Education in Sub-Saharan Africa
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Education for All (EFA)
Education for All (EFA) Country Report: South Africa (Update) 2012 Published by the Department of Basic Education 222 Struben Street Private Bag X895, Pretoria, 0001 Telephone: 012 357 3000 Fax: 012 323 0601 Website: http://www.education.gov.za ISBN: © Department of Basic Education, 2012 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................................... viii 1. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Education for All: a development imperative ......................................................................... 1 1.3 Education for All goals ............................................................................................................ 3 1.4 Measuring progress towards the Education for All goals ....................................................... 3 2. EDUCATION IN SOUTH AFRICA ................................................................................................. 4 2.1 The right to education ............................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Governance and organisation ................................................................................................. 4 2.3 The provision of education .................................................................................................... -
Supplying Basic Education and Learning to Sub-Saharan Africa in the Twenty-First Century
http://wje.sciedupress.com World Journal of Education Vol. 8, No. 2; 2018 Supplying Basic Education and Learning to Sub-Saharan Africa in the Twenty-First Century Idowu Biao1,* 1Department of Adult Education, University of Botswana, Botswana *Correspondence: Department of Adult Education, University of Botswana, Botswana. Tel: 267-7435-9491. E-mail: [email protected] Received: March 26, 2018 Accepted: April 9, 2018 Online Published: April 25, 2018 doi:10.5430/wje.v8n2p181 URL: https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n2p181 Abstract This article posits that schooling in Sub-Saharan Africa has so far failed to yield the results expected of it on two grounds. First, the population of persons accessing both basic education and other levels of education is negligible in comparison with those who ought to access them (1 out of every 4 primary school age children; less than half of the qualified secondary school students; about 7% gross enrolment within higher education). Second, schooling has failed to deliver the kind of socio-economic development expected in the case of Sub-Saharan Africa as a high prevalence of poverty still exists and incongruity continues to exist between the education provided and the livelihoods of Sub-Saharan Africans. Using this poor educational and development performance as justification, a more utilitarian, relevant and sustainable approach to basic education and learning is recommended for Africa going forward. This recommended approach combines both the current school system with a special non-formal education system for the purpose of delivering basic education and learning in Sub-Saharan Africa in the twenty-first century. -
Education for All and Millennium Development
EDUCATION FOR ALL AND MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS BEYOND 2015 PRINCIPLES FOR A POST-2015 EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Human rights in general and the right to education The 2015 target date for in particular should be the explicit foundation for a achieving the Millennium new development and education framework Development Goals (MDGs) Rights are not explicit in the current EFA targets and MDGs, yet and Education for All (EFA) they are enshrined in UN agreements, conventions and treaties. is fast approaching. The The state should guarantee the right and access to quality educa- tion for all. Privatization and public-private partnerships are not United Nations (UN) system, the solution to quality education for all states should take their governments, academics , and civil society are already responsibilities seriously and not rely on market forces to solve seeking to define the next problems in education. era of the post-2015 agenda. The UN Secretary General Education is a public good and a basic right; it is also a catalyst has appointed a High-lev- for the achievement of all other development goals. It should el Panel to advise on the therefore be at the centre of any new development framework. global development agenda Access to early childhood primary and secondary beyond 2015, while UNESCO , , has set up an EFA Steering education must be a fundamental goal Committee with a mandate Although progress has been made on access to primary to advise on the post -2015 education, at least 10% of primary-school-age children are still not in school _over 60 million children. -
Curriculum Reform in Lesotho: Teachers' Conceptions And
Curriculum Reform in Lesotho: Teachers’ conceptions and challenges NAME: CECILIA SELEPE SUPERVISOR: MS BRONWEN WILSON-THOMPSON A RESEARCH REPORT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE MASTERS DEGREE IN EDUCATIONAT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND, JOHANNESBURG, 15TH MARCH 2016 CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY 1.1 INTRODUCTION This study explored the teachers’ understanding and challenges in implementing integrated curriculum in Lesotho. Integrated curriculum was first implemented in 2013, the inception was introduced in foundation phase (grade one to three) and progressively moved to grade four and five in 2014 and 2015 respectively. The progression will happen until integrated curriculum reaches Matric as the new curriculum is being implemented in phases starting from primary school. Given this the research sites were primary schools in Maseru, the capital of Lesotho. This chapter outlines and gives the research context and what motivated the study. 1.2 BACKGROUND The value of Education in Lesotho can be traced back to the period before the country was colonized by Britain. The education of boys and girls was done separately instilling traditional values in them. The rationale of this indigenous education was to produce initiates who would pride themselves with their traditional values. The formal training lasted less than a year where boys were trained to fight with sticks and to protect their country from attacks, for girls the focus was more around respect and taking care of the family (Motaba, 1998). The change in education system then came during colonial rule which can be dated as far back as 1830s with the arrival of missionaries of different denominations. -
Full-Day Kindergarten: a Missing Link in the Prekindergarten Through Third Grade (P-3) Continuum for Many Students
BACKGROUNDER: Full-day Kindergarten: A Missing Link in the Prekindergarten through Third Grade (P-3) Continuum for Many Students ull-day kindergarten provides an essential bridge Too Few States Require Districts to Offer Fbetween prekindergarten (preK) and the primary Full-day Kindergarten grades. In kindergarten classrooms, students develop the academic, social, and emotional skills they need to ``Currently, only 11 states and the District of be successful later in school. These benefits seem to be Columbia require districts to offer at least five hours greater for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. of kindergarten per day.1 However, far too many children have no access to full- ``Forty-five states require that school districts provide day kindergarten, and not enough has been done in the at least half-day kindergarten. last decade to provide more children with access to this `` critical link between early childhood and K-12 education. There are five states that do not require districts to offer any type of kindergarten program, although many school districts offer half-day kindergarten Why is Full-day Kindergarten Important? at a minimum. ``Thirty-five states do not require children to attend In recent years, state and federal initiatives have greatly kindergarten. expanded access to prekindergarten programs for three- and four-year-old children. This expansion provides many more children with access to high-quality, full-day, The Amount of Instructional Time Students and often, full-year preK programs. Unfortunately, too Receive in Full-day Kindergarten Matters many children will follow full-day preK with half-day kindergarten which may jeopardize the important As in all grades, the amounts of instructional time academic and social gains made in preK. -
Primary Education Finance for Equity and Quality an Analysis of Past Success and Future Options in Bangladesh
WORKING PAPER 3 | SEPTEMBER 2014 BROOKE SHEARER WORKING PAPER SERIES PRIMARY EDUCATION FINANCE FOR EQUITY AND QUALITY AN ANALYSIS OF PAST SUCCESS AND FUTURE OPTIONS IN BANGLADESH LIESBET STEER, FAZLE RABBANI AND ADAM PARKER Global Economy and Development at BROOKINGS BROOKE SHEARER WORKING PAPER SERIES This working paper series is dedicated to the memory of Brooke Shearer (1950-2009), a loyal friend of the Brookings Institution and a respected journalist, government official and non-governmental leader. This series focuses on global poverty and development issues related to Brooke Shearer’s work, including: women’s empowerment, reconstruction in Afghanistan, HIV/AIDS education and health in developing countries. Global Economy and Development at Brookings is honored to carry this working paper series in her name. Liesbet Steer is a fellow at the Center for Universal Education at the Brookings Institution. Fazle Rabbani is an education adviser at the Department for International Development in Bangladesh. Adam Parker is a research assistant at the Center for Universal Education at the Brookings Institution. Acknowledgements: We would like to thank the many people who have helped shape this paper at various stages of the research process. We are grateful to Kevin Watkins, a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and the executive director of the Overseas Development Institute, for initiating this paper, building on his earlier research on Kenya. Both studies are part of a larger work program on equity and education financing in these and other countries at the Center for Universal Education at the Brookings Institution. Selim Raihan and his team at Dhaka University provided the updated methodology for the EDI analysis that was used in this paper. -
Financing Higher Education in Lesotho and a Selection of Other Sadc Countries
FINANCING HIGHER EDUCATION IN LESOTHO AND A SELECTION OF OTHER SADC COUNTRIES Spirit B. Tlali and Innocent Hapazari Faculty of Science and Technology, National University of Lesotho, P.O. Roma 180, Lesotho, Southern Africa. Email: [email protected] Abstract In practice, Lesotho’s Higher Education funding model is similar to most of her SADC counterparts, especially the few that have been elucidated upon in this document – namely Botswana, Namibia and Swaziland. The national governments are the major sponsors for their respective education systems and for higher education in particular. The sponsorship is generally in the form of direct government subvention to institutions and student support grants and/or loans, usually administered by some government body, such as the National Manpower Development Secretariat (NMDS) in the case of Lesotho. The government subvention is negotiated according to the institutional budgetary needs vis-viz the national government’s budgetary priorities and constraints for the given year. Comparatively, Lesotho has been observed to offer the lowest per capita support to its learners and, particularly to her Higher Education (HE) learners. Introduction The fact that HE plays a central role in driving socio-economic development and competitiveness of a country can never be over emphasized. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) categorized the contributions of HE to socio-economic development into four major domains, namely: the formation of human capital (primarily through teaching and learning), the building of knowledge bases (primarily through research and knowledge development), the dissemination and use of knowledge (primarily through interactions with knowledge users) and the maintenance of knowledge (through inter- generational storage and transmission of knowledge). -
National Education Policy (NEP)
Government of the Republic of Malawi National Education Policy (NEP) December, 2013 Ministry of Education, Science and Technology P/Bag 328, Lilongwe 3 Tel: 0 1789 422 Fax: 01 788 064 ii Foreword The National Education Policy (NEP) is designed to respond to the Malawi Growth and Development Strategy II (MGDS II) and various related national education policies including regional and international protocols on education. The policy recognizes that Early Childhood Education (ECD), primary and secondary education is critical foundations to tertiary education. It further recognizes the importance of inclusion of special needs education, out-of-school youth and adult literacy in the education sector. The NEP attempts to define the provision of quality education in a holistic manner through expanded access and equity, improved quality and relevance, and improved governance and management. The NEP is the Malawi Government’s document that spells out government policy on education. It outlines the sector’s priorities and defines the country’s education policies that will guide the development of the education sector in Malawi. The government recognizes that education is the backbone for socio-economic development, economic growth and a major source of economic empowerment for all people especially women, the youth and the physically challenged. It also has a strong impact on literacy; behaviour in terms of reproductive, maternal and child health; and on knowledge of HIV and AIDS. The policy also subscribes itself to the Sector Wide Approach (SWAp) to development, planning and financing of the education sector in line with the Malawi Development Assistance Strategy and Sector Working Group Guidelines. -
Measuring and Assessing School Quality in Rural Malawi Hewett Et Al., 2008
Measuring and Assessing School Quality in Rural Malawi Hewett et al., 2008 Measuring and Assessing School Quality in Rural Malawi Paul C. Hewett, Barbara S. Mensch, Joseph Chimombo, Sharon Ghuman, Cynthia Lloyd and Richard Gregory In developing countries, the school is the main learning and socializing institution outside the family. Investments in schooling are thought to be critical for individual poverty alleviation, the achievement of gender equity and empowerment, and societal economic growth. In recent years, the push for universal schooling — a goal that has been embraced by the international community through the Millennium Development Goals — has led to the elimination of school fees in many African countries. Malawi, one of the poorest countries in the world, was an early pioneer in eliminating school fees at the primary level and has seen an enormous increase in enrollment. With limited resources and under-trained teachers, the quality of most schools is believed to be poor with the result that students in primary school are probably not acquiring basic competencies. Without adequate quality, the promises implicit in the achievement of universal schooling are not likely to be met. In this paper, we will use the first wave of a longitudinal study being implemented in primary schools in two districts of southern Malawi to describe the levels and distribution of school quality, as well as to evaluate the association between various indicators of school quality and two educational outcomes 1) aggregated scores on administered literacy and math exams, and b) current school attendance. We begin by reviewing the literature on school quality in developing countries, discuss the limitations of conventional conceptualizations, while in turn proving a broader definition of school quality. -
Malawi Secondary Education Project (PPAR)
Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No.: 52888 PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized MALAWI SECONDARY EDUCATION PROJECT (CR. 3051) Public Disclosure Authorized JANUARY 29, 2010 Public Disclosure Authorized Sector Evaluation Division Independent Evaluation Group Currency Equivalents (annual averages) Currency Unit = Kwacha Secondary Education Project As of October 1997 As of March 16, 2006 US$1 = Kwacha 17.4 MWK1 = US$0.01 SDR 1.0 = US$1.36 (as of December 1997) US$1.43783 = SDR1 Abbreviations and Acronyms AfDB African Development Bank CAS Country Assistance Strategy CDSS Community Day Secondary School CIDA Canadian International Development Agency DANIDA Danish International Development Agency DCA Development Credit Agreement DPL Development Policy Loan EDMU Educational Development Management Unit EFA Education for All EMIS Educational Management information system EU European Union FTI Fast-Track Initiative to achieve Education for All JCE Junior Certificate Examination GDP Gross domestic product GTZ Gesellschaft fuer Zusammenarbeit ICR Implementation Completion Report IDA International Development Association IEG Independent Evaluation Group ISR Implementation Status and Results Report MOE Ministry of Education MSCE Malawi School Certificate Examination NGO Nongovernmental organization OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development PAD Project Appraisal Document PCU Project Coordination Unit PIU Project Implementation Unit PSLCE Primary School Leaving Certificate of Education PPAR Project Performance Assessment Report PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper PRSC Poverty Reduction Strategy Credit QAG Quality Assurance Group SWAP Sector-Wide Approach UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund USAID United States Agency for International Development Fiscal Year Government: January 1 — December 31 Director-General, Evaluation : Mr. -
Education for All: Advancing Disability Inclusion in LAC / Diana Hincapie, Suzanne Duryea and Isabel Hincapie
Education for All Education Division Advancing Disability Inclusion in Latin Social Sector America and the Caribbean Diana Hincapié Suzanne Duryea Isabel Hincapié POLICY BRIEF Nº IDB-PB-299 April, 2019 Education for All Advancing Disability Inclusion in Latin America and the Caribbean Diana Hincapié Suzanne Duryea Isabel Hincapié April, 2019 Cataloging-in-Publication data provided by the Inter-American Development Bank Felipe Herrera Library Hincapié, Diana. Education for all: advancing disability inclusion in LAC / Diana Hincapie, Suzanne Duryea and Isabel Hincapie. p. cm. — (IDB Policy Brief ; 299) Includes bibliographic references. 1. Children with disabilities-Education-Latin America. 2. Students with disabilities-Latin America. 3. Inclusive education-Latin America. 4. School attendance-Latin America. I. Duryea, Suzanne. II. Hincapié, Isabel. III. Inter-American Development Bank. Education Division. IV. Title. V. Series. IDB-PB-299 JEL codes: H41, I24, J14, O54 Keywords: Education policy, persons with disabilities, Latin America and the Caribbean http://www.iadb.org Copyright © 2019 Inter-American Development Bank. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC-IGO BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/ legalcode) and may be reproduced with attribution to the IDB and for any non-commercial purpose. No derivative work is allowed. Any dispute related to the use of the works of the IDB that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the IDB's name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of IDB's logo shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the IDB and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC-IGO license. -
Initiatives from Preschool to Third Grade a POLICYMAKER's GUIDE
FEB 2018 Initiatives From Preschool to Third Grade A POLICYMAKER'S GUIDE BRUCE ATCHISON LOUISA DIFFEY SPECIAL REPORT www.ecs.org | @EdCommission 2 he period between preschool and third grade is a tipping point in a Tchild’s journey toward lifelong learning — from “learning to read” Of the 2.5 million to “reading to learn.”1 If children do not have proficient reading skills by third grade, their ability to progress through school and meet grade-level students who dropped expectations diminishes significantly. While all areas of children’s learning and development are critical for school success, the predictive power of out of high school last a child’s third-grade reading proficiency on high school graduation and year, about 1.6 million dropout rates is startling.2 Consider: were firmly set on that J Children who are not reading proficiently by third grade are four times less likely to graduate from high school on time. trajectory when they were 8 years old. J If they live in poverty, they are 13 times less likely to graduate on time. J In 2016, they comprised more than half of all students (63 percent) who did not graduate on time. Pair that with the knowledge that about 30 percent of all fourth-graders and 50 percent of African-American and Hispanic fourth-graders nationwide are In 2016-17, 30 states reading below grade-level. Over half are likely to drop out or will not graduate on time. increased funding for If policymakers are to make a significant impact on the readiness of our pre-K, demonstrating nation’s future workforce, interventions and strategies to address gaps in overall support for learning must begin much earlier than third grade.