Peter Nathaniel Moore

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Peter Nathaniel Moore PETER NATHANIEL MOORE This World of Toil and Strife: Land, Labor, and the Making of an American Community, 1750-1805 (Under the Direction of PETER CHARLES HOFFER) This dissertation examines the eighteenth-century origins of southernness in the South Carolina piedmont. Looking through the lens of a single community – the Waxhaws, a predominately Scots-Irish settlement in the lower Catawba valley – “Toil and Strife” challenges the notion that the Carolina upcountry was a static, undeveloped backwater region until cotton planters transformed it after 1800. Rather, in the half- century preceding the cotton boom the Waxhaws underwent a comprehensive social, economic, and cultural transformation of its own making, one driven by the internal dynamics of the community itself – immigration patterns, neighborhood rivalries, changing religious and ethnic identities, population growth, and developing markets for slaves and wheat – not by land-grabbing speculators and aggressive planters. When cotton finally penetrated the piedmont in 1800, the Waxhaws bore little resemblance to the backcountry community of the late colonial period. The stress of economic, demographic, and generational change was felt most acutely in the community’s central institution, the Presbyterian church. For three decades neighbors and competing kin groups, divided by class, ethnicity, and doctrinal issues, struggled to control church location, leadership, worship, and the force of the Great Revival. This struggle ultimately set the church, once so vital to community life, on the path to obsolescence. In addition to religious history, this study examines contact and conflict between white settlers and neighboring Indians and underlines the importance of this encounter in shaping both the physical/spatial and mental world of white immigrants. It looks at how the insularity bred by the frontier played out in gender relations, sectarian conflict, the ambiguous relationships between masters and slaves, and neighborhood rivalries. It explores the social and economic impact of the Revolutionary War and looks at how class and neighborhood differences affected wartime allegiance. It reassesses the importance of land speculators both before and after the war from the local perspective. It also takes a long look at the Great Revival of 1802, moving beyond its impact on the local church and deep into its language and ritual structure, exploring the broader cultural context of its peculiar kind of somatic piety and the links between religious experience and generational change. INDEX WORDS: South Carolina, piedmont, community study, Waxhaws, Waxhaw settlement, Lancaster County, backcountry, religious history, Great Revival, Catawba Indians, land speculation, immigration, settlement patterns, wheat, sectarianism, frontier, Presbyterian Church, trial by touch, touching test, psalmody, hymnody, Revolutionary War. THIS WORLD OF TOIL AND STRIFE: LAND, LABOR, AND THE MAKING OF AN AMERICAN COMMUNITY, 1750-1805 by PETER NATHANIEL MOORE B.A., East Tennessee State University, 1983 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ATHENS, GEORGIA 2001 © 2001 Peter Nathaniel Moore All Rights Reserved THIS WORLD OF TOIL AND STRIFE: LAND, LABOR, AND THE MAKING OF AN AMERICAN COMMUNITY, 1750-1805 by PETER NATHANIEL MOORE Approved: Major Professor: Peter Charles Hoffer Committee: John Inscoe Michael Winship Claudio Saunt Charles Hudson Allan Kulikoff Electronic Version Approved: Gordhan L. Patel Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia December 2001 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation began as an effort to understand the ordeal of Agnes Richardson, a young widow who in 1771 was suspected in the murder of her husband and was forced to prove her innocence by touching his decomposing corpse. Agnes and I have been through many interpretive twists and turns since the original seminar paper in 1999, and we have accumulated a great many debts along the way. I consider myself fortunate to have had an ideal dissertation committee, one that brought a range of expertise and tremendous depth to my project, that never let me settle for cliche arguments, and that forced me to ask new questions, think through my assumptions, and ground my conclusions in solid evidence. Peter Hoffer has been a model dissertation director, always engaged, available, supportive, and ready with a constructive critique. Michael Winship originally steered me toward Agnes and the Waxhaws and has provided invaluable comments ever since, especially relating to religion and ethnicity. John Inscoe taught me most of what I needed to know about early American communities, and Charles Hudson and Claudio Saunt helped me understand the importance of Indians to an otherwise one-dimensional white immigrant community. In addition to my committee, I have benefited from the helpful suggestions and support of numerous colleagues and friends, including Allan Kulikoff, Gregory Nobles, Bryant Simon, Monica Chojnacka, Chris Schutz, Evan Ward, Todd Bennett, Richard Byers, John Keeling, Matt Hale, Randolph Scully, and Kirsten Wood. Thanks as well to Dan Richter and the McNeil Center for Early American Studies. My six-week visit to the Center was immensely helpful, enabling me to reconceptualize my project when I needed it most. iv v I would also like to thank the many folks who worked hard on my behalf to locate and retrieve source materials. The interlibrary loan staff at the University of Georgia is an exemplar of professional courtesy; their patience knows no bounds. The archival staffs at the South Carolina Department of Archives and History, the Presbyterian Department of History, the South Caroliniana Library, the North Carolina Division of Archives and History, the Southern Historical Collection, and the Camden Archives were always eager to help. In addition, two outstanding local historians, Louise Pettus and Nancy Crockett, provided friendly advice and source materials in the latter stages of my project. Nancy is a direct descendent of Agnes Richardson and cares about her historical fate far more than I do; it is to her that this study is dedicated. Funding from several sources enabled me to finish this project in a timely fashion. A year-long dissertation-writing fellowship from the University of Georgia permitted me to set aside my teaching responsibilities and focus on research and writing. The UGA history department, Center for Humanities and Arts, and graduate school also provided generous support, as did the Georgia Chapter of the Colonial Dames of America. In addition, the McNeil Center for Early American Studies provided the warmth of office space and good conversation during this southerner’s cold winter stay in Philadelphia. Countless friends have provided much-needed moral support and encouragement to a slightly-above-the-median-age student returning to graduate school. Glenn, Andy, Sonny, Robert, Arnold, Steve, and John, to name just a few, have always been there when I needed them. Along with my sons Nathaniel and Matthew, they have never hesitated to remind me about what really matters. Finally, this dissertation would not have been possible without the love, encouragement, patience, not to mention financial support of my long-suffering wife and best friend, Kim, who believed in me when I doubted myself and postponed her dreams vi so I could pursue mine. Her tolerance and unwavering faith made the ordeal of graduate school bearable; her companionship and friendship made it a joy. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................ iv LIST OF MAPS ........................................................viii INTRODUCTION .......................................................1 PROLOGUE: THE LOWER CATAWBA VALLEY, 1540-1750 ...................16 CHAPTER 1 COMMUNITIES, COLONISTS, AND CONFLICT ................29 2 THE SOCIAL COST OF COLONIZATION ......................61 3 TOIL AND STRIFE .........................................97 4 HOME FRONT ...........................................124 5 A YEOMAN COMMUNITY IN DECLINE, 1785-1805 ............150 6 NEW LIGHT .............................................184 EPILOGUE: ORIGINS OF THE OLD SOUTH ...............................213 APPENDICES 1 POPULATION ............................................218 2 KINSHIP AND IMMIGRATION NETWORKS ..................222 3 MARRIAGE AND CHURCH AFFILIATION, 1745-1808 ..........224 4 CHURCH MEMBERSHIP AND ADHERENCE, 1801 .............227 BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................229 vii LIST OF MAPS MAP 1: LOWER CATAWBA VALLEY AND PIEDMONT CULTURAL LANDSCAPE DURING JOHN LAWSON’S VISIT ....................26 MAP 2: SOUTH CAROLINA DURING THE REGULATOR ERA ................34 MAP 3: THE WAXHAWS’ CREEK SYSTEMS ..............................38 MAP 4: SETTLEMENT PATTERN IN THE WAXHAWS, 1757 ..................46 MAP 5: SETTLEMENT PATTERN IN THE WAXHAWS, 1765 ..................47 MAP 6: SOUTH CAROLINA ROADS IN THE LATE COLONIAL PERIOD ......103 MAP 7: SETTLEMENT PATTERN IN THE WAXHAWS, 1773 .................113 MAP 8: NEIGHBORHOODS, 1795 .......................................166 viii INTRODUCTION This is the story of an obscure and unexceptional place called the Waxhaws, a stretch of land in the central piedmont lying along the east side of the Catawba River near the North Carolina-South Carolina border and settled in the mid-eighteenth century by Scots-Irish farmers.1 Since the day
Recommended publications
  • Battle of the Waxhaws, September 20, 1780: Keeping the Name of a Revolutionary War Event Straight (Impossible!) and Lamenting the Loss of a DAR Monument Patricia M
    Photo above from The Charlotte Observer, September 26, 1941 (a photocopy of clipping found at The Heritage Room, Monroe, NC) Battle of the Waxhaws, September 20, 1780: Keeping the Name of a Revolutionary War Event Straight (Impossible!) and Lamenting the Loss of a DAR Monument Patricia M. Poland, September 2008 Dickerson Genealogy & Local History Room Union County Public Library, 316 E Windsor St, Monroe, NC 28112 www.union.lib.nc.us Presented to the John Foster Chapter DAR, first meeting of the new year (paper revised after the 9-11-2008 meeting—this is the revised & ‗official‘ paper) Union County Public Library, Monroe, NC www.union.lib.nc.us Sixty-seven years ago, a group from the Daughters of the American Revolution (Mecklenburg Chapter) stood in the pouring rain in southern Union County to dedicate a monument for a brief battle fought on the plantation of Captain James Walkup (Wauchope).1 Made of mortared stone and fitted with a proper brass plaque, the large and impressive monument sat on Walkup Road upon ground that saw a Revolutionary War conflict. (see sketch inserted here from ―The Wisackyola Historical Festival Review 1966‖, p 29) Sometime between 1992 and 1997 the monument was destroyed. The details of this destruction are not clearly known.2 But why this DAR group felt a monument was important enough to erect – that is something which should be known. The battle is considered a ‗skirmish‘ which does not mean it was insignificant. Patrick O‘Kelley shares in his three-volume series, Nothing but Blood and Slaughter, insight into how he had to rethink battles and skirmishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch 5 NC Legislature.Indd
    The State Legislature The General Assembly is the oldest governmental body in North Carolina. According to tradition, a “legislative assembly of free holders” met for the first time around 1666. No documentary proof, however, exists proving that this assembly actually met. Provisions for a representative assembly in Proprietary North Carolina can be traced to the Concessions and Agreements, adopted in 1665, which called for an unicameral body composed of the governor, his council and twelve delegates selected annually to sit as a legislature. This system of representation prevailed until 1670, when Albemarle County was divided into three precincts. Berkeley Precinct, Carteret Precinct and Shaftsbury Precinct were apparently each allowed five representatives. Around 1682, four new precincts were created from the original three as the colony’s population grew and the frontier moved westward. The new precincts were usually allotted two representatives, although some were granted more. Beginning with the Assembly of 1723, several of the larger, more important towns were allowed to elect their own representatives. Edenton was the first town granted this privilege, followed by Bath, New Bern, Wilmington, Brunswick, Halifax, Campbellton (Fayetteville), Salisbury, Hillsborough and Tarborough. Around 1735 Albemarle and Bath Counties were dissolved and the precincts became counties. The unicameral legislature continued until around 1697, when a bicameral form was adopted. The governor or chief executive at the time, and his council constituted the upper house. The lower house, the House of Burgesses, was composed of representatives elected from the colony’s various precincts. The lower house could adopt its own rules of procedure and elect its own speaker and other officers.
    [Show full text]
  • Col. Abraham Buford's Waxhaws Flags Make It to Charleston
    Vol. 3 No. 5 _______ ______________________________ ______ _ _ __May 2006 Col. Abraham Buford’s Waxhaws Flags Make it to Charleston – Finally! This gold silk flag is believed to have been captured by British Lt. Col. Banastre Tarleton at the Battle of the Waxhaws [Buford’s Massacre]. Held by the Tarleton family at their seat in England, Sotheby’s New York auction house will auction these three flags, along with one other captured in Connecticut by Tarleton, on June 14, 2006. Col. Abraham Buford was leading 350 Virginia Continental replacement troops to Charles Town when he learned of the surrender of Charles Town as he arrived at Lenud’s Ferry on the Santee River. From the north side of the Santee River, Col. Buford watched helplessly the defeat of Col. Anthony W. White’s cavalry at Lenud’s Ferry by Lt. Col. Tarleton’s dragoons. Buford was ordered to retreat to Hillsborough, NC. Accompanying SC Rebel Gov. John Rutledge and valuable supplies as far as the Pleasant Hill [SC] community, he was run down and defeated at the Battle of the Waxhaws on May 29, 1780 in the Waxhaws section of South Carolina in modern Lancaster County, SC. These flags will be on display in the Old Exchange Building in Charleston, SC from May 26 - 29, 2006 as a part of Charleston’s Spoleto Festival. “…To the last extremity.” Photos of the three flags courtesy of Sotheby’s. i 1 Editor / Publisher’s Notes In This Edition The Revolution in the South has something for everyone: research, Editor’s Notes…………….……………..………2 battlefielding, ballistics, archaeology, monument building, Greene Symposium Photos…………….….…….6 material conservation, biography, tours, re-enactments, books, Calendar of Upcoming Events……..……....……7 preservation budgets, and - best of all - discoveries for the asking.
    [Show full text]
  • Program of the 75Th Anniversary Meeting
    PROGRAM OF THE 75 TH ANNIVERSARY MEETING April 14−April 18, 2010 St. Louis, Missouri THE ANNUAL MEETING of the Society for American Archaeology provides a forum for the dissemination of knowledge and discussion. The views expressed at the sessions are solely those of the speakers and the Society does not endorse, approve, or censor them. Descriptions of events and titles are those of the organizers, not the Society. Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting Published by the Society for American Archaeology 900 Second Street NE, Suite 12 Washington DC 20002-3560 USA Tel: +1 202/789-8200 Fax: +1 202/789-0284 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.saa.org Copyright © 2010 Society for American Archaeology. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publisher. Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting 3 Contents 4............... Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting Agenda 5……….….2010 Award Recipients 10.................Maps of the America’s Center 12 ................Maps of Renaissance Grand St. Louis 14 ................Meeting Organizers, SAA Board of Directors, & SAA Staff 15 .............. General Information 18. ............. Featured Sessions 20 .............. Summary Schedule 25 .............. A Word about the Sessions 27............... Program 161................SAA Awards, Scholarships, & Fellowships 167............... Presidents of SAA . 168............... Annual Meeting Sites 169............... Exhibit Map 170................Exhibitor Directory 180................SAA Committees and Task Forces 184………….Index of participants 4 Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting America’s Center APRIL 16, 2010 5 PM Call to Order Call for Approval of Minutes of the 2009 Annual Business Meeting Remarks President Margaret W.
    [Show full text]
  • Nancy Louise Crockett Papers
    Manuscripts Collections South Caroliniana Library University of South Carolina Nancy Louise Crockett Papers Contact Information: South Caroliniana Library University of South Carolina Columbia SC 29208 803-777-3132 Email: [email protected] © 2018 University of South Carolina Libraries TABLE OF CONTENTS Biographical Sketch . 2 Scope and Content Note . 2 Description of Series . 3 Series List . 4 Container List . 5 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Nancy Louise Crockett was born on 22 Feb. 1913, in Riverside, Lancaster County, South Carolina, to Nancy Estelle (1 Aug. 1879-25 Feb. 1973) and Rufus Calhoun Crockett (29 Nov. 1874-14 May 1948). In 1929, Crockett graduated from Lancaster High School, valedictorian of her class. She attended Winthrop College and graduated, magna cum laude, in 1933. As a student, she was a member of the French Literary Society and the Royal Order of Strawberry Leaf, Winthrop’s Debating Society. Crockett taught History at H.R. Rice Elementary School for forty-five years. Through most of this time, she also served as the school’s principal. In the course of her career, she received several awards, including the Valley Forge Freedom Foundation Classroom Teacher’s Medal and Award in 1963 and the Lederer-Lawson award, recognizing her contributions to historical research, in 1968. Crockett also participated in a variety of local historical and professional organizations such as the Carolinas Genealogical Society, Lancaster County Historical Society, South Carolina Educational Association, and Waxhaws Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution. Throughout her life, she has remained an active member of Old Waxhaw Presbyterian Church, one of South Carolina’s oldest and most historic churches.
    [Show full text]
  • Davie, William Richardson
    Published on NCpedia (https://ncpedia.org) Home > Davie, William Richardson Davie, William Richardson [1] Share it now! WILLIAM RICHARDSON DAVIE Governor: 1798-1799 by Wilson Angley Research Branch, NC Office of Archives and History, 2005. https://www.ncdcr.gov/about/history/division-historical-resources/nc-highway-historical-marker-program [2] See also: William Richardson Davie [3], Dictionary of North Carolina Biography William Richardson Davie (1756-1820), who had a distinguished record in the Revolution, guided the creation of the University of North Carolina [4] and is known as the “Father of the University.” Born on June 22, 1756, in County Cumberland, England, he was the son of Archibald Davie and the former Mary Richardson, recently resettled from Scotland. In 1764 Davie moved with his family to the Waxhaw region near Lancaster, South Carolina, where his maternal uncle was minister of the Old Waxhaw Presbyterian Meeting House. Davie’s wife was the former Sarah Jones of Halifax, daughter of the leading anti-Federalist Willie Jones [5]. They were the parents of six children. Graduating from the College of New Jersey (now Princeton University) in 1776, Davie returned home to fight for the Patriot cause. Seriously wounded in 1779, he retired for a time from military activity to read law under Judge Spruce Macay [6] in Salisbury. Returning to battle with the approach of Cornwallis’ army, Davie served as commissary general under Nathanael Greene during the last stages of the Revolution. After the war, Davie moved to Halifax to practice law. In 1784-1785 he represented nearby Northampton County [7] in the state House; from 1786 through 1798 he served as a representative for the town of Halifax.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judicial Branch North Carolina’S Court System Had Many Levels Before the Judicial Branch Underwent Comprehensive Reorganization in the Late 1960S
    The Judicial Branch North Carolina’s court system had many levels before the judicial branch underwent comprehensive reorganization in the late 1960s. Statewide, the N.C. Supreme Court had appellate jurisdiction, while the Superior Court had general trial jurisdiction. Hundreds of Recorder’s Courts, Domestic Relations Courts, Mayor’s Courts, County Courts and Justice of the Peace Courts created by the General Assembly existed at the local level, almost every one individually structured to meet the specific needs of the towns and counties they served. Some of these local courts stayed in session on a nearly full-time basis; others convened for only an hour or two a week. Full-time judges presided over a handful of the local courts, although most were not full-time. Some local courts had judges who had been trained as lawyers. Many, however, made do with lay judges who spent most of their time working in other careers. Salaries for judges and the overall administrative costs varied from court to court, sometimes differing even within the same county. In some instances, such as justices of the peace, court officials were compensated by the fees they exacted and they provided their own facilities. As early as 1955, certain citizens recognized the need for professionalizing and streamlining the court system in North Carolina. At the suggestion of Governor Luther Hodges and Chief Justice M.V. Barnhill, the North Carolina Bar Association sponsored an in-depth study that ultimately resulted in the restructuring of the court system. Implementing the new structure, however, required amending Article IV of the State Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina's Federalists in an Evolving Public
    NORTH CAROLINA’S FEDERALISTS IN AN EVOLVING PUBLIC SPHERE, 1790-1810 Scott King-Owen A Thesis Submitted to the University of North Carolina at Wilmington in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History University of North Carolina at Wilmington 2006 Approved by Advisory Committee _______Dr. Chris Fonvielle_______ _________Dr. Paul Townend__________ __________Dr. Alan Watson________ Chair Accepted by ______________________________ Dean, Graduate School TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv DEDICATION.................................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................. vi LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... vii INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 – NORTH CAROLINA AND ITS FEDERALIST LEADERSHIP........... 16 CHAPTER 2 – PRESS AND PUBLIC IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY................. 44 CHAPTER 3 – WILLIAM BOYLAN, FEDERALIST PARTISAN ............................... 68 CHAPTER 4 – THE WAR OF THE EDITORS .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the First Americas
    In Search of the First Americas Michael R. Waters Departments of Anthropology and Geography Center for the Study of the First Americans Texas A&M University Who were the first Americans? When did they arrive in the New World? Where did they come from? How did they travel to the Americas & settle the continent? A Brief History of Paleoamerican Archaeology Prior to 1927 People arrived late to the Americas ca. 6000 B.P. 1927 Folsom Site Discovery, New Mexico Geological Estimate in 1927 10,000 to 20,000 B.P. Today--12,000 cal yr B.P. Folsom Point Blackwater Draw (Clovis), New Mexico 1934 Clovis Discovery Folsom (Bison) Clovis (Mammoth) Ernst Antevs Geological estimate 13,000 to 14,000 B.P. Today 13,000 cal yr B.P. 1935-1990 Search continued for sites older than Clovis. Most sites did not stand up to scientific scrutiny. Calico Hills More Clovis sites were found across North America The Clovis First Model became entrenched. Pedra Furada Tule Springs Clovis First Model Clovis were the first people to enter the Americas -Originated from Northeast Asia -Entered the Americas by crossing the Bering Land Bridge and passing through the Ice Free Corridor around 13,600 cal yr B.P. (11,500 14C yr B.P.) -Clovis technology originated south of the Ice Sheets -Distinctive tools that are widespread -Within 800 years reached the southern tip of South America -Big game hunters that killed off the Megafauna Does this model still work? What is Clovis? • Culture • Era • Complex Clovis is an assemblage of distinctive tools that were made in a very prescribed way.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Carolina Historical Review
    The North Carolina Historical Review Volume XIV April, 1937 Number 2 CHILD-LABOR REFORMS IN NORTH CAROLINA SINCE 1903 By Elizabeth Huey Davidson In 1903 North Carolina adopted its first child-labor law. It was a weak measure, forbidding the employment of children un- der twelve in factories, establishing a maximum of sixty-six hours a week for persons under eighteen, and providing no machinery for enforcement of the law. The passage of this measure had resulted from a slow growth of sentiment against the evils of child labor, and its terms represented a compromise between the reformers and the cotton manufacturers of the State. There was no organization to push further legislation, however, until the formation of the National Child Labor Com- mittee in 1904. This committee was largely inspired by the work of Dr. Edgar Gardner Murphy of Montgomery, Alabama, and had at first a number of prominent Southerners on its mem- bership roll. For its Southern secretary the committee chose Dr. Alexander J. McKelway, a Presbyterian clergyman of Char- lotte, North Carolina. The law of 1903 had been in effect a year when the committee attempted to reopen the drive for legislation. Its effectiveness in that length of time cannot be judged accurately, since the re- port of the Commissioner of Labor for 1904 fails to record the number of children employed in manufacturing. 1 The general consensus of opinion expressed by the manufacturers to the com- missioner was that the law should be accepted in good faith, but that it should also be the last one of its kind.
    [Show full text]
  • OSL Ages of the Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic Components at Area 15 of the Gault Site, Central Texas, U.S.A
    Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 7 (2016) 94–103 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jasrep OSL ages of the Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic components at Area 15 of the Gault Site, Central Texas, U.S.A. K. Rodrigues a,⁎, W.J. Rink b,M.B.Collinsc,T.J.Williamsc, A. Keen-Zebert d,G.I.Lόpez e a Department of Geological Sciences and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N Virginia St, Reno, NV 89557, United States b School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada c Department of Anthropology, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, United States d Division of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, NV 89503, United States e Luminescence Dating Laboratory, CENIEH (Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana), Paseo Sierra de Atapuerca 3, Burgos 09002, Spain article info abstract Article history: The Gault Site, Texas, U.S.A., affords a near-complete regional prehistoric sequence from an ~2 m-thick alluvial Received 31 August 2015 sedimentary interval. Age estimates on Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic components were obtained using Received in revised form 10 March 2016 optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating of silt-sized quartz grains. The luminescence characteristics of Accepted 11 March 2016 the quartz are favorable, showing normal equivalent dose distributions and no evidence of incomplete zeroing. Available online 12 April 2016 The artifacts span Clovis to Archaic forms, and their ages are generally in excellent agreement with independent radiocarbon ages from five other Texas sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Appalachian Studies Bibliography Cumulation 2013-June 2016 ______
    Appalachian Studies Bibliography Cumulation 2013-June 2016 _____________________ CONTENTS Agriculture and Land Use ................................................................................................................3 Appalachian Studies.........................................................................................................................8 Archaeology and Physical Anthropology ......................................................................................14 Architecture, Historic Buildings, Historic Sites ............................................................................18 Arts and Crafts ..............................................................................................................................21 Biography .......................................................................................................................................27 Civil War, Military.........................................................................................................................29 Coal, Industry, Labor, Railroads, Transportation ..........................................................................37 Description and Travel, Recreation and Sports .............................................................................63 Economic Conditions, Economic Development, Economic Policy, Poverty ................................71 Education .......................................................................................................................................82
    [Show full text]