Taiwan 2020 Asia's Mutual Funds Giant

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Taiwan 2020 Asia's Mutual Funds Giant TAIWAN 2020 ASIA’S MUTUAL FUNDS GIANT Markets and Securities Services Markets and Securities Services | Taiwan Mutual Funds 2020 2 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Chapter 1. Taiwan, the perfect demographics for mutual funds 4 Chapter 2. The Taiwan mutual funds industry 7 Chapter 3. Distribution dynamics 20 Chapter 4. Master Agents 28 Chapter 5. An evolving regulatory environment 32 Chapter 6. What future opportunities are there? 34 Summary 37 Markets and Securities Services | Taiwan Mutual Funds 2020 3 TAIWAN 2020: ASIA’S MUTUAL FUNDS GIANT For many years, the biggest secret of the Asian mutual funds industry was the size of Taiwan compared to the rest of Asia. While it’s relatively easy to get set up in Hong Kong, taking the 83-minute flight north to Taipei has often been regarded as being too difficult (indeed the air route was named the World’s Busiest for three years running from 2014 to 2017).1 2019 was a momentous year for the fund management industry in Taiwan, with many changes and developments occurring. Domestic funds once more exceeded the aggregate AUM of offshore funds, for the first time in many years, as both Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) and Target Date Funds (TDF) successfully captured a significant volume of the net new inflows to the market. Although the number of players in the market didn’t change much, it was the impact of regulatory changes in 2018 that were most felt by the fund managers. They were alert to the need to continue to provide ETFs that matched the liability requirements of insurance companies. They also saw how TDF were able to both meet a perceived market demand for longer term products, but were sufficiently short term for end investors to consider using them. TDF were particularly successful in being used in conjunction with investment linked insurance schemes (ILAS). Taiwan’s regulators made a few changes during the year and expressed increased concerns on the narrow investor base of most of the new ETFs launched. This was because many only had their single insurance company sponsor/client as an investor. These ETF providers will likely need to find ways to broaden the end-clients of their products, perhaps by having other Asian region insurance companies buy. On the political front, China and Taiwan continue to have their differences, but there are few restrictions on business. There are many Taiwanese-owned businesses located in China, which helps to greatly improve the dialogue between both sides. It’s said that more than two million Taiwanese now live and work in Mainland China. The frequency of daily flights across the 160 kilometer-wide Taiwan Straits between Taiwan and more than 10 cities in China has risen from zero 10 years ago to over 20 a day now, and it’s growing every year. Mainland Chinese are second only to Japanese in numbers of visitors to Taiwan, at nearly five million a year.2 For the fund and asset management industry, Taiwan offers opportunities across institutional and retail markets. Taiwan’s institutional investors, pension funds, insurance companies and state institutions have continued to grow and have now become significant holders of offshore investments in global markets across all sectors. The aggregate size of the Taiwan mutual funds market was reported to exceed US$350bn at the end of December 2019.3 This was made up of US$121bn in offshore funds, US$133bn in onshore local funds and US$62bn in other investment mandates from pension funds and other investors. There was a further approximate US$55bn in ETFs.4 By any standards, this makes Taiwan a location of prime importance to the fund management industry globally. The Taiwan institutional market has also grown substantially over the last 10 years. This is split between national pension funds, insurance companies and others. It’s estimated that the current size exceeds US$300bn, of which the five national pension funds exceed US$150bn. A high proportion of the assets are invested globally, and they also use hedge funds and other alternative investments, giving many opportunities to institutional fund managers. Below we provide an outline of the mutual funds industry in Taiwan, covering size and scale, key facts, who the leaders in the market are and what’s distributed, but also providing some brief coverage of the institutional market, which by its nature is less transparent than the regulated retail funds business, and guidance to those who wish to enter the market. 1 “Hong Kong-Taipei, World’s Busiest Airline Route 3 Years In A Row, Why?”, IATA, last accessed at https://english.cw.com.tw on 25 January 2018. 2 “Taiwan Passengers Up 8.8% in 2017: China Airlines Remains Largest Carrier; Japan Is Top International Market”, OAG Schedules Analyzer, last accessed from www.anna.aero on 25 January 2018. 3 SITCA, December 2019. Note US$1 = NT$30.7. 4 TWSE/Yuanta, December 2019. Markets and Securities Services | Taiwan Mutual Funds 2020 4 CHAPTER 1. TAIWAN, THE PERFECT DEMOGRAPHICS FOR MUTUAL FUNDS a. Taiwan demographics Compared to virtually all other markets in Asia, Taiwan has near-perfect demographics for the mutual funds industry. There’s a large middle-aged, middle-class population, with high average earnings, a high savings rate, modest pension provision and a desire to invest and actively manage money overseas rather than retain it in the home market. Some key economic statistics for Taiwan also helps to convey why the location is so attractive.5 GDP per capita is US$24,316, having grown at an average rate of 2.06% a year over the past five years. Unemployment is 3.80% of the 23.5m population. And inflation is a low 1.2%. Although marginally higher than Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan and South Korea, Taiwan also has one of the lowest birth rates in the world at 8.26 per 1,000, which has led to a rapidly aging population.6 Taiwan has a highly export-oriented economy, although it’s vulnerable to fluctuations in world demand. China is its biggest trading partner, representing 42.5% of total exports and 19.2% of total imports.7 Taiwan has also been a major investor into the development of China’s economic growth. Main industries in Taiwan include electronics, communications and information technology products, petroleum refining, chemicals, textiles, iron and steel, machinery, cement, food processing, vehicles, consumer products, and pharmaceuticals. It’s the original equipment/design manufacturer (OEM/ODM) centre for high-tech products. Through both direct investment and people migration, Taiwan has especially supported technology developments, manufacturing and some other growth industries in China. Population pyramid and density for Taiwan (% of age of total population) 8 Male Taiwan 2018 Female 100+ 95-99 90-94 85-89 80-84 75-79 70-74 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4 1.2 0.8 0.4 0 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 Inhabitants/km2 >40,000 Population (millions) Age Group Population (millions) 20,001 – 40,000 10,001 – 20,000 Population pyramid for Taiwan (end-2018), shows the 5,001 – 10,000 number of male and female inhabitants per year of age. 3,001 – 5,000 1,001 – 3,000 Currently, Taiwan’s population aged over 65 accounts for 501 – 1000 14.4%. From around 2015, old-age dependency ratios began 301 – 500 to climb rapidly to become among the highest in Asia and 101 – 300 0 – 100 will be on par with countries like Japan and South Korea. Markets and Securities Services | Taiwan Mutual Funds 2020 5 b. Investor habits Taiwanese investors are well known for their short-termism. Typically, the average hold period of an investment into funds can be around three to six months. Often it might just be until 5% or more gain has been made. Investors have been very willing to take an active role in managing their assets, in part due to the (usual) low level of initial charges applicable to sales of funds (up to 2%) and to the desire to take short-term profit rather than wait for long-term returns that might fluctuate more. This has led to the active use of mutual funds in a way very similar to equities to achieve sustained returns. Many fund companies have made attempts to slow down the rate of turnover activity in mutual funds by investors, some by introducing a broader selection of funds in their range, others through increased marketing efforts. By late-2019, around 30% of fund sales were made in “B” shares (of UCITS funds), which were reintroduced to the market in the previous couple of years. To date, there’s little evidence this has been successful. Even with the popularity of high-yield bond funds over the last five years, the term of holding this type of investment by many Taiwanese investors has averaged just nine months, according to many of the managers offering these products. Even more surprisingly, issuers of regular savings plans into mutual funds also report the average hold periods to be little more than 12 months. The Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) has similarly attempted to reduce the extent of turnover activity in mutual funds. In the last couple of years, it introduced a restriction on the extent of sales bonuses paid by banks to their sales staff for individual fund sales, which then extended to become a ban. In future, all such commissions or sales bonuses to staff have become based on retained AUM of client/customer holdings.
Recommended publications
  • Blackrock Multi Opportunity Absolute Return Fund
    JUNE 2019 BlackRock Multi Opportunity Absolute Return Fund The BlackRock Multi Opportunity Absolute Return Fund (Fund) Annual Fund Review provides an overview of market and fund performance over the twelve months to 30 June 2019, along with some key fund information as at 30 June 2019. early 2018, Australia’s economic growth slowed to an annual Market Commentary – Year in Review rate of just 1.4% for the year to June 2019 – the slowest rate The 12 months from 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2019 exhibited since the Global Financial Crisis in 2009. The RBA reduced distinct periods of market performance and proved to be the cash rate by 0.25% to 1.25% in June 2019 in response to a challenging period for investors with many twists and the broader economic slowdown and several indicators of turns. Global share markets moved higher early in the spare capacity in the Australian economy. Australia’s financial year before declining sharply in the fourth quarter unemployment rate remained low, but this has not translated of 2018 to then rebound in the first half of 2019. The global into any meaningful wage growth. Declining property prices economy continued to grow but showed signs of slowing and weak construction data proved to be major headwinds, down, especially towards the end of 2018 when recession with signs of flow-over effects onto the wider economy. fears took hold of financial markets. Corporate earnings However, investors responded positively to the release of the growth also declined meaningfully but remained slightly Royal Commission report, which appeared less severe than positive for the year.
    [Show full text]
  • April 17, 2013 the New CFTC Regulatory Regime for Private
    April 17, 2013 The New CFTC Regulatory Regime For Private Fund Managers; First Quarter 2013 Update The enactment of Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and its implementation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) has ushered in a new era of regulation of managers of “private funds.”1 Although not mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act, on April 24, 2012, the CFTC repealed CFTC Rule 4.13(a)(4), the exemption from registration as a “commodity pool operator” under the U.S. Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) commonly relied upon by managers of private funds. The impact of this action is addressed in our Alert of August 27, 2012.2 This White Paper provides a survey of some of the most significant aspects of the new swaps regulatory regime mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act that directly impact private fund managers. The CFTC has regulatory authority over “swaps,” the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has regulatory authority over “security-based swaps,”3 and the CFTC and SEC share regulatory authority over “mixed swaps.”4 For ease of presentation, this White Paper focuses on the regulatory actions of the CFTC, many of which have been taken in close coordination with the SEC.5 I. Swap Transaction Clearing, Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements. A. The Obligation to Clear Swaps. A fundamental component of the Dodd-Frank Act is to generally require exchange trading and central clearing of standard swaps in order to decrease systemic risk. Pursuant to Section 2(h) of the CEA, the CFTC may determine that a group, category, type, or class of swap must be centrally cleared.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing Entry Mode to Mainland China
    東海管理評論【特刊】 民國一百年,第十二卷,第一期,71-120 Choosing Entry Mode to Mainland China Joung -Yol Lin*, Batchuluun AMRITA** Abstract The Economic Cooperation Framework Agreements (ECFA) is an agreement between the Republic of China (Taiwan) and People’s Republic of China (Mainland China), which was signed on June 29, 2010. The ECFA can have a far reaching impact on bilateral businesses relationship of the two parties, further strengthening the financial infrastructure and enhancing financial stability. Currently, thirteen Taiwanese banks meet the capital adequacy or stake acquisition requirements in the mainland China; on the contrary, five mainland Chinese banks meet the capital adequacy and operation experience requirements for opening a representative office in Taiwan. Consequently, a merger of banks and related options between the two regions are under discussion. In a review of the ECFA and other reports, Taiwanese banks will be able to progress further on the banking business in the mainland market within 2 years. However, there are still many uncertainties and questions concerning bank characteristics after ECFA; such as competitive position, market efficiency, long term returns and dimensional stability. This paper investigates theoretical and empirical studies and application of PESTEL analysis on the major factors in the macro environment of China. Specific attention is made in regards to the securities, banking and insurance aspects. The vital finding of this study is investigation of the entry mode strategy for the Chinese market with a long –term vision to foster into global competition. Finally, in order to intensify the competitive advantage, this paper explores a viable model for Taiwanese Banks to structure their products and services upon.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Hedge Funds Vs
    Offshore Hedge Funds vs. Onshore Hedge Funds A Fund Associates White Paper, December 2008 White Paper, December 2008 Offshore Hedge Funds Vs. Onshore Hedge Funds Offshore Hedge Funds vs. Onshore Hedge Funds I. Who May Invest In Offshore Hedge Funds Investors in offshore hedge funds are comprised of non-U.S. individuals and institutions as well as U.S. tax- exempt institutions. Institutional investors include entities such as pension funds, endowments, foundations, and other pools of capital whose assets are managed by a group of fiduciaries. Since offshore funds operate on the assumption that the assets they accept are not subject to taxes in the investor’s home jurisdiction, they have no obligation to compile the information needed for an investor to calculate and pay taxes. This means that for practi- cal purposes, U.S. taxable investors are prevented from participating directly in offshore funds, because although they would be legally obligated to report and pay tax on any taxable income earned in the fund, their fund man- ager would be unlikely to supply them with the relevant information. II. General Structural Differences Between Onshore and Offshore Hedge Funds A. Onshore Hedge Funds Most hedge funds domiciled in the U.S. are organized as limited partnerships. This is because the limited partnership structure avoids double taxation of investment returns and grants investors (limited partners) limited liability protection, which shields them from losing more than their investment. The general partner is the fund manager and assumes responsibility for management of the fund’s portfolio as well as man- agement of the business of the partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW to START an OFFSHORE FUND Starting an Offshore Fund Has Its Complexities
    HOW TO START AN OFFSHORE FUND Starting an Offshore Fund has its complexities. If you have been a super trader with an impressive track record, it is likely that you are also seeking to enter the international investment fund arena for the first time, with 'seed capital' of between US$500K to US$1 million. This requires starting a private fund, preferably, offshore. To start an Offshore Fund, you need to know the types of specialist services available: Initial Fund Start Up Services • Incorporation of an Offshore Company • Preparation of Private Offering Memorandum (Prospectus), Shareholders' Agreement and Share Subscription Agreement. • Facilitation of Offshore Administration services and Private Offering Memorandum (Prospectus) and Subscription documentation. • Preparation of investor documentation, letters. • Vendor Due Diligence documentation Fund Administration Services • Providing the Offshore Fund its management office and non investment manager-trader operations personnel (if required) • Due diligence checks on Investor under the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations. • Risk Management and Data Recovery services. Investor Management Services • Providing prospective investors with offering memorandum and shareholders' agreement and offering materials • Managing subscription documents • Processing and notifying investment manager and general partner of subscriptions, capital contributions and withdrawals • Distributing financial reports, mailings and electronic communications • Responding to investor inquiries. Accounting Services • Calculation of monthly capital account balances on an economic and tax basis. • Calculation of management fees and performance allocation. • Preparation of monthly financial statements. • Calculation of fees due sales agent. • Interaction with investment managers and traders, banks, counsel and auditors. • Facilitate and manage the preparation of financial statements and year end audit. • Facilitate and manage tax preparation, planning and consulting.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackrock Strategic Funds Prospectus 20 May 2021
    20 MAY 2021 Prospectus for Switzerland BlackRock Strategic Funds This page is intentionally left blank Contents Page Introduction to BlackRock Strategic Funds 3 Structure 3 Important Notice 4 Distribution 4 Management and Administration 6 Enquiries 6 Board of Directors 7 Glossary 8 Investment Management of the Funds 12 Risk Considerations 13 Specific Risk Considerations 20 Derivatives and Other Complex Instrument Techniques 27 Excessive Trading Policy 40 Share Classes and Form of Shares 40 New Funds or Share Classes 43 Dealing in Fund Shares 43 Prices of Shares 44 Application for Shares 45 Redemption of Shares 46 Conversion of Shares 47 Dividends 48 Calculation of Dividends 49 Fees, Charges and Expenses 50 Taxation 52 Meetings and Reports 56 Appendix A - Summary of Certain Provisions of the Articles and of Company Practice 57 Articles of Association 57 Restrictions on Holding of Shares 57 Funds and Share Classes 58 Valuation Arrangements 59 Net Asset Value and Price Determination 59 Conversion 60 Settlement on Redemptions 60 In Specie Applications and Redemptions 60 Dealings in Shares by the Principal Distributor 61 Default in Settlement 61 Compulsory Redemption 61 Limits on Redemption and Conversion 61 Suspension and Deferrals 61 Transfers 62 Probate 62 Dividends 62 Changes of Policy or Practice 62 Intermediary Arrangements 62 Appendix B - Additional Information 63 History of the Company 63 Directors’ Remuneration and Other Benefits 63 Auditor 63 Administrative Organisation 63 Conflicts of Interest from relationships within the BlackRock
    [Show full text]
  • How to Start a Hedge Fund in the Us 2018
    HOW TO START A HEDGE FUND IN THE US 2018 THE OFFSHORE DIMENSION ERIC FLAYE, OF CONYERS, SHINES A LIGHT ON THE BVI HEDGE FUND STRUCTURING OPTIONS FOR US SPONSORS any of the initial questions US counsel In contrast, off shore entities (such as a typical BVI will have for a sponsor looking to launch fund) classifi ed as corporations for US tax purposes can a new hedge fund will be about the an- eff ectively ‘block’ any such att ribution of UBTI as they ticipated investor base, as that factor is are not tax-transparent vehicles. If the BVI fund earns fundamental in determining the appro- any UBTI, the character of that income is not passed- priate fund structure. through or otherwise att ributed to its investors. Th is MTh e three key categories of investors are: (i) taxable ‘blocking’ eff ect is the principal reason tax-exempt US US investors; (ii) tax-exempt US investors; and (iii) non- investors generally prefer to invest in off shore funds. US investors. If the anticipated investor base will principally be Non-US investors: such investors generally prefer to Eric Flaye practices in comprised of taxable US investors, as a general propo- invest in off shore funds classifi ed as corporations for the corporate department sition the US sponsor may rely exclusively on domestic US tax purposes so as to keep out of the US tax net (and in the British Virgin Islands jurisdictions (such as Delaware) for all of its potential avoid any att endant requirement to fi le US tax returns).
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Hedge Fund Disputes: We're Not in New York Anymore
    Offshore Hedge Fund Disputes: We're Not in New York Anymore Jonathan Sablone, Nixon Peabody LLP "Hedge Funds are sophisticated investment vehicles often strict adherence to the fund documents reminiscent of hedgehogs or sea urchins which tend regardless of the sale tactics utilized by the fund, to prick badly if not carefully handled . ." ― Judge and the difficulty encountered by onshore Joseph-Olivetti, Matter Between SV Special authorities looking to investigate, prosecute or seize Situations Fund Limited and Headstart Class F the assets of such funds. In many ways, offshore Holdings Limited, In the High Court of Justice, venues provide idyllic upsides to both fund British Virgin Islands (2008). managers and investors alike. These benefits may be outweighed by the downside of litigating a Introduction dispute offshore, however. Fund managers and investors often discount the offshore legal structure There is perhaps no better summation of the until a problem arises. It is only then that they may offshore legal philosophy, borrowed from English come to realize that offshore legal vehicles are not law, than the above statement by Judge Joseph- for everyone, and may provide insurmountable Olivetti in the SV case. Put simply, offshore problems when a loss of capital liquidity or a jurisdictions, following the lead of courts in the freezing of redemptions occurs. United Kingdom, are much more likely to apply a "buyer beware" standard to hedge fund investors Offshore Venues seeking redress in offshore courts. Both fund managers and institutional investors should Although there are many offshore jurisdictions understand the key differences in offshore law which have become havens for hedge funds and before forming, or investing in, an offshore fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of Asian Securities Regulaors
    (Compiled as of December 17, 2015) 6th COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ASIAN SECURITIES REGULAORS & SROs AND MARKET CHARACTERISTICS (Data and information provided by participating organizations in the 11th ASF Tokyo Round Table) CONTENTS I. Basic Organizational Features I – 1. Organization Type, Statutory Basis I – 2. Number of Staff, Funding Source and Number of Member Firms II. Regulatory Framework of the Securities Markets of Each Country III. Regulation & Self Regulation III – 1. Major Rule Making Functions of each Organization III – 2. Qualification System for Market Professionals III – 3. Training System for Employees/Sales Representatives of Securities Companies III – 4. Securities Firms Inspection or Audit III – 5. Disciplinary Action and Measures Against Misconducts III – 6. Dispute Resolution System between Securities Firms and Customers III – 7. Investor Education Activities IV. Market Structures IV – 1. Breakdown of Financial Assets held by Household Account IV – 2. Share of Foreign Investors in the Stock Trading on the Exchange IV – 3. Share of Foreign Investors in the Bond Trading on Exchange/OTC Market IV – 4. Settlement and Clearing Systems for Securities Transaction IV – 5. Current Status of Off-Exchange Transaction (including PTS, ATS, MTF, etc.) IV – 6. Share of On-line Trading V. Safety Net for Investors Protection VI. Challenges of Securities and Capital Market V – 1. Major Recent Incidents and/or Challenges in Securities and Capital Markets as a whole V – 2. Specific Challenges in Equity Market V – 3. Specific Challenges in Bond Market V – 4. Specific Measures introduced / Implemented for the Securities Market V – 5. Measures to Invite Foreign Investment (De-regulation, Promotion Activities, etc.) The content herein is based on the feedbacks from each delegate of participating organizations in the 11th ASF Tokyo Round Table.
    [Show full text]
  • Taichung Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. Individual Financial Statements and Independent Auditor's Report
    Stock No: 2812 Taichung Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. Individual Financial Statements and Independent Auditor’s Report 2017 and 2016 Address: No. 87, Min Chuan Road, West District, Taichung Tel. No.: (04)22236021 - 1 - §INDEX§ Notes to financial Item Page statements No. 1. Cover page 1 - 2. Index 2 - 3. Auditor’s Report 3~7 - 4. Individual Balance Sheet 8 - 5. Individual Income Statement 9~11 - 6. Individual Statements of Changes in 12 - Shareholders’ Equity 7. Individual Statements of Cash Flow 13~15 - 8. Individual Notes to financial statements (1) Organization and operations 16 1 (2) Financial reporting date and procedures 16 2 (3) Application of new and revised standards 17~22 3 and interpretation (4) Summary of significant accounting 22~35 4 policies (5) Main source of significant accounting 36~37 5 judgment, estimates and assumptions uncertainty (6) Summary of significant accounting titles 37~73 6~30 (7) Related party transactions 73~80 31 (8) Pledged assets 81 32 (9) Significant contingent liabilities and 81~84 33 unrecognized contractual commitments (10) Others 85~113 34~39 (11) Notes of disclosure 1. Information about important 114~115 40 transactions 2. Information regarding investees 114, 116~119 40 3. Information regarding investment in 114, 120 40 the territory of mainland china 9. Important accounting title list 121~136 - - 2 - Auditor’s Report To: Taichung Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. Audit opinions We have audited the accompanying individual balance sheet of Taichung Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related individual statement of income, individual statement of changes in shareholders equity, individual statement of cash flows, and Note of the individual financial statements (including major accounting policy) for the years then ended.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism, Nationalism, and Hegemonic Struggles Over Trade and Economic Liberalization in Taiwan
    POPULISM, NATIONALISM, AND HEGEMONIC STRUGGLES OVER TRADE AND ECONOMIC LIBERALIZATION IN TAIWAN by SZU-YUN HSU B.Sc., National Cheng-Kung University, 2000 M.Sc., National Taiwan University, 2004 M.Sc., London School of Economics and Political Science, 2008 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Geography) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) March 2019 © Szu-Yun Hsu, 2019 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the dissertation entitled: Populism, Nationalism, and Hegemonic Struggles over Trade and Economic Liberalization in Taiwan submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements by Szu-Yun Hsu for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography Examining Committee: Jim Glassman, Geography, UBC Supervisor Merje Kuus, Geography, UBC Supervisory Committee Member Luke Bergmann, Geography, UBC University Examiner John Roosa, History, UBC University Examiner Additional Supervisory Committee Members: Abidin Kusno, Environmental Studies, York University Supervisory Committee Member ii Abstract This research examines trade and economic liberalization in Taiwan in relation to crisis and hegemonic restructuring. Drawing on Gramscian scholarship, postcolonial theory, and critical geopolitics, the analysis expounds on the multiple crises facing Taiwan since the 1980s, documents the trade-related social and political struggles,
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report Annual Report 2017
    Stock Code:2812 2017 Annual Report Annual Report 2017 We Do Our Best For You 總行 臺中市西區民權路87號 電話:04-22236021 Date of publication:March 2018 Website:http://www.tcbbank.com.tw M.O.P.S:http://mops.twse.com.tw No.87, Min-Chuan Road, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C. Taichung Commercial Bank Company Limited Address:No. 87, Min Chuan Road, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel.:(04)2223-6021 Website: http://www.tcbbank.com.tw Company Spokesman Name: Cheng-Yuan Chen Taichung Commercial Bank Job title: Executive Vice President Tel.:(04)2223-6021 Email:[email protected] Acting Spokesman Name: Kai-Yu Lin Job title: Executive Vice President Tel.:(04)2223-6021 Eamil:[email protected] Shares Registrar Name: by internal function Address: 11F., NO. 50, Sec. 1, XinSheng South Road, ZhongZheng District, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. Website:http://www.tcbbank.com.tw Tel.:(02)2395-7388 Credit Rating Agency Chairman : Name: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd, Taiwan Branch Address: Suite 1306, 13F., No. 205, Tun Hwa N. Road, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel.:(02)8175-7600 External Auditors in the Most Recent Year Name of CPA firm: Deloitte & Touche Name of CPA: Kuan-Chung Lai & Wen-Ya Hsu Address: 12F., No. 156, MinSheng East Road, Sec. 3, Song Shan District, Taipei, Chin-Yuan Lai Taiwan, R.O.C. Wesbsite:http://www.deloitte.com.tw Tel.:(02)2545-9988 Name of any exchanges where the Company’s securities are traded overseas, and the method by which to access information on said offshore securities: None. CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]