PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMMING AND DELIVERY WORKING GROUP MEETING 101 - 8th St., 1st Floor, CR-171 Monday, December 15, 2014 9:30 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.

AGENDA Estimated Topic Time

1. Introductions (Jean Higaki, PDWG Chair) 5 min 2. Minutes from the September 15, 2014 Joint Partnership Local Streets and Roads/ Programming and Delivery Working Group (LSRPDWG) meeting 5 min i. Nominations and Elections 2015 PDWG Vice Chair and 2nd Vice Chair 5 min 3. Standing/ Programming Updates: A. Federal Programs Delivery Updates (Marcella Aranda, [email protected]) 5 min . Inactive Obligations Update* (The current Inactive Obligations listing is available online at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/Inactiveprojects.htm.) . Draft FFY2013- 14 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects* (Staff is seeking review and comment of the Draft 2014 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects. Comments may be submitted via email to [email protected] no later than Monday, December 15, 2014)

4. Federal/State Program Announcements: A. Caltrans/FHWA/CalRTPA Announcements (DLAWUA)* (Memo Only) 5 min (Caltrans Division of Local Assistance has posted program updates/announcements to their website. Jurisdictions are encouraged to review the bulletins for program changes.) i. Follow Up on Caltrans Risk-Based Invoice training (Caltrans recently conducted a series of training sessions throughout the Region. Information and presentations from these meetings can be found here: http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist4/ola/training.htm) ii. DLA OB 14-08 Notice to Proceed* (The purpose of this OB is to have local agencies submit a copy of their notice of contract award or Notice to Proceed letter to the DLAE when they send it to the contractor. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/DLA_OB/2014/ob14-08.pdf ) iii. DLA OB 14-07 Environmental Procedures* (The following changes were required by Section 1318 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/DLA_OB/2014/ob14-07.pdf ) 5. Information Items: (“Memo Only” unless otherwise noted) 20 min A. TIP Update* (Adam Crenshaw; [email protected]) . 2013 TIP Update (The current TIP and subsequent TIP Revisions are available online at: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/funding/tip/) . 2015 TIP and 2015 Air Quality Conformity Analysis Update (View the Final 2015 TIP and Final Air Quality Conformity Analysis at http://www.mtc.ca.gov/funding/tip/index.htm) B. PMP Certification Status* (Current PMP Certification status is available online at: http://mtc.ca.gov/services/pmp/).

PDWG Chair: Jean Higaki, San Mateo C/CAG MTC Staff Liaison: Kenneth Kao PDWG Chair: Seana Gause, Sonoma Co TA Meeting Manager: Marcella Aranda

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership PDWG\_2014 PDWG\PDWG - '14 Agenda\01_Dec 15 14 PDWG Agenda.docx (21) 12.10.14 PDWG 12.15.14 Page 1 of 106 PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMMING AND DELIVERY WORKING GROUP Meeting Agenda – December 15, 2014 Page 2 of 3

C. 2014 Programming and Delivery Working Group Meeting Calendar (The 2014 Programming and Delivery Working Group meeting calendar is available online at: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/meetings/schedule/2014_PDWG_Tentative_Meeting_Schedule.pdf) . 2015 Tentative Programming and Delivery Working Group Meeting Calendar* 6. Discussion Items: A. Financial Status of OneBayArea Grant (OBAG) Program and Revisions to Local OBAG Policies. MTC Resolution No. 4035, Revised.* (Craig Goldblatt; [email protected]) 20 min (Staff proposes to add a fifth year to OBAG 1 to address a funding shortfall in the program. Additionally staff will be recommending changes to an upcoming deadline that local jurisdictions need to meet with respect to bicycle/pedestrian and housing policies in their general plans.) B. Cap and Trade Update (Rebecca Long; [email protected]) 10 min C. Active Transportation Program (ATP) Update (Kenneth Kao; [email protected]) 15 min (Staff will discuss Cycle and Cycle 2 of the Active Transportation Program.) D. 2016 STIP Guidelines Update** (Kenneth Kao, [email protected];) 10 min E. Federal Efficiencies Subcommittee Update and SPOC Training Follow Up (Jean Higaki, PDWG Chair) 20 min F. 2014 PDWG Work Plan Update (Jean Higaki, PDWG Chair) 10 min 7. Recommended Agenda Items for Next Meeting: (All) 5 min The next tentative Joint LSRPDWG meeting: Thursday, January 8, 2015 9:30a – 11:30a, 1st Floor, Room 171 101-8th Street, Oakland 94607

* = Attachment in Packet ** = Handouts Available at Meeting Contact Marcella Aranda at [email protected] if you have questions regarding this agenda.

Public Comment: The public is encouraged to comment on agenda items at committee meetings by completing a request-to-speak card (available from staff) and passing it to the committee secretary. Public comment may be limited by any of the procedures set forth in Section 3.09 of MTC’s Procedures Manual (Resolution No. 1058, Revised) if, in the chair’s judgment, it is necessary to maintain the orderly flow of business. Record of Meeting: MTC meetings are recorded. Copies of recordings are available at nominal charge, or recordings may be listened to at MTC offices by appointment. Audiocasts are maintained on MTC’s Web site for public review for at least one year. Transit Access to the MetroCenter: BART to . AC Transit buses: #11 from Piedmont and Montclair; #26 from MacArthur BART; #62 from East or West Oakland; #88 from Berkeley. For transit information from other Bay Area destinations, call 511 or use the 511 Transit Trip Planner at www.511.org to plan your trip. Parking at the MetroCenter: Metered parking is available on the street. No public parking is provided at the MetroCenter. Spaces reserved for Commissioners are for the use of their stickered vehicles only; all other vehicles will be towed away. Accessibility and Title VI: MTC provides services/accommodations upon request to persons with disabilities and individuals who are limited-English proficient who wish to address Commission matters. For accommodations or translations assistance, please call 510.817.5757 or 510.817.5769 for TDD/TTY. We require three working days' notice to accommodate your request.

Acceso y el Titulo VI: La MTC puede proveer asistencia/facilitar la comunicacion a las personas discapacitadas y los individuos con conocimiento limitado del ingles quienes quieran dirigirse a la Comision. Para solicitar asistencia, por favor llame al numero 510.817.5757 o al 510.817.5769 para TDD/TTY. Requerimos que solicite asistencia con tres dias habiles de anticipacion para poderle proveer asistencia.

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership PDWG\_2014 PDWG\PDWG - '14 Agenda\01_Dec 15 14 PDWG Agenda.docx (21) 12.10.14 PDWG 12.15.14 Page 2 of 106 PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMMING AND DELIVERY WORKING GROUP Meeting Agenda – December 15, 2014 Page 3 of 3

Meeting Conduct: In the event that any public meeting conducted by MTC is willfully interrupted or disrupted by a person or by a group or groups of persons so as to render the orderly conduct of the meeting unfeasible, the Chair may order the removal of those individuals who are willfully disrupting the meeting. Such individuals may be subject to arrest. If order cannot be restored by such removal, the members of the committee may direct that the meeting room be cleared (except for representatives of the press or other news media not participating in the disturbance), and the session may continue on matters appearing on the agenda.

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership PDWG\_2014 PDWG\PDWG - '14 Agenda\01_Dec 15 14 PDWG Agenda.docx (21) 12.10.14 PDWG 12.15.14 Page 3 of 106 JOINT PARTNERSHIP LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS/ PROGRAMMING AND DELIVERY WORKING GROUP (LSRPDWG) MINUTES September 15, 2014 Page 1 of 3

1. Introductions Seana Gause (LSRWG Chair) requested introductions and called the meeting to order.

2. Minutes from the July 21, 2014 Joint Partnership Local Streets and Roads/ Programming and Delivery Working Group (LSRPDWG) The minutes from the July 21, 2014 LSRPDWG meeting were accepted.

3. Programming Updates a. Federal Programs Delivery Update Marcella Aranda (MTC) provided a local federal funds delivery update and summarized upcoming deadlines. Items of note are: STIP allocation requests for the December CTC meeting are due by October 13; per MTC Resolution 3606, allocation requests to the CTC for federal funds must also accompany the E-76 request for authorization packet to avoid unnecessary award extension requests. Caltrans now has a report online that tracks the progress of E-76s, tracking from the time of District receipt to federal authorization; sponsors will need the local code or federal project ID to begin a search. Caltrans has also posted their turnaround time goals for each level of review up to authorization. Staff included the final draft FFY2014-15 Annual Obligation Plan, the deadline to submit comments via FMS is September 26. Staff reminded the Group that the deadline to obligate PE funds for Cycle 6 HSIP was August 26, and distributed a listing of all lapsed HSIP projects from all cycles. In addition, sponsors that that are not meeting other obligations will have their FY14-15 OBAG projects deferred until they are able to justify the delays in delivery. Staff proposed having the Programming and Delivery Working Group (PDWG) do a project by project review at a the WG meetings for individual projects not meeting delivery deadlines. The Group was considerate of the proposed process. The HSIP call for projects is expected to be announced in the spring with significant changes to improve delivery performance.

4. Federal/State Program Announcements: a. New DBE Goal Requirements Ross McKeown (MTC) reported on the new DBE goal requirements affecting CON projects over $2M and A&E contracts greats than $500k; the Caltrans must approve the DBE goals prior to contract award effective October 1, 2014.

5. Information Items a. Active Transportation Program (ATP) Update Sean Co (MTC) provided an update to the Active Transportation Program (ATP). The CTC and Caltrans have announced their Statewide program of projects. The Regional recommendations are posted to the MTC website. The next cycle of ATP will begin development in spring 2015.

b. TIP Update Adam Crenshaw (MTC) provided a TIP Revision update and the status of the 2015 TIP development. The New ATP projects should be entered as an Administrative Modification or Amendment by November 1, 2014.

c. Draft FFY 2014-15 Annual Obligation Plan Ross McKeown (MTC) reported that Resolution 3606 requires the Obligation Plan be submitted at the beginning of each fiscal year. Under the revised policy, non-OBAG projects must submit a request for authorization November 1 for obligation by February 1. For the Bridge program, there is flexibility. For the Local Safety Programs, the State delivery deadline supersedes Resolution 3606. For FY13-14, the Region ran out of Obligation Authority and apportionment in June. The Region is entering FY14-15 with a

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership Joint LSRPDWG\_2014 Joint LSRPDWG\14 Joint LSRPDWG Minutes\05_Sep 15 14 LSRPDWG minutes.docx PDWG 12.15.14 Page 4 of 106 JOINT PARTNERSHIP LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS/ PROGRAMMING AND DELIVERY WORKING GROUP (LSRPDWG) MINUTES September 15, 2014 Page 2 of 3

negative balance and therefore, it is anticipated that the region will run out of apportionment much earlier. Jurisdictions are requested to review the draft and submit changes to MTC by September 26.

d. 2013 Regional Pavement Condition Report Sui Tan (MTC) summarized the draft 2013 Regional Pavement Condition report and stated that the public release is expected in mid-October. Final comments should be submitted to MTC by September 30.

6. Discussion Items a. MAP-21 Safety Performance Measures NPRM Dave Vautin (MTC) reported that FHWA is in the process of implementing the performance requirements included in MAP-21. There will be a series of six (6) rulemakings over the course of this year and implemented spring 2015. The Highway Asset Management NPRM is expected to be released in October. After the federal government sets the measures, the state will have 12 months to set specific numeric targets for each measure. After the state targets have been set, the MPOs will have 6 months to set its numeric targets for each measure. The performance reporting requirements will begin in 2016. The next RTP is expected to be completed in 2017 and development will begin in 2015.

b. Final Guidance on Transportation Development Act Article 3 (TDA3) Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) Review of Projects Theresa Romell (MTC) summarized the proposed changes to the guidance for the TDA3 Bicycle Advisory Committee review of projects. If a jurisdiction does not want or have a BAC, they can request to be represented by the Countywide BAC, but must go to their respective Boards and identify who will be representing the City via Resolution. The deadline for feedback is September 30.

c. Federal Efficiencies Subcommittee (FES) Update Jean Higaki (San Mateo C/CAG) provided an update on the FES and summarized the subcommittee’s current efforts. FES has scheduled a Single Point of Contact workshop for September 30, recommendations and/or issues should be directed to Jean Higaki or Seana Gause for consideration as part of the workshop agenda. The deadline to register for the workshop is September 24. d. 2014 PDWG Work Plan Jean Higaki (PDWG Chair) reported that there were no additional comments on the proposed 2014 Work Plan and is therefore finalized. The Group is proposing to absorb the Federal Efficiencies Subcommittee to encourage more agency participation.

e. 2014 LSRWG Work Plan Update The 2014 LSRWG Work Plan was accepted. Seana Gause (LSRWG Chair) reminded the Group that audience participation is essential to keeping the Working Group(s) productive; this would include PDWG-related items such as delivery topics, workshop items, etc. Recommendations for agenda items should be submitted via email to Marcella Aranda one month in advance of the meeting that it is intended for presentation/discussion. i. Pothole Report Update Nicholas Richter (MTC) provided an update on the 2013 Pothole Report development and solicited success and/or challenge stories. Staff solicited volunteers for a one-time subcommittee to meet after the October LSRWG meeting. The final report is anticipated to be published in Q1 2015.

Proposed Next LSRWG Meeting: Thursday, October 9, 2014 9:30 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership Joint LSRPDWG\_2014 Joint LSRPDWG\14 Joint LSRPDWG Minutes\05_Sep 15 14 LSRPDWG minutes.docx PDWG 12.15.14 Page 5 of 106 JOINT PARTNERSHIP LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS/ PROGRAMMING AND DELIVERY WORKING GROUP (LSRPDWG) MINUTES September 15, 2014 Page 3 of 3

MetroCenter, 1st Floor, Room 171 101-8th Street, Oakland 94607

Proposed Next LSRPDWG Meeting: (Subject to change to coincide with PTAC) Thursday, November 13, 2014 9:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. MetroCenter, 1st Floor, Room 171 101-8th Street, Oakland 94607

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership Joint LSRPDWG\_2014 Joint LSRPDWG\14 Joint LSRPDWG Minutes\05_Sep 15 14 LSRPDWG minutes.docx PDWG 12.15.14 Page 6 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

3A DISTRICT 4 Inactive Obligations As of 12/2/14 Local, State Administered/Locally Funded and Rail Projects Updated on 12/2/2014 Project No Agency/District Action Required Prefix County Agency Description Authorization Last FHWA Federal Funds Expenditure Unexpended Bal (newly added Date Expenditure Inactive Date Amt projects Date (9 mos since highlighted in last GREEN) Expenditure)

Deobligation Process Initiated. BRLS ALA Oakland 12TH & 14TH ST BRIDGES 33C0181 & 33C0182, BRIDGE 5012085 REPLACEMENT (SEISMIC) 09/01/09 10/08/13 07/05/14 13,376,883 11,060,488 2,316,395 Deobligation Process Initiated. SRTSL ALA Oakland FIVE ELEMENTARY SCH. & 1 MIDDLE SCH., SIDEWALK "BULB- 5012089 OUT" 03/02/08 12/17/13 09/13/14 612,703 498,989 113,714 Deobligation Process Initiated. HPLUL SM East Palo Alto 5438015 UNIVERSITY OVERCROSSING US 101, BIKE PED PATH 11/27/13 08/24/14 240,000 - 240,000 Deobligation Process Initiated. CML SON Sonoma County SMART TRAIL FROM HEARN AVENUE TO , 5920124 CONSTRUCT CLASS I BIKE PATH 02/15/11 12/19/13 09/15/14 620,000 84,524 535,476 Deobligation Process Initiated. CML SON Sonoma County CENTRAL TRAIL, PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE 5920142 PATH 12/31/13 09/27/14 160,000 - 160,000 Deobligation Process Initiated. STPL ALA Alameda County Transportation I-580-CASTRO VALLEY INTERCHANGE , RECONFIGURE ON 6430001 Improvement Authority AND OFF RAMPS 04/21/08 10/29/13 07/26/14 1,684,093 1,167,538 516,555 Final Invoice under review by Caltrans. SR2SCML SOL Suisun City ON SOUTH SIDE OF SR 12 FROM MARINA BLVD. TO GRIZZLY 5032020 Monitor for progress. ISLAND RD., BICYCLE/PEDETSRIAN TRAIL 02/28/12 12/27/13 09/23/14 1,114,000 905,707 208,293 Final Invoice under review by Caltrans. HSIPL ALA Oakland WEST GRAND AVE @ MARKET ST; MACARTHUR BLVD @ Monitor for progress. FRUITVALE AVE; MARKET ST @ 55TH, INSTALL LEFT TURN 5012096 LANE 06/30/11 12/19/13 09/15/14 222,930 193,002 29,928 Final Invoice under review by Caltrans. HSIPL ALA Oakland CITYWIDE INTERSECTIONS ( 14 LOCATIONS), COUNTDOWN 5012097 Monitor for progress. PED. X- SIGNALS 07/08/11 12/19/13 09/15/14 80,640 31,551 49,089 Final Invoice under review by Caltrans. CML ALA Alameda County Monitor for progress. Congestion Management W GRAND AVE, MACARTHUR BLVD, 20TH/HARRISON ST , 6273038 Agency INTERCONNECT AND X-IMPROVMENTS 05/17/08 10/08/13 07/05/14 500,000 478,278 21,722 Invoice under review by Caltrans. STPL MULT Metropolitan Monitor for progress. Transportation BAY AREA , REG. STREETS & ROADS 6084156 Commission PROGRAM 02/02/10 12/10/13 09/06/14 1,500,000 1,121,305 378,695 Invoice under review by Caltrans. STP MULT Metropolitan Monitor for progress. Transportation ROUTE 101 IN SONOMA COUNTY PM 13.9 TO PM 31.0, FPI 6084185 Commission PROJECT, INSTALL RAMP METERS,TC 12/31/13 09/27/14 350,000 - 350,000 Invoice under review by Caltrans. STPL SF City & County of San Monitor for progress. Francisco, MTA/Parking & MANSELL AVE; PERSIA STREET, 3R; BIKE/PEDESTRIAN 6328066 Traffic ENHANCEMENT 11/20/13 08/17/14 210,625 - 210,625 Records indicate project is in Final STPLZ ALA Union City VARIOUS LOCATIONS (SEE STATE COMMENTS) , SEISMIC 5354008 Voucher. District to verify. RETROFIT 09/01/96 10/10/13 07/07/14 513,474 441,475 71,999 Records indicate project is in Final CML SF San Francisco Department Voucher. District to verify. of Public Health 6447004 VARIOUS LOCATIONS, EDUCATION AND OUTREACH 04/27/11 11/15/13 08/12/14 500,000 488,380 11,620 Submit invoice to District by RPSTPLE MRN Mill Valley SYCAMORE AVE. BTW CAMINO ALTO AND N-S BIKEWAY IN 5113013 12/06/2014 MILL VALLEY, SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS 10/22/13 07/19/14 249,654 - 249,654 Final Invoice under review by Caltrans. HSIPL SCL Los Altos HOMESTEAD RD (BELLEVILLE WAY (CITY LIMITS) TO Monitor for progress. FOOTHILL EXPRESSWAY), SIGNALS, XWALKS,TURN ISLANDS, 5309015 BIKE/PED PATHWAYS 08/02/12 03/11/14 12/06/14 609,000 424,100 184,900 Final Invoice under review by Caltrans. HSIPL SCL Saratoga SARATOGA-LOS GATOS RD (SR 9) BETWEEN BIG BASIN WAY Monitor for progress. TO LOS GATOS CITY LIMIT, BIKE AND PED SAFETY 5332011 IMPROVEMENTS 03/31/08 03/06/14 12/01/14 1,361,721 1,210,346 151,375 Final Invoice under review by Caltrans. CML SON Petaluma PETALUMA BOULEVARD SOUTH ROAD DIET; WASHINGTON Monitor for progress. ST TO E ST, RECONFIGURE 4-THROUGH LANES TO 2- 5022048 THROUGH LANES 11/18/10 01/24/14 10/21/14 708,000 621,266 86,734 Final Invoice under review by Caltrans. CML SCL Sunnyvale Monitor for progress. SUNNYVALE DOWNTOWN; IOWA AVE BETWEEN MATHILDA 5213037 AVE AND SUNNYVALE AVE, STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 03/16/12 03/06/14 12/01/14 594,000 473,525 120,475 Final Invoice under review by Caltrans. HSIPL ALA Fremont PASEO PADRE PKWY: DECOTO-FREMONT & THORNTON- 5322036 Monitor for progress. WALNUT, REPL CONC LT POLES W/ ALUM. POLES 04/08/09 03/28/14 12/23/14 182,843 168,718 14,125 Final Invoice under review by Caltrans. RPSTPLE ALA Livermore Amador Valley 6193009 Monitor for progress. Transit Authority LIVERMORE, BUS RESTORATION 06/14/11 03/19/14 12/14/14 200,000 154,215 45,785

Page 1 of 4

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 7 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

3A DISTRICT 4 Inactive Obligations As of 12/2/14 Local, State Administered/Locally Funded and Rail Projects Updated on 12/2/2014 Project No Agency/District Action Required Prefix County Agency Description Authorization Last FHWA Federal Funds Expenditure Unexpended Bal (newly added Date Expenditure Inactive Date Amt projects Date (9 mos since highlighted in last GREEN) Expenditure) Invoice returned to agency. Resubmit STPL NAP Napa to District by 02/20/2015 5042056 CITY OF NAPA, PDA IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 02/20/14 11/17/14 275,000 - 275,000 Invoice returned to agency. Resubmit CML CC Richmond to District by 02/20/2015 IN CITY OF RICHMOND, CAB RIDE AND BIKE SHARE 5137045 PROGRAM (NI) 02/07/14 11/04/14 203,291 - 203,291 Invoice returned to agency. Resubmit BRLS SCL San Jose to District by 02/20/2015 SANTA CLARA ST OVER COYOTE CREEK (BR#37C0033) , 5005089 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 09/02/09 03/19/14 12/14/14 44,265 24,211 20,054 Invoice returned to agency. Resubmit CML ALA Albany to District by 02/20/2015 BUCHANAN/MARIN STREET FROM PIERCE ST. TO SAN 5178012 PABLO, BIKE LANE & PED. WALKWAY 06/01/12 03/06/14 12/01/14 1,702,000 1,410,745 291,255 Invoice returned to agency. Resubmit CML SM Daly City to District by 02/20/2015 5196030 MISSION STREET, PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS 08/01/06 03/19/14 12/14/14 2,295,300 1,881,015 414,285 Invoice returned to agency. Resubmit CML SON Windsor to District by 02/20/2015 INTERSECTION OF JAGUAR WAY AND WINDSOR ROAD, 5472018 INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL, CONSTRUCT 800' BIKELANES 03/14/14 12/09/14 108,000 - 108,000 Invoice returned to agency. Resubmit SRTSLNI SON Sonoma County to District by 02/20/2015 8 SCHOOLS WITHIN SONOMA COUNTY , IMPLEMENTATION 5920114 OF SRTS PROGRAM 06/03/09 03/28/14 12/23/14 500,000 476,603 23,397 Invoice returned to agency. Resubmit BPMP SCL Santa Clara County SAN TOMAS EXPRESSWAY OVER LOS GATOS CREEK, to District by 02/20/2015 CAMPBELL, CA - BRIDGE 37C0053, BRIDGE PREVENTIVE 5937156 MAINTENANCE 06/24/10 01/30/14 10/27/14 128,369 52,998 75,371 Invoice returned to agency. Resubmit HP21L SM San Mateo County Transit to District by 02/20/2015 District MISSION ST FR JDALY BLVD TO PARKVIEW AVE, PEDESTRIAN 6014011 IMPROVEMENTS 11/11/10 03/13/14 12/08/14 700,000 544,294 155,706 Invoice under review by Caltrans. BRLS SON Healdsburg HEALDSBURG AVE. BRIDGE OVER THE RUSSIAN RIVER 5027010 Monitor for progress. 20C0065, BRIDGE REHABILITATION 07/08/09 03/19/14 12/14/14 15,173,157 2,633,911 12,539,246 Invoice under review by Caltrans. SRTSL MRN Mill Valley E. SIDE OF CAMINO ALTO, SYCAMORE/MILLER, Monitor for progress. MILLER/ALMONTE BLVD., MULTI-USE PATHWAY, CURB EXT. 5113011 & TRAFFIC CALMING 04/24/12 03/21/14 12/16/14 565,286 70,700 494,586 Invoice under review by Caltrans. BRLO CC Contra Costa County ORWOOD BRIDGE (28C-0024) AT INDIAN SLOUGH, BRIDGE 5928045 Monitor for progress. REPLACEMENT (TC) 08/01/00 02/26/14 11/23/14 920,000 714,715 205,285 Invoice under review by Caltrans. HSIPHR3L CC Contra Costa County MARSH CREEK RD- 1 MILE E OF RUSSELMANN PARK RD TO Monitor for progress. 3/4 MILE W OF MORGAN TERRITORY, ROADWAY 5928096 REALIGNMENT 06/22/12 02/28/14 11/25/14 863,039 96,583 766,456 Invoice under review by Caltrans. BHLO SON Sonoma County REPLACE LAUGHLIN BRIDGE AT BRICKWAY BLVD EXT. , 5920075 Monitor for progress. BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 20C-0246 . 12/01/04 03/28/14 12/23/14 624,449 596,356 28,093 Invoice under review by Caltrans. BRLS CC Contra Costa County BYRON HWY 1.4 MILES FROM NORTHWEST OF ALAMEDA Monitor for progress. COUNTY LINE, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT , REALIGN BYRON 5928104 HWY 06/24/10 03/06/14 12/01/14 265,590 22,481 243,109 Invoice under review by Caltrans. BRLS CC Contra Costa County MARSH CREEK RD, APPROX. 1.8 MI E OF MORGAN Monitor for progress. TERRITORY RD, REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE WITH NEW 5928107 CONCRETE 2-1N STR 06/30/11 02/26/14 11/23/14 336,082 177,220 158,862 Records indicate project is in Final CML ALA Berkeley SAN PABLO AVE. CORRIDOR IN CITY OF BERKELEY , BICYCLE 5057019 Voucher. District to verify. RELATED - OTHER 04/01/00 03/26/14 12/21/14 1,432,000 1,408,421 23,579 Records indicate project is in Final HPLUL ALA Caltrans I-580-AL.COUNTY GREENVILLE RD TO HACIENDA DR. , WIDEN 6204071 Voucher. District to verify. FRW TO CONSTRUCT HOV LANE . 12/19/08 03/13/14 12/08/14 13,000,927 11,147,301 1,853,626 Submit invoice to District by RPSTPLE SON Rohnert Park COPELAND CREEK IN ROHNERT PARK, PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE 5379018 02/20/2015 PATH 12/14/10 02/26/14 11/23/14 670,000 498,683 171,317 Submit invoice to District by RPSTPLE SCL Gilroy MULTIPLE LOCATIONS IN CITY OF GILROY, CROSSING WALKS, 5034024 02/20/2015 SIDEWALKS, BICYCLE LANES 07/06/12 03/06/14 12/01/14 697,000 528,866 168,134 Submit invoice to District by CML SCL San Jose SAN JOSE CITYWIDE SRTS PROGRAM, IMPLEMENT BIKE/PED. 5005133 02/20/2015 IMPROVEMENTS 03/04/14 11/29/14 150,000 - 150,000

Page 2 of 4

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 8 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

3A DISTRICT 4 Inactive Obligations As of 12/2/14 Local, State Administered/Locally Funded and Rail Projects Updated on 12/2/2014 Project No Agency/District Action Required Prefix County Agency Description Authorization Last FHWA Federal Funds Expenditure Unexpended Bal (newly added Date Expenditure Inactive Date Amt projects Date (9 mos since highlighted in last GREEN) Expenditure) Submit invoice to District by HSIPL ALA Oakland HEGENBERGER ROAD @ EDES AVE, BALDWIN ST, HAMILTON 02/20/2015 ST, 73RD AVE, UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNALS & INSTALL 5012113 FLASHING BEACONS 01/25/12 02/28/14 11/25/14 668,571 112,049 556,522 Submit invoice to District by HSIPL ALA Oakland BANCROFT AVE. / 94TH AVE., INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS, 5012114 02/20/2015 CONSTRUCT CURB RAMPS 01/23/12 03/06/14 12/01/14 485,100 52,784 432,316 Submit invoice to District by CML SON Healdsburg 5027013 02/20/2015 HEALDSBURG FOSS CREEK, BIKE AND PED PATHWAY 04/17/09 03/19/14 12/14/14 2,254,910 51,973 2,202,937 Submit invoice to District by BPMP SM Redwood City VARIOUS BRIDGES IN CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, 5029027 02/20/2015 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE 06/22/11 02/14/14 11/11/14 26,559 12,911 13,648 Submit invoice to District by BPMP SM Redwood City 02/20/2015 MAIN ST, VETERANS BLVD, AND MAPLE ST OVER REDWOOD 5029032 CREEK, BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE 03/21/14 12/16/14 23,239 - 23,239 Submit invoice to District by STPLZ SOL Vallejo SACRAMENTO STREET OH IN THE CITY OF VALLEJO, SEISMIC 5030056 02/20/2015 RETROFIT - REPLACE BRIDGE 11/16/11 02/26/14 11/23/14 708,240 142,642 565,598 Submit invoice to District by STPL ALA Livermore 5053027 02/20/2015 CITYWIDE STREETS, ROAD REHABILITATION 03/04/14 11/29/14 1,053,000 - 1,053,000 Submit invoice to District by NMTPL MRN Sausalito 5098011 02/20/2015 2 LOCATIONS IN SAUSALITO, STEPS, LANES AND PATH IMP. 09/23/08 02/11/14 11/08/14 180,000 58,546 121,454 Submit invoice to District by CML MRN Sausalito GATE 6 ROAD INTERSECTION WITH STATE HWY 101 ON 02/20/2015 RAMP IN SAUSALITO, MARIN COUNTY., SIGNAL 5098012 MODIFICATION 04/04/12 02/11/14 11/08/14 88,000 40,534 47,466 Submit invoice to District by SRTS CC Richmond 5 LOCATIONS:CORONADO, HIGHLAND, NYSTROM, 02/20/2015 WASHINGTON AND WILSON ELEM. SCHOOLS., SAFE ROUTE 5137041 TO SCHOOL 05/11/12 03/28/14 12/23/14 741,000 435,894 305,106 Submit invoice to District by BRLS MRN Larkspur DOHERTY BRIDGE (ARROYO HOLON) 27C-0067 ., BRIDGE 5166014 02/20/2015 REPLACEMENT 12/07/01 03/19/14 12/14/14 3,238,517 2,364,812 873,705 Submit invoice to District by HSIPL CC El Cerrito IN EL CERRITO ON PORTRERO AVE 55TH&56TH AVE.., SIGNAL 5239013 02/20/2015 MODIFICATION 08/27/09 03/06/14 12/01/14 584,910 553,261 31,649 Submit invoice to District by BRLS CC San Pablo RUMRILL BLVD OVER SAN PABLO CREEK @ BROOKSIDE, 5303003 02/20/2015 REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 28C-0325 01/17/95 02/28/14 11/25/14 4,150,168 4,077,126 73,042 Submit invoice to District by BHLS SCL Los Altos FREMONT AVE BR (37C0115) @ PERMANENTE CRK, BRIDGE 5309004 02/20/2015 REPLACEMENT 09/10/02 01/10/14 10/07/14 388,800 379,483 9,317 Submit invoice to District by STPL CC Pleasant Hill CONTRA COSTA BLVD CHILPANCINGO PKWY TO SOUTH 02/20/2015 VIKING DR., REHABILITATE PAVEMENT, INSTALL TRAFFIC 5375029 SIGNAL 02/25/14 11/22/14 799,000 - 799,000 Submit invoice to District by HPLUL SM East Palo Alto 02/20/2015 BAY ROAD: CLARKE/ILLINOIS TO COOLEY LANDING (BAY 5438011 TRAIL), ROAD WIDEN, RESURFACE, STREETSCAPE, BIKE LANE 04/04/12 03/13/14 12/08/14 1,064,000 182,790 881,210 Submit invoice to District by BRLO SON Sonoma County BOHAN DILLON RD OVER SOUTH FORK GUALALA RIVER, 0.1 02/20/2015 MI N FORT ROSS RD, REPLACE 1-LN BRIDGE WITH 2-LN 5920126 BRIDGE(TC) 04/13/11 03/28/14 12/23/14 290,000 61,294 228,706 Submit invoice to District by BRLO NAP Napa County 04-NAP-0-CR, OAKVILLE CROSS RD AT NAPA RIVER, BRIDGE 5921010 02/20/2015 REPLACEMENT, BR.NO. 21C 07/30/96 03/13/14 12/08/14 548,000 535,410 12,590 Submit invoice to District by HSIPL MRN Marin County INTERSECTION OF HWY 101 ON/OFF RAMP & REDWOOD 02/20/2015 FRONTAGE ROAD/DE SILVA ISLAND DR., MODIFY 5927090 INTERSECTION, IMPROVE PED. SAFETY 12/15/11 02/26/14 11/23/14 359,145 65,751 293,394 Submit invoice to District by BRLO MRN Marin County SAN GEROMINO CREEK BRIDGE ON MOUNTAIN VIEW ROAD 02/20/2015 0.01 MI SOUTH OF SIR FRANCIS DRA, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 5927094 (TC) 03/22/13 03/11/14 12/06/14 328,000 4,679 323,321 Submit invoice to District by BRLS MRN Marin County ARROYO NICASIO BRIDGE ON NICASIO VALLEY ROAD, 5927097 02/20/2015 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 04/22/13 03/11/14 12/06/14 377,137 11,072 366,065 Submit invoice to District by BRLS MRN Marin County MUIR WOODS ROAD OVER REDWOOD CREEK, 2.0 MI WEST 5927098 02/20/2015 OF STATE HIGHWAY 1, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 04/17/13 03/11/14 12/06/14 239,031 5,656 233,375 Submit invoice to District by BRLS MRN Marin County OLEMA CREEK BRIDGE ON SIR FRANCIS DRAKE BLVD, BRIDGE 5927099 02/20/2015 REPLACEMENT 04/22/13 03/11/14 12/06/14 262,048 3,738 258,310

Page 3 of 4

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 9 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

3A DISTRICT 4 Inactive Obligations As of 12/2/14 Local, State Administered/Locally Funded and Rail Projects Updated on 12/2/2014 Project No Agency/District Action Required Prefix County Agency Description Authorization Last FHWA Federal Funds Expenditure Unexpended Bal (newly added Date Expenditure Inactive Date Amt projects Date (9 mos since highlighted in last GREEN) Expenditure)

Submit invoice to District by BPMP MRN Marin County MT. LASSEN DR. OVER MILLER CREEK, 0.06 MI N LUCAS 5927100 02/20/2015 VALLEY RD., BRIDGE REHABILITATION (TC) 05/28/13 03/11/14 12/06/14 63,250 2,308 60,942 Submit invoice to District by DEM05L ALA Port Of Oakland MARITIME ST. TO THE WEST AND UNION PACIFIC RR TO THE 6057014 02/20/2015 EAST, INTERMODAL STUDY 11/13/12 03/19/14 12/14/14 983,928 103,588 880,340 Submit invoice to District by TGR2DG. CC Regional Park PINOLE SHORES BAY TRAILS, CONSTRUCT CLASS I BICYCLE 6075019 02/20/2015 District PATH AND PED. TRAIL 04/07/11 03/06/14 12/01/14 600,000 445,178 154,822 Submit invoice to District by STPL MULT Metropolitan 02/20/2015 Transportation , REGIONAL PLANNING-PDA 6084186 Commission IMPLEMENTATION 01/09/14 10/06/14 8,000,000 - 8,000,000 Submit invoice to District by CML SOL Solano Transportation WITHIN SOLANO COUNTY, PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 6249035 02/20/2015 Authority SYSTEM, SOLANO TRANSIT AMBASSADOR PROGRAM 03/14/14 12/09/14 250,000 - 250,000

Page 4 of 4

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 10 of 106 PDWG Item 3A

TO: Partnership Programming and Delivery Working Group DATE: December 15, 2014

FR: Marcella Aranda

RE: Draft FFY2013-14 Annual Listing of Federally Obligated Projects

Attached is the draft FFY2013-14 Annual Listing of Federally Obligated Projects which reflects FHWA funds obligated in FFY2013-14 (10/1/13-9/30/14). Project sponsors are requested to review the draft table for content and in particular the following items:

TIP ID/EA: Review the “N/A” items to determine if there is a TIP ID Agency: Review the ”State-Managed” items within your respective counties to determine if an Agency can be assigned

Comments should be submitted via email to Marcella Aranda at [email protected] no later than Monday, December 15, 2014.

Attachment: 1- Draft FFY2013-14 Annual Listing of Federally Obligated Projects

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership PDWG\_2014 PDWG\PDWG - '14 - Memos\01_Dec 15 14 PDWG\03a_Draft FFY2013-14 Annual Listing of Federally Obligated projects Memo.docx

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 11 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt ALA110025 Alameda Alameda (City) OTIS DRIVE; WESTLINE DR TO WILLOW ST, AC PAVEMENT STP 5014034 ($1,068) 12/11/13 ALA110085 Alameda Alameda (City) Shoreline Dr, Westline Dr and Broadway Bike Lanes HSIP 5014037 $348,630 03/05/14 $348,630 ALA130022 Alameda Alameda (City) Alameda City Complete Streets STP 5014041 $130,000 01/30/14 $130,000 $505,000 Alameda Contra Costa ALA050017 Alameda Transit District (AC Enhanced Bus - Telegraph/Intl/East 14th CMAQ 6002022 $2,155,405 06/04/14 $2,155,405 Transit) ALA030002 Alameda Alameda County Alameda: Vasco Road Safety Improvements STP 5933102 ($1) 10/18/13 $235,000

ALA050035 Alameda Alameda County Cherryland/Ashland/CastroValley/Fairview SidwlkImp HPP 5933121 $611,920 03/20/14 $102,330

ALA050035 Alameda Alameda County Cherryland/Ashland/CastroValley/Fairview SidwlkImp CMAQ 5933127 $130,000 04/09/14 $130,000 $300,000

ALA070040 Alameda Alameda County HAMPTON RD BETWEEN MEEKLAND AVE. & MISSION BL, CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK,CURB,GUTTER CMAQ 5933092 ($45,355) 11/22/13 ALA110049 Alameda Alameda County MULTIPLE LOCATIONS - SEE SCOMMENT FOR DETAILS, REPAIR / REPLACE DRAINAGE INLET HSIP 5933097 ($426,600) 10/24/13 ALA130018 Alameda Alameda County Alameda Co-Various Streets and Roads Preservation STP 5933125 $100,000 04/09/14 $100,000

ALA991077 Alameda Alameda County E. 14th St/Mission Blvd Streetscape HPP 5933126 $539,940 04/09/14 $548,000 ON I-580 IN ASHLAND FROM 164TH AVE OFFRAMP TO 164TH AVE UNDERCROSSING, CONSTRUCT A N/A Alameda Alameda County NHPP 5801063 $2,137,000 08/20/14 SOLDIER PILE WALL AND REPAIR (TC) Alameda County ALA110033 Alameda Transportation Alameda County Safe Routes to School STP 6480006 $1,000,000 10/24/13 $1,000,000 Commission (ACTC) Alameda County ALA110033 Alameda Transportation Alameda County Safe Routes to School CMAQ 6480006 $4,673,065 10/24/13 $2,673,065 Commission (ACTC) Alameda County ALA110107 Alameda Transportation ALA-Community-Based Transportation Plan Updates STP 6480007 $475,000 10/29/13 $475,000 Commission (ACTC) Alameda County ALA110122 Alameda Transportation ALAMEDA COUNTY- VARIOUS LOCATION, PLANNING ASSISTANCE PASS STP 6480008 $3,905,000 09/04/14 Commission (ACTC) Alameda County N/A Alameda Transportation SUNOL GRADE - ALAMEDA & SANTA CLARA CO. I-680 , CONSTRUCT SOUNDWALL HPP 6273032 ($145,718) 03/26/14 Commission (ACTC) Altamont Commuter ALA110099 Alameda ACE Preventative Maintenance STP+ 6262014 $668,775 08/01/12 $668,775 Express (ACE) 18TH STREET IN OAKLAND TO ASHLAND AVENUE IN HAYWARD/FREMONT, SEISMIC RETROFIT-AERIAL ALA110055 Alameda STP+ 6000047 ($3,480,359) 09/26/14 District (BART) STRUCTURES

Bay Area Rapid Transit I-238 TO HAYWARD STATION, SR-92, INDUSTRIAL BLVD, AND UPRR, SEISMIC RETROFIT ALA110056 Alameda STP+ 6000044 ($293,517) 06/24/14 District (BART) OF BART STRUCTURES, FREMONT LINE Bay Area Rapid TransitDRAFT ALA110057 Alameda IN WEST OAKLAND, SEISMIC RETROFIT OF BART FACILITIES STP+ 6000049 $52,759 07/29/14 District (BART) Bay Area Rapid Transit ALA110121 Alameda BART Train Car Accident Repair Project STP 6000056 $1,493,189 04/17/14 $1,493,189 District (BART) Bay Area Rapid Transit ALA130032 Alameda BART Metro Priority Track Elements CMAQ 5094059 $40,000 03/21/13 $40,000 District (BART) Bay Area Rapid Transit ALA130032 Alameda BART Metro Priority Track Elements STP+ 6000059 $3,419,057 07/31/14 $1,539,000 District (BART) ALA090039 Alameda Berkeley IN ALAMEDA COUNTY ON I-80 AT PM 5.5 , ACCESS IMPROVE @ BIKE & PED FAC. STP 0801111 ($31,160) 03/26/14 ALA050059 Alameda Caltrans RTE.13, LANDSCAPING STP 6204063 ($216,018) 10/18/13

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 1 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 12 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt ALA070041 Alameda Caltrans ALAMEDA AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTIES ., INTEGRATE FREEWAY AND ARTERIAL CMAQ 6273046 ($81,566) 10/18/13 ALA130029 Alameda Caltrans Reconst I-880/SR92 Inter - Repl Planting & Irrigat HPP 6204118 $1,259,859 07/11/14 $260,000 ALA090066 Alameda Dublin ALAMO CANAL CREEK UNDERNEATH I-580, CONSTRUCT TRAIL RIP 5432014 ($1,611) 12/11/13 CLARK AVE.-VILLAGE PKW TO MAPLE DR., SILVER GATE DR.-DUBLIN BLVD. TO SSN R. RD., PAVEMENT ALA110024 Alameda Dublin STP 5432016 ($1,374) 11/05/13 RESURFACE ALA110034 Alameda Dublin GOLDEN GATE DRIVE, STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS CMAQ 5432015 ($17,608) 04/27/14 ALA110101 Alameda Emeryville SAN PABLO AVE (SR 123) BETWEEN 43RD & 47TH AVE., PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY SRTS 5106008 $565,750 08/12/14 $561,000

ALA110082 Alameda Fremont INTERSECTION OF FREMONT BLVD. AND ALDER AVE., INTERSECTION IMPROVMENT HSIP 5322048 $348,700 05/19/14 $348,700

ALA110083 Alameda Fremont INTERSECTION OF FREMONT BLVD. AND EGGERS DRIVE, INTERSECTION IMPROVMENTS HSIP 5322049 $275,700 08/28/14 ALA110088 Alameda Fremont NILES BLVD.OVERHEAD(BART/UPRR),BR#33C0128, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT (TC) BRIDGE 5322019 $10,061,200 09/26/14 ALA130020 Alameda Fremont Fremont Various Streets and Roads Preservation STP 5322054 $2,105,000 04/16/14 $2,105,000

ALA130025 Alameda Fremont Fremont City Center Multi-Modal Improvements STP 5322053 $86,291 09/26/14 $4,480,994 $1,374,006

ALA130025 Alameda Fremont Fremont City Center Multi-Modal Improvements STP 5322053 $4,480,994 03/21/14 $4,480,994 $1,374,006 N/A Alameda Fremont AUTO MALL PKWY/UNION PACIFIC RR BR#33C0400, PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE BRIDGE 5322038 ($2,614) 10/18/13 N/A Alameda Fremont ALVARADO BLVD OVER ALAMEDA CO.FLOOD CHANNEL, PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE BR#33C0 BRIDGE 5322039 ($11,785) 10/18/13 WEST "A" STREET: HATHAWAY AVE TO S GARDEN AVE, CONSTRUCT MEDIANS, INSTALL FLASHING ALA110108 Alameda Hayward HSIP 5050040 $161,000 09/11/14 BEACONS ALA130013 Alameda Hayward Hayward - Industrial Boulevard Preservation STP 5050041 $70,000 01/23/14 $70,000 $1,265,000

ALA110015 Alameda Livermore LIVERMORE DOWNTOWN, LIGHTING RETROFIT CMAQ 5053024 ($19,724) 04/14/14

ALA130010 Alameda Livermore Livermore Various Streets Preservation STP 5053027 $1,053,000 03/04/14 $1,053,000 Metropolitan N/A Alameda Transportation SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, EXPANSION OF CITY CAR SHARE SERVICES HPP 6084166 ($2) 04/08/14 Commission Metropolitan REG050021 Alameda Transportation SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL (FSP) CMAQ 6160014 ($1) 12/20/13 Commission - SAFE Metropolitan MTC030003 Alameda Transportation SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA_FY07/08, FWY OPERATION/TOS PLANNING STU CMAQ 6084126 ($2,218) 12/20/13 Commission (MTC) Metropolitan MTC030003 Alameda Transportation SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA FY 07/08, FWY OPERATION/ TOS PLANNING ST CMAQ 6084141 ($250) 10/18/13 Commission (MTC) Metropolitan MTC030003 Alameda Transportation SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, RAMP METER INSTALLATION CMAQ 6084147 $56,609 07/03/14 Commission (MTC) Metropolitan DRAFT REG050015 Alameda Transportation SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, TETAP SIGNAL TIMING PROGRAM CMAQ 6084132 ($20) 12/17/13 Commission (MTC) Metropolitan REG090040 Alameda Transportation SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, STATION AREA PLANNING PRO.& IMPLE. REGIONAL PLAN STP 6084170 ($359,891) 06/26/14 Commission (MTC) Metropolitan REG090042 Alameda Transportation NINE COUNTY SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, 511 TRAVELER INFORMATION STP 6084176 $20,875,000 09/03/14 Commission (MTC)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 2 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 13 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt Metropolitan Transportation REG090045 Alameda Commission (MTC) SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, CLIPPER FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM PHASE 3 (TC) CMAQ 6084190 $10,691,476 07/11/14 $8,000,000 Metropolitan REG090065 Alameda Transportation SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, CLIMATE INITIATIVES PROGRAM PUBLIC EDUCATION CMAQ 6084164 ($3,000,000) 07/28/14 Commission (MTC) Metropolitan REG110014 Alameda Transportation SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, STATION AREA PLANNING GRANT PR STP 6084146 $359,890 07/22/14 Commission (MTC) Metropolitan REG110037 Alameda Transportation SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, REGIONAL PLANNING-PDA IMPLEMENTATION STP 6084186 $8,000,000 01/09/14 $8,000,000 Commission (MTC) Metropolitan REG110037 Alameda Transportation SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, REGIONAL PLANNING-PDA IMPLEMENTATION (TC) STP 6084187 $2,000,000 07/17/14 $2,000,000 Commission (MTC) ALA070011 Alameda Oakland 66TH AVE.FROM SAN LEANDRO TO INTERNATION BLVD, STREETSCAPE CMAQ 5012087 ($36,559) 06/26/14 ALA070012 Alameda Oakland OAKLAND COLISIUM, PED. WALKWAY,LANDSCAPE RIP 5012107 ($112,209) 03/28/14 ALA110060 Alameda Oakland LAKE MERRITT CHANNEL BRIDGE (BR.NO.33C-0030), REPLACE BRIDGE (PER SEISMIC STRATEGY) BRIDGE 5012037 $17,696,838 04/02/14

ALA110068 Alameda Oakland COLISEUM WAY BRIDGE OVER DAMON SLOUGH, BRIDGE NO. 33C0253, BRIDGE SEISMIC RETROFIT BRIDGE 5012094 $822,379 07/02/14 HEGENBERGER RD. OVER SAN LEANDRO STREET- BRIDGE # 33C0202, BRIDGE PREVENTIVE ALA110069 Alameda Oakland BRIDGE 5012121 $580,978 07/31/14 MAINTENANCE ALA110074 Alameda Oakland VARIOUS LOCATIONS (SEE STATE COMMENTS), SEISMIC RETROFIT BRIDGE 5012025 ($547,182) 11/08/13 HEGENBERGER ROAD @ EDES AVE, BALDWIN ST, HAMILTON ST, 73RD AVE, UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNALS ALA110076 Alameda Oakland HSIP 5012113 $506,483 02/28/14 $737,912 & INSTALL FLASHING BEACONS ALA110077 Alameda Oakland BANCROFT AVE. / 94TH AVE., INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS, CONSTRUCT CURB RAMPS HSIP 5012114 $398,475 03/06/14 $398,475 ALA110078 Alameda Oakland SAN PABLO @ WEST GRAND AVE. AND @ WEST STREET, UPGRADE SIGNALS/MODIFY INTERSECTIONS HSIP 5012115 $344,520 04/10/14 $344,520

ALA110109 Alameda Oakland ON W. MACARTHUR BLVD. BETWEEN MARKET ST. & TELEGRAPH AVE., MODIFY TRAFFIC SIGNALS HSIP 5012117 $124,900 08/28/14 $124,900 ALA110110 Alameda Oakland ON 98TH AVE. BETWEEN MACARTHUR BLVD. & EDES AVE., TRAFFIC SIGNALS, PED. CROSSING HSIP 5012118 $99,300 08/15/14 $99,300 MARKET ST BETWEEN 45TH AVE. & ARLINGTON AVE., TRAFFIC SIGNALS, RESTRIPING & RECONFIGURE ALA110111 Alameda Oakland HSIP 5012119 $103,300 08/15/14 $103,300 INTERSEC SEVEN BLOCK AREA OF GRAND AVE. FROM PARK VIEW TO EUCLID, UPGRADE CROSSWALKS: SIGNING, ALA110125 Alameda Oakland HSIP 5012126 $104,200 09/02/14 $104,200 STRIPING, PED SIGNALS ALA110126 Alameda Oakland 9TH ST/MADISON, 8TH ST/JACSON,8TH ST/OAK ST,7TH ST/MADISON, UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNALS HSIP 5012129 $58,200 09/02/14 $58,200

ALA130016 Alameda Oakland Oakland Complete Streets STP 5012125 $467,000 06/08/14 $467,000 $3,384,000 N/A Alameda Oakland WEST GRAND AVE VIADUCT, BRIDGE 33C0393, BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE BRIDGE 5012108 ($356,948) 03/04/14 N/A Alameda Oakland HEGENBERGER RD OVER UPRR, BRIDGE # 33C0165, BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE BRIDGE 5012109 ($64,782) 02/25/14 N/A Alameda Oakland EAST 8TH STREET/LAKE MERRITT DRAIN, BRIDGE 33C0149, BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE BRIDGE 5012111 ($73,003) 03/07/14

N/A Alameda Oakland DRAFTOAKPORT STREET OVER TIDAL CHANNEL, BRIDGE 33C0031, BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE BRIDGE 5012112 ($34,328) 03/04/14 N/A Alameda Oakland LEIMERT BLVD. BRIDGE OVER SAUSAL CREEK. BR. # 33C0215, SEISMIC RETROFIT. BRIDGE 5012124 $663,975 04/27/14 ALA110130 Alameda Pleasanton VARIOUS BRIDGES IN THE CITY OF PLEASANTON, BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE BRIDGE 5101027 $32,756 07/31/14 $32,756 ALA110079 Alameda San Leandro WASHINGTON AVE @ MONTEREY BLVD./BRADRICK DR., SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT HSIP 5041041 $306,970 04/14/14 I-80 IN OAKLAND, EMERYVILLE, BERKELEY, ALBANY-PORT OF OAKLAND O/C TO COUNTY LINE, N/A Alameda State-Managed IM 0801112 $241,908 02/11/14 RHABILITATE PAVEMENT (TC) N/A Alameda State-Managed I-880, ADELINE ST/DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE, EMERGENCY REPAIR/CYPRESS ST VI ER 1404001 ($27,680,887) 07/11/14 N/A Alameda State-Managed I-880 / ADELINE ST - DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE, PERMANENT REPLACEMENT PROJECT ER 1510002 ($15,700,133) 07/11/14 IN ALAMEDA COUNTY, ON INTERSTATE 580 AT BENEDICT DRIVE OFF RAMP, CONSTRUCT A SOLDIER N/A Alameda State-Managed IM 5801059 $2,607,145 08/20/14 BEAM AND LAGGING WALL (TC)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 3 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 14 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt N/A Alameda State-Managed 5TH AVENUE OVERHEAD, SEISMIC RETROFIT BRIDGE REPLAC IM 8801057 $5,450,000 09/04/14 N/A Alameda State-Managed OAKLAND-S/O HIGH ST TO S/O FRUITVALE AVENUE, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT IM 8801059 $65,676 02/11/14 IN OAKLAND FROM OK-MADISON UNDERCROSSING TO WASHINGTON STREET UNDERCROSSING, N/A Alameda State-Managed IM 8801066 $113,734 08/12/14 UPGRADE MEDIAN BARRIER (TC) N/A Alameda State-Managed PALOMARES ROAD @ MM 8.70 ., EMERGENCY OPENING & PRE. RESTO ER 4430004 ($12,703) 11/22/13 ALA 84, 580 AND 680 AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS & CC 4 AND 80 AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, INSTALL METAL N/A Alameda State-Managed HSIP 000C361 ($3,340,930) 09/26/14 BEAM GUARDRAILS N/A Alameda State-Managed RT 260-POSEY/WEBSTER TUBES-RT 580 JOAQUIN UC, SIGNS AND LIGHTING REHABILITAT STP P001531 ($13,325) 04/09/14 IN THE CITY OF OAKLAND AT 0.1 NORTH OF MORAGA AVENUE UNDERCROSSING, INSTALL TIE-BACK N/A Alameda State-Managed STP P013033 $4,529,000 08/20/14 RETAINING WALL (TC) N/A Alameda State-Managed RTE 24 - ALA 5.3/6.2(PM) AND CC 0.01/1.3(PM), CONSTRUCT NEW 2-LANE BORE ARRA P024030 ($1,065,804) 08/31/14 N/A Alameda State-Managed HAYWARD-SANTA CLARA ST TO WATKINS STREET, REHABILITATE ROADWAY NHS P092036 $258,649 04/22/14 N/A Alameda State-Managed ALL CO RTE 238 FROM 238/680 SEP TO BLANCHE ST, REHABILITATE ROADWAY (TC) NHS P238009 ($1,467,322) 06/26/14 N/A Alameda State-Managed EAST END OF DUMBARTON BR. TO BRIDGE TOLL PLZA, OVRLY W/OGAC MED BARRIER RMBL NHS S084035 $60,881 04/22/14 ON ROUTE 24, AT PM 2.3 AND PM 5.6; ROUTE 580 AT PM 20.6, REMOVE GORE SIGNS AND REPLACE W/ N/A Alameda State-Managed HSIP X001586 $1,478,200 08/20/14 OVERHEAD SIGNS IN OAKLAND 0.1 MILE E/O BOSTON AVE O/C TO 0.2 MILES W/O RT 80/580 JUNCTION, REHABILITATE N/A Alameda State-Managed NHPP X001588 $14,023,700 08/20/14 PAVEMENT (TC) N/A Alameda State-Managed IN ALAMEDA COUNTY ON INTERSTATE ROUTE 80/580/880 SEPARATION, REHAB THE BRIDGE DECK (TC) NHPP 5801058 ($1,298,102) 09/26/14 IN SAN LEANDRO AT 150TH AVE OFF RAMP AT PM 32.5, CONSTRUCT SOLDIER PILE RETAINING WALL N/A Alameda State-Managed NHPP 5801060 $3,653,845 09/26/14 (TC) N/A Alameda State-Managed OAKLAND-S/O HIGH ST TO S/O FRUITVALE AVENUE, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT BRIDGE 8801059 $1,212,689 02/11/14 IN OAKLAND FROM SOUTH OF 29TH AVENUE TO NORTH OF 23RD AVENUE, IMPROVE ON AND OFF N/A Alameda State-Managed NHPP 8801070 $72,609,652 09/26/14 RAMPS (TC) N/A Alameda State-Managed IN FREMONT ON I-680, AT EAST WARREN AVENUE, EMERGENCY RELIEF - STORM DAMAGE REPAIR, RSP ER 19A4001 $700,000 03/04/14 IN ALAMEDA COUNTY, VARIOUS ROUTES, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, EMERGENCY RELIEF -- STORM DAMAGE N/A Alameda State-Managed ER 19D1005 $469,209 03/13/14 REPAIR ALA090015 Alameda Union City Union City Intermodal Station Infrastructure CMAQ 6264061 $8,692,000 12/12/13 $8,692,000 ALA110071 Alameda Union City DECOTO ROAD BRIDGE ; BRIDGE # 33C-0111, SEISMIC RETROFIT NHPP 5354027 ($475,390) 08/12/14 ALA110112 Alameda Union City ALVERADO-NILES ROAD: BETWEEN DECOTO ROAD TO MANN AVE., PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVMENTS HSIP 5354035 $62,010 08/26/14 $62,000 $287,600

ALA130023 Alameda Union City Whipple Road Pavement Rehabilitation STP 5354036 $651,000 06/08/14 $651,000

ALA130023 Alameda Union City Whipple Road Pavement Rehabilitation STP 5354036 $18,000 11/27/13 $18,000 ALA990015 Alameda Union City WHIPPLE RD OVER BART TRACKS, BRIDGE # 33C0223, SEISMIC RETROFIT BRIDGE 5354026 ($43,413) 11/22/13 CONTRA COSTA BLVD: CHIPANCINGO PARKWAY TO GOLF CLUB ROAD, INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, CC-110039 Contra Costa HSIP 5375026 ($650,000) 06/26/14 REHAB, BIKE/PED IMPROVE CC-130019 Contra Costa Antioch Antioch Ninth Street Preservation STP 5038023 $673,000 07/03/14 $673,000 Antioch - SRTS Pedestrian Improvements (CAVALLO/GARRO RD.WILBUR - DAVIDSON,TREGALLAS CC-130022 Contra Costa Antioch CMAQ 5038024 $330,000 08/10/14 $330,000 LONETREE-HILLCREST,DRAKE A-G ST) N/A Contra Costa Antioch DRAFTSR4; BAILEY TO SR4/160 I/C & ADJ. ARTERIALS, SR4 CORRIDOR SIGNAL INTERCONNE STP 5038011 ($52,325) 03/26/14 N/A Contra Costa BART BART RICHMOND LINE STATIONS, SEISMIC RETROFIT STP 6000046 ($719,888) 06/02/14 Bay Area Rapid Transit CC-130014 Contra Costa Richmond BART Station Intermodal Improvements CMAQ 6000056 $2,900,000 04/17/14 $2,900,000 District (BART) N/A Contra Costa Brentwood BRENTWOOD BLVD. (SR4) FROM PINE TO 2ND STREET, CURVE RECONSTRUCTION STP 5300005 $323,779 05/19/14 N/A Contra Costa Brentwood BRENTWOOD BLVD. (SR4) FROM PINE TO 2ND STREET, CURVE RECONSTRUCTION STP 5300005 ($89,821) 05/19/14 CC-010002 Contra Costa Caltrans RTE 24 - ALA 5.3/6.2(PM) AND CC 0.01/1.3(PM), CONSTRUCT NEW 2-LANE BORE ARRA P024030 $1,065,804 08/31/14 IN RICHMOND, SOUTH OF RICHMOND PARKWAY AND GIANT ROAD, RAIL TO RAIL CONNECTOR TRACK CC-090032 Contra Costa Caltrans CMAQ 7500212 $6,330,000 09/23/14 $6,330,000 BETWEEN UPRR AND BNSF CC-070030 Contra Costa Concord CONCORD BLVD: FARM BUREAU RD TO SIXTH ST, SIDEWALK, CURB RAMPS, BIKE LAN CMAQ 5135033 ($128,778) 09/17/14

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 4 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 15 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt

CC-070030 Contra Costa Concord Concord Blvd. Gap Closure, Phase 2 (FARM BUREAU RD TO SIXTH STREET) CMAQ 5135051 $128,778 09/17/14 $298,285 MONUMENT COORIDOR PEDESTRIAN AND BIKEWAY NETWORK, NEW PEDESTRAIN PATH / BIKE TRAIL CC-090067 Contra Costa Concord STP 5135046 ($146,261) 07/21/14 (TC) IN CONCORD: PARALLEL TO SR 242 FROM MAYETTE AVE / MAY COURT TO MEADOW LANE, NEW CC-110019 Contra Costa Concord CMAQ 5135040 ($9,951) 07/03/14 PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE PATH CC-110070 Contra Costa Concord CTY OF CONCORD BRIDGE PREV. MAINTENANCE, BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE BRIDGE 5135039 $282,941 07/15/14 VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF CONCORD- SEE COMMENT SECTION, TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND ADA CC-110086 Contra Costa Concord HSIP 5135043 $253,600 05/05/14 $253,600 UPGRADES CC-130011 Contra Costa Concord Detroit Avenue Bicyle and Pedestrian Improvements CMAQ 5135050 $198,000 04/27/14 $198,000 $767,000

CC-130013 Contra Costa Concord Ped/Bike Traffic Signal at Oak Grove Rd/Sierra Rd CMAQ 5135043 $100,980 05/05/14 $100,980 $403,920 CC-070087 Contra Costa Contra Costa County ALONG SAN PABLO AVENUE AND KAY ROAD, NEW SIDEWALKS AND BUS SHELTERS RIP 5928097 ($806) 03/04/14 CC-110020 Contra Costa Contra Costa County DEER VALLEY RD, 1/4 TO 1/2 MI S. OF CHADBOURE, REALIGN AND WIDEN ROADWAY HSIP 5928089 ($291,460) 02/25/14 CC-110021 Contra Costa Contra Costa County DEER VALLEY ROAD, NEAR MARSH CREEK ROAD, ROADWAY WIDENING FOR NEW SHOUL HRRR 5928084 $768,600 08/28/14 MARSH CREEK RD- 1 MILE E OF RUSSELMANN PARK RD TO 3/4 MILE W OF MORGAN TERRITORY, CC-110025 Contra Costa Contra Costa County HRRR 5928096 $654,239 03/05/14 ROADWAY REALIGNMENT MARSH CREEK RD- 1 MILE E OF RUSSELMANN PARK RD TO 3/4 MILE W OF MORGAN TERRITORY, CC-110025 Contra Costa Contra Costa County HSIP 5928096 $96,300 03/05/14 ROADWAY REALIGNMENT CAMINO TASSAJARA- 2000' EAST OF BLACKHAWK DRIVE TO 100' SOUTH OF FINLEY ROAD, ROADWAY CC-110027 Contra Costa HSIP 5928105 $700,000 08/15/14 Contra Costa County WIDENING- ADDING SHOULDERS FOR BIKE LANES KIRKER PASS ROAD FROM APPROX 1.5 WEST OF PITBURG CITY LIMITS (PCL) TO PCL, ROAD CC-110044 Contra Costa Contra Costa County STP 5928111 ($512,308) 11/05/13 RECONSTRUCTION CC-110045 Contra Costa Contra Costa County BETHEL ISLAND ROAD AT DUTCH SLOUGH, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT / BR.NO.28C BRIDGE 5928024 ($699,092) 11/22/13 CAMINO TASSAJARA RD- APPROX. 1 MI S OF HIGHLAND RD TO .2 MI N OF WINDEMERE PKWY, CC-110060 Contra Costa Contra Costa County HSIP 5928110 $675,000 08/15/14 ROADWAY WIDENING CC-110068 Contra Costa Contra Costa County JAIL ACCESS RD OVER MARSH CRK DETEN. FACILITY, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT,28C0226 (TC) BRIDGE 5928068 $1,400,000 05/19/14 $2,149,200 CC-110071 Contra Costa Contra Costa County SAN PABLO AVE BRIDGE @ RODEO CREEK, 28C0071, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT NHPP 5928067 $2,797,549 05/28/14 NORTH SIDE PACIFICA AVENUE BETWEEN MARINERS COVE DRIVE AND INLET DRIVE, PEDESTRIAN CC-110078 Contra Costa Contra Costa County SRTS 5928112 $539,163 08/28/14 WALKWAY CC-110084 Contra Costa Contra Costa County CANAL ROAD BETWEEN BAILEY ROAD AND LOTUS ROAD, BIKE LANES AND PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK CMAQ 5928116 $250,000 09/16/14 $250,000 ALHAMBRA VALLEY ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO LA BOCA RD. AND FERNDALE ROAD, SHOULDER CC-110088 Contra Costa Contra Costa County HSIP 5928118 $90,000 08/26/14 WIDENING / ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION CC-130027 Contra Costa Contra Costa County Port Chicago Hwy/Willow Pass Rd Bike Ped Upgrades CMAQ 5928122 $110,500 04/27/14 $205,000 $236,700

CC-130034 Contra Costa Contra Costa County West Contra Costa SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program CMAQ 5928121 $709,800 07/03/14 $709,800 CC-990046 Contra Costa Contra Costa County INTERSECTION OF TREAT BLVD. AND JONES RD., IRON HORSE TRAIL PEDESTRIAN BR RIP 5928048 ($27,902) 06/27/14 CC-990046 Contra Costa Contra Costa County INTERSECTION OF TREAT BLVD. AND JONES RD., IRON HORSE TRAIL PEDESTRIAN BR CMAQ 5928048 ($4,924) 06/27/14 Contra Costa CC-010009 Contra Costa Transportation SR 4 FROM LOVERIDGE ROAD TO SOMERSVILLE ROAD, CT RW LEGAL SERVICES-EMINENT D HPP 6072003 ($32,084) 11/20/13 Authority (CCTA) Contra Costa CC-110066 Contra Costa Transportation DRAFTSR-239 BETWEEN SR4 IN BTWD AND I-205 IN TRACY, PLANNING STUDY- DETERMINE ALIGNMENT HPP 6072014 $1,399,080 07/30/14 Authority (CCTA) Contra Costa CC-110101 Contra Costa Transportation Local PDA Planning - Contra Costa STP 6072017 $2,745,000 06/27/14 $2,745,000 Authority (CCTA) Contra Costa CC-130035 Contra Costa Transportation Interstate 80 Corridor Real Time Rideshare VPP 6072016 $322,400 07/23/14 $322,400 Authority (CCTA) CC-050075 Contra Costa Danville CAMINO TASSAJARA & CROW CANYON RD. TO E. TOWN, CONSTR. PED. WALKWAY & BIKEPAT HPP 5434016 ($2,751) 03/04/14 CC-050075 Contra Costa Danville Crow Canyon/Camino Tassajara Intersection Imps EARMARK 5434022 $66,000 07/21/14 $66,000 $1,157,100

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 5 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 16 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt

CC-130023 Contra Costa Danville Danville Various Streets and Roads Preservation STP 5434021 $140,000 05/05/14 $140,000 $793,000 MULTIPLE SCHOOLS IN THE SAN RAMON VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, EXPAND THE EXISTING N/A Contra Costa Danville SRTS 5434020 $225,500 05/28/14 STREET SMART PROGRAM CC-110005 Contra Costa El Cerrito ON CENTRAL AND LIBERTY ST, STREET SCAPE CMAQ 5239020 $98,878 07/10/14 CC-110041 Contra Costa El Cerrito FAIRMOUNT AVE AT ASHBURY AVENUE, SIGNAL MODIFICATION HSIP 5239012 ($31,214) 03/18/14 CC-110089 Contra Costa El Cerrito ARLINGTON BLVD AT BREWSTER DR., CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS, CURB RAMPS, BULB OUTS, ETC HSIP 5239023 $40,050 09/16/14 $42,400 El Cerrito Various Streets and Roads Preservation (ARLINGTON,CENTRAL, COLUSA, FAIRMOUNT& CC-130021 Contra Costa El Cerrito STP 5239024 $630,000 07/03/14 $630,000 MANILA AVE.) CC-130024 Contra Costa El Cerrito El Cerrito Ohlone Greenway Bike/Ped Improvements CMAQ 5239025 $398,385 04/27/14 $473,000 $2,995,000

CC-090064 Contra Costa Lafayette PLEASANT HILL ROAD FROM CONDIT TO OLYMPIC BLVD, PED/BIKE WALKWAY IMPROVEMENT (TC) RIP 5404024 ($225,060) 03/27/14

CC-130009 Contra Costa Lafayette Mt. Diablo Blvd West End Preservation STP 5404025 $584,000 05/05/14 $584,000 N/A Contra Costa Martinez MARTINEZ MARINA; FOOT OF NORTH COURT STREET., CONSTRUCT PASSENGER SHELTER. FBD 5024009 ($19,000) 06/12/14 N/A Contra Costa Martinez VINE HILL WAY - LINTON TERRACE & CENTER AVE, PAVEMENT OVERLAY,INSTALL GUARD STP 5024015 ($2,012) 04/27/14 N/A Contra Costa Martinez VINE HILL WAY - LINTON TERRACE & CENTER AVE, PAVEMENT OVERLAY,INSTALL GUARD STP 5024015 ($8,997) 04/27/14 Metropolitan CC-090035 Contra Costa Transportation Regional Planning Activities and PPM - CC County STP 6084175 $50,000 03/07/14 $50,000 Commission (MTC) BRIDE NO. 28-C0137, CANYON ROAD OVER BRANCH SAN LEANDRO CREEK, 2.4 MI N ALA C.L., REPLACE N/A Contra Costa Moraga BRIDGE 5415011 $413,877 05/05/14 EXISTING 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH NEW 2 LANE B CC-110077 Contra Costa Orinda MANZANITA DRIVE BRIDGE, BRIDGE NO. 28C-0386, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT (TC) BRIDGE 5444006 $539,616 06/27/14 CC-070084 Contra Costa Pittsburg PITTSBURG: BAILEY ROAD / BART / MAYLARD ROAD AREA, PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS (TC) STP 5127021 ($51,959) 05/19/14 NORTH PARKSIDE DRIVE OVER WILLOW PASS ROAD, SEISMIC RETROFIT AND PREVENTIVE CC-110056 Contra Costa Pittsburg BRIDGE 5127024 $81,182 05/01/14 MAINTENANCE CC-110037 Contra Costa Pleasant Hill OAK PARK BLVD/PATTERSON BLVD, SIGNAL UPGRADE AND LEFT TURN L HSIP 5375020 ($821) 11/05/13 ON PLEASANT HILL RD. BTW DIABLO VIEW RD. GEARY RD., CONSTRUCT 5' SIDEWALK AND RAISE CONC. CC-110038 Contra Costa Pleasant Hill HSIP 5375022 $294,789 07/28/14 ISLAND. CC-110051 Contra Costa Pleasant Hill IN CITY OF PLEASANT HILL LISA LANE NORTH SIDE, INSTALL NEW SIDEWALK CMAQ 5375019 ($35,229) 03/21/14 CC-110079 Contra Costa Pleasant Hill GOLF CLUB RD. BR. (28C0363) AT GRAYSON CREEK, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT BRIDGE 5375009 $4,134,627 08/13/14 CC-130005 Contra Costa Pleasant Hill Golf Club Rd Roundabout and Bike/Ped Improvements CMAQ 5375030 $498,000 09/03/14 $4,770,000

CC-130007 Contra Costa Pleasant Hill Pleasant Hill - Contra Costa Blvd. Preservation STP 5375029 $799,000 02/25/14 $799,000

CC-030011 Contra Costa Richmond GARRAD TUNNEL, REPAIR TUNNEL BY LINNER INSIDE TUNNEL STP 5137042 $413,000 09/23/14

CC-110007 Contra Costa Richmond NEVIN AVE, BART STATION. TO 19TH ST., BIKE/PED ENHANCEMENTS, RECON BART EAST ENTRANCE CMAQ 5137043 $1,217,000 09/10/14

CC-110016 Contra Costa Richmond NEVIN AVE. FROM 19TH ST TO 27TH, PED/BIKE IMPRVMTS, TRAFFIC CIRCLE, CURB RAMPS, ETC CMAQ 5137039 $2,654,000 09/23/14 $2,654,000 CC-110102 Contra Costa Richmond DRAFTEasy Go Richmond CMAQ 5137045 $203,291 02/07/14 $203,291 CC-130028 Contra Costa San Pablo San Pablo Various Streets and Roads Preservation STP 5303015 $454,000 05/05/14 $454,000

CC-110035 Contra Costa San Ramon BOLLINGER CANYON RD. FROM CANYON LAKE DR&DOUGHERTY RD. (4 INTER), SIGNAL CONTROL HSIP 5437023 $343,617 07/03/14 CC-110043 Contra Costa San Ramon ALCOSTA BLVD/DAVONA DR., SIGNAL MODIFICATION HSIP 5437021 ($49,361) 03/21/14 CC-130008 Contra Costa San Ramon San Ramon Valley Boulevard Preservation STP 5437027 $291,000 03/07/14 $291,000

CC-130041 Contra Costa San Ramon Citywide School Crossing Enhancement Project CMAQ 5437028 $274,600 06/08/14 $247,600 N/A Contra Costa State-Managed CONTRA COSTA CO. NON INTERSTATE VAR. LOCS., PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ER 4309005 ($55,874) 03/26/14

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 6 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 17 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt N/A Contra Costa State-Managed ON PLEASANT HILL RD. IN CITY OF LAFAYETTE, EMERGENCY OPENNING ER 4433010 $20,386 06/20/14 N/A Contra Costa State-Managed IN CONTRA COSTA CNTY O.5 MILE W RAILROAD AVE , WIDEN FREEWAY NHS P004119 ($4,247) 03/26/14 CC CO IN ANTIOCH/PITTSBURG ON RTE 4 FR .4 MI WST TO .6 MI EST SOMERSVILLE RD UC, WIDEN N/A Contra Costa State-Managed NHPP P004138 $8,122,599 08/26/14 ROADWAY & RECONSTRUCT INTERCHANGE NEAR MARINA VISTA AT MOCOCO OVERHEAD BRIDGE AND THE S/B MOCOCO OFF-RAMP, REHAB N/A Contra Costa State-Managed NHPP 6801071 $17,182,722 09/26/14 MOCOCO OVERHEAD BRDGE/REPLACE S/B MOCOCO (TC N/A Contra Costa State-Managed CITY OF RICHMOND, U.S.D.O.T. #029896N., GRADE CROSSING HAZARD ELIMINAT RAIL/HWY 7500122 ($138,319) 11/07/13 IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY @ MARKET AVE AND UPRR CROSSING, GRADE CROSSING HAZARD N/A Contra Costa State-Managed RAIL/HWY 7500155 ($599,181) 10/30/13 ELIMINATION IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY @ CHESLEY AVE AND UPRR CROSSING, GRADE CROSSING HAZARD N/A Contra Costa State-Managed RAIL/HWY 7500161 ($349,453) 10/30/13 ELIMINATION N/A Contra Costa UCSF STATEWIDE PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM, PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE EDUCATI STP 6342003 ($18,467) 10/24/13 1) SAN LUIS RD: LARKEY - MAIN; 2) MONTEGO: YGNACIO VALLEY RD - TAMPICO; 3) CALIF, ROADWAY CC-110013 Contra Costa Walnut Creek STP 5225024 ($63,624) 07/29/14 AND SIDEWALK REHABILITATION N/A Marin Caltrans SR1 AT TENNESSEE VALLEY ROAD IN MARIN CO., PLANNING, PROGRAMMING & MONITO PUBLIC LNDS 6204064 ($19,694) 03/26/14 MRN070014 Marin Fairfax SOUTH SIDE OF SIR FRANCIS DRAKE BLVD: OLEMA RD - CLAUS DR IN FAIRFAX, CONSTRUCT BIKE LANE NMTP 5277021 ($5,980) 04/27/14 MRN070014 Marin Fairfax PASTORI AVE. BETWEEN SFD BLVD. & CENTER, SIDEWALK, PATHWAY IMP. NMTP 5277022 ($107,000) 10/24/13 MARIN RD & SPRUCE RD OVER FAIRFAX CR; CANYON RD OVER SAN ANSELMO CR, BRIDGE PREVENTIVE N/A Marin Fairfax BRIDGE 5277026 $213,278 08/20/14 MAINTENANCE N/A Marin Fairfax CREEK ROAD OVER FAIRFAX CREEK IN THE TOWN OF FAIRFAX, MARIN COUNTY, SEISMIC RETROFIT (TC) STP 5277027 $450,994 08/22/14 MRN070015 Marin Larkspur DOHERTY DR: MAGNOLIA AVE TO LUCKY DRIVE, MULTI-USE PATHWAY/BIKE LANE CMAQ 5166018 ($85,000) 12/20/13 MRN070015 Marin Larkspur DOHERTY DR: MAGNOLIA AVE TO LUCKY DRIVE, MULTI-USE PATHWAY/BIKE LANE NMTP 5166018 ($182,000) 12/20/13 MRN110018 Marin Larkspur DOHERTY BRIDGE (ARROYO HOLON) 27C67 ., BRIDGE REPLACEMENT BRIDGE 5166014 $170,031 07/09/14 MRN110023 Marin Larkspur BON AIR BRIDGE REHABILITATION, REHAB. BRIDGE PILES & STRUCTUR BRIDGE 5166015 $674,800 08/15/14 MRN010006 Marin Marin County TENNESSEE VALLEY ROAD ONLY., BUILD MULTI-PURPOSE PATHWAYS HPP 5927058 $19,750 05/28/14 MRN050033 Marin Marin County Non-motorized Transp. Pilot Program - Marin County NMTP 5927051 $543,575 08/05/14 $543,575 SIR FRANCIS DRAKE BLVD: BAYWOOD CANYON RD - WHITE'S HILL BRIDGE, WIDEN THE WB SHOULDER MRN090050 Marin Marin County STP 5927086 ($43,809) 09/09/14 FOR CL.2 BIKE LANE. (TC) SIR FRANCIS DRAKE BLVD: BAYWOOD CANYON RD - WHITE'S HILL BRIDGE, WIDEN THE WB SHOULDER MRN090050 Marin Marin County TAP 5927086 $372,809 09/09/14 FOR CL.2 BIKE LANE. (TC) MRN110006 Marin Marin County STRAWBERRY POINT SCHOOL IN MARIN COUNTY, SIDEWALKS AND ADA COMPLIANT RAMPS CMAQ 5927082 ($2) 04/14/14 MARINWOOD, GREENBRAE & MARIN CITY IMPROVEMENTS IN MARIN COUNTY, IMPROVE AND REBUILD MRN110007 Marin Marin County CMAQ 5927083 ($119,061) 11/15/13 SIDEWALKS, RAMPS DRAINAGE ETC. MRN110011 Marin Marin County PT. REYES-PETALUMA RD. MP 11.93 TO 12.03, INSTALL MBGR SAFETY RAIL 140' HSIP 5927060 ($26,296) 06/26/14 MRN110012 Marin Marin County PT.REYES-PETALUMA/NICASIO & LUCAS VALLEY 4.7, INSTALL AND UPGRADE GUARD RAIL HRRR 5927077 ($8,724) 10/18/13 INTERSECTION OF HWY 101 ON/OFF RAMP & REDWOOD FRONTAGE ROAD/DE SILVA ISLAND DR., MRN110026 Marin Marin County HSIP 5927090 $291,645 08/20/14 MODIFY INTERSECTION, IMPROVE PED. SAFETY EAST SIR FRANCIS DRAKE BLVD. -- MP 0.55 TO MP 0.60., INSTALL GUARDRAIL AND RADAR SPEED MRN110038 Marin Marin County HSIP 5927101 $123,000 08/13/14 $123,000 FEEDBACK MRN130002 Marin Marin County ON SFD BLVD. MP 20.70 IN MARIN COUNTY., INSTALL CIDH RET. WALL ER 20D0006 ($122,031) 07/03/14 MRN130003 Marin Marin County MUIRWOOD ROAD, MP 0.49 IN MARIN COUNTY, INSTALL CIDH WALL AT DOWNHILL SIDE. ER 20D0003 ($446,230) 06/26/14 N/A Marin Marin County MARIN AVE. & BELL LANE BTW GREEN GLEN WAY;SCH, SRTS FED FUNDING SAFETY C&G; S SRTS 5927061 $350,460 04/09/14 N/A Marin Marin County IN MARIN COUNTY, MOST ROADWAY INTERSECTIONS, INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS NMTP 5927093 $654,366 04/16/14 DRAFTSAN ANTONIO ROAD OVER SOUTH SAN ANTONIO CREEK, 0.6 MI NORTH OF S.H. 101, BRIDGE N/A Marin Marin County STP 5927104 $821,000 04/14/14 REPLACEMENT (TC) Marin County Transit MRN110040 Marin MCTD Preventive Maintenance STP 6343002 $99,289 01/14/14 $216,017 District MRN090052 Marin Mill Valley SYCAMORE AVE. BTW CAMINO ALTO AND N-S BIKEWAY IN MILL VALLEY, SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS TAP 5113013 $249,654 09/17/14 E. SIDE OF CAMINO ALTO, SYCAMORE/MILLER, MILLER/ALMONTE BLVD., MULTI-USE PATHWAY, CURB MRN110014 Marin Mill Valley SRTS 5113011 $490,286 03/21/14 EXT. & TRAFFIC CALMING N/A Marin Ross WINSHIP AVE BRIDGE OVER SAN ANSELMO CREEK IN THE TOWN OF ROSS, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT (TC) BRIDGE 5176008 $75,209 05/19/14

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 7 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 18 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt N/A Marin Ross 27C-0078 SHADY LANE BRIDGE OVER ROSS CREEK, BRIDGE REHABILITATION BRIDGE 5176010 $16,555 07/03/14 N/A Marin Ross NORWOOD AVE. BRIDGE OVER ROSS CREEK, BRIDGE REHABILITATION BRIDGE 5176011 $16,555 07/03/14 N/A Marin Ross SIR FRANCIS DRAKE BRIDGE OVER CORTE MADERA CREEK, BRIDGE REHABILITATION NHPP 5176012 $19,999 08/20/14 MRN110032 Marin San Anselmo San Anselmo - Center Blvd Bridge Replace (27C0079) NHPP 5159019 ($123,942) 06/27/14 $814,476 $4,211,372 NOKOMIS AVE BRIDGE OVER SAN ANSELMO CR IN THE TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO, BRIDGE N/A Marin San Anselmo BRIDGE 5159017 ($670,000) 06/26/14 REPLACEMENT (TC) N/A Marin San Anselmo MADRONE AVE BRIDGE OVER SAN ANSELMO CREEK, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT BRIDGE 5159018 ($587,839) 06/27/14 MRN070009 Marin San Rafael San Rafael - Non-motorized Transport Pilot Program (PURTO SUELLO HILL TO SRTC) NMTP 5043023 $350,000 07/11/14 $847,000 MRN070009 Marin San Rafael MAHON CREEK PATH TO SRTC, INSTALL ADA COMPLIANT RAMPS;SI NMTP 5043024 ($10,979) 12/11/13 LINDARDO ST: WOODLAND AVE - ANDERSEN DR AND ANDERSEN DR: E/O LINDARO ST @ MAHON, MRN110048 Marin San Rafael SRTS 5043034 $399,100 07/30/14 CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS, INSTALL MEDIAN FENCING, SPEE S. GRAND AVENUE / W. 2ND. STREET INTERSECTION, TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION, S.W. ADA MRN110051 Marin San Rafael HSIP 5043037 $63,000 07/29/14 $63,000 COMPLIANCE MRN050010 Marin Sausalito SPENCER AVENUE IN SAUSALITO, CA, PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, TRAFFIC STP 5098008 ($21,163) 04/11/14 N/A Marin State-Managed MARIN CO. NON INTERSTATE VAR. LOCATIONS , PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ER 4330005 ($53,071) 06/26/14 N/A Marin State-Managed LUCAS VALLEY RD. MP 4.75. MSH-MRNCO-051-0., RESTORATION BY CIDH & RESURFAC ER 4434005 ($102,191) 10/18/13 IN MARIN COUNTY, VARIOUS ROUTES, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, EMERGENCY RELIEF -- STORM DAMAGE N/A Marin State-Managed ER 19DW001 $4,095,399 07/17/14 REPAIR IN MARIN COUNTY, VARIOUS ROUTES, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, EMERGENCY RELIEF -- STORM DAMAGE N/A Marin State-Managed ER 19DW005 $715,499 09/26/14 REPAIR N/A Marin State-Managed PARADISE DRIVE IN MARIN COUNTY, EMERGENCY OPENING ER 20D0001 ($30) 10/22/13 N/A Marin State-Managed NEAR POINT REYES STATION AT PETALUMA ROAD, RECONSTRUCT SLOPE (TC) STP P001580 ($158,712) 09/26/14 N/A Marin State-Managed LARKSPUR, CORTE MADERA, SAN RAFAEL, CONSTRUCT HOV LANE STP P101992 $522,962 02/19/14 ON RTE 131 IN TIBURON FROM MAR WEST ST TO MAIN ST, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (COLD N/A Marin State-Managed STP P131001 ($91,927) 03/26/14 PLANNING) (TC) N/A Marin State-Managed MILL VALLEY S/B OFF-RAMP TO EAST BLITHEDALE, WIDEN OFF-RAMP/CONSTRUCT SOUND NHS Q101122 ($748,368) 06/27/14 Transportation MRN050014 Marin Authority of Marin Central Marin Ferry Access Improvements NMTP 6406010 $1,500,000 07/21/14 $1,500,000 (TAM) NAP110006 Napa American Canyon American Canyon PDA Development Plan STP 5470011 $475,000 01/15/14 $475,000

NAP110007 Napa American Canyon American Canyon: Theresa Ave Sidewalk Imp Phase 3 CMAQ 5470012 $198,970 04/14/14 $200,000

NAP110007 Napa American Canyon THERESA AVENUE SIDEWALK, PHASE 3, ROADWAY REHABILITATION CMAQ 5470012 $198,970 04/14/14 $200,000 N/A Napa Napa IN THE CITY OF NAPA AT JEFFERSON ST, LINCOLN AVE AND MAIN STREET, SCOUR POA BRIDGE 5042050 ($6,905) 10/24/13 CALIFORIA BLVD, JEFFERSON ST, WEST PUEBLO AVE, TROWER AVE & WINE COUNTRY AVE, CAPE SEAL NAP110008 Napa Napa (City) STP 5042052 ($22,756) 11/07/13 PAVEMENT REHAB NAP110013 Napa Napa (City) Napa City North/South Bike Connection CMAQ 5042054 $460,000 03/07/14 $160,000 NAP110015 Napa Napa (City) LINDA VISTA AVE BETWEEN TROWER AVE AND REDWOOD RD, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION STP 5042055 ($90,328) 02/20/14 NAP110020 Napa Napa (City) TRANCAS STREET BRIDGE OVER NAPA RIVER., SCOUR COUNTERMEASURE NHPP 5042042 $398,385 07/31/14 NAP130001 Napa Napa (City) City of Napa PDA Implementation STP 5042056 $275,000 02/20/14 $275,000 N/A Napa Napa County CHILES CREEK BRIDGE ON CHILES-POPE VALLEY ROAD, BRIDGE REHAB BRIDGE 5921060 $72,152 04/01/14 N/A Napa Napa County DRAFTDRY CREEK BRIDGE ON DRY CREEK ROAD, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT (TC) BRIDGE 5921061 $379,500 04/01/14 NAP110016 Napa Napa County WOODEN VALLEY ROAD, SAFETY ENHANCEMENT HRRR 5921055 ($71,501) 04/27/14 NAP110017 Napa Napa County NORTH KELLY ROAD, SAFETY ENHANCEMENT HRRR 5921056 ($2,739) 01/09/14 Napa County NAP110014 Napa Transportation Planning NCTPA NAPA VALLEY VINE TRAIL, BIKE PATH TCSP 6429008 $1,700,000 09/16/14 Agency Napa County NAP130002 Napa Transportation Planning SRTS Non Infrastructure Program Cycle 2 CMAQ 6429013 $420,000 03/12/14 $420,000 Agency

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 8 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 19 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt IN NAPA COUNTY, NEAR NAPA AT CUTTINGS WHARF ROAD, EMERGENCY RELIEF - EARTHQUAKE N/A Napa State-Managed ER $550,000 09/02/14 DAMAGE IN NAPA COUNTY FROM STATE ROUTE 29 TO 0.1 MILE WEST OF SOLANO COUNTY LINE, WIDEN HWY TO N/A Napa State-Managed STP P012106 $13,583,528 09/26/14 4 LANES AND CONSTR RET WALLS N/A Napa State-Managed IN NAPA ON SR-29 FROM S & N OF TRANCAS ST, CONSTRUCT INTERCHANGE Min Alloc P029059 ($84,150) 03/26/14 N/A Napa State-Managed IN NAPA ON SR-29 FROM S & N OF TRANCAS ST, CONSTRUCT INTERCHANGE NHS P029059 ($1,410) 03/26/14 NEAR CALISTOGA FROM 0.2 MILE NORTH OF SILVERADO TRAIL TO LAKE COUNTY LINE, OVERLAY OF N/A Napa State-Managed STP P029108 ($69,433) 03/26/14 EXISTING PAVEMENT (TC) 0.3 MI S/O RT 12 EAST/AIRPORT BLVD JUNCTION TO NAPA RIVER BRIDGE, MAINTENANCE ASPHALT N/A Napa State-Managed NHS P029109 ($164,928) 01/07/14 CONCRETE OVERLAY (TC) IN/NEAR ST. HELENA FROM MEE LANE TO 0.1 MILE SOUTH OF SULPHUR CREEK BRIDGE, LEFT TURN N/A Napa State-Managed STP P029114 $18,967,000 08/20/14 CHANNELIZATION AND PAVEMENT REHAB (TC) N/A Napa State-Managed ABOUT 2 MILES SOUTH OF JUNCTION SR 128 AT CAPELL CREEK BRIDGE #21-0009, REPLACE BRIDGE (TC) BRIDGE P121025 $129,698 09/26/14 IN NAPA COUNTY NEAR CITY OF NAPA AT SARCO CREEK BRIDGE #21-0008, BR REPLACEMENT N/A Napa State-Managed BRIDGE P121026 $2,723,000 09/26/14 (SCOUR)(TC) IN NAPA COUNTY NEAR CITY OF NAPA AT SARCO CREEK BRIDGE #21-0008, BR REPLACEMENT N/A Napa State-Managed STP P121026 $275,000 09/26/14 (SCOUR)(TC) NEAR THE CITY OF NAPA ON SR 128 FROM KNOXVILLE RD TO THE SOLANO COUNTY LINE, N/A Napa State-Managed STP P128053 $3,271,850 09/26/14 MAINTENANCE ASPHALT OVERLAY (TC) N/A Napa State-Managed NAPA COUNTY NEAR CALISTOGA ON ROUTE 128, BONDED WEARING COURSE OVERLAY (TC) STP S128048 ($25,144) 02/19/14 IN NAPA CO, AT WOODEN VALLEY, AT 0.3 MI N OF WILD HORSE VALLEY RD, EMERGENCY RELIEF - N/A Napa State-Managed ER 25E3001 $625,000 09/20/14 EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE N/A Napa State-Managed NEAR LAKE HENNESSY CITY W/O SILVERADO TRAIL, INSTALL ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION ER 43H1004 ($132,245) 12/23/13 NORTH YOUNTVILLE BIKE ROUTE AND SIDEWALK EXTENSION, CROSSWALK IMPROVEMENTS, BIKE NAP090006 Napa Yountville RIP 5395002 ($127,989) 06/20/14 LANES & SIGNAGE (TC) NORTH YOUNTVILLE BIKE ROUTE AND SIDEWALK EXTENSION, CROSSWALK IMPROVEMENTS, BIKE NAP090006 Napa Yountville STP 5395002 $127,986 06/20/14 LANES & SIGNAGE (TC) SR 29 CORRIDOR FROM GREEN ISLAND ROAD TO SOUTH CITY LIMITS, DEVELOP STRATEGIC PLAN FOR NAP090006 Napa Yountville STP 5470011 $475,000 07/15/14 TRANSIT SERVICE IMPROVE Altamont Commuter REG110044 Regional ACE Positive Train Control STP 6262015 $129,156 08/05/14 $129,156 Express (ACE) Bay Area Air Quality REG130006 Regional Management District CMAQ 6297003 $700,000 04/09/13 $700,000 (BAAQMD) Bay Area Air Quality REG130006 Regional Management District Spare the Air Program CMAQ 6297003 $3,000,000 05/16/14 $3,000,000 (BAAQMD) Bay Area Rapid Transit REG050020 Regional BART Car Exchange (Preventive Maintenance) STP 6000061 $2,831,849 07/29/14 $2,831,849 District (BART) REG090003 Regional Caltrans ROUTE 101 IN SONOMA COUNTY PM 13.9 TO PM 31.0, FPI PROJECT, INSTALL RAMP METERS,TC STP 6084185 $350,000 12/31/13 $350,000 Metropolitan REG130003 Regional Transportation FSP and Call Box Program STP 6160025 $14,462,000 03/14/14 $14,462,000 Commission - SAFE Metropolitan DRAFTSAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA FREEWAYS, BRIDGES., FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL, CALL BOX, SAFE CAPITAL REG130003 Regional Transportation STP 6160025 $14,462,000 07/10/14 $14,462,000 (TC Commission - SAFE Metropolitan REG090003 Regional Transportation Freeway Performance Initiative (FPI) STP 6084185 $350,000 12/31/13 $350,000 $17,887,000 Commission (MTC) Metropolitan REG090042 Regional Transportation 511 Traveler Information STP 6084176 $20,875,000 11/06/13 $20,875,000 Commission (MTC)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 9 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 20 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt Metropolitan Transportation REG090045 Regional Commission (MTC) Clipper Fare Collection System CMAQ 6084190 $10,691,476 7/11/2014 $2,691,476 Metropolitan REG110010 Regional Transportation Regional Bicycle Sharing Program CMAQ 6084188 $1,725,000 07/11/14 $8,725,000 Commission (MTC) Metropolitan REG110037 Regional Transportation Regional Planning - PDA Implementation STP 6084186 $8,000,000 01/09/14 $8,000,000 Commission (MTC) Metropolitan REG110037 Regional Transportation Regional Planning - PDA Implementation STP 6084187 $2,000,000 01/09/14 $2,000,000 Commission (MTC) Sonoma County REG110015 Regional Transportation Regional Dynamic Ridesharing Pilot 6364010 $875,000 08/09/13 $875,000 Authority (SCTA) Bay Area Rapid Transit SF-110048 San Francisco BART 24th Street Train Control Upgrade Project STP 6000056 $2,000,000 04/17/14 $2,000,000 District (BART) SF-110026 San Francisco 34C0072, 22ND ST.OVER CALTRAIN, WEST OF 3RD., BRIDGE REPLACEMENT(TC) STP 6170023 $4,682,921 08/28/14 Golden Gate Bridge, N/A San Francisco Highway and GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, SEISMIC RETROFIT PHASE II BRIDGE 6003010 $12,948 08/05/14 Transportation District San Francisco County N/A San Francisco Transport Authority INTERSECTION OF BACON AND GOETTINGEN STREETS, SIDEWALK BULB-OUTS AND CURB RAMPS CMAQ 5934173 $155,786 07/28/14 (SFCTA) San Francisco County SF-070027 San Francisco Transport Authority Yerba Buena Island (YBI) Ramp Improvements NHPP 6272023 $18,500,000 09/18/14 $18,458,426 $62,989,194 (SFCTA) San Francisco County SF-110049 San Francisco Transport Authority Treasure Island Congestion Pricing Program VPP 6272041 $480,000 08/15/13 $480,000 (SFCTA) San Francisco County SF-991030 San Francisco Transport Authority US 101 Doyle Drive Replacement ARRA Q101153 $2,339,374 09/16/14 $1,000,000 (SFCTA) San Francisco County SF-991030 San Francisco Transport Authority US 101 Doyle Drive Replacement NHPP X075029 $5,021,481 09/26/14 $33,000,000 (SFCTA) San Francisco Depart of SF-130018 San Francisco SF Safe Routes to School Non-Infrastruce Program CMAQ 6447006 $1,439,000 04/14/14 $1,439,000 Public Health (SFDPH)

San Francisco Dept of SF-010004 San Francisco FOURTH ST BRIDGE (CHINA BASIN) BR NO 34C-0027, SEISMIC RETROFIT & HBRR REHAB_ BRIDGE 5934080 ($12,125,010) 03/26/14 Public Works (SFDPW)

San Francisco Dept of SF-070032 San Francisco LELAND AVE FR BAYSHORE TO RUTLAND, STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS RIP 5934140 ($12,441) 03/21/14 Public Works (SFDPW)DRAFT San Francisco Dept of SF-070032 San Francisco LELAND AVE FR BAYSHORE TO RUTLAND, STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS CMAQ 5934140 ($9,573) 03/21/14 Public Works (SFDPW)

San Francisco Dept of SF-110028 San Francisco HYDE EVANS L-LINE RICHARD MASON HIGHLAND_(SF), BRIDGE PRVENTIVE MAINTENANCE P BRIDGE 5934146 ($114,878) 11/15/13 Public Works (SFDPW)

San Francisco Dept of SF-130001 San Francisco 2ND STREET FROM MARKET TO KING, BICYCLE & PED IMPROVEMENTS, REPAVE STP 5934171 $1,334,068 09/18/14 Public Works (SFDPW)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 10 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 21 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt

San Francisco Dept of SF-130011 San Francisco SF- Second Street Complete Streets and Road Diet STP 5934171 $1,334,068 02/20/14 $1,334,068 $9,181,680 Public Works (SFDPW)

San Francisco Dept of SF-130012 San Francisco SF- Longfellow ES Safe Routes to School CMAQ 5934172 $192,812 12/30/13 $192,812 $477,495 Public Works (SFDPW)

San Francisco Dept of SF-130013 San Francisco SF-ER Taylor ES Safe Routes to School CMAQ 5923173 $155,786 11/27/13 $155,786 $363,845 Public Works (SFDPW)

San Francisco Dept of SF-130014 San Francisco SF- Broadway Chinatown Complete Streets STP 5934174 $203,991 11/20/13 $203,991 $3,206,545 Public Works (SFDPW) San Francisco Municipal SF-050034 San Francisco Transport Agency Light Rail Vehicle Overhaul Program STP 6328070 $4,629,676 07/03/14 $4,629,676 (SFMTA) San Francisco Municipal SF-070036 San Francisco Transport Agency VARIOUS BIKE ROUTES IN SAN FRANCISCO, DEVELOP IMPROVEMENT PLANS CMAQ 6328014 ($8,632) 06/26/14 (SFMTA) San Francisco Municipal VARIOUS INTERSECTIONS ON POWELL ST, WASHINGTON ST AND CLAY ST, PEDESTRAIN SAFETY SF-110019 San Francisco Transport Agency SRTS 6328019 $151,510 07/29/14 IMPROVEMENT (SFMTA) San Francisco Municipal ORTEGA STREET FROM 20TH AVE TO GREAT HIGHWAY, BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY SF-110029 San Francisco Transport Agency CMAQ 6328052 $69,034 08/07/14 IMPROVEMENTS (SFMTA) San Francisco Municipal VARIOUS UNCONTROLLED INTERSECTION IN SAN FRANCISCO, PEDESTRIAN SAFETY - CROSSWALKS, SF-110031 San Francisco Transport Agency HSIP 6328047 $316,100 09/18/14 $316,100 SIGNS AND MARKINGS (SFMTA) San Francisco Municipal SF-110032 San Francisco Transport Agency MASONIC AVENUE BETWEEN GEARY BLVD AND FELL ST, SIGNAL UPGRADE HSIP 6328048 $739,000 08/07/14 $739,264 (SFMTA) San Francisco Municipal INTERSECTIONS OF ALEMANY BLVD/ONONDAGA AVE AND OCEAN AVE/OTSEGO AVE, SRTS - SAFETY SF-110034 San Francisco Transport Agency SRTS 6328050 $38,273 05/19/14 IMPROVEMENTS (SFMTA) San Francisco Municipal SF-110037 San Francisco Transport Agency Linked Priced Electric Bikesharing VPP 6328054 $932,852 09/18/14 $1,166,996 (SFMTA) San Francisco Municipal SF-110040 San Francisco Transport Agency VARIOUS INTERSECTIONS IN SAN FRANCISCO, CONTINENTAL CROSSWALKS AND YIELD LINES (TC) RIP 6328064 $250,000 05/05/14 $250,000 (SFMTA) San Francisco Municipal SF-110055 San Francisco Transport Agency 7 INTERSECTIONS ON SOUTH VAN NESS AVENUE, SIGNALS AND CURB RAMPS HSIP 6328069 $261,900 06/08/14 $261,900 (SFMTA) San Francisco Municipal SF-110056 San Francisco Transport Agency POLK STREET, BETWEEN POST AND UNION STREETS - 9 INTERSECTIONS, SIGNALS AND CURB RAMPS HSIP 6328068 $252,900 04/27/14 $252,900 (SFMTA) San Francisco MunicipalDRAFT SF-130015 San Francisco Transport Agency Mansell Corridor Complete Streets STP 6328066 $210,625 11/20/13 $210,625 $11,779,153 (SFMTA) N/A San Francisco SFMTA SAN FRANCISCO, CITYWIDE, PEDESTRIAN SAFETY/ACCESS EDUCA STP 6328007 ($17,440) 06/30/14 IN SAN FRANCISCO AT SOUTHERN FREEWAY VIADUCT BRIDGE #34-0046, REHABILITATE BRIDGE DECK N/A San Francisco State-Managed NHPP 2801136 ($1,036,121) 09/26/14 (TC) N/A San Francisco State-Managed GREAT HIGHWAY FROM SLOAT TO SKYLINE, RESTORATION ER 4802001 ($148,860) 12/13/13 N/A San Francisco State-Managed SAN FRANCISCO CO ON I-80 AT PM 8.5, REHAB EYEBEAM CONNECTOR ON MAI (TC) IM 0801109 ($1,349) 02/24/14 N/A San Francisco State-Managed SF 101/1 SEPARATION TO GOLDEN GATE TOLL PLAZA, REPLACE/REHABILITATE ROADWAY NHPP X075027 $14,773,215 07/29/14 IN SAN FRANCISCO FROM RICHARDSON AVENUE TO THE GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE PLAZA, DOYLE DRIVE- N/A San Francisco State-Managed NHS X075038 ($2,000,000) 09/26/14 STOTM DRAIN & OUTFALL IMPROVEMENT

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 11 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 22 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt IN SAN FRANCISCO FROM RICHARDSON AVENUE TO THE GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE PLAZA, DOYLE DRIVE- N/A San Francisco State-Managed NHPP X075038 $1,770,600 09/26/14 STOTM DRAIN & OUTFALL IMPROVEMENT N/A San Francisco State-Managed IN CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ON SR 101/280 INTERCHANGE, REPLACE BRIDGE RAILS (TC) NHPP X075042 $7,914,062 07/24/14 SAN FRANCISCO AND SANTA CLARA COUNTIES ON VARIOUS ROUTES AND VARIOUS LOCATIONS, N/A San Francisco State-Managed STP 000C363 $2,433,974 09/26/14 CONSTRUCT ADA CURB RAMPS (TC) SM-110074 San Mateo Atherton Atherton-Fair Oaks-Middlefield Preservation STP 5261008 $285,000 09/12/14 $285,000 N/A San Mateo BART WEST OAKLAND AERIAL STRUCTURES, SEISMIC RETROFIT STP 6000040 $414,708 06/02/14 N/A San Mateo BART SF TO DALY CITY, M-LINE AERIAL STRUCTURES, SEISMIC RETROFIT STP 6000042 ($1,025,102) 06/02/14 Bay Area Air Quality REG110010 San Mateo Management District SAN FRANCISCO, SAN MATEO, SANTA CLARA COUNTRIES, REGIIONAL BICYCLE SHARING PROGRAM (TC) CMAQ 6084188 $1,725,000 07/11/14 $1,725,000 (BAAQMD) SM-070005 San Mateo Belmont OVERCROSS SR101 NORTH RALSTON EXIT, PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSING HPP 5268016 ($121,582) 01/14/14 SM-090041 San Mateo Brisbane BAYSHORE BLVD FROM NORTHERN CITY LIMITS TO VALLEY DRIVE, INSTALL CLASS 2 BIKE PATH STP 5376010 ($10,848) 10/18/13 SM-130026 San Mateo Caltrain Caltrain Control Point Installation STP 6170033 $1,375,566 07/16/14 $1,375,566

SM-130027 San Mateo Caltrain Caltrain Off-peak Marketing Campaign STP 6170033 $44,200 07/16/14 $44,200

SM-050028 San Mateo Caltrans US 101 / Broadway Interchange Improvement CMAQ 6204113 $3,613,000 01/30/14 $3,613,000 SM-110009 San Mateo Daly City VARIOUS LOCATION AROUND DALY CITY, INSTALL ACCESS RAMP AND NEW SIDEWALKS CMAQ 5196036 ($1,203) 11/05/13 CALLAN BLVD: HICKEY BLVD TO WEMBLEY DR AND KING DR: VERDUCI DR TO GELLERT BLVD, ROAD SM-130005 San Mateo Daly City STP 5196038 $562,000 06/08/14 $562,000 RESURFACING SM-070006 San Mateo East Palo Alto US 101 University Ave Interchange Improvements HPP 5438015 $240,000 11/27/13 $1,407,000 HALF MOON BAY ON ROUTE 1 BETWEEN NORTH MAIN STREET AND KELLY AVENUE, LANDSCAPE THE SM-090044 San Mateo Half Moon Bay STP P001550 ($25,000) 03/26/14 EXISTING MEDIANS (TEA PROJECT) SM-130010 San Mateo Menlo Park Menlo Park Various Streets and Roads Preservation STP 5273023 $427,000 06/08/14 $427,000 Metropolitan SM-090024 San Mateo Transportation Regional Planning Activities and PPM - San Mateo STP 6084175 $752,000 03/07/14 $752,000 Commission (MTC) SM-050052 San Mateo Pacifica SR1 San Pedro Creek Bridge Replacement HPP 6204111 $2,249,749 11/01/13 $2,250,000

SM-050052 San Mateo Pacifica SR1 San Pedro Creek Bridge Replacement CMAQ 6204111 $1,141,000 11/01/13 $1,141,000

SM-110073 San Mateo Pacifica FY 2014-15 Linda Mar Boulevard Pavement Rehab STP 5350020 $431,000 06/08/14 $431,000

SM-130006 San Mateo Portola Valley Town of Portola Valley Resurfacing Prog STP 5390005 $224,000 04/27/14 $224,000 MAIN ST, VETERANS BLVD, AND MAPLE ST OVER REDWOOD CREEK, BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE N/A San Mateo Redwood City STP 5029032 $23,239 03/21/14 MAINTENANCE SM-110026 San Mateo Redwood City SHOREWAY ROAD, SKYWAY ROAD, AIRPORT WAY, BIKE LANES, SIGNAGE, BIKE LANE IMPROVEMENTS CMAQ 5029028 ($11,686) 11/07/13 SM-110060 San Mateo Redwood City DRAFTCHARTER ST BETWEEN STAMBAUGH AND SPRING, CROSSWALK, BULB OUT, CURB RAMP SRTS 5029030 $578,000 05/29/14 $578,000 ON ROUTE 82, IN SAN BRUNO, FROM NOOR AVE TO SANTA LUCIA AVE, CONSTRUCT VARIOUS MEDIAN SM-070031 San Mateo San Bruno STP P082019 ($479,000) 10/23/13 AESTHETIC AND SAFETY SM-110075 San Mateo San Carlos Crestview Drive Pavement Rehabilitation-Phase 2 STP 5267019 $412,000 12/17/13 $412,000

SM-130012 San Mateo San Carlos San Carlos Streetscape and Ped Improvments CMAQ 5267021 $125,000 12/17/13 $125,000 $725,000

SM-130014 San Mateo San Carlos El Camino Real Pedestrian Upgrades CMAQ 5267020 $182,000 04/27/14 $182,000 SM-110036 San Mateo San Mateo (City) BERMUDA DRIVE - FIESTA CHANNEL BRIDGE, BRIDGE REHABILITATION_BR# 35C-0077 BRIDGE 5102033 $352,460 09/26/14

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 12 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 23 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt

SM-110047 San Mateo San Mateo (City) SR92/El Camino Real (SR82) Ramp Modifications HPP 6204106 $1,000,000 09/18/14 $1,000,000 $865,000

SM-110064 San Mateo San Mateo (City) North Central Pedestrian Improvement Program CMAQ 5102042 $49,350 01/14/14 $49,350 $1,222,574 SM-110020 San Mateo San Mateo County CANADA, MIDDLEFIELD, SEMICIRCULAR, ALPINE, EDGEWOOD, CRESTVIEW, AC OVERLAY STP 5935058 ($2,292) 12/11/13 San Mateo County SM-030023 San Mateo Transit District SAMTRANS: Preventive Maintenance STP 6014016 $687,240 08/29/14 $687,240 (SAMTRANS) San Mateo County SM-050051 San Mateo Transit District SR 82 - El Camino Real Grand Boulevard Initiative HPP 5267020 $119,839 04/27/14 $297,620 (SAMTRANS) San Mateo County SM-050051 San Mateo Transit District SR 82 - El Camino Real Grand Boulevard Initiative HPP 6014005 $178,150 09/03/13 $178,150 (SAMTRANS) San Mateo County SM-050051 San Mateo Transit District EL CAMINO REAL GRAND BLVD, STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT TCSP 6014015 $365,232 05/16/14 $365,232 (SAMTRANS) SM-110023 San Mateo South San Francisco GRAND,OYSTER POINT,HILLSIDE,GELLERT,RAILROAD,OAKMOUNT, ET AL, BIKE LANE INSTALLATION CMAQ 5177027 ($28,331) 10/28/13 SM-110051 San Mateo South San Francisco GRAND AVE/ MAGNOLIA AVE, TRAFFIC SIGNALS INSTALLATION HSIP 5177028 $307,375 07/02/14 $307,375 EL CAMINO REAL (SR82) DR CHESTNUT TO ARROYO AVE, IMPROVE PED. CROSSINGS, BULB OUT, ADA SM-130013 San Mateo South San Francisco CMAQ 5177033 $150,000 01/31/14 $1,000,000 RAMPS N/A San Mateo State-Managed SM CO NEAR PACIFIC ON RT 1 S/O LINDA MAR BLVD, CONSTRUCT TUNNELS, APPROACH RO ER 1187011 $16,282,082 06/03/14 N/A San Mateo State-Managed NEAR PACIFIC PM 1.3-PM 0.8 S/O LINDA MAR BLVD, MITIGATION AT DISPOSAL SITE ER 1187013 $2,440,754 09/26/14 IN SAN MATEO COUNTY NEAR BELMONT, AT BRIDGE #35-0245F AND BRIDGE #35-0244G, BRIDGE N/A San Mateo State-Managed BRIDGE 2801133 $165,365 02/11/14 REPLACEMENT, SEISMIC RETROFIT (TC) N/A San Mateo State-Managed SAN MATEO CO. NON INTERSTATE VAR. LOCATIONS, EMERGENCY REPAIR STORM DAMAGE ER 4362001 ($3,609,227) 06/12/14 N/A San Mateo State-Managed SAN MATEO CO. NON INTERSTATE VAR. LOCATIONS , PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ER 4362005 ($5,000) 03/26/14 N/A San Mateo State-Managed SC CO LINE TO LARKSPUR DR. UC IN MILLBRAE, UPGRADE METAL BEAM BARRIER IM 2801110 ($20,466) 04/09/14 N/A San Mateo State-Managed VAR LOC FR 280/92 SEP TO JUNIPERO SERRA BRIDG, GRIND/REPLACE PCC SLAB IM 2801111 ($53,042) 04/09/14 N/A San Mateo State-Managed CRYSTAL SPRINGS SAFETY ROADSIDE REST AREA , UPGRADE TO MEET ADA/CAL-OSHA IM 2801117 ($683,025) 06/26/14 RT 280 NEAR BELMONT FROM 0.2 MILE NORTH OF RANCHO PULGAS UC TO 0.3 MI SO SR 92, N/A San Mateo State-Managed IM 2801135 ($308,387) 03/26/14 PAVEMENT PRESERVATION (TC) IN THE CITY OF SAN BRUNO, ON ROUTE 280 AT THE SNEATH LANE OVERCROSSING, SEISMIC RETROFIT N/A San Mateo State-Managed IM 2801137 $2,168,000 08/20/14 (TC) N/A San Mateo State-Managed 5500 BLOCK OF ALPINE ROAD, STITCH PIER 62' LENGTH AT 30' DEEP REC TRAILS 22X0001 $261,164 05/15/14 N/A San Mateo State-Managed PORTOLA RD, REPLACE CULVERT , HEAD WALL, TRASH RACK REC TRAILS 22X0005 $22,849 09/20/14 N/A San Mateo State-Managed NEAR PESCADERO AND HALF MOON BAY, AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, INSTALL SOFT MEDIAN BARRIER (TC) HSIP P001558 ($239,576) 01/09/14 NEAR HALF MOON BAY APPROXIMATELY 0.8 MILE WEST OF PILARCITOS CREEK ROAD, STORM DAMAGE N/A San Mateo State-Managed STP P092039 $313,163 07/11/14 REPAIR (TC) IN SAN MATEO COUNTY ON US - 101, FROM CITY OF SAN CARLOS, DESIGN BUILD RAMP METERING N/A San Mateo State-Managed NHS Q101202 $1,187,469 04/22/14 SYSTEM (TC) SAN MATEO COUNTY NEAR SKY LONDA 2.6 MILES NORTH OF JUNCTION SR 35 AND 84, CONSTRUCT N/A San Mateo State-Managed STP S035008 ($254,994) 08/15/14 SOLDIER BEAM AND REPAIR SLIPOUT (TC) N/A San Mateo State-Managed DRAFTON ROUTE 84 IN SAN MATEO COUNTY NEAR LA HONDA, INSTALL COIR NETTING (TC) STP S084038 ($304,293) 02/19/14 US 101 NEAR EAST PALO ALTO, AT THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY LINE, REPLACE BRIDGE STRUCTURE AT SF N/A San Mateo State-Managed NHPP 000C366 $21,905,975 09/26/14 CREEK BRIDGE (TC) N/A San Mateo State-Managed IN SAN MATEO COUNTY AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS., CONSTRUCT CURB RAMPS AND PASSAGEWAYS (TC) STP 000C378 $1,894,000 08/20/14 N/A San Mateo State-Managed NR SKY LONDA S/O AND N/O ALPINE/PAGE MILL RD, STORM DAMAGE REPAIRS ER 43H8004 ($4,210) 03/26/14 REG090003 Santa Clara Caltrans SANTA CLARA CO, I-280 FROM PM 2 TO PM 5.*, NEW TOS & RAMP METERING EQUIPM ARRA 2801126 ($42,519) 11/22/13 REG090003 Santa Clara Caltrans SANTA CLARA CO, I-280 FROM PM 1.0 TO 4.5_*, NEW TOS & RAMP METERING EQUIPM ARRA 2801127 ($667,261) 12/04/13 NEAR SAN JOSE FROM ROUTE 280 TO SCOTT CREEK ROAD, LANDSCAPE MITIGATION FOR RAMP REG090003 Santa Clara Caltrans CMAQ 6204116 $160,000 09/18/14 METERING (TC) SCL030008 Santa Clara Caltrans ROUTE 87 (JULIAN ST TO RT 101) , LANDSCAPING ALONG NEW CORRIDOR STP 6204067 ($622,289) 03/27/14

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 13 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 24 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt

SCL110028 Santa Clara Campbell Campbell Avenue Portals Bike/Ped Improvements CMAQ 5306021 $3,717,362 04/02/14 $3,718,000 APRICOT AVE, CAMPBELL AVE, HACIENDA AVE (SEE COMMENT FOR REMAINING LOCATIONS), NEW SCL110058 Santa Clara Campbell HSIP 5306023 ($31,501) 06/27/14 RADAR SPEED PANEL INSTALLATION HACIENDA AVE BETWEEN WINCHESTER BLVD AND VIRGINIA AVE., STREETSCAPE AND BICYCLE SCL110116 Santa Clara Campbell TAP 5306024 $544,000 09/18/14 IMPROVEMENTS HARRIET AVE/ MC COY AVE/ SAN TOMAS AQUINO RD., INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SIGNS, PAVEMENT SCL110138 Santa Clara Campbell HSIP 5306027 $59,400 07/11/14 $59,400 MARKERS, SCL130003 Santa Clara Campbell Hamilton Avenue Preservation STP 5306026 $279,000 01/30/14 $279,000

SCL130009 Santa Clara Cupertino Stevens Creek Blvd Preservation STP 5318028 $735,000 03/26/14 $735,000 N/A Santa Clara Gilroy NON-INFRASTRUCTURE SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL, EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM SRTS 5034021 ($64,015) 01/09/14 SCL110049 Santa Clara Gilroy MULTIPLE LOCATIONS IN CITY OF GILROY, CROSSING WALKS, SIDEWALKS, BICYCLE LANES STP 5034024 ($47,647) 08/13/14 SCL110049 Santa Clara Gilroy MULTIPLE LOCATIONS IN CITY OF GILROY, CROSSING WALKS, SIDEWALKS, BICYCLE LANES TAP 5034024 $47,647 08/13/14 SCL130025 Santa Clara Gilroy Eigleberry Street Resurfacing STP 5034025 $808,000 05/28/14 $808,000 N/A Santa Clara Los Altos GRANT,SPRINGER,HOMESTEAD,PORTLAND, ALMOND , IN-PAVEMENT XWALK IMPROVEMENT STP 5309010 ($8,294) 03/26/14 SCL110025 Santa Clara Los Gatos UNIVERSITY AVENUE (SHELBURNE WAY TO VASONA DAM), ROAD REHABILITATION STP 5067019 ($45,943) 02/20/14 N/A Santa Clara Milpitas NON-INFRASTRUCTURE SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL, EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM SRTS 5314005 ($198,485) 12/20/13 SCL130024 Santa Clara Monte Sereno Monte Sereno Various Street and Road Preservation STP 5339003 $250,000 03/21/14 $250,000 N/A Santa Clara Mountain View CHURCH ST, CASTRO ST TO CALDERON AVE, ROAD REHAB STP 5124025 ($6,504) 10/22/13 SCL110096 Santa Clara Mountain View MIDDLEFIELD RD: BETWEEN EASY ST AND SHORELINE BLVD, RECONSTRUCT MEDIAN ISLANDS HSIP 5124029 $617,625 03/18/14 $652,500 SCL130019 Santa Clara Mountain View Mountain View Non-Infrastructure SRTS CMAQ 5124030 $500,000 04/01/14 $500,000

SCL110047 Santa Clara Palo Alto SAN ANTONIO RD (SR101 TO ALMA ST), NEW MEDIAN, CURB RAMPS, UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNALS, HSIP 5100015 ($48,696) 11/27/13 SCL050061 Santa Clara San Jose SAN JOSE:SJSU/JAPANTOWN PEDESTRIAN IMPRVMNT, PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS CMAQ 5005093 ($85,484) 10/24/13 SCL110034 Santa Clara San Jose San Jose - San Carlos Multimodal Phase 2 STP 5005104 $1,703,646 10/22/13 $2,024,000

SCL110034 Santa Clara San Jose San Jose - San Carlos Multimodal Phase 2 CMAQ 5005104 $326,700 10/22/13 $326,700

SCL110040 Santa Clara San Jose MINIDOKA AVE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT, PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED IMPROVEMEN SRTS 5005097 ($219,776) 12/11/13

SCL110057 Santa Clara San Jose San Jose Walk N Roll - Safe Access CMAQ 5005126 $297,639 08/20/14 $297,639 SCL110107 Santa Clara San Jose VARIOUS LOCATIONS (SEE STATE COMMENTS FOR ROADS & LIMITS OF WORK), ROAD REHAB STP 5005120 $12,410,000 10/24/13 SCL110128 Santa Clara San Jose NORTH FIRST ST: SR 237 TP BROKAW RD, INSTALL TUBULAR MARKETS, PAVEMENT TREATMENTS, HSIP 5005123 $100,000 07/17/14 OCALA AVE: DAYTONA DR. TO E CAPITOL EXPRESSWAY, INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS, CONSTRUCT SCL110135 Santa Clara San Jose HSIP 5005135 $149,700 05/05/14 $149,700 SIDEWALK, BUCKNALL RD. BETWEEN MAYFIELD TO WOODGLEN DR., CONSTRUCT CURB, GUTTER, SCL110136 Santa Clara San Jose SRTS 5005124 $198,371 05/29/14 $198,371 SIDEWALK,PAVEMENT, LIGHTS SCL130005 Santa Clara San Jose DRAFTSan Jose Citywide Pavement Management Program STP 5005134 $528,000 04/04/14 $528,000 $11,003,000

SCL130006 Santa Clara San Jose San Jose Citywide SRTS Program CMAQ 5005133 $150,000 03/04/14 $150,000 $1,000,000

SCL130007 Santa Clara San Jose Jackson Ave Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements CMAQ 5005125 $525,000 12/04/13 $525,000 $975,000

SCL130008 Santa Clara San Jose San Jose Walk N' Roll Phase II CMAQ 5005128 $1,000,000 05/28/14 $1,000,000

SCL130010 Santa Clara San Jose San Jose Pedestrian Oriented Traffic Signals CMAQ 5005127 $1,500,000 01/31/14 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 SCL991007 Santa Clara San Jose STEVENS CREEK BLVD. & WINCHESTER BLVD. ITS ., INSTALL ITS INFRASTRUCTURE CMAQ 5005064 ($3,003) 02/19/14

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 14 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 25 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt

SCL130038 Santa Clara Santa Clara (City) Santa Clara Various Streets and Roads Preservation STP 5019032 $1,891,000 04/01/14 $1,891,000

SCL130039 Santa Clara Santa Clara (City) Santa Clara Non-Infrastructure SR2S Phase 2 CMAQ 5019033 $500,000 04/14/14 $500,000

N/A Santa Clara Santa Clara County STEVENS CANYON RD/STEVEN CRK BRIDGE #37C0571, PLANT REPLACEMENT AND MONITORING (TC) BRIDGE 5937193 $25,500 08/12/14

N/A Santa Clara Santa Clara County HELYER AVENUE/COYOTE CREEK (BRIDGE #37C0541), PLANT REPLACEMENT AND MONITORING BRIDGE 5937194 $34,526 08/15/14

N/A Santa Clara Santa Clara County GILROY HOT SPRINGS RD / HOLLOW HUNTING CREEK, PLANT REPLACEMENT AND MONITORING (TC) BRIDGE 5937195 $27,000 08/15/14

SCL090002 Santa Clara Santa Clara County SAN TOMAS EXPRESSWAY BOX CULVERT REHABILITATION, REPAIR & RELINING CULVERT INVERT STP 5937137 ($2,149,810) 09/11/14

SCL110015 Santa Clara Santa Clara County ALMADEN EXPRESSWAY (SR87 TO HARRY RD), BIKE SIGNAL DETECTION CMAQ 5937166 ($53,296) 05/05/14 FELTER RD B/T CALAVERAS AND SIERRA RD VARIOUS LOCATION, SHOULDER IMPROVEMENTS, GUARD SCL110045 Santa Clara Santa Clara County HRRR 5937129 ($199,202) 11/15/13 RAILS, SIGNS, ET AL SCL110046 Santa Clara Santa Clara County BLACK RD IMPROVEMENT (HWY17 TO SKYLINE BLVD), MBGR AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVIC HSIP 5937138 ($84,192) 10/24/13 SCL110060 Santa Clara Santa Clara County BLOOMFIELD RD/CARNADERO CK,BR#37C0103, CONSTRUCT SCOUR COUNTERMEASURE BRIDGE 5937139 ($73,461) 11/22/13 SCL110062 Santa Clara Santa Clara County MASTEN AVE /LLAGAS CREEK, BR#37C0170, CONSTRUCT SCOUR COUNTERMEASURE (TC) BRIDGE 5937142 ($76,660) 11/15/13 SCL110067 Santa Clara Santa Clara County BOWDEN CT/ LLAGAS CREEK, BRIDGE#37C0518, CONSTRUCT SCOUR COUNTERMEASURE (TC) BRIDGE 5937143 ($76,002) 11/08/13 SCL110070 Santa Clara Santa Clara County FRAZIER RD OVER FURLONG CREEK, BR#37C0534, CONSTRUCT SCOUR COUNTERMEASURE (TC) BRIDGE 5937140 ($67,830) 10/18/13 SCL110073 Santa Clara Santa Clara County LLAGAS AVE/LLAGAS CREEK, BRIDGE#37C0550, CONSTRUCT SCOUR COUNTERMEASURE (TC) BRIDGE 5937145 ($103,437) 10/24/13 SCL110089 Santa Clara Santa Clara County WEST LITTLE LLAGAS CREEK BRIDGE (BR# 37C0377), BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE BRIDGE 5937153 ($172,465) 06/20/14 SCL110094 Santa Clara Santa Clara County STEVENS CRK. BR. ON STEVENS CANYON RD.37C-576, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT BRIDGE 5937046 ($56,433) 02/24/14 SCL110095 Santa Clara Santa Clara County STEVENS CRK.BR/STEVENS CANYON RD.37C0577, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT BRIDGE 5937047 ($95,516) 02/24/14 WATSONVILLE RD: UVAS RD TO 0.18 MILES SOUTH OF SANTA TERESA BLVD, WIDEN AND PAVE SCL110134 Santa Clara Santa Clara County HSIP 5937199 $207,000 08/20/14 $207,000 SHOULDERS SCL130021 Santa Clara Santa Clara County Santa Clara County NonInfrastructure SRTS Program CMAQ 5937200 $838,000 08/21/14 $838,000

SCL130037 Santa Clara Santa Clara County Capitol Expressway ITS and Bike/Ped Improvements CMAQ 5937196 $1,269,000 02/07/14 $1,269,000 $6,966,000 Santa Clara Valley N/A Santa Clara Transportation SR237/I-880, EXPRESS CONNECTORS VPP 6264048 ($62) 06/27/14 Authority (VTA) Santa Clara Valley SCL010040 Santa Clara Transportation 152/156 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONSTRUCT FLYOVER (W/B152 - S/B 156) HPP 6264029 ($191,816) 06/26/14 Authority (VTA) Santa Clara Valley SCL090031 Santa Clara Transportation Santa Clara Caltrain Station Bike/PedUndercrossing CMAQ 6264062 $1,251,000 02/12/14 $1,251,000 Authority (VTA) Santa Clara Valley CAPITOL EXPWY BETWN EASTRIDGE LOOP AND TULLY RD & CAPITOL EXPWY/EASTRIDGE LOOP, SCL110137 Santa Clara Transportation HSIP 6264063 $262,400 08/20/14 SIDEWALKS, XWALK, MEDIAN FENCE & TRAFFIC SIGNAL Authority (VTA) Santa Clara Valley SCL130020 Santa Clara Transportation DRAFTUpper Penitencia Creek Multi-Use Trail CMAQ 6264061 $1,514,000 12/31/13 $1,514,000 Authority (VTA) Santa Clara Valley SCL130040 Santa Clara Transportation Montague Expy Ped Bridge at Milpitas BART Study CMAQ $744,000 12/31/13 $744,000 Authority (VTA) SCL070026 Santa Clara Saratoga DEANZA TRAIL BET SUNNYVALE&SARATOGA, BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES CMAQ 5332012 ($36,197) 06/02/14 SCL070038 Santa Clara Saratoga BIG BASIN WAY - 6TH TO SARATOGA-LOS GATOS RD, PED/BICYCLE ENHANCEMENTS CMAQ 5332013 ($123,974) 03/18/14

SCL110017 Santa Clara Saratoga BIG BASIN WAY (SARATOGA-LOS GATOS RD - 6TH ST), STREETSCAPE CMAQ 5332019 ($774,413) 06/26/14

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 15 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 26 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt IN THE CITY OF SARATOGA AT THE 4TH STREET BRIDGE OVER SARATOGA CREEK, BRIDGE SCL110113 Santa Clara Saratoga BRIDGE 5332020 ($92,957) 06/26/14 REHABILITATION N/A Santa Clara State-Managed RTE 17/85 FWY I/C, CONST FWY I/C UrbMobProj 0007001 ($51,972) 04/09/14 N/A Santa Clara State-Managed RTE 17/85 FWY I/C, CONST FWY I/C STP 0007001 $51,972 04/09/14 N/A Santa Clara State-Managed SR-87 IN SAN JOSE FROM JULIAN ST TO SR-101 . , UPGRADE TO 6 LANE FREEWAY STP 0021001 ($190,656) 03/28/14 IN CUPERTINO AND LOS ALTOS FROM TANTAU AVE OVERCROSSING TO FOOTHILL EXPRESSWAY, N/A Santa Clara State-Managed NHPP 2801140 $7,045,246 08/22/14 RESURFACE AC SHDER REPLACE PCC SLABS GUARDRAIL (TC N/A Santa Clara State-Managed VAR. LOCATIONS FROM RT 680/101 TO ALPINE_RD., UPGRADE METAL TO CONCRETE BARR IM 2801113 ($43,184) 04/09/14 IN SAN JOSE 0.4 MILE S/O STEVENS CREEK BLVD TO 0.2 MILE N/O OLD BAYSHORE HWY, REHABILITATE N/A Santa Clara State-Managed IM 8801061 ($2,028,041) 06/26/14 ROADWAY (TC) N/A Santa Clara State-Managed IN LOS GATOS ON STATE ROUTE 17, COLD PLANING, AC PAVEMENTS, AC OVERLAYING (TC) STP P017105 ($812,548) 10/24/13 NEAR LOS GATOS, SOUTH OF SUMMIT ROAD TO SOUTH OF BEAR CREEK ROAD, UPGRADE DRAINAGE N/A Santa Clara State-Managed NHPP P017106 $1,611,387 02/26/14 SYSTEM, INST. MEDIAN BARRIER (TC) NEAR LEXINGTON HILLS FROM OLD SANTA CRUZ HWY TO LOS GATOS @ VARIOUS LOCATIONS, N/A Santa Clara State-Managed NHPP P017109 $715,935 09/26/14 RECONSTRUCT SLOPE (TC) STANFORD AVE/EL CAMINO REAL INTERSECTION, IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRANSIT ACCESS N/A Santa Clara State-Managed STP P082018 ($196,561) 10/23/13 (TC FROM 0.3 MILE N/O STEVENS CREEK BLVD O/C TO ROUTE 85/101 SEPARATION, REHABILITATE N/A Santa Clara State-Managed STP P085051 ($218,752) 06/26/14 PAVEMENT (TC) N/A Santa Clara State-Managed NEAR GILROY, SR-152 FR PRUNEDALE AV TO RT 156 , CONSTRUCT TRUCK CLIMBING LANES NHS P152068 ($89,189) 03/26/14 IN SCL CO FROM HOLSTIEN CREEK BRIDGE TO 1.7 KM EAST OF HOLSTIEN CREEK BRIDGE, CONSTRUCT N/A Santa Clara State-Managed NHS P152075 ($100,696) 06/30/14 LEFT TURN POCKET (TC) NEAR GILROY, ON ROUTE 152, FROM OLD LAKE RD. TO SAN FELIPE RD., REALIGN CURVE & UPGRADE N/A Santa Clara State-Managed HSIP P152079 $2,391,950 09/26/14 SHOULDERS IN SANTA CLARA FROM HECKER PASS TO UVAS CREEK, IMPROVE SIGHT DISTANCE, UPGRADE N/A Santa Clara State-Managed HSIP P152080 ($951,545) 09/26/14 SHOULDERS IN SANTA CLARA FROM HECKER PASS TO UVAS CREEK, IMPROVE SIGHT DISTANCE, UPGRADE N/A Santa Clara State-Managed HSIP P152080 $2,300,000 09/26/14 SHOULDERS N/A Santa Clara State-Managed IN THE CITY OF GILROY ON SR 152 FROM SR 101 TO SR 156, PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROJECT (TC) STP P152083 $8,073,200 08/20/14

N/A Santa Clara State-Managed IN SARATOGA 0.84 MILE WEST OF SANBORN ROAD, STORM DAMAGE REPAIR/TIE-BACK WALL (TC) STP S009018 $167,985 04/09/14 ON SR 9 AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS FROM 2.0 MILES EAST OF HEATHER HEIGHTS RD TO 6TH ST, UPGRADE N/A Santa Clara State-Managed HSIP S009019 ($603,735) 09/26/14 SHLD AND PROVIDE MINOR REALIGNMENT (TC) IN SANTA CLARA, FROM HECKER PASS TO UVAS CREEK, UPGRADE SHDERS AND PROVIDE MINOR N/A Santa Clara State-Managed HSIP S152080 ($476,949) 09/26/14 REALIGNMENT (TC) N/A Santa Clara State-Managed SR-237 IN SCL CO AT ROUTE 880/237 SEPARATION, MODIFY ROUTE 237/880 INTERCHAN STP S237007 ($6,163) 11/05/13 N/A Santa Clara State-Managed IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, UPGRADE BARRIER/GUARDRAIL END HSIP X085049 ($366,104) 03/26/14 N/A Santa Clara State-Managed ROUTES 85, 87, 101, 237, 280, 680 AND 880 AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, BRIDGE REHABILITATION (TC) BRIDGE X085056 $2,566,122 08/20/14 N/A Santa Clara State-Managed CITY OF SAN JOSE, U.S.D.O.T. #755082V, GRADE CROSSING HAZARD ELIMENAT RAIL/HWY 7500045 ($148,611) 02/21/14 SANTA CLARA AND SAN BENITO COUNTIES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, INSTALL 3 CHANGEABLE MESSAGE N/A Santa Clara State-Managed NHPP 000C370 $837,307 09/26/14 SIGNS (TC) IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY FROM SAN BENITO COUNTY LINE TO 85 INTERCHANGE, INSTALL RAMP N/A Santa Clara State-Managed HFL Q101234 $2,000,000 09/26/14 METERING AND TOS (TC) IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY FROM SAN BENITO COUNTY LINE TO 85 INTERCHANGE, INSTALL RAMP N/A Santa Clara State-Managed DRAFTNHPP Q101234 $13,498,164 09/26/14 METERING AND TOS (TC) INTERSECTION OF BERNARDO AVE AT REMINGTON DR, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SIGNS, STRIPPING, CURB SCL110115 Santa Clara Sunnyvale HSIP 5213045 $2,218 09/09/14 RAMPS INTERSECTION OF BERNARDO AVE AT REMINGTON DR, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, SIGNS, STRIPPING, CURB SCL110115 Santa Clara Sunnyvale HSIP 5213045 ($2,218) 09/09/14 RAMPS SCL130033 Santa Clara Sunnyvale Duane Avenue Roadway Preservation STP 5213050 $280,000 02/20/14 $280,000 $1,296,000

SOL130008 Solano Benicia Benicia - East 2nd Street Preservation STP 5003027 $495,000 04/14/14 $495,000

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 16 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 27 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt

SOL130009 Solano Benicia Benicia Safe Routes to Schools Infrastructure Imps CMAQ 5003028 $100,000 04/14/14 $100,000 SOL050009 Solano Dixon PARKWAY BLVD AND UPRR CROSSING, GRADE SEPARATION EARMARK 0014005 ($180,017) 12/23/13 N/A Solano Rio Vista SR 12-RIO VISTA BRIDGE, PROJECT STUDY REPORT HPP 5099011 ($9,997) 03/26/14 VARIOUS LOCATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF RIO VISTA, STREET NAME SIGN N/A Solano Rio Vista HPP 5099013 ($1,338) 10/22/13 IMPROVEMENT/REPLACEMENT N/A Solano Solano County CORDELIA ROAD BRIDGE AT SUISUN CREEK, ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION-PLANT BRIDGE 5923085 ($22,465) 08/07/14 SOL050046 Solano Solano County CORDELIA RD. FROM LOPES RD TO PITTMAN RD., PEDESTRIAN PATHS, BENCHES STP 5923073 ($1,322) 07/17/14 SOL050046 Solano Solano County CORDELIA RD. FROM LOPES RD TO PITTMAN RD., PEDESTRIAN PATHS, BENCHES CMAQ 5923073 ($27,194) 07/17/14 SOL070021 Solano Solano County Travis AFB: South Gate Improvement Project HPP 5923083 $119,600 08/19/14 $1,640,000 ALLENDALE RD,. BUNKER STATION RD, CANTELOW RD, KING RD, AND VARIOUS,, PAVEMENT SOL090027 Solano Solano County STP 5923100 $212,973 07/17/14 REHABILITATION SOL090035 Solano Solano County Vacaville-Dixon Bicycle Route (Phase 5) CMAQ 5923110 $60,000 01/13/14 $60,000 SOL110017 Solano Solano County VARIOUS STREETS IN SOLANO COUNTY, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION STP 5923102 ($70) 01/09/14 SOL110028 Solano Solano County ROBINSON ROAD AT BIG DITCH 23C-0185, REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE (TC) BRIDGE 5923070 ($34,767) 12/31/13 CORDELIA RD: THOMASSON LN TO HALE RANCH RD LAKE HERMAN RD: NEAR SKY VALLEY RD, SOL110052 Solano Solano County HSIP 5923114 $81,360 04/14/14 $81,360 CONSTRUCT 4' PAVED SHOULDER HARLEY RD: MIDWAY TO ALLENDALE RD, ROCKVILLE RD: ABERNATHY RD TO 1 MILE EAST, CONSTRUCT SOL110053 Solano Solano County HSIP 5923113 $75,150 04/14/14 $75,150 4' PAVED SHOULDERS PUTAH CREEK RD:.MARTINEZ LN TO 2 MILES EAST, DIXON AVE: JAHN RD TO 2 MILES EAST, CONSTRUCT SOL110054 Solano Solano County HRRR 5923115 $52,200 09/26/14 $52,200 4' PAVED SHOULDERS SOL130007 Solano Solano County Suisun Vallley Bicyle and Pedestrian Imps STP 5923109 $248,000 11/08/13 $248,000 $927,000 Solano Transportation SOL070020 Solano I-80/I-680/SR 12 Interchange Project STP 6204117 $999,962 04/27/14 $1,000,000 Authority (STA) Solano Transportation SOL110019 Solano Solano Safe Routes to School Program CMAQ 6249036 $1,256,000 04/01/14 $1,256,000 Authority (STA) Solano Transportation SOL110020 Solano Eastern Solano / SNCI Rideshare Program CMAQ 6249027 $533,000 03/12/14 $533,000 Authority (STA) Solano Transportation SOL110039 Solano Local PDA Planning - Solano STP 6249034 $1,577,000 04/01/14 $1,066,000 Authority (STA) Solano Transportation SOL130010 Solano Solano Transit Ambassador Program CMAQ 6249035 $250,000 03/14/14 $250,000 Authority (STA) Solano Transportation SOL130011 Solano Local PCA Planning - Solano STP 6249037 $75,000 05/28/14 $75,000 Authority (STA) CITY OF VALLEJO 0.7 MILE E/O TENNESSEE ST O/C TO .20 MILE W/O REDWOOD ST O/C, UPGRADE N/A Solano State-Managed NHPP 0802365 $854,549 09/26/14 DRAINAGE SYSTEMS (TC) IN SOLANO COUNTY, IN THE CITY OF VALLEJO, ON ROUTE 80 FROM REDWOOD, CONSTRUCT CONCRETE N/A Solano State-Managed HSIP 0802361 ($189,528) 06/26/14 BARRIER N/A Solano State-Managed BENICIA ON ROUTE 780 FROM ROUTE 680 TO E 5TH. , REHABILITATE ROADWAY IM 7802351 ($118,772) 03/26/14 REDISTRIBUTIO N/A Solano State-Managed FAIRFIELD/SUISUN CITY-RT 12 W/O CHADBOURNE RD, ASPHALT CONCRETE RESURFACING P012096 $299,478 04/22/14 N N/A Solano State-Managed SR 12 FROM OAKMONT DR TO AQUA CALIENTE RD , INSTALL SOFT MEDIAN BARRIER STP P012099 ($2,533) 03/26/14 N/A Solano State-Managed DRAFTNEAR RIO VISTA, FROM AZEVEDO RD TO LIBERTY ISLAND RD, SHOULDER WIDENING (TC) NHPP P012114 $1,612,908 09/26/14 N/A Solano State-Managed ON SR 113 NEAR DAVIS AT SR113/I-80 SEPARATION, INSTALL THRIE BEAM BARRIER IN THE MEDIAM HSIP P113033 $426,976 08/20/14 N/A Solano State-Managed SLO CO NR RIO VISTA FR 0.3 MI SOUTH OF ***, REPAIR FAILED PAVEMENT & SIDE (TC) STP S084036 ($308,894) 03/26/14 N/A Solano State-Managed IN FAIRFIELD AT I-80 AND SR 12, CONSTRUCT A TWO-LANE WB I-80/WB SR 12 (TC) NHPP X095025 $18,433,689 09/26/14 N/A Solano State-Managed IN SOLANO COUNTY, FROM ROUTE 780 TO 80, REHABILITATE PAVEMENT (TC) NHPP 6801073 $18,921,000 08/20/14 N/A Solano State-Managed SOL COUNTY RT 80 AT PM 27.0 & 28.3 , RECON SLOPE AND INSTALL DRAIN SYSTM ER 43D3004 ($29,315) 03/26/14 SOL090016 Solano Suisun City MAIN ST. FROM SOLANO ST. TO LOTZ WAY, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION ARRA 5032024 ($4,333) 11/27/13 WALTERS RD. AND PINTAIL DRIVE INTERSECTION, NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL, ADA RAMPS, PAVEMENT SOL110046 Solano Suisun City HSIP 5032027 $71,900 04/27/14 $71,900 MARKINGS,

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 17 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 28 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt

SOL130004 Solano Suisun City Walters Road-Pintail Drive Preservation STP 5032028 $356,000 05/01/14 $356,000 ON ALDRIDGE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 500' WEST OF EUBANKS DRIVE, OVER PUTAH SOUTH CR, BRIDGE N/A Solano Vacaville BRIDGE 5094058 $237,055 09/04/14 REHABILITATION (TC) SOL110016 Solano Vacaville ULATIS CREEK FROM ULATIS DR TO LEISURE TOWN ROAD, CLASS 1 BIKE PATH CMAQ 5094046 ($54,997) 05/19/14 Vacaville Various Street and Roads Preservation (DEPOT ST,LEISURE TOWN RD,BROWNS VALLEY SOL110043 Solano Vacaville STP 5094060 $1,231,000 03/07/14 $1,231,000 PKWY,E MONTE VISTA AV,ALLISON DR,DAVIS ST) SOL110048 Solano Vacaville BUCK AVE OVER ALAMO CREEK, BRIDGE REHABILITATION BRIDGE 5094057 $270,217 09/16/14 SOL130005 Solano Vacaville Allison Bicycle / Ped Improvements CMAQ 5094062 $66,000 01/16/14 $66,000 $384,000

SOL130006 Solano Vacaville Ulatis Creek Bike/Ped Path & Stscpe McCellan-Depot CMAQ 5094061 $150,000 12/31/13 $150,000 $350,000

SOL130016 Solano Vacaville Vacaville SRTS Infrastructure Improvements CMAQ 5094063 $26,500 02/20/14 $26,500 $276,707

SOL110035 Solano Vallejo Vallejo Downtown Streetscape TCSP 5030058 $1,150,000 07/11/14 $1,150,000 $1,306,000

SOL110035 Solano Vallejo Vallejo Downtown Streetscape CMAQ 5030058 $784,000 07/11/14 $784,000 $1,306,000 SOL110037 Solano Vallejo Sonoma Boulevard Improvements HSIP5-04-031 HSIP 5030057 $51,660 11/08/13 $311,300 SON070026 Sonoma Caltrans Rehab King Ridge Bridge over Austin Crk 20C0433 BRIDGE 5920146 $200,000 09/16/14 $85,000 $1,502,550 SON050031 Sonoma Cloverdale JEFFERSON STREET FROM W. 3RD ST. TO W. 1ST ST, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION STP 5039020 ($35,000) 07/03/14 SON110015 Sonoma Cotati City of Cotati Train Depot CMAQ 5383009 $200,000 01/14/14 $200,000 N/A Sonoma Healdsburg HEALDSBURG AVE. BRIDGE OVER THE RUSSIAN RIVER 20C0065, BRIDGE REHABILITATION BRIDGE 5027010 $12,436,695 04/08/14 ELY BLVD AT SPOONBILL AVE., AND CASA GRANDE RD AT CRINELLA DR., NEW IN-PAYMENT X-WALK SON110029 Sonoma Petaluma HSIP 5022051 ($16,413) 02/24/14 LIGHTS, UPGRADE SIDEWALKS SON110048 Sonoma Petaluma LAKEVILLE HWY(SR116) / PINE VIEW WAY, SAFETY IMPROVEMENT HSIP 5022054 $43,200 07/02/14

SON130002 Sonoma Petaluma Petaluma Complete Streets STP 5022055 $239,000 12/04/13 $239,000 $1,609,000

SON130020 Sonoma Petaluma : Transit Signal Priority System STP 5022056 $152,222 08/08/14 $152,222 N/A Sonoma Santa Rosa VARIOUS SCHOOLS WITHIN THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA, SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOLS SRTS 5028047 ($12,714) 03/18/14 N/A Sonoma Santa Rosa THIRD ST BETWEEN MORGAN AND B ST., PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS CMAQ 5028072 $126,000 07/02/14 SON090031 Sonoma Santa Rosa 6TH STREET UNDERCROSS, PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE PATH IMPROVEMENT RIP 5028065 ($13) 12/17/13 SON110011 Sonoma Santa Rosa MISSION BLVD, OCCIDENTAL RD, AND STEELE LN, ROADWAY REHABILITATION STP 5028064 ($56,441) 09/02/14 SON110027 Sonoma Santa Rosa INTERSECTION OF TOKAY ST./ AMETHYST WAY, CONSTRUCT AND WIDEN SIDEWALKS SRTS 5028058 $98,286 07/25/14

SON110056 Sonoma Santa Rosa 114 INTERSECTION THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA., CROSS WALK ENHANCEMENT HSIP 5028073 $149,500 03/14/14 $149,500

SON130021 Sonoma Santa Rosa Roseland Area / Sebastopol Rd Priority Development STP 5028075 $647,000 09/16/14 $647,000

SON130018 Sonoma Santa Rosa City Bus CityBus COA and Service Plan STP 5028074 $100,000 07/31/14 $100,000 N/A Sonoma Sebastopol SEBASTOPOL UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, IMPLEMENTATION OF SRTS PROGRAM SRTS 5123011 ($7,110) 10/18/13 SON110046 Sonoma Sonoma (City) DRAFTCHASE STREET BRIDGE OVER NATHANSON CREEK, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT BRIDGE 5114016 $148,136 09/12/14 N/A Sonoma Sonoma County VARIOUS LOCATIONS (SEE STATE COMMENTS), SEISMIC RETROFIT BRIDGE 5920030 ($114,641) 02/25/14 N/A Sonoma Sonoma County KINLEY DRIVE, UPGRADE METAL BEAM GUARDRAIL STP 5920101 ($22,500) 03/14/14 N/A Sonoma Sonoma County ON RIVER RD AT GILL CREEK ABOUT 2.0 MILES NW OF STATE HWY 128, REPLACE BRIDGE (TC) STP 5920144 $868,250 07/31/14 SON090001 Sonoma Sonoma County Replace Geysers Bridge over Sulpher Crk 20C0005 BRIDGE 5920111 $627,135 09/12/14 $627,135 $6,866,964 LEVERONI ROAD, BODEGA HIGHWAY, MARK WEST SPRINGS ROAD, BENNETT VALLEY ROAD., ROAD SON090028 Sonoma Sonoma County ARRA 5920121 ($85,147) 11/22/13 REHABILITATION SON110025 Sonoma Sonoma County Replace Hauser Bridge over Gualala River 20C0240 BRIDGE 5920125 $468,750 09/11/14 $468,750 $5,594,000 SON130001 Sonoma Sonoma County Sonoma County Urban Footprint Planning STP 5920141 $250,000 02/20/14 $250,000

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 18 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 29 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 3a DRAFT TABLE 1: FHWA LOCALLY AND STATE-MANAGED PROJECTS OBLIGATIONS, FFY 2013-14

Obligation FY14 Program TIP ID/ EA County Agency Project Name Program Proj_ID Obligation Date Future Funding Amount Amt Sonoma County SON070002 Sonoma SANTA ROSA CREEK TRAIL REACH-F, CONSTRUCT BIKE AND PEDDESTRIAN RIP 5920107 ($107,376) 06/26/14 Regional Parks Sonoma County SON110050 Sonoma Central Sonoma Valley Trail CMAQ 5920142 $160,000 12/31/13 $160,000 $340,000 Regional Parks SON130019 Sonoma Sonoma County Transit Sonoma County Transit: CNG Bus Replacements STP 6331003 $173,052 07/16/14 $173,052 N/A Sonoma State-Managed SONOMA CO. NON INTERSTATE AT VAR. LOCATIONS, PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ER 4376005 ($2,157,628) 12/23/13 N/A Sonoma State-Managed RIVER ROAD AT 14.19PM, EMERGENCY OPENING ER 4442086 ($1,891,633) 07/11/14 SONOMA CO., SR 128 AT GEYSERVILLE, AT THE RUSSIAN RIVER BRIDGE, EMERGENCY RELIEF -- STORM N/A Sonoma State-Managed ER 4717001 $1,840,000 04/16/14 DAMAGE REPAIR SON CO, NEAR THE TOWN OF GUERNEVILLE, ADJACENT TO POCKET CYN CREEK, EMERGENCY RELIEF -- N/A Sonoma State-Managed ER 4718001 $645,000 09/23/14 STORM DAMAGE REPAIR SON CO, NEAR THE TOWN OF GUERNEVILLE, ADJACENT TO POCKET CYN CREEK, EMERGENCY RELIEF -- N/A Sonoma State-Managed ER 4718005 $1,463,401 09/23/14 STORM DAMAGE REPAIR N/A Sonoma State-Managed ON SR 1 APPROXIMATELY 0.5 MILE NORTH OF JENNER, STORM DAMAGE REPAIR (TC) STP P001579 $418,222 08/28/14 N/A Sonoma State-Managed NEAR TOWN OF JENNER, 3.1 MILES SOUTH OF FORT ROSS ROAD, REPLACE CULVERT (TC) STP P001581 $1,724,818 09/26/14 NEAR JENNER, NORTH OF FORT ROSS STATE HISTORIC PARK, CONSTRUCT TIE-BACK RETAINING WALL N/A Sonoma State-Managed STP P001582 $2,331,660 09/26/14 (TC) NEAR CITY OF SEBASTOPOL AT LAGUNA DE SANTA ROSA BRIDGE, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT (SCOURING) N/A Sonoma State-Managed STP P012113 ($1,433,149) 09/26/14 (TC) IN SANTA ROSA FROM MISSION BLVD TO 0.3 MILE EAST OF SANTA ROSA CREEK BRIDGE, MAINTENANCE N/A Sonoma State-Managed NHPP P012117 $2,656,415 07/11/14 ASPHALT OVERLAY (TC) N/A Sonoma State-Managed IN SONOMA CO ON RTS 1,12 & 116 AT VARIOUS LOC, UPGRADE MBGR AND END TERMINALS STP P097035 ($1,167,199) 01/09/14 N/A Sonoma State-Managed SONOMA CO RTES 101,121 & 128 @ VARIOUS LOCS , UPGRADE MBGR AND END TERMINALS EQUITY BONUS P097036 ($559,011) 06/27/14 N/A Sonoma State-Managed SONOMA CO RTS 12,37,116 & 121 VARIOUS LOCS, UPGRADE MBGR AND END TERMINALS STP P097037 ($618,317) 01/09/14 N/A Sonoma State-Managed NR CLOVERDALE N/O HIATT RD-PRESTON OH UNIT 2, R/W; CONST 4-LANE FREEWAY NHS P101568 ($38) 02/24/14 ON SR 128 NEAR CLOVERDALE AT PM 1.8 WEST OF CLOVERDALE BLVD, INSTALL SEGMENTED PILE N/A Sonoma State-Managed STP P128054 $1,841,400 08/20/14 RETAINING WALL (TC) SONOMA COUNTY IN AND NEAR CLOVERDALE ON ROUTE 101, REPLACE AND GRIND EXISTING N/A Sonoma State-Managed NHS Q101204 ($127,333) 03/26/14 CONCRETE PAVEMENT (TC) N/A Sonoma State-Managed IN SONOMA COUNTY ON SR 12 AND 121, MODIFY INTERSECTION AND SIGNALIZE (TC) HSIP X097041 $503,272 02/20/14 N/A Sonoma State-Managed ON ROUTE 116 PM 45.2 , REBUILD SHOULDER & ADDL DRAINAGE ER 43D2004 ($12,105) 03/26/14 N/A Sonoma State-Managed NEAR JENNER 4.5 MILES EAST OF ROUTE 1, CONSTRUCT SOIL NAIL WALL ER 43F6004 ($1) 02/24/14 N/A Sonoma State-Managed IN THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA AT COLLEGE AVENUE UNDERCROSSING, MAJOR WIDENING PROJECT (TC) NHPP Q101236 $2,681,303 09/26/14 SON110044 Sonoma Windsor OLD REDWOOD HWY: WINDSOR RIVER RD/CONDE LN TO 4TH ST, PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE PATH TAP 5472017 $497,000 08/26/14 SON130003 Sonoma Windsor Jaguar Way/Windsor Road Bicycle /Ped Improvements CMAQ 5472018 $108,000 03/14/14 $108,000 $522,000 DRAFTTOTAL $612,554,760 $203,666,168 $259,002,649

Metropolitan Transportation Commission [TABLE 1] Page 19 of 19

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 30 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item Division of Local Assistance - Office Bulletin DLA-OB 14-08 – Notice to Proceed Office of Project Oversight Issued – November 12, 20144A.ii

Expires – Upon Issuance of LPP

Notice to Proceed Submittal

I. BACKGROUND

Division of Local Assistance Office Bulletin DLA-OB 13-3, Construction Oversight Program, established Caltrans’ policy and procedures for the Construction Oversight Program for Federal-aid highway projects administered by local agencies off the State Highway System (SHS).

To properly administer the program, it is essential that the Construction Oversight Engineer (COE) be apprised of when projects are scheduled to begin the construction phase. This will aid the COE in scheduling oversight reviews, and will provide real time project information consistent with FHWA direction.

Section 12.7 “Standard Specifications” of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) allows a local agency to use either Caltrans’ Standard Specifications, or the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (commonly referred to as the “Green Book”). In certain situations, locally developed standard specifications may be used.

In accordance with Section 8 – Prosecution and Progress, Caltrans’ Standard Specifications uses a notice of contract approval to establish the date the contractor is to begin work.

The Green Book uses a Notice to Proceed as per Section 6-1.2 – Commencement of Work, to establish when contract time shall commence. In addition, the Green Book defines a Notice to Proceed as “A written notice given by the Agency to the Contractor fixing the date on which the Contract time will start.”

Section 15.6 – Contract Award of the LAPM allows the administering agency to follow its normal procedures for award of the project without concurrence by Caltrans or the Federal Highway Administration.

Section 15.7 – Award Package of the LAPM requires the administering agency to complete and forward one package to the District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) after award of the contract and prior to submitting the first invoice of the contract phase. Currently, this package does not include the notice of contract award or Notice to Proceed to the contractor. In addition, the package is often not submitted timely enough to allow for scheduling of construction oversight reviews.

The purpose of this Office Bulletin is to establish Caltrans policy and procedures for receiving a notice of contract approval or a Notice to Proceed issued to contractors for Federal-aid highway projects administered by local agencies off the SHS.

II. POLICY

Local agencies shall submit a copy of their notice of contract award or Notice to Proceed letter, or equivalent, to the DLAE concurrent with its issuance to the contractor, for all Federal-aid projects.

Page 2of 2 Filename: DLA-OB 14-08 Notice to Proceed.docx Prepared by: TBuchanan PDWG 12.15.14 Page 31 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item Division of Local Assistance - Office Bulletin DLA-OB 14-08 – Notice to Proceed Office of Project Oversight Issued – November 12, 20144A.ii

III. PROCEDURE

The notice may be transmitted to the DLAE via email attachment, or fax.

The DLAE will provide a copy of the notice to the COE immediately upon receipt from the local agency. The COE will use the notice to assist in scheduling construction oversight reviews.

IV. APPLICABILITY/IMPACTS

This policy applies to all projects receiving Federal-aid funds administered by a local public agency.

Sections 15.6 and 15.7 of the LAPM will be modified to require submission of the notice concurrently with its issuance to the contractor by the local agency.

Recommended: ______Original Signed By ______11/12/2014 Tim Buchanan, Construction Oversight Engineer Date

Approved: ______Original Signed By ______11/12/2014 Mike Giuliano, Acting Chief Date Office of Project Oversight

Page 2of 2 Filename: DLA-OB 14-08 Notice to Proceed.docx Prepared by: TBuchanan PDWG 12.15.14 Page 32 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item Division of Local Assistance - Office Bulletin DLA-OB 14-07 – LAPM Chapter 6 - Environmental Procedures Office of NEPA Assignment and Environmental Compliance Issued – November 5,4A.iii 2014

Expires upon issuance of LPP

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 6 - Environmental Procedures

I. BACKGROUND On October 6, 2014, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) published a Final Rule in the Federal Register that amends 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 771.177 (and 771.118 for FTA) and takes effect November 5, 2014. The following changes were required by Section 1318 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21): Add four new categorical exclusions (CEs) to the “c list”. Moves 771.117(d)(1) through (d)(3) to the “c list” as (c)(26), (c)(27), and (c)(28) and adds 6 new constraints to their use. Adds a new CE, (d)(13), to the “d list” to cover those situations in which the “moved” CEs do not qualify under the “c list” due to the new constraints. Adds a new section on programmatic agreements between FHWA and State DOTs. Caltrans Division of Environmental Analysis (DEA) issued a fact sheet clarifying these changes and modified the Categorical Exclusion (CE) Checklist to reflect the revisions. The fact sheet is provided at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/ser/guidance.htm#factsheet2 and the updated CE Checklist is available at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/ser/forms.htm. This Office Bulletin (OB) updates the procedural guidance set forth in the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 6, Environmental Procedures consistent with DEA policy as described below.

II. POLICY This OB becomes effective November 5, 2014 consistent with the effective date of amendments to 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 771.117.

III. PROCEDURE All applicable sections in the LAPM, referencing the CE Checklist, have been updated with a direct electronic link to DEA’s revised CE Checklist. A note directing users to DEA’s Factsheet provide additional clarification, and the new constraints have also been added for each applicable Section.

Section 6.6, Step #12 of the LAPM is updated to read: 12. The district SEP (or designee) completes the CE Checklist (LAPM Exhibit 6-E) and CE form (LAPM, Exhibit 6-F) and for 23 U.S.C. §326 CEs, ensures Caltrans makes the project–level conformity determination consistent with the guidance provided in Chapter 38 of the SER. Note: Clarifying guidance and additional constraints, which must be considered when determining the applicability of 23 CFR 771.1117 (c)(26), (c)(27) and (c)(28)on the CE Checklist, are provided in DEA’s Fact Sheet for the New Categorical Exclusion (CEs) under 23 CFR 771.117(c), CEs Moved FROM the “d list” TO the “c list”, and Programmatic Agreements for CEs-Effective November 5, 2014

Page 1 of 2 Filename: DLA-OB 14-07 LAPM Chapter 6 Environmental Procedures Prepared by: GJimenez PDWG 12.15.14 Page 33 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item Division of Local Assistance - Office Bulletin DLA-OB 14-07 – LAPM Chapter 6 - Environmental Procedures Office of NEPA Assignment and Environmental Compliance Issued – November 5,4A.iii 2014

Section 6.7, Step #32 of the LAPM is updated to read: 32. The district SEP (or designee) also completes the CE Checklist and determines whether conclusions of the technical studies and the results of consultation indicate that the action qualifies for the CE. Note: Clarifying guidance and additional constraints, which must be considered when determining the applicability of 23 CFR 771.1117 (c)(26), (c)(27) and (c)(28)on the CE Checklist, are provided in DEA’s Fact Sheet for the New Categorical Exclusion (CEs) under 23 CFR 771.117(c), CEs Moved FROM the “d list” TO the “c list”, and Programmatic Agreements for CEs-Effective November 5, 2014

and Section 6.7, Step #33 of the LAPM is updated to read: 33. When the CE Checklist indicates that the action does not meet the criteria for a CE, the district SEP (or designee) prepares a transmittal letter, email, or documentation of telephone conversation or meeting (if applicable) with the LA explaining why the action does not meet the criteria for a CE, and recommends preparation of an EA or an EIS, as appropriate. The district SEP forwards a copy of the letter, email, or documentation of telephone conversation with LA to the DLAE and updates LP2000 accordingly. Note: Clarifying guidance and additional constraints, which must be considered when determining the applicability of 23 CFR 771.1117 (c)(26), (c)(27) and (c)(28)on the CE Checklist, are provided in DEA’s Fact Sheet for the New Categorical Exclusion (CEs) under 23 CFR 771.117(c), CEs Moved FROM the “d list” TO the “c list”, and Programmatic Agreements for CEs-Effective November 5, 2014

Exhibit 6-E, CE Checklist (dated March 14, 2013) is replaced in its entirety by the Attachment in this OB.

IV. APPLICABILITY/IMPACTS This OB applies to all local agency federal-aid transportation projects “off” the State Highway System (SHS). Failure to comply with 23 CFR 771 and/or utilize the most current CE Checklist may result in delays to project delivery or jeopardize the federal eligibility of the project.

Recommended: ______Original Signed By 11/05/2014 Guadalupe V. Jimenez Date Office of NEPA Assignment and Environmental Compliance

Approved: ______Original Signed By 11/05/2014 Germaine Belanger, Chief Date Office of NEPA Assignment and Environmental Compliance

Attachment: Exhibit 6-E “Categorical Exclusion Checklist”

Page 2 of 2 Filename: DLA-OB 14-07 LAPM Chapter 6 Environmental Procedures Prepared by: GJimenez PDWG 12.15.14 Page 34 of 106 PDWG Item 5A

TO: Programming and Delivery Working Group DATE: December 15, 2014

FR: Adam Crenshaw

RE: 2013 and 2015 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Updates

2015 TIP Development The Draft 2015 TIP and Draft Transportation Air-Quality Conformity Analysis were released for public comment on June 26, 2014. A public hearing to receive public testimony on these documents was held on July 9, 2014. The public comment period closed at 5:00pm on July 31, 2014. At its regularly scheduled September meeting, the Programming and Allocations Committee considered public comments received by the end of the comment period. The Commission approved the final transportation-air quality conformity analysis and the 2015 TIP on Wednesday, September 24, 2014. Staff forwarded the Final 2015 TIP to Caltrans to be included in the Draft 2015 Federal-Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP). The Draft 2015 FSTIP was released for public review and comment from October 7, 2014 through October 28, 2014. Caltrans approved the Final 2015 FSTIP in mid-November, 2014. Federal approval of the Final 2015 FSTIP and the Final Air Quality Conformity Analysis is expected in mid-December, 2014.

TIP Revision 13-16 – Amendment (Proposed) Amendment 15-02 revises 150 projects with a net increase in funding of approximately $1.39 billion. Among other changes, the revision: • Amends 24 new exempt Transit Capital Priority Program (TCP) funded projects into the TIP and updates the funding plans of 55 existing TCP funded projects to reflect the adoption of the FY2014-15 TCP Program of Projects, including the programming of approximately $379 million in Federal Transit Administration (FTA) formula funding; • Amends two new exempt Surface Transportation Program/Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (STP/CMAQ) funded projects into the TIP and updates the funding plans of 12 other STP/CMAQ funded projects to reflect the latest programming decisions and obligations, including the programming of Transit Performance Initiative (TPI) funds for three projects; • Amends 14 new exempt Active Transportation Program (ATP) funded projects into the TIP and updates the funding plans of four existing projects to reflect the programming of ATP funds; • Amends three new locally-funded exempt project, one new locally-funded non-exempt-not regionally significant project, and the preliminary engineering phase of one new locally- funded non-exempt projects into the TIP; • Updates the project description, funding plan, and regional air quality conformity project type for Solano County’s Redwood Parkway-Fairgrounds Drive Interchange Improvements project to reflect that the project has changed from a study to a non-exempt construction project;

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 35 of 106 2013 and 2015 TIP Updates PDWG: December 15, 2014 Page 2 of 4

• Updates the funding plan of the San Francisco County Transportation Authority’s Van Ness Avenue Bus Rapid Transit project to increase the total cost of the project by approximately $37 million to reflect the total cost of project implementation; • Updates the funding plan of BART’s Hayward Shop and Yard Expansion project to add approximately $39 million in prior year Proposition 1A funding; • Updates the funding plans of the Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District’s Golden Gate Bridge Seismic Retrofit Phase 3B and Golden Gate Bridge Suicide Deterrent- Safety Barrier projects to reflect the use of advanced construction financing; • Updates the funding plan of the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s Motor Coach Expansion project to reflect the award of approximately $9 million in funding available through the FTA’s Ladders of Opportunity Initiative (LOI) grant program; • Updates the funding plan of the Water Emergency Transportation Authority’s Central Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility project to reflect the award of $3 million in funding available through the FTA’s Passenger Ferry Grant Program; • Archives two projects as they have been completed; • Updates the funding plans and back-up listings of nine Caltrans managed grouped listings and amends one new exempt project into the TIP to reflect the latest programming decisions, including the addition of $343 million in State Highway Operation and Protection Program funding; and • Updates the funding plans of eight individually-listed Highway Bridge Program (HBP) projects and one Highway Safety Improvement Program funded project and amends one HBP funded exempt project into the TIP to reflect the latest information from Caltrans.

Changes made with this revision do not affect the air quality conformity finding or conflict with the financial constraint requirements. Commission approval is scheduled for December 17, 2014, Caltrans approval is expected in mid-January, 2015 and final federal approval is expected in mid- February, 2015.

TIP Revisions 15-01 – Administrative Modification (Pending) Administrative modification 15-01 is under development.

TIP Revisions 13-18 – Administrative Modification (Approved) Administrative modification 2013-18 revises 37 projects with a net increase in funding of approximately $50.5 million. Among other changes this revision: • Updates the funding plan of MTC’s Regional Planning Activities and PPM listing to reflect the programming of $1 million in Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) funds and $700,000 in Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) funds; • Updates the funding plan of the Napa Valley Vine Trail Design and Construction project to reflect the programming of $3.6 million in State Alternative Transportation Program (State ATP) funds; • Updates the funding plans of 10 Surface Transportation Program/Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (STP/CMAQ) funded projects, including the transfer of $3 million from the Freeway Performance Initiative Program to the Regional Arterial Operations and Signal Timing Program;

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 36 of 106 2013 and 2015 TIP Updates PDWG: December 15, 2014 Page 3 of 4

• Updates the funding plans of six Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funded projects to reflect the latest programming information from Caltrans; • Updates the funding plans of two projects to reflect the transfer of $68,300 in unexpended High Priority Project funds from the Bayveiw Transportation Improvements project to the Harney Way Roadway Widening project; and • Updates the funding plans and back-up listings of seven State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP) funded grouped listings and the Section 130 Railroad/Highway Crossing grouped listing to reflect the latest information from Caltrans, including the addition of $44 million in SHOPP funds and $834,000 in State STP funds.

The administrative modification is financially constrained by year and MTC relies on the State’s programming capacity in the amount of $44 million in SHOPP funds, $3.6 million in State ATP funds, $1 million in TIGER funds, $834,000 in State STP funds, $700,000 in SHRP 2 funds, and $62,800 in HPP funds. MTC’s 2013 TIP, as revised with Revision No. 2013-18, remains in conformity with the applicable State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality and the revision does not interfere with the timely implementation of the Transportation Control Measures contained in the SIP. The revision was approved into the FSTIP by the deputy executive director on September 29, 2014.

TIP Revisions 13-17 – Administrative Modification (Approved) Administrative modification 13-17 revises 24 projects with a net increase in funding of $56.5 million. Among other changes this revision: • Updates the funding plans of four projects to reflect the programming of $7 million in State Proposition 63 funds and $20 million in bridge toll funds to the Golden Gate Bridge – Suicide Deterrent Safety Barrier project as well as the reprogramming of Surface Transportation Program/Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (STP/CMAQ) funding from of the Richmond Rail Connector project, the Electric Vehicle Funding Strategies project, and the Freeway Performance Initiative program listing to the Golden Gate Bridge project; • Updates the funding plans and back-up listings of six State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP) funded grouped listings and the federal Safe Routes to Schools grouped listing to reflect the latest information from Caltrans; • Updates the funding plans of four State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funded projects to reflect the latest approvals by the Transportation Commission; and • Updates the sponsors or implementing agencies of three STP/CMAQ funded projects.

The administrative modification is financially constrained by year and MTC relies on the State’s programming capacity in the amount of $46 million in SHOPP funds and $7 million in State Proposition 63 funds. MTC’s 2013 TIP, as revised with Revision No. 2013-17, remains in conformity with the applicable State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality and the revision does not interfere with the timely implementation of the Transportation Control Measures contained in the SIP. The revision was approved into the FSTIP by the deputy executive director on August 1, 2014.

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 37 of 106 2013 and 2015 TIP Updates PDWG: December 15, 2014 Page 4 of 4

The 2013 TIP revision schedule (Attachment A) has been posted at the following link: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/funding/tip/2013/2013_TIP_Revision_Schedule.pdf and project sponsors are requested to submit revision requests before 5:00 PM on the stated deadlines.

The 2015 TIP revision schedule (Attachment B) will be posted at the following link: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/funding/tip/2015/2015_TIP_Revision_Schedule.pdf once the December Programming and Allocations Committee packet has been distributed and project sponsors are requested to submit revision requests before 5:00 PM on the stated deadlines.

Information on TIP revisions is also available through the TIPINFO notification system (electronic mails). Anyone may sign up for this service by sending an email address and affiliation to: [email protected]. FMS is available at the following link: http://fms.mtc.ca.gov/fms/. Projects in all the revisions can be viewed at: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/funding/tip/revisions.htm.

If you have any questions regarding any TIP project, please contact Adam Crenshaw at (510) 817- 5794 or [email protected] or Mallory Atkinson at (510) 817-5793 or [email protected]. The Fund Management System (FMS) system has also been updated to reflect the approvals received.

Attachments: A - 2013 TIP Revision Schedule as of September 17, 2014 B – 2015 TIP Revision Schedule as of August 20, 2014

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 38 of 106 PDWG - Item 5a - Attachment A

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) Tentative 2013 TIP REVISION SCHEDULE - Sorted by Revision Request Submission Deadline as of September 17, 2014 REVISION TIP REVISION REVISION REQUEST MTC STATE FEDERAL APPROVAL REVISION TYPE FINAL APPROVAL NUMBER SUBMISSION APPROVAL* APPROVAL* APPROVAL* STATUS DATE DEADLINE

2013 TIP Update 13-00 Thu, Feb 21, 2013 Thu, Jul 18, 2013 Fri, Jul 26, 2013 Mon, Aug 12, 2013 Approved Mon, Aug 12, 2013

Admin. Modification 13-01 Thu, Aug 1, 2013 Thu, Aug 15, 2013 N/A N/A Approved Thu, Aug 15, 2013

Amendment 13-04 Thu, Aug 1, 2013 Wed, Sep 25, 2013 Tue, Oct 1, 2013 Thu, Oct 24, 2013 Approved Thu, Oct 24, 2013

Admin. Modification 13-02 Sun, Sep 1, 2013 Tue, Sep 24, 2013 N/A N/A Approved Tue, Sep 24, 2013

Admin. Modification 13-03 Sun, Sep 1, 2013 Mon, Sep 30, 2013 N/A N/A Approved Mon, Sep 30, 2013

Admin. Modification 13-05 Tue, Oct 1, 2013 Thu, Nov 7, 2013 N/A N/A Approved Thu, Nov 7, 2013

Amendment 13-08 Tue, Oct 1, 2013 Wed, Nov 20, 2013 Tue, Nov 26, 2013 Fri, Dec 13, 2013 Approved Fri, Dec 13, 2013

Admin. Modification 13-06 Fri, Oct 25, 2013 Thu, Nov 21, 2013 N/A N/A Approved Thu, Nov 21, 2013

Admin. Modification 13-07 Fri, Nov 22, 2013 Mon, Dec 30, 2013 N/A N/A Approved Mon, Dec 30, 2013

Amendment 13-11 Sun, Dec 1, 2013 Wed, Jan 22, 2014 Wed, Feb 12, 2014 Wed, Feb 26, 2014 Approved Wed, Feb 26, 2014

Admin. Modification 13-09 Wed, Jan 1, 2014 Fri, Feb 7, 2014 N/A N/A Approved Fri, Feb 7, 2014

Admin. Modification 13-10 Sat, Feb 1, 2014 Wed, Apr 2, 2014 N/A N/A Approved Wed, Apr 2, 2014

Amendment 13-14 Sat, Feb 1, 2014 Wed, Mar 26, 2014 Thu, Apr 3, 2014 Mon, May 12, 2014 Approved Mon, May 12, 2014

Admin. Modification 13-12 Tue, Apr 1, 2014 Fri, May 2, 2014 N/A N/A Approved Fri, May 2, 2014

Admin. Modification 13-13 Tue, Apr 1, 2014 Thu, May 22, 2014 N/A N/A Approved Thu, May 22, 2014

Amendment 13-16 Tue, Apr 1, 2014 Wed, May 28, 2014 Wed, Jun 4, 2014 Thu, Jun 12, 2014 Approved Thu, Jun 12, 2014

Admin. Modification 13-15 N/A Wed, Jul 2, 2014 N/A N/A Approved Wed, Jul 2, 2014

Admin. Modification 13-17 N/A Fri, Aug 1, 2014 N/A N/A Approved Fri, Aug 1, 2014

Admin. Modification 13-18 N/A Tue, Sep 30, 2014 N/A N/A Pending TBD

TBD - To Be Determined N/A - Not Applicable / Not Required The schedule is also available at the following link: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/funding/tip/2013/2013_TIP_Revision_Schedule.pdf Note: * MTC has delegated authority to approve TIP administrative modifications, and may approve administrative modifications on, prior to, or after the tentative date listed

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 39 of 106 PDWG - Item 5a - Attachment B METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) Tentative 2015 TIP REVISION SCHEDULE - Sorted by Revision Request Submission Deadline as of August 20, 2014 REVISION TIP REVISION REVISION REQUEST MTC STATE FEDERAL APPROVAL REVISION TYPE FINAL APPROVAL NUMBER SUBMISSION APPROVAL* APPROVAL* APPROVAL* STATUS DATE DEADLINE TBD (Expected Mid- TBD (Expected Mid- 2015 TIP Update 15-00 Mon, Apr 28, 2014 Wed, Sep 24, 2014 Pending TBD November) December) TBD (Estimated 4 TBD (Estimated 4 Amendment 15-02 Sat, Nov 1, 2014 Wed, Dec 17, 2014 weeks after MTC weeks after State Pending TBD Approval Date) Approval Date)

Admin Mod 15-01 Fri, Nov 14, 2014 Fri, Dec 19, 2014 N/A N/A Pending TBD

Admin Mod 15-03 Thu, Jan 1, 2015 Fri, Jan 30, 2015 N/A N/A Pending TBD

TBD (Estimated 4 TBD (Estimated 4 Amendment 15-06 Thu, Jan 1, 2015 Wed, Feb 25, 2015 weeks after MTC weeks after State Pending TBD Approval Date) Approval Date)

Admin Mod 15-04 Sun, Feb 1, 2015 Fri, Feb 27, 2015 N/A N/A Pending TBD

TBD (Estimated 4 TBD (Estimated 4 Amendment 15-08 Sun, Feb 1, 2015 Wed, Mar 25, 2015 weeks after MTC weeks after State Pending TBD Approval Date) Approval Date)

Admin Mod 15-05 Sun, Mar 1, 2015 Tue, Mar 31, 2015 N/A N/A Pending TBD

Admin Mod 15-07 Wed, Apr 1, 2015 Thu, Apr 30, 2015 N/A N/A Pending TBD

TBD (Estimated 4 TBD (Estimated 4 Amendment 15-11 Wed, Apr 1, 2015 Wed, May 27, 2015 weeks after MTC weeks after State Pending TBD Approval Date) Approval Date)

Admin Mod 15-09 Fri, May 1, 2015 Fri, May 29, 2015 N/A N/A Pending TBD

Admin Mod 15-10 Mon, Jun 1, 2015 Tue, Jun 30, 2015 N/A N/A Pending TBD

TBD (Estimated 4 TBD (Estimated 4 Amendment 15-14 Mon, Jun 1, 2015 Wed, Jul 22, 2015 weeks after MTC weeks after State Pending TBD Approval Date) Approval Date)

TBD - To Be Determined N/A - Not Applicable / Not Required The schedule will also be available on the MTC's website at: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/funding/tip/2015 Note: * MTC has delegated authority to approve TIP administrative modifications, and may approve administrative modifications on, prior to, or after the tentative date listed

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 40 of 106 PDWG Item 5B

TO: Partnership Programming and Delivery Working Group DATE: December 15, 2014 FR: MTC Pavement Staff

RE: PMP Certification Status

Attached is the latest Pavement Management Program (PMP) Certification Status Listing. This listing is updated monthly, and is also available online at http://www.mtc.ca.gov/services/pmp.

Note any jurisdiction whose certification date will expire within 60 days (indicated by yellow shading), or those that have already expired (indicated by red shading). Please work with these jurisdictions to ensure their certification is current.

Per One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) policy (MTC Resolution No. 4035, Revised), only jurisdictions with a certified PMP are eligible to receive OBAG funds. Therefore, any jurisdictions whose PMP certification has expired are no longer eligible to receive OBAG funds.

For further information, contact Marcella Aranda at [email protected].

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership PDWG\_2014 PDWG\PDWG - '14 - Memos\01_Dec 15 14 PDWG\05c_PMP Certification Memo.docx

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 41 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

5B PMP Certification Expired Note: Updated report is posted monthly to: December 2, 2014 Expiring within 60 days http://www.mtc.ca.gov/services/pmp/ Certified

ᵜ "Last Major Inspection" is the basis for certification and is indicative of the date the field inspection was completed.

Last Major P-TAP Certification County Jurisdiction Inspectionᵜ Certified Cycle Expiration Date Alameda Alameda* 7/31/2012 Yes* 8/1/2015 Alameda Albany 8/31/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Alameda Berkeley 8/31/2013 Yes 14 9/1/2015 Alameda County of Alameda 12/31/2013 Yes 14 1/1/2016 Alameda Dublin 10/31/2012 Yes 15 4/30/2015 Alameda Emeryville 10/31/2010 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Alameda Fremont 11/30/2013 Yes 14 12/1/2015 Alameda Hayward 7/31/2013 Yes 14 8/1/2015 Alameda Livermore 10/31/2013 Yes 14 11/1/2015 Alameda Newark 9/30/2013 Yes 10/1/2015 Alameda Oakland 2/28/2013 Yes 3/1/2015 Alameda Piedmont 4/30/2013 Yes 5/1/2015 Alameda Pleasanton 8/31/2013 Yes 14 9/1/2015 Alameda San Leandro 12/31/2013 Yes 14 1/1/2016 Alameda Union City 8/31/2012 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Contra Costa Antioch 8/31/2013 Yes 14 9/1/2015 Contra Costa Brentwood 10/31/2012 Yes 15 4/30/2015 Contra Costa Clayton 6/30/2014 Yes 15 7/1/2016 Contra Costa Concord 9/30/2012 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Contra Costa Contra Costa County 5/31/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Contra Costa Danville 12/31/2012 Yes 15 1/1/2015 Contra Costa El Cerrito 7/31/2012 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Contra Costa Hercules 11/30/2013 Yes 12/1/2015 Contra Costa Lafayette* 8/31/2012 Yes* 9/1/2015 Contra Costa Martinez 1/31/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Contra Costa Moraga 9/30/2013 Yes 14 10/1/2015 Contra Costa Oakley 7/31/2012 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Contra Costa Orinda 10/31/2012 Yes 15 4/30/2015 Contra Costa Pinole 11/30/2012 No 12/1/2014 Contra Costa Pittsburg 10/31/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Contra Costa Pleasant Hill 10/31/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Contra Costa Richmond 9/30/2012 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Contra Costa San Pablo 12/31/2012 Yes 15 1/1/2015 Contra Costa San Ramon 9/30/2013 Yes 14 10/1/2015 Contra Costa Walnut Creek 11/30/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Marin Belvedere 7/31/2013 Yes 14 8/1/2015 Marin Corte Madera 9/30/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Marin Fairfax 7/31/2013 Yes 14 8/1/2015 Marin Larkspur 5/31/2014 Yes 6/1/2016 Marin Marin County 6/30/2013 Yes 15 7/1/2015 Marin Mill Valley* 7/31/2012 Yes* 8/1/2015 Marin Novato 1/31/2014 Yes 14 2/1/2016

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 42 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

5B PMP Certification Expired Note: Updated report is posted monthly to: December 2, 2014 Expiring within 60 days http://www.mtc.ca.gov/services/pmp/ Certified

ᵜ "Last Major Inspection" is the basis for certification and is indicative of the date the field inspection was completed.

Last Major P-TAP Certification County Jurisdiction Inspectionᵜ Certified Cycle Expiration Date Marin Ross 7/31/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Marin San Anselmo 3/31/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Marin San Rafael 11/30/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Marin Sausalito 7/31/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Marin Tiburon 12/31/2012 Yes 1/1/2015 Napa American Canyon 10/31/2013 Yes 11/1/2015 Napa Calistoga 8/30/2012 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Napa Napa 12/31/2013 Yes 14 1/1/2016 Napa Napa County 10/31/2013 Yes 14 11/1/2015 Napa St. Helena 8/31/2010 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Napa Yountville 8/31/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 San Francisco San Francisco 8/31/2013 Yes 9/1/2015 San Mateo Atherton 11/30/2012 Pending 15 4/30/2015 San Mateo Belmont 8/31/2012 Pending 15 4/30/2015 San Mateo Brisbane 8/31/2012 Pending 15 4/30/2015 San Mateo Burlingame 9/30/2013 Yes 14 10/1/2015 San Mateo Colma 10/31/2013 Yes 14 11/1/2015 San Mateo Daly City 12/31/2014 Yes 14 1/1/2017 San Mateo East Palo Alto 8/31/2013 Yes 14 9/1/2015 San Mateo Foster City 8/31/2013 Yes 9/1/2015 San Mateo Half Moon Bay 8/31/2013 Yes 14 9/1/2015 San Mateo Hillsborough 9/30/2012 Pending 15 4/30/2015 San Mateo Menlo Park 6/30/2013 Yes 7/1/2015 San Mateo Millbrae 12/31/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 San Mateo Pacifica* 11/30/2012 Yes 12/1/2015 San Mateo Portola Valley* 8/31/2012 Yes* 9/1/2015 San Mateo Redwood City 9/30/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 San Mateo San Bruno 7/31/2013 Yes 14 8/1/2015 San Mateo San Carlos 8/31/2013 Yes 9/1/2015 San Mateo San Mateo County 8/31/2013 Yes 14 9/1/2015 San Mateo San Mateo* 11/30/2012 Yes* 12/1/2015 San Mateo South San Francisco 7/31/2013 Yes 14 8/1/2015 San Mateo Woodside 10/31/2013 Yes 14 11/1/2015 Santa Clara Campbell 9/30/2013 Yes 14 10/1/2015 Santa Clara Cupertino 11/30/2012 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Santa Clara Gilroy 10/31/2012 Yes 15 4/30/2015 Santa Clara Los Altos 9/30/2013 Yes 14 10/1/2015 Santa Clara Los Altos Hills 6/30/2014 Yes 15 7/1/2016 Santa Clara Los Gatos 12/31/2012 Yes 1/1/2015 Santa Clara Milpitas 12/31/2013 Yes 15 1/1/2016 Santa Clara Monte Sereno 5/31/2013 Yes 6/1/2015 Santa Clara Morgan Hill 8/31/2013 Yes 14 9/1/2015

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 43 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

5B PMP Certification Expired Note: Updated report is posted monthly to: December 2, 2014 Expiring within 60 days http://www.mtc.ca.gov/services/pmp/ Certified

ᵜ "Last Major Inspection" is the basis for certification and is indicative of the date the field inspection was completed.

Last Major P-TAP Certification County Jurisdiction Inspectionᵜ Certified Cycle Expiration Date Santa Clara Mountain View 2/28/2013 Yes 15 3/1/2015 Santa Clara Palo Alto 9/30/2013 Yes 15 10/1/2015 Santa Clara San Jose 3/30/2014 Yes 14 4/1/2016 Santa Clara Santa Clara 11/30/2013 Yes 15 12/1/2015 Under Santa Clara Santa Clara County* 9/30/2011 Contract 14 1/1/2016 Santa Clara Saratoga 6/30/2013 Yes 14 7/1/2015 Santa Clara Sunnyvale 4/30/2014 Yes 14 5/1/2016 Solano Benicia 10/31/2012 Yes 15 4/30/2015 Solano Dixon 9/30/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Solano Fairfield 9/30/2012 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Solano Rio Vista 6/30/2013 Yes 7/1/2015 Solano Solano County 12/31/2013 Yes 1/1/2016 Solano Suisun City 12/31/2013 Yes 14 1/1/2016 Solano Vacaville 10/31/2013 Yes 14 11/1/2015 Solano Vallejo 12/31/2012 Yes 1/1/2015 Sonoma Cloverdale 7/31/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Sonoma Cotati 8/31/2011 Pending 15 4/30/2015 Sonoma Healdsburg 11/30/2012 No 12/1/2014 Sonoma Petaluma 9/30/2013 Yes 14 10/1/2015 Sonoma Rohnert Park 11/30/2012 No 12/1/2014 Sonoma Santa Rosa 4/30/2014 Yes 5/1/2016 Sonoma Sebastopol 12/31/2012 Yes 15 1/1/2015 Sonoma Sonoma 7/31/2013 Yes 8/1/2015 Sonoma Sonoma County 8/31/2013 Yes 15 9/1/2015 Sonoma Windsor 7/31/2013 Yes 8/1/2015

(*) Indicates One-Year Extension. Note: PTAP awardees are ineligible for a one-year extension during the cycle awarded.

(^) Indicates previous P-TAP awardee, but hasn't fulfilled requirement; must submit certification prior to updating to current P-TAP award status.

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 44 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

5C

PROGRAMMING AND DELIVERY WORKING GROUP (PDWG) 2015 MEETING SCHEDULE - TENTATIVE

All Meetings occur on the 3rd Monday of each month (unless otherwise noted) 9:30 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. – PDWG MetroCenter, 101-8th Street, Oakland 94607 (subject to availability)

MTC Staff Liaison: Kenneth Kao – [email protected] Meeting Manager: Marcella Aranda – [email protected]

Thursday, January 8* Monday, March 16 (1st Floor, Room 171, 9:30a - 12:00p) (1st Floor, Auditorium, 9:30a - 11:30a) *Note: This meeting will be combined with the Local Streets & Roads Working Group (LSRWG)

Thursday, May 14* Monday, April 20 (1st Floor, Room 171, 9:30a - 12:00p) (1st Floor, Auditorium, 9:30a - 11:30a) *Note: This meeting will be combined with the Local Streets & Roads Working Group (LSRWG)

Monday, June 15 Monday, July 20 (1st Floor, Auditorium, 9:30a - 11:30a) (1st Floor, Auditorium, 9:30a - 11:30a)

THERE ARE NO REGULARLY SCHEDULED PARTNERSHIP MEETINGS IN AUGUST

Thursday, September 10* Monday, October 19 (1st Floor, Room 171, 9:30a - 12:00p) (1st Floor, Auditorium, 9:30a - 11:30a) *Note: This meeting will be combined with the Programming and Delivery Working Group (PDWG)

Monday, November 16 Thursday, December 10* (1st Floor, Auditorium, 9:30a - 11:30a) (1st Floor, Room 171, 9:30a - 12:00p) *Note: This meeting will be combined with the Programming and Delivery Working Group (PDWG)

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership PDWG\PDWG Meeting Schedules\2015 PDWG_Tentative Meeting Schedule.docx rev. 12/01/2014 PDWG 12.15.14 Page 45 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

6A Metropolitan Transportation Commission Programming and Allocations Committee December 10, 2014 Agenda Item 3c MTC Resolution No. 4035, Revised Subject: One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) Program Funding Status Update and Next Steps

Background: The Commission adopted the inaugural OBAG Program in May 2012. OBAG provides funding to regional programs and to the county congestion management agencies (CMAs) for local decision making that advances the objectives of Plan Bay Area. The program spans four years from FY2012-13 through FY2015-16. Staff is providing an update to the OBAG Program and recommending actions to address projected financial shortfalls and upcoming local compliance deadlines.

Funding Outlook for OBAG 1: MTC faces a significant funding shortfall in OBAG due to reduced federal revenues. MTC staff estimated receiving about $185 million in federal funds annually over the four-year OBAG period, but MAP-21 has provided only $153 million per year. This represents a shortfall of about $126 million over the four-year OBAG 1 period. Staff recommends adding an additional year to OBAG 1 (FY2016- 17) as a transition year into OBAG 2. This approach minimizes the impact of the shortfall and honors prior funding commitments. The primary reasons for the roughly $32 million annual funding shortfall are summarized below:  MTC’s share of federal revenues decreased under MAP-21 from SAFETEA due to a lower population growth rate in relation to the rest of the State, and changes in CMAQ funding weighting factors for other air basins. ($24 million)  MTC staff based OBAG revenue projections on SAFETEA extensions, which were artificially high due to the redirection of earmark funds to formula programs. ($5 million)  Caltrans increased its off-the-top takedown of federal funds for oversight of local programs. ($3 million)

In addition, staff recommends programming $27 million in new funding in FY2016-17 to fund ongoing program commitments such as regional operations and regional and county planning. This is in addition to redirecting roughly $1.5 million from project failures (see item 2.c) to help cover ongoing commitments in FY2016-17.

As outlined in Attachment 1, staff proposes that $17 million of the new funding in FY2016-17 be assigned to on-going regional commitments with approximately $10 million assigned to on-going county CMA initiatives ($7.4 million to CMA planning and $2.7 million to Safe Routes to School). Final county CMA amounts are shown on the appendices to Attachment A of Resolution 4035.

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 46 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item Programming and Allocations Committee Agenda Item 3c December 10, 2014 6A Page 2

Consistent with current OBAG 1 policies for FY2015-16, funding provided to the counties by the CMAs under OBAG 1 will count toward the Federal Aid Secondary (FAS) program requirement for FY2016-17. Counties not receiving their minimum guarantee during OBAG 1 will be made whole during OBAG 2.

Local Compliance Policies: In order to be eligible for the next cycle of funding, OBAG currently requires that jurisdictions update their general plans’ circulation elements and housing elements by January 31, 2015 to comply with the California Complete Streets Act of 2008 and to reflect the most recent Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) commitments respectively. Staff recommends providing additional flexibility by extending the deadline for the circulation element update to January 31, 2016, and by extending the deadline for the housing element update to May 31, 2015 as detailed below:

Extend the deadline for housing element certification by 120 days from January 31, 2015 to May 31, 2015. This lines up with a 120-day grace period provided by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). If the grace period is exceeded per state law a jurisdiction will need to update its housing element on a four- rather than eight-year cycle to address RHNA. Along with providing more time, staff also recommends retaining HCD certification as the compliance milestone, the same used for OBAG 1.

Extend the deadline for circulation element adoption to meet Complete Streets Act of 2008 by one year from January 31, 2015 to January 31, 2016. CMA staff brought concerns earlier this year from a number of local jurisdictions about the difficulty of meeting the Complete Streets Act deadline of January 31, 2015. Reasons include cost and that the circulation element update was more involved and complex than the housing element update. MTC staff discussed this requirement at length with the Active Transportation Working Group (ATWG) in September 2014. ATWG members expressed concern that if jurisdictions were pressed to meet this deadline, the approach taken might be more hurried and less meaningful. However, some advocates were mixed on whether a resolution or a plan update were more effective, but expressed a desire to see continued progress.

MTC staff recommends providing more time for jurisdictions to update their general plan circulation elements by extending the deadline to January 31, 2016, with additional clarification of the final requirement (a resolution or general plan update) to be provided during development of OBAG 2. This will provide time to discuss this requirement further with the jurisdictions, advocates, and other stakeholders as part of developing policies for OBAG 2 over the next year.

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 47 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item Programming and Allocations Committee Agenda Item 3c December 10, 2014 6A Page 3

The extension recommendations acknowledge that OBAG 2 funds will not begin to be available until FY2017-18, and that a considerable number of jurisdictions will not meet the current January 31, 2015 deadline for housing and circulation element updates. Attachment 2 summarizes current compliance regionally.

OBAG 2 Development: Staff is also examining the implications of recommending that OBAG 2 continue over a five-year period (FY2017-18 through FY2021-22). The tentative development schedule of OBAG 2 is described below:

Tentative OBAG 2 Development Schedule Spring 2015  Staff to work with Stakeholders to develop OBAG 2 proposal  Present proposed OBAG 2 framework to PAC and finalize schedule Summer 2015 – Fall 2015  Conduct outreach and refine proposal Fall 2015  Commission Approves OBAG 2 Policies and Programs Winter 2015 - Fall 2016  CMA Project Solicitations and Selections Fall 2016  Commission approves OBAG 2 projects

Issues: None

Recommendation: Refer MTC Resolution No. 4035, Revised to the Commission for approval. Because Resolution No. 4035, Revised, is proposed for revision under other agenda items, it is included once under this item with all proposed revisions. Only items approved by the Committee will be forwarded to the Commission.

Attachments: Attachment 1: Proposed FY2016-17 programming for on-going commitments Attachment 2: OBAG Local Policy Compliance – Progress Report Letter: Bicycle Coalition – OBAG Complete Streets Requirement MTC Resolution No. 4035, Revised, Attachment A, Appendix A-1, Appendix A-2, Attachment B-1 and Attachment B-2.

J:\SECTION\ALLSTAFF\Resolution\TEMP-RES\MTC\RES-4035_ongoing\tmp-4035_Dec_Revised_12-1-2014-KW.docx

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 48 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

6A Attachment 1

OBAG 1 STP/CMAQ Program FY 2016-17 New Funding to On-Going Commitments December 2014 FY 16-17 STP/CMAQ OBAG 1 Funding ($ millions) FY 2016-17 expected STP/CMAQ revenue (FY 2013-14 actuals): $153

Funding needed for committed OBAG 1 shortfall:* $126

Balance remaining and available for on-going OBAG 1 commitments in FY 17: $27

FY17 Funding for On-Going Program Commitments

Regional Programs *** Regional Planning Activities (ABAG, BCDC, MTC) ** $1.8 511 Traveler Information $8.5 Incident Management $1.4 Freeway Performance Initiatives (FPI) $3.2 PMP, PTAP $1.9 Climate Initiatives $0.3 Regional Programs Total: $17

County Safe Routes To School Program County SRTS $2.7 County SRTS Total: $3

County CMA Planning County CMA OBAG 1 (CMA Planning) ** $7.4 County CMA Planning Total: $7

Grand Total: $27 J:\PROJECT\Funding\T4-MAP21\MAP21 - STP-CMAQ\MAP21 Cycle Programming\MAP21 Cycle 3\OBAG 2 Development\Revenue and Funding\[OBAG 2 Funding 11-26-2014.xlsx]OBAG 2 Dec 17 2014

* OBAG 1 shortfall = amount needed to reach $795 million commitment for OBAG 1 ** 3% escalation over FY 15-16 Base Planning amount, consistent with OBAG 1 policy *** Does not include $1.5 M redirected from deleted Cycles 1 & 2 projects

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 49 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14:Attachment Item 2 6A OBAG Local Policy Compliance ‐‐ Progress Report 12/1/2014

General Plan Housing Element RHNA 2014‐2022

Status Number of Jurisdictions Final Adopted element certified by HCD 8 7%

Adopted Adopted element in review by HCD 2 2% Draft element in compliance, pending Draft 34 31% local adoption & HCD approval Draft element currently being reviewed Draft 16 15% by HCD Draft element reviewed by HCD, Draft 76% additional tasks pending Draft element released but not sent to Draft 16 15% HCD Not Released to the Draft element not yet released to the 26 24% Public public Totals 109 100%

General Plan Circulation Element Complete Streets Act of 2008 Compliance

Status as of November 2013 OBAG 1 Report Card (92 Jurisdictions Receiving OBAG Funds): Resolution / General Plan Ordinance * No. of Jurisdictions 58 34 Percentage 63% 37%

Estimated Status of General Plan Amendments/Self‐Certifications as of November 2014: General Plan * No. of Jurisdictions 69 Percentage 63%

* Circulation Element meeting Complete Streets Act of 2008

J:\COMMITTE\PAC\2014 PAC Meetings\12_Dec'14_PAC\OBAG Update\3c_Attachment 2_Progress Report_Ver2.xlsx PDWG 12.15.14 Page 50 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

6A

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 51 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

6A

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 52 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item Date: May 17, 2012 W.I.: 1512 6A Referred by: Planning Revised: 10/24/12-C 11/28/12-C 12/19/12-C 01/23/13-C 02/27/13-C 05/22/13-C 09/25/13-C 11/20/13-C 12/18/13-C 01/22/14-C 02/26/14-C 03/26/14-C 04/23/14-C 05/28/14-C 06/25/14-C 07/23/14-C 09/24/14-C 12/17/14-C

ABSTRACT Resolution No. 4035, Revised

This resolution adopts the Project Selection Policies and Programming for federal Surface Transportation Authorization Act following the Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation Equity Act (SAFETEA), and any extensions of SAFETEA in the interim. The Project Selection Policies contain the project categories that are to be funded with various fund sources including federal surface transportation act funding available to MTC for its programming discretion to be included in the federal Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).

The resolution includes the following attachments: Attachment A – Project Selection Policies Attachment B-1 – Regional Program Project List Attachment B-2 – OneBayArea Grant (OBAG) Project List

Attachment A (page 13) was revised on October 24, 2012 to update the PDA Investment & Growth Strategy (Appendix A-6) and to update county OBAG fund distributions using the most current RHNA data (Appendix A-1 and Appendix A-4). The Commission also directed $20 million of the $40 million in the regional PDA Implementation program to eight CMAs and the San Francisco Planning Department for local PDA planning implementation. Attachment B-1 and B-2 were revised to add new projects selected by the Solano Transportation Authority and Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority and to add projects under the Freeway Performance Initiative and to reflect the redirection of the $20 million in PDA planning implementation funds.

Attachment A (pages 8, 9 and 13) was revised on November 28, 2012 to confirm and clarify the actions on October 24, 2012 with respect to the County PDA Planning Program.

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 53 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item ABSTRACT MTC Resolution No. 4035, Revised 6A Page 2

Attachment A (page 12) was revised on December 19, 2012 to provide an extension for the Complete Streets policy requirement. Attachments B-1 and B-2 were revised to add new projects selected by the Solano Transportation Authority, Sonoma County Transportation Authority and Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority; add funding for CMA Planning activities; and to shift funding between two San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency projects under the Transit Performance Initiatives Program.

Attachments B-1 and B-2 were revised on January 23, 2013 to add new projects selected by various Congestion Management Agencies and to add new projects selected by the Commission in the Transit Rehabilitation Program.

As referred by the Programming and Allocations Committee, Attachment B-1 and Appendix A-2 were revised on February 27, 2013 to add Regional Safe Routes to School programs for Alameda and San Mateo counties, and to reflect previous Commission actions pertaining to the Transit Capital Rehabilitation Program, and to reflect earlier Commission approvals of fund augmentations to the county congestion management agencies for regional planning activities. As referred by the Planning Committee, Attachments A and B-1 were revised to reflect Commission approval of the regional Priority Development Area (PDA) Planning and Implementation program and Priority Conservation Area (PCA) program.

As referred by the Programming and Allocations Committee, Attachments B-1 and B-2 and Appendix A-2 to Attachment A were revised on May 22, 2013 to shift funding between components of the Freeway Performance Initiative Program with no change in total funding; and split the FSP/Incident Management project into the Incident Management Program and FSP/Callbox Program with no change in total funding; and redirect funding from ACE fare collection equipment to ACE positive train control; and add new OBAG projects selected by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority, Napa County Transportation and Planning Agency, City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo (CCAG), and the Solano Transportation Authority, including OBAG augmentation for CCAG Planning activities.

Attachments B-1 and B-2 were revised on September 25, 2013 to add new projects selected by various Congestion Management Agencies in the OneBayArea Grant, Regional Safe Routes to School, and Priority Conservation Area Programs.

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 54 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item ABSTRACT MTC Resolution No. 4035, Revised 6A Page 3

Attachment A, Attachments B-1 and B-2 and Appendix A-2 to Attachment A were revised on November 20, 2013 to add new projects and make grant amount changes as directed by various Congestion Management Agencies in the OneBayArea Grant Program. Also the deadline for jurisdictions’ adoption of general plans meeting the latest RHNA was updated to reflect the later than scheduled adoption of Plan Bay Area.

Attachment B-1 to the resolution was revised on December 18, 2013 to add an FPI project for environmental studies for the I-280/Winchester I/C modification.

Attachment B-2 was revised on January 22, 2014 to adjust project grant amounts as directed by various Congestion Management Agencies in the OneBayArea Grant Program, including changes as a result of the 2014 RTIP.

Attachments B-1 and B-2 were revised on February 26, 2014 to add six OBAG projects selected by the CMA’s, make adjustments between two Santa Clara OBAG projects, and add three PDA Planning Program projects in Sonoma County.

Attachment B-1 was revised on March 26, 2014 to add 15 projects to the Transit Performance Initiative Program and 3 projects in Marin County to the North Bay Priority Conservation Area Program.

On April 23, 2014, Attachment B-1 was revised to add 13 projects to the Priority Conservation Grant Program, revise the grant amount for the BART Car Exchange Preventative Maintenance Project in the Transit Capital Rehabilitation Program, and add three projects to the Climate Initiatives Program totaling $14,000,000.

As referred by the Planning Committee, Attachment B-1 was revised on May 28, 2014 to reflect Commission approval of the selection of projects for the PDA Planning Technical Assistance and PDA Staffing Assistance Programs.

As referred by the Programming and Allocations Committee, Attachment A and Attachment B-2 were revised on May 28, 2014 to change the program delivery deadline from March 31, 2016 to January 31, 2017, and to adjust two projects as requested by Congestion Management Agencies in the OneBayArea Grant Program.

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 55 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item ABSTRACT MTC Resolution No. 4035, Revised 6A Page 4

On June 25, 2014, Attachment B-1 was revised to add an additional $500,000 to the Breuner Marsh Project in the regional PCA Program and to identify a transportation exchange project (Silverado Trail Phase G) for the Soscol Headwaters Preserve Acquisition in the North Bay PCA Program, and to Redirect $2,500,000 from Ramp Metering and Traffic Operations System (TOS) elements to the Program for Arterial System Synchronization (PASS), within the Freeway Performance Initiatives (FPI) Program.

On July 23, 2014, Attachment B-1 was revised to redirect $22.0 million from the Cycles 1 & 2 Freeway Performance Initiatives (FPI) Programs and $5 million from other projects and savings to the Golden Gate Bridge Suicide Deterrent System.

On September 24, 2014, Attachments B-1 and B-2 were revised to add 5 projects totaling $19M to the Transit Performance Initiative Program (TPI), to shift funding within the Freeway Performance Initiative Program; to add a project for $4 million for SFMTA for priority identified TPI funding; to provide an additional $500,000 to the Freeway Performance Initiative (FPI); and to amend programming for two projects in Santa Clara County: San Jose’s The Alameda “Beautiful Way” Phase 2 project, and Palo Alto’s US-101/Adobe Creek Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge project.

On December 17, 2014, Attachments A, B-1, and B-2 and Appendices A-1 and A-2 to Attachment A were revised to add a fifth year – FY 2016-17 - to the Cycle 2/OBAG 1 program to address the overall funding shortfall and provide additional programming in FY 2016-17 to maintain on-going commitments in FY 2016-17; make adjustments within the Freeway Performance Initiatives Program; rescind the Brentwood Wallace Ranch Easement Acquisition from the Priority Conservation Area (PCA) Program reducing the PCA program from $5 million to $4.5 million and use this funding to help with the FY 17 shortfall; identify two Santa Clara Local Priority Development Area Planning Program projects totaling $740,305 to be included within MTC’s Regional Priority Development Area Program grants; make revisions to local OBAG compliance policies for complete streets and housing as they pertain to jurisdictions’ general plans update deadlines; add five car sharing projects totaling $2,000,000 under the climate initiatives program; and add the Clipper Fare Collection Back Office Equipment Replacement Project to the Transit Capital Priority Program for $2,684,772.

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 56 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item ABSTRACT MTC Resolution No. 4035, Revised 6A Page 5

Further discussion of the Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policies is contained in the memorandum to the Joint Planning Committee dated May 11, 2012; to the Programming and Allocations Committee dated October 10, 2012; to the Commission dated November 28, 2012; to the Programming and Allocations Committee dated December 12, 2012 and January 9, 2013; to the Joint Planning Committee dated February 8, 2013;to the Programming and Allocations Committee dated February 13, 2013, May 8, 2013, September11, 2013, November 13, 2013, December 11, 2013, January 8, 2014, February 12, 2014, March 5, 2014, April 9, 2014; and to the Planning Committee dated May 9, 2014; and to the MTC Programming and Allocations Committee Summary Sheet dated May 14, 2014, June 11, 2014, July 9, 2014, September 10, 2014, and December 10, 2014.

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 57 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

Date: May 17, 2012 6A W.I.: 1512 Referred By: Planning

RE: Federal Cycle 2 Program covering FY 2012-13, FY 2013-14, FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16: Project Selection Policies and Programming

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4035

WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for the San Francisco Bay Area pursuant to Government Code Section 66500 et seq.; and

WHEREAS, MTC is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the nine- county San Francisco Bay Area region and is required to prepare and endorse a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) which includes federal funds; and

WHEREAS, MTC is the designated recipient for federal funding administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)assigned to the MPO/RTPA of the San Francisco Bay Area for the programming of projects (regional federal funds); and

WHEREAS, the federal funds assigned to the MPOs/RTPAs for their discretion are subject to availability and must be used within prescribed funding deadlines regardless of project readiness; and

WHEREAS, MTC, in cooperation with the Association of Bay Area Governments, (ABAG), the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), the Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Congestion Management Agencies (CMAs), transit operators, counties, cities, and interested stakeholders, has developed criteria, policies and procedures to be used in the selection of projects to be funded with various funding including regional federal funds as set forth in Attachments A, B-1 and B-2 of this Resolution, incorporated herein as though set forth at length; and

WHEREAS, using the policies set forth in Attachment A of this Resolution, MTC, in cooperation with the Bay Area Partnership and interested stakeholders, has or will develop a program of projects to be funded with these funds for inclusion in the federal Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), as set forth in Attachments B-1 and B-2 of this Resolution, incorporated herein as though set forth at length; and

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 58 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item MTC Resolution 4035 Page 2 6A

WHEREAS the federal TIP and subsequent TIP amendments and updates are subject to public review and comment; now therefore be it

RESOLVED that MTC approves the “Project Selection Policies and Programming” for projects to be funded with Cycle 2 Program funds as set forth in Attachments A, B-i and B-2 of this Resolution; and be it further

RESOLVED that the federal funding shall be pooled and redistributed on a regional basis for implementation of Project Selection Criteria, Policies, Procedures and Programming, consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP); and be it further

RESOLVED that the projects will be included in the federal TIP subject to final federal approval; and be it further

RESOLVED that the Executive Director or his designee can make technical adjustments and other non-substantial revisions, including updates to fund distributions to reflect final 2014-2022 FHWA figures; and be it further

RESOLVED that the Executive Director or designee is authorized to revise Attachments B-i and B-2 as necessary to reflect the programming of projects as the projects are selected and included in the federal TIP; and be it further

RESOLVED that the Executive Director shall make available a copy of this resolution, and such other information as may be required, to the Governor, Caltrans, and to other such agencies as may be appropriate.

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Adri e J. issier, Chair

The above resolution was entered into by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission at the regular meeting of the Commission held in Oakland, California, on May 17, 2012

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 59 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item Date: May 17, 2012 W.I.: 1512 6A Referred by: Planning Revised: 10/24/12-C 11/28/12-C 12/19/12-C 02/27/13-C 11/20/13-C 05/28/14-C 12/17/14-C

Attachment A Resolution No. 4035

Cycle 2 / OBAG 1 Program Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy

For FY 2012-13, FY 2013-14, FY 2014-15, FY 2015-16, and FY 2016-17

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Cycle 2 Program Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 60 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item May 17, 2012 Attachment A, MTC Resolution No. 40356A

BACKGROUND Anticipating the end of the federal Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA) on September 30, 2009, MTC approved Cycle 1 commitments (Resolution 3925) along with an overall framework to guide upcoming programming decisions for Cycle 2 to address the new six-year surface transportation authorization act funding. However, the successor to SAFETEA has not yet been enacted, and SAFETEA has been extended through continuing resolutions. Without the new federal surface transportation act, MTC may program funds forward based on reasonable estimates of revenues. It is estimated that roughly $795 million is available for programming over the upcoming four- year Cycle 2 period. Cycle 2 covers the four years from FY 2012-13 to FY 2015-2016 FY 2016-17 pending the enactment of the new authorization and/or continuation of SAFETEA. This attachment outlines how the region will use Cycle 2 funds for transportation needs in the MTC region. Funding decisions continue to implement the strategies and objectives of the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), Transportation 2035, which is the Bay Area’s comprehensive roadmap to guide transportation investments in surface transportation including mass transit, highway, local road, bicycle and pedestrian projects over the long term. The program investments recommended for funding in Cycle 2 are an outgrowth of the transportation needs identified by the RTP and also take into consideration the preferred transportation investment strategy of the Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS). Appendix A-1 provides an overview of the Cycle 2 Program commitments which contain a regional program component managed by MTC and a county program component to be managed by the counties.

CYCLE 2 REVENUE ESTIMATES AND FEDERAL PROGRAM ARCHITECTURE MTC receives federal funding for local programming from the State for local programming in the MTC region. Among the various transportation programs established by SAFETEA, this includes regional Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program and to a lesser extent, Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) and Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds. The STP/CMAQ/RTIP/TE programming capacity in Cycle 2 amounts to $795 million. The Commission programs the STP/CMAQ funds while the California Transportation Commission programs the RTIP and TE Funds. Furthermore, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) is contributing Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) funding to Cycle 2. Below are issues to be addressed as the region implements Cycle 2 programming, particularly in light that approval of Cycle 2 will precede approval of the new federal transportation act.

Revenues: A revenue growth rate of 3% over prior federal apportionments is assumed for the first year – FY 2012-13. Due to continued uncertainties with federal funding, the estimated revenues for the later years of the program, FY 2013-14 through FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17, have not been escalated, but held steady at the estimated FY 2012-13 apportionment amount. If there are significant reductions in federal apportionments over the Cycle 2 time period, as in the past, MTC will reconcile the revenue levels following enactment of the New Act by making adjustments later if needed, by postponement of projects or adjustments to subsequent programming cycles.

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Page 1 New Federal Surface Transportation Authorization Act, Cycle 2 Program Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 61 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item May 17, 2012 Attachment A, MTC Resolution No. 40356A

Assessment (RHNA) and added weighting to acknowledge very low and low income housing. The formula breakdown is as follows with distributions derived from each jurisdiction’s proportionate share of the regional total for each factor:

OBAG Fund Distribution Factors

Factor Weighting Percentage Population 50% RHNA* (total housing units) 12.5% RHNA (low/very low income housing units) 12.5% Housing Production** (total housing units) 12.5% Housing Production (low/very low income housing units) 12.5%

* RHNA 2014-2022 **Housing Production Report 1999-2006

The objective of this formula is to provide housing incentives to complement the region’s Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) which together with a Priority Development Area (PDA) focused investment strategy will lead to transportation investments that support focused development. The proposed One Bay Area Grant formula also uses actual housing production data from 1999-2006, which has been capped such that each jurisdiction receives credit for housing up to its RHNA allocation. Subsequent funding cycles will be based on housing production from ABAG’s next housing report to be published in 2013. The formula also recognizes jurisdictions’ RHNA and past housing production (uncapped) contributions to very low and low income housing units. The resulting OBAG fund distribution for each county is presented in Appendix A-4. Funding guarantees are also incorporated in the fund distribution to ensure that all counties receive as much funding under the new funding model as compared to what they would have received under the Cycle 1 framework.

The Commission, working with ABAG, will revisit the funding distribution formula for the next cycle (post FY2015-16 FY 2016-17) to further evaluate how to best incentivize housing production across all income levels and other Plan Bay Area performance objectives.

CYCLE 2 GENERAL PROGRAMMING POLICIES The following programming policies apply to all projects funded in Cycle 2: 1. Public Involvement. MTC is committed to a public involvement process that is proactive and provides comprehensive information, timely public notice, full public access to key decisions, and opportunities for continuing involvement. MTC provides many methods to fulfill this commitment, as outlined in the MTC Public Participation Plan, Resolution No. 3821. The Commission’s adoption of the Cycle 2 program, including policy and procedures meet the provisions of the MTC Public Participation Plan. MTC’s advisory committees and the Bay Metropolitan Transportation Commission Page 3 New Federal Surface Transportation Authorization Act, Cycle 2 Program Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 62 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item May 17, 2012 Attachment A, MTC Resolution No. 40356A

programs, magnetic levitation transportation technology deployment program, and experimental pilot projects. For more detailed guidance see the CMAQ Program Guidance (FHWA, November 2008). In the event that the next surface transportation authorization materially alters these programs, MTC staff will work with project sponsors to match projects with appropriate federal fund programs. MTC reserves the right to assign specific fund sources based on availability and eligibility requirements.

RTP Consistency: Projects included in the Cycle 2 Program must be consistent with the adopted Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), according to federal planning regulations. Each project included in the Cycle 2 Program must identify its relationship with meeting the goals and objectives of the RTP, and where applicable, the RTP ID number or reference.

Complete Streets (MTC Routine Accommodations of Pedestrians and Bicyclists) Policy): Federal, state and regional policies and directives emphasize the accommodation of bicyclists, pedestrians, and persons with disabilities when designing transportation facilities. MTC's Complete Streets policy (Resolution No. 3765) created a checklist that is intended for use on projects to ensure that the accommodation of non-motorized travelers are considered at the earliest conception or design phase. The county Congestion Management Agencies (CMAs) ensure that project sponsors complete the checklist before projects are considered by the county for funds and submitted to MTC. CMAs are required to make completed checklists available to their Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) for review prior to CMAs’ project selection actions for Cycle 2. Other state policies include, Caltrans Complete Streets Policy Deputy Directive 64 R1 which stipulates: pedestrians, bicyclists and persons with disabilities must be considered in all programming, planning, maintenance, construction, operations, and project development activities and products and SB 1358 California Complete Streets Act, which requires local agency general plan circulation elements to address all travel modes.

Project Delivery and Monitoring. Cycle 2 funding is available in the following four five federal fiscal years: FY 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, and FY 2015-16 and FY 2016-17. Funds may be programmed in any one of these years, conditioned upon the availability of federal apportionment and obligation authority (OA). This will be determined through the development of an annual obligation plan, which is developed in coordination with the Partnership and project sponsors. However, funds MUST be obligated in the fiscal year programmed in the TIP, with all Cycle 2 funds to be obligated no later than January 31, 2017. Specifically, the funds must be obligated by FHWA or transferred to Federal Transit Administration (FTA) within the federal fiscal year that the funds are programmed in the TIP. All Cycle 2 funding is subject to the Regional Project Funding Delivery Policy and any subsequent revisions (MTC Resolution No. 3606 at http://www.mtc.ca.gov/funding/delivery/MTC_Res_3606.pdf . Obligation deadlines, project substitutions and redirection of project savings will continue to be governed by

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Page 6 New Federal Surface Transportation Authorization Act, Cycle 2 Program Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 63 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item May 17, 2012 Attachment A, MTC Resolution No. 40356A

 A jurisdiction is required to have its general plan housing element adopted and certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for 2007-14 RHNA prior to January 31, 2013. If a jurisdiction submits its housing element to the state on a timely basis for review, but the State's comment letter identifies deficiencies that the local jurisdictions must address in order to receive HCD certification, then the local jurisdiction may submit a request to the Joint MTC Planning / ABAG Administrative Committee for a time extension to address the deficiencies and resubmit its revised draft housing element to HCD for re-consideration and certification.  For the OBAG cycle subsequent to FY 2015-16, jurisdictions must adopt housing elements by January 31, 2015 (based on a July 2013 SCS adoption date); therefore, jurisdictions will be required to have General Plans with approved housing elements and that comply with the Complete Streets Act of 2008 by that time to be eligible for funding. This schedule allows jurisdictions to meet the housing and complete streets policies through one general plan amendment.  For the OBAG cycle subsequent to FY 2016-17, a jurisdiction is required to have its general plan housing element adopted and certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for 2014-22 RHNA prior to May 31, 2015. Additionally, a jurisdiction is required to have its general plan circulation element comply with the Complete Streets Act of 2008 prior to January 31, 2016. These deadlines must be met in order to be eligible for funding for the subsequent OBAG cycle.  OBAG funds may not be programmed to any jurisdiction out of compliance with OBAG policies and other requirements specified in this attachment. The CMA will be responsible for tracking progress towards these requirements and affirming to MTC that a jurisdiction is in compliance prior to MTC programming OBAG funds to its projects in the TIP.  For a transit agency project sponsor under a JPA or district (not under the governance of a local jurisdiction), the jurisdiction where the project (such as station/stop improvements) is located will need to comply with these policies before funds may be programmed to the transit agency project sponsor. However, this is not required if the project is transit/rail agency property such as, track, rolling stock or transit maintenance facility.  CMAs will provide documentation for the following prior to programming projects in the TIP: o The approach used to select OBAG projects including outreach and a board adopted list of projects o Compliance with MTC’s complete streets policy o A map delineating projects selected outside of PDAs indicating those that are considered to provide proximate access to a PDA including their justifications as outlined on the previous page. CMA staff is expected to use this exhibit when it presents its program of projects to explain the how “proximate access” is defined to their board and the public.

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Page 13 New Federal Surface Transportation Authorization Act, Cycle 2 Program Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 64 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item May 17, 2012 Attachment A, MTC Resolution No. 40356A

Eligible non-pavement activities and projects include rehabilitation or replacement of existing features on the roadway facility, such as storm drains, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), curbs, gutters, culverts, medians, guardrails, safety features, signals, signage, sidewalks, ramps and features that bring the facility to current standards. The jurisdiction must still have a certified PMP to be eligible for improvements to non-pavement features.

Activities that are not eligible for funding include: Air quality non-exempt projects (unless granted an exception by MTC staff), capacity expansion, new roadways, roadway extensions, right of way acquisition (for future expansion), operations, routine maintenance, spot application, enhancements that are above and beyond repair or replacement of existing assets (other than bringing roadway to current standards), and any pavement application not recommended by the Pavement Management Program unless otherwise allowed above.

Federal-Aid Eligible Facilities: Federal-aid highways as defined in 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(5) are eligible for local streets and roads preservation funding. A federal-aid highway is a public road that is not classified as a rural minor collector or local road or lower. Project sponsors must confirm the eligibility of their roadway through the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) prior to the application for funding.

Federal Aid Secondary (FAS) Program Set-Aside: While passage of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 dissolved the Federal Aid Secondary (FAS) program, California statutes provide the continuation of minimum funding to counties, guaranteeing their prior FAS shares. The first three years of Cycle 2 were covered up-front under the Cycle 1 FAS program (covering a total 6-year period). The fourth and fifth years of Cycle 2 will be covered under the OBAG. Funding provided to the counties by the CMAs under OBAG will count toward the continuation of the FAS program requirement.

3. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements The Bicycle and Pedestrian program may fund a wide range of bicycle and pedestrian improvements including Class I, II and III bicycle facilities, bicycle education, outreach, sharing and parking, sidewalks, ramps, pathways and pedestrian bridges, user safety and supporting facilities, and traffic signal actuation.

According to CMAQ eligibility requirements, bicycle and pedestrian facilities must not be exclusively recreational and reduce vehicle trips resulting in air pollution reductions. Also to meet the needs of users, hours of operation need to be reasonable and support bicycle / pedestrian needs particularly during commute periods. For example the policy that a trail be closed to users before sunrise or after sunset limits users from using the facility during the peak commute hours, particularly during times of the year with shorter days. These user restrictions indicate that the facility is recreational rather than commute oriented. Also, as contrasted with roadway projects, bicycle and pedestrian projects may be located on or off the federal-aid highway system.

4. Transportation for Livable Communities The purpose of Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) projects is to support community- based transportation projects that bring new vibrancy to downtown areas, commercial cores, high- density neighborhoods, and transit corridors, enhancing their amenities and ambiance and making

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Page 16 New Federal Surface Transportation Authorization Act, Cycle 2 Program Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 65 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item May 17, 2012 Attachment A, MTC Resolution No. 40356A

 Air quality public education messages: Long-term public education and outreach can be effective in raising awareness that can lead to changes in travel behavior and ongoing emissions reductions; therefore, these activities may be funded indefinitely.  Non-construction outreach related to safe bicycle use  Travel Demand Management Activities including traveler information services, shuttle services, carpools, vanpools, parking pricing, etc.

Infrastructure Projects Bicycle/Pedestrian Use:  Constructing bicycle and pedestrian facilities (paths, bike racks, support facilities, etc.) that are not exclusively recreational and reduce vehicle trips  Programs for secure bicycle storage facilities and other facilities, including bicycle lanes, for the convenience and protection of bicyclists, in both public and private areas new construction and major reconstructions of paths, tracks, or areas solely for the use by pedestrian or other non-motorized means of transportation when economically feasible and in the public interest  Traffic calming measures

Exclusions found to be ineligible uses of CMAQ funds:  Walking audits and other planning activities (STP based on availability will be provided for these purposes upon CMA’s request)  Crossing guards and vehicle speed feedback devices, traffic control that is primarily oriented to vehicular traffic rather than bicyclists and pedestrians  Material incentives that lack an educational message or exceeding a nominal cost.

6. Priority Conservation Areas This is an outgrowth of the new regional program pilot for the development of Priority Conservation Area (PCA) plans and projects to assist counties to ameliorate outward development expansion and maintain their rural character. A CMA may use OBAG funding to augment grants received from the regionally competitive program or develop its own county PCA program Generally, eligible projects will include planning, land / easement acquisition, open space access projects, and farm-to-market capital projects.

PROGRAM SCHEDULE Cycle 2 spans apportionments over four five fiscal years: FY 20012-13, FY 2013-14, FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16 and FY 2016-17. Programming in the first year will generally be for the on-going regional operations and regional planning activities which can be delivered immediately, allowing the region to meet the obligation deadlines for use of FY 2012-13 funds. This strategy, at the same time, provides several months during FY 2012-13 for program managers to select projects and for MTC to program projects into the TIP to be obligated during the remaining second, third, and fourth and fifth years of the Cycle 2 period. If CMAs wish to program any OBAG funds in the first year, MTC will try to accommodate requests depending on available federal apportionments and obligation limitations, as long as the recipient has meet the OBAG requirements.

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Page 18 New Federal Surface Transportation Authorization Act, Cycle 2 Program Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 66 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

6A May 17, 2012 Appendix A-1 Appendix A‐1 MTC Resolution No. 4035 Page 1 of 1 Adopted: 05/17/12-C Cycle 2 / OBAG 1 Revised: 10/24/12-C 12/17/14-C Regional and County Programs FY 2012‐13 through FY 2016‐17 December 2014

Cycle 2/OBAG 1 Funding Commitments Regional Program (millions $ ‐ rounded) 4‐Year Total FY 2016‐17 *5‐Year Total Regional Categories 1Regional Planning Activities $7 $1.8 $8 2Regional Operations $96 $9.9 $106 3 Freeway Performance Initiative $96 $3.2 $99 4 Pavement Management Program $7 $1.9 $9 5Priority Development Activities $40 $40 6 Climate Initiatives $20 $0.3 $20 7Safe Routes To School ** $20 $2.7 $23 8Transit Capital Rehabilitation $150 $150 9Transit Performance Initiative $30 $30 10 Priority Conservation Area $10 $10

Regional Program Total: $475 $20 $495 * FY 17 funding does not include $1.488 M redirected from deleted projects in Cycles 1 & 2 60% ** Safe Routes To School assigned to County CMAs

One Bay Area Grant (OBAG 1) 4‐Year (millions $ ‐ rounded) Total *** FY 2016‐17 5‐Year Total Counties 1 Alameda $63 $1.0 $64 2Contra Costa $45 $0.8 $46 3 Marin $10 $0.7 $11 4 Napa $6 $0.7 $7 5San Francisco $38 $0.8 $39 6San Mateo $26 $0.7 $27 7Santa Clara $88 $1.1 $89 8 Solano $18 $0.7 $19 9 Sonoma $23 $0.7 $24

OBAG Total:** $320 $7 $327 *** 4‐Year OBAG amounts revised October 2012 to reflect revised RHNA, released July 2012. 40%

Cycle 2/OBAG 1 Total Total:* $795 $27.142 $822 J:\SECTION\ALLSTAFF\Resolution\TEMP‐RES\MTC\tmp‐4035_OBAG\[tmp‐4035_Appendices to Att‐A.xlsx]A‐1 Cycle 2 Funding NOTE: Amounts may not total due to rounding

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 67 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item May 17, 2012 Appendix A-2 MTC Resolution No. 6A4035 Page 1 of 1 Appendix A‐2 Revised: 02/27/13-C 05/22/13-C 09/25/13-C 11/20/13-C Cycle 2 / OBAG 1 12/17/14-C Planning & Outreach FY 2012‐13 through FY 2016‐17 December 2014

OBAG 1 ‐ County CMA Planning Cycle 2 / OBAG 1 County CMA Planning ‐ Base CMA‐OBAG 2016‐17 * County Agency 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 SubTotal Augmentation SubTotal Supplemental Total

Alameda ACTC $916,000 $944,000 $973,000 $1,003,000 $3,836,000 $3,270,000 $7,106,000 $1,034,000 $8,140,000 Contra Costa CCTA $725,000 $747,000 $770,000 $794,000 $3,036,000 $1,214,000 $4,250,000 $818,000 $5,068,000 Marin TAM $638,000 $658,000 $678,000 $699,000 $2,673,000 $418,000 $3,091,000 $720,000 $3,811,000 Napa NCTPA $638,000 $658,000 $678,000 $699,000 $2,673,000 $0 $2,673,000 $720,000 $3,393,000 San Francisco SFCTA $667,000 $688,000 $709,000 $731,000 $2,795,000 $773,000 $3,568,000 $753,000 $4,321,000 San Mateo SMCCAG $638,000 $658,000 $678,000 $699,000 $2,673,000 $752,000 $3,425,000 $720,000 $4,145,000 Santa Clara VTA $1,014,000 $1,045,000 $1,077,000 $1,110,000 $4,246,000 $1,754,000 $6,000,000 $1,145,000 $7,145,000 Solano STA $638,000 $658,000 $678,000 $699,000 $2,673,000 $333,000 $3,006,000 $720,000 $3,726,000 Sonoma SCTA $638,000 $658,000 $678,000 $699,000 $2,673,000 $0 $2,673,000 $720,000 $3,393,000 County CMAs Total: $6,512,000 $6,714,000 $6,919,000 $7,133,000 $27,278,000 $8,514,000 $35,792,000 $7,350,000 $43,142,000

Regional Agency Planning Cycle 2 Regional Agency Planning ‐ Base 2016‐17 * Regional Agency 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 SubTotal Augmentation SubTotal Supplemental Total

ABAG $638,000 $658,000 $678,000 $699,000 $2,673,000 $0 $2,673,000 $720,000 $3,393,000 BCDC $320,000 $330,000 $340,000 $351,000 $1,341,000 $0 $1,341,000 $360,000 $1,701,000 MTC $638,000 $658,000 $678,000 $699,000 $2,673,000 $0 $2,673,000 $720,000 $3,393,000 Regional Agencies Total: $1,596,000 $1,646,000 $1,696,000 $1,749,000 $6,687,000 $0 $6,687,000 $1,800,000 $8,487,000 J:\SECTION\ALLSTAFF\Resolution\TEMP‐RES\MTC\tmp‐4035_OBAG\[tmp‐4035_Appendices to Att‐A.xlsx]A‐2 Cycle 2 Planning

* 3% escalation from FY 2015‐16 Planning Base $42,479,000 $51,629,000

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 68 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item

May 17, 6A2012 Appendix A-3 Appendix A-3 MTC Resolution No. 4035 Page 1 of 1 Revised: 12/17/14-C Cycle 2 / OBAG 1 Safe Routes to School County Distribution FY 2012-13 through FY 2016-17 December 2014

Safe Routes To School County Distribution Public School Private School Total School Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment FY 13 - FY 16 FY 2016-17 * County (K-12) * (K-12) * (K-12) * Percentage Annual Funding SubTotal Supplemental Total $5,000,000 $20,000,000 $2,650,000 $22,650,000 Alameda 214,626 24,537 239,163 21% $1,073,184 $4,293,000 $569,000 $4,862,000 Contra Costa 166,956 16,274 183,230 16% $822,199 $3,289,000 $436,000 $3,725,000 Marin 29,615 5,645 35,260 3% $158,220 $633,000 $84,000 $717,000 Napa 20,370 3,036 23,406 2% $105,029 $420,000 $56,000 $476,000 San Francisco 56,454 23,723 80,177 7% $359,774 $1,439,000 $191,000 $1,630,000 San Mateo 89,971 16,189 106,160 10% $476,367 $1,905,000 $252,000 $2,157,000 Santa Clara 261,945 38,119 300,064 27% $1,346,462 $5,386,000 $713,000 $6,099,000 Solano 67,117 2,855 69,972 6% $313,982 $1,256,000 $166,000 $1,422,000 Sonoma 71,049 5,787 76,836 7% $344,782 $1,379,000 $183,000 $1,562,000 Total: 978,103 136,165 1,114,268 100% $5,000,000 $20,000,000 $2,650,000 $22,650,000 J:\SECTION\ALLSTAFF\Resolution\TEMP-RES\MTC\tmp-4035_OBAG\[tmp-4035_Appendices to Att-A.xlsx]A-3 REG SR2S

* From California Department of Education for FY 2010-11

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 69 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item MTC Res. No. 4035, Attachment B-1 Attachment B-1 Adopted: 05/17/12-C Revised: 10/24/12-C6A 11/28/12-C 12/19/12-C 01/23/13-C Cycle 2 02/27/13-C 05/22/13-C 09/25/13-C 11/20/13-C 12/18/13-C 02/26/14-C Regional Programs Project List 03/26/14-C 04/23/14-C 05/28/14-C FY 2012-13 through FY 2016-17 06/25/14-C 07/23/14-C 09/24/14-C December 2014 11/19/14-C 12/17/14-C Regional Programs Project List

Implementing Total Total Other Total Project Category and Title Agency STP/CMAQ RTIP/TAP/TFCA Cycle 2

CYCLE 2 REGIONAL PROGRAMS $453,179,000 $40,000,000 $493,179,000 1. REGIONAL PLANNING ACTIVITIES (STP Planning) ABAG Planning ABAG $2,673,000 $0 $2,673,000 BCDC Planning BCDC $1,341,000 $0 $1,341,000 MTC Planning MTC $2,673,000 $0 $2,673,000 1. REGIONAL PLANNING ACTIVITIES (STP Planning) TOTAL: $6,687,000 $0 $6,687,000 2. REGIONAL OPERATIONS (RO) 511 - Traveler Information MTC $57,800,000 $0 $57,800,000 Clipper® Fare Media Collection MTC $21,400,000 $0 $21,400,000 SUBTOTAL $79,200,000 $0 $79,200,000 Incident Management Program MTC/SAFE $12,240,000 $0 $12,240,000 FSP/Call Box Program MTC/SAFE $14,462,000 $0 $14,462,000 SUBTOTAL $26,702,000 $0 $26,702,000 2. REGIONAL OPERATIONS (RO) TOTAL: $105,902,000 $0 $105,902,000 3. FREEWAY PERFORMANCE INITIATIVE (FPI) Regional Performance Initiatives Implementation MTC $5,750,000 $0 $5,750,000 Regional Performance Initiatives Corridor Implementation MTC/SAFE $9,200,000 $0 $9,200,000 Program for Arterial System Synchronization (PASS) MTC $9,000,000 $0 $9,000,000 PASS - LAVTA Dublin Blvd Transit Performance Initiative MTC $500,000 $0 $500,000 PASS - AC Transit South Alameda County Corridors Travel Time Imps MTC $500,000 $0 $500,000 SUBTOTAL $24,950,000 $24,950,000 Ramp Metering and TOS Elements FPI - ALA I-580: SJ Co. Line to Vasco & Foothill to Crow Canyon Caltrans $5,150,000 $0 $5,150,000 FPI - ALA I-680: SCL Co. Line to CC Co. Line Caltrans $6,292,000 $14,430,000 $20,722,000 FPI - ALA SR92 & I-880: Clawiter to Hesperian & Decoto Road Caltrans $656,000 $0 $656,000 FPI - CC SR4 & SR242: Loveridge to Alhambra & I-680 to SR 4 Ph. 1 MTC/SAFE $750,000 $0 $750,000 FPI - CC SR4 & SR242: Loveridge to Alhambra & I-680 to SR 4 Ph. 2 Caltrans $8,118,000 $0 $8,118,000 FPI - Various Corridors Caltrans Right of Way (ROW) Caltrans $1,245,000 $0 $1,245,000 FPI - ALA I-580, I-680, I-880 Corridors - Caltrans PE Caltrans $4,100,000 $19,570,000 $23,670,000 FPI - SCL US 101: San Benito County Line to SR 85 Caltrans $3,417,000 $0 $3,417,000 FPI - SOL I-80: I-505 to Yolo County Line. Caltrans $0 $0 $0 FPI - MRN 101 - SF Co Line - Son Co Line Caltrans $10,000,000 $0 $10,000,000 FPI - SON 101 - MRN Co Line - Men Co Line MTC $350,000 $0 $350,000 SUBTOTAL $40,078,000 $34,000,000 $74,078,000 3. FREEWAY PERFORMANCE INITIATIVE (FPI) TOTAL: $65,028,000 $34,000,000 $99,028,000 4. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP) Pavement Management Program (PMP) MTC $1,600,000 $0 $1,600,000 Pavement Technical Advisory Program (PTAP) MTC $7,500,000 $0 $7,500,000 4. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP) TOTAL: $9,100,000 $0 $9,100,000

5. PRIORTY DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA) PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION Regional PDA Implementation PDA Planning - ABAG ABAG $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 SUBTOTAL $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 Transit Oriented Affordable Housing (TOAH) SF Park Parking Pricing (Transit Oriented Affordable Housing Exchange) SFMTA $10,000,000 $0 $10,000,000 SUBTOTAL $10,000,000 $0 $10,000,000 Local PDA Planning Local PDA Planning - Alameda ACTC $3,905,000 $0 $3,905,000 Local PDA Planning - Contra Costa CCTA $2,745,000 $0 $2,745,000 Local PDA Planning - Marin TAM $750,000 $0 $750,000 Local PDA Planning - City of Napa Napa $275,000 $0 $275,000 Local PDA Planning - American Canyon American Canyon $475,000 $0 $475,000 Local PDA Planning - San Francisco SF City/County $2,380,000 $0 $2,380,000 Local PDA Planning - San Mateo SMCCAG $1,608,000 $0 $1,608,000 Local PDA Planning - Santa Clara VTA $4,608,695 $0 $4,608,695 San Jose Stevens Creek/Santana Row/Winchester Specific Plan MTC/San Jose $640,305 $0 $640,305 Santa Clara El Camino Corridor Precise Plan MTC/Santa Clara $100,000 $0 $100,000 Local PDA Planning - Solano STA $1,066,000 $0 $1,066,000 Santa Rosa - Roseland/Sebastopol Road PDA Planning Santa Rosa $647,000 $0 $647,000 Sonoma County - Sonoma Springs Area Plan Sonoma County $450,000 $0 $450,000 Sonoma County - Airport Employment Center Planning Sonoma County $350,000 $0 $350,000

Metropolitan Transportation CommissionT4 New Act Cycle 2 Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy - Regional Program Project List Page 1 of 4 PDWG 12.15.14 Page 70 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item MTC Res. No. 4035, Attachment B-1 Attachment B-1 Adopted: 05/17/12-C Revised: 10/24/12-C6A 11/28/12-C 12/19/12-C 01/23/13-C Cycle 2 02/27/13-C 05/22/13-C 09/25/13-C 11/20/13-C 12/18/13-C 02/26/14-C Regional Programs Project List 03/26/14-C 04/23/14-C 05/28/14-C FY 2012-13 through FY 2016-17 06/25/14-C 07/23/14-C 09/24/14-C December 2014 11/19/14-C 12/17/14-C Regional Programs Project List

Implementing Total Total Other Total Project Category and Title Agency STP/CMAQ RTIP/TAP/TFCA Cycle 2

CYCLE 2 REGIONAL PROGRAMS $453,179,000 $40,000,000 $493,179,000 SUBTOTAL $20,000,000 $0 $20,000,000

Regional PDA Planning Regional PDA Implementation Priorities Bay Area Transit Core Capacity Study MTC $250,000 $0 $250,000 Public Lands Near Rail Corridors Assessment MTC $500,000 $0 $500,000 PDA Implementation Studies/Forums MTC $156,500 $0 $156,500 State Route 82 Relinquishment Exploration Study MTC/VTA $275,000 $0 $275,000 PDA Planning Oakland Downtown Specific Plan Oakland $750,000 $0 $750,000 South Berkeley/ Adeline/Ashby BART Specific Plan Berkeley $750,000 $0 $750,000 Bay Fair BART Transit Village Specific Plan San Leandro $440,000 $0 $440,000 Alameda Naval Air Station Specific Plan Alameda $250,000 $0 $250,000 Del Norte BART Station Precise Plan El Cerrito $302,500 $0 $302,500 Mission Bay Railyard and I-280 Alternatives San Francisco $700,000 $0 $700,000 Santa Clara El Camino Corridor Precise Plan Santa Clara $750,000 $0 $750,000 Sunnyvale El Camino Corridor Precise Plan Sunnyvale $587,000 $0 $587,000 San Jose Stevens Creek/Santana Row/Winchester Specific Plan San Jose $750,000 $0 $750,000 Staff Assistance Alameda PDA TDM Plan Alameda $150,000 $0 $150,000 Downtown Livermore Parking Implementation Plan Livermore $100,000 $0 $100,000 Oakland Transporation Impact Review Streamlining Oakland $300,000 $0 $300,000 Oakland Complete Streets, Design Guidance, Circulation Element Update Oakland $235,000 $0 $235,000 Downtown Oakland Parking Management Strategy Oakland $200,000 $0 $200,000 Technical Assistance Concord Salvio Streetscape Concord $50,000 $0 $50,000 South Richmond Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Richmond $60,000 $0 $60,000 San Mateo Planning/Growth Forum Series San Mateo $25,000 $0 $25,000 South San Francisco El Camino/Chestnut Ave Infrastructure Financing Analysis SSF $60,000 $0 $60,000 Milpitas Transit Area Parking Analysis Milpitas $60,000 $0 $60,000 Morgan Hill Housing/Employment Market Demand/Circulation Analysis Morgan Hill $60,000 $0 $60,000 Sab Jose West San Carlos Master Streetscape Plan San Jose $60,000 $0 $60,000 Sunnyvale Mathilda Ave Downtown Plan Line Sunnyvale $60,000 $0 $60,000 Downtown Sunnyvale Block 15 Sale/Land Exchange Sunnyvale $59,000 $0 $59,000 Sunnyvale El Camino Street Space Allocation Study Sunnyvale $60,000 $0 $60,000 SUBTOTAL $8,000,000 $0 $8,000,000 5. PRIORTY DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA) PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION TOTAL: $40,000,000 $0 $40,000,000 6. CLIMATE INITIATIVES PROGRAM (CIP) Car Sharing Hayward RFP for Car Sharing Services Hayward $200,480 $0 $200,480 Oakland Car Share and Outreach Program Oakland $320,526 $0 $320,526 CCTA Car Share4All CCTA $973,864 $0 $973,864 TAM Car Share CANAL TAM $125,000 $0 $125,000 City of San Mateo Car Sharing - A Catalyst for Change San Mateo $210,000 $0 $210,000 Santa Rosa Car Share SCTA $170,130 $0 $170,130 Public Education Outreach MTC $312,000 $0 $312,000 Transportation Demand Management MTC $6,000,000 $0 $6,000,000 Bay Area Bike Share (Phase II) MTC/BAAQMD $6,000,000 $0 $6,000,000 EV Charging Infastructure and Vehicles (Programmed by BAAQMD)* BAAQMD $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 6. CLIMATE INITIATIVES PROGRAM (CIP) TOTAL: $14,312,000 $6,000,000 $20,312,000 * Selected and funded by the BAAQMD. Listed here for informational purposes only 7. REGIONAL SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (RSRTS) Specific projects TBD by CMAs Alameda County SRTS Program - Supplemental ACTC $569,000 $0 $569,000 Contra Costa County SRTS Program - Supplemental CCTA $436,000 $0 $436,000 Marin County SRTS Program - Supplemental TAM $84,000 $0 $84,000 Napa County SRTS Program - Supplemental NCTPA $56,000 $0 $56,000 San Francisco County SRTS Program - Supplemental SFCTA $191,000 $0 $191,000 San Mateo County SRTS Program - Supplemental SMCCAG $252,000 $0 $252,000 Santa Clara County SRTS Program - Supplemental Santa Clara $713,000 $0 $713,000 Solano County SRTS Program - Supplemental STA $166,000 $0 $166,000 Sonoma County SRTS Program - Supplemental SCTA $183,000 $0 $183,000

Metropolitan Transportation CommissionT4 New Act Cycle 2 Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy - Regional Program Project List Page 2 of 4 PDWG 12.15.14 Page 71 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item MTC Res. No. 4035, Attachment B-1 Attachment B-1 Adopted: 05/17/12-C Revised: 10/24/12-C6A 11/28/12-C 12/19/12-C 01/23/13-C Cycle 2 02/27/13-C 05/22/13-C 09/25/13-C 11/20/13-C 12/18/13-C 02/26/14-C Regional Programs Project List 03/26/14-C 04/23/14-C 05/28/14-C FY 2012-13 through FY 2016-17 06/25/14-C 07/23/14-C 09/24/14-C December 2014 11/19/14-C 12/17/14-C Regional Programs Project List

Implementing Total Total Other Total Project Category and Title Agency STP/CMAQ RTIP/TAP/TFCA Cycle 2

CYCLE 2 REGIONAL PROGRAMS $453,179,000 $40,000,000 $493,179,000 Alameda County SRTS Program ACTC $4,293,000 $0 $4,293,000 Cavallo Rd, Drake St, and 'G' Street Safe Routes to School Imps Antioch $330,000 $0 $330,000 Actuated Ped /Bicycle Traffic Signal on Oak Grove Rd at Sierra Rd Concord $504,900 $0 $504,900 Port Chicago Hwy/Willow Pass Rd Pedestrian & Bicycle Imps Contra Costa County $441,700 $0 $441,700 West Contra Costa SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program Contra Costa County $709,800 $0 $709,800 Vista Grande Street Pedestrian Safe Routes to School Imps Danville $157,000 $0 $157,000 Happy Valley Road Walkway Safe Routes to School Imps Lafayette $100,000 $0 $100,000 Moraga Road Safe Routes to School Bicycle/Pedestrian Imps Moraga $100,000 $0 $100,000 Orinda Sidewalk Imps Orinda $100,000 $0 $100,000 Pittsburg School Area Safety Imps Pittsburg $203,000 $0 $203,000 Pleasant Hill - Boyd Road and Elinora Drive Sidewalks Pleasant Hill $395,000 $0 $395,000 San Ramon School Crossings Enhancements San Ramon $247,600 $0 $247,600 Marin County SRTS Program TAM $633,000 $0 $633,000 Napa County SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program NCTPA $420,000 $0 $420,000 San Francisco SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program SFDPH $1,439,000 $0 $1,439,000 San Mateo County SRTS Program SMCCAG $1,905,000 $0 $1,905,000 Campbell - Virginia Avenue Sidewalks Campbell $708,000 $0 $708,000 Mountain View - El Camino to Miramonte Complete Streets Mountain View $840,000 $0 $840,000 Mountain View SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program Mountain View $500,000 $0 $500,000 Palo Alto - Arastradero Road Schoolscape/Multi-use Trail Palo Alto $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 San Jose - Walk N' Roll Phase 2 San Jose $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 City of Santa Clara SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program Phase 2 Santa Clara $500,000 $0 $500,000 Santa Clara County SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program Santa Clara County $838,000 $0 $838,000 Solano County SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program STA $1,256,000 $0 $1,256,000 Sonoma County SRTS Program Sonoma County TPW $1,379,000 $0 $1,379,000 7. REGIONAL SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (RSRTS) TOTAL: $22,650,000 $0 $22,650,000

8. TRANSIT CAPITAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM SolTrans - Preventive Maintenance SolTrans $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 Transit Capital Rehabilitation Specific Projects TBD by Commission ECCTA Replace Eleven 2001 40' Buses ECCTA $636,763 $0 $636,763 BART Car Exchange Preventative Maintenance BART $2,831,849 $0 $2,831,849 Clipper Fare Collection Equipment Replacement MTC $9,994,633 $0 $9,994,633 SFMTA - New 60' Flyer Trolly Bus Replacement SFMTA $15,502,261 $0 $15,502,261 VTA Preventive Maintenance (for vehicle replacement) VTA $3,349,722 $0 $3,349,722 Clipper Back Office Fare Collection Equipment Replacement MTC $2,684,772 $0 $2,684,772 Unanticipated Cost Reserve TBD $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 SUBTOTAL $37,000,000 $0 $37,000,000 Transit Performance Initiative (TPI) Incentive Program Specific Projects TBD by Commission TPI - AC Transit Spectrum Ridership Growth AC Transit $1,802,676 $0 $1,802,676 TPI - ACE Positive Train Control SJRRC/ACE $129,156 $0 $129,156 TPI - Preventive Maintenance (for low income youth pass) Marin Transit $99,289 $0 $99,289 TPI - BART Train Car Accident Repair BART $1,493,189 $0 $1,493,189 TPI - BART 24th Street Train Control Upgrade BART $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 TPI - SFMTA Preventive Maintenance (for low income youth pass) SFMTA $1,600,000 $0 $1,600,000 TPI - SFMTA Light Rail Vehicle Rehabilitation SFMTA $5,120,704 $0 $5,120,704 TPI - VTA Preventive Maintenance (for low income fare pilot) VTA $1,302,018 $0 $1,302,018 TPI - AC Transit - East Bay Bus Rapid Transit AC Transit $2,155,405 $0 $2,155,405 TPI - BART - Metro Priority Track Elements BART $3,459,057 $0 $3,459,057 TPI - Caltrain - Off-peak Marketing Campaign Caltrain $44,200 $0 $44,200 TPI - Caltrain - Control Point Installation Caltrain $1,375,566 $0 $1,375,566 TPI - CCCTA - 511 Real-Time Interface CCCTA $100,000 $0 $100,000 TPI - CCCTA - Implementation of Access Improvement CCCTA $180,000 $0 $180,000 TPI - Petaluma - Transit Signal Priority, Phase I City of Petaluma $152,222 $0 $152,222 TPI - Santa Rosa - CityBus COA and Service Plan City of Santa Rosa $100,000 $0 $100,000 TPI - Vacaville - City Coach Public Transit Marketing / Public Outreach City of Vacaville $171,388 $0 $171,388 TPI - Marin Transit - MCTD Preventative Maintenance (Youth Pass Program) Marin Transit $116,728 $0 $116,728 TPI - NCTPA - Bus Mobility Device Retrofits NCTPA $120,988 $0 $120,988

Metropolitan Transportation CommissionT4 New Act Cycle 2 Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy - Regional Program Project List Page 3 of 4 PDWG 12.15.14 Page 72 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item MTC Res. No. 4035, Attachment B-1 Attachment B-1 Adopted: 05/17/12-C Revised: 10/24/12-C6A 11/28/12-C 12/19/12-C 01/23/13-C Cycle 2 02/27/13-C 05/22/13-C 09/25/13-C 11/20/13-C 12/18/13-C 02/26/14-C Regional Programs Project List 03/26/14-C 04/23/14-C 05/28/14-C FY 2012-13 through FY 2016-17 06/25/14-C 07/23/14-C 09/24/14-C December 2014 11/19/14-C 12/17/14-C Regional Programs Project List

Implementing Total Total Other Total Project Category and Title Agency STP/CMAQ RTIP/TAP/TFCA Cycle 2

CYCLE 2 REGIONAL PROGRAMS $453,179,000 $40,000,000 $493,179,000 TPI - SamTrans - Preventative Maintenance (Service Plan Implementation) SMCTD $687,240 $0 $687,240 TPI - SFMTA - Light Rail Vehicle (LRV) Propulsion System SFMTA $4,629,676 $0 $4,629,676 TPI - Sonoma County Transit - 30-foot CNG Bus Replacements Sonoma County $173,052 $0 $173,052 Specific Transit Performance Initiative Incentive Program projects - TBD TBD $32,987,446 $0 $32,987,446 SUBTOTAL $60,000,000 $0 $60,000,000 8. TRANSIT CAPITAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM TOTAL: $98,000,000 $0 $98,000,000

9. TRANSIT PERFORMANCE INITIATIVE (TPI) TPI - Capital Investment Program TPI-1 - AC Transit Line 51 Corridor Speed Protection and Restoration AC Transit $10,515,624 $0 $10,515,624 TPI-1 - SFMTA Mission Mobility Maximization SFMTA $5,383,109 $0 $5,383,109 TPI-1 - SFMTA N-Judah Mobility Maximization SFMTA $5,383,860 $0 $5,383,860 TPI-1 - SFMTA Potrero Ave Fast Track Transit and Streetscape Imps SFMTA $4,133,031 $0 $4,133,031 TPI-1 - VTA Light Rail Transit Signal Priority VTA $1,587,176 $0 $1,587,176 TPI-1 - VTA Stevens Creek - Limited 323 Transit Signal Priority VTA $712,888 $0 $712,888 TPI-1 - MTC Clipper Phase III Implementation MTC $8,000,000 $0 $8,000,000 TPI-2 - AC Transit South Alameda County Corridors Travel Time Imps AC Transit $5,000,000 $0 $5,000,000 TPI-2 - LAVTA Dublin Blvd Transit Performance Initiative LAVTA $1,009,440 $0 $1,009,440 TPI-2 - SFMTA Colored Lanes on MTA Rapid Network SFMTA $1,784,880 $0 $1,784,880 TPI-2 - SFMTA Muni Forward Capital Transit Enhancements SFMTA $3,205,680 $0 $3,205,680 TPI-2 - VTA Prev. Maint. (Mountain View Double Track Phase 1) VTA $8,000,000 $0 $8,000,000 Unprogrammed Transit Performance Initiative Reserve TBD $27,284,312 $0 $27,284,312 9. TRANSIT PERFORMANCE INITIATIVE (TPI) TOTAL: $82,000,000 $0 $82,000,000

10. PRIORITY CONSERVATION AREA (PCA) North Bay PCA Program Specific projects TBD by North Bay CMAs Marin PCA - Bayfront Park Recreational Bay Access Mill Valley $100,000 $0 $100,000 Marin PCA - Mill Valley - Sausalito Pathway Preservation Marin County $320,000 $0 $320,000 Marin PCA - Sunny Hill Ridge and Red Hill Trails San Anselmo $80,000 $0 $80,000 Marin PCA - Thatcher Ranch Easement Acq. (pending exchange) Novato $250,000 $0 $250,000 Marin PCA - Pacheco Hill Parkland Acq. (pending exchange) Novato $500,000 $0 $500,000 Napa PCA - Silverado Trail Yountville-Napa Safety Imps Napa County $143,000 $0 $143,000 Napa PCA: Napa Soscol Headwaters Preserve Acq. (SilveradoTrail Phase G Overlay) Napa County $1,107,000 $0 $1,107,000 Solano PCA - Suisun Valley Bicycle and Pedestrian Imps Solano County $1,175,000 $0 $1,175,000 Solano PCA - Solano PCA Assessment Plan STA $75,000 $0 $75,000 Sonoma PCA - Bodega Hwy Roadway Preservation Sonoma County $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 Sonoma PCA - Sonoma County Urban Footprint Planning Sonoma County $250,000 $0 $250,000 SUBTOTAL $5,000,000 $0 $5,000,000 Peninsula, Southern and Eastern Counties PCA Program Bay Trail Shoreline Access Staging Area Berkeley $500,000 $0 $500,000 Brentwood Wallace Ranch Easement (pending exchange) CCTA $0 $0 $0 Breuner Marsh Restoration and Public Access EBRPD $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 SF Bay Trail, Pinole Shores to Bay Front Park EBRPD $119,711 $0 $119,711 : Brokaw Road to Union Pacific Railroad San Jose $712,700 $0 $712,700 Pier 70 - Crane Cove Park Port of SF $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 Twin Peaks Connectivity Conceptual Plan SF Rec. and Parks $167,589 $0 $167,589 Southern Skyline Blvd. Ridge Trail Extension SF PUC $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 SUBTOTAL $4,500,000 $0 $4,500,000

10. PRIORITY CONSERVATION AREA (PCA) TOTAL: $9,500,000 $0 $9,500,000

CYCLE 2 REGIONAL PROGRAMS TOTAL TOTAL: $453,179,000 $40,000,000 $493,179,000 J:\SECTION\ALLSTAFF\Resolution\TEMP-RES\MTC\RES-4035_ongoing\[tmp-4035_Attach_B-1_DEC.xlsx]Attach B-1 12-17-14

Metropolitan Transportation CommissionT4 New Act Cycle 2 Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy - Regional Program Project List Page 4 of 4 PDWG 12.15.14 Page 73 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item MTC Resolution No. 4035, Attachment B-2 Attachment B-2 Adopted: 05/17/12-C Revised: 10/24/12-C6A 12/19/12-C 01/23/13-C Cycle 2 05/22/13-C 09/25/13-C OBAG Project List 11/20/13-C 01/22/14-C FY 2012-13 through FY 2016-17 02/26/14-C 05/28/14-C December 2014 09/24/14-C 12/17/14-C OBAG Program Project List Implementing Total Total Other Total Project Category and Title Agency STP/CMAQ (RTIP, etc.) Cycle 2

CYCLE 2 COUNTY OBAG PROGRAMMING $309,314,000 $18,036,000 $327,350,000 ALAMEDA COUNTY Specific projects TBD by Alameda CMA $0 $0 $0 CMA Base Planning Activities - Alameda ACTC $3,836,000 $0 $3,836,000 CMA Planning Activities Augmentation - Alameda ACTC $3,270,000 $0 $3,270,000 CMA Planning Activities FY 2016-17 Supplement - Alameda ACTC $1,034,000 $0 $1,034,000 Alameda County Safe Routes to School Program ACTC $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 Alameda City Complete Streets Alameda (City) $635,000 $0 $635,000 Alameda County Various Streets and Roads Preservation Alameda County $1,665,000 $0 $1,665,000 Berkeley Downtown BART Plaza Streetscape BART $340,000 $3,726,000 $4,066,000 Shattuck Ave Complete Streets and De-Couplet Berkeley $2,777,000 $0 $2,777,000 Berkeley - Hearst Avenue Complete Streets Berkeley $2,156,000 $0 $2,156,000 Dublin Boulevard Preservation Dublin $470,000 $0 $470,000 Emeryville - Hollis Street Preservation Emeryville $100,000 $0 $100,000 Fremont Various Streets and Roads Preservation Fremont $2,105,000 $0 $2,105,000 Fremont City Center Multi-Modal Imps Fremont $5,855,000 $0 $5,855,000 Hayward - Industrial Boulevard Preservation Hayward $1,335,000 $0 $1,335,000 Livermore Various Streets Preservation Livermore $1,053,000 $0 $1,053,000 Enterprise Drive Complete Streets and Road Diet Newark $454,000 $0 $454,000 Oakland Complete Streets Oakland $3,851,000 $0 $3,851,000 7th Street West Oakland Transit Village Phase 2 Oakland $3,288,000 $0 $3,288,000 Lakeside Complete Streets and Road Diet Oakland $7,000,000 $0 $7,000,000 Oakland - Peralta and MLK Jr. Way Streetscape- Phase I Oakland $5,452,000 $0 $5,452,000 Lake Merritt BART Bikeways Oakland $571,000 $0 $571,000 Piedmont Complete Streets Piedmont $129,000 $0 $129,000 Pleasanton Complete Streets Pleasanton $832,000 $0 $832,000 San Leandro Boulevard Preservation San Leandro $804,000 $0 $804,000 Whipple Road Complete Streets Union City $669,000 $0 $669,000 Union City BART TLC Phase 2 Union City $8,692,000 $0 $8,692,000 ALAMEDA COUNTY TOTAL: $60,373,000 $3,726,000 $64,099,000 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Specific projects TBD by Contra Costa CMA TBD $0 $0 $0 CMA Base Planning Activities - Contra Costa CCTA $3,036,000 $0 $3,036,000 CMA Planning Activities Augmentation - Contra Costa CCTA $1,214,000 $0 $1,214,000 CMA Planning Activities FY 2016-17 Supplement - Contra Costa CCTA $818,000 $0 $818,000 Antioch 9th Street Preservation Antioch $673,000 $0 $673,000 Richmond BART Station Intermodal Imps. BART $2,900,000 $0 $2,900,000 Balfour Road Preservation Brentwood $290,000 $0 $290,000 Clayton Various Streets Preservation Clayton $386,000 $0 $386,000 Concord BART Station Bicycle and Ped. Access Imps. Concord $0 $1,195,000 $1,195,000 Detroit Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Imps. Concord $965,000 $1,189,000 $2,154,000 Concord Various Streets Preservation Concord $757,000 $0 $757,000 Contra Costa County Various Streets and Roads Preservation Contra Costa County $1,941,000 $0 $1,941,000 Danville Various Streets and Roads Preservation Danville $933,000 $0 $933,000 El Cerrito Various Streets and Roads Preservation El Cerrito $630,000 $0 $630,000 El Cerritto Ohlone Greenway Bike and Ped. Imps. El Cerrito $3,468,000 $0 $3,468,000 Hercules Intermodal Transit Center Hercules $2,584,000 $0 $2,584,000 Hercules - Refugio Valley Road Preservation Hercules $702,000 $0 $702,000 Lafayette - Mt. Diablo Blvd West Preservation Lafayette $584,000 $0 $584,000 Martinez Various Streets and Roads Preservation Martinez $1,023,000 $0 $1,023,000 Moraga Various Streets and Roads Preservation Moraga $709,000 $0 $709,000 Oakley Various Streets and Roads Preservation Oakley $1,031,000 $0 $1,031,000 Ivy Street Preservation Orinda $552,000 $0 $552,000 Pinole - San Pablo Avenue Preservation Pinole $453,000 $0 $453,000 Pittsburg - Railroad Avenue Preservation Pittsburg $299,000 $0 $299,000 Pittsburg Multimodal Station Bike/Ped Access Imps. Pittsburg $1,300,000 $0 $1,300,000 Golf Club Road Roundabout and Bike/Ped Imps. Pleasant Hill $4,770,000 $0 $4,770,000 Pleasant Hill - Contra Costa Boulevard Preservation Pleasant Hill $799,000 $0 $799,000 Dornan Drive/Garrard Blvd Tunnel Rehabilitation Richmond $413,000 $0 $413,000 Richmond Local Streets and Roads Preservation Richmond $3,030,000 $0 $3,030,000 San Pablo Various Streets and Roads Preservation San Pablo $454,000 $0 $454,000 San Pablo Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Imps. San Pablo $5,978,000 $0 $5,978,000 San Ramon Valley Blvd Preservation San Ramon $291,000 $0 $291,000 Walnut Creek North Main Street Preservation Walnut Creek $655,000 $0 $655,000 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TOTAL: $43,638,000 $2,384,000 $46,022,000 MARIN COUNTY Metropolitan Transportation Commission T4 New Act Cycle 2 Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy - OBAG Program Project List Page 1 of 4 PDWG 12.15.14 Page 74 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item MTC Resolution No. 4035, Attachment B-2 Attachment B-2 Adopted: 05/17/12-C Revised: 10/24/12-C6A 12/19/12-C 01/23/13-C Cycle 2 05/22/13-C 09/25/13-C OBAG Project List 11/20/13-C 01/22/14-C FY 2012-13 through FY 2016-17 02/26/14-C 05/28/14-C December 2014 09/24/14-C 12/17/14-C OBAG Program Project List Implementing Total Total Other Total Project Category and Title Agency STP/CMAQ (RTIP, etc.) Cycle 2

CYCLE 2 COUNTY OBAG PROGRAMMING $309,314,000 $18,036,000 $327,350,000 Specific projects TBD by Marin CMA TBD $0 $0 $0 CMA Base Planning Activities - Marin TAM $2,673,000 $0 $2,673,000 CMA Planning Activities Augmentation - Marin TAM $418,000 $0 $418,000 CMA Planning Activities FY 2016-17 Supplement - Marin TAM $720,000 $0 $720,000 Central Marin Ferry Bike/Ped Connection TAM $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 Bolinas Avenue and Sir Francis Drake Intersection Imps. Ross $274,000 $0 $274,000 San Rafael Various Streets and Roads Preservation San Rafael $457,000 $0 $457,000 San Rafael Transit Center Pedestrian Access Imps. San Rafael $1,900,000 $0 $1,900,000 Fairfax Parkade Circulation and Safety Imps. Fairfax $0 $300,000 $300,000 North Civic Center Bicycle and Pedestrian Imps Marin County $243,000 $407,000 $650,000 Donahue Street Preservation Marin County $1,077,000 $0 $1,077,000 DeLong Ave. and Ignacio Blvd Preservation Novato $779,000 $0 $779,000 MARIN COUNTY TOTAL: $10,041,000 $707,000 $10,748,000

NAPA COUNTY Specific projects TBD by Napa - NCTPA TBD $0 $0 $0 CMA Base Planning Activities - Napa NCTPA $2,673,000 $0 $2,673,000 CMA Planning Activities FY 2016-17 Supplement - Napa NCTPA $720,000 $0 $720,000 Napa City North/South Bike Connection Napa (City) $300,000 $0 $300,000 California Avenue Roundabouts Napa (City) $2,463,000 $431,000 $2,894,000 Silverado Trail Phase "H" Preservation Napa County $794,000 $0 $794,000 NAPA COUNTY TOTAL: $6,950,000 $431,000 $7,381,000

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY Specific projects TBD by San Francisco CMA $0 $0 $0 CMA Base Planning Activities - San Francisco SFCTA $2,795,000 $0 $2,795,000 CMA Planning Activities Augmentation - San Francisco SFCTA $773,000 $0 $773,000 CMA Planning Activities FY 2016-17 Supplement- San Francisco SFCTA $753,000 $0 $753,000 Longfellow Safe Routes to School SF DPW $670,307 $0 $670,307 ER Taylor Safe Routes to School SF DPW $519,631 $0 $519,631 Chinatown Broadway Complete Streets Phase IV SF DPW $3,410,536 $1,910,000 $5,320,536 Mansell Corridor Complete Streets SFCTA $1,762,239 $0 $1,762,239 Masonic Avenue Complete Streets SFMTA $10,227,539 $0 $10,227,539 Second Street Complete Streets SFMTA $10,515,748 $0 $10,515,748 Transbay Center Bicyle and Pedestrian Imps. TJPA $6,000,000 $0 $6,000,000 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TOTAL: $37,427,000 $1,910,000 $39,337,000

SAN MATEO COUNTY Specific projects TBD by San Mateo CMA $0 $0 $0 CMA Base Planning Activities - San Mateo SMCCAG $2,673,000 $0 $2,673,000 CMA Planning Activities Augmentation - San Mateo SMCCAG $752,000 $0 $752,000 CMA Planning Activities FY 2016-17 Supplement - San Mateo SMCCAG $720,000 $0 $720,000 PDA Planning Augmentation - San Mateo SMCCAG $84,000 $0 $84,000 Atherton Various Streets and Roads Preservation Atherton $285,000 $0 $285,000 Belmont Various Streets and Roads Preservation Belmont $534,000 $0 $534,000 Ralston Road Pedestrian Improvements Belmont $250,000 $0 $250,000 Old County Road Bike and Pedestrian Imps Belmont $270,000 $0 $270,000 Carolan Avenue Complete Streets and Road Diet Burlingame $986,000 $0 $986,000 US 101 / Broadway Interchange Bike/Ped Imps Caltrans $3,613,000 $0 $3,613,000 Daly City Various Streets and Roads Preservation Daly City $562,000 $0 $562,000 John Daly Boulevard Bicycle and Pedestrian Imps. Daly City $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 Bay Road Bike and Ped Imps. Phase II and III East Palo Alto $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 Menlo Park Various Streets and Roads Preservation Menlo Park $427,000 $0 $427,000 Menlo Park Various Streets Bicycle and Pedestrian Imps Menlo Park $797,000 $0 $797,000 Millbrae Various Streets and Roads Prerservation Millbrae $445,000 $0 $445,000 San Pedro Creek Bridge Replacement Bike/Ped Imps Pacifica $1,141,000 $0 $1,141,000 Pacifica Linda Mar Blvd Preservation Pacifica $431,000 $0 $431,000 Palmetto Avenue Streetscape Pacifica $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 Portola Valley Various Streets and Roads Preservation Portola Valley $224,000 $0 $224,000 Redwood City Various Streets and Roads Preservation Redwood City $548,000 $0 $548,000 Middlefield Road Bicyle and Pedestrian Imps Redwood City $1,752,000 $0 $1,752,000 Metropolitan Transportation Commission T4 New Act Cycle 2 Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy - OBAG Program Project List Page 2 of 4 PDWG 12.15.14 Page 75 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item MTC Resolution No. 4035, Attachment B-2 Attachment B-2 Adopted: 05/17/12-C Revised: 10/24/12-C6A 12/19/12-C 01/23/13-C Cycle 2 05/22/13-C 09/25/13-C OBAG Project List 11/20/13-C 01/22/14-C FY 2012-13 through FY 2016-17 02/26/14-C 05/28/14-C December 2014 09/24/14-C 12/17/14-C OBAG Program Project List Implementing Total Total Other Total Project Category and Title Agency STP/CMAQ (RTIP, etc.) Cycle 2

CYCLE 2 COUNTY OBAG PROGRAMMING $309,314,000 $18,036,000 $327,350,000 San Bruno Avenue Pedestrian Improvements San Bruno $265,000 $0 $265,000 San Bruno Avenue Street Median Imps San Bruno $735,000 $0 $735,000 Crestview Drive Pavement Rehabilitation San Carlos $412,000 $0 $412,000 San Carlos Streetscape and Pedestrian Imps San Carlos $850,000 $0 $850,000 El Camino Real Ped Upgrades (Grand Boulevard Inititive) San Carlos $182,000 $0 $182,000 Mount Diablo Ave. Rehabilitation San Mateo (City) $270,000 $0 $270,000 North Central Pedestrian Imps San Mateo (City) $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 San Mateo Citywide Crosswalk Improvements San Mateo (City) $368,000 $0 $368,000 Semicircular Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Imps San Mateo County $320,000 $0 $320,000 South San Francisco Citywide Sidewalk Gap Closures South San Francisco $357,000 $0 $357,000 South San Francisco Grand Blvd Pedestrain Imps South San Francisco $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 South San Francisco Grand Blvd Complete Streets South San Francisco $0 $1,991,000 $1,991,000 SAN MATEO COUNTY TOTAL: $25,253,000 $1,991,000 $27,244,000 SANTA CLARA COUNTY Specific projects TBD by Santa Clara CMA $0 $0 $0 CMA Base Planning Activities - Santa Clara VTA $4,246,000 $0 $4,246,000 CMA Planning Activities Augmentation - Santa Clara VTA $1,754,000 $0 $1,754,000 CMA Planning Activities FY 2016-17 Supplement - Santa Clara VTA $1,145,000 $0 $1,145,000 Hamilton Avenue Preservation Campbell $279,000 $0 $279,000 Campbell Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrain Imps. Campbell $3,718,000 $0 $3,718,000 Stevens Creek Boulevard Preservation Cupertino $735,000 $0 $735,000 Ronan Channel / Lions Creek Multi-Use Trail Gilroy $1,034,000 $0 $1,034,000 Eigleberry Street Preservation Gilroy $808,000 $0 $808,000 Los Altos Various Streets and Roads Preservation Los Altos $312,000 $0 $312,000 El Monte Road Preservation Los Altos Hills $186,000 $0 $186,000 Hillside Road Preservation Los Gatos $139,000 $0 $139,000 Milpitas Various Streets and Roads Preservation Milpitas $1,652,000 $0 $1,652,000 Monte Sereno Various Streets and Roads Preservation Monte Sereno $250,000 $0 $250,000 Monterey Road Preservation Morgan Hill $1,379,000 $0 $1,379,000 Mountain View Various Streets Preservation and Bike Lanes Mountain View $1,166,000 $0 $1,166,000 Palo Alto Various Streets and Roads Preservation Palo Alto $956,000 $0 $956,000 US 101/Adobe Creek Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge Palo Alto $0 $4,350,000 $4,350,000 San Jose Citywide Bikeway Program San Jose $1,150,000 $0 $1,150,000 San Jose Citywide Pavement Management Program San Jose $11,531,000 $0 $11,531,000 San Jose Citywide SRTS Infrastructure Program San Jose $1,150,000 $0 $1,150,000 San Jose Citywide Smart Intersections Program San Jose $1,150,000 $0 $1,150,000 Downtown San Jose Bike Lanes and De-Couplet San Jose $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 East San Jose Bicycle/Pedestrian Transit Connection San Jose $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 Jackson Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Imps. San Jose $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 San Jose Pedestrian-Oriented Traffic Safety Signals San Jose $3,000,000 $0 $3,000,000 St. Johns Bikeway and Pedestiran Improvements San Jose $1,185,000 $0 $1,185,000 The Alameda "Beautiful Way" Grand Boulevard Phase 2 San Jose $3,150,000 $0 $3,150,000 Santa Clara Various Streets and Roads Preservation Santa Clara (City) $1,891,000 $0 $1,891,000 San Tomas Expressway Box Culvert Rehabilitation Santa Clara County $7,850,190 $0 $7,850,190 Capitol Expressway Traffic ITS and Bike/Ped Imps. Santa Clara County $8,234,810 $0 $8,234,810 San Tomas Aquino Spur Multi-Use Trail Phase 2 Santa Clara County $3,234,000 $0 $3,234,000 Saratoga Village Sidewalk Preservation Saratoga $162,000 $0 $162,000 Saratoga Ave-Prospect Rd Complete Streets Saratoga $4,205,000 $0 $4,205,000 Duane Avenue Preservation Sunnyvale $1,576,000 $0 $1,576,000 East & West Channel Multi-Use Trails Sunnyvale $3,440,000 $0 $3,440,000 Fair Oaks Avenue Bikeway and Streetscape Sunnyvale $956,000 $0 $956,000 Maude Avenue Bikeway and Streetscape Sunnyvale $695,000 $0 $695,000 Sunnyvale Safe Routes to School Ped Infrastructure Imps Sunnyvale $1,569,000 $0 $1,569,000 Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road Bike/Ped Safety Enhancements Sunnyvale $524,000 $0 $524,000 Milpitas BART Station Montague Expwy Ped Overcrossing VTA $744,000 $0 $744,000 VTA/San Jose: Upper Penitencia Creek Multi-Use Trail VTA $1,514,000 $0 $1,514,000 Santa Clara Caltrain Station Bike/Ped Undercrossing VTA $1,251,000 $0 $1,251,000 SANTA CLARA COUNTY TOTAL: $84,921,000 $4,350,000 $89,271,000 SOLANO COUNTY Specific projects TBD by Solano CMA $0 $0 $0 CMA Base Planning Activities - Solano STA $2,673,000 $0 $2,673,000 Metropolitan Transportation Commission T4 New Act Cycle 2 Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy - OBAG Program Project List Page 3 of 4 PDWG 12.15.14 Page 76 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item MTC Resolution No. 4035, Attachment B-2 Attachment B-2 Adopted: 05/17/12-C Revised: 10/24/12-C6A 12/19/12-C 01/23/13-C Cycle 2 05/22/13-C 09/25/13-C OBAG Project List 11/20/13-C 01/22/14-C FY 2012-13 through FY 2016-17 02/26/14-C 05/28/14-C December 2014 09/24/14-C 12/17/14-C OBAG Program Project List Implementing Total Total Other Total Project Category and Title Agency STP/CMAQ (RTIP, etc.) Cycle 2

CYCLE 2 COUNTY OBAG PROGRAMMING $309,314,000 $18,036,000 $327,350,000 CMA Planning Activities Augmentation - Solano STA $333,000 $0 $333,000 CMA Planning Activities FY 2016-17 Supplement - Solano STA $720,000 $0 $720,000 West A Street Preservation Dixon $584,000 $0 $584,000 East 2nd Street Preservation Benicia $495,000 $0 $495,000 Benicia Safe Routes to Schools Infrastructure Imps Benicia $100,000 $0 $100,000 Dixon SRTS Infrastructure Imps Dixon $100,000 $0 $100,000 Beck Avenue Preservation Fairfield $1,424,000 $0 $1,424,000 SR 12 Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Rio Vista $100,000 $0 $100,000 Solano County - Various Streets and Roads Preservation Solano County $1,389,000 $0 $1,389,000 Vaca-Dixon Bike Route Phase 5 Solano County $1,800,000 $0 $1,800,000 West B Street Bicycle/Pedestrian RxR Undercrossing STA $1,394,000 $1,141,000 $2,535,000 Local PDA Planning Augmentation STA $511,000 $0 $511,000 Eastern Solano / SNCI Rideshare Program STA $533,000 $0 $533,000 Solano Transit Ambassador Program STA $250,000 $0 $250,000 Driftwood Drive Path Suisun City $349,065 $0 $349,065 Walters Road/Pintail Drive Preservation Suisun City $356,000 $0 $356,000 Suisun/Fairfield Intercity Rail Station Access Imps Suisun City $415,000 $0 $415,000 Vacaville SRTS Infrastructure Imps Vacaville $303,207 $0 $303,207 Vacaville - Various Streets and Roads Preservation Vacaville $1,231,000 $0 $1,231,000 Allison Bicycle/Pedestrian Imps. Vacaville $450,000 $0 $450,000 Ulatis Creek Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway and Streetscape Vacaville $500,000 $0 $500,000 Vallejo SRTS Infrastructure Imps Vallejo $247,728 $0 $247,728 Vallejo Downtown Streetscape - Phase 3 Vallejo $2,090,000 $0 $2,090,000 SOLANO COUNTY TOTAL: $18,348,000 $1,141,000 $19,489,000

SONOMA COUNTY Specific projects TBD by Sonoma - SCTA $0 $0 $0 CMA Base Planning Activities - Sonoma SCTA $2,673,000 $0 $2,673,000 CMA Planning Activities FY 2016-17 Supplement - Sonoma SCTA $720,000 $0 $720,000 Cloverdale Safe Routes to Schools Phase 2 Cloverdale $250,000 $0 $250,000 Cotati Old Redwood Highway South Preservation (CS) Cotati $250,000 $0 $250,000 Healdsburg Various Streets and Roads Preservation Healdsburg $250,000 $0 $250,000 Petaluma Complete Streets Petaluma $1,848,000 $0 $1,848,000 Rohnert Park Various Streets Preservation Rohnert Park $1,103,000 $0 $1,103,000 Rohnert Park Bicyle and Pedestrian Improvements Rohnert Park $500,000 $0 $500,000 Downtown Santa Rosa Streetscape Santa Rosa $360,000 $353,000 $713,000 Santa Rosa Complete Streets Road Diet on Transit Corridors Santa Rosa $2,460,000 $0 $2,460,000 Sebastopol Various Streets and Roads Preservation Sebastopol $250,000 $0 $250,000 SMART Vehicle Purchase SMART $6,600,000 $0 $6,600,000 SMART Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway SMART $0 $1,043,000 $1,043,000 Sonoma Various Streets and Roads Preservation Sonoma (City) $250,000 $0 $250,000 Sonoma County Various Streets and Roads Preservation Sonoma County $3,377,000 $0 $3,377,000 Windsor Road/Jaquar Lane Bicycle/Pedestrian Imps. Windsor $630,000 $0 $630,000 Conde Lane/Johnson Street Pedestrian Imps. Windsor $432,000 $0 $432,000 Windsor Rd/Bell Rd/Market St Pedestrian Imps. Windsor $410,000 $0 $410,000 TOTAL: $22,363,000 $1,396,000 $23,759,000

Cycle 2 Total TOTAL: $309,314,000 $18,036,000 $327,350,000 J:\SECTION\ALLSTAFF\Resolution\TEMP-RES\MTC\RES-4035_ongoing\[tmp-4035_Attach_B-2_Dec.xlsx]Attach B-2 12-17-14

Metropolitan Transportation Commission T4 New Act Cycle 2 Project Selection Criteria and Programming Policy - OBAG Program Project List Page 4 of 4 PDWG 12.15.14 Page 77 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B TFWG Item 13

TO: Transit Finance Working Group DATE: December 3, 2014 FR: Kenneth Folan and Rebecca Long

RE: Update on State Cap and Trade Programs

Low Carbon Transit Operations Program

On November 7, Caltrans and CalSTA released draft guidelines for the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP). This is a formula-based program, largely similar to the existing State Transit Assistance (STA) and the Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) programs. The FY 2014-15 State Budget appropriated $25 million statewide for LCTOP for 2014-15 and Senate Bill 862 (a 2014 budget trailer bill) continuously appropriates 5 percent of the annual auction proceeds in the Greenhouse Reduction Fund (GGRF) for LCTOP beginning in FY 2015-16.

The draft LCTOP guidelines are attached and available at: (http://www.dot.ca.gov/docs/DiscussionGuidelinesLCTOP_11_07_14.pdf). On a November 19th conference call with interested parties, Caltrans stated that comments on the draft guidelines would be accepted through December 10th. MTC intends to submit a comment letter and would appreciate your input.

Our initial impression of the guidelines is overall positive, given that the guidelines look a lot like the PTMISEA program, which has been relatively straightforward administratively. In our comment letter we plan to recommend that the guidelines:

1. Clarify whether funds can be donated to another operator (as opposed to being transferred to a sub-recipient). If so, this may be helpful to those operators receiving small dollar amounts. 2. Regarding formulaic shares of funds, clarify whether revenue shares will be fixed for the entire fiscal year, or re-calculated and applied retroactively like STA. In general, MTC may recommend year over year variability in fairness to operators coming online with new revenue service. 3. Regarding the provision of a full project funding plan, clarify whether there are allowances for a funding plan of a minimum operable segment if the benefits of the segment are sufficient to meet program objectives, similar to PTMISEA guidelines.

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 78 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B State Cap and Trade Page 2

4. Regarding the 50% Disadvantaged Communities (DAC) expenditure requirement, note that for operators with only relatively small DAC in their service areas, this may lead to an inefficient use of resources as LCTOP projects are heavily concentrated in specific areas.

Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program

Draft guidelines for the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) program were released by the Strategic Growth Council (SGC) on September 23. Since that time, MTC has actively engaged the SGC, alongside the California Association of Councils of Government (CALCOG), in advocating for a meaningful role for MPOs in this program— consistent with the requirement in SB 862 that SGC coordinate with MPOs on the identification and prioritization of projects. The draft AHSC guidelines were silent on this issue and acknowledged it as an outstanding detail to be addressed at a later date. SGC staff has indicated they plan to release an addendum to the guidelines regarding the MPO role in early December.

Based on conversations with SGC staff, it appears that the addendum to the guidelines will allow MPOs to develop a regional process to identify and recommend AHSC projects to the SGC. Review of initial “concept applications” and full applications by MPOs and SGC would happen in a parallel process, with consultation occurring between MPOs and SGC. MPO recommendations would not be binding on SGC, but would ensure dialogue between regions and the state and consideration of regional priorities. This proposed approach would be solidified in the addendum when that is released.

In an encouraging development, SGC announced on November 24 that it has postponed adoption of the guidelines from December 11th to January 20th. This will allow more time for SGC staff to consider and revise the program’s guidelines in response to the numerous comments submitted by MTC and many other agencies within the Bay Area and across the state. Once the final guidelines are adopted, MTC staff will develop a process and criteria for regional prioritization of projects for the Commission’s consideration in early 2015.

Next Steps

We will discuss these items at the December 3rd Transit Finance Working Group. Please provide us comments at that meeting or by emailing Kenneth Folan at [email protected].

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 79 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B

GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION FUND

Draft Guidelines for LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM

November 7, 2014

SM

CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 80 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

Low Carbon Transit Operations Program – Draft Guidelines

Table of Contents

Section Page

Executive Summary 1

Roles and Responsibilities – Partner Agencies 4

1. Air Resources Board 2. Strategic Growth Council 3. State Controller’s Office 4. Department of Finance

Roles and Responsibilities – Administrative Agencies 4

5. Caltrans 6. Eligible Project Sponsors 7. Project Lead/Recipient Agency

Project Eligibility Criteria 6

8. Greenhouse Gas Reduction criteria 9. Disadvantaged Communities criteria 10. Eligible projects A. Transit Capital Projects B. Transit Operations Projects C. Transit Maintenance Projects 11. Useful Life 12. Short-Range Transit Plan 13. Project Full Funding Plan

Documentation for Allocation requirements 13

A. List of proposed expense types B. Authorized Agent Form C. Certifications and Assurances D. Allocation Request and Project Description E. Corrective Action Plan (CAP) F. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP)

(11/07/14)

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 81 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

Section Page

Documentation for Reporting Requirements 15

Project Reporting Requirements

Semi-Annual Progress Report

Final Report

Program Reporting Requirements

A. Annual CTC Report B. Annual Legislative Report C. Annual Expenditure Report

Audit Responsibility 17

Project Audit (Transportation Development Act)

Spot Audit

Funding Process/Appropriation 18

Reassigned Funds

Interest Earned

Savings

Program Process and Timeline 20

(11/07/14)

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 82 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Low Carbon Transit Operations Program

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) is one of several programs that are part of the Transit, Affordable Housing, and Sustainable Communities Program established by the California Legislature in 2014 by Senate Bill 862. The LCTOP was created to provide operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to reduce greenhouse gas emission and improve mobility, with a priority on serving disadvantaged communities. Approved projects in LCTOP will support new or expanded bus or rail services, expand intermodal transit facilities, and may include equipment acquisition, fueling, maintenance and other costs to operate those services or facilities, with each project reducing greenhouse gas emissions. For agencies whose service area includes disadvantaged communities, at least 50 percent of the total moneys received shall be expended on projects that will benefit disadvantaged communities. Senate Bill 852 (Statutes of 2014) appropriates $25 million for LCTOP for 2014-15 and Senate Bill 862 continuously appropriates 5 percent of the annual auction proceeds in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) for LCTOP beginning in 2015-16.

Senate Bill 862 establishes the LCTOP as a formulaic program instead of a state-level competitive program. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is responsible for ensuring that the statutory requirements of the program are met in terms of project eligibility, greenhouse gas reduction, disadvantaged community benefit, and other requirements of law. However, as a formulaic program, local agency recipients are responsible to ensure projects selected provide maximum public benefits. As such, recipients are strongly encouraged to select those projects that maximize public benefits for transit ridership, greenhouse gas reduction, disadvantaged community benefit, and other co-benefits. Recipient agencies are encouraged to work closely with their Metropolitan Planning Agencies, Regional Transportation Planning Agencies, local governments, and affected communities, to achieve co-benefits including but not limited to encouragement of infill development, low-income housing, protection of disadvantaged communities from displacement, active transportation benefit, and other environmental and health benefits. Caltrans may require reporting on project co-benefits, not for eligibility analysis but to gauge the effectiveness of the overall program. This program will be administered by Caltrans in coordination with Air Resources Board and the State Controller’s Office (SCO).

HISTORY

Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, took a long-term, comprehensive approach to addressing climate change and its effects on the environment and natural resources. In order to slow the effects of climate change, AB 32 set the requirement that by 2020 California must reduce greenhouse gas emissions to the level of 1990, a reduction of approximately 15 percent of the normally expected level of emissions. AB 32 additionally calls for continued greenhouse gas reduction beyond 2020. The Air Resources Board (ARB) was directed to be the lead agency to implement the law. The ARB worked in coordination with multiple state agencies through the Climate

Page 1 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 83 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

Action Team. AB 32 required ARB to develop a Scoping Plan, laying out the strategy to meet the goals set in law. Part of the Scoping Plan establishes the GGRF, which is funded by fees annually collected from large sources of greenhouse gases and also from proceeds of ARB’s quarterly auction of emissions credits.

The Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB 375) supports the State’s climate action goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through coordinated transportation and land use planning to encourage more sustainable communities. Metropolitan Planning Organizations are directed to develop a “sustainable communities’ strategy” as an integral part of their Regional Transportation Plan.

Passed in 2011, Senate Bill 535 (SB 535) directs State and Local agencies to make significant investments that improve California’s most vulnerable communities. The identification of “disadvantaged communities” is assigned to the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), and the establishment of guidelines for qualifying expenditures is assigned to the California ARB.

As one of the programs established in the Transit, Affordable Housing, and Sustainable Communities Program by SB 862 in 2014, the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program will draw funds from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund to support transit agencies in their efforts to increase transit ridership and to meet the statewide greenhouse gas reduction goals of AB 32 and the associated regional greenhouse gas reduction goals of SB 375. SB 862 directs Caltrans, in coordination with ARB, to develop guidelines describing methodologies to meet the criteria for LCTOP. The Strategic Growth Council will review the LCTOP Guidelines for consistency with state policy goals.

IMPLEMENTATION

Working with the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA), Caltrans participated in workshops to gather input from local agencies and the public to help develop the guidelines. Input from these workshops has been an integral part of the development of these guidelines. Final LCTOP Guidelines will include ARB guidance related to measurement of greenhouse gas reduction benefits and qualification of benefits for and in disadvantaged communities. After final LCTOP Guidelines are adopted, Caltrans will invite eligible transit agencies to submit projects for Caltrans review. Caltrans, in consultation with ARB, will determine whether proposed projects and expenditures are eligible for funding before authorizing the SCO to release funds to the project sponsors.

The following Draft LCTOP Guidelines describe the process that recipient transit agencies must follow to qualify and receive a share of the Fund. These funds are available to provide operations, maintenance, and capital assistance for transit agencies with the goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving mobility for the California public, and include a priority to serve disadvantaged communities. Caltrans anticipates that the final interim guidelines will be adopted in December 2014.

In Fiscal Year 2014-15, the Budget Act appropriated $25 million to the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program from the GGRF. Eligible transit agencies will be notified of their share of the available funds on December 1, 2014, and Caltrans will provide the interim guidelines by December 19, 2014. The recipient

Page 2 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 84 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP agencies will have until February 1, 2015 to submit expenditure proposals to Caltrans. The projects will then be reviewed by Caltrans and ARB to assure compliance with the requirements of SB 862 and the interim guidelines. By April 1, 2015, Caltrans will submit a final list of approved expenditures to SCO, and the approved amount of funds will be available for release by April 15, 2015. Details of this procedure are included in the following guidelines.

Page 3 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 85 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

Low Carbon Transit Operations Program – Draft Guidelines

Roles and Responsibilities – Partner Agencies

1. Air Resources Board (ARB) • ARB will develop the methodology for measurement of greenhouse gas reduction and provide guidance to the State agencies administering the GGRF proceeds. • ARB will adopt guidelines for investing GGRF proceeds in California’s most disadvantaged communities. • ARB will coordinate with Caltrans to help develop the guidelines for LCTOP. • ARB will work with Caltrans to determine the eligibility of the projects submitted by the Project Sponsors. 2. Strategic Growth Council (SGC) (GC 75200.1) • SGC will review and coordinate the activities of member agencies of the council for each program under the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program. • SGC will review the grant guidelines of each program. • SGC will coordinate outreach to promote access and program participation in disadvantaged communities. 3. State Controller’s Office a. SCO will prepare a list of eligible project sponsors and the formulaic share of funds each is to receive in the state fiscal year, per PUC Sections 99313 and 99314. By December 1, 2014, the SCO shall notify eligible project sponsors of the funding level each agency may receive from the $25 million appropriated by SB 852. In 2015-16 and each fiscal year thereafter, the SCO shall notify eligible project sponsors of the estimated dollar level each will receive. Starting in 2015-16, the estimate of funding available for the fiscal year shall be based on the estimate provided to the SCO by Caltrans in consultation with the Department of Finance (DOF). b. SCO will allocate LCTOP funds to eligible project sponsors based on the notification list of approved expenditures submitted to Caltrans by local agencies. Caltrans, in coordination with ARB, will review the projects submitted by local agencies for compliance with the criteria established in law, then Caltrans will authorize SCO to release the funds. 4. Department of Finance Upon enactment of the annual budget, DOF will consult with Caltrans to provide information on the amount of auction proceeds reflected in the budget for the fiscal year.

Roles and Responsibilities – Administrative Agencies

5. Caltrans, in coordination with the ARB, develops the guidelines for the LCTOP, defining the criteria for project eligibility and reporting requirements. Caltrans will have Guidelines that will explain the following process to apply for LCTOP funds: a. Project eligibility for capital, operational and maintenance projects

Page 4 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 86 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

i. Greenhouse gas reduction benefit ii. Compliance with required benefits for disadvantaged communities iii. The useful life of a project iv. Project delivery milestones v. Total project cost and funding plan b. Allocation Request Process i. Required forms ii. Request review and approval c. Project Reporting requirements i. Semi-annual Reports ii. Final Reports iii. Expanded Transportation Development ACT (TDA) audit d. Program Reporting requirements i. Annual Legislative Report ii. Annual Expenditure Record e. Audits i. Audit of project expenditures and outcomes ii. Audit of recipients of LCTOP funds iii. Spot audits of projects

Caltrans will be the administering agency for this program and will provide assistance and guidance to local agencies in receiving their allocation by:

a. Providing process directions through written Guidelines and support staff available for consultation b. Setting up the schedule for the allocation process c. Project evaluation, in collaboration with ARB, to determine approval of the allocation requests d. Sending a list of approved expenditures for each transit agency to SCO for release of funds e. Monitoring progress of projects through reporting requirements f. Coordinating with ARB and SCO to assure compliance with LCTOP criteria g. Reviewing project completion h. Conducting spot audits and on-site monitoring as needed i. Preparing annual program report for the Legislature

6. Eligible Project Sponsors, qualified by Public Utilities Code (PUC) 99313 and 99314 • A transportation planning agency and county transportation commission, or the San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board, that is eligible for State Transit Assistance funds, per PUC 99313, is eligible for allocations from the GGRF for this

Page 5 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 87 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

program. The allocation share is determined by formula based on the ratio of the population of the area under its jurisdiction to the total population of the state. • A transit operator, including a transportation planning agency, a county transportation commission, or the San Diego Development Board, that is eligible for State Transit Assistance funds per PUC 99314, is eligible for allocations from the GGRF for this program. The allocation share is determined by formula based on the ratio of the revenue of the transit operator’s jurisdiction to the total revenue of all operators in the state.

7. Project Lead/Recipient Agency • The project lead/recipient agency is responsible for overseeing or performing all work up to completion of the project when multiple project sponsors contribute LCTOP funds to a joint project. • The project lead/recipient agency receives all LCTOP funds directly from the SCO and is accountable for all reporting. If funds are transferred to a sub-recipient, the original/initial recipient agency is still responsible for providing all information required in progress and final reports, as directed by statute. A sub-recipient agency could be a transit agency qualifying under Public Utility Code section 99314, who received a transfer of from a project lead / recipient agency qualifying under Public Utility Code section 99313. A sub-recipient agency is responsible for complying with any agreement it has with the Recipient agency. • All project documentation (i.e., Reports, Transportation Development Act Audits, Corrective Action Plans, Reassignment of GGRFs requests, Final Reports, and any additional information needed in case of an audit) is the responsibility of the project lead/recipient agency. In addition, the original/initial recipient agency is responsible for ensuring the project is completed as described in the allocation request and in compliance with all items included in the Certifications and Assurances document.

Project Eligibility Criteria

Projects must be evaluated to ensure it provides a greenhouse gas reduction benefit and evaluated to see if the investments could result in projects that benefit disadvantaged communities, and/or are located within a disadvantaged community.

LCTOP was created to provide operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve mobility, with a priority on serving disadvantaged communities. ARB has provided all agencies administering GGRF monies with the following guidance on how to incorporate these priorities in project criteria.

8. Greenhouse Gas Reduction criteria (measurement criteria to be provided by ARB and will be included at that time)

Page 6 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 88 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

9. Disadvantaged Communities criteria (provided by ARB in the Interim Guidance to Agencies Administering Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Monies, 10/20/14 version):

For transit agencies whose service areas include disadvantaged communities (DAC) as identified in Section 39711 of the Health and Safety Code, at least 50 percent of the total moneys received shall be expended on projects or services that benefit the DAC. The California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal EPA) shall identify disadvantaged communities based on geographic, socioeconomic, public health, and environmental hazard criteria. This process will utilize CalEnviroScreen, a tool that assesses all census tracts in the State to identify areas disproportionately affected by multiple types of pollution and areas with vulnerable populations.

Eligible Project Sponsors shall consult the CalEPA website (http://oehha.ca.gov/ej/ces2.html) to determine which, if any, disadvantaged communities fall within their service areas, and report those in the format proscribed by Caltrans. Only the Cal EPA designation of disadvantaged communities shall be used for the purpose of the LCTOP. Eligible Project Sponsors with service areas that include disadvantaged communities shall consult the ARB’s website (http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/auctionproceeds/auctionproceeds.htm) for the most recent information on the criteria to evaluate projects which are (1) located within a disadvantaged community, and (2) not within a disadvantaged community, but still provide a benefit to a disadvantaged community. Where applicable, eligible Project Sponsors shall describe the benefits of selected projects to disadvantaged communities in the format proscribed by Caltrans. Projects eligible for these funds must be designed to avoid displacement of disadvantaged community residents and businesses.

The ARB’s criteria for disadvantaged communities, as adopted by the Board on September 18, 2014, are listed below. If these criteria are later updated, and these LCTOP guidelines have not been updated, the ARB updated criteria will take precedent over the criteria listed below.

The following criteria is provided to assist the recipients in determining if projects will provide direct, meaningful, and assured benefits to a disadvantaged community. Each criterion is independent; a project need only meet one criterion to qualify as eligible to be considered as located within or providing benefits to one or more disadvantaged communities.

Projects will achieve greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions by reducing passenger vehicle miles travelled through incentives, infrastructure, or operations improvements (e.g., providing better bus connections to intercity rail, encouraging people to shift from cars to mass transit). The applicable ARB criterion below is split into two parts: Low Carbon Transportation and Transit Projects.

Page 7 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 89 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

Low Carbon Transportation:

Projects will achieve GHG reductions through the use of zero and near zero-emission passenger vehicles, buses, trucks, and freight technology.

DRAFT CRITERIA TO EVALUATE PROJECTS

Step 1 – Located Within: Evaluate the project to see if it meets at least one of the following criteria for being located in a disadvantaged community census tract and provides direct, meaningful, and assured benefits to a disadvantaged community.

Project must meet at least one of the following criteria focused on reducing air pollution for disadvantaged community residents:

a. Project provides incentives for vehicles or equipment to those with a physical address in a disadvantaged community; or

b. Project provides incentives for vehicles or equipment that will be domiciled in a disadvantaged community; or

c. Project provides incentives for vehicles or equipment that reduce air pollution on fixed routes that are primarily within a disadvantaged community (e.g., freight locomotives) or vehicles that serve transit stations or stops in a disadvantaged community (e.g., zero- emission buses); or

d. Project provides greater mobility and increased access to clean transportation for disadvantaged community residents by placing services in a disadvantaged community, including ride-sharing, car-sharing, or other advanced technology mobility options (e.g., neighborhood electric vehicles, vanpooling, shuttles, smartphone application-based ride- sharing services, bikesharing services).

Step 2 – Provides Benefits To: If the project does not meet the above criteria for “located within,” evaluate the project to see if it meets at least one of the following criteria for providing direct, meaningful, and assured benefits to a disadvantaged community.

Project must meet at least one of the following criteria focused on reducing air pollution for disadvantaged community residents:

a. Project provides incentives for vehicles or equipment to those with a physical address in a ZIP code that contains a disadvantaged community census tract; or

b. Project provides incentives for vehicles or equipment that operate primarily in “impacted corridors,” [Note: ARB will publish a list of “impacted corridors” based on its assessment of which freight corridors have a substantial air quality impact on disadvantaged communitys.]; or

Page 8 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 90 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

c. Project provides incentives for vehicles or equipment that primarily serve freight hubs (e.g., ports, distribution centers, warehouses, airports) located in a ZIP code that contains a disadvantaged community census tract; or

d. Project provides greater mobility and increased access to clean transportation for disadvantaged community residents by placing services that are accessible by walking within ½ mile of a disadvantaged community, including ride-sharing, car-sharing, or other advanced technology mobility options (e.g., neighborhood electric vehicles, vanpooling, shuttles, bikesharing services).

Transit Projects:

Projects will achieve GHG reductions by reducing passenger vehicle miles travelled through incentives, infrastructure, or operational improvements (e.g., providing better bus connections to intercity rail, encouraging people to shift from cars to mass transit).

DRAFT CRITERIA TO EVALUATE PROJECTS 1

Agencies can also use criteria in other applicable tables.

Step 1 – Located Within: Evaluate the project to see if it meets at least one of the following criteria for being located in a disadvantaged community census tract and provides direct, meaningful, and assured benefits to a disadvantaged community.

Project must meet at least one of the following criteria focused on increasing transit service along transit lines or corridors that have stations or stops in a disadvantaged community, or improving transit access for disadvantaged community residents, or reducing air pollution in a disadvantaged community:

A. Project provides improved transit or intercity rail service for stations or stops in a disadvantaged community (e.g., new transit lines, more frequent service, greater capacity on existing lines that are nearing capacity, improved reliability, bus rapid service for disadvantaged community residents); or B. Project provides transit incentives to residents with a physical address in a disadvantaged community (e.g. . vouchers, reduced fares, transit passes); or C. Project improves transit connectivity at stations or stops in a disadvantaged community (e.g. network/fare integration, better links between transit and active transportation); or D. Project improves connectivity between travel modes for vehicles or equipment that service stations or stops in a disadvantaged community (e.g., bicycle racks on transit vehicles); or E. Project creates or improves infrastructure or equipment that reduces air pollution at a station, stop or transit base in a disadvantaged community (e.g., auxiliary power, charging stations); or F. Project creates or improves infrastructure or equipment that reduces air pollution on regular routes that are primarily within a disadvantaged community (e.g., rail electrification, zero-emission bus); or

1 If applicable, other criteria in ARB’s guidance may be used.

Page 9 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 91 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

G. Project provides greater mobility and increased access to clean transportation for disadvantaged community residents by placing services in a disadvantaged community, including ride-sharing, car- sharing, or other advanced technology mobility options associated with transit (e.g., neighborhood electric vehicles, vanpooling, shuttles, smartphone application-based ride-sharing services, bikesharing services); or H. Project improves transit stations or stops in a disadvantaged community to increase safety and comfort (e.g., lights, shelters, benches).

Step 2 – Provides Benefits To: If the project does not meet the above criteria for “located within,” evaluate the project to see if it meets at least one of the following criteria for providing direct, meaningful, and assured benefits to a disadvantaged community. Project must meet at least one of the following criteria focused on increasing transit service along transit lines or corridors that are accessible to disadvantaged community residents, or improving transit access for disadvantaged community residents, or reducing air pollution in a disadvantaged community:

A. Project provides improved local bus transit service for riders using stations/ or stops that are accessible by walking within ½ mile of a disadvantaged community (e.g., more frequent service, rapid bus service); or B. Project improves local bus transit connectivity for riders using stations or stops that are accessible by walking within ½ mile of a disadvantaged community (e.g., better links to active transportation, bicycle racks on local bus); or C. Project provides improved intercity rail (and related feeder bus service), commuter bus or rail transit service for riders using stations or stops in a ZIP code that contains a disadvantaged community census tract (e.g., new lines, express bus service); or D. Project provides improved intercity rail (and related feeder bus service), commuter bus or rail transit connectivity for riders using stations or stops in a ZIP code that contains a disadvantaged community census tract (e.g., network/fare integration, better links between local bus and intercity rail, bicycle racks on rail); or E. Project will increase intercity rail (and related feeder bus service), commuter bus or rail transit ridership, with at least 25% of new riders from disadvantaged communities; or F. Project provides greater mobility and increased access to clean transportation for disadvantaged community residents by placing services that are accessible by walking within ½ mile of a disadvantaged community, including ride-sharing, car-sharing, or other advanced technology mobility options associated with transit (e.g., neighborhood electric vehicles, vanpooling, shuttles); or G. Project improves transit stations or stops that are accessible by walking within ½ mile of a disadvantaged community, to increase safety and comfort (e.g., lights, shelters, benches); or H. Project includes recruitment, agreements, policies or other approaches that are consistent with federal and state law and result in at least 25% of project work hours performed by residents of a disadvantaged community; or I. Project includes recruitment, agreements, policies or other approaches that are consistent with federal and state law and result in at least 10% of project work hours performed by residents of a

Page 10 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 92 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

disadvantaged community participating in job training programs which lead to industry-recognized credentials or certifications.

10. Eligible Projects

Per Public Resource Code 75230 (d) (1-3) moneys shall be expended to provide transit operating or capital assistance that meets all of the following criteria:

• Expenditures supporting new or expanded bus or rail services, or expanded intermodal transit facilities, and may include equipment acquisition, fueling, and maintenance, and other costs to operate those services or facilities, • The recipient transit agency demonstrates that each expenditure directly enhances or expands transit service to increase mode share, and • The recipient transit agency demonstrates that expenditures reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

A. Transit Capital Projects (as defined in Title 49 USC 5302) • New or expanded bus or rail services, facilities and equipment (e.g., new construction, expansion or modernization of buildings, bus shelters, or transit centers with a priority to those that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and/or that benefits a disadvantaged community) • Purchase of equipment for rehabilitation, safety or modernization (e.g., bus engines, computer systems, and signage) • Expanded intermodal transit facilities (e.g., modernization of bus shelters, transit centers, and operations and maintenance facilities, etc.) • Bus rapid transit (BRT) improvements (e.g., construction or expansion of BRT lanes or equipment) • Rolling stock (e.g., purchase, replace or rehabilitate transit vehicles, such as buses, vans, paratransit vehicles, and rail transit vehicles) • Purchase of equipment and/or materials that will enhance or modernize transit operations • Purchase of equipment that will enhance or modernize maintenance of transit facilities and transit fleet B. Transit Operations Projects • Fueling for transit fleet • Costs of operational revisions that will increase mode share, increase ability to reduce GHG emissions, and benefit the residents of a DAC. • Outreach to community to increase transit ridership • Transit passes or discounts that increase transit ridership • Other costs to operate transit services or facilities

Page 11 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 93 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

C. Transit Maintenance Projects • Costs of revisions to maintenance procedures that will enhance reliability and safety, and will achieve higher ridership • Costs of converting equipment to enhance efficiency of fleet and maintenance equipment • Other costs to maintain transit services or facilities

Transit operations and maintenance investments made in one year may be included in subsequent years’ project plans. For example, if a transit operator uses LCTOP funds to expand transit service in one year, future years’ projects may include the continuation of that same service, through the funding of related operations or maintenance costs. Transit capital investments that include the purchase of new zero-emission vehicles may be presumed to meet the service enhancement and mode-share increase requirements of Public Resource Code 75230 (d).

11. Useful Life

To be eligible, capital projects must have a useful life not less than that typically required for capital assets (rolling stock, infrastructure, rail infrastructure, equipment) pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law, (Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 16720) of part 3 of Division 4 of Title 2) specifically subdivision (a) of Section 16727. Buses and rail rolling stock, including paratransit vehicles, are considered to be equipment with a useful life of two years or more.

12. Transit Plan

Projects must be consistent with the project sponsor’s most recent short-range transit plan, regional plan, or publicly-adopted plan (including a transportation improvement program) that programs funds for transit projects. If the project sponsor is in a Metropolitan Planning Organization area, the project should also be consistent with the Sustainable Communities Strategy, as required by SB375. A certified Board Resolution authorizing the capital, operational, or maintenance project also meets this requirement.

13. Project Full Funding Plan

The project sponsor must provide a Total Project Cost and Funding Plan for the project that shows all fund sources (not just the LCTOP portion) needed to complete the project. The executive authority of a project sponsor must sign the statement on the funding plan cover sheet to assume all fiscal responsibilities. If future year LCTOP funding is to be dedicated to the project, include those funds on the Total Project Cost and Funding Plan sheet as well.

If this transit project is part of a development project that is inclusive of multiple types of projects and funding (i.e., transit, development, housing, mixed land use, etc.), the LCTOP project must be

Page 12 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 94 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

able to be clearly identified for the purposes of reporting and tracking. Please supply a copy of the total development plan, of which the transit project is identified as an integral component.

14. Documentation (forms) for Allocation requirements

a. List of Proposed Expenditures - Per PRC 75230 (h) (1) the sponsor shall submit a list of proposed expense types for anticipated funding levels. b. Authorized Agent Form – The executive authority of a project sponsor must submit to Caltrans a signed and dated Authorized Agent form that is Board Approved, identifying the agent who has the authority to act for the project sponsor to submit the Allocation Request and reporting documents. If there is a change in the authorized agent, the project sponsor must submit a new form. This form is required even when the authorized agent is the executive authority himself. c. Certifications and Assurances – Before submitting an Allocation Request, the project sponsor must submit a self-certification that he/she will meet all requirements of the LCTOP guidelines, including reporting deadlines. Only allocation requests from agencies with a signed Certifications and Assurances document on file will be accepted. d. Allocation Request and Project Description -- Project sponsors must submit to Caltrans a description of the proposed transit capital, operational or maintenance project or projects it intends to fund with the LCTOP allocation. A guide for this form will be available on-line. The LCTOP Allocation Request is the basis for Caltrans’ verification that the project is consistent with LCTOP project requirements. This document includes: • Identification of project sponsor • Signature page signed by project sponsors (must have an Authorized Agent form on file) • A detailed summary of the project • Detailed Description of major benefits (compliance details of improved mobility, increased mode share, greenhouse gas reduction, and benefits to disadvantaged communities) • Project Schedule for all relevant phases (allocations will only be made to fund phases or projects scheduled to start within six months of receipt of funds) • Total project cost and funding plan (must include all funding sources) • Projected cash flow schedule

Any contributing project sponsor(s) must also sign the allocation request indicating the dollar amounts to be contributed, or provide a signed letter detailing this information. If there are multiple contributing project sponsors, each sponsor must sign the allocation request indicating their respective portion of funds being contributed or submit a signed letter with the required information as described above.

Allocation Request Submittal -- The signed original allocation request (including relevant sections of the publicly-adopted plan or Board Resolution) and letter of verification from the regional entity must be mailed to:

Page 13 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 95 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

LCTOP Program California Department of Transportation Division of Rail and Mass Transportation, MS #39 P.O. Box 942874 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001

A scan of the allocation request may be e-mailed, but a signed original must follow by mail. Agencies who fail to submit revisions made to the Allocation Request as requested by Caltrans staff and/or are delinquent in other required reports and submittals will not receive additional allocations of LCTOP funds until all delinquent items have been submitted and approved.

e. Corrective Action Plan (CAP) – To change an approved allocated project, including any changes to the originally approved scope, schedule, or cost, the project sponsor must first obtain approval from Caltrans by submitting a CAP form. This must be done before the funds can be applied to any use other than the current project’s approved scope of work. Funds may not be used on a different project until the CAP has been submitted and approved. The CAP must indicate the current approved scope, funded amounts, and schedule in the “Original” column on the left. The revised scope, funding amounts, and schedule are to be listed in the “Revised” column on the right. If a project has already undergone changes with previously approved CAPs, the current approved information should be entered in the “Original” column, rather than the information from the original allocation request. If the project schedule is being revised to reflect any delays or obstacles, an adequate justification must be given and the amended LCTOP project completion date must fall within the original Budget Act time limits.

All CAPs must have the Justification for Change box filled in. If a justification is not deemed adequate by Caltrans staff, the agency will be asked to provide a revised justification before the CAP is approved.

If it is found that an agency has begun spending funds on a task or project outside the approved scope of work prior to submitting a CAP, the agency will be placed on the list of high risk project sponsors. Caltrans is entitled to recover any and all funds that are spent on any ineligible costs.

Upon receipt of the CAP, Caltrans has 45 days to review and approve/not approve the document.

f. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) – (for project ready to proceed before allocation). Project Sponsors may apply to Caltrans for a Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) for one or more projects or project components. If approved by Caltrans, the LONP allows a project sponsor to expend its own funds (i.e., incur reimbursable expenses) for any Caltrans approved project component and to be reimbursed in the future as funds become available through auction of Cap and Trade credits. Caltrans gives equal opportunity of available funding to project sponsors with

Page 14 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 96 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

an approved LONP as well as those that require an allocation approval to begin. (See LCTOP LONP Guidelines) Upon receipt of the LONP request, Caltrans has 45 days in which to review and approve/not approve the document.

Agencies who fail to submit revisions made to the LONP Request as requested by Caltrans staff and/or are delinquent in other required reports and submittals will not receive additional allocations of LCTOP funds until all delinquent items have been submitted and approved.

Project sponsors proceed at their own risk, as project expense reimbursement under the LONP depends on the availability of auction funds in the GGR Fund.

15. Documentation for Reporting Requirements a. Project Reporting Requirements (responsibility of Project Sponsor) • Semi-Annual Progress Report - Project sponsors are required to report semiannually to Caltrans on the activities and progress of each approved and allocated project to ensure those activities funded from auction proceeds are timely, within approved scope and cost, and are achieving the intended purpose for which they are to be utilized. Project sponsors must notify Caltrans when allocated LCTOP funds have been encumbered and must provide completed and signed progress reports every six months until the approved project is completed, and the project final report has been filed.

The report consists of two sections, the “Semi-Annual Report” and the “Semi-Annual Itemized Expenditure Table.” This report must contain accurate and up-to-date information on the progress of each project. Reports will only be accepted by Caltrans staff when determined to be complete and accurate.

• All projects are expected to begin work within six months of receiving an allocation. Should a project experience any delays, the cause of such delay must be reported in the table in Section 7 Amendment, under “Justification for Change.” Any justification deemed inadequate by Caltrans staff will be questioned and the agency will be asked to provide further information.

• Projects that have not begun within one year of the receipt of funds must include a clear description of the circumstances delaying the project that leaves no question that the circumstances were unforeseen, extraordinary, and beyond the control of the agency. The description must include information indicating what steps the agency plans to take to keep the project on track. Agencies with a project that is repeatedly delayed will be encouraged to reassign the funds allocated to that project to either an ongoing project or a pending allocation request that can utilize the funds immediately. The agency may then request the funds for the delayed project once the project is ready to proceed within six months.

Page 15 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 97 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

Reports are due 45 days after the end of the fiscal year (June 30) and 45 days after the end of calendar year (December 31).

All reports must reflect accurate and complete project information. Any incomplete or inaccurate reports will not be accepted and will be considered delinquent until submitted with corrections and/or additional information as requested by Caltrans staff. Agencies found to have submitted inaccurate information will be placed on the list of high risk project sponsors and could be subjected to a Spot Audit [see Section 15 (b)].

• Final Project Report – Once a project has been completed, the Project Sponsor must notify Caltrans, Division of Rail and Mass Transportation by e-mail or letter. Within six months of completion, the project sponsor must submit a Final Project Report. The forms will be available on-line. The Final Project Report includes: a. Final Project Report form. This report must include the comparison of actual project performance of the final project to the projected performance when the allocation was requested. b. Final Project Itemized Expenditure Table. c. Verification of project completion as scoped. The project sponsor must provide evidence of project completion. In the majority of cases, evidence of project completion can be satisfied by submitting one or more of the following: • Photographs of the completed project • A copy of the final invoicing • A copy of the punch list from the facility’s final walk-through, or • If the project is a vehicle, supply the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) of the vehicle(s) acquired.

The above list is only a few samples of what can be used to show evidence of completion of a project. Please feel free to contact the LCTOP office to discuss what other means may exist for your circumstances.

d. Savings -- If the project has been completed with a savings, the report should indicate the amount of savings and how those funds will be applied towards an eligible LCTOP project. Any project cost savings not reassigned to a current project, should be applied to the next allocation request submitted, and used prior to, or along with, the allocation of additional funds. LCTOP staff will inquire about the status of any outstanding cost savings every six months until said savings are exhausted.

Please ensure that expenditure interest and all other information in the final report is properly reported. Incomplete or incorrect reports will not be accepted and will be

Page 16 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 98 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

considered delinquent until corrections are provided. Agencies with delinquent reports will not receive further LCTOP allocations until the correct reports have been received by Caltrans.

b. Program Reporting Requirements (responsibility of Caltrans)

i. Annual Legislative Report: Per Health and Safety Code Section 39721 administering agencies shall report to the Department of Finance and the Department of Finance shall submit an annual report to the Legislature on the status of projects and their outcomes.

ii. Annual Expenditure Record: GC, GGRF, Section 16428.9, requires State agencies that have been appropriated monies from the GGRF to prepare an expenditure record. An expenditure record is prepared for a program, not for individual projects. It provides elements that describe the proposed use of the monies and must be submitted prior to expenditure of those monies for projects. The State ARB shall develop guidance on reporting and quantification methods for all state agencies that receive appropriations from the fund to ensure the requirements of this section are met. Caltrans submits the Expenditure Record to ARB prior to expending any funds (from ARB’s “Interim Guidance to Agencies Administering Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Monies: Expenditure Record and Fiscal Procedures”).

16. Audit Responsibility a. Project Audit (Transportation Development Act)

Annual audit of public transportation operators required under the Transportation Development Act (TDA), per PUC 99245, must include verification of receipt and appropriate expenditure of funds. Project sponsors receiving LCTOP funds in a fiscal year for which a TDA audit is conducted must submit a copy of the audit to Caltrans by six months after the close of the fiscal year (December 31). Caltrans will make the audits available to the Legislature and the SCO. Project sponsors may request a 90-day extension from the December 31 deadline to March 31. They must notify Caltrans in writing via e-mail or a formal letter.

Project sponsors who fail to submit an expanded TDA audit documenting all LCTOP funding allocated to date will not receive future LCTOP allocations until the required document(s) have been submitted to Caltrans.

b. Spot Audit/On-site Monitoring – conducted by Caltrans

Spot audits and/or on-site monitoring can take place at any time at the discretion of the Caltrans without prior warning given to the agency. Either a spot audit or monitoring may be conducted on a specific issue or function. Any evidence or information that supports the need for a compliance audit action or monitoring will be pursued by Caltrans. High risk project sponsors are likely to become the subject of an audit or on-site monitoring.

Page 17 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 99 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

Agencies or projects will be placed on the high risk list for the following:

• Delinquent with reporting and/or providing documentation as stipulated in the LCTOP guidelines • Agencies with frequent errors or have not conformed to the requirements of previous awards • Agencies engaged in multiple reassignments of funds • Projects with 0 percent progress one year after allocation • Special situations

Caltrans will select agencies each year and perform an extensive review of all LCTOP related information from that agency. If selected, an agency may be asked to provide additional documents pertinent to the LCTOP program and projects that have been funded. If inconsistencies are found, agencies will be provided an opportunity to correct those errors. If discrepancies are not corrected, the agency will not be eligible to receive future funding.

17. Funding Process/Appropriation

Funding for this program shall be provided in Fiscal Year 2015-16 and beyond by a continuous appropriation of 5 percent of the proceeds from the auction of greenhouse gas emission allowances in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, administered by ARB. The auctions occur four times a year and proceeds are deposited into the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund.

The State Controller’s Office will list eligible project sponsors and the amount of funds each will receive, per PUC Sections 99313 and 99314, based on a formula from previously allocated State Transit Assistance (STA) funds to local agencies. The allocation is split evenly between funds received based on population and funds received based on revenue generated.

a. Reassigned Funds: Project sponsors may find that they have surplus funds at the completion of an approved LCTOP project, or they may determine that the funded LCTOP project is no longer the highest priority as an eligible fund use. As a result, the project sponsor may apply to reassign funds to a different project. If the project is complete and there are surplus funds, an agency should include the proposed use for the surplus funds as part of the required Final Report. If the use of surplus funds has not yet been determined, Caltrans staff shall treat the project as on-going – not completed – until the agency identifies a project to receive the surplus funds.

If the agency elects to reprioritize eligible projects and redirect approved LCTOP funds, a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for the original project must be submitted. The CAP must indicate the current approved amount in the “Original” column and the lower revised project cost in the “Revised” column. The CAP must list the amount of surplus funds (and

Page 18 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 100 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

any interest if applicable) that will be transferred and the project that will receive the reassigned funds in the “Justification for Change” box.

When reassigning funds to a NEW project:

• A CAP form is needed for the project that is transferring funds to the new project, and a new Allocation Request is needed for the project receiving the funds. • The Allocation Request for the reassigned funds should be treated the same as an Allocation Request submitted for new funding, and all required documents must be submitted in the same manner. • The new project must expend the funds within the time limits of the applicable Budget Act. • The new allocation request has all the authorized signatures of the same agencies as the original project, so that all contributing project sponsors are aware of the new use of their contributed funds. • The project sponsor may not expend the surplus funds on the new project before receiving a Reassigned Funds Approval Letter from Caltrans authorizing the sponsor to do so.

If reassigning funds to an EXISTING project:

• The project sponsor submits a CAP for the project that will no longer be using LCTOP funds. The funds should be listed in both the Original and Revised columns and the Justification section should list the project that will receive the reassigned funds. • An additional CAP is to be submitted for the existing project receiving the reassigned funds. This CAP should list the original fund amounts and the revised amounts based on the transfer of funds following the steps listed above. If Caltrans staff determines an agency has a pattern/history of reassigning the same funds multiple times, the agency may be placed on the list of high risk project sponsors and could be subject to a Spot Audit (see section 15. b).

Agencies who fail to submit revisions made to the CAP as requested by Caltrans staff and/or are delinquent in other required reports and submittals will not receive additional allocations of LCTOP funds until all delinquent items have been submitted and approved.

b. Interest Earned: Interest on LCTOP funds must be used in the same manner as the principal. Interest earned must only be used for approved LCTOP projects, in the following ways:

• If project costs exceed the amount on the approved allocation request, any interest earned may be applied to the project, if a project sponsor first submits a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) (available on the Caltrans, Division of Rail and Mass Transportation website, or from Caltrans LCTOP staff) and Caltrans approves that CAP before any interest earned is applied to the project.

Page 19 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 101 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

• Interest remaining after project closeout must be applied to another approved LCTOP project. Any unused interest not applied to a current project should be applied to the next allocation request submitted, and used prior to, or along with, the allocation of additional funds.

• The LCTOP staff will inquire about the status of unused interest every 6 months until said interest earned is exhausted.

c. Savings: If the project has been completed with a savings, the report should indicate the amount of savings and how those funds will be applied towards an eligible LCTOP project(s). Any project cost savings not reassigned to a current project, should be applied to the next allocation request submitted, and used prior to, or along with, the allocation of additional funds The LCTOP staff will inquire about the status of any outstanding cost savings every six months until said savings are exhausted.

18. Program Process and Timeline

Budget Act Appropriation of $25 Million for 2014-15:

1. By December 1, 2014, the SCO will release the estimate of funding available for each transit operator for 2014-15.

2. Caltrans will release the final program guidelines by December 19, 2014. Eligible recipients may begin submitting project information to Caltrans, in the format proscribed by Caltrans, to confirm eligibility of proposed expenditures. Project proposals will be due by Feb. 1, 2015, to Caltrans’ Division of Rail and Mass Transportation.

3. In coordination with ARB, Caltrans shall confirm eligibility of the proposals submitted by the recipient agencies, develop a list of approved expenditures, and notify the eligible recipients of any deficiencies that must be addressed for approval. The list will include project descriptions and any certifications required by the program guidelines, such as timely expenditures of funds. Caltrans and ARB shall finalize a list of approved projects, and submit the list to the SCO by April 1, 2015.

4. Upon Caltrans notification to the SCO of project eligibility, and upon a Caltrans finding, in consultation with DOF, that funds in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund are sufficient to support a full allocation, the SCO will release the approved amount of funds to each approved recipient by April 15, 2015, up to 75 percent of their full allocation. If auction proceeds prior to the Caltrans notification are not sufficient to fund the 75 percent allocation, Caltrans may direct the SCO to reduce the initial allocation After the fourth auction of the fiscal year occurs, the SCO may release the remainder of funds by June 30, 2015.

Page 20 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 102 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

5. Due to the Budget Act appropriation, Eligible recipients must receive project approval to encumber funds by June 30, 2015, and request allocation by June 30, 2017.

Continuous Appropriation Effective 2015-16:

1. By July 10 of each fiscal year, or within 10 days of budget enactment, whichever is later, Caltrans will consult with DOF and notify SCO of the estimated amount available to the Program in the fiscal year.

2. By September 1 of that fiscal year, or within 60 days of Caltrans notification, whichever is later, the SCO releases the estimate of funding available for each transit operator for the fiscal year.

3. Upon release of the funding level by SCO, eligible recipients may begin submitting project information to Caltrans, in the format proscribed by Caltrans, to confirm eligibility of proposed expenditures in the fiscal year. All project proposals must be received by November 1, of that fiscal year. In addition to the “baseline plan” that may not exceed the SCO estimate of funding available, eligible recipients may submit a “supplemental plan” that may include additional expenditures up to 20 percent of the SCO estimate of funding. Eligible recipients are encouraged to request allocations in a timely manner to realize public benefit, but may also retain the continuous appropriation allocation across multiple fiscal years to accumulate funding for a larger expenditure. Additionally, an eligible recipient may choose to resolve uncertainty on the level of auction proceeds by postponing submittal of an expenditure plan until all auction for a fiscal year are complete, and then submitting a plan to expend those known funds in the following fiscal year.

4. In coordination with ARB, Caltrans shall confirm eligibility of the proposals submitted by the recipient agencies, and will then develop a list of approved expenditures, and will notify the eligible recipients of any deficiencies that must be addressed for approval. The list will include project descriptions and any certifications required by the program guidelines, such as timely expenditures of funds. Caltrans will submit the final approved list of approved expenditures to SCO by January 15, 2016.

5. Upon Caltrans notification to the SCO of project eligibility, the SCO will release the approved amount of funds available to each recipient from prior auctions by February 15, of that fiscal year. The SCO shall not allocate to any recipient an amount greater than that entity’s share of auction proceeds received to that date. The SCO will release any additional amount of approved funds from subsequent auction by June 30, of that fiscal year.

Page 21 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 103 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

Continuous Appropriation Cycle 2 and Ongoing Adjustments:

In addition to the funds available for the new fiscal year, the SCO shall provide adjustments for any unallocated funds available to an eligible recipient from a prior fiscal year.

Page 22 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 104 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B Draft Guidelines – GGRF – LCTOP

TIMELINE FOR PROCESS – LCTOP fy 14-15 and 15-16

2014-15

SCO releases notification of funding available to transit operators for 2014-15 (shares of the $25M) Dec. 1, 2014

Caltrans releases LCTOP interim final guidelines Dec. 19, 2014

Agencies submit expenditures proposals, due by: Feb. 1, 2015

Caltrans and ARB concurrently review expenditures and submit approved projects to the SCO. Caltrans prepares expenditure record April 1, 2015

SCO releases approved amount of funds to recipients April 15, 2015

2015-16 and continuous

Caltrans/DOF notifies SCO of estimated amount available to the Program July 10 (or within 10 days of budget enactment)

SCO notifies transit operators of available funds for fiscal year Sept. 1 (or within 60 days of DOF notice)

Transit agencies submit expenditure proposals to Caltrans, due by: Nov. 1, 2015 (or 60 days after fund notification is released)

Caltrans, in collaboration with ARB, reviews and approves a Jan. 15 list of eligible projects and submits list to SCO

SCO releases approved amount of funds to recipients Feb. 15 up to the recipient’s share of auction proceeds received to date

Page 23 of 23 11/07/14

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 105 of 106 PDWG 12/15/14: Item 6B

This page intentionally left blank

PDWG 12.15.14 Page 106 of 106