DOCSLIB.ORG

Population Trends of North American Shorebirds Based on the International Shorebird Survey Marshall A. Howe, Paul H. Geissler* &

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Population Trends of North American Shorebirds Based on the International Shorebird Survey Marshall A. Howe, Paul H. Geissler* & 0045006 Biological Conservation 49 (1989) 185-199 Population Trends of North American Shorebirds Based on the International Shorebird Survey Marshall A. Howe, Paul H. Geissler* Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Laurel, Maryland 20708, USA & Brian A. Harrington Manomet Bird Observatory, Manomet, Massachusetts 02345, USA (Received 16 May 1988; revised version received 10 January 1989; accepted 12 January 1989) A BS TRA C T Shorebirds Charadrii are prime candidates Jor population decline because of their dependence on wetlands that are being lost at a rapid pace. Thirty-six of the 49 species of shorebirds that breed in North America spend most of the year in Latin America. Because populations of most species breed and winter at remote sites, it may be most feasible to monitor their numbers at migration stopovers. In this study, we used statistical trend analysis methods, developed .for the North American Breeding Bird Surw,y, to analyze data on shorebird populations during southbound migration in the United States. Survey data were collected by volunteers in the International Shorebird Survey ( ISS). The analyses indicate that whimbrels Numenius phaeopus, short-billed dowitchers Limnodromus griseus, and sanderlings Calidris alba have undergone statistically significant declines. Methodological concerns over both the ISS and the trend analysis procedures are discussed in detail and biological interpretations of the results are suggested. INTRODUCTION Reliable data on population size and change are basic to evaluating the conservation status of species. Because absolute numbers are usually * Present address: Migratory Bird Management Office, US Fish & Wildlife Service, Laurel, Maryland 20708, USA. 185 Biol. Conserv. 0006-3207/89/$03"50 ,,~'~ 1989 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, England. Printed in Great Britain 0045007 186 Marshall A. Howe, Paul H. Geissler, Brian A. Harrington impossible to obtain for large populations, one is often forced to rely on indices that reflect proportional changes in population from year to year. The North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) is one of the best examples of a broad geographic population sampling scheme that provides indices to population change (Bystrak, 1981). The Route Regression Method (Geissler & Noon, 1981), developed by Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, uses raw BBS data to generate estimates of rate and direction of species-specific population change over any given range of years. This method is based on the assumption that changes in populations sampled along roadsides are representative of changes in the entire population of each species. The validity of this assumption is enhanced by the stratified random selection of BBS routes and by the spatial stability of most breeding bird populations. The BBS is primarily suited to species that are both detectable from roadsides and uniformly or randomly distributed within suitable habitat. It is considered an effective index of population change for about 240 species of North American birds. Other methods are required to survey species not detectable from roadsides or whose distributions are highly clumped. Shorebirds fall into this category because their breeding grounds are not readily accessible and their distribution patterns in migration and winter tend to be highly clumped. It is important that reliable monitoring methods for shorebirds be developed, as most species are dependent upon vulnerable wetland habitats. These habitats have been disappearing at a rapid pace (Howe, 1987). Forty- six percent of the wetlands that existed in the United States at the time of European settlement have been lost to a variety of man's activities (Tiner, 1984). Total wetland area destroyed between the mid-1950s and the mid- 1970s alone is equal to twice the size of the State of New Jersey (Tiner, 1984). Comparable rates of wetland loss have recently been documented for Latin America, where most species spend the winter (Scott & Carbonell, 1986). Shorebirds often congregate in vast numbers in certain of the remaining wetlands, from which they procure food critical for fueling long migration flights or for winter survival. If wetland habitats continue to be lost or degraded, we should eventually expect to see this pattern reflected in declining shorebird populations. The difficulty of sampling shorebird populations on a regular basis in remote arctic breeding grounds or Latin American wintering grounds (where 36 of the 49 species that breed in North America spend most of the year) leads one to consider the possibility of sampling populations during migration through the United States. Although migration counts are not typically used as an index to total populations, two studies (Svensson, 1978; Hussell, 1981) have found parallels between migration counts of passerines and breeding counts conducted the same years. A substantial data set of 0045008 Population trends in shorebirds 187 shorebird surveys at southbound migratory stopovers, during 1972-83, already exists. These data were collected by volunteer collaborators as part of the International Shorebird Survey (ISS) administered by Manomet Bird Observatory (MBO) in Massachusetts and the Canadian Wildlife Service. In this paper, we describe an analysis of the United States subset of these data, complete through 1982 and including part of 1983, to derive estimates of population trends of North American shorebirds. METHODS Structure of the International Shorebird Survey Unlike the BBS, sampling areas in the ISS are neither preselected randomly nor of a transect design. The purpose of the ISS has been to identify important stopovers and to enhance knowledge of migration routes, rather than to obtain statistically defensible estimates of population change. To accomplish ISS goals, volunteer participants attempt to visit specific stopovers at 10-day intervals between 1 July and 1 December, the inclusive period of most southbound shorebird migration. In reality, few people are able to achieve such intensive coverage and many sites are surveyed only a few times annually or even missed entirely in some years. Survey sites are distributed throughout eastern North America. The great majority lie on the Atlantic coast and a few observers report from the Caribbean and South America. The highest density of sites is between Maine and North Carolina. Special attention is paid to ensuring coverage of sites that traditionally attract large numbers of shorebirds. At each site the total number of each species is estimated by direct count. In tidal areas, an effort is made to survey the sites during the same segment of the tide cycle each time to minimize the effect of local movements in response to tidal fluctuations. Each survey is summarized on forms provided by M BO. The forms are checked and edited by MBO staff and the data are computerized. Editing of the ISS data set for trend analysis To be suitable for trend analysis, the ISS data must meet the same assumption that is made for the BBS, that the sample of birds counted is consistently representative of the total population. For several reasons this assumption cannot be made for ISS data: (1) survey sites are not selected in a random or other statistical manner (emphasis is placed on sites known to be traditionally important and some important sites are relatively inaccessible and not covered); (2) because migrating shorebirds move through at varying 0045009 188 Marshall A. Howe, Paul H. Geissler, Brian A. Harrington rates determined by physiological and climatological factors, major flights in and out of a stopover could take place between consecutive sampling times; and (3) many species prefer inland freshwater sites, opportunistically selecting wetlands that have the proper water conditions at any given time. Despite these drawbacks, acceptance of certain assumptions about the migration ecology of shorebirds and careful selection of species to be analyzed can increase the probability that ISS samples are representative of species' whole populations. If analyses are confined to coastal sites and to species that are obligate users of the coast, the chance of overlooking major segments of the migrating population is decreased. We know from several studies not only that many stopovers traditionally attract large numbers of shorebirds (Senner & Howe, 1984) but also that returns of individual birds of at least some species to the same stopovers in successive years occur much more often than would be expected by chance alone (Smith & Houghton, 1984; B. A. Harrington, unpublished data). This fact lends credence to the notion that approximately the same breeding populations are being sampled at a given migratory stopover in successive years. Clearly, however, the time that the birds are sampled is of critical importance. Most species exhibit sharp population peaks (or multiple peaks representing differential migration of adult males, adult females, and juveniles) during migration. Therefore, the interval between sampling visits should be short enough to intercept the peaks, which may vary somewhat from year to year. Several studies suggest that, early in southbound migration, lengths of stay of individual birds at stopovers average two to three weeks. From these limited data, we tentatively conclude that the ten-day sampling interval the ISS attempts to achieve is adequate. Based on the above considerations, we conducted two subsetting procedures on the ISS data set for 1972-83 as follows: the first eliminated all but Atlantic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Web-Book Catalog 2021-05-10
    Lehigh Gap Nature Center Library Book Catalog Title Year Author(s) Publisher Keywords Keywords Catalog No. National Geographic, Washington, 100 best pictures. 2001 National Geogrpahic. Photographs. 779 DC Miller, Jeffrey C., and Daniel H. 100 butterflies and moths : portraits from Belknap Press of Harvard University Butterflies - Costa 2007 Janzen, and Winifred Moths - Costa Rica 595.789097286 th tropical forests of Costa Rica Press, Cambridge, MA rica Hallwachs. Miller, Jeffery C., and Daniel H. 100 caterpillars : portraits from the Belknap Press of Harvard University Caterpillars - Costa 2006 Janzen, and Winifred 595.781 tropical forests of Costa Rica Press, Cambridge, MA Rica Hallwachs 100 plants to feed the bees : provide a 2016 Lee-Mader, Eric, et al. Storey Publishing, North Adams, MA Bees. Pollination 635.9676 healthy habitat to help pollinators thrive Klots, Alexander B., and Elsie 1001 answers to questions about insects 1961 Grosset & Dunlap, New York, NY Insects 595.7 B. Klots Cruickshank, Allan D., and Dodd, Mead, and Company, New 1001 questions answered about birds 1958 Birds 598 Helen Cruickshank York, NY Currie, Philip J. and Eva B. 101 Questions About Dinosaurs 1996 Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY Reptiles Dinosaurs 567.91 Koppelhus Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, N. 101 Questions About the Seashore 1997 Barlowe, Sy Seashore 577.51 Y. Gardening to attract 101 ways to help birds 2006 Erickson, Laura. Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg, PA Birds - Conservation. 639.978 birds. Sharpe, Grant, and Wenonah University of Wisconsin Press, 101 wildflowers of Arcadia National Park 1963 581.769909741 Sharpe Madison, WI 1300 real and fanciful animals : from Animals, Mythical in 1998 Merian, Matthaus Dover Publications, Mineola, NY Animals in art 769.432 seventeenth-century engravings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of the Population Trend of Far Eastern Curlew Numenius Madagascariensis in Banyuasin Peninsula, South Sumatra, Indonesia
    Ecologica Montenegrina 44: 11-18 (2021) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em http://dx.doi.org/10.37828/em.2021.44.2 Is the global decline reflects local declines? A case of the population trend of Far Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascariensis in Banyuasin Peninsula, South Sumatra, Indonesia MUHAMMAD IQBAL1*, CIPTO DWI HANDONO2, DENI MULYANA3, ARUM SETIAWAN4, ZAZILI HANAFIAH4, HENNI MARTINI5, SARNO4, INDRA YUSTIAN4 & HILDA ZULKIFLI4 1Biology Program, Faculty of Science, Sriwijaya University, Jalan Padang Selasa 524, Palembang, South Sumatra 30139, Indonesia. 2Yayasan Ekologi Satwa Liar Indonesia (EKSAI), Jalan Kutisari 1 No. 19, Surabaya, East Java 60291, Indonesia 3Berbak Sembilang National Park, South Sumatra office, Jalan Tanjung Api-api komplek Imadinatuna No. 114, South Sumatra, Indonesia 4Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Sriwijaya University, Jalan Raya Palembang-Prabumulih km 32, Indralaya, South Sumatra, Indonesia. 5Hutan Kita Institute (HAKI), Jalan Yudo No. 9H, Palembang, South Sumatra 30126, Indonesia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received 28 June 2021 │ Accepted by V. Pešić: 13 July 2021 │ Published online 16 July 2021. Abstract Far Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascariensis (Linnaeus, 1766) is Endangered species confined in East Asian Australasian Flyway (EAAF) sites. We compiled and summarized all historical numbers of Far Eastern Curlew in Banyuasin Peninsula, South Sumatra, Indonesia. A total of 30 records were documented from 1984 to 2020. The largest number is 2,620 individuals during the migration period in 1988. Unfortunately, the largest number drop to 1,750 individuals in wintering period in 2008, and then drop to 850 individuals in 2019. The numbers indicate that the population decline by up to 62% in the last 35 years (1984 to 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Population Analysis and Community Workshop for Far Eastern Curlew Conservation Action in Pantai Cemara, Desa Sungai Cemara – Jambi
    POPULATION ANALYSIS AND COMMUNITY WORKSHOP FOR FAR EASTERN CURLEW CONSERVATION ACTION IN PANTAI CEMARA, DESA SUNGAI CEMARA – JAMBI Final Report Small Grant Fund of the EAAFP Far Eastern Curlew Task Force Iwan Febrianto, Cipto Dwi Handono & Ragil S. Rihadini Jambi, Indonesia 2019 The aim of this project are to Identify the condition of Far Eastern Curlew Population and the remaining potential sites for Far Eastern Curlew stopover in Sumatera, Indonesia and protect the remaining stopover sites for Far Eastern Curlew by educating the government, local people and community around the sites as the effort of reducing the threat of habitat degradation, habitat loss and human disturbance at stopover area. INTRODUCTION The Far Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariencis) is the largest shorebird in the world and is endemic to East Asian – Australian Flyway. It is one of the Endangered migratory shorebird with estimated global population at 38.000 individual, although a more recent update now estimates the population at 32.000 (Wetland International, 2015 in BirdLife International, 2017). An analysis of monitoring data collected from around Australia and New Zealand (Studds et al. in prep. In BirdLife International, 2017) suggests that the species has declined much more rapidly than was previously thought; with an annual rate of decline of 0.058 equating to a loss of 81.7% over three generations. Habitat loss occuring as a result of development is the most significant threat currently affecting migratory shorebird along the EAAF (Melville et al. 2016 in EAAFP 2017). Loss of habitat at critical stopover sites in the Yellow Sea is suspected to be the key threat to this species and given that it is restricted to East Asian - Australasian Flyway, the declines in the non-breeding are to be representative of the global population.
    [Show full text]
  • Help Us Find the Long- Billed Curlew
    How You Can Help The Montana Bird Conservation Partnership, (montanabirds.org) started the “Curlew We are very interested in finding Long-billed Curlews Initiative” to help conserve habitat for in the Mission Valley. Please keep your eyes open Curlews and other grassland species across and ears tuned! If you find Curlews, please fill out the the state. For a variety of reasons, the accompanying postcard (see back of this brochure for Flathead Indian Reservation/Mission Valley both postcard and contact information). and surrounding grasslands have been chosen as one of the focal areas for these Grasslands provide critical habitat to many species of efforts. birds and other wildlife. Conservation practices that promote healthy grassland habitats are beneficial to We would like to know more about where both livestock and many species of wildlife. Curlews live in western Montana! To record Specifically, curlew habitat can be improved by sightings of curlews go to implementing appropriate grazing management, mtaudubon.org/issues/grasslands to fiill out a avoiding conversion of grasslands, establishing native postcard, or visit map-me.org/sites/mvcurlews grasses and forbs, reducing the use of pesticides to to record your sighting on a map. Greg Lavaty, photo maintain insects and other valuable food resource , You can also directly contact the individuals and minimizing disturbance during the breeding and groups below. Help us find the Long- period (~ April 15–July 15 in the Mission Valley area). For more information contact: billed Curlew Every land owner has different needs and conditions. We encourage you to contact your local Natural Amy Seaman at Montana Audubon in the Mission Valley & Resources Conservation Service Office to discuss 406.210.9449; [email protected] specific Best Management Practices that work for you, your lands, the Curlew, and other local wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • A PROBABLE SHORT-BILLED DOWITCHER (Limnodromus Griseus, SCOLOPACIDAE) at TONGOY, IV REGION: FIRST RECORD of the GENUS and SPECIES for CHILE?
    Boletin Chi/eno de Omitologia 4: 21- 28 Uni6n de Ornil610905 de Chile 1997 un'Gn d. O,"jIQlol~1 de ChIle A PROBABLE SHORT-BILLED DOWITCHER (Limnodromus griseus, SCOLOPACIDAE) AT TONGOY, IV REGION: FIRST RECORD OF THE GENUS AND SPECIES FOR CHILE? FRANl;:OIS VUILLEUMIER Department of Ornithology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192, USA. ABSTRACT A single dowitcher, identified as a Short-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus (Scolopacidae), was observed during a period of about four hours on 22 January 1997 at Estero Tongoy, IV Regi6n, Chile. The dowitcher was part of a large mixed~species flock of shorebirds containing about 500 individuals of 14 species, and including eight other species of boreal migrant shorebirds breeding in North America. These birds foraged in a tidal area of soft mud partially covered with halophytic plants. The distribution of the two American species, the Short-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus and the Long-billed Dowitcher L. sco!opaceus, and their occurrence in southern South America are reviewed and discussed. In Argentina, the status of Limnodromus spp. remains uncertain. There are very few records, of both Limnodromus griseus and L. sco!opaceus, from Buenos Aires Province, but identification of either species needs verification. There are two records of L. griseus from Rio Grande do Sui in southern Brazil. The observation of a probable Limnodromus griseus at Estero Tongoy appears to be the first record of this genus and species for Chile, about 1500 km south of the southernmost records of this species along the Pacific coast at Arequipa, southern Peru.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Long-Billed Curlew Numenius Americanus in Peru and Other Observations of Nearctic Waders at the Virilla Estuary Nathan R
    Cotinga 26 First record of Long-billed Curlew Numenius americanus in Peru and other observations of Nearctic waders at the Virilla estuary Nathan R. Senner Received 6 February 2006; final revision accepted 21 March 2006 Cotinga 26(2006): 39–42 Hay poca información sobre las rutas de migración y el uso de los sitios de la costa peruana por chorlos nearcticos. En el fin de agosto 2004 yo reconocí el estuario de Virilla en el dpto. Piura en el noroeste de Peru para identificar los sitios de descanso para los Limosa haemastica en su ruta de migración al sur y aprender más sobre la migración de chorlos nearcticos en Peru. En Virilla yo observí más de 2.000 individuales de 23 especios de chorlos nearcticos y el primer registro de Numenius americanus de Peru, la concentración más grande de Limosa fedoa en Peru, y una concentración excepcional de Limosa haemastica. La combinación de esas observaciones y los resultados de un estudio anterior en el invierno boreal sugiere la posibilidad que Virilla sea muy importante para chorlos nearcticos en Peru. Las observaciones, también, demuestren la necesidad hacer más estudios en la costa peruana durante el año entero, no solemente durante el punto máximo de la migración de chorlos entre septiembre y noviembre. Shorebirds are poorly known in Peru away from bordered for a few hundred metres by sand and established study sites such as Paracas reserve, gravel before low bluffs rise c.30 m. Very little dpto. Ica, and those close to metropolitan areas vegetation grows here, although cows, goats and frequented by visiting birdwatchers and tour pigs owned by Parachique residents graze the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Shorebirds and Horseshoe Crabs in Jamaica Bay: 2014 Update
    Shorebirds and Horseshoe Crabs in Jamaica Bay: 2014 Update credit: Don Riepe Debra Kriensky, New York City Audubon Harbor Herons Working Group Annual Meeting –Dec. 11‐12, 2014 Photo Credit: coastaloutdooradventures.com Sanderling Ruddy Turnstone Red Knot Shorebird Migration Semipalmated Sandpiper Dunlin http://fossilcollector.wordpress.com/ Photo Credit: marinebio.org www.allposters.com Jamaica Bay JBWR Big Egg Marsh Plumb Beach Dead Horse Bay Bay Dunes Shorebird monitoring sites Horseshoe crab monitoring sites CITIZEN SCIENCE Horseshoe Crab Monitoring 2009‐2014 Average # of HSC Counted per Sampling Night 350 Note: Different sampling methods 300 used at PBW & DHB in 2014 Night 250 Sampling per 200 Plumb Beach Dead Horse Bay Counted 150 Big Egg Marsh HSC Plumb Beach West of # 100 Average 50 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Year Plumb Beach June 2012 vs. November 2012 Shorebird Monitoring 2009‐2014 Maximum Count per Species ‐ Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge 3000 2500 American Oystercatcher Black‐bellied Plover 2000 Dunlin Least Sandpiper Red Knot 1500 Ruddy Turnstone Sanderling Semipalmated Plover 1000 Semipalmated Sandpiper Short‐billed Dowitcher White‐rumped Sandpiper 500 Willet 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Shorebird Monitoring 2009‐2014 Maximum Count per Species ‐ Plumb Beach 3500 3000 American Oystercatcher Black‐bellied Plover 2500 Dunlin Least Sandpiper Red Knot 2000 Ruddy Turnstone Sanderling 1500 Semipalmated Plover Semipalmated Sandpiper Short‐billed Dowitcher 1000 White‐rumped Sandpiper Willet 500 TOTAL HSC 0 2009 2010 2011 2012
    [Show full text]
  • 54971 GPNC Shorebirds
    A P ocket Guide to Great Plains Shorebirds Third Edition I I I By Suzanne Fellows & Bob Gress Funded by Westar Energy Green Team, The Nature Conservancy, and the Chickadee Checkoff Published by the Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center Table of Contents • Introduction • 2 • Identification Tips • 4 Plovers I Black-bellied Plover • 6 I American Golden-Plover • 8 I Snowy Plover • 10 I Semipalmated Plover • 12 I Piping Plover • 14 ©Bob Gress I Killdeer • 16 I Mountain Plover • 18 Stilts & Avocets I Black-necked Stilt • 19 I American Avocet • 20 Hudsonian Godwit Sandpipers I Spotted Sandpiper • 22 ©Bob Gress I Solitary Sandpiper • 24 I Greater Yellowlegs • 26 I Willet • 28 I Lesser Yellowlegs • 30 I Upland Sandpiper • 32 Black-necked Stilt I Whimbrel • 33 Cover Photo: I Long-billed Curlew • 34 Wilson‘s Phalarope I Hudsonian Godwit • 36 ©Bob Gress I Marbled Godwit • 38 I Ruddy Turnstone • 40 I Red Knot • 42 I Sanderling • 44 I Semipalmated Sandpiper • 46 I Western Sandpiper • 47 I Least Sandpiper • 48 I White-rumped Sandpiper • 49 I Baird’s Sandpiper • 50 ©Bob Gress I Pectoral Sandpiper • 51 I Dunlin • 52 I Stilt Sandpiper • 54 I Buff-breasted Sandpiper • 56 I Short-billed Dowitcher • 57 Western Sandpiper I Long-billed Dowitcher • 58 I Wilson’s Snipe • 60 I American Woodcock • 61 I Wilson’s Phalarope • 62 I Red-necked Phalarope • 64 I Red Phalarope • 65 • Rare Great Plains Shorebirds • 66 • Acknowledgements • 67 • Pocket Guides • 68 Supercilium Median crown Stripe eye Ring Nape Lores upper Mandible Postocular Stripe ear coverts Hind Neck Lower Mandible ©Dan Kilby 1 Introduction Shorebirds, such as plovers and sandpipers, are a captivating group of birds primarily adapted to live in open areas such as shorelines, wetlands and grasslands.
    [Show full text]
  • Shorebird Habitat Conservation Strategy
    Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint Venture Shorebird Habitat Conservation Strategy May 2007 1 Shorebird Strategy Committee and Members of the Joint Venture Science Team Bob Gates, Ohio State University, Chair Dave Ewert, The Nature Conservancy Diane Granfors, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bob Russell, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bradly Potter, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mark Shieldcastle, Ohio Department of Natural Resources Greg Soulliere, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cover: Long-billed Dowitcher. Photo by Gary Kramer. i Table of Contents Plan Summary................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements...................................................................................................... 2 Background and Context ................................................................................................. 3 Population Status and Trends ......................................................................................... 6 Habitat Characteristics .................................................................................................. 11 Biological Foundation..................................................................................................... 14 Planning Framework.................................................................................................. 14 Migration and Distribution........................................................................................ 15 Limiting
    [Show full text]
  • Common Shorebirds
    Photo: Davor Desancic Davor Photo: Happy birding! Happy viewing shorebirds. viewing Bay shoreline parks provide such resources along along resources such provide parks shoreline Bay human world with which we share this planet. planet. this share we which with world human opportunities for for opportunities where abundant food resources exist. Our East East Our exist. resources food abundant where thus essential to shorebird survival. shorebird to essential thus conservation and a desire to protect the non- the protect to desire a and conservation visitors with outstanding outstanding with visitors to travel in vast flocks and stop at feeding areas areas feeding at stop and flocks vast in travel to sites is essential to successful migration, and and migration, successful to essential is sites the natural world, and with it a dedication to to dedication a it with and world, natural the avocet habitats and provide provide and habitats which requires food. Migrating shorebirds tend tend shorebirds Migrating food. requires which Flyway. Protection of these important stopover stopover important these of Protection Flyway. find that you develop a sense of connection to to connection of sense a develop you that find American American California’s coastal coastal California’s Migratory flight requires large amounts of energy, energy, of amounts large requires flight Migratory the migratory route known as the Pacific Pacific the as known route migratory the that visit our East Bay shores each year. You may may You year. each shores Bay East our visit that crucial sections of of sections crucial Spend time getting to know the varied shorebirds shorebirds varied the know to getting time Spend Rest Stops Rest parks that both protect protect both that parks the use of a spotting scope and tripod.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Winter Sandpipers
    Identifying Winter Sandpipers Audubon Coastal Bird Survey Training Webinar – 29 Jan 2013 Erik I. Johnson [email protected] What is a Sandpiper? • Scolopacidae A plover – excludes • Charadriidae: plovers • Haematopodidae: oystercatchers • Recurvirostridae: stilts and avocets – 40 species in North America!! A generalized sandpiper – Highly specialized carnivores that forage on invertebrates in wet fields, mudflats and along beaches. Breeding Winter Plumage transitions (molt) Breeding Winter Why so Drab? Reduced predation risk Shorebird Predators Peregrine Falcon Merlin Safety in Numbers How Birders Benefit: - Clusters of birds (easier to spot) - Compare sizes Epic Migrations Gregory Breese/U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Gone for Winter Solitary Sandpiper Upland Sandpiper Hudsonian Godwit Semipalmated Sandpiper White-rumped Sandpiper Baird’s Sandpiper Pectoral Sandpiper Buff-breasted Sandpiper Wilson’s Phalarope Shorebirds Made Easy 1) Large 2)Medium 3) Small Courtesy: Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences Limosa (godwits) and Arenaria (turnstones) Large (size > Willet) Medium-sized Genus Numenius (the “curlews”) Both are somewhat hard to find in winter LONG-BILLED CURLEW WHIMBREL Lacks striping in face Dark striping in face Buffy underneath Brownish underneath Very long bill Longish bill Large Genus Tringa (the “tattlers”) WILLET Large, vocal Size ≈ Black-necked Stilt Unmistakable in flight Reference Species Genus Tringa (the “tattlers”) LESSER YELLOWLEGS GREATER YELLOWLEGS 1 1 1 1.5 Perfectly straight Slightly upturned (more dramatic in males) Size ≈ dowitcher Size > dowitcher ≈ Black-necked Stilt “tu-tu” (x1 or 2 tu) calls “tu-tu-tu” (x3 tu) calls Genus Tringa (the “tattlers”) large Medium-sized Dave Patton Genus Tringa (the “tattlers”) GREATER YELLOWLEGS large LESSER YELLOWLEGS Medium-sized Dave Patton Genus Limnodromus (the “dowitchers”) Dowitchers are chunky and very long-billed.
    [Show full text]
  • The฀identification฀and฀ Migration฀of Breeding฀plumaged฀ Dowitchers฀ In฀southern฀ontario Alvaro Jaramillo Ron Pi�Away and Peter Burke
    Reference: Jaramilo, A.; R. Pittaway and P. Burke. 1991. The Identification and Migration of Breeding Plumaged Dowitchers in Southern Ontario. Birders Journal Volume 1, No. 1, October 1991. p8 - 25. © Birders Journal Publishing. www.birdersjournal.ca The฀Identification฀and฀ Migration฀of Breeding฀Plumaged฀ Dowitchers฀ in฀Southern฀Ontario Alvaro Jaramillo Ron Pi�away and Peter Burke Dowitcher taxonomy and iden�fica�on have caused a great deal of confusion in the past. Originally, the Long-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus scolopaceus and Short-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus were described as different species. Due to the frequent observa�ons of birds that appeared to be intermediate, the two forms were lumped (Bent 1927). In 1932 W.Rowan published a paper describing the newly discovered breeding popula�on of Short- billed Dowitchers in Alberta and Manitoba. He decided that these bright looking birds were worthy of subspecific recogni�on,L.g.hendersoni (Rowan 1932). He also concluded that Long- billed Dowitcher was a separate species, partly because birds iden�fied as intermediates were actually L.g.hendersoni. Conover (1941) was in complete agreement with Rowan, but there was s�ll some confusion surrounding the occurrence of Short-billed Dowitchers on the West Coast that appeared to be of the eastern nominate subspecies. It was not un�l 1950, through a careful analysis of museum specimens, that Pitelka (1950) cleared up some of the remaining puzzles. He also came to the conclusion that the Long-billed Dowitcher and the Short-billed Dowitcher were different species. Part of the confusion had come from the fact that the Short-billed Dowitcher is highly variable as a species.
    [Show full text]