DOCSLIB.ORG

My Favourite Leader

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MY FAVOURITE LEADER THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN FUNDED WITH SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION. THIS PUBLICATION REFLECTS THE VIEWS ONLY OF THE AUTHOR, AND THE COMMISSION CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY USE WHICH MAY BE MADE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN. MY FAVOURITE LEADER ISBN 978-619-154-120-1 2 CONTENT BULGARIA Alexander I Battenberg ..................................................... 7 Tsar Simeon I the Great ...................................................... 9 Khan Krum ............................................................................10 Tsar Ivan Asen II ..................................................................11 Stefan Stambolov ...............................................................12 Vasil Levski ............................................................................13 King Simeon the Great .....................................................14 King Simeon the Great .....................................................15 ESTONIA Konstantin Päts ....................................................................19 Lennart Georg Meri ...........................................................21 Arnold Rüütel .......................................................................22 POLAND KING JAN III SOBIESKI (1629 – 1696) ..........................25 JÓZEF PIŁSUDSKI (1867 – 1935) ...................................26 MIESZKO I (935–992) ........................................................27 LECH WAŁĘSA (born in 1943) ........................................28 ROMANIA Vlad III, Prince of Wallachia (1431–1476/77) ...........31 Dimitrie Cantemir (1673–1723) .....................................34 Nicolae Constantin Paulescu (30 October 1869 – 17 July 1931) ................................37 Cornel Coposu .....................................................................40 Badea Cârțan ........................................................................43 3 GREECE Ioannis Kapodistrias (1776 - 1831) ..............................47 Charilaos Trikoupis (1832 - 1896) ................................49 Eleftherios Venizelos (1864 - 1936) .............................51 Mavrokordatos Alexandros (1791- 1865) .................53 Koumoundouros Alexandros (1817-1883) ...............55 PORTUGAL King João I (1357 - 1433) ................................................59 King João V, the Magnanimous(1689 - 1750) .........60 Marquês de Pombal (1699 - 1755) ..............................61 Manuel de Arriaga (1840 – 1917) ................................62 General Ramalho Eanes (1935) .....................................63 4 BULGARIA 6 ALEXANDER I BATTENBERG Bulgaria is famous for its long existence as a country. Starting from the 7th century, dozens of rulers and political leaders (as we call them today) have been in charge of Bulgaria. Whether they were good or bad for the prosperity of the country, they have certainly left their mark on the Bulgarian history. Some were powerful kings in the middle ages who ruled for decays, while others were presidents for a few years but each and every one of them has that thing which one considers as “significant”. For me, the most significant Bulgarian ruler is Alexander I Battenberg. Alexander I Battenberg was the very first knyaz (prince) of modern Bulgaria. His father was a German. Alexander had participated in the war which liberated the Bulgarians from the Ottoman Empire. His contribution in the Liberation was one of the main reasons why he was chosen to be the ruler of newborn modern Bulgaria. He was young, brave, ambitious and well recognized by the people. He accepted being the ruler of Bulgaria despite he was not a true Bulgarian, which I think was very risky for him because he could have been disliked and hated by the whole nation. What is more, even agreeing to become the very first knyaz of Bulgaria was itself a dangerous decision. How could a young foreigner just come and turn the country into a power and raise it from the ashes of the led 5 centuries rule by the Ottomans? So what quality should have a person who wants to stay in charge of a newborn country? Ambitiousness, of course. Alexander turned out to be a very ambitious young man. A quality that is really hard to find today. Or if you find it, it doesn’t come with being hardworking and innovative. But how can you turn your ambitions into reality if you don’t 7 have the power to go after them? Alexander knew that he had to work really hard to do everything right and he didn’t give up. He started doing many reforms but he also brought back things from the past that were forgotten or forbidden. He made Bulgaria a true European country for a short period of time. During Alexander’s rule was proclaimed the Unification of Bulgaria which united the country. This act of bravery was not well accepted by some of the influential countries back in the time and they wanted Alexander to resign from being a knyaz. He was deposed by force and was sent to Western Europe. Later on, he came back as a try to return but he was again unwanted and left Bulgaria once again. He gently stepped aside and was succeeded by Ferdinand I who became the new knyaz. During the time of the new ruler Bulgaria was declared as an independent country and he received the title “tsar” (king). This act shows how Alexander chose to quietly go away than stay unwanted on the throne. He knew what was better for Bulgaria and did it. Even if it meant leaving the country itself. Alexander I Battenberg – one of the most significant rulers in the whole history of my country. He was brave, ambitious and hardworking – there’s a lack of all these qualities today. Our society needs more role models like him and people who are willing to do anything for what they believe in. I believe that Alexander I Battenberg is the most significant Bulgarian ruler. Marin Yordanov 8 TSAR SIMEON I THE GREAT It’s hard for me to say who exactly is my favorite Bulgarian ruler, as all Bulgarian rulers had an impact on the country but if I had to choose the most influential one, that would be Tsar Simeon I the Great. Tsar Simeon I the Great ruled Bulgaria from 893 to 927 during the First Bulgarian state. He led a lot of successful battles against the Byzantine Empire and Serbia. One of the most popular is the Battle of Achelous on August 20, 917 against the Byzantines. During the rule of Simeon I Bulgaria reached its biggest territorial expansion. Bulgaria bordered the Black, Aegean and Adriatic Sea. Simeon I is also related to the Golden age when the Bulgarian culture was at its peak. The literature, arts and architecture were blossoming. The writers had the chance to develop their skills as they would write hundreds of manuscript scrolls in the tsar’s court. The palace was gorgeous. The murals, the mosaics and the stained glasses were breathtaking. Simeon I moved the Bulgarian capital from Pliska to Preslav. In Preslav was situated the magnificent Golden (Round) Church. It’s being called “round” because of its shape. I admire Tsar Simeon I the Great because he was brave and dedicated to his goal to raise Bulgaria’s authority. Angela Nakou 9 KHAN KRUM Khan Krum is my favourite ruler of Bulgaria, because he is unwavering in his decisions, brave and he never gives up of his dream that one day Bulgaria will be one of the strongest countries in Europe Khan Krum‘s reign is linked to one glorious event. The first written laws. Except that he have been clever warrior, he‘ve also been talented politician. His reign starts after Khan Kardams. after his nationality is pannonian Bulgarian. In the beginning of 811 y. the byzantine emperor Nikiphoros I Genik wants to attack the first capital of Bulgaria - Pliska. After he passed through the Balkan and breaks two Bulgarian squad the emperor‘s army reaches Pliska, he burns and plunder it. Khan Krum three times tried to offer piece to emperor Nikiphoros I Genik, but he rudely refused. Then Khan Krum mobilises all the forces and attacks Nikiphoros on 26th 811 in the Varbitsa pass. The emperor is captured. The legend says that Khan Krum ordered to be made a silver glass from emperor‘s head, which on the night of the win he raised a toast with the Slavic princes and said: Drink bunch from the Nikiphoros head. These words stayed forever in Khan Krum‘s biography. He is great, he is unwavering, he got the nickname Scarry because of his deeds. Khan Krum is my favourite ruler of Bulgaria. He is the person who meaned the most for the first Bulgarian county. Asen Vladimirov 10 TSAR IVAN ASEN II My favorite Bulgarian ruler is Tsar Ivan Asen II. His rule is known as one of the greatest periods in the history of Bulgaria. When he ascended the throne in 1218 he terminated the internal strives and established strong central power. This reflected favorably on the life in the country. I like Ivan Asen II because he managed to expand the borders of Bulgaria by using the power of diplomacy. His rule lead to an economic and cultural rise. Ivan Asen II is one of the first medieval Orthodox rulers who started minting golden coins with their face and title on them. Tsar Ivan Asen II donated a lot to monasteries, especially the monastery on the Athos peninsula (today’s Greece). He led the Bulgarian army to the Battle of Klokotnitsa when his forces totally crushed the army of Theodor Komnin of Epirus. Ivan Asen II showed an unexpected mercy when he released most of the captured enemy army. Ivan Asen is my favorite ruler because of his successful domestic and foreign policy which made Bulgaria the most powerful country in Southeast
Recommended publications
  • British Clandestine Activities in Romania During the Second World

    British Clandestine Activities in Romania During the Second World

    British Clandestine Activities in Romania during the Second World War This page intentionally left blank British Clandestine Activities in Romania during the Second World War Dennis Deletant Visiting ‘Ion Ra¸tiu’ Professor of Romanian Studies, Georgetown University, USA © Dennis Deletant 2016 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2016 978–1–137–57451–0 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2016 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries.
  • Bulgaria's Perpetual Stagnation Due to Its Negative National Narrative

    Bulgaria's Perpetual Stagnation Due to Its Negative National Narrative

    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2021 Maledictum Bulgaricus: Bulgaria’s Perpetual Stagnation Due to its Negative National Narrative and Political Nostalgia Yoana Sidzhimova Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Sidzhimova, Yoana, "Maledictum Bulgaricus: Bulgaria’s Perpetual Stagnation Due to its Negative National Narrative and Political Nostalgia" (2021). CMC Senior Theses. 2645. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2645 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College Maledictum Bulgaricus: Bulgaria’s Perpetual Stagnation Due to its Negative National Narrative and Political Nostalgia submitted to Professor Zachary Courser by Yoana Nikolaeva Sidzhimova for Senior Thesis Full Year Thesis 2020 – 2021 May 3, 2021 1 Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank Professor Courser for his guidance throughout my entire journey at CMC. From sitting in his office for our first ever advisor meeting freshman year, having the pleasure to learn and work alongside him in CMC’s Policy Lab, and, finally, completing my thesis with his guidance, my experience at CMC would not have been the same without him there. Thank you for always pushing me and helping me understand the value in a ‘Big Think,’ having my best interests as a both a student and individual at heart, and, most importantly, reminding me the value in slowing down and taking a breather. I have learned so much from you in the past four years.
  • Communism and Post-Communism in Romania : Challenges to Democratic Transition

    Communism and Post-Communism in Romania : Challenges to Democratic Transition

    TITLE : COMMUNISM AND POST-COMMUNISM IN ROMANIA : CHALLENGES TO DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION AUTHOR : VLADIMIR TISMANEANU, University of Marylan d THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FO R EURASIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE VIII PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C . 20036 LEGAL NOTICE The Government of the District of Columbia has certified an amendment of th e Articles of Incorporation of the National Council for Soviet and East European Research changing the name of the Corporation to THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR EURASIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH, effective on June 9, 1997. Grants, contracts and all other legal engagements of and with the Corporation made unde r its former name are unaffected and remain in force unless/until modified in writin g by the parties thereto . PROJECT INFORMATION : 1 CONTRACTOR : University of Marylan d PR1NCIPAL 1NVEST1GATOR : Vladimir Tismanean u COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 81 1-2 3 DATE : March 26, 1998 COPYRIGHT INFORMATIO N Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funded by contract with the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research . However, the Council and the United States Government have the right to duplicate an d disseminate, in written and electronic form, this Report submitted to the Council under thi s Contract, as follows : Such dissemination may be made by the Council solely (a) for its ow n internal use, and (b) to the United States Government (1) for its own internal use ; (2) for further dissemination to domestic, international and foreign governments, entities an d individuals to serve official United States Government purposes ; and (3) for dissemination i n accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the United State s Government granting the public rights of access to documents held by the United State s Government.
  • Fonds Gabriel Deville (Xviie-Xxe Siècles)

    Fonds Gabriel Deville (Xviie-Xxe Siècles)

    Fonds Gabriel Deville (XVIIe-XXe siècles) Répertoire numérique détaillé de la sous-série 51 AP (51AP/1-51AP/9) (auteur inconnu), révisé par Ariane Ducrot et par Stéphane Le Flohic en 1997 - 2008 Archives nationales (France) Pierrefitte-sur-Seine 1955 - 2008 1 https://www.siv.archives-nationales.culture.gouv.fr/siv/IR/FRAN_IR_001830 Cet instrument de recherche a été encodé en 2012 par l'entreprise Numen dans le cadre du chantier de dématérialisation des instruments de recherche des Archives Nationales sur la base d'une DTD conforme à la DTD EAD (encoded archival description) et créée par le service de dématérialisation des instruments de recherche des Archives Nationales 2 Archives nationales (France) INTRODUCTION Référence 51AP/1-51AP/9 Niveau de description fonds Intitulé Fonds Gabriel Deville Date(s) extrême(s) XVIIe-XXe siècles Nom du producteur • Deville, Gabriel (1854-1940) • Doumergue, Gaston (1863-1937) Importance matérielle et support 9 cartons (51 AP 1-9) ; 1,20 mètre linéaire. Localisation physique Pierrefitte Conditions d'accès Consultation libre, sous réserve du règlement de la salle de lecture des Archives nationales. DESCRIPTION Type de classement 51AP/1-6. Collection d'autographes classée suivant la qualité du signataire : chefs d'État, gouvernants français depuis la Restauration, hommes politiques français et étrangers, écrivains, diplomates, officiers, savants, médecins, artistes, femmes. XVIIIe-XXe siècles. 51AP/7-8. Documents divers sur Puydarieux et le département des Haute-Pyrénées. XVIIe-XXe siècles. 51AP/8 (suite). Documentation sur la Première Guerre mondiale. 1914-1919. 51AP/9. Papiers privés ; notes de travail ; rapports sur les archives de la Marine et les bibliothèques publiques ; écrits et documentation sur les départements français de la Révolution (Mont-Tonnerre, Rhin-et-Moselle, Roer et Sarre) ; manuscrit d'une « Chronologie générale avant notre ère ».
  • BULGARIA and HUNGARY in the FIRST WORLD WAR: a VIEW from the 21ST CENTURY 21St -Century Studies in Humanities

    BULGARIA and HUNGARY in the FIRST WORLD WAR: a VIEW from the 21ST CENTURY 21St -Century Studies in Humanities

    BULGARIA AND HUNGARY IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR: A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY 21st -Century Studies in Humanities Editor: Pál Fodor Research Centre for the Humanities Budapest–Sofia, 2020 BULGARIA AND HUNGARY IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR: A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY Editors GÁBOR DEMETER CSABA KATONA PENKA PEYKOVSKA Research Centre for the Humanities Budapest–Sofia, 2020 Technical editor: Judit Lakatos Language editor: David Robert Evans Translated by: Jason Vincz, Bálint Radó, Péter Szőnyi, and Gábor Demeter Lectored by László Bíró (HAS RCH, senior research fellow) The volume was supported by theBulgarian–Hungarian History Commission and realized within the framework of the project entitled “Peripheries of Empires and Nation States in the 17th–20th Century Central and Southeast Europe. Power, Institutions, Society, Adaptation”. Supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences NKFI-EPR K 113004, East-Central European Nationalisms During the First World War NKFI FK 128 978 Knowledge, Lanscape, Nation and Empire ISBN: 978-963-416-198-1 (Institute of History – Research Center for the Humanities) ISBN: 978-954-2903-36-9 (Institute for Historical Studies – BAS) HU ISSN 2630-8827 Cover: “A Momentary View of Europe”. German caricature propaganda map, 1915. Published by the Research Centre for the Humanities Responsible editor: Pál Fodor Prepress preparation: Institute of History, RCH, Research Assistance Team Leader: Éva Kovács Cover design: Bence Marafkó Page layout: Bence Marafkó Printed in Hungary by Prime Rate Kft., Budapest CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................... 9 Zoltán Oszkár Szőts and Gábor Demeter THE CAUSES OF THE OUTBREAK OF WORLD WAR I AND THEIR REPRESENTATION IN SERBIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY .................................. 25 Krisztián Csaplár-Degovics ISTVÁN TISZA’S POLICY TOWARDS THE GERMAN ALLIANCE AND AGAINST GERMAN INFLUENCE IN THE YEARS OF THE GREAT WAR................................
  • 175 Churches and Monasteries – Objects Of

    175 Churches and Monasteries – Objects Of

    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ DERMENDZHIEV, Athanas,; DOYKOV, Martin (2017). The Churches and Monasteries – objects of religious tourism in the district of Veliko …. The Overarching Issues of the European Space: Society, Economy and Heritage in a Scenario … Porto: FLUP, pp. 175‐183 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CHURCHES AND MONASTERIES – OBJECTS OF RELIGIOUS TOURISM IN THE DISTRICT OF VELIKO TARNOVO (BULGARIA) Athanas DERMENDZHIEV Department of Geography, Faculty of History, “St. Cyril and St. Methodius” University of Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria [email protected] Martin DOYKOV Department of Geography, Faculty of History, “St. Cyril and St. Methodius” University of Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria. [email protected] Abstract The need of focusing on the significance of religious tourist sites and objects in the region of Veliko Tarnovo is provoked by socio-economic necessities. The last presume activation of cultural-historical resources with a view to the interest to the available objects. Religion, as spirit and interaction, presumes corresponding objectification. The last one is a segment in the formation of religious-tourist bank for its exploitation in spiritual-nationalistic direction. Recognized by Bulgarians as an ozonizing areal, the region of Veliko Tarnovo presumes fixing on values of cultural-historical content. Their studying and the explanation of their existence
  • States, Societies and Individuals in Central and Eastern Europe

    States, Societies and Individuals in Central and Eastern Europe

    FOUREMPIRES ANDAN ENLGARGEMENT States, Societies and Individuals in Central and Eastern Europe Edited by Daniel Brett, Claire Jarvis, Irina Marin FOUR EMPIRES AND AN ENLARGEMENT States, Societies and Individuals: Transfiguring Perspectives and Images of Central and Eastern Europe Edited by DANIEL BRETT, CLAIRE JARVIS AND IRINA MARIN Papers from the 5th International Postgraduate Conference held at the School of Slavonic and East European Studies UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UCL 2008 FOUR EMPIRES AND AN ENLARGEMENT STATES, SOCIETIES AND INDIVIDUALS: TRANSFIGURING PERSPECTIVES AND IMAGES OF CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE EDITED BY DANIEL BRETT, CLAIRE JARVIS AND IRINA MARIN Studies in Russia and Eastern Europe No. 4 ISBN: 978-0-903425-80-3 Editorial matter, selection and introduction © Daniel Brett, Claire Jarvis, Irina Marin 2008. Individual chapters © contributors 2008 All rights reserved. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Contents Mysterious knocks, flying potatoes and rebellious servants: Spiritualism and social conflict in late imperial Russia 1 Julia Mannherz The Ukrainian Stundists and Russian Jews: a collaboration of evangelical peasants with Jewish intellectuals in late imperial Russia 17 Sergei Zhuk “Forebears”, “saints” and “martyrs”: the politics of commemoration in Bulgaria in the 1880s and 1890s 33 Stefan Detchev Celebrating the nation: the case of Upper Silesia after the plebiscite in 1921 49
  • The Rise of Bulgarian Nationalism and Russia's Influence Upon It

    The Rise of Bulgarian Nationalism and Russia's Influence Upon It

    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2014 The rise of Bulgarian nationalism and Russia's influence upon it. Lin Wenshuang University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Wenshuang, Lin, "The rise of Bulgarian nationalism and Russia's influence upon it." (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1548. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/1548 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RISE OF BULGARIAN NATIONALISM AND RUSSIA‘S INFLUENCE UPON IT by Lin Wenshuang B. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 1997 M. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 2002 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Humanities University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky May 2014 Copyright © 2014 by Lin Wenshuang All Rights Reserved THE RISE OF BULGARIAN NATIONALISM AND RUSSIA‘S INFLUENCE UPON IT by Lin Wenshuang B. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 1997 M. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 2002 A Dissertation Approved on April 1, 2014 By the following Dissertation Committee __________________________________ Prof.
  • Long Waves in Politics and Institutions: the Case of Greece Jason Koutoufaris-Malandrinos

    Long Waves in Politics and Institutions: the Case of Greece Jason Koutoufaris-Malandrinos

    Long Waves in Politics and Institutions: The case of Greece Jason Koutoufaris-Malandrinos To cite this version: Jason Koutoufaris-Malandrinos. Long Waves in Politics and Institutions: The case of Greece. 2015, http://bestimmung.blogspot.gr/2015/10/long-waves-in-politics-and-institutions.html. hal-01352167 HAL Id: hal-01352167 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01352167 Submitted on 5 Aug 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License LONG WAVES IN POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONS : THE CASE OF GREECE * by Jason Koutoufaris-Malandrinos Le grand homme dʼaction est celui qui pèse exactement lʼétroitesse de ses possibilités, qui choisit de sʼy tenir et de profiter même du poids de lʼinévitable pour lʼajouter à sa propre poussée. Fernand Braudel 1. I ntroduction It is known that Kondratieff waves reflect long-run movements in price indices and interest rates, and, by extension, fluctuations in general economic activity. Can we discern similar patterns in politics and institutional change? I will attempt a comparative sketch of the political institutions and ideologies in Greece during the periods 1821/1831 to 1910 and 1940/1949 to 2015.
  • Contents More Information

    Contents More Information

    Cambridge University Press 0521837561 - Cumans and Tatars: Oriental Military in the Pre-Ottoman Balkans, 1185- 1365 Istvan Vasary Table of Contents More information Contents Preface page xi 1 Introduction 1 Remarks on the sources 1 Cumans and Tatars 4 2 Cumans and the Second Bulgarian Empire 13 The antecedents and outbreak of the liberation movement 13 Bulgars, Vlakhs and Cumans before 1185 17 Ethnic names and ethnic realities in the sources of the Second Bulgarian Empire 22 Bulgaria, Vlakhia and Cumania in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries 27 Origins and possible Cuman affiliations of the Asen dynasty 33 Peter and Asen versus Isaakios and Alexios Angeloi: the first phase of the Cumano-Vlakho-Bulgarian league’s fight against Byzantium, 1186–1197 42 Kaloyan and his Cumans against Byzantium and the Latins 47 The Cumans’ role in the restoration of Bulgaria 54 3 Cumans in the Balkans before the Tatar conquest, 1241 57 Cumans during the reign of Boril, 1207–1218 57 Cumans during the reign of Ivan Asen II until 1237 61 Two waves of Cuman immigration to Bulgaria and the Latin Empire, 1237, 1241 63 Cumans in the service of John Batatzes and Theodoros II, 1241–1256 67 4 The first period of Tatar influence in the Balkans, 1242–1282 69 The Tatar conquest in the Balkans 69 Prince Nogay 71 The Tatars release ‘Izzadd¯ın in Thrace, 1264 72 Nogay’s marriage to a Byzantine princess, 1272 79 The Tatars’ role in the struggle for the Bulgarian throne, 1277–1280 79 Tatars invited to punish Sebastokrator Ioannes of Thessaly, 1282 84 vii © Cambridge University
  • Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/30/2021 05:40:26AM Via Free Access

    Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/30/2021 05:40:26AM Via Free Access

    1. The rise of an unstable century At the dawn of the twentieth century, the European powers confronted two major geopolitical weaknesses. The first one related to the future of the Tsarist Empire, the second to the escalating fragmentation of the so-called “sick man of Europe”, that is, the Ottoman Empire and, broadly speaking, the Balkan Peninsula. In reality, since 1809, the European powers were concerned about a potential “booming revolution” in the Tsarist Empire.1 The debates were vivid among intellectuals and in political circles, but they reached their peak when the 1905 revolution threatened, for a while, the implosion of Russia and the stability of Europe. Until that moment, reactionary circles feared that any reform – including those introduced during the Enlightenment, those dealing with the educa- tional reform, and those related to the foundation of the Academy – would encourage the lower popular strata and potentially most of the peasants to a rebellion. Joseph de Maistre and the Marquis de Coustine, for example, as well as the Slavophiles in Russia belonged to this mainstream. Others, by contrast, believed that the autocratic regime, particularly promoted by Nicholas I, was so refractory to any reform that the only way to achieve change was by revolution. From Narodniks to Anarchists and Marxists, several schools of thought, both in Russia and in Western Europe, nur- tured that belief. To a large extent, these opinions were mainly connected to the unbalanced social relations in the Tsarist Empire, that is, the polari- zation between landowners and peasantry, as well as the industrial – and the broader economic – backwardness of the country.
  • Iuliu Maniu and Corneliu Zelea Codreanu Against King Carol

    Iuliu Maniu and Corneliu Zelea Codreanu Against King Carol

    Reluctant Allies? Iuliu Maniu and Corneliu Zelea Codreanu against King Carol II of Romania Introduction Iuliu Maniu is today regarded as the principle upholder of democratic and constitutional propriety in interwar Romania. As leader of the Romanian National Peasant Party throughout much of the interwar period and the Second World War, he is generally considered to have tried to steer Romania away from dictatorship and towards democracy. Nevertheless, in 1947 Maniu was arrested and tried for treason together with other leaders of the National Peasant Party by the communist authorities. The charges brought against Maniu included having links to the ‘terrorist’ and fascist Romanian Legionary movement (also known as the Iron Guard). The prosecutors drew attention not only to the entry of former legionaries into National Peasant Party organizations in the autumn of 1944, but also to Maniu’s electoral non- aggression pact of 1937 with the Legionary movement’s leader, Corneliu Zelea Codreanu. The pact had been drawn up to prevent the incumbent National Liberal government manipulating the elections of December 1937. Maniu had subsequently acted as defence a witness at Codreanu’s trial in 1938. 1 Since the legionaries were regarded by the communists as the agents of Nazism in Romania, Maniu was accordingly accused of having encouraged the growth of German influence and fascism in Romania.2 Maniu was sentenced to life imprisonment and died in Sighet prison in 1953. Possibly no single act of Maniu’s interwar career was more condemned within Romanian communist historiography than his electoral pact with the allegedly Nazi- 1 Marcel-Dumitru Ciucă (ed.), Procesul lui Iuliu Maniu, Documentele procesului conducătorilor Partidului Naţional Ţărănesc, 3 volumes, Bucharest, 2001, vol.