FACT SHEET TWO RIVERS Two Rivers, a joint venture between African Rainbow Minerals (ARM) (54%) and Implats (46%), is managed by ARM. The operation is situated on the farm Dwarsrivier on the southern part of the eastern limb of the Bushveld Complex some 35 kilometers south-west of in , . The operation comprises two on-reef decline shafts and a concentrator plant and has a life-of-mine offtake agreement with Impala Refining Services (IRS). In FY2020, Two Rivers produced 6E in concentrate production of 261 000 ounces.

Regional locality map showing PGM mineral rights and

Regionalinfrastructure locality map showing PGM in mineralthe Two rights and Rivers surroundings infrastructure in the Two Rivers surroundings

24°37'30''S 24°37'30''S MODIKWA 15' E R37 (ARM – Amplats) 30 ° 0° E 3 30 °3 0' E

BURGERSFORT

STEELPOORT

24°45'S 24°45'S R37

KENNEDY'S VALE (Eastplats)

R555

TWO RIVERS PLATINUM

MOTOTOLO 25°S (Glencore – Amplats) 25°S

R37 DER BROCHEN (Amplats)

LYDENBURG R540 R577 BOOYSENDAL (Northam Platinum)

R577 E 0 5 10 ' 30°3 0 30° E Scale (km) 25°15'S 25°15'S 30°15' E

2 GEOLOGY

Both the Merensky and underlying UG2 Reefs occur on the property but only the UG2 is currently exploited. The UG2 outcrops in the Klein Dwarsrivier valley over a north-south strike length of 7.5 kilometres and dips to the west at about 7 to 10 degrees. The vertical separation between the Merensky and UG2 Reefs is around 140 to 160 metres. Due to the extreme topography, the Merensky reef outcrops further up the mountain slope and also results in the UG2 occurring at a depth of 1 650 metres below surface on the south-western boundary.

Three distinct reef types have been defined for the UG2 Reef at Two Rivers, namely the ‘normal reef’ with a thick main chromitite layer; a ‘split reef’ characterised by an internal pyroxenite/norite lens within the main chromitite layer; and a ‘multiple split reef’ with numerous pyroxenite/norite lenses occuring within the main chromitite layer.

Mineral Resources (inclusive reporting) as at 30 June 2020 6E Grade Category Tonnes (Mt) Width (cm) 4E Grade (g/t) 6E (Moz) (g/t) indicated 75.7 210 3.13 3.42 8.3 Merensky inferred 61.4 145 3.98 4.32 8.5

measured 14.4 148 4.66 5.65 2.6 UG2 indicated 83.8 143 4.77 5.73 15.4 inferred 80.3 120 4.47 5.33 13.8 Total 315.5 4.14 4.80 48.7 Mineral Reserves as at 30 June 2020 6E Grade Orebody Category Tonnes (Mt) Width (cm) 4E Grade (g/t) 6E (Moz) (g/t) proved 4.6 242 2.79 3.41 0.5 UG2 probable 58.6 243 2.95 3.57 6.7 Total 63.2 2.94 3.55 7.2

3 INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION SCENE SCENE THE DETAILSTHE DETAILS – MINERAL – MINERAL RESOURCES RESOURCES AND OVERVIEWAND OVERVIEW SETTINGSETTING AND MINERALAND MINERAL RESERVES RESERVES APPENDICESAPPENDICES

TwoTwo Rivers Rivers

GeneralisedGeneralised geological geological succession succession of the of the upperupper portion portion of the of Critical Zone the Critical Zone at Two at RiversTwo Rivers Two RiversTwo Rivers – Merensky – Merensky

Q Q Q Legend Q Pt Q PtPd Q Pd 6E 6E Legend 100 100 GabbroGabbro Width (±Width m) (± m) AnorthositeAnorthosite Norite 50 50 Norite Main MainZone Zone PyroxenitePyroxenite ChromititeChromitite 0 0 PegmatoidPegmatoid Not to Notscale to scale -50

-50 Width (cm) Width (cm)

-100 -100 66 66 BastardBastard Hangingwall Hangingwall

-150 -150 0 0 5 5 10 10 Grade (g/t)Grade (g/t) 0.3 0.3 BastardBastard Reef Reef O PyroxeniteO PyroxeniteO PegmatoidO PegmatoidO Anorthosite/noriteO Anorthosite/noriteO ChromititeO Chromitite 8 8 MerenskyMerensky Hangingwall Hangingwall

Two RiversTwo Rivers – UG2 – UG2(split) (split) 3 3 MerenskyMerensky Reef Reef Q Q Q Q Pt Q PtPd Q Pd 6E 6E 200 200 150 150 100 100 12 12 MerenskyMerensky Footwall Footwall 1 1 50 50 0 0 0.3 Merensky Footwall 2 -50 -50 0.3 Merensky Footwall 2 -100 -100

Width (cm) 11

Width (cm) Merensky Footwall 3 to 5 -150 -150 11 Merensky Footwall 3 to 5 -200 -200 8 -250 -250 8 MerenskyMerensky Footwall Footwall 6 6 -300 -300 -350 -350 0 0 3 3 6 6 9 9 12 12 Grade (g/t)Grade (g/t) 70 70 MerenskyMerensky Footwall Footwall 7 7 O PyroxeniteO PyroxeniteO PegmatoidO PegmatoidO Anorthosite/noriteO Anorthosite/noriteO ChromititeO Chromitite

Two RiversTwo Rivers – UG2 – UG2(normal) (normal) 50 50 UG2 HangingwallUG2 Hangingwall Q Q Q Q Pt Q PtPd Q Pd 6E 6E 200 200

150 150 4 4 UG2 HangingwallUG2 Hangingwall 100 100

50 50 INTRODUCTION SCENE THE DETAILS – MINERAL RESOURCES 0 AND OVERVIEW SETTING AND MINERAL RESERVES APPENDICES 0 Width (cm) 2.5 Width (cm) 2.5 UG2 ReefUG2 Reef -50 -50 -100 -100 Two Rivers -150 -150 70 0 0 5 5 10 10 70 UG2 FootwallUG2 Footwall Generalised geological succession of the Grade (g/t)Grade (g/t) upper portion of the Critical Zone at Two Rivers O O O O Two Rivers – Merensky O Pyroxenite PyroxeniteO Pegmatoid PegmatoidO Anorthosite/norite Anorthosite/noriteO Chromitite Chromitite

Q Pt Q Pd Q 6E Legend 100 Gabbro Width (± m) Anorthosite 50 Norite Main Zone Pyroxenite Chromitite Two RiversTwo Rivers Merensky Merensky 6E metal 6E metal ratio ratio Two RiversTwo Rivers UG2 UG26E metal 6E metal ratio0 ratio Pegmatoid Not to scale as at 30as Juneat 30 2020 June (%)2020 (%) as at 30as Juneat 30 2020 June (%)2020INTRODUCTION (%) -50 SCENE THE DETAILS – MINERAL RESOURCES Width (cm) Two Rivers Merensky 6E metal ratio as at 30 June 2020 Two Rivers UG2 6EAND metalOVERVIEW ratioSETTING as at 30 JuneAND MINERAL 2020 RESERVES APPENDICES -100 66 Bastard Hangingwall

Pt Pt 53.7 53.7 Pt Pt -150 45.8 45.8 Pt 0 5 48.104 Two Rivers Grade (g/t) Pd Pd 29.1 29.1 Pd Pd 27.5 27.5 0.3 Bastard Reef Pd O Pyroxenite26.2O Pegmatoid O Anorthosite/norite O Chromitite Rh3.2 3.2 Rh 8.5 8.5 8 Merensky Hangingwall Rh Rh 8.4 Generalised geological succession of the upper portion of the Critical Zone at Two Rivers Ru Ru 6.8 6.8 Two Rivers – Merensky Ru Ru 14.0Two14.0 Rivers – UG2 (split) Ru 12.0 3 Merensky Reef Q Q Q Q Pt Q Pd Q 6E Pt Pd 6E Legend 1.2Ir 1.2 100 Ir 3.4 3.4 200 Gabbro Ir Ir 3.9 Width (± m) Ir 150 Anorthosite Norite 5.9 50 0.8 100 12 Merensky Footwall 1 Au Au 5.9 Au 0.8Au 50 Main Zone Pyroxenite Au 1.0 Chromitite 0 0 Pegmatoid -50 0.3 Merensky Footwall 2 00 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40%40% 50% 50% 60% 60% 0 0 10% 10% 20%-100 20% 30%30% 40% 40% 50%Not50% to scale INTRODUCTION -50 SCENE THE DETAILS – MINERAL RESOURCES0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Width (cm) 11 Width (cm) Merensky Footwall 3 to 5 (%) AND OVERVIEW SETTING AND MINERAL RESERVES APPENDICES -150 (%) (%) -200 (%) 66(%) -100 -250 Bastard Hangingwall 8 Merensky Footwall 6 MerenskyMerensky metal ratiosmetal metal derivedratios ratios derived from derived the from Mineral from the Mineralthe Resource Mineral Resource estimate. Resources estimate. estimate. UG2 metal metalUG2 ratiosmetal ratios derivedratios derived derived from from the from-300 Mineralthe the Mineral Mineral Reserve Resources Reserve estimate. estimate. estimate. -150 -350 0 5 10 0 3 6 9 12 Two Rivers Grade (g/t) Grade (g/t) 70 Merensky Footwall 7 O 0.3Pyroxenite O PegmatoidBastardO Anorthosite/norite Reef O Chromitite O Pyroxenite O Pegmatoid O Anorthosite/norite O Chromitite IMPLATSIMPLATS MINERAL RESOURCE8 AND MINERAL RESERVEMerensky STATEMENT Hangingwall 2020 77 Two Rivers Generalised geological successionMINERAL of the RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE STATEMENT 2020 77 upper portion of the Critical Zone at Two Rivers TwoTwo Rivers Rivers - Merensky – Merensky TwoTwo Rivers Rivers - UG2 – UG2 (split) (split) TwoTwo Rivers Rivers - UG2 – UG2 (normal) (normal) 3 Merensky Reef 50 UG2 Hangingwall Q Q Q Q Pt Q Pd Q 6E Q Pt Q Pd Q 6E Legend Pt Pd 6E 100 Gabbro 200 Width (± m) 200 150 planning. AnorthositeThe mine scheduling of the two declines is done Mining methods and mine planning Norite 50 100 150 Main Zonein DataminePyroxenite Studio 5D Planner™.12 The scheduleMerensky is evaluated Footwall 1 4 UG2 Hangingwall The UG2 orebody is accessed via two decline shaft systems50 Chromitite 100 0 0 Pegmatoid situated 3km apart, namely the Main Decline and the-50 North against the grade and thickness50 0.3 block model.Merensky The three Footwall distinct 2 Not to scale -50 -100 0 Width (cm) Width (cm) reef types including normal-, split reef and multiple split reef facies, 2.5 Decline. Reef production is through a fully mechanisedWidth (cm) -150 bord 11 Merensky Footwall 3 to 5 UG2 Reef -200 -50 and-100 pillar stoping method. A mining section consists of66 6m, 8m Bastardimpact Hangingwall signifi cantly on the mine plan. Dilution calculations are -250 8 Merensky Footwall 6 -100 and 10m bords, with pillar sizes increasing with depth-300 below based on the specifi c reef type. Hangingwall and footwall -150 -350 -150 0 5 10 surface. The pillars are 6m x 6m to 12m x 12m in size.0 The bords3 6 overbreak,9 percentage12 off-reef,0 ore remaining (mining5 losses), 10 70 UG2 Footwall Grade (g/t) Grade (g/t) 70 MerenskyGrade (g/t) Footwall 7 0.3 geological losses (potholes, faults, dykes and replacement are mined mainly on strike. A 3D geological model withO layer O BastardO Reef O O Pyroxenite O Pegmatoid O Anorthosite/norite O Chromitite Pyroxenite Pegmatoid Anorthosite/norite Chromitite O Pyroxenite O Pegmatoid O Anorthosite/norite O Chromitite pegmatoid) and a shaft call factor are applied to the planned areas grades and widths per stratigraphic unit is used in the mine8 Merensky Hangingwall to generate the tonnage and grade profi les. Two Rivers – UG2 (split) Two Rivers – UG2 (normal) 3 Merensky Reef Two Rivers50 Merensky 6E metalUG2 ratioHangingwall Two Rivers UG2 6E metal ratio Q Pt Q Pd Q 6E Q Pt Q Pd Q 6E as at 30 June 2020 (%) as at 30 June 2020 (%) 200 200 150 Two100 Rivers 20-year estimated LoM platinum ounce150 12 profile Merensky Footwall 1 Pt 53.7 Pt 45.8 50 4 UG2 Hangingwall as at 30 June 2020 (in concentrate) 100 Impala0 20-year estimated LoM platinum ounce profile as at 30 June 2020 (in concentrate) Pd 29.1 Pd 27.5 -50 50 0.3 Merensky Footwall 2 -100 Rh 3.2 Rh 8.5

Width (cm) 0 Width (cm) 11 Merensky Footwall 3 to 5 2.5 UG2 Reef -150 180 -200 -50 Ru 6.8 Ru 14.0 -250 160 8 Merensky Footwall 6 -100 1.2 3.4 -300 140 Ir Ir -350 -150 5.9 0.8 0120 3 6 9 12 Au Au 0 5 10 70 UG2 Footwall Grade (g/t) 100 70 MerenskyGrade (g/t) Footwall 7 O Pyroxenite O Pegmatoid O Anorthosite/norite O Chromitite 0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 80 O Pyroxenite O Pegmatoid O Anorthosite/norite O Chromitite (%) (%) 60 40 Merensky metal ratios derived from the Mineral Resource estimate. UG2 metal ratios derived from the Mineral Reserve estimate.

Two RiversPt Koz in concentrate 20 – UG2 (normal) 0 Two Rivers50 Merensky 6E metalUG2 Hangingwallratio Two Rivers UG2 6E metal ratio Q Pt Q Pd Q 6E as at 30 June 2020 (%) as at 30 June 2020 (%) IMPLATS MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE STATEMENT 2020 77 200 2021 2040 150 Pt 4 UG2 Hangingwall 53.7 Pt 45.8 100 Pd 29.1 Pd 27.5 50 Q LoM I Q LoM II Q LoM III 3.2 8.5 0 Rh Rh Width (cm) 2.5 UG2 Reef -50 Ru 6.8 Ru 14.0

-100 Ir 1.2 Ir 3.4 -150Two Rivers 20-year estimated LoM palladium ounce profile Au 5.9 Au 0.8 4 as at0 30 June 2020 (in concentrate)5 10 70 UG2 Footwall Grade (g/t) 0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% O Pyroxenite O Pegmatoid O Anorthosite/norite O Chromitite (%) (%) 100 Merensky metal ratios derived from the Mineral Resource estimate. UG2 metal ratios derived from the Mineral Reserve estimate. 80 Two Rivers Merensky 6E metal ratio Two Rivers UG2 6E metal ratio as at 30 June 2020 (%) as at 30 June 2020 (%) IMPLATS 60 MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE STATEMENT 2020 77

Pt 40 53.7 Pt 45.8

Pd 20 29.1 Pd 27.5 Rh Pd Koz in concentrate 3.2 Rh 8.5 0 Ru 6.8 Ru 14.0

Ir 1.2 Ir 3.4 2021 2040

Au 5.9 Au 0.8 Q LoM I Q LoM II Q LoM III 0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% (%) (%) Merensky metal ratios derived from the Mineral Resource estimate. UG2 metal ratios derived from the Mineral Reserve estimate. The estimated 20-year LoM profi le for Two Rivers is shown above. Mineral Reserves refl ect the width and grade delivered to the mill IMPLATS LoM I constitutes production from the Main and North DeclineMINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERALrather RESERVE than STATEMENT an in 2020 situ channel77 grade quoted in respect of the Mineral Shafts. LoM II is an extension of the Main Decline infrastructure Resources. The modifying factors used in the UG2 Mineral Reserve into the Kalkfontein RE and portions 1 and 2. The UG2 at estimate are based on the mine plan, which envisages a Buffelshoek is excluded and does not form part of LOM II. The mechanised bord and pillar layout. No Inferred Mineral Resources profi le is based on assumptions and may change in future. Trial have been converted into Mineral Reserves. The Mineral Reserve mining and a feasibility study was conducted in 2012/13 on the estimates are refl ected in both 4E and 6E formats. Rounding of Merensky Reef. There is currently a feasibility study in progress numbers may result in minor computational discrepancies. The on the Merensky Reef. results tabulated in this report must be read as estimates and not as calculations. More details regarding the Mineral Resources and It should be noted that the Mineral Reserve estimate is the result of Mineral Reserves can be found in the 2020 African Rainbow the planning process applied against the Measured and Indicated Minerals (ARM) annual report (www.arm.co.za). Mineral Resources only, through the application of detailed modifying factors; importantly, it should be noted that this process The conversion and classifi cation of Mineral Reserves at is subjected to rigorous economic viability testing at given market Two Rivers is informed by: conditions. • Economic testing at given market conditions (price deck) • Most of the Indicated Mineral Resources can be classifi ed Mineral Reserve estimation and reconciliation as Probable Mineral Reserves The updated Mineral Reserve estimates refl ect total estimates • Most of the Measured Mineral Resources can be classifi ed for Two Rivers as at 30 June 2020. Corresponding estimated as Proved Mineral Reserves. attributable Mineral Reserve estimates are tabulated on page 35.

IMPLATS 80 MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE STATEMENT 2020 Two Rivers

Mining methods and mine planning planning. The mine scheduling of the two declines is done The UG2 orebody is accessed via two decline shaft systems in Datamine Studio 5D Planner™. The schedule is evaluated situated 3km apart, namely the Main Decline and the North against the grade and thickness block model. The three distinct Decline. Reef production is through a fully mechanised bord reef types including normal-, split reef and multiple split reef facies, and pillar stoping method. A mining section consists of 6m, 8m impact signifi cantly on the mine plan. Dilution calculations are and 10m bords, with pillar sizes increasing with depth below based on the specifi c reef type. Hangingwall and footwall surface. The pillars are 6m x 6m to 12m x 12m in size. The bords overbreak, percentage off-reef, ore remaining (mining losses), are mined mainly on strike. A 3D geological model with layer geological losses (potholes, faults, dykes and replacement grades and widths per stratigraphic unit is used in the mine pegmatoid) and a shaft call factor are applied to the planned areas to generate the tonnage and grade profi les.

Two Rivers 20-year estimated LoM platinum ounce profile as at 30 June 2020 (in concentrate)

180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40

Pt Koz in concentrate 20 0 2021 2040

Q LoM I Q LoM II Q LoM III

Two Rivers 20-year estimated LoM palladium ounce profile Impalaas at 30 20-yearJune 2020 estimated(in concentrate) LoM palladium ounce profile as at 30 June 2020 (in concentrate)

100

80

60

40

20 Pd Koz in concentrate 0 2021 2040

Q LoM I Q LoM II Q LoM III

The estimated 20-year LoM profi le for Two Rivers is shown above. Mineral Reserves refl ect the width and grade delivered to the mill LoM I constitutes production from the Main and North Decline rather than an in situ channel grade quoted in respect of the Mineral Shafts. LoM II is an extension of the Main Decline infrastructure Resources. The modifying factors used in the UG2 Mineral Reserve into the Kalkfontein RE and portions 1 and 2. The UG2 at estimate are based on the mine plan, which envisages a MININGBuffelshoek is excluded and does not form part of LOM II. The mechanised bord and pillar layout. No Inferred Mineral Resources profi le is based on assumptions and may change in future. Trial have been converted into Mineral Reserves. The Mineral Reserve mining and a feasibility study was conducted in 2012/13 on the estimates are refl ected in both 4E and 6E formats. Rounding of Merensky Reef. There is currently a feasibility study in progress numbers may result in minor computational discrepancies. The on the Merensky Reef. results tabulated in this report must be read as estimates and not as calculations. More details regarding the Mineral Resources and TheIt should UG2 be noted orebody that the Mineral is accessed Reserve estimate via is two the result decline of Mineralshaft Reserves systems can be situated found in the 2020three African kilometres Rainbow the planning process applied against the Measured and Indicated Minerals (ARM) annual report (www.arm.co.za). apart,Mineral Resources namely only, the through Main the applicationDecline of and detailed the North Decline. Underground mining operations are fullymodifying mechanised factors; importantly, and it should the bordbe noted and that this pillar process mining The method conversion isand employed classifi cation of whereMineral Reserves stoping at widths is subjected to rigorous economic viability testing at given market Two Rivers is informed by: averageconditions. around 1.8 metres. A mining section consists• Economic testingof eight at given 12 market metre conditions rooms, (price deck)with pillar • Most of the Indicated Mineral Resources can be classifi ed sizesMineral increasing Reserve estimation with depth and reconciliation below surface. as Probable Mineral Reserves The updated Mineral Reserve estimates refl ect total estimates • Most of the Measured Mineral Resources can be classifi ed for Two Rivers as at 30 June 2020. Corresponding estimated as Proved Mineral Reserves. attributable Mineral Reserve estimates are tabulated on page 35.

80 IMPLATS METALLURGYMINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE STATEMENT 2020

Two Rivers has a concentrator plant on site, where initial processing is done. It comprises a standard MF2 design as generally used in the industry. Concentrate is transported by road to Impala’s Mineral Processes in Rustenburg where further processing takes place in terms of an agreement with Impala Refining Services (IRS). A 40 000 tonne per month plant expansion project is due to be commissioned during FY2022. sustainable development

Two Rivers is committed to social development initiatives and engages in, develops and builds community relationships. It takes responsibility for economic, social and environmental issues that impact its people, communities and environments and is involved in a number of community projects in the area. The Two Rivers Platinum Community Forum was established primarily to share information about the mine with local communities and to set up a network for social upliftment projects.

5 history

Platinum was first discovered in the area by renowned explorer Hans Merensky on the nearby farm Maandagshoek (now Modikwa Platinum) in the 1920s. During 2001, Assmang elected to dispose of its platinum interests at the Dwarsrivier Chrome mine. Two Rivers Platinum, the JV between Avmin and Implats, secured the platinum rights in December of that year. Subsequent corporate activity involving Avmin, ARM and Harmony resulted in the transfer of Avmin’s share in Two Rivers to a new, empowered platinum entity, ARM Platinum, a division of ARM. The joint venture partners began development of the Two Rivers project in June 2005. The concentrator plant was commissioned early in FY2007 and in FY2008 the mine successfully made the transition from project to operation.

In 2015 portions 4, 5 and 6 of the farm Kalkfontein, as well as a portion of the farm Tweefontein, were incorporated into the Two Rivers mining right. An agreement was also reached for the remaining Implats-owned mineral rights on portions of the farms Kalkfontein and Buffelshoek in exchange for a royalty payment.

BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT

ARM was founded in 2004 as South Africa’s first black-owned mining company. Two Rivers complies with the BEE equity component of the Mining Charter while all other aspects of the Charter are dealt with at an operational level. The operation subscribes to the transformation of South African business by actively promoting BEE ownership and employing local SMEs (small- and medium-sized enterprises).

6 TWO RIVERS – key statistics

TWO RIVERS – KEY STATISTICS FY2020 FY2019 Production Tonnes milled ex mine (000t) 3 016 3 405 Headgrade (6E) (g/t) 3.45 3.52 6E in concentrate (000oz) 261 313 Labour efficiency Tonnes milled per employee costed** (t/man/annum) 911 1 070 Cost Mining cost of sales (Rm) (3 394) (3 064) Mining operations (Rm) ( 2016) (2 103) Processing operations (Rm) (467) (448) Other (Rm) (911) (513)

(Rm) 2 483 2 551 Total cost (US$m) 158 180

Unit costs (R/t) 823 749 per tonne milled (US$/t) 53 53 (R/oz) 9 513 8 140 per 6E ounce in concentrate (US$/oz) 607 574 Financial ratios Gross margin ex mine (%) 45.3 23.9 Capital expenditure (Rm) 800 571 (US$m) 51 40 Safety LTIFR (pmmhw+) 2.03 2.4 FIFR (pmmhw+) – – Labour complement Own employees (no) 2 365 2 336 Contractors (no) 964 925

7 CONTACT DETAILS

HEAD OFFICE 2 Fricker Road, Illovo, 2196 Private Bag X18, Northlands, 2116 Tel: +27 (11) 731 9000 E-mail: [email protected] www.implats.co.za

Group Executive: Corporate Affairs Johan Theron Tel: +27 (11) 731 9013 E-mail: [email protected]

Executive: Corporate Affairs Emma Townshend Tel: +27 (21) 794 8345 E-mail: [email protected]

Group Head: Corporate Communications Alice Lourens Tel: +27 (11) 731 9033 E-mail: [email protected]

DECEMBER 2020