippit (1938) demonstrated that the production 55 of workers (in this case grade 5 and 6 students) was higher in a setting run democratically that one run by autocratically.
Lewin's (1931, 1933, 1938,1943) project was not to understand the self of the individual but to understand those forces that shape the behavior of that individual. From a purely behaviorist point of view, the self is not relevant to equations predicting future behavior except as a repository of past conditioning (Chambless & Goldstein, 1979). Lewin (1943) took into account the effects of past conditioning by including the dimensions of the remembered past and anticipated future into his model. On the other hand, from a purely behaviorist standpoint, the
Lewin & Lippitt (1938) result should not have occurred as the system of rewards and punishments would have general applicability in both democratic and autocratic situations. There must have been some element, within the psychological make-up of the individuals studied, that led them to work more efficiently and cooperatively in the democratic setting. Lewin & Lippitt
(1938) were not concerned with finding such an element; they were concerned with studying experimentally the differential effects of democratic and autocratic work environments. Lewin
(1930, 1938, 1943) is open to charges of determinism because his equations left out the possibility of a self containing volition in which will could reside.
Eco-mapping. Eco-maps were originally graphic representations of the systems at play in a social work client's life, although Vodde & Giddings (2000) adapted it for use with social work practicum students. In commending the use of these maps to social work, Hartman (1995) explained,
Social workers, in attempting to understand their traditional unit of attention - the person
in his total life space over time - faced with an overwhelming amount of data.... An ecological metaphor can lead social workers to see the client not as an isolated entity for
study, but as a part of a complex ecological system, (pp. 112 - 113)
Hartman (1995) explained that the construction of these maps begins with the nuclear family system or household drawn in a large circle at the map's center typically with squares to depict males and circles to depict females. Connections are shown to relevant systems that interact with the family such as extended family, friends, organizations and government agencies. These connections have become standardized with thicker lines indicating a stronger relationship, curvy or red lines indicating that the system is a stressful relationship, arrows pointing to the client indicating that the system primarily influences the client, arrows pointing to the system indicating that the client primarily influences the system, and arrows pointing both direction indicating a two directional flow of influence. Hartman (1995) recommended that eco- maps be used along with genograms to increase the social worker and client's understanding of the systems involved:
Just as the eco-map can begin to portray and objectify the family in space, so can the
genogram picture the family system through time, enabling an individual to step out of
the system, examine it, and begin to gain a greater understanding of complex family
dynamics as they have developed and as they affect the current situation.... A genogram
is simply a family tree that includes more social data. (p. 118)
In the adaptation proposed by Vodde & Giddings (2000), the social work practicum student is presented at the center of an organizational structure with connecting system lines drawn to individuals within that organization. Additional relationships are drawn to individuals outside of the agency in which the student was placed if they impact on the success of the practicum experience in some way. The eco-maps are then used to increase the student's 57 understanding of their experience and to assist them in problem solving within the context of complex organizational systems.
Eco-maps, as understood in this account, remind us of the social environment mapped by
Lewin (1943). The addition of the genogram suggests an element of Lewin's "psychological past" without the recognition that such pasts are subjectively understood. There is no attempt to predict behavior based on forces emanating from the environment or from the psychological past, therefore eco-mapping avoids the implications of determinism. The self is presumed to exist with agentive qualities, but no attempt is made to map that self; therefore, the relationship between individual selves and the environmental forces that impact on it are not understood.
Mapping in career counselling. Cahill & Martland (1996) reported that they use self- maps as an adjunct to career counselling with clients invited to write a description or draw a map to illustrate the nature, causes and possible resolutions of career problems. Typically, a circle representing the person would be placed in the center of a map which would then be surrounded by issues, both internal and environmental, impacting on their career choices. Cahill
& Martland said such narratives or maps would likely be sketchy, paradoxical or contain statements that were contrary to the clients' behaviour. Clients were encouraged to reflect on their narratives or maps and to revise or elaborate on them as needed to increase their utility in building self-understanding, problem solving and career alternatives. By the end of the counselling process clients were expected to be able to articulate problems and resolutions associated with career goals linking past, present and future.
Mapping, in this example, served to provide an outline for a narrative self-story related to one aspect of the individual - his or her career. Cahill & Martland (1996) attempted to help clients narrate a richer and more complete story so as to make choices that were in keeping with 58 the aspirations and resources of the individual. Thus, the self that was being mapped was not a general theory of one's self, but a representation of certain aspects of that self in relation to possible careers - a social self. A strength of the approach Cahill & Martland (1996) advocated is it allows for the client to account for cultural, environmental and situational differences not addressed by standardized instruments. It also allows for client empowerment in self-definition and, perhaps, self-revision.
Shepard & Marshall (1999) used the idea of mapping to illustrate possible future selves in a group of 42 adolescents aged 11 to 13. Possible selves were defined as cognitive manifestations of goals, aspirations, values, and fears. All participants used their "imaginative capacity and self- reflection... to create a set of hoped-for, and feared future selves" (p. 38). Specifically, they were asked to respond to the following prompts: "Think about what you hope to become" and "Think about what you fear, dread, or don't want for yourself." The responses were placed on flash cards and maps of these possible future "selves" were cooperatively prepared illustrating the relative importance of the hoped-for or feared self, self-efficacy as related to this hoped-for or feared outcome, outcome expectancy, and steps needed to achieve the desired outcome or prevent the feared outcome. Forty-three percent of respondents presented an occupational hoped-for outcome while 13% wanted possessions such as a computer. The largest percentage of feared outcomes (23%) involved safety concerns while 15% mentioned relationship concerns such as losing a family member or never getting married.
The "selves" mapped by Shepard & Marshall (1999) present as possible future items in the Jamesian objective self. For example, while becoming a computer owner might be a desired outcome, it would hardly constitute the entire self of the individual at any given moment in time.
The exercise in estimating self-efficacy in achieving future goals might speak to the volitional component of James' (1890) subjective self, but not to other components of that self. The act of developing a future self from a menu of possibilities reminds us of a social constructionist approach, again with the presumption of agency.
The self-mapping used in these examples of career counselling remind us of the "mind mapping" technique that has been used in educational settings (Budd, 2004; Weeks, 2002). The self-as-knower is placed in a central position in such maps linked to what is known, often including self-characteristics. Mind-mapping, in this sense, has also been used in cognitive- behavioral therapy to provide a flexible case summary that helps to prevent important parts of the case from being over-looked (Williams, Williams, & Appleton, 1997). In these examples, some aspect of the self is given centrality but remains undefined. The map produced from these exercises was designed to aid the visualization of the self within a context or environment. In using this technique in the context of career planning, Shepard & Marshall (1999) and Cahill &
Martland (1996) were, like Lewin (1943) and Hartland (1995), using a graphic display to illustrate an issue of complexity. A core self, however, was assumed and not mapped.
Mapping the self memetically. There is general agreement that the self is a complex cultural construct (Harre, 1984; Lock, 1981/1990; Mead, 1912/1990). Such an entity would be constructed of cultural units (Blackmore, 1999; Donald, 2001; Price, 1999), and such units could be graphically displayed. A number of terms have been promoted as names for those cultural units, among them: "mnemotype", "idene", "sociogene", "concept" and "culturgen" (Wilson,
1999, p. 148), but the term "meme" has increasingly come to predominate in the lexicon of those who wish to talk about such cultural units (ibid.). Dawkins' (1976) contribution was to suggest these cultural units had certain attractive and repellant properties coupled with behavioral or phenotypic implications for the individual. This allows for the possibility of preparing maps which include those aspects of the self that were assumed in the field theory,
eco-mapping and mind mapping approaches while maintaining the environmental connections
emphasized by all three. Research, involving the preparation of such maps, will necessarily
involve both an exploration into the nature and structure of the self, and an exploration into the
nature and structure of the memes of which the self is composed.
Directions Provided by Considerations of the Self in Society
For those focusing on societal influence on the construction of the self, the locus of control ranged from the determinism of classical behaviorism to the free will of the constructivism with social constructionism taking a position on the free will side of a continuum.
Attempts at mapping focused on environmental determinants of behavior modified by psychological characteristics, which may be heritable. For those taking a determinist position, the self is non-existent, an illusion. Those taking a position allowing for self-determined construction failed to postulate a mechanism whereby self-determination may occur without the assumption of a homunculus. It was hoped that the memetic approach used in this study would allow for the mapping of a self affected by societal forces while allowing for the exploration of the nature of the will or volition that appears to emanate from within.
Composite Models of the Self
There is research supportive of each perspective reviewed in this paper. There is a stability connected to at least some aspects of self (Adler, 1927/1957, 1929, 1967; Holland,
1997; Kwiatkowska, 1990). Neurological research suggests that stability may be based on emotion, a feeling of what happens (Damasio, 1999) and that left-hemispheric activity serves to narrate a story or rationalization supporting that feeling (Gazzaniga, 2000; Libet, 1985; Wolford et al., 2000). That narrative is self-constructed (Charmaz, 1990; Snow & Anderson, 2003), but 61 the free will implied by that empowerment (Wiedenfeld et al., 1990) is restricted to some degree within cultural boundaries (Caprara et al., 1998; Hopper, 2003; Wortham, 2001), or it may be illusory (Chambless & Goldstein, 1979; Taylor, 1989). While remaining cognisant of the limitations inherent in each methodology, the pervasive suggestion is that perspectives should be combined in some ways that unite or balance those perspectives.
Although Adler (1927/1957, 1929, 1967) was discussed in the section dealing with the stability of the self, his work was referenced again constructivist, behaviorist and social constructionist approaches. Adlerians draw upon the ability of clients to change their selves in some ways, drawing on a "striving for perfection" drive. Adlerians use behavioral techniques with clients in the form of "homework" assignments, and they use a social constructionist perspective with respect to the construction of the childhood self from the culture of the family.
Adlerian psychotherapy may be viewed as an attempt to develop a composite self before the existence of the competing schools of thought necessitated that consideration.
Jopling (2000) attempted to gain such a balance by combining self-inquiry and culture.
"My project of reflective self-inquiry and reflective self-evaluation presupposes the ability to wield a communally shared fund of concepts and contrastive distinctions..." (p. 139). The suggestion appears to be that while the self may indeed be determined, at least partially, by narrative influences dependant on culture, there is also a certain stability to the self that precludes pure randomness.
The self was one of four pillars in Schlossberg, Waters & Goodman's (1995) "4S" model of factors that influence the ability of an individual to cope with life transitions. The self was defined as including personal characteristics socioeconomic status, gender, age, state of health and ethnicity, and psychological resources such as ego development, outlook including self- efficacy and values as represented by religious beliefs and cultural norms. The other pillars in this model included "situation", "support" and "strategies". Thus, the self was defined in terms that were potentially verifiable within a contextual situation that included coping skills.
Seigal (2005) suggested the self has physical, cultural and reflective dimensions, and he grounded this view in the Western, particularly British, philosophical tradition: "Locke,
Mandeville, Hume, and Smith.... recognized, if only implicitly, that the self was a compound of bodily, relational, and reflective elements.... None regarded the self as independent of social relations" (pp. 166-167). Reflectivity may be a prior condition of agency, but our thinking is, if not determined by, heavily dependent on the twin environmental influences of biology and culture.
There has been widespread recognition of the need to develop a comprehensive or encompassing vision of the self. This section begins by discussing attempts to develop that vision using James' (1890, 1892/1999) dichotomy of the self that is simultaneously objective and subjective. This is followed by consideration of how a memetic perspective may add to a developing comprehensive model. No comprehensive model of the self can be developed without consideration of issues of cultural diversity, and we conclude this section with a discussion of cross-cultural issues associated with the self.
The Objective and Subjective Self
Harre (1991) attempted to resolve the apparent dichotomy between the stable self and the social constructionist self by positing a singular "Self-1" accompanied by "Selves-2" within the person. The idea of agency along with the sense of continuity is embedded in "Self-1." "Selves-
2" are based on observed behavior and accompany the different roles individuals play in the course of their lives. Long before the controversy Harre (1991) addressed, James (1892/1999) 63 described the self as a duplex consisting of both subject and object, partly known and partly knower. The subjective "I" consists of that which observes while the objective "me" consists of those qualities that the "I" observes in himself. The objective qualities of self are contextual:
Properly speaking, a man has as many social selves as there are individuals who
recognize him and carry an image of him in their mind. To wound any one of these his
images is to wound him. But as the individuals who carry the images fall naturally into
classes, we may practically say that he has as many different social selves as there are
distinct groups of persons about whose opinion he cares. He generally shows a different
side of himself to each of these different groups.(James, 1892/2003 p. 122)
Mead (1934) reasoned, "The attitudes of the others constitute the organized ME and then one reacts toward that as an I" (p. 176). He said that the self is a cognitive structure that is not present at birth, but is developmental with the child's early social precepts being "partial selves - or 'me's' which are quite analogous to the child's perceptions of his hands and feet, which precede his perception of himself as a whole" (Mead, 1912/1990, p. 198). A unitary self then develops from a combining of these social selves into a "generalized other" which may be viewed as internalized social control but is necessary in the development of mind or intelligence (Mead,
1934).
Research into the Jamesian Model of Self
Hart & Damon (1985) proposed adding reflectivity to the elements of continuity, distinctness and volition included in the Jamesian T. They subsequently (Damon & Hart, 1988), used quantitative and qualitative methods to study the development of the self in youth age six to fifteen. They began with the individual's self-definition, the domain of the Jamesian 'me.' Measuring the objective self. Rejecting existing standardized scales, Damon & Hart
(1988) used open-ended questions like "What are you like?"; "Why is that important?"; "What are you not like?"; "What kind of person are you?"; and, "What are you especially proud of about yourself?" (pp. 67-69). These questions were used to introduce areas for conversation. For example, the question "What kind of person are you" led to one respondent replying, "I believe in world peace," which led to the follow-up question "Why is that important?" (p. 69). The answers to these questions were then coded for physical, active, social and psychological responses reflecting distinctions made by James in his outline of the objective self's constituents.
It was expected that each of the four categories would be present at some level at all age groups.
The authors posited a complementary hierarchy of age-related complexity for each categorization: categorical identifications, comparative assessments, inter-personal interpretations, and systematic beliefs and plans. They cautioned that this hierarchy of conceptualization would reflect social-contextual, that is, cultural conditions, and that other sequences were possible, even likely.
Subjects were placed at a modal level of 1 to 4 within this hierarchy dependent on the level of complexity and conceptualization involved in their answers to the 'me' (objective self) questions, and these answers were coded for physical, activity, social, and psychological responses. The researchers found a positive correlation between age and modal level at each of the three testing times (r=.48, p<.001; r=.67. p<.001). From year to year, subjects tended to rank in the same order relative to other subjects with respect to modal response from test one to test two and from test two to test three (r=.33, p<.01; r=.49, p<.001). A one-tailed test of statistical significance revealed a tendency to change in a positive direction (i.e. in increasing complexity) when change occurred in individual responses (p<.001). Damon & Hart (1988) conclude that 65 this data shows "the regular and predictable nature of self-concept development between the ages
4 and 18" (p. 109).
In a strict sense, we found little stability: Only 14 subjects organized their ideas about
themselves in the same way at the end as at the beginning of our 3 years of testing. But
the observed changes were not random. Indeed, they were quite predictable in light of
developmental theory: A change in modal level of self-understanding was almost always
to the next higher level, and this change was initially heralded by a gradual increase in
the percentage of reasoning characteristic of the higher level, (p. 115)
Assessing the subjective self. Damon & Hart (1988) also used a system of open-ended questions with respect to the Jamesian T. The agentive self was assessed with questions like
"How did you get to be the way you are?" (p.71). Continuity of self was assessed with questions like "If you change from year to year, how do you know it's the same you?" (p. 74). Questions like "What makes you special?" and, "What makes you different from everyone else you know?"
(p. 76) were taken to measure the quality of distinctness. Again, interpretive levels were assigned responses. For example, level one of the Agency component was described as "Supernatural, biological, or social forces determine the existence or formulation of self (p. 70). By this categorization, the behaviorists described earlier in this paper were operating from the lowest level of Agency! Level 4 of Agency was described as "Personal or moral evaluations of life possibilities influence the existence or formation of the self." An example of a Level 4 response to the question "How did you get to be the way you are?" was, "Well, I decided to be kind to people because I've seen lots of kids hurt other kids' feelings for no reason, and it's not right or fair. Nobody should try to hurt another person's feelings or be mean to them" (p. 71). With this interpretative template, Damon & Hart (1988) found the three self-as-subject components at all age levels but they reported a gradual movement toward increasing levels of sophistication in communication. Continuity and distinctness tended to develop sequentially with the initial sense of continuity in childhood commonly attributed to unchanging self- characteristics. By adolescence, this belief in the absolute stability of self-characteristics becomes "untenable" (p. 129).
Damon & Hart (1988) admitted that they had difficulty creating "developmentally interpretable responses for the self-as-subject components" (p. 126). They reported, however, a sense of continuity and distinctness develops in an ordered sequence that is preceded by parallel understandings of the objective self. Measurement of continuity and distinctness was accomplished by two raters using the split-half method with an inter-rater agreement of 0.84. The raters found a high correlation (.60) between age and developmental level of continuity for the second and third testing (r=.60; r=.54). The third testing (at three years) resulted in correlations between continuity and distinctness of r=.55 and continuity and self-as-object of r=.59. They noted, "During childhood, the sense of identity - continuity and distinctness - is attributed to unchanging self-characteristics.... However, the rapid cognitive, social, and physical changes that accompany adolescence makes this belief in the absolute stability of self-characteristics untenable" (p. 129). The correlation between age and developmental level of agency for the second testing time was r=.48, p<.0001, (df=71) and for the third testing time was r=.53, px.OOOl, (df=46). Agency did not correlate significantly with the development of continuity.
They concluded that a sense of agency develops through four progressive levels: 1) self- development is seen as non-volitional; 2) the self's own wishes and desires are considered sufficient to control the evolution of self; 3) self-formation is conceived as a process that occurs 67 within a social matrix; and 4) "one's volitional control of self-formation derives from deeply held personal values or philosophies" (p. 136).
Recognition of cross-cultural concerns. In an attempt to pre-empt possible criticism that these findings could be culture-bound, Damon and Hart (1988) replicated their study in a Puerto
Rican fishing village. They reported similar general findings to their main study, although Puerto
Rican children were more concerned about relational effects and less concerned about the relative superiority of their actions. Concerns the research had forced responses into pre-existing categories, and the statistical analysis used to demonstrate longitudinal change was constrained by this categorization, were not addressed. Specifically, the researchers took seven elements representing two characterizations of the self (objective and subjective), and developed questions from the standpoint of each of these elements. They coded responses to those very same elements, thus ignoring the possibility that other elements could have more accurately reflected the individual's self or that there may be an interpretive relationship between elements. They tested those elements for change in the longitudinal portion of the study (at 18 months and 3 years).
Concerns with respect to Damon & Hart. The observation by Damon & Hart (1988) that the subjective self-elements were foreshadowed by parallel conceptual development within the objective self suggests a self-interpretive factor at play. Further, by Hart and Damon's (1985) admission, their measure of the Jamesian T is incomplete with respect to the element of self- reflectivity. Given that they had recommended inclusion of reflectivity to the subjective self, it is surprising they did not attempt to assess it. Their conclusions imply that the reflective self is subsumed within the agentive self, a reasonable position on the basis that thinking cannot be separated from agency. This, however, begs explanation as to why they felt it necessary to posit reflectivity as a separate subcategory initially. Arguably agency is necessary for self-reflective change but not sufficient. It is possible to be self-reflective without having any intention to change.
Further criticism of the Damon & Hart (1988) study comes from a social constructionist perspective. While suggesting that volitional control comes from deeply held values and philosophies, no consideration is made of a process of negotiation and regeneration within one's social environment that would lead to such values. A related concern is that the method of research did not allow new categorizations to come out of the data that could have identified such a process. Finally, despite anticipating questions of cultural relativity, the researchers failed to completely address those questions with their Puerto Rican replication. Puerto Rico is a U.S. colony and its culture is European based. The replication of the study in a more collectivist culture which is not tied to the imperial power economically would have given more robust results. In any case, the use of pre-set categorizations could lead to apparent replication through a failure to recognize alternatives.
While triangulation of quantitative and qualitative methods may increase a study's power and scope (Elliot, Fischer, & Rennie, 1999; Mays & Pope, 1995), engaging in quantitative analysis with inadequate conceptualization may lead to an inability to interpret research in meaningful ways (Borg & Gall, 1985). The study by Damon & Hart was not designed to test the adequacy of the Jamesian self, it assumed that adequacy and attempted to use it to test a hypothesis of developmental transition. We are left with results that are difficult to interpret.
There may be some aspects of self which are developmental, but we cannot know if the elements used adequately describe them, or how those elements relate to a total self. We need a structural grounding of the self before we can test elements of that self in relation to each other. 69
Combining James with Social Construction
As we have seen, Harre (1991) attempted to resolve the apparent dichotomy between the stable self and the social constructionist position by positing a singular "Self-1" accompanied by
"Selves-2" within the person. Harre later (1998) added the idea of "Selves-3" which is how others perceive us with the resultant effect of extending the self into social discourse. Harre
(1984) embedded the Self-1 in languaging involving indexical pronouns: " T, the first person pronoun, does have a referential force to a hypothetical entity 'the self, in much the same way that the gravitational term g refers to a hypothetical entity, the gravitational field" (p. 82). The T then develops a theory about who we are. Like theories in the natural sciences, these theories of self can be amended with further evidence, but, unlike natural science theories, we tend to become who we think we are.
Missing from these accounts of a composite self is an understanding of how cultural and genetic factors interact to produce a self that is at once determined and self-determined. Agency implies free will. The assumption of Plato, Descartes and Kant that this will was divinely given ignores the fact that any such will is subject to the parameters of the giver and is thus not truly free. Although James insisted the subjective and objective were two sides of the same self, the dualistic nature of the language used allows for the perception of a homuncular construct, which, as Harre (1989a) noted, keeps reappearing due to the grammar of indexical pronouns. Further,
James failed to propose how agency could have emerged independent of a divine giver. I propose to now explore a mechanism whereby culture may interact with a composite self and how 'will' could have evolved from such materialist beginnings. 70
The Memetic Self
The models of the self constructed by Adler (1927/1057, 1929) and James (1890,
1892/1999) have been reflected in the perspectives of the self presented in this literature review.
It is possible to entertain the notion that a singular comprehensive model of the self is evolving which will gain widespread recognition across schools of psychological thought. It has been proposed that the self is a collection of interlocking units of culture called memes (Blackmore,
1999; Kenyon, 1993). Although the idea that the self is a cultural construct is not new (Donald,
2001; Hermans, 2003; Shotter, 1997), little has been done to show how units culture may combine to form selves. This section deals with the memetic perspective with a view on how it may contribute to our growing understanding of the self.
The Qualities of Memes as Units of Culture
After noting that culture changes far more rapidly than genetic inheritance, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins (1976) coined the term "meme" to represent a small unit of imitation or replicable culture. He suggested that these memes have sufficient fecundity, fidelity and longevity to compete with other memes and complexes of memes (memeplexi) within a 'cultural soup'. Mutations, he suggested, could bring unexpected results: "Scholars of the Septuagint started something big when they mistranslated the Hebrew word for 'young woman' into the
Greek word for 'virgin', thereby coming up with a prophecy 'behold a virgin shall conceive and bear a son" (1976, p. 18).
Steven Pinker (1997) chided Dawkins, "A complex meme does not arise from the retention of copying errors. It arises because some person knuckles down, racks his brain, musters his ingenuity, and composes or writes or paints or invents something" (p. 209). Dawkins
(1982) anticipated Pinker by suggesting that cultural evolution may be "Lamarckian" (p. 112)", 71 intentionality, combined with creativity, may lead to a dynamic within cultural evolution that involves the passing on of deliberately acquired characteristics. Stephan Jay Gould (1996) agreed with Dawkins on the efficacy of cultural evolution, and such evolution is Lamarckian, but he characterized Dawkins as being a "determinist." Dawkins (1976, 1999) has maintained a spirited defence of free will that has spanned more than two decades; therefore, it is likely that Gould's
(1996) concern stems from a misreading of Dawkins, and this misreading supports an argument that there exists attractive forces between memes. Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist with a speciality in genetics and a penchant for using terms such as 'replication' when talking about cultural units. These memes (evolutionary biology, genetics, replication) have connotative meanings of 'determinism' with accompanying negative emotional valence in the minds of some, regardless of what Dawkins actually said on the subject. Thus, this interaction between
Dawkins and Gould may be used as an example of the utility of using a memetic perspective in analyzing discourse.
Defining memes as "the smallest complex ideas capable of replicating themselves with reliability and fecundity," Dennett (1991, p. 201) suggested that human consciousness is a huge complex of such memes. Since our minds have a finite capacity, such memes would be in a
Darwinian struggle for "mind space". He subsequently added that memes, to be successful, need only replicate, and this replication would not be directly tied to our own survival as human beings (Dennett, 1995). A simple melody or advertising jingle that comes, unbidden, into our minds is obviously a good replicator. The phrase "Play it again, Sam" is a better replicator, and is, therefore, commonly 'remembered' in place of the actual phrase "Play it Sam, for old time's sake" in the classic movie, Casablanca. A suicide cult that results in the death of its members does not result in the death of the associated cult-memeplex if the murder/suicide has the effect 72 of spreading the memes involved to other minds. Dennett (1996) suggested that memplexi are a kind of life form in an ecosystem of human minds called culture whose replicatory interest exists independent of our individual or collective interest as a species. He agreed with Dawkins (1976,
1986) that we have the potential 'will' to resist memetic determinism, but added that memeplexi thrive by convincing us to abandon our sense of reason except for mundane purposes.
The tension between the view that successful memes or constellations of memes convince us to abandon reason, and the view that we have free will, reminds us of the social constructionist position of recognizing the power and influence of culture while simultaneously insisting on the individual's power to self-construct. Tittle's (1996) plaintive question, "Who is the self that chooses to revise?" could be directed equally at Dawkins and Dennett. Fortunately, memeticists have addressed precisely this question.
The Self as a Complex of Memes
Taking the idea that we each have multiple drafts of reality in our brains at any given moment and that the one draft that gains primacy is the 'reality' of which we are aware (Dennett,
1991), Carlton University's Timothy Kenyon (1993) suggested that the self is the 'center of gravity' of a complex narrative:
The self is an abstract homuncular construct, comprising at one level of description a
constellation of memes, and at another level a succession of memes that serially dominate
as the virtual captains of the organism. The self is seemingly unified over time in virtue
of the relation between present virtual captains and past ones, and in virtue of a certain
kind of compatibility obtained between temporally distinct meme constellations in a
single body. (p. 62) 73
Kenyon is not attempting to revive the notion of a homunculus, and he cleverly avoids the problem of infinite regress that notion implies. By using Dennett's (1991, 1996) concept of
'multiple drafts of reality', and applying that concept to the self he is, in a sense, actually agreeing with those postmodernists (Neimeyer, 2002; Strong, 2005; Shotter, 1997) who have postulated the existence of multiple selves. With the idea of a narrative center of gravity that presents as a 'homuncular construct' uniting various memetic 'captains of the organism' he allows for feelings of temporal constancy. Kenyon is able to unite those who argue for the stability of the self, with those who argue for social constructionist selves, by using the idea that memes exert differentially attractive forces on other memes (Dawkins, 1976). Such attractive forces would give some stability to memetic structures, but neither Dawkins nor Kenyon suggest a source of this attraction. There has been agreement, however, that memes include cognitive and behavioral dimensions (Csikszentmihalyi, 1993; Dawkins, 1986; Robles-Diaz-de-Leon, 2003), and it would be reasonable to infer that such an attractive force flows from the affective and connotative meanings associated with each meme as held within the mind of the individual.
Thus, in a bygone era, the memes for "love" and "marriage" went together like the memes for
"horse" and "carriage". The affect and connotation associated with particular memes will vary between individuals thus, at one level of abstraction, it is we that are binding particular memeplexi together through our emotive understandings, but we do so within the framework of our cultural experience.
Independent of Kenyon, Susan Blackmore (1999) developed the theme that the self is an interlocking complex of mutually attractive memes she termed a "selfplex". The Blackmorian selfplex is virtually identical with Damasio's extended or autobiographical self, and both are consistent with Adler's definition of the self as "the convictions I have about who I am" (cited in 74
Mosak, 1979, p. 58), with the important distinction that Blackmore (1999) viewed those convictions to be illusory. She represents a group of memeticists who, like classical behaviorists, believe we are genetically and culturally determined. Boyd and Richardson (2000) based their critique of Blackmore on the observation that memes are often systematically transformed during transmission - a process unlike natural selection. While this observation may be interpreted as evidence against Blackmore's determinism, the authors allow for the possibility that multiple processes including something like natural selection shape human culture. In short, memes are not perfectly analogous to genes.
Since Blackmore, the concept of the meme has been used to explore contagion in suicidal behavior (Marsden, 2001), environmental activism (Robles-Diaz-de-Leon, 2003), negative reciprocity (Freidman & Sing, 2004), and community response to youth suicide (Robertson,
2004). E. O. Wilson (1999), who coined a competing term for use in socio-biology, conceded,
"The Dawkin's 'meme' has gradually replaced such synonyms as 'mnemotype', 'idene',
'sociogene', 'concept' and 'culturgen' in describing this phenomena" (p. 148).
Selected Studies Using the Concept of the Meme
Although a memetic self was conceptualized prior to this research, such a self had not been studied using individual participants. None-the-less, some memetic studies had implications for this work.
The meme in participatory environmental research. Using the definition of 'meme' as a unit of cultural transmission containing a specific substantive message, and following consultations with villagers bordering a protected rainforest in central Mexico, Robles-Diaz-de-
Leon (2003) created 'environmental memes' such as the following: 75
"Limpio" (Clean) Would you like to have a clean town? Everything is better if we make an effort. Pick up the garbage off the streets. You know the truth about the environment. Talk to others about it. (p. 31)
Robles-Diaz-de-Leon's (2003) study was an investigation into differential public participation in dealing with local environmental issues using a memetic approach. The issues identified by people in four separate villages included garbage in the streets, grey water, burning plastics and the lack of recreational usage. The researcher identified the predominant issue in each village based on information from informants in a preliminary interview. For example, 80% of the interviewees in the village "A" identified garbage in the streets as an issue in their town, so that became village A's issue. Similarly, Village B was selected for recreation issues, C for grey water, and D for burning plastics. A fifth village was used as a control. As a pre-test, the researcher measured the amount of garbage in the streets, grey water, burnt plastics, and recreational use in each of the five villages.
The researcher selected a different intervention in each village to deal with the environmental issue. In village A she organized a public meeting where the "Limpio" meme was co-constructructed. In village B she developed a similar memeplex, without a public meeting, promoting recreational use, and this memeplex was advertised on posters placed in public locations. In village C she organized a participatory meeting to discuss the issue of grey water without the specific development of a relevant memeplex. In village D the issue was raised
(burning plastics) in poster form without a public meeting and without memeplex construction.
Robles-Diaz-de-Leon (2003) recounted the amount of garbage, recreational use, grey water, and burning plastics after a three-month interval and compared the change in each with that of the control village using a variance-covariance matrix with significance to a .05 level of confidence. For example, the amount of garbage in the control village increased from 5.46 units per street to 7 units during the course of the study. Only in two villages did the amount of garbage decline: the one which involved the participatory (Limpio) meme construction, and the village where the issue of burning plastics was raised. In both cases the variance from the control village was considered significant (p=.0064; p=.0066).
Village B had the lowest rate of recreational usage at the pre-test, but after the distribution of memetically based posters, had the highest (p=.0403 as compared to the control).
No other village recorded a significant variation in recreational usage from the control. None of the towns associated with the remaining two issues (grey water and burning plastics) differed from the control in terms of variance at the post-test.
Robles-Diaz-de-Leon (2003) concluded that the most successful method of aiding people to change their behaviors involved the use of memetics (p. 123). While this observation was consistent with the results that only the targeted interventions involving memetics (participatory meeting plus memetics and memetics alone) produced the intended results, it does not explain the result of one village, targeted for the issue of burning plastics, that produced a significant difference with respect to garbage in the streets. This suggests that there were other confounding variables for which the study could not control. It may be that there pre-existed more informal leaders willing to act on environmental issues in some villages as opposed to others. It may be that the issues varied in magnitude from village to village. Finally, although a designer meme (or memeplex) containing affective and behavioral components was passed on in the two villages where such memes were introduced, the study does not speak to the cognitions those villagers had in either disseminating or in receiving those memes. We do not know how the villagers 77 related the memetic messages to themselves, or how their prior notions of self-agency may have affected the results.
Replicatory power in urban legends. Heath, Bell, & Sternberg (2001) examined the effect levels of disgust and other emotions, have on meme propagation on the internet. In an initial study, 63 university undergraduates rated 17 urban legends, drawn from a data base of
112, for emotion-inducing content on a 7-point Likert scale that covered eight emotions. They were also asked whether they would pass that story on. Those stories that would be passed along evoked reactions of interest ([beta] = .49. p<.01), surprise ([beta]=.24,p.<.05) and disgust
([beta]=.27,p<.05).
In a second related study, researchers manipulated the capacity of stories to evoke disgust by varying the content. For example, in one story a man opens a cola beverage and: 1) notices a dead mouse at the bottom; 2) drinks some beverage before noticing a dead mouse at the bottom; or 3) ingests part of the mouse before noticing it. Forty-two undergrads were asked to read 12 such stories and rate them as low, medium and high-disgust stories with a resultant inter-rater agreement of .92. The participants were asked whether the story was true, plausible, and whether it would make them change their behavior. Participants reported that they were more willing to pass along stories rated highly disgusting (p.<.05) but with no increased significance between a reported willingness to pass on a story that was thought to be true, plausible or likely to change behavior.
In a third variation of this study, three researchers independently rated 76 stories for the 7 following disgust motifs (coefficient alphas are given in brackets): unusual sexual activity such as bestiality (.96), contact with bodily substances such as feces or urine (.88), violations of hygiene (.76), ingestion of inappropriate food such as rats or bodily substances (.96), violations 78 of the body (.84), contact with proscribed animals (.93). These motifs were then applied to the results of experiment #1 with the result that those stories that had more disgust motifs were more likely to be passed on ([beta] = .26, p<001).
The Heath, Bell, & Sternberg (2001) study lends support to the argument that memetic propagation is aided by associated emotions such as disgust. The study was based, however, on what a university sample said they would do, not on actual behavior. It may be that the nature of the experimental model influenced participants to state that they would pass on stories when, in fact, they may not. Further, urban legends, while containing only a few memes, are really short narratives - memeplexi. This means that there are likely a complex of emotions connected to each story, some positive. One such emotion, mentioned by the authors, might be thankfulness that the content of the story had not happened personally. Another emotion might be a feeling of superiority to those involved in the story. Another confounding variable might involve the motives of those passing stories along. The authors suggest the possibility that people desire to bond with others who feel the same way. It is possible that for some there may be a moral point.
For example, it may be that fundamentalist Christians who believe that Halloween is an evil holiday would be more likely to believe, and pass on, stories about contaminated Halloween candy. In summation, there are several uncontrolled variables associated with this research making interpretation of the findings difficult.
Memetic priming for suicide. Marsden (2001) tested the suicide contagion hypothesis that exposure to a suicide meme will increase suicide risk. Since ethical considerations precluded direct experimentation, he resorted to exposing the concept of suicide in a controlled fashion to
67 adult internet users and comparing their estimates of the suicide risk of a hypothetical distressed student to those of a control group. These estimates were coded numerically on a five 79 point Likert scale, where a '5' meant that the distressed student would very likely commit suicide and a '1' represented the opinion that suicide was not at all likely. The means of the experimental and control groups were 2.42 and 1.77 respectively which were statistically significant - (F(l,65)
= 11.79, p< .001).
Marsen (2001) subsequently suggested that those susceptible to suicide contagion should be those with a reduced residual capacity to spread culture, that is, those who become socially isolated and culturally disenfranchised. His experiment neither supports nor disconfirms that suggestion. Indeed, his experiment is not literally about suicide at all; it is about the interpretation we may give to a set of facts given our prior exposure to information. Such information primes our interpretation in a particular direction. It is a leap to suggest this is evidence of a suicide contagion meme that increases suicide risk.
Expanding the concept of the meme. Each of these three studies varied in their definition of the concept "meme." Robles-Diaz-de-Leon (2003) said, "Memes are ideas that are self- disseminating and self-protecting that have a certain architecture to their presentation" (p. 31).
The example of her "Limpio" meme extended the notion of Dawkins (1976) in that it contained more than one behavioral suggestion (to pick up the garbage and to talk to others), and it seemed designed to appeal to an agentive self by asking, "Would you like to see a clean town?" (Robles-
Diaz-de-Leon, 2003 p. 31). Heath, Bell, & Sternberg (2001) equated memes with very short stories, but they added the element of emotion to their propagation. Marsden (2001) defined the meme as an object of contagion thus leaving himself open to Coyne's (1999) criticism that memetics involves a tautology. All three, however, expanded the definition of meme beyond
Dawkins' (1976) definition as an elemental unit of culture like "arch" or "liberty." From the
Dawkins' perspective, the three studies involved small groups of interlocking memes, with the 80 implication that it may be impossible to study memes in isolation, but only in a relational context. In summation, the memetic approach has been used to unite aspects of the stable and social constructionist approaches with a strong suggestion of behavioral determinism.
An Evolutionary Account of Self
Damasio (1999) said the process of the body monitoring its internal states, necessary for homeostasis, creates a feeling of 'me' as opposed to 'not me' giving us the ability, for example, to react to external sources of pain. This evolved characteristic is present in animals without the capacity for selfhood which, while not purely a function of brain capacity, requires brains sufficient to hold such a cognitive structure.
Blackmore (1999, 2000) speculated that memetic evolution now drives genetic evolution in humans. She noted that our brain size far exceeds that which would be required for evolutionary advantage over our nearest rivals and the necessity that all human babies are born prematurely as compared to other hominids. She suggested that early humans developed the capacity to transmit memes by use of language and other forms of imitation, and those who were better at holding and transmitting memes were more desired as sexual partners. Memetic structures of increasing complexity required larger brains, thus, like a peacock's tail feathers, human brain size, once it obtained the capacity to hold memes, continued in an evolutionary spiral until a maximum was reached beyond which further increase would result in intolerable mortality levels. Coyne (1999) replied that the human brain reached its present volume approximately 500,000 years ago while the proliferations of language-based memes would have begun 30,000 to 50,000 years ago"1. Recent research has suggested that beneficial mutations have occurred to genes affecting brain development within the past 50,000 years (Gilbert, Dobyns, &
Lahn, 2005) with a change to the ASPM gene occurring as recently as 5,800 years ago 81
(Abraham, 2005), but it is difficult to link individual mutations with phenotype and any attempt to do so on this evidence would be speculative. Irrespective of the accuracy of Blackmore's speculation, since selfplexi are not simply a function of brain size, early humans would have developed selves at some point subsequent to their carrying capacity to do so.
In his hermeneutic analysis of early Greek literature, Julian Jaynes (1976) noted pre-
Homeric Greeks were not conscious of a self and were, therefore, unable to exercise self-agency.
His most controversial suggestion was when events happened, for which their culture had not developed a pre-programmed response, increasing levels of impotent distress led to right hemispheric activity. The resultant visions were interpreted as messages from the gods leading to new behaviors. With a different interpretation of similar data that included an added examination of early Egyptian culture, and using a definition of mind to mean a cognitive structure that allows for the notions of objectivity and reason, David Martel Johnson (2003) said the early
Greeks and Egyptians did not have minds. Once the mind, so defined, evolved in a particular population, its adaptive efficacy led to its replication in other populations. Jaynes' (1976) 'self is situated within the cognitive structure Johnson (2003) calls 'mind'. The power of these interpretations stems from the implications provided by the idea that self and mind are culturally evolved entities. As Harre (1984) commented:
Even if Jaynes' claim...to have identified the moment at which mankind invented self-
consciousness as the experiential aspect of novel practices of self-ascription of
responsibility for and sources of intentions to perform actions as sometime between the
composition of the Illiad and the Odyssey is fantasy, the fact that his claim is clearly
intelligible (and might conceivably be defensible) demolishes the necessary universality 82
aspect of Kant's claim. To put it crudely, we learn to be conscious, and may amongst our
fellow humans learn to be conscious, to organize experience, in different ways. (p. 145)
The idea that the self has both agentive and cultural qualities has been widely accepted
(Adams, 2003; Arthur, 2004; Hutcheon, 1999). It would be expected that the self in individualistic cultures may be different from the self in collectivist cultures (Lent, 2004; Tang,
2001). On the other hand, acculturation is highly individualized with respect to both direction and degree (Arthur, 2003; Berry, 2002; Marin & Gamba, 2002; Organista, Organista, &
Kurasaki, 2002). In any case, the dichotomization of culture between individualist and collectivist is too simplistic as all cultures represent a balance between autonomy, community and, perhaps, divinity (Pinker, 2002; Waldram, 2004). The range of personalities within cultures and the individualization of acculturation effects (Berry, 2002; Organista et al., 2002; Phinney,
2002), reinforces the notion of agency in the consideration of individual selves. The contribution of Jaynes (1976), reinforced by the work of Johnson (2003) with respect to the construct of objectivity, is the cultural adaptation of self, including the ability to observe one's objective self with a sense of continuity and distinctness, was necessary to gain a sense of agency. Thus, the notion of William James (1892/1999) that the objective and subjective selves cannot be separated, is confirmed, and the difficulty of Damon & Hart (1988) in finding defining questions for the subjective self that did not lead back to the objective self is explained: the two aspects of self co-evolved and are tightly dependent on each other. This cultural adaptation was so successful in improving problem solving and goal orientated planning that the self was quickly replicated in all cultures, but with differing cultural manifestations. Thus, while in Japanese culture, the self outside of the group is considered incomplete (Cross & Gore, 2003;
Rosenberger, 1992), there is still a self whose relationship to the collectivity is defined. 83
A memetic perspective allows us to understand and interpret this cultural evolutionary process. A hominid evolved with the capacity to retain cultural memes learned through imitation.
Groups of interlocking memes, memeplexi, evolved that governed complex behavior. An individual might have a collection of memeplexi leading to different phenotypic behavior triggered by different contexts or situations, and these behaviors were likely, but not necessarily, related to whether or not they increased the individual's probability of survival. Eventually, a memeplex evolved representing the self and this allowed individuals to see themselves both as objects within a larger context and as activators and animators within a variety of contexts. This, in turn, allowed for an even more complex cognitive structure - mind. If Jaynes (1976) and
Johnson (2003) are right, this advance in cultural evolution occurred relatively recently in human history.
Memes and free will. As we have seen, Blackmore (1999, 2000) aligned her understanding with behavioral determinism. Free will, along with the self we think we have, is an illusion. In such an understanding these illusions evolved as clever creations associated with particular memes, or clusters of memes, so as to enhance their replicatory power in competition with other memes. If we think we have a self and that our responses are freely determined decisions of that self, then we become emotionally committed to the memeplexi behind those responses, even to the point of subsuming those imagined selves to the will of religious or ideological collectivities. Dawkins (1976, 1982, 1986, 1999) was mistaken, we cannot override our selfish genes and our equally selfish memes, we can only be buffeted about by competition between competing memeplexi and the dictates of our genes. There is, however, an alternate memetic view that situates the self in mind and supports the notion of free will. Both camps within memetics, determinist and non-determinist, agree that once our
ancestors developed a capacity for imitation, memetic transference became possible.
Increasingly, complex clusters of memes governed behavior, but these memeplexi evolved
algorithmically in Darwinian fashion - there was no self to guide the process. Eventually,
however, a selfplex evolved that became preserved in a culture or cultures1" by patterns of social
discourse including grammatical changes to language such as the use of indexical pronouns
(Blustein & Noumair, 1996; Cross & Gore, 2003; Harre, 1984). This change meant that
individual selves no longer had to evolve algorithmically, but could be learned as part of normal
maturation that included language acquisition. With the existence of the self, objective thinking became possible, and according to Dawkins (1976, 1999), it became possible to transcend
genetic and memetic determinism.
This evolutionary conceptualization of self eliminates the need for either a Cartesian
homunculous (Descartes, 1643/1990) or a Nietzschean cosmic will (Seigel, 2005). It is the
Damasian (1999) 'feeling of me' or 'proto-self that allows us to recognize our reflection in a cultural mirror and this recognition leads to cognitive reflectivity. Free will occurs with the
capacity to understand our subjectivity by objectifying ourselves to our selves. With this
capacity we have the potential to make choices at variance with both genetic and memetic pressure. Developmental transitions are a function of this free will, and the enhancement of the
capacity for free will is the definition of counselling for client empowerment. In the larger context, free will (even with the proviso that no will can be totally unencumbered) means that
Lamarckian, as opposed to Darwinian, cultural evolution is possible.
It is the possibility of Lamarckian evolution that confounds Blackmore (1999). Such evolution is not dependent upon random mutation but on purposive change. In the metaphor of 85
Johnson-Laird (1988/1990), the self is a software package that allows the organism to stand outside of itself bracketing presumptions in Husserlian fashion. While all aspects of an individual's horizon of understanding may not be so accessible (Laverty, 2003), some aspects are
(Rennie, 2000). It is the resultant approximation to an objective reality that allows the individual to make choices at variance with his or her genetic and memetic dictates. Put simply, without the concept of objective reality that the concept of self makes possible, Blackmore's (1999, 2000) determinism must stand.
Writing half a century before Dawkins (1976) coined the term "meme," Vygotsky (1939,
1986, 2004; Wertsch, 1988) offered a perspective that incorporates behavioral explanations, while accommodating the emergence of higher cognitive processes brought about by the mastery of the means of cultural behavior and thinking. Briefly, conditioning processes lead to a
"natural memory" which we share with other animals. The historical development of humans, however, "went beyond the limits of psychological functions given to them by nature and proceeded to a new culturally elaborated organization of their behavior" (Wertsch, 1988 p. 25).
These "higher mental functions," including consciousness, have social origins and are governed by a different set of rules than the more primitive primal functions. Elementary functions continue to generate behaviors based on behavioral principles, but a second possibility exists whereby stimulation may be self-generated through the use of artificial internal stimuli that become the cause of behavior. Human behavior continues to be shaped by conditioning processes in the environment, and since culture has become part of the human environment behavior could be shaped by that environment using the same deterministic mechanisms. There exists, however, another level of organization that may also determine behavior, and it would be within that level of organization that will would be found. 86
Memes and the construction of narratives. Vygotsky's (2004) suggestion, "Every product of the imagination, stemming from reality, attempts to complete a full circle and to be embodied in reality" (p. 41) has a memetic flavor. He held that our creative and imaginative processes are based in experiential reality interpreted through culture with units of that culture grouped and extended in novel ways, and these interpretive creations then cause the creator to experience a feeling of agony when those creations are not then embodied in reality. Vygotsky (1986) viewed the creation of these narratives to be an example of a higher mental process based on the context, motivations, needs, interests and history of the individual. The suggestion that the narratives then create an emotional response that demands a behavior suggests that the individual is not entirely in control of the process.
Csikszentmihalyi (1993) defined "flow" as a process of losing your self in an activity, that is, not being self-aware with an increased reliance on intuitive responses. If one's self is not present in the construction of a narrative, who or what is controlling the process? The answer has to be found within the memes themselves. If, as Dawkins' (1976) suggested, memes exert a differentially attractive force on other memes, the presence of one such unit of culture may attract a connect piece of culture without conscious effort on the part of the narrator, then both flow and Nietzsche's observation that "A thought comes when it wishes, not when T wish."
(quoted in Seigel, 2005 p. 550) is explained. A memetic flow would still bear some relationship to the individual within whose mind the flow occurred. If Price (1999) used the metaphor of the self and its worldview as a landscape to describe that relationship:
A meme in fact, is like the single raindrop. It falls with others upon a pre-formed
perceptual landscape. Isolated thoughts gather together in a string - a pattern of co
existing memes - which we might compare to a few drops congregating together in a 87
splash of water. With sufficient mass the splash of water starts to flow into streams and
rivers which are, if we like, the connectors between the raindrops and the pools and lakes,
if not the oceans, of our thoughts. (3, para. 3)
Despite the landscape provided by worldview, the passive nature of flow may allow for the unexamined creation of antisocial, alcoholic, sexist, racist or terrorist narratives, each demanding a Vygostskian embodiment in reality. Recognizing this dark possibility,
Csikszentmihalyi (1993) recommended that the individual place mental parameters over flow: "If you achieve control over your mind, your desires, and your actions, you are likely to increase order around you. If you let them be controlled by genes and memes, you are missing the opportunity to be yourself (p. 290). The self is recognized as an entity capable of critically evaluating and directing memetic flow. We are returned to the hard work of evaluating the results of our creative and imaginative processes by evaluating those results against some objective standard.
As we have seen, Doen (1998), suggested that narrative therapists revisit the notion of objective reality. From a memetic perspective, narrative construction could become a means whereby memes replicate themselves in the minds of passive individuals who then act on the basis of those narratives. Memeticist and philosopher Daniel Dennett (1991) explained, while discussing his multiple drafts of reality thesis, "Narratives are under continual revision, there is no single narrative that counts as the canonical version" (p. 136). It may be possible for the self to use objective criteria in constructing and revising its criteria or in making conscious multiple drafts of reality and selecting from amongst them. If the self is understood as simply a narrative, then it is difficult to visualize how such a narrative could be capable of establishing objective primacy over other such narratives. Alternatively, if we view the self not as a narrative, but as an 88 evolved cultural structure that replicated within populations because of its efficacy at reducing subjective perceptions, then it may be just the vehicle to hold in check both imaginative and relativistic excess. On the other hand, if the self were a cultural structure, it would be affected, if not determined, by cultural grand narratives. Such grand narratives would define "truth" and, conceivably, the self that is capable of holding truths. The resultant implication of relativism needs to be considered in the study of the self.
Cultural Relativism with Respect to the Self
Some writers have suggested that the self is a modern invention (Foucault, 1982/1997;
Holstein & Gubrium, 2000; Taylor, 1989), while others (Cross & Gore, 2003; Frow & Morris,
2000; Gergen, 1996) have pictured the individualistic self as unique to western culture. In support of a dichotomy between individualist and collectivist selves, Blustein & Noumair (1996) suggested that while western societies view the self as unitary and stable, non-western societies view it as flexible and varied. On the other hand, none of the German, French and British philosophers in Seigal's (2005) review of post-Cartesian European thought regarded the self as independent of social relations. This would imply that if there are differences between individualist and collectivist selves, those differences may be more of emphasis than of structure.
On the other hand, the notion that the self is a cultural construct would imply that cultures with different histories could exhibit variation with respect to the structure and nature of the self. This examination of the literature with respect to these issues of cultural diversity begins with critiques of the modern western self. This is followed with an examination of Buddhist thought on the self and a review of descriptions of the self from selected collectivist cultures. Finally, a comparison between Inuit and western counselling methods is reviewed with resultant implications for their respective understandings of the self. Critiques of Modernity
The amoral self. In Charles Taylor's (1989) view, the modern western self is a composite of the rationalism of Descartes and the romanticism of Rousseau. He complained, "The life of instrumental reason lacks the force, the depth, the vibrancy, the joy, the elan of nature. But there is worse...the instrumental stance toward nature constitutes a bar to ever attaining it" (1989, p.
383). With the influence of Rousseau, "The source of unity and wholeness which Augustine found only in God is now to be discovered within the self" (p. 362). Taylor (1989a) recommended that each self have a moral grounding:
To know who you are is to be orientated in moral space, a space in which questions arise
about what is good or bad, what is worth doing and what is not, what has meaning and
importance for you and what is trivial and secondary, (p. 28)
Taylor's (1989a) perspective may have been prompted by a longing for an outside power greater than ourselves to lift us to imagined heights beyond which we are otherwise incapable.
Still, he reminds us that man is a moral animal, and he implies that non-western cultures may better represent that morality in their cultural selves.
The empty self. Cushman (1995) described the nineteenth-century American bourgeois self as "individualistic, hardworking, moralistic, frugal and emotionally restricted" (p. 62). In the manner of Foucault (1982/1997), he tied this self to the requirements of industrial capitalism.
As capitalism changed to a consumer economy, personality replaced character as an essential component of self. The need to attend to the details of one's public performance, implied in the development of personality, created the ideal consumer. Such an empty self "experiences a significant absence of community, tradition and shared meaning" and interprets "the absences, loneliness, and disappointments of life as a chronic, undifferentiated hunger" (p. 79). Both 90 advertising and psychology attempt to heal this self perpetuating the consumer economy.
Cushman's analysis of psychology is based on this consumer metaphor:
"(Heinz) Kohut described a world in which, ideally, children develop in part by using
their parents - by consuming, metabolizing, and then leaving them.... Throughout one's
life, others 'show up as commodities; the individual is pictured as consuming others and
metabolizing their good qualities, in order to accomplish the building of the masterful,
bounded, feeling self" (p. 272).
In criticizing psychology for necessarily being limited by the means of production,
Cushman (1995) ignored the arguments of Adler (1927/1957, 1967) and Fromm (1969) who did integrate history and social forces in their practices. None-the-less, the assumption that the self necessarily has specific qualities such as individualism or consumerism needs to be avoided in a culturally inclusive psychology.
Self as a linguistic construction
"There could be no process by which our words for how we felt could get meaning by an
inner attention to our own states, like a kind of pointing.... Unless there were public
criteria for their correct use by others, they could never be talked to or learnt by
themselves.... Learning vocabulary later put to first-person use must be achieved in
contexts where the learning (I) is the second person (you) to you, the instructor" (Harre,
1989a, p. 25).
In keeping with his theory that the self is a linguistic construction, Harre (1998) said that certain pathologies of self could be treated by the teaching of locally valid grammars. It is sobering to consider that psychologists may be replaced some day by English teachers, or that grammar could become a staple in a psychologist's 'bag of tricks.' A strength of this notion is 91 that cultural difference in self construction should be reflected in language. For example, the fundamental gender difference in Cree is not between sexes but between animate and inanimate.
There is thus no pronoun in Cree for 'him' or 'her' but there are pronoun forms for animate objects or beings as opposed to that which is considered inanimate. This difference in language construction could be expected to translate into differences in self-representation from those
English speakers whose fundamental linguistic gender difference is male versus female.
If we view language as a reflection of the culture in which it is based, then it is through language that self possibilities are both constrained and expressed. Donald (2001) summarized,
"Any given culture is a gigantic cognitive web, defining and constraining the parameters of memory, knowledge and thought in its members" (p. xiv). Thus culture defines and constitutes the boundaries of the self (Lock, 1981/1990); it not only delimits the "assemblage of interpretive possibilities" (Holstein & Gubrium, 2000, p. 161), it creates the interpreter.
Self as illusion. Blackmore (2002) criticized James' assumption that a stream of consciousness exists consisting of temporally ordered mental representations. Referring to neurological research into the color phi phenomenon (Dennett, 1991) she concluded that consciousness is constructed backward from a focusing loci. An implication of this position is that the temporality assumed in the Jamesian T might be a variable cultural construct. Her further implication, that the self is an illusion, speaks to her background as a Buddhist. An examination of that tradition provides a non-western focus on the self.
The Buddhist Experience of Self
Drawing on the work of Rhys Davids, who translated the writings of Gotama Siddhattha from the original Pali text, Hutcheon (2001) quotes the founder of Buddhism: 92
"Since neither soul nor aught belonging to soul can really and truly exist, the view which
holds that this I who am 'world', who am 'soul' shall hereafter live permanent, persisting,
unchanging, yea abide eternally: is not this utterly and entirely a foolish doctrine?" (p. 5).
In this text, Siddhattha is debunking an idea apparently already present in 6th century
B.C.E. Indian culture, that there is an immortal soul associated with the indexical first person pronoun. While Theravatan Buddhists follow the Pali texts, the Mahayana tradition accepts as inspired, Vedic translations. From this tradition, Tibetan monk Sogyal Rinpoche (1993) writes:
"Two people have been living in you all your life. One is the ego, garrulous demanding,
hysterical, calculating, the other is the hidden spiritual being, whose still voice of wisdom
you have only heard or attended to." (p. 120)
Rinpoche (1993) is clearly not using the term 'ego' in the Freudian sense as the source of reason balancing conflicting demands of the superego and id. Instead, he assumes the presence of two selves in the individual: one false and one true, which reminds us of the humanistic search for an "authentic self (Edley, 1993). Buddhism evolved further as it crossed the Sea of Japan.
Kabat-Zinn (1994) offered the following explanation of the Zen Buddhist doctrine of 'no-self:
"No-self does not mean being a nobody. What it means is that everything is interdependent and that there is no isolated, independent core 'you" (p. 238).
A self must be present in a culture to necessitate its negation. Kabat-Zinn's (1994) explanation is not a total negation as it leaves open the possibility of a relational self constructed in language. Another western practitioner of Zen, Alan W. Watts (1963), suggested that the concept of self was never totally eliminated from Buddhism:
"The Supreme Self, is always just beyond its own control of itself. In the words of the
philosopher Shankara: 'The Knower can know other things, but cannot make Itself the 93
object of Its own knowledge, in the same way that fire can burn other things but cannot
burn itself.... This, then, is why the way of the Buddha is, at one moment in history, a
way of complete withdrawal from maya, the cosmic game, and, at another, the way of the
Bodhisattva who lays aside the endless peace of nirvana to return into the cycle of birth-
and-death..." (pp. 88, 89).
It appears, from this discussion, that the suggestion that the self is a purely European construct is mistaken. Buddhism encountered the concept of self in all of the cultures to which it adapted. In its Mahayana form, Buddhism carried with it a version of self that was either essentialist (as in the notion of a true self) or linguistically constructed.
Examinations of the Self in Selected Collectivist Cultures
The Japanese self. It has been suggested that Japanese is one collectivist culture that may be contrasted with a more individualistic North America (Cross & Gore, 2003; Rosenberger,
1992). According to Rosenberger, the word for self in Japanese, 'jibun', implies that the self is not an essentiality apart from the social realm. By itself a Japanese self is linguistically a fraction
- becoming whole only when occupying one's place in a social unit. Cross & Gore (2003) agreed suggesting that the Japanese language reflects and promotes the idea that the person is known by and understood in terms of meaningful contexts and relationships. They also noted less use of indexical pronouns in Japanese as compared to U.S. American culture.
Group identification in East Asian women. It has been reported that Korean mothers spend 1/3 of the time talking to their children about their past as compared to U.S. American mothers (Cross & Gore, 2003). Further, East Asian women are more likely to define themselves in terms of group membership as compared to U.S. women who are more likely to define themselves in terms of close relationships (mother, wife, best friend). Lent (2004) suggested that self-esteem, measured as self-satisfaction, was found to relate more highly to global life satisfaction in individualistic than in collectivistic nations while relationship harmony was found to be a better predictor of life satisfaction in a collectivistic context.
Comparing white and black South Africans. In a study of 615 undergraduate students using self-report questionnaires, Heaven, Simbayi, Stones, & Roux (2000) compared the values of white Afrikaners with black South Africans. Multiple regression analyses showed that the social identities for self-identified Afrikaners were mainly linked with ethnic language
(Afrikaans) and religion. Among self-identified black South Africans, however, social identities were more encompassing, including the notions of global citizen and South African. The researchers concluded that the values measured implied different identities founded on different ideological objectives.
Immigrant selves in British Columbia. After working with immigrants and foreign students, Ishu Ishiama (1995) suggested that the subjective impact of cultural relocation involves a threat to one's validation system with a resultant undervalidation of self. The self is both constructed and maintained within a cultural milieu, and it begins to deteriorate when not reinforced by familiar cultural interactions or when confronted by unfamiliar cross-cultural interactions that challenge assumptions upon which the originating self was developed. The resultant undervalidation or invalidation of self may lead to feelings of insecurity, discomfort, abandonment, self-depreciation, incompetence, helplessness, alienation and/or meaninglessness.
Ishiama (1995) suggested that grief work may be necessary to assist some clients facing cultural dislocation. This suggestion is in keeping with Bridges' (1980, 2001) model that grieving is a transition stage during which a new self is constructed. 95
Variations on a cultural theme. All cultures examined in this section seem to require a self, but the expression of self may vary. The dichotomization of culture between individual and collectivist may be too simplistic as all cultures represent a balance between autonomy, community and, perhaps, divinity (Pinker, 2002; Waldram, 2004). Seta, Schmidt, & Bookhout
(2006) examined this theme using Cheek's Aspects of Identity Questionnaire to divide a sample of 165 U.S. American introductory psychology students into two groups: those with higher personal identity and those with higher social identity. They used the median score on the scale as the cut off between the two subsamples. Participants were then shown a videotape of a discussion between actors identified as Greek and non-Greek, and they were asked to give an opinion as to why a targeted Greek expressed the opinions he had in two settings: conflict and consensus. As predicted, those who scored higher on for social identity tended to cite group membership (Greek) as the source of the targeted male's opinions while those who scored higher for personal identity tended to cite individual personal characteristics [F(2, 120) = 4.13. p =.02].
An implication of this finding is that there may be considerable variation within cultures with respect to individualism and collectivism. Although there must be commonalities that allow us to recognize a group of people as a culture, we need to make allowance for the range of possibilities within those cultures and the individualization of acculturative effects (Berry, 2002; Organista et al., 2002; Phinney, 2002) if we are to build a culturally inclusive psychology of the self.
A Comparison oflnuit and Western Approaches to Counselling
Korhonen (2002) used grounded theory, merged with phenomenology, to compare Inuit counselling (helping) practises with western counselling methods. Specifically, she segmented and coded the transcriptions of 17 Inuit elders and five younger Inuit who were involved in counselling or helping their people who had been interviewed using an open-ended unstructured format; and she used the same coding procedure on 17 counselling textbooks plus selected works of Adler, Bandura, Beck, Berne, Ellis, Glasser, Harris, Lazarus, May, Perls, Rogers, and Wolpe.
She reported that axial coding of the texts produced the following broad categories: 'building a relationship', 'information-gathering', 'counsellor characteristics' 'goal-setting' and 'choosing interventions'. The transcripts of the Inuit elders and helpers produced the following broad categories: 'values,' 'counselling relationship,' and 'strategies.' The codings produced unexpected agreement between theorists::
The depth of the seminal theorists' influence in and agreement with this model was
unexpected.... The unanimity of the holistic view of the client, and emphasis on
acceptance of client perceptions and decisions in all aspects of the process - problem-
definition, goal-setting, choice of interventions, etc. - was unexpected. Multicultural
counselling seems to be a holistic, integrative, client-centered process identical to
conventional counselling, (p. 277)
The level of agreement between western and Inuit methods was also unexpected:
Effective counselling in both a traditional Inuit framework and with younger Inuit seems
also to be a client-centered approach based on trust, understanding and acceptance of
client individuality, needs and context, with affective and cognitive interventions
perceived as especially helpful, and decisions based on client choice, (p. 279)
Korhonen (2002) reported that she had been aware of the pragmatic and adaptive nature of traditional Inuit life because she had worked with the Inuit Taspiriit (a self-government institution of the Inuit) previously; however, the stress that both elders and younger Inuit placed on the empirical assessment of reality and truth, and the priority of reason were new findings for her. She also did not expect the strong emphasis the Inuit placed on individual context, action 97 and choice because she had been "influenced by the literature which often cites reason/cognitivism, innovation/future-orientation, and individualism/independent action as features not typical of non-Western or traditional cultures" (p. 279).
With respect to the traditional collectivist nature of Inuit culture, Korhonan (2002) reported, "All group members were expected to follow the rules that affected group survival, but decisions about other life matters were very much individually based. Non-interference in individual and family matters was generally a norm" (p. 207). Three dominant themes about humanity emerged from the data: that human beings are essentially similar; that each person is nevertheless unique; and that humans are thinking beings whose ability to reason is their most important tool for long life. She added, "The elders all make clear their belief that humans seem to have an innate and individual core of personality, a unique self, that influences action and thought" (p. 213).
Although it is reasonable to suggest that there will be differences in values and emphasis between cultures, Korhonen (2002) reminds us that there also may be similarities across cultures.
Good research involves a quest to identify similarities as well as the difference.
Unresolved Issues Flowing From the Literature
A young child is asked "Who are you?" and s/he smiles sweetly and points toward her body. Instinctively he follows the dictum, "I don't have a body, I am my body" (Pinker, 1997).
Science has led an assault on Platonic dualism (Damasio, 1999; Hutcheon, 1996; Pickering &
Skinner, 1990), and any consideration of the self must acknowledge a unity. The concept of self that is discussed in this paper is a body-based autobiographical representation. It takes into account certain genetic and biological underpinnings, but since the seat of the self has not been located in the brain (Penfield, 1975/1990), it remains a cognitive structure. The self has been variously described as stable (Adler, 1927/1957), multiple (Hermans,
2003), contextual (Cross & Gore, 2003), self-constructed (Botella & Herrero, 2000), socially constructed (Neimeyer, 2002), saturated (Gergen, 1991) and illusory (Blackmore, 1999). Stable, neurological, constructivist, behavioral and social constructionist perspectives were presented in this literature review with each demonstrating efficacy in understanding the self and in contributing to the art of counselling. A comprehensive model of the self must account for each perspective.
Models of the self associated with the work of Adler (1927/1957, 1929) and James (1890,
1892/1999) have been reflected both in schools of psychology and in research into the self.
While built on the notion that the self is a relatively stable structure, Adlerian Psychotherapy utilizes cognitive and behavioral interventions in a change effort involving self-construction from a menu of possibilities embedded within culture. The Jamesian self is built of subjective and objective elements also embedded within culture. The element of constancy that is part of the Jamesian subjective self is analogous to the Adlerian sense of self-stability. The Jamesian elements of volition and uniqueness are implied by the Adlerian supposition of the ability to self- change. The Adlerian suggestion that a functional self includes elements of productivity and intimacy could be reflected in the "activity" and "social" elements of the Jamesian objective self.
Thus, the Adlerian and Jamesian models are not mutually exclusive, and may be viewed as the basis of a common understanding of the self that has been emergent within psychology. Both the work of Adler (1927/1957, 1929) and James (1980, 1982/1999) were based on introspective analysis of anecdotal evidence with resultant concerns with respect to comprehensiveness and generalizability. Concerns have been raised that this conceptualization of the self, as volitional and individual, is ethnocentrically culturally bound (Cross & Gore, 2003; Cushman, 1995; Rosenberger, 1992). Questions about the comprehensiveness and general applicability of the
Jamesian / Adlerian self remain.
Groundbreaking research was attempted on the development of the adolescent self
(Damon & Hart, 1988), but that research was itself grounded in the model of self proposed by
James and the results were thereby constrained by the categories available in that model. Further, their attempts to answer cross-cultural concerns by replicating their study in a Puerto Rican village failed to answer concerns that the model of the self from which they operated could not be generalized to collectivist cultures. Although their research demonstrated a developmental process related to self within the categorical constraints available, there is a need to understand the selves of individuals unconstrained by earlier conceptualizations, and to compare the results of that research to the models of the self current in the literature.
Attempts to map the self (Hartman, 1995; Lewin, 1943; Shepard & Marshall, 1999) have focused on environmental determinants with some attention to roles that may be thought of as constituting part of the Jamesian objective self, but these attempts have not included representation of the structure of the self as a unity that includes subjective dimensions. This failure to map the whole individual may be the result of inadequate technology available to those who wish to describe how an individual may be constituted from elements of culture. A memetic approach may allow the portrayal of such a structure in units of culture while maintaining compatibility with major aspects of each of the perspectives presented in this review.
Martin and Sugarman (2001) suggested that different perspectives could be accommodated in one model:
Self is an ever changing, dynamic process of understanding particular being. This said
self, as a core necessary aspect of personhood, is related to particular identity, embodied 100
being, and deliberative, reflective agency in ways that give it an existential and
experiential grounding. This grounding ensures some necessary degree of stability within
an overall pattern of processural change, (p. 107)
Making explicit the tacit understanding of the self implicit in Martin and Sugerman's account would increase the ability of counsellors and clients to visualize the change effort required in self-construction and re-construction while suggesting strategies for meeting self- change goals. The creation of visual representations or "maps" of the self would represent a concrete way of realizing this goal. If the self is a cognitive structure, then such maps of the self would consist of units of culture. The utility of such maps would be determined by how well they represent self. The major research question informing this paper, "How do people experience co- constructing maps of their self-identity using a memetic process?" involved recognition of these considerations and informed the selection of the method used. CHAPTER 3: METHOD
The exploration of the self in this research involved preparing representations of the selves of participants by isolating defining memes from detailed self-descriptions. It was anticipated that by using the concept of the meme, the self could be mapped in a way that represents both its stability over time and its capacity for change. The self was conceptualized as a fluid and richly complex construct, and it was not certain that maps constructed in this manner would resonate with peoples' lived experience. The rich and thick descriptions required of research participants in describing themselves suggested a qualitative methodology.
A number of qualitative methods were considered that commended themselves to the needs of this research including hermeneutic phenomenology, grounded theory, and discourse analysis. The method selected, transcendental realism (Miles & Huberman, 1994), allowed for the incorporation of useful elements of these other approaches. The general methodological considerations that led to the development of a specific applied approach is presented along with the accompanying conceptual framework that guided this research. Selection of the participant population, data collection and method of analysis flowed from these initial methodological considerations.
General Methodological Considerations
The richness of the self-descriptions sought in this research, the conceptualization of the self as an interpretation of lived experience, and the need to return to participating individuals to refine, elaborate and correct their descriptions, all suggest a hermeneutic approach (Laverty,
2003; Patton, 2002). On the other hand, the concept of an objective self with the implication there is an objective reality that we may approximate in some ways, is not consistent with
Heideggarian philosophy (Johnson, 2000; Laverty, 2003). While aspects of the hermeneutic approach were considered applicable to this research, the philosophical stance associated with the method would have detracted from any results obtained. None-the-less, the depth of involvement required of the participants to this research and the fact that only they could decide if the resultant maps have resonance with their lived experience indicated that they should be referred as co-researchers, a label with a distinctly hermeneutic flavor. The possibility of combining aspects of hermeneutics with realist methodologies was considered. David Rennie
(2000) said one such realist approach, grounded theory, necessarily applies a hermeneutic approach:
When interviews are used as the mode of inquiry, the analyst already has a sense of the
text given by a respondent even before it is transcribed. Moreover, the act of transcribing
it deepens the understanding of it so that, irrespective of whether or not the text as a
whole is read and reread prior to the analysis of its particulars, the analyst has a sense of
the meaning of the text as a whole. Thus, the hermeneutic circle is entered. In other
words, the understanding of the whole of the text influences the understanding of a part
of it, and the understanding of each part in turn influences the understanding of the
whole. This circling of part to whole and back again results in progressive understanding
that, in principle, is non-ending, although, hopefully, it reaches a kind of stability... (p.
484)
In recommending the triangulation of Heideggerian hermeneutics with grounded theory,
Wilson & Hutchinson (1991) suggested that hermeneutics reveals uniqueness of shared meanings while grounded theory serves to anchor those meanings to a conceptual framework. If hermeneutics involves the interpretation of lived experience, and if we wish to make knowledge statements, then it is necessary to ground those interpretations to an objectivist understanding while acknowledging relativistic limitations to a realist approach. If we accept Rennie's (2000) description of hermeneutics as involving alternating cycles of induction and abduction, then it is those imaginative processes that need this grounding.
Grounded theory has been used in research into the self. Charmaz (1990) found that the separation of a 'dialectical self from the 'physical self assisted in helping patients keep illness in the background of their lives. Marsden (2002) used a grounded theory approach to construct
'meme maps' of consumers' felt associations to the terms 'healthy-living', 'natural', and 'well- being'. But while grounded theory has demonstrated efficacy in research into the self and in research involving memetic construction, the fact that I already had a general theory of the self from which to draw would seem to preclude the use of this method (Glaser, 1992, 2002; Strauss,
1987). A further concern voiced by Conrad and Reissman (as cited in Charmaz, 2000) was that
"fracturing" data limits understanding, because "grounded theorists aim for analysis rather than the portrayal of subjects' experience in its fullness" (p. 521). Both analysis and an understanding of the experience of self, in its fullness, were required by this research. On the other hand, if we use Harre's (1989) concept of the self as being a theory about who we are, then each participant would be co-constructing a new individualized theory, with as much fullness and richness to which they may individually be disposed. From this perspective, the method of grounded theory would have some application, but would it still be grounded theory?
Wortham (2001) used a method of discourse analysis to create diagrams and common themes from dialogue, contextual cues, indexicality and voicing in an effort to gain an in-depth understanding of the interaction of individuals. While this method would be valuable in determining the internal structure of personal memes, the risk of this approach is that the primary researcher becomes the expert in deciding what the participant / co-researcher's self looks like. This risk could be minimized by using the interview-as-negotiated-text technique advocated by
Fontana and Frey (2000). With the co-researcher given the final say on interpretations with respect to self-maps, his or her voice is preserved.
While narrative and discursive methods speak to an element in this study, the conceptual framework within which the study is embedded is larger. Perhaps a useful analogy presents from the work of Frow and Morris (2000) who state, with respect to methods employed in their study of media influence on cultural evolution in Australia, "Cultural studies (as opposed to ethnography) tend to make greater use of techniques of textual analysis, to make use of a greater diversity of sources, to make more eclectic use of methodologies" (p. 329). The conceptual framework of this proposal includes the idea that the self consists of interlocking memes, which are replicative units of culture. In effect the self with its surrounding worldview or cognitive schema consists of a culture of one. Krai and Burkhardt (2002) declared that a purpose of cultural psychology is to study of the of link between culture and mind. If cultural studies are so broad as to justify greater diversity and eclecticism than is the norm in other kinds of qualitative research then the same logic should hold true to studies of the self.
Elements of hermeneutic inquiry, grounded theory and discourse analysis have been found useful in considering methodologies to inform this research, yet all of these methods also contain philosophical assumptions that would constrain the work. Patton (2002) observed,
"Being pragmatic allows one to eschew methodological orthodoxy in favor of methodological appropriateness as the primary criterion forjudging methodological quality recognizing that different methods are appropriate for different situations" (p. 72). On the other hand, a unified praxis ensures consistency and coherence while lending authenticity to the results. Miles and
Huberman (1994) attempted to build a method that was philosophically and methodologically consistent while at the same time acknowledging, "To us it seems clear that research is actually more of a craft than a slavish adherence to methodological rules. No study conforms exactly to a standard methodology; each one calls for the researcher to bend the methodology to the particularities of a particular setting" (p. 5).
Miles and Huberman (1994) described their approach as "transcendental realism" explaining "Reality exists independent of one's interpretations, and dependable knowledge claims, including claims of causality, can be made from systematically gathered and analyzed qualitative data. At the same time, participant meanings and contextual effects must be taken into account" (quoted in Morrow & Smith, 2000, p. 206). This position is consistent with the understanding that the creation of the self that allowed for self-objectification also allowed for objective inquiry. None-the-less, Miles and Huberman (1994) also hold that "In epistemological debates it is tempting to operate at the poles. But in the actual practice of empirical research, we believe that all of us - realists, interpretivists, critical theorists - are closer to the center with multiple overlaps" (pp. 4-5).
In recommending the use of astringent or descriptive codes, interpretive or pattern codes and graphic representation, Miles and Huberman (1994) give the appearance of offering a method similar to grounded theory. On the other hand, they do not believe that it is possible to bracket ones' ideas, theories and hypotheses, and that the central question in research is, "How do I permit data to elaborate, correct, and extend my ideas?" (p. 155). In this sense, their method is to grounded theory as hermeneutics is to phenomenology. Miles and Huberman's (1994) recommendation that data be returned to participants for clarification and elaboration leading to increasing depth of understanding and interpretation reminds one of the hermeneutic circle.
Finally, Wortham's (2001) method of discourse analysis that includes creating diagrams and finding common themes from dialogue appeared compatible with Miles and Huberman's (1994) method of graphic representation and interpretive coding.
In summation, the method of Miles and Huberman was considered philosophically consistent with the parameters of this research, and it offered the flexibility to incorporate modifications unique to the demands of this study. Thus, it allows for the interpretative methods inherent in a hermeneutic approach that may lead to a deepening understanding of context and recognition of participant voice while grounding it in the assumption of a reality that exists outside those interpretations. It avoids the suggestion of fracturing and narrowly construing data contained in criticisms of grounded theory while providing a method of identifying and representing memes that make up the self. It is open to methods of discourse analysis in elaborating those memes while providing a general framework from which to investigate more enduring aspects of self. In addition, it has received wide support as a reputable method (Fielding
& Lee, 1998; Morrow & Smith, 2000; Rudestam & Newton, 2001).
Conceptual Framework
"A conceptual framework is the current version of the researcher's map of the territory being investigated" (Miles & Huberman, 1994, p. 20). My conceptual map involved an integration of the work of Adler (1927/1957, 1929, 1967), Damasio (1999), and Blackmore
(1999, 2000). Specifically using Adler's definition that "the self is the convictions I have about who I am" (Mosak, 1979, p. 58) and with reference to the work of Damasio (1999) that provides a neurological basis for the self, I proposed to use the concept of the meme (Dawkins, 1976,
1986) to co-construct maps of the selves of a sample of volunteers. My conceptual framework is represented graphically in Figure 1. 107
Figure 1. A graphic representation of the conceptual framework informing this study showing the process of making the implicit self explicit, mapping that self and relating the map back to the co-researcher's lived experience
In keeping with the model provided by Miles and Huberman (1994), I expected that this conceptual framework could evolve as the study progressed. For example, I suspected that the issue of intentionality, which is not represented in Figure 1 (although it may be subsumed under
'lived experience'), may have a role to play in the development of the self. While my conceptual framework included the idea that a memetically sound representation of the self may be produced, the contents of the individual self-maps are not preconceived.
Harre (1989) described the self as a theory "in terms of which a being orders, partitions, and reflects on its own experience and becomes capable of self-intervention and control" (p.
404). The core task of this research involved each co-researcher presenting their individual and unique theory of themselves, which were then represented in memetic map form, perhaps making their implicit theory of self explicit for the first time. 108
Trialling the Proposed Research Method
Rudestam and Newton (2001) recommended piloting instruments and procedures prior to their use in qualitative research. Using an open-ended format beginning with the statement,
"Tell me about yourself," this method was piloted with a University of Calgary graduate student during the development of this research proposal. The taped transcript was segmented with each segment given a label that described its content. Those labels were equated with memes, were linked in a pattern that seemed subjectively logical, and were presented back to the participant for discussion. Her self-map is reproduced in Figure 2. As this mapping exercise was only a prototype, a cycle of repeated interviews was not completed.
Figure 2. A memetic map of the self of a university student displaying relational forces between memes and the number of times (in brackets) each meme was referenced during the interview. 109
The numbers in brackets in Figure 2 show how many times the named meme occurred in the transcript. Attractive force between memes was inferred from the participant narrative, for example, she described her dog as her friend whom she cared for, but that she felt guilty leaving it for long hours while she was at university. Thus "dog owner" was linked to "friend,"
"nurturer" and "guilty" memes. The broken line between the memes "Catholic" and "Eve" represents repulsion between two memes. "Eve" represents a certain way of being at variance with her Catholic upbringing, and the repulsive force between the two introduces an element of instability into her self. The participant said she feels as though she cannot give up either the Eve or Catholic memes. The individualized nature of each meme is illustrated by the memos attached to two memes, "Eve" and "child" in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Memetic map of the self of a university student with memos attached to two memes indicating the structure of those memes. 110
For many people, their meme for 'child' would represent happiness and nurturing. In this case, the memo attached to child indicates a negative affect. The memo attached to 'Eve' indicates that this may be an area of developmental transition. Schlossberg, Waters, & Goodman
(1995) suggest that "A transition...results in changed relationships, routines, assumptions, and roles" (p. 27). Such transitions may result in changes to the self or changes to behavior without change to the self. Bridges (1980, 2001), however, said that a change only counts as a transition if it results in a change to the self, and that is the position adopted by this research. Using the
Bridgesian conceptualization, it was thought that transitions may be used to track the dynamic nature of the self. It was thought that this student, for example, may wish to seek an accommodation between her Catholic upbringing and the new values that she has identified as
'Eve'. Subsequent conversation indicated that she had begun a process of such accommodation under a more generalized umbrella, 'spirituality'.
As a result of this trial, it was decided that the concept of the meme needed a more precise definition serving to differentiate it from other ideas and descriptors. Using the notion that memes exhibit a particular architecture (Robles-Diaz-de-Leon, 2003) it was proposed that structure of the meme as understood in this research exhibits a referent to a commonly understood meaning and a behavioral dimension (Dawkins, 1976) along with an affective dimension (Heath et al., 2001). A fourth connotative dimension was added as a result of this trial after it was noted that the participant connected some memes such as her conservative values to
Catholicism, connotatively.
In summation, in this research memes are defined as having four necessary dimensions: referent, connotative, affective and behavioral. It was decided to accept Dawkins' (1976, 1982) definition of a meme as an elemental unit of culture as opposed to one that equates it with a short Ill story (Heath et al., 2001; Robles-Diaz-de-Leon, 2003). In this way the self could be studied as a narrative consisting of units of culture called memes.
Selection of the Participant Population
Participants were recruited using print advertising and posters supplemented by presentations made to classes and community groups in a process of purposeful random sampling. The recruitment advertisement template for both print advertising and 5" by 9" posters appears in Appendix D. Print advertisements were placed in the La Ronge weekly newspaper and University of Calgary student newspaper and posters were distributed in both La
Ronge and the university. Presentations describing the research and inviting participation in that research were made to classes at a community college centered in La Ronge and the University of Calgary. The following community groups and organizations were contacted and invited to advertise for participants to this research: The International Student Center (U. of C), the Native
Center (U. of C), The Calgary Humanist Association, and the Northern Teacher Education
Program (La Ronge). Potential participants were invited to contact the writer by e-mail or by telephone.
No one in on-going counselling was considered for the role of participant in this research so as to help ensure the selves being studied would not be in the state of transition implied by that process. To ensure that a collaborative process was respected minimizing power differentials between researcher and participants, only adults at least 18 years of age were be selected for this study. Potential participants were read a Recruitment Script (Appendix E) to ensure that they understood the purpose, procedures and time commitment required in this research.
To enhance the credibility and authenticity of the results, a balance was sought for gender, ethnicity and socio-economic status in recruitment selection. Similarly, some balance 112 was sought between urban and rural populations and for education level. It was also considered beneficial to have participants from traditionally collectivist cultures as well as individuals form more individualistic (western) cultures. Participant selection ended when the level of diversity required by this study was met.
In total 26 people applied to be participants in this study. The first three applicants to apply to be participants in this research were accepted: a Metis woman in her twenties, an
Amerindian woman in her forties and a Caucasian male in his forties who identified himself as a humanist. In the interest of diversity it was decided to reject people who had similar characteristics of people already accepted into the study. Those who were subsequently accepted included a transsexual, a woman of joint Canadian - U.S. American citizenship who became a professional boxer, a woman who became paralyzed as a result of an accident, a woman of Metis and Caucasian ancestry who did not identify with either ancestry, a Caucasian male in his thirties who identified himself as a Catholic, an Amerindian male his twenties, a Caucasian male in his fifties who identified with Aboriginal Spirituality, a Russian male in his twenties, and a Chinese woman in her twenties. The Amerindian female withdrew from the study prior to the first interview.
Those not included in the study included two aboriginal women who were personal friends of the researcher, the husband of one of the participants already accepted into the study, one Amerindian woman who was of the same age cohort as the one initially accepted, three middle-aged Caucasian men, a Caucasian woman of the same age cohort and humanist views as a woman already accepted, and two university students who were thought to have similar characteristics to some of the female university students already selected. Four international students applied after the number of participants accepted had reached eleven, one more than the 113 maximum proposed in the research proposal, and after a majority of the initial interviews had been held. All of these late applicants were Caucasian, a racial group already well-represented in the study. It was also noted that all four of these applicants were women and that gender balance had already been achieved. Thus, the increased diversity that might have been obtained by a more international sample was balanced by considerations related to race and gender as well as practical difficulties in adding on to a study already in process.
Data Collection, Analysis and Management
All participants participated in three cycles of data collection over a seven-month period.
All interviews were audio taped, and initial interviews were transcribed and analysed with the aid of a qualitative software package. The research involved the following steps:
1. Using an open-ended semi-structured interview format, the participants' self-
narratives were recordedv;
2. The self-narratives were transcribed, and those transcriptions were segmented and
coded. Initial descriptive codes were examined for four memetic dimensions
(referent, connotation, affect and behavior). Memoing was used to identify
connotative, affective and behavioral dimensions attached to each meme. Themes
(interpretive codes) were noted as they appeared to relate to relationships among
memes;
3. Data obtained from step 2 was displayed in figure form following the procedure
recommended by Miles & Huberman (1994), and these figures were called
"memetic self-maps;"
4. These graphic displays were presented to the participants individually during a
second interview for the purpose of confirmation, elaborating and correcting, and 114
the self-maps were then revised to more accurately reflect each participant/co-
researcher's lived experience;
5. Ways in which various aspects of the participant's maps reflected their actual
lived experience, including developmental transitions, were explored through
open-ended questioning during their second and third interviews;
6. The second version of their memetic self-maps were presented to participants
during their third interviews with the invitation to confirm, elaborate or correct
those maps;
7. Feelings of empowerment directed toward self-change (and any "blocks" to such
change) were explored by the participants using open-ended questioning during
the third interview.
Preparation and Refinement of Memetic Maps
Initial Procedure. Participants were asked to talk about their selves with prompt questions available (see Appendix C) for use if needed to generate full and rich self-descriptions.
The open-ended conversational style allowed for a full exploration of themes. The initial interviews lasted one to two hours and produced from 13 to 25 pages of transcript. The transcripts were then divided into segments representing units of thought, and those segments were coded for the main ideas in those units (descriptive coding). Descriptive codes were then examined for the set of properties used in this study to define memes. Those codes that did not fit the definition of a meme were either discarded or included as properties of existent memes. It was possible for one segment to be coded for more than one meme. Memes appearing in the same segment were considered connected unless the participant was contrasting those memes.
Memes that referred to other memes explicitly or implicitly in their referent, connotative, 115 affective or behavioral dimensions were also considered connected. The combination of having a finite number of categories (memes) that were connected to some, but not all, other such categories allowed for a mapping of those categories. Such maps were prepared by the researcher to be returned to the participants in a second interview.
Second Interview. Similar to the process involved in a hermeneutic circle, data collection and analysis proceeded in a cyclical fashion alternating between induction and abduction for the duration of three phases. During phase one, the researcher collected information, segmented and coded data, and prepared initial memetic maps. During phase two, the researcher returned to the individual participant co-researchers to co-construct revised memetic maps using new data provided by them. Participants were invited to discuss ways that their map could be strengthened, and, they were invited to elaborate on issues that came to mind while viewing their maps. They were invited to reflect on things that happened in their past that helped make their present selves. They were invited to share any new thoughts or feelings about who they are as a result of developing this map of themselves, and from discussing it. They were asked if there had been any changes that had occurred since the first interview and whether looking at their map lead them to think of changes that they would want to make to their selves.
Third interview: In similar form to the second interview, the participants were shown, and then asked to comment on their second self-map. They were asked for any new insights they may have had with respect to themselves, and whether any changes occurred to who they were since the previous interview. They were also asked to elaborate, clarify or explain ideas previously expressed that were not adequately understood by the researcher. They were asked about their feelings of empowerment and whether those feelings had stayed the same, increased 116 or decreased as a result of their participation in this research. They were also invited to share any other impacts this research may have had on them.
Timelines. The first phase of this project began in January, 2007 with the distribution of print advertising and posters (see Appendix D). Initial interviews began in February and the process of transcribing, segmenting and coding of those initial interviews continued while further interviewing was completed. The first versions of the memetic self-maps were completed by
May, 2007. At that time, the memetic maps completed in Phase One were returned to the participants for verification and amendment. Concomitantly, participants were asked to elaborate on any changes that had occurred to their selves in the time frame between the first and second interviews. As a result of those interviews the participant self-maps were revised, and a third round of interviews began in August, 2007 with the purpose of improving further the trustworthiness of those maps. In addition, open-ended questions were presented inviting participants to discuss possible future developmental transitions.
Qualitative computer software. The qualitative software used in this study, Analysis
Software for Word-Based Records (AnSWER) was developed by the Center for Disease Control,
Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention (U.S.A.) to coordinate and conduct large-scale, team-based analysis projects. Although it was developed for large-scale studies using multiple researchers, this public domain software is designed with sufficient flexibility that it was easily adapted to the needs of this study. Each participant's data was entered into the software as a separate project within a larger study. This allowed each participant's self narrative to be segmented and coded individually without reference to the other participants while allowing for later group comparisons. Computerized systemization allowed for procedures that were consistently applied to the development of participant self-maps and for audit trails documenting how concepts, 117 theories, and hypotheses were developed. The AnSWR analysis uses code and source data to categorize segmented text. Coding involved carefully reading through the textual data, identifying ideas about viewpoints and experiences, creating codes to help mark similar data, and then assigning codes to like data. In this program, text segments can be broken down into subunits, called embedded or nested text segments, linked with other segments, or they may stand alone. The program allowed for the clustering of coded segments in the form of interpretive or pattern codes thus developing a hierarchy of relationships. Notes were attached to each astringent code to describe its memetic properties.
Ethical Considerations
All participants signed a consent form to participate after having read a summary of the research proposal and their role in that research (Appendix F). I summarized the scope of the research to help ensure their understanding, and answered any questions they had, prior to their consent to participate. Participants were encouraged to choose a pseudonym to help ensure the confidentiality of their information, and all but one participant chose to exercise this right.
Permission was obtained to use non-identifying direct quotes in the dissertation. Participants were notified of their right to withdraw from the project at any time, and that any tapes or notes made prior to their decision to withdraw would be destroyed provided that the decision to withdraw was made prior to their review of their first self-map. All taped interviews used in the study were kept in a locked filing cabinet, and all computer records were protected by a password. These provisions are to be maintained for five years at which time all such records will be erased. 118
CHAPTER 4: INDIVIDUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF EACH SELF
Eleven applicants were accepted as participants in this study ranging in age from 24 to 59 with an average age of 37.3. Eight of the participants in the sample were resident in Calgary and three were resident in La Ronge. Four participants were university students, six were employed away from the university, and one was unemployed. The sample was equally divided by gender: five females, five males and one transsexual. With respect to nationality, eight were Canadian, one was Chinese, one was Russian, and one had joint Canadian - US American citizenship. The racial composition included seven Caucasians, two people of North American aboriginal ancestry, one Chinese, and one person whose mother was Metis and father was "white" who identified herself as simply "Canadian."
The self-maps, while under construction, represented eleven separate research projects.
The participants were co-researchers in the sense that they had the final say as to when their individual map adequately represented themselves, if at all. These constructions, along with participant reaction to the process of co-construction, are presented individually in this chapter.
The results were then grouped for all participants in a search for commonalities, and these are presented in Chapter 5.
Tina
Tina was a married Metis female in her 20s. In addition to raising three children (four by the end of the study), she was employed part-time at a janitorial position.
Tina's First Interview
When initially asked to tell the researcher about herself (February 3, 2007), Tina gave her age, the number of children she had, her marital status, and the fact that she likes to clean. She said that talking about herself was very hard, but her responses gradually lengthened producing 119
15 pages of transcript. This transcript was divided into segments, and the segments were coded for memes. A total of 23 memes were applied 70 times to 52 segments. Memes appearing in the same segment were considered connected unless the participant was contrasting those memes.
Memes that referred to other memes explicitly or implicitly in their referent, connotative, affective or behavioral dimensions were also considered connected. By comparing descriptive codes with these four dimensions and by connecting related memes, a map of Tina's definition of her self was artfully created and is reproduced in Figure 3.
Familial core. The meme "mother" was found in 11 segments in Tina's initial transcript.
Tina ascribed maternal responsibility for the safety and care of children to this meme. Her behavior associated with "mother" included ensuring that her children are safe, cared for, attend school, and have many toys. She engaged in excessive worry for her children's safety, and this led to extensive restrictions on what they were allowed to do. The meme "mother" is illustrated by being connected to memes for caring, anxiety, and paranoid.
There is an interpretive factor in the identification of memes. For example, it may have been possible to add a meme for "toy-giver" to Tina's self-map. On the other hand, "toy giver" was only mentioned once in the interview and that was in relation to the meme "mother" with the resultant interpretation that ensuring her children had many toys was subsumed as part of Tina's behavioral definition of what it means to be a "mother." The list of segments coded for "mother," along with notes related to the definition of Tina's meme "mother," and rational related to connecting that meme with other memes in Tina's self-map is reproduced in Figure G. Also reproduced in Figure G is the list of all of the memes used in Tina's self-map including their four dimensions. Figure 4: Memetic map of Tina resulting from the segmentation and coding of her initial interview showing the number segments coded for each meme (in brackets)
One characteristic of motherhood, according to Tina, is love. But this is also an emotion associated with being a daughter and a sister, and is also applied to other children not her own.
Had Tina described herself as a "lover," then that might have qualified as a meme in its own right, but she did not. On the other hand, "love" is very much a theme in her life, so this theme called an "interpretive code" in the model suggested by Miles and Huberman (1994) but referred 121 to as a "thematic code" in this context, is represented in her self-map as a box. Themes do not necessarily exhibit the four central characteristics attributed to memes (referent, connotative,
affective and behavioral), but they may represent a characteristic or quality common to a group or cluster of memes. Other thematic centers represented in Tina's map include "Family Person",
"Decent Person", "Empowered" and "Learner".
The meme "mother" had such force in Tina's self that it saved her from binge drinking on two occasions. Tina was known as a "partier" as a teenager. She rebelled, left home, dropped out of school, experimented with drugs and drank to excess. She reported, "Getting pregnant made me sober up and smarten up." One of Tina's children died, and in her grief she began binge drinking again. "I got into alcohol really, really bad, probably months straight. I was only sober for 2 days." Then she discovered that she was pregnant again: "The only time that I actually changed was when I found out I was pregnant, and then I had to, I couldn't drink. I couldn't go out. I couldn't do all that stuff, so I actually had to sit down and relax."
All four segments in which Tina described herself as paranoid were associated with her children. She would not allow her children to play in the bush behind their home. Her husband slept on a couch so that she could be close to their baby at night. She awoke frequently to listen to her baby breathing. She worried when her children were out of sight. Her anxiety was also associated with motherhood. It is possible that that the words "paranoid" and "anxiety" represented the same meme in this instance, and the decision to code the two as separate memes was subjectively based on the understanding that Tina had previously been diagnosed as having an Anxiety Disorder, therefore part of her self-definition was someone who suffers from this condition. At the time of this study, she was no longer taking medication or counselling for anxiety. When she recognized panic symptoms, she would go into a separate room and talk or will herself out of it. Thus her anxiety was also associated with her sense of empowerment.
The second most referenced meme in Tina's map is "wife," and connections were formed between it and memes for budgeter, cleaner and open-minded. She admitted to "spoiling" her husband:
"My best friend... lives on the farm, she grows her own grain, makes her own butter,
makes her own bread, takes care of her man, stuff like that. I like doing that. I just won't
let my husband touch my vacuum cleaner; I like cooking for him. I don't think he's ever
done laundry. I just enjoy doing that for him. I enjoy cleaning and taking care of my
household. My best friend... thinks I spoil (her husband) too much, and I know I do, and
she says that makes him lazy, and I know it does, but I don't care."
"Wife" is also connected to the interpretive or thematic codes "Family Person" and
"Love." These two themes with their surrounding memes were presented as the core of who she was. Tina reported that she places considerable pressure on her self as a result of her status as a family member and the importance she places on that role. The presence of connected
"budgeter," "cleaner" and "mediator" memes suggested that for her just being is not enough, there are behavioral roles associated with being a family member that must be fulfilled.
The "mother" meme is also connected to the interpretive or thematic code "Decent
Person." It seemed to be of considerable importance to Tina that she sees herself as such a person, and the fact that she takes the duties associated with motherhood seriously marks her as a decent person. The meme that is most closely associated with the theme "Decent Person," however, is "open-minded." It was coded for just five segments but had associative connections with seven adjoining memes. For example, Tina has the role of mediator in her family of origin 123 because she can see alternative points of view, a quality that she defined as part of being a decent person. This quality of being open-minded leads her to care for and befriend people of minority status. It has led her to be against stereotyping, and this "anti-stereotyping" meme led her to defend students who have been stereotyped negatively by teachers. She also defended gays and lesbians from negative stereotyping. She said being open-minded enhanced her ability to "get along with" her husband. It also contributes to her belief in education, and although she does not have a lot of formal education, she read extensively and made education a priority with her children. The link between "mother" and "education" was missed on this initial self-map but was included in a subsequent version.
Self as animator. Another center in Tina's self-map was that of being an animator defined by Tina as someone who gets things done. This meme was only mentioned explicitly in two segments, but it was implied in her self-characterizations as being "stubborn," a "budgeter," and as being a self-directed learner. The capacity for self-animation implies the interpretive theme
"Empowerment" which, as we have seen, may be connected to her meme "anxiety."
Tina's Second interview
Tina was shown her initial memetic self-map on May 8, 2007, three months after her initial interview. Her initial reaction was that it was a good representation of who she is. While looking at that map, she mentioned that she is a "yeller." Her children listen to her husband when he talks normally, but that she has to yell for them to listen. In response to this information, I added a meme "yeller" to her memetic map which was attached to "mother." I considered merely adding this as a descriptor of what it means to be a mother, but I obtained the sense from Tina that this is not how she would define mother. Tina said that she was different, in some ways, from our interview three months earlier.
She said she was not as paranoid as she used to be, and that she was no longer trying to please everybody. Tina said she was giving her husband chores at home, and he was helping out with things like laundry, and she allows him to do the laundry in his own way. She noted that her husband had begun bottle-feeding their baby. These changes, and her new capacity to say "no" allowed her more time to relax, and she realized that she never had time to do so before. She said she is now working part-time to help out with finances, and this has forced her to get up earlier resulting in her having breakfast with her eldest son. He told her, "I like it when you have breakfast with me mom." This led her to realize she had been sleeping in, partly because she had been "a little depressed." She also said she cried during her recent birthday. She had worked "so hard" to make everyone else's birthday special, but she had to buy her own birthday cake and make her own food.
Additional empowerment. As a result of this new information, we added memes for "self changer" and "assertive" to Tina's self-map with "self changer" connected to "animator,"
"mother," and "wife." This indicated that she felt empowered to make changes to her roles as mother and wife. Dotted lines were used to indicate connections with "wife" and "assertive" indicating that these changes were at a preliminary stage, in her estimation. A dotted line between "self changer" and "assertive" was used to indicate that she still relapses into non- assertive behavior, as indicated by her response to the failure of her family to adequately remember her birthday. We added a meme for "pleaser" indicating that she takes care of others' needs but often neglects her own, and we attached this meme to "Decent Person" as the core of this tendency to please others is the feeling that she is a good person when she engages in this behavior. This was connected to "assertive" (with a dotted line) because Tina appears to have recognized the implications of at least some of this behavior, and she was taking some steps to ensure her needs are recognized and met. These changes, along with others made as a result of this second interview, are shown on Tina's amended self-map (Figure 4).
The addition of emotion. Figure 4 reflects increasing complexity in Tina's self-map with the most striking addition being an emotive element beyond that afforded by the memes themselves. This addition resulted from Tina's discussion about how she handles anxiety attacks.
She admitted that she could not take her children to a mall because of social anxiety, yet she said she does not like the way she feels on medication because she "should be feeling everything."
With further questioning she said, "Because that is part of life. To feel is part of life.... That's who I am." Tina said that a repertoire of emotions such as "sad, happy, mad, confused, distant," are necessary to feel human. "People are supposed to feel to learn, to grieve, to feel excitement," she added. Tina admitted to bouts of depression and guilt that prevents other emotions from surfacing. When these emotions are overpowering, she hides from others and attempts to generate positive thinking. The repertoire of accessible human emotions is represented by a bar at the bottom of Tina's self-map with green arrows flowing to and through various memes that are frequently triggered, or in turn trigger, these emotions. A second bar is represented above the base bar representing the depression and guilt that block other emotions. A yellow line is drawn from that bar to the "self-changer" meme indicating that when she is depressed her capacity for self-change is diminished. A new meme: "hider of negative feelings" was added, connected to
"pleaser." 126
gay Jrtenib rule player
btatMiiit- lit •MtfrH,!IIlg it)
/ eduuUioa X open \ |
tjeamer {4fvar
lmjspetjdcttt BdfcftJ;
I mjiowered
ujil J pre, n i
Figure 5: Revised Memetic map of Tina resulting from her second interview 127
Additional self-disclosure. Subsequent to this discussion of feelings, Tina said she was bi sexual, and she thinks more like a guy than like a woman. She finds that "straight" women are judgmental and controlling while men are more accepting of her. She added that lesbians are easier to get along with than straight women because, "they know who I am." She has to play a role with straight women and generally, "I have to be different around different people." Her husband has not been jealous of her male friends, but he has been jealous of a female friend. Tina said her sexuality contributed to her open-mindedness. She added, "When me and (her husband) did our vows we made sure that 'faithful' was not in there because that's not realistic." Her husband has had sex with a female friend with her approval, but she said that if he was to lie and sneak around, that would "break my heart." As a result of this discussion we added a "bi-sexual" meme to Tina's map with connections to "guy friends," "open-minded," "role-player," and "anti- stereotyping." We added "role-player" to the self-map connected to being bi-sexual. The meme
"open-minded" was elaborated to include reference to an open marriage.
Tina was invited to elaborate on her self-description as "stubborn." She replied, "I like my house in a certain way; it's my way or the highway." Tina believes her children are a reflection on her, and they have to be well mannered. She blames when people do not live up to her expectations. As a result of this elaboration, we moved the meme "stubborn" to a somewhat more central location in her self-map and added a directional arrow from "stubborn" to "blamer" indicating a tendency to blame when she does not get her way.
Tina was invited to elaborate on her notion that having children had profoundly changed her twice. She was asked if there was anything that happened in her childhood that led to this value of placing her newborn's needs so much in the forefront. Tina replied, "Before I had kids it was all about me. I didn't care about anyone else. I learned it wasn't about me - it was about him. If I didn t take care of him no one else would." When reminded that not all women change their lifestyle when they discover that they are pregnant, Tina said that she did not want her children on welfare and dropping out of school. She said she was lucky that she came from a good family that valued children. As a result of this discussion, we incorporated the idea that a mother who values her children is both a loving and a decent person by drawing connections between these memes.
When invited to share new thoughts or feelings, or ways of seeing herself as a result of developing her self-map Tina replied, "After the first interview my head was so clear. It was relaxing. I was clear-headed for a good two days after that." She went on to say that she realized that different things made her who she was.
In answer to the question, "Does looking at this map of yourself lead you to think of changes that you would want to make to your self?" Tina replied, "I am going to spend more time on me and not try so hard to make everyone else around me happy." She said she plans to become more assertive, to say "No" more and to take relaxing baths, "For at least 15 minutes."
She started working and said she likes bringing money into the house and buying things with her own money. She added that the guilt she feels when she relaxes, and the fact that relaxing reminds her of depression, inhibits these changes.
Tina's Third Interview
This session occurred on September 8, 2007, exactly seven months after the first session and four months after the second. Tina suggested that the revised map "pretty much" summarized who she is, and that she had no new thoughts or feelings associated with the map which she described as "pretty cool." She said she hasn't changed, despite the fact that she was now pregnant with her fourth child, and she said that she is the same person she has "always been." As a result of her pregnancy, she was seeking a transfer to a less demanding job, and she and her husband were looking for a bigger house. Her pregnancy led her husband to taking on more chores. She explained with a smile, "When I'm pregnant I get spoiled." She anticipated, however, that with the birth of her new baby she will have less time for herself.
Tina said that the process of participating in this research had neither empowered nor disempowered her, but she had always considered herself an empowered person. The process of this research made her think about who she is and how she sees herself. It made her think about things she wanted to change, such as having negative feelings, being a blamer, being paranoid and being a smoker. On the other hand, she was aware of these negatives before the research and would have likely been working to change them anyway. She said the positive things about her included being a wife, a mother and a cleaner, and while she is proud of these things, "you can always do better." She said no further changes to her self-map were necessary.
Trevor
Trevor was a single Amerindian male in his twenties. He had no children and was employed full-time as an addictions worker.
Trevor's First Interview
Trevor's first interview, March 20, 2007, produced 13 pages of single spaced transcript that was then divided into 110 segments. Thirty-eight memes were identified as applicable to these segments, and they were applied a total of 145 times. Some segments were coded for more than one meme. Memes appearing in the same segment were considered connected unless the participant was contrasting those memes. Memes that referred to other memes explicitly or implicitly in their referent, connotative, affective or behavioral dimensions were also considered connected. The memes along with the number of segments that were applied to each meme (in 130 brackets), and the connections with other memes were placed in a memetic self- map reproduced in Figure 5.
Figure 6: Memetic map of Trevor resulting from the segmentation and coding of his initial interview showing the number segments coded for each meme (in brackets)
Retrospective narrative construction. There is no clear starting point in Trevor's memetic self-map, or perhaps there are numerous potential starting points. Someone with a strong sense of chronological order might start with the gender roles he learned in childhood taking care of two 131 younger siblings in a small Saskatchewan city while his elders drank. An essentialist might start with the core of who he is, an empowered person whose sense of self-worth is tied being active.
A psychologist might be tempted to start with "self-esteem," coded for more segments than any other meme (10) on his self-map. I started with the interpretive or thematic code "Rememberer" because Trevor talked about himself in storied form, and the stories he recounted seemed to provide meaning and direction. In the following exchange Trevor talked about how the memories become "learnings" that ground him in who he is:
Lloyd: What is in you that stays the same?
Trevor: What is in me that stays the same? I think that what it is, and actually I had a
discussion about this with one of my friends, she was actually an ex-streetworker, and she
has changed her life around, was the experiences, the experiences stay the same I think.
Lloyd: So do you mean the memories are the same, you know its you because, you have
the same memories of, of your growing up last year as you do this year?
Trevor: Not only that, it's there, but also what you learnt, the learnings.
Lloyd: The learnings?
Trevor: Ya! Ya know, it's like a little kid learning to walk. He's still a little kid, just
because he can walk does not mean he is any different. He can expand on it, right, and
you can expand on and add things on to it, maybe he will run, maybe he will jump,
maybe he'll skip, swim or bike. It all adds on to it, but it's still the same.
Nine segments of the initial interview were coded for the meme "learner." Much of
Trevor's learning is informal and introspective: "I learned about myself from myself. And I often quite thought something that I say quite often, 'It's a shame that our eyes are always looking outward, because we'll find real answers inside ourselves." "Learner" is connected to the development of beliefs and an empowering ability to act on those beliefs:
I am a drum keeper, a pow-wow drum, and ya know, my Indian name is 'Against the
Wind' and that. I got that name when I was young, and what that meant was I was always
going against some beliefs; I would be strong enough to stand up for what I believe,
basically.
There is another, but possibly related, interpretation on how Trevor received his Indian name:
The whole reason why I got that name was because my Uncle , who is not a
traditional native guy, observed me when I was kid, and I would always piss against the
wind. And that is how I got my name, and that's pretty much who I am. It's more like, ya
know, I am more stand-up. That's why I enjoy my work. I feel there is a need for my HIV
work up here, is because it's not a popular thing, people don't like talking about it.
Individuality. Trevor said that everyone is unique in the way they experience and interpret events, and that is what gives us our individuality. Given the direction provided him by his Indian name, it is perhaps not surprising that Trevor has incorporated a meme into his self that we labelled "unique experiencer." Trevor said that he welcomes new experiences, such as this research, and he welcomes the opportunities to change himself that come with these unique experiences. He remembered being the child of an alcoholic with the result that he became both
"cautious" and a potential alcoholic. By identifying himself as a "potential alcoholic," Trevor consciously works to ensure that he does not become a practicing alcoholic. He related this to his self-identification as an addictions worker. He said being an addictions worker "was me trying 133 make sense of myself and my childhood." He added, "I noticed patterns of my life where I would go out with alcoholics, and there are things I wanted to address."
Categorizing self-esteem as a meme. Trevor's "cautious" meme includes a tendency to discount other peoples' compliments, a trait associated with low self-esteem. He associated caution with both introversion and with being single, and his unhappiness with these two aspects of himself led him to examine his own self-esteem. While "self-esteem" might not ordinarily be thought of as a meme, in this case it represents the quality of feeling positive about oneself, and it is something that Trevor has worked on frequently by drawing on his Indian name, using positive affirmations, and by challenging himself to attempt new behaviors. Trevor said he made
"self-esteem" into part of who he is to diminish the effects of those parts of his self that are self- critical or cautious. As a youth and young adult Trevor bolstered his self-esteem through his involvement in martial arts, but more recently he has worked on accepting compliments and in engendering pride in both his accomplishments and in who he is.
Punishing wrong-doers. A "Self-evaluation" theme was added to Trevor's self-map touching on self-esteem but including positive and negative connotation and affect in a variety of other memes including "cautious," "arrogant," "self-critical," "loves kids," and "human." He recognized an "intimidator" component related to his anger. In one example, he chased a "John" with a baseball bat. In another, he threatened a father who had hit his (the father's) child in a shopping mall. In his evaluation these methods of curbing the behavior of wrongdoers was ineffective and potentially self-defeating. He has since cultivated more subtle methods of intimidation.
Trevor traced the anger he has over people who abuse children and women to his childhood experience of protecting his younger siblings. He learned the roles of "man," 'protector, "parent" and "big brother" that were consistent with a gender role of "judge, jury and executioner." He found that he had to discard some parts of his gender role: "As a person, as a man, I had to relearn its okay to cry, its okay to laugh, its okay to be happy. You don't need to be this big stoic Indian."
Trevor's gender-based role as a protector of women and children led to a further self- identification: "I am a big Indian, and no one is really going to mess with a big Indian." This, in turn, led to an interest in his aboriginal heritage:
So then I thought, 'What's it mean to be Indian?' and I thought, 'warrior', so I did some
research, and I realized back in the old days we used to go on vision quests, so I went on
a vision quest, and that's where the answer to that question came from, was when I went
on a vision quest.
Trevor embraced Taoism as well as aboriginal spirituality. He said he learns from both traditions, and these learnings guide his behaviors and relationships with others.
On becoming more human. Trevor has a history of dating women who were drug abusers, and one such woman left a memory and learning on the nature of being human. She was on prescribed medication for a mood disorder, but she stopped taking her medication. As Trevor recalled, "Those pills were stabilizing her mood but that's not what she wanted. Many times she told me that she stopped taking the pills because she wanted to feel something; she wanted to feel human and those pills did not allow her to do that."
Trevor befriended prostitutes to help them "be able to feel again, being able to think about things other than their addiction." He saw even their lies as signs of progress toward humanness "because one has to feel something such as fear in order to prompt the lie."
Eventually he decided that it was not his job to help female alcoholics and street-workers find 135 their humanity, but the theme remained: Being human has to do with feeling, including protective feelings that justify intervention, and without normal feelings then one isn't fully human. The traditional male role is not fully human because it restricts the expression of feeling, while dependency on drugs necessarily negates a quality of humanness for the same reason.
Being human also includes a capacity to act and to engage in social relationships with others.
Thus relationships may confirm one's humanity with the result that Trevor felt incomplete when single.
Trevor's attempts to restore the humanity of others may be seen as the reflection of a powerful urge toward animating solutions to problems. This meme "animator" is also reflected in his attempts at self-change, his preoccupation with monitoring and improving his self-esteem, his behavior associated with his anger, his advocacy for youth, and his pride in his accomplishments at work. A meme for self-directed learning completes a circle of who he is with an animator meme at its core. His drive toward doing led me to label a meme, evidenced by his behavior in performing "guerrilla theater" on a doctor to illustrate that doctor's over-prescription of drugs to aboriginal people, as "aboriginal activist." This was not a term Trevor had used, but it was one that he embraced in our second interview.
Trevor's Second Interview
Trevor said the inclusion of the meme "aboriginal activist" in his self-map "was almost prophetic" because, although he would have not given himself that label at the time of our initial interview 2.5 months previously, he had become politically active in the interim at both the band and community levels. "Aboriginal activist" was a label I suggested for a constellation of factors that included referent, connotative, affective and behavioral components (see Appendix H) flowing from some actions and his interpretations of those actions. In one case, for example, 136
Trevor recalled visiting a doctor with ambiguous complaints to see if he would be prescribed anti-depressant medication. His interpretation, which in part flowed from his involvement with a woman who resisted such medication, was that doctors over-prescribe to treaty Indians. Trevor had not been aware of the "aboriginal activist" label until our second interview. He now said his activism, based on the need to eliminate poverty, "was like igniting a fire that keeps me focussed on something bigger than myself."
Trevor's general reaction to his initial memetic self-map was, "It's an awesome picture... damn good in fact." He said his self is constantly changing, and since the first interview he had been developing his arts - guitar, poetry, and song writing - to a greater level than before. His writing was from an "activist" perspective, critical of society and greed. His "singleness" also changed as he was now dating, but he was worried that his new girlfriend drinks and uses drugs.
He said that he was not as cautious as he had been earlier in the year, as was evidenced by his dating and his activism. He said the overweight meme, which fairly reflected his view of himself
2.5 months ago, was no longer self-representative. After some negotiation he suggested the word
"big" more fairly represented his current representation of himself.
A developmental transition. It seemed that "Rememberer," "activist," "empowerment / animator," and "caring" had all converged to create a new meme, "artist" within Trevor's self.
Directional arrows from the initiating centers were added to show this relationship. In addition, the meme "single" was changed to "dating," but this was flagged to indicate that he still views himself as single and is not sure about the longer-term nature of this dating relationship. Dotted lines connecting "single / dating" to "child of alcoholic" and "cautious" are used to indicate the changing relationship between these memes. A new directional connection between "dating" and
"self-esteem" was used to indicate his dating had a positive effect on his self-esteem, and the 137 meme was moved to recognize its relationship to "Humanness." We changed the name of the
"overweight" meme to "big," and we changed the connection between "big" and "cautious" to a dashed line indicating change was happening to that connection. These changes are among the revisions added to Trevor's second self-map (Figure 7).
Figure 7: Revised memetic map of Trevor resulting from his second interview Humanness and emotion. Trevor said it was important to validate himself as a human being by being in a relationship. He said street-workers also need relationships to validate their humanity, but they are prevented from doing so by the nature of their occupation. They cannot allow themselves to feel in their sexual relationships and they cannot allow themselves to trust people "on the street." Denying or repressing their human emotions, they become less human in some important sense. People who are prescribed mood-modifying drugs are inhibited chemically in their capacity to feel. Trevor added that male gender-roles restrict men's capacity to feel emotions, and this also restricts their humanity. Trevor developed his humanness by recognizing and choosing to experience his emotions.
"Humanness" presented as a theme in this interview that impacted or triggered a number of memes in his self-constellation. As a result, a "Humanness" theme was added to Figure 6 that circles his self-map. "Humanness" had already been present as an interpretive code, but the beige directional arrow flowing from it incorporates the idea that this is a theme that serves to bind a variety of aspects of his self with particular emphasis on emotive and behavioral components within "protector," "big," "child of alcoholic," "dating," "artist" and "caring."
Refinement of social interest. Trevor's animating impulse led him to attempt to redress perceived wrongs with such aggression that he described himself as "capable of being an asshole." Recognizing that his behavior in using his size, training and arrogance to intimidate others was a denial of their humanity and his own, Trevor decided to modify his behavior. This decision indicates his "self-changer" and "learner" components to his self may over-rule initial intimidator tendencies and further suggests self-empowerment.
Trevor advised that he had become more of a political activist at the band and community levels over the 2.5-month period between first and second interviews. The "aboriginal activist" meme was made more central by adding connections to "empowerment," "artist," and "self- changer." His interest in eliminating poverty was added to his definition of this "aboriginal activist" meme.
Trevor's Third Interview
Trevor said his second self-map (Figure 7) was an accurate reflection of who he was. He said he had not realized how complex he was, and looking at the map helped him focus on areas that he would like to re-visit such as Taoism, "big," "introvert," and his gender roles. A number of events had happened to his life during the three-month period from the second interview that challenged his thinking about his own mortality. He was in a serious auto accident, his uncle stabbed his father with a knife, and his grandmother became sick. Trevor said he appreciated being human even more, and he became less cautious with increased awareness that the time one has to do and accomplish is finite. He said what we, as humans, really "own" is our feelings and experiences, and these must be successfully cultivated during our limited time. He said he views himself as being a part of humanity and, "it is more important to exist rather than figure out why
I am here."
While his father was in hospital unconscious from stab wounds, Trevor told him that he forgave him for being "a lousy father," and that he loved him. He thought his father heard this because now their relationship is better with father-son bonding occurring. Trevor said he had been very angry with his uncle, but later he thought, "If a tiger attacked a deer would you blame the tiger?" He explained his analogy by observing that his uncle was an alcoholic and an illicit drug user, and his father was trying to get him to "sober up." His uncle's reaction was the reaction of an alcoholic and a drug user, not a fully human person. Although he still could not trust his uncle to act humanely, Trevor moved beyond his initial rage. Trevor was hospitalized following an auto accident, and the woman he had been dating visited to ask him for money. This led to Trevor re-evaluating and ending their relationship. He formed the opinion that she was using him as an enabler in her abuse of alcohol and other drugs.
Trevor said the relationship served to get him "out of his shell" and he was, by this third interview, seeing another woman who did not drink and who seemed "to fit the bill." He said he is now looking for commonalities in a relationship and asked, "If you have nothing to talk about what's the point of being in a relationship?" Reflecting on this he said alcoholic women would
"come on" to him, and he mistook this for interest in him. They came to him "like a bee to honey," and he had been attempting "to use honey to attract butterflies."
Trevor said there was a time when he was very young that he was disempowered, but as a child he sometimes gave adults "the illusion" they wanted, if it served his purposes. He said he remembered being intimidated by his teachers in early grade school, but then in grade 4 and 5 he started to "become bad" to find out what he could do and what limits there might be to his rebelliousness. Trevor said participating in this research had made him more able to make changes in himself because seeing "the map" helped him visualize possible changes. He explained, "I look at it. I go home. I live, but I think the map is in my head, and I think that maybe I should not see myself as a big intimidator."
John Blonde
John Blonde (JohnB) was a Caucasian male in his fifties in a common-law marriage to an aboriginal woman. He was also the father of an adult child. His ancestors emigrated from
Germany to Canada and settled in a German-Catholic community in Saskatchewan. He was employed in a professional capacity. 141
John Blonde's First Interview
Racism led to questioning Catholicism. JohnB began by talking about racism as it affects aboriginal people. He suggested that young children are open to playing with anyone, but they may learn racist stereotyping from their families and schools as had happened to him growing up in a "typical German-Catholic community". This was JohnB's only reference to his German heritage, but eight out of a total of 79 interview segments were coded "Catholic". His stance against racism appeared to be a theme that affected much what he did, and it was related negatively to his Catholic upbringing. In high school he had his first experience knowing a non- white, non-Catholic person, and this experience led him to question the church's teachings:
If you're not Catholic you can't get to heaven; maybe some Anglicans have a shot at it
but no one else could. How the church has almost maintained its power is through
ignorance; and a lot of people, they just followed it, because the priest, the pope was
infallible.
Challenging the church's authority over spiritual matters led to a more general life theme,
"Challenger of authority" which was seen in the memes: "cynical", "inquisitive" and
"independent thinker." This progression from German-Catholic to "Challenger of authority" is pictured in Figure 8.
"Independent thinking" was a focus of as many segments (8) as "Catholic." JohnB recalled that when he was in the first grade his mother, who was a caretaker at the school, would periodically break into the school records to see how he was achieving in relation to the other students. If he wasn't at the top of the class, he would be given extra lessons at home. He told his mother, "That's wrong and you're telling me not to lie, and not to break into things and not to 142 steal but you are doing it." She replied that her focus on his education made it different, but he did not agree.
Figure 8: Memetic map of John Blonde resulting from the segmentation and coding of his initial interview showing the number segments coded for each meme (in brackets)
Developing self-empowerment. JohnB was born with a clubfoot. Despite accepting the label "cripple," he drove himself to overcome his physical limitations in sports, thus displaying a competitive spirit associated with an initial sense of empowerment. Sixteen segments of the transcribed interview were coded for "animator." Although initially this animator meme was 143 associated with challenging church and parental authority and with becoming a competitor in sports, later it also became associated with social activism and self-change. He introduced non- native friends to aboriginal people to overcome negative racial stereotyping. He pursued education as a means to self-empowerment. He set out to overcome his natural shyness. In the course of this animation, he found that he played different roles in different situations. Although this may be thought of as empowering, it also gave him the sense that who he is, is contextually dependent. Since he appeared to be different in different contexts, JohnB worried that there was no real person behind his animator self, that in some sense he was non-existent. Feelings connected to these thoughts may have contributed to the depression he felt in one part of his life.
JohnB found that at work he played a different role than in social situations. As a supervisor of others, he was placed in an authoritative role requiring him to direct, educate and evaluate with competence. Conversely, he described himself as "a social idiot," and he avoided being with people when not at work often to the point of not answering his telephone. Low social self-esteem is pictured in Figure 8 as connected to evasiveness and being a shy.
JohnB developed an anti-racist theme to his life early, and one of the ways this theme manifest in his self-definition was in community development. His attempt to educate non- aboriginal friends about the native condition is pictured as part of the meme "aboriginal activist," but he also defined himself as a multicultural activist:
The value system that I have is everyone should have a right to their own religion, to their
own beliefs to their own culture, and as a matter of fact I value that as being Canadian,
because we always say we're a mixing pot, well lets start showing it. Let's start showing
compassion. JohnB's activism on aboriginal issues and his community development efforts suggested an impulse toward compassion and caring. Six segments were coded for caring, and the meme was presented next to a more general theme labelled "Empathetic." His roles as a mentor and as a person concerned with the social environment of aboriginal people ("social environmentalist - abor.") were thus linked.
Resolving a spiritual quest. JohnB's appreciation of aboriginal spirituality was connected to his Catholic upbringing. He reasoned, "If anything, maybe the aboriginal is purer in that they don't have the big cathedrals, and they don't have the pope and the governing structure and all of it. So I think it has in some sense a purer spirituality." In JohnB's understanding aboriginal spirituality involved the belief in a god known as "The Creator," but this is really the same god as is worshipped by Christians. He suggested that Christianity represents a corrupted form of aboriginal spirituality:
I think where Christianity has gone astray is that we have fell from... going way back
hundreds of years, when Christianity went across Europe basically raping, plundering,
pillaging, they say Christianity was basically a land grab, but Christians even from the
beginning of time, have been very powerful, have ruled with money, with power over
people. I don't think like that was the intent at the beginning of it, that it was people that
took the power on and became very corrupt much like governments, and that is missing
from aboriginal spirituality.
JohnB continued to refer to himself as a Catholic, but he defined his spirituality by connecting with nature and through mystical experiences in aboriginal ceremonies such as the sweat lodge: 145
It seems strange that a little white boy is going to sweats, and jokingly I call them spooks
and I'm going, 'Oh, they are back in there, the spooks like me' but the spirits seem to
come to me always more than even aboriginal people.
John Blonde's Second Interview
JohnB reviewed his self-map two months and 10 days after the initial interview. He agreed that his beginning was centered on the German-Catholic side of the draft self-map (Figure
8), and that he became a challenger of authority subsequent to that beginning, and these elements eventually evolved into his worker-social self. He added that the items on the right side of the map (e.g., Catholic, crippled), followed by items on the left (e.g., work), "pushed" the center (the animator-empowered core) to happen. He suggested there already is a chronology in the map, and there are three or four selves are contained in the map with him reverting to a particular
"self dependent on context. He agreed with the suggestion that the empowered center seems to unite the other selves.
Multiple selves. As a result of this insight selves 1, 2 and 3 were added to represent the different "persons" JohnB presents in different contexts with the core "animator-empowered" complex common to all three (see Figure 9). The notation that this core would not have developed without the first two "selves" was added to JohnB's animator meme (see Appendix I). 146
Rememberer
C-JL>
c0mmmv Individualizing memes. JohnB said the fact of his German ancestry did not influence his affect or behavior with the result that "German" was eliminated as a meme. Given that memetic self-maps represent a changing self at a particular time, and given that JohnB did not believe in much Catholic dogma, it was possible that the meme "Catholic" should also not appear on his self-map. When asked why he had referred to himself as a Catholic, JohnB said he still viewed himself as a kind of generalized Christian who believes that Aboriginal Spirituality is closer to original Christian teachings, but he had used the term "Catholic" reflexively because that is how he was raised. One interpretation of this conversation is that JohnB made a mistake, and the meme coded "Catholic" should be given a different label. Such an interpretation would flow from an assumption that there are meanings essential to certain terms, and that to be a Catholic one must believe in, for example, the infallibility of the popes. Another interpretation is that the meme which has been labelled "Catholic" in JohnB's self evolved, but that the label remained. He spontaneously thinks of himself as a Catholic with the understanding that early Christianity is compatible with modern aboriginal spirituality. Following this second interpretation, "Catholic" remained a meme in JohnB's self-map, but its connotative meaning was amended to include the idea of a generalized primal Christianity. Disputing a connotation of shyness. Eight segments of the initial interview were coded "shy," but JohnB said this over-represented its importance as to who he was at the time of the interviews. He became far less shy as he grew older, but the fact of his shyness was mentioned a number of times because it had an important effect on his development in a variety of areas. It was explained that the number of times a meme is mentioned is not directly correlated to the importance or centrality that meme may have, although it is true that often those parts of the self that are mentioned more frequently have more felt importance at the time of the discussion. While the number of connections between "shy" and other memes on the map (5) seemed to imply a centrality that is no longer accurate, JohnB's shyness was still apparent in his social and work situations. He said, for example, that he feels more comfortable in smaller, more intimate groups. To represent a decrease in shyness over time, broken lines replaced solid links between "shy" and three memes that no longer evidence shyness to the degree to which it once occurred. The connections with empowerment remained solid in the revised self-map because it was JohnB s own sense of empowerment that allowed him control over his shyness. The solid link between "shy" and JohnB's "caring-empathetic" core remained because it was through the memory of his shyness that he connects with, and sometimes defends, people who are themselves overly shy. Un-meming frustration. JohnB also objected to the coding of "frustrated" as a meme. Three segments had been coded "frustrated" from our initial interview. Two of these segments referred to his becoming frustrated when attempting to improve his community, and the third involved encounters with arrogant people. He said he was not a frustrated person, but he would sometimes become frustrated in certain situations, and he elaborated that this occurred when he was challenging authority and when he was defending aboriginal rights. He suggested that "frustration" was not a behavioral trait but a personality trait. "Frustration" was not a meme, by which he defined himself, but an emotion he sometimes felt in certain contexts, therefore it was eliminated as a meme in the second version of his self-map. His notion that frustration is related to personality traits suggested that a menu of emotions were embedded in his personality. A bar representing the emotions that he highlighted was added to the base of his self in Figure 9. Diffuse arrows were then drawn connecting these emotive options to memes that may elicit an emotive response. The missing meme of competitiveness. JohnB said "competitiveness" was missing from his self-map. He suggested that he has always had this quality, and that it shows up in sports, recreation and social events. His competitiveness even enters into his community involvement, and his frustration is tied to people not "jumping on board." He added that he has competed in sports throughout his life, and sports continue to play a role in his life. As a result of this information, memes for "competitive" and "sports" were added to his revised self-map. Elaborating spirituality. I noted that JohnB had not mentioned spirituality until I asked, at the end of our first interview, "Is there any else that you can add that would help in letting me know who you are? Is there anything we've missed?" I asked if he reflexively hid his spirituality from all but his closest friends. He replied "True," and added, "I need to see closeness to share it. Unless people know me very well, they don't get into my inner bubble." I concluded from this that spirituality appears to be a theme that originates on the Aboriginal Spiritualist / theist / storyteller side of his mind and directly influences his activism and animator centers without always being apparent to others. A "spirituality" thematic code was added to JohnB's self map with a thematic line of a different color emanating from it to indicate that, while present, it is not always visible to those with whom he interacts. JohnB's spirituality contained many references to nature, and he said (in our first interview) that he sometimes likes nature more than he likes people. He elaborated in this interview that people can get very frustrating "because they have the ability to think and to stand you up." He said nature is "somewhat predictable," and violence in nature, as in a storm, can be beautiful, but violence in people is "quite ugly." He added that it is easier to see yourself as part of a bigger process, if in awe of nature. This idea of identifying with something that is transcendent was incorporated within JohnB's conceptualization of aboriginal spirituality. Developing social interest. JohnB said he would like to have all his thoughts and experiences and be 30. He clarified he would not want to be younger if it meant losing those experiences. One of the things he would change in himself, if he could, would be the art of being able to influence people more with respect to community development. He said community development is becoming more of a passion, and he shared the hope that other "boomers" will also want to work to make the world a better place. As a result of this portion of our discussion, "Rembemberer" was expanded to be a thematic code as well as a meme to JohnB's self-map. John Blonde's Third Interview While noting his revised self-map (Figure 9) is complex and difficult to follow, JohnB said "it captures everything." When asked if he had any new insights as to who he was, he said, "I thought that was your role!" He said he is biased when it comes to who he is, and by asking others one would get a different perspective. He had no new insights and no new changes happened to him since the second interview four months previous. JohnB said growing up in rural Saskatchewan influenced his development because children in his day had to make their own entertainment. For him this meant frequent hikes into the bush. Nature then became something he cherished and he was predisposed by his childhood to living in a small community surrounded by nature. During the second interview JohnB said his animator core had developed from "challenger of authority" and "worker" themes. When asked to talk about a time when he did not have such an animator core, he said growing up in a rural community whose structure is based on authority leads to poor self-confidence, withdrawal and shyness and feelings of disempowerment. He added, "Then you get your job and you have no choice but to develop that (sense of empowerment)." He said he did not know from where that "spark" comes that leads some to question authority. JohnB reported no change in his ability to developmentally change his self as a result of his participation in this research. He felt the map reflects who he thinks he is, but he would be more interested in my perspective. He said he was also interested in comparing his self with others in the final report. 151 Judy Judy was in her fifties, a widowed mother of one and a career civil servant nearing retirement. Her mother was aboriginal from a Metis community in Saskatchewan while her father was non-native. She was raised in Alberta. Judy's First Interview In her initial interview, February 21, 2007, Judy described herself as responsible, mature, fun, kind, friendly, loyal, smart, and a pet lover. Further discussion revealed that each of these descriptors involved decision-making. Decision-making implies a decision maker, and I asked her if the decision maker changes over time, how she knows it is still her. She replied it is a feeling that it is still her, and the decisions that she makes "feel right." I surmised that a "Feeling of Me" formed the basis of who Judy is, and this is represented as a bar at the base of Figure 10. From this base flows a sense of decision-making empowerment, and this sense of empowerment leads to animation. Five out of 68 segments were coded for the meme "animator." In total 31 memetic codes were used 91 times. Two memes in conflict. "Animator" implies a sense of empowerment, but Judy also talked about her life having been partly a product of environmental forces driving her in particular directions. For example, "worker" was mentioned in seven segments, but she felt that early experiences forced her into a particular career path. There is a tension, therefore, between the two memes "animator" and "environmentally driven," and this tension was represented in this map as an orange arrow with arrowheads pointing in both directions. Both memes were flagged to represent the idea that neither is operative all of the time. reeling ot Me ,..,IIMI.^„I.,J..I.^ ill Figure 10: Memetic map of Judy resulting from the segmentation and coding of her initial interview showing the number segments coded for each meme (in brackets) "Animator" also appeared to be a theme in Judy's life affecting or being part of such memes as "self-changer," "intelligent," "reflective" and "independent thinker." She said intelligence "gives me some ability to do what I want. It gives me a more interesting life, and it's probably not for everybody, but it gives me some ability to understand what's going on around me, and I value it." This theme was represented by a grey directional arrow emanating from "animator." The importance of remembering. Judy talked about herself as a rememberer in six segments, but the theme of remembering seemed to permeate her entire self. By remembering reflectively, she said, we can gain an understanding of who we are and why. This helps her to become resilient when facing life's challenges. One becomes more mature as one collects experiences, and this allowed her to become more of a family person. Her memories of interactions with people in poverty led her to become a social activist. Her memories helped her establish lasting friendships. Even the body, she said, develops memory from repeated use, as when neural pathways become entrenched. This general theme of memory is represented by three diffuse arrows emanating from "rememberer" and proceeding in different directions throughout Judy's self-map. The social self. A third theme represented in Judy's self-map is "Social Being." This theme was not also coded as a meme but was inferred from her discussion of contexts in which she is humorous, kind, a friend, a family person, a role player, a community member and a humanist. Defining herself as "the family connector," she saw herself as the person who brings family together socially. As a role player, she differentially applied skills such as levity, seriousness, and responsibility to various contexts with the purpose of enhancing the well-being of others. Judy also talked about what she is not. She is not severe. She would get feedback from her friends such as "When I first met you, you were really scary because you looked so severe," but she never accepted that definition of herself. Although she admitted to being non-expressive, especially in her younger years, she defined herself as friendly. As she has grown older, she has begun to show her friendliness more by becoming animated, making eye contact, smiling and talking more, so people will see "what has been inside all along." But she still has difficulty with small-talk: I hate the trivial. When people are, you know, in social gatherings and they are talking about silly nothing things, I can't do that. I am very bad at that. You know, if you want talk about something serious, I'm your man. If you want to talk about TV... its pointless. I'm not a good social chit-chatterer. Defining herself by what she is not. Despite having experienced a successful career spanning decades in which she rose to management positions, Judy did not define herself as a social worker. She does not always agree with how her job does things, and she finds the root causes of social ills to be broader than her profession appears willing to acknowledge. She said she had wanted to be an artist or a lawyer when she was younger, but she "fell into" social work as a young single-parent who needed an income. This is reflected in the meme "environmental driven" in her self-map. While acknowledging that she is "quite good at" her profession, she insisted that is not who she is. Judy is also not a "Catholic" despite being raised in the Roman Catholic Church and having attended a separate school taught by priests and nuns. She began questioning Roman Catholic teachings in grade 10 when a priest presented instructions, as church law, on how long and in what way couples could kiss each other. She remembered thinking, "This is crap," and she 155 thought that if this teaching was wrong, other church teachings may also be wrong. She decided she was the kind of person who needed evidence, as opposed to faith, to believe something, and she decided the very idea of a god was not logical. On the other hand, she had her daughter baptized soon after her birth in case she was wrong. Judy's Second Interview Defining herself by what she is not, continued. Judy had not described herself as Metis in our first interview. She explained she was "as Canadian as you can get." Although Judy's mother was from a Metis community in Saskatchewan, she did not identify as Metis because she wasn't raised in that community and was not assimilated into a Metis culture. She said people presumed she was Caucasian, but she has been open about her Metis heritage. She said, "Blood does not drive you. For me the Metis part is overwhelmed by a lot of things." She hoped it may someday be possible to simply define oneself as "Canadian." I added a "Canadian" meme attached to both "meaning-maker" and "reflective" on her self-map in Figure 11. Judy also said she would not define herself as a humanist. Although she had recently joined an association of humanists because they shared similar views, she found such labels to be unhelpful or misleading since some people do not know, or have a distorted view, of what a humanist is. The label of the meme was, therefore, changed to "non-theist." Her decision to join an organization of non-theists is represented in Figure 11 by her meme "community" to which the "non-theist" meme is connected. Defining her genuine self. Judy said she did not think she had changed in the five-month interval since our first interview. A constant with her is "genuine" which she defined as recognizing "the good, bad and indifferent within self." The idea of genuineness was added to her "Feeling of Me" base. She added that maturity involves knowing ones' self, believing in 156 ones' self, and in making an effort to relate to others in positive ways. These ideas were added to her "mature" meme. Social Being [ reding I*) Me iiKlmlmg a son-*: of being «hv« and thai lijure b a genuine peiAoii thai m4> be ih$ "Kind" had been added as a meme on Judy's initial self-map, but it had not been fully developed with connotative, affective and behavioral characteristics. Judy explained it was not a word she uses a lot because it is part of empathy and compassion; it does not mean a lot on its own. As a result of this information, "kind" was deleted as a meme. A review of her first interview revealed references to compassion in Judy's definitions of pet lover, friend, empathetic, caring and activist. "Compassion" was added to Judy's revised self-map as a theme uniting different aspects of her self and incorporating the idea of kindness. Judy had said she can be a "pain in the butt." In this interview she elaborated, "I would be a pain in the butt about things I believe in, things that people need to take into account but they don't." She described a conflict involving two supervisors who failed to acknowledge the situation with the result that resolution was impossible. She intervened to force a resolution. This "pain in the butt" dimension seemed to include elements of "caring" and "animator." As she brought this element of caring to her work, a link between "caring" and "work" was added. Childhood determinants of self. Judy had mentioned being "parentified" several times during our initial interview in reference to her having taken care of younger siblings in her family of origin. It was not added as a meme in the initial draft because it was not clear that this was a way that she defined herself - it may have only been a historical causal factor. During this session, she added that she tends to take a parental interest in the form of becoming protective toward people to whom she is not related. As a result of this conversation a new meme "parentified" was placed in her self-map connected to "responsible" and "environmentally driven" with the latter meme connected to "resilient." The direct link between "environmentally driven" and "responsible" was eliminated as it was not needed, the new meme "parentified" provides a mechanism whereby such a relationship may occur. The meme "single" was added and attached to "environmentally driven" after Judy explained that she preferred that term "single" to "widowed." Pleasure and meaning in life. While discussing her own mortality, Judy explained basic necessities, such as having a home, are important, but accumulated possessions would give her no pleasure at all. In answer to the supplementary question "What is important?" she answered: "Awareness that you are alive, that everything that happens is meaningful and that you have the opportunity to experience it. Fun is important but possessions are not." As a result of this interaction, "meaning maker" was added to her self-map and attached to "reflective." The sense of being alive was added to the baseline "feeling of me" upon which her self is built. Judy said the meme "humorous" was more important to her than was reflected by its being mentioned just once during the first interview. She explained, "It is something that I always enjoyed; then I recognized its power." As an example, she created a photograph of her shaking her finger with the caption: "Don't you think of putting your dishes there," and placed this in the staff coffee room. This proved to be an effective and inoffensive way to get employees to take responsibility for their dirty dishes. The power and utility of "humorous" was acknowledged by extending the "animator" theme to include "humorous." A directional arrow from "humorous" to the interpretive or thematic code "Social Being" was added with the implication that "humorous" becomes a quality associated with themes emanating from that code. Judy explained she has had more than three decades of experience in her profession, and she wants to give others the benefit of that experience, so they could then become proactive and make change faster. As a result of this insight the idea of using mentoring to further social goals was added to the definition of the "mentor" meme. Judy s Third Interview Judy reported no changes to her self since the second interview a month earlier. She had no new insights about who she is. She explained it is more difficult to say what you are, as opposed to what you do. For example, when people ask, "What do you do?" she finds it simpler to reply that she is a social worker, but then she added, "That is not me!" She said that no one wants to know her deeply, so an exercise such as this is useful in developing self-knowledge. Judy said the quality of self-empowerment was always present in her even though, as a child, she was encouraged to listen and do as she was told. When she was divorced, she discovered there were things that she did not know how to do, but she could learn to do them. She didn't remember a time when she felt overwhelmed, and she recalled that when she was 6, while berry-picking, she led an older girl who "fell to pieces" to safety during a hailstorm. Judy said the process of participating in this study reminded her that she is stronger than what she might sometimes think. She believes she has the resources to do what she wants to do, and her change from devout Catholic to non-theist reflected this. Her action in taking her grandchildren to a church to appreciate the music demonstrated, "I don't have to throw out everything. That which is beautiful I can appreciate." She defined herself, from this experience, as empowered as opposed to reactive. She said the self-map represents her, and it is somebody she wants to be. She finds the capacity for self-directed change empowering. No changes to Judy's self-map were effected as a result of the third interview. Pangloss Pangloss presented as a Caucasian stage-hand in his forties. He was in a common law marriage and had no children. He was a Canadian citizen born and raised in British Columbia but living and working in Alberta. 160 Pangloss' First Interview Pangloss' initial interview (February 1, 2007) resulted in coding 49 memes applied 142 times to 89 segments of text. The meme with the highest frequency (11) was "rememberer" followed by "animator" (10) and "moralist" (10). According to Pangloss, we are determined but also limited by our memories. His memories defined others as well as himself: My parents were both drinkers. I knew that I wouldn't finish high school if I stayed at my parent's house. They were split up by then, but I would go from house to house on a 6- month basis by grade 11. They were hostile to education... So I moved out, and I had this East Indian landlord. This (was a) Sikh fellow, and he had a bunch of conditions for me staying. There was one that I attend every day of school unless I was sick, and if was sick I had to stay in the house, and that my grades had to either stay the same or get better, and if they got worse, I had to move back in with one of my parents... very paternalistic, very masculine environment, but every day he asked me, 'What did you learn today?' and I had to come up with something. Although memories may be self-defining, Pangloss noted what gets remembered is part of a subjective process. He used metaphor to convey both this subjectivity and the feeling of self- constancy that accompanies his memories: It's like a running relay race in a way; things get handed off in a way. From time to time I remember the things that matter, and forget those things that don't. I've forgotten most of my life, so like a relay race the baton of memories gets handed on from time to time. Pangloss recognized that his memories define himself, and therefore the meme represented by "rememberer" has a formative and maintenance role with respect to other memes. It is presented as having a close relationship with "metaphor maker," "story teller," "self- 161 critical," "learner" and "moralist," but other self-defining memes are also remembered. Recognizing this distinctiveness, "rememberer" was embedded in a diamond shape in Figure 12. Figure 12: Memetic map ofPangloss resulting from the segmentation and coding of his initial interview with the number segments coded for each meme in brackets 162 The right to exact retribution. The role of moralist appeared to provide a grounding from which Pangloss's worldview flows. He has become angry when people take advantage of or humiliate others, and he has expressed moral outrage when other peoples' rights are not respected. He internalized a moral injunction to model good behavior and increase the world's happiness, a goal that he connected to defining himself as a humanist. Yet, he has not always lived by his own moral code, and this has resulted in considerable self-criticism. When someone acts with cruelty toward another, Pangloss said he feels a compulsion to act cruelly toward them in front of others, so they will be humiliated. Thus, "moral" is presented as linked to "protector" by a meme for "angry" that may, at times, be reflected as moral outrage. Pangloss shared a narrative that illustrated the potential of his outrage: I saw my sister and there was blood coming out of her ear. I come from a violent family, and I knew what that meant immediately and her reaction to me, which was a distrust and disdain and kind of hatred that I'm a guy. I picked up on that, that it was probably was my drunk brother-in-law that I never really liked. His name was Mel. My father was downstairs. I went upstairs and made sure my nephew was fine. I dragged Mel downstairs by the shirt, not loud I was quite calm, I was quite slow but I weigh 220 and I just ridden my bike 22 km. I had big legs. He was a radio reporter; he didn't have much of a chance resisting me. I'm physically imposing, so I brought him down the stairs. My father had just seen my sister; no words have been said. This is a very vocal house, but nobody said anything. It's eerily quiet, and I brought him into the middle of the living room downstairs, my dad's room, and there was a 30-30 Remington, a deer hunting rifle, my dad had it, it was up on the wall. I grabbed the rifle; I went to my dad's bedroom and I got the bullets. I loaded it completely with bullets... I put a bullet in the chamber and I cocked it, my dad held Mel and I spoke for the first time. Now my dad never let me take the lead, he was the cop; he was in charge, and I told Mel if he wanted to live he would turn around right now and walk out the front door, and not look back, and that the gun would be trained on him until he was out of sight. Pangloss said he would have killed a man without remorse had the man not followed his exact instructions to leave. Pangloss' roles as protector and intimidator were activated even though he was not particularly close to his sister. This incident also illustrated an "animator" meme that is also connected to his "opinionated," "outspoken," "activist," "perfectionist," "mentor" and "community developer" roles; but, more generally, it points to the interpretive code "Empowered Self as a theme that permeates his being. Social interest. The meme, "community developer" points to social interest but also contains an element of reciprocal altruism. Pangloss found he is "a heck of a lot happier" when he focussed on making his neighbourhood and his world better instead of focusing on what he called "short term gains for myself." He reported that, ""Every day I am ready willing and able to make a positive difference in somebody's life," thus "community development" is linked to memes for "kind" and "caring" as well as "anti-racism" and "anti-stereotyping." The interpretive code "Social Self represents a side of Pangloss that is intensely interested in interacting with others. This interaction is also linked to "embracer of life" as in the following metaphor: "If I am not having fun with every revolution of the pedals then I shouldn't be on the bike." Pangloss embraced life flexibly: The world is larger than me. The agenda of the outside world is so much bigger than me. Today could have been a good day if, on the way home, my bus had been hit by a truck, and I was in the hospital, and I missed the dinner, it could still have ended up being a good day, it would just be a different adventure. The idea of flexibility involves accepting chaos. He said that if you hold onto your goals in the face of changing circumstances, "not only will you be thwarted, but you'll piss everybody off around you... as the field changes, change your target." Thus, flexibility enhances empowerment along with the enjoyment of life. This relationship between "flexibility" and "Empowered Self is reflected in Pangloss' self-definition as a role player. Being self-aware and inconstant. Flexibility leads to what Pangloss called "some weird kind of continuum" of existence. He said he is mostly not hateful, selfish or racist, but that he can be all of these things. While this "continuum of possibilities" could be applied to all memes, it appeared to apply more to some, and those memes were flagged so as to indicate that they were not always operative. Thus, he sees himself as "anti-racist" in a majority of contexts, but he is not always anti-racist. An implication of this "continuum of possibilities" is that in certain contexts he could be substantially a different person. He admitted to being aware of such changes in his self, but he also admitted to times when he is not self-aware. Introspection following a suicide attempt as a teenager led Pangloss to become "incredibly self-aware." This included the mutability of memory: "This moment, right now, oh yeah, it's me looking at you. Tomorrow, I'm going to have a memory of looking at you." He pondered, "What is this thing that is experiencing stuff?" He concluded that he is only partially self-aware, but that awareness includes being self-critical, a learner, a humanist, heterosexual, sensual, having independent beliefs and having unique experiences. Although no one trait or characteristic is uniquely his, Pangloss said the combination makes him unique, but that uniqueness is contextual: 165 You wanna know what makes me unique, it depends on who you compare me too. Compare me to a whole bunch of people who were raised Anglican and taught Sunday school, and were kicked out of the church, and got a philosophy degree, and became stage hands after a TV career, we would all be the same. You know it depends... what makes me unique? Throw me into Niger and I'll tell you that it's my big belly, my height and my white skin. Throw me in women's studies at SFU and I'll say it's the testes, you know, throw me on stage and I'll say it's that I read books without pictures, (laughs) sorry that's a bad thing to say, there is a high level of illiteracy in stagecraft. This self-awareness and the memes associated with it gave Pangloss a sense of having a "private self," such that he could become a "community of one," living the rest of his life with books and having his groceries delivered. He reported he is, with his failings, proud of who he is. In particular, he is proud of his curiosity and willingness to change his mind in the face of contrary evidence. This "proud" meme is presented in Figure 12 as producing affect in his "Private Self," his remembrances, stories, metaphors, opinions and the focus of his empowered self. His "Empowered Self theme is presented as permeating his entire being, but it is grounded in the values he applies, and it activates and animates his social self. Within these themes, a number of memes are in conflict. For example, Pangloss' "egalitarian" meme may be in conflict with his "protector" meme with the latter requiring him to place himself in a superior role over others. Similarly, his "intimidator" meme may be in conflict with "non-aggressive," and "moralist" may be in conflict with "flexible." Pangloss' Second Interview Pangloss reported that he was nervous and excited about this interview, "I woke up with tense stomach muscles...how would he assess me?" The question in his mind was whether the assessment would be ingratiating or whether I would say things he did not like. He drew an analogy of an argument between persons A and B with A winning. Who benefits? He explained that Person B benefits because he gets to discard or change some things about himself. He concluded after a review of his initial memetic map that this "assessment" was ingratiating. He reported surprise that he did not see "vindictive", "arrogant", "vain" or "self-centered" in his self-map. He said he did not think he hid these things from the researcher. Returning to the theme of exacting retribution. When asked to give an example of his vindictiveness, Pangloss talked about peeing on the grave of an aunt after her funeral, and telling her he would do so when she was still alive. He said this gave him the feeling of having punched a bad person in the nose. He was angry with her, not because of the way she treated him, but for how she treated other relatives. He also mentioned destroying the tax records of an employer, and then calling Revenue Canada to accuse them of tax evasion. The employer had docked two other employees' wages when they pulled people out of a burning car and had to be themselves hospitalized. "Vindictive," in his mind, equated with rough justice. Arrogance reportedly goes with vindictiveness because the latter implies being "judge, jury and executioner." Pangloss said he does not consult with the people being wronged; he just acts. In answer to a question about who made him the protector of wronged people, Pangloss replied that he tends to be more sceptical and introspective than people around him. Thus, he has a "leg up" on most, and while his superior knowledge or ability may be fact, knowing that fact is arrogance. Still, he maintained that he does not want to put himself above anyone else, and he "cannot stand people who are arrogant." The memes "moralist," "protector," "intimidator" and "aggressive" seemed to flow from the incident Pangloss had described in our first interview involving his assault on his sister's ex- partner. The second interview revealed that these memes were not sufficiently negative to represent him the way that he represents himself. Memes for "vindictive," "arrogant," and "vain" were connected to "moralist", "intimidator" and "aggressive" in a revised self-map represented in Figure 13. Pangloss' insistence that he be seen negatively in some ways suggested a thematic quality to his meme "guilty" and a thematic line was created binding the above mentioned memes to each other. The new meme "vindictive" is in tension with the meme "empathetic," so a tension line was drawn between the two. "Arrogant" is contrasted with "egalitarian," but a tension line between "protector" and egalitarian already accounts for this contradiction (with the understanding that the Panglossian "protector" already connotes arrogance). Memes such as "caring," "unselfish" and "angry" were flagged to indicate that he does not always exhibit these characteristics. He was not always empathetic or vindictive, so these memes were also flagged. Everything matters. This second interview (July 1) occurred exactly five months after our initial interview, but Pangloss was unable to voice changes to his self that had occurred over that time. He said that he is still "unreasonably happy and surrounded by love." A "Love" theme connecting "sensual", "embracer of life", "heterosexual", "monogamous" and "brother" was added. He also suggested that everything is a test, it always matters, and this awareness makes him laugh: "If everything matters, then I matter, you matter, the squirrel that sneaks into my kitchen matters. He recalled that a previous girlfriend believed that weekends didn t matter, that it was "time off and she spent her weekends, and their bank account, on cocaine. j, Empowered »--"••*" V Self 'J [typirw «i| *- [ proujd Figure 13: Revised memetic self-map of Pangloss with amendments flowing from his second interview Pangloss was impressed by Sun-Tzu's first dictum: "No battle plan ever survived first contact with the enemy," but Taoism is too naturalistic for him. He suggested that he is more comfortable with existentialism because it emphasizes personal choice and it is "out of fashion" as he enjoys being contrarian. As a result of this information, the idea of being contrarian was added to his "animator" meme. It was also noted that a belief in one's ability to choose is essential to the idea of empowerment. In explaining how he is demanding, Pangloss said he applies a "yardstick" to everyone he comes into contact with, and he expects them to live up to their capabilities. He recognizes that his perception could be wrong, but he demands that people "be human" in their dealings with others. He admitted this is being "judge and jury," but he insisted that everyone judges others all the time and, "As grown ups we are supposed to make moral evaluations." He added on this point that people think of him as "an asshole." He then recounted an injustice involving an employer not paying for overtime until he spoke up. This information was added to Pangloss' "demanding" meme, which was then connected to "arrogant." It was noted that Pangloss showed understanding for some people who made poor decisions as a result of life circumstances, such as his parents, yet he has been demanding of others. He suggested that the past is prologue but not destiny. The sins of his deceased aunt occurred over decades when she was surrounded by love, yet she remained devoid of gratitude. He pitied her for cheating herself out of joy, and wondered if a 12 year-old boy could see she was wrong, why could she not see it? He concluded she was bad, and some people are "just bad," and that "we are fools to think otherwise." "We can all choose redemption," he said, but some people refuse to make that choice. Pangloss excused his parents' abuse because they did 170 the best they could with what they knew in difficult circumstances. He did not extend the same to his aunt because she could, in his estimation, have behaved better. A humanist perspective. Pangloss explained that a humanist viewpoint is centered on a non-supernatural world with special emphasis placed on reason and dialogue, which evokes a secular ethic of maximizing happiness. He said reason and dialogue can solve most human problems, and we can learn to live together. He said humanism could accommodate religion. "The western spiritual ethic," he suggested, "is too heavily dependent on punishment in another realm," but a humanist ethic involves being good simply because one wants to be good. Pangloss suggested if he were not a humanist, he would have a narrower worldview and would be less concerned with personal ethics. As a result of this information, the ideas of opposing supernaturalism, but supporting reason, dialogue, ethics and goodness were incorporated into his "humanist" meme. Links were added between "humanist" and "intellectual," and between "humanist" and "empathetic." Pangloss said he models good behavior and tries to increase happiness in the world. This idea of modelling good behavior was added to his "moralist" meme. A social interest theme was added to his self-map. Pangloss said that being heterosexual "narrows my sexual behavior but not my ability to love." He loves both men and women and finds there is a strong correlation between liking someone and finding them attractive. As a result "Love" was added as a theme that permeates various aspects of his self. With respect to his feeling of being a "community of one," and that he could live the rest of his life with books and groceries delivered, Pangloss explained he sometimes struggles to pick up the phone when someone calls. Sometimes, he has to remind myself that he is in a relationship and that he has to share with his partner. A daydream of his is to win a lottery 171 permitting him to "peddle around in countries that are warm." A conflict or tension line was added between "Social Self and "loner" in his self-map. Pangloss' Third Interview Pangloss was interviewed a third time on October 1, three months after the second interview and eight months after our initial one. Pangloss had reviewed his revised self-map (Figure 13) and the definitions of the memes that made up his self-map (Appendix K) in advance of the interview. "What struck me" he said, "was how indelibly uninterested I was in finding out from someone else what I am." Pangloss said he pays attention to himself only to the extents of its utility. He is not interested in himself as a subject in its own right. He said, "I was determined to convince you that there were negatives in my personality, so I presented an inaccurate picture." Pangloss was invited to make the picture more accurate. Pangloss expressed the concern that if meme-making depends on qualities that are extrinsic, then it cannot represent those elements of self that are intrinsic of which he is not aware. He shared that he can exaggerate things to the point of dishonesty, using examples that re- enforce whatever image he wishes. "All is marketing," he said. Pangloss had shared that he was looking for some kind of independent "assessment" that would serve to cut through the "marketing." During this interview, he agreed it was logically possible to describe a self without assessing it, but he added, "This flies in the face of a million years of human evolution." He asserted that we evolved to make judgements, often in crisis situations, with minimal information. He did not have a concern about my judgement of him at the beginning of this research, but now he decided he likes me, and my opinion of him matters; therefore, he wanted to present himself in a positive light. On the other hand, he did not want to lie about himself because then what is liked is the lie and not the reality. Positive statements may be seen as step in negotiating a relationship "like courtship," he said, and there exists a fine line between the reality and the lie. Further, his self-mage will be partly dependent on whether or not he is having a good day. While this line of reasoning adds to the tentativeness associated with this and every other self-map, this variability is already encompassed by Pangloss' "continuum of possibilities" meme. In answer to the question, "Is being ingratiating dishonest?" Pangloss suggested that being ingratiating is natural. If it is not supplication or submission, then it is not dishonest. For example, he thinks that marijuana is a "wonderful thing," and he would not deny it to others despite the fact that he does not use it due to his allergies. Pangloss explained he was using "ingratiating" in a non-pejorative sense meaning to present oneself in a positive light. When asked how he resolves contradictory elements within his self, Pangloss replied: "I don't know that I have to resolve conflicts between contradictory parts of my nature. I am utilitarian in my ethics. I want to know the effects of my actions. Sometimes I think that bad behavior deserves retribution. Justice is something that has to be enforced by every member of society. Pangloss said individual members of society sometimes have to step in and exact retribution even though we would like others to take care of it. Some matters, such as cranky neighbors, are not police matters. This view may be in conflict with his egalitarian value but, "Being an adult involves holding two contradictory ideas in your head and not needing to resolve them." This answer also combines values held in what was referred to as his "Grounded Self with a compulsion to act that drives his "Empowered Self." When asked to recount from where this sense of empowerment came, Pangloss reviewed the story (first presented in his second interview) of his attempted suicide. A girl, to whom he had made love, had sex with another youth the following night. He swam into the Pacific thinking that if he was too tired to swim back he would drown, but some friends in a canoe saw him, presumed that he was caught in the tides, and paddled out to save him. He did not remember them pulling him into the canoe. While in hospital he thought that the reason he tried to kill himself was he had been living for the approval of others. He observed that everyone was as wretched as he was. He became more selfish, and this led him to become more generous toward others. He noted that the more he knows himself the easier it is to understand others. I gathered that increased empowerment resulted from increased self-awareness, coupled with an awareness that others were like him in some important ways. None-the-less, Pangloss declared, "I have never been a good sage to understand how I make changes in my life... I am not my own grand subject. The key to happiness is finding something greater than your self and dedicating yourself to it. The outward focus is far more interesting to me. I would rather ask someone else how they are." Pangloss said he "came out" of the process of this research as he thought he would, "complicated, contradictory and confusing." He explained this is why he is sometimes frustrating to his friends. He said he likes the way he is, and he would have to be an ideologue to be simple. "I am not an ideologue and that makes me feel better." Freddie Fredelle identified herself / himself as a Caucasian with some aboriginal heritage who is transsexual. S/he was not in a romantic relationship at the time of these interviews, and s/he did not have any children. S/he was in his/her late fifties, and was unemployed at the time of this study although s/he had previously been employed in the oil industry. S/he is referred by her preferred gender, female, for the balance of this study except when she referred specifically to 174 that part of her self that was male. Despite this convention, Fredelle was careful to emphasize that transgenderality incorporates both female and male personas. Fredelle's First Interview Fredelle presented two themes within her self that were pictured as being in opposition to each other: a male side she named "Fred" and a female side she named "Fredelle." These two themes are represented by boxes in Figure 14 with those memes associated with each lying in the general area of the thematic persona. In all, twenty-seven codes were applied 123 times to 100 segments of transcribed text. Thirty of these 100 segments were coded for the meme "feminine." She reported: There's absolutely nothing female or feminine about my physicality, so the only part of me that is genuinely feminine is the mental and consequently the spiritual, the emotional, the results of my mental activity. That is were my femininity resides; my goal is to be female and feminine, it's not necessarily to pass as a female and be feminine. To Fredelle, the qualities of being loving, sensitive, and caring are feminine. She said her sexual development was from a feminine perspective, and she wanted to relate to her lover in a feminine way, as opposed to an aggressive, dominant, and strong masculine way. She admitted, however, that her idea of femininity exists in her own mind, and she cannot state that women, generally, share this idea: Now, I can never know how another woman feels, just no one can know how other women feel. She can only assume that the other woman feels the same as she does because of... when I think of myself as a woman, I see a person who is sensitive to things that are of a sensual nature, a self-loving sensual nature. 175 Figure 14; Memetic map ofFredelle resulting from the segmentation and coding of her initial interview with the number segments coded for each meme in brackets Freddie's concept of "feminine" is largely coterminous with her "Fredelle" persona, so the two are pictured in Figure 14 as overlapping. Other memes associated with being feminine include being cooperative, hopeful, non-aggressive and multicultural. "Multicultural" includes acceptance of diversity and difference while "male society" enforces rigid conformity. Sabotaging success as a male. The male side of her self, represented by "Fred," featured negative memes such as "depressed," "bald," "old" and "mortal." She viewed the parts of herself that are "unavoidably masculine" as "dead weight." This understanding led to ritualized self- defeating behaviors: I don't wanna be a success as a man, that's for sure. I will do whatever it takes to not succeed as a man, and I know that is a conscious decision on my part, but it might be an unconscious decision in that I've never allowed myself to succeed openly in social or business or even romantic things. I've always wanted to sabotage Fred... "Transsexual" is presented as the core meme uniting the "Fred" and "Fredelle" personas in one self. She views it not as a sexuality but more as a "transgenderality," having fantasized being passive and feminine with both male and female partners. She tried, unsuccessfully, to be "gay" because, from her perspective, gays are accepted in most situations in society. She concluded, however, that transsexuality is core to her being - the source of her uniqueness, creativity and learning. She decided to work for societal change, so transsexuals may gain the rights that homosexuals have attained. Empowerment. Social activism implies a sense of empowerment, and eight segments were coded for an "animator" meme from the initial interview. This sense of empowerment was related to Fredelle's "coming out," presenting her transsexuality to her church. Having gained acceptance in the Unitarian congregation, she began organizing a transsexual presence in other forums such as the annual "gay pride" parade. Although this event represented a positive transition, the act of undermining herself to deny success under her "Fred" persona also represented a kind of empowerment. "Roleplayer," on the other hand, was defined by Fredelle to be disempowering, as she was felt compelled to play a role due to her physical man-form. Other self-defining memes that imply empowerment included "intellectual," "community member," and "leader." In defining herself as an intellectual, Fredelle stated she prefers the world of ideas to manual labor. Her transsexuality contributed toward independent thinking that, in turn, contributed toward her atheism. None-the-less, she felt a need to avoid isolation and cultivated her self as part of a community. That need for community has been, in part, served by her membership in the Unitarian Church. Recently, she has been both building the transsexual community and speaking out for transsexual rights - activities that suggested incorporation of a "leader" meme into her self. Fredelle's spirituality involved a belief in the interconnectedness of nature and community and is linked to her involvement in the Unitarian Church and her definition of multiculturalism. In two of three segments she linked her spirituality to her atheism that, in turn, allows for a universal force that is without awareness. Fredelle's Second Interview Fredelle said her initial self-map accurately depicted the disproportionate imbalance between her two centers: Fred and Fredelle. She noted that Fredelle contains "all the good things about me," and she concluded that she would be a better person to have lost Fred, "I would be just as complete as I am now but unburdened." She said Fred is connected with being depressed and a misfit and added, "Nature is not necessarily just. Nature cares only about reproduction of species; it cares nothing for quality of life. Nature screwed me up with this Fred stuff." Developmental change. She said she had an orchidectomy during the five month interval between the first and second interviews, and reported that "tears of joy were going down my face" with the removal of the first testicle. She considered her testicles to have been an insult to her, and with their removal she felt more like taking care of her body. Her impulse to engage in 178 self-defeating behaviors was reduced; she explained, "No testicles will benefit from my efforts to help myself." She noted there is nothing her self-map about health maintenance or self-care, but with the surgical change came a feeling of self-nurturing. As a result of this information, the meme "self-changer" was added to Freddie's self-map situated between "animator" and "transsexual" in Figure 15. The solid line connecting "animator" with "self-defeating" was changed to a dotted line reflecting the change that she is no longer attempting to sabotage "Fred" by neglecting his/her health. Further, a meme for self- nurturing was added to the map connected to Fredelle and to "self-changer." A tension line was drawn connecting "self defeating" and "self-nurturing." Although Fredelle plans to go to Montreal to have Gender Reassignment Surgery, she could be happy with a penis as she does not find the penis as offensive as testicles. After an operation to remove her penis she will be physically a female with an artificial vagina, but she said she will still be a transsexual because of her history and memories. This was her first indication that memories are essential to her self, and a meme for "rememberer" was added to her self-map with thematic lines emanating from it to various parts of her self. A never-ending conflict. Fredelle said she cannot resolve the dichotomy of Fred and Fredelle and become both simultaneously. Fred is understood as "the enemy" while, "There is enough in Fredelle to be a complete human being, and you cannot combine the two." A two- arrowed yellow line was added indicating conflict and tension between Fred and Fredelle. The "I" that is often identified with the animating principle, is viewed to be on the Fredelle side of the ledger. There can be no battle between the two because Fred has no animating "I." As a result of this consideration, the arrow connecting "animator" to "self-defeating" was changed to a 179 directional one since there is no sense in which the Fred side is part of, or has access to, "animator." Despite this consideration Fredelle admitted: The real me was both the Fred and the Fredelle. They formed a committee that could not get along. A hidden controller was a result of that conflict. I may still have some conflicts in the future, but the conflicts will have shifted from being internal to external. Fredelle can now take on anything the world throws at her. She is no longer being undermined by Fred. interview Social interest through activism. Fredelle reported that she was working on her skills as an editor and writer, and she wants to do business over the internet. This will allow her more freedom to be herself than did her previous occupation in the oil industry. She said she wants to educate people to understand and accept transgendered people, and that was one of her motivations in consenting to this research. She asserted that transsexuality is a "mental thing" that can be accommodated: "If you can't change the mind to suit the body, then change the body to suit the mind." As a result of this information "activist" was added as a meme connected to "animator" and "transsexual" on her self-map. Fredelle also reported she does not define herself by her emotions but attempts to recognize and transcend those emotions so that they will not govern her. The changes she is making to her physical self will allow her to role play a more feminine Fredelle, but she added, "I don't want to be a transvestite, I just want to be me." A connecting link was added between "role player" and "feminine." Fredelle's Third Interview Fredelle reviewed her revised self-map approximately five weeks after her second interview. She noted that a wig is not the same thing as a hairpiece which is permanently attached to the scalp. "Wig wearer" was changed to "hairpiece wearer" on the self-map. This change, and others flowing from this third interview, are represented in Figure 16. New emotional awareness. During her second interview, Fredelle said emotions were not properly part of the self and were to be monitored and controlled by a rational mind. She had experienced intense anger illustrated by her happiness that her father's line dies with her because "He was a vicious man." Consequent to her orchidectomy, Fredelle reported feeling free of her past with a concomitant openness to emotion. As and example, she reported "tears of happiness" when observing a young boy at a mall. She now associated her former less emotional self with maleness, and she described her new emotional functioning as a "wonderful time of change." A 181 bar representing a menu of emotions was added to her self-map (Figure 16). A diffuse arrow was drawn from "feminine" to this bar identifying it as her perceived source for her newly awakened emotional functioning. menu of emotions Figure 16: Revised memetic map ofFredelle with amendments flowing from her third interview Fredelle was asked for the significance, if any, of her signing her e-mails as "Fred. She explained she signs her name according to how she feels "at the moment," and she may not have felt "particularly feminine at the time." She explained she is "adopting" a Thai girl, at-risk for forced sex-trade activity, through "World Vision," and she is doing it as "Fred" because "it is easier this way." Since losing her testes, she added, "it doesn't matter as much whether people refer to me as Fred or Fredelle. The big push to get rid of my maleness is not as great as it was." She explained that her testes had been oppressive just by existing, "Nature wants you to reproduce. I am getting back at nature because I am now non-reproduceable. I wanted to force nature to say 'I screwed up when I put Fredelle into a male body." New hope in femininity. Fredelle said what empowers her is knowledge, confidence, courage and vision and this resulted in a new-found optimism. She noted that one day after she turned 57, having had quadruple bypass surgery, it occurred to her that "life is too short to allow the corporation to dictate who I was." She told many more people about her transsexuality and enjoyed her body more. She explained that to feel the feminine aspects of her body, such as her long hair, are a wonderful experience. She said the army shaves the heads of soldiers to remove their individuality, but she, with her hair, has reclaimed hers. She described short-haired people as "mean and vicious," and suggested that long hair represents love. She said this empowerment was recent and involved rejecting "the Fred memes." Fredelle said spirituality equates with connectedness, and all things on her feminine side can be used in building this spirituality. She found that she can now look at a woman and admire her without physical sexual consequences. Previously she would become aroused and would masturbate, which she viewed as a physical price for attraction adding, "To me it was hell to be sexual." As a result of this information a new meme "sensual" was added to her self-map incorporating both her sexuality and her sensuality in appreciating the feminized aspects of her body. 183 Freddie said that the experience of participating in this research "empowered me to be physically free." Turning 60 symbolically allowed her the freedom to change, and she felt no obligations to the past anymore. She explained that the night before this interview she installed a bathroom cabinet, and the lyrics to a Phil Oakes song came to her, "I want to give all that I have to give; cross my heart and hope to live." She noted that he hadn't been putting the effort into life, but now she is, "I see myself as a woman at the beginning of her second life." This resulted in a new commitment to life that had been developing over the past few months. Previously she had viewed life as a sentence; now she pictured herself as an adventurer "throwing everything I got into it." She said she was feeling empowered and courageous, and these feelings serve to activate her "unique," "learner," "animator" and "intellectual" centers. She said counselling had been helpful. It had been a condition of participation in this research that participants not be in counselling, but she explained that she entered counselling between the first and second interviews because she needed to talk to someone. Chantelle Chantelle was a Caucasian female in her twenties with dual citizenship: Canadian and US-American, and she had lived in both countries during her formative years. She enrolled at the University of Calgary following her release from prison. Although her only child was in foster care, she took an active interest in that child and referred to herself as a single parent. Chantelle's First Interview Chantelle began our initial session on February 19, 2007 by talking about her aspirations as a student in counselling psychology. She said she was interested in studying the experience of hope in women's prisons. She also described herself as a boxer, having recently turned professional following eight successful years at the amateur level. She said she loves most sports, 184 and she mentioned she had won a four-year baseball scholarship to Colorado State University out of high school, but she had failed to take advantage of that scholarship. She said her clients in the prison system tend to relate well to sports analogies, but for her sports also represents a stress release. In total 33 unique codes were applied 86 times to 46 segments of text from Chantelle's initial interview. Five of these 46 segments were coded for "student" while six segments were coded for "athlete." Both memes represented positive roles for Chantelle that re-enforced her self-image as having a potential for success within society. A new beginning through athletics. Chantelle said her self-definition as an athlete was central to her "turning her life around." "Athlete" became part of her self-definition before she became a student, and it gave her the confidence to become a student. Both "athlete" and "student" are united by "proud" in Figure 17 as these represent roles in which she has been successful and were related as a source of her pride. "Athlete" is illustrated with links to "determined," "counsellor," "worker," "animator" and "aggressive," and it is shown in a box illustrating it as both a thematic code and as a meme. It was considered to be a theme in that she carries some of the attitudes of an athlete, for example, competitiveness, to other aspects of her life. Volition and change. "Animator" was also represented as both a meme and a theme within Chantelle's self, and she provided examples of animation within moralist, activist, athletic, learner, family and self-changer contexts. A blue thematic arrow was drawn from "animator" through the following memes: "aggressive", "athlete", "determined" and "overextended". This drive to accomplish, she said, came from her spirit which in turn was a function of certain emotion-related constants such as being good-hearted, being driven to learn, 185 and having a passion or drive to "keep going" despite obstacles. These underlying drives are represented in Figure 17 as being present in a bar at the base of her self with directional arrows flowing from that base to "spirit" and then to "animator." Chantelle understood this spirit as a constant that cannot be taken away or "stolen," and it is represented by a diamond within her self to illustrate that meme's special place in her self-construct. t'.irwiimi g ,\l-rmne.l inipii'j-e w Imrc h, imt"-'H|UHif wcperk'nce-a potion aritri\sn-k.et;pjj;nin£ j i - - - IT Figure 17: Memetic map of Chantelle resulting from the segmentation and coding of her initial interview with the number segments coded for each meme in brackets 186 "Self-changer" as a self-defining meme was mentioned in more segments than any other (12). She reported that initially she became good at sports as an outlet for her anger, but now she plays because she wants to excel. She credited her pregnancy with her decision to stop criminal activity and to become successful in legitimate ways: I think the biggest thing in my life was my son and he is 7 now, just turned 7, and I would say that he was kind of like my saviour that ah, when I found out I was pregnant it was something to... look, it changed my view on life, like suddenly I wasn't just being reckless and just living for myself and I actually, I needed to start caring about something, and he provided that for me, so like when he was a baby I wanted to do everything I could to be a good person and live well, stay off drugs, get an education, that kind of stuff. Although her son was taken into foster care, Chantelle continued to build a life for herself with the hope of reuniting with him in a family. Reflectivity and self-criticism are two elements connected to her change effort, but the drive for self-change runs as a theme through much of her life and is pictured as flowing through her "intelligent," "determined," "serious," "responsible," "ex-con" and "counsellor" selves. Developing a "Work Self was a planned, developmental change for Chantelle, and she reported it involved the realization that she could succeed by pursuing socially acceptable goals while, in some sense, remaining the same person: So the changes come from pursuing goals and achieving them and learning and just growing as a person, so maybe becoming wiser would change, my knowledge would change, but my personality would still be the same. Using athletical metaphors. Separate memes for "worker" and "counsellor" were defined, and each was recorded in five segments, but in Chantelle's usage, the two terms were often 187 interchangeable. Hence, the two memes were drawn as overlapping in Figure 16. She has drawn on her athletic background to aid in her counselling: It's one thing to watch it on TV, but its another thing to actually to be in the ring, take the pain and deliver and stay focussed, and ahh, if you kind of put that in terms of life, a lot of these people have been through some painful past and you know, they're able to take that but also to have some positive energy about their life and move forward, and using some of those like similarities between sports and life, it's definitely helpful. Memory not only served Chantelle in her work, but it provided a feeling of constancy in a life marked by change. In each of the four segments coded "rememberer" she is the person who was the central actor, and this appeared to give a sense of constancy. She explained, "I don't think my personality, or like my, the things that actually make me, me, those don't change." Although it was only coded for one segment, the meme "responsible" represented a quality that persists cross-contextually: Wherever I am whether it's school, work, home, sports, whatever, like I am very dedicated to what I am doing, and if I take something on I will see it through, so I believe in commitment, dedication with that I try to be; I know I am a fairly serious person... Chantelle's Second Interview Chantelle's second interview occurred on July 2, 4.5 months after the first. She noted that both "humble" and "proud" appeared on her initial self-map, and she recalled that at one time her pride involved being arrogant, overconfident and rude, but that began to change when she was 18 or 19. She discovered that she could be proud without "throwing it in others' faces." While noting that being proud in a non-aggressive way was necessary to her self, she said she would move "proud" to the outside of the map and move humble more toward the inside to show the 188 relative importance she placed on being humble. An attempt was made to accomplish this change, however her pride was connected to her roles as athlete and student, and it was associated with her determination to succeed. It was held in place by those memes and without those connections she would cease to be proud. Put another way, moving "proud" to the outside of her self would necessitate that she devalue her accomplishments as a student and as an athlete in some way so that those two memes would also not play so central a role in who she is. Acknowledging that "humble" is more central to Chantelle's being than was originally represented, I shifted it toward the interior of her self-map, and a unidirectional arrow was drawn connecting it with "proud " to represent how the latter meme is moderated by the former (see Figure 18). Concomitant with this change, a broad thematic arrow flowing from "self-changer" was connected to the memes for "humble" and "egalitarian." This was considered consistent with her history of moderating how she expresses her pride to others. A second change to Chantelle's memetic self-map involved drawing a thematic link flowing from "animator" to learner to self-changer before continuing to areas of her self affected by her change efforts. This change better reflected the source of her will to change - the belief that not only were the changes to become a better person good in themselves, but she also had the power to effect these changes in her self. In addition, the theme "animator" was expanded to include the concept of empowerment. Re-evaluating family connections. Chantelle said one of her brothers had died since our interview four months earlier, and this had resulted in a re-evaluation of how she relates to family. She felt guilty she was not more connected to her family - torn between wanting to be there for her family and distancing herself from negative and co-dependent (drug related) relationships. While this reflective thought could be precursor to further developmental change 189 to her self, it is evident that Chantelle was motivated by moral considerations that are sometimes in conflict. A new meme "moralist" was added to her map that includes the idea that she avoids actions that would support the bad behavior of others. Her self-map was amended to show a tension between "moralist" and "family person." Ci'iManr* Lett Uwiugh unijal. uig h,iv.k.pnmrui feol'iigi t'Ood-liewwJ, ifuit* trvtapn, to jriiejtifctite, - Figure 18: Revised memetic self-map of Chantelle with amendments flowing from her second interview A drive to perfection. Chantelle was asked what drives her to take on more than she can reasonably expect to handle (represented by the meme "overextended"), and to excel at all she attempts. She replied that she has a lot of energy, and that if she happens to "take a night off she finds herself "sitting at home" wondering what to do with herself. She said her mission is to make her life count for something, to do as much as she can as well as she can. She tries to do something positive each day, but not necessarily work related. Recreational activities with friends such as rafting "count" while passive activities that do not build relationships like watching TV do not count. To some extent this view was represented by "a passion or drive to keep going" in Chantelle's "underlying constants" bar. Her self-map was elaborated by adding "making life meaningful through activity" to that bar and by adding the explanation "felt through underlying background feelings" after the word "constants." In addition the meme "activity" was added to a cluster that includes "overextended" and "overachiever." "Activity" was not defined as the same as "activist" which implies a direct social purpose. The activity meme, as felt by Chantelle, may be defined as valuing purposeful action with the connotation that she is deficient or worth less when inactive. The importance of having energy. Chantelle had mentioned being young during our first interview, and she returned to that theme in the second. She explained that being young means opportunity and energy. It also means that sometimes she has to prove herself and display her competence to older people. "Young" is contextual; her baseball peers call her "an old fart" because she does not drink or party with them. She would like to be older, so she could fit in better in certain contexts, but she likes the energy of being young. As a result of this information the meme "young" was amended to add the connotation of energy and it was linked to the activity meme thus moving "young" to a more central location. "Ex-con" was moved to the periphery as it appeared that "young" was more central to her current self-definition. When asked what future changes she would make to her self Chantelle replied, "I kind of like my map; it fits in with who I am. I like the bottom part, the constants, the passion to keep going." She went on to suggest that she does not like the phrase "impulse to learn" and would change that to "drive to learn." She would move "good person" more toward the inside. She said that in the future she would like to reduce athletics in importance, especially as it is related aggressiveness and competitiveness, while maintaining an active but less intense athletic life. "Impulse to learn" was changed to "drive to learn" in Figure 18. In addition "good person" was moved toward a more central location while maintaining its contact with "parent" and "kind." Chantelle's Third Interview Chantelle reviewed her revised memetic self-map on August 9, five weeks after her second interview. She commented, "It's how I would describe myself, it's perfect." When it was pointed out that I felt I was unable to move the "pride" meme to the outside of her map because the aspects of herself in which she felt pride kept that meme closer to a central part of her self, she replied that it made sense to her. She said she had associated pride with a negative connotation, and she appreciated that the directional arrow from the meme "humble" representing her attempts to dampen the effect of pride on her behavior. When asked if she had any new insights about who she was, Chantelle said her spiritual aspect is strong, and she has had time to reflect on this. She is torn between connecting with family and keeping her distance, and she has decided to keep her distance due to their use of illicit drugs. She had explained this to her brothers. She hadn't talked to her parents, and she emphatically stated that she would not be talking to them. These insights were already represented in Chantelle's revised map (Figure 18) with a tension line drawn between "family person" and "moralist" and with her spirit represented at the base of her self-map. Her sense of family was, at the time of this third interview, more associated with her son than with her siblings and parents. "Empowerment" was noted as a theme on Chantelle's self-map. She said she was not empowered as a child, and she had been a "shy foster kid." She stopped going to school and ended up on a course that resulted in series of convictions. She said that the process of "getting clean," going to jail, having her son, and then starting school contributed to her self- empowerment. Finding her own passions and doing positive things built her energy. She started boxing "from and angry place," but then she realized that she was good at it, and this contributed to her sense of empowerment. A counsellor had also helped her to realize that she was "worth something." Chantelle was asked whether there had been any changes in her ability or willingness to make changes to her self as a result of her participation in the process of this research. She replied she had been thinking about this question a lot. She considered her values and how they connect with her life. She did not think she will change much with respect to her values, but she intends to not let things "bug her" as much. She will gradually de-emphasize sports in her life as she ages. Two months prior to this third interview, she suffered a torn tendon and was forced to lie on a couch for a week. The period of inactivity resulted in her becoming depressed, but when she went back to work her mood became "instantly better." She would like to change this reliance on activity, but she did not feel more empowered to make such changes as she was already "fairly empowered" prior to her participation in this research. Magdelynn Magdelynn was a Caucasian of Canadian citizenship in her thirties and a student at the University of Calgary. Her father was a mixture of Polish and English while her mother was a mixture of French and Scottish. She identified herself ethnically as "Canadian." She lost the use of her legs following a motorcycle accident necessitating the use of a wheelchair. Magdelynn's First Interview When asked to describe her self, Magdelynn said, "I see myself kind of all these fractured pieces, like it's almost like a pie, a pie chart." She described herself as having a "Forest Gump life" where she "just kind of floats along wherever the breeze takes me." She used to be different: Before I crashed my motorbike and ended up in my chair I was very goal orientated, like I had this to do and that to do, and right before my crash, I just kind of completed all these things from my 5 year plan like, got my education degree finally, and like, was teaching and was like, 'Okay, I've finished the end of this, now what?' so I was in the process of trying to think what I was going to do for the next 5 year plan, and then I crashed my bike... This first interview segment about having a "Forest Gump life" was coded as "environmentally driven" and "flexible." The accident led to a transition in her self that resulted in the qualities represented by these two memes rise to greater prominence. She went on to explain that while family has always been important to her, she realized after the accident it is not something you develop in a "five year plan," but it is something that you live and "it happens." Rebuilding her self with athletics. More segments (17 out of 93) were coded for "athlete' than any of the other forty codes applied to those segments, yet this too was a product of her "Forest Gump life." She had not defined herself as an athlete prior to her accident. She had played hockey, but she did not see herself as being skilled in that sport. After the accident with the help of a friend, she found wheelchair basketball: I'm not a quad, but I am not really paraplegic either, because I do have these two limbs, but I don't have any balance, so I can use my limbs if I'm not falling over and smashing my head on a table or whatever is in line for me to hit. So anyway, haphazardly I just kind of found wheelchair basketball, and it was like, "This is the greatest" because you could strap yourself in your chair, and the chair is made so it doesn't flip over very easily so I was, ahh, I could play this... After playing wheelchair basketball for a year and a half, she was invited to try out for the Canadian national team. She decided to "test the waters" to see where this "Forest Gump life" took her. The second largest number interview segments (12) were coded "gimp:" I prefer to call myself a gimp rather than like, disabled because in my mind when you think of disabled, disabled alarms can't do anything; like, it doesn't function. So I don't see myself as disabled 'cause I can do a whole lot of things that able-bodied people can't do, or would not even think of trying to do... A relationship between "gimp," "athlete," "environmentally driven" and "flexible" is illustrated in Figure 19. "Environmentally driven" along with overlapping memes for "context dependent" and "role player" form a "Relativistic" core that may not have been present prior to her accident. This core allows flexibility in taking advantage of her "Forest Gump" 195 opportunities. Figure 19: Memetic map of Magdelynn resulting from the segmentation and coding of her initial interview with the number segments coded for each meme in brackets The thick link between "gimp" and "athlete" illustrates a strong relationship (associations in more than two segments) in Magdelynn's account of her self. There is also a strong link between "gimp" and "anti-stereotyping." She said many people act as though disabled people are "incapable, incompetent and hard of hearing." Her angry response was to aggressively challenge these attitudes, and she admitted the increased post-accident emphasis she placed on "intelligent" was, in part, a reaction against the prejudicial attitudes she faced. Magdelynn's self-identification as a "gimp" reinforced her self-identification as a "unique experiencer." She believed no one is quite like her, and no one would experience events in quite the same way. She was proud of both her uniqueness and her athletic accomplishments - both animated by a competitive spirit. An interpretive or thematic code was added to this section called "Active Competitor," a theme that was also evident in her perfectionism. The meme with the third largest number of segmental codings (8) is "intense," and it represents a quality necessary for success as an athlete, but Magdalynn brings this quality to life generally. She said she is driven by her goals, and this intensity has led her to become an "overachiever" as an athlete, daughter and worker. This led to her self-description as an anxious person - if she does not get everything done then she feels that there is something wrong with her. Her anxiety is also connected to her self-image as disorganized: She attempts to do many things simultaneously with the result that she does not get everything accomplished to her self- expectations with the connotation that she is lacking in organizational skills. Her intensity was also connected to her self as an animator. She said she was not a spectator but a player. She was also action-orientated in other ways: When she disagreed with a bureaucratic decision about what type of wheel chair was appropriate for her, she appealed the decision and overcame bureaucratically set regulations. This "animator" self is also reflected in her roles as a worker, counsellor, learner and daughter. The remembered stories that she told herself re-enforced her self-image as an achiever and gave her a sense of constancy midst environmental forces dictating change. In the act of remembering, Magdalynn used metaphor such as her self-description as a "fractured pie" at the start of our initial interview. Defining her religious views. Magdelynn was raised Roman Catholic. She was baptized as an infant, confirmed as a youth, went to church with her family, and was sent to an all-girls Catholic school in Saskatchewan which she described as, "like way out in the middle of nowhere." After her accident her parents had pastoral care people come to see her on a regular basis, but she reported that their prayers did not affect her in a positive way. She reported she would humor them because she was "too tired and weak to fight anybody." She continued, however, to have a belief by faith that there is a supreme being: I always believed that there is something out there, I don't know if it's, like the Catholic god 'cause I could not understand why, like the Catholic Church wasn't tolerant of, say people with a different sexual orientation. That bugged me and I was like, "You say you're all fine and good and you're like shunning all these different people. Why is this?" so I was like, "it doesn't make any sense because something is supposed to be all loving, why are people getting discouraged and getting pushed away, and then when you have Catholic priests who are like, traumatizing little kids. What is that?" Like, I could not wrap my head around that for anything, so I thought, "I am out of here." I quit this. So I don't... so I only go to church with my mom and dad kind of to appease them, but I do believe in like, karma or like I don't know if I believe in destiny, but I believe, well I guess, destiny and faith are sort of the same thing, but I do believe there is something you can't see or feel, well maybe you can emotionally feel a connection, but there is something out there that impacts what you do. Magdelynn presented with a theistic belief in eight segments but sometimes expressed it as a hope, "I have a hope that there is, like the higher power is all-loving and there is an absolute acceptance of people." Her spirituality was connected to her theistic belief or hope: "I'm spiritual because I believe that there is something else. There is just not the physical entities that are walking around here." She actualizes her spirituality by being good to others, "just because it feels better." "Caring" is shown as connected, in Figure 20, to "theist," "daughter," "counsellor" and the overlapping themes that were also coded as memes: "Family Person" and "Relationship Builder." While family has always been important, Magdelynn admitted to not attending to her family relationships for periods of time as she intensely pursued other interests. Her meme as a relationship builder is also actualized in her preference for team sports. She described herself as "intensely loyal," and said she enjoyed team sports for the comradery. A number of themes are presented as binding various aspects of Magdelynn's self in a unitary whole. The "Achiever" theme is pictured, in Figure 19, as running through "learner," "self-changer," "gimp" and "athlete." "Rememberer" runs through "metaphor maker," "independent belief," "spiritual," "Catholic," "friend," and "Relationship Builder / Family Person." "Relationship Builder" and "Family Person" themes are pictured as extending through "daughter," "caring," "sister" and "athlete" memes. Figure 19 also represents how Magdelynn felt fractured. Tension lines were drawn between "rigid" and "flexible;" "relationship builder" and "achiever;" and, "relationship builder" and "adaptive/context." Magdelynn's Second Interview Magdelynn began this interview, which occurred 4.5 months after the first, by reporting that there had been a shift from her emphasis in achieving in sports to achieving in relationships, especially within her family. Her emphasis on achievement in learning remained unchanged. A conflict between her roles as an athlete and as a family member had left her feeling "fractured" at the time of our initial interview with both her mother and boyfriend feeling neglected. Concomitantly, her basketball team had been "too rigid" in scheduling, so she stopped playing for the national team. As she still played recreationally, she continued to see herself as an athlete. A mind mechanism for change. Magdelynn's initial self-map allowed for changing priorities. Her animator meme, central to the achievement theme, was shown as connected to family and learning as well as to sports. Her meme "self-changer" connected to flexibility which, in turn, connected to "adaptive / context" within a "Relativistic" cluster, which is also connected to athlete. Thus, a mind mechanism was represented whereby she was able to make the changes she outlined between the first and second interviews without making substantive changes to her self; however, her decision to reduce the time spent on sports reduced the tension between "adaptive (to) context" and "relationship builder," therefore the line of tension between the two was removed in her revised self-map (Figure 20). Magdelynn reported she had become less rigid, but she still wants things "just so" in her house. She began spending more time with her boyfriend and her family with the result that she felt less fractured. She developed more confidence in allowing others to know who she is with the result that she became less of a role player. The link between "athlete" and "rigid" was deleted, and the link between "rigid" and "self critical" was changed to a dashed line indicating less association between the two. A link between "rigid" and "perfectionist," an association suggested by her wanting things "just so," was added. The meme "adaptive - context" was modified to reflect feeling is less "fractured." Figure 20: Revised memetic self-map ofMagdelynn with amendments flowing from her second interview Magdelynn said she would add "sexual" to her meme-map with the connotation that she viewed her sexuality as connected to being attractive, life-giving and complete. A new "sexual" meme was added to Figure 20 represented as coming from her body using a directional arrow, but pictured as also connected to "Family Person" and "Relationship Builder." 201 Religious and spiritual beliefs expanded. Magdelynn explained that her belief in a higher power allows her be confident in the future despite her realization that she cannot "do everything under the sun." Thus, she expressed faith that everything will work out, or if not, it is all part of some master plan that explains why, somehow, it is not supposed to work out. She wanted to feel nurtured by that higher power, and she wanted the children she is working with to have that feeling as well. She believed, however, that the Roman Catholic Church is too rigid and not consistent in their capacity to care for others. She said that without her spirituality she would be angry and self-centered. This response was anticipated in Magdelynn's initial self-map with connecting lines drawn between "theist" and "caring," "anxious" and "relationship builder." With this information, however, the link between "Catholic" and "Relationship Builder" was moved to connect "Relationship Builder" and "theist." Links were also added connecting "spiritual" to "kind" and "friend." I obtained the sense that in her internalized theistic and spiritual belief Magdelynn was reaching out with her mind to some understanding beyond both her physical limitations and the limitations of a materialist interpretation of nature. This led to a new interpretive or thematic code labelled "Transcendence" that was pictured in Figure 20 as feeding both her theistic and spiritual selves. A significant other. At the end of this interview, Magdelynn suggested adding another meme to her self-map: "significant other" reflecting her role as a partner to her boyfriend. She said he provides a calming and supportive influence that allows her to be how she feels inside, "I have somebody who watches my back so I can be soft." She reciprocated by listening, supporting and laughing with him. She reported dreams of having a family. A new meme, "significant other," was added to Figure 20 connected to "sexual," "Family Person," "Relationship Builder," and "Friend" Magdelynn's Third interview Approximately six weeks after the second interview, Magdelynn said that her second self-map was closer to who she is, and that the new "Transcendence" interpretive code "hit the nail on the head." She added that she wants to make a mark on the world, to leave a legacy, and this desire accompanies the theme of transcendence. Becoming less context-dependent. Magdelynn changed her metaphor in describing her self. She said she now sees herself more as a mobile with different pieces that move and rotate as a unit than as a "fractured pie." She felt more in balance with her real values being more consistently applied across contexts. Thus, when she was in Toronto playing basketball, she learned that she was more comfortable and less stressed by refusing to play a role that involved drinking and partying. The links between "role player" and "athlete," "environmentally driven" and "flexible," and "adaptive context" and "disorganized" were eliminated in recognition of the weakening influence of the Relativistic cluster had on her total self. These changes are reproduced in Figure 21. Magdelynn said she had a drive to achieve all of her life, and she suggested it may be a function of being a first-born child. She explained she is still "very much a role player," and although, when it is mapped on paper, "it appears kinda connected," she still feels fractured at times. She said she wants to be the same person "no matter what." This feeling of being uncomfortable with context dependency, and the suggestion that she would like to be the same person across contexts, implies a feeling that there should be a unitary self whose constancy is reflected in her memories. As a result of this interpretation, a "Feeling of Self theme was attached to "Rememberer." Figure 21: Revised memetic self-map of Magdelynn with amendments flowing from her third interview Brent Brent was a "third or fourth generation" male in his thirties who described himself ethnically, "Canadian." He was Caucasian and single at the time of this research. Brent's First Interview A core theme Brent presented was "rememberer." More segments (13) were coded for "rememberer" than any of the other 30 memes applied 119 times to 74 segments of text. Brent explained who he was through a series of remembered narratives on which he would reflectively dwell. His memories and the importance he placed on them led to his becoming a "packrat." So much space was taken in his house with memorabilia that he did not have space for usual household furniture such as sofas and chairs. He found he could dispose of items if he first took their picture so as to ensure the memory of the item was preserved. The "rememberer" meme is pictured as a diamond in Figure 22 so as to signify its importance as a theme. Links connect it with "reflective," "animator," "student," "storyteller" and "self-changer," but a thematic line was also drawn to other aspects of himself such as "self-aware," "friend," "caring," "family member," and "packrat." Taking issues seriously, self lightly. Another theme recurrent within Brent's narrative of his self was represented as "Takes self lightly." This theme was closely associated with "humorous," which was represented behaviorally in self-depreciating humour and as a theme in his roles as a student, teacher, friend, leader and broadcaster. This quality helped him embrace his baldness, and it contributed generally to his ability to change himself. It was a quality he brings to reflective thought, which he said helps keeps his thoughts "in balance." He credited his reflectivity with developing a "long view" of the world especially with respect to environmental 205 issues. He said the quality of taking himself lightly helped preserve relationships and reduce stress. Figure 22: Memetic map of Brent resulting from the segmentation and coding of his initial interview with the number segments coded for each meme in brackets Being an environmentalist gave purpose to Brent's life and was associated with a drive to understand the world around him. This theme is represented in Figure 22 as "attempts to understand," and is associated most closely with "empathetic," "flexible" and "positive spirit." As an example, Brent recounted his attempt to understand the action of a former girlfriend who had ended their relationship after she saw his house. He recognized her values as different from his, and he resolved to deal with some aspects of his "packrat" behaviors that others found off- putting. The meme "flexible" was a relatively recent addition to his self: I am much happier than I was then. I think by letting that rigidity go I'm able to be flexible with myself, be patient with myself, be understanding, allow myself to fail, ah, allow myself to move on and particularly with other people.... Sometimes I change my mind, and I am not sure what I believe and I certainly have in the course of many years, but I used to wonder about that. I thought we had to be one way. I was a little more rigid in my thinking when I was younger. The theme "Attempts to understand" is associated with empathy and flexibility and is drawn to connect disparate elements of his self including "environmentalist," "teacher" and "animator." Brent honed a sense of himself as an empowered "doer." Being an athlete is important to him, but he was also an elected leader in his cycling association, has taught classes in swimming, was an activist in promoting environmentally sustainable lifestyles and has held leadership positions within the environmental movement. "Animator" is also connected to "teacher," "broadcaster," "self-esteem" and "family member" in his self-structure. Re-establishing family links. Brent said he has not felt close to his family. As a youth, his parents did not understand him and were not proud of him. He adopted a "punk rocker" lifestyle and became "heavily into environmentalism." He did not use Styrofoam or plastic cutlery and rarely ate beef because of the high energy demands and wastefulness of these products. He did not establish a career until he was in his 30s and lived a frugal existence. He has not sent his family Christmas or birthday cards, but he recently began talking to his parents "almost weekly." His mother always says "I love you," and sometimes he will say, "I love you too." He eschewed 207 flowers because they die. He was not close to his one brother. "Family member" is represented as having a link to "animator" in Figure 22 because he has controlled the amount and nature of the contact with his family; but it is his memories that give "family member" a continued place in his self. Brent shared that he would like to have a child of his own some day if he could find a suitable partner. His had begun to worry about his status as a single male: I think I romanticize a role as a boyfriend because I do, quite frankly, I think that that is a role I would like to play, but I haven't played it for any significant length. I have never had a relationship for over 10 months in my life, and that starts to surprise me as I come into my late 30's. Brent had not been in a romantic relationship for a two and a half year period prior to his participation in this research. He said he had not been ready for a relationship and did not know how to meet eligible women. Then he met someone on the internet: I was on Lava Life, and you have to buy credits in order to, in order to communicate with the other person anymore than simply sending them a smile as it were, and I thought about it for awhile because you can exchange a smile for free and I thought I am a bit... I question these things. I question Lava Life. I thought I preferred to meet someone the old fashioned way, but this woman was fairly good looking, I thought, and I liked her profile and what she had written about herself. I actually bought some credits. We met. We had a great time. She, ah, I thought she was quite attractive. I thought we were on the same wave-length, and we started dating, and that was quite shocking to me actually because I had never been on a second date. Brent said he believed that his "packrat" tendencies and being overextended contributed to her decision that they were not compatible. This led him to re-examine some aspects of his self. Because of this determination to change his single status, "single" was connected to "animator" in Figure 22. Building belief in self. "Self-esteem" was used as a label for a meme developed within Brent's self that represents the quality of thinking positively about his existence and his ability to affect the world around him, and it is pictured as being connected to "good person" and his roles as a broadcaster, athlete and teacher. He reported that he had not developed the level of self- esteem he needed to pursue a career as a teacher until he was well into adulthood: I was in a swim class at the U of C and I was simply taking courses because I wanted to stay active, and a teacher that I had, the swim instructor who is a prof here at the U of C, she said to me at the time, she saw me swimming and she said, "Have you ever swam masters?" and I had, and I said, "Ya, I did when I was in Thunder Bay, my old school," and she said "You ought to consider teaching swimming," and I thought, "Wow, she thinks I am good enough to teach," and then bugles started blowing, then I started to think... "Wow, I can do that." She instilled in me this confidence that I didn't have, and maybe I was struggling with esteem at the time, but I thought, "Wow, I can do that. And maybe I'll go into coaching as well, and get my coaching certification," and suddenly I started pursuing that, and I became a swim instructor and cycling coach. Subsequent to some successful coaching experiences Brent enrolled in a college of education to become a professional teacher. Although he had only taught full-time for one year prior to his participation in this research, he identified himself as a teacher in ten segments, the 209 second most common reference to himself in the initial interview. He said he brings two distinctive qualities to his students: his sense of humour and his drive to understand others. Representing multiple "selves." To better represent his self, Brent's self-map was constructed to include three sides or "selves:" a feeling self that included such memes as "caring," "empathetic" and "positive spirit;" an active self that is centered on the meme "empowered animator;" and, "self characteristics" such a "bald" and "single." These three "selves" do not represent separate selves, but were meant to be fully integrated aspects of who he was. Brent's Second Interview Brent's initial comment, after reviewing the first draft of his self-map 4.5 months after his first interview, was the map represented him well, but he would connect "positive spirit" and "good person" more tightly, and that he would also connect "good person" with "environment." He said "good person" represents a theme that runs through a number of memes in his self-map. It was, therefore, defined as a thematic center (as well as a meme) in his revised self-map (Figure 23) with thematic lines connecting it to "activist" and "environmentalist" in one direction, and "positive spirit," "empathetic," "friend," "caring" and "kind" in the other. With this revision, an "empathetic" theme connecting with "environmentalist" was not needed and was removed. The interpretive theme "Attempts to understand" was incorporated into Brent's definition of "good person" and "empathetic." Put simply, this revision recognized that Brent's empathetic self flowed from his attempts to be a good person rather than the reverse. Relationship with religion. Brent explained that to teach in a Catholic system you have to get a priest's letter documenting your faith. This was a problem for him because he had not been living the Catholic faith nor had he been attending church. His old high school motto was "goodness, discipline and knowledge," and it so happened that the school to which he applied had the same motto. He suggested this motto represented his personal connectedness to the divine, yet he had the feeling that the vice-principal probably knew that his faith was not as strong as it needed to be. Brent explained that he does not accept a lot of Catholic dogma. He said the church should be more progressive on environmental issues: "If we are not environmental how can we care for the sick because the environment is making them sick." In his understanding one could still be Catholic and hold views at variance with official church doctrine. He believed his activity in favor of environmentalism is evidence of a positive spirit. A good person, he explained, reflects on what he does and considers other peoples' feelings with respect to outcomes. Brent said many Catholics are good people and you can trust them, but many miss the broader picture: the connection between being stewards of the planet and environmentalism, but he admired their sense of community. He did not feel part of that community because he is not devout, and he is a member of the environmentalist community which is not, generally, Catholic. Although Brent would not describe himself as a devout Catholic, he was raised in that church and still defined himself as a Catholic, in some sense; therefore, "Catholic" was added to his revised self-map connected to "family person." A tension line was drawn between "Catholic" and "environmentalist" illustrating a conflict between the two. A meme for "community" was added, connected to "environmentalist" in recognition of his appreciation of community and a desire to be part of one. The meme "good person" was amended to include the idea of reflecting on one's owns actions in consideration and respect of others. 211 Characteristic Figure 23: Revised memetic self-map of Brent with amendments flowing from his second interview Brent also said he would add "radio listener" to his self-map connected to "learner." He explained that he listens to CBC regularly for both news and music. He would also add another meme, "music", to his self-map. Music represents, for him, activism, empowerment, storytelling and at times, humor. He noted this kind of music is most likely found on CBC Radio. Memes for "radio listener" and "music" were added. The meme for "music" was linked to "activism" and "empowerment" and was placed along a thematic line emanating from "humor." The "Rememberer" theme line was extended to connect with "music." Attempts to understand himself in relation with others. Brent noted inconsistency in others. He used the example of a teacher who recycles newspapers, but gathers paper from his classroom to garbage it without recycling. To Brent, this suggested the teacher was not totally committed to the environment. The fact that Brent would take note of this discrepancy and interpret it in a way that reflects on the other teacher's commitment, suggests a certain rigidity connected to environmental issues. A meme for "rigid" was added to his self-map and connected to "environmentalist." This meme may be understood as being in conflict with another aspect of his self, "flexible;" therefore, a tension line was drawn between the two. Brent explained that the woman he met on the internet (mentioned in the first interview), forced him to look at himself. She had said she had felt uncomfortable in his house because it was cold and was without furniture. He had made progress in becoming less of a packrat and in cleaning and renovating the house, and this process accelerated after they stopped dating. Brent subsequently met and dated another woman who owned a dog. He bought the woman a dog brush to deal with the dog shedding. He also insisted that she should stop smoking. In turn, she accepted the mess at his house, but he was attempting to make his home more welcoming and liveable. Brent still defined himself as single because he was not married, and despite his desire for family, he noted that he struggles with making a commitment. This information re-enforced the notion that a "rigid" meme exists in tension with a "flexible" meme within Brent's self. A link was drawn between "rigid" and "family member" since Brent had described his family of origin as "very oppressive" when he was a teenager, and this was a source of his own rigidity on certain issues. Brent's parents established a joint account with him to help him purchase a townhouse but, "Even now I wasn't able to tell them I bought a new car. I was afraid my parents would not approve because I lost money on the trade-in." He shared the worry his parents may not respect his decisions. This information also supports the interpretation that "flexible" was not an actual theme that runs through his self-map but is a reflection of his empowerment, so I reversed the thematic arrow connecting the two. This allowed thematic arrows to radiate from "empowerment" to "self-changer" and to "packrat," a meme that he is changing on the belief that he is empowered sufficiently to accomplish that change. The meme "family member" was modified to reflect an internal conflict between wanting to become closer to his family and resisting that change. Brent elaborated on his difficulty in disposing of the items that filled his house. He explained that if he gives up these items he may lose the memories associated with them, but he discovered taking pictures of such items helped empower him to throw them away. He had problems disposing furniture, paper, books, notes to himself, and even clippings from his hair after haircuts. Newspapers represented an extended memory. He documented his life with tapes, photos, and papers. This information demonstrated how essential "rememberer" was to his self- definition. Brent said a friend of his, a fellow cyclist, was murdered the November before the interviews associated with this study began. He said he had begun sensing the deceased person's presence, and this scared him. He woke up in the middle of the night prior to this second interview afraid that he would see a ghost. Brent said he felt guilty when another cyclist said the deceased "could be an asshole sometimes," because he found himself agreeing. He began thinking about what people might come to understand of him, if he died. He noted that while the deceased believed in cherishing each day, he was also filled with a deep-seated anger. Brent appeared to be recognizing his own mortality and his potential legacy as he pondered the meaning of the death of his friend. Cognitive and emotional dissonance was expressed over this potential transition; however, it was not clear the direction such a transition would take in effecting change to his self. Brent's Third Interview Brent's third interview occurred one month after the second. He said his frugality came from his parents who were "too concerned with saving." He also shared the insight that his sense of community came from people who were activists on environmental issues. He was involved with a student newspaper and part of the cycling community, and he organized races as part of that community. His radio show promotes activism. He said that he is also part of a teaching community. As a result of this information, his participation in his cycling and teaching communities were added to the behavioral aspect of his "community" meme. Brent said that for 7 years he did not have a television, and he felt good about this decision, but the internet had now replaced the potential television had for unprofitably occupying his time. He described the internet as "a strange addiction," and he suggested he is more productive without a computer. Signs of Brent's frugality had been interpreted as a function of his environmental concern for the planet in the preparation of the first and second versions of his self-map, but this new information suggested that his frugality with respect to the purchase of possessions and the expenditure of his time constituted an ethic related to his upbringing. Although compatible with environmental activism, such frugality could exist 215 independently. Thus, a meme for frugal was added to a third version of Brent's self-map linked to both "family" and "environmentalism" (Figure 24). Brent said the quality of taking himself lightly had its roots in elementary school. He enjoyed making people laugh, and he saw this as an effort to make people like him. He was shy when he went to high school, but he discovered that almost everyone else was also shy. This knowledge gave him the courage to take risks and be humorous. While attending university, he noted that the people he respected took themselves lightly. He also learned to appreciate there are multiple perspectives, and he tried to replace a tendency toward rigidity with the understanding that people are merely doing the best they can with the knowledge they have. Brent credited his mother for instilling within him the idea of self-empowerment by insisting that he take responsibility for his actions. He said his sense of empowerment increased during university, "When I said I would do something they expected you to do it." He became interested in the power of positive thinking and discovered he could empower himself in sports by reaching inside and finding an inner strength. Brent had thought his ideas of goodness came from the Roman Catholic Church; then he met people at university that were respectful, empathetic and loving without being religious. He tended to find these good qualities within activist communities - people working for the greater good. He decided he wanted to be a good person with the added understanding that one did not have to be a Catholic to be such a person. 216 Figure 24: Revised memetic self-map of Brent with amendments flowing from his third interview Brent discovered taking himself lightly helped him to be genuine. In grade school he used to be funny for the sake of being funny, but later he understood there is a time and place for humor. He has seen humorists who are "over the top," yet are able to treat others with respect, but he has difficulty understanding or respecting comedians who denigrate others. He added that the quality of taking himself lightly has allowed him to be more transparent in his relationships. A direct link was added between "Good Person" and "Takes self lightly," to give greater emphasis to the relationship between the two. Reflecting on his self- map, Brent said that he was happy to see himself with identified characteristics to which he can add. "It feels empowering that I can continue to work on my self. It feels empowering. It's like me, but it's not strictly me either." Brent added that he changes with the seasons: Summer is a time for athletics and living in the moment while winter is a time for reflectivity and inner growth. Nick Nick was an ethnic Russian, born in Kazakhstan but raised in Siberia. He was in his twenties and married without children. He was a student at the University of Calgary when he participated in this research. Nick's First Interview Ten of Nick's segments (out of 41) were coded "animator," and he said he finds individuality in action: "You have a choice to behave like an ordinary man or behave like a little bit different from ordinary man, ... you have chosen how to behave yourself; it's more interesting." Nick linked his animator self with a competitive spirit: "Everybody wants to be best. Sometimes you can find a man that is better than you. Ok, you should develop your skills more to be competitive, to be such a man." Six segments were coded "competitive" while an equal number were coded "self-changer," "If I see I'm not right in some situation it's like ok, I know the quality which I should develop." These memes: "animator", "competitive", and "self- changer" are shown as linked in Figure 25 where they form the core of a representation of Nick's self. Lnuinavjouv pnxe^e* ao^a^ed - \ u .. f i-jf A, i Figure 25: Memetic map of Nick resulting from the segmentation and coding of his initial interview with the number segments coded for each meme in brackets The thematic code "Empowerment' also applies to Nick's competitive, self-changer, adaptive and spirit selves. Nick said he uses his intelligence or cleverness to adapt to new situations. Nick defined his spirit as positive and enthusiastic with a confidence in his own empowerment, and this spirit has carried him through difficulties. Nick said he carries his competitiveness into his social self. "Social Self is pictured in Figure 25 as a thematic code inferred from his "learner," "worker," "student," "husband," and "friend" selves. He said he incorporates a humorous aspect of himself in social situations, and he acts differently according to context, which also makes him a role player. Playing different roles can change how he defines himself, thus "role player" was linked to "self-changer." Recognizing environmental determinants. A counterpoint to Nick's empowerment is his sense of being "environmentally driven." As an example of being driven by context, Nick said that he is a more calm in Canada than he was in Russia due to Canada having a more relaxed culture. Initially frustrated, he learned that Canadian culture moves "at it's own pace," and he learned to pace himself accordingly. In figure 24 a directional arrow was drawn connecting "environmentally driven" with "self-changer" as the environment effects self-change through a feedback mechanism. "Environmentally driven" is also linked to "reflective" because through reflectivity he comes to understand the nature of his environmentally driven self, and thus comes to have some sense of control over the process. Searching for the subjective self. "Reflective" forms a focal point that is connected to "intelligent," "thinker," and "rememberer." An interpretive or thematic code "Awareness" was inserted into Figure 25 to illustrate a self-perceived result of a process involving these capacities. Nick reflected on who he was: Who can tell you what me is me? For example, my interior voice of course it's me.... for example who can prove what you is you? You asking yourself, 'is it true what who is me who I can remember when I was 3 years old, is it me again?' and you know because your interior voice is what tells you. On further reflection, Nick revealed that his interior voice flows from an unconscious process accessed through feeling. This base as to who he is was drawn as a bar at the bottom of his self-map with a directional arrow from that unconscious feeling to "interior voice." This interior voice lets Nick know he is the same person while exercising different aspects of his self across temporal and situational contexts. A directional arrow was drawn from "interior voice" to "rememberer." It was Nick's view that this inner voice, reflecting internal feeling states, tells him what memories to access. "Rememberer" is also represented as a theme that connects to "reflective," "environmentally driven," "role player," "student" and "learner. Nick's Second Interview It had been approximately 5.5 months since the initial interview. Nick's first comment, on reviewing his self-map created from that interview, was that the pieces may be thought of as fitting together like parts to a narrative or story. He said there was not enough about his social self in the map, and it should be represented as more central to who he is. He described himself as a "social guy with many friends." He also suggested that his spirit included a drive to try new experiences. As a result of this new information, a new meme "friend," was added to the map (Figure 26) connected to "role player," "humorous" and "Social Self." "Social Self was moved so that it connected with a thematic line flowing from "rememberer." A link was added between "spirit" and "unique experiencer." 221 Unootiscioui.picxijssesactes.tedttiraftgKteHnij; MIllllWlMfcH——a——WIIMIIMIIlllllinil IIMl Mill ' lllrtll llllll1IIIIIIIIl*M^B