Digital Preservation in Archives: Overview of Current Research and Practices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Digital Preservation in Archives: Overview of Current Research and Practices National Archives of Sweden Digital Preservation in Archives: Overview of Current Research and Practices January 2004 - February 2005 LDB-enheten Raivo Ruusalepp Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 ARCHIVES AS A STAKEHOLDER 1 1.2 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT 3 2. DIGITAL RECORDS IN RECORDS MANAGEMENT...................................................... 5 2.1 GUIDANCE AND CONSULTATION OF RECORDS CREATORS 5 2.2 METADATA USED IN RECORDS MANAGEMENT 9 2.3 DIGITAL SIGNATURES AS RECORDS AUTHENTICATION METHOD 11 2.4 APPRAISAL OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS 12 2.5 CONCLUSION 13 3. FROM AGENCY TO ARCHIVE.......................................................................................... 14 3.1 WHAT TO CAPTURE? 14 3.2 SIGNIFICANT PROPERTIES OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS 15 3.3 TRANSFER OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS AND ITS LEGAL REGULATION 17 3.4 CONCLUSION 18 4. DIGITAL PRESERVATION AND DIGITAL ARCHIVE ................................................. 20 4.1 DIGITAL PRESERVATION STRATEGIES 21 4.1.1 Emulation......................................................................................................... 21 4.1.2 Migration strategies ......................................................................................... 26 4.1.3 Encapsulation................................................................................................... 33 4.1.4 Persistent Objects / Persistent Archives .......................................................... 35 4.2 COMPARING DIGITAL PRESERVATION STRATEGIES – A SMALL SUMMARY 38 4.3 DIGITAL ARCHIVE MODELS AND SYSTEMS 40 4.3.1 The OAIS model.............................................................................................. 40 4.3.2 OAIS model implementations and related projects......................................... 43 4.3.3 Digital repository management systems.......................................................... 47 4.4 DIGITAL PRESERVATION – CONCLUSION 49 5. FROM ARCHIVE TO USERS .............................................................................................. 52 5.1 SIGNIFICANT PROPERTIES 52 5.2 DYNAMIC DOCUMENTS 53 5.3 AUTOMATION OF FINDING AIDS 53 5.4 DIGITISATION OF ARCHIVES’ HOLDINGS 54 5.5 ACCESS TO DIGITAL ARCHIVES – CONCLUSIONS 55 6. CONCLUSION – A LOOK INTO THE FUTURE.............................................................. 57 6.1 COST MODELS FOR DIGITAL ARCHIVING 58 6.2 AUTOMATION AND SCALABILITY OF DIGITAL ARCHIVES 58 6.3 BENCHMARKING 59 6.4 RISK ANALYSIS 59 6.5 PRESERVATION OF WEB AND DYNAMIC RECORDS 59 6.6 METADATA 60 6.7 RECORDS CREATED WITH OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE 60 7. BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................... 63 APPENDIX 1. MATRIX OF DIGITAL PRESERVATION RESEARCH PROJECTS AND RESEARCH TOPICS.......................................................................................................................... 68 1. Introduction “The last decade and a half has produced more records than any previous similar period of human activity. The fact, that the majority of these records is less reliable, retrievable or accessible than ever before, is one of the ironies of the modern information age.”1 Idiosyncratic software systems generate, manage and store digital data using proprietary technologies and media that are not developed to prevent manipulation and that are subject to obsolescence. Therefore, long-term preservation of digital information is plagued by storage media short lifespan, obsolete hardware and software, proprietary file formats, defunct technologies and web sites. Indeed, the majority of computer products and services on the market today did not exist five years ago.2 The essence of the “problem” with digital preservation is the lack of proven methods to ensure that the digital information will continue to exist, that we will be able to access this information using the available technology tools, or that any accessible information is authentic and reliable. The last twenty five years have seen vigorous research into issues of digital preservation: technological obsolescence, storage media fragility, the manipulability of electronic systems that challenge our capacity of guaranteeing the long-term preservation, and the authenticity of electronic records. The formidable body of literature that has accumulated on the topic is divided between (sometimes-conflicting) suggestions: • to study and understand the technological context of electronic records in each individual case; • that the preservation of authenticity of records over time should be based on requirements and procedures that are independent of specific technological contexts; • to use platform-independent and open, standardised file formats for preservation; • to emulate the original technological environment on future technology platforms; • to migrate the records into formats suitable for access on current platforms; • preserve the contents of digital records on paper or microfilm; • etc. Practical implementations of these (theoretical) suggestions by archives are twofold: on the level of policies and strategies; and ad hoc practical solutions where time for planning has been short. Rarely have the two been joined into a whole, as the following report testifies, with insufficient funding often cited as the main cause. Resources devoted to preservation of electronic records within archival institutions have not been commensurate with the task. Policy and strategy are fine, but without implementation they are not worth very much.3 Implementation is arguably the greatest unresolved issue of digital preservation, and the most difficult to deliver, because it involves major resources, compliant organisations, dedicated management and appropriately skilled staff. Archivists have sometimes felt that they are expected to provide answers and solutions to problems that outstretch their capabilities. 1.1 Archives as a stakeholder Naturally, archives are but one interest group involved in finding solutions to the questions of long-term digital preservation – librarians, science communities, cultural heritage, businesses 1 L. Duranti, ’From Here to Eternity’: Concepts and Principles for the Management of Electronic Records (1999), p. 1 2 S.S. Chen, The Paradox of Digital Preservation (2001), p. 2 3 G. O’Shea, Research issues in Australian approaches to policy development (1997), p. 253 1 and government agencies, technology industry, medical institutions and many others are seeking to overcome the same problems with technology obsolescence and extending usability of digital data that depends on this technology. Many of these stakeholders have their specific requirements and correspondingly a specific angle to the digital preservation problem. For many years, different interest groups have worked on their theories and solutions separately, but in recent years, different communities have started to co-operate again and the results of this are beginning to emerge. The specific needs of different stakeholders have also become clearer and better defined through this co-operation, and this includes archives. For archives, public or private, the provision of their “traditional” services of providing long- term access to authentic and usable records, has become considerably more complicated through the use of digital technology. And in developing their “new”, digital services, the archives have to bear in mind their own stakeholders who have different interests. For example: • The users of archives Who have ever rising expectations to the access to resources in archives: access should be electronic, rapid, precise and preferably on-line. • The records’ creators Who have invested into technical infrastructure for creating records electronically and who clearly want that functionality of their records maintained also in the archives and for the long term. • The society in general Digital records form part of the society’s memory and need to be kept for future generations as a proof and sign of our time and generation. • The heritage industry In general public perception archives are often grouped together with ‘heritage organisations’ or ‘memory organisations’, alongside with libraries, museums and other institutions that “do preservation”. Many archives are making various collections accessible to the general public on-line through their digitisation programmes. Digitised material, even if created only for providing access to digital copies of original materials, tends to increase the need for digital preservation in the archives. • Technology Technology that keeps developing and changing and making the archivists’ task of preserving access to digital resources easier and more difficult at the same time. First serious attempts to air the archivists’ concerns with the technology development to the ICT industry were made by the DLM-Forum4 and were met with a supportive response.5 • Fundmakers Archivists and records managers need to constantly convince their paymasters that the solutions they are suggesting offer a good return on investment. Archives have occasionally suffered a temporary “loss of voice” because the answers to all the problems with managing and preserving digital records are not easy to find, particularly in a situation where the solutions sought by governments have to be clearly defined, cheap to implement, easy to use and reliable for long-term. These answers and solutions are only 4
Recommended publications
  • Bestandsstrategieën Nationaal Archief
    Bestandsstrategieën Nationaal Archief VERSIE 1.0 Datum 15-11-2016 Status Definitief Definitief | Bestandsstrategieën | 16-11-2016 Colofon Projectnaam Ontwikkelen duurzaamheidsstrategieën Projectleider(s) Remco van Veenendaal Contactpersoon R. van Veenendaal T +31 6 29 45 19 51 F +31-70-331 5477 [email protected] Postbus 90520 | 2509 LM Den Haag Auteurs R. van Veenendaal, Pepijn Lucker Versie 1.0 Bijlage(n) Pagina 2 van 46 Definitief | Bestandsstrategieën | 16-11-2016 Inhoud Colofon—2 1 Inleiding—6 2 Doel en resultaat—7 2.1 Doel—7 2.2 Doelgroep—7 2.3 Resultaat—7 3 Bestandsstrategieën—7 3.1 Algemene uitgangspunten—7 3.2 Opbouw hoofdstukken—10 4 TIFF—11 4.1 Algemene informatie—11 4.2 Risico-inventarisatie—12 4.2.1 Extensies—12 4.2.2 Specifieke kleurruimtes—12 4.2.3 Softwareondersteuning multipage-TIFF-bestanden—12 4.2.4 Beperkte detectie van corruptie of beschadiging—13 4.2.5 Ter info: black pixel detector—13 4.2.6 LZW-compressie—13 4.3 Evaluatie—13 4.4 Ondersteuning in het e-Depot—13 4.4.1 Formaten—13 4.4.2 Migration Pathways—14 4.4.3 Software en Tools—14 4.5 Alternatieven—14 4.6 Voorgestelde strategie—16 5 E-mail—17 5.1 Algemene informatie—17 5.2 Risico-inventarisatie—18 5.2.1 Opslag—18 5.3 Evaluatie—19 5.4 Alternatieven—19 5.5 Ondersteuning in het e-Depot—19 5.5.1 Herkenning van Outlook-, Gmail- en Notes-mailboxen—19 5.5.2 Formaten—19 5.5.3 Migration Pathways—20 5.5.4 Software en Tools—20 5.6 Voorgestelde strategie—20 6 Portable Document Format (PDF)—21 7 Portable Document Format Archivable (PDF/A)—23 7.1 Algemene
    [Show full text]
  • INST 785 Section 0101 Documentation, Collection, and INST 785 Appraisal of Records Spring 2020
    Course Syllabus – INST 785 Section 0101 Documentation, Collection, and INST 785 Appraisal of Records Spring 2020 Course Description Dr. Eric Hung he / him / his Appraisal is considered to be the archivist’s “first responsibility.” The [email protected] responsibility is “first” because appraisal comes first in the sequence of archival functions and thus influences all subsequent archival activities, and it is “first” in importance because appraisal determines what tiny sliver of Class Meetings: the total human documentary production will actually become “archives” Tuesdays, 6:00-8:45pm and thus a part of society’s history and collective memory. The archivist is HBK 0105 thereby actively shaping the future’s history of our own times. Office Hours The topic of appraisal remains one of considerable controversy in archives. ELMS Chat Office Hours: The archival literature includes debates over the definitions and indicators Mondays, 2:00-3:00pm, of long-term value, the purpose of appraisal, who intervenes in appraisal or by appointment. If you decisions, when in the information life cycle do they intervene, and which want to meet in-person, I methods work for which types of records and which types of organizations. am generally on campus The literature is replete with tensions between the theory and practice of on Tuesdays. appraisal and between questions of universalism versus specificity (by type of record, media, type of organization, time period, country, etc.). Syllabus Policy One of the problems with the literature on appraisal is that there are few This syllabus is a guide for methods for rigorously evaluating the feasibility or effectiveness of different the course and is subject appraisal methodologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Archiving 2016 Preliminary Program
    M ARCHIVING2016 A April 19-22, 2016 • Washington, DC R G www.imaging.org/archiving General Chair: Kari Smith, O MIT Libraries, Institute Archives and Special Collections R P Y R A N I M I L E R P Sponsored by the Society for Imaging Science and Technology April 19-22, 2016 • Washington, DC About the Conference The IS&T Archiving Conference brings together provides a forum to explore new strategies an international community of imaging experts and policies, and reports on successful projects and technicians as well as curators, managers, that can serve as benchmarks in the field. and researchers from libraries, archives, mu- Archiving 2016 is a blend of short courses, seums, records management repositories, in- invited focal papers, keynote talks, and formation technology institutions, and com- peer-reviewed oral and interactive display mercial enterprises to explore and discuss the presentations, offering attendees a unique field of digitization of cultural heritage and opportunity for gaining and exchanging archiving. The conference presents the latest knowledge and building networks among research results on digitization and curation, professionals. Cooperating Societies • American Institute for Conservation Foundation of the American Institute for Conservation (AIC) • ALCTS Association for Library Collections & Technical Services • Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) • Digital Library Federation at CLIR . • Digital Preservation Coalition (DPC) s e g o • IOP/Printing & Graphics Science Group V h p o t s • ISCC – Inter-Society Color Council i r h C • Museum Computer Network (MCN) : o t o h • The Royal Photographic Society P Short courses offer an intimate setting to gain more in-depth knowledge about technical aspects of digital archiving.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Society Archives
    OSA book OSA / Publications OPEN SOCIETY ARCHIVES Open Society Archives Edited by Leszek Pudlowski and Iván Székely Published by the Open Society Archives at Central European University Budapest 1999 Copyright ©1999 by the Open Society Archives at Central European University, Budapest English Text Editor: Andy Haupert ISBN 963 85230 5 0 Design by Tamás Harsányi Printed by Gábor Rózsa Printing House, Budapest on Niveus acid-free offset printing paper of 90g/m2 produced by Neusiedler Szolnok Paper Mill, Hungary. This paper meets the requirements of ISO9706 standard. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I. The coordinates of the Archives The enemy-archives (István Rév) 14 Archival parasailing (Trudy Huskamp Peterson) 20 Access to archives: a political issue (Charles Kecskeméti) 24 The Open Society Archives: a brief history (András Mink) 30 CHAPTER II. The holdings Introduction 38 http://www.osaarchivum.org/files/1999/osabook/BookText.htm[31-Jul-2009 08:07:32] OSA book COMMUNISM AND COLD WAR 39 Records of the Research Institute of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty 39 • The Archives in Munich (András Mink) 39 • Archival arrangement and structure of the records of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Research Institute (Leszek Pud½owski) 46 • The Information Resources Department 49 The East European Archives 49 Records of the Bulgarian Unit (Olga Zaslavskaya) 49 Records of the Czechoslovak Unit (Pavol Salamon) 51 Records of the Hungarian Unit (Csaba Szilágyi) 55 Records of the Polish Unit (Leszek Pud½owski) 58 Records of the Polish Underground Publications Unit
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Data Archive and Preservation in the Cloud – What to Do and What Not to Do 2 © 2013 Storage Networking Industry Association
    DigitalPRESENTATION Data Archive TITLE and GOES PreservationHERE in the Cloud - What To Do and What Not To Do Chad Thibodeau / Cleversafe Sebastian Zangaro / HP SNIA Legal Notice The material contained in this tutorial is copyrighted by the SNIA unless otherwise noted. Member companies and individual members may use this material in presentations and literature under the following conditions: Any slide or slides used must be reproduced in their entirety without modification The SNIA must be acknowledged as the source of any material used in the body of any document containing material from these presentations. This presentation is a project of the SNIA Education Committee. Neither the author nor the presenter is an attorney and nothing in this presentation is intended to be, or should be construed as legal advice or an opinion of counsel. If you need legal advice or a legal opinion please contact your attorney. The information presented herein represents the author's personal opinion and current understanding of the relevant issues involved. The author, the presenter, and the SNIA do not assume any responsibility or liability for damages arising out of any reliance on or use of this information. NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. Digital Data Archive and Preservation in the Cloud – What to do and What Not to Do 2 © 2013 Storage Networking Industry Association. All Rights Reserved. 2 Abstract Cloud Archive Challenges and Best Practices This session will appeal to Storage Vendors, Datacenter Managers, Developers, and those seeking a basic understanding of how best to implement a Cloud Storage Digital Data Archive and Cloud Storage Digital Data Preservation service.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Small Scale Academic Web Archiving: DACHS
    10 Small Scale Academic Web Archiving: DACHS Hanno E. Lecher Leiden University [email protected] 10.1 Why Small Scale Academic Archiving? Considering the complexities of Web archiving and the demands on hard- and software as well as on expertise and personnel, one wonders whether such projects are only feasible for large scale institutions such as national libraries, or whether smaller institutions such as museums, university depart- ments and the like would also be able to perform the tasks required for a Web archive with long-term perspective. Even if the answer to this is yes, the question remains whether this is necessary at all. One could think that the Internet Archive in combination with the efforts of the increasing number of national libraries is already covering many, if not most relevant Web resources. Does academic or other small scale Web archiving make sense at all? Let me begin with this second question. The Internet Archive has done groundbreaking work as the first initiative attempting comprehensive archiv- ing of Web resources. Its success in accomplishing this has been revolution- ary, and it has laid the foundation on which many other projects have built their work. Still, examining what the Internet Archive and other holistic pro- jects1 can achieve it is easy to discover some limitations. Since their focus of collection is very broad, they have to rely on robots for a large part of their collecting activities, automatically grabbing as many Web pages as possible. This kind of capturing is often very superficial, missing parts located further down the tree, many pages being downloaded incompletely, and some file types as well as the hidden Web being ignored altogether.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection in Web Archives: the Value of Archival Best Practices
    WITTENBERG: SELECTION IN WEB ARCHIVES Selection in Web Archives: The Value of Archival Best Practices Jamie Wittenberg, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States of America Abstract: The abundance of valuable material available online has mobilized the development of preservation initiatives at collecting institutions that aim to capture and contextualize web content. Web archiving selection criteria are driven by the limitations inherent in harvesting technologies. Observing core archival principles like provenance and original order when establishing collection development policies for web content will help to ensure that archives continue to assure the authenticity of the materials they steward. Keywords: Web Archives; Archival Theory; Digital Libraries; Internet Content; Selection and Appraisal Introduction The abundance of valuable material available online has mobilized the development of preservation initiatives at collecting institutions that aim to capture and contextualize web content. Methodologies for web collection practices are institution and collection-specific. Among institutions charged with preserving cultural heritage, web archiving has become commonplace. However, the disparity between institutional selection and appraisal criteria reveals the absence of standardization for web archive establishment. The Australian web archive, for example, accessions content that it evaluates as having long-term research value. The Library of Congress web archive, represented by its Minerva team, established a collection
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Tape and Cloud Storage for Long-Term Data Preservation 1
    Comparing Tape and Cloud Storage for Long-Term Data Preservation November 2018 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Perceptions of Leading Edge Technology ..................................................................................................... 2 Reliability ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Security ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Speed ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Storing Data .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Retrieving Data ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Data Growth .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Redundancy .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER February 2012
    NEWSLETTER February 2012 Contents Universal Declaration on Archives adopted by UNESCO………………………….2 APEnet Liaison group ……………………………………………………………………2 EURBICA activities……………………..................................................…4 Hungarian Presidency of the EU………………………….…………………………….5 Polish Presidency of the EU ………………………….………………………………11 UNESCO Conference of the Memory of the World Programme ………………...13 DLM Forum Triennial Conference in Brussels……………………………………..15 1 Universal Declaration on Archives adopted by UNESCO Declaration, adopted unanimously by Annual General Meeting in Oslo (on 17 September 2010) by the ICA delegates officially become one of the core pillars in ICA's advocacy policy. This year the Declaration was officially endorsed also by the UNESCO in the plenary session on 10 November 2011. The Universal Declaration on Archives is currently available in 20 languages on ICA web page (Arabic, Catalan, Chinese, Croatian, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hungarian, Icelandic, Italian, Japanese, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovenian, Spanish, Welsh) and was developed by ICA/SPA (Section of Professional Associations) on the model of the "Déclaration québécoise des Archives”.This is an important step in improving public understanding of archives, since it provides a splendid opportunity to raise still further awareness of archives among the general public and key decision-makers. The Declaration is a powerful succinct statement of the relevance of archives in modern society. It emphasizes the key role of archives in administrative transparency and democratic accountability, as well as the preservation of collective social memory. The Declaration repositions effective archives management as an essential function which underpins modern public administration, good practice in private business, and ready access to information by citizens. The first version of the Declaration was written by archivists in Québec in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Programme
    Preliminary Programme DLM Forum Member Meeting 28-29th November 2018 Vienna, Austria The Austrian States Archives are pleased to invite members of the DLM Forum to the Mem- ber Meeting in Vienna on the 28th and 29th of November, 2018. The venue of the meeting is the Conference Hall of the Austrian State Archives (Notten- dorfer Gasse 2, 1030 Vienna). The Archives are situated only 5 stops by underground from the City Center. During the conference, Vienna will be in the middle of the holiday season. The city comes alive with lights, music, Christmas Markets and more. If you are considering a long weekend in Vienna, you might enjoy the magical Christmas spirit and get some gifts at its great shop- ping boulevards. The Christmas markets are selling traditional food, mulled wine and hand crafted goods and are loved by both locals and tourists alike. Please visit DLM Forum website and register If you have any questions, please contact Ms Beatrix Horvath at [email protected] See you in Vienna! Wednesday 28th November CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION AND NEW SOLUTIONS FOR DIGITAL DATA 11:45 – 12:20 Registration and coffee / tea 12:20 – 12:30 Welcome Chair: Jan Dalsten Sørensen Jan Dalsten Sørensen, Welcome from the chair of the DLM Forum and Chair of the DLM Forum the Austrian State Archives Mrs. Karin Holzer, Austrian State Archives Chair: Jonas Kerschner, Austrian 13:30 – 14:30 Session I, Interactive session States Archives J. Dalsten Sørensen, Danish National Archives, Denmark Meet the new eArchiving Building Block Mrs. Manuela Speiser, European
    [Show full text]
  • Yale University Library Preservation Department
    Yale University Library Preservation Department 45th Annual Report July 2015-June 2016 Roberta Pilette January 17, 2016 Preservation Department Annual Rpt FY2016 1 Yale University Library Preservation Department 45th Annual Report July 2015-June 2016 Roberta Pilette, Director of Preservation and Chief Preservation Officer Murray Harrison, Senior Administrative Assistant Preservation Staffing: July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016 Positions budgeted: C&T 11.00 11.00 M&P 10.47 11.00 Positions filled: C&T 9.00 11.00 M&P 10.47 11.00 OVERVIEW OF THE DEPARTMENT The Yale University Library Preservation Department is responsible for the long-term preservation of all library materials. The Department consists of four units—Preservation Services; Digital Reformatting & Microfilm Services (DRMS); Conservation & Exhibition Services (CES) including Collections Conservation & Housing (CCH), Special Collections Conservation (SCC) and Exhibit Production Support (EPS); and Digital Preservation Services. The Department organizational chart can be found in Appendix I, the annual statistics for the Department can be found in Appendix II. 344 Winchester moving & more construction The construction of that portion of the department associated with the Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript (BRBL) Technical Services construction was completed during the first quarter of FY16. The move for Preservation Administration, Preservation Services, and Digital Preservation Services took place in August 2015. Those moves went smoothly and the units settled into the new spaces. Digital Preservation Services moved all of their equipment into their new spaces and spent the year making significant use of the enlarged work areas. Digital Preservation and the Born Digital Working group collaborated on the specifications for the new di Bonaventura Digital Archeology and Preservation laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Foreign Periodicals LESTER K
    Abstracts of Foreign Periodicals LESTER K. BORN, Editor Library of Congress Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/27/2/298/2744602/aarc_27_2_a138372207p60440.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 DENMARK Nordisk Arkivnyt, VOL. 7 (1962), NO. 2. Staten overtager Erhvervsarkivet (The state takes over the business archives). P. 21-22. The business archives organized privately 20 years ago in Aarhus, now boasting about 6,000 running meters of archives and a library of about 19,000 volumes, were taken over by the state on October 1, 1962. The core of the collection consists of deposits from nationwide economic organizations, but there have been accessions also from numerous smaller private enterprises. The law authorizing this transfer to public administration provides for a board of five to seven members, including the national archivist and two or three representatives each from the business world and from the universities. A chief archivist administers the institution and is a nonvoting member of the board. Financial support is guaranteed by law and is to be provided for in the regular budget. The archives may also solicit private support for special projects and for the increase of its research funds. Centraladministrationens journaliseringsproblemer (Inventory problems of the central administration). P. 22. The Ministry for Archival Affairs has called attention to the need for revision of inventorying methods to insure a speedier system of disposal of the archives of the central administration. Dacia og Rhodos (Dacia and Rhodos). P. 22. Short review of a work found in the estate of Th. Hatt Olsen, which was published posthumously by colleagues in the National Archives at Copenhagen.
    [Show full text]