BP Installs First Dual ESP System at Wytch Farm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BP Installs First Dual ESP System at Wytch Farm Reprinted from: May 2005 issue, pgs 27-29. Used with permission. INTELLIGENT WELL COMPLETIONS SPECIAL FOCUS BP installs first dual ESP system at Wytch Farm Environmentally sensitive location gets downhole backup pump to reduce workover requirement. P. Duffy, D. Cooke, BP; and R. Mackay, D. Whitelock and E. Jamieson, Schlumberger BP has recently installed a is usually charged as an oper- REDA dual electrical submers- ating expense to the well, plat- ible pump (ESP) system from form or field. Consequently, Schlumberger at Wytch Farm cost and frequency of work- oil field, Dorset, England. The overs, when combined with system, designed for redun- lost revenue from deferred oil dant operation, will enable BP production while scheduling a to reduce workover frequency workover, can significantly im- by increasing ESP system run- pact operating costs. This espe- life. Wytch Farm is a mature cially affects the economic vi- field in an environmentally ability of mature fields or other sensitive area. Any reduction marginal developments. in workover frequency is seen The redundant-pump strat- as a big win within BP. egy is intended to reduce the ESPs installed in simi- number of workovers over the lar Wytch Farm wells have life of a well, and, thus, cost. achieved run-lives in excess The Wytch Farm well needing of 1,500 days. Therefore, the a new ESP presented a further new ESP assemblies were de- powerful motive to minimize signed to account for changing workovers—it is located on a reservoir conditions over this small island off the southern period and feature two differ- Fig. 1. Looking east over Poole Harbour, Round Island is in coast of England in Poole Har- ent pump configurations, with the foreground and Furzey Island (oil derrick indicates Wytch bour, Dorset, England, Fig. 1. plans to switch operation be- Farm location) lies beyond. (Photo courtesy J. P. Allen, Images This region has been described tween the two systems in the of Dorset). as, “nationally important . future. Gauges that allow the one of the richest in lowland use of a 24-hr surveillance, Britain for diversity of natural monitoring and optimization companies have been involved in the in- habitats and many important service also were installed. stallation of more than 30 oil well com- nature reserves,” by the Poole Harbour Described here are: the background pletions equipped with two ESPs. The Study Group. Exposure to a potential of dual ESPs to reduce workover costs; second pump is intended as a backup (or HSE (Health, Safety and Environment) need for the dual system in Wytch Farm’s redundant) device to be used should the incident can be directly related to the environmentally sensitive Well L-12; de- first pump fail. amount of well intervention activity un- sign features of the system; and delivery Most of these 30 wells are located off- dertaken by the operator. BP is thus dili- and installation in September 2004. shore, where interventions to replace a gent about minimizing interventions. failed pump involve using a mobile off- BACKGROUND shore drilling unit or an existing platform WYTCH FARM, WELL L12 Over the past eight years, Schlumberger drilling rig. The cost of such an operation Wytch Farm is the largest onshore MAY 2005 World Oil SPECIAL FOCUS INTELLIGENT WELL COMPLETIONS Fig. 2. Today, Wytch Farm oil fi eld comprises eight mainland sites in the southern UK and two on Furzey Island. oil field in Western Europe. The devel- the well and install a new ESP. opment comprises eight mainland well A maximum run-life for the new in- sites, plus two on nearby Furzey Island, stallation was obviously desired. Famil- Fig. 2. The field has 57 wells actively iar with backup ESP systems, BP had producing, plus 26 injectors; it has an es- already considered using this technology timated 500 MM bbl of recoverable oil. to minimize workover costs and prolong First oil was produced in 1960. the economic life of other wells in the Wytch Farm encompasses three pri- Wytch Farm development. Well L12 of- mary reservoirs: Frome at 800 m (2,625 fered both the opportunity to implement ft), Bridport at 924 m (3,032 ft), and a backup system and install two different Sherwood at 1,585 m (5,200 ft). The pump sets in the same well to cope with Wareham and Kimmeridge formations changing reservoir conditions over time. are also oil productive in the area. Well L12, situated on Furzey Island, SYSTEM DESIGN produces from the Sherwood formation. The redundant system used compris- Following a lateral sidetrack in 2003, L12 es two complete ESPs, each deployed on was completed with a single ESP system. a bypass system, Fig. 3. A pump-support After initially producing 5,000 bopd with sub, from which the lower ESP/bypass low water cut, the well declined substan- system is hung, is included at the base of tially to 2,000 bopd and the ESP suffered the upper ESP bypass. premature failure from low flow. To operate the lower ESP, a blanking When considering next steps, uncer- plug is set in a nipple profile below the tainty arose about what rate of future lower Y-tool to prevent recirculation. An Fig. 3. Two complete ESP systems are production to expect. A subsequent ESP isolation tool straddles two other nipple installed in Well L12, each a different workover could result in an oversized profiles, above and below the upper Y- pump confi guration. The lower unit is pump if the well continued to decline, tool. This serves to isolate the upper ESP producing 2,450 bopd with a 38% water cut. BP expects to switch to the upper or an undersized pump should produc- while the lower is operating, and creates unit in about 2.5 years. tion stabilize. Both scenarios had poten- the production flow path, Fig. 4. tial for further workovers in the future, Production can be switched to the up- which would require rig moves at signifi- per ESP by removing the isolation tool cant cost and environmental risk. and installing a second blanking plug The dual-bypass system had to fit In an attempt to avoid such a rig in the nipple profile below the upper Y- within the 9⅝ -in., 40.0-ppf casing and move to Furzey Island, a jet pump was tool. The second blanking plug prevents accommodate the selected 5.40-in. OD installed in a sliding sleeve above L12’s recirculation of the upper ESP during ESP set. To optimize the lower ESP siz- existing ESP assembly. It was thought operation. ing, the largest size of bypass tubing pos- that the jet pump might achieve an ac- The existing lower completion in Well sible was used for the upper ESP bypass ceptable production rate and help char- L12 includes a sliding sleeve. Access to assembly. This was 2⅞ -in. VAM FJL acterize future well performance. The the sleeve was a design requirement for flush-joint tubing. jet pump produced around 600 bopd, any new artificial lift completion. The The nipple sizes in the dual-bypass as- but it also provided time to gather well dual-bypass system was the ideal solu- sembly were dictated by the bypass tub- performance data and hence determine a tion to maintain the intervention path, ing size, and the need to maintain access more accurate rate prediction for an ESP. while enabling a backup ESP system to to the sliding sleeve in the lower comple- A decision was then made to workover be deployed. tion. It was possible to use the standard MAY 2005 World Oil With this in mind, the upper and lower stalled without incident in September ESP assemblies were configured differ- 2004. In accordance with the planned ently. The lower assembly, which will be operating strategy, the blanking plug was used first, includes a 125-hp motor. The set in the lower system telescopic swivel upper assembly includes a 150-hp mo- nipple, and the isolation tool was set tor and additional pump stages so that across the top nipple and upper telescop- the target flow rate can be maintained ic swivel nipple, isolating the upper ESP when water cut increases. An advanced and creating the flow path for the lower gas handler will accommodate the pre- ESP. The lower ESP was started and is dicted rise in gas-to-oil ratio over time. producing 2,450 bopd with a water cut BP expects to switch production to the of 38%. WO upper ESP system after about 2.5 years to maintain optimal performance as con- ACKNOWLEDGMENT ditions change. The authors thank the managements of BP and Included with each of the ESP as- Schlumberger for permission to publish this article. semblies is a Phoenix MultiSensor, Type 1 gauge, which measures pump intake THE AUTHORS pressure, pump discharge pressure, in- P. Duffy, well operations lead for BP in Wytch take temperature, motor winding tem- Farm, holds a bachelor’s degree in engineering perature, vibration and current leakage. from the University of Liverpool, England. He has worked in a variety of petroleum and well engineering positions within BP for 15 years. SYSTEM DELIVERY He is a chartered engineer, and member of the To coincide with planned rig move- Institution of Mechanical Engineers. ments, and avoid additional rig moves, D. Cooke, senior completions engineer for BP BP wanted the workover to occur just in Wytch Farm, holds a bachelor’s degree in six weeks after placing the order for the mining engineering from the Camborne School dual-ESP system. With this in mind, the of Mines, England. He has worked in a variety system was designed to use standard 9⅝ - of completion engineering positions with ser- in.
Recommended publications
  • The Poole Harbour Status List
    The Poole Harbour Status List Mute Swan – Status – Breeding resident and winter visitor. Good Sites – Seen sporadically around the harbour but Poole Park, Hatch Pond, Brands Bay, Little Sea, Ham Common, Arne, Middlebere, Swineham and Holes Bay are all good sites. Bewick’s Swan Status – Uncommon winter visitor. Once a regular winter visitor to the Frome Valley now only arrives in hard or severe winters. Good Sites – Along the Frome Valley leading to Wareham water meadows and Bestwall Whooper Swan Status – Rare winter visitor and passage migrant Good Sites – In the 60’s there were regular reports of birds over wintering on Little Sea, however, sightings are now mainly due to extreme weather conditions. Bestwall, Wareham Water Meadows and the harbour mouth are all potential sites Tundra Bean Goose Status – Vagrant to the harbour Taiga Bean Goose Status – Vagrant to the harbour Pink-footed Goose Status – Rare winter visitor. Good Sites – Middlebere and Wareham Water Meadows have the most records for this species White-fronted Goose Status – Once annual, but now scarce winter visitor. Good Sites – During periods of cold weather the best places to look are Bestwall, Arne, Keysworth and the Frome Valley. Greylag Goose Status – Resident feral breeder and rare winter visitor Good Sites – Poole Park has around 10-15 birds throughout the year. Swineham GP, Wareham Water Meadows and Bestwall all host birds during the year. Brett had 3 birds with collar rings some years ago. Maybe worth mentioning those. Canada Goose Status – Common reeding resident. Good Sites – Poole Park has a healthy feral population. Middlebere late summer can host up to 200 birds with other large gatherings at Arne, Brownsea Island, Swineham, Greenland’s Farm and Brands Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • 233 08 SD50 Decision Document New Bespoke
    Permitting decisions Variation to permit We have decided to issue the variation for Kimmeridge wellsite operated by Perenco UK Limited. The variation number is EPR/ZP3230CE/V002 We have also carried out an Environment Agency initiated variation to the permit. We consider in reaching that decision we have taken into account all relevant considerations and legal requirements and that the permit will ensure that the appropriate level of environmental protection is provided. This variation is required as the Environment Agency has a duty, under the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016, regulation 34(1), to periodically review permits. As a result of that review we have identified a number of necessary changes we must make to reflect current legislation and best practice. These changes principally relate to: Implementation of the Mining Waste Directive namely the addition of extractive waste management activities, Oil storage activities The variation also aim to: Consolidate all previous variations to the original permit so as to bring them together into one permit so the requirements will be clearer. Formalise changes to monitoring requirements and compliance limits where we have agreed them in writing, for example as the result of a hydrogeological risk assessment review. Address site specific issues which result in a change to the current permit, for example incorporating completed improvement conditions into the permit and removing inconsistencies. This permit relates to the Kimmeridge Wellsite which forms part of the Perenco UK Limited’s Wytch Farm operation based on the Isle of Purbeck in Dorset. Kimmeridge Wellsite is located on top of the coastal cliffs surrounding Kimmeridge Bay, approximately 9km from the main Wytch Farm operations, which are the subject of a separate permit.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeological Field Guide to the Wessex Basin
    Hydrogeological Field Guide to the Wessex Basin Technical Report IR/00/77 R Tyler-Whittle, P Shand, K J Griffiths and W M Edmunds This page is blank BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Natural Environment Research Council TECHNICAL REPORT IR/00/77 Hydrogeology Series Technical Report IR/00/77 Hydrogeological Field Guide to the Wessex Basin R Tyler-Whittle, P Shand, K J Griffiths and W M Edmunds This report was prepared for an EU BASELINE fieldtrip. Bibliographic Reference Tyler-Whittle R, Shand P, Griffiths K J and Edmunds W M, 2000 Hydrogeological Field Guide to the Wessex Basin British Geological Survey Report IR/00/77 NERC copyright 2000 British Geological Survey Keyworth, Nottinghamshire BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY KEYWORTH NOTTINGHAM NG12 5GG UNITED KINGDOM TEL (0115) 9363100 FAX (0115) 9363200 DOCUMENT TITLE AND AUTHOR LIST Hydrogeological Field Guide to the Wessex Basin R Tyler-Whittle, P Shand, K J Griffiths and W M Edmunds CLIENT CLIENT REPORT # BGS REPORT# IR/00/77 CLIENT CONTRACT REF BGS PROJECT CODE CLASSIFICATION Restricted SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE PREPARED BY CO-AUTHOR (Lead Author) CO-AUTHOR CO-AUTHOR PEER REVIEWED BY CO-AUTHOR CHECKED BY CO-AUTHOR (Project Manager or deputy) CO-AUTHOR APPROVED BY CO-AUTHOR (Project Director or senior staff) CO-AUTHOR APPROVED BY OS Copyright (Hydrogeology acknowledged Group Manager) Assistant Director Layout checked by clearance (if reqd) BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available from Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG the BGS Sales Desk at the Survey headquarters, ☎ 0115-936 3100 Telex 378173 BGSKEY G Keyworth, Nottingham. The more popular maps and Fax 0115-936 3200 books may be purchased from BGS-approved stockists Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3LA and agents and over the counter at the Bookshop, Gallery ☎ 37, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, (Earth 0131-667 1000 Telex 727343 SEISED G Fax 0131-668 2683 Galleries), London.
    [Show full text]
  • Wytch Farm Landscape and Access Enhancement Fund the Dorset
    Wytch Farm Landscape and Access Enhancement Fund The Dorset Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty is a nationally important protected landscape, with vibrant communities and a wealth of wildlife and heritage. Within the AONB is the largest on-shore oilfield in Europe, at Wytch Farm near Corfe Castle. As part of a planning application to extend the working life of the oilfield by a further 20 years, the oilfield operator, Perenco UK has provided a sum of £1.7 million for landscape, biodiversity and sustainable transport projects to enhance the landscape. This sum is to be used to fund projects that compensate for the environmental impacts of the further retention of the oilfields infrastructure in the landscape. How to Apply If you would like to apply to this fund, please assess your project against the information below to check whether you fulfil the criteria. Applications are to be made on a form downloadable from the Dorset AONB website. What kinds of project can be funded? Projects can be funded which: • Strengthen the character of the surrounding landscape by heathland and acid grassland mosaic creation, conservation, enhancement and management. • Enhance biodiversity by the conservation, enhancement and management of boundary features (hedgerows, veteran trees and earthbanks), woodlands (e.g. through Rhododendron control) and rural lanes. • Improve rights of way and / or facilities for no-car access and conserving tranquillity. Funding is to be targeted to physical works which achieve these aims. Project management time to deliver a practical project can be included within the overall proposal but funds will not be awarded to projects with a disproportionate amount of revenue costs (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Investigation of the Brenscombe Outdoor Centre Canoe Swamping Accident in Poole Harbour, Dorset on 6 April 2005 Ma
    Report on the investigation of the Brenscombe Outdoor Centre canoe swamping accident in Poole Harbour, Dorset on 6 April 2005 Marine Accident Investigation Branch Carlton House Carlton Place Southampton United Kingdom SO15 2DZ Report No 22/2005 December 2005 Extract from The United Kingdom Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2005 – Regulation 5: “The sole objective of the investigation of an accident under the Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2005 shall be the prevention of future accidents through the ascertainment of its causes and circumstances. It shall not be the purpose of an investigation to determine liability nor, except so far as is necessary to achieve its objective, to apportion blame.” NOTE This report is not written with litigation in mind and, pursuant to Regulation 13(9) of the Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2005, shall be inadmissible in any judicial proceedings whose purpose, or one of whose purpose is to attribute or apportion liability or blame. CONTENTS Page GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS SYNOPSIS 1 SECTION 1 - FACTUAL INFORMATION 3 1.1 Particulars of canoe swamping accident 3 1.2 Brenscombe Outdoor Centre 5 1.3 Leadership Direct, client and course 5 1.4 Accident background 6 1.4.1 Exercise aim 6 1.4.2 Exercise area 6 1.5 Narrative 9 1.5.1 Pre-water preparations 10 1.5.2 Transit 10 1.5.3 Rescue 13 1.5.4 Client’s reaction 16 1.6 BOC staff 16 1.6.1 Staff 16 1.6.2 Safety instructor 16 1.6.3 Additional instructor
    [Show full text]
  • Canoeing in Poole Harbour
    wildlife in Poole Harbour Poole in wildlife and safety sea to guide Your Poole Harbour is home to a wealth Avocet of wildlife as well as being a busy Key Features: Elegant white and black wader with distinctive upturned bill and long legs. commercial port and centre for a wide Best to spot: August to April Where: On a low tide Avocet flocks can be range of recreational activities. It is a found in several favoured feeding spots with fantastic sheltered place to explore the southern tip of Round Island and the mouth of Wytch Lake being good places. However these are sensitive feeding by canoe all year round, although zones and it’s not advised to kayak here on a low or falling tide. Always carry a means of calling for help and keep it Fact: Depending on the winter conditions, Poole Harbour hosts the it’s important to remember this within reach (waterproof VHF radio, mobile phone, 2nd or 3rd largest overwintering flock of Avocet in the country. whistles and flares). site is important for birds (Special Protection Area). Wear a personal flotation device. Get some training: contact British Canoeing Red Breasted Merganser Harbour www.britishcanoeing.org.uk or the Poole Harbour Key Features: Both males and females have a Canoe Club www.phcc.org.uk for local information. spiky haircut on the back of their heads and males have a distinct green glossy head and Poole in in Wear clothing appropriate for your trip and the weather. red eye. Best to spot: October to March Always paddle with others.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorset and East Devon Coast for Inclusion in the World Heritage List
    Nomination of the Dorset and East Devon Coast for inclusion in the World Heritage List © Dorset County Council 2000 Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum June 2000 Published by Dorset County Council on behalf of Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum. Publication of this nomination has been supported by English Nature and the Countryside Agency, and has been advised by the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the British Geological Survey. Maps reproduced from Ordnance Survey maps with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: LA 076 570. Maps and diagrams reproduced/derived from British Geological Survey material with the permission of the British Geological Survey. © NERC. All rights reserved. Permit Number: IPR/4-2. Design and production by Sillson Communications +44 (0)1929 552233. Cover: Duria antiquior (A more ancient Dorset) by Henry De la Beche, c. 1830. The first published reconstruction of a past environment, based on the Lower Jurassic rocks and fossils of the Dorset and East Devon Coast. © Dorset County Council 2000 In April 1999 the Government announced that the Dorset and East Devon Coast would be one of the twenty-five cultural and natural sites to be included on the United Kingdom’s new Tentative List of sites for future nomination for World Heritage status. Eighteen sites from the United Kingdom and its Overseas Territories have already been inscribed on the World Heritage List, although only two other natural sites within the UK, St Kilda and the Giant’s Causeway, have been granted this status to date.
    [Show full text]
  • 135. Dorset Heaths Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 135. Dorset Heaths Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 135. Dorset Heaths Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Perenco UK Limited Wytch Farm Oilfield, Gathering Station and Wellsites Thrasher's Lane Corfe Castle Wareham Dorset BH20 5JR
    Notice of variation and consolidation with introductory note The Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 Perenco UK Limited Wytch Farm Oilfield, Gathering Station and Wellsites Thrasher's Lane Corfe Castle Wareham Dorset BH20 5JR Variation application number EPR/NP3730CZ/V006 Permit number EPR/NP3730CZ Variation and consolidation application number EPR/NP3730CZ/V006 - Wytch Farm Oilfield, Gathering Station and Wellsites i Wytch Farm Oilfield, Gathering Station and Wellsites Permit number EPR/NP3730CZ Introductory note This introductory note does not form a part of the permit Under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 (Schedule 5, Part 1, paragraph 19) a variation may comprise a consolidated permit reflecting the variations and a notice specifying the variations included in that consolidated permit. Schedule 1 of the notice specifies the conditions that have been varied and schedule 2 comprises a consolidated permit which reflects the variations being made. All the conditions of the permit have been varied and are subject to the right of appeal. This variation is to add or vary- 1. The installation activities. These activities on site haven’t changed but the regulation of them under the Environmental Permitting Regulations now includes four separately listed activities and seven Directly Associated Activities (DAAs), including flaring for emergency purposes only. The main installation listed activities are for: oil storage and handling, refining gas, odourising gas, and burning fuel in a turbine (less than 50MW thermal input), under Part 2 Schedules 1.1 and 1.2 of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016. There are also four discharges of site surface water to surface water which are not standalone water discharges and are DAAs of the main installation activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Poole Harbour & Purbeck
    fc_A-SoJ4la IaJJLoh E>ox 3 Poole Harbour & Purbeck Catchment Management Plan First Annual Review March 1997 BLANDFORD FORUM % ^POOLE tu CONTENTS VISION FOR THE CATCHM ENT.................... ............................................................................................ 2 1. INTRODUCTION..............................;................................................................................ ;....... ;..........3 1.1 The Environment Agency................................................................................................................3 1.2 The Environment Agency and Catchment Management Planning............................................... 3 2. PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAL REVIEW...................................................................................................... 4 3. OVERVIEW OF THE CATCHMENT......................................................................................................... 4 4. SUMMARY OF PROGRESS..................................... ................. ............................................................. 4 4.1 Flood Defence..................................................................................................................................4 4.2 Water Quality................... !.......... ................................................................................................... 5 4.3 Conservation..... ;............................................................................................................................5 5. ACTION PLAN
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND THE ENVIRONMENT School of Civil and Environmental Engineering PHYSICAL DRIVERS OF SALTMARSH CHANGE IN ENCLOSED MICROTIDAL ESTUARIES BY SARAH C. GARDINER Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2015 [ii] UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND THE ENVIRONMENT SCHOOL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Doctor of Philosophy PHYSICAL DRIVERS OF SALTMARSH CHANGE IN ENCLOSED ESTUARIES Sarah C. Gardiner Estuaries are among the most biologically productive ecosystems on the planet, per unit area, with intertidal habitats and particularly saltmarshes providing a variety or ecosystem services and supporting large numbers of both primary and secondary producers. These habitats are globally important and are found throughout tropical to temperate climates. Micro-tidal estuaries are found throughout the world and particularly sensitive to sea-level rise, as they are limited in their ability to adjust and are considered vulnerable to future changes .Hence, at a broad scale, understanding the drivers and mechanisms of saltmarsh change in micro-tidal systems is crucial in aiding decision making in future coastal management.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jurassic Shales of the Wessex Area: Geology and Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resource Estimation
    THE JURASSIC SHALES OF THE WESSEX AREA: GEOLOGY AND SHALE OIL AND SHALE GAS RESOURCE ESTIMATION The Jurassic shales of the Wessex area: geology and shale oil and shale gas resource estimation Lias, Black Ven, Dorset. Photograph from the Geologists’ Association Carrack Archive. © NERC i © OGA 2016 THE JURASSIC SHALES OF THE WESSEX AREA: GEOLOGY AND SHALE OIL AND SHALE GAS RESOURCE ESTIMATION Disclaimer This report is for information only. It does not constitute legal, technical or professional advice. The Oil and Gas Authority does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage of any nature, however caused, which may be sustained as a result of reliance upon the information contained in this report. All material is copyright and is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 4DU. It may be produced in whole or in part subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source, but should not be included in any commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those indicated above requires the written permission of the Oil and Gas Authority. Suggested citation: Greenhalgh, E. 2016. The Jurassic shales of the Wessex Area: geology and shale oil and shale gas resource estimation. British Geological Survey for the Oil and Gas Authority, London, UK. Requests and enquiries should be addressed to: Toni Harvey Senior Geoscientist - UK Onshore Email: [email protected] ii © OGA 2016 THE JURASSIC SHALES OF THE WESSEX AREA: GEOLOGY AND SHALE OIL AND SHALE GAS RESOURCE ESTIMATION Foreword This report has been produced under contract by the British Geological Survey (BGS), as an addendum to the Weald Basin study (Andrews, 2014).
    [Show full text]