In Defence of Trotskyism No. 9 £1 Waged, 50P Unwaged/Low Waged, €1.50 on the Continuity of Trotskyism Four Internationals Since 1864

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In Defence of Trotskyism No. 9 £1 Waged, 50P Unwaged/Low Waged, €1.50 on the Continuity of Trotskyism Four Internationals Since 1864 In Defence of Trotskyism No. 9 £1 waged, 50p unwaged/low waged, €1.50 On the Continuity of Trotskyism Four Internationals since 1864: Founding of the 1st (Workingman’s) In- Second Congress of the 4th International ternational (IWA, 1864–1876) in London. Paris 1946: Pierre Favre (PCI, France), S. It held left-wing socialist, communist, Santen (Holland), Pierre Frank (PCI), anarchist and trade unions. Dissolved by Jock Haston (RCP), Colin de Silva Marx because of anarchist reaction to his (standing, LSSP, Grandizo Munis, who defence of the Paris Commune. bloced with Max Shachtman here. Sixth Congress of the 2nd (Socialist) Second Congress of the 3rd International International in Amsterdam in 1904: (Comintern) Moscow 1920: Karl Radek Includes Rosa Luxemburg , Karl Kaut- (third), Nikolai Bukharin (fifth), Maxim sky (Germany), Victor Adler (Austria), Gorky (ninth), Vladimir Ulyanov (Lenin, Georgii Plekhanov (Russia), Edouard tenth, hands in pockets), Grigory Zinoviev Vaillant (France) and Sen Katayama (thirteenth, hands behind his back), Maria (Japan). Ulyanova (nineteen white blouse). Page 2 On the Continuity of Trotskyism Where We Stand ets/workers’ councils to sup- agenda of the petty-bourgeois press the inevitable counter- reformist leaders of the Labour 1. WE STAND WITH revolution of private capitalist party and trade unions KARL MARX: ‘The emancipa- profit against planned produc- 5. We oppose all immigra- tion of the working classes must tion for the satisfaction of so- tion controls. International be conquered by the working cialised human need. finance capital roams the planet classes themselves. The struggle 3. We recognise the necessity in search of profit and imperial- for the emancipation of the for revolutionaries to carry out ist governments disrupts the working class means not a serious ideological and political lives of workers and cause the struggle for class privileges and struggle as direct participants in collapse of whole nations with monopolies but for equal rights the trade unions (always) and in their direct intervention in the and duties and the abolition of the mass reformist social de- Balkans, Iraq and Afghanistan all class rule’ (The International mocratic bourgeois workers’ and their proxy wars in Somalia Workingmen’s Association parties despite their pro- and the Democratic Republic of 1864, General Rules). capitalist leaderships when the Congo, etc. Workers have 2. The capitalist state con- conditions are favourable. Be- the right to sell their labour sists, in the last analysis, of cause we see the trade union internationally wherever they ruling-class laws within a judicial bureaucracy and their allies in get the best price. Only union system and detention centres the Labour party leadership as membership and pay rates can overseen by the armed bodies the most fundamental obstacle counter employers who seek to of police/army who are under to the struggle for power of the exploit immigrant workers as the direction and are controlled working class, outside of the cheap labour to undermine the in acts of defence of capitalist state forces and their direct gains of past struggles. property rights against the inter- agencies themselves, we must ests of the majority of civil fight and defeat and replace Subscribe to Socialist Fight society. The working class must them with a revolutionary lead- and In Defence of Trotskyism overthrow the capitalist state ership by mobilising the base and replace it with a workers’ against the pro-capitalist bu- Four Issues: UK: £12.00, EU: state based on democratic sovi- reaucratic misleaders to open £14.00 the way forward for the struggle Rest of the World: £18.00 Socialist Fight produces IDOT. for workers’ power. Please send donations to help It is a part of the Liaison Com- 4. We are fully in support of in their production mittee for the Fourth Interna- all mass mobilisations against Cheques and Standing Orders the onslaught of this reactionary to tional with the Liga Comunista, Con-Lib Dem coalition. How- Brazil and the Tendencia Mili- ever, whilst participating in this Socialist Fight Account No. 1 tante Bolchevique, Argentina. struggle we will oppose all poli- Unity Trust Bank, Sort Code Editor: Gerry Downing cies which subordinate the 08-60-01, Account. No. Assistant Editor: John Barry working class to the political 20227368. Introduction ity of Trotskyism: Reply to Revolutionary Commu- This pamphlet on the continuity of Trotsky- nist International Tendency (RCIT) Part 2. ism consists of two parts. The first part is an The following quote could have been written article from Socialist Fight No 8, November at anytime in the post war history of Trotsky- 2011 by Gerry Downing On the Continuity of ism. It neither guarantees the orthodoxy of Trotskyism: Programme vs. Struggle? No, Pro- the authors not the success of their endeav- gramme via Struggle! The second part is a devel- ours. It could describe either an unprincipled opment from that and was part of the docu- lash-up or a principled fight for revolutionary mentation for the founding conference of the Trotskyism. But it does speak of struggle on Socialist Fight in March 2014; On the Continu- a programmatic basis similar to the one we are engaged upon now. Socialist Fight: PO Box 59188, London, NW2 9LJ, http://socialistfight.com/[email protected]. On the Continuity of Trotskyism Page 3 “The process of winning political hegemony for revolutionary Marxism in the upsurge will involve a range of tactics and organisational forms. But we must be clear on our goal: to build revolutionary Marxist, that is, mass Trotskyist parties in every country as sections of the Fourth International. One important aspect of the struggle to build the Fourth International is attempting to unify the world Trotskyist movement — the political forces that affirm the Transitional Program and identify with the Trotskyist tradition. If we achieved this, we could qualitatively increase our impact in the workers’ movement and clarify and resolve our differences in the framework of international democratic cen- tralism. Our International needs to promote a process of political clarification and organ- isational reunification of the world Trotskyist movement. To build the Fourth International as a real World Party of Socialist Revolution — this is the core of the problem we face. To take advantage of the contradictions in the present, undeniably difficult situation to the Goldman-Morrow-Heijenoort minority advance the struggle to build the Fourth In- in the American Socialist Workers Party. ternational — this is the decision we must Therefore when in 1946 Haston led a delega- make.”[1] tion of the RCP to a conference of some of We might mention this Wiki article on the the sections of the Fourth International in life of Jock Haston which shows the struggle Paris it is surprising that he moved that the for Trotskyism was waged by many: conference be considered as a Congress of “With the turn of the war against the Nazis the movement. This was in part motivated by the RCP was at pains to look for any signs of the opposition of the RCP to the demoralisa- the coming revolutionary upheavals that were tion of the German comrades of the Interna- expected in line with the perspectives of the tional Communists of Germany (IKD). Fourth International as outlined in the fa- More important, politically, were the amend- mous Transitional programme. The leading ments that Haston wrote, along with Bill theoretician of the RCP, Ted Grant, was Hunter, to the resolutions of the FI leader- therefore far seeing when he sought to tailor ship put forward at the meeting. In contrast the political demands of the movement to to the FI leadership the RCP amendments the actual movement rather than succumbing recognise that Stalinism had emerged from to a rosy view of events. This realistic view of the war strengthened and that an economic events was also prompted by the agreement crisis was unlikely in the near future. There- of the RCP leadership with the documents of fore it was argued political demands and ex- pectations had to recognise these changes Socialist Fight: PO Box 59188, London, NW2 9LJ, http://socialistfight.com/[email protected]. Page 4 On the Continuity of Trotskyism and not pose revolutionary tasks in the ab- loism were clear did a section of the F.I. pull sence of a revolutionary situation. The FI back. In our opinion, the “orthodox” move- majority around Ernest Mandel and Michel ment has still to face up to the new theoreti- Pablo, backed by the SWP in the United cal problems which rendered it susceptible to States, prevailed however. Pabloism in 1943-50 and gave rise to a The dispute with the leadership of the FI ragged, partial split in 1952-54.”[3] deepened with time and became centred on On one level there is a great deal of truth in three interlinked questions. Firstly there was this assertion, serious problems beset the the role of Stalinism in Eastern Europe Fourth International during the war, the US where the RCP took a different position to SWP was clearly falling victim to national the FI in particular when the latter began to isolation, but is very wrong to speak of “the support the split of Josip Broz Tito in Yugo- failure of Leon Trotsky’s perspective of the slavia from the USSR the RCP became very break-up of the Soviet bureaucracy and of critical. This criticism being expressed in new October revolutions in the aftermath of documents written by Haston. Secondly the war”. Trotsky’s perspectives were those there was the question of economic perspec- of revolutionary struggle. The Trotskyist tives and the growing tendency of the Labour fought those struggles heroically as outlined party government of Clement Attlee to take below. We cannot speak of the “failure of various industries into state ownership as was perspectives” in this manner as if was wrong also happening in Eastern Europe.
Recommended publications
  • REVOLUTION Or WAR #10
    REVOLUTION or WAR #10 Journal of the International Group of the Communist Left (IGCL) Biannual – September 2018 Summary The Rise of New Communist Forces and The Fight for The International Party International Situation Balance-sheet of Railworkers’ Defeat of Spring 2018 in France March 28th IGCL Leaflet for The Generalization and Unity of The Struggles May 10th Communique on The American Withdrawal from The Irani Nuclear Agreement Marxism and The National Question Correspondence What Relation between the International Party and Its Local Organizations? Debate within the Proletarian Camp What Is The Party? (Nuevo Curso) The Future International (Internationalist Communist Tendency) Some Comments on the ICT Text on the Future International History of the Working Class Movement Rosa Luxemburg and The Feminism (Nuevo Curso) E-mail : [email protected], website : www.igcl.org 4 dollars/3 euros Content (Our review is also available in French) The Rise of New Communist Forces and The Fight for The International Party..........................1 International Situation Balance-sheet of The Railway Workers’ Defeat of Spring 2018 in France........................................3 March 28th IGCL Leaflet for The Generalization and Unity of The Struggles..................................6 May 10th Communique on The American Withdrawal of The Irani Nuclear Agreement..............9 Marxism and The National Question............................................................................................................ 10 Correspondence What Relation
    [Show full text]
  • Pablo Bio-Bibliographical Sketch
    Lubitz' TrotskyanaNet Michel Pablo Bio-Bibliographical Sketch Contents: Basic biographical data Biographical sketch Selective bibliography Basic biographical data Name: Michel Pablo Other names (by-names, pseud. etc.): Abdelkrim ; Alain ; Archer ; Gabe ; Gabriel ; Henry ; Jérôme ; J.P. Martin ; Jean-Paul Martin ; Mike; Molitor ; M.P. ; Murat ; Pilar ; Michalēs N. Raptēs ; Michel Raptis ; Mihalis Raptis ; Mikhalis N. Raptis ; Robert ; Smith ; Spero ; Speros ; Vallin Date and place of birth: August 24, 1911, Alexandria (Egypt) Date and place of death: February 17, 1996, Athens (Greece) Nationality: Greek Occupations, careers, etc.: Civil engineer, professional revolutionary Time of activity in Trotskyist movement: 1928 - 1964 (1995) Biographical sketch A lifelong revolutionary, Michel Pablo for some one and a half decades was the chief leader of the Trotskyist Fourth International – or at least of its majority faction. He was perhaps one of the most renowned and at the same time one of the most controversial figures of the international Trotskyist movement; for all those claiming for themselves the label of "orthodox" Trotskyism, Pablo since 1953 was a whipping boy and the very synonym for centrism, revisionism, opportunism, and even for liquidationism. 'Michel Pablo' is one (and undoubtedly the best known) of more than about a dozen pseudonyms used by a man who was born Michael Raptis [Mikhalēs Raptēs / Μισέλ Πάμπλο]1 as son of Nikolaos Raptis [Raptēs], a Greek civil engineer, in Alexandria (Egypt) on August 24, 1911. He grew up and attended Greek schools in Egypt and from 1918 in Crete before, at the age of 17, he moved to Athens enrolling at the Polytechnic where he studied engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defence of Trotskyism No.1
    In Defence of Trotskyism Price: Waged: £2.00 Concessions: 50p, €3 Number 1. Winter 2009-2010 China: deformed workers‟ state or rising world imperialist power? Reply to the International Bolshevik Tendency and the Spart “Family” In Defence of Trotskyism is published by the International Trotskyist Current. Contact: PO Box 59188, London, NW2 9LJ. Email: [email protected] đoàn kết , اتحاد قدرت است . ,Unity is strength, L'union fait la force, Es la unidad fuerza, Η ενότητα είναι δύναμη là sức mạnh, Jedność jest siła, ykseys on kesto, યુનિટિ થ્રૂ .િા , Midnimo iyo waa awood, hundeb ydy chryfder, unità ,אחדות היא כוח ,Einheit ist Stärke, एकता शक्ति, है единстве наша сила, vienybės jėga, bashkimi ben fuqine Ní ,الوحدة هو القوة ,è la resistenza, 団結は力だ", A unidade é a força, eining er styrkur, De eenheid is de sterkte neart go chur le céile, pagkakaisa ay kalakasan, jednota is síla, 일성은 이다 힘 힘, Workers of the World In Defence of Trotskyism page 2 Introducing In Defence of Trotskyism To the International Trotskyist Current he International Trotskyist Current has begun this series of theoretical and Date: Wednesday, 7 January, 2009, 10:34 PM polemical journals because much of the material is very specialised and We read your 20-point Platform with interest, and note directed at the Trotskyist ―Family‖ and far left currents who take theory your agreement with Trotsky that programme must seriously and are familiar with the historical conflicts and lines of demarca- T come first. While some points of your platform are for- tion which constitutes the history of revolutionary Trotskyism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Workers' Inquiry from Trotskyism to Operaismo
    the author(s) 2014 ISSN 1473-2866 (Online) ISSN 2052-1499 (Print) www.ephemerajournal.org volume 14(3): 493-513 The Workers’ Inquiry from Trotskyism to Operaismo: a political methodology for investigating the workplace Jamie Woodcock abstract This article discusses different approaches to conducting a workers’ inquiry. Although there is a certain level of ambiguity in the term, it is taken to mean a method for investigating the workplace from the point of view of the worker. The article aims to examine the methodological concerns involved with conducting a contemporary inquiry and to consider the different debates that have emerged from its use. It examines a particular set of examples from Marx, the breaks from orthodox Trotskyism with the Johnson-Forest Tendency and Socialisme ou Barbarie, and early phase of Operaismo or Italian Workerism. It is intended as a specific intervention that aims to understand what can be learned from an unorthodox Trotskyist interpretation of a workers’ inquiry and how this moment can provide an inspiration for the rethinking and reapplication of Marxism, both in terms of theory and practice, to the changing world. Introduction The aim of this article is to consider what can be learned from a number of different attempts at workers’ inquiries. This will be neither an exclusive nor an exhaustive study, but examine particular moments of interest. The different groups that broke with orthodox Trotskyism and the later Italian tradition sought to critically reassess the changing world around them, something that remains an important task today. The current conjuncture in the UK is characterised by the continuing impact of austerity.
    [Show full text]
  • Charlie Van Gelderen (1913-2001)
    Charlie van Gelderen (1913-2001) https://internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article546 Obituary Charlie van Gelderen (1913-2001) - IV Online magazine - 2001 - IV336 - December 2001 - Publication date: Monday 10 December 2001 Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine - All rights reserved Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine Page 1/3 Charlie van Gelderen (1913-2001) Charlie van Gelderen was the last survivor of those who attended the 1938 Founding Conference of the Fourth International in Paris. He attended as an observer on behalf of South African Trotskyists, though he was already living in Britain by that time. He died peacefully at home in Cambridge on October 26 after a short illness at the age of 88, still a fully paid up and until very recently an active member of the International Socialist Group (British section of the Fourth International). Charlie was born in August 1913 in the small town of Wellington, 40 miles from Cape Town, South Africa. He became politically active as a young man, initially joining the Fabian Society, but in 1931 he became an enthusiastic supporter of the ideas of Leon Trotsky. Together with his twin brother, Herman, he was instrumental in setting up the first Trotskyist organisation in South Africa, the International Marxist League. Charlie was also involved in setting up the Commercial Workers Union in the Cape and for a time became its full time secretary. The South African Trotskyist movement split in 1932 in response to the "French turn", the position put forward by Trotsky at the time urging his French supporters to enter the French Socialist Party.
    [Show full text]
  • 1Contents FSC Contents.Qxd
    22REVIEWS (Composite)_REVIEWS (Composite).qxd 2/11/2019 11:39 AM Page 123 123 Reviews Latin America Grace Livingstone, Britain and the Dictatorships of Argentina and Chile 1973­1982, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, 292 pages, ISBN 9783319782911, £16 During the twentieth century, Latin America was the scene of numerous military coups which established oppressive dictatorships notorious for their abuse of democratic and human rights. This book is a detailed study of the policies adopted by Britain towards two of them – in Chile and Argentina. On 11 September 1973, Augusto Pinochet, the head of Chilean armed forces, launched a coup against the democratically elected socialist president, Salvador Allende. He bombed the presidential palace, fired on and arrested thousands of Allende supporters and other left­wingers, and shut down all democratic institutions. In Argentina on 26 March 1976, the widowed third wife of former dictator Juan Peron, Isabella Peron, who had been elected president, was overthrown by the army, which closed down the Congress, banned political parties, dissolved the Supreme Court, and arrested thousands of political activists including former ministers. In the cases of both Chile and Argentina, the British Foreign Office and leading ambassadorial staff – despite theoretical commitments to democracy – recommended recognition of the military juntas established and downplayed reports of human rights infringements. Grace Livingstone attributes this to the class basis of the personnel involved. She states that, in 1950, 83% of Foreign Office recruits attended private schools and the figure was still 68% ten years later. In 1980, 80% of ambassadors and top Foreign Office officials had attended fee­paying schools.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical and Comparative Analysis of Organisational Forms of Selected Marxist Parties, in Theory and in Practice, with Special Reference to the Last Half Century
    Rahimi, M. (2009) A critical and comparative analysis of organisational forms of selected Marxist parties, in theory and in practice, with special reference to the last half century. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/688/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] A critical and comparative analysis of organisational forms of selected Marxist parties, in theory and in practice, with special reference to the last half century Mohammad Rahimi, BA, MSc Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD Centre for the Study of Socialist Theory and Movement Faculty of Law, Business and Social Science University of Glasgow September 2008 The diversity of the proletariat during the final two decades of the 20 th century reached a point where traditional socialist and communist parties could not represent all sections of the working class. Moreover, the development of social movements other than the working class after the 1960s further sidelined traditional parties. The anti-capitalist movements in the 1970s and 1980s were looking for new political formations.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialist Re­ Yvonne Groseil View, and I Was Quite Impressed by It
    Tvvo Vievvs on the Dialectics of Nature To William F. Warde tal to Sartre and Hyppolite. There is and I hope it will precipitate in this I have just read your article, "Is Na­ one point in your article, however, with country a greater appreciation of the ture Dialectical?" in the Summer 1964 which I would take some exception. problem and wide discussion of it. That is when you argue against the issue of the International Socialist Re­ Yvonne Groseil view, and I was quite impressed by it. anti-dialecticians by pointing out the Although I must plead guilty to a advances made in science, especially by November 15, 1964 rather superficial knowledge of Marx­ Oparin, through the use of dialectical ism, I am very interested in Hegel's method. Dialectical logic may help the Reply work. During my study of Hegel, I have scientist reach some useful hypotheses Here are some comments on the main come to the conclusion that the ques­ for later investigation, but this is not questions of theoretical interest raised tion of the philosophy of nature is a the essential point here. by this friendly letter. crucial one. In my opinion, Hegel's I t seems to me that the method or 1. Would knowledge of the method of philosophy falls apart into a dualism of means by which scientific discoveries the materialist dialectic, which is based mind and matter instead of being the are made is secondary in this argument. on the most general laws of being and synthesis he desired just because of the What is really vital is the fact that only becoming, assist the physical scientist failure of his philosophy of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Week School on Political Issues from the History of AWL
    Week school on political issues from the history of AWL Day One Session: Heterodox, orthodox, and “orthodox Mark 2” 1. Why we started: 1966-8 Trotskyism: http://www.workersliberty.org//taxonomy/term/555 http://www.workersliberty.org/wwaawwmb The AWL's tradition: http://www.workersliberty.org/node/5146 Session: Party and perspectives What happened in 1968 and how the left responded ***************** Why we fused with IS (SWP) Timeline 2. Ireland: 1968-71 1964 July 2: After years of civil rights agitation in USA, Civil Rights http://www.workersliberty.org/node/10010 Act becomes law. October 15: Labour wins general election, after 13 years of Session: The debates in 1969 - “withdraw subsidies”, Tory rule “southern arsenals”, “troops out” before August 1969, “Catholic economism” and transitional demands, “troops out” 1965 in August 1969. January 31: USA starts bombing of North Vietnam. Vietnam war, and movement against it, escalate. Day Two February: SLL, then biggest revolutionary group in Britain, launches its own independent "Young Socialists" as a 3. The Tories and Labour 1970-4 response to limited expulsions by Labour Party after SLL wins majority in Labour youth movement. Session: General strike Our Labour Party debate then: syndicalism, economism, and 1966 politics Summer: Beginning of "Cultural Revolution" in China: a faction of the bureaucracy mobilises gangs to purge rivals 4. Stalinism 1968-75 reinforce autarkic, ultra-statist policy. But many leftists in the West will admire the "Cultural Revolution"; Maoism will Session: Czechoslovakia 1968 be a big force on the revolutionary left from 1968 to the “Soviet dissidents” mid-70s, though less so in Britain than in other European Vietnam and Cambodia 1975 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Communist International, the Soviet Union,And Their Impact on the Latin America Workers’ Movement
    The Communist International, the Soviet Union,and their impact on the Latin America Workers’ Movement DAN LA BOTZ Abstract: The Soviet Union and A L the Communist International had an adverse influence on the Latin CONTRA American workers’ movement, ), 1957-1964. continually diverting it fighting for UCIÓN L a democratic socialist society. They ALHE T REVO A DE subordinated the workers’ movements L ( to the interests of the Soviet . Union’s ruling class, the Communist IQUEIROS PORFIRIANA bureaucracy. At one moment, they led S the workers’ movement in disastrous ARO F L uprisings, while in a subsequent era A they encouraged it to build alliances DICTADURA AVID with capitalist and imperialist power. D Keywords: Soviet Union. Communist International. Communist Parties. Cuba. Workers Movement. A Internacional Comunista, a União Soviética e seu impacto no movimento de trabalhadores da América Latina Resumo: A União Soviética e a Internacional Comunista tiveram uma influência adversa no movimento latino-americano de trabalhadores, frequentemente, distraindo-o de sua luta por uma sociedade socialista democrática. Ambas subordinaram os movimentos de trabalhadores aos interesses da classe dominante na União Soviética, a burocracia comunista. Em um momento, dirigiram o movimento de trabalhadores para levantes desastrosos, DAN LA BOTZ enquanto em um período subsequente encorajaram-no a fazer alianças com Ph.D in American history and poderes capitalistas e imperialistas. professor at the Murphy Institute, the Palavras-chaves: União Soviética. labor school of the City University Internacional Comunista. Partidos of New York. He is the author of ten Comunistas. Cuba. Movimento de books on labor, social movements, Trabalhadores. and politics in the United States, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Hansen Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf78700585 No online items Register of the Joseph Hansen papers Finding aid prepared by Joseph Hansen Hoover Institution Archives 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA, 94305-6003 (650) 723-3563 [email protected] © 1998, 2006, 2012 Register of the Joseph Hansen 92035 1 papers Title: Joseph Hansen papers Date (inclusive): 1887-1980 Collection Number: 92035 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 109 manuscript boxes, 1 oversize box, 3 envelopes, 1 audio cassette(46.2 linear feet) Abstract: Speeches and writings, correspondence, notes, minutes, reports, internal bulletins, resolutions, theses, printed matter, sound recording, and photographs relating to Leon Trotsky, activities of the Socialist Workers Party in the United States, and activities of the Fourth International in Latin America, Western Europe and elsewhere. Physical Location: Hoover Institution Archives Creator: Hansen, Joseph, Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Archives. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Joseph Hansen papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Archives in 1992. Accruals Materials may have been added to the collection since this finding aid was prepared. To determine if this has occurred, find the collection in Stanford University's online catalog at http://searchworks.stanford.edu . Materials have been added to the collection if the number of boxes listed in the online catalog is larger than the number of boxes listed in this finding aid.
    [Show full text]
  • O Eview Bssay
    c:\users\ken\documents\type3402\rj 3402 050 red.docx 2015-02-04 9:19 PM o eview bssay BEHIND THE SCENES AT THE BRPF, THE VIETNAM SOLIDARITY CAMPAIGN, AND THE RUSSELL TRIBUNAL Stefan Andersson [email protected] Ernest Tate. Revolutionary Activism in the 1950s and 60s: a Memoir. Vol. 1: Can- ada 1955–1965. Pp. xvi, 274. C$15; £9; €11. Vol. 2: Britain 1965–1969. London: Resistance Books, 2014. Pp. xviii, 402. isbn: 978-0-902869-60-8. C$21; £13. i. introduction rnest (Ernie) Tate was born in 1934 in Northern Ireland and emigrated to b=Canada in 1955. He describes himself as “a working class activist without any formal education, politically formed mainly by my experiences in a small Trotskyist group in Canada” (Memoir 2: 164). He came to Britain in 1965 to establish, with much help from his partner, Jess MacKenzie, a British Section of the Fourth International. This is when the International Marxist Group (img) was born. In this review I will limit my comments to Tate’s activities in his second volume relating to the brpf, the Vietnam Solidarity Campaign (vsc) and the International War Crimes Tribunal (iwct). Tate describes how the img came into being and some of its main person- alities: Ken Coates, Pat Jordan, Geoff Coggan, and in particular Tariq Ali. Ali was elected President of the Oxford Union in 1965 and organized the first teach-in against the Vietnam war in the uk. He was a delegate on behalf of the British Peace Committee to the Communist-dominated Helsinki Peace Conference, visited Vietnam as a member of one of the investigative commis- sions sent out by the iwct and reported his findings at the session in Stock- holm in May 1967.
    [Show full text]