Difficulties Identifying Three-Toed Swiftlets Aerodramus Papuensis in New Guinea

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Difficulties Identifying Three-Toed Swiftlets Aerodramus Papuensis in New Guinea Australian Field Ornithology 2018, 35, 126–128 http://dx.doi.org/10.20938/afo35126128 Difficulties identifying Three-toed Swiftlets Aerodramus papuensis in New Guinea Michael Tarburton School of Science and Technology, Pacific Adventist University, Private Mail Bag, Boroko. Papua New Guinea. Email: [email protected] Abstract. This note shows that a pale throat is not a reliable means to distinguish the Three-toed Swiftlet Aerodramus papuensis from three other New Guinea swiftlets (Uniform A. vanikorensis, Bare-legged A. nuditarsus and Mountain Swiftlets A. hirundinaceus). It also gives weights and measurements for a much larger sample of the four species than previously known, and for the first time describes the calls and roosting times of theThree-toed Swiftlet. In the hand, the Three-toed Swiftlet Aerodramus papuensis on 12–18 June 2000 and 27–29 July 2005, I observed is easy to identify because it is the only swiftlet that has Three-toed Swiftlets feeding outside the cave-entrance, three toes. Identifying it in the field is another matter. It over Mt Palawap, and noticed that sometimes (but not has been claimed that “most distinctively, it has a silvery- always) the throat appeared to be paler than the chest and grey throat that contrasts with the remainder of the sooty- stomach. By following and closely scrutinising one bird at grey underparts” (Chantler & Driessens 1995, p. 136). a time, I realised that the appearance of the throat varied This same feature has been used by other authors as from being the same colour as the chest and stomach to well (Salomonsen 1983; Beehler et al. 1986; Gregory being lighter than the chest, depending on the angle of the 2017). Pratt & Beehler (2014) in their second edition of the bird’s axis to the light source and the observer. I checked Birds of New Guinea deleted the statement that the pale this with some of the birds that we subsequently caught throat can be used in the field to distinguish the species inside the cave. The two accompanying photographs (as suggested in their earlier edition: Beehler et al. 1986), (Figure 1) show that the same individual can have a in response to my sending them photographs to show throat either lighter in colour or uniform with the chest. its deceptiveness. In-the-field and in-the-hand evidence It is unfortunate that the flash went off for one of these both show that the pale throat is not a reliable means to photographs but not the other. However, the difference was distinguish this species from the Uniform A. vanikorensis, real in natural light, and it is not a result of one photograph Bare-legged A. nuditarsus and Mountain Swiftlets A. having natural light and one having electronic light. This hirundinaceus. Beehler et al. (1986), Pratt & Beehler finding makes the identification of this species in the field a (2014) and Gregory (2017) indicated that its smaller size little more difficult. can be used to separate it from the Bare-legged Swiftlet, Because published measurements of this species and that Uniform and Mountain Swiftlets are both smaller are few (n = 23) and because I have considerably more than the Three-toed Swiftlet. Chantler & Driessens (1995) measurements from both museum skins and live birds, suggested that the Three-toed and Bare-legged Swiftlets these are recorded here. The museum skins are 17 birds are similar in size. from Wengomanga, (~–7.300, 146.21666) and eight from On two visits to Losapi Cave, Papua New Guinea (PNG), Hamo Aseki near Menyamya (–7.11123, 145.99434) (both a b Table 1. Standard measurements of the Three-toed Swiftlet: weight (g) and other measurements (mm); n = number of birds. Morphological feature Average Minimum Maximum n Weight 19.5 15.4 25.4 107 Wing (flattened) 135 120 142 101 Outer rectrix 54 47 60 89 Inner rectrix 46.6 40 52 77 Tail 44 1 Wing span 314.4 306 324 8 Length 124.9 116 131 14 Tarsus 11.9 9.2 14.2 32 Middle toe 6.6 5.2 8.4 32 Claw 4.9 3.7 6.2 32 Figure 1. A Three-toed Swiftlet showing variable colour of Culmen 8.8 5.6 10 32 throat compared with chest, photographs (a) with flash Exposed culmen 5.0 4.0 5.7 32 and (b) without flash. Photo: Michael Tarburton Three-toed Swiftlet identification 127 in Morobe Province, PNG) (all these skins are in the Australian National Wildlife Collection, Canberra, ACT), four birds from Losapi Cave (skins in the PNG Museum), one bird from Luplupwiatem Cave (Western Province, PNG), one from Manjim on the Ganz River (~–5.520426, 144.452450) and one from Mt Orata (~–6.04315, 144.607) in the Kubor Mountains (Western Highlands Province, PNG) (all these skins are in the Australian Museum, Sydney). I also have measurements from 68 live birds caught at Losapi Cave and 11 live birds caught at Luleve Cave near Losapi Cave (–6.649167, 145.161389, at 1362 m above sea-level in Chimbu Province) 7 km west of Herowana, Eastern Province, PNG. These total 111 birds, and the measurements taken from them are given in Table 1. Figure 2. Three-toed Swiftlet showing some feathers on Does the larger sample still support the size differences the tarsus. Photo: Michael Tarburton given in the literature? Tables 2 and 3 enable us to determine this. The Three-toed Swiftlet averages only divide, and only south of that divide in the east (based on 1 mm shorter in wing-length and is 2.5 g lighter than the a dubious record discovered by Somadikarta (1975) and Bare-legged Swiftlet. With the huge overlap in the ranges thought to be close to Port Moresby). This distribution of these measurements, however, this distinction could not was also accepted by Salomonsen (1983), Beehler et al. be made in the hand, let alone in the field. Is the Three- (1986) and Chantler & Driessens (1995). The locations of toed Swiftlet larger than Uniform and Mountain Swiftlets? the birds in the present paper confirm that the distribution There is significant difference in their weights, so weight of the Three-toed Swiftlet does extend south of the central could be used to distinguish birds in the hand, but there is ranges in PNG, but not just in the east. overlap in the range of wing-lengths so this measure could not separate all individuals of the species in the hand or in Another feature that helped Somadikarta (1967) the field. distinguish the Three-toed Swiftlet from the Bare-legged It was when Somadikarta (1967) realised that the Three- Swiftlet was that the former had a densely feathered toed Swiftlet subspecies of Whitehead’s Swiftlet Collocalia tarsus. All 90 Three-toed Swiftlets that I examined for this whiteheadi (now Aerodramus whiteheadi) had only three character had a feathered tarsus, even though some of the toes that this was designated a full species. Somadikarta individuals were moulting at the time. The tarsi of some (1967) also defined the distribution of the Three-toed had only sparse feathering, but none was naked. Figure 2 Swiftlet as being in New Guinea north of the central shows this feature. Table 2. Wing-lengths (mm) for similar Aerodramus swiftlet species in Papua New Guinea: mean ± standard error and confidence intervals of 95% and 99% per z-score, minimum and maximum Significance is given by comparing the z-score with that of the nearest mean, and therefore will also be significant to the other two means);n = number of birds; S = significance (* = significant, ns = not significant). Species Mean Minimum Maximum n Mean 95% 99% S Three-toed A. papuensis 135 ± 0.03 0.06 0.08 * 120 142 101 Bare-legged A. nuditarsus 136 ± 1.11 2.18 2.86 ns 131 142 10 Mountain A. hirundinaceus 120 ± 0.7 1.4 1.8 * 109 137 81 Uniform A. vanikorensis 117.5 ± 0.28 0.53 0.70 * 101 130 389 Table 3. Weights (g) for similar Aerodramus swiftlet species in Papua New Guinea: mean ± standard error and confidence intervals of 95% and 99% per z-score, minimum and maximum. Significance is given by comparing the z-score with that of the nearest mean, and therefore will also be significant to the other two means); n = number of birds; S = significance (* = significant, ns = not significant). Species Mean Minimum Maximum n Mean 95% 99% S Three-toed A. papuensis 19.5 ± 0.2 0.4 0.5 * 15.4 25.4 107 Bare-legged A. nuditarsus 22 ± 0.2 0.4 0.5 * 21.5 23 8 Mountain A. hirundinaceus 9.5 ± 0.1 0.2 0.3 * 7.5 11.4 52 Uniform A. vanikorensis 10.3 ± 0.15 0.29 0.39 * 5.4 14 120 128 Australian Field Ornithology M. Tarburton Gregory (2017, p. 82) noted for the Three-toed Swiftlet, Acknowledgements a presumed resident in New Guinea: “echolocation I thank Cliff Frith for his help with editing the manuscript as well as abilities are uncertain, vocalisation undescribed and some an anonymous referee for helpful input. nocturnal or crepuscular activities possible”. Beehler & Pratt (2014) said that this species echolocates with clicking calls but agreed that there is no information on its flight call. References My visits to Losapi and Lulevi Caves were in June 2000 Beehler, B.M., Pratt, T.K. & Zimmerman, D.A. (1986). Birds of and July 2005, the middle of the non-breeding season, New Guinea. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New thus indicating that Three-toed Swiftlets roost throughout Jersey, USA. the year in their breeding caves.
Recommended publications
  • ATIU SWIFTLET KOPEKA (Aerodramus Sawtelli): SPECIES STATUS REPORT 2020
    ATIU SWIFTLET KOPEKA (Aerodramus sawtelli): SPECIES STATUS REPORT 2020 Atiu Swiftlet James J. S. Johnson Author: Te Ipukarea Society Te Ipukarea Society, PO Box 649, Rarotonga Cook Islands Funded with the support of: The Ridge to Reef Project through the National Environment Service, funded by Global Environment Facility (GEF) and facilitated by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Species status report – Kopeka, Atiu Swiftlet (Aerodramus sawtelli) Summary The Atiu swiftlet (Aerodramus sawtelli), known locally as the kopeka, is endemic to the island of Atiu within the Cook Islands and is listed under the IUCN Red List as ‘Vulnerable’ (BirdLife International, 2016; IUCN 2020). Under the Ridge to Reef project (R2R), the Atiu Swiftlet was listed as a key terrestrial species for conservation activities (UNDP Project document, undated). Projects relevant to the kopeka that were initially planned to be implemented under R2R included: support for the kopeka conservation effort; support collaborative work amongst key stakeholders such as National Environment Service (NES), National Heritage Trust (NHT), the Atiu Island Council and Traditional Leaders to create and implement a Species Conservation Plan for this species; and to measure the population at the end of the project to gauge the overall results of the species conservation plan. The R2R baseline figures for the kopeka were recorded at 420 individuals in 2015. Species target goals upon completion of the R2R project were for ‘no net decline in population numbers’. During the four-year R2R programme 2015-19, later extended to 2021, no updated population surveys were conducted. In 2016 -2017, estimated population numbers were around 600 adults (M.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Sheath-Tailed Bat American Samoa Emballonura Semicaudata Semicaudata Species Report April 2020
    Pacific Sheath-tailed Bat American Samoa Emballonura semicaudata semicaudata Species Report April 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office Honolulu, HI Cover Photo Credits Shawn Thomas, Bat Conservation International. Suggested Citation USFWS. 2020. Species Status Assessment for the Pacific Sheath Tailed Bat (Emballonura semicaudata semicaudata). April 2020 (Version 1.1). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, Honolulu, HI. 57 pp. Primary Authors Version 1.1 of this document was prepared by Mari Reeves, Fred Amidon, and James Kwon of the Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, Honolulu, Hawaii. Preparation and review was conducted by Gregory Koob, Megan Laut, and Stephen E. Miller of the Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office. Acknowledgements We thank the following individuals for their contribution to this work: Marcos Gorresen, Adam Miles, Jorge Palmeirim, Dave Waldien, Dick Watling, and Gary Wiles. ii Executive Summary This Species Report uses the best available scientific and commercial information to assess the status of the semicaudata subspecies of the Pacific sheath-tailed bat, Emballonura semicaudata semicaudata. This subspecies is found in southern Polynesia, eastern Melanesia, and Micronesia. Three additional subspecies of E. semicaudata (E.s. rotensis, E.s. palauensis, and E.s. sulcata) are not discussed here unless they are used to support assumptions about E.s. semicaudata, or to fill in data gaps in this analysis. The Pacific sheath-tailed bat is an Old-World bat in the family Emballonuridae, and is found in parts of Polynesia, eastern Melanesia, and Micronesia. It is the only insectivorous bat recorded from much of this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet of Breeding White-Throated and Black Swifts in Southern California
    DIET OF BREEDING WHITE-THROATED AND BLACK SWIFTS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ALLISON D. RUDALEVIGE, DESSlE L. A. UNDERWOOD, and CHARLES T. COLLINS, Department of BiologicalSciences, California State University,Long Beach, California 90840 (current addressof Rudalevige:Biology Department, Universityof California,Riverside, California 92521) ABSTRACT: We analyzed the diet of nestling White-throated(Aeronautes saxatalis) and Black Swifts (Cypseloidesniger) in southern California. White- throatedSwifts fed their nestlingson bolusesof insectsmore taxonomicallydiverse, on average(over 50 arthropodfamilies represented), than did BlackSwifts (seven arthropodfamilies, primarfiy ants). In some casesWhite-throated Swift boluses containedprimarily one species,while other bolusesshowed more variation.In contrast,all BlackSwift samplescontained high numbersof wingedants with few individualsof other taxa. Our resultsprovide new informationon the White-throated Swift'sdiet and supportprevious studies of the BlackSwift. Swiftsare amongthe mostaerial of birds,spending most of the day on the wing in searchof their arthropodprey. Food itemsinclude a wide array of insectsand some ballooningspiders, all gatheredaloft in the air column (Lack and Owen 1955). The food habitsof a numberof speciesof swifts have been recorded(Collins 1968, Hespenheide1975, Lack and Owen 1955, Marfn 1999, Tarburton 1986, 1993), but there is stilllittle informa- tion availablefor others, even for some speciesthat are widespreadand common.Here we providedata on the prey sizeand compositionof food broughtto nestlingsof the White-throated(Aerona u tes saxa talis) and Black (Cypseloidesniger) Swifts in southernCalifornia. The White-throatedSwift is a commonresident that nestswidely in southernCalifornia, while the Black Swift is a local summerresident, migrating south in late August (Garrettand Dunn 1981, Foersterand Collins 1990). METHODS When feedingyoung, swifts of the subfamiliesApodinae and Chaeturinae return to the nest with a bolusof food in their mouths(Collins 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • DIET of WHITE-NEST SWIFLETS (Aerodramus Fuciphagus) NURUL AFIQAH BINTI MAHADI This Project Is Submitted in Partial Fulfillment
    - DIET OF WHITE-NEST SWIFLETS (Aerodramus Fuciphagus) NURUL AFIQAH BINTI MAHADI This project is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science with Honours (Animal Resource Science and Management Programme) Department of Zoology Faculty of Resource Science and Technology UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARA W AK 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First and foremost, I am grateful to God Almighty for His grace providing me the strength and patience in fulfilling on this project. I would like to thank Dr. Lim Chan Koon as supervisor for invaluable his advice, support and encouragement throughout the project. My special thank also to Professor Sulaiman Hanapi for provides information, support and help in identification of the insects. I would like to thank Mr. Lo Siaw Kuie for allowing me to collect guano sample from his birdhouse in Kuching. For the fieldwork and laboratory work, I thanked all management staffs of the Department of Zoology, mainly to Mr. Isa Sait, Mr.Raymond Patrik Atet, Mr. lailani and Mr. Wahap for their contribution throughout my final year project. My appreciation especially for Nurasyikin A. Rahim, Siti Maisarah Mohd Shari and my other collages for helping me in order to finish the project. Lastly, I would like to dedicate this success to my father, Mahadi B. Che Noh, my mother, Rohaini Bt Salleh and other family members for their prayers, support, motivation and encouragement. II , " .. ,,_ .. .' .. ,,'.,,~,.~;rdk. llN[VnRSrri r..1ALAVSIA SARAWAI( TABLE OF CONTENTS Declaration I Acknowledgement II
    [Show full text]
  • Echolocation in Oilbirds and Swiftlets
    REVIEW ARTICLE published: 28 May 2013 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00123 Echolocation in Oilbirds and swiftlets Signe Brinkløv 1*, M. Brock Fenton 1 and John M. Ratcliffe 2 1 Department of Biology, Western University, London, ON, Canada 2 Institute of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark Edited by: The discovery of ultrasonic bat echolocation prompted a wide search for other animal Mariana L. Melcón, Fundación biosonar systems, which yielded, among few others, two avian groups. One, the South Cethus, Argentina American Oilbird (Steatornis caripensis: Caprimulgiformes), is nocturnal and eats fruit. The Reviewed by: other is a selection of diurnal, insect-eating swiftlets (species in the genera Aerodramus Noritaka Ichinohe, National Institute of Neuroscience, Japan and Collocalia:Apodidae)fromacrosstheIndo-Pacific.Birdecholocationisrestrictedto Lore Thaler, Durham University, UK lower frequencies audible to humans, implying a system of poorer resolution than the *Correspondence: ultrasonic (>20 kHz) biosonar of most bats and toothed whales. As such, bird echolocation Signe Brinkløv, Department of has been labeled crude or rudimentary. Yet, echolocation is found in at least 16 extant Biology, Western University, bird species and has evolved several times in avian lineages. Birds use their syringes to 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada. produce broadband click-type biosonar signals that allow them to nest in dark caves and e-mail: [email protected] tunnels, probably with less predation pressure. There are ongoing discrepancies about several details of bird echolocation, from signal design to the question about whether echolocation is used during foraging. It remains to be seen if bird echolocation is as sophisticated as that of tongue-clicking rousette bats.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate Papua New Guinea Ii
    The fantastic Forest Bittern showed memorably well at Varirata during this tour! (JM) ULTIMATE PAPUA NEW GUINEA II 25 AUGUST – 11 / 15 SEPTEMBER 2019 LEADER: JULIEN MAZENAUER Our second Ultimate Papua New Guinea tour in 2019, including New Britain, was an immense success and provided us with fantastic sightings throughout. A total of 19 Birds-of-paradise (BoPs), one of the most striking and extraordinairy bird families in the world, were seen. The most amazing one must have been the male Blue BoP, admired through the scope near Kumul lodge. A few females were seen previously at Rondon Ridge, but this male was just too much. Several males King-of-Saxony BoP – seen displaying – ranked high in our most memorable moments of the tour, especially walk-away views of a male obtained at Rondon Ridge. Along the Ketu River, we were able to observe the full display and mating of another cosmis species, Twelve-wired BoP. Despite the closing of Ambua, we obtained good views of a calling male Black Sicklebill, sighted along a new road close to Tabubil. Brown Sicklebill males were seen even better and for as long as we wanted, uttering their machine-gun like calls through the forest. The adult male Stephanie’s Astrapia at Rondon Ridge will never be forgotten, showing his incredible glossy green head colours. At Kumul, Ribbon-tailed Astrapia, one of the most striking BoP, amazed us down to a few meters thanks to a feeder especially created for birdwatchers. Additionally, great views of the small and incredible King BoP delighted us near Kiunga, as well as males Magnificent BoPs below Kumul.
    [Show full text]
  • Swiftlets and Edible Bird's Nest Industry in Asia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Pertanika Journal of Scholarly Research Reviews (PJSRR - Universiti Putra Malaysia,... PJSRR (2016) 2(1): 32-48 eISSN: 2462-2028 © Universiti Putra Malaysia Press Pertanika Journal of Scholarly Research Reviews http://www.pjsrr.upm.edu.my/ Swiftlets and Edible Bird’s Nest Industry in Asia Qi Hao, LOOI a & Abdul Rahman, OMAR a, b* aInstitute of Bioscience, bFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor. [email protected] Abstract – Swiftlets are small insectivorous birds which breed throughout Southeast Asia and the South Pacific. Among many swiftlet species, only a few are notable to produce edible bird’s nests (EBN) from the secreted saliva during breeding seasons. The taxonomy of swiftlets remains one of the most controversial in the avian species due to the high similarity in morphological characteristics among the species. Over the last few decades, researchers have studied the taxonomy of swiftlets based on the morphological trade, behavior, and genetic traits. However, despite all the efforts, the swiftlet taxonomy remains unsolved. The EBN is one of the most expensive animal products and frequently being referred to as the “Caviar of the East”. The EBN market value varies from US$1000.00 to US$10,000.00 per kilogram depending on its grade, shape, type and origin. Hence, bird’s nest harvesting is considered a lucrative industry in many countries in Southeast Asia. However, the industry faced several challenges over the decades such as the authenticity of the EBN, the quality assurance and the depletion of swiftlet population.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Review of Edible Bird Nests and Swiftlet Farming
    Journal homepage: www.jcimjournal.com/jim www.elsevier.com/locate/issn/20954964 Available also online at www.sciencedirect.com. Copyright © 2015, Journal of Integrative Medicine Editorial Offi ce. E-edition published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. All rights reserved. ᲒReview "DPNQSFIFOTJWFSFWJFXPGFEJCMFCJSEOFTUTBOE TXJGUMFUGBSNJOH Lee Suan Chua1,2, Siti Najihah Zukefl i1,2 1. Metabolites Profi ling Laboratory, Institute of Bioproduct Development, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Skudai, 81310 Johor Bahru, Malaysia 2. Department of Bioprocess and Polymer Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Skudai, 81310 Johor Bahru, Malaysia ABSTRACT Edible bird’s nest (EBN) is currently widely consumed by the Chinese community as tonic food and functional food, which is believed to have many medicinal benefi ts. Some studies have reported the biochemical compositions of EBN, graded on the basis of colour, nitrate and nitrite contents. Other studies have shown signifi cant biological effects, while ongoing research is in progress to explore potential pharmacological applications. The high demand for EBNs in the global market has forced the local regulatory bodies to monitor swiftlet farming activities, including the EBN cleaning process. Furthermore, numerous techniques have been developed to authenticate EBN; proteomics is likely to be the most promising of these methods. However, there are limited numbers of relevant protein sequences deposited at the database. More research is needed at the molecular level to explore the mechanisms behind the biological functions, such as bone strength improvement, skin rejuvenation, epidermal growth factor activity and cell proliferation.The current and future prospects of EBN and swiftlet farming are critically reviewed in this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarburton 2002
    Micronesica 34(2):105-108, 2002 Demise of the Polynesian Sheath-tailed Bat Emballonura semicaudata in Samoa MICHAEL K. TARBURTON Biology, Pacific Adventist University, PMB Boroko, Papua New Guinea. [email protected] Abstract—A search of 41 lava tube caves during 1994-97 in Samoa revealed only two caves containing five Polynesian Sheath-tailed Bats. At least five other caves showed signs of previous bat occupation, and several caves have historical records of large numbers of sheath-tailed bats. The suggested causes for the decline to the verge of extinction in decreasing order of significance are Cyclones Val & Ofa, agro-defor- estation, and use of pesticides. The Polynesian Sheath-tailed Bat Emballonura semicaudata used to be com- mon in Fiji (pers. obs. 1970’s), Samoa (Ollier et al. 1979), American Samoa, (Amerson et al. 1982, Grant et al. 1994), the Marianas (Perez 1972), and Palau (Bruner & Pratt 1979). However, its decline and probable extinction on some islands has already been reported in the Marianas (Bruner & Pratt 1979, Lemke 1986), and American Samoa (Grant et al. 1994). In 1995 Holly Freifeld of the American Samoa Dept. of Marine and Wildlife resources visited the Fijian caves I had worked in and found very few Sheath-tailed Bats remaining. (pers comm.). The Sheath-tailed Bat has apparently died out on Rota (Lemke 1986, Steadman 1992), but is possibly still common on Palau (Bruner & Pratt 1979, Wiles in Grant et al. 1994). The frequent inclusion of Vanuatu in the range of this species was based on just one specimen which is now thought to have come from Fiji (Flannery 1995), thus the actual status of the species is much more restricted and less common than previously believed.
    [Show full text]
  • Nest-Site Characteristics of the Edible-Nest Swiftlet Aerodramus Fuciphagus (Thunberg, 1812) at Si-Ha Islands, Phattalung Province, Thailand
    The Natural History Journal of Chulalongkorn University 2(2): 31-35, August 2002 ©2002 by Chulalongkorn University Nest-site Characteristics of the Edible-nest Swiftlet Aerodramus fuciphagus (Thunberg, 1812) at Si-Ha Islands, Phattalung Province, Thailand SUPALUCK VIRUHPINTU 1,2*, KUMTHORN THIRAKHUPT 2, ART-ONG PRADATSUNDARASAR 2 AND PILAI POONSWAD 3 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Naresuan University, Phittsanulok 65000, THAILAND 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, THAILAND 3 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, THAILAND ABSTRACT.–Caves on the Si-Ha Islands, Phattalung Province, Thailand, used by Aerodramus fuciphagus as their breeding sites were examined for the nest- site characteristics in October 2000. One hundred and twenty-five nest sites from 25 nest patches were investigated for the texture of the cave wall. Results showed that the nest-site selection was determined by the unique character of the cave wall rather than by random choice. Most nest patches, ranging 1-80 m2, were found on the smooth surface of the inward-inclining walls. Nest sites characterized as smooth and concave with supporter were found in all nest patches. Supporters, protruding U-shaped rocks, were found in all nest patches and were used entirely by birds, suggesting that supporters play an important role in the nest survival and the breeding success. The data of nest-site characteristics are important for the develop- ment of the interior wall structure of the cultivated house. KEY WORDS: nest-site characteristics; Edible-nest Swiftlet; Aerodramus fuciphagus A. unicolor (Jerdon, 1840) (Ali, 1996; Wells, INTRODUCTION 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Habitat Selection and Seasonality of Breeding in Germain's Swiftlet (Aerodramus Inexpectatus Germani) in Southern Thailand
    Foraging Habitat Selection and Seasonality of Breeding in Germain's Swiftlet (Aerodramus inexpectatus germani) in Southern Thailand Nutjarin Petkliang A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Prince of Songkla University 2017 Copyright of Prince of Songkla University i Foraging Habitat Selection and Seasonality of Breeding in Germain's Swiftlet (Aerodramus inexpectatus germani) in Southern Thailand Nutjarin Petkliang A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Prince of Songkla University 2017 Copyright of Prince of Songkla University ii Thesis Title Foraging Habitat Selection and Seasonality of Breeding in Germain’s Swiftlet (Aerodramus inexpectatus germani) in Southern Thailand Author Mrs. Nutjarin Petkliang Major Program Biology Major Advisor Examining Committee : .............................................................. ...........................................Chairperson (Assist. Prof. Dr. Sara Bumrungsri) (Assoc. Prof. Philip David Round) Co-advisor .............................................Committee (Assoc. Prof. Dr. George Andrew Gale) .............................................................. (Assoc. Prof. Dr. George Andrew Gale) .............................................Committee (Assist. Prof. Dr. Sara Bumrungsri) .............................................Committee (Dr. Sopark Jantarit) The Graduate School, Prince of Songkla University, has approved this thesis as fulfillment of the requirements for Doctor
    [Show full text]
  • 59-66 Maisarah Burhanuddin.Pmd
    Malays. Appl. Biol. (2017) 46(2): 59–66 RANGING BEHAVIOUR OF EDIBLE NEST SWIFTLET (Aerodramus sp.) IN KUALA LANGAT DISTRICT, SELANGOR, MALAYSIA MAISARAH BURHANUDDIN* and HAFIDZI MOHD NOOR Department of Plant Protection Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan *E-mail: [email protected] Accepted 20 May 2017, Published online 27 June 2017 ABSTRACT The edible bird’s nest has been consumed by humans for centuries for its medicinal properties and health benefits. Traditionally, the dried gelatinous coating of the edible-nest swiftlet is boiled together with rock sugar and eaten as a delicacy. However, today, the edible bird’s nest has also been commercialised into health and cosmetic products. Despite the importance of the product, many questions remain within the nest builder, the edible-nest swiftlet (Aerodramus fuciphagus) specifically regarding their ecology and behaviour in nature. The ranging behaviour of the Aerodramus sp., and its foraging areas were studied in the Kuala Langat district. The swiftlets were successfully tagged and tracked using vehicles. The research was conducted from March 2013 to July 2013. It was found that swiftlets had an average core area of 1687.06 ha (16.87 km²), a home range size of 6437.47 ha (64.37 km²) and an average flying distance from their birdhouses which ranged from 2 to 6 km. They were mostly found roaming in open fields, young oil palm plantations and nearby forested areas. Pearson correlation analysis showed that 50% of core feeding range areas and 95% of feeding range areas of the swiftlets correlated negatively with wind velocity (mph) at r = 0.8057, P = 0.0287 and r = 0.820, P = 0.024, respectively.
    [Show full text]