Werkbund, and the Aesthetics of Culture in the Wilhelmine Period

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Werkbund, and the Aesthetics of Culture in the Wilhelmine Period The Kunstgewerbe, the Werkbund, and the Aesthetics of Culture in the Wilhelmine Period MARK JARZOMBEK Cornell University Joseph Goebbels'famous claim about the connection between politics and that concept back to its nonreactionary, Wilhelmine roots.1 This paper, art in his letter to Wilhelm Furtwdngler in 1933 epitomizes Nazi theories which looks at the discourse on cultural aesthetics as it emerged in the first concerning the cultural benefits of art. In it he attempts both to legitimize decade of the twentieth century, also challenges some received notions about and cunningly obscure an underlying reactionary agenda: the Werkbund, an organization of artists, architects, and industrialists founded in 1907. With the Werkbund, the utopian potential of cultural We who are giving form to modern German politics, see aesthetics that emerged in the context of liberal bourgeois theory long before it ourselves as artists to whom has been assigned the great was co-opted by the right wing revealed itself for the first time as a powerful responsibility of forming, from out of the brute mass, the instrument of cultural definition. This paper will also discuss some of the solid and full image of the people. early formulators of Wilhelmine cultural aesthetics in various disciplines, Though there are many studies of post-World War I cultural aesthetics, Karl Scheffier (art critic), Heinrich Waentig (economist), Hermann especially in the context of Hitler'sfinal solution, little has been done to trace Muthesius (architect), and Georg Fuchs (playwright), among others. BY THE TURN OF THE TWENTIETH century, the German This article forms part of a larger work that analyzes the full spectrum Kunstgewerbe began to champion a full spectrum of aesthetic, of related political and economic issues in this period. I would like to economic, and patriotic issues that directly involved it in debates thank the librarians at Sibley Library, Cornell University, and at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, where I was a visiting member in concerning Germany's national identity and international Weltpoli- the School of Historical Studies, for their kind assistance. All translations tik. As the domain where industry and domesticity met head-on, are by the author unless otherwise noted. the Kunstgewerbe, so it was promised, could alleviate the crisis of 1. Reinhard Merker, Die bildenden Kunste im Nationalsozialismus (Co- logne: Dumont, 1983), for example, avoids discussions about Wilhelmine rapid industrialization without abandoning the essential premises theories of cultural aesthetics even though they fed into Hitler's program. of modernity. But the task, according to the calculations of The general tendency, exemplified by Merker, as well as by Henry Kunstgewerbe defenders, was enormous. As Heinrich Waentig, Grosshans, Hitler and the Artists (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1983), is to professor of economy and cultural history at Berlin and Munich see Hitler only in the context of radical anti-Semitism as it began to gain momentum at the turn of the century, and to not implicate other cultural and a prominent Kunstgewerbe promoter, pointed out, "Modern, theorists. large industrial technology took control of the domestic forms An important work is Jeffrey Herf, Reactionary Modernism, Technology, much quicker than anyone had expected ... with a chaotic Culture, and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984). The writers who interest Herf most are Oswald confusion of styles as the result."2 And this confusion, it was Spengler, Ernst Junger, and Werner Sombart. Herf, concentrating on the argued, left Germany in danger of self-victimization. Karl Gross, 1920s and 1930s, attempts to provide a new methodological balance to the professor of metal sculpture in Dresden and an important study of the rise of Hitler, which he discusses not as a single political narrative but as a reconciliation between-and a collapse of-irrationalist Werkbund theorist, basing himself on the biblical story of Jacob traditionalism and industrial, technological modernism. Herf moves away and Esau, explained that "the creative energies of the nation are from simplistic notions that the reactionary movement had its origins in not being supported, instead industrialists and store owners, either volkisch ideology or technocratic authoritarianism. Unfortunately, driven by greed, will sell the spirit of the nation for a lentil soup."3 Herf does not deal with pre-World War I Wilhelmine theories of cultural aesthetics, which are in his work, as in Merker's, ignored because they were not overtly tainted by reactionary politics. As I try to show, the reactionary implications of Wilhelmine aesthetics were concealed behind thinkers are today considered to be Germany's principal pre-World War I their commitment to seemingly liberal notions of national unity, organic theorists is unfortunate, for it gives the illusion that the Nazi movement culture, and political harmony. can only be discussed in the context of reactionary theory, as if liberal Analysis of Wilhelmine aesthetics, however, cannot be the analysis of bourgeois discourses were not complicit in the emergence of fascism. individual theorists-as is the focus of Herf's book-but rather of 2. Heinrich Waentig, Wirtschafi und Kunst, Eine Untersuchung Uber discursive practices, largely because Wilhelmine aesthetics emerged not as Geschichte und Theorie der modernen Kunstgewerbebewegung (Jena: Gustav a single theory encapsulated in the writings of one or two leading Fischer, 1909), 272. intellectuals, but in the domain of a group of influential thinkers, of which 3. Karl Gross, "Kunstgewerbliche Zeit- und Streitfragen," Kunstgewer- only a small number are represented in this paper. That none of these beblatt 19 (1908): 116. JSAH 53:7-19, MARCH 1994 7 This content downloaded from 128.59.106.243 on Mon, 01 Aug 2016 17:06:43 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 8 JSAH 53:1, MARCH 1994 These were not solitary voices. The crisis of the German When the Werkbund was founded in 1907, most of its members bourgeoisie in the wake of that country's now legendary transfor- had known each other for years. What drew them together was a mation from an agrarian to an industrialized nation has been the mutual feeling that the time had come for a smaller organization subject of numerous studies. But histories of the period tend to than the Verband des deutschen Kunstgewerbes, one that would define emphasize the more illustrious critics, such as Georg Simmel, more precisely the political, national, and pedagogical mission of Georg Luklcs, and Max Weber, and leave the Kunstgewerbler to the the Kunstgewerbe, while demonstrating that the longed-for recon- art history specialists.4 The Kunstgewerbe, in actuality, played an ciliation between the bourgeoisie and industry was not a distant important role in linking aesthetics to questions of modernity and utopia but an imminent reality. Fritz Schumacher, professor of national identity. Its supporters were convinced that aesthetics architecture at the Technische Hochschule in Dresden, claimed that would play the key role in Germany's status as a modern nation as the Werkbund aimed for nothing less than "the reconquest of a it was the only place where the interests of culture, life, industry, harmonious culture."9 and politics, both internal and external, could come together and Despite these polemics, the Werkbund is usually portrayed as a find a common voice. If the rapidly expanding and increasingly quiet revolution, a type of calm before the storm of a bolder and wealthy middle class could only educate itself to its new cultural more aggressive modernism.10 Julius Posener, for example, task, then the numerous threats to German social stability might argued that the Werkbund comprised individuals with "different be alleviated. To this end, the Verband des deutschen Kunstgewerbes, a and even opposing opinions" and that they "had no well-defined large organization of over seventeen thousand members and doctrine" except that, as "good Germans" interested in improving presided over by Hermann Muthesius, sponsored hundreds of the aesthetic appearance of industrial objects, they were "ad- public lectures, 210 in 1906 alone.5 But the real emphasis lay on vanced and progressive," supporting "quality" and the "well- the creation of Kunstgewerbe museums and Kunstgewerbe schools, being of the worker."1l The danger of this assumption is that it like the one in Diisseldorf, headed by Peter Behrens and later can give the impression that the Werkbund lacked hegemonic Wilhelm Kreis, and the one in Berlin opened in 1901 by Emperor tendencies and that it had little to do with certain theoretical Wilhelm II himself and headed by Bruno Paul.6 Furthermore, the speculations that by 1907 were not only well-defined, but that had government helped underwrite numerous exhibitions in which already degenerated into a powerful jargon.12 the Kunstgewerbe played important roles, such as the vast German 9. KurtJunghanns, Der Deutsche Werkbund-Sein erstesJahrzehnt (Berlin: city exhibition in Dresden in 1903. Representing 128 cities, more Henschelverlag Kunst und Gesellschaft, 1982), 141. For further discus- than 400 manufacturers, and thousands of artists, and occupying sion, see Stanford Anderson, "Deutscher Werkbund-the 1914 Debate: two-dozen buildings, it attracted more than four hundred thou- Hermann Muthesius versus Henry van de Velde," companion to Contem- porary Architectural Thought, ed.
Recommended publications
  • Die Schmidts Ein Jahrhundertpaar
    Reiner Lehberger Die Schmidts Ein Jahrhundertpaar Atlantik 00877_2_Lehberger_INHALT.indd 3 13.08.2020 12:32:02 Atlantik Bücher erscheinen im Hoffmann und Campe Verlag, Hamburg. 2. Au age 2020 Copyright © 2018 by Hoffmann und Campe Verlag, Hamburg www.hoffmann-und-campe.de www.atlantik-verlag.de Umschlaggestaltung: Hannah Kolling © Hoffmann und Campe Umschlagabbildung Vorderseite: © Dieter Bauer / Imago Umschlagabbildung Rückseite: © J. H. Darchinger / Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Satz: Pinkuin Satz und Datentechnik, Berlin Gesetzt aus der New Aster LT Druck und Bindung: CPI books GmbH, Leck Printed in Germany ISBN 978-3-455-00877-7 00877_2_Lehberger_INHALT.indd 4 13.08.2020 12:32:02 Inhalt Einleitung: »Ohne Helmut will ich keine Nacht mehr allein verbringen« S. 7 1. Die frühen Jahre: Schülerfreundschaft an der Licht- warkschule S. 15 2. Jugend unterm Hakenkreuz S. 41 3. Kriegsheirat S. 57 4. »Ein Vorschuss auf die Ehe« S. 78 5. Die Schmidts in der NS-Zeit: »Durchwursteln«, P ichtbewusstsein und Scham S. 94 6. Der 8. Mai 1945 – Ein Neubeginn auch für die Schmidts S. 106 7. Die fünfziger Jahre: Fernbeziehung S. 141 8. Die sechziger Jahre: Tiefe Ehekrise S. 157 9. Die Bonner Jahre: Ein gemeinsames Projekt S. 173 10. Was die Schmidts zusammenhielt S. 220 11. Zurück in Hamburg und der Welt: Die achtziger und neunziger Jahre S. 272 00877_2_Lehberger_INHALT.indd 5 13.08.2020 12:32:02 12. Das eigene Haus bestellen: Ein letztes großes Projekt der Schmidts S. 296 13. Geglückte Altersbeziehung S. 300 14. Mythos »revisited« S. 316 Danksagung S. 329 Anmerkungen S. 331 Literaturverzeichnis S. 346 Bildnachweise S. 350 00877_2_Lehberger_INHALT.indd 6 13.08.2020 12:32:02 Einleitung: »Ohne Helmut will ich keine Nacht mehr allein verbringen« Oktober 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture of Sir Ernest George and His Partners, C. 1860-1922
    The Architecture of Sir Ernest George and His Partners, C. 1860-1922 Volume II Hilary Joyce Grainger Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Ph. D. The University of Leeds Department of Fine Art January 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS Notes to Chapters 1- 10 432 Bibliography 487 Catalogue of Executed Works 513 432 Notes to the Text Preface 1 Joseph William Gleeson-White, 'Revival of English Domestic Architecture III: The Work of Mr Ernest George', The Studio, 1896 pp. 147-58; 'The Revival of English Domestic Architecture IV: The Work of Mr Ernest George', The Studio, 1896 pp. 27-33 and 'The Revival of English Domestic Architecture V: The Work of Messrs George and Peto', The Studio, 1896 pp. 204-15. 2 Immediately after the dissolution of partnership with Harold Peto on 31 October 1892, George entered partnership with Alfred Yeates, and so at the time of Gleeson-White's articles, the partnership was only four years old. 3 Gleeson-White, 'The Revival of English Architecture III', op. cit., p. 147. 4 Ibid. 5 Sir ReginaldýBlomfield, Richard Norman Shaw, RA, Architect, 1831-1912: A Study (London, 1940). 6 Andrew Saint, Richard Norman Shaw (London, 1976). 7 Harold Faulkner, 'The Creator of 'Modern Queen Anne': The Architecture of Norman Shaw', Country Life, 15 March 1941 pp. 232-35, p. 232. 8 Saint, op. cit., p. 274. 9 Hermann Muthesius, Das Englische Haus (Berlin 1904-05), 3 vols. 10 Hermann Muthesius, Die Englische Bankunst Der Gerenwart (Leipzig. 1900). 11 Hermann Muthesius, The English House, edited by Dennis Sharp, translated by Janet Seligman London, 1979) p.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Values: the Career of Charles Rennie Mackintosh 1900-2015 Professor Pamela Robertson It Is a Great Pleasure to Be Back
    Keynote Speech Strand 4 Critical Values: The Career of Charles Rennie Mackintosh 1900-2015 Professor Pamela Robertson It is a great pleasure to be back in Barcelona for this exciting Congress. I am grateful to the organisers, in particular Lluis Bosch and Mireia Freixa, for the invitation to speak to you today on Mackintosh, and to all those whose hard work has delivered such a successful and stimulating event. The strand this afternoon is research, specifically research in progress. This session invites us to reflect, for a moment, on critical values and critical fortunes. How are reputations and understandings formed? What value systems are they based on? How do they shift, and why? What are the future directions for us as curators, scholars, teachers? What I aim to present briefly today is threefold: an overview of the critical literature and research surrounding the career of Charles Rennie Mackintosh from around 1900 to 2015 (Fig. 1) – in the hope that this case study will provide some parallels with your individual experiences as researchers, whether working with male and/or female subjects; some reflections on the recently launched Mackintosh Architecture research website; and finally some general remarks on future directions for research. What emerges is the significance of context and individuals; the catalyst of curators and exhibitions; the gradual transference of Mackintosh's artistic legacy into the public domain; and, for Mackintosh at least, the central role of one institution, the University of Glasgow. In 1996, Alan Crawford divided Mackintosh's 'life after death' into three phases which comprised Mackintosh and the Architects, the Enthusiasts, and the Market.1 The trajectory of the scholarly presentation of Mackintosh’s work can, I believe, be divided into five broad phases, though of course at times these overlap: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Eine Tradition Und Ihre Erforschung Herausgegeben Von Karl Schmid Jlý
    Sonderdruck aus Veröffentlichungen zur Zähringer-Ausstellung I herausgegebenvom Archiv der StadtFreiburg i. Br. und der LandesgeschichtlichenAbteilung des Historischen Seminarsder Albert-Ludwigs-Universität DIE ZÄHRINGER Eine Tradition und ihre Erforschung Herausgegeben von Karl Schmid jlý. J( aP5S9ý T Jan Thorbecke Verlag Sigmaringen © 1986 by Jan Thorbecke Verlag GmbH & Co., Sigmaringen Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Ohne schriftliche Genehmigung des Verlages ist es nicht gestattet, das Werk unter Verwendung mechanischer, elektronischer und anderer Systeme in irgendeiner Weise zu verarbeiten und zu des verbreiten. Insbesondere vorbehalten sind die Rechte der Vervielfältigung- auch von Teilen Werkes - auf photomechanischem oder ähnlichem Wege, der tontechnischen Wiedergabe, des Vortrags, der Funk- und Fernsehsendung, der Speicherung in Datenverarbeitungsanlagen, der Übersetzung und der literarischen oder anderweitigen Bearbeitung. Einbandgestaltung: Peter Lorenz Grafik Design, Freiburg i. Br. (unter Verwendung einer Miniatur der Zähringer Burg in einer Handschrift der Chronik Johann Sattlers, mit freundlicher Genehmigung der Badischen Landesbibliothek Karlsruhe). Gesamtherstellung: M. Liehners Hofbuchdruckerei GmbH & Co.. Sigmaringen Printed in Germany " ISBN 3-7995-7040-3 DIETER GEUENICH Bertold V., der »letzte Zähringer« Eine überlebensgroße Rittergestalt in den Blendarkaden des südlichen Seitenschiffs des Freiburger Münsters stellt, wie man in Freiburg weiß, nach alter Überlieferung den Zähringerherzog BertoldV. dar'. In stattlicher Größe
    [Show full text]
  • 16 Bauhaus and Beyond Friday, March 20, 2020 1:45 PM
    16 Bauhaus and Beyond Friday, March 20, 2020 1:45 PM Admin Remember, any photograph or image you don't create must be given attribution in EVERY post you use it in. It's fine to use designs from elsewhere, as long as you give credit. Possible format for virtual Expo during exam time: First half hour, everybody in Pod A host a Zoom room, demonstrate what they have, answer questions from folks in Pods B,C,D, who stroll between Zoom rooms. Next half hour, Pod B is host, etc. Zooms are open, can still invite family and friends online. http://www.rchoetzlein.com/website/artmap/ Fiell, Charlotte & Peter. Design of the 20th Century. Taschen America, 2012. AesDes2020 Page 1 Fiell, Charlotte & Peter. Design of the 20th Century. Taschen America, 2012. Everything changed around 1920. Modernist era began. Abstract shapes, unadorned surfaces, function rules 1914-1918 WORLD WAR I Economies changed Art changed See timelines Short discussion: What do you already know about Bauhaus? Bauhaus video Design in a Nutshell, from the British Open University: http://www2.open.ac.uk/openlearn/design_nutshell/index.php# Brian Douglas Hayes. Bauhaus: A History and Its Legacy, 2012. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYrzrqB0B8I. 8:38 Bauhaus has roots in Deutscher Werkbund Still trying to integrate craftsmanship with industrialization: 1907 -1935. Big change in aesthetics. The Deutscher Werkbund (German Association of Craftsmen) is a German association of artists, architects, designers, and industrialists, established in 1907. The Werkbund became an important element in the development of modern architecture and industrial design, particularly in the later creation of the Bauhaus school of design.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1914 Werkbund Debate Resolved: the Design and Manufacture of Frank O
    The 1914 Werkbund Debate Resolved: The Design and Manufacture of Frank O. Gehry’s Guggenheim Museum, Bilbao Irene Nero Concern about McDonaldization in architecture is not new pride should dictate that goods be of fine quality, so as not to to architectural discourse.1 The terms of expression may be “pollute the visual environment.”4 different, but some of the important issues are fundamentally Van de Velde, another of the founding members, was also the same as those found at the core of the historic 1914 influenced by England’s Industrial Revolution, but this time, Werkbund debate between Hermann Muthesius and Henry van by its vocal opponent—John Ruskin. Van de Velde was in de Velde. This landmark debate serves as one of the earliest, if agreement with Muthesius that goods produced should be of not the earliest, example of publicly demonstrated concern high quality, but felt that handcrafting in the English Arts among modern architects regarding the origins of design and and Crafts tradition was more appropriate for establishing a manufacture of architecture.2 Primarily, at debate was the is- national identity.5 Both of the powerful Werkbund members sue of architecture becoming a standardized type-object, sub- agreed that quality was an issue in the production of German ject to ubiquitous distribution, versus architecture remaining goods, but had divergent ideas regarding their manufacture. an individualized, artistically-inspired creation. “Sameness” Manufactured goods, however, were not the only items under was an issue, simply because it was deemed an affront to the consideration at the Werkbund exhibition for standardization. creative process.
    [Show full text]
  • Considering Peter Behrens
    Engramma • temi di ricerca • indici • archivio • libreria • colophon 81 giugno 2010 ISBN:978-88-98260-26-3 Considering Peter Behrens Interviews with Ludwig Mies van der Rohe (Chicago, 1961) and Walter Gropius (Cambridge, MA, 1964) Stanford Anderson As a young scholar I had the opportunity to interview both Ludwig Mies van der Rohe and Walter Gropius about their experiences, as young men, in the atelier of Peter Behrens in Berlin. On June 27, 1961, when I had newly declared my doctoral dissertation project to be the work of Behrens, Mies received me for an hour in his office at 230 East Ohio Street in Chicago. On 6 February 1964, after my return from doctoral research in Europe and the beginning of my career at MIT, Walter Gropius entertained me for a two-hour lunch at his favorite restaurant in Harvard Square in Cambridge, Massachusetts.The interviews were not recorded, but I did immediately write out my record of the discussions. Information from these interviews appears in my 1968 dissertation, much later published as Peter Behrens and a New Architecture for the Twentieth Century (Anderson 2000). The dissertation did not provide the opportunity to consider the whole of the interviews or entertain their content. Here, for the most part I will give an account of the interviews, though I will quote some parts of my notes where they best convey the thoughts of either Mies or Gropius in the interviews. Both Mies and Gropius offered views of Behrens’ career before the time they converged in Berlin (1907-08), thus providing an apt entry point into the interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Miller on Harrod, 'Bruno Paul: the Life and Work of a Pragmatic Modernist'
    H-German Miller on Harrod, 'Bruno Paul: The Life and Work of a Pragmatic Modernist' Review published on Sunday, July 1, 2007 William Owen Harrod. Bruno Paul: The Life and Work of a Pragmatic Modernist. Stuttgart: Edition Axel Menges, 2005. 128 pp. $69.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-3-932565-47-2. Reviewed by Wallis Miller (School of Architecture, University of Kentucky) Published on H-German (July, 2007) Forgotten Modernist In a beautifully produced book, typical of this publisher's productions, William Owen Harrod introduces an English-speaking audience to the German designer Bruno Paul (1874-1968). One might call Paul a polymath because his oeuvre included illustrations and caricatures as well as furniture, interior, and architectural designs. Indeed, Harrod's monograph chronicles Paul's career in terms of a Gesamtkunstwerk (from illustrations for the periodicals Jugend and Simplicissimus to standardized furniture, ship interiors, and villas for a range of clients) subject to Paul's evolving stylistic approaches. But Harrod is also able to insist on a certain degree of consistency in Paul's work by identifying several principles that underpinned all of his efforts: a regard for a non-professional audience, especially a middle-class one; an eagerness to define and refine modern form without a fear of history; an attention to craft; and the belief that the integration of art in all aspects of daily life would produce a harmonious culture. Bruno Paul was, above all else, a practitioner and not a theoretician. He seldom wrote about design. Aside from posing a problem for discussing content, this fact points to the issue of evidence for such a discussion in the first place.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Architekturausstellung Als Kritische Form 2018
    Die Architekturausstellung als kritische Form 1 Lehrstuhl für Architekturgeschichte und kuratorische Praxis EXTRACT “Die Architekturausstellung als kritische Form von Hermann Muthesius zu Rem Koolhaas” Wintersemester 2018/19 LECTURE 1 / 18 October 2018 Die Architekturausstellung als kritische Form. Vorgeschichte, Themen und Konzepte. Basic questions: - What is an architecture exhibition? - How can we exhibit architecture? - What does the architecture exhibition contribute to? Statements: - Exhibitions of architecture are part of a socio-political discourse. (See Toyo Ito’s curatorial take on the Architecture Biennale in Venice in 2012 http://www.domusweb.it/en/interviews/2012/09/03/toyo-ito-home-for-all.html) - Exhibitions of architecture are model-like presentations / They should present the new directions of the discipline. (“Critical” in this context of this lecture class means: exhibitions introducing a new theoretical and / or practical concept in contrast to existing traditions) PREHISTORY I. - Model Cabinets (Modellkammer), originally established as work tools for communication purposes and as educational tools for upcoming architects / engineers. Further aspect: building up an archive of technological inventions. - Example: The medieval collection of models for towers, gates, roof structures etc. in Augsburg, hosted by the Maximilianmuseum. - Originally these cabinets were only accessible for experts, professionals, not for public view. Sources of architecture exhibitions: - Technical and constructive materials (drawings, models). They tend to be private or just semi- public collections built up with education purposes. - The first public exhibitions of these models in the arts context didn’t happen until the end of the 18th century. Occasion: Charles de Wailly exhibited a model of a staircase in an arts exhibition in 1771.
    [Show full text]
  • MITTEILUNGEN Des Museumsverbandes in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern E.V
    2019MITTEILUNGEN DES MUSEUMSVERBANDES IN M-V MITTEILUNGEN des Museumsverbandes in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern e.V. des Museumsverbandes inMecklenburg-Vorpommern 2019 MITTEILUNGEN des Museumsverbandes in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern e.V. 2019 IMPRESSUM Mitteilungen des Museumsverbandes in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern e.V. 28. Jahrgang, 2019 Herausgeber Museumsverband in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern e.V. Vorsitzende: Dr. Kathrin Möller Koordinationsbüro Burgwall 15 18055 Rostock Telefon: 0381.81706180 Fax: 0381.81706181 E-Mail: [email protected] www.museumsverband-mv.de Text- und Bildredaktion Dr. Peter Danker-Carstensen E-Mail: [email protected] Redaktionsschluss: 1.10.2019 Lektorat Dr. Stefan Knüppel Erscheinungsweise: jährlich © für die Abbildungen bei den jeweiligen Autoren bzw. bei den durch sie vertretenen Institutionen. Frühere Ausgaben der Mitteilungen können im Koordinationsbüro angefordert werden. Schutzgebühr 7,50 € zuzüglich Versand- kosten. Für Mitglieder des Museumsverbandes sind die Hefte kostenfrei. Nachdruck mit Genehmigung des Vorstandes. Hergestellt mit Förderung durch das Ministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur des Landes Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Umschlagbild Die Kunsthalle Rostock im Winter 1970. Foto: Jürgen Sindermann Gestaltung Marco Pahl (www.grafikagenten.de) Druck Druckerei Weidner, Rostock INHALT VORWORT 5 BEITRÄGE 6 Bildende Kunst am Meer des Friedens. Die Biennale der Ostseeländer als Ursprung der Kunsthalle 6 Rostock Elke Neumann „Ein halbes Jahrhundert für die Kunst“: Die Kunsthalle Rostock hat 50 Jahre wechselvolle
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying Hitler's Salon: Patrick J. Jung
    Quantifying Hitler’s Salon: A Statistical Analysis of Subjects at the Great German Art Exhibition, 1937-1944 Patrick J. Jung Department of Humanities, Social Science, and Communication Milwaukee School of Engineering Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202, USA Email: [email protected] Abstract: In recent decades, scholars have reassessed earlier historical interpretations that argued German art produced during the Nazi era was little more than kitsch. This reassessment has occurred in part due to the increased accessibility to the various sources required to thoroughly research Nazi-era art. The availability of the artistic oeuvre of the Third Reich has been enhanced by the 2012 launch of the online database Grosse deutsche Kunstausstellung, 1937-1944. This database makes possible a quantitative analysis of the artworks exhibited at Adolf Hitler’s annual art exhibition, the Grosse deutsche Kunstausstellung (Great German Art Exhibition), from 1937 to 1944. Tabulating the information found in this database indicates that landscapes and related works constituted the dominant subject category. Portraits, nudes, and depictions of animals were also significant, but overtly political art was uncommon. The subjects of Nazi-era art reflected the racial ideology of the Third Reich, but several subject categories remain largely unexamined in this respect. This essay provides statistical evidence that supports many of the scholarly interpretations concerning these subject categories and suggests new directions for future research. Keywords: Third Reich, Nazi-era art, Great German Art Exhibition, Adolf Hitler Introduction: Reassessing Nazi-Era Art Prior to the 1970s, art historians generally dismissed Nazi-era art as mere kitsch and the product of a dictatorship that had suppressed modernist styles.
    [Show full text]
  • Geschichte Des Kostüms « Adolf Rosenberg Geschichte Kostüms
    ADOLF ROSENBERG GESCHICHTE DES KOSTÜMS « ADOLF ROSENBERG GESCHICHTE KOSTÜMS// TEXT VON PROF. DR. EDUARD HEYCK DRITTER BAND E.WEYHE . NEW YORK 794 LEXINGTON AVENUE PRINTED IN GERMANY BY ERNST WASMUTH LTD., BERLIN \6l GROSSBRITANNIEN NACH MITTE DES 16. JAHRHUNDERTS 12 3 Zahllos sind die Bildnisse der Maria Stuart, infolge ihres leichtsinnig- romantischen und tragischen Ruhmes. In vielen englischen und schottischen Schlössern legte man nach ihrem Tode (1587) und in den nächsten Jahrhunderten Wert darauf, ein Bildnis von ihr zu' besitzen, welches in die Familie durch ihr persönliches Geschenk — angeblich — gekommen sei. Die allermeisten Gemälde und Stiche sind indessen sehr mittelbare, aus schlechten Vorlagen weiter abgeleitete oder will- kürlich auf Verschönerung bedachte Darstellungen. Den besten Porträtwert haben die Zeichnungen und Bildnisse, die von ihr in Frankreich zu der Zeit entstanden, als sie dort 1558 — 1560 die junge Gattin des Königs Franz II. war. Dem damaligen England und Schottland fehlte es noch an heimischen tüchtigen Malern. — Marias Schönheit erscheint übrigens auf den authentischen Jugendbildnissen von Clouet durchaus nicht überwältigend. Abb. 1. (Links.) Franz II. von Frankreich und Maria. Englischer nachträg- licher Stich, wenig wertvoll. Das Galakostüm der Königin ist einer späteren englischen Zeit entnommen. Abb. 2. (Mitte.) Gutes Bildnis Marias, um 1675. Von dem in England sich zeitweilig aufhaltenden Italiener Federigo Zuccaro. Abb. 3. (Rechts.) Bildnis zweifelhafter Zuweisung. Es wird auch auf Maria Stuart's Mutter Maria von Lothringen gedeutet, was aus Kostüm- gründen aber nur bei nachträglicher Darstellung möglich wäre. So y3(>% SS ü PQ w U Q m Ä . Ü 2; < < f^W OS X HH S 2: < < s \o H2 g •-< 2 u OD S CO OS > ^ o o l1 55 M o Ol 3 Mi H Q -( U U ttj n H < U QJ Ü J62 SÜDLICHE NIEDERLANDE ÄLTERES 16.
    [Show full text]