DOCSLIB.ORG

The History of Family Medicine and Its Impact in US Health Care Delivery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The History of Family Medicine and Its Impact in US Health Care Delivery 1 The History of Family Medicine and Its Impact in US Health Care Delivery Cecilia Gutierrez, MD & Peter Scheid, MD University of California San Diego Department of Family and Preventive Medicine Cecilia Gutierrez, MD Peter Scheid, MD Assistant Clinical Professor Staff Physician Division of Family Medicine Community Care Health Centers UCSD School of Medicine 8041 Newman Avenue 9500 Gilman Drive Mail Code 0807 Huntington Beach, Ca 92647 La Jolla, CA 92093 [email protected] [email protected] 2 ABSTRACT: Data from the last five years show a decline in the number of students choosing Family Medicine; no doubt the reasons are multi-factorial and complex. We believe that one major factor is the disapproval often experienced by students expressing their interest in Family Medicine. This disapproval is based largely on a misunderstanding of Family Medicine’s importance in the United States’ health care delivery. Hence, a better understanding of our past and present role in the U.S. might stimulate interest in Family Medicine as a career choice. We present a brief history of Family Medicine in the context of the history of US medicine. We demonstrate the fundamental role of Family Medicine in U.S. healthcare, and examine future challenges: from Keystone III to the Future of Family Medicine Project. 3 INTRODUCTION Most of us go through training and practicing medicine without receiving any formal education about the history of medicine in the US, much less about the history of Family Medicine: Where do we come from? What forces and people have influenced our specialty? What struggles, accomplishments, and disappointments has the discipline faced? How have we contributed to the development of medicine and to the delivery of health care in this country? This paper traces our history from the mid-1800s to the present time, looks at our history in the context of the development of medicine and medical education in the US, as well as the social forces and significant historical events in our society. We are the product of that history and we stand on the shoulders of many who made Family Medicine possible. History does not just explain the past but also, by providing the framework for understanding the present, helps us to move forward. As Dr. Stephens, the great founder of our specialty said: “Medicine is always the child of its time and cannot escape being influenced and shaped by contemporary ideas and social trends” (1) We will look at the birth and growth of Family Medicine, the triumphs, the dreams, some of the obstacles and challenges found along the path as well as at the hopes and strategies for the future. We hope to help strengthen our identity as Family Physicians; to stimulate students to learn more about Family Medicine as a career choice; to learn more about the fundamental role of Family Medicine in health care delivery in this country and to promote personal commitment to promoting our specialty in all aspects of our work. 4 PART I HISTORY OF FAMILY MEDICINE II A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE The 1800s The US population was still settled in small towns, and farming and production of goods were the major foundation of the economy. Health care was unstructured; the doctor often visited his patients in a horse and buggy. Most doctors did not have formal training; some learned the job as apprentices working with older physicians, or attending small courses and workshops. There were no medical schools, no organized training nor organized medicine and no system to ensure quality of care. (2,3) Most of the time, the doctor went to visit patients and took care of all members of the family. He knew his patients very well, he delivered babies, set fractures, treated a multitude of illnesses, helped those dying, and some did surgery and took care of trauma. Many were astute clinicians, with great knowledge and capabilities; they were very committed to serving their people. The payment was fee for service, and often goods were brought to doctors as payment. Although many doctors were outstanding physicians, there were also many who claimed incredible healing powers; there was a lot of “quackery” and no standards of care to which doctors were held. (3,4,5) 5 As cities grew, physicians began to see the need for organization and got together to address on a larger scale the needs of the growing society. The need to establish formal medical education and standards were recognized as a priority. The AMA was established in 1846 with a major aim being to organize and regulate medical education. JAMA was founded in 1882. By 1900, the AMA’s objectives were to: - Purify the profession from quackery - Establish an orthodox medical education based on natural science - Promote standards for public health (sanitation, food and drugs) - Standardize medical education The Beginning of a New Century: As the new century began, there was a strong sense that medical practices were far behind from those of European countries, particularly England and Germany. Concerned about the state of medical education, the AMA sought support from the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, to study the medical schools of the nation. Abraham Flexner led the project and the results of the study were the first critical event to influence the development of medical education. The findings were published in the Flexner Report, 1910 (6). As a result of the recommendations of the Flexner Report major changes were implemented: 6 - Pre-medical requirements were established with strong basis in science - Medical curriculum was standardized (strongly based on science) - Full-time faculty were dedicated to teaching and research - The medical schools were attached to universities The Flexner Report provided the basis for the development of medicine and the environment for the subsequent growth and development of specialties as the basis for the delivery of health care. Specialties flourished and began to dominate medicine. In the 1900s the American Boards emerged in an effort by physicians to organize medicine into subspecialties, to define a body of knowledge and to create specific requirements for membership. The first American Board was Ophthalmology in 1917 followed by Otolaryngology 1924, thirteen more followed by 1930 and four more by 1940. (3) The AMA prospered and gained professional and academic control of sub-specialization through the American Boards. The Boards’ responsibility was to prepare and administer professional certifying examinations for individuals in their fields. One important fact as US medicine is that the medical bureaucracy evolved toward specialization and institutionalization but not toward nationalizing medicine. Four areas of control were established: - The universities control the MD degree 7 - The state controls licensing to practice medicine - The AMA controls graduate medical education through the Council of Medical Education and the Residency Review Committees - The American Boards control certification of specialists By 1935 the major changes to medical education were: - Standardization of pre-doctoral medical education awarding all physicians the same medical degree - Specialization based on extended graduate education; i.e. Residency - Specialist control over the location and use of technology. Hospitals became the major place where medicine and technology reside and are developed - Medicine became institutionalized, based in medical schools and city/county hospitals As a result of these changes the cost of medical education increased and medicine became a profession of the upper class. Specialization was emphasized and highly valued while GPs became lower rank, smaller in numbers and aging. There was a lot of animosity between the specialists and the GPs. GPs continued to lose ground as they were prevented from hospital work, procedures and other activities. In the 1940s, and particularly during WW II, the US recognized the superiority of Germany and England in regard to scientific and technological advances. The war led to 8 an intense push toward scientific and technological advances in all fields. The Federal government invested substantial resources into the development of science and America fell in love with science and technology. Just to point out some critical developments: Enrico Fermi demonstrated the atomic reaction. The Germans had the knowledge and likely the capability to develop an atomic bomb. World War II was followed by the Cold War with scientific knowledge and technological achievement at the center of the race for power. The National Science Foundation was established in 1950. The Soviets demonstrated their technological superiority by putting the first satellite into orbit, Sputnik in 1957. NASA was founded in 1958 and only eleven years later, Apollo XI landed on the moon. In spite of all these changes, from 1920 to 1960 neither medical schools nor the enrollment of students grew considerably, while the population continued to increase. Eventually this created a shortage of physicians. In the 1960s the public began to express their dissatisfaction with the state of medicine, mainly: - The shortage of physicians - The inaccessibility of health care in rural areas and inner cities - The high cost of medical care - The increased depersonalization of medicine - The fragmentation of care In response to public concerns and outcry the AMA responded by 9 1. Increasing and extending direct federal support to medical schools through the Health Profession Education Assistance Act and by creating 2. The Citizen’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: the Hope, the Hype, the Promise, the Peril
    Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: The Hope, the Hype, the Promise, the Peril Michael Matheny, Sonoo Thadaney Israni, Mahnoor Ahmed, and Danielle Whicher, Editors WASHINGTON, DC NAM.EDU PREPUBLICATION COPY - Uncorrected Proofs NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICINE • 500 Fifth Street, NW • WASHINGTON, DC 20001 NOTICE: This publication has undergone peer review according to procedures established by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM). Publication by the NAM worthy of public attention, but does not constitute endorsement of conclusions and recommendationssignifies that it is the by productthe NAM. of The a carefully views presented considered in processthis publication and is a contributionare those of individual contributors and do not represent formal consensus positions of the authors’ organizations; the NAM; or the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data to Come Copyright 2019 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Suggested citation: Matheny, M., S. Thadaney Israni, M. Ahmed, and D. Whicher, Editors. 2019. Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: The Hope, the Hype, the Promise, the Peril. NAM Special Publication. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine. PREPUBLICATION COPY - Uncorrected Proofs “Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.” --GOETHE PREPUBLICATION COPY - Uncorrected Proofs ABOUT THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICINE The National Academy of Medicine is one of three Academies constituting the Nation- al Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (the National Academies). The Na- tional Academies provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Required Procedural Training in Family Medicine Residency: a Consensus Statement
    248 April 2008 Family Medicine Residency Education Required Procedural Training in Family Medicine Residency: A Consensus Statement Melissa Nothnagle, MD; Julie M. Sicilia, MD; Stuart Forman, MD; Jeremy Fish, MD; William Ellert, MD; Roberta Gebhard, DO; Barbara F. Kelly, MD; John L. Pfenninger, MD; Michael Tuggy, MD; Wm. MacMillan Rodney, MD; STFM Group on Hospital Medicine and Procedural Training Background and Objectives: Specific procedural training standards for US family medicine residen- cies do not exist. As a result, family physicians graduate with highly variable procedural skills, and the scope of procedural practice for family physicians remains poorly defined. Our objective was to develop a standard list of required procedures for family medicine residencies. Methods: The Society of Teachers of Family Medicine Group on Hospital and Procedural Training convened a working group of 17 family physician educators. A multi-voting process was used to define categories and propose a list of required procedures for US family medicine residency programs. Results: The group defined five categories of procedures within the scope of family medicine. Consensus was reached for a core list of procedures that all family medicine residents should be able to perform by the time of graduation. Conclusions: Defining standards for procedural training in family medicine will help clarify family medicine’s scope of practice and should benefit both patients and family physicians. We propose that with input from national family medicine organizations, the procedure list presented in this report be used to develop a national standard for required procedural training. (Fam Med 2008;40(4):248-52.) Controversy exists over which procedures should be requirements for procedure skills to include “a list of taught in family medicine residency.
    [Show full text]
  • Patient Care Through Telepharmacy September 2016
    Patient Care through Telepharmacy September 2016 Gregory Janes Objectives 1. Describe why telepharmacy started and how it has evolved with technology 2. Explain how telepharmacy is being used to provide better patient care, especially in rural areas 3. Understand the current regulatory environment around the US and what states are doing with regulation Agenda ● Origins of Telepharmacy ● Why now? ● Telepharmacy process ● Regulatory environment ● Future Applications Telepharmacy Prescription verification CounselingPrescription & verification Education History Origins of Telepharmacy 1942 Australia’s Royal Flying Doctor Service 2001 U.S. has first state pass telepharmacy regulation 2003 Canada begins first telepharmacy service 2010 Hong Kong sees first videoconferencing consulting services US Telepharmacy Timeline 2001 North Dakota first state to allow 2001 Community Health Association in Spokane, WA launches program 2002 NDSU study begins 2003 Alaska Native Medical Center program 2006 U.S. Navy begins telepharmacy 2012 New generation begins in Iowa Question #1 What was the first US state to allow Telepharmacy? a) Alaska b) North Dakota c) South Dakota d) Hawaii Question #1 What was the first US state to allow Telepharmacy? a) Alaska b) North Dakota c) South Dakota d) Hawaii NDSU Telepharmacy Study Study from 2002-2008 ● 81 pharmacies ○ 53 retail and 28 hospital ● Rate of dispensing errors <1% ○ Compared to national average of ~2% ● Positive outcomes, mechanisms could be improved Source: The North Dakota Experience: Achieving High-Performance
    [Show full text]
  • Preventive Health Care
    PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE DANA BARTLETT, BSN, MSN, MA, CSPI Dana Bartlett is a professional nurse and author. His clinical experience includes 16 years of ICU and ER experience and over 20 years of as a poison control center information specialist. Dana has published numerous CE and journal articles, written NCLEX material, written textbook chapters, and done editing and reviewing for publishers such as Elsevire, Lippincott, and Thieme. He has written widely on the subject of toxicology and was recently named a contributing editor, toxicology section, for Critical Care Nurse journal. He is currently employed at the Connecticut Poison Control Center and is actively involved in lecturing and mentoring nurses, emergency medical residents and pharmacy students. ABSTRACT Screening is an effective method for detecting and preventing acute and chronic diseases. In the United States healthcare tends to be provided after someone has become unwell and medical attention is sought. Poor health habits play a large part in the pathogenesis and progression of many common, chronic diseases. Conversely, healthy habits are very effective at preventing many diseases. The common causes of chronic disease and prevention are discussed with a primary focus on the role of health professionals to provide preventive healthcare and to educate patients to recognize risk factors and to avoid a chronic disease. nursece4less.com nursece4less.com nursece4less.com nursece4less.com 1 Policy Statement This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the policies of NurseCe4Less.com and the continuing nursing education requirements of the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation for registered nurses. It is the policy of NurseCe4Less.com to ensure objectivity, transparency, and best practice in clinical education for all continuing nursing education (CNE) activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Geriatric Medicine and Why We Need Geriatricians! by Juergen H
    Geriatric Medicine and why we need Geriatricians! by Juergen H. A. Bludau, MD hat is geriatric medicine? Why is there a need for 1. Heterogeneity: As people age, they become more Wthis specialty? How does it differ from general heterogeneous, meaning that they become more and more internal medicine? What do geriatricians do differently when different, sometimes strikingly so, with respect to their they evaluate and treat an older adult? These are common health and medical needs. Imagine for a moment a group questions among patients and physicians alike. Many of 10 men and women, all 40 years old. It is probably safe internists and family practitioners argue, not unjustifiably, to say that most, if not all, have no chronic diseases, do not that they have experience in treating and caring for older see their physicians on a regular basis, and take no long- patients, especially since older adults make up almost half of term prescription medications. From a medical point of all doctors visits. So do we really need another type of view, this means that they are all very similar. Compare this physician to care for older adults? It is true that geriatricians to a group of 10 patients who are 80 years old. Most likely, may not necessarily treat older patients differently per se. But you will find an amazingly fit and active gentleman who there is a very large and important difference in that the focus may not be taking any prescription medications. On the of the treatment is different. In order to appreciate how other end of the spectrum, you may find a frail, memory- significant this is, we need to look at what makes an older impaired, and wheelchair-bound woman who lives in a adult different from a younger patient.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tool to Help Clinicians Do What They Value Most
    Health Information Technology: a Tool to Help Clinicians Do What They Value Most Health care professionals like you play a vital role in improving the health outcomes, quality of care, and the health care experience of patients. Health information technology (health IT) is an important tool that you can use to improve clinical practice and the health of your patients. Health IT can help health care professionals to do what you do best: provide excellent care to your patients. Research shows that when patients are Health IT encompasses a wide range of electronic tools that can help you: engaged in their health care, it can lead to • Access up-to-date evidence-based clinical guidelines and decision measurable improvements in safety and support quality. • Improve the quality of care and safety of your patients Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) • Provide proactive health maintenance for your patients • Better coordinate patients’ care with other providers through the secure and private sharing of clinical information. Health IT can help you to solve clinical problems with real-time data Quality improvement and clinical decision support rely on information about your patient population being readily available in digital form. Health IT can help you monitor your patients’ health status and make specific and targeted recommendations to improve your patients’ health. Access to real-time data through electronic health records and health IT will help you: A MAJORITY OF PROVIDERS • Use clinical decision support to highlight care options tailored to believe that electronic health information your patients has the potential to improve the quality of patient care and care coordination.
    [Show full text]
  • AAFP Toolkit: Building and Growing a Sustainable Telehealth Program
    A Toolkit for Building and Growing a Sustainable Telehealth Program in Your Practice SEPTEMBER 2020 This toolkit was developed in partnership with Manatt Health. About AAFP The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) is the national association of family physicians. It is one of the largest national medical organizations, with 136,700 members in 50 states, D.C., Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Guam, as well as internationally. We are a membership organization in the purest sense: an association of family physicians led by family physicians. With our colleagues throughout the country, we work to solidify family medicine as the cornerstone of a functioning health care system. We lobby government, negotiate with payers, partner with employers, educate patients, and champion family medicine on the national stage. The AAFP exists to support family physicians so they can spend more time doing what they do best: providing quality, cost-effective patient care. About Manatt Health Manatt Health combines firsthand experience in shaping public policy, sophisticated strategy insight, deep analytic capabilities, and legal excellence to provide uniquely valuable professional services to the full range of health industry stakeholders. Manatt has deep expertise in advising providers, states, payers, and health tech companies on developing, providing, and paying for innovative virtual care solutions. Our diverse team of more than 160 attorneys and consultants from Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, and its consulting subsidiary, Manatt Health Strategies, LLC, is passionate about helping our clients advance their business interests, fulfill their missions, and lead health care into the future. For more information, visit https://www.manatt.com/Health.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Offerings Include
    JAMA 2021 Offerings Include: Print Edition Rate Card Effective January 1, 2021 • Patient Page Publication • Selections A supplement of curated articles on a therapeutic topic • Microsites Contact Account Manager for Information Contacts Editor Howard C. Bauchner, MD Boston University School of Medicine Insertion Order or Billing Questions Reprints Denise Steinhauser JAMA, JAMA Cardiology, JAMA Internal Medicine, (312) 464-2455 JAMA Ophthalmology, JAMA Neurology, JAMA Oncology, [email protected] JAMA Psychiatry and JAMA Network Open Marsha Fogler, Account Manager Production Questions JAMA Network Reprint Sales Michael Deegan [email protected] (312) 464-2401 USA: 1-800-482-1450 [email protected] Rest of World: 1-856-489-4446 Please include in the email the specific issue of JAMA in which your ad is running. (Note: JAMA is a weekly.) JAMA Dermatology, JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, JAMA Pediatrics, JAMA Surgery, and JAMA Network Open Display + Online Advertising Rachel Sisholtz Pharmaceutical | Device JAMA Network Reprint Sales (862) 261-9600 [email protected] Maureen Reichert USA: 1-800-482-1450 [email protected] Rest of World: 1-856-489-4446 (862) 261-9616 General Inquiries and Non-Profit Organization requests: Nancy Souza JAMA Network Reprints Communications [email protected] [email protected] (862) 261-9615 Requests from non-profit organizations, AMA members, medical Jeff Bonistalli societies, and academic institutions. Director of Advertising Pharmaceutical & Devices [email protected] Health Systems Branding | Products and Service | CME Recruitment Advertising (800) 262-2260 | (312) 464-5909 Fax [email protected] Thalia Moss [email protected] Anna Frazier Director of Advertising Health Systems & Recruitment [email protected] Domestic Subscription Rates (800) 262-2350 Online Site Licensing (312) 464-4371 Page 2 JAMA 2021 Print Edition Rate Card Rates 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sports Medicine Examination Outline
    Sports Medicine Examination Content I. ROLE OF THE TEAM PHYSICIAN 1% A. Ethics B. Medical-Legal 1. Physician responsibility 2. Physician liability 3. Preparticipation clearance 4. Return to play 5. Waiver of liability C. Administrative Responsibilities II. BASIC SCIENCE OF SPORTS 16% A. Exercise Physiology 1. Training Response/Physical Conditioning a.Aerobic b. Anaerobic c. Resistance d. Flexibility 2. Environmental a. Heat b.Cold c. Altitude d.Recreational diving (scuba) 3. Muscle a. Contraction b. Lactate kinetics c. Delayed onset muscle soreness d. Fiber types 4. Neuroendocrine 5. Respiratory 6. Circulatory 7. Special populations a. Children b. Elderly c. Athletes with chronic disease d. Disabled athletes B. Anatomy 1. Head/Neck a.Bone b. Soft tissue c. Innervation d. Vascular 2. Chest/Abdomen a.Bone b. Soft tissue c. Innervation d. Vascular 3. Back a.Bone b. Soft tissue c. Innervation 1 d. Vascular 4. Shoulder/Upper arm a. Bone b. Soft tissue c. Innervation d. Vascular 5. Elbow/Forearm a. Bone b. Soft tissue c. Innervation d. Vascular 6. Hand/Wrist a. Bone b. Soft tissue c. Innervation d. Vascular 7. Hip/Pelvis/Thigh a. Bone b. Soft tissue c. Innervation d. Vascular 8. Knee a. Bone b. Soft tissue c. Innervation d. Vascular 9. Lower Leg/Foot/Ankle a. Bone b. Soft tissue c. Innervation d. Vascular 10. Immature Skeleton a. Physes b. Apophyses C. Biomechanics 1. Throwing/Overhead activities 2. Swimming 3. Gait/Running 4. Cycling 5. Jumping activities 6. Joint kinematics D. Pharmacology 1. Therapeutic Drugs a. Analgesics b. Antibiotics c. Antidiabetic agents d. Antihypertensives e.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 1
    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 1 and hepatic pathology. The rotation consists of daily interpretation of Pathology and subspecialty biopsies, participation in subspecialty conferences, slide set study, and assigned readings. Students participate in their own Laboratory Medicine learning by setting their rotation objectives with faculty at the start of their elective and following through with a schedule of clinical, laboratory and core lecture conferences. Students will need to obtain the appropriate Pathologists play many roles in medicine, from interpreting surgical staff members' permission for the rotation as follows: dermatopathology biopsies to supervising clinical laboratory testing. It has been estimated (Garth Fraga); neuropathology (Kathy Newell); renal pathology (Timothy that 70% of all medical decisions are based on data generated by Fields); breast pathology (Fang Fan); hepatic pathology (Maura O'Neil). pathology departments. The department of Pathology and Laboratory Prerequisite: Completion of the core clinical clerkships and permission of Medicine at KUMC plays an integral role in the core curriculum and also the faculty. LEC. offers elective courses to medical students interested in learning more about laboratory practice. Students in elective rotations participate in daily teaching conferences and specimen “sign-out” at the University of Kansas Hospital. They receive hands-on exposure to pathology technical methodology in the surgical pathology suite, cytopathology and hematopathology. PAON 920. Molecular Medicine: Approaches & Ethics. 2 Hours. Molecular Medicine: Approaches Ethics is a two semester course for first year MD-PhD students taught by the Director of the MD- PhD Program, with other faculty from the basic science and clinical departments. Through lectures, small group discussion, online modules, evaluation of primary literature, and presentations/discussions with current KUMC faculty, students will be introduced to the process of scientific investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY School of Medicine Pathologists' Assistant
    DUKE UNIVERSITY School of Medicine Pathologists’ Assistant Program Department of Pathology Academic Programs The Department of Pathology at Duke University offers a wide array of training programs to fit individual requirements and goals. The Residency Training program is an ACGME approved program and is available as an Anatomic Pathology/Clinical Pathology combined program, a shorter Anatomic Pathology only program, or an Anatomic Pathology/Neuropathology program. Subspecialty fellowships in Cytopathology, Dermatopathology, Hematopathology, Medical Microbiology, and Neuropathology are also ACGME approved. These programs provide the highest quality of graduate medical education by drawing on the depth and breadth of faculty expertise in the Department in all aspects of anatomic and clinical pathology and the availability of a wide variety of often complex clinical cases seen at Duke University Health System. For medical students interested in a career in Pathology pre-doctoral fellowships, internships and externships are available. Research Training in Experimental pathology can be obtained through Pre- and postdoctoral fellowships of one to five years. All pre-doctoral fellows are candidates for the Ph.D. degree in pathology. The Ph.D. is optional in postdoctoral programs, which provide didactic and research training in various aspects of modern experimental pathology. A two year NAACLS accredited Pathologists’ Assistant Program leads to a Master of Health Science degree, certifies graduates to sit for the ASCP Board of Certification examination, and leads to exciting career opportunities in a variety of anatomic pathology laboratory settings. Pathologists’ assistants are analogous to physician assistants, but with highly specialized training in autopsy and surgical pathology. This profession was pioneered in the Duke Department of Pathology 50 years ago, and is one of only twelve such programs in existence today.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum of the Faculty of Family Medicine
    CURRICULUM OF THE FACULTY OF FAMILY MEDICINE WEST AFRICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter One: Introduction 1.1 Introductory statement 1.2 Needs analysis 1.3 Mission of the Faculty 1.4 Aim and Goals of the Residency Training 1.5 The philosophy. Chapter Two: Pre-Entry (Primary) Syllabus 2.1 Aim of the primary exam 2.2 The Primary syllabus 2.3 The Primary revision course 2.4 The Primary examination Chapter Three: Membership Syllabus 3.1 Goal of the membership training 3.2 Introduction/General structure 3.3 Rotations with durations 3.4 Syllabus for core knowledge 3.5 Syllabus for skills acquisition Chapter Four: Fellowship Syllabus 4.1 Goal of the fellowship training 4.2 Introduction/General structure 4.3 Rotations with durations 4.4 Syllabus for core knowledge 4.5 Syllabus for skills acquisition 4.6 Proposal writing 4.7 Dissertation writing 4.8 Casebook writing Chapter Five: Training institutions and requirements for accreditation 5.1 Accreditation procedure 5.2 Accreditation requirements Chapter Six: Assessments 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Summative Assessments 6.3 Formative Assessments 6.4 Mentorship Appendices CHAPTER ONE – INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introductory statement Family medicine is the medical discipline also known as general practice, general medical practice, family practice, or primary care. It is a discipline which integrates several medical specialties into a new whole. It is concerned with the holistic approach to patient care in which the individual is seen in his totality and in the context of his family and community. The trainees in family medicine should be appropriately equipped to meet the contemporary and future health needs of individuals and families within their practice community.
    [Show full text]