Vol. 28, No. 3, June 2016 J Kor Phys Ther 2016:28(3):195-200 KPT pISSN 1229-0475 eISSN 2287-156X Original Article JJ http://dx.doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.3.195 The Different Muscle Activation of Upper Extremity and Core Muscle by the Changes of Leg Support Surface during Push-up

Sun-Uk Kim1, Seong-Bin Kim1, Sang-Seok Yeo2 1Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Convergence Technology, Dankook University; 2Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea

Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the effects of the different condition of leg support surface on the upper extremity and core muscle activity during the push-up exercise. Methods: Fifteen healthy subjects that were practicable push-ups were recruited in this study. Subjects were instructed the push-up ex- ercise in the different condition of the leg support surface. Each condition of support surface was set to the high and lower, and the un- stable and stable condition. Muscle activation was measured by using the surface electromyography (EMG), and recorded from the tri- ceps brachii, serratus anterior, latissimus dorsi, rectus abdominis, abdominal external oblique, and erector spinea muscle. Results: In the results of experiments, there was no significant difference of muscle activation in upper extremity between the high un- stable and high stable support surface. By contrast, muscle activation of the rectus abdominis and abdominal external oblique was sig- nificantly higher in the low unstable support surface, compared with those of the low stable support surface. It is well known that the core muscle was important to stabilization of trunk stability. Conclusion: This result demonstrates that the low and unstable support surface for the lower extremity was suited for training of core muscle for trunk stabilization during the push-up exercise.

Keywords: Core muscle, Push-up exercise, Electromyography

INTRODUCTION hancing muscle strength and endurance.2,4 The push-up exercise can be performed either on a stable support The push-up exercise is one of an easy and popular exercise that can surface such as floor or wall, or on an unstable support surface, such be widely used in general exercise programs in order to strengthen as a Swiss ball or Variations in the push-up exercise may change the upper extremity. In addition, it is evaluated as an effective exer- muscular activation pattern. Many studies have reported that mus- cise method that can contribute to a healthy recovery by preventing cle activity of upper extremity changes when they compared the shoulder damage and improving the muscle strength near the joints unstable push-up exercise with the stable push-ups.5-7 The shoulder after injury.1-3 The push-up exercise is known to be a representative stabilizer muscles, such as the serratus anterior, levator scapulae, closed kinetic chain exercise that targets the and rhomboid, upper and lower , were increased during the brachii, as well as the scapular stabilizing muscles. As such, push-up exercise on an unstable surface. Moreover, there are other the push-up exercise can activate co-contraction of various muscles, muscle groups, such as anterior shoulder and core muscle, are in- which can improve dynamic stability of joints and upright posture volved and it effectively improves balance by stimulating muscle maintenance. Moreover, it provides facilitation of proprioceptive proprioceptors. In addition, many previous studies reported that feedback by stimulating afferent receptors around joints, and en- experiments under various environmental conditions were con-

Received May 20, 2016 Revised Jun 13, 2016 Copylight © 2016 The Korea Society of Physical Therapy Accepted Jun 14, 2016 This is an Open Access article distribute under the terms of the Creative Commons Corresponding author Sang-Seok Yeo Attribution Non-commercial License (Http:// creativecommons.org/license/by-nc/4.0.) E-mail [email protected] which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution,and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 www.kptjournal.org 195 The Journal of JKPT Korean Physical Therapy Sun-Uk Kim, et al. ducted to examine the therapeutic effects of push-up exercise.7-9 It is study, they were the ones who agreed to voluntary participation of known that there are differences in the muscle activities of the upper the study. extremity muscles with regard to the shoulder width, hand position, slope and height of a support surface during push-up exercise.10-12 2. Experimental equipment However, scores of the recent studies on exercise therapy, including Telemyo 2400T (Noraxon, USA) used in the experiment is a device push-up exercise, have reported on the effects of on an un- that uses surface electromyograms (EMG) for measuring muscle stable surface to indicate that such exercises improve the strength of activities during push-up exercise. Noraxon Myo Reserach Master core muscles that is mainly needed to maintain a posture.13,14 The Edition 1.08 XP Software was used in the experiment to collect and core muscles which are deep muscles in the trunk are largely divided analyze the muscle activities. On measuring sites, circular type 2 into abdominal muscles and lower-back muscles. The abdominal Ag/AgCl electrodes (3M, USA) were used. balls and rubber muscles include the , the abdominal exter- balls were used as unstable surfaces while flat height-adjustable nal oblique muscle, the abdominal internal oblique muscle, and the benches were used as stable surfaces after adjusting their height abdominal transversus muscle.15 The main muscles of lower-back similar to those of the gym ball and the rubber ball. muscles are the multifidus and erector spinea muscle.15,16 Sling exercises and Swiss ball exercises were used in the studies 3. Electromyography measurement aimed at examining the effects of exercises on an unstable surface, To carry out the present study, hair on the skin where sensors would and the effects of such exercises have been proven improve muscles be attached was removed and its surface was cleaned with alcohol in activities in the trunk and shoulders through many studies.14 None- order to minimize skin resistance. Electrodes were attached to the theless, push-up exercise on an unstable surface is focused on pro- triceps brachii, the serratus anterior, the latissimus dorsi, the rectus viding an unstable support surface of hands and is limited to mea- abdominis muscle, the abdominal external oblique muscle and the suring the patterns of change in muscle activities of the upper ex- erector spinea muscle of the study subjects in order to measure the tremity muscles. Though there are some recent studies on push-up muscle activities of their upper extremity muscles and core mus- exercise, reporting on the patterns of change in muscle activities by cles.13,14,17 Active electrodes were attached to muscle bellies that show making a support surface of the lower limbs unstable, they are lim- the clearest muscular contraction with maximum muscular con- ited to measuring and proving the patterns of change in the muscle traction while the subjects were in the position for a Manual Muscle activities of only the upper extremity muscles.17 Therefore, identifi- Test (MMT) of each muscle.10 In addition, amplified waves were fil- cation of different activation in upper extremity muscle and core tered through a Bandpass filter of 10-350 Hz for signal processing. muscle during push-up exercise on an unstable surface can provide The mean value of root mean squares (RMS) was used for each useful information for clinicians and researchers in the therapeutic muscle’s activity. exercise. The present study aims to investigate differences in muscle activi- 4. MVIC measurement ties of the upper extremity muscles and the core muscles during Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC) was performed push-up exercise on an unstable surface and a stable surface of the and measured while the subjects were in the position for a MMT in lower limbs. order to normalize the value of EMG activity.11,18 The MVIC was measured for five seconds and for three seconds except the first and METHODS the last second, the mean EMG signal was used. The normalized value of muscle activities in the upper extremity muscles and the 1. Subjects core muscles was computed after setting the MVIC value at 100% For the purpose of the present study, 15 male college students who and dividing the value of each muscle’s activity during push-up ex- did not have the history of muscular illness to do push-ups were se- ercise by the MVIC value. lected. After being informed of the purpose and method of the

196 www.kptjournal.org http://dx.doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.3.195 The Muscle Activation during Push-up Exercise JKPT

5. Experimental procedure face was performed with the hands at the shoulder width just like in The experiment was carried out after checking the signals of the at- the exercise on a stable surface, however the feet on rubber balls of tached electrodes. However, push-up exercises on an unstable sur- 55 cm and 25 cm in height, and its mean value was calculated after face and a stable surface were performed in a random order and the repeating the exercise for three times (Figure 1). After the subjects push-up movements were classified into arm-folding and arm-un- performed the push-up exercise under one condition and a 30-min- folding movements. The push-up exercise on a stable surface was ute break was given in order to prevent them from accumulating fa- performed with the hands at the shoulder width and the feet on sta- tigue before the next push-up exercise under the other condition. ble support surfaces of 55 cm and 25 cm off the ground, and its mean value was calculated after repeating the exercise for three 6. Data analysis times. On the other hand, the push-up exercise on an unstable sur- The signals were processed in the following manners. Amplified waves were filtered through a Bandpass filter of 10-350 Hz. The mean value of root mean squares (RMS) was used for each muscle’s activity. SPSS 20.0 for windows (IBM Corporation, USA) was used for comparative analysis of the measured data in the present study. The collected data was analyzed using an independent t-test, and statistical significance was set at p< 0.05.

RESULTS

1. General characteristics The mean age of the study subjects was 24.14 ± 0.53 years old (23-25 years) with the average height of 174.43±5.24 cm (168-187 cm) and the average weight of 71.43±8.68 kg (62-90 kg).

2. Difference in muscle activities of upper extremity muscles The study subjects showed lower muscle activities of the triceps bra- chii, serratus anterior and latissimus dorsi during the push-up exer- cise on a high and unstable support surface than on a stable support surface by 3.34%, 3.70%, and 1.90%, respectively, however, there were no statistically significant differences (p> 0.05).

Table 1. Difference of muscle activation in upper extremity muscle ac- cording to the height of lower extremity and condition of support sur- face

Upper extremity muscle Triceps brachiii Serratus anterior Latissimus dorsi

High Unstable 22.05% (8.07) 30.19% (11.46) 15.43% (7.76) Stable 25.39% (9.96) 33.89% (10.93) 17.33% (9.3) p-value 0.338 0.389 0.562 Low Unstable 24.96% (8.26) 38.36% (10.15) 16.34% (9.56) Stable 21.65% (10.17) 27.86% (9.6) 14.11% (5.99) p-value 0.353 0.116 0.467

Figure 1. Different conditions of push up exercise. Values represent mean (standard deviation).   http://dx.doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.3.195  www.kptjournal.org 197 The Journal of JKPT Korean Physical Therapy Sun-Uk Kim, et al.

Table 2. Difference of muscle activation in core muscle according to However, on a low and unstable support surface of the lower limbs the height of lower extremity and condition of support surface  the push-up exercise appeared to induce a significant level of muscle Core muscle activities of the abdominal muscles while it induced no particular Abdominal Rectus abdominis Erector spine external oblique differences in the muscle activities of the upper extremity muscles. High Unstable 21.11% (11.07) 19.86% (8.87) 3.54% (1.34) It is thought that the push-up exercise on a low and unstable sup- Stable 15.64% (9.00) 17.51% (8.90) 5.04% (3.06) port surface leads to much more muscle activities of the abdominal p-value 0.164 0.49 0.338 Low Unstable 22.31% (11.74) 23.57% (10.17) 4.91% (1.94) muscles than the exercise on a high and unstable support surface. Stable 13.06% (8.24) 16.05% (7.56) 4.14% (2.04) The push-up exercise on a low and unstable support surface is ex- p-value 0.023* 0.035* 0.319 pected to improve the muscle activities of not only the upper ex- Values represent mean (standard deviation).   tremity muscles but also the core muscles, and enhances the exercise *p< 0.05.    effects. From the previous studies of push-up exercise performed On the other hand, the subjects showed higher muscle activities under various conditions, it has been known that the exercise can of the triceps brachii, serratus anterior and latissimus dorsi during improve the strength of selective safe muscles in the shoulder joints the push-up exercise on a low and unstable support surface by with regard to changes in the length of the support surface.8 In ad- 3.31%, 10.50%, and 2.23%, respectively, but there were no statistically dition, on top of the length of the support surface, the height and significant differences (p> 0.05) (Table 1). position of hands create differences of the muscle activities in the shoulders.19 Lear et al.10 reported that the push-up exercise using the 3. Difference in muscle activities of core muscles combination of two different conditions enhanced the stability of The study subjects showed higher muscle activities of the rectus ab- the shoulder joint. dominis muscle and the abdominal external oblique muscle during Moreover, exercises on an unstable surface have been proven to the push-up exercise on a low and unstable support surface than on enhance the muscle activities of the upper extremity muscles a stable support surface by 9.25% and 7.52%, respectively, and there through many studies.3,16 In addition, the exercises have been re- were statistically significant differences (p< 0.05). ported to induce not only more muscles activities but also more en- Nonetheless, there were no statistically significant differences in durance of the muscles, and help improve coordination of muscles.21 the erector spinea muscle (p> 0.05). When the subjects performed In particular, exercises on an unstable surface have been known to the push-up exercise on a high and unstable support surface, the maximize the exercise effects as they contract both the agonist muscle activities of the rectus abdominis muscle, abdominal exter- muscle and the synergistic muscle simultaneously to induce im- nal oblique muscle and erector spinea muscle were either higher or provement in the strength, balancing ability and stability of the lower by 5.47%, 2.37%, and -1.50% respectively, than on a stable sup- muscles by stimulating the neurotransmitter system.19 In addition, port surface, however, there were no statistically significant differ- Oh et al.22 reported that when a push-up exercise on a stable surface ences (p> 0.05) (Table 2). and a push-up exercise with a sling on an unstable surface were compared, the exercise on an unstable surface induced high muscle DISCUSSION activities of the upper extremity muscles. However, a variety of the recent studies have reported on not only muscle activities of the up- The present study was conducted to investigate differences in mus- per extremity muscles during exercises on an unstable surface but cle activities of the upper extremity muscles and the core muscles also comparison of different patterns in muscle activities of the core during push-up exercises on different support surfaces of the lower muscles, which are related to the trunk.13,14,23 limbs. According to the results of the experiment, similar muscle In terms of core muscle, Petrofsky et al.13 reported that different activities were observed in both the upper extremity muscles and core muscle activation during abdominal crunches between stable the core muscles during the push-up exercise on a high support sur- surface and unstable surface using Swiss ball. They suggested that face of the lower limbs, whether the surface be stable or unstable. the exercise on an unstable surfacecan induce higher muscle activi-

198 www.kptjournal.org http://dx.doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.3.195 The Muscle Activation during Push-up Exercise JKPT ties of the core muscles, compared with those of stable surface. Fur- 3. Park SK, Lee OH, Kim JS et al. A comparison of muscle activity in thermore, according to Escamilla et al.,14 an on a periscapular muscles during push-up plus exercise on stable support and unstable support. The Journal of Korean Academy of Orthopedic Swiss ball improved muscle activities of the core muscles in com- Manual Therapy. 2005;11(2):71-82. parison to muscle activities induced during push-up and sit-up ex- 4. Ellenbecker TS, Davies GJ. Closed kinetic chain exercise: a comprehen- ercises on a Swiss ball.14 Considering the aforementioned findings of sive guide to multiple joint exercise. Champaign, Human Kinetics, 2001: 53-8. the previous studies in general, it is thought that they are in line with 5. Youdas JW, Budach BD, Ellerbusch JV et al. Comparison of muscle-acti- the findings of the present study, and moreover, exercises on an un- vation patterns during the conventional push-up and perfect· pushup™ stable surface can make the core muscles in the trunk more active. exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 ;24(12):3352-62. 6. Kim EY, Park HG, Ahn BH. Comparative studies of muscle activity on In conclusion, through the present study, push-up exercise on a upper extremity between push-up bend and push-up plus movement low and unstable surface of the lower limbs was shown to induce according to change of supporting base interval. The Journal of Korean much higher muscle activities of the core muscles in the trunk. Such Academy of Physical Therapist. 2008;15(3):31-41. 7. Shim YH, Nam KS, Park JW. Effect of glenohumeral joint rotation on results are thought to suggest other effects of push-up exercise serratus anterior, pectoralis major and upper trapezius EMG activity which was mainly used in improving the strength of the upper ex- during push-up plus exercise. J Kor Phys Ther. 2016;28(2):106-111 tremity muscles, and indicate that the exercise can be an effective 8. Anderson KG, Behm DG. Maintenance of EMG activity and loss of force output with instability. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(3):637-40. exercise therapy to improve the strength of both the upper extremi- 9. Lehman GJ, MacMillan B, MacIntyre I et al. Shoulder muscle EMG ac- ty muscles and the core muscles. The present study has limitations tivity during push up variations on and off a Swiss ball. Dyn Med. as it was confined to healthy male adults in their twenties, therefore, 2006;5:7. 10. Lear LJ, Gross MT. An electromyographical analysis of the scapular sta- its results are inadequate to generalize to men and women of all age bilizing synergists during a push-up progression. J Orthop Sports Phys groups and patients. Hence, there is a need to broaden the test group Ther. 1998;28(3):146-57. to various age groups and women in future studies to investigate 11. Cho YH, Kim SO, Choi JH. The differenes of shoulder muscle activity onset time according to body tilting angle in push-up exercise. J Korean differences in muscle activities, and moreover, it is thought that ad- Soc Phys Med. 2015;10(2):55-61. ditional studies are called for to analyze muscles activities during 12. Moseley JB Jr, Jobe FW, Pink M et al. EMG analysis of the scapular mus- push-up exercise on a support surface of the knees among the elder- cles during a shoulder rehabilitation program. Am J Sports Med. 1992; 20(2):128-34. ly and infirm and women who otherwise, have difficulty to perform 13. Petrofsky JS, Batt J, Davis N et al. Core muscle activity during exercise on a typical push-up exercise. Then, the findings of such future studies a mini stability ball compared with abdominal crunches on the floor and can be used as data to develop exercise therapies to treat patients on a swiss ball. Journal of Applied Research. 2007;7(3):255-72. 14. Escamilla RF, Lewis C, Bell D. Core muscle activation during Swiss ball and other exercise programs. and traditional abdominal exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010; 40(5):265-76. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 15. McGill SM, Grenier S, Kavcic N et al. Coordination of muscle activity to assure stability of the lumbar spine. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003; 13(4):353-9. “This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program 16. Yoon JG. Relationship between muscle activity and kinematic variables through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded of the upper extremity during a push up task on stable and unstable sur- faces. J Kor Phys Ther. 2011;23(2):7-15. by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF- 17. Dolan P, Adams MA. The relationship between EMG activityand exten- 2015R1D1A1A01060314)”. sor moment generation in the erector spinaemuscles during bending and lifting activities. J Biomech. 1993;26(4-5):513-22. 18. Lee GW, Yoon TL, Kim KS et al. EMG activity of abdominal muscles REFERENCES during lumbopelvic stabilization exercises. Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy. 2014;21(2):1-7. 1. Panjabi MM. Clinical spinal instability and low back pain. J Electro- 19. Kim YS, Kim DY, Ha MS. Effect of the push-up exercise at different pal- myogr Kinesiol. 2003;13(4):371-9. mar width on muscle activities. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(2):446-9. 2. Park Sk, Park JM, Lee JH. Effects of a push-up plus exercise program on 20. Jung HK. The effects of the shoulder stabilizer muscle activity during a scapular position and muscle activity in individuals with rounded shoul- push up plus exercise according to presence or absence of visual infor- der posture. J Kor Phys Ther 2010;22(5):1-8. mation on stable and unstable support. Daegu University. Dissertation http://dx.doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.3.195  www.kptjournal.org 199 The Journal of JKPT Korean Physical Therapy Sun-Uk Kim, et al.

of Master’s Degree. 2015. tween stable push-ups and push-ups with a unilateral v-shaped suspen- 21. Choi WI. An analysis of core muscle acitivity differences by knee joint sion system at different heights. J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13(3):502-10. angles in exercise on unstable surfaces. Korea National Sport Uni- 23. Lee JS. Comparison of core muscle activity on surface conditions and versity. Dissertation of Master’s Degree. 2015. loads during squat exercise. Dankook University. Dissertation of Master’ 22. Joaquin C, Sebastien B, Juan CC et al. Muscle activation differences be- s Degree. 2013.

200 www.kptjournal.org http://dx.doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.3.195