DOCSLIB.ORG

White River National Forest Roadless Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
White River National Forest Roadless Areas PROFILES OF WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST..........................................................................................................................5 Adam Mountain, #49 (8,200 acres) ...........................................................................................................................5 Ashcroft, #83 (900 acres)...........................................................................................................................................5 Assignation Ridge, #69 (13,300 acres) ......................................................................................................................6 Baldy Mountain, #67 (6,000 acres)............................................................................................................................7 Basalt Mountain A, #51A (14,000 acres)...................................................................................................................7 Basalt Mountain, #51B (7,400 acres).........................................................................................................................8 Berry Creek, #25 (8,600 acres) ..................................................................................................................................8 Blanco to South Fork A #5A (35,400 acres) and Big Ridge to South Fork B, #5B (6,000 acres) .............................9 Black Lake East, #20 (700 acres) and Black Lake West, #19 (900 acres)...............................................................10 Blair Mountain, #16 (500 acres) ..............................................................................................................................11 Boulder, #27 (1,300 acres) .......................................................................................................................................11 Budges, #14 (1,000 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Buffer Mountain, #33 (11,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................13 Burnt Mountain, #76 (1,600 acres) ..........................................................................................................................13 Chicago Ridge, #59 (5,100 acres)............................................................................................................................14 Corral Creek, #37 (3,100 acres) ...............................................................................................................................15 Crystal River, #70B (6,100 acres)............................................................................................................................15 Deep Creek, #23 (9,900 acres).................................................................................................................................16 Dome Peak, #6 (12,000 acres) .................................................................................................................................17 East Divide/Fourmile Park, #60 (8,700 acres).........................................................................................................18 East Vail, #36 (8,000 acres)......................................................................................................................................18 East Willow, #73 (7,100 acres) ................................................................................................................................19 Elk Creek B, #17B (7,200 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Elliot Ridge, #13 (3,100 acres) ................................................................................................................................20 Fawn Creek–Little Lost Park, #3 (5,400 acres) .......................................................................................................21 Freeman Creek, #28 (1,000 acres) ...........................................................................................................................22 Gallo Hill, #82 (1,400 acres)....................................................................................................................................22 Game Creek, #39 (6,100 acres)................................................................................................................................23 Grizzly Creek, #26 (6,700 acres) .............................................................................................................................23 Gypsum Creek, #48 (17,900 acres)..........................................................................................................................24 Hardscrabble, #44 (11,700 acres).............................................................................................................................25 Hay Park, #70A (11,100 acres) ................................................................................................................................26 Holy Cross City, #58 (800 acres) .............................................................................................................................26 Homestake, #54 (4,100 acres)..................................................................................................................................27 Hoosier Ridge, #56 (6,100 acres).............................................................................................................................27 Housetop Mountain, #62 (12,700 acres)..................................................................................................................28 Hunter, #75 (1,100 acres).........................................................................................................................................29 Little Grand Mesa, #41 (6,500 acres) ......................................................................................................................30 Lower Piney, #12 (13,400 acres)..............................................................................................................................30 Mamm Peak, #55 (25,400 acres) .............................................................................................................................31 Maroon East, #79 (1,400 acres) ...............................................................................................................................32 Maryland Creek, #31 (1,500 acres)..........................................................................................................................32 McClure Pass, #80 (2,200 acres) .............................................................................................................................33 McFarlane, #78 (1,400 acres) ..................................................................................................................................33 Meadow Mountain A, #40A (1,600 acres)...............................................................................................................34 Meadow Mountain B, #40B (3,100 acres)...............................................................................................................34 Morapos A, #1A (23,600 acres) ...............................................................................................................................35 Morapos B, #1B (14,000 acres) ...............................................................................................................................36 Mormon Creek, #64 (3,000 acres) ...........................................................................................................................36 No Name, #57 (3,800 acres) ....................................................................................................................................37 North Elk, #7 (9,900 acres)......................................................................................................................................37 2 3 North Independent A, #77 (4,500 acres) ..................................................................................................................38 North Independent B, #81 (900 acres) .....................................................................................................................39 North Woody, #71 (8,500 acres) ..............................................................................................................................39 Pagoda Peak, #2 (9,200 acres) ................................................................................................................................40 Piney Lake, #30 (900 acres).....................................................................................................................................41 Porcupine Peak, #35 (7,700 acres)...........................................................................................................................41 Ptarmigan A, #21A (2,700 acres), B #21B (1,800 acres), and C #21 C (900 acres)................................................42 Ptarmigan Hill A, #47A (13,100 acres)....................................................................................................................43
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BRECKENRIDGE SKI RESORT PEAK 6 PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RECORD of DECISION August 2012
    PEAK 6 PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Record of Decision AUGUST 2012 USDAUSDA ForestForest ServiceService WhiteWhite RRiveriver NNationalational FForestorest DillonDillon RangerRanger DDistrictistrict The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. BRECKENRIDGE SKI RESORT PEAK 6 PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RECORD OF DECISION August 2012 USDA FOREST SERVICE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION (R2) WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST DILLON RANGER DISTRICT Summit County, Colorado Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Scott Fitzwilliams, Forest Supervisor White River National Forest For Information Contact: Joe Foreman, Winter Sports Administrator Dillon Ranger District PO Box 620 Silverthorne, Colorado 80498 (970) 262-3443 Record of Decision RECORD OF DECISION INTRODUCTION This Record of Decision (ROD) documents my decision to approve selected projects within Breckenridge Ski Resort’s 5,756-acre Special Use Permit (SUP) boundary on the White River National Forest (WRNF) in Summit County, Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2010/228 ON THE COVER Rocky Mountain National Park Photograph by: Billy Schweiger A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2010/228 David M. Theobald1,2 Jill S. Baron2,3 Peter Newman1 Barry Noon4 John B. Norman III1,2 Ian Leinwand1 Sophia E. Linn1 Richard Sherer4 Katherine E. Williams2,5 Melannie Hartman2 1Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1480 2Natural Resource Ecology Lab, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1499 3U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, CO 80523 4Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1474 5Current address: Department of Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071 This report was prepared under Task Order J2380060103 (Cooperative Agreement #H1200040001) July 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail
    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail THE CENTENNIAL STATE The Colorado Rockies are the quintessential CDT experience! The CDT traverses 800 miles of these majestic and challenging peaks dotted with abandoned homesteads and ghost towns, and crosses the ancestral lands of the Ute, Eastern Shoshone, and Cheyenne peoples. The CDT winds through some of Colorado’s most incredible landscapes: the spectacular alpine tundra of the South San Juan, Weminuche, and La Garita Wildernesses where the CDT remains at or above 11,000 feet for nearly 70 miles; remnants of the late 1800’s ghost town of Hancock that served the Alpine Tunnel; the awe-inspiring Collegiate Peaks near Leadville, the highest incorporated city in America; geologic oddities like The Window, Knife Edge, and Devil’s Thumb; the towering 14,270 foot Grays Peak – the highest point on the CDT; Rocky Mountain National Park with its rugged snow-capped skyline; the remote Never Summer Wilderness; and the broad valleys and numerous glacial lakes and cirques of the Mount Zirkel Wilderness. You might also encounter moose, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, marmots, and pika on the CDT in Colorado. In this guide, you’ll find Colorado’s best day and overnight hikes on the CDT, organized south to north. ELEVATION: The average elevation of the CDT in Colorado is 10,978 ft, and all of the hikes listed in this guide begin at elevations above 8,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, sun protection, and extra food, and know that a hike at elevation will likely be more challenging than the same distance hike at sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Southern Stansbury Range Tooele County Utah
    ~+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++"~, i UTAH GEOLOGICAL AND MINERALOGICAL SURVEY I AFFILIATED WITH + i+ + * THE COLLEGE OF MINES AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES .:. i UNIVERSITY OF UTAH I f SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH .r. :t.:. .:- i... :i: * GEOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN :i:.:- i STANSBURY RANGE i + TOOELE COUNTY, UTAH i by .:- .:..:­ 1 John A. Teichert .:- I.:.. .:. I :i: .:­ -:. -:. i I+ * *.1- *+ t Bulletin 65 May, 1959 i + PRICE $1.50 i + +-:. ~++++++++++++++++~1-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++~ UTAH GEOLOGICAL AND MINERALOGICAL SURVEY The Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey was authorized by act of the Utah State Legislature in 1931; however, no funds were made available for its establishment until 1941 when the State Government was reorganized and the Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey was placed within the new State Department of Publicity and Industrial Development where the Survey functioned until July 1, 1949. Effective as of that date, the Survey was trans­ ferred by law to the College of Mines and Mineral Industries, University of Utah. The Utah Code Annotated 1943, Vol. 2, Title 34, as amended by chapter 46 Laws 0/ Utah 1949, provides that the Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey "shall have for its objects": 1. "The collection and distribution of reliable information regarding the mineral resources of the State. 2. "The survey of the geological formations of the State with special ref­ erence to their economic contents, values and uses, such as: the ores of the various metals, coal, oil-shale, hydro-carbons, oil, gas, industrial clays, cement materials. mineral waters and other surface and underground water supplies, mineral fertilizers, asphalt, bitumen, structural materials, road-making ma­ tE,'rials.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • The Pikes Peak Group in Photos
    Pikes Pique The Newsletter of the CMC Pikes Peak Group June, 2019 | No. 257 The Pikes Peak Group in Photos Last Snowshoe at Leadville – by Dean Waits This has indeed been a good snow year, hopefully filling reservoirs and rivers for floaters, wetting our thirsty forest as it certainly satisfied this group’s appetite for our last snowshoe of the season. New Member Orientation L–R: Ruth and Mike Cranford, Elisabeth, Adam, Everett and William Clements, Kim Wetzel (leader), Steve and Susan Waskow, Carmen Laird, L–R: Glenn Barr, Kim Wetzel, Rick Keetch, Tony Sanabria, Eric Hunter Audrey Burkart (leader), Emmy Soeberg, Sylvi Kuperman; kneeling: Jerry (leader), Jim Taylor, Lisa Powell, and Carl Redick. Photo credit Dean Waits. and Sam Laird, Bobbi Leavens and Charlie the Pooch. Photo credit Dean For April the snow was still a few feet deep near Tennessee Pass Waits. as it covered all but the top of one of the several remaining Coke PPG 100th Anniversary Hike to Barr Camp ovens. Yes, it’s been a great snow year for the Sawatch and Mosquito Ranges as explained by Eric Hunter, leader of these adventurous Pikes Peak Group trekkers. It was still cool and the snow relatively firm on this beautiful blue bird sky day, later warming into the 50’s thus softening the snow for this 8-mile jaunt and creating an anticipation for the cold beer and food later. The trail we hiked along is loaded with history and lots of current- day activity. In the 1880’s the Denver, Rio Grande & Western trains chugged along this roadbed to get over the pass and later through a tunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Mesozoic to Cenozoic Cooling Histories of the Flanks of the Northern and Central Rio Grande Rift, Colorado and New Mexico
    New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources A DIVISION OF NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY Late Mesozoic to Cenozoic cooling histories of the flanks of the northern and central Rio Grande rift, Colorado and New Mexico Shari A. Kelley1, Charles E. Chapin2, and Jeff Corrigan3 1Department of Geological Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275; 2New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico 87801; 3ARCO Oil and Gas Company, Plano, Texas 75075 SOCORRO 1992 11 NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY Laurence H. Lattman, President NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES & MINERAL RESOURCES Charles E. Chapin, Director and State Geologist BOARD OF REGENTS Ex Officio Bruce King, Governor of New Mexico Alan Morgan, Superintendent of Public Instruction Appointed Lt. Gen. Leo Marquez, President, 1989-1995, Albuquerque Charles Zimmerly, Secretary/Treasurer, 1991-1997, Socorro Diane D. Denish, 1992-1997, Albuquerque J. Michael Kelly, 1992-1997, Roswell Steve Torres, 1991-1997, Albuquerque BUREAU STAFF ORIN J. ANDERSON, Senior Geologist DEBBIE GOERING, Staff Secretary VIRGINIA McLesion, Economic Geologist RUBEN ARCHULETA, Metallurgical Lab. Tech. Lois GOLLMER, Geotechnical Records Clerk NORMA J. MEEKS, Director of Publications Office Augustus K. ARMSTRONG, USGS Geologist IBRAHIM GUNDILER, Senior Metallurgist BARBARA R. Popp, Chemical lab. Tech. II GEORGE S. AusTIN, Senior Industrial Minerals Geologist STEVE HAASE, Ground-Water Geologist MARSHALL A. REITER, Senior Geophysicist AL BACA, Maintenance Carpenter II WILLIAM C. HANEBERG, Engineering Geologist JACQUES R. RENAULT, Senior Geologist JAMES M. BARKER, Senior Industrial Minerals Geologist JOHN W. HAWLEY, Senior Env. Geologist JAMES M. ROBERTSON, Senior Economic Geologist PAUL W. BAUER, Field Economic Geologist LYNNE HEMENWAY, Computer Pub./Graphics Spec.
    [Show full text]
  • PIKE and SAN ISABEL NATIONAL FORESTS Antelope Creek (6,900 Acres)
    PIKE AND SAN ISABEL NATIONAL FORESTS Antelope Creek (6,900 acres) ......................................................................................................... 3 Aspen Ridge (14,200 acres) ............................................................................................................ 4 Babcock Hole (8,900 acres) ............................................................................................................ 5 Badger Creek (12,400 acres)........................................................................................................... 7 Boreas (10,200 acres)...................................................................................................................... 8 Buffalo Peaks East (5,700 acres) .................................................................................................... 9 Buffalo Peaks South (15,300 acres) .............................................................................................. 10 Buffalo Peaks West (8,300 acres) ................................................................................................. 12 Burning Bear (19,300 acres) ......................................................................................................... 13 Chicago Ridge (5,900 acres) ......................................................................................................... 14 Chipeta (28,700 acres) .................................................................................................................. 15 Cuchara North
    [Show full text]
  • Our Valley—Our Heritage Preserving Hardscrabble Ranch in Brush Creek Valley
    Case Statement for Our Valley—Our Heritage Preserving Hardscrabble Ranch in Brush Creek Valley Eagle Valley Land Trust Prepared by: Robin Thompson June and July 2017 All photos courtesy of Ed Roberson, Mirr Ranch Group | Hearing and Acting on the Call of the Wild If you listen closely you can hear the sound of each step you take, the swish of grass as you walk through it and in the distance, a babbling brook. There are people who live in inner cities who don’t know what that sounds like. Here in the mountains of Colorado, we are in a very unique area where we have that available to us every time we walk out our front door. That is right now. If we don’t act now, it may not be there for our future or our children or grandchildren. Fortunately there is a way that you can help protect this incredible resource today for future generations. And you will be in the company of several other respected organizations, leaders, and concerned citizens. Listen: “We have a unique opportunity to protect this outstanding place, in fact, we believe this is a once in a lifetime opportunity. Eagle County encourages your careful consideration and support for The Conservation Fund’s Protect Initiative application!” Board of County Commissioners Jill H. Ryan Kathy Chandler-Henry Jeanne McQueeney Chair Commissioner Commissioner “The Town has fought to preserve this property for more than 30 years, spending thousands of hours working to mitigate development proposals that had been submitted by the previous property owner. The Town is very excited that an opportunity to protect this beautiful property in perpetuity has finally come to fruition.” Town of Eagle Anne McKibbin Mayor “This campaign is about is being part of something bigger than any single one of us.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2004 Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Citation Information Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado School of Law 401 UCB Boulder, Colorado 80309-0401 2004 Table of Contents SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION ........................................................... 1 I. Overview ................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Specific Special Use Provisions............................................................................................. 1 A. Water Rights ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]