DOCSLIB.ORG

THESIS IMPROVED STICK NUMBER UPPER BOUNDS Submitted by Thomas D. Eddy Department of Mathematics in Partial Fulfillment of the Re

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THESIS IMPROVED STICK NUMBER UPPER BOUNDS Submitted by Thomas D. Eddy Department of Mathematics in Partial Fulfillment of the Re THESIS IMPROVED STICK NUMBER UPPER BOUNDS Submitted by Thomas D. Eddy Department of Mathematics In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2019 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Clayton Shonkwiler Henry Adams Hamid Chitsaz Copyright by Thomas D. Eddy 2019 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT IMPROVED STICK NUMBER UPPER BOUNDS A stick knot is a mathematical knot formed by a chain of straight line segments. For a knot K, define the stick number of K, denoted stick(K), to be the minimum number of straight edges necessary to form a stick knot which is equivalent to K. Stick number is a knot invariant whose precise value is unknown for the large majority of knots, although theoretical and observed bounds exist. There is a natural correspondence between stick knots and polygons in R3. Previous research has attempted to improve observed stick number upper bounds by computationally generating such polygons and identifying the knots that they form. This thesis presents a new variation on this method which generates equilateral polygons in tight confinement, thereby increasing the incidence of polygons forming complex knots. Our generation strategy is to sample from the space of confined polygons by leveraging the toric symplectic structure of this space. An efficient sampling algorithm based on this structure is described. This method was used to discover the precise stick number of knots 935, 939, 943, 945, and 948. In addition, the best-known stick number upper bounds were improved for 60 other knots with crossing number ten and below. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The foremost person I must thank for helping me complete this thesis is my advisor, Clay Shonkwiler. He is responsible for suggesting this interesting and fruitful topic for my master’s thesis. Our many hours of discussion have always been insightful and enjoyable. Clay’s guidance has been invaluable thus far in my graduate education. I am indebted to Harrison Chapman for generously aiding me on several occasions. With- out his help debugging code, there are many points where this research could have stalled. Thanks also for critiquing an early version of a talk, being a source of random polygon knowledge, and giving advice about academic life. I’m also grateful to Jason Cantarella for giving me access to the plCurve project repos- itory. Allowing me to branch the project made the results of this thesis possible. I would be remiss if I didn’t mention Colin Roberts and Brenden Balch who are always willing to talk about geometry with me. Plenty of the things I understand about symplectic geometry have come from grappling with these ideas at Colin’s whiteboard. Additionally, they provided thoughtful feedback on the first draft of this thesis. Finally, I am appreciative for the tremendous amount of love and support that my parents continue to share with me. A phone call with them is often the perfect antidote to a frustrating day. iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to Juanita Duque Rosero. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT . ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . iii DEDICATION . iv LIST OF FIGURES . vi Chapter 1 Introduction . 1 Chapter 2 Background . 3 2.1 Knot Theory . 3 2.2 Symplectic Geometry . 20 Chapter 3 Generating Random Polygons in Confinement . 25 3.1 The Space of Confined Equilateral Polygons . 25 3.2 Algorithm for Sampling Confined Polygon Space . 31 Chapter 4 Results . 36 4.1 Methodology . 37 4.2 Improved Stick Number Bounds . 40 4.3 Further Questions . 44 Bibliography . 47 Appendix A Stick Number Bounds . 51 A.1 Upper Bounds for Small Crossing-Number Knots . 52 A.2 Upper Bounds for Large Crossing-Number Knots . 58 Appendix B Knot Frequency Counts . 68 B.1 Frequency of Knots Generated in Confinement . 69 Appendix C Coordinates of Discovered Stick Knots . 96 C.1 9-Stick Knots . 97 C.2 10-Stick Knots . 98 C.3 11-Stick Knots . 115 Appendix D Index . 173 v LIST OF FIGURES 2.1 Trefoil knot with knot diagram . 4 2.2 Trefoil knot deformation . 5 2.3 Reidemeister moves . 6 2.4 Stick knot . 7 2.5 Knot composition . 8 2.6 Torus knot . 9 2.7 Torus knot diagrams . 9 2.8 Simple knots . 11 2.9 Trefoil knot decomposition . 13 2.10 Vector field on R2 generated by translation . 22 2.11 Vector field on S2 generated by a Hamiltonian action . 23 3.1 Fan triangulation coordinates . 27 3.2 Pol3(6) polytope . 28 3.3 Polygon in rooted confinement . 29 d 3.4 Pol3,1(6) polytope . 30 3.5 TSMCMC polytope update step . 33 d 4.1 Equilateral 9-stick knots . 41 4.2 Equilateral 10-stick 10147 knot . 42 4.3 Equilateral 10- and 11-stick knots . 43 vi Chapter 1 Introduction The stick number of a knot K is the least number of straight sticks which can be chained together to form K. This number is a knot invariant which has been studied since at least the 1990’s [33]. Although the invariant can be easily and intuitively defined, relatively little is known about the precise stick number for most knot types. Prior to this thesis, stick number was known for only 31 of the 250 knots with crossing number ten or fewer, as can be observed in Section A.1. Nonetheless, various theoretical and observed bounds for stick number exist. Many of the stick numbers which are known precisely have come from lowering the observed upper bounds until they became equivalent to the theoretical lower bounds. The most successful reductions in observed upper bounds have typically come from computational means, as in [34]. This thesis presents a new computational method for further reducing observed stick number upper bounds. Our strategy starts by considering stick knots as polygons in three- dimensional space. We try to randomly generate many such n-gons hoping that we will observe a sample forming a knot whose best-known stick number upper bound is greater than n. If so, this sample represents an improvement to the upper bound. We do not naively sample polygons, however. We consider an enriched sample of polygons in spherical confinement. Intuitively, sampling from the space of confined polygons should increase the chance that the samples form more complex knots. As we can observe in Appendix B, the formation of complex knots is still rare in con- finement; trivial knots predominate. Even so, sampling in this way does increase our odds of observing complex knots. Indeed, this method proved very effective at improving stick number upper bounds. After sampling 40 billion stick knots from the space of confined 1 polygons, we were able to improve the best-known bounds of 65 knots with crossing number ten and below. Moreover, these reductions in upper bounds contributed to the discovery of the precise stick number of five knots. A full summary of results is presented in Chapter 4. Chapter 2 provides definitions, background, and previous results relevant to the text. The chapter starts with a self-contained introduction to knot theory, focusing on the stick number invariant and methods for identifying knots. A review of selected topics from sym- plectic geometry follows. This material is necessary to describe the algorithm used to sample confined polygon space. Chapter 3 details the algorithm, originally proposed in [13], we used to generate confined random polygons. This algorithm is based on the toric symplectic structure of confined polygon space. The chapter begins by describing this structure and the special properties it confers. The remainder of the chapter is devoted to a description of the algorithm, including pseudo-code. The goal is for the reader to be able to understand and implement the algorithm based on this description. The final chapter presents the new stick number results mentioned above. In the first section we discuss the exact methodology used to generate polygons and identify their knot type. The main results of the thesis follow. The text concludes with a discussion of remaining questions and open problems. Additional avenues of research are suggested. Detailed appendices are also included with the text. Appendix A contains tables listing the best-known upper bounds on stick number. All knots with crossing number ten and below are included, as well as bounds for selected knots with more crossings. Appendix B lists the frequency counts of sampled n-gons. Appendix C contains vertex coordinates for each knot type for which an improved bound was discovered. Finally, an index of important terms is available in Appendix D. 2 Chapter 2 Background In order to understand the polygon generation algorithm described in Chapter 3 and give context to the results presented in Chapter 4, we first review some prerequisite concepts. This material falls roughly into two disciplines: knot theory and symplectic geometry. Section 2.1 gives a self-contained introduction to the topics in knot theory which are referenced later in this thesis. Specifically, the section will cover: basic concepts and def- initions; important classes of knots; knot invariants; and previous results related to stick number. Stick knots are the essential objects of study in this thesis and thus it is important for the reader to have a clear understanding of this material. In contrast, the overview of relevant symplectic geometry concepts provided in Section 2.2 is briefer. This is due to the fact that these ideas are less central to the results of this thesis and because they require substantial background knowledge. Indeed, an understanding of the fundamentals of differential geometry is assumed. This section is included because it is necessary to understand the algorithm for randomly sampling confined polygons presented in Chapter 3. If the reader is only interested in the Chapter 4 results, then this section can safely be skipped.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Khovanov Homology of Rational Tangles
    The Khovanov Homology of Rational Tangles Benjamin Thompson A thesis submitted for the degree of Bachelor of Philosophy with Honours in Pure Mathematics of The Australian National University October, 2016 Dedicated to my family. Even though they’ll never read it. “To feel fulfilled, you must first have a goal that needs fulfilling.” Hidetaka Miyazaki, Edge (280) “Sleep is good. And books are better.” (Tyrion) George R. R. Martin, A Clash of Kings “Let’s love ourselves then we can’t fail to make a better situation.” Lauryn Hill, Everything is Everything iv Declaration Except where otherwise stated, this thesis is my own work prepared under the supervision of Scott Morrison. Benjamin Thompson October, 2016 v vi Acknowledgements What a ride. Above all, I would like to thank my supervisor, Scott Morrison. This thesis would not have been written without your unflagging support, sublime feedback and sage advice. My thesis would have likely consisted only of uninspired exposition had you not provided a plethora of interesting potential topics at the start, and its overall polish would have likely diminished had you not kept me on track right to the end. You went above and beyond what I expected from a supervisor, and as a result I’ve had the busiest, but also best, year of my life so far. I must also extend a huge thanks to Tony Licata for working with me throughout the year too; hopefully we can figure out what’s really going on with the bigradings! So many people to thank, so little time. I thank Joan Licata for agreeing to run a Knot Theory course all those years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Knots, Links, Spatial Graphs, and Algebraic Invariants
    689 Knots, Links, Spatial Graphs, and Algebraic Invariants AMS Special Session on Algebraic and Combinatorial Structures in Knot Theory AMS Special Session on Spatial Graphs October 24–25, 2015 California State University, Fullerton, CA Erica Flapan Allison Henrich Aaron Kaestner Sam Nelson Editors American Mathematical Society 689 Knots, Links, Spatial Graphs, and Algebraic Invariants AMS Special Session on Algebraic and Combinatorial Structures in Knot Theory AMS Special Session on Spatial Graphs October 24–25, 2015 California State University, Fullerton, CA Erica Flapan Allison Henrich Aaron Kaestner Sam Nelson Editors American Mathematical Society Providence, Rhode Island EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Dennis DeTurck, Managing Editor Michael Loss Kailash Misra Catherine Yan 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 05C10, 57M15, 57M25, 57M27. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Flapan, Erica, 1956- editor. Title: Knots, links, spatial graphs, and algebraic invariants : AMS special session on algebraic and combinatorial structures in knot theory, October 24-25, 2015, California State University, Fullerton, CA : AMS special session on spatial graphs, October 24-25, 2015, California State University, Fullerton, CA / Erica Flapan [and three others], editors. Description: Providence, Rhode Island : American Mathematical Society, [2017] | Series: Con- temporary mathematics ; volume 689 | Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: LCCN 2016042011 | ISBN 9781470428471 (alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Knot theory–Congresses. | Link theory–Congresses. | Graph theory–Congresses. | Invariants–Congresses. | AMS: Combinatorics – Graph theory – Planar graphs; geometric and topological aspects of graph theory. msc | Manifolds and cell complexes – Low-dimensional topology – Relations with graph theory. msc | Manifolds and cell complexes – Low-dimensional topology – Knots and links in S3.msc| Manifolds and cell complexes – Low-dimensional topology – Invariants of knots and 3-manifolds.
    [Show full text]
  • Planar and Spherical Stick Indices of Knots
    PLANAR AND SPHERICAL STICK INDICES OF KNOTS COLIN ADAMS, DAN COLLINS, KATHERINE HAWKINS, CHARMAINE SIA, ROB SILVERSMITH, AND BENA TSHISHIKU Abstract. The stick index of a knot is the least number of line segments required to build the knot in space. We define two analogous 2-dimensional invariants, the planar stick index, which is the least number of line segments in the plane to build a projection, and the spherical stick index, which is the least number of great circle arcs to build a projection on the sphere. We find bounds on these quantities in terms of other knot invariants, and give planar stick and spherical stick constructions for torus knots and for compositions of trefoils. In particular, unlike most knot invariants,we show that the spherical stick index distinguishes between the granny and square knots, and that composing a nontrivial knot with a second nontrivial knot need not increase its spherical stick index. 1. Introduction The stick index s[K] of a knot type [K] is the smallest number of straight line segments required to create a polygonal conformation of [K] in space. The stick index is generally difficult to compute. However, stick indices of small crossing knots are known, and stick indices for certain infinite categories of knots have been determined: Theorem 1.1 ([Jin97]). If Tp;q is a (p; q)-torus knot with p < q < 2p, s[Tp;q] = 2q. Theorem 1.2 ([ABGW97]). If nT is a composition of n trefoils, s[nT ] = 2n + 4. Despite the interest in stick index, two-dimensional analogues have not been studied in depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Bounds for Minimal Step Number of Knots in the Simple Cubic Lattice
    Bounds for minimal step number of knots in the simple cubic lattice R. Schareiny, K. Ishiharaz, J. Arsuagay, Y. Diao¤, K. Shimokawaz and M. Vazquezyx yDepartment of Mathematics San Francisco State University 1600 Holloway Ave San Francisco, CA 94132, USA. zDepartment of Mathematics Saitama University Saitama, 338-8570, Japan. ¤Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of North Carolina Charlotte Charlotte, NC 28223, USA. Abstract. Knots are found in DNA as well as in proteins, and they have been shown to be good tools for structural analysis of these molecules. An important parameter to consider in the arti¯cial construction of these molecules is the minimal number of monomers needed to make a knot. Here we address this problem by characterizing, both analytically and numerically, the minimum length (also called minimum step number) needed to form a particular knot in the simple cubic lattice. Our analytical work is based on an improvement of a method introduced by Diao to enumerate conformations of a given knot type for a ¯xed length. This method allows to extend the previously known result on the minimum step number of the trefoil knot 31 (which is 24) to the knots 41 and 51 and show that the minimum step numbers for the 41 and 51 knots are 30 and 34 respectively. We report on numerical results resulting from a computer implementation of this method. We provide a complete list of estimates of the minimum step numbers for prime knots up to 10 crossings, which are improvements over current published numerical results. We enumerate all minimal lattice knots of a given type and partition them into classes de¯ned by BFACF type 0 moves.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Bounds for Equilateral Stick Numbers
    Contemporary Mathematics Upper Bounds for Equilateral Stick Numbers Eric J. Rawdon and Robert G. Scharein Abstract. We use algorithms in the software KnotPlot to compute upper bounds for the equilateral stick numbers of all prime knots through 10 cross- ings, i.e. the least number of equal length line segments it takes to construct a conformation of each knot type. We find seven knots for which we cannot construct an equilateral conformation with the same number of edges as a minimal non-equilateral conformation, notably the 819 knot. 1. Introduction Knotting and tangling appear in many physical systems in the natural sciences, e.g. in the replication of DNA. The structures in which such entanglement occurs are typically modeled by polygons, that is finitely many vertices connected by straight line segments. Topologically, the theory of knots using polygons is the same as the theory using smooth curves. However, recent research suggests that a degree of rigidity due to geometric constraints can affect the theory substantially. One could model DNA as a polygon with constraints on the edge lengths, the vertex angles, etc.. It is important to determine the degree to which geometric rigidity affects the knotting of polygons. In this paper, we explore some differences in knotting between non-equilateral and equilateral polygons with few edges. One elementary knot invariant, the stick number, denoted here by stick(K), is the minimal number of edges it takes to construct a knot equivalent to K.Richard Randell first explored the stick number in [Ran88b, Ran88a, Ran94a, Ran94b]. He showed that any knot consisting of 5 or fewer sticks must be unknotted and that stick(trefoil) = 6 and stick(figure-8) = 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Stick Number of Spatial Graphs
    STICK NUMBER OF SPATIAL GRAPHS MINJUNG LEE, SUNGJONG NO, AND SEUNGSANG OH Abstract. For a nontrivial knot K, Negami found an upper bound on the stick number s(K) in terms of its crossing number c(K) which is s(K) ≤ 2c(K). Later, Huh and Oh utilized the arc index α(K) to 3 3 present a more precise upper bound s(K) ≤ 2 c(K)+ 2 . Furthermore, Kim, No and Oh found an upper bound on the equilateral stick number s=(K) as follows; s=(K) ≤ 2c(K) + 2. As a sequel to this research program, we similarly define the stick number s(G) and the equilateral stick number s=(G) of a spatial graph G, and present their upper bounds as follows; 3 3b v s(G) ≤ c(G) + 2e + − , 2 2 2 s=(G) ≤ 2c(G) + 2e + 2b − k, where e and v are the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively, b is the number of bouquet cut-components, and k is the number of non-splittable components. 1. Introduction Throughout this paper we work in the piecewise linear category. A graph is a finite set of vertices connected by edges allowing loops and multiple edges. A spatial graph is a graph embedded in R3. We consider two spatial graphs to be the same if they are equivalent under ambient isotopy. A bouquet is a spatial graph consisting of only one vertex and loops. Note that a knot is a spatial graph consisting of a vertex and a loop. A stick spatial graph is a spatial graph which consists of finite line seg- ments, called sticks, as drawn in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Knot Theory Course at the Ium
    THE KNOT THEORY COURSE AT THE IUM Mathematical knot theory studies certain types of curves in Euclidean space R3, namely knots, links, and braids. A knot, roughly speaking, is an oriented closed curve (without self-intersections) in Euclidean space R3 considered up to a natural equivalence relation, called isotopy. Intuitively, you should think of a knot as a thin elastic string that can be stretched, compressed, and moved about in space but may not be cut and glued back. Here are some examples of knots : (a) the unknot or trivial knot; (b) the trefoil; (c) the figure eight knot; (d) the granny knot; (e) the knot known as 52; (f) a knot isotopic to one of the first five (try to guess – which one?). Рис. 1. Examples of knots 1 2 A link, roughly speaking, is a set of several pairwise nonintersecting closed curves in R3 without self-intersections. Intuitively, you should think of a link as several thin elastic strings that can be stretched, compressed, and moved about in space but may not be cut and glued back. Here are some examples of links: (a) the trivial two component link; (b) the Hopf link; (c) the Whitehead link; (d) the Borromeo rings. Рис. 2. Examples of links Roughly speaking, a braid in n strings is an ordered set of pairwise non- intersecting curves moving downward from n aligned points of a horizontal plane to n similarly aligned points of a second horizontal plane. You can think of the strings of a braid as being thin elastic strings can be stretched, compressed, and moved about in space, but may not be cut and glued back.
    [Show full text]
  • Mia Nguyen University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Mathematics
    The Hexagonal Lattice Number of the Figure Eight is 11 2019 Nebraska Conference for Undergraduate Women in Mathematics Mia Nguyen University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Mathematics Quick review of knot theory are able to make some estimates about the stick number of some simple knots. From the cubic model of the knot, we project it Knot theory is a branch of topology that studies three- onto the xyw-plane and transform it to hexagonal lattice. For dimensional manifolds. A mathematical knot is a closed curve the conversion, the angle of 30o at each corner and the minimal that is embedded in 3-dimensional Euclidean space. Two or number of sticks are prominent. more knots combined together are considered as a link. It is not obvious to determine if 2 given knots are equivalent to each other or not. Proving stick number of the figure eight is Definition of hexagonal lattice 11 Hexagonal lattice includes points such that an equilateral trian- gle is formed by every 3 nearby points. There are 4 orientations associated with the lattice, one goes up, one goes to the right, and 2 oblique axes. The simple hexagonal lattice is defined as the point lattice where x = <1, 0, 0>, y = <1/2, 3/2, 0>, w = <0, 0, 1>, and z = y - x. Figure 5: The 52 knot and its projection in the simple hexagonal lattice. The x-stick, y-, z-, and w-sticks are straight line segments that are parallel to directions of x, y, z, and w. Stick number is the In Figure 5, jP jx = 2; jP jy = 4; jP jz = 3; jP jw = 5, and smallest number of edges needed to form a knot.
    [Show full text]
  • New Stick Number Bounds from Random Sampling of Confined Polygons
    New Stick Number Bounds from Random Sampling of Confined Polygons Thomas D. Eddy and Clayton Shonkwiler Department of Mathematics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Abstract The stick number of a knot is the minimum number of segments needed to build a polygonal version of the knot. Despite its elementary definition and relevance to physical knots, the stick number is poorly understood: for most knots we only know bounds on the stick number. We adopt a Monte Carlo approach to finding better bounds, producing very large ensembles of random polygons in tight confinement to look for new examples of knots constructed from few segments. We generated a total of 220 billion random polygons, yielding either the exact stick number or an improved upper bound for more than 40% of the knots with 10 or fewer crossings for which the stick number was not previously known. We summarize the current state of the art in Appendix A, which gives the best known bounds on stick number for all knots up to 10 crossings. 1 Introduction The stick number of a knot is the minimum number of segments needed to create a polygonal version of the knot. The equilateral stick number is defined similarly, though with the added restriction that all the segments should be the same length. Despite their elementary definitions, these invariants are only poorly understood: for example, prior to our work the exact stick number was only known for 30 of the 249 nontrivial knots up to 10 crossings. The sheer simplicity of its definition partially explains the appeal of the stick number as a knot invariant, but the stick number is also interesting as a prototypical geometric or physical knot invariant since the number of segments needed to build a knot is a measure of the geometric complexity of the knot.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2010.04188V1 [Math.GT] 8 Oct 2020 Knot Has Been “Pulled Tight”, Minimizing the Folded Ribbonlength
    RIBBONLENGTH OF FAMILIES OF FOLDED RIBBON KNOTS ELIZABETH DENNE, JOHN CARR HADEN, TROY LARSEN, AND EMILY MEEHAN ABSTRACT. We study Kauffman’s model of folded ribbon knots: knots made of a thin strip of paper folded flat in the plane. The folded ribbonlength is the length to width ratio of such a ribbon knot. We give upper bounds on the folded ribbonlength of 2-bridge, (2; p) torus, twist, and pretzel knots, and these upper bounds turn out to be linear in crossing number. We give a new way to fold (p; q) torus knots, and show that their folded ribbonlength is bounded above by p + q. This means, for example, that the trefoil knot can be constructed with a folded ribbonlength of 5. We then show that any (p; q) torus knot K has a constant c > 0, such that the folded ribbonlength is bounded above by c · Cr(K)1=2, providing an example of an upper bound on folded ribbonlength that is sub-linear in crossing number. 1. INTRODUCTION Take a long thin strip of paper, tie a trefoil knot in it then gently tighten and flatten it. As can be seen in Figure 1, the boundary of the knot is in the shape of a pentagon. This observation is well known in recreational mathematics [4, 21, 34]. L. Kauffman [27] introduced a mathematical model of such a folded ribbon knot. Kauffman viewed the ribbon as a set of rays parallel to a polygo- nal knot diagram with the folds acting as mirrors, and the over-under information appropriately preserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Knot Spectrum of Random Knot Spaces
    Yuanan Diao, Claus Ernst*, Uta Ziegler, and Eric J. Rawdon The Knot Spectrum of Random Knot Spaces Abstract: It is well known that knots exist in natural systems. For example, in the case of (mutant) bacteriophage P4, DNA molecules packed inside the bacteriophage head are considered to be circular since the two sticky ends of the DNA are close to each other. The DNAs extracted from the capsid, without separating the two ends, can pre- serve the topology of the (circular) DNAs, and hence are well-defined knots. Further- more, knots formed within such systems are often varied and different knots occur with different probabilities. Such information can be important in biology. Mathemat- ically, we may view (and model) such a biological system as (by) a random knot space and attempt to obtain information about the system via mathematical analysis and numerical simulation. The question here is to find the probability that a randomly (and uniformly) chosen knot from this space is of a particular knot type. This is equiv- alent to finding the distribution of all knot types within this random knot space (called the knot spectrum in an earlier paper by the authors). In this paper, we examine the behavior of the knot spectrums for knots up to 10 crossings. Using random polygons of various lengths under different confinement conditions as the random knot spaces (model biological systems), we demonstrate that the relative spectrums of the knots, when divided into groups by their crossing numbers, remain surprisingly robust as these knot spaces vary. For a given knot type K, we let PK(L, R) be the probability that an equilateral random polygon of length L in a confinement sphere of radius R has knot type K.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1512.03592V1 [Math.GT] 11 Dec 2015 Httease O H Rtqeto Sngtv O H Knot the for Negative Is [5]
    AN UPPER BOUND ON STICK NUMBERS OF KNOTS YOUNGSIK HUH AND SEUNGSANG OH Abstract. In 1991, Negami found an upper bound on the stick number s(K) of a nontrivial knot K in terms of the minimal crossing number c(K) of the knot which is s(K) ≤ 2c(K). s K 3 c K K In this paper we improve this upper bound to ( ) ≤ 2 ( ( ) + 1). Moreover if is a s K 3 c K non-alternating prime knot, then ( ) ≤ 2 ( ). 1. Introduction A simple closed curve embedded into the Euclidean 3-space is called a knot. Two knots K and K′ are said to be equivalent, if there exists an orientation preserving homeomorphism of R3 which maps K to K′, or to say roughly, we can obtain K′ from K by a sequence of moves without intersecting any strand of the knot. And the equivalence class of K is called the knot type of K. A knot equivalent to another knot in a plane of the 3-space is said to be trivial. A stick knot is a knot which consists of finite line segments, called sticks. One natural question concerning stick knots may be the stick number s(K) of a knot K which is defined to be the minimal number of sticks for construction of the knot type into a stick knot. Since this representation of knots has been considered to be a useful mathematical model of cyclic molecules or molecular chains, the stick number may be an interesting quantity not only in knot theory of mathematics, but also in chemistry and physics.
    [Show full text]