Klimt and Schiele 6
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gustav Klimt: the Magic of Line
Page 1 OBJECT LIST Gustav Klimt: The Magic of Line At the J. Paul Getty Museum, Getty Center July 3–September 23, 2012 All works by Gustav Klimt (Austrian, 1862–1918) unless otherwise specified 1. The Auditorium of the Old 4. Man in Three Quarter View (Study for Burgtheater, 1888-89 and 1893 Shakespeare's Theater), 1886-87 Watercolor and gouache Black chalk, heightened with white Unframed: 22 x 28 cm (8 11/16 x 11 in.) Unframed: 42.5 x 29.4 cm (16 3/4 x 11 Privatsammlung Panzenböck 9/16 in.) EX.2012.3.19 Albertina, Wien EX.2012.3.27 2. Profile and Rear View of a Man with Binoculars, Sketch of His Right Hand, 5. Head of a Reclining Young Man, Head 1888-89 in Lost Profile (Study for Black chalk, heightened with white, Shakespeare's Theater), 1887 87 on greenish paper Black chalk, heightened with white, Unframed: 45 x 31.7 cm (17 11/16 x 12 graphite 1/2 in.) Unframed: 44.8 x 31.4 cm (17 5/8 x 12 Albertina, Wien 3/8 in.) EX.2012.3.29 Albertina, Wien EX.2012.3.33 3. Man with Cap in Profile (Study for Shakespeare's Theater), 1886-87 6. Reclining Girl (Juliet), and Two Studies Black chalk heightened with white of Hands (Study for Shakespeare's Unframed: 42.6 x 29 cm (16 3/4 x 11 Theater), 1886-87 7/16 in.) Black chalk, stumped, heightened Albertina, Wien with white, graphite EX.2012.3.28 Unframed: 27.6 x 42.4 cm (10 7/8 x 16 11/16 in.) Albertina, Wien EX.2012.3.32 -more- -more- Page 2 7. -
Japanese Aesthetics and Gustav Klimt: in Pursuit of a New Voice Svitlana Shiells
Strand 2. Art Nouveau and Politics in the Dawn of Globalisation Japanese Aesthetics and Gustav Klimt: In Pursuit of a New Voice Svitlana Shiells Abstract At the end of the nineteenth century, Japonisme—an artistic lingua franca—became one of the most organic, overarching components of Gustav Klimt’s new art. This paper draws parallels between Gustav Klimt’s Portrait of Sonja Knips and It ō Jakuch ū’s print Golden Pheasant and Bamboo in Snow . The discovery of an unexpectedly close dialogue between Klimt and Jakuch ū and the striking similarity of the formal language of the two works supports the paper’s thesis that It ō Jakuch ū’s print is the primary source of influence behind the conception and execution of the portrait and, by extension, that Klimt’s engagement with Japanese stimuli is one of the main engines behind his creative pursuit, starting at the end of the 1890s. This discovery challenges preconceived notions and existing concepts and illustrates the impossibility of understanding Klimt’s heritage comprehensively and adequately without examining the role of Japonisme in it. Keywords: Gustav Klimt, Japonisme, It ō Jakuch ū, the Vienna Secession, ukiyo-e prints. 1 In the wake of the World Fair of 1873 in Vienna, a strong wave of Japonisme permanently re- shaped the capital of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. According to Hermann Bahr, the Viennese encountered the presence of “Japonisme in all the arts,” which were “impossible to understand without bearing in mind the influence of Japanese art.” 1 Japonisme indeed became a Zeitgeist in fin de siècle Vienna and, in the visual arts, Gustav Klimt was its main advocate. -
African Masks
Gustav Klimt Slide Script Pre-slides: Focus slide; “And now, it’s time for Art Lit” Slide 1: Words We Will Use Today Mosaics: Mosaics use many tiny pieces of colored glass, shiny stones, gold, and silver to make intricate images and patterns. Art Nouveau: this means New Art - a style of decorative art, architecture, and design popular in Western Europe and the US from about 1890 to 1910. It’s recognized by flowing lines and curves. Patrons: Patrons are men and women who support the arts by purchasing art, commissioning art, or by sponsoring or providing a salary to an artist so they can continue making art. Slide 2 – Gustav Klimt Gustav Klimt was a master of eye popping pattern and metallic color. Art Nouveau (noo-vo) artists like Klimt used bright colors and swirling, flowing lines and believed art could symbolize something beyond what appeared on the canvas. When asked why he never painted a self-portrait, Klimt said, “There is nothing special about me. Whoever wants to know something about me... ought to look carefully at my pictures.” We may not have a self-portrait but we do have photos of him – including this one with his studio cat! Let’s see what we can learn about Klimt today. Slide 3 – Public Art Klimt was born in Vienna, Austria where he lived his whole life. Klimt’s father was a gold engraver and he taught his son how to work with gold. Klimt won a full scholarship to art school at the age of 14 and when he finished, he and his brothers started a business painting murals on walls and ceilings for mansions, public theatres and universities. -
Klirnt and Schiele Stephan Kleinschuster May 6, 1997 AR592
The Evolution of Expressionism In Turn-of-the-Century Vienna: Klirnt and Schiele Stephan Kleinschuster May 6, 1997 AR592 1 1 Until 1897, Classicism in Viennese high art had served as a mimetic construct of the elite society who were both art's staunchest supporters and the purveyors of moral and philosophical values that served as it's staple of judgment. In the following years, from 1898 to 1918, were revolutions of both natures, political and philosophical. The artistic transformation from the Classicism of the Habsburg Monarchy to the expressionism of the Cafe "Nihilism" could be seen most obviously in two of Vienna's foremost artists of the time, Gustav Klimt and Egon Schiele. This paper seeks to compare and contrast the works of these two artists who seem to crystallize the moral, social, political, and artistic upheaval of early Twentieth Century Vienna. It lS fitting that Gustav Klimt and Egon Schiele died six months from one another, both of the Spanish influenza, and both in 1918. It is important to note that even though stylistic variables call for their ultimate contrast, they loved and admired one another, and they both stood for the values that defined Secessionism. Their proximity in philosophy makes it all the more profound to discover their differences. In Klimt came classical objectivity housed in a contemporary conceptual framework. In Schiele came the shift to brutal subjectivity that pushed the limits of this framework. Even though, as will be discussed, the similarity of the subject matter seems to remain a constant, the execution becomes the variable upon which the change becomes dependent. -
Download Download
Dreams anD sexuality A Psychoanalytical Reading of Klimt’s Beethoven Frieze benjamin flyThe This essay presenTs a philosophical and psychoanalyTical inTerpreTaTion of The work of The Viennese secession arTisT, GusTaV klimT. The manner of depicTion in klimT’s painTinGs underwenT a radical shifT around The Turn of The TwenTieTh cenTury, and The auThor attempTs To unVeil The inTernal and exTernal moTiVaTions ThaT may haVe prompTed and conTribuTed To This TransformaTion. drawinG from friedrich nieTzsche’s The BirTh of Tragedy as well as siGmund freud’s The inTerpreTaTion of dreams, The arTicle links klimT’s early work wiTh whaT may be referred To as The apollonian or consciousness, and his laTer work wiTh The dionysian or The subconscious. iT is Then arGued ThaT The BeeThoven frieze of 1902 could be undersTood as a “self-porTraiT” of The arTisT and used To examine The shifT in sTylisTic represenTaTion in klimT’s oeuVre. Proud Athena, armed and ready for battle with her aegis Pallas Athena (below), standing in stark contrast to both of and spear, cuts a striking image for the poster announcing these previous versions, takes their best characteristics the inaugural exhibition of the Vienna Secession. As the and bridges the gap between them: she is softly modeled goddess of wisdom, the polis, and the arts, she is a decid- but still retains some of the poster’s two-dimensionality (“a edly appropriate figurehead for an upstart group of diverse concept, not a concrete realization”2); the light in her eyes artists who succeeded in fighting back against the estab- speaks to an internal fire that more accurately represents lished institution of Vienna, a political coup if there ever the truth of the goddess; and perhaps most importantly, 28 was one. -
Viennese Art, Ugliness, and the Vienna School of Art History: the Vicissitudes of Theory and Practice
Viennese art, ugliness, and the Vienna school of art history: the vicissitudes of theory and practice Kathryn Simpson Around 1900 in Vienna, the concept of ugliness developed a new significance in both art theory and practice. The theorists of the Vienna school of art history, including Franz Wickhoff, Alois Riegl, and later Otto Benesch and Max Dvoř{k, rejected the scholarly tradition of Germanic contemporaries like renowned art historian Heinrich Wölfflin, who championed classical art as the highest aesthetic good. By contrast the Vienna school art historians opposed absolute aesthetics and its insistence that a specifically classical beauty was the goal of all art.1 At the dawn of the twentieth century, Wickhoff and Riegl both presented radically new theories arguing for a revaluation of aesthetic values, a non-hierarchical relationship between so-called beauty and ugliness, and the importance of developing an art that was appropriate for the age. Ugliness was suddenly spotlighted in Viennese artistic practice as well. Gustav Klimt was the undisputed king of the Viennese art scene; he had inherited the throne from the revered history painter, designer, and decorator Hans Makart, whose sensual, decorative sensibility had defined late-nineteenth-century tastes in Vienna, giving rise to the term Makartstil, or ‘Makart style.’ After three years as the leader of the Vienna Secession movement, Klimt produced a series of works of art which enraged sectors of the intellectual establishment and the general public, who reacted in particular to the purported ugliness of Klimt’s latest visions. Yet shortly thereafter young Viennese artists eager to lead what they called the ‘new art’ movement began to develop deliberate strategies of ugliness to help create and buttress their own antagonistic artistic personae. -
Florida State University Libraries
Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2009 Gustav Mahler, Alfred Roller, and the Wagnerian Gesamtkunstwerk: Tristan and Affinities Between the Arts at the Vienna Court Opera Stephen Carlton Thursby Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MUSIC GUSTAV MAHLER, ALFRED ROLLER, AND THE WAGNERIAN GESAMTKUNSTWERK: TRISTAN AND AFFINITIES BETWEEN THE ARTS AT THE VIENNA COURT OPERA By STEPHEN CARLTON THURSBY A Dissertation submitted to the College of Music in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2009 The members of the Committee approve the Dissertation of Stephen Carlton Thursby defended on April 3, 2009. _______________________________ Denise Von Glahn Professor Directing Dissertation _______________________________ Lauren Weingarden Outside Committee Member _______________________________ Douglass Seaton Committee Member Approved: ___________________________________ Douglass Seaton, Chair, Musicology ___________________________________ Don Gibson, Dean, College of Music The Graduate School has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii To my wonderful wife Joanna, for whose patience and love I am eternally grateful. In memory of my grandfather, James C. Thursby (1926-2008). iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The completion of this dissertation would not have been possible without the generous assistance and support of numerous people. My thanks go to the staff of the Austrian Theater Museum and Austrian National Library-Music Division, especially to Dr. Vana Greisenegger, curator of the visual materials in the Alfred Roller Archive of the Austrian Theater Museum. I would also like to thank the musicology faculty of the Florida State University College of Music for awarding me the Curtis Mayes Scholar Award, which funded my dissertation research in Vienna over two consecutive summers (2007- 2008). -
LESSON Gustav Klimt Elements Of
LESSON 1 Gustav Klimt Elements of Art Tree of Life Verbal Directions LESSON GUSTAV KLIMT/ELEMENTS OF ART 1 KIMBALL ART CENTER & PARK CITY ED. FOUNDATION LESSON OVERVIEW Students will learn about the artist Gustav Klimt (1862–1918) and his SUPPLIES • Images of Klimt’s artwork decorative art style. Klimt was a twentieth century master of decorative showcasing elements of art. art, a visual art style known for hosting design and ornamentation of • Samples of Tree of Life. items. Students will also learn about the elements of art and how they are • Gold glitter. portrayed in Klimt’s artwork. Students will use these elements with verbal • Glue. directives to create their own “Tree of Life”, one of Klimt’s most famous • Black sharpies. works, in his decorative style. • Markers. • Metallic markers and/or INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES paint markers. • Learn about Gustav Klimt. • White or brown paper. • Learn about the elements of art and apply them in artwork. • Black construction paper for Line, Shape, Form, Value, Space, Color, Texture matting artwork. • Learn about Klimt’s decorative style of art. • Create a “Tree of Life” using elements of art in the style of Klimt. GUSTAV KLIMT Gustav Klimt (1862-1918) was an Austrian symbolist painter and his artwork was viewed as a rebellion against the traditional academic art of his time. He is noted for his highly decorative style in art most often seen in art with women with elaborate gowns, blankets and landscapes. Klimt was a co-founder of the Vienna Secessionist movement, a movement closely linked to Symbolism whereby artists tried to show truth using unrealistic or fantastical objects. -
SYMBOLISM of the SERPENT in KLIMT's DRAWINGS Antonela
SECTION: LANGUAGE AND DISCOURSE LDMD 2 SYMBOLISM OF THE SERPENT IN KLIMT’S DRAWINGS Antonela Corban, PhD. “Al. I. Cuza” University of Iaşi and University of Burgundy, Dijon Abstract. The theme of the serpent repeats and undergoes constant reinterpretation in many of Klimt’s paintings, the author often considering the significance conferred to it by tradition, yet adding personal elements as well in its pictorial approach. The purpose of this article is to indicate and analyze the very paintings in which Klimt treats the theme of the snake from the perspective of its potential significations. To start with, we shall focus on the analysis of the signification of the snake/ serpent symbol in various cultural and religious areas and we shall insist on the ambivalent character of this symbol (the serpent could be associated with both life and death, being a creature that triggers both fear and fascination). Out of the many interpretations associated with the symbolic myth of the serpent, we shall choose only those related to Klimt’s work, noticing that the artist copes, each and every time, with a different signification of it. A first meaning the painter considers is that of creative wisdom, based on intelligence, knowledge and power – Asclepius’s serpent (in Medicine and Hygeia) or Athens’ serpent (Pallas Athene). On the other hand, it may represent the poisonous intelligence associated with cunning and envy, as in Jurisprudence, in Envy or his late, unfinished work, Adam and Eve. It could be about the complex embodiment of natural forces (benevolent, as the dragon from Tragedy, or hostile, as the Echidna – like monster, together with Typhon, the winged one, in Beethoven Frieze). -
Artist Resources – Gustav Klimt (Austrian, 1862-1918) Gustav Klimt Foundation Klimt at Neue Galerie, New York
Artist Resources – Gustav Klimt (Austrian, 1862-1918) Gustav Klimt Foundation Klimt at Neue Galerie, New York The Getty Center partnered with Vienna’s Albertina Museum in 2012 for the first retrospective dedicated to Klimt’s prolific drawing practice. Marking the 150th anniversary of his birth, the prominent collection traced Klimt’s use of the figure from the 1880s until his death. Digital resources from the Getty provide background on Klimt’s relationships to Symbolism and the Secession movement, his public murals, drawings, and late portraits. In 2015, the Neue Galerie commemorated the film, Woman in Gold, with an exhibition bringing together Klimt’s infamous portrait of Adele Bloch Bauer with a suite of historical material. Bauer’s portrait was at the nexus of a conversation about the return of Nazi looted art, now in prestigious museums, to the progeny of families they were stolen from during WWII. San Francisco’s de Young museum presented the first major exhibition of Klimt’s work on the west coast in 207, paiting the Vienna Secessionist with sculptures and works on paper by August Rodin, whom Klimt met in 1902. The Leopold museum celebrated the centennial of Klimt’s death and his contribution to Viennese modernism in a comprehensive survey in 2018. Also in 2018, the Museum of Fine Arts Boston and the Royal Academy of Art in London opened surveys exploring the creative influences of Klimt and his young mentee Egon Schiele through the medium of drawing. Klimt, 1917 In a series of talks in Boston in conjunction with the exhibition, Professor Judith Bookbinder spoke about the aesthetic differences of Klimt, Schiele, and Schiele’s contemporary Oskar Kokoschka. -
Gustav Klimt (1862-1918) Gustav Klimt's Work Is Highly Recognizable
Gustav Klimt (1862-1918) Gustav Klimt’s work is highly recognizable around the world. He has a reputation as being one of the foremost painters of his time. He is regarded as one the leaders in the Viennese Secessionist movement. During his lifetime and up until the mid-twentieth century, Klimt’s work was not known outside the European art world. Gustav Klimt was born on July 14, 1862 in Baumgarten, near Vienna. He was the second child of seven born to a Bohemian engraver of gold and silver. His father’s profession must have rubbed off on his children. Klimt’s brother Georg became a goldsmith, his brother Ernst joined Gustav as a painter. At the age of 14, Klimt went to the School of Arts and Crafts at the Royal and Imperial Austrian Museum for Art and Industry in Vienna along with his brother. Klimt’s training was in applied art techniques like fresco painting, mosaics and the history of art and design. He did not have any formal painting training. Klimt, his brother Ernst and friend Franz Matsch earned a living creating architectural decorations on commission. They worked on villas and theaters and made money on the side by painting portraits. Klimt’s major break came when the trio helped their teacher paint murals in Kunsthistorische Museum in Vienna. His work helped him begin gain the job of painting interior murals and ceilings in large public buildings on the Ringstraße, including a successful series of "Allegories and Emblems". His work on murals in the Burgtheater in Vienna earned him in 1888 a Golden order of Merit by Franz Josef I of Austria and he became an honorary member of the University of Munich and the University of Vienna. -
Title Japonisme in Polish Pictorial Arts (1885 – 1939) Type Thesis URL
Title Japonisme in Polish Pictorial Arts (1885 – 1939) Type Thesis URL http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/6205/ Date 2013 Citation Spławski, Piotr (2013) Japonisme in Polish Pictorial Arts (1885 – 1939). PhD thesis, University of the Arts London. Creators Spławski, Piotr Usage Guidelines Please refer to usage guidelines at http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/policies.html or alternatively contact [email protected]. License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives Unless otherwise stated, copyright owned by the author Japonisme in Polish Pictorial Arts (1885 – 1939) Piotr Spławski Submitted as a partial requirement for the degree of doctor of philosophy awarded by the University of the Arts London Research Centre for Transnational Art, Identity and Nation (TrAIN) Chelsea College of Art and Design University of the Arts London July 2013 Volume 1 – Thesis 1 Abstract This thesis chronicles the development of Polish Japonisme between 1885 and 1939. It focuses mainly on painting and graphic arts, and selected aspects of photography, design and architecture. Appropriation from Japanese sources triggered the articulation of new visual and conceptual languages which helped forge new art and art educational paradigms that would define the modern age. Starting with Polish fin-de-siècle Japonisme, it examines the role of Western European artistic centres, mainly Paris, in the initial dissemination of Japonisme in Poland, and considers the exceptional case of Julian Żałat, who had first-hand experience of Japan. The second phase of Polish Japonisme (1901-1918) was nourished on local, mostly Cracovian, infrastructure put in place by the ‘godfather’ of Polish Japonisme Żeliks Manggha Jasieski. His pro-Japonisme agency is discussed at length.