DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment Environmental United States Department of Agriculture Assessment ELKHORN PROJECT Canyon Lakes Ranger District, Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests Forest Service Larimer County, Colorado March 2014 Elkhorn Area from West Lake Campground Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Kevin W. Atchley District Ranger Canyon Lakes Ranger District For more information contact: Nehalem Clark, Project Lead 2150 Centre Ave, Bldg. E Fort Collins, CO 80526 (970) 295-6617 [email protected] The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 2 Canyon Lakes Ranger District, Arapaho Roosevelt National Forest and Pawnee National Grassland Elkhorn Project – Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES.................................................................................. 4 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 2: DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ..................................................... 12 CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ................................................. 37 CHAPTER 4: CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION ............................................ 131 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ............................................................................................. 132 BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................... 139 3 Canyon Lakes Ranger District, Arapaho Roosevelt National Forest and Pawnee National Grassland Elkhorn Project – Environmental Assessment LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES MAPS Map 1. Elkhorn Area Vicinity Map 11 Map 2. Forest Plan Management Areas and Designated Roadless Areas 18 Map 3. Existing Transportation System 19 Map 4. Alternative 2 – Elkhorn Proposed Vegetation Treatments 20 Map 5. Alternative 2 – Elkhorn Proposed Transportation System 21 Map 6. Alternative 2 – Proposed Watershed Improvement Projects 25 TABLES Table 1. Proposed vegetation treatment units, Elkhorn project 16 Table 2. Summary of Elkhorn road system and proposed changes 22 Table 3. Watershed ownership and condition class 39 Table 4. Fuel hazard by class for Elkhorn project area 53 Table 5. Fuel model by percent of Elkhorn project area 55 Table 6. Predicted fire behavior results for the existing conditions and No Action 57 alternative under 90th percentile weather Table 7. Change in fuel hazard acres before and after proposed vegetation 58 treatments (tx), within project area and within proposed treatment units, in acres. Table 8. Predicted fire behavior results for all treatment units post- 59 implementation under 90th percentile weather Table 9. Predicted fire behavior results for Unit 1 before and after treatment 60 under 90th percentile weather. Table 10: Summary of determinations for Threatened (T) and Sensitive plants 62 4 Canyon Lakes Ranger District, Arapaho Roosevelt National Forest and Pawnee National Grassland Elkhorn Project – Environmental Assessment Table 11. Species of Local Concern included in project analysis 63 Table 12. Acres and percent cover type, Elkhorn project area (all land ownership) 76 Table 13. Habitat Structure Stage (HSS) for principal forest types (acres), Elkhorn 78 project area (all land ownership) Table 14. Changes in HSS expected to occur following proposed vegetation 84 treatments (tx), Elkhorn project Table 15. Federally-listed wildlife species and Forest Service management 86 indicator and sensitive species included in the Elkhorn wildlife project analysis Table 16. Summary of determinations and estimation of effects by alternative for 86 the Elkhorn Project. Table 17. Vegetation treatment units, as part of the Elkhorn proposed action, 116 requiring an easement or temporary road use permit from private landowners Table 18. Summary of existing road mileages in Elkhorn project area 127 FIGURES 39 Figure 1. Map of the watersheds draining the Elkhorn project area Figure 2. Tiger salamander photo 41 Figure 3. Existing and expected road density in Elkhorn project area 47 Figure 4. Historic vegetation management activities within the Elkhorn project 79 area Figure 5. Key Observation Points and proposed vegetation treatment units, 119 Elkhorn Project APPENDICES Appendix 1. Elkhorn Public Scoping Comments and Responses 151 Appendix 2. Elkhorn Project description of vegetation treatment prescriptions 163 5 Canyon Lakes Ranger District, Arapaho Roosevelt National Forest and Pawnee National Grassland Elkhorn Project – Environmental Assessment CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Background The Canyon Lakes Ranger District (CLRD) of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests is proposing a suite of projects within the Elkhorn project area for the purpose of reducing hazardous fuels adjacent to private land and communities; maintaining or improving forest health and watershed condition; enhancing bighorn sheep habitat by reducing hiding cover for predators, providing for long-term recreational opportunities in the Christmas tree area and recommending an effective transportation system for this area. The Elkhorn project area is defined by the Cache la Poudre River and Highway 14 to the south, the Manhattan Road (CR 69) to the east, the Deadman Road to the north and a portion of Forest System Road (FSR) 517 to the west. It is adjacent to the communities of Crystal Lakes, Red Feather Lakes, Manhattan and the Upper Poudre Canyon. The Elkhorn project area is approximately 22,293 acres in total consisting of 20,800 acres of National Forest System (NFS) lands while state and private land comprise the remainder. (See Vicinity Map on page 11). This project is being prepared under 36 CFR 218, a pre-decisional objection process for preparing NEPA. This process is intended to be collaborative and address public concerns before a decision is made. One of the many purposes of NEPA is to reduce agency paperwork and delay in analysis. Therefore, this Environmental Assessment (EA) tiers to the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared for the 1997 Revision of the Land and Resource Management Plan for the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests (Forest Plan). The Forest Plan defines management within Forest Lands, and reference to this document eliminates repetitive discussions of decisions that have been made previously. These documents, as well as detailed information from resource specialists in the project record, are available upon request from the Canyon Lakes Ranger District, Fort Collins, Colorado. This EA is not a decision document. Instead, it presents evidence and analysis necessary to determine whether the consequences of the proposed action have “significant” effects on the human environment and therefore, whether an EIS is necessary. Upon completion of this determination, the Responsible Official Kevin W. Atchley, District Ranger, will make a decision to implement the proposed action or the no action alternative. Purpose and Need for Action The purposes of this project are to: Reduce hazardous fuels on National Forest System (NFS) lands that may contribute to the increase spread and intensity of wildfire; Maintain and improve forest health in stands affected by the current mountain pine beetle (MPB) epidemic; Provide economic timber products; Improve watershed and fisheries conditions; Enhance bighorn sheep habitat; Provide for long-term recreational opportunities in the Christmas tree sale area; and Manage the transportation system for the project area. 6 Canyon Lakes Ranger District, Arapaho Roosevelt National Forest and Pawnee National Grassland Elkhorn Project – Environmental Assessment Fuels Hazard Reduction Many of the forest stands in the lower elevations of the project area do not exhibit characteristics typical of the fire regime and condition class expected at this elevation and location. The land ownership pattern within and adjacent to the project area is intermingled Federal and private land ownership. Current fuels conditions in the project area, including dead trees killed by the mountain pine beetle (MPB) epidemic, can contribute to uncharacteristically severe wildfire behavior that could threaten improvements on private property and affect natural resources on NFS land. Action is needed to restore these stands to stocking levels and species composition that more closely resemble typical conditions. There is a high density of homes in the communities adjacent to the Elkhorn project area and on other surrounding private parcels. In addition to community structures, values at risk include infrastructure such as utility lines, evacuation routes and water supplies. As a means of reducing the threat from wildfire created by these conditions,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Locatable Mineral Reports for Colorado, South Dakota, and Wyoming provided to the U.S. Forest Service in Fiscal Years 1996 and 1997 by Anna B. Wilson Open File Report OF 97-535 1997 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. CONTENTS page INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 COLORADO ...................................................................... 2 Arapaho National Forest (administered by White River National Forest) Slate Creek .................................................................. 3 Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests Winter Park Properties (Raintree) ............................................... 15 Gunnison and White River National Forests Mountain Coal Company ...................................................... 17 Pike National Forest Land Use Resource Center .................................................... 28 Pike and San Isabel National Forests Shepard and Associates ....................................................... 36 Roosevelt National Forest Larry and Vi Carpenter ....................................................... 52 Routt National Forest Smith Rancho ............................................................... 55 San Juan National
    [Show full text]
  • Pikes Peak Massif
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • Fred Barr 1882 - 1940 by Eric Swab
    Fred Barr 1882 - 1940 By Eric Swab I have always considered Fred Barr the benevolent benefactor of Pikes Peak hikers. He is credited with single handedly building the famous trail from Manitou Springs to the summit of Pikes Peak that bares his name. It is clear that he loved the mountains; however, his motivation for building trails was a combination of that admiration and his entrepreneurial spirit. Fred was born in Arkansas in June of 1882 to William M. and Mary Wade Barr, the eldest of 6 children. All of his siblings were girls.1 He came to Colorado with his family in 18932 when he was 11 years old. By 1900 we find Fred living with his family in Colorado City (now the Westside of Colorado Springs).3 Fred’s maternal grandfather Joel H. Wade had settled at the foot of Cheyenne Mountain on the Cripple Creek stage road in 1885. The Cripple Creek stage stopped at Wade’s place during the mining camp’s boom days.4 It is said that young Fred liked to hitch rides on those stage coaches headed into the mountains.5 These experiences must have been quite a thrill for a Kansas boy, and undoubtedly contributed to Fred’s appreciation of Pikes Peak. The Burro Livery Business By 1900 the City Directory for Colorado City lists William Barr & Son, proprietors of burros & tourist carriages on the north side of Manitou Rd, West End. That same year, Fred Barr, at age 18, is listed as a driver at the Garden of Gods station, residing on the north side of Colorado Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Camping Information for the Guanella Pass Area
    Clear Creek Ranger District Visitor Services & Idaho Springs Visitor Center 2060 Miner St. Idaho Springs, CO 80452 (303) 567-4382 htttp://fs.usda.gov United States Department of Agriculture CAMPING Camping Information for the Guanella Pass area General Information With a few exceptions, dispersed camping is allowed on national forest public lands. Camping in the national forest at one location is limited to 14 consecutive days. The campsite must then be moved a minimum of three miles. Camping can then continue for an additional 14 days. Camping is restricted to a maximum of 28 days in any 60-day period. More than 40% of lands within the Arapaho National Forest boundary are private or otherwise owned. A map showing land ownership is recommended. It is YOUR responsibility to know if you are on private, city, county, state, national park or national forest land. Pack out all trash. There are no services. Practice Leave No Trace ethics. Restricted Areas within the Guanella Pass road corridor from Georgetown to Grant New camping regulations are in place along the Guanella Pass corridor from Georgetown to Grant. This includes no camping along the Silver Dollar Lake Road. Concentrated impacts from visitors to the Guanella Pass corridor are causing safety concerns, damaging resources and threatening municipal water sources. Camping is restricted to campgrounds and designated campsites only. Developed Campgrounds on the Clear Creek RD, Arapaho National Forest Georgetown to the summit of Guanella Pass Clear Lake Campground A small rustic campground located 4 miles south of Georgetown along the Guanella Pass Road, elevation 9,600 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Bison Peaks Lodge ~ Lake George, Colorado (Park County)
    ~ Bison Peaks Lodge ~ Lake George, Colorado (Park County) Ranches ~ Land ~ Homes ~ Cabins Central Colorado Mountains TrueWestColorado.com 719.687.9200 (Office) Offered at $1,100,000 Colorado Homes For Sale Mountain‐Themed Lodge for Large Groups ~ Surrounded by Pike National Forest ~ Pond and Creek ~ Superb Outdoor Recreation Camp ~ Untouched, Dramatic Mountain Scenery ~ Hunt, Hike, Ride, Bike, Shoot, Fish, Boat No Covenants ~ Paved Access 36.72+/‐ Acres Bison Peaks Lodge has the location and amenities suitable for an outstanding outdoor adventure/recreation camp for youth, families or hunting! Surrounded by 1000+ acres of Pike National Forest & nestled in the Tarryall River Valley, you have endless opportunities to explore your wild & adventurous side – hunting, orienteering, ATV, archery, target shooting, mountain biking, hiking, fishing, boating & MORE! The accommodations are already in place for large groups including a rustic mountain lodge (sleeps 21) w/ commercial kitchen & water well, Pond & Creek great room / dining area with a huge wood‐burning fireplace, a bunk house that hosts 18, and (8) yurts with sleeping space for another 30+ people! Other exciting Property features: a 1940’s 1‐room dry cabin (w/ dedicated outhouse!), workshop, rustic outdoor cooking, rock climbing wall, campfire rings, nature/mountain biking trails, mature pine & colorful groves of aspen encircle lush meadows interlaced with game trails. A variety of wildlife ‐ trophy deer, elk, bear and turkey call this region their own. Every direction delivers a dramatic and awe‐inspiring mountain landscape. Venture a short distance to experience one of the best Colorado fly‐fishing destination in Colorado along the lazy banks of the Tarryall River or toss a line as your boat meanders across the beautifully scenic Tarryall Reservoir.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Evans Wilderness Trails
    South Platte Ranger District 19316 Goddard Ranch Ct Morrison, CO 80465 (303)275-5610 Voice (303)275-5642 Fax RIDING HIKING www.fs. usda. gov/goto/psicc/sopl Pike Mount Evans Wilderness Trails 1. Cub Creek Trail #40 11. Resthouse Meadows Trail #57 2. Indian Creek Trail #41 12. Summit Lake Trail #82 3. Lost Creek Trail #42 13. South Chicago Creek Trail #90 4. Beartrack Lakes Trail #43 14. Abyss Trail #602 5. Beaver Meadows Trail #44 15. Rosalie Trail #603 6. Lincoln Lake Trail #45 16. Meridian Trail #604 7. Captain Mountain Trail #46 17. Threemile Trail #635 8. Chicago Lakes Trail #52 18. Tanglewood Trail #636 9. Hells Hole Trail #53 19.BierstadtTrail#711 10. Roosevelt Lakes Trail #56 Each Wilderness has its own set of regulations in addition to the following three regulations, established under the Wilderness Act of 1964, which apply to all Wilderness areas. • Motorized equipment is prohibited, including chain saws, battery powered tools, generators, etc. • Mechanized transportation is prohibited, including bicycles, hang gliders or carts. • Aircraft, including helicopters, are prohibited from landing, or dropping off/picking up any materials, supplies or persons. Additional regulations for each Wilderness on the Pike National Forests can be found by calling the managing District Office. Arapaho National Forest (#1-13) Pike National Forest (#14-19) Clear Creek Ranger District South Platte Ranger District 101 Chicago Creek Rd 19316 Goddard Ranch Ct PO Box 3307 Morrison, CO 80465 Idaho Springs, CO 80452 303-275-5610 303-567-3000 Required Registration Beginning in the spring of 2005, the Forest Service is implementing a mandatory self-issuing permit system in the Mount Evans and Lost Creek Wildernesses to enable us to better manage these heavily visited Wildernesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests and Pawnee National Grassland
    Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests And Pawnee National Grassland Monitoring and Evaluation Report of the 1997 Revision of the Land and Resource Management Plan for Fiscal Year 2012 Table of Contents Forest Certification ............................................................................................................................ iii Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 A brief overview of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests and Grassland Monitoring and Evaluation ................................................................................................................. 9 A review of the past fifteen years of monitoring by the Forest Monitoring and Evaluation Team Table 4.1 Minimum Legally Required Monitoring Activities Lands AdequatelyRestocked ................................................................................................................................ 10 Harvest Unit Size ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Control of Destructive Insects and Diseases ........................................................................................................ 11 Population Trends of Management Indicator Species .......................................................................................... 12 Effects of Off-Road Vehicles ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Third Congress of the United States of America
    H. R. 631 One Hundred Third Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three An Act To designate certain lands in the State of Colorado as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND DEFINITIONS. (a) SHORT TITLE.ÐThis Act may be cited as the ``Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993''. (b) DEFINITIONS.Ð(1) As used in this Act with reference to lands in the National Forest System, the term ``the Secretary'' means the Secretary of Agriculture. (2) As used in this Act with respect to lands not in the National Forest System, the term ``the Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Interior. SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO THE WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM. (a) ADDITIONS.ÐThe following lands in the State of Colorado are hereby designated as wilderness and, therefore, as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: (1) Certain lands in the Gunnison Resource Area adminis- tered by the Bureau of Land Management which comprise approximately 3,390 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled ``American Flats Additions to the Big Blue Wilderness Proposal (American Flats)'', dated January, 1993, and which are hereby incorporated in and shall be deemed to be a part of the wilderness area designated by section 102(a)(1) of Public Law 96±560 and renamed Uncompahgre Wilderness by section 3(f) of this Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Clear Creek Ranger Distric MVUM
    United States Department of Agriculture of Department States United 420000 430000 440000 450000 460000 470000 Forest Service Forest 105°52'30"W 105°45'0"W 105°37'30"W 105°30'0"W 105°22'30"W Legend +$ +$ Thorodin Mtn Colorado JAN-01-2010 Colorado ) Roads Open to Highway Legal Vehicles PURPOSE AND CONTENTS Roads Open to All Vehicles Seasonal Designation (See Table) America's Great Outdoors Great America's 39°52'30"N OF THIS MAP ! ! ! Dispersed Camping Golden Gate Canyon ! ! ! (See Dispersed Camping Table) State Park ! The designations shown on this motor vehicle use map ! 39°52'30"N ! are effective as of the date on the front cover and will Interstate ! ! 719.1C ! ! ! ! ! remain in effect until superseded by the next year's motor ! Highways, US, State ! 4N ! ! ! ! 7! ! 1 ! 9 ! . ! 1 ! +$ ! ! ! ! ! ! vehicle use map. It is the responsibility of the user to ! ! ! 7 ! ) ! Other Public Roads 1 ! ! ! 6 ! Dakota Hill ! acquire the current MVUM.This map shows the National ! ! ! . 1 70333 ! ! ! ! ! t ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! c ! . Short Route Identifier i ! ! r ! 3 t ! ! Forest System roads, National Forest System trails, and ! ! 4 s ! ! Apex i ! ! ! 71 ! D ! $ t ! + ! r ! s ! ! ! ! # ! G e e ! ! the areas on National Forest System lands in the Clear Milepost Marker g r ! n o ! ! ! ! ! a F ! i R l ! l a ! G r n ! p e ! Creek Ranger District that are designated for motor vehicle ! d io 1 FS Campground l t . ! i u a ! 9 r 7 n o N ! ! ! use pursuant to 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) a B lt 7 1 7 e 5 ! ! ! n C v 3 ! e .
    [Show full text]
  • Cheyenne Mountain State Park Management Plan
    COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Cheyenne Mountain State Park 2013 PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN www.cpw.state.co.us - This page is intentionally left blank - ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Development of the Cheyenne Mountain State Park Management Plan was made possible through the support and collaborative efforts of the Cheyenne Mountain State Park Management Planning Team, Colorado Parks & Wildlife Leadership Team, and interested members of the public. This management plan is the fourth management plan to be developed based on the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Park Management Plan Template, which was approved in 2009 by the Colorado State Parks Board. Cheyenne Mountain State Park Management Planning Team Scott Babcock, Strategic Planning Manager - Parks Mitch Martin, Cheyenne Mountain State Park Manager John Geerdes, Southeast Region Manager - Parks Nancy Matchett, Trails Coordinator Shaun Gordon, Design & Construction Region Manager Jeff Thompson, Resource Stewardship Coordinator Additional research and mapping assistance provided by the following CPW Seasonal Staff: Caitlyn Horose, Megan Deffner, Sarah Lamagna, and Dan Nally. Special thanks to other CPW program staff that provided input and suggestions on draft iterations of the plan. CPW Leadership Team Rick Cables, Director Chad Bishop, Asst. Director of Wildlife Natural Resources Kurt Mill, Northwest and Southwest Region Manager - Parks Ken Brink, Asst. Director of Parks & Outdoor Recreation Dan Prenzlow, Southeast Regional Manager Steve Cassin, Chief Financial Officer Gary Thorson, Asst. Director of Information & Education Heather Dugan, Asst. Director of Law Enforcement Ron Velarde, Northwest Regional Manager Marilyn Gallegos‐Ramirez, Asst. Director of Support Jeff Ver Steeg, Asst. Director of Research, Policy & Planning Services John Geerdes, Southeast Region Manager - Parks Steve Yamashita, Northeast Regional Manager Tony Gurzik, Acting Southwest Regional Manager Consultants Special thanks to Computer Terrain Mapping, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Region 2 – Historical Geography, Names, Boundaries
    NAMES, BOUNDARIES, AND MAPS: A RESOURCE FOR THE HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY OF THE NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM OF THE UNITED STATES THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION (Region Two) By Peter L. Stark Brief excerpts of copyright material found herein may, under certain circumstances, be quoted verbatim for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, education, and research, without the need for permission from or payment to the copyright holder under 17 U.S.C § 107 of the United States copyright law. Copyright holder does ask that you reference the title of the essay and my name as the author in the event others may need to reach me for clarifi- cation, with questions, or to use more extensive portions of my reference work. Also, please contact me if you find any errors or have a map that has not been included in the cartobibliography ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In the process of compiling this work, I have met many dedicated cartographers, Forest Service staff, academic and public librarians, archivists, and entrepreneurs. I first would like to acknowledge the gracious assistance of Bob Malcolm Super- visory Cartographer of Region 2 in Golden, Colorado who opened up the Region’s archive of maps and atlases to me in November of 2005. Also, I am indebted to long-time map librarians Christopher Thiry, Janet Collins, Donna Koepp, and Stanley Stevens for their early encouragement and consistent support of this project. In the fall of 2013, I was awarded a fellowship by The Pinchot Institute for Conservation and the Grey Towers National Historic Site. The Scholar in Resi- dence program of the Grey Towers Heritage Association allowed me time to write and edit my research on the mapping of the National Forest System in an office in Gifford Pinchot’s ancestral home.
    [Show full text]
  • National Forests. of Colorado $
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BI5CELLANEOUS PUBLICATION N218 ! NATIONAL FORESTS. OF COLORADO $ Snowmass Lake ai\d Peak Holy Cross National forest Prepared by the Forest Service Issued May, 192S ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BK PKOCUKKD PROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS U.S.GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, I). C. AT IS CENTS PEE COPY THE NATIONAL FORESTS OF COLORADO CONTENTS Page. Page. National forests 1 The national forests of Colorado— Fire 'protection 1 Continued. Forest management 3 The. White River National Forest. 18 Research 5 The Leadville National Forest 20 Reforestation 5 The Cochetopa National Forest 21 Grazing (i Tile Holy Cross National Forest__ 23 Game (5 The Gunnison National Forest 23 Recreation 7 Tlie Grand Mesa National Forest-. 25 The national forests of Colorado S The TTncompahgre National Forest- 27 Organization 10 The San Juan National Forest 28 The Pike National Forest 10 Tin1 Montezuma National Forest- 30 The Colorado National Forest 12 The Rio Grande National Forest— 30 The Arapaho National Forest 11 The San Isabel National Forest 32 The Routt National Forest 17 The forest trees of Colorado 34 NATIONAL FORESTS The chief purpose of the national forests is the conservation of wood and water. In this respect all national forests are alike. They are also alike in that all resources—forage, wild life, recrea­ tion, and other resources as well as wood and water—are managed with the object of deriving from them the greatest possible contribu­ tion to the general public welfare. On the other hand, details of management are different on different forests because of local con­ ditions.
    [Show full text]