Mpemba Effect, Shechtman's Quasicrystals and Students
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Mpemba Effect, Shechtman's Quasicrystals following example: If we take two equal water and Students’ Exploring Activities samples differing only by their temperatures, place them in identical containers that are left to Authors: cool in the same way, is it possible that warmer MAREK BALÁŽOVIČ water freezes first? Hronská 3, Zvolen, Slovakia, Mpemba was an ordinary African high school [email protected], student in the 1960s. An interesting freezing phenomenon of hot water was first observed in Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, connection with making ice cream. He noticed Slovakia that when he placed hot milk mixed with sugar (ice cream mixture) into the freezer, it would freeze in a shorter time compared to when he had BORIS TOMÁŠIK allowed the mixture to cool before. Mpemba Tajovského 40, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia asked his physics teacher about the cause of this, but the teacher responded to him that he had made [email protected] a mistake and that this phenomenon cannot have Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, occured. Later, Mpemba found that faster freezing Slovakia of hot milk was known among ice cream producers, who prepared their products more quickly by this method. Therefore he started Abstract experiments with cooling again. He found that hot In the 1960s, Tanzanian student Erasto Mpemba ice cream mixture not only freezes faster, but that and his teacher published an article with the title it applies to water as well. Initial temperature “Cool” in the journal Physics Education difference was significant. Water hotter than 90 ° (Mpemba, E. B. – Osborne, D. G.: Cool?. In: C freezes faster than water with initially room Physics Education, vol.4, 1969, pp. 172-175.). In temperature in the same conditions. this article they claimed that hot water freezes faster than cold water. The article raised not only a wave of discussions, and other articles about Didactic message this topic, but also a whole series of new experiments, which should verify this apparent Mpemba repeatedly demanded an explanation thermodynamic absurdity and find an adequate from his teacher. But the teacher still insisted that explanation. Here we give a review with the phenomenon cannot have occurred. If references to explanations and we bring some Mpemba would have been satisfied with the claim proposals for experimental student work in this of his teacher and become a passive recipient of area. We introduce Mpemba Effect not only as a educational explanations, everything would have paradoxical physics phenomenon, but we shall been probably fully forgotten soon. However, he present a strong educational message that the remained active in seeking answers to actual Mpemba story brings to the teachers and their observation and his researching activities despite students. This message also creates a bridge rejection and ridicule by his classmates and between this phenomenon and the discovery for teachers. Several months later, he met with Dr. which the 2011 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was Osborne, a university physics teacher who visited awarded. It leads to critical adoption of Mpemba’s high school. Mpemba took the traditional knowledge and encourages resilience opportunity and asked his unanswered question. in investigative exploration of new things. Dr. Osborne didn’t reject Mpemba’s observation a priori and decided to explore it. In his laboratory experiments he also found that warmer water Introduction freezed faster in some cases. The previous It is not hard to give positive answer to the observations were confirmed. question if hot water can freeze faster than cold By its character, Mpemba’s story closely water. For example, if we let a drop of hot water resembles the discovery story of the Israeli Daniel and a bucket of cold water cool in the same Shechtman. Shechtman discovered quasicrystals freezer, it is clear that a drop of hot water freezes for which he was awarded the 2011 Nobel Prize in sooner. Likewise, hot water in the freezer freezes Chemistry. He became a target of criticism by sooner than cold water which we have poured out fellow scientists and wider professional and let it cool just in a warm summer night. So the community after the announcement of his question shall be formulated more precisely in the discovery in 1982. Head of science department where he worked even put Shechtman in a Shechtman’s discovery of quasicrystals does not position, where persisting on his quasicrystal have such a far-reaching history as Mpemba discover meant losing his job. Shechtman, like Effect. It is also due to the methods of examining Mpemba, insisted on his observations and failed the diffraction pattern of crystals, which are not so to respond to textbook precepts. He let other old. However, it is very interesting, that what crystallographers verify his observations helped the scientists to understand distribution of independently. When observations were atoms in quasicrystals were medieval works of confirmed, he managed to find one scientist who art. Mosaics located in Alhambra and in Iran from was willing to publish an article about their the time of the Middle Ages have similar structure paradoxical discovery with him. After publication like quasicrystals. of the article in 1984 [1], a new era of crystallography has begun. Both discoveries of paradoxical facts point out several aspects: Explanations teachers as well as scientists are reluctant to Despite more than 2000 years of history, Mpemba accept a new record, which at first glance phenomenon hasn’t got its uniform explanation, contradicts the generally introduced concepts of which has its reasons. Since the issue of the observed reality. Our belief in traditions is often Mpemba article, dozens of other contributions stronger than the new experimental evidence. have come out which represented the explanations New things are viewed with great skepticism, of the phenomenon documented by the results of while the textbook records are rather uncritically their experiments. The entire mosaic of accepted. When unexpected results are observed, interpretations has been formed in the past forty students, but also teachers, and even some years. Each of its parts looked like the only true scientists tend not to study them in depth but one. The reason may be the fact that each of the correct the measured data in order to achieve the observers studied the phenomenon in different expected "correct" values. This approach not only conditions. In a seemingly simple experiment of kills the investigative spirit, but impoverishes the cooling warm and cool water, there is a wide opportunity to explore new things, which in the range of factors affecting the temperature history of science, has often come down an decrease of water in time. They are, for example, unexpected path. It is therefore necessary to the properties of the liquid container in which it is highlight the relentless approach of Mpemba, located, or the properties of the cooling Shechtman, or other serious researchers who had environment. The cause of the phenomenon may to face the counter thoughts of their colleagues, be different for each case. In addition, the yet remained faithful to experimental evidence of phenomenon does not always occur. Therefore, their own work. the first step to its investigation is finding the conditions under which it can be observed. The Known – unknowns among the discoveries effort to find common explanation for the Paradoxical fast freezing of hot water is named emergence of the phenomenon, applicable for all after Mpemba. Mpemba effect, although without cases, is probably not a good way. We should this term, however, occured in human knowledge therefore withdraw from seeking the only single much earlier. The first record of that is from correct interpretation. Here are a few parts of the Aristotle [2]. He describes people who accelerated interpretative puzzle. the cooling process of water by leaving water to Evaporation. Warmer water evaporates faster than get warm in the sun before cooling. He reported cold water. Because of that it reduces its volume also about fishermen who used hot water to water faster. Since the time needed to freezing is their rods, which were fixed in this way into the directly proportional to the amount of water, it can holes in the ice during the winter. Other scholars be easy to explain this phenomenon. This captured the fact that warmer water freezes faster, explanation was one of the first after the too. They were people like Roger Bacon [3], René rediscovery of the phenomenon. It is discussed in Descartes [4], and Francis Bacon [5]. Cooling more detail by G. P. Kell [7]. The relation process of warm liquids was regularly used in ice between the speed of temperature decrease and cream and ice drinks production in India in the th the size of the liquid surface was dealt with J. 18 century [6]. However, with the advent of Walker [8]. Evaporation is well applicable as the modern theories of heat transfer, these cause of the Mpemba phenomenon in cases where observations retreated into the background in the liquid surface is too large. However, Mpemba field of scientific discussion and general effect was also observed in closed containers with knowledge. no evaporation.[9] In these cases, evaporation cause is unusable. Contact with the cooler. If the containers are Chemical Composition. Heating process of water cooled in a freezer with ice coating, the container causes not only its temperature change, but also with hot water can melt ice under itself. Ice is not other changes, like change of the quantity of a good heat conductor. If it is melted below the jar dissolved gases and solid substances contained in more, the jar will be closer to the freezer. The heat water. By heating water, the gases are expelled will then be eliminated faster. Mpemba himself and solids reduce their concentration.