Food Security

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Food Security SPM5 Food security Coordinating Lead Authors: Cheikh Mbow (Senegal), Cynthia Rosenzweig (The United States of America) Lead Authors: Luis G. Barioni (Brazil), Tim G. Benton (United Kingdom), Mario Herrero (Australia/ Costa Rica), Murukesan Krishnapillai (Micronesia/India), Emma Liwenga (Tanzania), Prajal Pradhan (Germany/Nepal), Marta G. Rivera-Ferre (Spain), Tek Sapkota (Canada/Nepal), Francesco N. Tubiello (The United States of America/Italy), Yinlong Xu (China) Contributing Authors: Erik Mencos Contreras (The United States of America/Mexico), Joana Portugal Pereira (United Kingdom), Julia Blanchard (Australia), Jessica Fanzo (The United States of America), Stefan Frank (Austria), Steffen Kriewald (Germany), Gary Lanigan (Ireland), Daniel López (Spain), Daniel Mason-D’Croz (The United States of America), Peter Neofotis (The United States of America), Laxmi Pant (Canada), Renato Rodrigues (Brazil), Alex C. Ruane (The United States of America), Katharina Waha (Australia) Review Editors: Noureddine Benkeblia (Jamaica), Andrew Challinor (United Kingdom), Amanullah Khan (Pakistan), John R. Porter (United Kingdom) Chapter Scientists: Erik Mencos Contreras (The United States of America/Mexico), Abdoul Aziz Diouf (Senegal) This chapter should be cited as: Mbow, C., C. Rosenzweig, L.G. Barioni, T.G. Benton, M. Herrero, M. Krishnapillai, E. Liwenga, P. Pradhan, M.G. Rivera-Ferre, T. Sapkota, F.N. Tubiello, Y. Xu, 2019: Food Security. In: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van Diemen, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S. Neogi, M. Pathak, J. Petzold, J. Portugal Pereira, P. Vyas, E. Huntley, K. Kissick, M. Belkacemi, J. Malley, (eds.)]. In press. 437 Chapter 5 Food security Table of contents Executive summary ..................................................................................... 439 5.5 Mitigation options, challenges and opportunities ........................................................................... 480 5.1 Framing and context .................................................................... 441 5.5.1 Supply-side mitigation options .................................. 480 5.1.1 Food security and insecurity, the Box 5.4: Towards sustainable food system and climate change .............................. 442 intensification in South America ............................................. 481 5.1.2 Status of the food system, 5.5.2 Demand-side mitigation options .............................. 487 food insecurity and malnourishment ..................... 445 5.6 Mitigation, adaptation, food security and 5.1.3 Climate change, gender and equity .......................... 446 land use: Synergies, trade-offs and co-benefits .... 492 Box 5.1: Gender, food security and climate change ......................................................................... 447 5.6.1 Land-based carbon dioxide removal (CDR) 5.1.4 Food systems in AR5, SR15, and bioenergy ....................................................................... 492 and the Paris Agreement ................................................ 448 5.6.2 Mitigation, food prices, and food security .......... 494 5.6.3 Environmental and health effects of 5.2 Impacts of climate change on food systems ............ 450 adopting healthy and sustainable diets ................. 497 5.6.4 Sustainable integrated agricultural systems ....... 499 5.2.1 Climate drivers important to food security ......... 450 Cross-Chapter Box 6 | Agricultural intensification: 5.2.2 Climate change impacts on food availability .... 451 Land sparing, land sharing and sustainability ............ 502 5.2.3 Climate change impacts on access ........................... 460 5.6.5 Role of urban agriculture ................................................ 505 5.2.4 Climate change impacts on food utilisation ....... 462 5.6.6 Links to the Sustainable Development Goals ... 507 5.2.5 Climate change impacts on food stability ............ 464 5.7 Enabling conditions and knowledge gaps ................. 507 5.3 Adaptation options, challenges and opportunities ........................................................................... 464 5.7.1 Enabling policy environments ...................................... 508 5.3.1 Challenges and opportunities ...................................... 464 5.7.2 Enablers for changing markets and trade ............. 511 Box 5.2: Sustainable solutions for 5.7.3 Just Transitions to sustainability ................................. 511 food systems and climate change in Africa .................... 465 5.7.4 Mobilising knowledge ....................................................... 512 5.3.2 Adaptation framing and key concepts .................... 466 5.7.5 Knowledge gaps and key research areas .............. 513 Box 5.3: Climate change and indigenous food systems in the Hindu-Kush Himalayan Region ............. 469 5.8 Future challenges to food security .................................... 514 5.3.3 Supply-side adaptation ..................................................... 470 5 5.8.1 Food price spikes ................................................................. 514 5.3.4 Demand-side adaptation ................................................. 472 Box 5.5: Market drivers and the consequences 5.3.5 Institutional measures ...................................................... 473 of extreme weather in 2010–2011 ....................................... 516 5.3.6 Tools and finance ................................................................. 475 5.8.2 Migration and conflict ...................................................... 516 Box 5.6: Migration in the Pacific region: 5.4 Impacts of food systems on climate change ............. 475 Impacts of climate change on food security ................. 517 5.4.1 Greenhouse gas emissions from food systems ..... 475 Frequently Asked Questions .................................................................... 519 5.4.2 Greenhouse gas emissions from croplands and soils ................................................ 476 FAQ 5.1: How does climate change 5.4.3 Greenhouse gas emissions from livestock .......... 477 affect food security? .......................................................................... 519 5.4.4 Greenhouse gas emissions from aquaculture ... 478 FAQ 5.2: How can changing diets help address climate change?.................................................... 519 5.4.5 Greenhouse gas emissions from inputs, processing, storage and transport ........................... 478 5.4.6 Greenhouse gas emissions associated References .............................................................................................................. 520 with different diets .............................................................. 479 438 Food security Chapter 5 Executive summary Pastoral system vulnerability is exacerbated by non-climate factors (land tenure, sedentarisation, changes in traditional institutions, The current food system (production, transport, processing, invasive species, lack of markets, and conflicts). {5.2.2} packaging, storage, retail, consumption, loss and waste) feeds the great majority of world population and supports the Fruit and vegetable production, a key component of healthy livelihoods of over 1 billion people. Since 1961, food supply per diets, is also vulnerable to climate change (medium evidence, capita has increased more than 30%, accompanied by greater use high agreement). Declines in yields and crop suitability are projected of nitrogen fertilisers (increase of about 800%) and water resources under higher temperatures, especially in tropical and semi-tropical for irrigation (increase of more than 100%). However, an estimated regions. Heat stress reduces fruit set and speeds up development of 821 million people are currently undernourished, 151 million children annual vegetables, resulting in yield losses, impaired product quality, under five are stunted, 613 million women and girls aged 15 to 49 and increasing food loss and waste. Longer growing seasons enable suffer from iron deficiency, and 2 billion adults are overweight or a greater number of plantings to be cultivated and can contribute obese. The food system is under pressure from non-climate stressors to greater annual yields. However, some fruits and vegetables need (e.g., population and income growth, demand for animal-sourced a period of cold accumulation to produce a viable harvest, and products), and from climate change. These climate and non-climate warmer winters may constitute a risk. {5.2.2} stresses are impacting the four pillars of food security (availability, access, utilisation, and stability). {5.1.1, 5.1.2} Food security and climate change have strong gender and equity dimensions (high confidence). Worldwide, women play Observed climate change is already affecting food security a key role in food security, although regional differences exist. through increasing temperatures, changing precipitation Climate change impacts vary among diverse social groups depending patterns, and greater frequency of some extreme events (high on age, ethnicity, gender, wealth, and class. Climate extremes confidence). Studies that separate out climate change from other have immediate and long-term impacts on livelihoods of poor factors affecting crop yields have
Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Food Systems Concept and Framework
    Sustainable food systems Concept and framework WHAT IS A SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEM? Food systems (FS) encompass the entire range of actors and their interlinked value-adding activities involved in the production, aggregation, processing, distribution, consumption and disposal of food products that originate from agriculture, forestry or fisheries, and parts of the broader economic, societal and natural environments in which they are embedded. The food system is composed of sub-systems (e.g. farming system, waste management system, input supply system, etc.) and interacts with other key systems (e.g. energy system, trade system, health system, etc.). Therefore, a structural change in the food system might originate from a change in another system; for example, a policy promoting more biofuel in the energy system will have a significant impact on the food system. A sustainable food system (SFS) is a food system that delivers food security and nutrition for all in such a way that the economic, social and environmental bases to generate food security and nutrition for future generations are not compromised. This means that: – It is profitable throughout (economic sustainability); – It has broad-based benefits for society (social sustainability); and – It has a positive or neutral impact on the natural environment (environmental sustainability). A sustainable food system lies at the heart of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Adopted in 2015, the SDGs call for major transformations in agriculture and food systems in order to end hunger, achieve food security and improve nutrition by 2030. To realize the SDGs, the global food system needs to be reshaped to be more productive, more inclusive of poor and marginalized populations, environmentally sustainable and resilient, and able to deliver healthy and nutritious diets to all.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conditions for Sustainability of Tropical Agriculture. Bioeconomic Models Applied to Five Contrasting Farming Systems
    The conditions for sustainability of tropical agriculture. Bioeconomic models applied to five contrasting farming systems. Paper presented for the mini-symposium on modeling at the International Association of Agricultural Economists conference In Berlin August 2000. Bruno Barbier1 and Chantal Carpentier2 Abstract Bioeconomic models (BEMs) are models that simulate biophysical processes and economic activities based on optimization algorithms. This paper describes five applications of BEMs in five contrasted tropical farming systems from Africa and Latin America. The objective of this study is to understand the land use dynamic, assess the strengths and limitations of each agro-ecosystem, and predict the response farmers are likely to give to various external changes such as prices and population growth. Since these models are reasonable approximation of what is likely to happen in the future, we made recommendations about the possibilities of boosting production, alleviating poverty and maintaining the environment. The simulations show contrasting results for each site. The main factor of differentiation between each site is rainfall with the more challenging area being the Sahel. However the more humid area is not the better area. The seemingly better area is the hillside area of Honduras because springs and good access to a large city made intensification a reality. The problems are of different nature in each site. The African villages have the greatest challenges since population growth requires intensification and that intensification under warm climate is more expensive than under colder climate. Indeed the central problem of most African soils is its low natural fertility and then the high oxidation rates which makes permanent cultivation difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Data and Energy Poverty Alleviation
    big data and cognitive computing Article Big Data and Energy Poverty Alleviation Hossein Hassani 1,* , Mohammad Reza Yeganegi 2 , Christina Beneki 3, Stephan Unger 4 and Mohammad Moradghaffari 5 1 Research Institute of Energy Management and Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417466191, Iran 2 Department of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran 1955847781, Iran; [email protected] 3 Department of Tourism, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Ionian University, Galinos Building, 7 Tsirigoti Square, 49100 Corfu, Greece; [email protected] 4 Department of Economics and Business, Saint Anselm College, 100 Saint Anselm Drive, Manchester, NH 03103, USA; [email protected] 5 Department of International Relations and Energy Policies, Azad University of Tehran, North Branch, Vafadar Blvd., Shahid Sadoughi St. Hakimieh Exit, Shahid Babaee Highway, Tehran 1651153311, Iran; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 11 June 2019; Accepted: 16 September 2019; Published: 24 September 2019 Abstract: The focus of this paper is to bring to light the vital issue of energy poverty alleviation and how big data could improve the data collection quality and mechanism. It also explains the vicious circle of low productivity, health risk, environmental pollution and energy poverty and presents currently used energy poverty measures and alleviation policies and stresses the associated problems in application due to the underlying dynamics. Keywords: energy poverty alliteration; big data 1. Introduction Energy poverty is a term widely used to define living conditions under unaffordable and inaccessible energy resources. There are a number of factors that cause energy poverty in a broader sense. On the one hand, local factors such as natural resources, geographical location, local policies, household income or education level play an important role in individual energy accessibility and affordability [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • Lactic Acid Bacteria
    Sustainable Agriculture August 2013 SA-8 Natural Farming: Lactic Acid Bacteria David M. Ikeda1, Eric Weinert, Jr.1, Kim C.S. Chang1, Joseph M. McGinn1, Sherri A. Miller1 Cheyanne Keliihoomalu2, and Michael W. DuPonte2 1Cho Global Natural Farming Hawai‘i, Hilo, HI 2College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, Cooperative Extension Service, Hilo, HI Introduction for the production of yogurt, cheese, cultured butter, Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are ubiquitous microorgan- sour cream, sausage, kimchee, olives, and sauerkraut isms that can be beneficial in crop and livestock produc- (Nordqvist 2004). tion. With their long history of use in food preservation by many world cultures (Nordqvist 2004), LAB are How Are LAB Cultured? generally recognized as safe for human consumption. By Step-by-step instructions are given below. Rice grains producing lactic acid as a fermentation metabolite, these are readily available, economical sources of LAB. microorganisms prolong storage, preserve nutritive value, When washing rice with clean water in preparation for and enhance flavors of otherwise perishable foods. LAB cooking, colonies of LAB can be collected in the rinse are easy to collect and economical to culture, store, and water. Microorganisms other than LAB are also pres- use. This fact sheet addresses frequently asked questions ent, but allowing the rice rinse water to sit for 3 to 5 concerning LAB collection, culture, storage, and use in days will cause LAB to become the predominant spe- Natural Farming. cies. Since the rinse water is low in nutrients, milk is then added as a food source for the LAB. Fresh cow’s What Are Lactic Acid Bacteria? or goat’s milk, which is high in lactose (milk sugar), “Lactic acid bacteria” (LAB) refers to a large group is an ideal food source for LAB proliferation, or cul- of bacteria, rather than a single species or strain, that ture.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Human Activities
    4 Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Human Activities CO-CHAIRS D. Kupfer (Germany, Fed. Rep.) R. Karimanzira (Zimbabwe) CONTENTS AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, AND OTHER HUMAN ACTIVITIES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 77 4.1 INTRODUCTION 85 4.2 FOREST RESPONSE STRATEGIES 87 4.2.1 Special Issues on Boreal Forests 90 4.2.1.1 Introduction 90 4.2.1.2 Carbon Sinks of the Boreal Region 90 4.2.1.3 Consequences of Climate Change on Emissions 90 4.2.1.4 Possibilities to Refix Carbon Dioxide: A Case Study 91 4.2.1.5 Measures and Policy Options 91 4.2.1.5.1 Forest Protection 92 4.2.1.5.2 Forest Management 92 4.2.1.5.3 End Uses and Biomass Conversion 92 4.2.2 Special Issues on Temperate Forests 92 4.2.2.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Temperate Forests 92 4.2.2.2 Global Warming: Impacts and Effects on Temperate Forests 93 4.2.2.3 Costs of Forestry Countermeasures 93 4.2.2.4 Constraints on Forestry Measures 94 4.2.3 Special Issues on Tropical Forests 94 4.2.3.1 Introduction to Tropical Deforestation and Climatic Concerns 94 4.2.3.2 Forest Carbon Pools and Forest Cover Statistics 94 4.2.3.3 Estimates of Current Rates of Forest Loss 94 4.2.3.4 Patterns and Causes of Deforestation 95 4.2.3.5 Estimates of Current Emissions from Forest Land Clearing 97 4.2.3.6 Estimates of Future Forest Loss and Emissions 98 4.2.3.7 Strategies to Reduce Emissions: Types of Response Options 99 4.2.3.8 Policy Options 103 75 76 IPCC RESPONSE STRATEGIES WORKING GROUP REPORTS 4.3 AGRICULTURE RESPONSE STRATEGIES 105 4.3.1 Summary of Agricultural Emissions of Greenhouse Gases 105 4.3.2 Measures and
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Poverty and Bioenergy Discussion Paper
    Fuel poverty is a worldwide issue affecting an ever increasing proportion of the global population. Although there is recognition of the Fuel Poverty and Bioenergy problem at the highest levels of government, insufficient Discussion paper efforts are being made to address fundamental needs. Bioenergy and other renewables, have a significant role to play in mitigating the worst effects of fuel poverty although this needs careful planning and implementation. IEA BioenergyIEA BIOENERGY: Task 43 ExCo: Report 2015:TR03a2009:05 FUEL POVERTY AND BIOENERGY DISCUSSION PAPER Authors K.M. Richardsa, S. Pearceb, J. Domacc,W. Whited, S. Elbee, E.E. Hohlef a TV Energy Ltd, New Greenham Park, Newbury, RG19 6HS United Kingdom Tel: +44 1635 817420, Fax +44 1635 552779, [email protected] bUniversity of Reading, Whiteknights park, Reading, United Kingdom c North-West Croatia Regional Energy, Dužice 1, ZAGREB, 10000, CroatiaTel: +385 1 309 8315, Fax: +385 1 309 8316, [email protected] d Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, 5320-122 Street, Edmonton, Alberta T6H 3S5 Tel: +1 780 4357315, Fax +1 780 4357359, [email protected] e SPRINT (GbR), Luisenstr. 16, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany, Tel. +49 6151 6677801, Fax +49 6151 4600960, [email protected] f The Energy Farm – Center for Bioenergy, Røykenviklinna 617, N-2760 Brandbu, Norway Tel: +47 61 336090, Fax: +47 61 336090, [email protected] KEY MESSAGES Fuel poverty is a worldwide issue affecting an ever increasing proportion of the global population. Although there is recognition of the problem at the highest levels of government, insufficient efforts are being made to address fundamental needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Poverty in the Context of Climate Change
    Empowered lives. Resilient nations. Energy and Poverty in the Context of Climate Change Background Papers Series 2012/17 Abstract Energy drives development, economic as well as human, with advanced technologies as means to achieve this. The deprivations in energy in terms of quantity as well as quality causes lack of development thereby poverty and human sufferings. This technical paper is an attempt at providing deeper insights into these aspects with a focus on the developing countries of the Asia and the Pacific region. The paper begins with emphasizing the issues of securing energy needs of poor and climate change mitigation emerging as conflicting challenges, and their significance in the Asia-Pacific region in the global context. These challenges are extremely critical in the region because it has the highest energy deprivation among the poor at present and it is fast moving towards emerging as the biggest emitter of CO2 in the future. Further, the linkages between energy, poverty, sustainable development and climate change are analysed by developing different sets of indicators and the results suggested relatively strong association among these. Finally, the possibility of providing universal access to modern energy carriers for the households of the Asia-Pacific is explored by adopting a low-carbon pathway. Key words: Energy Access, Energy Security, Climate Change, Poverty The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations, including UNDP, or the UN Member States. This paper was submitted to UNDP Asia-Pacific Regional Centre as a technical background paper to inform the Asia-Pacific Human Development Report, “One Planet to Share”.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Energy for Poverty Reduction: an Action Plan
    Sustainable Energy for Poverty Reduction: an Action Plan Authors: ITDG, IT Consultants, IT Power and ITDG Latin America Contents Executive summary ................................................................... 3 1 Introduction................................................................................. 6 1.1 Background .................................................................................. 6 1.2 Who are the two billion without access to modern energy? ...... 11 1.3 Energy service options .............................................................. 14 2 International initiatives to get energy to the poor ................ 17 2.1 Existing international initiatives .................................................. 17 2.2 The role of the international institutions ..................................... 19 2.3 Financing energy for the poor .................................................... 22 3 Action plan for sustainable energy for poverty reduction .. 24 3.1 International declaration ............................................................ 24 3.2 National implementation ............................................................ 25 3.3 Other institutions ........................................................................ 28 3.4 The voice of the poor ................................................................. 30 A1 China case study ..................................................................... 31 A 1.1 Chinese economy and energy ................................................... 31 A 1.2 Examples:
    [Show full text]
  • What Factors Account for State-To-State Differences in Food Security?
    What Factors Account for State-to-State Differences in Food Security? By Judi Bartfeld, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Rachel Dunifon, Cornell University, Mark Nord, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Steven Carlson, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Economic Information Bulletin No. 20. Abstract States differ in the extent to which their residents are food secure— meaning that they have consistent access to enough food for active, healthy living. The prevalence of food security in a State depends not only on the characteristics of households in the State, such as their income, employment, and household structure, but also on State-level characteristics, such as average wages, cost of housing, levels of participation in food assistance programs, and tax policies. Taken together, an identified set of household-level and State-level factors account for most of the State-to-State differences in food security. Some State-level factors point to specific policies that are likely to improve food security, such as policies that increase the supply of affordable housing, promote the use of Federal food assistance programs, or reduce the total tax burden on low-income households. Keywords: Food security, food insecurity, hunger, very low food security, State predictors of food security 1800 M St, NW Washington, DC 20036 November 2006 1 EIB-20/What Factors Account for State-to-State Differences in Food Security? Introduction Food security, defined as access by all people at all times to enough food for an active, healthy life, is one of several conditions necessary for the Nation’s population to be healthy and well nourished.
    [Show full text]
  • Small-Scale Solar Power Saves Energy System Billions in Fuel, Grid and CO₂ Costs
    Greenpeace EU media briefing - EMBARGO 6AM CET 4 October 2018 4 October 2018 Report: small-scale solar power saves energy system billions in fuel, grid and CO₂ costs Payback period for household solar panels would be cut in half with fairer cost-benefit analysis Households with solar panels are saving the energy system billions in fuel and grid costs and benefiting society overall by helping cut greenhouse gases, a new report has found. An accurate assessment of costs and benefits of small-scale, locally distributed solar power would also allow households and small businesses to recover investments in solar panels twice as fast as is currently possible, according to the report by energy consultancy ecoSynergies. The new valuation of solar power that is the basis for this report – and is in line with brand new EU renewable energy rules – is based on the so-called ‘value of solar’ approach that is already used in the United States,i but has never before been applied in a European context. The report focuses on two Spanish case studies because, while Spain has some of the best conditions for solar energy in Europe, it also has some of the most restrictive laws for people and small businesses producing their own electricity with solar panels. Energy consultants ecoSynergies expect that the results of the Spanish analysis would be replicated in other European countries. The overall benefits of small-scale renewables, which mainly stem from savings on fossil fuel costs, CO₂ emission savings, avoided operating costs for fossil fuel and nuclear plants, and power grid distribution savings, are not currently recognised in remuneration schemes for distributed solar power.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending Hunger and Achieving Food Security for All Answers to Guiding Questions -UNFPA
    Ending hunger and achieving food security for all Answers to guiding questions -UNFPA System Closely related SDGs Selected SDGS with Selected SDGs selected for HLPF synergies to where trade-offs harness need to be mitigated Ending hunger and achieving food security for all: 2, 3, 17 1, 4, 5, 6, 8 6, 13, 14, 15 strengthening livelihoods of the poor, ensuring sustainable and healthy food production systems and improving the lives of all V Guiding questions 1. Which areas and socio-economic groups are especially vulnerable to poor nutrition and food insecurity and what are ways to ensure that food systems transformations leave no one behind? Key messages: - There are striking interlinkages between nutrition and food security, poverty, gender, and reproductive health- with girls, adolescents and women especially vulnerable to malnutrition given the negative impacts of gender inequality and other forms of discrimination on individual food security and access to nutrients; - Lack of universal access to optimal nutrition among girls, pregnant women and infants has long lasting and intergenerational consequences for sexual and reproductive health and development, resulting in negative pregnancy outcomes and lifelong consequences that include lower cognitive development for the newborn, delayed maturation, extended adolescent growth periods, as well as adult-onset conditions, such as obesity and diabetes; - Poverty and food insecurity are among key drivers of sexual bartering, survival sex, sex work and child marriage. The special nutritional needs among girls and young women needs to be prioritized as part of a comprehensive approach to breaking the intergenerational cycle of poverty and gender discrimination, including by ending child marriage, discouraging early childbearing, and assuring that all young women have the opportunity to grow into adulthood before starting a family.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributing to Food Security and Sustainability in a Changing World
    Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture Contributing to food security and sustainability in a changing world platform fo r agrobiodiversit y PA Rr e s e a r c h Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture Contributing to food security and sustainability in a changing world OUTCOMES OF AN EXPERT WORKSHOP HELD BY FAO AND THE PLATFORM ON AGROBIODIVERSITY RESEARCH FROm 14–16 APRIL 2010 IN ROME, ITALY Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the Platform for Agrobiodiversity Research platform fo r agrobiodiversit y PA Rr e s e a r c h Hosted by Bioversity International The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-106748-2 All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees.
    [Show full text]