Berkeley Studies 28 (2019) 49

Recent Works on Berkeley (2017 – 2019)

Airaksinen, Timo. “Berkeley’s Siris: An Interpretation.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 216-46. _____ and Gylling, Heta. “A Threat Like No Other Threat, against the Freethinkers.” History of European Ideas 43 (2017): 598-613. Arbour, Benjamin H. and Trickett, Gregory E. “Evil Does Not Pose Any Special Problem for Berkeleyan Idealism: An Idealist Response to John DePoe.” Philosophia Christi 20 (2018): 567-80. Atherton, Margaret. “Berkeley and Skepticism.” In Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present, edited by Diego W. Machuca and Baron Reed. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2018. Pp. 369-79. _____. Berkeley. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2019. Belfrage, Bertil. “Atomism in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 85-98. _____. “The Mystery of Goodness in Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 141-57. Belfrage, Bertil, and Brook, Richard, eds. The Bloomsbury Companion to Berkeley. New York: Bloomsbury, 2017. Bertini, Daniele. “George Berkeley.” APhEx: Portale Italiano di Filosofia Analitca 18 (2018): 1-27. Bettcher, Talia Mae. “Berkeley’s of .” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 397-420. Bordner, S. Seth. “Immaterialism and Common Sense.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 343-54. _____. “If We Stop Thinking about Berkeley’s Problem of Continuity, Will It Still Exist?” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (2017): 237-60. Breidert, Wolfgang. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 435-57. Brook, Richard. “Berkeley and the Passivity of Ideas.” Iyyun 66 (2017): 59-74. _____. “De Motu: Berkeley’s .” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 158-73. Brower, Virgil W. “Religion and Repugnance: Empiricism, Political Theology, Projective Disgust.” In On Taste: Aesthetic Exchanges, ed. Lars Aagaard Mogensen and Jane Forsey. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2018. Pp. 53-68. Callahan, Eugene. Review of Language and the Structure of Berkeley’s World by Kenneth L. Pearce. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (2018): 218-21.

Berkeley Studies 28 (2019) 50

Carlin, Laurence. “Berkeley and Leibniz.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 254-67. Charles, Sébastien. “The Reception of Berkeley in Eighteenth-Century France.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 334-42. Conte, Jaimir. “Sobre a imortalidade.” Revista Litterarius 17 (2018): 1-7. Daniel, Stephen H. “Berkeley on God’s Knowledge of Pain.” In Storrie (2018a), 136-45. _____. “Substance and Person: Berkeley on Descartes and Locke.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74, no. 4 (2018): 7-20. DePoe, John M. “Berkeleyan Idealism, Christianity, and the Problem of Evil.” Philosophia Christi 19 (2017): 401-413. Diana, Rosario. Esse est percipi: George Berkeley e Film di Samuel Beckett. Teatro- reading filosofico. Milano: Mimesis Edizioni, 2017. Dicker, Georges. “Berkeley’s Critique of Locke’s Theory of Perception.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 268-87. Downing, Lisa. “Sensible Qualities and Secondary Qualities in the First Dialogue.” In Storrie (2018a), 7-23. Falkenstein, Lorne. “Reid’s Critique of Berkeley’s Position on the Inverted Image.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 16 (2018): 175-91. Fennema, Scott. “George Berkeley and Jonathan Edwards on Idealism: Considering an Old Question in Light of New Evidence.” Intellectual History Review 29 (2019): 265-90. Fields, Keota. “Berkeley and Hume on the Imagination.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 314-33. _____. “Berkeley’s Semiotic Idealism.” In Storrie (2018a), 61-83. Flage, Daniel E. “Is Berkeley’s God Omnipotent?” Review of Metaphysics 71 (2018): 703-21. Frankel, Melissa. “The Cartesian Roots of Berkeley’s Account of Sensation.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (2017): 214-31. _____. Review of Language and the Structure of Berkeley's World by Kenneth L. Pearce. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/language-and-the- structure-of-berkeleys-world/, 2017.12.14. Garrett, Don. “Hey, What’s the Big Idea? Berkeley and Hume on Extension, Local Conjunction, and the Immateriality of the Soul.” In Storrie (2018a), 191-204. Glauser, Richard. “Immediate and Mediate Perception in Berkeley.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 355-84. Gorham, Geoffrey. “Early American Immaterialism: Samuel Johnson’s Emendations of Berk”Bloomsbury companioneley.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 54 (2018): 441-56.

Berkeley Studies 28 (2019) 51

Grzeliński, Adam. “Alciphron; or the Minute : Berkeley’s Redefinition of Free-Thinking.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 174-95. Hight, Mark A. “Berkeley’s Correspondence.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 49-62. Hill, James. “The Active Self and Perception in Berkeley’s Three Dialogues. In Storrie (2018a), 123-35. Holden, Thomas. “Berkeley on Inconceivability and Impossibility.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (2019): 107-122. Huggler, Jørgen. “The Response to George Berkeley’s Philosophy in Twentieth-Century Danish Experimental Psychology: Edgar Rubin and Edgar Tranekjaer Rasmussen.” Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 51 (2018): 47-70. Hunter, Hugh. “Malebranche, Berkeley and the Path to Idealism.” Science et Esprit: Revue de philosophie et de théologie 70 (2018): 41-50. Jankowiak, Tim. “Kantian Phenomenalism without Berkeleyan Idealism.” 22 (2017): 205-231. Jennings, Gavan. Berkeley’s Theory of Radical Dependence. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2018. Jones, Tom. “George Berkeley’s Biography.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 5-20. Kelly, Patrick. “Berkeley’s Querist: ‘Hints . . . What Is to be Done in this Critical State of Our Affairs’ or Proposals for a Hyperborean Eutopia?” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 196-215. Kendrick, Nancy. “Berkeley’s Bermuda Project in Context.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 21-48. Lee, Sukjae. “Berkeley on Continuous Creation: Occasionalism Contained.” In Storrie (2018a), 106-122. Loaiza, Juan R. “Molyneux’s Question in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 32 (2017): 231-47. López, Alberto Luis. “Berkeley: Sobre el conocimiento nocional de la mente.” Contrastes: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 22 (2017): 137-54. _____. “Respuesta al comentario de David Camilo Téllez Guzmán: ‘Berkeley: el papel de Dios en la teoría de la visión’.” Ideas Y Valores 66 (2017): 409-412. _____. Review of Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.” Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía 57 (2019): 465-72. Marušić, Jennifer Smalligan. “Berkeley on the Objects of Perception.” In Storrie (2018a), 40-60. McCracken, Charles J. “Berkeley and Descartes.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 247-53. _____. “Berkeley and Malebranche.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 288-98. McDonough, Jeffrey. “Berkeley on Ordinary Objects.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 385-96.

Berkeley Studies 28 (2019) 52

McGlynn, Conor. “An Intuitionistic Defence of Berkeley’s Master Argument.” 79 (2019): 236-42. Millar, Alan. “Berkeley’s Puzzle.” Analysis 77 (2017): 232-42. Moriarty, Clare Marie. “The Ad Hominem Argument of Berkeley’s Analyst.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (2018): 429-51. Oda, Takaharu. “Berkeley on Voluntary Motion: A Conservationist Account.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018): 71–98. Olanshile, Muideen, Adeyanju and Awolowo, Obafemi. “A Critical Assessment of Locke and Berkeley on the Problem of Perception.” Cogito: Multidisciplinary Research Journal 10 (2018): 50-58. Ott, Walter. Review of Berkeley’s Principles Expanded and Explained by Tyron Goldschmidt. Philosophical Review 127 (2018): 115-17. Oya, Alberto. “George Berkeley: els arguments positius a favor del immaterialisme i el principi de semblança.” Comprendre 19 (2017): 83-92. _____. “La crítica de George Berkeley al representacionalismo de John Locke.” Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 35 (2018): 109-126. Pearce, Kenneth L. “Berkeley on Unperceived Objects and the Publicity of Language.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 34 (2017): 231-50. _____. “How Berkeley’s Gardener Knows His Cherry Tree.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (2017): 553-76. _____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Religion.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 458-83. _____. Review of Idealism and Christian Theology, edited by Joshua R. Farris and S. Mark Hamilton. Faith and Philosophy 34 (2017): 365-69. _____. “Matter, God, and Nonsense: Berkeley’s Polemic Against the Freethinkers in the Three Dialogues.” In Storrie (2018a), 176-90. _____. “What Descartes Doubted, Berkeley Denied, and Kant Endorsed.” Dialogue 58 (2019): 31-63. Rickless, Samuel. “Berkeley’s Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 99-122. _____. “Berkeley’s Argument for the Existence of God in the Three Dialogues.” In Storrie (2018a), 84-105. _____. “Is Shepherd’s Pen Mightier Than Berkeley’s Word?” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (2018): 317-30. Roberts, John Russell. “Berkeley on the Philosophy of Language.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 421-34. _____. “A Puzzle in the Three Dialogues and Its Platonic Resolution.” In Storrie (2018a), 146-59.

Berkeley Studies 28 (2019) 53

_____. “Berkeley on Evil.” In The History of Evil, vol. IV: The History of Evil in the 18th and 19th Centuries, edited by Douglas Hedley, Chad Meister, and Charles Taliaferro. New York: Routledge, 2018. Pp. 5-21. Robinson, Howard. “Berkeley and Twentieth-Century Realist–Anti-Realist Controversies.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017): 63-82. Schwerin, Alan. “On Hume’s Defense of Berkeley.” Open Journal of Philosophy 5, no. 6 (2015): 327-37. Spiegel, James S. “Berkeleyan Idealism and Christian Philosophy.” Philosophy Compass 12 (2017): 1-9; https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12400. Stapleford, Scott. “The Worst Argument in the World – Defended.” 16 (2017): 15- 23. _____. “What’s the Point of a Dreaming Argument?” Think 18 (2019): 31-34. Stoneham, Tom. “Three Dialogues between Hylas, Philonous and the Sceptic.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 121-40. _____. “Berkeley and the Problem of Consciousness.” In Consciousness and the Great : What Would They Have Said about Our Mind–Body Problem? Edited by Stephen Leach and James Tartaglia. Oxford: Routledge-Taylor Francis, 2017. Pp. 96-105. _____. “Some Issues in Berkeley’s Account of Sense Perception.” In Storrie (2018a), 24- 39. _____. “Action, Knowledge and Embodiment in Berkeley and Locke.” Philosophical Explorations 21 (2018): 41-59. Storrie, Stefan, ed. Berkeley's Three Dialogues: New Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. _____. “The Scope of Berkeley’s Idealism in the 1734 Edition of Three Dialogues.” In Storrie (2018a), 160-75. Van Cleve, James. “Reid’s Opposition to Berkeley.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 299- 313. West, Peter. “Berkeley on the Relation Between Abstract Ideas and Language in Alciphron VII.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018): 51-70. _____. “Reid and Berkeley on Scepticism, Representationalism, and Ideas.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 17 (2019): 191-210. Yetter-Chappell, Helen. “Idealism Without God.” In Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics, edited by Tyron Goldschmidt and Kenny Pearce. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. Pp. 66-81.