Powerpoint Presentation Template
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CAPE TOWN MEET-UP INFORMATION BRIEFING – 14 FEB 2020 Programme 1. Welcome 2. Cape Town’s commitment to climate action: Transforming the city through climate smart development 3. Competition rules 4. Cape Town’s 4 sites 5. Questions 1 C40 Reinventing Cities Competition sites Gideon Brand – Urban Catalytic Investment 14 February 2020 Cape Town’s 4 sites 1. Athlone station 2. Moquet Farm, Dieprivier 3. Tygerdal, MonteVista station 4. Kapteinsklip station, Mnandi Background – Why these sites? Why these sites? • 10 challenges → Cape Town’s climate action commitment • Transit accessible precincts → strong TOD potential • Lend themselves to mixed-use densification → transformation potential • Contribute to improved urban efficiency • Catalyse wider precinct regeneration opportunities • Forming part of the City’s Catalytic Land Development Programme (CLDP) 5 City spatial strategy 2012 CTSDF 2018 MSDF Atlantis Atlantis Melkbosstrand Melkbosstrand CT CBD CT CBD Bellville Bellville Mitchell’s Mitchell’s Plain Plain Philippi Khayelitsha Approved SF 2016TOD Philippi Hout Bay Hout Bay Khayelitsha Gordon’s Bay Gordon’s Bay Simon’s Town Simon’s Town Spatial transformation requires creation of ACCESS TO MORE OPPORTUNITIES FOR MORE PEOPLE To achieve this, Cape Town has adopted an inward growth and investment focus to support dense, diverse and transit-oriented land uses. Directing spatial transformation Atlantis Spatial Investment Premise Transfor- City City mation CapEx OpEx Melkbosstrand Area Urban Inner City investment priority. Where Core spatial transformation is most Table achievable. Areas of co- Priority Priority View investment between public and Durbanville private sector. Incremental Bellville Growth and Maintenance and upgrading CT CBD Consolidation focus for the City and Subject to Priority incremental growth in support of capacity. spatial transformation. Claremont Airpor t Speculative Beyond City’s investment Wynber horizons. Ability to achieve g Mitchell’ spatial transformation via Philippi s Plain Khayelitsha development is considered Hou Somerset unlikely. t West Zero Zero Bay Privately funded areas. Muizenberg Achieving spatial transformation Gordon’s Bay objectives require significant investment from developer. Simon’s Town Protection To Partnerships based on protecting Limited maintain asset. asset May be May be Unique high high CoCT Catalytic Land Development Programme (CLDP) 8 CoCT Catalytic Land Development Programme (CLDP) 9 C40 Reinventing Cities – Proposed sites 10 C40 Reinventing Cities – Proposed sites 11 Athlone station Athlone station 13 Social vulnerability Household density Athlone station Employment density Monthly income 14 Property value Land ownership Athlone station Sales churn Infrastructure risk 15 Athlone SRA 16 Athlone station Technical considerations • Leverage great location • Rationalised access • Street-building interface • Mixed use, incl public facilities • Upgraded public realm / pedestrianised street landscape • Benefit to the local community • Rezoned to MU in 2019 17 Moquet Farm, Dieprivier Moquet Farm, Dieprivier 19 Moquet Farm, Dieprivier 20 Social vulnerability Household density Moquet Farm, Dieprivier Employment density Monthly income 21 Property value Land ownership Moquet Farm, Dieprivier Sales churn Infrastructure risk 22 Moquet Farm, Dieprivier 23 Moquet Farm, Dieprivier Technical considerations • Potential heritage resource - HWC • Leverage Main Road corridor exposure • Prominent intersection – landmark feature • Linkage to station • NMT opportunity to connect to river corridor • Community benefit – quality open space element 24 Tygerdal depot, MonteVista station Tygerdal, MonteVista station 26 Tygerdal, MonteVista station Monthly incomeMonthly Household Household density Social vulnerabilitySocial Employment density Employment 27 Tygerdal, MonteVista station Land Land ownership Infrastructure Infrastructure risk Sales churn Property valueProperty 28 Tygerdal, MonteVista station Tygerdal, MonteVista station Tygerdal, MonteVista station Technical considerations • Leverage great location • Stormwater function → multi-functional amenity • Open space interface • Station forecourt – Park & Ride facility (multi-purpose parking solution) • Mix of uses / densities / typologies • Active uses at station to facilitate safer environment Kapteinsklip station, Mnandi Kapteinsklip station, Mnandi 33 Social vulnerability Household density Kapteinsklip station, Mnandi Employment density Monthly income 34 Property value Land ownership Kapteinsklip station, Mnandi Sales churn Infrastructure risk 35 Kapteinsklip station, Mnandi 36 Kapteinsklip station, Mnandi 37 Kapteinsklip station, Mnandi Technical considerations • Massive opportunity (30 ha) – phasing • Leverage unique coastal location • Integrate with existing coastal node • Public realm improvement – safe NMT towards Mnandi resort • Development framework, zoning & EIA in place, 2018 • Disused railway strip 38 Kapteinsklip – Development framework X X X X X 39 Kapteinsklip – Development framework 40 Way forward Process & timelines COMPETITION FINAL AWARD LAUNCH 1ST PHASE SHORTLISTING OF THE BID DEC 2019 15 MAY 2020 AUGUST 2020 FEB 2021 nd Official launch of 1st Bidding 2ND Bidding 2 Bidding competition window close window opens window close - - Winning projects Announcement of announced sites - Contracting finalised → 42 Next steps Submit: before 15 May 2020 43 44 Thank You.