DOCSLIB.ORG

The Character Table for E8 David Vogan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Character Table for E8 David Vogan The Character Table for E8 David Vogan n January 8, 2007, just before 9 in What’s E8? the morning, a computer finished writ- A Lie group is a group endowed with the structure ing to disk about sixty gigabytes of of a smooth manifold, in such a way that group files containing the Kazhdan-Lusztig multiplication and inversion are smooth maps. Opolynomials for the split real group Every finite group is a Lie group: the manifold G of type E8. Values at 1 of these polynomials structure is just the zero-dimensional discrete are coefficients in characters of irreducible repre- structure. For that reason the study of Lie groups sentations of G; so all irreducible characters were is necessarily more complicated than the study written down. The biggest coefficient appearing of finite groups. But it’s not unreasonable to was 11,808,808, in the polynomial concentrate on connected Lie groups. If you do that, a miracle happens: connected Lie groups are 152q22 + 3472q21 + 38791q20 + 293021q19 less complicated than finite groups. The reason is that a connected Lie group is almost completely +1370892q18 + 4067059q17 + 7964012q16 determined by its Lie algebra. The Lie algebra is the tangent space to the group manifold at the identity 15 14 13 +11159003q + 11808808q + 9859915q element, endowed with a nonassociative product called the Lie bracket. Since the Lie algebra is a +6778956q12 + 3964369q11 + 2015441q10 finite-dimensional vector space, it can be studied using linear algebra ideas. A typical method is to +906567q9 + 363611q8 + 129820q7 look at one element X of the Lie algebra, and to +41239q6 + 11426q5 + 2677q4 regard “Lie bracket with X” as a linear transfor- mation from the Lie algebra to itself. This linear +492q3 + 61q2 + 3q: transformation has eigenvalues and eigenvectors, and those invariants can be used to describe the Its value at 1 is 60,779,787. structure of the Lie algebra. This calculation is part of a larger project Just as finite groups are successive extensions called the atlas of Lie groups and repre- of nonabelian simple groups (and Z=pZ), connected sentations. In this article I’ll try to explain the Lie groups are successive extensions of connected atlas project, what Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials simple Lie groups (and the additive group R). Many are, why one might care about them, and some- questions about general Lie groups can be reduced thing about the nature of this calculation and the to the case of connected simple Lie groups, and calculators. so to questions about simple Lie algebras over the real numbers. David Vogan is professor of mathematics at the Mas- Many algebra problems are easier over alge- sachusetts Institute of Technology. His email address is braically closed fields, so it’s natural to relate Lie [email protected]. Supported in part by NSF FRG grant algebras over R to Lie algebras over C. If k ⊂ K is 0554278. any field extension, an n-dimensional Lie algebra 1022 Notices of the AMS Volume 54, Number 9 gk over the small field k gives rise naturally to an well established as the “right” way to present the n-dimensional Lie algebra gK = gk ⊗k K over the theory, the older explicit constructions continue large field K. The algebra gk is called a k-form of to be a powerful tool. gK . We can study real Lie algebras by first studying What we are seeking is an understanding of complex Lie algebras, and then studying their real Lie groups and (infinite-dimensional) representa- forms. tions of this aesthetically inferior sort: one that Wilhelm Killing in 1887 was able to classify for the exceptional groups in particular may rely simple Lie algebras over the complex numbers. He on explicit calculations. Always our goal is to found four infinite families of classical Lie algebras find formulations of results that are as clean and An, Bn, Cn, and Dn; and five exceptional Lie algebras simple and general as possible; but we allow for G2, F4, E6, E7, and E8. Each of these complex Lie the possibility of verifying some results by long algebras has a finite number of real forms; the real computations. The calculation we have done for E8 forms were described completely by Élie Cartan in is certainly long. I will say a few words in the last the 1890s. section about the kind of clean and simple results In each case there are two distinguished real we are extracting from it. forms: the compact real form, for which the cor- A general warning about mathematical precision. responding Lie group is compact, and the split I have tried to make the mathematical statements real form. The term “split” refers to factorization convey accurately our level of understanding; but I of certain characteristic polynomials. The split have deliberately omitted or obscured many impor- form has the property that there is an open set tant details. (Here is an example. In equation (D) of Lie algebra elements X for which the linear below, I say that Harish-Chandra found a basis for transformation of Lie bracket with X has only real the solutions of a system of differential equations. eigenvalues. If one works with simple Lie algebras When certain eigenvalues for the system are zero, over other fields, there is always an analogue of Harish-Chandra did not find all the solutions. The the split form. The compact form is special to the ones that he found suffice for the expression real field. of irreducible characters: equation (E) remains The Lie groups attached to classical Lie algebras true.) Undoubtedly the number of unintentional are all related to classical linear algebra and ge- obscurities and omissions is equally large. For both ometry. A real Lie group of type Bn, for instance, categories, I apologize in advance. 2n+1 is the group of linear transformations of R The level of historical precision is perhaps even preserving a nondegenerate quadratic form. These lower. I have omitted reference to many mathe- groups were already known in Lie’s work, and in maticians whose work played a crucial role in the some sense they go back even to Euclid. developments reported here. For these omissions I The great surprise in Killing’s work was his will not attempt to give an illustrative example but discovery of the exceptional Lie algebras: five I will again apologize. simple Lie algebras (of dimensions 14, 52, 78, 133, and 248) having no straightforward connection to Unitary Representations and Their classical geometry. Work in the twentieth century on the classification of finite simple groups shows Disreputable Cousins that we should be delighted with such a short and A unitary representation of a topological group tractable list of exceptions. G is a continuous action of G by automorphisms The atlas project is aimed at understanding the of a Hilbert space (preserving the inner product). structure and representation theory of Lie groups. Another way to say this is that a unitary repre- Each member of the project has a slightly different sentation is a realization of G as symmetries of a idea about what “understanding” means. Certainly (possibly infinite-dimensional) Euclidean geometry. it should include a thorough understanding of the Because Hilbert spaces are the basic objects of exceptional groups. quantum mechanics, one can also say that a unitary There is an aesthetic in this subject according representation is a realization of G as symmetries to which the best proof is one not referring to of a quantum-mechanical system. A unitary repre- the Cartan-Killing classification. In practice, such a sentation is called irreducible if the Hilbert space proof may be difficult to find. One of the most fun- has exactly two closed G-stable subspaces. damental results is Cartan and Weyl’s description Because so many function spaces are closely of the finite-dimensional irreducible representa- related to Hilbert spaces, unitary representations tions of a connected Lie group. This theorem are a fundamental tool for understanding ac- was first proved in the 1930s using explicit con- tions of topological groups. To prepare this tool structions of representations of simple Lie groups, for use, we seek to understand arbitrary unitary given separately in each case of the classification. representations of arbitrary topological groups. Only twenty years later did Harish-Chandra give An arbitrary unitary representation can often a construction independent of the classification. be written as a direct integral of irreducible uni- Even today, when Harish-Chandra’s approach is tary representations. The notion of direct integral October 2007 Notices of the AMS 1023 extends that of direct sum. If T is the unit circle, (The correct notion of equivalence—Harish- the Hilbert space L2(T) has a direct sum decom- Chandra’sinfinitesimal equivalence—isabitsubtle, 2 P inθ position L (T) = n2Z C · e given by Fourier and involves unbounded operators. That causes series. The Hilbert space L2(R) has a direct integral difficulties with making precise statements in the 2 R ixξ decomposition L (R) = ξ2R C · e dξ given by the rest of this section, but nothing insurmountable.) Fourier transform. Quasisimple representations turn out to be easier There is an extremely general theorem guaran- to describe than unitary representations. teeing existence of a direct integral decomposition What is the relation to the original problem into irreducible representations: it suffices that of describing unitary representations? A unitary the topological group have a countable dense representation is automatically quasisimple, so we subset. There are moderately general theorems want to understand when a quasisimple irreducible guaranteeing uniqueness of direct integral decom- representation is actually unitary. That is, we want positions. This uniqueness holds (for example) to know whether Vπ admits a G-invariant Hilbert for all algebraic Lie groups—subgroups of n × n space structure.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Orthogonal Symmetric Affine Kac-Moody Algebras
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 367, Number 10, October 2015, Pages 7133–7159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/tran/6257 Article electronically published on April 20, 2015 ORTHOGONAL SYMMETRIC AFFINE KAC-MOODY ALGEBRAS WALTER FREYN Abstract. Riemannian symmetric spaces are fundamental objects in finite dimensional differential geometry. An important problem is the construction of symmetric spaces for generalizations of simple Lie groups, especially their closest infinite dimensional analogues, known as affine Kac-Moody groups. We solve this problem and construct affine Kac-Moody symmetric spaces in a series of several papers. This paper focuses on the algebraic side; more precisely, we introduce OSAKAs, the algebraic structures used to describe the connection between affine Kac-Moody symmetric spaces and affine Kac-Moody algebras and describe their classification. 1. Introduction Riemannian symmetric spaces are fundamental objects in finite dimensional dif- ferential geometry displaying numerous connections with Lie theory, physics, and analysis. The search for infinite dimensional symmetric spaces associated to affine Kac-Moody algebras has been an open question for 20 years, since it was first asked by C.-L. Terng in [Ter95]. We present a complete solution to this problem in a series of several papers, dealing successively with the functional analytic, the algebraic and the geometric aspects. In this paper, building on work of E. Heintze and C. Groß in [HG12], we introduce and classify orthogonal symmetric affine Kac- Moody algebras (OSAKAs). OSAKAs are the central objects in the classification of affine Kac-Moody symmetric spaces as they provide the crucial link between the geometric and the algebraic side of the theory.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Trace Formula
    Clay Mathematics Proceedings Volume 4, 2005 An Introduction to the Trace Formula James Arthur Contents Foreword 3 Part I. The Unrefined Trace Formula 7 1. The Selberg trace formula for compact quotient 7 2. Algebraic groups and adeles 11 3. Simple examples 15 4. Noncompact quotient and parabolic subgroups 20 5. Roots and weights 24 6. Statement and discussion of a theorem 29 7. Eisenstein series 31 8. On the proof of the theorem 37 9. Qualitative behaviour of J T (f) 46 10. The coarse geometric expansion 53 11. Weighted orbital integrals 56 12. Cuspidal automorphic data 64 13. A truncation operator 68 14. The coarse spectral expansion 74 15. Weighted characters 81 Part II. Refinements and Applications 89 16. The first problem of refinement 89 17. (G, M)-families 93 18. Localbehaviourofweightedorbitalintegrals 102 19. The fine geometric expansion 109 20. Application of a Paley-Wiener theorem 116 21. The fine spectral expansion 126 22. The problem of invariance 139 23. The invariant trace formula 145 24. AclosedformulaforthetracesofHeckeoperators 157 25. Inner forms of GL(n) 166 Supported in part by NSERC Discovery Grant A3483. c 2005 Clay Mathematics Institute 1 2 JAMES ARTHUR 26. Functoriality and base change for GL(n) 180 27. The problem of stability 192 28. Localspectraltransferandnormalization 204 29. The stable trace formula 216 30. Representationsofclassicalgroups 234 Afterword: beyond endoscopy 251 References 258 Foreword These notes are an attempt to provide an entry into a subject that has not been very accessible. The problems of exposition are twofold. It is important to present motivation and background for the kind of problems that the trace formula is designed to solve.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTES on FINITE GROUP REPRESENTATIONS in Fall 2020, I
    NOTES ON FINITE GROUP REPRESENTATIONS CHARLES REZK In Fall 2020, I taught an undergraduate course on abstract algebra. I chose to spend two weeks on the theory of complex representations of finite groups. I covered the basic concepts, leading to the classification of representations by characters. I also briefly addressed a few more advanced topics, notably induced representations and Frobenius divisibility. I'm making the lectures and these associated notes for this material publicly available. The material here is standard, and is mainly based on Steinberg, Representation theory of finite groups, Ch 2-4, whose notation I will mostly follow. I also used Serre, Linear representations of finite groups, Ch 1-3.1 1. Group representations Given a vector space V over a field F , we write GL(V ) for the group of bijective linear maps T : V ! V . n n When V = F we can write GLn(F ) = GL(F ), and identify the group with the group of invertible n × n matrices. A representation of a group G is a homomorphism of groups φ: G ! GL(V ) for some representation choice of vector space V . I'll usually write φg 2 GL(V ) for the value of φ on g 2 G. n When V = F , so we have a homomorphism φ: G ! GLn(F ), we call it a matrix representation. matrix representation The choice of field F matters. For now, we will look exclusively at the case of F = C, i.e., representations in complex vector spaces. Remark. Since R ⊆ C is a subfield, GLn(R) is a subgroup of GLn(C).
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTRUCTING INTEGER MATRICES with INTEGER EIGENVALUES CHRISTOPHER TOWSE,∗ Scripps College
    Applied Probability Trust (25 March 2016) CONSTRUCTING INTEGER MATRICES WITH INTEGER EIGENVALUES CHRISTOPHER TOWSE,∗ Scripps College ERIC CAMPBELL,∗∗ Pomona College Abstract In spite of the proveable rarity of integer matrices with integer eigenvalues, they are commonly used as examples in introductory courses. We present a quick method for constructing such matrices starting with a given set of eigenvectors. The main feature of the method is an added level of flexibility in the choice of allowable eigenvalues. The method is also applicable to non-diagonalizable matrices, when given a basis of generalized eigenvectors. We have produced an online web tool that implements these constructions. Keywords: Integer matrices, Integer eigenvalues 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 15A36; 15A18 Secondary 11C20 In this paper we will look at the problem of constructing a good problem. Most linear algebra and introductory ordinary differential equations classes include the topic of diagonalizing matrices: given a square matrix, finding its eigenvalues and constructing a basis of eigenvectors. In the instructional setting of such classes, concrete “toy" examples are helpful and perhaps even necessary (at least for most students). The examples that are typically given to students are, of course, integer-entry matrices with integer eigenvalues. Sometimes the eigenvalues are repeated with multipicity, sometimes they are all distinct. Oftentimes, the number 0 is avoided as an eigenvalue due to the degenerate cases it produces, particularly when the matrix in question comes from a linear system of differential equations. Yet in [10], Martin and Wong show that “Almost all integer matrices have no integer eigenvalues," let alone all integer eigenvalues.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Computation of the Rank Profile Matrix and the Generalized Bruhat Decomposition Jean-Guillaume Dumas, Clement Pernet, Ziad Sultan
    Fast Computation of the Rank Profile Matrix and the Generalized Bruhat Decomposition Jean-Guillaume Dumas, Clement Pernet, Ziad Sultan To cite this version: Jean-Guillaume Dumas, Clement Pernet, Ziad Sultan. Fast Computation of the Rank Profile Matrix and the Generalized Bruhat Decomposition. Journal of Symbolic Computation, Elsevier, 2017, Special issue on ISSAC’15, 83, pp.187-210. 10.1016/j.jsc.2016.11.011. hal-01251223v1 HAL Id: hal-01251223 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01251223v1 Submitted on 5 Jan 2016 (v1), last revised 14 May 2018 (v2) HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Fast Computation of the Rank Profile Matrix and the Generalized Bruhat Decomposition Jean-Guillaume Dumas Universit´eGrenoble Alpes, Laboratoire LJK, umr CNRS, BP53X, 51, av. des Math´ematiques, F38041 Grenoble, France Cl´ement Pernet Universit´eGrenoble Alpes, Laboratoire de l’Informatique du Parall´elisme, Universit´ede Lyon, France. Ziad Sultan Universit´eGrenoble Alpes, Laboratoire LJK and LIG, Inria, CNRS, Inovall´ee, 655, av. de l’Europe, F38334 St Ismier Cedex, France Abstract The row (resp. column) rank profile of a matrix describes the stair-case shape of its row (resp.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Symmetry
    Molecular Symmetry Symmetry helps us understand molecular structure, some chemical properties, and characteristics of physical properties (spectroscopy) – used with group theory to predict vibrational spectra for the identification of molecular shape, and as a tool for understanding electronic structure and bonding. Symmetrical : implies the species possesses a number of indistinguishable configurations. 1 Group Theory : mathematical treatment of symmetry. symmetry operation – an operation performed on an object which leaves it in a configuration that is indistinguishable from, and superimposable on, the original configuration. symmetry elements – the points, lines, or planes to which a symmetry operation is carried out. Element Operation Symbol Identity Identity E Symmetry plane Reflection in the plane σ Inversion center Inversion of a point x,y,z to -x,-y,-z i Proper axis Rotation by (360/n)° Cn 1. Rotation by (360/n)° Improper axis S 2. Reflection in plane perpendicular to rotation axis n Proper axes of rotation (C n) Rotation with respect to a line (axis of rotation). •Cn is a rotation of (360/n)°. •C2 = 180° rotation, C 3 = 120° rotation, C 4 = 90° rotation, C 5 = 72° rotation, C 6 = 60° rotation… •Each rotation brings you to an indistinguishable state from the original. However, rotation by 90° about the same axis does not give back the identical molecule. XeF 4 is square planar. Therefore H 2O does NOT possess It has four different C 2 axes. a C 4 symmetry axis. A C 4 axis out of the page is called the principle axis because it has the largest n . By convention, the principle axis is in the z-direction 2 3 Reflection through a planes of symmetry (mirror plane) If reflection of all parts of a molecule through a plane produced an indistinguishable configuration, the symmetry element is called a mirror plane or plane of symmetry .
    [Show full text]
  • The Top Yukawa Coupling from 10D Supergravity with E8 × E8 Matter
    hep-th/9804107 ITEP-98-11 The top Yukawa coupling from 10D supergravity with E E matter 8 × 8 K.Zyablyuk1 Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow Abstract We consider the compactification of N=1, D=10 supergravity with E E Yang- 8 × 8 Mills matter to N=1, D=4 model with 3 generations. With help of embedding SU(5) → SO(10) E E we find the value of the top Yukawa coupling λ = 16πα =3 → 6 → 8 t GUT at the GUT scale. p 1 Introduction Although superstring theories have great success and today are the best candidates for a quantum theory unifying all interactions, they still do not predict any experimentally testable value, mostly because there is no unambiguous procedure of compactification of extra spatial dimensions. On the other hand, many phenomenological models based on the unification group SO(10) were constructed (for instance [1]). They describe quarks and leptons in representa- tions 161,162,163 and Higgses, responsible for SU(2) breaking, in 10. Basic assumption of these models is that there is only one Yukawa coupling 163 10 163 at the GUT scale, which gives masses of third generation. Masses of first two families· and· mixings are generated due to the interaction with additional superheavy ( MGUT ) states in 16 + 16, 45, 54. Such models explain generation mass hierarchy and allow∼ to express all Yukawa matrices, which well fit into experimentally observable pattern, in terms of few unknown parameters. Models of [1] are unlikely derivable from ”more fundamental” theory like supergrav- ity/string. Nevertheless, something similar can be constructed from D=10 supergravity coupled to E8 E8 matter, which is low-energy limit of heterotic string [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Symmetries on the Lattice
    Symmetries On The Lattice K.Demmouche January 8, 2006 Contents Background, character theory of finite groups The cubic group on the lattice Oh Representation of Oh on Wilson loops Double group 2O and spinor Construction of operator on the lattice MOTIVATION Spectrum of non-Abelian lattice gauge theories ? Create gauge invariant spin j states on the lattice Irreducible operators Monte Carlo calculations Extract masses from time slice correlations Character theory of point groups Groups, Axioms A set G = {a, b, c, . } A1 : Multiplication ◦ : G × G → G. A2 : Associativity a, b, c ∈ G ,(a ◦ b) ◦ c = a ◦ (b ◦ c). A3 : Identity e ∈ G , a ◦ e = e ◦ a = a for all a ∈ G. −1 −1 −1 A4 : Inverse, a ∈ G there exists a ∈ G , a ◦ a = a ◦ a = e. Groups with finite number of elements → the order of the group G : nG. The point group C3v The point group C3v (Symmetry group of molecule NH3) c ¡¡AA ¡ A ¡ A Z ¡ A Z¡ A Z O ¡ Z A ¡ Z A ¡ Z A Z ¡ Z A ¡ ZA a¡ ZA b G = {Ra(π),Rb(π),Rc(π),E(2π),R~n(2π/3),R~n(−2π/3)} noted G = {A, B, C, E, D, F } respectively. Structure of Groups Subgroups: Definition A subset H of a group G that is itself a group with the same multiplication operation as G is called a subgroup of G. Example: a subgroup of C3v is the subset E, D, F Classes: Definition An element g0 of a group G is said to be ”conjugate” to another element g of G if there exists an element h of G such that g0 = hgh−1 Example: on can check that B = DCD−1 Conjugacy Class Definition A class of a group G is a set of mutually conjugate elements of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Lattices and Vertex Operator Algebras
    My collaboration with Geoffrey Schellekens List Three Descriptions of Schellekens List Lattices and Vertex Operator Algebras Gerald H¨ohn Kansas State University Vertex Operator Algebras, Number Theory, and Related Topics A conference in Honor of Geoffrey Mason Sacramento, June 2018 Gerald H¨ohn Kansas State University Lattices and Vertex Operator Algebras My collaboration with Geoffrey Schellekens List Three Descriptions of Schellekens List How all began From gerald Mon Apr 24 18:49:10 1995 To: [email protected] Subject: Santa Cruz / Babymonster twisted sector Dear Prof. Mason, Thank you for your detailed letter from Thursday. It is probably the best choice for me to come to Santa Cruz in the year 95-96. I see some projects which I can do in connection with my thesis. The main project is the classification of all self-dual SVOA`s with rank smaller than 24. The method to do this is developed in my thesis, but not all theorems are proven. So I think it is really a good idea to stay at a place where I can discuss the problems with other people. [...] I must probably first finish my thesis to make an application [to the DFG] and then they need around 4 months to decide the application, so in principle I can come September or October. [...] I have not all of this proven, but probably the methods you have developed are enough. I hope that I have at least really constructed my Babymonster SVOA of rank 23 1/2. (edited for spelling and grammar) Gerald H¨ohn Kansas State University Lattices and Vertex Operator Algebras My collaboration with Geoffrey Schellekens List Three Descriptions of Schellekens List Theorem (H.
    [Show full text]
  • Lie Algebras of Generalized Quaternion Groups 1 Introduction 2
    Lie Algebras of Generalized Quaternion Groups Samantha Clapp Advisor: Dr. Brandon Samples Abstract Every finite group has an associated Lie algebra. Its Lie algebra can be viewed as a subspace of the group algebra with certain bracket conditions imposed on the elements. If one calculates the character table for a finite group, the structure of its associated Lie algebra can be described. In this work, we consider the family of generalized quaternion groups and describe its associated Lie algebra structure completely. 1 Introduction The Lie algebra of a group is a useful tool because it is a vector space where linear algebra is available. It is interesting to consider the Lie algebra structure associated to a specific group or family of groups. A Lie algebra is simple if its dimension is at least two and it only has f0g and itself as ideals. Some examples of simple algebras are the classical Lie algebras: sl(n), sp(n) and o(n) as well as the five exceptional finite dimensional simple Lie algebras. A direct sum of simple lie algebras is called a semi-simple Lie algebra. Therefore, it is also interesting to consider if the Lie algebra structure associated with a particular group is simple or semi-simple. In fact, the Lie algebra structure of a finite group is well known and given by a theorem of Cohen and Taylor [1]. In this theorem, they specifically describe the Lie algebra structure using character theory. That is, the associated Lie algebra structure of a finite group can be described if one calculates the character table for the finite group.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlasrep —A GAP 4 Package
    AtlasRep —A GAP 4 Package (Version 2.1.0) Robert A. Wilson Richard A. Parker Simon Nickerson John N. Bray Thomas Breuer Robert A. Wilson Email: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.maths.qmw.ac.uk/~raw Richard A. Parker Email: [email protected] Simon Nickerson Homepage: http://nickerson.org.uk/groups John N. Bray Email: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.maths.qmw.ac.uk/~jnb Thomas Breuer Email: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~Thomas.Breuer AtlasRep — A GAP 4 Package 2 Copyright © 2002–2019 This package may be distributed under the terms and conditions of the GNU Public License Version 3 or later, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses. Contents 1 Introduction to the AtlasRep Package5 1.1 The ATLAS of Group Representations.........................5 1.2 The GAP Interface to the ATLAS of Group Representations..............6 1.3 What’s New in AtlasRep, Compared to Older Versions?...............6 1.4 Acknowledgements................................... 14 2 Tutorial for the AtlasRep Package 15 2.1 Accessing a Specific Group in AtlasRep ........................ 16 2.2 Accessing Specific Generators in AtlasRep ...................... 18 2.3 Basic Concepts used in AtlasRep ........................... 19 2.4 Examples of Using the AtlasRep Package....................... 21 3 The User Interface of the AtlasRep Package 33 3.1 Accessing vs. Constructing Representations...................... 33 3.2 Group Names Used in the AtlasRep Package..................... 33 3.3 Standard Generators Used in the AtlasRep Package.................. 34 3.4 Class Names Used in the AtlasRep Package...................... 34 3.5 Accessing Data via AtlasRep ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013
    Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013 AMS Short Course on Random Matrices, Part Monday, January 7 I MAA Short Course on Conceptual Climate Models, Part I 9:00 AM –3:45PM Room 4, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center 8:30 AM –5:30PM Room 5B, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center Organizer: Van Vu,YaleUniversity Organizers: Esther Widiasih,University of Arizona 8:00AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Mary Lou Zeeman,Bowdoin upper level. College 9:00AM Random Matrices: The Universality James Walsh, Oberlin (5) phenomenon for Wigner ensemble. College Preliminary report. 7:30AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Terence Tao, University of California Los upper level. Angles 8:30AM Zero-dimensional energy balance models. 10:45AM Universality of random matrices and (1) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University (6) Dyson Brownian Motion. Preliminary 10:30AM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy report. (2) balance models, I. Laszlo Erdos, LMU, Munich Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 2:30PM Free probability and Random matrices. Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota (7) Preliminary report. Alice Guionnet, Massachusetts Institute 2:00PM One-dimensional energy balance models. of Technology (3) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University 4:00PM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy NSF-EHR Grant Proposal Writing Workshop (4) balance models, II. Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 3:00 PM –6:00PM Marina Ballroom Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota F, 3rd Floor, Marriott The time limit for each AMS contributed paper in the sessions meeting will be found in Volume 34, Issue 1 of Abstracts is ten minutes.
    [Show full text]