DOCSLIB.ORG

Calculations of Hyperfine Parameters in Solids Based on DFT and Using Wien2k

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calculations of Hyperfine Parameters in Solids Based on DFT and Using Wien2k Calculations of Hyperfine parameters in solids based on DFT and using WIEN2k Peter Blaha Institute of Materials Chemistry TU Wien Hyperfine parameters: Sample Reference Isomer shift: = ( 0 – 0 ); it is proportional to the electron density at the nucleus the constant is proportional to the change of nuclear radii during the transition (we use =-.291 au3mm s-1) Magnetic Hyperfine fields: Btot = Bcontact + Borb + Bdip these fields are proportional to the spin-density at the nucleus and the orbital moment of the probed atom as well as the spin moment distribution in the crystal Quadrupole splitting: e Q Vzz given by the product of the nuclear quadrupole moment Q times the electric field gradient Vzz. The EFG is proportional to an integral over the non-spherical charge density (weighted by 1/r3) Schrödinger equation From the previous slide it is obvious, that we need an accurate knowledge of the electron (and magnetization) density, which in principle can be obtained from the solution of the many- body Schrödinger equation for the corresponding solid. H = E 23 However, a many-body problem with ~10 particles is not solvable at all and we must create models for the real material and rely on an approximate solution of the Schrödinger equation. (This will be briefly discussed in the next slides and my preferred options are marked in red.) Concepts when solving Schrödingers-equation 1 2 k k k V (r ) i i i 2 • Representation of the solid: • cluster model: approximate solid by a finite cluster • periodic model: approximate “real” solid by infinite ideal solid (supercells !) BaSnO3 If calculations disagree with experiment: the structural model could be wrong Concepts when solving Schrödingers-equation 1 2 k k k V (r ) i i i 2 • Exchange and correlation: • Hartree-Fock (exact exchange, no correlation) • correlation: MP2, CC, ... • Density functional theory: approximate exchange + correlation • LDA: local density approximation, “free electron gas” • GGA: generalized gradient approximation, various functionals • hybrid-DFT: mixing of HF + GGA, various functionals • LDA+U, DMFT: explicit (heuristic) inclusion of correlations If calculations disagree with experiment: the DFT approximation could be too crude Concepts when solving Schrödingers-equation 1 2 k k k V (r ) i i i 2 • basis set for wavefunctions: • “quantum chemistry”: LCAO methods • Gauss functions (large “experience”, wrong asymptotics, ... ) • Slater orbitals (correct r~0 and r~ asymptotics, expensive) • numerical atomic orbitals • “physics”: plane wave based methods • plane waves (+ pseudopotential approximation) • augmented plane wave methods (APW) • combination of PW (unbiased+flexible in interstitial regions) • + numerical basis functions (accurate in atomic regions, cusp) Concepts when solving Schrödingers-equation 1 2 k k k V (r ) i i i 2 • Computational approximations: • relativistic treatment: •non-, scalar-, fully-relativistic treatment • treatment of spin, magnetic order • approximations to the form of the potential • shape approximations (ASA) • pseudopotential (nodeless valence orbitals) • “full potential” Concepts when solving Schrödingers-equation • in many cases, the experimental knowledge about a certain system is very limited and also the exact atomic positions may not be known accurately (powder samples, impurities, surfaces, ...) • Thus we need a theoretical method which can not only calculate HFF- parameters, but can also model the system: • total energies + forces on the atoms: • perform structure optimization for “real” systems • calculate phonons (+ partial phonon-DOS) • investigate various magnetic structures, exchange interactions • electronic structure: • bandstructure + DOS • compare with ARPES, XANES, XES, EELS, ... • hyperfine parameters • isomer shifts, hyperfine fields, electric field gradients WIEN2k software package An Augmented Plane Wave Plus Local Orbital Program for Calculating Crystal Properties Peter Blaha Karlheinz Schwarz Georg Madsen Dieter Kvasnicka Joachim Luitz November 2001 Vienna, AUSTRIA Vienna University of Technology WIEN2k: ~1700 groups mailinglist: 1800 users http://www.wien2k.at APW Augmented Plane Wave method The unit cell is partitioned into: atomic spheres Interstitial region unit cell R mtr I Basisset: ul(r, ) are the numerical solutions PW: i ( k K ). r of the radial Schrödinger equation e in a given spherical potential for a join particular energy Atomic partial waves K Alm coefficients for matching the PW K Am u (r , )Ym (rˆ ) m “Exact” solution for given (spherical) potential! w2web GUI (graphical user interface) Structure generator spacegroup selection import cif file step by step initialization symmetry detection automatic input generation SCF calculations Magnetism (spin-polarization) Spin-orbit coupling Forces (automatic geometry optimization) Guided Tasks Energy band structure DOS Electron density X-ray spectra Optics theoretical EFG calculations • The coulomb potential Vc is a central quantity in any theoretical calculation (part of the Hamiltonian) and is obtained from all charges (electronic + nuclear) in the system. (r ) V c (r ) dr V LM (r )Y LM (rˆ) r r LM • The EFG is a tensor of second derivatives of VC at the nucleus: 2V (0) (r )Y V ; V 20 dr ij zz 3 xi x j r • Since we use an “all-electron” method, we have the full charge distribution of all electrons+nuclei and can obtain the EFG without further approximations. • The spherical harmonics Y20 projects out the non-spherical (and non-cubic) part of . The EFG is proportional to the differences in orbital occupations (eg. pz vs. px,py) • We do not need any “Sternheimer factors” (these shielding effects are included in the self-consistent charge density) theoretical EFG calculations (r )Y20 V dr The charge density in the integral zz 3 can be decomposed in various ways for analysis: r EF according to energy (into various valence or semi-core contributions) according to angular momentum l and m (orbitals) spatial decomposition into “atomic spheres” and the “rest” (interstital) 3 Due to the 1/r factor, contributions near the nucleus dominate. theoretical EFG calculations We write the charge density and the potential inside the atomic spheres in an lattice-harmonics expansion (r ) LM (r )YLM (rˆ) V (r ) v LM (r )YLM (rˆ) LM LM spatial decomposit ion : (r )Y Y (r )Y LM LM 20 (r )Y V 20 d 3 r LM d 3 r 20 d 3 r zz 3 3 3 r sphere r int erstital r 20 (r ) V dr interstiti al zz 3 sphere r orbital decomposit ion : nk * nk 20 (r ) lm l m Y20 drˆ p p; d d ; (s d ) contr . k ,n.l ,l ,m ,m pp dd V zz V zz V zz ..... interstiti al theoretical EFG calculations pp dd V zz V zz V zz ..... interstitial 1 V pp 1 ( p p ) p zz 3 2 x y z r p 1 V dd d d 1 (d d ) d zz 3 xy x 2 y 2 2 xz yz z 2 r d • EFG is proportial to differences of orbital occupations , e.g. between px,py and pz. • if these occupancies are the same by symmetry (cubic): Vzz=0 • with “axial” (hexagonal, tetragonal) symmetry (px=py): =0 In the following various examples will be presented. Nuclear Quadrupole moment Q of 56Fe Compare theoretical and experimental EFGs Q 1 ( previous value) Q eQV zz FeF 2 2 FeSi FeZr3 Fe2O3 FeNi YFe 2 Fe P FeS2 2 Fe4N FeCl2 FeBr2 (exp.) F - EFGs in fluoroaluminates 10 different phases of known structures from CaF2-AlF3, BaF2-AlF3 binary systems and CaF2-BaF2-AlF3 ternary system Isolated octahedra Rings formed by four Isolated chains of octahedra sharing octahedra linked by corners corners -BaAlF5 -BaCaAlF7 -CaAlF5, -CaAlF5, Ca2AlF7, Ba3AlF9-Ib, Ba3Al2F12 -BaAlF5, -BaAlF5 -Ba3AlF9 Q and Q calculations using XRD data Q,exp = 0,803 Q,cal AlF 2 3 R = 0,38 -C aAlF Attributions= 4,712.10 performed-16 |V | with with R2 = respect 0,77 to the proportionality between5 |V | Q zz -C aAlF 5 zz 1,0 1,8e+6 Ca2AlF 7 AlF and for the multi-site compounds 3 Q -BaAlF 5 -C aAlF 5 -BaAlF 5 1,6e+6 -C aAlF 5 -BaAlF 5 Ca2AlF 7 Ba Al F 0,8 3 2 12 -BaAlF 1,4e+6 5 Ba3AlF 9-Ib -BaAlF 5 -Ba 3AlF 9 -BaAlF 5 -BaC aAlF 1,2e+6 7 Ba3Al2F 12 R egression Q Ba3AlF 9-Ib 0,6 Q ,m es. = Q , cal. (H z) Q 1,0e+6 -Ba 3AlF 9 -BaC aAlF 7 R égression 8,0e+5 0,4 Experimental Experimental 6,0e+5 4,0e+5 0,2 2,0e+5 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,0e+21 2,0e+21 3,0e+21 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 Calculated V (V .m -2) zz Calculated Q Important discrepancies when structures are used which were determined from X-ray powder diffraction data Q and Q after structure optimization 1,8e+6 1,0 -16 Q = 5,85.10 Vzz Q, exp = 0,972 Q,cal 1,6e+6 R2 = 0,993 R2 = 0,983 0,8 1,4e+6 1,2e+6 Q (H z) 0,6 Q AlF 1,0e+6 3 AlF 3 -C aAlF 5 -C aAlF 5 -C aAlF 5 8,0e+5 -C aAlF 5 Ca2AlF 7 Ca AlF 0,4 2 7 Experimental -BaAlF 5 Experimental -BaAlF 6,0e+5 5 -BaAlF 5 -BaAlF 5 -BaAlF 5 -BaAlF 5 Ba3Al2F 12 4,0e+5 Ba Al F Ba AlF -Ib 3 2 12 0,2 3 9 Ba AlF -Ib 3 9 -Ba 3AlF 9 -Ba 3AlF 9 2,0e+5 -BaC aAlF 7 -BaC aAlF 7 R egression R egression Q ,exp. = Q , cal. 0,0 0,0 0,0 5,0e+20 1,0e+21 1,5e+21 2,0e+21 2,5e+21 3,0e+21 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 -2 Calculated V zz (V .m ) Calculated Q Very fine agreement between experimental and calculated values M.Body, et al., J.Phys.Chem.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Solid-State NMR Techniques for the Structural Characterization of Cyclic Aggregates Based on Borane–Phosphane Frustrated Lewis Pairs
    molecules Review Solid-State NMR Techniques for the Structural Characterization of Cyclic Aggregates Based on Borane–Phosphane Frustrated Lewis Pairs Robert Knitsch 1, Melanie Brinkkötter 1, Thomas Wiegand 2, Gerald Kehr 3 , Gerhard Erker 3, Michael Ryan Hansen 1 and Hellmut Eckert 1,4,* 1 Institut für Physikalische Chemie, WWU Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany; [email protected] (R.K.); [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (M.R.H.) 2 Laboratorium für Physikalische Chemie, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland; [email protected] 3 Organisch-Chemisches Institut, WWU Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany; [email protected] (G.K.); [email protected] (G.E.) 4 Instituto de Física de Sao Carlos, Universidad de Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos SP 13566-590, Brazil * Correspondence: [email protected] Academic Editor: Mattias Edén Received: 20 February 2020; Accepted: 17 March 2020; Published: 19 March 2020 Abstract: Modern solid-state NMR techniques offer a wide range of opportunities for the structural characterization of frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs), their aggregates, and the products of cooperative addition reactions at their two Lewis centers. This information is extremely valuable for materials that elude structural characterization by X-ray diffraction because of their nanocrystalline or amorphous character, (pseudo-)polymorphism, or other types of disordering phenomena inherent in the solid state. Aside from simple chemical shift measurements using single-pulse or cross-polarization/magic-angle spinning NMR detection techniques, the availability of advanced multidimensional and double-resonance NMR methods greatly deepened the informational content of these experiments. In particular, methods quantifying the magnetic dipole–dipole interaction strengths and indirect spin–spin interactions prove useful for the measurement of intermolecular association, connectivity, assessment of FLP–ligand distributions, and the stereochemistry of adducts.
    [Show full text]
  • TBTK: a Quantum Mechanics Software Development Kit
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Copenhagen University Research Information System TBTK A quantum mechanics software development kit Bjornson, Kristofer Published in: SoftwareX DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2019.02.005 Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Bjornson, K. (2019). TBTK: A quantum mechanics software development kit. SoftwareX, 9, 205-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2019.02.005 Download date: 09. apr.. 2020 SoftwareX 9 (2019) 205–210 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect SoftwareX journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/softx Original software publication TBTK: A quantum mechanics software development kit Kristofer Björnson Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, DK–2100, Copenhagen, Denmark article info a b s t r a c t Article history: TBTK is a software development kit for quantum mechanical calculations and is designed to enable the Received 7 August 2018 development of applications that investigate problems formulated on second-quantized form. It also Received in revised form 21 February 2019 enables method developers to create solvers for tight-binding, DFT, DMFT, quantum transport, etc., that Accepted 22 February 2019 can be easily integrated with each other. Both through the development of completely new solvers, Keywords: as well as front and back ends to already well established packages. TBTK provides data structures Quantum mechanics tailored for second-quantization that will encourage reusability and enable scalability for quantum SDK mechanical calculations. C++ ' 2019 The Author.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview on the Libxc Library of Density Functional Approximations
    An overview on the Libxc library of density functional approximations Susi Lehtola Molecular Sciences Software Institute at Virginia Tech 2 June 2021 Outline Why Libxc? Recap on DFT What is Libxc? Using Libxc A look under the hood Wrapup GPAW 2021: Users' and Developers' Meeting Susi Lehtola Why Libxc? 2/28 Why Libxc? There are many approximations for the exchange-correlation functional. But, most programs I ... only implement a handful (sometimes 5, typically 10-15) I ... and the implementations may be buggy / non-standard GPAW 2021: Users' and Developers' Meeting Susi Lehtola Why Libxc? 3/28 Why Libxc, cont'd This leads to issues with reproducibility I chemists and physicists do not traditionally use the same functionals! Outdated(?) stereotype: B3LYP vs PBE I how to reproduce a calculation performed with another code? GPAW 2021: Users' and Developers' Meeting Susi Lehtola Why Libxc? 4/28 Why Libxc, cont'd The issue is compounded by the need for backwards and forwards compatibility: how can one I reproduce old calculations from the literature done with a now-obsolete functional (possibly with a program that is proprietary / no longer available)? I use a newly developed functional in an old program? GPAW 2021: Users' and Developers' Meeting Susi Lehtola Why Libxc? 5/28 Why Libxc, cont'd A standard implementation is beneficial! I no need to keep reinventing (and rebuilding) the wheel I use same collection of density functionals in all programs I new functionals only need to be implemented in one place I broken/buggy functionals only need to be fixed in one place I same implementation can be used across numerical approaches, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Structure Study of Copper-Containing Perovskites
    Electronic Structure Study of Copper-containing Perovskites Mark Robert Michel University College London A thesis submitted to University College London in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, February 2010. 1 I, Mark Robert Michel, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Mark Robert Michel 2 Abstract This thesis concerns the computational study of copper containing perovskites using electronic structure methods. We discuss an extensive set of results obtained using hybrid exchange functionals within Density Functional Theory (DFT), in which we vary systematically the amount of exact (Hartree-Fock, HF) exchange employed. The method has enabled us to obtain accurate results on a range of systems, particularly in materials containing strongly correlated ions, such as Cu2+. This is possible because the HF exchange corrects, at least qualitatively, the spurious self-interaction error present in DFT. The materials investigated include two families of perovskite-structured oxides, of potential interest for technological applications due to the very large dielectric constant or for Multi-Ferroic behaviour. The latter materials exhibit simultaneously ferroelectric and ferromagnetic properties, a rare combination, which is however highly desirable for memory device applications. The results obtained using hybrid exchange functionals are highly encouraging. Initial studies were made on bulk materials such as CaCu3Ti4O12 (CCTO) which is well characterised by experiment. The inclusion of HF exchange improved, in a systematic way, both structural and electronic results with respect to experiment. The confidence gained in the study of known compounds has enabled us to explore new compositions predictively.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyscf: the Python-Based Simulations of Chemistry Framework
    PySCF: The Python-based Simulations of Chemistry Framework Qiming Sun∗1, Timothy C. Berkelbach2, Nick S. Blunt3,4, George H. Booth5, Sheng Guo1,6, Zhendong Li1, Junzi Liu7, James D. McClain1,6, Elvira R. Sayfutyarova1,6, Sandeep Sharma8, Sebastian Wouters9, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chany1 1Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125, USA 2Department of Chemistry and James Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA 3Chemical Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA 4Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA 5Department of Physics, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom 6Department of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA 7Institute of Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, P. R. China 8Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80302, USA 9Brantsandpatents, Pauline van Pottelsberghelaan 24, 9051 Sint-Denijs-Westrem, Belgium arXiv:1701.08223v2 [physics.chem-ph] 2 Mar 2017 Abstract PySCF is a general-purpose electronic structure platform designed from the ground up to emphasize code simplicity, so as to facilitate new method development and enable flexible ∗[email protected] [email protected] 1 computational workflows. The package provides a wide range of tools to support simulations of finite-size systems, extended systems with periodic boundary conditions, low-dimensional periodic systems, and custom Hamiltonians, using mean-field and post-mean-field methods with standard Gaussian basis functions. To ensure ease of extensibility, PySCF uses the Python language to implement almost all of its features, while computationally critical paths are implemented with heavily optimized C routines.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2005.05756V2
    “This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the author and AIP Publishing. This article appeared in Oliveira, M.J.T. [et al.]. The CECAM electronic structure library and the modular software development paradigm. "The Journal of Chemical Physics", 12020, vol. 153, núm. 2, and may be found at https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0012901. The CECAM Electronic Structure Library and the modular software development paradigm Micael J. T. Oliveira,1, a) Nick Papior,2, b) Yann Pouillon,3, 4, c) Volker Blum,5, 6 Emilio Artacho,7, 8, 9 Damien Caliste,10 Fabiano Corsetti,11, 12 Stefano de Gironcoli,13 Alin M. Elena,14 Alberto Garc´ıa,15 V´ıctor M. Garc´ıa-Su´arez,16 Luigi Genovese,10 William P. Huhn,5 Georg Huhs,17 Sebastian Kokott,18 Emine K¨u¸c¨ukbenli,13, 19 Ask H. Larsen,20, 4 Alfio Lazzaro,21 Irina V. Lebedeva,22 Yingzhou Li,23 David L´opez-Dur´an,22 Pablo L´opez-Tarifa,24 Martin L¨uders,1, 14 Miguel A. L. Marques,25 Jan Minar,26 Stephan Mohr,17 Arash A. Mostofi,11 Alan O'Cais,27 Mike C. Payne,9 Thomas Ruh,28 Daniel G. A. Smith,29 Jos´eM. Soler,30 David A. Strubbe,31 Nicolas Tancogne-Dejean,1 Dominic Tildesley,32 Marc Torrent,33, 34 and Victor Wen-zhe Yu5 1)Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, D-22761 Hamburg, Germany 2)DTU Computing Center, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark 3)Departamento CITIMAC, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain 4)Simune Atomistics, 20018 San Sebasti´an,Spain 5)Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA 6)Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA 7)CIC Nanogune BRTA and DIPC, 20018 San Sebasti´an,Spain 8)Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, 48011 Bilbao, Spain 9)Theory of Condensed Matter, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom 10)Department of Physics, IRIG, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Structure, Atomic Forces and Structural Relaxations by Wien2k
    Electronic structure, atomic forces and structural relaxations by WIEN2k Peter Blaha Institute of Materials Chemistry TU Vienna, Austria R.Laskowski, F.Tran, K.Schwarz (TU Vienna) M.Perez-Mato (Bilbao) K.Parlinski (Krakow) D.Singh (Oakridge) M.Fischer, T.Malcherek (Hamburg) Outline: General considerations when solving H=E DFT APW-based methods (history and state-of-the-art) WIEN2k program structure + features forces, structure relaxation Applications Phonons in matlockite PbFI Phase transitions in Aurivillius phases Structure of Pyrochlore Y2Nb2O7 phase transitions in Cd2Nb2O7 Concepts when solving Schrödingers-equation Treatment of Form of “Muffin-tin” MT spin Non-spinpolarized potential atomic sphere approximation (ASA) Spin polarized pseudopotential (PP) (with certain magnetic order) Full potential : FP Relativistic treatment of the electrons exchange and correlation potential non relativistic Hartree-Fock (+correlations) semi-relativistic Density functional theory (DFT) fully-relativistic Local density approximation (LDA) Generalized gradient approximation (GGA) Beyond LDA: e.g. LDA+U, Hybrid-DFT 1 2 k k k V (r) i i i Schrödinger - equation 2 Basis functions Representation plane waves : PW, PAW augmented plane waves : APW non periodic of solid atomic oribtals. e.g. Slater (STO), Gaussians (GTO), (cluster, individual MOs) LMTO, numerical basis periodic (unit cell, Blochfunctions, “bandstructure”) DFT Density Functional Theory Hohenberg-Kohn theorem: (exact) The total energy of an interacting inhomogeneous electron gas in the presence of an external potential Vext(r ) is a functional of the density E V (r) (r)dr F [ ] ext Kohn-Sham: (still exact!) 1 (r)(r) E T [] V (r)dr drdr E [] o ext 2 | r r | xc Ekinetic Ene Ecoulomb Eee Exc exchange-correlation non interacting hom.
    [Show full text]
  • HPC Applications on Shaheen (Bioscience/Chemistry/Materials Science/Physics)
    HPC Applications on Shaheen (Bioscience/Chemistry/Materials Science/Physics) Zhiyong Zhu KAUST Supercomputing Core Lab 2018/10/15 Outline • Codes Available • Steps to Run – Use VASP as an example Codes Available • Bioscience/Molecular Dynamics – CP2k, CPMD, Gromacs, Lammps, Namd, etc • Chemistry/Materials Science/Physics – VASP, Wien2k, Quantum ESPRESSO, NWChem, Gaussian, ADF, etc • More information – WWW.hpc.kaust.edu.sa/app6 Example • VASP as an example – The Vienna Ab-initial Simulation Package (VASP) is a computer program for atomic scale materials modeling, e.g. electronic structure calculations and quantum-mechanical molecular dynamics from first-principles (https://WWW.vasp.at). Steps to Run • Login Shaheen • Check Code Availability • Prepare Input Files for VASP • Prepare Jobscript for Slurm Job Scheduler • Job Submission using Slurm Commands • Check Output Files Login Shaheen • Logins – ssh -X [email protected] – ssh -X [email protected] (cdl[1,2,3,4]) Code Availability • module avail – module avail – module avail <code>/<version> Code Availability • WWW.hpc.kaust.edu.sa – WWW.hpc.kaust.edu.sa/app6 Prepare Input Files • 3 Different Working Directories – /home – Space is limited; Not mounted on compute nodes Prepare Input Files • 3 Different Working Directories – /project – Space is limited; Data are backed up Prepare Input Files • 3 Different Working Directories – /scratch – Files older than 60 days are deleted automatically Prepare Input Files • Examples under Installation Folder – /sw/xc40cle6/code/version/compilation/example
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Atomistic Simulation Software Usage [1.3]
    A LiveCoMS Perpetual Review Trends in atomistic simulation software usage [1.3] Leopold Talirz1,2,3*, Luca M. Ghiringhelli4, Berend Smit1,3 1Laboratory of Molecular Simulation (LSMO), Institut des Sciences et Ingenierie Chimiques, Valais, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1951 Sion, Switzerland; 2Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS), Faculté des Sciences et Techniques de l’Ingénieur, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; 3National Centre for Computational Design and Discovery of Novel Materials (MARVEL), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; 4The NOMAD Laboratory at the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society and Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany This LiveCoMS document is Abstract Driven by the unprecedented computational power available to scientific research, the maintained online on GitHub at https: use of computers in solid-state physics, chemistry and materials science has been on a continuous //github.com/ltalirz/ rise. This review focuses on the software used for the simulation of matter at the atomic scale. We livecoms-atomistic-software; provide a comprehensive overview of major codes in the field, and analyze how citations to these to provide feedback, suggestions, or help codes in the academic literature have evolved since 2010. An interactive version of the underlying improve it, please visit the data set is available at https://atomistic.software. GitHub repository and participate via the issue tracker. This version dated August *For correspondence: 30, 2021 [email protected] (LT) 1 Introduction Gaussian [2], were already released in the 1970s, followed Scientists today have unprecedented access to computa- by force-field codes, such as GROMOS [3], and periodic tional power.
    [Show full text]
  • (DFT) and Its Application to Defects in Semiconductors
    Introduction to DFT and its Application to Defects in Semiconductors Noa Marom Physics and Engineering Physics Tulane University New Orleans The Future: Computer-Aided Materials Design • Can access the space of materials not experimentally known • Can scan through structures and compositions faster than is possible experimentally • Unbiased search can yield unintuitive solutions • Can accelerate the discovery and deployment of new materials Accurate electronic structure methods Efficient search algorithms Dirac’s Challenge “The underlying physical laws necessary for the mathematical theory of a large part of physics and the whole of chemistry are thus completely known, and the difficulty is only that the exact application of these laws leads to equations much too complicated to be soluble. It therefore becomes desirable that approximate practical methods of applying quantum mechanics should be developed, which can lead to an P. A. M. Dirac explanation of the main features of Physics Nobel complex atomic systems ... ” Prize, 1933 -P. A. M. Dirac, 1929 The Many (Many, Many) Body Problem Schrödinger’s Equation: The physical laws are completely known But… There are as many electrons in a penny as stars in the known universe! Electronic Structure Methods for Materials Properties Structure Ionization potential (IP) Absorption Mechanical Electron Affinity (EA) spectrum properties Fundamental gap Optical gap Vibrational Defect/dopant charge Exciton binding spectrum transition levels energy Ground State Charged Excitation Neutral Excitation DFT
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Chemical Calculations of NMR Parameters
    Quantum Chemical Calculations of NMR Parameters Tatyana Polenova University of Delaware Newark, DE Winter School on Biomolecular NMR January 20-25, 2008 Stowe, Vermont OUTLINE INTRODUCTION Relating NMR parameters to geometric and electronic structure Classical calculations of EFG tensors Molecular properties from quantum chemical calculations Quantum chemistry methods DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY FOR CALCULATIONS OF NMR PARAMETERS Introduction to DFT Software Practical examples Tutorial RELATING NMR OBSERVABLES TO MOLECULAR STRUCTURE NMR Spectrum NMR Parameters Local geometry Chemical structure (reactivity) I. Calculation of experimental NMR parameters Find unique solution to CQ, Q, , , , , II. Theoretical prediction of fine structure constants from molecular geometry Classical electrostatic model (EFG)- only in simple ionic compounds Quantum mechanical calculations (Density Functional Theory) (EFG, CSA) ELECTRIC FIELD GRADIENT (EFG) TENSOR: POINT CHARGE MODEL EFG TENSOR IS DETERMINED BY THE COMBINED ELECTRONIC AND NUCLEAR WAVEFUNCTION, NO ANALYTICAL EXPRESSION IN THE GENERAL CASE THE SIMPLEST APPROXIMATION: CLASSICAL POINT CHARGE MODEL n Zie 4 V2,k = 3 Y2,k ()i,i i=1 di 5 ATOMS CONTRIBUTING TO THE EFG TENSOR ARE TREATED AS POINT CHARGES, THE RESULTING EFG TENSOR IS THE SUM WITH RESPECT TO ALL ATOMS VERY CRUDE MODEL, WORKS QUANTITATIVELY ONLY IN SIMPLEST IONIC SYSTEMS, BUT YIELDS QUALITATIVE TRENDS AND GENERAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE SYMMETRY AND MAGNITUDE OF THE EXPECTED TENSOR ELECTRIC FIELD GRADIENT (EFG) TENSOR: POINT CHARGE MODEL n Zie 4 V2,k = 3 Y2,k ()i,i i=1 di 5 Ze V = ; V = 0; V = 0 2,0 d 3 2,±1 2,±2 2Ze V = ; V = 0; V = 0 2,0 d 3 2,±1 2,±2 3 Ze V = ; V = 0; V = 0 2,0 2 d 3 2,±1 2,±2 V2,0 = 0; V2,±1 = 0; V2,±2 = 0 MOLECULAR PROPERTIES FROM QUANTUM CHEMICAL CALCULATIONS H = E See for example M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tool for X-Ray Absorption Spectra (XAS) Calculations 27
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS: EWinS 2016 – EUSpec Winter School on core level spectroscopies Publishers: Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, Ljubljana, Slovenia Univeristy of Nova Gorica, Vipavska 13, Nova Gorica, Slovenia Edited by: Anton Kokalj, Layla Martin-Samos, Barbara Ressel Layout by Anton Kokalj Ljubljana & Ajdovščina, Slovenia, 2016 EWinS 2016: EUSpec Winter School on core level spectroscopies February 1 – 11, 2016 Sponsors http://www.cost.eu/ http://psi-k.net/ i EWinS 2016: EUSpec Winter School on core level spectroscopies February 1 – 11, 2016 Organizers Local organizers Layla Martin-Samos (University of Nova Gorica) Anton Kokalj (Jožef Stefan Institute) Barbara Ressel (University of Nova Gorica) International committee Hubert Ebert (University of Munich) Didier Sébilleau (University of Rennes 1) Amélie Juhin (University P. et M. Curie-CNRS) Frank de Groot (Utrecht University) Maddalena Pedio (CNR-IOM) Jarmila Savkova (University of West Bohemia) Sara Lafuerza (ESRF) Nicholas Hine (University of Warwick) Yaroslav Kvashnin (Uppsala University) ii EWinS 2016: EUSpec Winter School on core level spectroscopies February 1 – 11, 2016 Scope of the winter school The two-week winter school EWinS 2016 – EUSpec Winter School on core level spectroscopies is an activity of the COST Action MP1306 EUSpec – Modern Tools for Spectroscopy on Advanced Materials that is closely related to the ETSF (European Theoretical Spectroscopy Facility) and will take place in February 2016 at the University of Nova Gorica (Slovenia). The aim of the school is to introduce theoreticians as well as experimentalists to foundations of modern approaches for studying core level spectroscopies from first-principles modeling to the most advanced experimental spectroscopy techniques. The school will bring together experts and early career investigators working on advanced materials science, with a common interest in high level and up-to-date sophisticated spectroscopy experiments and modeling tools.
    [Show full text]