DOCSLIB.ORG

Some Iowa Records of Lepidoptera

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Northern Iowa Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 27 Annual Issue Article 59 1920 Some Iowa Records of Lepidoptera A. W. Lindsey The Barnes' Museum Copyright ©1920 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Lindsey, A. W. (1920) "Some Iowa Records of Lepidoptera," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 27(1), 319-335. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol27/iss1/59 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lindsey: Some Iowa Records of Lepidoptera SOME row j\ RECORDS OF LEPIDOPTERA AW. LINDSEY My first contribution to the study of the Lepidoptera of Iowa appeared in the Proceedings of the Academy for 1914 in the form of a list of butterflies, exclusive of skippers, taken in Wood­ bury county (Proc. Ia. Acad. Sci. xxi, 1914, 341-346). Later I was able to complete the identification of the skippers in my possession and to examine a number of collections in various parts of the state, thus increasing my list to such an extent that in 1917 I published a second list, embracing the entire state and including all of the Diurnals (Ent. News xxviii, 1917, 347-353). \Vhile the latter was in the hands of the printer during the sum­ mer of 1917 a number of additional records were made at Sioux City, and these, together with a few corrections, are mentioned below. It seems unnecessary to repeat the records already published. ·with the exception of a few notes in "Lepidoptera" in 1918 I have not yet published any records of the moths taken in Iowa, though during my last few years of residence in the state I made the most of every opportunity to add to these and listed in manu­ script several hundred species. Since taking up my residence in Decatur I have found it expedient to give up my private collec­ tion, but before doing so I am preparing this list, which shall include, with the exception of the more common species and a few others, only records of specimens now in my possession. All specimens which are rare or otherwise of interest are to be placed in the Barnes collection. The nomenclature and arrangement follows Barnes and McDunnough's "Check List" with a few changes made necessary by later studies. PAPILIONOIDEA Nymphalidae NYMPHALINAE Argynnis aphrodite Fab. One specimen at Sioux City, June 21, 1917. Phyciodes tharos form vern. marcia Edw. The specimens recorded in my first list as camillus belong here. Published by UNI ScholarWorks, 1920 1 Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, Vol. 27 [1920], No. 1, Art. 59 320 IOWA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE VoL. XX VII, 1920 Libytheidae Lib}1thea bachmani Kirt. Specimens formerly recorded as carinenta be­ long here. C arinenta is not known to occur north of Texas. Riodinidae Caiephelis borealis G. & R. There is a specimen labelled Fairfax, Ia., in the collection at Ames. Lycaenidae THECLINAE Strymon acadica Edw. Taken at Sioux City in 1917. CHRYSOPHANINAE H codes dione Scud. Locally common at Iowa City. II eodcs hclloides Bdv. I have taken this at Okoboji, Ames and Iowa City. LYCAENINAE H emiargus isola Reak. Occurs as far east at Iowa City. Plebeius melissa Edw. Taken at Sioux City in 1917. HESPERIOIDEA Hesperiidae HESPERIINAE Thanaos bri::;o Bdv. & Lee. :\Iid River and Homestead, May. PAMPHILINAE Oarisma Poweshiek Parker. Sioux City, 1917. Pamphila sassacus race dacotac Skin. A single female taken in 1909 at Sioux City proved a puzzle for years, but it has at last been identified by comparison with a paratype female in the Barnes collection. Euphyes bimacula G. & R. One female was taken in 1917 at Sioux City. SPHINGOIDEA Sphingidae Protoparce sexta Joh. Distribution general. Common. Protoparce quinquemacu/atus Haw. Common throughout the state. Ceratomia a111yntor Hbn. Sioux City. C eratomia undulosa Wik. Sioux City and Iowa City. Sphinx clzersis Hbn. Sioux City, Macedonia. Smerinth1u jamaiccnsis Dru. Sioux City, Iowa City. Paonias excaecatus A. & S. Throughout the state. Paonias myops A. & S. Iowa City. Cressonia juglandis A. & S. Sioux City, l\facedonia. Pachysphiux modcsta Harr. Throughout the state. Hemaris th::,•sbe Fab. Sioux City. One specimen. H cmaris dijfinis Bdv. Sioux City and Dickinson county. II emaris dijfinis f. aest. axillaris G. & R. Sioux City. Pholus satellitia form pandorus Hbn. All parts of the state. Pho/us achemon Dru. Sutherland. Ampeloeca myron Cram. Sioux City and Iowa City. S phccodina abbotti Swains. Iowa City, ?.Iacedonia. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol27/iss1/59 2 Lindsey: Some Iowa Records of Lepidoptera IOWA LEPIDOPTERA 321 Deidamia inscriptum Harr. I have seen three specimens of this inter­ esting little sphinx in Professor Wickham's collection, all taken at Iowa City. Amphion nessus Cram. Sioux City, Iowa City. Xylophanes tersa Linn. Decorah (A. F. Porter) Muscatine. C elerio gall ii Rott. Decorah (A. F. Porter). C elerio lineata Fab. Common everywhere. SATURNIO IDEA Saturniidae Samia cecropia Linn. Common everywhere. This species feeds on a great many different trees, and I have counted as many as fifty cocoons on a single Box Elder. Callosamia promethea Dru. Becoming rare in eastern Iowa, where it feeds on Wild Cherry. Tro pa ea luna Linn. Fairly common throughout the state. Te/ea polyphemus Cram. Also common everywhere. Automeris io Fab. Found everywhere but not in large numbers. I have taken the larva on Bur Oak at Sioux City. Ceratocampidae Anisota rub-icunda Fab. Ames, Iowa City. Adelocephala bicolor Harr. Homestead. Citheronia regalis Fab. Professor Wickham tells me that he has taken the larva of this species at Iowa City, and the record should be preserved. Basilona imperialis Dru. l am indebted to Professor Wickham for records of the occurrence of this species at Iowa City. BOMBYCOIDEA Syntomidae Scepsis fulvicollis Hbn. A common diurnal moth of the prairies. Ctenucha 7.'cnosa \Vlk. Though this insect is much more common in Arizona and Central America, I have a single fresh specimen taken at Sioux City, July 21, 1915. Arctiidae NOLINAE Roeselia nzi11uscula Zell. Iowa City. UTHOSIINAE Clemensia albata Pack. Sioux City, August. H ypoprepia miniata Kirby. Sioux City and Dickinson county. Hypoprepia fucosa Hbn. Decorah (i\. F. Porter), ::\1uscatine (Hoopes collection). ARCTIIN.\E Ammalo tenera Hbn. Sioux City, ;\fay and June. Ammalo inopinatus Hy. Edw. Sioux City, one specimen only. Halisidota tessc/aris i\. & S. Throughout the state. Eubaphe laeta Guer. Sioux City, July; Iowa City, June. Eubaphe aurantiaca Hbn. Sioux City and Dickinson county. Published by UNI ScholarWorks, 1920 3 Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, Vol. 27 [1920], No. 1, Art. 59 322 IOWA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE VoL. XXVII, 1920 Eubaphe immaculata Reak. Sioux City, July. Eubaphe immaculata form trimaculosa Reak. Sioux City, July. Phragmatobia fuliginosa race franco11ica Sloss. Sioux City, two speci- mens, April and July. Diacrisia latipennis Stretch. Booneville, June ( R. Whittle). Diacrisia virginica Fab. One of our most common moths. I sia isabella A. & S. Common everywhere. H_yphan.tria cunea Dru. Throughout the state. Estigmene acraea Dru. \Nith the last. Common. Estigmene congrua \Vlk. Sioux City, May, June. Specimens of this were formerly identified as M. c'estalis amelaina Dyar. Ecpanthcria dcfiorata Fah. Iowa City. Prof. B. Shimek once brought me a larva of this species taken on Liparis liliifolia. Apantesis intermcdia Stretch. Sioux City, late August. Apantesis rectilinea French. Sioux City, one specimen, August 26. Apantesis 111irhabo Grote. Sioux City. Early September. Apantesis argc Dru. Sioux City, Apr., July, August. Apantesis ·virguncula Kirby. Sioux City, June 20, one specimen. Apantesis vittata \Vlk. Iowa City, August. Apantesis vittata race phalerata Harris. Sioux City and Iowa City, May and August. Euchaetias egle Dru. Sioux City. Euchaetias oregonensis Stretch. Sioux City and Iowa City. Bred from Asclepias sp. Utetheisa bella Linn. Iowa City, Ames, Sioux City. Utetheisa ornatrix Linn. Lake Okoboji, July, 1916, L. L. Buchanan. Haploa colona form re7•ersa Stretch. Sioux City, June. Haploa lecontei Bdv. Sioux City, June. Haploa lecontei form militaris Harris. Sioux City, June, July. Very common in the woods. Haploa lccontci form i·estalis Pack. Sioux City, June, July. Less com­ mon than the preceding form. Agaristidae Alypia octomaculata Fab. Sioux City, June. The larva is fairly com­ mon at times on Woodbine, but I have never taken many adults. Noctuidae AGROTINAE Heliothis paradoxa Grote. Professor \Vickham has one m:ale of this unmistakable species, taken at Iowa City, August 4, 1898. Heliothis p/z/oxiphaga G. & R. Sioux City, August 26, 1917, one male. A western species. H eliothis obsoleta Fab. Common everywhere. Dasypoudaea lucen.s ab. luxuriosa Grt. Sioux City, July, 1917, two specimens. Lygranthoecia brevis Grt. Dickinson county, August; Sioux City, Sep­ tember. Two specimens only. Lygranthoecia rufimedia Grt. A good series of this species was col­ lected from the flowers of Lactuca sp. at Sioux City in June, 1917. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol27/iss1/59 4 Lindsey: Some Iowa Records of Lepidoptera IOWA LEPIDOPTERA 323 L.vgranthoecia marginata Haw. Sioux City and Ames. Lygranthoecia impcrspicua Stkr. Two only, Ames, August 3 and 14, 1918, at light. Schinia hulstia Tepp. Ames, August, 1918, one only. Schinia chrysella Grt. Ames, Iowa City, August. Schinia trifascia Hbn. Sioux City, August 26, September 2, 1917, two only. Schinia oleagina Morr. Sioux City, August, September. Two specimens. S chinia gracileuia Hlm. Sioux City, A.mes, August, September.
Recommended publications
  • Rare Native Animals of RI

    Rare Native Animals of RI

    RARE NATIVE ANIMALS OF RHODE ISLAND Revised: March, 2006 ABOUT THIS LIST The list is divided by vertebrates and invertebrates and is arranged taxonomically according to the recognized authority cited before each group. Appropriate synonomy is included where names have changed since publication of the cited authority. The Natural Heritage Program's Rare Native Plants of Rhode Island includes an estimate of the number of "extant populations" for each listed plant species, a figure which has been helpful in assessing the health of each species. Because animals are mobile, some exhibiting annual long-distance migrations, it is not possible to derive a population index that can be applied to all animal groups. The status assigned to each species (see definitions below) provides some indication of its range, relative abundance, and vulnerability to decline. More specific and pertinent data is available from the Natural Heritage Program, the Rhode Island Endangered Species Program, and the Rhode Island Natural History Survey. STATUS. The status of each species is designated by letter codes as defined: (FE) Federally Endangered (7 species currently listed) (FT) Federally Threatened (2 species currently listed) (SE) State Endangered Native species in imminent danger of extirpation from Rhode Island. These taxa may meet one or more of the following criteria: 1. Formerly considered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for Federal listing as endangered or threatened. 2. Known from an estimated 1-2 total populations in the state. 3. Apparently globally rare or threatened; estimated at 100 or fewer populations range-wide. Animals listed as State Endangered are protected under the provisions of the Rhode Island State Endangered Species Act, Title 20 of the General Laws of the State of Rhode Island.
  • Saturniidae) of Rio Grande Do Sul State, Brazil

    Saturniidae) of Rio Grande Do Sul State, Brazil

    214214 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 63(4), 2009, 214-232 ARSENURINAE AND CERATOCAMPINAE (SATURNIIDAE) OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL STATE, BRAZIL ANDERSONN SILVEIRA PRESTES Laboratório de Entomologia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Caixa postal 1429, 90619-900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; email: [email protected] FABRÍCIO GUERREIRO NUNES Laboratório de Entomologia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Caixa postal 1429, 90619-900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; email: [email protected] ELIO CORSEUIL Laboratório de Entomologia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Caixa postal 1429, 90619-900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; email: [email protected] AND ALFRED MOSER Avenida Rotermund 1045, 93030-000 São Leopoldo, RS, Brazil; email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. The present work aims to offer a list of Arsenurinae and Ceratocampinae species known to occur in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The list is based on bibliographical data, newly collected specimens, and previously existing museum collections. The Arsenurinae are listed in the following genera (followed by number of species): Arsenura Duncan, 1841 (4), Caio Travassos & Noronha, 1968 (1), Dysdaemonia Hübner, [1819] (1), Titaea Hübner, [1823] (1), Paradaemonia Bouvier, 1925 (2), Rhescyntis Hübner, [1819] (1), Copiopteryx Duncan, 1841 (2). Cerato- campinae are listed in Adeloneivaia Travassos, 1940 (3), Adelowalkeria Travassos, 1941 (2), Almeidella Oiticica, 1946 (2), Cicia Oiticica, 1964 (2), Citheronia Hübner, [1819] (4), Citioica Travassos & Noronha, 1965 (1), Eacles Hübner, [1819] (4), Mielkesia Lemaire, 1988 (1), Neocarne- gia Draudt, 1930 (1), Oiticella Travassos & Noronha, 1965 (1), Othorene Boisduval, 1872 (2), Procitheronia Michener, 1949 (1), Psilopygida Michener, 1949 (2), Scolesa Michener, 1949 (3) and Syssphinx Hübner, [1819] (1).
  • Moths of North Carolina - Early Draft 1

    Moths of North Carolina - Early Draft 1

    Erebidae Catocala crataegi Hawthorn Underwing 10 9 8 n=10 • • 7 High Mt. 6 • N 5 • • u 4 3 • m 2 b 1 • e 0 • r 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 NC counties: 8 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec o 10 f 9 n=7 = Sighting or Collection 8 • 7 Low Mt. High counts of: in NC since 2001 F 6 l 5 2 - Ashe - 2011-07-04 = Not seen since 2001 4 • i 3 2 - Madison - 2019-06-24 g 2 Status Rank h 1 1 - Ashe - 2011-07-04 0 NC US NC Global t 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 D Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec a 10 10 9 9 t 8 n=1 8 n=0 e 7 Pd 7 CP s 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Three periods to each month: 1-10 / 11-20 / 21-31 FAMILY: Erebidae SUBFAMILY: Erebinae TRIBE: Catocalini TAXONOMIC_COMMENTS: One of 103 species in this genus that occur in North America (Lafontaine and Schmidt, 2010, 2015), 67 of which have been recorded in North Carolina.
  • Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society

    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society

    JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY Volume 38 1984 Number 3 Joumal of the Lepidopterists' Society 38(3). 1984. 149-164 SOD WEBWORM MOTHS (PYRALIDAE: CRAMBINAE) IN SOUTH DAKOTA B. McDANIEL,l G. FAUSKEl AND R. D. GUSTIN 2 ABSTRACT. Twenty-seven species of the subfamily Crambinae known as sod web­ worm moths were collected from South Dakota. A key to species has been included as well as their distribution patterns in South Dakota. This study began after damage to rangeland in several South Dakota counties in the years 1974 and 1975. Damage was reported from Cor­ son, Dewey, Harding, Haakon, Meade, Perkins, Stanley and Ziebach counties. An effort was made to determine the species of Crambinae present in South Dakota and their distribution. Included are a key for species identification and a list of species with their flight periods and collection sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS Black light traps using the General Electric Fluorescent F ls T8 B1 15 watt bulb were set up in Brookings, Jackson, Lawrence, Minnehaha, Pennington and Spink counties. In Minnehaha County collecting was carried out with a General Electric 200 watt soft-glow bulb. Daytime collecting was used in several localities. Material in the South Dakota State University Collection was also utilized. For each species a map is included showing collection localities by county. On the maps the following symbols are used: • = collected by sweepnet. Q = collected by light trap. Key to South Dakota Cram binae 1a. Rs stalked .__ ... ___ .. __ ......................... _..... _ ................................. _._............................................. 2 lb. Rs arising directly from discal cell ................................................................. _............ _............
  • Report on the Badlands/Parkland Lepidoptera Survey 2017 by the Alberta Lepidopterists' Guild, Under Research Permit #17-171

    Report on the Badlands/Parkland Lepidoptera Survey 2017 by the Alberta Lepidopterists' Guild, Under Research Permit #17-171

    Report on the Badlands/Parkland Lepidoptera Survey 2017 by the Alberta Lepidopterists' Guild, under research permit #17-171 Report to Alberta Tourism, Park and Recreation, Parks Division November 2017 by Gregory R. Pohl Gregory Pohl and other members of the Alberta Lepidopterists' Guild were granted a research permit (#17-171) for moth and butterfly (Lepidoptera) observation and collection in the Tolman - Rumsey area of central Alberta in the summer of 2017. This is our report of the species observed and collected in the area. Study Sites: The following sites were visited and sampled for Lepidoptera: 1. Rowley townsite (Figure 1). 51.760°N 112.786°W. July 14-16, 2017. Abandoned home sites and field margins; disturbed area along train tracks. Although not a protected area requiring a permit, this was our base of operations and camping area, it was convenient to observe and collect moths and butterflies here. Most of the species encountered here are expected to occur in nearby parks and natural areas. Collecting methods - daytime observation and netting; UV light traps; mercury vapour lights. 2. "North Rumsey": Township Road 589, vicinity of Rumsey Natural Area. 51.965°N 112.625°W. July 15, 2017. Rolling parkland with small sloughs. Although not technically within the Rumsey Natural Area, this site is very near and is comprised of similar habitat. The species seen here are all expected within the natural area. Collecting methods - daytime observation and netting. 3. "West Rumsey": Western edge of Rumsey Natural Area (Figure 2). 51.882°N 112.691°W. July 15, 2017. Rolling parkland and grassland.
  • Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve

    Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve

    SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 159 SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Doug Macaulay Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159 Project Partners: i ISBN 978-1-4601-3449-8 ISSN 1496-7146 Photo: Doug Macaulay of Pale Yellow Dune Moth ( Copablepharon grandis ) For copies of this report, visit our website at: http://www.aep.gov.ab.ca/fw/speciesatrisk/index.html This publication may be cited as: Macaulay, A. D. 2016. Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve. Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159. Alberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, AB. 31 pp. ii DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policies of the Department or the Alberta Government. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... vi 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 METHODS ................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................
  • First Record of Citheronia Regalis (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) Feeding on Cotinus Obovatus (Anacardiaceae) Author(S): Gary R

    First Record of Citheronia Regalis (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) Feeding on Cotinus Obovatus (Anacardiaceae) Author(S): Gary R

    First Record of Citheronia regalis (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) Feeding on Cotinus obovatus (Anacardiaceae) Author(s): Gary R. Graves Source: Florida Entomologist, 100(2):474-475. Published By: Florida Entomological Society https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0210 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1653/024.100.0210 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Scientific Notes First record of Citheronia regalis (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) feeding on Cotinus obovatus (Anacardiaceae) Gary R. Graves1,2,* The regal moth (Citheronia regalis F.; Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) 2016) shows historic and recent records of C. regalis for only 11 of was historically distributed in eastern North America from southern the 34 counties in which natural populations of smoketree have been New England and southern Michigan, south to southern Florida, and documented (Davis & Graves 2016). west to eastern Nebraska and eastern Texas (Tuskes et al.
  • Otter Slough Conservation Area (Stoddard County, Missouri) by Hugo L

    Otter Slough Conservation Area (Stoddard County, Missouri) by Hugo L

    SOUTHERN LEPIDOPTERISTS’ NEWS VOLUME 43 NO. 2 (2021), PG. 159 A LEPIDOPTERA BIODIVERSITY BLITZ AT THE OTTER SLOUGH CONSERVATION AREA (STODDARD COUNTY, MISSOURI) BY HUGO L. KONS JR. 1 & ROBERT J. BORTH 2 ABSTRACT We conducted a Lepidoptera biodiversity blitz on 3 and Catocala crataegi complex, representing the most 4 June 2018 at the Otter Slough Conservation Area in northerly locality that we are aware of for these Stoddard County, Missouri. We documented as many phenotypes. Recent material was needed for DNA Lepidoptera species as possible with MV/UV lights, sequencing. rotten banana/brown sugar bait, and diurnal collecting with nets. We present records for 235 species, including From 3-4 June 2018 we visited the Otter Slough 193 Macrolepidoptera and 19 Rhopalocera 3. Habitats Conservation Area to sample Catocala and document as sampled include hydric hardwood forest, cypress many other co-occurring Lepidoptera species as swamp, open wetlands, and field. Examples of some possible. This paper reports the Macrolepidoptera and species are shown on 15 color plates of live photos and Rhopalocera species recorded during this survey. This pinned specimens research was conducted under Wildlife Collectors Permit #17910 issued by the Missouri Department of INTRODUCTION Conservation. The Otter Slough Conservation Area is a 4,866 acre area MATERIALS AND METHODS including hydric hardwood forest (Figure 2:B, E-H), cypress-tupelo swamp (Figure 2:A), open marsh with Lepidoptera were sampled with a 400 watt MV cattails, sedge meadow, and cypress (Figure 2:D), illuminated sheet, 175 watt MV light trap, 15 watt UV mowed field (Figure 2:C (middle)), and slough habitats.
  • (Larva), Regal Moth Or Royal Walnut Moth (Adult), Citheronia Regalis (Fabricius) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Saturniidae: Ceratocampinae)1 Donald W

    (Larva), Regal Moth Or Royal Walnut Moth (Adult), Citheronia Regalis (Fabricius) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Saturniidae: Ceratocampinae)1 Donald W

    EENY-052 Hickory Horned Devil (Larva), Regal Moth or Royal Walnut Moth (Adult), Citheronia regalis (Fabricius) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Saturniidae: Ceratocampinae)1 Donald W. Hall2 The Featured Creatures collection provides in-depth profiles of insects, nematodes, arachnids, and other organisms relevant to Florida. These profiles are intended for the use of interested laypersons with some knowledge of biology as well as academic audiences. Introduction The regal or royal walnut moth, Citheronia regalis (Fabri- cius), is one of our largest and most spectacular moths. Like most other moths, it is nocturnal but is sometimes observed at lights. The imposing larva, known as the hickory horned devil, is most often observed when it is full grown and comes down from the trees to wander in search of a site for pupation. The regal moth is a beautiful and fascinating member of our native fauna, and its larvae should not be killed. If a larva is found crawling on pavement or in an area of thick turf grass where it would have difficulty burrowing, it should be moved to an area of soft soil or a mulched area where it can Figure 1. Hickory horned devil caterpillar, of the regal moth, Citheronia burrow for pupation. regalis (Fabricius), showing size in relation to an adult human’s hand. Credits: Lyle J. Buss, UF/IFAS 1. This document is EENY-052, one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date August 1998. Revised September 2014 and February 2021. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu for the currently supported version of this publication.
  • Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera

    Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera

    EN62CH15-Mitter ARI 5 November 2016 12:1 I Review in Advance first posted online V E W E on November 16, 2016. (Changes may R S still occur before final publication online and in print.) I E N C N A D V A Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera Charles Mitter,1,∗ Donald R. Davis,2 and Michael P. Cummings3 1Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742; email: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560 3Laboratory of Molecular Evolution, Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017. 62:265–83 Keywords Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017.62. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org The Annual Review of Entomology is online at Hexapoda, insect, systematics, classification, butterfly, moth, molecular ento.annualreviews.org systematics This article’s doi: Access provided by University of Maryland - College Park on 11/20/16. For personal use only. 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035125 Abstract Copyright c 2017 by Annual Reviews. Until recently, deep-level phylogeny in Lepidoptera, the largest single ra- All rights reserved diation of plant-feeding insects, was very poorly understood. Over the past ∗ Corresponding author two decades, building on a preceding era of morphological cladistic stud- ies, molecular data have yielded robust initial estimates of relationships both within and among the ∼43 superfamilies, with unsolved problems now yield- ing to much larger data sets from high-throughput sequencing. Here we summarize progress on lepidopteran phylogeny since 1975, emphasizing the superfamily level, and discuss some resulting advances in our understanding of lepidopteran evolution.
  • 2010 Season Summary Index NEW WOFTHE~ Zone 1: Yukon Territory

    2010 Season Summary Index NEW WOFTHE~ Zone 1: Yukon Territory

    2010 Season Summary Index NEW WOFTHE~ Zone 1: Yukon Territory ........................................................................................... 3 Alaska ... ........................................ ............................................................... 3 LEPIDOPTERISTS Zone 2: British Columbia .................................................... ........................ ............ 6 Idaho .. ... ....................................... ................................................................ 6 Oregon ........ ... .... ........................ .. .. ............................................................ 10 SOCIETY Volume 53 Supplement Sl Washington ................................................................................................ 14 Zone 3: Arizona ............................................................ .................................... ...... 19 The Lepidopterists' Society is a non-profo California ............... ................................................. .............. .. ................... 2 2 educational and scientific organization. The Nevada ..................................................................... ................................ 28 object of the Society, which was formed in Zone 4: Colorado ................................ ... ............... ... ...... ......................................... 2 9 May 1947 and formally constituted in De­ Montana .................................................................................................... 51 cember
  • The Effect of Insects on Seed Set of Ozark Chinquapin, Castanea Ozarkensis" (2017)

    The Effect of Insects on Seed Set of Ozark Chinquapin, Castanea Ozarkensis" (2017)

    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2017 The ffecE t of Insects on Seed Set of Ozark Chinquapin, Castanea ozarkensis Colton Zirkle University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Botany Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Recommended Citation Zirkle, Colton, "The Effect of Insects on Seed Set of Ozark Chinquapin, Castanea ozarkensis" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 1996. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1996 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. The Effect of Insects on Seed Set of Ozark Chinquapin, Castanea ozarkensis A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology by Colton Zirkle Missouri State University Bachelor of Science in Biology, 2014 May 2017 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. ____________________________________ Dr. Ashley Dowling Thesis Director ____________________________________ ______________________________________ Dr. Frederick Paillet Dr. Neelendra Joshi Committee Member Committee Member Abstract Ozark chinquapin (Castanea ozarkensis), once found throughout the Interior Highlands of the United States, has been decimated across much of its range due to accidental introduction of chestnut blight, Cryphonectria parasitica. Efforts have been made to conserve and restore C. ozarkensis, but success requires thorough knowledge of the reproductive biology of the species. Other Castanea species are reported to have characteristics of both wind and insect pollination, but pollination strategies of Ozark chinquapin are unknown.