DOCSLIB.ORG

Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan Examination

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan Examination June 2018 | NT | P16-1398/P17-1569 Matter 1: Development Strategy CALA Homes Ltd VALE OF AYLESBURY LOCAL PLAN EXAMINATION MATTER 1: DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY ON BEHALF OF: CALA HOMES LTD Pegasus Group Pegasus House | Querns Business Centre| Whitworth Road | Cirencester | Gloucestershire | GL7 1RT T 01285 641717 | F 01285 642348 | W www.pegasusgroup.co.uk Birmingham | Bracknell | Bristol | Cambridge | Cirencester | East Midlands | Leeds | Liverpool | London | Manchester ©Copyright Pegasus Planning Group Limited 2011. The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of Pegasus Planning Group Limited Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan Examination Matter 1: Development Strategy CONTENTS: Page No: 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. MATTER 1 – DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 2 June 2018 | NT | P16-1398/P17-1569 Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan Examination Matter 1: Development Strategy 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1.1 This short Hearing Statement complements the representations to the Proposed Submission Draft Plan (October 2017) provided by Pegasus Group on behalf of CALA Homes Ltd, and addresses the additional evidence which has become available in the interim including the representations submitted by participants, the response to Q40 prepared by the Council and the Inspectors Agenda. It does not re-iterate the points made in and should be read alongside previous representations. June 2018 | NT | P16-1398/P17-1569 Page 1 Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan Examination Matter 1: Development Strategy 2. MATTER 1 – Development Strategy The distribution of growth 2.1.1 In our previous representations to the Regulation 19 consultation, it was identified that regardless of the fact that Edlesboourgh is one of the most sustainable and least constrained Larger Villages; and the fact that Ickford is equally as sustainable as the other Medium Villages, they are both planned to receive a disproportionately low level of growth. 2.1.2 The Inspectors Agenda Session 11, suggests that: “Some of the arguments are that settlements of similar sustainability scores or of similar sizes have different sized allocations but perhaps that misses the point that the allocations are meant to be capacity based.” 2.1.3 Whilst it is agreed that allocations will be informed by their respective capacities, it is necessary for these allocations to provide (or at least facilitate) a sustainable distribution of growth across the District. The spatial distribution does not achieve this for a number of reasons. 2.1.4 Firstly, the distribution takes no account of the respective sustainability and constraints of individual Larger and Medium Villages. For example, the Larger Villages of Pitstone and Steeple Claydon are both less sustainable than Edlesborough (according to the Council’s Settlement Hierarchy Assessment) and yet are planned to receive greater levels of growth; and the Medium Village of Stewkley is less sustainable than Ickford (according to the Council’s Settlement Hierarchy Assessment) and yet is planned to receive greater levels of growth. Similarly, Medium Villages which are equally as sustainable as Ickford are planned to receive much greater levels of growth. The Local Plan does not therefore provide for the most sustainable distribution of growth, and fails to provide for the needs of sustainable Larger and Medium Villages (namely Edlesborough and Ickford). 2.1.5 Secondly, the justification for the level of housing in some settlements not being commensurate with the sustainability of those settlements (regardless of the capacity of allocations) is that Neighbourhood Plans have been made in response to the saved policies of the previous Local Plan (including the housing requirement which was developed in the context of a different national policy context). June 2018 | NT | P16-1398/P17-1569 Page 2 Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan Examination Matter 1: Development Strategy 2.1.6 The Examiner of the Edlesborough Neighbourhood Plan explicitly identified that the Neighbourhood Plan would be replaced by the VALP. The reason for this, is that the VALP was expected to provide for a sustainable distribution to meet the objectively assessed needs. However, the VALP has proposed a distribution which deliberately avoids any reconsideration of the distribution from areas with Neighbourhood Plans contrary to the expectation of the Examiner. Such an approach set a two tier approach to the distribution, with those areas with Neighbourhood Plans maintaining the numbers of the previous (non-NPPF) Local Plan and all other areas having to compensate for the resultant under-provision. In summary, not only is there no robust justification for the distribution of growth, it actively serves to bias the distribution away from those areas with Neighbourhood Plans. 2.1.7 Thirdly, the justification for excluding some potential allocations from further consideration was again that a Neighbourhood Plan which does not provide for the sustainable distribution of the objectively assessed needs. There is therefore no robust justification for excluding some potential allocations from further consideration. 2.1.8 Fourthly, as set out in other representations, the VALP does not provide for the full objectively assessed needs including unmet needs (by a significant margin) and so the refusal to consider additional sites within Neighbourhood Plan areas will further bias the distribution necessary to achieve the full objectively assessed needs. 2.1.9 Fifthly, there is absolutely no justification for the disproportionately low level of growth in Ickford. 2.1.10 In summary, the refusal to consider the spatial distribution holistically (as the distribution to Neighbourhood Plan areas has not been considered) or to consider allocations in Neighbourhood Plan areas is not justified, it is not positive for those areas, and it does not reflect sustainable development. Similarly, the absence of any justification for the distribution of growth between Medium Villages prevents a sustainable distribution of growth. The proposed allocation at Ickford 2.1.11 The proposed allocation at Land off Turnfields, Ickford is less sustainable than the potential allocation at 42 Worminghall Road (according to the Sustainability Appraisal). June 2018 | NT | P16-1398/P17-1569 Page 3 Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan Examination Matter 1: Development Strategy 2.1.12 On the matter of the draft allocation of land at Turnfields, Ickford for 20 dwellings, the Inspector should be made aware of the fact that there is a pending application relating to that land (LPA ref.17/02516/AOP). The application was submitted on 3rd July 2017 and has yet to be determined almost a year later. 2.1.13 It would appear that the application has been held up due to objections from the following:- - The LPA’s Landscape Officer - The Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) 2.1.14 The relevant consultation responses are attached. 2.1.15 In summary the LPA’s Landscape Officer considers that the proposed development would be likely to result in significant adverse landscape character and visual impacts to the site and the immediate surroundings. The objections are both in principle and proposal specific. 2.1.16 The LLFA objects to the proposed development due to insufficient evidence to prove that the proposed surface water drainage scheme is feasible. 2.1.17 The Applicant has suggested that options are available which could be funded by the developer but has thus far presented no evidence to demonstrate that these would be feasible and/or viable. 2.1.18 These objections to the planning application bring into question the deliverability of the site regardless of whether it is 20 units as per the draft allocation or 30 units as per the current planning application. The absence of allocations at Edlesborough 2.1.19 The issues at Edlesborough are also further complicated by the fact that there is evidence of difficulties in bringing forward some of the sites that are allocated in the made Edlesborough Neighbourhood Plan (NP). These allocations are relied upon to deliver to achieve even the unsustainable distribution of growth proposed in the Local Plan. 2.1.20 The NP allocation at Slicketts Lane has been the subject of an outline application for 40 dwellings (LPA ref. 17/02539/AOP) since 12th July 2017. June 2018 | NT | P16-1398/P17-1569 Page 4 Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan Examination Matter 1: Development Strategy However there have been very strong objections from the LPA’s Conservation Officer regarding the impact of the development on the settings of 3no. nearby listed buildings. She has recommended refusal. 2.1.21 There has also been an objection from the Conservation Officer from the adjoining LPA (Central Bedfordshire) who were not consulted on the application. There are also questions about whether they were even aware of the proposals to allocate the land in the Neighbourhood Plan and whether the setting of Bellows Mill (which sits in the adjoining authority area) had been properly taken into account by the NP. Notably the site allocations policy does not refer to this building although it does refer to the other two listed buildings. It is also understood that there are concerns from the LPA’s Landscape Officers and it is difficult to see how the LPA is going to balance the loss of this greenfield site as allowed for in the NP with the landscape and heritage objections which appear to bring into question whether the site should have been allocated in the first place. 2.1.22 A revised master plan has been submitted by the Applicant but concerns remain. There are also outstanding objections relating to drainage. 2.1.23 The NP allocation at Land at Good Intent is allocated for 15 dwellings in the made NP (NP Policy EP3). Criterion (iii) of the policy requires that the site has vehicular access from Cow Lane only (via site EDL003A), but with pedestrian and cycle access from Good Intent. It is understood that the landowner has been unable to secure the necessary access from Cow Lane and a planning application was submitted with alternative access arrangements (LPA ref.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 16.0 Management/Restoration of Particular Features
    AYLESBURY VALE DISTRICT COUNCIL Conservation Area Management Plan – District Wide Strategy 16.0 Management/restoration of particular features 16.1 Aims 16.2 Issues for Aylesbury Vale in relation to the management/restoration of particular I Clearly identify those features (such as traditional features street signage for example) which make a positive contribution to the character and appearance of the 16.2.1 There are three groups of features that stand out conservation area in the appraisal from analysis of the sample survey and through I Produce information leaflets on the importance of consultation with local groups and development certain features including why they are important control. These are: and general advice on their care and management – these should be distributed to every household within I Shopfronts the conservation area(s) subject to available I Boundary walls resources I Traditional paving materials I Build a case (based on the thorough analysis of the conservation area) for a grant fund to be established 16.2.2 Shopfronts are strongly represented in identifying the particular feature for repair and Aylesbury and Buckingham (and Winslow and reinstatement Wendover outside the sample survey) and despite a I Seek regional or local sponsorship of a scheme for good shopfront design guide, the issues of poor quality, the reinstatement of particular features such as badly designed shopfronts, inappropriate materials for shopfronts fascias and poor colour schemes and lighting design I Consultation with grant providers such as English are still significant issues in these market towns. Heritage and the Heritage Lottery Fund should establish at an early stage the potential success of an 16.2.3 Boundary walls are a district-wide issue and are application and identify a stream of funding for also a Buildings at Risk issue throughout the district.
    [Show full text]
  • Wing Historic Settlement Assessment Report
    Archaeological Services & Consultancy Ltd SETTLEMENT ASSESSMENT REPORT: WING BUCKINGHAMSHIRE on behalf of the Wing Parish Council Neighbourhood Plan Team Martin Cuthbert BA (Hons) AIfA March 2014 ASC: 1612/WHP/3 Letchworth House Chesney Wold, Bleak Hall Milton Keynes MK6 1NE Tel: 01908 608989 Fax: 01908 605700 Email: [email protected] Website: www.archaeological-services.co.uk Wing, Buckinghamshire Settlement Assessment Report 1612/WHP Site Data ASC project code: WHP ASC Project No: 1612 County: Buckinghamshire Village/Town: Wing Civil Parish: Wing NGR (to 8 figs): SP 8812 2257 (centre) Extent of site: Wing CP Commissioned by: Wing Parish Council Neighbourhood Plan Team Wing Buckinghamshire Contact name: Cllr Sarah Roe Internal Quality Check Primary Author: Martin Cuthbert Date: 3rd March 2014 Revisions: Date: Edited/Checked By: Alastair Hancock Date: 3rd March 2014 © Archaeological Services & Consultancy Ltd No part of this document is to be copied in any way without prior written consent. Every effort is made to provide detailed and accurate information. However, Archaeological Services & Consultancy Ltd cannot be held responsible for errors or inaccuracies within this report. © Ordnance Survey maps reproduced with the sanction of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. ASC Licence No. AL 100015154 ASC Ltd 2014 Page 1 Wing, Buckinghamshire Settlement Assessment Report 1612/WHP Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aylesbury Vale Community Chest Grants April 2014 - March 2015
    Aylesbury Vale Community Chest Grants April 2014 - March 2015 Amount Granted Total Cost Award Aylesbury Vale Ward Name of Organisation £ £ Date Purpose Area Buckinghamshire County Local Areas Artfully Reliable Theatre Society 1,000 1,039 Sep-14 Keyboard for rehearsals and performances Aston Clinton Wendover Aylesbury & District Table Tennis League 900 2,012 Sep-14 Wall coverings and additional tables Quarrendon Greater Aylesbury Aylesbury Astronomical Society 900 3,264 Aug-14 new telescope mount to enable more community open events and astrophotography Waddesdon Waddesdon/Haddenham Aylesbury Youth Action 900 2,153 Jul-14 Vtrek - youth volunteering from Buckingham to Aylesbury, August 2014 Vale West Buckingham/Waddesdon Bearbrook Running Club 900 1,015 Mar-15 Training and raceday equipment Mandeville & Elm Farm Greater Aylesbury Bierton with Broughton Parish Council 850 1,411 Aug-14 New goalposts and goal mouth repairs Bierton Greater Aylesbury Brill Memorial Hall 1,000 6,000 Aug-14 New internal and external doors to improve insulation, fire safety and security Brill Haddenham and Long Crendon Buckingham and District Mencap 900 2,700 Feb-15 Social evenings and trip to Buckingham Town Pantomime Luffield Abbey Buckingham Buckingham Town Cricket Club 900 1,000 Feb-15 Cricket equipment for junior section Buckingham South Buckingham Buckland and Aston Clinton Cricket Club 700 764 Jun-14 Replacement netting for existing practice net frames Aston Clinton Wendover Bucks Play Association 955 6,500 Apr-14 Under 5s area at Play in The Park event
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of EPC Meeting Held on 16
    Edlesborough Parish Council Minutes of Meeting held on Thursday 16th October 2014 at Northall Village Hall commencing at 7.30pm AGENDA ITEM ACTION BY WHOM & WHEN Open Forum DLP Planning gave a short presentation on behalf of their client McCann Homes. The presentation outlined McCann Homes initial plans for a development on the land between Kingsmead and Chiltern Avenue. During the presentation McCann homes shared information about the location, number of homes, access points and facilities the plan would like to offer the village. Parishioners expressed concern at the: Positioning of the proposed access road. Extra pressure on the village’s existing utilities and facilities which are already struggling to cope. McCann Homes indicated that the development would provide approximately 60 new homes. McCann Homes will be hosting a public meeting to engage with Parishioners before submitting a planning application. Trenches Behind Pebblemoor Mr Inchbold from McCann Homes apologised for the large clay and rubble filled trenches behind some of the Pebblemoor homes. He assured Parishioners and the Council that the rubble and clay will be removed and disposed of correctly. The site will then levelled with topsoil and reseeded with grass. The Chairman formally opened the Parish Council meeting at 7:35pm. Present: Cllr Williams (Chairman), Cllr Cubbage, Cllr Mrs Owen, Cllr Mrs Woodhouse, Cllr Holt, Cllr Pratt, Lin Sargeant (RFO & Planning), Penny Pataky (Clerk), District Cllr Chris Poll, and 15 parishioners, Representatives from DLP Planning Ltd Ellie Smith & Simon James and their client Andrew Inchbold Managing Director of McCann Homes. Cllr Wilkinson (Vice-Chairman) arrived for the final part of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Wing Neighbourhood Plan
    Wing Neighbourhood Plan 2014 – 31 Draft: April 2014 0 Contents CONTENT PAGE CONTENT PAGE NO. NO. Foreword 2 Policy VE1 18 1. Introduction 3 9. Economy 19 What is a Neighbourhood Plan? 3 Community 19 Why should Wing have a 3 Commercial Businesses 19 Neighbourhood Plan 2. Planning Context 4 Policies E1, E2, E3, E4 20 National Planning Policy 4 10. Traffic and Transport 21 Aylesbury Vale District Council Planning 4 Public Transport 21 Policy 3. Vision and Objectives 5 Roads 21 4. Community Involvement 6 Congestion and Pedestrians 22 5. Countryside and Green Space 6 Parking 23 Landscape and Trees 7 Policies T1, T2, T3 23 Green Spaces 7 11. Housing 24 Footpaths 8 Housing Market 24 Access to Strategic Green Spaces, Long 8 Infill Housing 25 Distance Footpaths and Bridleways Long Spinney 10 Housing Mix 26 Allotments 10 Housing Needs 26 Wildlife 10 Policies HO1, HO2, HO3 27 Policies CGS 1,2,3 11, 12 12. Housing Allocations 28 6. Facilities 13 Methodology 28 General Facilities 13 Stewkley Road/Dormer Avenue 30 Allotments Leisure 13 Policy A1 30 Healthcare 13 Meadow Way/Moorlands 31 Policy F1 14 Policy A2 31 7. Heritage 15 13. Community Facilities for the 32 Future History 15 Required Facilities List 33 Conservation Area 16 14. Implementation and 34 Monitoring Heritage Group 17 Neighbourhood Plan Map 35 Policies HE1, HE2 17 Glossary 36 8. Visiting and Enjoying Wing 18 Table showing relationship 37 between Policies and objectives Wing Heritage and Wildlife Trails 18 1 Foreword In 2011, the Localism Act introduced a new opportunity for local communities to shape their future formally as part of the planning system.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixteenth-Century People: Some Aspects of Social Life in Elizabethan
    SIXTEENTH CENTURY PEOPLE : SOME ASPECTS OF SOCIAL LIFE IN ELIZABETHAN BUCKS H. A. HANLEY Details of the personal lives of ordinary people are not easily come by for most periods of history and this is the truer the further one goes back in time, The 17th-century world of Sir Ralph Yerney and his circle emerges fresh and vivid from the pages of the Claydon House correspondence, but before 1600 personal documents of any kind are rare even for members of the upper classes. For this reason, if we are to form any impression of the lives and personalities of men and women of the Elizabethan period, we have to resort to more indirect sources of information. The records of court proceedings, in particular, where they survive, often preserve sharp fragments of individual experience embedded in their unpromising prose. The following brief portraits are—with one excep- tion—derived from the extant depositions of witnesses in cases heard in the ecclesiastical court for the Archdeaconry of Buckingham between 1578 and 1585,1 supplemented, where possible, by reference to other sources such as wills and parish registers. Apart from their intrinsic human interest, they illustrate, in concrete form, some aspects of the life of the society to which they relate. To a great extent they speak for themselves and comment has accordingly been kept to a minimum. The broader outlines of the social and economic structure have been described for us by Mrs. E. M. Elvey in her recent article2 in this journal on the early records of the Archdeaconry of Buckingham which, although it relates to the first half of the sixteenth century, is true in most essentials of the Elizabethan period also.
    [Show full text]
  • LCA 8.4 Pitstone-Edlesborough Slopes Landscape Character Type
    Aylesbury Vale District Council & Buckinghamshire County Council Aylesbury Vale Landscape Character Assessment LCA 8.4 Pitstone-Edlesborough Slopes Landscape Character Type: LCT 8 Vale B0404200/LAND/01 Aylesbury Vale District Council & Buckinghamshire County Council Aylesbury Vale Landscape Character Assessment LCA 8.4 Pitstone-Edlesborough Slopes (LCT 8) Key Characteristics Location Broader in the east, defined by the county boundary and stretching between the settlements of Slapton and Edlesborough. To the Area of transition west the LCA funnels into a narrow corridor between Pitstone and between Foothills and Cheddington extending to the county boundary at Marsworth. Vale LCAs Network of improved Landscape character The gently undulating landscape lying below the drains and streams Chiltern Foothills gradually merges into the flat vale landscape to the north. draining northwards The area is crossed by the west coast mainline railway and the Grand Union Irregular field pattern Canal. Drained by numerous streams and brooks fed by local springs rising Mixed land use at the interface with the Foothills to the south. Extensive arable field system Large arable fields but with smaller paddocks adjacent to settlements and remnant orchards. around Ivinghoe Aston Extensive settlements at Pitstone and Edlesborough. Geology Predominantly Gault clay extending to the chalk formation on the Distinctive Features southern boundary. In the east are smaller pockets of greensand as well as deposits of head and alluvium. Grand Union Canal Settlements at Topography The northern part has similar characteristics to the flat vale Edlesborough, Pitstone landscape, however, the land falls gently from south to north. The village of and Ivinghoe Slapton in the north lies at a level of between 85 – 90m AOD.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckinghamshire. L:3Slade
    DmEGrORY.] BUCKINGHAMSHIRE. L:3SLADE. 115 LINSLADE is a parish adjoining Leighton Buzzard, Wall Box, Canal bridge, cleared 8.35 &i u a.m. 12.10, bounded on the east by the river Ousel, which seyarat.s 2.30, 5.30, 8 &; 9.30 p.m.; sUlldays, 7.30 p.m the counties of Bedford and Buokingham: it is in the Wall Box, Railway station, cleared at 8.35 &; 1I.0 a.m, :Mid division of the county, three hundred of Cottesloe, 12.20, 2.30, 5.30, 8.0 &; 9.30 p.m.; ,sundays, 7.30 p.m the head of a petty sessional division, union and county Wall Box, Southcote, cleared at 7.5 p.m.; su'nday, court dilltrict of Leighton Buzzard. rural deanery of 9.40 a.m Ivinghoe, archdeaconry of Buckingham and diocese of Oxford. COUNTY MAGISTRATES FOR LINSLADE PETTY This parish is governed by an Urban District Council of nine members, formed in , under the pro­ SESSIONAL DIVISION. visions of the" Local Government Act, 1894" (56 and 57 Finlay Lt.-Col. .Alex. Manor house, Little Brickhill, Bletcb. Vict. ch. 73). ley, chairman The church of St. Barnabas, erected in 1849, Orkney Earl of, Wing lodge, Leighton Buzzard is a building of stone in the Decorated style, consisting Cotes Oharles esq. Burcott lodge, Wing,Leighton Buzzard of Chancel with a vestry opening into it on. the south Finch Henry esq. The Gables, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard side, nave of four bays, north porch, south aisle, and a Fountaine Bernard Thomas esq. Stoke house, Stoke western tower with low spire added in 1868, and con­ Hammond, Bletchley .
    [Show full text]
  • Archive Catalogue
    Buckinghamshire Archaeological Society CATALOGUE OF THE SOCIETY'S COLLECTION OF ARCHIVES HELD IN THE MUNIMENT ROOM Compiled by Lorna M. Head With additional material by Diana Gulland Buckinghamshire Papers No.1 2002 additions and amendments 2007 HOW TO USE THE CATALOGUE These archives may be consulted, on application to Mrs. Diana Gulland, the Hon. LibrarianIArchivist, on Wednesdays from 10.00am to 4.00pm. When requesting material please quote the call mark, found on the left-hand side of the page, together with the full description of the item. General e nquiries about the archives, or requests for more details of those collections which are listed as having been entered on to the Library's database, are welcomed either by letter or telephone. This Catalogue describes the archives in the Muniment Room at the time of printing in 2002. Details of additions to the stock and of progress in entering all stock on to the Society's computer database will be posted on our proposed website and published in our Newsletters. Buckinghamshire Archaeological Society Library County Museum Church Street Aylesbury Bucks HP20 2QP Telephone No. 01296 678114 (Wednesdays only) CONTENTS Call mark Page Introduction 3 Antiquarian collections Warren R. DAWSON DAW Gerald and Elizabeth ELVEY ELVEY Henry GOUGH and W. P. Storer GOU F. G. GURNEY GUR R. W. HOLT HOL Rev. H. E. RUDDY RUD A. V. WOODMAN WOO Dr Gordon H. WYATT WYA Other collections ELECTION MATERIAL ELECT George LIPSCOMB'S notes for The History and Antiquities of the County of Buckingham L1 P Copies of MANUSCRIPTS MSS MAPS MAPS MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTION MISC POLL BOOKS and ELECTION REGISTERS POLL Topographical PRINTS PRINTS Parish REGISTER transcripts REG SALE CATALOGUES SAL INTRODUCTION, by Lorna Head For many years after its foundation in 1847, the Buckinghamshire Archaeological Society was the only repository for archives in the county and a collection was gradually built up through deposits and gifts.
    [Show full text]
  • Election of Parish Councillors for the Parishes Listed Below (Aylesbury Area)
    NOTICE OF ELECTION Buckinghamshire Council Election of Parish Councillors for the Parishes listed below (Aylesbury Area) Number of Parish Parishes Councillors to be elected Adstock Parish Council 7 Akeley Parish Council 7 Ashendon Parish Council 5 Aston Abbotts Parish Council 7 Aston Clinton Parish Council 11 Aylesbury Town Council for Bedgrove ward 3 Aylesbury Town Council for Central ward 2 Aylesbury Town Council for Coppice Way ward 1 Aylesbury Town Council for Elmhurst ward 2 Aylesbury Town Council for Gatehouse ward 3 Aylesbury Town Council for Hawkslade ward 1 Aylesbury Town Council for Mandeville & Elm Farm ward 3 Aylesbury Town Council for Oakfield ward 2 Aylesbury Town Council for Oxford Road ward 2 Aylesbury Town Council for Quarrendon ward 2 Aylesbury Town Council for Southcourt ward 2 Aylesbury Town Council for Walton Court ward 1 Aylesbury Town Council for Walton ward 1 Beachampton Parish Council 5 Berryfields Parish Council 10 Bierton Parish Council for Bierton ward 8 Bierton Parish Council for Oldhams Meadow ward 1 Brill Parish Council 7 Buckingham Park Parish Council 8 Buckingham Town Council for Highlands & Watchcroft ward 1 Buckingham Town Council for North ward 7 Buckingham Town Council for South ward 8 Buckingham Town Council form Fishers Field ward 1 Buckland Parish Council 7 Calvert Green Parish Council 7 Charndon Parish Council 5 Chearsley Parish Council 7 Cheddington Parish Council 8 Chilton Parish Council 5 Coldharbour Parish Council 11 Cublington Parish Council 5 Cuddington Parish Council 7 Dinton with Ford &
    [Show full text]
  • Bedfordshire. Leighton Buzzard
    DIRECTORY.] BEDFORDSHIRE. LEIGHTON BUZZARD. 93' Labor-in-Vain (Bucks), Ledburn (Bucks), Leighton Buz­ PLACES OF WORSHIP, with times of services:- zard (Beds), Linslade (Bucks), Little Billington (Beds), All Saints' Church, Rev. Thomas Wallis Richards M.A_ Litt.!eworth (Bucks), Mentmore (Bucks), Milton Bryant vicar; Rev. John Fulton Hood B. A. & Rev. Robert Orr,.. (Beds), Northall (Bucks), ~orthall South End (Bucks); curates; II a.m. & 6 p.m. & wed. & saints' days, 11 Potsgrove (Beds), Reach (Beds), Ringshall (Bucks), Sand a.m. & 7.30 p.m House (Beds), Salford (Beds), Seabrook (Bucks), Sheep St. Andrew's Church, Church street; u a. m. & 6 p.m. &. Lane (Beds), Slapton (Bucks), Soulbury (Bucks), South­ fri. 7.30 p.m. during Lent & Saints' days court (Bucks), Stanbridge (Beds), Saint Margaret Catholic (Iron church), Beaudesert, Rev. Charles Edward (Bucks), Stewkley (Bucks), Stockgrove (Bucks), Stoke Reilly; holy communion 8.30; mass 10 a. m.; 6.30 p.m. ; Hammond (Bucks), 'febworth (Beds), Tilsworth (Beds), daily mass 7. 30 a. m. ; wed. 8 p. m Toddington (Beds), Vallence End (Beds), Wingfield (Bee¥>), Friend's Meeting House, North street; 10.30 a.m. & 6 p.m.; Wing (Bucks), Wingbury (Bucks),·WoburnSands (Beds), thurs. 10.30 a. m Woburn (Beds), Woodcock Hall (Beds) Baptist, Hockliffe street, Rev. Robert Edward Chettle­ For Bankruptcy purposes is included in that of Luton ; borough; ro.3o a.m. & 6 p.m. & mon. & wed. 7.30 p.m A. Ewen, Luton, official receiver Baptist, Lake st.. Rev. Alfd. Jas. Grant ; 10.30 a. m. & 6 p. m. Certified Bailiffs appointed under the • • Law of Distress Primitive Methodist, North street, Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • BUCKS.] FAR 546 [POST OFFIC£ Farmers-Continued
    [BUCKS.] FAR 546 [POST OFFIC£ FARMERs-continued. Cox E. W. Haddenham, Thame Dawkins W. Beaconsfield Clarke Elias, Lillingstone Dayrell, Cox G. Penn, Amersham Dawkins W. Coleshill, Amersbam Buckingham Cox J. Great Marlow Day J. & T. Mursley, Winslow ClarkeG.Lillingstone Dayrell,Buckingm Cox J. Denbam, Quainton, Winslow Day T. Caldecot, Bow brick hill, Bletch- Clarke G. Sympson, Bletcbley Station Cox J. Ibstone, Wallingford ley Station Clarke J. 8henley Brook end, Stony Cox W. Lane end, ·waddesdon, Aylesbry Dean J. Chartridge, Chesham Stratford Cox W. Haddenham, Thame Dean T. Huttons, Hambleden, Henley- Clarke J. Hogsbaw, Winslow Craft J. Hyde heath, Little Missenden, on-Thames Clarke J. B. Cbetwode, Buckingham Amersbam Dell J. Bledlow, Tring Clarke J. Low. Winchendon,Waddesdon Craft'I'.Brays green,Hundridge,Cheshm Dell J. Great 1.\'Iissenden, Amersham ClarkeJ .0.W aterStratford, Buckingham Cranwell J. Thornborough, Buckinghm Dell R. Prestwood common, Great Clarke R. King's hill, Little Missenden, Creswell G. St. Peter st. Great Marlow Missenden, Amersham Amersbam Creswell W. Wycombe rd. Gt. Marlow DellS. Ridge, Bledlow, Tring Clarke R. Three Households, Chalfont Crick C. Pin don end, Hanslope, Stony Denchfield J. Aston Abbotts, Aylesbury St. Giles, Slough Stratford Denchfield R.jun. Whitchurch,Aylesbury Clarke Mrs. S. Oving, Aylesbury Crick J. Hanslope, Stony Stratford Denchfield W. Akely, Buckingham Clarke S. Steeple Claydon, Winslow Cripps J. Dagnall, Eddlesborough, Deverell R. Stoke Mandeville, Aylesbury Clarke T. Lower Weald, Calverton, Dunstable Devrell J. Chemscott, Soulbury, Leigh- Stony Stratford Crook R. &. H. Oakley, Thame ton Buzzard Clarke T. C. Lit. Missenden, Amersham Crook E. Jxbill, Oakley, Thame Dickins E. Gran borough, Winslow Clarke W.
    [Show full text]