Strength of Bolsheviks/Weakness of Provisional Government/War What

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Strength of Bolsheviks/Weakness of Provisional Government/War What

Source What reason does it give? What evidence does it use? Use Do you agree or disagree? How trustworthy is this Strength of quotes Explain why this meant source? 10 very Bolsheviks/Weakness of success for the revolution trustworthy, 1 not at all Provisional Government/War Source A: An extract from the diary of P. Sorokin, a Socialist Source B: A. J. P. Taylor, a British historian, writing in his book Revolutions Revolutionary describing the Bolshevik attack on the and Revolutionaries, published in 1980 Provisional Government on 25 October 1917. The diary was published in 1920. The Provisional Government had shrunk to a meeting of ministers in the Winter Palace. It was not overthrown by a mess attack on the Winter I learned that the Bolsheviks had brought up the warship Palace. A few Red Guards climbed in through the servants’ entrance, Aurora and had opened fire on the Winter Palace, demanding found the Provisional Government in a meeting and arrested the ministers the surrender of the members of the Provisional Government in the name of the people. Six people, five of them Red Guards, were barricaded there…There was a team of women and young casualties of bad shooting by their comrades. military trainees bravely resisting an overwhelming force of Bolshevik troops…Poor women, poor lads, their situation was desperate, for we knew the wild sailors would tear them to pieces. Source C: BBC Bitesize account of the October Revolution. In April 1917 the German government helps the Bolshevik leader Lenin return 2019. to Russia. He publishes the 'April Theses', offering people: 'Peace, bread, land', and proclaims: ‘All power to the Soviets'. The Russian people wanted the war to come to an end. However, the Provisional Government decided to continue Source D: Morgan Philips Price, Manchester Guardian (17th July, 1917) Russia’s involvement. They feared that foreign investment from Britain and France would cease in the event of a There then rose upon the stand a man whose name has been on all lips for Russian withdrawal. many weeks past - Lenin. He is a short man with a round head, small pig-like eyes, and close-cropped hair. The words poured from his mouth, In March, 1917, the Petrograd Soviet declared that it would overwhelming all in a flood of oratory [speech]. One sat spellbound [amazed] no longer support an offensive war against Germany. at his command of language and the passion of his denunciation. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Revolution in Real Time: the Russian Provisional Government, 1917
ODUMUNC 2020 Crisis Brief Revolution in Real Time: The Russian Provisional Government, 1917 ODU Model United Nations Society Introduction seventy-four years later. The legacy of the Russian Revolution continues to be keenly felt The Russian Revolution began on 8 March 1917 to this day. with a series of public protests in Petrograd, then the Winter Capital of Russia. These protests But could it have gone differently? Historians lasted for eight days and eventually resulted in emphasize the contingency of events. Although the collapse of the Russian monarchy, the rule of history often seems inventible afterwards, it Tsar Nicholas II. The number of killed and always was anything but certain. Changes in injured in clashes with the police and policy choices, in the outcome of events, government troops in the initial uprising in different players and different accidents, lead to Petrograd is estimated around 1,300 people. surprising outcomes. Something like the Russian Revolution was extremely likely in 1917—the The collapse of the Romanov dynasty ushered a Romanov Dynasty was unable to cope with the tumultuous and violent series of events, enormous stresses facing the country—but the culminating in the Bolshevik Party’s seizure of revolution itself could have ended very control in November 1917 and creation of the differently. Soviet Union. The revolution saw some of the most dramatic and dangerous political events the Major questions surround the Provisional world has ever known. It would affect much Government that struggled to manage the chaos more than Russia and the ethnic republics Russia after the Tsar’s abdication.
[Show full text]
World War I Timeline C
6.2.1 World War I Timeline c June 28, 1914 Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophia are killed by Serbian nationalists. July 26, 1914 Austria declares war on Serbia. Russia, an ally of Serbia, prepares to enter the war. July 29, 1914 Austria invades Serbia. August 1, 1914 Germany declares war on Russia. August 3, 1914 Germany declares war on France. August 4, 1914 German army invades neutral Belgium on its way to attack France. Great Britain declares war on Germany. As a colony of Britain, Canada is now at war. Prime Minister Robert Borden calls for a supreme national effort to support Britain, and offers assistance. Canadians rush to enlist in the military. August 6, 1914 Austria declares war on Russia. August 12, 1914 France and Britain declare war on Austria. October 1, 1914 The first Canadian troops leave to be trained in Britain. October – November 1914 First Battle of Ypres, France. Germany fails to reach the English Channel. 1914 – 1917 The two huge armies are deadlocked along a 600-mile front of Deadlock and growing trenches in Belgium and France. For four years, there is little change. death tolls Attack after attack fails to cross enemy lines, and the toll in human lives grows rapidly. Both sides seek help from other allies. By 1917, every continent and all the oceans of the world are involved in this war. February 1915 The first Canadian soldiers land in France to fight alongside British troops. April - May 1915 The Second Battle of Ypres. Germans use poison gas and break a hole through the long line of Allied trenches.
[Show full text]
The German Army, Vimy Ridge and the Elastic Defence in Depth in 1917
Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 18, ISSUE 2 Studies “Lessons learned” in WWI: The German Army, Vimy Ridge and the Elastic Defence in Depth in 1917 Christian Stachelbeck The Battle of Arras in the spring of 1917 marked the beginning of the major allied offensives on the western front. The attack by the British 1st Army (Horne) and 3rd Army (Allenby) was intended to divert attention from the French main offensive under General Robert Nivelle at the Chemin des Dames (Nivelle Offensive). 1 The French commander-in-chief wanted to force the decisive breakthrough in the west. Between 9 and 12 April, the British had succeeded in penetrating the front across a width of 18 kilometres and advancing around six kilometres, while the Canadian corps (Byng), deployed for the first time in closed formation, seized the ridge near Vimy, which had been fiercely contested since late 1914.2 The success was paid for with the bloody loss of 1 On the German side, the battles at Arras between 2 April and 20 May 1917 were officially referred to as Schlacht bei Arras (Battle of Arras). In Canada, the term Battle of Vimy Ridge is commonly used for the initial phase of the battle. The seizure of Vimy ridge was a central objective of the offensive and was intended to secure the protection of the northern flank of the 3rd Army. 2 For detailed information on this, see: Jack Sheldon, The German Army on Vimy Ridge 1914-1917 (Barnsley: Pen&Sword Military, 2008), p. 8. Sheldon's book, however, is basically a largely indiscriminate succession of extensive quotes from regimental histories, diaries and force files from the Bavarian War Archive (Kriegsarchiv) in Munich.
[Show full text]
World War One Blog July to September 1917 Adobe
Irish Voices from the First World War A blog based on PRONI sources Monitoring the pace, accuracy and effect of bombardment and the ebb and flow of infantry attack was indispensable to trench warfare, D1981/1 July to September 1917 British Army commanders were convinced that the Western German army would have been close to defeat by later 1917, had not the Russian front begun to crumble in September, as revolutionary insurgents, crucially assisted by the German state, took over the Russian administration in a vast upheaval. Following the misery of Passchendaele where teeming rain created perhaps one of the bleakest landscapes of battle in the war, the British Army revived in confidence by virtue of promising success in the mass use of tanks during the first days of Cambrai. In spite of formal adherence to international rules of combat, how prisoners were treated, by all sides, depended greatly on the state of mind of attacking troops hour by hour, D1981/1 Document 1: Journal entries of Captain Godfrey John Mulholland (4th son of Henry, 2nd Baron Dunleath, Ballwalter Park), Horse Transport, Army Service Corps, June 1917. The A.S.C. was responsible for supply of food, equipment and ammunition to forces on front line. Mulholland proud of equestrian assignment and skills [D4179/9/2/] 4th June – Went on Leave 14th June – Went to very good Corps Horse Show near Mardeuil in which we won 1st prize for best stripped H.D. horse. Went to still better Army Horse Show at Camblain l’Abbé, excellent jumping and turns out. A Portuguese officer won the jumping.
[Show full text]
TIMELINE of EVENTS March 1917 Tsar Nicholas Abdicates and The
TIMELINE OF EVENTS March 1917 Tsar Nicholas abdicates and the Provisional Government takes over supported by the Soviet. It now has to deal with all the problems which led to the downfall of the Tsar – the war, food shortages and peasant demands for land…. April 16th 1917 Lenin arrives in Russia. He makes a speech demanding an end to the war with Germany, land for the peasants and nationalisation of banks. He insists that no support be given to the Provisional Government – instead the Soviets (there are Soviets in other cities) should get together and form a new government. These ideas became known as the April Theses. June 1917 The Provisional Government orders the armies to attack Austria. This fails and turns into a retreat. Soldiers began to desert in large numbers. Many go to Petrograd and join the Bolsheviks demanding an end to the Provisional Government July 1917 100000 soldiers and Bolsheviks are out in the streets demanding ‘All power to the Soviets’. These three days of rioting in Petrograd are known as the July Days. Kerensky sends loyal troops into the city to deal with the uprising. He claims the Bolsheviks have been paid by Germany to make trouble and Lenin is a German agent. Lenin has to leave Russia to avoid arrest and goes to Finland. Other leading Bolsheviks are arrested. The Bolsheviks have become unpopular and weak. August 1917 Kerensky become leader of the Provisional Government. He has to deal with a challenge from General Kornilov, Commander in Chief of the army who wants to take control.
[Show full text]
The Root Mission to Russia, 1917. Alton Earl Ingram Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1970 The Root Mission to Russia, 1917. Alton Earl Ingram Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Ingram, Alton Earl, "The Root Mission to Russia, 1917." (1970). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1786. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1786 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 71-3418 } INGRAM, Alton Earl, 1934- THE ROOT MISSION TO RUSSIA, 1917. [ [I' The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1970 History, modern University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan !■ i I ■ 1 ■■ ■■ ■■ !■ ■■ !■■■■! ■' ....... THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED THE ROOT MISSION TO RUSSIA 1917 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Alton Earl Ingram B.A., Northeast Louisiana State College, 1958 M.A., Louisiana State University, 1961 May, 1970 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to thank his faculty advisor, professor Burl Noggle, for his assistance during the preparation of this dissertation and his wife, Mimi, who has given unlimited assistance, encouragement, and under standing throughout the entire course of his graduate program. TABLE OP CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS......................................
[Show full text]
WORLD WAR ONE: the FEW THAT FED the MANY British Farmers and Growers Played a Significant Role in the War Effort During 1914-1918 to Produce Food for the Nation
NATIONAL FARMERS' UNION WORLD WAR ONE: THE FEW THAT FED THE MANY BRITISH FARMERS AND GROWERS PLAYED A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN THE WAR EFFORT DURING 1914-1918 TO PRODUCE FOOD FOR THE NATION. THIS REPORT FOCUSES ON HOW THE EVENTS OF THE GREAT WAR CHANGED THE FACE OF BRITISH FARMING AND CHANGED THE WAY FARMERS AND GROWERS PRODUCED FOOD. CONTENTS Britannia ruled the imports In the lead up to World War One the population of Great Britain was 45 million with 1.5 million employed fter the agricultural depression of the 1870s, British The question of domestic food production was raised in a in agriculture. As hundreds of thousands of male farm agriculture was largely neglected by government. report in 1905 from the Royal Commission on the Supply of workers left the fields for the front line, those left behind The development of refrigeration and the Industrial Food and Raw Materials in Time of War. It recommended were expected to produce the food for the nation. ARevolution, that brought steam engines and railways that “it may be prudent to take some minor practical into force, impacted heavily on British farmers. Countries steps to secure food supplies for Britain”. The Government were suddenly able to transport produce across huge focused on the carrying capacity of the merchant fleet and 2-3 Pre-War Britain distances to the ports. Meat, eggs, grains and other goods the Royal Navy to keep the shipping lanes open and did not How did Britain feed the nation before World were transported on ships from Australia, South Africa and heed these early warnings.
[Show full text]
A Comparative Study of America's Entries Into World War I and World War II
East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2009 A Comparative Study of America's Entries into World War I and World War II. Samantha Alisha Taylor East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Taylor, Samantha Alisha, "A Comparative Study of America's Entries into World War I and World War II." (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1860. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1860 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Comparative Study of America's Entries into World War I and World War II _____________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History _____________________ by Samantha Alisha Taylor May 2009 _____________________ Stephen Fritz, Chair Elwood Watson Ronnie Day Keywords: World War One, World War Two, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, American Entry ABSTRACT A Comparative Study of America's Entries into World War I and World War II by Samantha Alisha Taylor This thesis studies events that preceded America‟s entries into the First and Second World Wars to discover similarities and dissimilarities.
[Show full text]
NJDARM: Collection Guide
NJDARM: Collection Guide - NEW JERSEY STATE ARCHIVES COLLECTION GUIDE Record Group: Governor Walter Evans Edge (1873-1956; 1st Term 1917-1920) Series: Correspondence, 1917-1919 Accession #: 1957.002, 1979.003 prob. Series #: S3900001 Guide Date: 1987 (JK) Volume: 3 c.f. [6 boxes] Contents Box 1 Correspondence filed by county: 1. Atlantic complaints, 1917-1919 (2 files). 2. Atlantic Board of Elections, 2 July 1917. 3. Atlantic requisitions, 1917-1918. 4. Bergen complaints, 1917-1919 (2 files). 5. Bergen requisitions, 1917-1918. 6. Burlington College, 18 May 1917. 7. Burlington complaints, 1917-1918. 8. Burlington requisitions, 1917-1918. 9. Camden complaints, 1917-1919. 10. Camden requisitions, 1917-1918. 11. Cape May complaints, 1917. 12. Cape May requisitions, May, August 1917. 13. Cumberland complaints, 1917-1918. 14. Essex complaints, 1917-1919 (2 files). 15. Essex requisitions, 1917-1918. 16. Gloucester complaints, 1917-1918. 17. Hudson complaints, 1917-1919. 18. Hudson Board of Elections, 1917. 19. Hudson requisitions, 1917-1918. 20. Hunterdon complaints, 1917. 21. Mercer complaints, 1917-1919. 22. Middlesex complaints, 1917-1919. 23. Middlesex requisitions, February, June 1917. 24. Monmouth complaints, 1917-1919. file:///M|/highpoint/webdocs/state/darm/darm2011/guides/guides%20for%20pdf/s3900001.html[5/16/2011 9:34:02 AM] NJDARM: Collection Guide - 25. Monmouth Board of Elections, 1918. 26. Monmouth requisitions, 3-4 September 1917. 27. Morris complaints, 1917-1919. 28. Morris requisitions, 4-5 April 1917. 29. Ocean complaints, 1917-1918. 30. Ocean requisitions, June - July 1917. 31. Passaic complaints, 1917-1919. 32. Passaic requisitions, 3, 12 February 1917. 33. Salem complaints, 1917-1918. 34.
[Show full text]
Federal Reserve Bulletin July 1917
FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN ISSUED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD AT WASHINGTON JULY, IS17 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1917 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD. EX OPFICIO MEMBEES. W. P. G. HARDING. Governor, PAUL M. WARBURG, Vice Governor. WILLIAM G. MCADOO, Secretary of the Treasury, FREDERIC A. DELANO. Ohairman. ADOLPH C. MILLER. CHARLES S. HAMLIN. JOHN SKELTON WILLIAMS, Comptroller of the Currency. H. PARKER WILLIS, Secretary. SHERMAN ALLBN, Assistant Secretary and Fiscal Agent. M. 0. ELLIOTT, Counsel. Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis SUBSCRIPTION PRICE OF BULLETIN. The Federal Reserve Bulletin is distributed without charge to member banks of the system and to the officers and directors of Federal Reserve Banks. In sending the Bulletin to others the Board feels that a subscription should be required. It has accordingly fixed a subscription price of $2 per annum. Single copies wiil be sold at 20 cents. Foreign postage should be added when it will be required. Remittances should be made to the Federal Reserve Board. Member banks desiring to have the Bulletin supplied to their officers and directors may have it sent to not less than 10 names at a subscription price of $1 per annum. No complete sets of the Bulletin for 1915 are available. Bound copies of the Bulletin for 1916 may be had at $5 per copy. in Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page, Review of the month .. 497 Subscriptions to the Liberty Loan 505 New form of Federal Reserve Bank statement .
[Show full text]
Newport News Port of Embarkation in World War I Guide
BRITISH REMOUNT STATION ANIMAL EMBARKATION DEPOT NO. 301 JOINT BASE LANGLEY-EUSTIS Between 30th and 34th Streets near downtown piers Between 30th and 34th Streets 300 Washington Blvd., Ft. Eustis Newport News played an important role even before entering WWI. The On August 4, 1917, this depot had the capacity of 900 men, 10,000 Camp Eustis, named after War of 1812 veteran Brigadier General Abraham brutal ﬁ ghting exhausted Great Britain’s supply of horses, which were animals and a veterinary hospital for 1,500 animals. A total of 57,944 Eustis and founder of Fort Monroe’s Artillery School of Practice, was vital to the movement of its troops, artillery, and supplies. The British animals were handled at this depot, and it was recorded that “when created in March 1918. Although 20,000 soldiers were shipped overseas Remount Commission established a Remount Station and by the end of running at capacity, it required 900,000 lbs. of bran, 4,500,000 lbs. of from this camp, its primary purpose was to house several schools. Used the war, almost 500,000 animals, worth nearly $3 billion today, had been oats and 9,000,000 lbs. of hay per month for feeding purposes.” as a coast artillery training camp and artillery range, it also hosted motor transported from this compound. CAMP HILL transport, trench mortar and anti-aircraft artillery units. Of the various camps and depots established in present-day Newport News during WWI, CURTISS FLYING SCHOOL Warwick Blvd. and 64th St. Camp Eustis (known as Fort Eustis after 1923 and now known as Joint 30 Jeff erson Ave.
[Show full text]
Soldiers' Wives in Russia During 1917
IRSH 49 (2004), pp. 47–70 DOI: 10.1017/S0020859003001366 # 2004 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis Women, Protest, and Revolution: Soldiers’ Wives in Russia During 1917* Sarah Badcock Summary: This study explores the role and political impact of soldiers’ wives in three Volga provinces of Russia: Nizhnii Novgorod, Kazan, and Tambov between February and October 1917. Despite relatively low levels of formal organization, soldiers’ wives made a significant mark on revolutionary politics at a local level. Common grievances, which centred on the inadequacy of state support in the context of rising food prices and shortages, were the defining feature of soldiers’ wives as a group. Though they secured little direct representation in government, and did not affiliate with any political parties, they operated collectively to address their grievances, both in petitions and in public demonstrations. Their demands continued to escalate in 1917, and the government was unable to cushion them from Russia’s profound economic crisis. Soldiers’ wives rejected both Soviet and provisional government leadership as a result, and their alienation contributed to the sense of political crisis that pervaded 1917. INTRODUCTION Soldiers’ wives played one of the most prominent and best-known roles in the February revolution. Their demonstrations in Petrograd alongside other women on International Women’s Day were the spark that lit the conflagration of revolution.1 The toppling of the Tsarist regime in February 1917 heralded an eight-month interregnum, during which the provisional government, a shifting coalition of liberals and moderate socialists, strove above all else to keep Russia in the war, and to avoid the * This paper was first presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies conference, Washington DC, in November 2001, and a subsequent version was presented to the Birmingham University SIPS seminar in March 2002.
[Show full text]