Transform Margins: Development, Controls and Petroleum Systems – an Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transform Margins: Development, Controls and Petroleum Systems – an Introduction Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 25, 2021 Transform margins: development, controls and petroleum systems – an introduction M. NEMCˇ OK1,2*, S. RYBA´ R2,3, S. T. SINHA4, S. A. HERMESTON5 & L. LEDVE´ NYIOVA´ 2 1EGI at University of Utah, 423 Wakara Way, Suite 300, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA 2EGI Laboratory at SAV, Du´bravska´ cesta 9, 840 05 Bratislava, Slovakia 3Department of Geology and Paleontology, Comenius University, Ilkovicˇova 6, Mlynska´ dolina, Bratislava 842 15, Slovakia 4Reliance Industries Ltd., Reliance Corporate Park, Block 5, A Wing, Navi Mumbai-400701, India 5Jaguar Ventures LLC., 4507 Park Ivy Court, Katy, TX 77494, USA *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: This paper provides an overview of the existing knowledge of transform margins including their dynamic development, kinematic development, structural architecture and thermal regime, together with the factors controlling these. This systematic knowledge is used for describ- ing predictive models of various petroleum system concept elements such as source rock, seal rock and reservoir rock distribution, expulsion timing, trapping style and timing, and migration patterns. The paper then introduces individual contributions to this volume and their focus. Supplementary material: Location table and map of specific transform examples, structural ele- ments of the Romanche transform margin and glossary of terms used in this article is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3276407 Gold Open Access: This article is published under the terms of the CC-BY 3.0 license. This volume shows dynamic linkage between new called sheared margins (Rabinowitz & Labrecque transform margin research and increasing transform 1979; Scrutton 1979) or strike-slip margins (Nagel margin exploration. It offers a critical set of predic- et al. 1986), and margins developed by dominat- tive tools via an understanding of the mechanisms ing transform tectonics are the focus of this special involved in the development of play concept ele- publication. ments at transform margins and their controlling Worldwide case examples of transform mar- factors. Our introduction to this volume reviews the gins allow one to group them into two categories current knowledge of the transform margins, focus- with respect to their initial role in ocean opening. ing on their dynamic development, kinematic devel- The first group contains transform margins which opment, structural architecture, thermal regimes started as transfer faults between neighbouring rift and petroleum systems. The last part of this paper units (see Bally 1982; Gibbs 1984; Bosworth 1985; introduces the contributions to this volume. Lister et al. 1986; Versfelt & Rosendahl 1989; Moustafa 2002). The Central Atlantic Rift System Dynamic development (Schettino & Turco 2009; Fig. 1) is a typical exam- ple for this category, having its geometry charac- Rifted continental margins are typically segmen- terized by numerous offsets of neighbouring rift ted, consisting of extensional margins (e.g. Falvey zones. Its faults that were active as transfer faults 1974; Veevers 1981; Buck 1991; Menzies et al. and subsequent transforms for the longest time are 2002; Manatschal 2004; Huismans & Beaumont the ones represented by the largest transform 2005, 2008), transform margins (see the models of margins, separating regions with oceanic crusts of Wilson 1965; Freund 1974; Mascle 1976; Mascle differing age ranges (Mu¨ller et al. 1997; Fig. 2). & Blarez 1987) and oblique margins (e.g. Cochran They include the transform margins associated with 1973; Sims et al. 1999; Bird 2001; Clifton & Sch- the Gettysburg–Tarfaya transform fault system lische 2001; d’Acremont et al. 2006; Lizarralde (Nemcˇok et al. 2005 and references therein) and et al. 2007). Transform margins, which are also Cobequid–Chedabucto–Gibraltar transform fault From:Nemcˇok, M., Ryba´r, S., Sinha, S. T., Hermeston,S.A.&Ledve´nyiova´, L. (eds) Transform Margins: Development, Controls and Petroleum Systems. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 431, http://doi.org/10.1144/SP431.15 # 2016 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London. Publishing disclaimer: www.geolsoc.org.uk/pub_ethics Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 25, 2021 M. NEMCˇ OK ET AL. Plate reconstruction at 200 Ma (Triassic–Jurassic boundary) (Schettino & Turco 2009). Initial oceanic crust associated with the East Coast and Blake Spur magnetic Fig. 1. anomalies is shown in yellow. Orange denotes individual rift branches. Red lines are spreading centres, blue represents oceanic crust. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 25, 2021 TRANSFORM MARGINS Fig. 2. Age of the oceanic crust age (Mu¨ller et al. 1997). Colour-coding indicates Jurassic, Cretaceous, Palaeogene and Neogene–Present ages. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 25, 2021 M. NEMCˇ OK ET AL. Blue represents oceanic Plate reconstruction at 147.7 Ma (Tithonian) (Schettino & Turco 2009). Rifting in northern Central Atlantic evolved to drifting. The Atlas rift branch was aborted and crusts of the Ligurian and Alpine Tethys oceans. Fig. 3. the plate boundary migrated to the north. GiF, Gibraltar Fault; NPF, North Pyrenean Fault. Orange, active rifting; red, sea-floor spreading centres. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 25, 2021 TRANSFORM MARGINS system (Le Roy & Pique´ 2001; Schettino & Turco uplift mechanisms related to the thermal effects 2009; Fig. 3). Other examples of transforms divid- of rifting: ing neighbouring rift zones are (Table 1): the Cape (1) depth-dependent extension (Royden & Keen Range and Wallaby transforms in Western Austra- 1980; Hellinger & Sclater 1983; Watts & lia, the Coromandal transform in East India and Thorne 1984; Morgan et al. 1985); the Davie transform in East Africa. (2) lateral heat flow (Steckler 1981; Cochran1983; The second group contains transform margins Alvarez et al. 1984; Buck et al. 1988); and that started as transforms connecting oceans opened (3) secondary convection under rift shoulders at different times. Examples come from: (Keen 1985; Steckler 1985; Buck 1986). (1) the Sierra Leone and Northern Demerara In addition, representing permanent uplift mech- faults that have divided the Central Atlantic anisms, they are driven by: from the Equatorial Atlantic since Albian (1) magmatic underplating (Cox 1980; Ewart time (e.g. Loncke et al. 2015; Nemcˇok et al. et al. 1980; McKenzie 1984; White & McKen- 2015a and references therein); zie 1988); (2) the Pernambuco and Fernando Poo faults that (2) flexural-isostatic uplift (Watts et al. 1982; divided the Equatorial Atlantic from the South Gilchrist & Summerfield 1990; Weissel & Atlantic since Albian time (Rosendahl et al. Karner 1994); and 2005; Nemcˇok et al. 2012b, 2015a and refer- (3) lithospheric unloading and/or ductile necking ences therein); and (Zuber & Parmentier 1986; Parmentier 1987; (3) the Falklands and Agulhas transform faults Braun & Beaumont 1989; Issler et al. 1989; (Edwards 2013, pers. comm.) representing the Chery et al. 1992; Weissel & Karner 1994), southern terminus of the South Atlantic. Further contribution comes from: What makes transform margins different from (1) the erosional unloading of margin coupled extensional margins is the amount of post-breakup with depositional loading of basin (e.g. van uplift. Extensional margins are normally associated Balen et al. 1995; van der Beek et al. 1995; with distinct uplift driven by, representing transient Burov & Cloetingh 1997); and Table 1. Timing data on selected transform margins Transform name Length of Length of spreading Source continent-continent ridge-continent clearance (Ma) clearance (Ma) Between two main oceanic segments Azores-Gibraltar 45.8 Reading off the map by Mu¨ller et al. Transform (2008) Charlie Gibbs Transform 37.5 Reading off the map by Mu¨ller et al. (European side) (2008) Charlie Gibbs Transform 18.5 Reading off the map by Mu¨ller et al. (N American side) (2008) Falklands Transform 39.7 Reading off the map by Mu¨ller et al. (2008) South Tasman Transform about 10 33.9 Gibson, 2015 pers. comm.; reading off the map by Mu¨ller et al. (2008) Sort of between two main oceanic segments St Paul Transform 4–8 12 Reading off the maps by Mu¨ller et al. (1997, 2008); Nemcˇok et al. 2012b Romanche Transform 14 32 Reading off the maps by Mu¨ller et al. (1997, 2008); Nemcˇok et al. 2012b Between two neighbor rift zones Cape Range Transform 8.2 Reading off the map by Mu¨ller et al. (2008) Coromandal Transform 5.5–11 Reading off the map by Mu¨ller et al. (2008); Sinha et al. (2015) Davie Transform 50.3 Reading off the maps by Mu¨ller et al. (1993, 1997) Wallaby-Zenith Transform 15.2 Reading off the map by Mu¨ller et al. (2008) Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 25, 2021 M. NEMCˇ OK ET AL. Fig. 4. (a) Middle to Late Jurassic palaeogeography of Morocco (Nemcˇok et al. 2005). (2) margin unloading coupled with basin loading resulting in mountain ranges preventing siliciclas- due to gravity gliding (Mohriak et al. 2008). tic material from the hinterland from entering the oceanic basin. Protected from such input, wide car- Transform margins, apart from exceptions, in con- bonate platforms were developing on the shelf. The trast, are not associated with distinct uplift for the transform segment in the centre did not undergo any following reasons. The strike-slip displacement of distinct uplift. This allowed sediments to funnel into the blocks along the transform fault zone does not the oceanic basin through the system of failed pull- include any significant removal of the hanging wall apart basins. Figure 4b shows the distribution of from the footwall that would react by the isostatic depositional environments later after the breakup. uplift. An interpreted comparison of uplift related It documents that, after the erosional removal of to extensional and transform margins after the the mountain ranges at extensional margins, sedi- breakup comes from the Central Atlantic (Nemcˇok ments had an equal opportunity to enter oceanic et al.
Recommended publications
  • Transform Faults Represent One of the Three
    8 Transform faults ransform faults represent one of the three Because of the drift of the newly formed oceanic types of plate boundaries. A peculiar aspect crust away from ridge segments, a relative move- T of their nature is that they are abruptly trans- ment along the faults is induced that corresponds formed into another kind of plate boundary at their to the spreading velocity on both sides of the termination (Wilson, 1965). Plates glide along the ridge. Th e sense of displacement is contrary to fault and move past each other without destruc- the apparent displacement of the ridge segments tion of or creation of new crust. Although crust is (Fig. 8.1b). In the example shown, the transform neither created or destroyed, the transform margin fault is a right-lateral strike-slip fault; if an observer is commonly marked by topographic features like straddles the fault, the right-hand side of the fault scarps, trenches or ridges. moves towards the observer, regardless of which Transform faults occur as several diff erent geo- way is faced. Transform faults end abruptly in a metries; they can connect two segments of growing point, the transformation point, where the strike- plate boundaries (R-R transform fault), one growing slip movement is transformed into a diverging or and one subducting plate boundary (R-T transform converging movement. Th is property gives this fault) or two subducting plate boundaries (T-T fault its name. In the example of the R-R transform transform fault); R stands for mid-ocean ridge, T for fault, the movement at both ends of the fault is deep sea trench ( subduction zone).
    [Show full text]
  • Segmentation of Transform Systems on the East Pacific Rise
    Segmentation of transform systems on the East Paci®c Rise: Implications for earthquake processes at fast-slipping oceanic transform faults Patricia M. Gregg Massachusetts Institute of Technology/WHOI Joint Program in Oceanography, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA Jian Lin Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA Deborah K. Smith ABSTRACT Per®t et al., 1996) indicate that ITSCs are Seven of the eight transform systems along the equatorial East Paci®c Rise from 128 N magmatically active, implying that the regions to 158 S have undergone extension due to reorientation of plate motions and have been beneath them are hotter, and thus the litho- segmented into two or more strike-slip fault strands offset by intratransform spreading spheric plate is thinner than the surrounding centers (ITSCs). Earthquakes recorded along these transform systems both teleseismically domains. To explore the effect of segmenta- and hydroacoustically suggest that segmentation geometry plays an important role in how tion on the transform fault thermal structure, slip is accommodated at oceanic transforms. Results of thermal calculations suggest that we use a half-space steady-state lithospheric the thickness of the brittle layer of a segmented transform fault could be signi®cantly cooling model (McKenzie, 1969; Abercrom- reduced by the thermal effect of ITSCs. Consequently, the potential rupture area, and bie and Ekstrom, 2001). The temperature thus maximum seismic moment, is decreased. Using Coulomb static stress models, we within the crust and mantle, T, is de®ned as T 5 k 21/2 illustrate that long ITSCs will prohibit static stress interaction between transform seg- Tmerf [y(2 t) ], where Tm is the mantle ments and limit the maximum possible magnitude of earthquakes on a given transform temperature at depth, assumed to be 1300 8C; k system.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Risk Where Tectonic Plates Collide—A Plan to Advance Subduction Zone Science
    Reducing Risk Where Tectonic Plates Collide— A Plan to Advance Subduction Zone Science Circular 1428 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover. A U.S. Geological Survey scientist surveys Loowit Creek drainage on Mount St. Helens, part of a long-term project to track sediment erosion and deposition in the channel. View to the north, with Spirit Lake and Mount Rainier in the background. U.S. Geological Survey photograph by Kurt Spicer. Reducing Risk Where Tectonic Plates Collide—A Plan to Advance Subduction Zone Science By Joan S. Gomberg, Kristin A. Ludwig, Barbara A. Bekins, Thomas M. Brocher, John C. Brock, Daniel Brothers, Jason D. Chaytor, Arthur D. Frankel, Eric L. Geist, Matthew Haney, Stephen H. Hickman, William S. Leith, Evelyn A. Roeloffs, William H. Schulz, Thomas W. Sisson, Kristi Wallace, Janet T. Watt, and Anne Wein Circular 1428 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William H. Werkheiser, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2017 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Transform Continental Margins – Part 1: Concepts and Models Christophe Basile
    Transform continental margins – Part 1: Concepts and models Christophe Basile To cite this version: Christophe Basile. Transform continental margins – Part 1: Concepts and models. Tectonophysics, Elsevier, 2015, 661, pp.1-10. 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.08.034. hal-01261571 HAL Id: hal-01261571 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01261571 Submitted on 25 Jan 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Tectonophysics, 661, p. 1-10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2015.08.034 Transform continental margins – Part 1: Concepts and models Christophe Basile Address: Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, ISTerre, F-38041 Grenoble, France.cbasile@ujf-grenoble. Abstract This paper reviews the geodynamic concepts and models related to transform continental margins, and their implications on the structure of these margins. Simple kinematic models of transform faulting associated with continental rifting and oceanic accretion allow to define three successive stages of evolution, including intra- continental transform faulting, active transform margin, and passive transform margin. Each part of the transform margin experiences these three stages, but the evolution is diachronous along the margin. Both the duration of each stage and the cumulated strike-slip deformation increase from one extremity of the margin (inner corner) to the other (outer corner).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ocean Basin & Plate Tectonics
    Sept. 2010 MAR 110 HW 3: 1 Homework 3: The Ocean Basin & Plate Tectonics 3-1. THE OCEAN BASIN The world ocean basin is an extensive suite of connected depressions (or basins) that are filled with salty water; covering 72% of the Earth’s surface. The ocean basin bathymetric profile in Figure 3-1 highlights features of a typical ocean basin, which is bordered by continental margins at the ocean’s edge. Starting at the coast, the sea floor the slopes slightly across the continental shelf to the shelf break where it plunges down the steeper continental slope to continental rise and the abyssal plain, which is flat because accumulated sediments. The continental shelf is the flooded edge of the continent -extending from the beach to the shelf break, with typical depths ranging from 130 m to 200 m. The sea floor slopes over wide shelves are 1° to 2° - virtually flat- and somewhat steeper over narrower shelves. Continental shelves are generally gently undulating surfaces, sometimes interrupted by hills and valleys (see Figure 3-2). Sept. 2010 MAR 110 HW 3: 2 The continental slope connects the continental shelf to the deep ocean, with typical depths of 2 to 3 km. While appearing steep in these vertically exaggerated pictures, the bottom slopes of a typical continental slope region are modest angles of 4° to 6°. Continental slope regions adjacent to deep ocean trenches tend to descend somewhat more steeply than normal. Sediments derived from the weathering of the continental material are delivered by rivers and continental shelf flow to the upper continental slope region just beyond the continental shelf break.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Classes of Transform Faults
    Two classes of transform faults SrM^r" } Department of Geology, Rutgers >, Newark, New Jersey 07102 ABSTRACT The fault motion is strike slip, and the displacement termina11 s ab- ruptly at both ends. In this model, both transform faults are ridge- A theoretical model and experimental work with cooling wax, as to-trench types (Wilson, 1965). They represent initial cuts in the well as a consideration of some faults that were originally cited as tennis ball (the lithosphere) and thus constitute original or funda- transform faults, have suggested that two classes of transform mental plate boundaries. It is proposed that all transform faults faults exist. They are termed "boundary transform fault" and that represent original or fundamental plate boundaries be called "ridge transform fault." They differ in the degree and manner in "boundary transform faults." which they delineate plate boundaries and probably also in age rel- We can apply the concept of boundary transform fault to the ative to a given plate. South American plate (Fig. 1). The present east boundary of this plate is the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Initially, however, the east bound- INTRODUCTION ary was an incipient break in the combined continent of South America and Africa. At that time, the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and its Since Wilson's (1965) original definition of transform faults and offsets due to transform faults did not exist. The west boundary of Sykes's (1967) confirmation of the nature of movement along them, the South American plate is the Peru-Chile Trench bordered by the the term "transform fault" has come to be applied to such contrast- Andes.
    [Show full text]
  • Plate Tectonics
    Plate Tectonics Introduction Continental Drift Seafloor Spreading Plate Tectonics Divergent Plate Boundaries Convergent Plate Boundaries Transform Plate Boundaries Summary This curious world we inhabit is more wonderful than convenient; more beautiful than it is useful; it is more to be admired and enjoyed than used. Henry David Thoreau Introduction • Earth's lithosphere is divided into mobile plates. • Plate tectonics describes the distribution and motion of the plates. • The theory of plate tectonics grew out of earlier hypotheses and observations collected during exploration of the rocks of the ocean floor. You will recall from a previous chapter that there are three major layers (crust, mantle, core) within the earth that are identified on the basis of their different compositions (Fig. 1). The uppermost mantle and crust can be subdivided vertically into two layers with contrasting mechanical (physical) properties. The outer layer, the lithosphere, is composed of the crust and uppermost mantle and forms a rigid outer shell down to a depth of approximately 100 km (63 miles). The underlying asthenosphere is composed of partially melted rocks in the upper mantle that acts in a plastic manner on long time scales. Figure 1. The The asthenosphere extends from about 100 to 300 km (63-189 outermost part of miles) depth. The theory of plate tectonics proposes that the Earth is divided lithosphere is divided into a series of plates that fit together like into two the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. mechanical layers, the lithosphere and Although plate tectonics is a relatively young idea in asthenosphere. comparison with unifying theories from other sciences (e.g., law of gravity, theory of evolution), some of the basic observations that represent the foundation of the theory were made many centuries ago when the first maps of the Atlantic Ocean were drawn.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Models of Oceanic Transform Faults
    Tectonophysics 522–523 (2012) 34–54 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Tectonophysics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto Review Article Origin and models of oceanic transform faults Taras Gerya ⁎ Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Department of Geosciences, Zurich, Switzerland article info abstract Article history: Mid-ocean ridges sectioned by transform faults represent prominent surface expressions of plate tectonics. A Received 22 March 2011 fundamental problem of plate tectonics is how this pattern has formed and why it is maintained. Gross-scale Received in revised form 30 June 2011 geometry of mid-ocean ridges is often inherited from respective rifted margins. Indeed, transform faults seem Accepted 7 July 2011 to nucleate after the beginning of the oceanic spreading and can spontaneously form at a single straight ridge. Available online 22 July 2011 Both analog and numerical models of transform faults were investigated since the 1970s. Two main groups of analog models were developed: thermomechanical (freezing wax) models with accreting and cooling plates Keywords: – Transform faults and mechanical models with non-accreting lithosphere. Freezing wax models reproduced ridge ridge Mid-ocean ridges transform faults, inactive fracture zones, rotating microplates, overlapping spreading centers and other Analog models features of oceanic ridges. However, these models often produced open spreading centers that are dissimilar Numerical models to nature. Mechanical models, on the other hand, do not accrete the lithosphere and their results are thus only applicable for relatively small amount of spreading. Three main types of numerical models were investigated: models of stress and displacement distribution around transforms, models of their thermal structure and crustal growth, and models of nucleation and evolution of ridge-transform fault patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Thermal Structure of Oceanic Transform Faults 2 Mark D
    1 On the thermal structure of oceanic transform faults 2 Mark D. Behn1,*, Margaret S. Boettcher1,2, and Greg Hirth1 3 1Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA 4 2U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USA 5 6 7 Abstract: 8 We use 3-D finite element simulations to investigate the upper mantle temperature 9 structure beneath oceanic transform faults. We show that using a rheology that 10 incorporates brittle weakening of the lithosphere generates a region of enhanced mantle 11 upwelling and elevated temperatures along the transform, with the warmest temperatures 12 and thinnest lithosphere predicted near the center of the transform. In contrast, previous 13 studies that examined 3-D advective and conductive heat transport found that oceanic 14 transform faults are characterized by anomalously cold upper mantle relative to adjacent 15 intra-plate regions, with the thickest lithosphere at the center of the transform. These 16 earlier studies used simplified rheologic laws to simulate the behavior of the lithosphere 17 and underlying asthenosphere. Here, we show that the warmer thermal structure 18 predicted by our calculations is directly attributed to the inclusion of a more realistic 19 brittle rheology. This warmer upper mantle temperature structure is consistent with a 20 wide range of geophysical and geochemical observations from ridge-transform 21 environments, including the depth of transform fault seismicity, geochemical anomalies 22 along adjacent ridge segments, and the tendency for long transforms to break into a series 23 of small intra-transform spreading centers during changes in plate motion. 24 Key Words: Oceanic transform faults, mid-ocean ridges, fault rheology, intra-transform 25 spreading centers 26 *Corresponding Author, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth Hazards of The
    Chapter 10: Earth Hazards of the weather • the measure Western US of short-term conditions of the atmosphere such as temperature, wind speed, and Natural hazards are events that result from natural processes and that humidity. have signifi cant impacts on human beings. Extreme weather conditions or geologic activity can cause substantial short-term or long-term changes to our environment. These changes can infl uence crops, homes, infrastructure, and plates • large, rigid pieces of the atmosphere. The 4.6-billion-year-old Earth has experienced many of these the Earth’s crust and upper natural changes, and it has always adjusted accordingly. mantle, which move and interact with one another at their boundaries. The Western United States is located at the junction of three tectonic plates: the Pacifi c, the Juan de Fuca, and the North American. The movement of these plates, even though it occurs on the scale of millimeters per year, makes the Western US a dynamic landscape. The dramatic result is a dizzying assortment subduction • the process of natural hazards such as earthquakes, tsunamis, landslides, and volcanoes. by which one plate moves The Pacifi c plate is subducting under Alaska, creating the volcanoes of the under another, sinking into the mantle. Aleutian Islands. The Juan de Fuca plate is subducting under Washington, Oregon, and Northern California, creating the Cascade volcanoes, and the Pacifi c plate is grinding past the North American plate along the famous San Andreas Fault. At the same time, the Basin and Range province, which includes fault • a fracture in the Earth’s nearly the entire state of Nevada, is being stretched and faulted by plate crust in which the rock on one side of the fracture moves movement.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Segmentation of the Cephalonia–Lefkada Transform Fault Zone (Greece) from an Insar Multi-Mode Dataset of the Lefkada 2015 Sequence
    remote sensing Article On the Segmentation of the Cephalonia–Lefkada Transform Fault Zone (Greece) from an InSAR Multi-Mode Dataset of the Lefkada 2015 Sequence Nikos Svigkas 1,2,3,* , Simone Atzori 2, Anastasia Kiratzi 1 , Cristiano Tolomei 2 , Andrea Antonioli 2, Ioannis Papoutsis 3, Stefano Salvi 2 and Charalampos (Haris) Kontoes 3 1 Department of Geophysics, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece 2 Osservatorio Nazionale Terremoti, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, 00143 Roma, Italy 3 Institute of Space Applications and Remote Sensing, National Observatory of Athens, 15236 Athens, Greece * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 July 2019; Accepted: 6 August 2019; Published: 8 August 2019 Abstract: We use Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) to study the Cephalonia–Lefkada Transform Fault Zone (CTF) in the Ionian Sea. The CTF separates continental subduction to the north from oceanic subduction to the south, along the Hellenic Subduction Zone. We exploit a rich multi-modal radar dataset of the most recent major earthquake in the region, the 17 November 2015 Mw 6.4 event, and present new surface displacement results that offer additional constraints on the fault segmentation of the area. Based on this dataset, and by exploiting available information of earthquake relocation, we propose a new rupture process for the 2015 sequence, complementary to those published already. Our modelling includes an additional southern fault segment, oblique to the segment related with the mainshock, which indicates that the CTF structure is more complex than previously believed. Keywords: InSAR; fault segmentation; Cephalonia–Lefkada Transform Fault; seismology 1. Introduction The Cephalonia–Lefkada Transform Fault Zone (CTF) in western Greece (Figure1a), connects two different subducting regimes: subduction of continental lithosphere to the north, with subduction of oceanic lithosphere to the south [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Plate Boundaries
    Transform Boundaries Transform boundaries occur where one segment of rigid lithosphere slides horizontally past another in response to stresses in the lithosphere. The oceanic ridge system is offset (or segmented) by many transform faults. Severe, shallow earthquakes are associated with transform boundaries. Transform faults and fracture zones in the Atlantic Ocean Explanation The San Andreas Fault is a transform fault linking the East Pacific Rise with the Gorda and Juan de Fuca Ridges. Actually an inter-connecting fault system. The west side is moving north relative to the east side. Cause of numerous large shallow earthquakes. Rotating the previous sketch to show the movement of the San Andreas fault Not only do transform faults connect spreading ridges, but also ridges and trenches and two trenches. Two ridges Ridge and trench Two trenches Characteristics of plates . Plates can contain BOTH continental and oceanic crust (North American). They may be largely oceanic (Pacific) or mostly continental (Eurasian). Most plates are bounded by different types of margins (spreading, converging, transform). Plates vary enormously in size (Pacific versus Juan de Fuca). How to recognize Lithospheric Plate Boundaries Volcanic Mid-Ocean Ridges Deep oceanic Trenches Earthquake Zones 1) Along ocean ridges (shallow) 2) Associated with ocean trenches (deep – Benioff zone) 3) Where plates slide past each other (shallow, transform faults) Distribution of Volcanoes 1. Along island arcs 2. Along continental margins Volcanic mid-ocean ridges and trenches Ocean ridges are boundaries where plates are being created, whereas trenches are boundaries where plates are being destroyed (subducted). Location of earthquakes Earthquakes occur along ALL plate boundaries, consequently they provide an ideal demarcation of individual plates.
    [Show full text]