DOCSLIB.ORG

REDD BULL Agriculture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REDD BULL Agriculture United States Department of REDD BULL Agriculture Forest Service Environmental Assessment June 2020 Superior Ranger District, Lolo National Forest Mineral County, Montana For More Information Contact: Project Leader Pat Partyka ([email protected]) Plains/Thompson Falls Ranger District P.O. Box 429 Plains, MT 59859 Telephone: 406-826-3821 Superior District Ranger Carole Johnson ([email protected]) Superior Falls Ranger District P.O. Box 460 Superior, MT 59872 Telephone: 406-822-4233 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) Email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Redd Bull Environmental Assessment Contents CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION .......................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background and Setting ................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action ........................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Original Proposed Action .............................................................................................................. 7 1.4.1 Design Criteria ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.5 Public Involvement ........................................................................................................................ 8 1.5.1 Issue Resolution ...................................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 2: ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS .................................................................................... 29 3.1 Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions ........................................................ 29 3.2 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................... 31 3.2.1 Resilient Vegetative Conditions ........................................................................................... 31 3.2.2 Old Growth ........................................................................................................................... 37 3.2.3 Weeds ................................................................................................................................... 42 3.3 Fire and Fuels .............................................................................................................................. 44 3.4 Soils ............................................................................................................................................. 56 3.5 Hydrology .................................................................................................................................... 62 3.6 Fisheries ...................................................................................................................................... 72 3.7 Wildlife ........................................................................................................................................ 79 3.8 Transportation System ............................................................................................................... 114 3.9 Economics ................................................................................................................................. 118 3.10 Roadless................................................................................................................................... 122 3.11 Recreation ................................................................................................................................ 145 Literature Cited .................................................................................................................................... 151 Appendix A: Maps Appendix B: Detailed Vegetation Treatments Appendix C: Resource Protection Measures and Monitoring Appendix D: Science Basis for Vegetation Restoration Treatments i Redd Bull Environmental Assessment ii Redd Bull Environmental Assessment CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION 1.1 Introduction Redd Bull is a collaboratively-developed, integrated restoration project designed to restore native fish habitat, improve the health and resiliency of forest vegetation, reduce forest fuels, enhance big game habitat, provide diverse recreation opportunities, and support the economic structure of local communities within an 85,000-acre landscape south of St. Regis (see Figure 1.1). The Lolo National Forest is proposing vegetation, road, and recreation management activities to achieve these objectives. Figure 1.1: Vicinity Map This Environmental Assessment (EA) discloses the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of the proposal and its alternatives to determine whether they may significantly affect the quality of the human environment and thereby require preparation of an environmental impact statement. Preparation of this EA fulfills agency policy and direction to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Lolo Forest Plan, 40 CFR 1508.9, 36 CFR 220.7, and other relevant federal and State laws and regulations. The reports cited in this EA and additional project documentation are contained within the project file located at the Superior Ranger District office in Superior, Montana. These documents are available upon request. 1.2 Background and Setting The Redd Bull project area is situated between Interstate 90 and the Montana/Idaho border within the Dry, Cold, Little Joe, Twomile, and Ward Creek watersheds. Dry and Cold Creeks are tributary to the 1 Redd Bull Environmental Assessment Clark Fork River and the remaining watersheds are tributary to the St. Regis River, which flows into the Clark Fork River at St. Regis. The project area primarily consists of National Forest System (NFS) land (95 percent). The remaining lands are mostly private, located along the river valley bottoms. In 2015, the Forest Service began field assessments in the Redd Bull project area to determine the existing condition of the various resource components (e.g. wildlife and aquatic habitat, vegetation, soil, recreation, etc.) and identify opportunities to achieve desired conditions outlined in the Lolo Forest Plan1. After gaining an understanding of project area conditions, the Forest Service initiated a public collaborative process in 2016 to identify public use patterns, items and/or areas of importance, and desired management outcomes. During this process, the Forest Service sponsored 2 fieldtrips and 6 meetings that were open to everyone and were well-attended. The result of field assessments and public engagement was the development of an integrated management action plan (Proposed Action) that addressed various resource needs and opportunities within the project area. The Lolo Forest Plan uses management areas (MAs) to guide management on NFS lands within the Lolo National Forest. The Forest has been divided into 28 MAs, each with different management goals, and resource potential and limitations. Most land within the project area is allocated to Forest Plan management areas that emphasize forest health. Approximately 12 percent is allocated to big game winter and summer range, and 11 percent emphasizes riparian and stream values. About 26 percent of the NFS land within the project area is located within 3 inventoried roadless areas2 (IRA): Marble
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Photo Guide for Appraising Downed Woody Fuels in Montana Forests
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. USDA FOREST SERVICE GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT INT-96 NOVEMBER 1981 PHOTO GUIDE FOR APPRAISING DOWNED WOODY FUELS IN MONTANA FORESTS: Grand Fir- Larch-Douglas-Fir, Western Hemlock, Western Hemlock-Western Redcedar, and Western Redcedar Cover Types William C. Fischer INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE OGDEN, UTAH 84401 THE AUTHOR WILLIAM C. FISCHER is a research forester for the Fire Effects and Use Research and Development Program, at the Northern Forest Fire Laboratory. His current assignment is to develop techniques and procedures for applying existing research knowledge to the task of producing improved operational fire management plans, with special emphasis on fire use, fuel treatment, and fuel management plans. Mr. Fischer received his bachelor's degree in forestry from the University of Michigan in 1956. From 1956 to 1966, he did Ranger District and forest staff work in timber management and fire control on the Boise National Forest. RESEARCH SUMMARY Four series of color photographs show different levels of ,downed woody material resulting from natural processes in four forest cover types in Montana. Each photo is supplemented by inventory data describing the size, weight, volume, and condition of the debris pictured. A subjective evaluation of potential fire behavior under an average bad fire weather situation is given. I nstructions are provided for using the photos to describe fuels and to evaluate potential fire hazard. USDA FOREST SERVICE GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT INT-96 NOVEM,BER 1981 PHOTO GUIDE FOR APPRAISING DOWNED WOODY FUELS IN MONTANA FORESTS: Grand Fir- Larch-Douglas-Fir, Western Hemlock, We~tern Hemlock-Western Redcedar, and Western Redcedar Cover Types Will iam C.
    [Show full text]
  • Helena Interagency Dispatch Center
    Helena Interagency Dispatch Center Cooperating Agencies: USDA Forest Service- Helena National Forest USDI Bureau of Land Management Montana Dept. of Natural Resources & Conservation- Central Lands Office Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Lewis and Clark, Broadwater, Jefferson and Meagher Counties Helena, Montana NEWS RELEASE For Release Immediately Contact:: Amy Teegarden Office: (406) 495-3747 Cell Phone: (406) 439-9135 FIRE RESTRICTIONS TO BEGIN THIS WEEK HELENA, MONT., July 17, 2007- Stage 1 fire restrictions will be implemented this Friday, by the Helena National Forest and members of the Helena Fire Restrictions division. “Thunderstorms coupled with record-breaking heat this week is a recipe for wildfires and local officials are instituting fire restrictions in an effort to reduce new fire starts.” stated Amy Teegarden, spokesperson for the Helena National Forest. Restrictions on smoking and open fires on federal and state lands, as well as on private-forested lands in Lewis and Clark County will take effect Friday, July 20 at 0001. Restrictions will be enforced on lands administered by the Helena National Forest, Bureau of Land Management and Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks in Lewis and Clark, Broadwater and Jefferson Counties. Under the restrictions campfires may be built only in developed recreation sites such as campgrounds and picnic areas. Campfires in rock rings and the use of wood stoves in canvas tents outside of campgrounds and other developed sites are prohibited. The Helena Interagency Dispatch Center provides initial
    [Show full text]
  • Cut and Sold (New) - CUTS203F Cumulative As of FY 2014 Q1 Report Type: Quarterly Page: 1 of 39 Filter: All Sales ,All Sales Run Date: 01/23/2014 06:54 PM
    Cut and Sold (New) - CUTS203F Cumulative as of FY 2014 Q1 Report Type: Quarterly Page: 1 of 39 Filter: All Sales ,All Sales Run Date: 01/23/2014 06:54 PM Region: R1, Northern Region Forest: 02 Beaverhead/Deerlodge National Forest SIZE CLASS INFORMATION Size Sold Sold Sold Sold Cut Cut Cut Class Size Class Description Number Volume Volume Value ($) Volume Volume Value ($) of Sales (MBF) (CCF) (MBF) (CCF) 0 Size Class = 0, in TSA backfeed 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 Non-convertible 39 0.00 0.00 5,650.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 3 < $300 399 843.47 2,151.35 8,469.43 1,992.48 5,012.43 18,459.55 4 $301 - $10,000 2 404.40 699.00 25,056.84 2,533.03 5,259.92 67,989.84 5 $10,001 - $100,000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 $100,001 - $1,000,000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 $1,000,001 - $5,000,000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 > $5,000,000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A **ADDVOL Default Size Class 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N **NONTIM Default Size Class 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P **PRETIM Default Size Class 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R **RPLCMT Default Size Class 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Forest (0102) Total : 440 1,247.87 2,850.35 39,176.27 4,525.51 10,272.35 86,644.39 Cut and Sold (New) - CUTS203F Cumulative as of FY 2014 Q1 Report Type: Quarterly Page: 2 of 39 Filter: All Sales ,All Sales Run Date: 01/23/2014 06:54 PM Region: R1, Northern Region Forest: 02 Beaverhead/Deerlodge National Forest (Continued) PRODUCT & SPECIES - CONVERTIBLE 01 Sawtimber Species Sold Sold Sold Sold ($) Sold ($) Cut Cut Cut Code Description
    [Show full text]
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Land Management Plan, Helena
    United States Department of Agriculture 2020 Land Management Plan Helena - Lewis and Clark National Forest Forest Service Helena - Lewis and Clark National Forest R1-20-16 May 2020 In accordance with federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (for example, Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resource potential of national forest RARE II and wilderness areas in Montana Compiled by Christopher E. Williams 1 and Robert C. Pearson2 Open-File Report 84-637 1984 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1 Present address 2 Denver, Colorado U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/NEIC Denver, Colorado CONTENTS (See also indices listings, p. 128-131) Page Introduction*........................................................... 1 Beaverhead National Forest............................................... 2 North Big Hole (1-001).............................................. 2 West Pioneer (1-006)................................................ 2 Eastern Pioneer Mountains (1-008)................................... 3 Middle Mountain-Tobacco Root (1-013)................................ 4 Potosi (1-014)...................................................... 5 Madison/Jack Creek Basin (1-549).................................... 5 West Big Hole (1-943)............................................... 6 Italian Peak (1-945)................................................ 7 Garfield Mountain (1-961)........................................... 7 Mt. Jefferson (1-962)............................................... 8 Bitterroot National Forest.............................................. 9 Stony Mountain (LI-BAD)............................................. 9 Allan Mountain (Ll-YAG)............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2019 to 09/30/2019 Helena-Lewis and Clark National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R1 - Northern Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Bob Marshall Wilderness - Recreation management In Progress: Expected:04/2015 04/2015 Debbie Mucklow Outfitter and Guide Permit - Special use management Scoping Start 03/29/2014 406-758-6464 Reissuance [email protected] CE Description: Reissuance of existing outfitter and guide permits in the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=44827 Location: UNIT - Swan Lake Ranger District, Hungry Horse Ranger District, Lincoln Ranger District, Rocky Mountain Ranger District, Seeley Lake Ranger District, Spotted Bear Ranger District. STATE - Montana. COUNTY - Flathead, Glacier, Lewis and Clark, Missoula, Pondera, Powell, Teton. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex. FNF Plan Revision & NCDE - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:05/2018 06/2018 Joseph Krueger GBCS Amendment to the Lolo, Objection Period Legal Notice 406-758-5243 Helena, Lewis & Clark,and 12/14/2017 [email protected] Kootenai NFs Description: The Flathead NF is revising their forest plan and preparing an amendment providing relevant direction from the EIS NCDE Grizzly Bear Conservation Strategy into the forest plans for the Lolo, Helena, Kootenai, and Lewis & Clark National Forests. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/goto/flathead/fpr Location: UNIT - Kootenai National Forest All Units, Lewis And Clark National Forest All Units, Flathead National Forest All Units, Helena National Forest All Units, Lolo National Forest All Units.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Efforts in Montana and Contact Information: Below Are the Public Land Collaborative Efforts in Montana, Both Past and Present, of Which We Are Aware
    Collaborative efforts in Montana and contact information: Below are the public land collaborative efforts in Montana, both past and present, of which we are aware. They are all addressing a range of public land management issues including active forest management, recreation, wilderness, economic development and conservation. Not all are specifically addressing Wilderness Study Areas (WSAs). Each has a unique story and offers lessons on what works, regardless of whether their efforts encompass one of the 7 wilderness study areas identified in SJ 20. More information about many of these collaboratives can be found through the Montana Forest Collaboration Network (MFCN) which assists collaborative groups across Montana in forest and grassland restoration, conservation and resource utilization for the benefit of all. The enclosed report, Collaboration at a Crossroads, also includes several case studies highlighting the issues collaboration faces in Montana in more depth. Beaverhead Deerlodge Partnership/ Forest Jobs and Recreation Act This collaboration included the timber industry, conservation and recreation working to provide wood products and jobs; achieve significant fish and wildlife habitat restoration; protect public land and ensure access for future generations; and support a robust recreation economy including motorized and non-motorized use. It is no longer active. For more information contact • Tony Colter, Sun Mountain Lumber • John Todd, Montana Wilderness Association • Tracy Stone-Manning, National Wildlife Federation; former staff Senator Tester • Tom France, National Wildlife Federation • Barb Cestero or Paul Spitler, The Wilderness Society Beaverhead Deerlodge Working Group Formed in 2011, the purpose of the Beaverhead-Deerlodge Working Group (BDWG) is to bring together diverse interests to develop agreement around priorities and approaches for project work and increase the pace and scale of restoration on the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest (BDNF).
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2019 to 03/31/2019 Kootenai National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2019 to 03/31/2019 Kootenai National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R1 - Northern Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) FNF Plan Revision & NCDE - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:05/2018 06/2018 Joseph Krueger GBCS Amendment to the Lolo, Objection Period Legal Notice 406-758-5243 Helena, Lewis & Clark,and 12/14/2017 [email protected] Kootenai NFs Description: The Flathead NF is revising their forest plan and preparing an amendment providing relevant direction from the EIS NCDE Grizzly Bear Conservation Strategy into the forest plans for the Lolo, Helena, Kootenai, and Lewis & Clark National Forests. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/goto/flathead/fpr Location: UNIT - Kootenai National Forest All Units, Lewis And Clark National Forest All Units, Flathead National Forest All Units, Helena National Forest All Units, Lolo National Forest All Units. STATE - Montana. COUNTY - Flathead, Glacier, Granite, Lake, Lewis and Clark, Lincoln, Mineral, Missoula, Pondera, Powell, Sanders, Teton. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Flathead National Forest; portions of the Lolo, Kootenai, Helena, and Lewis & Clark NF found in the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (grizzly bears). Pacific Northwest National - Recreation management In Progress: Expected:11/2020 12/2020 Matthew McGrath Scenic Trail Comprehensive Scoping Start 11/01/2017 503-808-2405 Plan Est. Comment Period Public [email protected] EA Notice 10/2019 Description: The Comprehensive Plan will develop administrative and management goals, objectives and practices for public lands in Forest Service Regions 1 and Regions 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Inactive Mines on Gallatin National Forest-Administered Land
    Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Gallatin National Forest-AdministeredLand Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Abandoned-Inactive Mines Program Open-File Report MBMG 418 Phyllis A. Hargrave Michael D. Kerschen CatherineMcDonald JohnJ. Metesh PeterM. Norbeck RobertWintergerst Preparedfor the u.s. Departmentof Agriculture ForestService-Region 1 Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Gallatin National Forest-AdministeredLand Open-File Report 418 MBMG October 2000 Phyllis A. Hargrave Michael D. Kerschen Catherine McDonald John J. Metesh Peter M. Norbeck Robert Wintergerst for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service-Region I Prepared Contents List of Figures .V List of Tables . VI IntToduction 1 1.IProjectObjectives 1 1.2AbandonedandInactiveMinesDefined 2 1.3 Health and Environmental Problems at Mines. 3 1.3.1 Acid-Mine Drainage 3 1.3.2 Solubilities of SelectedMetals 4 1.3.3 The Use of pH and SC to Identify Problems. 5 1.4Methodology. 6 1.4.1 Data Sources : 6 1.4.2Pre-Field Screening. 6 1.4.3Field Screening. 7 1.4.3.1 Collection of Geologic Samples. 9 1.4.4 Field Methods ' 9 1.4.4.1 Selection of Sample Sites 9 1.4.4.2 Collection of Water and Soil Samples. 10 1.4.4.3 Marking and Labeling Sample Sites. 10 1.4.4.4ExistingData 11 1.4.5 Analytical Methods """"""""""""""""'" 11 1.4.6Standards. 12 1.4.6.1Soil Standards. 12 1.4.6.2Water-QualityStandards 13 1.4.7 Analytical Results 13 1.5 Gallatin National Forest 14 1.5.1 History of Mining 16 1.5.1.1 Production 17 1.5.1.2Milling 18 1.6SummaryoftheGallatinNationaIForestInvestigat~on 19 1.7 Mining Districts and Drainages 20 Gallatin National Forest Drainages 20 2.1 Geology "' ' '..' ,.""...' ""." 20 2.2 EconomicGeology.
    [Show full text]
  • Failed National Parks in the Last Best Places
    Contents MONTANA THE MAGAZINE OF WESTERN HISTORY f AUTUMN 2009 f VOLUME 59 , NUMBER 3 3 Failed National Parks in the Last Best Place Lary M. Dilsaver and William Wyckoff 25 Dying in the West PART 1: HOSPITALS AND HEALTH CARE IN MONTANA AND ALBERTA, 1880-1950 Dawn Nickel 46 Cromwell Dixon THE WORLD'S YOUNGEST AVIATOR Del Phillips ON THE COVER The front cover features Maynard Dixon's Oncoming Storm (1941, oil on canvas,36" x 40"), courtesy Gerald Peters Gallery, Santa Fe, New Mexico. On the back cover is The History ofMontana: Exploration and Settlement (1943-44 , oil on canvas), one of the murals in the History of Montana series painted by John W. "Jack" Beauchamp, an artist and the director of the Helena Art Center at Carroll College in the 1940s. Saloon manager Kenny Egan commissioned the artist to paint the murals for the Mint Cigar Store and Tavern located in downtown Helena in 1943· Before the building was demolished in i960, the murals were removed and donated to the Montana Historical Society by the Dennis and Vivian Connors family. Three of the panels are currently on loan to Helena's City County Building, where they hang in the main meeting room. The History ofMontana: Exploration and Settlement depicts people and places central to the state's story, including the Lewis and Clark Expedition and St. Mary's Mission and its founders, Fathers Pierre-] ean De Smet and Anthony Ravalli. The mission and a number of other Montana natural, historic, and recreational sites were proposed as inclusions to the national park system.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 105–267 105Th Congress an Act to Direct the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior to Exchange Oct
    PUBLIC LAW 105±267ÐOCT. 19, 1998 112 STAT. 2371 Public Law 105±267 105th Congress An Act To direct the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior to exchange Oct. 19, 1998 land and other assets with Big Sky Lumber Co. and other entities. [H.R. 3381] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Gallatin Land Consolidation Act SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. of 1998. Montana. This Act may be cited as the ``Gallatin Land Consolidation Act of 1998''. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. Congress finds thatÐ (1) the land north of Yellowstone National Park possesses outstanding natural characteristics and wildlife habitats that make the land a valuable addition to the National Forest System; (2) it is in the interest of the United States to establish a logical and effective ownership pattern for the Gallatin National Forest, reducing long-term costs for taxpayers and increasing and improving public access to the forest; (3) it is in the interest of the United States for the Secretary of Agriculture to enter into an Option Agreement for the acquisition of land owned by Big Sky Lumber Co. to accomplish the purposes of this Act; and (4) other private property owners are willing to enter into exchanges that further improve the ownership pattern of the Gallatin National Forest. SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) BLM LAND.ÐThe term ``BLM land'' means approxi- mately 2,000 acres of Bureau of Land Management land (includ- ing all appurtenances to the land) that is proposed to be acquired by BSL, as depicted in Exhibit B to the Option Agree- ment.
    [Show full text]