DOCSLIB.ORG

Social-Infrastructure-And-Open-Space-Assessment-East-Leppington-Precinct-2013-06-12.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social-Infrastructure-And-Open-Space-Assessment-East-Leppington-Precinct-2013-06-12.Pdf Client Department of Planning and Infrastructure Project Social Infrastructure and Open Space Assessment - East Leppington Precinct Date Contact 12 June 2013 Jenny Vozoff 93872600 [email protected] Prepared by Jenny Vozoff and Chris Manning Reviewed by Chris Manning Date 12 June 2013 Job number 12/2887 Updated Final East Leppington Report 12 Document name June 2013 Version 2 This document is printed on paper produced using sustainable forestry practices and chlorine free pulp 7.5 Active sporting open space 52 Contents 7.6 Natural settings and linkages 55 7.7 Conclusion 57 8 Conclusion 58 8.1 Summary conclusion 58 8.2 Land requirements 59 Executive Summary 1 9 References 63 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Background to the study 3 1.2 Development context 3 Figures 1.3 Scope of this study 5 Figure 1 East Leppington Precinct Aerial Map 4 1.4 Study process 5 Figure 2 Existing community infrastructure – 2 Policy framework 6 Education and childcare 19 2.1 Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 6 Figure 3 Existing community infrastructure – Community services and centres 20 2.2 Southwest Subregion Draft Subregional Strategy 7 Figure 4 Existing community infrastructure - Open Space and Recreational Facilities 23 2.3 Growth Centres SEPP 7 Figure 5 Indicative Layout Plan 34 2.4 Growth Centres Development Code 7 2.5 Camden Council policies 9 2.6 Liverpool Council policies 9 Appendices 2.7 Campbelltown Council policies 10 Appendix 1 Regional open space and recreation facilities 65 3 Principles and approach 12 Appendix 2 Extract from Urbis 2012 – Existing 3.1 Principles for sustainable community Social Infrastructure near East Leppington 76 infrastructure 12 3.2 Approach to planning social infrastructure 13 3.3 Approach to open space planning 14 4 Existing social context 16 4.1 Social profile 16 4.2 Existing social infrastructure 18 5 Population forecasts 29 5.1 Development scenario 29 5.2 Estimating occupancy rates 29 5.3 Projected population numbers 30 5.4 Age and household characteristics 30 6 Community facility requirements 33 6.1 Indicative Layout Plan 33 6.2 Local and district standards for provision 33 6.3 Community facility requirements 36 6.4 Conclusion 42 7 Open space and recreation requirements 43 7.1 Demand considerations 43 7.2 Standards and rates for provision of open space 44 7.3 Recommended quantum of open space 47 7.4 Passive open space for recreation 50 Department of Planning and Infrastructure: Social Infrastructure and Open Space Assessment - East Leppington Precinct 1 will not be conveniently accessible for local sporting Executive Summary activity by the future East Leppington population. In time, as the adjacent Growth Centre precincts develop, some of their existing facilities are likely to be redeveloped to meet the needs of their future populations. Any spare capacity which currently This report provides demographic analysis and an exists in facilities and open space within Camden and assessment of the social infrastructure required to Liverpool LGAs is likely to be taken up by population support residential development within the East growth in other release areas already approved. Leppington Precinct of the South West Growth Centre of Sydney. The report has been prepared for This means that future demand for local level the Department of Planning and Infrastructure facilities, services and open space will need to be (DP&I) as one of a number of specialist technical addressed by new social infrastructure to be studies required to inform the planning process for provided within the East Leppington Precinct. the precinct. The study has been undertaken by Elton Consulting in association with Parkland Chapter 4 also considers the availability of district Environmental Planners, who have had responsibility and regional facilities and the extent to which they for the open space and recreation advice and may be able to meet demand arising from analysis. development in East Leppington Precinct. The needs of the future East Leppington population for regional This Report contains ten chapters. level facilities, services and open space will be met by existing facilities and open space and by those Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the study, proposed to be developed within the North describes its development context and outlines the Leppington Precinct. There will be no need to study scope and process. provide any regional facilities or open space within the East Leppington Precinct. Chapter 2 outlines the policy background to the study, identifying objectives for the provision of Chapter 5 considers the future population of the social infrastructure and open space for the precinct East Leppington Precinct. Based upon an anticipated within the Metropolitan Plan for Sydney, South West yield of 4,386 dwellings across the precinct derived Sub-regional Strategy, Growth Centres SEPP and from the ILP (version 12.6), it is estimated that the Development Code, and policies of Camden, future population of the Precinct will be about 14,493 Campbelltown and Liverpool Councils. These policies people at completion. About 3,485 people will live and objectives provide the framework and criteria within the Liverpool LGA component of the precinct, against which the Indicative Layout Plan (ILP) for the about 2,174 in the Camden LGA component and precinct is assessed. about 8,834 people will live within the Campbelltown LGA component. This population is expected to have Chapter 3 outlines principles for the provision of reasonably similar characteristics to households in social infrastructure and the approach to the other recent release areas in South West Sydney. planning of social infrastructure and open space adopted in this study, drawing from the objectives of Chapter 6 examines requirements for local and the policy framework in Chapter 2. district level community facilities to be located within the East Leppington Precinct. Recommendations Chapter 4 examines the social context of the East include: Leppington Precinct, including the social profile of the population of the surrounding area and existing One public primary school, to be provided by DEC services, facilities, open space and recreational facilities. In terms of local and district social Neighbourhood level retail services for daily needs infrastructure, it finds that the Precinct contains no existing community facilities, services or open space A neighbourhood level multi-purpose community which might be used or adapted for use by the centre of around 600 - 620sqm, as a base for future population of East Leppington. local community activities and services, to be owned and managed by Campbelltown Council Some local level facilities and open space areas are located in adjacent areas. However these are not Possibly three or four child care centres to be within local walking distance for the future East provided by the private sector, depending on size Leppington population and have been provided to and supply in nearby areas meet the needs of their local catchments. As such, they generally will not have capacity to also meet the Places of worship, according to local demand and needs of the future East Leppington population. In with sites purchased through the market particular, it is noted that there are some sporting fields in nearby areas with spare capacity, but these Department of Planning and Infrastructure: Social Infrastructure and Open Space Assessment - East Leppington Precinct 1 Local medical centre / GPs, according to market opportunities for physical activity and an interest in demand and accommodated in commercial participating in sports. premises The proposed low rate of provision of open space Residential aged care facilities, with sites to be and sporting facilities is of concern from an open acquired through the market. space and recreation planning perspective, as we believe that an insufficient quantum of open space The draft ILP makes appropriate provision for will be provided in the precinct to meet the future recommended community facilities. needs of the East Leppington population. Demand will therefore be placed on resources and facilities in Chapter 7 considers requirements for local and adjacent areas, which have not been planned to district level open space and recreation facilities to cope with this. The low rate of provision also sets an be located within East Leppington. The study has unfortunate precedent for the planning of future identified a need for: precincts within the Growth Centre. About 41.02 hectares of local and district open Regional active and informal open space will be space, based on the Liverpool and Campbelltown catered for in the Western Sydney Parklands, and Councils’ standard of 2.83 ha/1000 people. This the regional aquatic and indoor recreation facility open space would be owned and maintained by within the adjacent Leppington Town Centre. Liverpool, Camden and Campbelltown Councils. Chapter 8 provides a conclusion, summing up the Two district/key suburb parks, focused on the findings and recommendations of the study. area near Leppington House Park and in the north-east of the Precinct. Chapter 8 also includes a table and map identifying the areas of land within the precinct that provide Local parks within walking distance of most open space, sporting facilities, schools and other dwellings community facilities. Two sports parks with double playing fields and sports courts (5 hectares each) Five playgrounds for young children – two in the district parks and in three local playgrounds A network of walking and cycling trails along the creek line and linking to the wider network, particularly to the Leppington Major Centre. The actual rate of provision proposed within the Indicative Layout Plan (ILP version 12.6) of 26.0197ha falls well short of the recommended quantum based on the application of the Council and DPI standard (41.02 ha). The actual rate of provision is equivalent to only 1.79 ha/1000 persons, compared to the adopted standard of 2.83 ha/1000.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statement of Heritage Impact
    Heritage Assessment Assessment of Heritage Significance at 125 Heath Road Leppington RAPPOPORT PTY LTD © CONSERVATION ARCHITECTS AND HERITAGE CONSULTANTS 45 Hardie Street, Mascot NSW 2020 (02) 9693 1788 [email protected] Job No. 2281 January 2015 Heritage Impact Statements RAPPOPORT Heritage Approvals & Reports Conservation Management Plans Interpretation Strategies HERITAGE Photographic Archival Recording On-site Conservation Architect Expert Heritage Advice CONSULTANTS Conservation Management Documents Heritage Assessment 125 Heath Road Leppington Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 HISTORICAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................................... 5 3.0 PHYSICAL EVIDENCE AND SETTING ...................................................................................... 11 4.0 ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ........................................................................................... 19 5.0 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................... 24 6.0 SOURCES ............................................................................................................................. 25 The following table forms part of the quality management control undertaken by Rappoport Pty Ltd regarding the monitoring of its intellectual property as issued. Issue Notes / Description
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Camden Show Program of Events.Pdf
    Camden Show HOW TO BECOME A MEMBER CAMDEN SHOW ATTRACTIONS Camden Show TH TH 2 BIG DAYS OF FAMILY FUN! Friday 27 & Saturday 28 If you are interested in becoming a Member please visit the Show Office or our website below and fill out a LUMBERJACKS ...‘Still a Country Show’ March 2020 2020 Membership Form. Get ready to laugh and cheer, as the Lumberjacks are back at the Camden Show for 2020. You will see speed climbing SUPREME CHAMPION SPONSORS Available till 5pm and racing up and down 50 foot climbing poles, old time 2020 MEMBERSHIP - Annually Including GST 27th March log rolling, plus chainsaw carving and much more, as these whackyLumberjacksdueloffinacomicalbattletoseewho ADULT 21 years and over $32.00 is the best in the bush! JUNIOR 16 - 20 years $27.00 Travelling all the way from Canada the team of Lumberjacks deliver a high energy, action packed Show that is guaranteed 6 - 15 years of age CHILD $5.00 to leave you laughing, clapping, cheering and letting out the CHILDREN Under 6 years of age FREE odd scream. The Show is well suited for all ages and is a mustsee!!!Youcanevenhaveagoataxethrowingyourself. MACARTHUR & NARELLAN AGED PENSIONER/SENIOR on production of card $15.00 JOINING FEE $10.00 INVICTUS X GRAND CHAMPION SPONSORS ELJAY FREESTYLE ENTERTAINMENT SHOW This Entitles A Member: Action packed motorcycle and 1. Free entry to the ground for both Friday & Saturday on production of ticket. bicycle trials stunt show with a twist 2. MembersareentitledtoentertheirownbonafideExhibitsatreducedentry of comedy. The Eljay team consists fees in most sections. of highly skilled, professional and experiencedriderswhocontinually 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Western Sydney Regional Transportation Study
    GREATER WESTERN SYDNEY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY: FORECASTING TRAVEL DEMAND Authored by: Helen Battellino and Carolyn Stone PPM Consultants Pty Ltd 101 Sussex Street Sydney NSW 2000 [email protected] [email protected] Greater Western Sydney Transportation Study Battellino & Stone Acknowledgements The authors wish to acknowledge the Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils for initiating and funding this project. The project would also not have been possible without the expertise and dedication of Dr Nariida Smith and the Transport Futures Team at the CSIRO who undertook the analysis of the data on current travel trends and Paul van den Bos of Computing in Transportation who modelled the scenarios using the Sydney Strategic Travel Model (STM). The authors would also like to thank David Kilsby (Kilsby Australia) for his assistance in developing the model inputs, the Transport Population and Data Centre (TPDC) for providing access to the STM and Frank Milthorpe, Modelling Manager, TPDC, for his advice in using the STM. This work was also made possible by using systems developed for scenario modelling using the STM by David Kilsby and Paul van den Bos in previous projects for the then Department of Transport. This work is as yet not publicly available. The results of this study and the views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors. State of Australian Cities National Conference 2003 Page 2 Greater Western Sydney Transportation Study Battellino & Stone 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background This paper is based on a consulting project undertaken for the Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils (WSROC) to help understand the travel demand patterns that might arise from various land use and transport infrastructure scenarios in Western Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2015-Robert Townson
    Oatley Heritage & Historical Society Projects. Month & Year of Topic Topic Written &Spoken Presenters November 2015 Robert Townson Julian Sheen Who was he? “Own” to privately, individually control, privatize – non public land Major Sources Brian Madden The Background to the Townson Grants 1977 V E W Goodin Townson, Robert Australian Dictionary of Biography 1967 Hugh Torrens Robert Townson an all too long forgotten Salopian 2010 Birth Born (christened) 2nd April 1762 in Richmond Surrey to John Townson merchant. It seems he was illegitimate Context Seven Years War – Industrial Revolution - Technology N Ferguson – four great inventions in 1760s: The longitude finding chronometer (Harrison 1761) The advanced steam engine (Watt 1764) The spinning jenny (Hargraves 1766) The water frame – vital for spinning cotton (Arkwright 1769) Production of iron It was also the Age of Enlightenment Science – Medicine (aspirin),Salicylic acid Edward Stone (1763) Physics (electricity). Astronomy, Biology Geology, Curiosity, categories, rational explanations and understandings Why is it so? Enormous curiosity tempered with a bias of reason: the need to understand the vast array of natural phenomena. Linnaean Society Robert Townson moved to Shropshire to live with his sister when his father died in 1773. She was married to a country cleric. Townson began a career in the mercantile business in Manchester where there was money to be made but he could not stick at it. 1776 to 1783 QUOTE 1783 – “I set to estimate the difference between sacrificing for at least the best years of my life everything that afforded me pleasure to the probable increase of my fortune by continuing in trade; or resolving at once to manage it with such economy as should enable me to pursue the path my inclination pointed out.” (HT) So he decided to follow his muse to become a naturalist.
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Local Environmental Plan 2010 (Amendment No 39) Under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
    New South Wales Camden Local Environmental Plan 2010 (Amendment No 39) under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 The Greater Sydney Commission makes the following local environmental plan under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. RON MOORE, GENERAL MANAGER, CAMDEN COUNCIL As delegate for the local plan-making authority Published LW 29 June 2018 (2018 No 339) Camden Local Environmental Plan 2010 (Amendment No 39) [NSW] Camden Local Environmental Plan 2010 (Amendment No 39) under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 1 Name of Plan This Plan is Camden Local Environmental Plan 2010 (Amendment No 39). 2 Commencement This Plan commences on the day on which it is published on the NSW legislation website. 3 Land to which Plan applies This Plan applies to land to which Camden Local Environmental Plan 2010 applies and, in particular, to certain land at Leppington and Varroville that is to the east of Camden Valley Way and Denham Court Road and Raby Road on the adjusted boundary between the local government areas of Camden and the City of Campbelltown, being part of the land locally known as East Leppington/Willowdale and Emerald Hills, including the following land that was partly within the Campbelltown local government area: (a) Lot 102, DP 1192131, being 52 St Andrews Road, Varroville and Part Lot 2, DP 1086624, being 111 Raby Road, Leppington, (b) land that is to the east of Camden Valley Way and to the west of Willowdale Drive, Denham Court, (c) land that is to the east of Camden Valley Way and to the west of Denham Court Road, Denham Court.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Rail Link - Glenfield to Leppington - M28
    Worksite Protection Planning Diagrams South West Rail Link - Glenfield to Leppington - M28 Stations Covered GLENFIELD 2 EDMONDSON PARK 8 LEPPINGTON 17 Kilometrage References 41.755km 2 45.000km 7 50.000km 15 53.384km 22 Mon, 09 August 2021 @ 13:54:04 EST MAGEE LANE 41.755km 41.905km 42.055km A RAILWAY PARADE WENTWORTH AVENUE 60 75 75 S 42+070 S S 42+068 S S 42+080 S S 42+017 S GD21 RAILWAY PARADE X60 S 41+999 S S 41+958 S 62A DOWN EAST HILLS S 41+948 S S 41+905 S S 41+869 S X45 DOWN LEPPINGTON MAIN LINE 60A60B - 62B S 42+031 S GD 16 CO_ACTING 16 GD S 41+825 S S 41+820 S DOWN EAST HILLS S 41+795 S S 41+793 S S 41+775 S 4 S 41+777 S 42 KM 23 GD S 41+756 S DOWN MAIN SOUTH UP LEPPINGTON MAIN 115 S41+732 S41+730 100 3 GLENFIELD 60A 75 115 63A UP MAIN SOUTH GD 16 GD DOWN MAIN SOUTH X40 Glenfield South Jct X40 GLENFIELD UP ESCAPE ROAD 61B 60 60 115 115 115 115 P UP MAIN SOUTH 2 60 NEXT UP 56B 80 100 UP EAST HILLS X60 DOWN MAIN SOUTH 61A X60 80 80 60 60 60 1 60 105 UP MAIN56A SOUTH 15 UP EAST HILLS GD 18 GD SSFL MAIN LINE 80 80 80 80 GD 15 GD 60 60 70 42+069 S S 42+008 S S 42+037 S S 42+035 S S 42+019 S S 41+971 S S 41+929 S S 41+820 S GD 20 GD S 41+887 S S 41+770 S S41+720 S 41+729 S S 41+758 S FOOTBRIDGE N GLENFIELD STATION GLENFIELD S00 41.761 U 41.761 S00 A 42.055km 42.206km 42.356km S 42+363 S GB 42+360 GB S 42+306 S RAILWAY PARADE 42+303 S (SWRL) VIADICT DOWN S 42+254 S FLYOVER SOUTHERN S 42+243 S S 42+374 S GD 24 GD CLEARED POINTS CARS 8 S 42+185 S S 42+204 S S 42+155 S S 42+127 S DOWN EAST HILLS 60 S 42+098 S 75 75 S 42+070 S S 42+068
    [Show full text]
  • ASIC Unclaimed Money Gazette
    Commonwealth of Australia Gazette No. UM1/16, Monday 29 February 2016 Published by ASIC ASIC Gazette Contents Unclaimed consideration for compulsory acquisition - S668A Corporations Act RIGHTS OF REVIEW Persons affected by certain decisions made by ASIC under the Corporations Act 2001 and the other legislation administered by ASIC may have rights of review. ASIC has published Regulatory Guide 57 Notification of rights of review (RG57) and Information Sheet ASIC decisions – your rights (INFO 9) to assist you to determine whether you have a right of review. You can obtain a copy of these documents from the ASIC Digest, the ASIC website at www.asic.gov.au or from the Administrative Law Co-ordinator in the ASIC office with which you have been dealing. ISSN 1445-6060 (Online version) Available from www.asic.gov.au ISSN 1445-6079 (CD-ROM version) Email [email protected] © Commonwealth of Australia, 2016 This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all rights are reserved. Requests for authorisation to reproduce, publish or communicate this work should be made to: Gazette Publisher, Australian Securities and Investment Commission, GPO Box 9827, Melbourne Vic 3001 ASIC GAZETTE Commonwealth of Australia Gazette UM1/16, Monday 29 February 2016 Unclaimed consideration for compulsory acquisition Page 1 of 270 Unclaimed Consideration for Compulsory Acquisition - S668A Corporations Act Copies of records of unclaimed consideration in respect of securities, of the following companies, that have been compulsorily
    [Show full text]
  • Western Sydney – Australia's Development Site
    2018 Real Estate Outlook | Market and investment Western Sydney – Australia's development site The surge in infrastructure development and real estate construction projects to accommodate Sydney’s growing population has begun. What is your Western Sydney strategy? Today, we have moved from ambitious Over the past five years, Western Sydney concepts to more practical plans, many has been in transition from the poor of which are under construction. A customer to the big and shiny CBD to its number of major government-backed east to a region full of potential - with the infrastructure projects are already promise of a key real estate, development underway and others are progressing and construction hub. through the planning process. These large-scale projects are injecting Back when people would ask: ‘Why are you confidence into the private sector to in Western Sydney?’ there was a stirring invest in the region through all forms recognition of the need for Western Sydney of development. to thrive in order to unlock the economic potential in NSW, and potentially Australia. This was also driven by the need to accommodate our growing population. 01 2018 Real Estate Outlook | Market and investment A more integrated planning environment continued growth in industrial and logistics has also helped, with the creation of the facilities around the Moorebank intermodal The question we Greater Sydney Commission and the terminal along the M4/M7 corridor. now ask, is not, release of the integrated Future Transport As jobs and supporting infrastructure are Strategy for NSW. built, the demand for housing will continue. ‘why are you in Precincts and zones are emerging across Government policy decisions around land the region, which are going to provide release and planning approvals will be critical.
    [Show full text]
  • Crown Cemetery Development, Varroville
    CROWN CEMETERY DEVELOPMENT, VARROVILLE Presentation from the Scenic Hills Association at Public Meeting of the Independent Planning Commission, 25 March 2019 (Copy provided 26 March 2019) I am the Convenor of the Scenic Hills Association (Association) as well as an owner of state listed Varro Ville Homestead which this cemetery proposal completely surrounds. I am speaking here as the Convenor of the Association though at times I will, of necessity, refer to issues that my husband and I are more involved in. We oppose this Development Application. Trust and Confidence in the Process Unlike the Wallacia cemetery proposal, also being considered by the Planning Commission, cemeteries are and were prohibited in the Scenic Hills E3 Environmental Protection Area, when the Catholic Metropolitan Cemeteries Trust (or CMCT) took out an option on this land at 166-176 St Andrews Road Varroville and applied for a spot-rezoning. It is now almost six years that the community has been fighting this proposal, during which time there has been a notable lack of integrity in the planning process at every level of government, starting with a questionable land deal at the heart of this proposal involving a land developer and certain people on our own Council, that has left us without any trust in the planning system - such that if this cemetery is approved as currently recommended by the Department of Planning (DOP), we will not leave any stone unturned in getting this whole saga investigated by whatever means. We have supported various proposals put to us over the last year – from an integrity commission with powers to investigate past projects (during the Kaldas Review of Governance in the NSW Planning System) to a Royal Commission into the Planning System proposed by the Greens at the election last weekend.
    [Show full text]
  • New South Wales Results
    2019 federal election Results Map NEW SOUTH WALES Roma Tewantin-Noosa QUEENSLAND Tweed Heads RICHMOND Lismore Ballina Moree PAGE Tibooburra Glen Innes Inverell Grafton Bourke Narrabri Coffs Harbour NEW Armidale ENGLAND Nambucca Heads Gunnedah COWPER PARKES Tamworth Kempsey Cobar Port Macquarie Taree Broken Hill Scone LYNE Dubbo Forster SOUTH Muswellbrook AUSTRALIA Wellington Mudgee HUNTER Cessnock Condoblin Parkes CALARE Newcastle Forbes Orange Bathurst Lithgow Cowra Sydney Wentworth FARRER RIVERINA Camden Grifth Young Bowral HUME Wollongong Leeton Balranald Goulburn Kiama Wagga Wagga Tumut A.C.T. Queanbeyan Ulladulla Deniliquin GILMORE Batemans Bay Albury EDEN-MONARO Cooma Eden VICTORIA Key Division boundary LYNE Division name TASMANIA Party Liberal Party* The Nationals* Australian Labor Party * Liberal/National Coalition The electoral boundaries represented on this map 0 100 Km are those in place at the 2019 election. 2019 federal election Results Map NEW SOUTH WALES Sydney Surrounds Greta Karuah Largs Nelson Maitland Raymond Terrace Bay Loxford PATERSON Williamtown Cessnock Stockrington Abernethy Kotara NEWCASTLE Putty Newcastle Laguna Charlestown Belmont Bucketty Dora Creek Swansea Mellong SHORTLAND Mogo Creek Wyee Ravensdale Higher Macdonald DOBELL Budgewoi St Albans Toukley Wyong Colo Heights Mangrove Ourimbah The Entrance Mountain Central Colo ROBERTSON Maroota Gosford Wamberal Lithgow Mount Irvine MACQUARIE Terrigal Woy Woy Berambing Macmasters Beach Mount Kurrajong Victoria BEROWRA Brooklyn Richmond Blackheath Windsor Berowra Glenhaven Katoomba Lawson Wallacia Sydney Urban Camden Helensburgh Appin Bargo Thirroul Bulli CUNNINGHAM Wollongong Mandemar Mittagong Bowral Dapto WHITLAM Primbee Moss Vale Key Shellharbour Wildes Meadow Division boundary DOBELL Division name Bundanoon Upper Kangaroo Kiama Party Meryla Valley Liberal Party* Australian Labor Party * Liberal/National Coalition The electoral boundaries represented on this map 0 10 Km are those in place at the 2019 election.
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Municipal Council Area Street Names
    CAMDEN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AREA STREET NAME SOUTH CAMDEN Adelong Place The name Adelong appears to be derived from the Aboriginal language meaning "along the way" or "plain with a river". Antill Close Named after the Antill family of “Jarvisfield” Picton. Henry Colden Antill who was born in 1779 in New York of British stock, his father was John Antill. Henry migrated to Sydney on 1/1/1810. Married Eliza Wills in 1818 and in 1825 settled on his estate near Picton, named Jarvisfield; and, in 1844 he subdivided part of his estate on the north of Stonequarry Creek, as the result he made possible the founding of the town of Picton (originally known as Stonequarry). He died and was buried in the family vault at Jarvisfield, in August 1852, survived by six sons and two daughters. Picture of Henry Colden Antill Araluen Place The name 'Araluen' meant 'water lily' or 'place of the water lilies' in the Aboriginal dialect of the Araluen area of NSW Armour Avenue Named after Robert William Armour born 1848 worked at the”Hermitage” The oaks in 1845. A noted bushman and expert horseman. In the early 1850s he brought land at Cobbitty. Son George was a prominent apiarist and well known keen sportsman, barber and poet. He died on 29 Oct 1933 and is buried at St. Paul’s Cobbitty. Arndell Street Most likely named after Doctor Thomas Arndell (1753- 1821), surgeon, magistrate and landholder, was one of seven assistant surgeons who formed the medical staff led by Surgeon-General John White which cared for the convicts in the First Fleet .
    [Show full text]
  • Tocal Conservation and Management Plan Volume 1
    TOCAL CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Volume 1: Report Prepared by Eric Martin and Associates Geoffrey Britton Dr Brian Walsh For CB Alexander Foundation NSW Department of Primary Industries within NSW Department of Trade, Investment and Regional Infrastructure and Services EMA ERIC MARTIN AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS 10/68 Jardine Street FINAL KINGSTON ACT 2604 1001 PH: 02 6260 6395 Fax: 02 6260 6413 ISSUE 6 Email: [email protected] 30 October 2014 This page is intentionally blank. EMA Eric Martin & Associates TOCAL Volume 1 Conservation and Management Plan 1001 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ______________________________________________________ I 1.0 INTRODUCTION ______________________________________________________ 1 1.1 Background ___________________________________________________ 1 1.2 Brief _________________________________________________________ 1 1.3 Authorship ____________________________________________________ 1 1.4 Methodology & Structure of Conservation and Management Plan (CMP) ___ 2 1.5 Details, Definitions and Abbreviations _______________________________ 2 1.6 Location ______________________________________________________ 4 1.7 Current Status _________________________________________________ 7 1.8 Acknowledgement ______________________________________________ 7 1.9 Limitations ____________________________________________________ 8 2.0 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ____________________________________________ 9 2.1 Introduction ____________________________________________________ 9 2.2 Indigenous/European Contact ____________________________________
    [Show full text]