Bible Test Review-Unit 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

BIBLE TEST REVIEW-UNIT 1 1. What did God create on each of the 6 days of creation? 2. What did God do on the 7th day? 3. What does it mean that we are created in God's image? 4. What command did God give to Adam and Eve while they were in the Garden of Eden? 5. How did Adam and Eve disobey God? 6. Name some of the results of sin. 7. Name 3 of Adam and Eve's sons. 8. Why did Cain kill Abel? 9. What lie did Cain tell God? 10. Why did God still protect Cain? 11. Who was saved from the flood? 12. Who closed the door of the ark? 1 3. Where did the ark land after the water started to go down? 14. Why did Noah and his family set up an altar and offer sacrifices? 1 5. What was God's promise to Noah and to us after the flood? 16. Name Noah's 3 sons. 17. Why was it wrong for the people to build the Tower of Babel? 1 8. How did God stop their building of the tower? BIBLE TEST REVIEW-UNIT 1 -ANSWERS 1. Day 1: day and night Day 4; sun, moon and stars Day 2: sky and water Day 5: birds and fish Day 3: land and plants Day 6: animals and people 2. He rested, 3. Humans are like God and are meant to act like Him. They are to take care of the world. 4. They were to fill the earth, rule over it and take care of it. 5. They ate the fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. 6. Death, pain in childbirth, hard work, hate and jealousy, Adam and Eve had to leave the Garden of Eden, all sin 7. Cain, Abel, Seth 8. He was jealous (angry) because God accepted Abel's offering, but God did not accept Cain's offering. 9. Cain said that he did not know where Abel was. 10. Even though Cain sinned, God still loved him. (Just like He continues to love us even though we also sin every day,) 11. Noah, his wife, his 3 sons and their wives 12. God did. 1 3. Mount Ararat 14. They thanked and praised God for watching over them during the flood. 15. He said He would not again destroy the world with a flood. 16. Shem, Ham, japheth 1 7. They were building it for themselves, not for God's glory. They were not relying on God's strength, 1 8. He caused the men to speak different languages so they became confused and they scattered. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Garment of Adam in Jewish, Muslim, and Christian Tradition
24 The Garmentof Adam in Jewish, Muslim, and ChristianTradition Stephen D. Ricks Although rarely occurring in any detail, the motif of Adam's garment appears with surprising frequency in ancient Jewish and Christian literature. (I am using the term "Adam's garment" as a cover term to include any garment bestowed by a divine being to one of the patri archs that is preserved and passed on, in many instances, from one generation to another. I will thus also consider garments divinely granted to other patriarchal figures, including Noah, Abraham, and Joseph.) Although attested less often than in the Jewish and Christian sources, the motif also occurs in the literature of early Islam, espe cially in the Isra'iliyyiit literature in the Muslim authors al ThaclabI and al-Kisa'I as well as in the Rasii'il Ikhwiin al ~afa (Epistles of the Brethren of Purity). Particularly when discussing the garment of Adam in the Jewish tradition, I will shatter chronological boundaries, ranging from the biblical, pseudepigraphic, and midrashic references to the garment of Adam to its medieval attestations. 1 In what fol lows, I wish to consider (1) the garment of Adam as a pri mordial creation; (2) the garment as a locus of power, a symbol of authority, and a high priestly garb; and (3) the garment of Adam and heavenly robes. 2 705 706 STEPHEN D. RICKS 1. The Garment of Adam as a Primordial Creation The traditions of Adam's garment in the Hebrew Bible begin quite sparely, with a single verse in Genesis 3:21, where we are informed that "God made garments of skins for Adam and for his wife and clothed them." Probably the oldest rabbinic traditions include the view that God gave garments to Adam and Eve before the Fall but that these were not garments of skin (Hebrew 'or) but instead gar ments of light (Hebrew 'or).
[Show full text]
Latter-Day Saint Liturgy: the Administration of the Body and Blood of Jesus
religions Article Latter-Day Saint Liturgy: The Administration of the Body and Blood of Jesus James E. Faulconer Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA; [email protected] Abstract: Latter-day Saint (“Mormon”) liturgy opens its participants to a world undeﬁned by a stark border between the transcendent and immanent, with an emphasis on embodiment and relationality. The formal rites of the temple, and in particular that part of the rite called “the endowment”, act as a frame that erases the immanent–transcendent border. Within that frame, the more informal liturgy of the weekly administration of the blood and body of Christ, known as “the sacrament”, transforms otherwise mundane acts of living into acts of worship that sanctify life as a whole. I take a phenomenological approach, hoping that doing so will deepen interpretations that a more textually based approach might miss. Drawing on the works of Robert Orsi, Edward S. Casey, Paul Moyaert, and Nicola King, I argue that the Latter-day Saint sacrament is not merely a ritualized sign of Christ’s sacriﬁce. Instead, through the sacrament, Christ perdures with its participants in an act of communal memorialization by which church members incarnate the coming of the divine community of love and fellow suffering. Participants inhabit a hermeneutically transformed world as covenant children born again into the family of God. Keywords: Mormon; Latter-day Saint; liturgy; rites; sacrament; endowment; temple; memory Citation: Faulconer, James E. 2021. Latter-Day Saint Liturgy: The In 1839, in contrast to most other early nineteenth-century American religious leaders, Administration of the Body and Joseph Smith, the founder of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints1 said, “Being Blood of Jesus.
[Show full text]
In Search of Noah's Ark
IN SEARCH OF NOAH'S ARK History does not care how events happen, it just takes the side of those who do great things and achieve great goals. At the time of writing, this scientific work I was guided by the only desire to enrich our history, to fill the gaps in it, to make it more open to understanding others, but not in any way to harm the established historical order in it. The constant desire to find God, to explain the inexplicable, the deification of the forces of nature, the desire to comprehend the incomprehensible at all times inherent in man. Studying the world around us, people learn more and more new things, and as a result of this there is a need to preserve and transmit information, whether it is in visual form, written or verbal in legends or myths. For example, in religious texts. "Noah did everything God commanded him to do. Upon completion of the construction, God told Noah to enter the ark with his sons and wife, and with the wives of his sons, and to bring also into the ark of all the animals in pairs, that they might live. And take for yourself of all food which is necessary themselves and for animals. Then the ark was shut down by God. Seven days later (in the second month, the seventeenth [27th-according to the translation of the Septuagint] day) the rain poured out on the earth, and the flood lasted forty days and forty nights, and the water multiplied, and lifted up the ark, and it rose above the earth and floated on the surface of the waters.
[Show full text]
Temple Symbolism in the Conflict of Adam and Eve
Studia Antiqua Volume 2 | Number 2 Article 7 February 2003 Temple Symbolism in The onflicC t of Adam and Eve Duane Wilson Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studiaantiqua Part of the Biblical Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Wilson, Duane. "Temple Symbolism in The onflC ict of Adam and Eve." Studia Antiqua 2, no. 2 (2003). http://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studiaantiqua/vol2/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studia Antiqua by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Temple Symbolism in The Conflict of Adam and Eve Duane Wilson The Conflict of Adam and Eve is a fascinating pseudepigraphic work that tells the story of the couple after they are cast out of the Garden of Eden. After they left the garden, God commanded them to live in a cave called the Cave of Treasures. This paper explores the function of the Cave of Treasures as a temple to Adam and Eve. Some of the aspects of temple worship discussed include the gar- ment, the use of tokens, and aspects of prayer and revelation. The Conflict of Adam and Eve with Satan is a pseudepigraphic work of unknown authorship that was written in Arabic between the seventh and ninth centuries a.d.1 It was later translated into Ethiopic. The text is divided into three parts, the first of which contains a lengthy story about Adam and Eve after they were cast out of the Garden of Eden.
[Show full text]
The Armenians
THE ARMENIANS By C.F. DIXON-JOHNSON “Whosoever does wrong to a Christian or a Jew shall find me his accuser on the day of judgment.” (EL KORAN) Printed and Published by GEO TOULMIN & SONS, LTD. Northgate, Blackburn. 1916 Preface The following pages were first read as a paper before the “Société d’Etudes Ethnographiques.” They have since been amplified and are now being published at the request of a number of friends, who believe that the public should have an opportunity of judging whether or not “the Armenian Question” has another side than that which has been recently so assiduously promulgated throughout the Western World. Though the championship of Greek, Bulgarian and other similar “Christian, civilized methods of fighting,” as contrasted with “Moslem atrocities” in the Balkans and Asia Minor, has been so strenuously undertaken by Lord Bryce and others, the more recent developments in the Near East may perhaps already have opened the eyes of a great many thinking people to the realization that, in sacrificing the traditional friendship of the Turk to all this more or less sectarian clamor, British diplomacy has really done nothing better than to exchange the solid and advantageous reality for a most elusive and unreliable, if not positively dangerous, set of shadows. It seems illogical that the same party which recalled the officials (and among them our present War Minister) appointed by Lord Beaconsfield to assist the Turkish Government in reforming their administration and collecting the revenue in Asia Minor, and which on the advent of the Young Turks refused to lend British Administrators to whom ample and plenary powers were assured, should now, in its eagerness to vilify the Turk, lose sight of their own mistakes which have led in the main to the conditions of which it complains, and should so utterly condemn its own former policy.
[Show full text]
Does Ezekiel 28:11–19 Affirm the Fall of Satan in Genesis 1:1–2 As Claimed in the Gap Theory?
VIEWPOINT || JOURNAL OF CREATION 32(3) 2018 Does Ezekiel 28:11–19 affirm the fall of Satan in Genesis 1:1–2 as claimed in the gap theory? Joel Tay and KeeFui Kon The gap theory claims that Ezekiel 28:11–19 and Isaiah 14:12–15 refer to the fall of Satan in the mineral Garden of Eden before Creation Week. This event is said to have occurred in between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2. Gap proponents are intimidated by secular geologists who claim that the earth is billions of years old. By inserting billions of years between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2, gap proponents assume that this allows them to reconcile Scripture with the idea of long ages. This paper demonstrates that the passage in Ezekiel 28 cannot relate to this supposed time gap even if the passage refers to the fall of Satan. If the text is understood as a reference to the fall of Satan, we would still be required to interpret the timing of Satan’s fall as an event that occurred after the sixth day of creation, and the final judgment of Satan is reserved for fire rather than water. We show that the gap theory is an extrabiblical and artificial construct that has been imposed upon the text of Genesis 1:1–2, and that Ezekiel 28 is actually problematic for the gap theory. ap theory claims that there was a previous earth that was 5. God destroyed the earth and everything in it with a Gcreated and then destroyed billions of years ago because worldwide Flood that produced the fossils and rock layers of the rebellion of Lucifer.
[Show full text]
A Review of the Search for Noah's Ark
The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 6 Print Reference: Pages 485-502 Article 39 2008 A Review of the Search for Noah's Ark Anne Habermehl Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Habermehl, Anne (2008) "A Review of the Search for Noah's Ark," The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 6 , Article 39. Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol6/iss1/39 In A. A. Snelling (Ed.) (2008). Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Creationism (pp. 485–502). Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Science Fellowship and Dallas, TX: Institute for Creation Research. A Review of the Search for Noah’s Ark Anne Habermehl, B.Sc., 25 Madison Street, Cortland, NY 13045 Abstract There have been many alleged sightings of the Ark and numerous attempts to ﬁnd it, mainly on Mount Ararat, but search attempts so far have been without success. In the light of history, geology, and archaeology, we need to consider that the Ark probably landed elsewhere, and that there may be little of it left.
[Show full text]
Mount Ararat Archaeological Survey Not Necessarily Those of the Associates Dr
Contents EDITOR: Bryant G. Wood, PhD EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Richard D. Lanser Jr., MA, MDiv GRAPHICS AND PHOTO EDITOR: Michael C. Luddeni, NAPP CONSULTING EDITORS: Rev. Gary A. Byers, MA Rev. Scott Lanser, MA Henry B. Smith, Jr., MA William Saxton, MA BOARD OF DIRECTORS: David P. Livingston, Founder Delphi’s Inﬂ uence on the World of the New Testament Gary A. Byers, President Part 3: Faults, Fumes and Visions George DeLong, Treasurer Ernest B. McGinnis.......................................................65 Ronald K. Zuck, Secretary Bible and Spade is received four times a year by members of the Associates for Biblical Research. For an annual contribution of $35.00 or more, members sustain the research and outreach ministries of ABR, including the world-wide radio program “The Stones Cry Out.” To contact ABR, write P.O. Box 144, Akron PA 17501, or email [email protected]. Visit our website at http://www.biblearchaeology. org. © 2008 Associates for Biblical Research. All rights reserved. ISSN 1079-6959 ABR purpose and statement of faith Rex Geissler sent on request. Mount Ararat sunset at the Işak Pasha Palace. Photo taken from Urartian Rock Chamber Tomb at the Beyazıt Opinions expressed by authors not on Castle. the editorial staff of Bible and Spade are Mount Ararat Archaeological Survey not necessarily those of the Associates Dr. Cevat Başaran, Dr. Vedat Keleş and for Biblical Research. Rex Geissler..................................................................70 All Scripture quotations are taken from the New International Version unless speciﬁ ed otherwise. Editorial guidelines will be sent upon Front cover: Urartu’s capital city of Toprakkale, showing request. Tushpa Fortress at Van southwest of Mount Ararat.
[Show full text]
AT the SUMMIT of MOUNT ARARAT-MASIS Melkonyan A. A. Academician of NAS RA the Most Valuable and Magnificent Names of Ararat
AT THE SUMMIT OF MOUNT ARARAT-MASIS Melkonyan A. A. Academician of NAS RA The most valuable and magnificent names of Ararat and Masis for us Armenians have been known since earliest times. Ararat is mentioned in the Bible as a name mountains where Noah’s ark rested after the Flood subsided1. The word Ararat is presented as Armenia In Vulgatae and King James Bible2. It is suggested that the names of both Aratta (the 3rd millennium BC) of the Sumerian and Urartu (Van Kingdom, the first half of the 1st millennium BC) of the Assyrian cuneiform sources are derivations of the name of Ararat3. Great Ararat-Masis (5165 m) and Lesser Masis (Sis) (3925 m) Armenian historical sources preserved several mythological and folk legends connected with Great Masis and Hayk Patriarch’s generations (the 3rd-1st millennia BC) and kings of Great Armenia Artashes I (189-160 BC) and Trdat III (298-330 AD)4. While visiting Armenia William of Rubruck and Marko Polo saw Ararat and left testimonies about it. William of Rubruck had been told an Armenian tradition about the 1 Genesis 8:4. 2 Kings 19:37 and Isa 37:38. 3 Պետրոսյան Լ.Ն., Հայ ժողովրդի փոխադրամիջոցներ, Հայ ազգաբանություն և բանահյուսություն. ժողովածու, 6, Երևան, 1974, էջ 123: Kavoukjian M., Armenia, Subartu and Sumer. The Indo-European Homeland and Ancient Mesopotamia. Transl. from the Armenian original by N. Ouzounian, Montreal, 1987, pp. 59-81. cf. Մովսիսյան Ա., Հնագույն պետությունը Հայաստանում, Արատտա, Երևան, 1992, էջ 29-32: Դանիելյան Է., Հայոց պատմական և քաղաքակրթական արժեհամակարգի պաշտպանության անհրաժեշտությունը, “Լրաբեր” հաս.
[Show full text]
Seven Mountains to Aratta
Seven Mountains to Aratta Searching for Noah's Ark in Iran B.J. Corbin Copyright ©2014 by B.J. Corbin. All rights reserved. 1st Edition Last edited: August 30, 2015 Website: www.bjcorbin.com Follow-up book to The Explorers of Ararat: And the Search for Noah’s Ark by B.J. Corbin and Rex Geissler available at www.noahsarksearch.com. Introduction (draft) The basic premise of the book is this... could there be a relationship between the Biblical "mountains of Ararat" as the landing site of Noah's Ark and the mythical mountain of Aratta as described in ancient Sumerian literature? Both the Biblical Flood mentioned in Genesis chapters 6-8 and The Epic of Gilgamesh in tablet 11 (and other Sumerian texts), seem to be drawing from the same historical flood event. Probable Noah’s Ark landing sites were initially filtered by targeting "holy mountains" in Turkey and Iran. The thinking here is that something as important and significant as where Noah's Ark landed and human civilization started (again) would permeate throughout history. Almost every ancient culture maintains a flood legend. In Turkey, both Ararat and Cudi are considered holy mountains. Generally, Christians hold Mount Ararat in Turkey as the traditional landing site of Noah's Ark, while Muslims adhering to the Koran believe that Mount Cudi (pronounced Judi in Turkish) in southern Turkey is the location where Noah's Ark landed. In Iran, both Damavand and Alvand are considered holy mountains. Comparing the geography of the 4 holy mountains, Alvand best fits the description in Genesis 11:2 of people moving “from the east” into Shinar, if one supports that definition of the verse.
[Show full text]
Genesis (B'reshiyt 6:9 – 11:32) Introduction: Chapter 6
NOAH GENESIS (B’RESHIYT 6:9 – 11:32) INTRODUCTION: 1. Because of the wickedness – the mixing and mingling – God determined to blot out all inhabitants of the earth. a. Mankind had corrupted his way and, consequently, corrupted the earth itself. 2. Josephus records that Adam had predicted destruction of world by flood and fire. a. Antiquities of the Jews, Book I, chapter 2, paragraph iii. 3. Lamech named him “Noah” indicating that he would bring “rest,” meaning of name. a. Geneological record in Gen. 5 seems to indicate that he was born in 1056. b. Possibility that he was born in 1058, written in Hebrew as . 4. Noah was the remnant – “he found grace” in the eyes of the LORD; he was righteous, unpolluted and walked with God. a. Noah, like Adam, would be father of mankind after the flood. b. From the beginning, we see that there is always a remnant. c. Apparently, Noah was the ONLY one considered righteous. 5. The flood waters are called “the waters of Noah” in Isaiah 54:9. a. Rabbis deduce that the waters are Noah’s responsibility. b. He had been content to protect his own righteousness by distancing himself. 6. If he had completed responsibility to that generation fully, flood might not have happened. a. Inferring that, ultimately, God’s people are responsible for some events. b. “Sons of God” in Gen. 6 are how narrative begins; ends with corrupted earth. 7. Much is made of fact that Noah “walked with God” but Abraham “before Him.” a. Abraham is considered as spiritually superior to Noah.
[Show full text]
God's Rejection of Cain Outside the Garden of Eden (Genesis 4:1-16)
Concordia Seminary - Saint Louis Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary Master of Sacred Theology Thesis Concordia Seminary Scholarship Spring 5-18-2018 Falling Far from the Tree? God's Rejection of Cain outside the Garden of Eden (Genesis 4:1-16) Mark Remington Squire Concordia Seminary - St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.csl.edu/stm Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, History of Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Squire, Mark Remington, "Falling Far from the Tree? God's Rejection of Cain outside the Garden of Eden (Genesis 4:1-16)" (2018). Master of Sacred Theology Thesis. 395. https://scholar.csl.edu/stm/395 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Concordia Seminary Scholarship at Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Sacred Theology Thesis by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FALLING FAR FROM THE TREE? GOD’S REJECTION OF CAIN OUTSIDE THE GARDEN OF EDEN (GENESIS 4:1–16) A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, Department of Exegetical Theology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Sacred Theology By Mark Remington Squire April 2018 Approved by Dr. David L. Adams Advisor Rev. Thomas J. Egger Reader Dr. Joel C. Elowsky Reader © 2018 by Mark Remington Squire. All rights reserved. ii CONTENTS PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... v ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................... vi ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................................
[Show full text]