DOCSLIB.ORG

Alliance Green New Deal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alliance Green New Deal ALLIANCE GREEN NEW DEAL Party Headquarters 88 University Street, Belfast, BT7 1HE 028 9032 4274 [email protected] https://twitter.com/allianceparty www.facebook.com/alliancepartyni www.allianceparty.org Published and promoted by Sharon Lowry on behalf of The Alliance Party of 88 University Street, Belfast BT7 1HE. Printed by GPS Colour Graphics Ltd, 4 Marshalls Road, Belfast BT5 6SR. APRIL 2021 www.allianceparty.org WHAT IS A GREEN NEW DEAL? 2 TOP PROPOSALS 3 INTRODUCTION ALLIANCE GREEN NEW DEAL 4 UK CONTEXT 5 NI CONTEXT 6 CHAPTER 1: THE GREEN ECONOMY THE GREEN ECONOMY 8 GREEN RECOVERY 8 ECONOMIC POLICIES & DELIVERY 9 JOB CREATION 9 SKILLS FOR THE FUTURE 10 RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 11 EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS 11 CHAPTER 2: FINANCE ISSUES FUNDING A GREEN RECOVERY 14 TAX & SPENDING REFORM 14 NI COST OF DIVISION 15 PERSONAL INCOME 16 CHAPTER 3: GOVERNMENT NI EXECUTIVE 18 ALL-ISLAND COLLABORATION 19 UK GOVERNMENT 19 CHAPTER 4: INFRASTRUCTURE TRANSPORT 21 ENERGY 24 PLANNING & HOUSING 26 SOCIAL CARE 28 CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE 30 NATURE & BIODIVERSITY 31 WASTE MANAGEMENT 32 CHAPTER 6: GLOBAL JUSTICE 33 CONTENTS PAGE 1 • Transition to a Green Economy • Guarantee zero-carbon public that prioritises investment, transport with better routes wellbeing and the planet. right across NI and cheaper fares for disabled people and • Create over 50,000 secure young people. green jobs across NI, with targeted bursaries and • Offer interest-free loans for an retraining allowances. electric vehicle and accelerated installation of • Provide a universal, affordable charging points. childcare system so we can all access new opportunities. • Establish mandatory agriculture audits to help • Legislate for workers’ rights in farmers transition to the gig economy. sustainable farming. • Reform and restore dignity in • Ban current and future fossil the unjust social security fuel exploration, including system. fracking. • Fight for migrants’ rights and • Hold citizens assemblies to to overhaul the Home Office. place social dialogue and • Retrofit all social housing and equity at the centre of provide grants to retrofit decision-making. privately owned homes. WHAT IS A GREEN NEW DEAL? • Demand tax justice. • Invest in our Social Care workforce and ensure care jobs are well-paid and secure. It’s about rapidly decarbonising our economy, The Covid-19 pandemic has shown us how and in doing so, creating an equitable, our economy and society directly impact sustainable economy filled with well-paid, our ability to get through a crisis: from secure green jobs in existing and emerging our physical and mental health, our job industries. and our housing conditions, to our access to social security, green space and public Alliance has developed its own Green New services. Deal tailored to Northern Ireland. The policies OUR PRIORITIES in this document show how we can simultaneously combat the climate Tackling the climate emergency likewise emergency and inequality through involves much more than environmental investment, radical change and breaking down policy. the barriers of division. A Green New Deal recognises that tackling We don’t want to return to the status quo. the climate emergency goes hand in hand with economic and social justice. Together, we don’t have to. PAGE 2 WHAT IS A GREEN NEW DEAL? OUR PRIORITIES PAGE 3 ALLIANCE GREEN NEW DEAL 4 We, too, have an opportunity to dream big UK CONTEXT UK CONTEXT 5 and need a recovery plan that better protects us in the future. While we will all experience the effects of NI CONTEXT 6 This time, any New Deal must be a Green New climate change, we won’t all do so Deal, and any economic recovery stimulus equally, nor do we all bear equal must be for a green recovery. responsibility. In fact, we can trace half of global industrial emissions since 1988 to Experts are increasingly stressing the need for just 25 corporate and state-owned a major investment-led, green recovery entities, including ExxonMobil, Shell, BP, because addressing the climate emergency and Chevron.1 goes hand in hand with an economic and social transformation. The world’s richest 10% produce around The fight against the climate emergency 50% of all emissions. requires more than environmental policy tweaks. The Alliance Green New Deal Meanwhile, the poorest half of the world’s demands urgent, radical change based on population – 3.5 billion people – is long-term security and collective prosperity. responsible for just 10% of carbon emissions, yet they are the most This is our vision for an urgent, radical threatened by the catastrophic storms, overhaul of the policies and practices that droughts, and other severe weather shocks INTRODUCTION hinder our progress and exploit our people linked to climate change. and our planet. It’s also our plan to grasp the enormous opportunities in moving towards a Confronting Carbon Inequality (2020), Oxfam. sustainable, green economy, with the Alliance ALLIANCE GREEN NEW DEAL Young people across the world have taken the Green New Deal creating at least 50,000 jobs For this reason, the 2015 Paris Climate lead in challenging Governments to protect by 2030. Agreement demands that high-income countries go further, faster in radically Alliance has a vision for a united the planet: they protested to demand the This past year, we have acted in solidarity at reducing emissions, by no later than the community: an inclusive, dynamic, change we need to secure their future. We an unprecedented scale to protect one “second half of this century”. It also requires prosperous and sustainable Northern joined their marches, and we listened. another. Alliance is committed to breaking governments to reduce emissions “on the Ireland where we can all thrive, enjoy down the barriers of division. We want to Time is quickly running out to tackle the basis of equity, and in the context of living freely and securely and be treated build upon these efforts and accelerate the climate emergency. Yet, in doing so, we can sustainable development and efforts to with dignity in a region rich with creation of a wonderfully diverse, inclusive build the future we not only want but need: eradicate poverty.” opportunities and biodiversity. We believe society that stands united in protecting our • Creating thousands of secure, green jobs in a society for everyone. future. The 2021 United Nations Climate Change by stimulating our economy and reskilling Conference (COP26) will take place in The Alliance Green New Deal shows what we workers; Glasgow in November, under the UK’s As we emerge from the pandemic, it’s time can achieve together in Northern Ireland and presidency. This is a critical landmark as for this vision to become a reality. • Preserving our planet for future how Alliance will use its influence in participating countries’ decisions will define generations; and Westminster for UK-wide intervention and From Covid-19 to losing our place in the our future: we must reach net-zero emissions • Building an inclusive, equitable society for global action. It also outlines how we can European Union, we know how unbelievably no later than 2050 to achieve the 1.50C goal. facilitate collaboration on an all-island basis. our lives can be upended, with things we once everyone. The UK has set its target for net-zero took for granted taken from us. We have a chance for change. These principles will underpin our priorities emissions by 2050. We believe this is far too Change for good. going forward, and the document will evolve The pandemic has laid bare the injustices and slow, and the UK should be providing more as we reach milestones in recovery and the weaknesses in our society and economy. We want to learn lessons from the past year, robust and demonstrable leadership. If the UK reduction of emissions. It's worth noting that We’ve seen the damage caused by acting too build a new society, invest in thousands of cannot reach net carbon zero well ahead of this document is intended to accompany, and slowly, chronically underfunded public secure, green jobs, and transform our 2050, it is unlikely that the rest of the world not replace, our next Manifesto. services, and flawed, short-term, and self- economy to become both sustainable and will do so. serving decisions. equitable. Therefore, the UK must have much more Emerging from the pandemic, we will likely Throughout history, periods of great upheaval ambitious targets and frontload the changes face a weakened economy, significant job have sparked incredible change: from the New to policy and practices with clear binding losses and more entrenched inequalities. Deal in response to the Great Depression, to milestones along the way. the birth of the welfare state and NHS from And the pandemic is not the only crisis we The UK also recently dissolved its Department World War II. face. While everyday life has felt at a standstill for International Development, cut its foreign the past year, climate change continues to aid budget, and introduced tighter accelerate. 1 The Carbon Majors Database, CDP Carbon Majors Report 2017. PAGE 4 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION PAGE 5 immigration restrictions, signalling a The Alliance Green New Deal puts forward THE GREEN ECONOMY 8 significant shift away from its crucial proposals to achieve nature-friendly farming commitments under the Paris Agreement. that reduces emissions while protecting GREEN RECOVERY 8 wildlife, biodiversity, and small farmers. Now more than ever, governments like the UK ECONOMIC POLICIES & DELIVERY 9 must lead the way with radical change, end Active travel and our public transport network JOB CREATION 9 fossil fuel subsidies, and prioritise the rights of have suffered from chronic underinvestment SKILLS FOR THE FUTURE 10 those marginalised politically, economically for years, which means we are hugely over- and socially – those least responsible and reliant on private car use.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S.-South Korea Alliance: Issues for Congress
    December 10, 2019 U.S.-South Korea Alliance: Issues for Congress Overview of Alliance Agreement (CMA). The CMA establishes land, sea, and air South Korea (officially the Republic of Korea, or ROK) is buffer zones in the heavily armed Demilitarized Zone considered one of the United States’ most important (DMZ) that separates the two Koreas and around the strategic and economic partners in Asia. The U.S.-ROK maritime border, called the Northern Limit Line. Mutual Defense Treaty, signed in 1953 at the end of the Implementation of the CMA required U.S. military officials Korean War, commits the United States to help South to modify practices in the DMZ, including removing land Korea defend itself, particularly from North Korea mines and guard posts. While observers point to a marked (officially the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, or reduction of tension in the DMZ, some critics maintain that DPRK). South Korean troops have fought in U.S.-led the CMA-mandated changes reduced alliance readiness conflicts, including in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. The with little sacrifice in return from North Korea. United States includes South Korea under its “nuclear umbrella,” otherwise known as extended deterrence. Figure 1. U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) Bases The U.S. military has maintained a large troop presence in South Korea since the end of the Korean War. Currently, approximately 28,500 U.S. troops are based in the ROK, predominately Army personnel. Camp Humphreys, which will host most of the troops when completed, is the largest U.S. overseas military base in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Greening Recovery Efforts for People, Planet and Prosperity
    Greening Recovery Efforts for People, Planet and Prosperity UN Development Group Task Team on the Socio-Economic Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic 9 April 2021 1. Why a Green Recovery? 2. A Future Possible - Country Examples 3. Navigating Forward - possible UN Responses 2 Overview of a ‘Once in a Generation’ Crisis 3 Source - World Bank Why a Green Recovery? • Spending on clean energy has an impact on GDP that is about 2x – 7x stronger—than spending on non-eco- friendly energy. (IMF, 2021) • Investing in nature conservation has multipliers of up to 7x over five years. Spending to support unsustainable land uses has negative returns. (IMF, 2021) • investments in renewable energies, building efficiency and green transport would add 20.5 million jobs by 2030, compared to 3 million jobs under BAU (ILO) • Green R&D spending has high growth and positive climate/nature/pollution multipliers. Source: Hepburn et al. 2020 4 Global Green Recovery Response to Date USD 14.6 trillion (excl. EC) USD 1.9 trillion USD 341 billion 5 Source - UNEP-Oxford Smith School, 2021 // *data for 2020 - does not cover spending announced in 2021 Global Green Recovery Response to Date … Green recovery spending as a percentage of total Total debt stock for 19 EMDE countries over time recovery spending, versus recovery spending as % GDP (AE spending 17x higher than EMDE spending) Source - UNEP-Oxford Smith School, 2021 // *data 6 for 2020 - does not cover spending announced in 2021 …and limited options for many with looming debt vulnerability Source: UNDP, April 2021. Sovereign 7 Debt Vulnerabilities in Developing Economies A Future Possible - Country Examples The Self Starters Some Green Recovery Examples GREEN ENERGY Argentina – USD 390K to finance the incorporation of renewable energy into the fishery industry Colombia – USD 4.3 million funding for 27 strategic renewable energy and transmissions projects, including the generation of 55 thousand jobs, include 9 wind, 5 solar, 3 geothermal and one hydrogenation, as well as 9 energy transmission lines.
    [Show full text]
  • A Green Economic Recovery: Global Trends and Lessons for the United States
    A Green Economic Recovery: Global Trends and Lessons for the United States Jonas Nahm Assistant Professor for Energy, Resources, and Environment School of Advanced International Studies Johns Hopkins University Statement before the House Foreign Affairs Committee Subcommittee on Europe, Eurasia, Energy, and the Environment Hearing on Green Recovery Plans for the COVID-19 Crisis The economic recession caused by efforts to contain the global Covid-19 pandemic has, in the short- term, led to a drop of global greenhouse gas emissions. Yet three factors caution against optimism that the economic recession could trigger substantial shifts toward long-term decarbonization. First, emissions reductions during the current economic recession have been small and are unlikely to have a lasting impact on efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Past recessions have been followed by rapid increases in emissions that have offset much of the downturn and the 2020 recession has begun to follow a similar pattern. Second, while economic stimulus spending in the recovery offers an opportunity to invest in long-term climate policies that also create jobs and deploy capital in the economy, G20 economies have thus far spent far less on programs with environmental co-benefits than in the aftermath of the 2009 recession. Third, the Covid-19 pandemic has further strained economic and political relationships with China, a key producer of technologies urgently needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the global economy. This is detrimental to short-term efforts to address the global climate crisis. The United States is uniquely equipped to be at the global frontier of clean energy technology innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Stimulus Index an Assessment of the Orientation of COVID-19 Stimulus in Relation to Climate Change, Biodiversity and Other Environmental Impacts
    Green Stimulus Index An assessment of the orientation of COVID-19 stimulus in relation to climate change, biodiversity and other environmental impacts The Green Stimulus Index (GSI) assesses the effectiveness of the COVID-19 stimulus efforts in ensuring an economic recovery that takes advantage of sustainable growth opportunities, and is resilient to climate and biodiversity. It provides a method to gauge the current impact of the COVID-19 responses, to track countries’ progress over time, and to identify and recommend measures for improving the effectiveness of those responses. This assessment is updated regularly – please use the latest version. This note is part of a series looking at economic responses to COVID-19. Other notes relate to corporate bailouts, international assistance flows into developing countries and job-creating fiscal stimulus. This work was undertaken by the Finance for Biodiversity Initiative (F4B) and funded by the MAVA Foundation. Spokesperson is Mateo Salazar. Contact email: [email protected] Executive summary Across 17 major economies, announced economic stimulus packages will pump approximately USD 3.5 trillion directly into sectors that have a large and lasting impact on nature. These flows present an opportunity to support these sectors through the current COVID-19 crisis, while increasing their sustainability and resilience in the face of the parallel climate and biodiversity crises. So far, government responses have largely failed to harness this opportunity, disregarding the broader sustainability and resilience impacts of their actions. In 13 of the 17 countries considered, potentially damaging flows outweigh those supporting nature. Of the more developed countries, the United States stands out as the largest scale risk, with $479 billion USD providing unrestricted support to sectors proven to be environmentally harmful in the past amidst several rollbacks on environmental regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pathway to a Green New Deal: Synthesizing Transdisciplinary Literatures and Activist Frameworks to Achieve a Just Energy Transition
    The Pathway to a Green New Deal: Synthesizing Transdisciplinary Literatures and Activist Frameworks to Achieve a Just Energy Transition Shalanda H. Baker and Andrew Kinde The “Green New Deal” resolution introduced into Congress by Representative Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Senator Ed Markey in February 2019 articulated a vision of a “just” transition away from fossil fuels. That vision involves reckoning with the injustices of the current, fossil-fuel based energy system while also creating a clean energy system that ensures that all people, especially the most vulnerable, have access to jobs, healthcare, and other life-sustaining supports. As debates over the resolution ensued, the question of how lawmakers might move from vision to implementation emerged. Energy justice is a discursive phenomenon that spans the social science and legal literatures, as well as a set of emerging activist frameworks and practices that comprise a larger movement for a just energy transition. These three discourses—social science, law, and practice—remain largely siloed and insular, without substantial cross-pollination or cross-fertilization. This disconnect threatens to scuttle the overall effort for an energy transition deeply rooted in notions of equity, fairness, and racial justice. This Article makes a novel intervention in the energy transition discourse. This Article attempts to harmonize the three discourses of energy justice to provide a coherent framework for social scientists, legal scholars, and practitioners engaged in the praxis of energy justice. We introduce a framework, rooted in the theoretical principles of the interdisciplinary field of energy justice and within a synthesized framework of praxis, to assist lawmakers with the implementation of Last updated December 12, 2020 Professor of Law, Public Policy and Urban Affairs, Northeastern University.
    [Show full text]
  • Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States
    The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States Updated April 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33105 SUMMARY RL33105 The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and April 16, 2021 Relations with the United States Derek E. Mix Many U.S. officials and Members of Congress view the United Kingdom (UK) as the United Specialist in European States’ closest and most reliable ally. This perception stems from a combination of factors, Affairs including a sense of shared history, values, and culture; a large and mutually beneficial economic relationship; and extensive cooperation on foreign policy and security issues. The UK’s January 2020 withdrawal from the European Union (EU), often referred to as Brexit, is likely to change its international role and outlook in ways that affect U.S.-UK relations. Conservative Party Leads UK Government The government of the UK is led by Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the Conservative Party. Brexit has dominated UK domestic politics since the 2016 referendum on whether to leave the EU. In an early election held in December 2019—called in order to break a political deadlock over how and when the UK would exit the EU—the Conservative Party secured a sizeable parliamentary majority, winning 365 seats in the 650-seat House of Commons. The election results paved the way for Parliament’s approval of a withdrawal agreement negotiated between Johnson’s government and the EU. UK Is Out of the EU, Concludes Trade and Cooperation Agreement On January 31, 2020, the UK’s 47-year EU membership came to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change: Green Recovery and Trade
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT CLIMATE CHANGE, GREEN RECOVERY AND TRADE UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT CLIMATE CHANGE, GREEN RECOVERY AND TRADE Geneva, 2021 ii © 2021, United Nations This work is available through open access, by complying with the Creative Commons licence created for intergovernmental organizations, at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations or its officials or Member States. The designations employed and the presentation of material on any map in this work do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Photocopies and reproductions of excerpts are allowed with proper credits. This publication has not been formally edited. United Nations publication issued by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2021/2 eISBN: 978-92-1-005630-4 iii Contents Note ........................................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................iv Acronyms and abbreviations ......................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • ARE THERE DOWNSIDES to a GREEN ECONOMY? the Trade, Investment and Competitiveness Implications of Unilateral Green Economic Pursuit
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT ARE THERE DOWNSIDES TO A GREEN ECONOMY? The Trade, Investment and Competitiveness Implications of Unilateral Green Economic Pursuit New York and Geneva, 2013 ii ARE THERE DOWNSIDES TO A GREEN ECONOMY? Note Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested, together with a reference to the document number. A copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint should be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations. Acknowledgements This paper was prepared by Aaron Cosbey ([email protected]), Associate and Senior Climate Change and Trade Advisor of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) within the framework of the activities of the UNCTAD Climate Change Programme. The author would like to thank a number of reviewers for their valuable input on this text, including Lucas Assunção, Daniel De La Torre Ugarte, Eugenia Nunez, David Vivas-Eugui and Chris Beaton, as well as the participants of the UNCTAD/UNEP/DESA Ad Hoc Expert Meeting on The Green Economy: Trade and Sustainable Development Implications, Geneva, 7-8 October 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Significance of Alliance Athologiesp in Bipolar Systems: a Case of the Peloponnesian War from 431-421 BCE
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2016 Determining the Significance of Alliance athologiesP in Bipolar Systems: A Case of the Peloponnesian War from 431-421 BCE Anthony Lee Meyer Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the International Relations Commons Repository Citation Meyer, Anthony Lee, "Determining the Significance of Alliance Pathologies in Bipolar Systems: A Case of the Peloponnesian War from 431-421 BCE" (2016). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 1509. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/1509 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DETERMINING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ALLIANCE PATHOLOGIES IN BIPOLAR SYSTEMS: A CASE OF THE PELOPONNESIAN WAR FROM 431-421 BCE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts By ANTHONY LEE ISAAC MEYER Dual B.A., Russian Language & Literature, International Studies, Ohio State University, 2007 2016 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES ___April 29, 2016_________ I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Anthony Meyer ENTITLED Determining the Significance of Alliance Pathologies in Bipolar Systems: A Case of the Peloponnesian War from 431-421 BCE BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts. ____________________________ Liam Anderson, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • How Green Is India's Stimulus for Economic Recovery?
    1 Vibhuti Garg, IEEFA Energy Economist, Lead India Max Schmidt, IISD Fellow Christopher Beaton, IISD Lead, Sustainable Development March 2021 How Green Is India’s Stimulus for Economic Recovery? How India Can Raise Its Ambition for a Green Stimulus in 2021 Executive Summary As of the beginning of March 2021, no other economy has committed as much money to the energy sector as India has in response to the ongoing global COVID-19 crisis or to meet its long-standing ambitions on other policy objectives, such as energy security, air pollution and climate change.1 But where is the public money commitment going: towards sustainable energy choices? Or towards fuels or sectors with high carbon emissions? Analysis of 70 energy-related policies from the Energy Policy Tracker (EPT), as well as India’s annual budget announcements in February 2021 presents a “mixed bag” picture. More than US$120bn has been committed to the energy sector since January 2020, of which renewable-energy-related measures received almost twice as much funding as fossil fuels. However, both are dwarfed by policies related to other sectors. These policies largely support transmission and distribution companies in the power sector and may disproportionately benefit fossil fuels, depending upon whether the government promotes more fossil fuels than clean technologies under such programs. While the COVID-19 crisis has dominated energy sector discourse over the past year, we estimate that around ~22% of the committed value is primarily intended to deal with COVID-19, while the rest of the support reflects ongoing government policy objectives on energy security, climate change and air pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Reexamining the US-Turkish Alliance
    Joshua W. Walker Reexamining the U.S.-Turkish Alliance The July 22, 2007, Turkish national elections instigated a series of political debates in Turkey about the role of the 60-year-old U.S. alliance and the future orientation of Turkish foreign policy. Does Turkey still need its U.S. alliance in a post–Cold War environment? Particularly after U.S. pres- sure on Turkey in 2003 to open a northern front in the war in Iraq, which the Turkish parliament rejected, and given how unpopular the United States has become in the Middle East and in Europe, is the alliance still valuable to An- kara today? Coupled with the deteriorating situation in Iraq and the constant threat of the Turkish use of force in northern Iraq, these debates have forced U.S.-Turkish relations onto the international scene. The severity of the es- trangement in relations has been consistently downplayed on both sides of the Atlantic, even while external factors such as Turkey’s floundering EU mem- bership process and regional differences over how to deal with Iraq have only exacerbated the problems in the alliance. The fallout from the Iraq war has now gone beyond a simple misunderstanding between the United States and Turkey and casts a dark shadow over future relations and the wider regional security structure of the Middle East. The emergence of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) as a political force in Turkish politics has coincided with this unprecedented estrangement in U.S.-Turkish relations. Although the 2002 elections allowed the AKP to form a single-party government, their legitimacy was disputed.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Quotas: Legal Reforms and Implementation in Bosnia and Herzegovina”
    “Application of Quotas: Legal Reforms and Implementation in Bosnia and Herzegovina” Besima Borić National Gender Task Force Office, Bosnia & Herzegovina A paper presented at the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA)/CEE Network for Gender Issues Conference The Implementation of Quotas: European Experiences Budapest, Hungary, 22–23 October 2004 The ramifications of a long conflict and massive human displacement continue to shape the post-war reconstruction of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). The situation of women in BiH and the evolution of their political rights—and, therefore, the observations of this paper—must be viewed in the context of a country transitioning from the ravages of war to sustainable peace and democratization. This case study examines the political participation of women in BiH and the use of electoral quotas. Background to Women’s Political Participation Women in BiH were granted full suffrage in 1946 immediately after the World War, in the Federative People’s Republic of Yugoslavia. Today, the Constitution of BiH and the Constitutions of the two entities—the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska—accord women equal social, political and economic rights, including the right to vote and to stand for election. The latter are recognized in the 1979 international Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). According to Articles 7 and 8 of CEDAW, the state is obliged to respect and protect women’s political rights and to introduce special measures to ensure that they can exercise them fully. Such measures include positive discrimination, mandatory election quotas for women and reserved seats in the legislature.
    [Show full text]