DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the Mid Term Review of the Project: Enhancing Climate Resilience of the Vulnerable Communities and Ecosystems in Somalia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the Mid Term Review of the Project: Enhancing Climate Resilience of the Vulnerable Communities and Ecosystems in Somalia Report of the Mid Term Review of the Project: Enhancing Climate Resilience of the Vulnerable Communities and Ecosystems in Somalia A Project of the Government of Somalia, the United Nations Development Programme and the Global Environment Facility July 2017 Dennis Fenton, Team Leader Ismail Abdullahi Elmi, Puntland Mukhtar Mohamoud Abdillahi, Somaliland Mid‐Term Review Report Undertaken during April – May, 2017, by Ismail Abdullahi Elmi, Mukhtar Mohamoud Abdillahi and Dennis Fenton Government of Somalia United Nations Development Programme Least Developed Countries Fund for Climate Change Country: PIMS Number 5268 Somalia Atlas Project Number 00084974 Project Type FSP x MSP EA Implementing Agency UNDP Somalia (Direct Implementation Modality) GEF Focal Area Climate Change UNDP Strategic Plan (2014 – Environment and sustainable development 2017) Primary Outcome: Countries are able to reduce the likelihood of conflict, and lower the risk of natural disasters, including from climate change Secondary Outcome: Growth and development are inclusive and sustainable, incorporating productive capacities that create employment and livelihoods for the poor and excluded. UNDP CP Outcome 3 (2011 – Somali women and men benefit from increased sustainable livelihood 2015) opportunities and improved natural resources management. Project timeframe: Project Budget: Project Document Signature Date: December 2014 Total budget: US$72,820,0001 of which: Original Planned Closing Date: December 2018 GEF funds: US$8,000,000 Current Planned Closing Date: December 2018 UNDP funds: US$22,820,000 Planned Project Duration: 48 months EU funds $34,000,000 Government of Somalia: US$8,000,000 1 Figures from CEO Endorsement Request. 1 Contents List of Boxes, Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................ 4 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. 5 Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. 6 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction to the Project and the Review ................................................................................. 13 1.1 Background to the Project .......................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Purpose of the Review ................................................................................................................ 13 1.3 The Review outputs and how will they be used ......................................................................... 13 1.4 Review methodology .................................................................................................................. 14 1.5 Structure of the Review .............................................................................................................. 15 2. The Project Development Context and Project Outline ................................................................... 17 2.1 Development context ................................................................................................................. 17 2.2 UNDP Program ............................................................................................................................ 18 2.3 Problems that the Project seek to address ................................................................................. 19 2.4 Overall objective and Project components ................................................................................. 1 9 2.5 Main stakeholders and partners ................................................................................................. 19 2.6 Project start and its duration ...................................................................................................... 20 2.7 Project budget and implementation status ................................................................................ 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................... 22 3. Project Formulation ...................................................................................................................... 22 3.1. Approach to the Project design ................................................................................................. 22 3.2. The problem analysis ................................................................................................................. 22 3.3 The Project’s strategy ................................................................................................................. 23 3.4 The Project’s logical framework .................................................................................................. 24 3.5 The Project’s Ownership, Partnerships and Linkages ................................................................. 26 3.6 The Project’s Management Arrangements (including Monitoring) ............................................ 26 3.7 The Approach to Sustainability and Replicability ........................................................................ 27 3.8 Other issues pertinent to Project Design .................................................................................... 28 3.8.1 Gender considerations ......................................................................................................... 28 3.8.2 Alignment to LDCF ............................................................................................................... 29 3.8.3 Comparative advantage of UNDP ........................................................................................ 29 4. Project Implementation ................................................................................................................ 30 4.1 Approach to implementation ...................................................................................................... 30 2 4.2 Organizations involved in Project implementation .................................................................... 32 4.2.1 UNDP .................................................................................................................................... 32 4.2.2 Project Board ....................................................................................................................... 33 4.2.3 Project Management Office (PMO)/Project Implementing Team (PIT) .............................. 33 4.2.4 The Responsible Partners .................................................................................................... 34 4.2.5 Others .................................................................................................................................. 35 4.3 Planning, coordination and consultation .................................................................................... 35 4.3.1 Inception Period ................................................................................................................... 35 4.3.2 Project planning ................................................................................................................... 35 4.3.3 Activity planning .................................................................................................................. 36 4.4 Monitoring, reporting and knowledge management. ................................................................ 37 4.5 Financial Status ........................................................................................................................... 38 4.6 Other issues ................................................................................................................................ 39 4.6.1 Oversight .............................................................................................................................. 39 4.6.2 Partnership arrangements and participation ...................................................................... 39 4.6.3 Gender ................................................................................................................................. 40 4.6.4 Risk management ................................................................................................................. 40 5. Project Results to Date.................................................................................................................. 41 5.1 Outcome 1 ................................................................................................................................... 41 5.2 Outcome 2 ................................................................................................................................... 43 5.3 Objective ..................................................................................................................................... 47 5.4 Ratings ......................................................................................................................................... 48 5.5 Gender ........................................................................................................................................ 49 6. Summary of Key Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................. 51 6.1 Summary of the Key
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Briefing Paper
    NEW ISSUES IN REFUGEE RESEARCH Working Paper No. 65 Pastoral society and transnational refugees: population movements in Somaliland and eastern Ethiopia 1988 - 2000 Guido Ambroso UNHCR Brussels E-mail : [email protected] August 2002 Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees CP 2500, 1211 Geneva 2 Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.unhcr.org These working papers provide a means for UNHCR staff, consultants, interns and associates to publish the preliminary results of their research on refugee-related issues. The papers do not represent the official views of UNHCR. They are also available online under ‘publications’ at <www.unhcr.org>. ISSN 1020-7473 Introduction The classical definition of refugee contained in the 1951 Refugee Convention was ill- suited to the majority of African refugees, who started fleeing in large numbers in the 1960s and 1970s. These refugees were by and large not the victims of state persecution, but of civil wars and the collapse of law and order. Hence the 1969 OAU Refugee Convention expanded the definition of “refugee” to include these reasons for flight. Furthermore, the refugee-dissidents of the 1950s fled mainly as individuals or in small family groups and underwent individual refugee status determination: in-depth interviews to determine their eligibility to refugee status according to the criteria set out in the Convention. The mass refugee movements that took place in Africa made this approach impractical. As a result, refugee status was granted on a prima facie basis, that is with only a very summary interview or often simply with registration - in its most basic form just the name of the head of family and the family size.1 In the Somali context the implementation of this approach has proved problematic.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Planning Guidelines for Somaliland 2009
    Land Use Planning Guidelines for Somaliland Project Report No L-13 March 2009 Somalia Water and Land Information Management Ngecha Road, Lake View. P.O Box 30470-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. Tel +254 020 4000300 - Fax +254 020 4000333, Email: [email protected] Website: http//www.faoswalim.org. Funded by the European Union and implemented by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the SWALIM Project concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This document should be cited as follows: Venema, J.H., Alim, M., Vargas, R.R., Oduori, S and Ismail, A. 2009. Land use planning guidelines for Somaliland. Technical Project Report L-13. FAO-SWALIM, Nairobi, Kenya. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms ............................................................................................ v Acknowledgments ..........................................................................................vi ABOUT THE GUIDELINES................................................................................ vii 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 1.1 What is land use planning?................................................................. 1 1.2 Recent
    [Show full text]
  • SOMALIA RAINFALL and FLOODS UPDATE 02 May 2021
    SOMALIA RAINFALL and FLOODS UPDATE 02 May 2021 Due to climate change and its associated impacts Somalia is now recording more wet and dry weather events, often with disastrous consequences for the people facing such extremes. It has become even more difficult to predict such sequential events. Currently, more than 80 percent of the country is facing drought conditions in the mid of the primary Gu rainy season. Yet, flash floods have been reported in the last two days following heavy and sporadic rains in Somaliland. In addition, limited climate change adaptive capacities has led to irresponsible socio- economic practices like cutting of river banks to extract irrigation waters, further exposing the communities to climate hazards. For instance, riverine flooding due to open river banks near Baarey and Moyko villages has been reported in Jowhar within Middle Shabelle region. With current climate models predicting extreme temperatures and rainfall in the future within the region, the country is likely to continue experiencing frequent flood and drought events with likely consequences of affecting untold numbers of people, taxing economies, disrupting food production, creating unrest and prompting migrations. FLOODS AND RAINS UPDATE The Gu rains continued to spread across most parts of the country with Somaliland and Puntland experiencing moderate to heavy rains over the last week. Other areas in central and southern regions recorded light to moderate rains. The Ethiopian highlands received moderate rains within the last week. Since 25 May 2021, most parts of Somaliland have been receiving moderate to heavy rains. Localized flash floods caused by the heavy rainfall were reported on 01 May 2021 in parts of Hargeisa district.
    [Show full text]
  • Somaliland Assistance Bulletin
    Somaliland Assistance Bulletin 1 – 30 November 2005 HUMANITARIAN SITUATION Security & Access The overall security situation in Somaliland remained stable. A verdict was issued on the trail case of the 10 arrested suspects of the killings of four humanitarian workers occurring in 2003 and 2004. The case originally started in March 2005. According to the regional court in Hargeisa, 8 men were found guilty of "terrorism" and were sentenced to death. Following the killing of the 4 expatriate humanitarian workers, the UN in collaboration with the national authorities established a Special Protection Unit (SPU) initially to provide protection for humanitarian workers of UN & international NGOs, subsequently extended to the rest of the community. Since then no further incidents were reported. A deadly mine accident occurred in Burao on 16 November 2005 where a vehicle diverted from the main road towards a roadside short cut. Three out of a total of seven passengers were reported dead, including one UN staff member. Somaliland Mine Action Center (SMAC), supported by UNDP, coordinates mine action activities, since late 1999, an approximate area of around 115 million square meters has been cleared. Food Security/Livelihoods Aerial Photograph of Burao settlements, source UN Habitat. Deyr rain started on time, whereby most areas received Ministry of Health & Labour (MOH&L), the Somali Red normal to above normal rains except for parts of Crescent Society, Save the Children Fund, Candlelight southern Awdal region. Rainfall distribution and intensity and Havoyoco. Sources of income among Burao were good and allowed for further replenishment of water settlements were labeled more irregular and unreliable.
    [Show full text]
  • Puntland and Somaliland: the Land Legal Framework
    Shelter Branch Land and Tenure Section Florian Bruyas Somaliland Puntland State of Somalia The Land Legal Framework Situation Analysis United Nations Human Settlement Programme November 2006 Map of Somalia 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Scope and methodology of the study Chapter 1: Introduction Somalia, Somaliland and Puntland 1.1 Background 1.2 Recent history of Somalia 1.3 Clans 1.4 Somaliland 1.5 Puntland 1.6 Land through History 1.6.1 Under colonial rules 1.6.2 After independence Chapter 2: Identification of needs and problems related to land 2.1 Land conflict 2.2 IDPs and refugees 2.2.1 Land tenure option for IDPs 2.3 Limited capacity 2.3.1 Human resources 2.3.2 Capital city syndrome Chapter 3: The current framework for land administration 3.1 Existing land administration 3.1.1 In Somaliland 3.1.2 In Puntland 3.2 Existing judicial system 3.2.1 In Somaliland 3.2.2 In Puntland 3.3 Land and Tenure 3.2.1 Access to land in both regions 3 Chapter 4: A new legal framework for land administration 4.1 In Somaliland 4.1.1 Laws 4.1.2 Organizations 4.2 In Puntland 4.2.1 Law 4.2.2 Organizations 4.3 Land conflict resolution Chapter 5: Analysis of the registration system in both regions 5.2 Degree of security 5.3 Degree of sophistication 5.4 Cost of registering transactions 5.5 Time required for registering transactions 5.6 Access to the system Chapter 6: Minimum requirements for implementing land administration in other parts of the country Chapter 7: Gender perspective Chapter 8: Land and HIV/AIDS References Annexes --------------------------------------- 4 Acknowledgement I appreciate the assistance of Sandrine Iochem and Tom Osanjo who edited the final draft.
    [Show full text]
  • DROUGHT, DISPLACEMENT and LIVELIHOODS in SOMALIA/SOMALILAND Time for Gender-Sensitive and Protection-Focused Approaches
    DROUGHT, DISPLACEMENT AND LIVELIHOODS IN SOMALIA/SOMALILAND Time for gender-sensitive and protection-focused approaches JOINT AGENCY BRIEFING NOTE – JUNE 2018 ‘The drought destroyed our house, and by that I mean we lost all we had.’ Farhia,1 Daynile district, Banadir region Thousands of Somali families were displaced to urban centres by the 2017 drought. Research by a consortium of non-government organizations indicates that they do not intend to return home anytime soon. It also shows how precarious and limited are the livelihood opportunities for displaced people in Somalia; how far people’s options are affected by gender; and how changing gender dynamics present further protection threats to both men and women. Comparing the findings for Somaliland with those for the rest of the country, the research underscores the importance of local dynamics for people’s opportunities and protection. Gaps were highlighted in the provision of basic services for women particularly. Local, state and federal authorities, donors, and humanitarian and development actors need to improve displaced people’s immediate access to safe, gender-sensitive basic services – and to develop plans for more durable solutions to displacement. As floods in April to June 2018 have forced more people to leave their homes, an immediate step up in the response is essential. © Oxfam International June 2018 This paper was written by Emma Fanning. Oxfam acknowledges the assistance of Anna Tomson, Eric Kramak from REACH, Anna Coryndon, Francisco Yermo from Oxfam as well as colleagues in Oxfam, Plan International, World Vision, Danish Refugee Council and Regional Durable Solutions Secretariat (ReDSS) in its production.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Pilot Livelihoods Profiles
    Cross-border Pilot Livelihoods Profiles Report prepared by: Alexandra Crosskey & Abdi-Fatah Ahmed Ismail August 2009 The Pastoral Areas Coordination, Analysis and Policy Support (PACAPS) project is implemented by the Feinstein International Center of Tufts University, under USAID grant number 623‐A‐00‐07‐ 00018‐00. The early warning and early response components of the project are supported by FEG Consulting. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development, the United States Government or Tufts University. Contents Foreword …………………………………..…………………………….……………………………………………………. 4 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………..……………………………………….……….. 4 Section 1: How to Use the Cross‐border Profiles ………………………..………….…………..………… 6 1. Understanding Cross‐border Livelihoods ………………………..………………………………. 6 2. Early Warning ……………………………………….………………………………………..……………….. 6 a. Projected Outcome Analysis for Early Warning ………………………………………..…… 7 b. Early Warning Monitoring ……………………………………..……………………………….… 10 3. Program Development ………………………….……………………….……………………………. 12 a. Intervention Design ………………………………….…………………….……………………….. 12 b. Intervention Timing ………………………………….………………………..……………………. 13 c. Monitoring the Impact of a Project ………………………..…………………….………….. 14 Section 2: Cross‐border Livelihood Profiles …………………………..……………..………………………… 16 1. Introduction ……………………….……………………………………………………………….. 16 2. Filtu‐Dolo Ethiopia – Mandera Kenya Pastoral Livelihood Profile ……………..…..… 17 3. Ethiopia / Somalia
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial, Neo-Liberal Africa?
    Review of African Political Economy No. 113: 417-422 © ROAPE Publications Ltd., 2007 ISSN 0305-6244 Imperial, Neo-Liberal Africa? Alfred B. Zack-Williams & Giles Mohan Now that the fanfare and euphoria surrounding what has been called Tony Blair’s passionate denunciation of impoverishment in Africa as ‘a scar on the conscience of the world’ (Lone, 2007), the ‘development buzz’ (Collier, 2007) generated by rock stars and the ‘make poverty history campaign’ has all died down, it seems quite a good time to reflect on the ‘achievements’ to date. These campaigns were preceded by the UN millennium development goals on poverty alleviation, which in turn were followed by the Report of the Commission for Africa. More than a third of the way towards the 2015 goal, it is clear as Salim Lone suggests, that the developed world is falling behind on its commitments to African countries and the plight of many Africans is getting worse. According to Lone, no sub-Saharan African country has met the criteria on poverty alleviation and it would have been unthinkable that Western Governments, which gleefully presided over the creation of new classes of super- super rich, would use their considerable influence to push African leaders to pursue policies which would shift resources away from the rapacious national elites towards the poor … Nor was it likely the west would permit Africa to stray from the neo-liberal orthodoxies prescribed for the continent by the World Bank and the IMF. Readers of this journal would be familiar with the challenge and critical engagement, which the Editorial Working Group has posed to the new orthodoxies of ‘neo-liberalism’ and, in particular, the World Bank and IMF-sponsored structural adjustment programmes (SAPs) in Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • UN Joint Programme on Local Governance and Decentralized Service Delivery (JPLG)
    UNITED NATIONS SOMALIA UN Joint Programme on Local Governance and Decentralized Service Delivery (JPLG) 2nd Quarterly Report 2011 August 2011 UN Joint Programme on Local Governance and Decentralised Service Delivery JPLG 2nd Quarterly Report April – June 2011 Participating UN UN Habitat, UNDP, UNICEF, ILO Cluster/Priority United Nations Transitional Plan for Organization(s): and UNCDF. Area: Somalia 2008 -2010 Outcome Two Implementing Ministries of Interior in Somaliland, Puntland and the Transitional Federal Government and target Partner(s): District Councils. Joint Programme Title: UN Joint Programme on Local Governance and Decentralized Service Delivery (JPLG) Total Approved Joint US$ 37,187,000 Programme Budget: Location: Somaliland, Puntland and south central Somalia SC Approval Date: April 2008 Joint Programme Phase One – 2008 – 2010 and Starting Completion 31/12/ 01/04/2008 Duration: Phase Two 2010 - 2012 Date: Date: 2012 2008 -2011 Through JP pass through with UNDP as AA: Donor Donor Currency USD SIDA 65,000,000 SK 7,030,268 DFID 5,025,000 GBP 7,749,134 Danida 21,000,000 DEK 3,675,212 Norway 6,000,000 NOK 1,002,701 Through JP and bilateral to UNDP EU 7,000,000 Euro 8,908,590 Pass through funds 2009 – 2011 28,365,905 % of Funds Committed: UNDP Italy: $1,800,00; 1,800,000 95% USAID: $1,458,840 1,458,840 Approved: DK:$693,823 693,823 Norway: $723,606 723,606 UNDP TRAC: $100,000 100,000 SIDA: $132,000; 132,000 BPCR: $132,930 132,930 UN Habitat Italy: 866,775 Euro 1,243,400 Parallel Funds 2009 -2011 6,284,599 UNCDF 832,000 TOTAL APPROVED
    [Show full text]
  • Study Report an Analysis of Women's Land Rights &Territorial Rights Of
    STUDY REPORT AN ANALYSIS OF WOMEN’S LAND RIGHTS & TERRITORIAL RIGHTS OF SOMALI MINORITIES IN SOMALILAND Principal Consultant: Dr. Adam Ismail Smart Consultancy & Training Agency (SCOTRA) Hargeisa, Somaliland May 2016 Page 0 of 47 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................3 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .............................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................4 Key findings: .............................................................................................................................................. 6 1. BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY ........................................................................................................8 2. HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY OF SOMALILAND .................................................................................9 3. METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY .................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Study areas ........................................................................................................................................ 12 3.1 Questionnaire: .................................................................................................................................. 12 3.2 Focus group discussions (FGD):........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UN Joint Programme on Local Governance and Decentralized Service Delivery (JPLG)
    UNITED NATIONS SOMALIA UN Joint Programme on Local Governance and Decentralized Service Delivery (JPLG) 1st Quarterly Report 2011 FINAL May 2011 UN Joint Programme on Local Governance and Decentralised Service Delivery JPLG 1st Quarterly Report January – March 2011 Central Administrations of Somaliland, Puntland and the Transitional Federal Government and target Partner(s): District Councils. Joint Programme Title: UN Joint Programme on Local Governance and Decentralized Service Delivery (JPLG) Total Approved Joint US$ 37,187,000 Programme Budget: Location: Somaliland, Puntland and south central Somalia SC Approval Date: April 2008 Starting Completion 31/12/ Joint Programme 2008 – 2012 01/04/2008 Date: Date: 12 Duration: 2009 -2010 Through JP pass through with UNDP as AA: Donor Donor Currency USD SIDA 30,000,000 SK 3,813,361 DFID 2,275,000 GBP 3,482,109 Danida 15,000,000 DEK 2,672,511 Norway 6,000,000 NOK 1,002,701 Through JP and bilateral EC to UNDP 5,000,000 Euro 7,350,000 Sub total JP Funds 18,320,682 % of Funds Committed: Parallel Funds 2009 -2011 67% Approved: UNDP Italy: $1,800,00; 1,800,000 USAID: $1,757,428 1,757,428 DK:$693,823 693,823 Norway: $723,606 723,606 UNDP TRAC: $100,000 100,000 SIDA: $132,000; 132,000 BPCR: $132,930 132,930 UNHabitat Italy: 866,775 Euro 1,243,400 Sub total Parallel Funds 5,860,511 UNCDF $832,000 TOTAL APPROVED 2009 – 2010 25,013,704 % of Donor USD committed 75% SIDA 3,813,361 DFID 3,482,109 2009/2011: EC 6,051,447 Funds Disbursed: Danida 87,000 Norway 35,000 UNDP/parallel 2,282,771 % of 50% UNDP/USAID 1,758,428 approved UN Habitat/parallel 587,535 UNCDF 232,500 TOTAL 18,330,151 Delay Expected Duration: 5 years Forecast Final Date: December 2012 6 (Months): 2 UN Joint Programme on Local Governance and Decentralised Service Delivery EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In this reporting period US$3,248,902 has been disbursed against an annual workplan and budget of US$23.3M and of which US$17,456,249 is currently available or committed.
    [Show full text]
  • S.No Region Districts 1 Awdal Region Baki
    S.No Region Districts 1 Awdal Region Baki District 2 Awdal Region Borama District 3 Awdal Region Lughaya District 4 Awdal Region Zeila District 5 Bakool Region El Barde District 6 Bakool Region Hudur District 7 Bakool Region Rabdhure District 8 Bakool Region Tiyeglow District 9 Bakool Region Wajid District 10 Banaadir Region Abdiaziz District 11 Banaadir Region Bondhere District 12 Banaadir Region Daynile District 13 Banaadir Region Dharkenley District 14 Banaadir Region Hamar Jajab District 15 Banaadir Region Hamar Weyne District 16 Banaadir Region Hodan District 17 Banaadir Region Hawle Wadag District 18 Banaadir Region Huriwa District 19 Banaadir Region Karan District 20 Banaadir Region Shibis District 21 Banaadir Region Shangani District 22 Banaadir Region Waberi District 23 Banaadir Region Wadajir District 24 Banaadir Region Wardhigley District 25 Banaadir Region Yaqshid District 26 Bari Region Bayla District 27 Bari Region Bosaso District 28 Bari Region Alula District 29 Bari Region Iskushuban District 30 Bari Region Qandala District 31 Bari Region Ufayn District 32 Bari Region Qardho District 33 Bay Region Baidoa District 34 Bay Region Burhakaba District 35 Bay Region Dinsoor District 36 Bay Region Qasahdhere District 37 Galguduud Region Abudwaq District 38 Galguduud Region Adado District 39 Galguduud Region Dhusa Mareb District 40 Galguduud Region El Buur District 41 Galguduud Region El Dher District 42 Gedo Region Bardera District 43 Gedo Region Beled Hawo District www.downloadexcelfiles.com 44 Gedo Region El Wak District 45 Gedo
    [Show full text]