DOCSLIB.ORG

Lesser Prairie-Chicken Conservation Initiative, 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lesser Prairie-Chicken Conservation Initiative, 2008 Lesser Prairie-Chicken Conservation Initiative Lesser Prairie Chicken Interstate Working Group May 2008 Dawn M. Davis New Mexico Department of Game and Fish/ University of Idaho Russ E. Horton Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation Eric A. Odell Colorado Division of Wildlife Randy D. Rodgers Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks Heather A. Whitlaw Texas Parks and Wildlife Department LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN CONSERVATION INITIATIVE Dawn M. Davis New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 1 Wildlife Way Santa Fe, NM 87505 [email protected] Russ E. Horton Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation 1801 North Lincoln Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73105 [email protected] Eric A. Odell Colorado Division of Wildlife 317 W. Prospect Road Ft. Collins, CO 80526 [email protected] Randy D. Rodgers Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks P.O. Box 338 Hays, KS 67601 [email protected] Heather A. Whitlaw Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Box 42125, TTU Lubbock, TX 79409-2125 [email protected] This report should be cited as: Davis, D. M., R. E. Horton, E. A. Odell, R. D. Rodgers and, H. A. Whitlaw. 2008. Lesser Prairie- Chicken Conservation Initiative. Lesser Prairie Chicken Interstate Working Group. Unpublished Report. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins, CO. USA. Cover photo credit: Don MacCarter Contributors Grant M. Beauprez Christopher Rustay Lesser Prairie-chicken Biologist Shortgrass Prairie BCR Coordinator New Mexico Department of Game and Playa Lakes Joint Venture Fish 1824 Stanford Drive NE 800 Laurelwood Dr., #1 Albuquerque, NM 87106 Clovis, NM 88101 Doug Schoeling Steve DeMaso Oklahoma Dept. of Wildlife Upland Game Program Leader Conservation Texas Parks and Wildlife Department P.O. Box 53465 4200 Smith School Rd. Oklahoma City, OK 73152 Austin, TX 78744 Trent Verquer Christian A. Hagen Terrestrial Biologist Sage Grouse Conservation Coordinator Colorado Division of Wildlife Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 2500 South Main 237 South Hines Boulevard Lamar, CO 81052 P.O. Box 8 Hines, OR 97738 Donald H. Wolfe Senior Biologist Jonathan B. Haufler George Miksch Sutton Avian Research Executive Director Center Ecosystem Management Research P.O. Box 2007 Institute Bartlesville, OK 74005-2007 210 Borderlands P.O. Box 717 Jeffrey A. Yost Seeley Lake, MT 59868 Terrestrial Biologist Colorado Division of Wildlife John Hughes P.O. Box 775777 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Steamboat Springs, CO 80477 West Texas Suboffice P.O. Box 713 Canadian, TX 79014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1. CONSERVATION STATUS OF LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN POPULATIONS .................................................................................................................5 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 State Laws and Existing Regulatory Mechanisms ..................................................... 5 New Mexico ............................................................................................................ 5 Texas ....................................................................................................................... 6 Oklahoma ................................................................................................................ 6 Kansas ..................................................................................................................... 6 Colorado .................................................................................................................. 7 1.3 Conservation and Management Plans ........................................................................ 7 New Mexico ............................................................................................................ 7 Texas ....................................................................................................................... 8 Oklahoma ................................................................................................................ 8 Kansas ..................................................................................................................... 8 Colorado .................................................................................................................. 8 U.S. Bureau of Land Management ......................................................................... 8 U.S. Forest Service (National Grasslands) ............................................................. 8 Range-Wide Strategies............................................................................................ 9 CHAPTER 2. NATURAL HISTORY ............................................................................. 10 2.1 Species Taxonomy ................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Seasonal Activities and Habitats .............................................................................. 10 Lek Sites................................................................................................................ 10 Nesting Cover ....................................................................................................... 11 Brood Habitat ........................................................................................................ 13 Autumn/Winter Habitat ........................................................................................ 14 2.3 Diet ........................................................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER 3. LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION ......... 15 3.1 Historic Distribution and Abundance ...................................................................... 15 New Mexico .......................................................................................................... 15 Texas ..................................................................................................................... 16 Oklahoma .............................................................................................................. 17 Kansas ................................................................................................................... 17 Colorado ................................................................................................................ 18 3.2 Current Status and Distribution ............................................................................... 18 New Mexico .......................................................................................................... 19 Texas ..................................................................................................................... 23 Oklahoma .............................................................................................................. 24 Kansas ................................................................................................................... 25 Colorado ................................................................................................................ 26 3.3 Population Reintroduction ....................................................................................... 28 3.4 Current Approaches to Inventory and Monitoring Efforts ...................................... 28 New Mexico .......................................................................................................... 28 Texas ..................................................................................................................... 30 Oklahoma .............................................................................................................. 31 Kansas ................................................................................................................... 32 Colorado ................................................................................................................ 33 3.5 Harvest Estimates ..................................................................................................... 34 New Mexico .......................................................................................................... 34 Texas ..................................................................................................................... 34 Oklahoma .............................................................................................................. 38 Kansas ................................................................................................................... 38 Colorado ................................................................................................................ 39 CHAPTER 4. POTENTIAL THREATS TO LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKENS .............. 40 4.1 Habitat Fragmentation ............................................................................................. 40 4.2 Livestock Grazing .................................................................................................... 41 4.3 Changing Land Uses ................................................................................................ 42 4.4 Predation .................................................................................................................. 43 4.5 Hunting and Poaching .............................................................................................. 43
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Grassland Conservation Plan for Prairie Grouse
    A GRASSLAND CONSERVATION PLAN FOR PRAIRIE GROUSE Photo credit: Michael Schroeder Photo credit: Rick Baetsen Photo Credit: Tom Harvey North American Grouse Partnership 2008 Preferred Citation: Vodehnal, W.L., and J.B. Haufler, Editors. 2008. A grassland conservation plan for prairie grouse. North American Grouse Partnership. Fruita, CO. Page i A GRASSLAND CONSERVATION PLAN FOR PRAIRIE GROUSE 2008 STEERING COMMITTEE William L. Vodehnal (Coordinator), Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Rick Baydack, University of Manitoba Dawn M. Davis, University of Idaho Jonathan B. Haufler, Ph.D., Ecosystem Management Research Institute Rob Manes, Kansas-The Nature Conservancy Stephanie Manes, United States Fish and Wildlife Service James A. Mosher, Ph.D., North American Grouse Partnership Steven P. Riley, Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Heather Whitlaw, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prairie grouse, including all species of prairie-chicken and the sharp-tailed grouse, have declined precipitously and steadily from historical levels throughout the Great Plains of North America. While many factors have contributed to these declines, the loss and fragmentation of expansive prairies to farming, and the reduction of habitat quality within remaining prairie fragments are known to be the primary causes. The social, political and economic drivers that have facilitated this loss of native grasslands throughout the United States and Canada generally fall beyond the jurisdiction of individual local, regional, state, and provincial wildlife management authorities. As a result, many grassland- dependent species requiring high-quality native grasslands are now threatened, endangered, or species of concern. Grasslands have been identified as some of the most endangered ecosystems in North America, so it is not surprising that many associated species are of concern for their level of decline.
    [Show full text]
  • GREATER PRAIRIE-CHICKENS Larkin A
    U N I V E R S I T Y OF N E B R A S K A – L I N C O L N EC305 MANAGEMENT OF SANDHILLS RANGELANDS FOR GREATER PRAIRIE-CHICKENS Larkin A. Powell, Conservation Biologist and Animal Ecologist, School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska–Lincoln Walter H. Schacht, Range Scientist, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln Lars C. Anderson, Range Ecologist, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln William L. Vodehnal, Certified Wildlife Biologist, Nebraska Game and Parks Commission reater prairie-chickens fascinate landowners, hunters, and birders Galike. They are a symbol of the natural heritage of the Great Plains. Their colorful mating rituals decorate pastures, and their booming calls add charm to meadows. Many landowners want to learn more about managing pastures to increase the number of greater prairie-chickens. Some have a personal desire to conserve the species. Others recognize that these native grouse offer income opportunities in the form of fee hunting and ecotourism. The more information landowners have, the easier it will be to find these birds and make sure they flourish year after year. Whatever your interest in greater prairie-chickens, learning more about this interesting species will help you maintain their habitat while you maintain your land. Stuhr Museum of the Prairie Pioneer Millions of greater prairie-chickens once inhabited the vast prairies in the Midwest. Their numbers were so great that in the late 1800s and early 1900s, a so- called “chicken hunting culture” was created. The loss of habitat was, by far, the biggest reason for the dramatic decline in prairie-chicken numbers, but hunting was another factor.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDE to PRAIRIE GROUSE VIEWING Glacial Ridge National Wildlife Refuge, Near Crookston, Minnesota
    Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Education GUIDE TO PRAIRIE GROUSE VIEWING Glacial Ridge National Wildlife Refuge, near Crookston, Minnesota Reserve your chance today for an experience of a lifetime. In April, small 3-person blinds are placed on the dancing grounds or leks of Greater Prairie-Chickens and Sharp-tailed Grouse near Crookston, Minnesota. Blinds are placed adjacent to the lek so they do not disturb the birds, yet are close to the action. Past blinds have been close enough so that birds occasionally perched or danced on top of them to the delight of the human visitors. Greater Prairie- Greater Prairie‐Chicken by Ross Hier, Chickens and Sharp-tailed Grouse are shy birds. Every precaution Area Wildlife Manager, MnDNR should be taken to minimize disturbance during their courtship display. GUIDELINES FOR USE OF PRAIRIE GROUSE BLINDS 1. Arrive and settle in the blind no later than 60 minutes before sunrise (while it is still very dark), or 5:30 p.m. for evening viewing. Keep in mind that blinds are typically at least a ½ mile walk from the parking area. Usually you want to be leaving the parking area at least 80 minutes before sunrise. The prairie chickens usually come to the booming grounds in the dark and begin booming before daylight. You will hear them before you can see them. The best displays are at sunrise if the birds are not disturbed earlier in the morning. If you arrive late, the birds will flush from the lek or dancing ground and will probably return, but the display will not be as spectacular.
    [Show full text]
  • Diets of Greater Prairie Chickens on the Sheyenne National Grasslands1,2 3 4 Mark A
    Diets of Greater Prairie Chickens on the Sheyenne National Grasslands1,2 3 4 Mark A. Rumble, Jay A. Newell, and John E. Toepfer Abstract.-- Diets of greater prairie chickens on the Sheyenne National Grassland of North Dakota were examined. During the winter months agricultural crops (primarily corn) were the predominant food items. Green vegetation was consumed in greater quantities as spring progressed. Dandelion flowers and alfalfa/sweetclover were the major vegetative food items through the summer. Both juvenile and adults selected diets high in digestible protein obtained through consumption of arthropods and some plants. INTRODUCTION The Sheyenne National Grassland is an island of suitable prairie chicken habitat in eastern North Initially, the development of agriculture on Dakota. Because the population of prairie the prairies was credited with increasing the chickens on the Sheyenne National Grassland population and range of the greater prairie increased during the period 1974-1980 (Manske and chicken (Tympanuchus cupido (Hamerstrom et al. Barker 1981), the possibility of an annual 1957). Further development however, of harvest arose. Yet, the reasons for this agriculture, primarily "clean farming", population increase were not clear. As a result, contributed to their decline (Yeatter 1963, this study was initiated by the Rocky Mountain Westemier 1980). Prairie chicken populations are Forest and Range Experiment Station, in highest in areas where agriculture is cooperation with Montana State University to interspersed with grasslands in approximately a determine food habits of greater prairie chickens 1:2 ratio (Evans 1968). The quality of the on the Sheyenne National Grassland. grassland habitats is also important, however (Christisen and Krohn 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • MANAGEMENT of SANDHILLS RANGELANDS for GREATER PRAIRIE-CHICKENS Larkin A
    U N I V E R S I T Y OF N E B R A S K A – L I N C O L N EC305 MANAGEMENT OF SANDHILLS RANGELANDS FOR GREATER PRAIRIE-CHICKENS Larkin A. Powell, Conservation Biologist and Animal Ecologist, School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska–Lincoln Walter H. Schacht, Range Scientist, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln Lars C. Anderson, Range Ecologist, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln William L. Vodehnal, Certified Wildlife Biologist, Nebraska Game and Parks Commission reater prairie-chickens fascinate landowners, hunters, and birders Galike. They are a symbol of the natural heritage of the Great Plains. Their colorful mating rituals decorate pastures, and their booming calls add charm to meadows. Many landowners want to learn more about managing pastures to increase the number of greater prairie-chickens. Some have a personal desire to conserve the species. Others recognize that these native grouse offer income opportunities in the form of fee hunting and ecotourism. The more information landowners have, the easier it will be to find these birds and make sure they flourish year after year. Whatever your interest in greater prairie-chickens, learning more about this interesting species will help you maintain their habitat while you maintain your land. Stuhr Museum of the Prairie Pioneer Millions of greater prairie-chickens once inhabited the vast prairies in the Midwest. Their numbers were so great that in the late 1800s and early 1900s, a so- called “chicken hunting culture” was created. The loss of habitat was, by far, the biggest reason for the dramatic decline in prairie-chicken numbers, but hunting was another factor.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesser Prairie-Chicken Initiative Report
    Lesser Prairie-Chicken Conservation Beyond Boundaries Initiative Report February 2012 Background/ Did You Know? • The lesser prairie-chicken is a Purpose ground-nesting bird native to the rangelands of the south central Lesser prairie-chicken populations have plains of the U.S. and best declined dramatically during the past several known for its unique courtship decades due to loss of native prairie, habitat displays and “booming” sounds. fragmentation, and degradation of habitat on both private and public lands. The • A lek is an area where lesser Natural Resources Conservation Service prairie-chicken males display (NRCS), its partners and cooperating during the breeding season to landowners are working to increase the number and the range of the lesser attract females; may also be prairie-chicken through the Lesser Prairie-Chicken Initiative (LPCI). At the referred to as a booming ground same time, the initiative is promoting the overall health of grazing lands and or strutting ground. the long-term sustainability of ranching operations.The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has worked cooperatively with NRCS to ensure the initiative’s • The lesser prairie-chicken is conservation practices provide long-term benefits to the overall lesser prairie- comparable in morphology, chicken population; minimize or eliminate short-term harmful effects to those plumage and behavior to the populations, and cause no negative effects to other listed and candidate species greater prairie-chicken, although that share habitat with the lesser prairie-chicken. the lesser prairie-chicken is smaller and has distinctive NRCS State Conservationists in Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma courtship displays and and Texas (states within the lesser prairie-chicken’s range), with the assistance vocalizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Expansion GHG Biological Assessment
    Biological Assessment Victoria Power Station Expansion Victoria County, Texas Prepared for Victoria WLE, LP Prepared by Whitenton Group, Inc. September 2013 Revised June 2014 3413 Hunter Road • San Marcos, Texas 78666 • office 512-353-3344 • fax 512-392-3450 www.whitentongroup.com Biological Assessment Victoria Power Station Expansion Victoria County, Texas Prepared for Victoria WLE, LP Victoria, Texas Prepared by Whitenton Group, Inc. 3413 Hunter Road San Marcos, Texas 78666 WGI Project No. 1243 September 2013 Revised June 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. i ACRONYMS ..............................................................................................................................................iii 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 3 3.0 ACTION AREA .................................................................................................................................... 4 4.0 AGENCY REGULATIONS ................................................................................................................. 5 4.1 ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Conservation Strategies for the Lesser Prairie-Chicken and Sand Dune Lizard in New Mexico
    Collaborative Conservation Strategies for the Lesser Prairie-Chicken and Sand Dune Lizard in New Mexico Findings and Recommendations of the New Mexico LPC/SDL Working Group August 2005 Collaborative Conservation Strategies for the Lesser Prairie-Chicken and Sand Dune Lizard in New Mexico Findings and recommendations of the New Mexico LPC/SDL Working Group The New Mexico LPC/SDL Working Group August 2005 (This page intentionally left blank) ii Executive Summary After more than two years of negotiations, a broad strategy for the protection of two at-risk species in southeastern New Mexico has been agreed to by state and federal agencies, ranchers, oil and gas industry representatives, and conservation interests. This document presents the findings and recommendations of the New Mexico LPC/SDL Working Group, a multi-party group of stakeholders with interests in conservation management and land use decisions regarding two candidate species for federal listing under the Endangered Species Act: the Lesser Prairie-Chicken (LPC) and Sand Dune Lizard (SDL). One of the first achievements of its kind addressing multiple candidate species, this report outlines a comprehensive approach for reducing biological threats while affirming and protecting economic values and traditional land uses. It applies across a large region including portions of Quay, De Baca, Curry, Chaves, Roosevelt, Eddy, and Lea counties. Candidate Species and the Southeast New Mexico Working Group The LPC is a prairie grouse species native to the southern Great Plains, including parts of Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. The SDL is a lizard species native to a small area of southeastern New Mexico and west Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Evolutionary History of North American Prairie Grouse (Genus: Tympanuchus) Using Multi-Locus Coalescent Analyses
    EXPLORING THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF NORTH AMERICAN PRAIRIE GROUSE (GENUS: Tympanuchus) USING MULTI-LOCUS COALESCENT ANALYSES Stephanie J. Galla, B.S. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2013 APPROVED: Jeff A. Johnson, Major Professor Steve Wolverton, Committee Member Qunfeng Dong, Committee Member Sam Atkinson, Chair of the Department of Biological Sciences Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Galla, Stephanie J. Exploring the evolutionary history of North American prairie grouse (Genus: Tympanuchus) using multi-locus coalescent analyses. Master of Science (Biology), May 2013, 74 pp., 13 tables, 19 figures, references, 144 titles. Conservation biologists are increasingly using phylogenetics as a tool to understand evolutionary relationships and taxonomic classification. The taxonomy of North American prairie grouse (sharp-tailed grouse, T. phasianellus; lesser prairie- chicken, T. pallidicinctus; greater prairie-chicken, T. cupido; including multiple subspecies) has been designated based on physical characteristics, geography, and behavior. However, previous studies have been inconclusive in determining the evolutionary history of prairie grouse based on genetic data. Therefore, additional research investigating the evolutionary history of prairie grouse is warranted. In this study, ten loci (including mitochondrial, autosomal, and Z-linked markers) were sequenced across multiple populations of prairie grouse, and both traditional and coalescent-based phylogenetic analyses were used to address the evolutionary history of this genus. Results from this study indicate that North American prairie grouse diverged in the last 200,000 years, with species-level taxa forming well-supported monophyletic clades in species tree analyses. With these results, managers of the critically endangered Attwater’s prairie-chicken (T.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesser Prairie-Chicken: a Decade in Purgatory
    Lesser Prairie-Chicken: A Decade in Purgatory Jess Alford © A Report on the Tenth Anniversary of the Lesser Prairie- Chicken’s Designation as a “Candidate Species” under the Endangered Species Act (June 9, 2008) Lesser Prairie Chicken: A Decade in Purgatory Lesser Prairie-Chicken: A Decade in Purgatory The lesser prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) inhabits shinnery oak and sand sagebrush grasslands in parts of Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. An indicator species for the Southern Great Plains, the range of lesser prairie-chicken has been reduced by over 90 percent and its population has declined by an estimated 97 percent since the 1800s. In 1995, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service received a petition to list the lesser prairie chicken as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act. The agency concluded that the petition contained substantial information that warranted further review in July 1997, but then concluded that listing the species was precluded by other priorities in June 1998. The lesser prairie-chicken was subsequently designated a “Candidate Species,” a statutory purgatory where imperiled species may dwell for years before the Fish and Wildlife Service determines their listing status under the Endangered Species Act. June 9, 2008, is the tenth anniversary of the date that lesser prairie- chicken was made a Candidate Species. Candidate Species status provides no protection to designated species. For the lesser prairie-chicken, Candidate Species status has meant continued exposure to threats such livestock grazing, oil and gas extraction, conversion of habitat to cropland, and other factors that have contributed to the bird’s continued decline throughout many parts of its range.
    [Show full text]
  • Valentine National Wildlife Refuge: Wildlife List
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Valentine National Wildlife Refuge Wildlife List Wildlife Abounds Valentine National Wildlife Refuge Hackberry and Look for ducks and geese, especially in the Native (NWR), located 25 miles south of Pelican Lakes during the spring and fall. Watch for Prairie the town of Valentine, Nebraska, is pintail, mallard, ruddy, canvasback, 71,774 acres in size and was established and many more ducks. Take a walk in 1935 as a Refuge and breeding on the nature trail up to the old fire grounds for migratory birds and tower on the west end of Hackberry other wildlife. In fact, most of the Lake for a view of the Sandhills and wildlife present in historical times a look at grassland sparrows. This goose, are still present on the Refuge designed by J.N. today. Numerous wetlands, lakes, Duck Lake Look in the trees around the boat “Ding” Darling, wet meadows, and large expanses of ramp for they are an oasis for has become the native prairie attract a wide variety songbirds. Watch for warblers, blue symbol of the of wildlife. This brochure lists and black-headed grosbeaks, Lazuli National Wildlife 289 species of birds, 41 species of buntings, eastern bluebirds, and Refuge System. mammals, 16 species of reptiles, and many more. six species of amphibians that have been recorded on the Refuge. Check-list Key Sp Spring March – May S Summer June – August May, September, and October offer F Fall September – November good opportunities for observing a W Winter December – February variety of migratory birds. Spring migrants, including waterfowl and c common – present in large warblers, are most numerous in May.
    [Show full text]