The Politics of Awkward Comedy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Politics of Awkward Comedy Awkward! The Politics of Awkward Comedy Tom van der Krieke 10550003 Research Master Thesis Department of Media Studies University of Amsterdam 28 June 2019 Supervisor: Abe Geil Second reader: Carolyn Birdsall 1 Abstract This thesis seeks to trace the politics of an emotion that has become all too common in the Western world: the feeling of awkwardness. The popularity of awkward comedy since television series like The Office (2001-2003) and Curb Your Enthusiasm has been enormous. What does this popularity say about the current political and economic systems? Part of this investigation is into the notion of awkwardness itself. Film reviews from the early 20th century mostly refer to awkwardness when discussing certain physical features. Not only does this thesis seek to trace the political roots of awkwardness, but it also seeks it in the ontology of the medium of film and television as well with the help of theories on film by Giorgio Agamben and Siegfried Kracauer. To come closer to an understanding of the political meaning of awkwardness this thesis also seeks to gain a better understanding of the link between comedy and awkwardness through the humour theories of Sigmund Freud and Henri Bergson. These theories will provide an answer as to why we laugh at awkward comedy as well as provide an understanding of the relationship between awkwardness and society. Awkwardness also has a certain affective and contagious quality to it. That is why this thesis also seeks to understand how awkwardness works as a negative affect through the works of Sianne Ngai and Laurent Berlant. Ultimately all these different sides of awkwardness together show how it is a notion, which is constantly changing with the politics and economics of the era. It will be argued that research on the subject of awkwardness ultimately can lead to understanding of power, through its many qualities. 2 Table of Contents 1. An Awkward Introduction…………………………………………………………………..p. 4 2. A Brief History of Awkwardness in Film and Television……………………………...p. 8 2.1 The Use of the Term Awkwardness in Early Film Reviews…………………………p. 8 2.2 Slapstick and Physical Awkwardness………………………………………………….p. 10 2.3 Television and Social Awkwardness…………………………………………………...p. 15 2.4 I Love Lucy…………………………………………………………………………………..p. 17 2.5 The Party…………………………………………………………………………………….p. 18 3. Awkwardness and Comedy………………………………………………………………...p. 22 3.1 Bergson and Awkward Laughter………………………………………………………...p. 23 3.2 Freud and The Awkward Ego…………………………………………………………….p. 25 3.3 The Office…………………………………………………………………………………….p. 27 3.4 Curb Your Enthusiasm…………………………………………………………………….p. 30 4. Awkwardness and Affect…………………………………………………………………...p. 34 4.1 Cringe Comedy……………………………………………………………………………..p. 34 4.2 Eighth Grade………………………………………………………………………………..p. 38 5. Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………p. 44 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………..p. 45 3 1. An Awkward Introduction Life for many people often feels like a string of awkward moments. This awkwardness can be found in the workspace, romantic relationships, or friendships. It often expresses fears of doing something wrong in a social context. This particular feeling has become popular over the last twenty years or so. In shows like The Office (2001-2003) and Curb Your Enthusiasm (2000-) humour shifted to a sole focus on awkward moments. MTV even created a show with the name Awkward. (2011-2016). This show undoubtedly helped popularize this particular phrase by describing certain moments in once life. An exclamation of the word awkward indeed has become a term of its own. Memes with the phrase “that awkward moment when …” have also been and are still a popular way to describe certain pains from daily life. While many people recognize awkwardness in their own life, or even defining big parts of their life, awkwardness has not yet been recognized as a defining emotion of our time. Emotions like anger (Pankaj Mishra), fear (Heinz Bude), and anxiety (Sianne Ngai), have become recognized as emotions that define the post 9/11 Western world. Awkwardness could easily be added to this list, as it is a dominating force in daily life, as well as dominating popular culture. Adam Kotsko undertakes one of the few investigations into this phenomenon in his book “Awkwardness”. Kotsko investigates awkwardness from a philosophical and a political perspective. The etymology of the word awkwardness contains the words ‘awk’ and ‘ward’. Awk is a medieval English word for something that has been turned into the wrong direction, while the -ward part implicates some form of movement, as in backward or forward. Awkwardness is thus a movement in the wrong direction (Kotsko 6). Kotsko believes that we are currently in “a state of cultural awkwardness” (17). This awkward state according to Kotsko is to be traced back to the 1960s and post-Fordism. Fordism had been a fairly stable economic system that created a huge (white) middle-class in the United States. In the mid 1960s however it became clear through social unrest that this economic system had hugely neglected the African-Americans and women in its growth (Kotsko 18). What the social movements in the 1960s provided was considerable improvement for women and African- Americans, but any radical changes were halted. For Kotsko the origins of the awkward age are to be found here. The normative social model saw some great changes, while “they did not produce any viable positive alternative” (Kotsko 19). What then came into being was a world where people do not know how to attain and retain equality, as well as a world where people do not really know their place anymore. In the 1970s a lot of the foundations that helped create a middle class through the model of Fordism, became depleted by decreasing the power of the unions, and deindustrialization (Kotsko 20). 4 This thesis seeks out to trace the political implications of awkward comedy. Kotsko already heads into this direction with his focus on the economic conditions into which awkwardness came into being. Kotsko dives into the political and economic forces that created awkwardness but fails to trace this awkward comedy through the history of film and television. This thesis will seek an answer to the following question: what are the underlying politics and economics that have created the subgenre of awkward comedy in the early twenty-first century? This question will be answered by looking at three relatively unexplored areas of awkwardness, namely tracing the history of awkwardness, explaining the link between awkwardness and humour theory, and tracing the affective qualities of awkwardness. Each chapter will deal with one of these topics paired with a focus on particular political and economic systems. In the analysis of various films and television series with awkward comedy these theories will be further explained. The first chapter looks at the origins of the word awkward and how this word has been used since the start of comedy film. Unsurprisingly, the meaning of the word awkward in describing comedy has immensely altered. In early film reviews the use of the word awkward was almost exclusively used to describe a form of physical comedy. This physical comedy in the form of slapstick already has some mimesis that can also be found back in the type of humour that we have now come to describe as awkward comedy. This chapter attempts to trace the roots of awkwardness by both looking at the ontologies of film and television, while simultaneously also focussing on the economic systems. In this chapter the focus will be on Fordism and post-Fordism as economic systems that first allowed a certain awkwardness to grow. To trace back the politics of awkwardness in history it is crucial to find a moment where this form of comedy finds a shift. To do this the first chapter will be analysing an episode of the well-known television series I Love Lucy (1951-1957). I Love Lucy is one of the first television sitcoms, and was the first sitcom to introduce several techniques that can still be recognized to this day in the genre; these are the three-camera setup and the use of a live audience. The other object that this chapter will be analysing is the ground-breaking and in some ways radical comedy film The Party (1968). This is one of the first films to deal with awkwardness on a much more social level. What this chapter will attempt to provide is trace the histories of awkwardness through both film and television, as these are the places where the awkward comedy can predominantly be found today. In the second chapter we jump to the early 21st century, where a wave of awkwardness hit the sitcom genre with The Office and Curb Your Enthusiasm. This chapter will try to gain a better grip on the philosophical relationship between awkwardness and comedy. To do this, this chapter will be mainly focussed on the field of humour theory, where there is a philosophical inquiry in why we laugh at certain types of comedy. There is an 5 explicit link between comedy and awkwardness. Just try to think of watching a show filled with social awkwardness without having to laugh at it. This would be pure torture! Henri Bergson’s Laughter provides key insights into the reason why we laugh at something. Traditionally there have been three theories of humour: superiority theory, relief theory, and incongruity theory (Critchley 2). According to the superiority theory we laugh at something or someone because there is a feeling of being superior. This is the theory that dominated philosophical thinking on laughter until the eighteenth century. The relief theory argues that there is a certain tension that gets released through laughter. This is where Freud’s theory on humour also fits in. Incongruity theory argues that humour is created through a felt incongruity between what we know to be true and the reality that takes place in the joke (Critchley 3).
Recommended publications
  • Hist Art 3901 Course Change.Pdf
    COURSE CHANGE REQUEST Last Updated: Haddad,Deborah Moore 3901 - Status: PENDING 12/31/2020 Term Information Effective Term Summer 2021 Previous Value Summer 2017 Course Change Information What change is being proposed? (If more than one, what changes are being proposed?) to offer a 100% distance learning offering of 3901 What is the rationale for the proposed change(s)? The course ran in AU20 during the pandemic and received a course assurance. The department would like the flexibility to run the course as a "DL" course in the future. What are the programmatic implications of the proposed change(s)? (e.g. program requirements to be added or removed, changes to be made in available resources, effect on other programs that use the course)? The department will be able to offer the course as "DL" during the summer (with college approval) and students who are off-campus during the summer will be able to take the course and further their degree requirements. The course is also a Film Studies major course option and it will help students in that program as well. Is approval of the requrest contingent upon the approval of other course or curricular program request? No Is this a request to withdraw the course? No General Information Course Bulletin Listing/Subject Area History of Art Fiscal Unit/Academic Org History of Art - D0235 College/Academic Group Arts and Sciences Level/Career Undergraduate Course Number/Catalog 3901 Course Title World Cinema Today Transcript Abbreviation World Cinema Course Description An introduction to the art of international cinema today, including its forms and varied content.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Game of Thrones,' 'Fleabag' Take Top Emmy Honors on Night of Upsets
    14 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 Stars hit Emmy red carpet Jodie Maisie Comer Natasha Lyonne Williams Michelle Williams Naomi Watts Sophie Turner Kendall Jenner Vera Farmiga Julia Garner beats GoT stars to win ‘Game of Thrones,’ ‘Fleabag’ take top first Emmy Los Angeles Emmy honors on night of upsets ctress Julia Gar- Los Angeles Emmy for comedy writing. Aner beat “Game of “This is just getting ridiculous!,” Phoebe Waller-Bridge’s Thrones” stars, including edieval drama “Game Waller-Bridge said as she accept- ‘Fleabag’ wins big at Emmys Sophie Turner, Lena Head- of Thrones” closed ed the comedy series Emmy. Los Angeles ey, Maisie Williams, to win Mits run with a fourth “It’s really wonderful to know, her first Emmy in Support- Emmy award for best drama se- and reassuring, that a dirty, angry, ctress Phoebe Waller-Bridge won Lead ing Actress in a Drama Se- ries while British comedy “Flea- messed-up woman can make it Actress in a Comedy Series trophy at ries category at the 2019 bag” was the upset winner for to the Emmys,” Waller-Bridge Athe 71st Primetime Emmy Awards gala Emmy awards here. best comedy series on Sunday on added. here for her role in “Fleabag”, The first-time Emmy a night that rewarded newcom- Already the most- awarded which was also named as the nominee was in contention ers over old favorites. series in best comedy series. with Gwendoline Christie Billy Porter, the star of LGBTQ The Emmys are Hollywood’s Emmy “This is just getting ridicu- (“Game of Thrones”), Head- series “Pose,” won the best dra- top honors in television, and the history lous,” Waller-Bridge said as she ey (“Game of Thrones”), matic actor Emmy, while British night belonged to Phoebe Waller- with accepted the honour for best com- Fiona Shaw (“Killing newcomer Jodie Comer took the Bridge, the star and creator of 38 wins, edy series.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 Rock: Complexity, Metareferentiality and the Contemporary Quality Sitcom
    30 Rock: Complexity, Metareferentiality and the Contemporary Quality Sitcom Katrin Horn When the sitcom 30 Rock first aired in 2006 on NBC, the odds were against a renewal for a second season. Not only was it pitched against another new show with the same “behind the scenes”-idea, namely the drama series Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. 30 Rock’s often absurd storylines, obscure references, quick- witted dialogues, and fast-paced punch lines furthermore did not make for easy consumption, and thus the show failed to attract a sizeable amount of viewers. While Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip did not become an instant success either, it still did comparatively well in the Nielson ratings and had the additional advantage of being a drama series produced by a household name, Aaron Sorkin1 of The West Wing (NBC, 1999-2006) fame, at a time when high-quality prime-time drama shows were dominating fan and critical debates about TV. Still, in a rather surprising programming decision NBC cancelled the drama series, renewed the comedy instead and later incorporated 30 Rock into its Thursday night line-up2 called “Comedy Night Done Right.”3 Here the show has been aired between other single-camera-comedy shows which, like 30 Rock, 1 | Aaron Sorkin has aEntwurf short cameo in “Plan B” (S5E18), in which he meets Liz Lemon as they both apply for the same writing job: Liz: Do I know you? Aaron: You know my work. Walk with me. I’m Aaron Sorkin. The West Wing, A Few Good Men, The Social Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Junior Mints and Their Bigger Than Bite-Size Role in Complicating Product Placement Assumptions
    Salve Regina University Digital Commons @ Salve Regina Pell Scholars and Senior Theses Salve's Dissertations and Theses 5-2010 Junior Mints and Their Bigger Than Bite-Size Role in Complicating Product Placement Assumptions Stephanie Savage Salve Regina University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/pell_theses Part of the Advertising and Promotion Management Commons, and the Marketing Commons Savage, Stephanie, "Junior Mints and Their Bigger Than Bite-Size Role in Complicating Product Placement Assumptions" (2010). Pell Scholars and Senior Theses. 54. https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/pell_theses/54 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Salve's Dissertations and Theses at Digital Commons @ Salve Regina. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pell Scholars and Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Salve Regina. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Savage 1 “Who’s gonna turn down a Junior Mint? It’s chocolate, it’s peppermint ─it’s delicious!” While this may sound like your typical television commercial, you can thank Jerry Seinfeld and his butter fingers for what is actually one of the most renowned lines in television history. As part of a 1993 episode of Seinfeld , subsequently known as “The Junior Mint,” these infamous words have certainly gained a bit more attention than the show’s writers had originally bargained for. In fact, those of you who were annoyed by last year’s focus on a McDonald’s McFlurry on NBC’s 30 Rock may want to take up your beef with Seinfeld’s producers for supposedly showing marketers the way to the future ("Brand Practice: Product Integration Is as Old as Hollywood Itself").
    [Show full text]
  • Which Seinfeld Character Are You?
    EPISODE 181: THE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MEETING WHICHWHICH SEINFELDSEINFELD CHARACTERCHARACTER AREARE YOU?YOU? In our business dealings, we are often guilty of just not listening. We come to the table with an agenda—a new product, a new service—and wait while a prospect or existing client tells us what’s going on with his or her business. At some point, that person will pause—and we pounce with our spiel. This approach rarely works - successful business development requires some level of rapport and relationship building. As in all aspects of life, this can mean dealing with those who may not share your views or approach. In order to adapt quickly and improvise in these instances, it’s helpful to understand people’s communication and personality styles. There are a number of tests that can help us understand the personality and communication styles of others, including the popular DISC model. This model has four quadrants: dominance, influence, steadiness, and conscientiousness. Influence and steadiness are on the right side of the brain, and dominance and conscientiousness are on the left side. Understanding someone’s dominant quadrant can help you find a way to work more effectively with them. UNDERSTANDING WHAT SEINFELD YOUR SITCOM CAST Now that you understand where you fall QUADRANT ARE YOU? within the quadrants, you can begin to think about how to work and respond to any cast of characters you may come I’ll let you in on an interesting tidbit, successful sitcoms often across. Friction will naturally arise include a character from each of the following quadrants, because these are people with opposite because the resulting friction tends to be funny.
    [Show full text]
  • 72Nd Emmy's Nominations Facts Figures
    FACTS & FIGURES FOR 2020 NOMINATIONS as of July 28, 2020 does not include producer nominations 72nd EMMY AWARDS updated 07.28.2020 version 1 Page 1 of 24 SUMMARY OF MULTIPLE EMMY WINS IN 2019 Game Of Thrones - 12 Chernobyl - 10 The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel - 8 Free Solo – 7 Fleabag - 6 Love, Death & Robots - 5 Saturday Night Live – 5 Fosse/Verdon – 4 Last Week Tonight With John Oliver – 4 Queer Eye - 4 RuPaul’s Drag Race - 4 Age Of Sail - 3 Barry - 3 Russian Doll - 3 State Of The Union – 3 The Handmaid’s Tale – 3 Anthony Bourdain Parts Unknown – 2 Bandersnatch (Black Mirror) - 2 Crazy Ex-Girlfriend – 2 Our Planet – 2 Ozark – 2 RENT – 2 Succession - 2 United Shades Of America With W. Kamau Bell – 2 When They See Us – 2 PARTIAL LIST OF 2019 WINNERS PROGRAMS: Comedy Series: Fleabag Drama Series: Game Of Thrones Limited Series: Chernobyl Television Movie: Bandersnatch (Black Mirror) Reality-Competition Program: RuPaul’s Drag Race Variety Series (Talk): Last Week Tonight With John Oliver Variety Series (Sketch): Saturday Night Live PERFORMERS: Comedy Series: Lead Actress: Phoebe Waller-Bridge (Fleabag) Lead Actor: Bill Hader (Barry) Supporting Actress: Alex Borstein (The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel) Supporting Actor: Tony Shalhoub (The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel) Drama Series: Lead Actress: Jodie Comer (Killing Eve) Lead Actor: Billy Porter (Pose) Supporting Actress: Julia Garner (Ozark) Supporting Actor: Peter Dinklage (Game Of Thrones) Limited Series/Movie: Lead Actress: Michelle Williams (Fosse/Verdon) Lead Actor: Jharrel Jerome (When They See Us) Supporting
    [Show full text]
  • “You're the Worst Gay Husband Ever!” Progress and Concession in Gay
    Title P “You’re the Worst Gay Husband ever!” Progress and Concession in Gay Sitcom Representation A thesis presented by Alex Assaf To The Department of Communications Studies at the University of Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts (Honors) April 2012 Advisors: Prof. Shazia Iftkhar Prof. Nicholas Valentino ii Copyright ©Alex Assaf 2012 All Rights Reserved iii Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my Nana who has always motivated me to pursue my interests, and has served as one of the most inspirational figures in my life both personally and academically. iv Acknowledgments First of all, I would like to thank my incredible advisors Professor Shazia Iftkhar and Professor Nicholas Valentino for reading numerous drafts and keeping me on track (or better yet avoiding a nervous breakdown) over the past eight months. Additionally, I’d like to thank my parents and my friends for putting up with my incessant mentioning of how much work I always had to do when writing this thesis. Their patience and understanding was tremendous and helped motivate me to continue on at times when I felt uninspired. And lastly, I’d like to thank my brother for always calling me back whenever I needed help eloquently naming all the concepts and patterns that I could only describe in my head. Having a trusted ally to bounce ideas off and to help better express my observations was invaluable. Thanks, bro! v Abstract This research analyzes the implicit and explicit messages viewers receive about the LGBT community in primetime sitcoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Views on Happiness in the Television Series Ally Mcbeal: the Philosophy of David E
    QUT Digital Repository: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/ McKee, Alan (2004) Views On Happiness In The Television Series Ally Mcbeal: The Philosophy Of David E. Kelley. Journal of Happiness Studies 5(4):pp. 385- 411. © Copyright 2004 Springer The original publication is available at SpringerLink http://www.springerlink.com 1 Views on happiness in the television series Ally McBeal: the philosophy of David E Kelley Alan McKee Film and Television Queensland University of Technology Kelvin Grove QLD 4059 Australia [email protected] 2 Abstract This article contributes to our understanding of popular thinking about happiness by exploring the work of David E Kelley, the creator of the television program Ally McBeal and an important philosopher of happiness. Kelley's major points are as follows. He is more ambivalent than is generally the case in popular philosophy about many of the traditional sources of happiness. In regard to the maxim that money can't buy happiness he gives space to characters who assert that there is a relationship between material comfort and happiness, as well as to those that claim the opposite position. He is similarly ambivalent about the relationship between loving relationships and happiness; and friendships and happiness. In relation to these points Kelley is surprisingly principled in citing the sources that he draws upon in his thinking (through intertextual references to genres and texts that have explored these points before him). His most original and interesting contributions to popular discussions of the nature of happiness are twofold. The first is his suggestion that there is a lot to be said for false consciousness.
    [Show full text]
  • THIS ISSUE: Comedy
    2014-2015 September ISSUE 1 scene. THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS THEATRE ASSOCIATION THIS ISSUE: Comedy www.ista.co.uk WHO’S WHO @ ISTA… CONTENTS Patron 2 Connections Professor Jonothan Neelands, by Rebecca Kohler National Teaching Fellow, Chair of Drama and Theatre Education in the Institute of Education 3 Comedy d’un jour and Chair of Creative Education in the Warwick Business School (WBS) at the University of by Francois Zanini Warwick. 4 Learning through humour Board of trustees by Mike Pasternak Iain Stirling (chair), Scotland Formerly Superintendent, Advanced Learning Schools, Riyadh. Recently retired. 8 Desperately seeking the laughs Jen Tickle (vice chair), Jamaica by Peter Michael Marino Head of Visual & Performing Arts and Theory of Knowledge at The Hillel Academy, Jamaica. 9 “Chou” – the comic actor in Chinese opera Dinos Aristidou, UK by Chris Ng Freelance writer, director, consultant. 11 Directing comedy Alan Hayes, Belgium by Sacha Kyle Theatre teacher International School Brussels. Sherri Sutton, Switzerland 12 Videotape everything, change and be Comic, director and chief examiner for IB DP Theatre. Theatre teacher at La Chataigneraie. grateful Jess Thorpe, Scotland by Dorothy Bishop Co Artistic Director of Glas(s) Performance and award winning young people’s company 13 Seriously funny Junction 25. Visiting. Lecturer in the Arts in Social Justice at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland. by Stephen Finegold Honorary life members 15 How I got the best job in the world! Dinos Aristidou, UK Being a clown, being a
    [Show full text]
  • 30 Rock and Philosophy: We Want to Go to There (The Blackwell
    ftoc.indd viii 6/5/10 10:15:56 AM 30 ROCK AND PHILOSOPHY ffirs.indd i 6/5/10 10:15:35 AM The Blackwell Philosophy and Pop Culture Series Series Editor: William Irwin South Park and Philosophy X-Men and Philosophy Edited by Robert Arp Edited by Rebecca Housel and J. Jeremy Wisnewski Metallica and Philosophy Edited by William Irwin Terminator and Philosophy Edited by Richard Brown and Family Guy and Philosophy Kevin Decker Edited by J. Jeremy Wisnewski Heroes and Philosophy The Daily Show and Philosophy Edited by David Kyle Johnson Edited by Jason Holt Twilight and Philosophy Lost and Philosophy Edited by Rebecca Housel and Edited by Sharon Kaye J. Jeremy Wisnewski 24 and Philosophy Final Fantasy and Philosophy Edited by Richard Davis, Jennifer Edited by Jason P. Blahuta and Hart Weed, and Ronald Weed Michel S. Beaulieu Battlestar Galactica and Iron Man and Philosophy Philosophy Edited by Mark D. White Edited by Jason T. Eberl Alice in Wonderland and The Offi ce and Philosophy Philosophy Edited by J. Jeremy Wisnewski Edited by Richard Brian Davis Batman and Philosophy True Blood and Philosophy Edited by Mark D. White and Edited by George Dunn and Robert Arp Rebecca Housel House and Philosophy Mad Men and Philosophy Edited by Henry Jacoby Edited by Rod Carveth and Watchman and Philosophy James South Edited by Mark D. White ffirs.indd ii 6/5/10 10:15:36 AM 30 ROCK AND PHILOSOPHY WE WANT TO GO TO THERE Edited by J. Jeremy Wisnewski John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ffirs.indd iii 6/5/10 10:15:36 AM To pages everywhere .
    [Show full text]
  • Crazy Ex-Girlfriend and Feminist Politics of Offence
    KATRIN HORN “PERIOD SEX”: CRAZY EX-GIRLFRIEND AND FEMINIST POLITICS OF OFFENCE When cartoon versions of the supporting cast call the main character of The CW’s Crazy Ex-Girlfriend (2015–) exactly that – a crazy ex-girlfriend – in the opening credits of season one, the offended Rebecca Bunch (played by co-creator Rachel Bloom) vehemently protests: “the situation is a lot more nuanced than that!” TV critics mostly agree, calling the show “witty, well-acted, brazenly inventive, and a pleasure to watch” (Bastién 2017) or simply “The Best Show on TV [...] that demonstrates the near-total creative freedom of TV’s latest evolutionary period better than any other” (Zoller Seitz 2016). A Slate-review that proclaims it “one of the most critically acclaimed programs on broadcast television,” however, also notes that Crazy Ex-Girlfriend (CXG) is not “among the lowest [rated], but consistently in the absolute last spot, almost as if it’s trying to make a point” (Wilson 2018). Headlines like “4 reasons why ‘Crazy Ex- Girlfriend’ is the best show you’re not watching (Fitzpatrick 2015) are therefore a staple of the show’s critical reception. The explanation usually given – “Hate the title? Us too […]” (Pandell 2016) – is that show’s title, “a sexist term,” as the credit sequence acknowledges, is so offensive it repels most potential viewers. The embrace of offensiveness in the “Subversive Show with the Terrible Name” (Lenker 2016), however, does not stop there. It instead extents to narrative as well as aesthetic levels. As such, the title is not so much ‘terrible’ as it is telling: it proclaims the show’s reliance on offence, which is used – this article argues – as a tool of feminist critique of contemporary modes of representation of women, romance, and mental illness.
    [Show full text]
  • Mehammer2011.Pdf (1.123Mb)
    1 Innhold Kapittel 1: Innledning og problemstilling .............................................................................. 4 «Dristighet» ................................................................................................................................ 7 Et ønske om å tas seriøst .......................................................................................................... 11 Sammensetning og fremgangsmåte .......................................................................................... 15 Kapittel 2: Rammer for analysen ......................................................................................... 18 2.1 Et ønske om å tas useriøst: «Comic Impetus» .................................................................... 19 Lattersporet ........................................................................................................................... 22 The ‖Tree-headed Monster‖ ................................................................................................. 24 En teatralsk og åpenbar genre .............................................................................................. 25 En diffus og mindre adekvat definisjon ............................................................................... 27 En svak start men iøynefallende avslutning ......................................................................... 31 2.2 «Dokumentarisk realisme»: En dumdristig affære? ........................................................... 34 En rigid visjon .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]