DOCSLIB.ORG

Micronesia OF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Micronesia OF are ’h Jez O A BLUEPRINT FOR CONSERVING THE BIODIVERSITY OF THE FEDERATED STATESmicronesia OF Vision: The Federated States of Micronesia will have more extensive, diverse and higher quality of marine, terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems, which meet human needs and aspirations fairly, pre- serve and utilize traditional knowledge and practices, and fulfill the ecosystem functions necessary for all life on Earth funded and supported by contents Executive Summary 8 1.0 Introduction 10 2.0 The Place and Its People 11 This plan was funded 2.1 Overview of the FSM Ecoregions 11 and supported, and 2.2 Ecological Context 11 2.3 Human Context 14 is owned by: the FSM 3.0 Building a Foundation for Conservation Design 17 National and State Gov- 3.1 Ecoregional Planning Framework 17 3.2 Planning Teams 17 ernments The Nature 3.3 The Planning Process 17 3.4 Conservation Targets 18 Conservancy, U.S. Forest 3.5 Target Occurrences and Viability 22 Service, UNDP-Global 3.6 Conservation Goals 24 Environment Fund, US 4.0 The FSM Conservation Blueprint: the Biological Portfolio 27 4.1 Portfolio Design and Selection 27 Department of the 4.2 The Ecoregional Portfolio 28 4.3 Priority Action Areas 29 Interior. 4.4 Success at Meeting Conservation Goals 30 5.0 Threats Assessment 32 5.1 Critical Threats 32 6.0 Taking Action: Multi-Area Conservation Strategies 36 6.1 Communtiy/Traditional Actions 37 6.2 Government Actions Public Policy 37 6.3 Conservation Plannning 38 6.4 Securing Public Funds 39 7.0 Addressing Data Gaps Looking Toward The Next Generation 40 7.1 Geographic Data Gaps 40 7.2 Conservation Target Data Gaps 40 7.3 Ecoregional Planning Process Gaps and Next Steps 41 This Page: 7. 4 Conclusion 41 Nan Madol ruins on Pohnpei Island 8.0 References 43 Cover Photo: APPENDICES Dausokele Estuary on the north side of Pohnpei Island Appendix A. Detailed Maps of Areas of Biodiversity Significance 48 Appendix B. Detailed List of Conservation Targets 55 Appendix C. Key Terms 71 Appendix D. List of Areas of Biodiversity Significance 72 Appendix E. Criteria for Prioritizing Areas of Biodiversity Significance 91 Appendix F. List of Priority Action Areas 92 Appendix G. Summarized Threats to Areas of Biodiversity Significance 98 2 A BLUEPRINT FOR CONSERVING THE BIODIVERSITY OF THE FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA CONTENTS 3 acknowledgements This plan was a collaboration of many individuals and organizations. It was funded and SCIENCE TEAM supported by: The Nature Conservancy, U.S. Forest Service, UNDP-Global Simpson Abraham Development Review Commission, Kosrae Environment Facility, US Department of the Interior, and the Federated States of To ny Abraham Division of Marine Surveillance, Kosrae Micronesia and respective state governments. Many thanks to all whom gave generously Dr. Steve Amesbury University of Guam Marine Lab, Guam their time and expertise to help protect the extraordinary biodiversity within the Herson Anson Division of Forestry, Pohnpei Federated States of Micronesia. Donald David Division of Marine Development, Pohnpei Ahser Edward College of Micronesia-FSM As will be discussed further in Section 3.2, the contributors were organized into four Okean Ehmes FSM National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan "teams": Coordinator Coordinator, Pohnpei Marjorie Falanruw US Forest Service, Yap David Hinchley The Nature Conservancy TNC, Palau We gratefully ac- Ta rita Holm Palau National Office of Environmental Response and CORE TEAM Coordination, Palau knowledge all those Bill Raynor The Nature Conservancy FSM Country Program Francis Itimai FSM Fisheries Division, Pohnpei Wayne Ostlie The Nature Conservancy Worldwide Office Eugene Joseph Conservation Society of Pohnpei, Pohnpei who contributed pho- Karen Poiani The Nature Conservancy Hawaii Field Office Joe Konno Environmental Protection Agency, Chuuk tos: Jez O'hare, Margie Stuart Sheppard The Nature Conservancy Worldwide Office Willy Kostka Conservation Society of Pohnpei, Pohnpei Audrey Newman The Nature Conservancy Hawaii Field Office Ishmael Lebehn FSM Department of Economic Affairs, Pohnpei Falanruw, Dave Vecella, Donna Shanefelter The Nature Conservancy Hawaii Field Office Patricia Leon The Nature Conservancy, Pohnpei Holly Copeland The Nature Conservancy Wyoming Field Office Steve Lindsay Micronesian Aquaculture and Marine Consultant Services, Pohnpei Pius Liyagel, Charles Dr. Harley Manner Department of Geography, University of Guam Chieng, Patricia Leon, Valentine Martin FSM Fisheries Division, Pohnpei NBSAP STEERING COMMITTEE Madison Nena Kosrae Conservation and Safety Organization, Kosrae and Holly Copeland. Francis Itimal NBSAP Chairman Romeo Osiena Department ofMarine Resources, Chuuk Simpson Abraham Kosrae Island Resource Mgmt. Program, Kosrae Innocente Penno Office of the Governor, Chuuk Yo user Anson Dept of Land & Natural Resources, Pohnpei Dr. Bob Richmond University of Guam Marine Lab Dr. Don Buden College of Micronesia, Pohnpei Andy Tafilicheg Yap Fisheries Division, Yap Jane Chigiyal Dept of Foreign Affairs, Pohnpei Mayoriko Victor The Nature Conservancy, Pohnpei OKean Ehmes NBSAP Project Manager Jane Elymore Dept of Health, Education & Social Affairs, Pohnpei Joseph Giliko Dept of Resources & Development, Yap LOCAL EXPERTS TEAM Edigar Isaac Dept of Finance & Administration, Pohnpei Rooston Abraham Fisheries Development Division, Kosrae Brett Kant Dept of Justice, Pohnpei Simpson Abraham Development Review Commission, Kosrae This Page: Sonia Kephas NBSAP Support Staff To ny Abraham Division of Marine Surveillance, Kosrae Native dances on Yap. Joe Konno Chuuk Environmental Protection Agency, Chuuk Les Aidel Dept. of Division of Commerce and Industry, Kosrae Willy Kostka Conservation Society of Pohnpei, Pohnpei Jackson Albert College of Micronesia Land Grant, Kosrae Ishmael Lebehn Dept of Economic Affairs, Pohnpei Julita Albert Environmental Protection Agency, Chuuk John Mooteb Dept of Economic Affairs, Pohnpei Andy J. Andrew Utwe Resource Management Committee, Kosrae Eugene Pangelinan National Oceanic Resource Management Authority, Pohnpei Sebastian Anefal Department of Economic Affairs, Yap Moses Pretrick Dept of Health Education & Social Affairs, Pohnpei Herson Anson Division of Forestry, Pohnpei Maderson Ramon Dept of Economic Affairs, Pohnpei Jocyleen Anson Division of Surveying & Mapping, Pohnpei Bill Raynor NBSAP Vice Chairman (NGO) Yo user Anson Dept of Land & Natural Resources, Pohnpei Bernard Billimont Municipal Affairs Coordinator, Chuuk Ethan Brown Division of Forestry, Pohnpei Continued on page 6 4 A BLUEPRINT FOR CONSERVING THE BIODIVERSITY OF THE FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5 acknowledgements LOCAL EXPERTS TEAM (CONTINUED) Ty ler McAdam Conservation Society of Pohnpei, Pohnpei Soichy Buliche Commission on Resources and Development, Satowan Len McKenzie Department of Primary Industries, Queensland, Australia Stuart Campbell Department Primary Industries, Cairns, Queensland, Australia Venantius Meryog Division of Marine Resources, Yap Blair P. Charley Development Review Commission, Kosrae Thomas A. Mooh Yap Kathy Chaston Yap Community Action Program, Yap John Mootmag Yap Evironmental Stewardship Consortium, Yap Charles Chieng Yap Community Action Program, Yap Toyo Mori Department of Transportation, Chuuk Eliot Cholymay Department of Education, Chuuk Cyprian Mugunbey Yap Madachiro Christlib State Legislature, Chuuk Dr. V.K. Murukesan Agricultural Experiment Station—Land Grant, College of Carlos Jose Cianchini Isla Caja de Muertos Natural Reserve, Department of Natural Micronesia, Yap Resources, Puerto Rico Madison Nena Kosrae Conservation and Safety Organization, Kosrae Rob Coles Queensland Department of Primary Industries Kosaky Niwwiano Resource Management Committee, Lelu,Kosrae Anne Cummings Development Review Commission, Kosrae Yo shiyuki "Alik" Oda Development Review Commission Rinson Edmond Division of Consumer Services, Department of Commerce Herbert Osawa Environmental Protection Agency, Chuuk and Industry Romio A. Osiena Department of Marine Resources, Chuuk Largo Edwin Peace Corps, Pohnpei Kiupu K. Palik Kosrae Okean Ehmes FSM Department of Economic Affairs Innocente Penno Dept. of Education, Chuuk Konrad Englberger South Pacific Commission, Pohnpei Jackson A. Phillip College of Micronesia-Coop. Ext. Service, Pohnpei Andy George Development Review Commission, Kosrae John Pona Council of Pilung, Yap Singkitchy P. George Department of Commerce and Industry, Kosrae Ted Ratun Yap Yo siwo P. George State Court, Kosrae Ta nseny Reynold Governor's Office/Women Affairs Barb Gimlin Federal Emergency Management Agency, Wash., D.C. Jayson Robert Guide and Assist Through Awareness, Chuuk Kondios Gornelius Department of Land, Kosrae Marcus Rosario Nett District Government, Pohnpei Charlie Hallers Department of Public Affairs (Youth Division), Chuuk Francis Ruegorong Division of Marine Resources, Yap Florencio Harper State Legislature, Chuuk Rudolph Ruethin Division of Marine Resources, Yap John B. Ham Council of Pilung, Yap Nimos Salik Tafunsak Municipal Government, Kosrae Mary Jane Hartman Chuuk Stoner Sanney Resource Management Committee,Walung, Kosrae Bruce Howell Department of Public Works, Kosrae Valentine Santiago Conservation Society of Pohnpei, Pohnpei Peres Ioanis Environmental Protection Agency, Pohnpei Narciso Sebastian Department of Education, Chuuk Melissa Iwamoto Division of Marine Resources, Yap Aaron K. Sigrah Governor's Office, Kosrae Robert H. Jackson Development Review Commission, Kosrae Betty Sigrah Development Review Commission,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chuuk Visitors Bureau P.O BOX 1142 WENO, CHUUK FSM 96942 TEL: (691) 330-4133/330-4480 EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: H 21
    Welcome to CHUUK A Guide to the Historic Wrecks Courtesy Chuuk and Visitors Bureau Island Attractions - Best Wrecks - Island Maps - Activities - History Welcome he many islands within this huge atoll are crowned with Tnatural beauty. The outer barrier reef is punctuated with idyllic sandspits dotted with coconut palms. The high islands in the central lagoon rise into the blue Micronesian skies. The word “Chuuk” means “high mountains” in the Chuukese language. Chuuk State, which is one of four states in the Federated States of Micronesia, consists of 290 islands with 250 islands uninhabited. The islands have natural beauty and most still display a traditional lifestyle. The main population area is within the vast Chuuk Lagoon (sometimes called Truk Lagoon) where the vestiges of WWII attract divers from around the world. The huge inner lagoon is famously known for the “World’s Greatest Wreck Diving.” The islands were heavily attacked by the US in the Second World War then bypassed and blockaded by the Allies. The sunken hulls of Japanese ships remain along with ruined weapons and fortifications on land. Many divers feel it has the best collection of shipwrecks and WWII era airplanes in the world. The hulks have been transformed into amazing “shipreefs”, holding the very best of the undersea world and maritime history at one site. Incredible corals in a kaleidoscope of colors and shapes fed by warm, clear waters attract divers worldwide. The reefs also are home to a great variety of fish and corals. Visitors can see the islands and there are many “picnic islands” that are great for day trips and relaxing.
    [Show full text]
  • Micronesica 37(1) Final
    Micronesica 37(1):163-166, 2004 A Record of Perochirus cf. scutellatus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Ulithi Atoll, Caroline Islands GARY J. WILES1 Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources, 192 Dairy Road, Mangilao, Guam 96913, USA Abstract—This paper documents the occurrence of the gecko Perochirus cf. scutellatus at Ulithi Atoll in the Caroline Islands, where it is possibly restricted to a single islet. This represents just the third known location for the species and extends its range by 975 km. Information gathered to date suggests the species was once more widespread and is perhaps sensitive to human-induced habitat change. The genus Perochirus is comprised of three extant species of gecko native to Micronesia and Vanuatu and an extinct form from Tonga (Brown 1976, Pregill 1993, Crombie & Pregill 1999). The giant Micronesian gecko (P. scutellatus) is the largest member of the genus and was until recently considered endemic to Kapingamarangi Atoll in southern Micronesia, where it is common on many islets (Buden 1998a, 1998b). Crombie & Pregill (1999) reported two specimens resem- bling this species from Fana in the Southwest Islands of Palau; these are consid- ered to be P. cf. scutellatus pending further comparison with material from Kapingamarangi (R. Crombie, pers. comm.). Herein, I document the occurrence of P. cf. scutellatus from an additional site in Micronesia. During a week-long fruit bat survey at Ulithi Atoll in Yap State, Caroline Islands in March 1986 (Wiles et al. 1991), 14 of the atoll’s larger islets com- prising 77% of the total land area were visited. Fieldwork was conducted pri- marily from dawn to dusk, with four observers spending much of their time walking transects through the forested interior of each islet.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Pohnpei Land Use Plan and Implementation Strategy
    ASSESSING POHNPEI LAND USE PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY by Carrie A. Hall Internship Report Submitted To Marine Resource Management Program College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon 97331 1997 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Acknowledgments I would like to thank the University of Micronesia and South Pacific Program for providing me the opportunity to work on Pohnpei and be part of this exciting project. I would also like to express my appreciation for all those I worked with on Pohnpei and who contributed to this project, especially my counterparts Emensio Emperiam and Charles Aiken and fellow technical assistants for all for their help, support, and making my stay in Pohnpei wonderful. A special thanks also, to my advisor Jim Good and graduate committee members Bruce DeYoung and Flaxen Conway for their help and advice with the writing of this internship report. Lastly, I would like to thank my family for their support and all my friends who made my time in Corvallis enjoyable. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 1 BACKGROUND 3 Physical Setting 3 History . 7 Social Setting 9 Population 9 Schooling 9 Family . 10 Religion 10 Social Setting 10 Political Setting 11 Economic Setting 12 LAND USE PLANNING AND ZONING IN POHNPEI 14 Previous Planning Attempts 14 Why Past Attempts May Have Failed and a Possible Remedy 15 Why Past Attempts May Have Failed . 15 Why Community Involvement is Needed 16 Types of Community Involvement . 17 A Possible Remedy . 19 Current Situation . 21 Organization and Initial Structure For Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report on the Present State of Nan Madol, Federated States of Micronesia
    2010 Survey for International Cooperation Japan Consortium for International Cooperarion in Cultual Heritage Survey Report on the Present State of Nan Madol, Federated States of Micronesia March 2012 Japan Consortium for International Cooperation in Cultual Heritage Foreword 1. This is a report on the fiscal 2010 survey conducted by the Japan Consortium for International Cooperation in Cul- tural Heritage in regard to the archaeological site of Nan Madol in the Federated States of Micronesia. 2. The following members were responsible for writing each of the chapters of this report. Writers: Chapters 1, 4, 6 – Tomomi Haramoto Chapters 2, 3 – Osamu Kataoka Chapter 5 – Tomo Ishimura Editor: Tomomi Haramoto, Japan Consortium for International Cooperation in Cultural Heritage i ii Preface The Japan Consortium for International Cooperation in Cultural Heritage (JCIC-Heritage) collects information in various forms to promote Japan’s international cooperation on cultural heritage. Under this scheme of information collection, a cooperation partner country survey was conducted in the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) in fiscal 2010, as presented in this report. It was conducted in response to a request from the UNESCO Apia Office, to provide a foundation of information that would facilitate the first steps toward protecting Nan Madol, the largest cultural heritage site in FSM. Cooperation partner country surveys are one of the primary activities of JCIC-Heritage’s initiatives for interna- tional cooperation. They particularly focus on collecting basic information to identify fields of cooperation and their feasibility in a relevant partner country. As of fiscal 2011, cooperation surveys have been conducted in Laos, Mongo- lia, Yemen, Bhutan, Armenia, Bahrain, and Myanmar, and have effectively assisted Japan’s role in international coop- eration.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Underwater Club
    o Wellington Underwater Club September 2013 Published every two months Contact Us: [email protected] It’s officially Spring [email protected] We are over the hump – the shortest day has long [email protected] past and we are on the way to summer and the longest day. Daylight saving is only a few days Next Club Meetings: away (actually 29th September), and that means 6:00 pm Thistle Inn more after work dives. Last Tuesday of the month 31st August was the Wellington Underwater Club AGM. A dedicated group fronted up to enjoy the th shout and snacks, confirm the Committee and fees 24 September & th and congratulate those who won awards. There 29 October were some changes on the Committee – Alan, Sophie and Klare stood down and Phil relinquished the Treasurer role. Our special thanks to them for Membership Renewal their work for the Club. Read about the AGM and new Committee on p3. It’s that time of year again. An email As it has turned out, Spring is the period when the was sent last week with details about dive community has focused on marine sign up and renewal of membership - conservation issues. Internationally, the fill out membership renewal or new detrimental effects of accumulating debris in the member form and pay your ocean is drawing attention. Locally, right through subscription (cash on a club activity, September there have been opportunities to join in cheque or bank transfer to WUC - beach or underwater clean ups. details on the form). See p3 for fees.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of the Genus Lepidodactylus Fitzinger (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from the Mortlock Islands, Chuuk State, Federated States of Micronesia1
    A New Species of the Genus Lepidodactylus Fitzinger (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from the Mortlock Islands, Chuuk State, Federated States of Micronesia1 Donald W. Buden2 Abstract: A new species in the Group II complex of the gekkonid lizard genus Lepidodactylus Fitzinger is described based on recently collected material from Namoluk Atoll, Mortlock Islands, Chuuk State, Federated States of Micronesia. Lepidodactylus oligoporus Buden, n. sp., is distinguished from other members of Group II by differences in the numbers of midbody scale rows (130–134), fourth-toe scansors (15–19), interorbital scales (34–35), and precloacal/femoral pore-bearing scales (12–15) and by the lack of cloacal spurs and the presence of a moderate amount of webbing between the toes. In body size and scutellation, it most resembles L. novaeguineae Brown & Parker from New Guinea and L. pulcher Boulenger from the Admiralty Islands. The gekkonid genus Lepidodactylus Fit- species (lugubris group) have the terminal as zinger includes 31 species (Uetz et al. 2005) well as several subterminal scansors divided that for the most part are distributed from or notched. Among the 10 species in Group Southeast Asia southward and eastward to II (see Zug et al. 2003), L. paurolepis Ota, the Indo-Australian Archipelago and Oceania Fischer, Ineich & Case from Palau is the (Bauer and Henle 1994, Ota et al. 2000, Zug only one recorded from the Caroline Islands, et al. 2003). With the exception of the par- a chain of high volcanic islands and many thenogenetic L. lugubris (Dumeril & Bibron) more low coralline atolls spanning approxi- and its two parental species (Radtkey et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationships of the Starlings (Sturnidae: Sturnini) and the Mockingbirds (Sturnidae: Mimini)
    THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE STARLINGS (STURNIDAE: STURNINI) AND THE MOCKINGBIRDS (STURNIDAE: MIMINI) CHARLESG. SIBLEYAND JON E. AHLQUIST Departmentof Biologyand PeabodyMuseum of Natural History,Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511 USA ABSTRACT.--OldWorld starlingshave been thought to be related to crowsand their allies, to weaverbirds, or to New World troupials. New World mockingbirdsand thrashershave usually been placed near the thrushesand/or wrens. DNA-DNA hybridization data indi- cated that starlingsand mockingbirdsare more closelyrelated to each other than either is to any other living taxon. Some avian systematistsdoubted this conclusion.Therefore, a more extensiveDNA hybridizationstudy was conducted,and a successfulsearch was made for other evidence of the relationshipbetween starlingsand mockingbirds.The resultssup- port our original conclusionthat the two groupsdiverged from a commonancestor in the late Oligoceneor early Miocene, about 23-28 million yearsago, and that their relationship may be expressedin our passerineclassification, based on DNA comparisons,by placing them as sistertribes in the Family Sturnidae,Superfamily Turdoidea, Parvorder Muscicapae, Suborder Passeres.Their next nearest relatives are the members of the Turdidae, including the typical thrushes,erithacine chats,and muscicapineflycatchers. Received 15 March 1983, acceptedI November1983. STARLINGS are confined to the Old World, dine thrushesinclude Turdus,Catharus, Hylocich- mockingbirdsand thrashersto the New World. la, Zootheraand Myadestes.d) Cinclusis
    [Show full text]
  • (SPREP) Compile and Review Invasive Alien Species Infor
    Report for the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) Compile and Review Invasive Alien Species Information for the Federated States of Micronesia and its constituent states Chuuk, Kosrae, Pohnpei and Yap March 2015 Shyama Pagad Biodiversity Data Management Ltd. Programme Officer, IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group 1 Table of Contents Glossary and Definitions ....................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Key Information Sources ....................................................................................................................... 6 SECTION 1 .............................................................................................................................................. 8 Alien and Invasive Species in FSM and constituent States of Chuuk, Kosrae, Pohnpei and Yap ...... 8 Results of information review .............................................................................................................. 8 SECTION 2 ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Pathways of introduction and spread of invasive alien species ....................................................... 10 SECTION 3 ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Market Forces and Nearshore Fisheries Management in Micronesia
    October 2011 Asia Pacific Conservation Region Marine Program Report No 6/11 An Interdisciplinary Study of Market Forces and Nearshore Fisheries Management in Micronesia “Fisheries are complex social–ecological systems that need to be managed by addressing problems related not only to the resources themselves but to the people targeting them” (Gutiérrez et al. 2011) Report by: Kevin L. Rhodes1, Kimberley Warren-Rhodes2, Peter Houk3 Javier Cuetos-Bueno4 and Quentin Fong5 October 2011 Asia Pacific Conservation Region Marine Program Report No 6/11 An Interdisciplinary Study of Market Forces and Nearshore Fisheries Management in Micronesia “Fisheries are complex social–ecological systems that need to be managed by addressing problems related not only to the resources themselves but to the people targeting them.” (Gutiérrez et al. 2011) Report by: Kevin L. Rhodes1 Kimberley Warren-Rhodes2 Peter Houk3 Javier Cuetos-Bueno4 Quentin Fong5 Authors’ Affiliations: 1 Pacific Marine Science and Conservation, Grass Valley, CA, USA 2 NASA-Ames, Moffett Field, CA, USA 3 Pacific Marine Resources Institute, Saipan, Commonwealth of the Northern Marina Islands 4 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, San Diego, CA, USA 5 Alaska Sea Grant Marine Advisory Program, University of Alaska, Kodiak, AK, USA Corresponding Author: Kevin L. Rhodes – Pacific Marine Science and Conservation, Grass Valley, CA, USA; [email protected] Suggested Citation: Rhodes, K.L., Warren-Rhodes, K., Houk, P., Cuetos-Bueno, J., Fong, Q. and Hoot, W. 2011. An Interdisciplinary Study of Market Forces and Nearshore Fisheries Management in Micronesia. A Report of the Marine Program of the Asia Pacific Conservation Region, The Nature Conservancy. Report No. 6/11.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Development Project
    Project Number: 49450-023 November 2019 Pacific Renewable Energy Investment Facility Federated States of Micronesia: Renewable Energy Development Project This document is being disclosed to the public in accordance with ADB’s Access to Information Policy. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS The currency unit of the Federated States of Micronesia is the United States dollar. ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BESS – battery energy storage system COFA – Compact of Free Association DOFA – Department of Finance and Administration DORD – Department of Resources and Development EIRR – economic internal rate of return FMR – Financial Management Regulations FSM – Federated States of Micronesia GDP – gross domestic product GHG – greenhouse gas GWh – gigawatt-hour KUA – Kosrae Utilities Authority kW – kilowatt kWh – kilowatt-hour MW – megawatt O&M – operation and maintenance PAM – project administration manual PIC – project implementation consultant PUC – Pohnpei Utilities Corporation TA – technical assistance YSPSC – Yap State Public Service Corporation NOTE In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars unless otherwise stated. Vice-President Ahmed M. Saeed, Operations 2 Director General Ma. Carmela D. Locsin, Pacific Department (PARD) Director Olly Norojono, Energy Division, PARD Team leader J. Michael Trainor, Energy Specialist, PARD Team members Tahmeen Ahmad, Financial Management Specialist, Procurement, Portfolio, and Financial Management Department (PPFD) Taniela Faletau, Safeguards Specialist, PARD Eric Gagnon, Principal Procurement Specialist,
    [Show full text]
  • Jungle Myna (Acridotheres Fuscus)
    Invasive animal risk assessment Biosecurity Queensland Agriculture Fisheries and Department of Jungle myna Acridotheres fuscus Steve Csurhes First published 2011 Updated 2016 © State of Queensland, 2016. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ deed.en" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Front cover: Jungle myna Photo: Used with permission, Wikimedia Commons. Invasive animal risk assessment: Jungle myna Acridotheres fuscus 2 Contents Summary 4 Introduction 5 Identity and taxonomy 5 Description and biology 5 Diet 5 Reproduction 5 Preferred habitat and climate 6 Native range and global distribution 6 Current distribution and impact in Queensland 6 History as a pest overseas 7 Use 7 Potential distribution and impact in Queensland 7 References 8 Invasive animal risk assessment: Jungle myna Acridotheres fuscus 3 Summary Acridotheres fuscus (jungle myna) is native to an extensive area of India and parts of southeast Asia. Naturalised populations exist in Singapore, Taiwan, Fiji, Western Samoa and elsewhere. In Fiji, the species occasionally causes significant damage to crops of ground nuts, with crop losses of up to 40% recorded. Within its native range (South India), it is not a well documented pest, but occasionally causes considerable (localised) damage to fruit orchards.
    [Show full text]