System Fg'r Juqgeng Ene Skating Routmes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

System Fg'r Juqgeng Ene Skating Routmes ll III l I 118 904 THS AN 0‘? EC? WE E§/4\1.?UE\ it??? SYSTEM FG'R JUQGENG ENE SKATING ROUTMES Thasfs €05 the Begren of I'VE. A. Ht,t'i’:AE‘! CTB” m ““H’ E‘LA'I'EILHE FETZQERME MOW-2E 1857 M .. g“; " dun ‘. " . u.’ "' Inna/1mm???)my???“unmwuummm ‘2‘ ..._*t I \ . "Rig: 28 o 2093 , J" --'-. - 1 ’ - f‘ L‘fiCthah if“; . 3'- Umvmkty AN OBJECTIVE EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR JUDGING FREE SKATING ROUTINES By Kathleen Fitzgerald Moore A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Health, Physical Education and Recreation 1967 Jr 3/ .35/ ’ ,/,.: L / H / /rx4“' I“. ~"' To Mr. Montgomery Wilson under whose guidance I learned the fundamentals of figure skating and thereby grew to love the sport. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my appreciation to Dr. William Heusner for his guidance throughout the study. A special thank you goes to Mr. W. H. Bainbridge, Mr. Donald Jackson, Miss Beryl Williamson, and Mr. and Mrs. Hayes Jenkins for their participation in the judging of the skating routines used in comparing the proposed evaluation system with the system currently in use. Thank you also to the people who helped me understand and analyze the related judging systems for synchronized swimming, diving, gymnastics, and roller skating. I would also like to thank my typist, Miss Susan Foster, for her help in the preparation of this manuscript. iv ABSTRACT AN OBJECTIVE EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR JUDGING FREE SKATING ROUTINES by Kathleen Fitzgerald Moore This thesis develops and tests an experimental objective evaluation system and compares it to the present system used for evaluating the free skating routine portion of figure skating competitions. An attempt is also made to determine the best method for deciding final placement of the skaters after the individual judges' scores have been awarded. Eight filmed senior ladies' programs are evaluated by five judges under four different conditions. Scores are an- alyzed and conclusions are drawn. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . iv LIST OF TABLES . \riii LIST OF APPENDIXES . ix Chapter I INTRODUCTION TO THE PROBLEM . Introduction Need for the Study Statement of the Problem Objectives of the Study Limitations of the Study II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE . Figure Skating--Amateur Figure Skatinga-Professional Roller Skating Synchronized Swimming Women's Gymnastics Men's Big Ten Gymnastics--l96#-l965 Diving ' Comparison of Methods of Judging III METHODOLOGY . 50 Acquisition of Films Selection of Skaters Selection of Judges Testing Equipment Testing Procedure Present System Experimental System Determination of Final Placement IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . 1+1 Analysis of the Data Summary vi TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTINUED Chapter Page V SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS . #4 Summary Conclusions Recommendations APPENDIX C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 [+8 BIBLIOGRAPHY vfi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Comparison of Evaluation Systems . 28 2. Penalties for Errors . 35 3. Level Of Difficulty O O O O O O O O I O O O O O O O 38 viii LIST OF APPENDIXES Appendix Page I Placement Determination for Roller Skating . #8 II Master Score Sheet for Synchronized Swimming Contests . 50 III Example of Figure Skating Placement System . 51 IV Test Program Content . 53 V Rho Correlations . 57 ix CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION TO THE PROBLEM Introduction Each year skaters spend hour after hour, day after day preparing themselves for competition. The child must skate when the ice is available. If the child is in earnest about competing, this can mean skating an hour or two before school every morning, arranging the school class schedule so as to be out early in the afternoon, or even spending time on the ice during the day.and being tutored in the necessary subjects. Parents must often drive the child to and from the ice arena as public conveyances are not usually convenient to schools, homes and arenas. Parents of the serious competitor spend between $2,000 and $10,000 every year on skating. (Z’P'BS) This figure in- cludes the fee for joining a club; renting ice; paying for lessons; buying boots, blades, and skating clothes; transport- ing skaters to and from competitions; paying entry fees; and many other smaller, but none the less necessary expenses, such as skate guards, skate bag, records, and record case. Included~ in the expenses, also, is the summer training necessary for the serious competitor. Here the skaters practice between five and seven hours a day depending upon their level of achievement. 2 From this it can be seen that a great amount of time, energy and money is put into the training of the competitive skater.(2’p'86) Judges who evaluate these skaters are selected from the official United States Figure Skating Association (hereinafter referred to as the USFSA) list of all judges and referees. The requirements for USFSA national judges are quite broad. They include recommendations by the candidate's club president and sectional vice-chairman of the Figure Judging Committee. The national judge is then appointed by the Executive Committee on the basis of A. Actual figure skating experience and knowledge B. Judges' schools attended and/or conducted C. Judging of all official figure and pair tests D. Adequate trial judging record of Gold Pair and Eighth Tests E. Official judging or refereeing at USFSA sanctioned competitions F. Adequate record of trial judging of free skating.(7’p'll9) The judge, after completing this training and meeting these re- quirements,should be prepared to judge free skating programs. He is not, however, and could not possibly be expected to be able to judge the complex routines. The background he has received con- sists of reading a short twelve page section from the end of the revised Evaluation of Errors in Figures published by the USFSA in 1959. This in itself is ridiculous as the first 118 pages of the book are spent laboring in great detail how to judge figures. Also included in this book is a table which lists 25 jumps and 14 spins. The authors themselves say the lists were made up many years ago.(8’p°3 ) This is certainly true and the 5 lists have never been revised as some 48 jumps and 50 spins can now be listed. From the material in the rule book, plus informa- tion obtained at judges' schools, the USFSA expects to produce judges knowledgable in the area of free skating. The problem becomes serious when it is realized that material distributed at judges' schools is either taken directly from the free skating section of the Evaluation of Errors in Figures book or is some- one's own interpretation of the method which should be used to judge. The problem is then compounded by the theory that the mark for free skating is built up by observation of its good qualities and by the fact that the rule book vaguely gives guide- lines of techniques to be included in the programs, but does not indicate what the penalties are for failure to effectively dis- play skill in the prescribed areas. (8,p.122) How can judging possibly be consistent throughout the United States if there is no precise guideline for judges to follow? Need for the Study Skaters may loose competitions by one one-hundreth of a point. (69P046) Can this be justified if the tool used for evalu- ating the performance does not measure that precisely? In other sports there are standards which must be met. The performance is evaluated in terms of whether the standard is made or missed, or how close the performance comes to meeting the standard. For example, the basketball player knows that his worth to the team is judged by his ability to make baskets. The track star knows his ability to run is measured in seconds, and he must run a specific distance faster than his opponents to win. The masculine gymnast 1+ knows a minimum level of difficulty must be included in his routine and certain compositional requirements must be fulfilled. He is also aware of the amount deducted from his score for errors in execution. From this information he can put a program together that will fit both his ability and the judging standard. In ice skating, however, the picture is different. When the skater skates the free skate routine he is not sure what standard is being used to mark him. What is worse is the fact that the judge does not know either,as his system is entirely subjective and may easily change from skater to skater. Also, the judge has no com- mon basis upon which to compare skaters. Without this basis for comparison, how can skating be called a sport? Statement of the Problem The purpose of this study is to develop and to test an objective evaluation system for judging free skating routines. Methods for determining the final placement of skaters will also be analyzed. Objectives of the Study One objective of the study is to determine whether the subjective system of weighting which judges currently give to the components of a routine is the same as, or different from, the weightings given in the experimental system. Secondly, an attempt will be made to determine which system is more effective. A third concern of the paper is to determine the best method for deciding final placement of the skaters after the individual judge's scores have been awarded; that is, should placement be 5 based on the scores of the top three judges, the bottom three judges, the middle three judges, all five judges or a majority ordinal system? Limitations of the Study Outstanding professional skaters in the United States and Canada were engaged to test and retest the two systems of judg- ing.
Recommended publications
  • Ice Skating Australia Incorporated Affiliated to the International Skating Union
    Ice Skating Australia Incorporated Affiliated to the International Skating Union 2014 Technical and Regulations Communication No 62 Changes from 2014 ISU Congress – Singles and Pairs As previously communicated to all skaters, coaches and officials any rule changes that eventuated as a result of proposals presented at the 2014 ISU Congress will be effective from the 1st July 2014. These changes are summarised below. This communication is a summary of changes and does not replace the official ISU Communications and Regulations that will be released in due time. Call to Start All competitors must take their starting position at the latest 30 seconds after their name has been announced. The first skater in a warm up group is allowed 60 seconds to take the starting position. If the competitor is between 1 and 30 seconds late to take their position the Referee shall apply a 1.0 deduction. If the competitor is greater than 31 seconds late, the competitor is withdrawn. Well Balanced Program – Repetitions As per ISU Rule 512, Paragraph 2, all Junior and Senior singles skaters need to ensure that their Free Skating programs meet the new well balanced programs requirements for repetitions of double jumps as described below: . Any double jump including (double Axel) cannot be included more than twice in total in a Free Skate Program (as a Solo Jump or a part of Combination/Sequence). Of all the triple and quadruple jumps only two (2) can be executed twice. If a third repeated jump is executed in a combination or sequence, the entire combination or sequence will be treated as an additional element and therefore not considered (but this element will occupy a jump element box if one is empty).
    [Show full text]
  • Figure Skating Elements and Requirements
    2018 FIGURE SKATING ELEMENTS AND REQUIREMENTS EVENT: Pairs Free Skating Program Open to all qualified skaters. At least one partner must have passed the appropriate pairs test. Partners must be male/female. Skaters are required to comply with the “well balanced program” requirements outlined in the current USFS Rule Book in Sections 5000 though 5550. (Also see USFS website). **Indicates I.J.S Event Pre-Juvenile: No Test (Time: 2:00 +/- 10 sec) Juvenile**: At least the USFS Pre-Juvenile Pairs Test (Time: 2:30 +/- 10 sec) Intermediate**: At least the USFS Juvenile Pairs Test (Time: 3:00 +/- 10 sec) Novice**: At least the USFS Intermediate Pairs Test (Time: 3:30 +/- 10 sec) Junior**: At least the USFS Novice Pairs Test (Time: 4:00 +/- 10 sec) Senior**: At least the USFS Junior Pairs Test (Time: 4:30 +/- 10 sec) Adult Bronze: No Test (Time: 2:10 max) Adult Silver: At least the USFS Adult Bronze Pairs test or Pre-Juvenile Pairs Test (Time: 2:40 max) Adult Gold: At least the USFS Adult Silver Pairs test or Juvenile Pairs Test (Time: 3:40 max) Adult Masters: At least the complete USFS Intermediate Free Skate Test or Intermediate Pairs Test. (Time: 3:40 max) EVENT: Pairs Short Program Open to all qualified skaters. At least one partner must have passed the appropriate pairs test. Partners must be male/female. Skaters are required to comply with the “well balanced program” requirements outlined in the current USFS Rule Book in Sections 5200 through 5230. (Also see USFS website) **Indicates I.J.S Event Intermediate **: At least USFS Juvenile Pairs Test.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNOUNCEMENT White Nights International Adult Figure Skating Competition St.Petersburg, Russia, 24-26 May, 2013
    САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКАЯ РЕГИОНАЛЬНАЯ ОБЩЕСТВЕННАЯ ФИЗКУЛЬТУРНО-СПОРТИВНАЯ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ «ЛИГА ЛЮБИТЕЛЕЙ ФИГУРНОГО КАТАНИЯ» LEAGUE OF FANS OF FIGURE SKATING, SAINT-PETERSBURG, RUSSIA ОГРН/Main State Registration Number 1107800009316 International Adult Figure Skating Competition White Nights for Men, Ladies, Pairs, Ice Dance and Synchronized Skating organized by the League of Fans of Figure Skating Saint-Petersburg, Russia May 24 – May 26, 2013 ANNOUNCEMENT White Nights International Adult Figure Skating Competition St.Petersburg, Russia, 24-26 May, 2013 1. GENERAL The International Adult Figure Skating Competition White Nights 2013 will be conducted in accordance with the ISU Constitution and General Regulations 2012, the ISU Special Regulations & Technical Rules Single & Pairs Skating and Ice Dance 2012, the Special Regulations & Technical Rules Synchronized Skating 2012, as well as all pertinent ISU Communications, and this Announcement. If there is a conflict between pertinent ISU Regulations or Communications and provisions set forth in this Announcement, the provisions in the Announcement govern. International Adult Figure Skating Competition White Nights 2013 will take place in the historic center of the world of figure skating, the city where was held the first ISU World Championships in 1896. Participation in the International Adult Figure Skating Competition White Nights 2013 is open to all skaters who belong to an ISU Member, as per Rule 107, paragraph 9 and 12, Rule 109, paragraph 1, and qualify with regard to eligibility, according to Rule 102, provided their ages fall within the limits specified in this Announcement and they meet the participation requirements. In the International Adult Figure Skating Competition White Nights 2013 only single skaters may compete who have reached at least the age of eighteen (18) before July 1st, preceding the event but have not reached the age of seventy-nine (79) before July 1st, preceding the competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Synchronized Skating 15-16
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ONTENTS C ICE DANCE 14-15 EQUIPMENT 2 ICE DANCE LIFTS 14-15 OTHER ICE DANCE ELEMENTS 15 TROKING TOPPING S & S 2-3 STROKING 2 STOPPING 2-3 SYNCHRONIZED SKATING 15-16 EDGES, TURNS & MOVES 3-5 COMPETITION TERMS 16 EDGES 3 OFFICIALS 16 TURNS 3-4 COMPETITIONS & MOVES 4-5 COMPETITION ELEMENTS 16-18 SINGLES SKATING 5-11 ORGANIZATIONS & SPINS 5-6 PROGRAMS 18-19 FLYING SPINS 6 JUMPS 6-10 SPIT & STAG JUMPS 11 OTHER TERMS 19 ! PAIRS SKATING 12-14 Index of Terms 20-23 IFTS L 12-13 ! OTHER PAIRS ELEMENTS 13-14 EQUIPMENT STROKING & STOPPING ! BOOT – One component of the ice-skate formed STROKING traditionally by many layers of leather and ! CROSSOVERS – Crossovers are used to negotiate corners and may include synthetic gain speed by crossing one foot over the other. In a materials to improve forward crossover, to turn toward the left the right foot the overall fit and is crossed over the left and just the opposite is true decrease weight. The when turning to the right. Crossovers are also done boot provides the while skating backward using the same method as moving forward. mounting surface on the sole and heel for ! SCULLING (SWIZZLES) – A basic two-foot propulsion the blade of the ice skate.! method used by beginners where the feet are pushed in ! BLADE "!One component of the ice-skate that is typically 3/16” thick and out on the inside edges of the blade to move forward or backward. and composed of tempered steel and chrome. The blade has a number of components including the toe pick to assist primarily ! STROKING – Stroking is a fundamental skating move, which with toe jumps (see “Toe Jumps”) and footwork (see is used to gain speed either forward or backward.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the “Barbara Ann Scott: Come Skate with Me” Exhibit Podcast Presented by the City of Ottawa Archives
    Welcome to the “Barbara Ann Scott: Come Skate with me” exhibit podcast presented by the city of Ottawa archives. In the podcast, City Archivist Paul Henry interviews Barbara Ann Scott at her home in Florida, and Educational Programming Officer Olga Zeale interviews Paul Henry and Elizabeth Manley in Ottawa. PH: My name is Paul Henry, I am City Archivist for the City of Ottawa. OZ: Why was it important for the City of Ottawa Archives to acquire Barbara Ann Scott’s collection? PH: Uh, well the mandate of the City of Ottawa Archives is to document the corporation of the City of Ottawa as well as serve as a repository for records that would otherwise be lost to history; records that in particular tell the story of the individual contributions of notable citizens, organizations, businesses, community organizations, that have contributed to the fabric of Ottawa and which tell, essentially, the story of the gap between what the City does and what our known history of an area is. So, the private records really flush out and make interesting a story of Ottawa beyond its role as a nation‟s capital. The Barbara Ann Scott collection fulfills that in many ways. Barbara is our most decorated citizen, our most decorated Olympic athlete, and if you think back to those days in „47 and „48 when we had, and gave Barbara the key to the city and had events and parades in her honour. The number of people that came out in those days to celebrate her accomplishments was certainly something, and in many ways, the city, in some way belongs to Barbara.
    [Show full text]
  • Skate Levels
    Skate Levels Tot 1 Pre School Beginner Who Has Never Skated Proper Way To Fall In a standing position, stretch hands and arms higher than eye- level so you can see them. (Not so high that the pupil would tent to fall backwards.) Tuck chin to keep head forward. Bend knees and continue the falling down action as you would sit on a chair. Continue gently until skater falls on one cheek (bottom, that is), keeping the hands in position and off the ice. Proper Way to Get Up Facing the instructor, get in the position of a puppy dog on hands and knees. Put one foot between hands, and then bring second foot between hands, keeping weight balanced on center of both feet. Rise, slowly, looking at the instructor, until skater is in proper standing position. Remain still for five seconds. Repeat falling and getting up two more times. Marching in Standing Position With arms in front as in holding handlebars of a bicycle, lift alternate feet three times, remain still in proper position for five seconds. Repeat for a total of three times. Marching While Moving March, counting 1, 2, 3; and then glide on two feet (feet parallel and comfortably apart but no farther out than hips). Repeat five times. Tot 2 Two-Foot Jump In Place While standing still with hands in handlebar position, bend knees, jump up, land, bend knees to almost teapot position, then stand up straight again. Repeat for a total of three times. Forward Swizzle Standing Still Standing in proper position, put heels together forming a wide "V" position, then move toes together until touching.
    [Show full text]
  • FIGURE SKATING PROGRAMS OVERVIEW Skaters May Choose the Starskate Program, Learning Core Figure Skating Skills and Taking Tests at Organized Test Sessions
    FIGURE SKATING PROGRAMS OVERVIEW Skaters may choose the STARSkate Program, learning core figure skating skills and taking tests at organized test sessions. STARSkaters may also choose to enter competitions (known as non- qualifying events). Other skaters may wish to enter the Skate Canada Competitive Program, try their hand at synchronized skating or participate as an adult figure skating member. (1) STARSKATE PROGRAM: The Skate Canada STARSkate Program offers opportunities for skaters to develop basic to advanced skating skills in four different areas: Interpretive, Dance, Free Skating, and Skating Skills which are then grouped into the following levels: PRIMARY LEVEL TESTS • Skating Skills: Preliminary, Junior Bronze • Free Skating: Preliminary, Junior Bronze • Dance: Preliminary, Junior Bronze • Interpretive: Introductory INTERMEDIATE LEVEL TESTS • Skating Skills: Senior Bronze, Junior Silver • Free Skating: Senior Bronze, Junior Silver • Dance: Senior Bronze, Junior Silver • Interpretive: Bronze SENIOR LEVEL TESTS • Skating Skills: Senior Silver, Gold • Free Skating: Senior Silver, Gold • Dance: Senior Silver, Gold, Diamond • Interpretive: Silver, Gold ORDER OF TESTS - A candidate for a test must have passed all of the preceding tests in the same category in each of the disciplines. For example, a skater must pass the Preliminary Skating Skills test prior to attempting the Junior Bronze Skating Skills test. There are two exceptions. Free Skate tests can be taken in parts (elements and program). For example, a skater must pass Junior Bronze elements part in order to progress to the Senior Bronze elements. This skater is not required to pass 1 the equivalent program portion to progress. Also, in the Competitive Test Program, skaters can begin testing at any level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nutcracker on Ice” Will Be Performed December 15, 16, 17, 2017
    Robert Crown Community Center 1701 Main Street Evanston, IL 60202 847-448-8633 cityofevanston.org Dear Figure Skaters and Parents, The 43rd anniversary presentation of “The Nutcracker on Ice” will be performed December 15, 16, 17, 2017. Auditions will be held for featured roles, duets, trios and the Platinum group number on Sunday, August 27, 2017 between 9am and 2pm. A makeup session will only be offered to those with special circumstances and have made arrangements ahead of time. AUDITION AGE & TEST REQUIREMENTS Youth Soloists Girls: Passed ISI Freestyle 5 or Basic Skills FS 6 and above. (5-20 years of age) Boys: Passed ISI FS 1 or Basic Skills FS 1 and above. Adult Soloists Passed ISI Freestyle 1 or Basic Skills FS 1 and above (21 years of age & up) Platinum Freestyle Group USFS Novice Freestyle and above OR complete a successful audition which will be skated during the solo auditions (details below). ELIGIBILITY Skaters who wish to audition must be registered in the Fall Skating School Program or have been registered in a Robert Crown freestyle level / specialty class, the Theatre On Ice program or contracted for two hours of practice ice in the last twelve months. REGISTER To register for the audition, please list your name, age, tested level and freestyle level class, program - i.e. class or practice ice times within the last twelve months on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s) posted on the “Skating School” bulletin board located in the lobby. In order to audition, you must sign up by Friday, August 18 at 6pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Panel Handbook
    Judging System Technical Panel Handbook Single Skating 2021/2022 July 12th, 2021 2021-2022 1 Calling procedure In both Short Program and Free Skating whenever possible we should call the elements really performed and not the elements that are required. Any wrong elements will receive an “*” that will result in “No Value”. General Any element in Short Program and Free Skating started after the required time (plus the ten (10) seconds allowed) must not be identified by the Technical Panel and will have no value. Falls in elements and in any part of the program must be reviewed with normal speed. 2021-2022 2 Step Sequences Rules General All step sequences should be executed according to the character of the music. Short stops in accordance with the music are permitted. Step Sequences must fully utilize the ice surface. Turns and steps must be balanced in their distribution throughout the sequence. Short Program Short Program for Senior & Junior Men and for Senior & Junior Women must include one Step Sequence fully utilizing the ice surface. May include any unlisted jumps. Free Skating A well balanced Free Skating program must contain one Step Sequence fully utilizing the ice surface. Jumps can also be included in the step sequence. Step sequences too short and barely visible cannot be considered as meeting the requirements of a step sequence. Level features 1. Minimum variety (Level 1), simple variety (Level 2), variety (Level 3), complexity (Level 4) of difficult turns and steps throughout (compulsory) 2. Rotations in either direction (left and right) with full body rotation covering at least 1/3 of the pattern in total for each rotational direction 3.
    [Show full text]
  • College Voice Vol. XLI No. 8
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College 2017-2018 Student Newspapers 2-20-2018 College Voice Vol. XLI No. 8 Connecticut College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/ccnews_2017_2018 Recommended Citation Connecticut College, "College Voice Vol. XLI No. 8" (2018). 2017-2018. 7. https://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/ccnews_2017_2018/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Newspapers at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2017-2018 by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. NEW LONDON, CONNECTICUT TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2018 VOLUME XLI • ISSUE 8 THE COLLEGE VOICE CONNECTICUT COLLEGE’S INDEPENDENT STUDENT NEWSPAPER SINCE 1977 Students Rally Title IX Coordinator Behind Dr. Baldwin Debate Continues HANNAH JOHNSTON DANA GALLAGHER NEWS EDITOR MANAGING EDITOR The Connecticut College Gender and Within a week of the announcement of Women’s Studies department is in a time Associate Dean of Equity and Inclusion of transition. Last year, a long, national and acting Title IX coordinator B. Afeni search yielded the hiring of a depart- McNeely Cobham’s departure, students ment chair, Professor Danielle Egan, gathered in Cro to discuss the shortcom- who officially began at the beginning of ings in Conn’s approach to upholding Ti- this semester (Spring 2018). At a recent tle IX requirements. Although the 2015 intra-departmental GWS meeting, con- “Dear College Letter” released by the U.S. sisting of Egan and fellow tenure-track Department of Education states: “Des- professor in the department Ariella Ro- ignating a full-time Title IX coordinator tramel, and the majoring and minoring will minimize the risk of a conflict of in- students, the future of the GWS depart- terest and in many cases ensure sufficient ment was discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • USFSA Collegiate Conference
    INTERCOLLEGIATE TECHNICAL RULEBOOK GENERAL COMPETITION ANNOUNCEMENT & TECHNICAL RULES 2014-15 SEASON September, 2014 1 Table of Contents SECTION 1: GENERAL COMPETITION RULES ........................................................... 3 A. EVENTS ............................................................................................................... 3 B. TEST LEVEL........................................................................................................ 3 C. ENTRY RESTRICTIONS .................................................................................... 4 D. ENTRIES .............................................................................................................. 4 E. MUSIC .................................................................................................................. 5 F. AWARDS ............................................................................................................. 5 G. SANCTIONS ........................................................................................................ 5 H. ELIGIBILITY TO COMPETE ............................................................................. 5 I. GROUP SIZES ..................................................................................................... 5 J. WARM-UP GROUPS ........................................................................................... 5 K. TEAM REGISTRATION FOR SEASON PARTICIPATION ............................. 6 L. JUDGING SYSTEM ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 'Smalltown Boy' Abbott Earns Fourth, Final Crown
    6/30/2018 'Small-town boy' Abbott earns fourth, final crown | icenetwork.com: Your home for figure skating and speed skating. Subscribe Login Register HOME SCHEDULE + RESULTS SKATERS NEWS PHOTOS FANS 'Small­town boy' Abbott earns fourth, final crown Brown's artistry lands him silver; Disappointed Aaron settles for bronze Posted 1/12/14 by Lynn Rutherford, special to icenetwork Jeremy Abbott returned to his rightful place: the top of the U.S. senior men's podium. His performance of his Muse free skate wasn't his best, with a quad and just four clean triples, but his components score (93.42) was the highest of the event. His score of 274.27 is a new U.S. record and gave him his fourth career national title. ­Jay Adeff It wasn't as magical as Thursday's short program, but Jeremy Abbott's free skate won him a fourth U.S. title and second trip to the Olympics on Sunday at the 2014 Prudential U.S. Figure Skating Championships in Boston's TD Garden. The 28­year­old skater, who has announced this is his final competitive season, landed a quadruple toe loop and four clean triples ­­ including a triple Axel­double toe combination ­­ in an emotional, finely nuanced program that earned 174.41 points. His 274.27­point total was enough to hold off a charging Jason Brown, who won the free skate with an exuberant outing to Riverdance. http://web.icenetwork.com/news/2014/01/12/66520210/small-town-boy-abbott-earns-fourth-final-crown 1/4 6/30/2018 'Small-town boy' Abbott earns fourth, final crown | icenetwork.com: Your home for figure skating and speed skating.
    [Show full text]