Nurses' Perception of Nursing Services Documentation Barriers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nurses' Perception of Nursing Services Documentation Barriers Electron J Gen Med 2018;15(3):em28 ISSN:2516-3507 OPEN ACCESS Original Article https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/86184 Nurses’ perception of nursing services documentation barriers: a qualitative approach Seyed Majid Vafaei1, Zahra Sadat Manzari2, Abbas Heydari3, Razieh Froutan4, Leila Amiri Farahani5 ABSTRACT Background: Researches has shown that the quality of nursing documentation services in the world, including Iran, is far from existing standards. Understanding the barriers to improving the documentation of nursing services is essential for the first step. The aim of this study was to identify barriers to improving the nursing documentation services using the experience of nurses in the emergency department of one of the Iranian hospitals. Materials and Methods: This study is based on content analysis in accordance with the style of Graneheim in 2017 in the emergency department of one of the Iranian hospitals. This qualitative study was performed on 20 participant from different nursing grades including 17 nurses, 1 head nurse, and 2 members of the accreditation committee. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews and using interview guide and field note. Results: Research data have been explained in four main themes of qualification of documentation including sub-categories of the need for effective training, the need for training in the standards of documentation, and the necessity of skills in reporting; job burnout including sub-categories of job stress and work pressure; perceived control including sub-categories of planned control and effective monitoring and control; intra-organizational coordination including sub-categories of improving health information system and documentation management time, legal barrier for documentation including sub-categories of escaping from the law and legal liabilities. Conclusion: In this study, 599 primary codes were extracted and the main themes documentation competency, job burnout, perceived control, intra- organizational coordination, and legal barrier extracted. Keywords: qualitative approach, barriers, nursing services documentation INTRODUCTION Documentation is an important factor in improving the quality of nursing care, and quality promotion is an effective factor in the transparency of nursing practice (1). Researches shows that the quality of documentation of patients’ files is not satisfactory and is not in accordance with nursing standards (1-3). Several methods are used, such as workshop training, continuous and planned monitoring, the use of documentary evidence-based procedures, document service audits, and reduced work pressure to improve the documentation of nursing care (4-7). In Iran, this problem is more prominent than other developed countries in the world, which we are trying to improve the conditions and bring them closer to standards. In this regard, many descriptive studies have been done on the documentation of nursing services, but these studies have not significantly improved. In the research environment, a preliminary study showed that the current documentation has many problems, and the researcher’s observations, which have been present in this environment for many years, are in agreement with this issue. Introduction to intervention In this regard, understanding the experiences of nurses working in the research environment is a barrier to the documentation of nursing services so that effective interventions can be planned and, on the other hand, they also insure the participation of nurses. Accordingly, this study aims to identify 1 PhD candidate in Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Correspondence: Zahra Sadat Manzari Medical Sciences, Mashhad. Iran. Email: [email protected] Assistant Professor, Medical-Surgical Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing and 2 Assistant Professor, Medical-Surgical Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. Tel: +98 5138591511 3 Department of Medical- Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. E-mail: [email protected] 4 Assistant Professor, Medical-Surgical Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. 5 Assistant professor Department of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Received: 4 Jan 2018, Accepted: 13 Feb 2018 © 2018 by the authors; licensee Modestum Ltd., UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Electronic Journal of General Medicine Vafaei et al. / Triage Methods in Children, A Systematic Review these barriers nurses’ perception of nursing services documentation in the emergency department of one of the hospitals in Iran. RESEARCH METHOD Content analysis strategy has been used in this research. Participants were selected based on purpose from among the emergency department staff at one of the Iranian hospitals. It is a state-owned hospital covered by a medical university with 240 active beds. Participants working in the Emergency Department Hospital with diverse backgrounds and undergraduate nursing graduates were male and female. Accordingly, the researcher conducted 20 semi- structured interviews with 13 contributors. Terms of participation Participants in the research had at least one year of work experience in the emergency department and were involved in the process of documentation of nursing services. Sampling was initially based on the purpose and then on the development of the theory and data collection based on Snowball sampling. The data of this study was collected through semi-structured interviews with 20 persons involved in nursing documentation, which had at least one year of work experience and 20 hours of observation. Data collection was started from clinical nurses and then extended to other groups according to the extracted data and codes. This qualitative study was performed on 20 participant from different nursing grades including 17 nurses, 1 head nurse, and 2 members of the accreditation committee nurses, 2 medical doctor and one matron. The interview guide included several open questions to allow participants to express their perceptions and experiences in detail. The length of the interview varied from 65 minutes to 30 minutes to 90 minutes depending on the participants’ circumstances. At the beginning of each interview, participants were asked to describe their work day. They were then asked to describe their perceptions and practices regarding how to document nursing care. After each interview, the recorded information was examined and then the interviews were transcribed word by word. The recorded information was typed and re- matched with the recordings; this action was taken to increase the accuracy of the information recorded and to allow researchers to gain more control over the information provided. Therefore, based on this, the following were removed, respectively, by the implementation of the word-for-word interview bar immediately after each interview, by reading the entire text several times to obtain a general understanding of the content, the division of the text into meaning, Extracting a summary of semantic and coding units, classifying primary codes into subcategories and hands based on comparing their similarities and differences, and finally extracting categories as the expression of latent content in the data that results from Each unstructured interview was the guide for the next interview, so sampling continued until saturation. The research question was: What are the barriers and problems associated with documentation with regard to the experiences of nursing staff in the emergency department? The validity and reliability of the present study are rooted in four dimensions of credibility, Dependability, conformability, and transferability (8). Credibility of this research was obtained through continuous engagement to the participants and the research data, and the correctional views of the experts in the process of interviews and the analysis of the extracted Credibility d data were used. In addition, the text of interviews, extracted codes, and subcategories were shared with some contributors. Integration was used in the data collection method and attempts have been made to select the a variety of samples so that staff from different groups depending on the type of responsibility, use of the opinion of experts outside the research team to evaluate the coordination of the findings, interpret and conclusions based on data could be provided. In the case of conformability, all the activities carried out, including the stages of the work and how the data were obtained, were carefully recorded. Finally, for transferability of the research findings, efforts were made to share the information obtained with an individual outside the research environment where the situations was similar to the participants in the research, and the results would be matched with his experiences. In this research, the purpose of the research is to explain the interview method. This study has been approved by the University’s Ethics Committee of Mashhad University Health Sciences under the code 940864. To respect ethics in the research, consent has been obtained from all the
Recommended publications
  • Nursing Documentation in Clinical Practice
    From the Department of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Nursing Documentation in Clinical Practice Instrument development and evaluation of a comprehensive intervention programme Catrin Björvell Stockholm 2002 Nursing Documentation in Clinical Practice Instrument development and effects of a comprehensive education programme By: Catrin Björvell Cover layout: Tommy Säflund Printed at: ReproPrint AB, Stockholm ISBN 91-7349-297-3 NURSING DOCUMENTATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE There is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle than to initiate a new order of thing. Machiavelli, The Prince Nursing documentation in clinical practice Instrument development and evaluation of a comprehensive intervention programme Catrin Björvell, Department of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Abstract The purpose of this study was to describe and analyse effects of a two-year comprehensive intervention concerning nursing documentation in patient records when using the VIPS model - a model designed to structure nursing documentation. Registered Nurses (RNs) from three acute care hospital wards participated in a two-year intervention programme, in addition, a fourth ward was used for comparison. The intervention consisted of education about nursing documentation in accordance with the VIPS model and organisational changes. To evaluate effects of the intervention patient records (n=269) were audited on three occasions: before the intervention, immediately after the intervention and three years after the intervention. For this purpose, a patient record audit instrument, the Cat-ch-Ing, was constructed and tested. The instrument aims at measuring both quantitatively and qualitatively to what extent the content of the nursing process is documented in the patient record.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of Using Standardized Nursing Terminology
    Page 1 of 20 Selecting a Standardized Terminology for the Electronic Health Record that Reveals the Impact of Nursing on Patient Care By Cynthia B. Lundberg, R.N., BSN; SNOMED Terminology Solutions; Judith J. Warren, PhD, RN, BC, FAAN, FACMI; University of Kansas; Jane Brokel, PhD, RN, NANDA International; Gloria M. Bulechek, PhD, RN, FAAN; Nursing Interventions Classification; Howard K. Butcher, PhD, RN, APRN, BC; Nursing Interventions Classification; Joanne McCloskey Dochterman, PhD, RN, FAAN; Nursing Interventions Classification; Marion Johnson, PhD, RN; Nursing Outcomes Classification; Meridean Maas PhD, RN; Nursing Outcomes Classification; Karen S. Martin, RN, NSN, FAAN; Omaha System; Sue Moorhead PhD, RN, Nursing Outcomes Classification; Christine Spisla, RN, MSN; SNOMED Terminology Solutions; Elizabeth Swanson, PhD, RN; Nursing Outcomes Classification, Sharon Giarrizzo-Wilson, RN, BSN/MS, CNOR, Association of PeriOperative Registered Nurses Citation: Lundberg, C., Warren, J.., Brokel, J., Bulechek, G., Butcher, H., McCloskey Dochterman, J., Johnson, M., Mass, M., Martin, K., Moorhead, S., Spisla, C., Swanson, E., & Giarrizzo-Wilson, S. (June, 2008). Selecting a Standardized Terminology for the Electronic Health Record that Reveals the Impact of Nursing on Patient Care. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics (OJNI), 12, (2). Available at http:ojni.org/12_2/lundberg.pdf Page 2 of 20 Abstract Using standardized terminology within electronic health records is critical for nurses to communicate their impact on patient care to the multidisciplinary team. The universal requirement for quality patient care, internal control, efficiency and cost containment, has made it imperative to express nursing knowledge in a meaningful way that can be shared across disciplines and care settings. The documentation of nursing care, using an electronic health record, demonstrates the impact of nursing care on patient care and validates the significance of nursing practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Nursing Terminologies: a Landscape Analysis
    Standard Nursing Terminologies: A Landscape Analysis MBL Technologies, Clinovations, Contract # GS35F0475X Task Order # HHSP2332015004726 May 15, 2017 Table of Contents I. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 4 II. Background ........................................................................................................ 4 III. Landscape Analysis Approach ............................................................................. 6 IV. Summary of Background Data ............................................................................ 7 V. Findings.............................................................................................................. 8 A. Reference Terminologies .....................................................................................................8 1. SNOMED CT ................................................................................................................................... 8 2. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) ........................................................ 10 B. Interface Terminologies .................................................................................................... 11 1. Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System .................................................................................... 11 2. International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) ............................................................. 12 3. NANDA International
    [Show full text]
  • Practice Directive Documentation Standards
    Practice Directive Documentation Standards College of Registered Nurses of Prince Edward Island December 2020 Approved by CRNPEI Council Dec 10, 2020 Introduction The College of Registered Nurses of Prince Edward Island (CRNPEI) and the College of Licensed Practical Nurses of Prince Edward Island (CLPNPEI) are legislated to serve and protect the public interest through the regulation of individual registered nurses (RN), nurse practitioners (NP) and licensed practical nurses (LPN). For the purposes of this document the term nurse(s), will refer to all three designations of nurses in Prince Edward Island. Nurses in Prince Edward Island are accountable to practice within their Code of Ethics, Standards of Practice, and to meet established agency practice policies and procedures. As self-regulating professions, Nurses are regulated under the authority of the Prince Edward Island Regulated Health Professions Act (2013) and corresponding regulations, which outline the accountabilities and responsibilities of Nurses. This includes a Nurses’ legal responsibility to practice within their scope of practice and level of competence. Nurses must know what they are authorized and competent to perform, including any limitations in skill, knowledge, and judgement to ensure their practice is within their scope. Nursing documentation is a vital component of safe, ethical and effective nursing practice, regardless of the context of practice or whether the documentation is paper- based or electronic. Purpose The purpose of this practice directive is to set a standard for how nurses should document within their practice while remaining accountable to the CRNPEI Standards of Practice, and the Regulated Health Professions Act (RHPA). This document describes nurses’ accountability and the expectations for documentation in all practice settings, regardless of the documentation method or storage.
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Elements of Nursing Notes and the Transition to Electronic Health Records
    FEATURE: NURSING Essential Elements of Nursing Notes and the Transition to Electronic Health Records The Migration from Narrative Charting Will Require Creativity to Include Essential Elements in EHRs. By Marjorie M. Heinzer, PhD, PNP-BC, CRNP urses have told the patient’s story for KEYWords decades in the form of written narrative Charting, documentation, nursing care, computerization, nursing notes and the verbal shift report. electronic health record, EHR. N The advent of paper flow sheets and checklists over Abstract the past two decades streamlined the data record- Nursing notes have historically told the patient’s story of ing process for many specialty and acute-care nursing care during a hospital stay, but technology and units. However, improvements in computer tech- trends in healthcare require conversion of paper to electronic nology now support the implementation of clinical health records (EHR). The purpose of this study was to explore what clinical nurses believe are essential elements documentation and information systems across of nursing notes, ways that these data are documented and all healthcare disciplines. This move to computer- barriers to documentation. ized systems makes it necessary for nursing and This qualitative study used four focus groups. Twenty-four allied health professionals to reframe their think- registered nurses identified themes of evidence of care, quality issues, interaction patterns, clarification and the ing about recording the patient’s story. Commonly “picture” of the patient. held beliefs among some nurses, as explored in this Barriers to documentation were time, legal issues, study, are the need to tell the patient’s story, explain defensive charting, “sidebars” and family/patient behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 49. Documentation and the Nurse Care Planning Process
    Documentation and the Care Planning Process Chapter 49. Documentation and the Nurse Care Planning Process Gail M. Keenan, Elizabeth Yakel, Dana Tschannen, Mary Mandeville Background Tools are needed to support the continuous and efficient shared understanding of a patient’s care history that simultaneously aids sound intra- and interdisciplinary communication and decisionmaking about the patient’s future care. Such tools are vital to ensure that the continuity, safety, and quality of care endure across the multiple handovers made by the many clinicians involved in a patient’s care. A primary purpose of documentation and recordkeeping systems is to facilitate information flow that supports the continuity, quality, and safety of care. Since recordkeeping systems serve multiple purposes (e.g., legal requirements, accreditation, accountability, financial billing, and others), a tension has arisen and is undermining the primary purpose of the record and instead fueling discontinuity of care, near-misses, and errors. Among the more specialized types of documentation is the plan of care, a requirement of the Joint Commission.1, 2 Though planning and plans should facilitate information flow across clinician providers there is little generalizable evidence about their effectiveness. In the first part of this chapter, evidence from studies on nursing documentation, care plans, and interdisciplinary plans of care is presented and synthesized into a framework for the Hands- on Automated Nursing Data System (HANDS) method. The method is an intervention that addresses the need for broad-based standardization of key aspects of documentation and communication to facilitate patient-centric information flow. HANDS standardizes the plan of care documentation and processes by replacing the current widely variable forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Documentation Module
    Documentation Module 1 | Page Documentation May 2017 “If it wasn’t documented, it wasn’t done” Table of Contents About this Module/Overview/Objectives………………………………………Page 3 Pre-Test…………………………………………………………………………Page 4-5 Chapter 1………………………………………………………………………..Page 6- 7 Abbreviations Appropriate Use of Abbreviations Approved JCAHO “Do Not Use” List Chapter 2……………………………………………………………………….Page 7-8 Good Documentation Components Who, What, When, Where, How, Outcome, Follow-up, Accuracy, Objective Data vs. Subjective Data Chapter 3……………………………………………………………………..Page 9-11 Basic Rules of Documentation Documenting when it happens or as soon as possible Legal Implications: If it wasn’t documented, it wasn’t done State Regulations Related to Documentation Federal Regulations Related to Documentation Chapter 4…………………………………………………………………….Page 11-13 Best Practices 24 hour Communication Tool SBAR Report Chapter 5…………………………………………………………………….Page 13 Walking Rounds Ways to do them without overtime Seeing conditions of residents Chapter 6…………………………………………………………………….Page 14-21 Resources Documentation in-service Case Studies / Examples of documentation (or lack thereof) that lead to bad outcomes Electronic Health Records and Use of Electronic Signatures Sample Nurses Notes (Proper/Poor Documentation) 2 | Page Documentation May 2017 SBAR example About this Module: Documentation is a process of reporting and recording information used by health-care practitioners to aid in the directing of resident care based on decision making and continuity of care. Documentation is written evidence of: The interactions between and among health professional, clients, their families, and health care organizations. The administration of tests, procedures, treatments, and resident/family education. The result of, or resident response to diagnostic tests and interventions Documentation is a professional responsibility of all health-care practitioners; documentation provides written evidence of the practitioner’s accountability to the resident, institution, profession, and society.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 STAR Documentation
    5 STARR Documentation Components of a good eBridge Progress note & Guidelines for Nursing Documentation Liz Henderson, RN; Lillian Ananian, RN; Erin Cox, RN; Jen Clair, RN; Trish Zeytoonjian, RN; Shelly Stuler, RN; Annabaker Garber, RN, Melissa Lantry, RN General Purposes of documentation • Informs health care planning • Utilized for quality assurance/improvement • Influences allocation of resources S.T.A.R.R • Think about this with EVERY note you write: • S Source of truth • T Tell the Patient’s Story • AAccountability, Accuracy & Authorship • RReflect the nursing care YOU have provided • RResolve outstanding problems Source of Truth • The Electronic Health Record (EHR) is utilized by multiple disciplines caring for the patient and ultimately should accurately reflect individualized, patient-centered care • Documentation should reflect actual care that is provided to the patient • Information should be valid and reliable (Wang, Hailey & Yu, 2011) Tells the patient’s story • Reflects individualized patient care • Standardizes communication across providers Content of Documentation should include: • Diagnosis • Current problems • Nursing Interventions • Up-to-date assessments related to each problem • Outcomes • Resolution of active problems (Keenan, Yakel, Tschannen, & Mandeville, 2008) Professional accountability Provision 4 of the Code of Ethics for Nurses states that: “The nurse is responsible and accountable for individual nursing practice..In each instance, the nurse retains accountability and responsibility for the quality of practice
    [Show full text]
  • Documentation Guidelines for Nurses
    DOCUMENTATION FOR NURSES Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Definition ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Professional Principles of Documentation .................................................................................................... 2 Confidentiality .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Why is Documentation Important? .............................................................................................................. 3 The Purpose of Nursing Documentation ................................................................................................. 3 Who Has a Role in Documentation? ............................................................................................................ 4 Firsthand Knowledge ............................................................................................................................... 4 Designated Recorder ............................................................................................................................... 4 Client or Family ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Students .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Documentation in Psychiatric Nursing
    International Journal of Health Sciences December 2014, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 99-101 ISSN: 2372-5060 (Print), 2372-5079 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/ijhs.v2n4a8 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.15640/ijhs.v2n4a8 Documentation in Psychiatric Nursing Susan Anand1 Documentation is anything written or electronically generated that describes the status of a client or the services given to that client (1). In nursing practice, it is used to monitor a client’s progress and to communicate with other care providers; it also reflects the nursing care that is provided to a client (2). Thus regardless of the area of practice or whether it is paper-based or electronic, documentation is inevitable in nursing as it is essential for safe, ethical and effective nursing practice. Three common documentation methods are used namely - focus charting, SOAP/SOAPIER and narrative documentation. Flow sheets and checklists are also frequently used as an adjunct to document routine and ongoing assessments and observations. Purposes of Documentation in Psychiatric Nursing Practice It is a tool to enhance practice and patient care. Patient care documents are reliable, permanent records of client care which serve as basis for communication between health professionals. Documentation demonstrates professional accountability; it can be used for nursing audit and legal requirements. Further it provides a base for improving the quality of service and facilitates research and also provides a valuable source of evidence and rationale for funding and resource management. 1 MSc Nursing, M.Phil, PhD., Karnataka, India.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Quality of Electronic Documentation in Critical Care Nursing Brent Alan Stevens Walden University
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2017 Improving the Quality of Electronic Documentation in Critical Care Nursing Brent Alan Stevens Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Library and Information Science Commons, and the Nursing Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Health Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral study by Brent Stevens has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Deborah Lewis, Committee Chairperson, Health Services Faculty Dr. Donna Schumacher, Committee Member, Health Services Faculty Dr. Jennifer Nixon, University Reviewer, Health Services Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2017 Abstract Improving the Quality of Electronic Documentation in Critical Care Nursing by Brent A. Stevens MSN, Walden University, 2012 Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Nursing Practice Walden University May 2017 Abstract Electronic nursing documentation systems can facilitate complete, accurate, timely documentation practices, but without effective policies and procedures in place, a gap in practice exists and quality of care may be impacted. This systematic review of literature examined current evidence regarding electronic nursing documentation quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Documentation in Nursing Practice Workbook | 1 PART 1 Workbook Activities 1 Workbook Activity #1
    BCCNM LEARNING MODULE — WORKBOOK Documentation In Nursing Practice 900 – 200 Granville St T: 604.742.6200 Vancouver, BC V6C 1S4 Toll-free: 1.866.880.7101 Canada bccnm.ca Introduction Introduction This workbook offers activities that allow you to apply ideas presented in the module. It is organized in four sections: Part 1 includes workbook activities that are related to various topic areas addressed in the learning mod- ule. As you work through the module, you will be directed to complete a specific workbook activity. Part 1 also includes pages for you to record your thoughts related to learning in this module. There are two pages: “Thoughts from Reflection Points” provides a space to jot down your thoughts related to “Reflection Points” included in the Module, while “Insights and affirmations” provides a space to note new insights related to your documentation practice. This information will be useful for you in completing your learning plan at the completion of this module. Part 2, “Applying My Learning”, includes case scenarios and associated questions. Completing the questions related to the cases provides an opportunity for you to apply all of the information that has been offered in the module in the context of practice-based scenarios. When you have completed the questions, you may wish to compare your responses with those provided in the “Applying my learning:Perspectives” located in Part 4. Part 3 This section of the workbook provides an opportunity for you to create a plan for your professional growth. A sample Learning Plan is provided to help you in this process.
    [Show full text]