DOCSLIB.ORG

Capstone Test and Evaluation Master Plan for ADS-B Radar-Like Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capstone Test and Evaluation Master Plan for ADS-B Radar-Like Services Federal Aviation Administration Alaskan Region Capstone Program Management Office 801 B Street, Suite 500 Anchorage Alaska 99501 Capstone Test and Evaluation Master Plan for ADS-B Radar-Like Services Final 30 January 2000 ALASKAN REGION Investment in Safety Preamble The Capstone Program is sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA’s) Alaskan Region and is in cooperation with the FAA Safe Flight 21 Program. The Capstone Program accelerates nationwide efforts to improve aviation safety and efficiency through a multi-year introduction of current and emerging concepts and technologies. Initial validation plans include the installation of government-furnished Global Positioning System (GPS) driven avionics suites in up to 150 commercial aircraft serving the Bethel/Yukon-Kuskokwim delta area in and around Bethel, Alaska. For the first year and beyond, compatible data link transceivers installed at strategically located ground sites are designed to facilitate Air Traffic Control and flight information services. The Capstone Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) for ADS-B Radar-Like Services outlines the activities for use of the Capstone ADS-B system for radar-like services in airspace in and around Bethel, Alaska. These activities are based on a transition from aircraft supplemental VFR use of Capstone avionics to authorizing air traffic control use of ADS-B in applying procedures for separation, sequencing, and other VFR & IFR radar-like services. Operational feedback during this initial period will lead to system refinements, requirement validation, and risk mitigation prior to ADS-B use for radar-like services. The scheduled operational date for ADS- B radar-like services is 1 January 2001. The Capstone Program Office in coordination with other participating organizations is producing this document. It presents program background; system descriptions; and test management, organization, planning, and documentation activities. The Capstone TEMP for ADS-B Radar- Like Services is not intended as a Public Relations document; inquiries into such should be directed to the appropriate offices of the participating organizations. Acknowledgements FAA Alaskan Region FAA Safe Flight 21 Program Alaska Air Carrier Association Alaska Aviation Safety Foundation Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) University of Alaska Anchorage Alaska Airman’s Association, Inc. NAS Implementation Support Contract (NISC) The MITRE Corporation Center for Advanced Aviation System Development (CAASD) UPS Aviation Technologies Lockheed Martin Table of Contents 1. Program Overview................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Capstone Background .........................................................................................................1 1.2. Capstone ADS-B Radar-Like Services ............................................................................... 2 1.2.1. Objective ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.2.2. Description of Operational Use................................................................................... 3 1.2.3. Potential Advantages................................................................................................... 4 1.2.4. ATC Procedures and Phraseology............................................................................... 4 1.3. Purpose of TEMP................................................................................................................ 5 1.4. Implementation and Operational Evaluation Activities...................................................... 5 1.5. Schedule .............................................................................................................................. 7 1.6. System Description ............................................................................................................. 8 1.6.1. Capstone Ground System............................................................................................ 8 1.6.2. Capstone Avionics....................................................................................................... 9 2. Capstone Deliverables.......................................................................................................... 12 2.1. Capstone ADS-B System End-to-End Performance Analysis .......................................... 12 2.2. Safety Engineering Report ................................................................................................ 12 2.3. Safety Benefit Study.......................................................................................................... 12 2.4. Performance and Operational Data ................................................................................... 13 3. Developmental Test and Evaluation...................................................................................16 3.1. Ground System.................................................................................................................. 16 3.1.1. Equipment .................................................................................................................16 3.1.2. Procedures and Training............................................................................................ 18 3.1.3. Approvals .................................................................................................................. 19 3.2. Airborne System................................................................................................................ 20 3.2.1. Equipment .................................................................................................................20 3.2.2. Procedures and Training............................................................................................ 22 3.2.3. Approvals .................................................................................................................. 23 4. Operational Evaluation .......................................................................................................24 4.1. Ground System.................................................................................................................. 24 4.1.1. Data Collection Methodology ................................................................................... 24 4.1.2. Performance Measures .............................................................................................. 25 4.2. Airborne System................................................................................................................ 25 4.2.1. Data Collection Methodology ................................................................................... 25 i 4.2.2. Performance Measures .............................................................................................. 25 4.3. Safety Effects and Benefits ............................................................................................... 25 4.3.1. Data Collection Methodology ................................................................................... 26 4.3.2. Performance Measures .............................................................................................. 26 5. Capstone System Safety....................................................................................................... 27 5.1. System Safety.................................................................................................................... 27 5.2. Capstone System Safety Program Plan ............................................................................. 28 5.2.1. Program Scope and Objectives ................................................................................. 28 5.2.2. Capstone System Safety Organization ...................................................................... 28 5.2.3. Capstone Program Milestones................................................................................... 29 5.2.4. Capstone System Safety Requirements..................................................................... 29 5.2.5. Hazard Analysis ........................................................................................................ 34 5.2.6. Capstone System Safety Data ................................................................................... 34 5.2.7. Safety Verification .................................................................................................... 35 5.2.8. Audit Program........................................................................................................... 35 5.2.9. Training ..................................................................................................................... 35 5.2.10. Incident Reporting..................................................................................................... 36 5.2.11. Capstone System Safety Interfaces ........................................................................... 36 6. Resources Summary ............................................................................................................ 37 Appendix A: FAA Administrator’s Letter on Capstone ADS-B Radar-Like Services ......... 1 Appendix B: Detailed Capstone ADS-B Radar-Like Services Schedule.................................1 Appendix C: Capstone Avionics Supplemental Type Certificate............................................ 1 Appendix D: WJHTC Micro-EARTS Acceptance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Runway Safety Spring 2021 Report
    Graphical NOTAM Interface For Improving Efficiency of Reporting NOTAM Information April 2021 Design Challenge: Runway Safety/Runway Incursions/Runway Excursions Challenge E: Optimizing application of NextGen technology to improve runway safety in particular and airport safety in general. Team Members: Undergraduate Students: Matthew Bacon, Gregory Porcaro, Andrew Vega Advisor’s Name: Dr. Audra Morse Michigan Technological University Table of Contents | 1 02 Executive Summary Runway excursions are a type of aviation incident where an aircraft makes an unsafe exit from the runway. According to the Ascend World Aircraft Accident Summary (WAAS), 141 runway excursion accidents involving the Western-built commercial aircraft fleet occurred globally from 1998 to 2007, resulting in 550 fatalities; 74% of landing phase excursions were caused by either weather-related factors or decision-making factors (Ascend, 2007). One mitigation strategy is training pilots how to interpret Runway Condition Codes (RWYCCs) to understand runway conditions. Recent developments such as NextGen and Electronic Flight Bags (EFBs) have improved the quality of weather condition reporting. However, Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs), the primary source of runway condition information and any other irregularities in airspace, are still presented to pilots in an inefficient format contributing to runway excursions and safety concerns NOTAMs consist of confusing abbreviations and do not effectively convey the relative importance of information. The team developed an Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) user interface that provides a graphical representation of NOTAM and weather information to improve how pilots receive condition changes at airports. The graphical NOTAM interface utilizes Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) to receive real time NOTAM updates.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Aviation Infrastructure and Funding Challenges—Meeting Future Safety, Capital and Technological Needs
    S. HRG. 109–530 ALASKA AVIATION INFRASTRUCTURE AND FUNDING CHALLENGES—MEETING FUTURE SAFETY, CAPITAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL NEEDS FIELD HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JULY 5, 2006 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 29–336 PDF WASHINGTON : 2006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 11:25 Aug 22, 2006 Jkt 029336 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\29336.TXT JACKF PsN: JACKF SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii, Co-Chairman CONRAD BURNS, Montana JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia TRENT LOTT, Mississippi JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine BARBARA BOXER, California GORDON H. SMITH, Oregon BILL NELSON, Florida JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada MARIA CANTWELL, Washington GEORGE ALLEN, Virginia FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire E. BENJAMIN NELSON, Nebraska JIM DEMINT, South Carolina MARK PRYOR, Arkansas DAVID VITTER, Louisiana LISA J. SUTHERLAND, Republican Staff Director CHRISTINE DRAGER KURTH, Republican Deputy Staff Director KENNETH R. NAHIGIAN, Republican Chief Counsel MARGARET L. CUMMISKY, Democratic Staff Director and Chief Counsel SAMUEL E. WHITEHORN, Democratic Deputy Staff Director and General Counsel LILA HARPER HELMS, Democratic Policy Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 11:25 Aug 22, 2006 Jkt 029336 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\29336.TXT JACKF PsN: JACKF C O N T E N T S Page Hearing held on July 5, 2006 ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Airspace Violations and Pilot Report Data
    NASA/CR—2005-213923 Violations of Temporary Flight Restrictions and Air Defense Identification Zones: An Analysis of Airspace Violations and Pilot Report Data Michael Zuschlag John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts September 2005 The NASA STI Program Office ... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. the advancement of aeronautics and space Collected papers from scientific and science. The NASA Scientific and Technical technical conferences, symposia, Information (STI) Program Office plays a key seminars, or other meetings sponsored or part in helping NASA maintain this important co-sponsored by NASA. role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, The NASA STI Program Office is operated by technical, or historical information from Langley Research Center, the lead center for NASA programs, projects, and missions, NASA’s scientific and technical information. The often concerned with subjects having NASA STI Program Office provides access to the substantial public interest. NASA STI Database, the largest collection of aeronautical and space science STI in the world. • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- The Program Office is also NASA’s institutional language translations of foreign scientific mechanism for disseminating the results of its and technical material pertinent to research and development activities. These results NASA’s mission. are published by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which includes the following report types: Specialized services that complement the STI Program Office’s diverse offerings include • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of creating custom thesauri, building customized completed research or a major significant databases, organizing and publishing research phase of research that present the results of results ... even providing videos.
    [Show full text]
  • ICAO Abbreviations and Codes
    Doc 8400 Procedures for Air Navigation Services ICAO Abbreviations and Codes This edition incorporates all amendments approved by the Council prior to 24 July 2010 and supersedes, on 18 November 2010, all previous editions of PANS-ABC (Doc 8400). Eighth Edition — 2010 International Civil Aviation Organization Suzanne Doc 8400 Procedures for Air Navigation Services ICAO Abbreviations and Codes ________________________________ This edition incorporates all amendments approved by the Council prior to 24 July 2010 and supersedes, on 18 November 2010, all previous editions of PANS-ABC (Doc 8400). Eighth Edition — 2010 International Civil Aviation Organization Published in separate English, French, Russian and Spanish editions by the INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION 999 University Street, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3C 5H7 For ordering information and for a complete listing of sales agents and booksellers, please go to the ICAO website at www.icao.int First edition,1964. Seventh edition, 2007. Eighth edition, 2010. Doc 8400, Procedures for Air Navigation Services — ICAO Abbreviations and Codes Order Number: 8400 ISBN 978-92-9231-626-6 © ICAO 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior permission in writing from the International Civil Aviation Organization. AMENDMENTS Amendments are announced in the supplements to the Catalogue of ICAO Publications; the Catalogue and its supplements are available on the ICAO website at www.icao.int. The space below is provided to keep a record of such amendments. RECORD OF AMENDMENTS AND CORRIGENDA AMENDMENTS CORRIGENDA Date Date Entered Date Date Entered No.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA JO 7930.2Q, Notices to Airmen (NOTAM)
    ORDER JO 7930.2Q Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: December 18, 2015 SUBJ: Notices to Airmen (NOTAM) This Order prescribes direction used to format and distribute information regarding unanticipated or temporary changes to services, components of, or hazards in, the National Airspace System (NAS). Controllers are required to be familiar with the provisions of this order that pertain to their operational responsibilities. The Notices to Airmen (NOTAM) system does not advertise data already published or charted. Distribution: ZAT-721, ZAT-464 Initiated By: AJV-0 Vice President, Mission Support Services 12/18/15 JO 7930.2Q Comments/Corrections Comments or corrections concerning this publication may be submitted on this form and submitted electronically to: 9−AJV−8−HQ−[email protected] Notice to Editor The following comments/corrections are submitted concerning the information contained in: Paragraph number Title Page Dated _________________ Name Street City State Zip Comments/Corrections 12/18/15 JO 7930.2Q Notices to Airmen (NOTAM) Explanation of Changes Effective: December 18, 2015 a. Chapter 1. GENERAL is published. The change is to delete the phrase “or fall within.” Airport, Technical Operations (Tech Ops) AeroNav Per the Code of Federal Regulations, paragraph Products, and Flight Service Station (FSS) is added to 1-2-4, Airport Condition Reporting, is added to the definition of a NOTAM Originator. Also, an indicated what Airports can report and to provide International/Pointer NOTAM definition is added information on the airport conditions that may affect and includes how NOTAMs are numbered. Finally, the safe operations of aircraft. (Removed this). an Out of Service definition is added.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Acronyms
    Aviation Acronyms 5010 AIRPORT MASTER RECORD (FAA FORM 5010-1) 7460-1 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION 7480-1 NOTICE OF LANDING AREA PROPOSAL 99'S NINETY-NINES (WOMEN PILOTS' ASSOCIATION) A/C AIRCRAFT A/DACG ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE AIRFIELD CONTROL GROUP A/FD AIRPORT/FACILITY DIRECTORY A/G AIR - TO - GROUND A/G AIR/GROUND AAA AUTOMATED AIRLIFT ANALYSIS AAAE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF AIRPORT EXECUTIVES AAC MIKE MONRONEY AERONAUTICAL CENTER AAI ARRIVAL AIRCRAFT INTERVAL AAIA AIRPORT AND AIRWAY IMPROVEMENT ACT AALPS AUTOMATED AIR LOAD PLANNING SYSTEM AANI AIR AMBULANCE NETWORK AAPA ASSOCIATION OF ASIA-PACIFIC AIRLINES AAR AIRPORT ACCEPTANCE RATE AAS ADVANCED AUTOMATION SYSTEM AASHTO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS AC AIRCRAFT COMMANDER AC AIRFRAME CHANGE AC AIRCRAFT AC AIR CONTROLLER AC ADVISORY CIRCULAR AC ASPHALT CONCRETE ACAA AIR CARRIER ACCESS ACT ACAA AIR CARRIER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ACAIS AIR CARRIER ACTIVITY INFORMATION SYSTEM ACC AREA CONTROL CENTER ACC AIRPORT CONSULTANTS COUNCIL ACC AIRCRAFT COMMANDER ACC AIR CENTER COMMANDER ACCC AREA CONTROL COMPUTER COMPLEX ACDA APPROACH CONTROL DESCENT AREA ACDO AIR CARRIER DISTRICT OFFICE ACE AVIATION CAREER EDUCATION ACE CENTRAL REGION OF FAA ACF AREA CONTROL FACILITY ACFT AIRCRAFT ACI-NA AIRPORTS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL - NORTH AMERICA ACID AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION ACIP AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING ACLS AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM ACLT ACTUAL CALCULATED LANDING TIME Page 2 ACMI AIRCRAFT, CREW, MAINTENANCE AND INSURANCE (cargo) ACOE U.S. ARMY
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Alaska Interagency Aviation Safety Initiative
    Evaluation of the Alaska Interagency Aviation Safety Initiative Prepared for: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Matt Berman Stephanie Martin Alexandra Hill Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage September 2005 Evaluation of the Alaska Interagency Aviation Safety Initiative 1. Introduction Aviation crashes are the leading cause of occupational fatalities in Alaska. From 1990 through 1999, aviation crashes in Alaska caused 106 work-related pilot deaths. This rate is nearly five times the rate for U.S. pilots as a whole.1 In 2000, Congress passed legislation aimed at reducing the number of occupational aviation fatalities in Alaska by 50 percent for the years 2000 through 2009. This legislation created an interagency initiative—the Alaska Aviation Safety Initiative—to improve safety in Alaska through the combined efforts of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB), the NOAAs National Weather Service (NWS), and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).2 The original proposal for the initiative was developed in September 1999, at the invitation of Alaska’s Senator Ted Stevens and the recommendation of Jim Hall, Chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). The initiative began as a three-year renewable commitment (FY 2000-2002) with NIOSH acting as the lead agency. Congress appropriated approximately $800,000 per year to fund the initiative. The four agencies have designated senior staff to function as the Alaska leadership team for the initiative. The team meets quarterly to plan, coordinate, and evaluate programs.3 The objectives of the Alaska Aviation Safety Initiative (the Initiative) are: • To reduce the number of aircraft crashes and deaths; • To promote aviation safety within the air transportation industry in Alaska through epidemiologic risk analysis of aircraft crashes; and • To evaluate aviation safety interventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Capstone Program Plan (Draft)
    DRAFT Federal Aviation Administration Alaskan Region Capstone Program Management Office 801 B Street, Suite 500 Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Capstone Program Plan DRAFT Version 3.0 12 June 2001 ALASKAN REGION Investment in Safety DRAFT PREAMBLE This document is designed as an umbrella program plan for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Alaskan Region Capstone Program. The term umbrella, as it is used here, means the contents are intended to create high level objectives from which detailed work plans can be developed and accomplished. Each organization that accepts tasking under a particular objective or element takes with it the responsibility for developing a work plan, generating procedures for participants to use their element, and for recording and reporting the progress made toward validation. To accommodate future developments facilitated by the Capstone Program efforts, the number and the date of each successive program plan version is printed on the cover. This Capstone Program Plan version 3.0 is complimentary to Versions 1.0 and 2.0. These previous versions established the initial Capstone avionics and ground infrastructure. Version 3.0 documents the activities supporting the infrastructure in the Bethel/Yukon-Kuskokwim delta area, planning for expansion to Juneau/Southeast Alaska, and establishing ties to future implementation work, with the main focus on FY 2001. DRAFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Capstone Program accelerates efforts to improve aviation safety and efficiency through a multi-year introduction of current and emerging concepts and technologies. According to information published by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, accident rates in Alaska are elevated up to 400 percent above the national average.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Impact of Capstone Phase 1
    Enclosure 1 The Impact of Capstone Phase 1 Post-Transition Annual Report - 2005 July 2006 The MITRE Corporation’s Center for Advanced Aviation System Development Aviation Technology Division The contents of this material reflect the views of the author and/or the Director of the Center for Advanced Aviation System Development. Neither the Federal Aviation Administration nor the Department of Transportation makes any warranty or guarantee, or promise, expressed or implied, concerning the content or accuracy of the views expressed herein. © 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. The Impact of Capstone Phase 1 Post-Transition Annual Report – 2005 Acknowledgements The authors of this report gratefully acknowledge information provided by the following organizations or groups: Airlines, Operators and Pilots in the Y-K Delta; Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory Points of Contact University of Alaska Anchorage, Aviation Technology Division Paul Herrick, Associate Dean, Community and Technical College University of Alaska Anchorage 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99504 Telephone: 907 786-6411 Fax: 907 786-6401 Email: [email protected] MITRE, Center for Advanced Aviation Systems Development Patrick Murphy, Safety Management 7515 Colshire Drive McLean, Virginia, 22102 Telephone: 703 983-7080 Fax: 703 983-6653 Email: [email protected] Page 2 of 141 © 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. The Impact of Capstone Phase 1 Post-Transition Annual Report – 2005 1 Introduction................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Capstone Phase 1 Program ................................................................................. 5 1.2 Importance of Aviation in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta................................... 6 1.3 Traffic in the Y-K Delta...................................................................................... 6 1.4 Historical Accidents in the Y-K Delta...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notams Back to Basics: Airports
    NOTAMs Back to Basics: Airports Federal Aviation Administration NOTAMs Affect All Users of the NAS ICAO Flight U.S. Service NOTAM Flight Stations Office Inspection Flight Dispatch Air Instrument Wild Fire Pilot Traffic Approach Fighting Control Procedure Office Service DOD Centers Technical ATO Operations Security Technician Airport General Operator Public Information valid through Federal Aviation 2 December 2018 Administration A NOTAM is a notice containing information essential to personnel concerned with flight operations but not NOTAM known far enough in advance to be publicized by other means. NOTAMs concern the establishment, condition, or change of any component (facility, service, procedure, or hazard) in the NAS. They must state the abnormal status of a component of the NAS — not the normal status. In 1947, it was agreed to begin issuing NOTAMs via telecommunications. NOTAMs were modeled after Notice to Mariners, which advised ship captains of hazards in navigating the high seas. Information valid through Federal Aviation 3 December 2020 Administration NOTAM Contractions NOTAMs have a unique language characterized by the use of specialized contractions. Contractions are imperative to the NOTAM structure because they make communication more efficient and allow computer systems to parse important words. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) is the leading authority for standardizing contractions in the international aeronautical community. If there is no ICAO contraction, plain language is used. Reference: FAA Order JO 7340.2, Contractions, the manual for commonly used contractions Contractions Manual Information valid through Federal Aviation 4 December 2020 Administration Building Blocks of a NOTAM Information valid through Federal Aviation 5 December 2020 Administration NOTAM Components All NOTAMs follow a specific format, which includes several required elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Metar Abbreviations Metar/Taf List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
    METAR ABBREVIATIONS http://www.alaska.faa.gov/fai/afss/metar%20taf/metcont.htm METAR/TAF LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS $ maintenance check indicator - light intensity indicator that visual range data follows; separator between + heavy intensity / temperature and dew point data. ACFT ACC altocumulus castellanus aircraft mishap MSHP ACSL altocumulus standing lenticular cloud AO1 automated station without precipitation discriminator AO2 automated station with precipitation discriminator ALP airport location point APCH approach APRNT apparent APRX approximately ATCT airport traffic control tower AUTO fully automated report B began BC patches BKN broken BL blowing BR mist C center (with reference to runway designation) CA cloud-air lightning CB cumulonimbus cloud CBMAM cumulonimbus mammatus cloud CC cloud-cloud lightning CCSL cirrocumulus standing lenticular cloud cd candela CG cloud-ground lightning CHI cloud-height indicator CHINO sky condition at secondary location not available CIG ceiling CLR clear CONS continuous COR correction to a previously disseminated observation DOC Department of Commerce DOD Department of Defense DOT Department of Transportation DR low drifting DS duststorm DSIPTG dissipating DSNT distant DU widespread dust DVR dispatch visual range DZ drizzle E east, ended, estimated ceiling (SAO) FAA Federal Aviation Administration FC funnel cloud FEW few clouds FG fog FIBI filed but impracticable to transmit FIRST first observation after a break in coverage at manual station Federal Meteorological Handbook No.1, Surface
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Capstone Program, Phase II Baseline Report Southeast Alaska
    FAA Capstone Program, Phase II Baseline Report Southeast Alaska Prepared by: Matthew Berman Wayne Daniels Jerry Brian Alexandra Hill Leonard Kirk Stephanie Martin Jason Seger Amy Wiita prepared for: Federal Aviation Administration Alaskan Region April 2003 Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99508 This page intentionally left blank EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FAA CAPSTONE PROGRAM, PHASE II BASELINE REPORT • SOUTHEAST ALASKA Why This Study? This report describes air safety and aviation infrastructure in southeast Alaska as of December 31, 2002. It establishes a baseline to enable the University of Alaska Anchorage (UAA) to evaluate how the Capstone program affects aviation safety in the region. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) contracted with UAA’s Institute of Social and Economic Research and Aviation Technology Division to do a variety of training and evaluation tasks related to the Capstone program. That program is a joint effort of industry and the FAA to improve aviation safety and efficiency in selected regions of Alaska, through government-furnished avionics equipment and improvements in ground infrastructure. The name “Capstone” is derived from the way the program draws together concepts and recommendations in reports from the Radio Telecommunications Conference of America, the National Transportation Safety Board, the Mitre Corporation’s Center for Advanced Aviation System Development, and representatives of the Alaskan aviation industry. The first phase of the program began in southwest Alaska in 1999. Phase II began in March 2003. The Phase II area–the Capstone Southeast Alaska region– includes all of southeast Alaska and extends west along the Gulf of Alaska to Cordova.
    [Show full text]