CONCLUSION Conclusion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CONCLUSION Conclusion CONCLUSION Conclusion Collaboration: Sea-level Marin Adaptation significantly impact all residents and tourists Response Team’s (C-SMART) sea level rise traveling this portion of the coast during high tides, vulnerability assessment examined the exposure, as few alternative routes are available. Buildings, sensitivity and adaptive capacity of built and or land surrounding buildings, that flood near daily, natural assets. Many of Marin’s essential and or even only during annual storms, are not likely to beloved coastal community assets are vulnerable sustain the expense and trauma from reoccurring to sea level rise. flood damage. This is especially a concern for the Calles and Patios neighborhoods in Stinson Beach In their current conditions and without intervention, and Tomales Bay homes that are not elevated to the most vulnerable coastal Marin assets are accommodate higher waters and waves. beaches and buildings on or near the water’s dynamic edge. Maps 83-87 and the following sections highlight major vulnerabilities by onset, or timing, for roughly 2030, 2050, and 2100. IMPACTS AT-A-GLANCE: SCENARIO 2 1,681 acres 2030 Expectations (Scenarios 1 & 2) flooded @ MHHW 3,000+ residents plus + annual storm tourists o Beaches, underground on-site surge wastewater treatment systems (OWTS), buildings, and streets in Stinson Beach 2,054 acres 110 569 acres Calles and Patios neighborhoods. flooded @ MHHW agricultural of o Shoreline Highway between Stinson +20-year storm acres aquaculture Beach and Bolinas, the Walker Creek surge (mostly ranch) crossing in Marshall, and bridges on 588 homes & Middle Road and Valley Ford Lincoln businesses could School Road. flood, 60 could o Beaches and beach front and downtown suffer from buildings and streets in Bolinas. erosion o Septic systems, beaches, marshes, and Property Owners buildings along the eastern and western $561 million in County of Marin shores of Tomales Bay. assessed Caltrans o The water distribution pipe underneath property value Bolinas Public Utility Shoreline Highway and Sir Francis Drake Stinson Beach Water 2.3 miles of wet Boulevard serving Inverness residents. Fire Districts road, o Intertidal rocky lands off Muir Beach and National Parks Service 2 ports, Duxbury Reef in Bolinas. California State Parks 1 marina, o Fire service facilities and tsunami AT&T evacuation routes in Stinson Beach. 1 boat launch o Recreational facilities at Dillon Beach Beaches Resort and Lawson’s Landing. Tidal Marshes o Blufftop buildings in Muir Beach, Bolinas, Eelgrass beds and Dillon Beach may be vulnerable to Estuaries accelerated erosion. These small pockets of flooding along the coast could result, at best, in daily road and recreation facilities closures. Consistent erosion exacerbated by higher tides and storm surges could take out portions of the roads for longer periods of time and may require repair. This level of damage would Marin Coast Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Page 183 CONCLUSION Map 83 Southern Marin Coast 2030 Sea Level Rise and Storm Surge Expectations Marin Coast Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Page 184 CONCLUSION Map 83. Northern Marin Coast 2030 Sea Level Rise and Storm Surge Expectations Marin Coast Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Page 185 CONCLUSION Mid Century Expectations (Scenario 3) The following places could face chronic and storm surge flooding and erosion at twenty inches of sea level and a 20-year storm surge by 2050. o Locations presented in near-term scenarios 1 and 2. o Seadrift neighborhood in Stinson Beach. o Bluff top homes in Muir Beach, Bolinas, and Dillon Beach. o Olema-Bolinas Road, the only road to Bolinas. o Additional buildings and streets in downtown Bolinas, including the historic district. o Bolinas Public Utilities District lift station at the end of Wharf Road. o The Bolinas Wye and local roads in Seadrift neighborhood, Stinson Beach. Credit: CDA Stinson Beach west of State Route 1 could face tidal flooding, including Calle del Arroyo, the access road to nearly all IMPACTS AT-A-GLANCE: SCENARIO 3 lower Stinson Beach homes. 2,062 acres o Shoreline Highway in Stinson Beach, Pt. flooded @ MHHW 3,000+ residents plus Reyes Station and East Shore at creek + 20-year storm tourists crossings, and low lying segments of Sir surge Francis Drake Boulevard in Inverness could prevent through access. 680 homes, businesses, & o Public access sites along these roads 172 569 acres institutions could would be compromised. agricultural of flood, 148 could acres aquaculture By mid-century, near-term impacts will continue to suffer from (mostly ranch) worsen and reach to new areas in Bolinas, Stinson erosion Beach, and around Tomales Bay. Over water housing may not be feasible without significant $793 million in alterations. Road closures could last longer and assessed repeated flooding could cause even greater property value damage. By this time period, significant alterations Property Owners to the roadways maybe necessary to maintain 5 miles of wet County of Marin through access and avoid frequent and costly road, Caltrans repairs. Underground utilities in Stinson Beach 1 port, Bolinas Public Utility and around Tomales Bay may become 1 marina, Stinson Beach Water overburdened by higher waters and lose 1 boat launch Fire Districts National Parks Service functionality, requiring conversion to other systems Beaches to ensure remaining homes are livable. Beaches California State Parks Tidal Marshes AT&T would be severely eroded and bluff collapse an Creeks even greater risk than in the near-term. These Eelgrass beds closures would significantly impact existing and Estuaries new residents and tourists that would have major ripple effects on the West Marin economy. Marin Coast Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Page 186 CONCLUSION Map 84. Southern Marin Coast 2050 Sea Level Rise and Storm Surge Expectations Marin Coast Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Page 187 CONCLUSION Map 85. Northern Marin Coast 2050 Sea Level Rise and Storm Surge Expectations Marin Coast Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Page 188 CONCLUSION End of Century Expectations (Scenarios 4 & 5) IMPACTS AT-A-GLANCE: SCENARIO 5 By 2100, higher high tides at 80 inches of sea 2,772 acres 3,000+ residents plus level rise could adversely impact the locations flooded @ MHHW tourists flooded in the near- and medium-terms, and significant portions of the areas that previously 2,846 acres 457 569 acres only suffered storm surge flooding. Tidal flooding flooded @ MHHW agricultural of would reach beyond State Route 1 and Sir Francis +100-year storm acres aquaculture Drake Boulevard in low-lying areas. Daily tidal surge (mostly ranch) flooding at 40 inches, or about 3.5 feet, of sea 1,075 buildings level rise could reach 850 parcels, 400 buildings, could flood, 719 and 7 miles of road. With a 100-year storm surge could suffer from an additional 300 parcels, 450 buildings, and 7.4 erosion miles of road would also flood. $855.4 million in Property Owners At 80 inches, or about 6.5 feet of sea level rise, assessed County of Marin 1 1,220 parcels, 1,060 buildings, and 17 miles of property value Caltrans road could face tidal flooding. A 100-year storm 18 miles of wet Bolinas Public Utility surge could flood these areas and further inland, road, Stinson Beach Water and an additional 1,300 parcels, and a total of 1 port, Fire Districts 1,075 buildings and 18 miles of road, including all 1 marina, National Parks Service low-lying areas in Muir Beach, Stinson Beach, 1 boat launch California State Parks Bolinas, Inverness, and East Shore, effected. The AT&T damage would be exacerbated by storm water Beaches flowing down the hills into the ocean or bay. Tidal Marshes Destroyed building stock could compromise over Creeks $300 million (2015 dollars) in assessed value. Eelgrass beds Vulnerable single family homes amount to $855 Estuaries million in market value (2015 dollars). In addition, bluff erosion could destroy several hundred buildings in Muir Beach, Bolinas, and Dillion Beach. Below is a list of additional areas that could be flooded. o Locations presented in near- and medium- term scenarios 1, 2, and 3 would only see more frequent and severe flooding if they still exist. o Shoreline Highway through East Shore. o Buildings in Inverness west of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. o Downtown Bolinas up to Brighton Road, including the market, library, community center, gas station, museum, historic buildings and other valued places. At this level and frequency of flooding, many of the vulnerable properties and roadways could not exist in their current state. Thus, completely changing West Marin’s look, feel, livability, Inverness Yacht Club septic system covers. Credit: S. Callow economic activity, and accessibility; warranting a forward thinking examination of and funding for adaptation measures well before these risks arise. 1 2016 dollars Marin Coast Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Page 189 CONCLUSION Map 86. Southern Marin Coast Long-term Sea Level Rise and Storm Surge Expectations Marin Coast Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Page 190 CONCLUSION Map 87. Northern Marin Coast Long-term Sea Level Rise and Storm Surge Expectations Marin Coast Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Page 191 CONCLUSION Flooding from sea level rise could reduce side septic leach lines to the east side of useable living space; adversely affect tourism, Shoreline Highway and away from Tomales Bay transportation, and natural attractions and in Marshall. resources, and homes and businesses. The most vulnerable built areas are the Calles and Implementing additional adaptation measures Patios neighborhoods, along the shoreline of may require new institutional, legal, and Bolinas Lagoon and Bolinas beach front, and on financing arrangements, engineering measures, the shallows and shores of Tomales Bay. In and other incremental actions property owners East Shore, nearly all development is vulnerable can take. These measures and sea levels on the by the medium-term. coast must be monitored and evaluated to inform need and effectiveness of these types of More than 3,000 existing residents, hundreds of strategies.
Recommended publications
  • River Otter (Lontra Canadensis) Monitoring Report 2019 Marin County, California
    PO Box 103 Web: riverotterecology.org Forest Knolls, CA 94933 Facebook.com/BayAreaOtters 415.342.7956 Instagram: riverotterecology River Otter (Lontra canadensis) Monitoring Report 2019 Marin County, California The River Otter Ecology Project PO Box 103, Forest Knolls, CA 94933 By Megan Isadore and Terence Carroll February 21, 2020 Daniel Dietrich The River Otter Ecology Project 1 February 21, 2020 Background While historical records on river otters in the San Francisco Bay Area are sparse, existing information indicates that river otters had been extirpated from much, if not all, of Marin County by the 1930’s when both Grinnell and trapping records indicate no coastal river otters in Marin and southward. Beginning in 1989, river otters were noticed in coastal Marin County, particularly in Rodeo Lagoon, Walker Creek, and Lagunitas Creek. As apex predators using variety of terrestrial and aquatic habitat types, river otters are sentinel indicators of watershed function and health (Larivière and Walton 1998). They predate a wide variety of native and non-native species in freshwater and marine environments (Penland and Black 2009, Garwood and others 2013). They are susceptible to parasites such as Cryptosporidium and Giardia spp. (Gaydos and others 2007), and Vibrio spp. (Bouley and others 2015), and they may bioaccumulate environmental contaminants such as mercury, metals, organochlorines, and hydrocarbons (Francis and others 1994, Halbrook and others 1996, Bowyer and others 2003). Furthermore, understanding river otter ecology and population status is a critical element of ecosystem management (Bowen 1997, Kruuk 2006, Ben-David and Golden 2009). River otters transport aquatic nutrients to land (Ben-David and others 2004); transmit trophic effects (Crait and Ben-David 2007); and affect the composition and abundance of prey species via trophic subsidy (Garwood and others 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • North Coaster
    North Coaster Writing — Photography — Marin and Sonoma Coast Travel Directory North Coaster A journal for travelers along the Marin and Sonoma coastline Highway 1: A theory by Jordan Bowen, Page 3 “Frogs” and “Baseball hat people” by Jim Pellegrin, Page 5 “No worries” by Samantha Kimmey, Page 5 Russian House #1 by Jordan Bowen, Page 9 Travel directory Page 15 “Coast live oak” by Amber Turner Page 22 Photographs by David Briggs Edited by Tess Elliott Published by the Point Reyes Light Box 210, Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 (415) 669.1200 ptreyeslight.com Highway 1: A theory By Jordan Bowen “Once this rocky coast beneath me was a plain of sand; then the sea rose and found a new shore line. And again in some shadowy future the surf will have ground these Highway 1 snakes along the lip of the continent, rocks to sand and will have returned the coast to its ear- winding past the ridges, hills and cliffs thrust upward lier state. And so in my mind’s eye these coastal forms and out of the ocean over millions of years by two plates merge and blend in a shifting, kaleidoscopic pattern in touching. In geologic time, what’s visible to our eyes has which there is no finality, no ultimate and fixed reality— all happened rather quickly. Within the timeframe of the earth becoming fluid as the sea itself.” American imperium, little more than a century and a half Since the historic deluges of California’s wettest win- in coastal California, the landscape seems permanent, ter, a year or so after the state’s driest winter, Highway 1’s enduring in this exact form until a storm crumbles a part steep embankments have been belted together in places of the cliff bearing Route 1 back into the sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Supervisors- Attached Please Find Our Letter of Opposition to the SCA Ordinance for Sleepy Hollow As Drafted by Our Attorne
    From: Andrea Taber To: Rice, Katie; Kinsey, Steven; Adams, Susan; Arnold, Judy; Sears, Kathrin Cc: Dan Stein; Thorsen, Suzanne; Lai, Thomas Subject: Sleepy Hollow Homeowners Association Letter of Oppostion to the SCA Ordinance Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 8:12:53 PM Attachments: Document4.docx Dear Supervisors- Attached please find our letter of opposition to the SCA Ordinance for Sleepy Hollow as drafted by our attorney Neil Moran of Freitas McCarthy MacMahon & Keating, LLP. Sleepy Hollow Homeowners Association May 3, 2013 Board of Supervisors of Marin County 3501 Civil Center Drive San Rafael, CA 94903-4157 Re: Stream Conservation Area (SCA) Proposed Amendments to the Development Code Honorable Members of the Board of Supervisors: INTRODUCTION The Sleepy Hollow Homes Association (SHHA) objects to the proposed changes to Chapters 22.33 (Stream Protection) and 22.63 (Stream Conservation Area Permit) as they would apply to the residents of the unincorporated portion of San Anselmo known as Sleepy Hollow. We ask that the County exempt and/or delay implementation of any changes to Chapters 22.33 and 22.63 as to the city-centered corridor streams, including Sleepy Hollow. The SHHA supports implementation of the proposed amendments to the San Geronimo Valley, to protect wildlife habitat in streams where Coho Salmon currently exist. The SHHA supports regulations to ensure the health and survival of the species in these areas. The SHHA recognizes the urgency of this matter to the San Geronimo Valley, both for the survival of the endangered and declining Coho population and for the property rights of the affected residents who are currently subject to a building moratorium.
    [Show full text]
  • Goga Wrfr.Pdf
    The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top: Golden Gate Bridge, Don Weeks Middle: Rodeo Lagoon, Joel Wagner Bottom: Crissy Field, Joel Wagner ii CONTENTS Contents, iii List of Figures, iv Executive Summary, 1 Introduction, 7 Water Resources Planning, 9 Location and Demography, 11 Description of Natural Resources, 12 Climate, 12 Physiography, 12 Geology, 13 Soils, 13
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    INDEX Alabama Jazz Music Hall of American Jazz Museum (Kan- AAA (American Automobile Fame Museum (Birming- sas City, KSMO), 535 Association), 1047 ham, AL), 419 American Museum of Natural AARP, 10 Alabama Shakespeare Festi- History (New York City), 110 Abby Aldrich Rockefeller val (Montgomery), 428–429 American Visionary Art Folk Art Museum (Williams- The Alamo (San Antonio, TX), Museum (Baltimore, DE), burg, VA), 226 644 182 Abiel Smith School (Boston, Ala Moana Beach Park (HI), America the Beautiful Access MA), 36 1002 Pass, 9 Abrams Falls Trail (TN), 299 Alaska, 984–1001 America the Beautiful Senior Absecon Lighthouse (Atlantic Alaska Native Heritage Cen- Pass, 10–11 City, NJ), 144 ter (Anchorage, AK), 999 The Amish Country (PA), Abundant Memories Heritage Alaska Public Lands Informa- 168–171 Village (near Branson, MO), tion Center (Anchorage), Amon Carter Museum (Fort 556 1000 Worth, TX), 626 The Abyss (AZ), 783 Alaska Raptor Center (Sitka, Amtrak, 16, 17 Acadia National Park (ME), AK), 990 Anaehoomalu Bay (A-Bay, 99–103 Alaska State Museum HI), 1016 Accommodations, 25–27 (Juneau, AK), 991–992 Anasazi Heritage Center and Acoma Pueblo (NM), 800 Alaska Zoo (Anchorage), 999 Museum (Dolores, CO), 696 Adamstown (PA), 170 Albuquerque (NM), 794–800 Anchorage (AK), 998–1001 Adirondack Museum (Blue Albuquerque Museum of Art Anchorage Museum at Ras- Mountain Lake, NY), 135 and History (NM), 795–796 muson Center (AK), 999 The Adirondacks (NY), Alcatraz Island (CA), 824 Andrew Low House (Savan- 133–137 Allen Lambe House Museum nah, GA), 256 Adler Planetarium and (Wichita, KS), 1028 Andrew Molera State Park Astronomy Museum Allstate 400 at the Brickyard (CA), 860 (Chicago, IL), 459 (Indianapolis, IN), 496 Andy Warhol Museum (Pitts- Adventureland (Orlando, FL), Alltech FEI (Federation burgh, PA), 176 339–340 Equestre Internationale) Anheuser-Busch Brewery (St.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Francis Drake, California Encounter with Miwok, 1579
    Library of Congress The World Encompassed by Sir Francis Drake (Voyage of 1577-1580) compiled by Drake’s nephew, Francis Drake, from the journal of the ship’s chaplain, Frances Fletcher, and others; published 1628 excerpts: Nova Albion (California), 1579 In December 1577 the Drake expedition departed England to sail west around the world, reaching the Pacific Ocean in eleven months after a calamitous sail through the Straits of Magellan. During the next year the Golden Hind sailed north along the continents’ west coast as far north as Vancouver, partly in search of the elusive “northwest passage.” Repelled by the cold weather they endured that far north, even in spring months, The World Encompassed by Sir Francis Drake, Drake and his crew turned south and anchored near San Francisco Bay in 1628, frontispiece and title page June 1579, remaining for five weeks to prepare for the long sail across the Pacific Ocean. There they met the native inhabitants, the Coastal Miwok. " In 38 deg. 30 min. we fell with a convenient and fit harbor,1 and June 17 came to anchor there, where we continued till the 23 day of July following. During all which time, notwith- standing it was in the height of summer, and so near the sun, yet were we continually visited with like nipping colds as we had felt before; insomuch that if violent exercises of our bodies, and busy employment about our necessary labors, had not sometimes compelled us to the contrary, we could very well have been contented to have kept about us still our winter clothes; yea (had our necessities suffered us) to have kept our beds; neither could we at any time, in whole fourteen days together, find the air so clear as to be able to take the height of sun or star [latitude].
    [Show full text]
  • Tomales Bay Harbor Seals: a Colony at Risk, 1992
    THIRD BIENNIAL STATE OF TOMALES BAY CONFERENCE October 24, 1992 Tomales Bay Harbor Seals: A Colony at Risk? Sarah G. Allen, Point Reyes Bird Observatory 4990 Shoreline Hwy, Stinson Beach Ca 94970 Mary Ellen King, Audubon Canyon Ranch 4900 Shoreline Hwy, Stinson Beach Ca 94970 INTRODUCTION Conservation, management, and protection of harbor seats come under the purview of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) of 1972 (Public Law 92-522). A primary directive of the MMPA is to protect marine mammal stocks from declining below their optimum sustainable population. To fulfill this directive in California, the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), in cooperation with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), has been conducting annual, state-wide, aerial surveys of harbor seals to assess the status of the population. Harbor seal colonies along the Point Reyes coastline represent about 20% of the estimated breeding population of the state of California, and consequently, have received attention from CDFG and NMFS. In cooperation with these agencies and supported by the Point Reyes National Seashore and the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary, S. Allen has been monitoring harbor seals in Point Reyes since 1982. Audubon Canyon Ranch has supported surveys in Tomales Bay conducted by M. King and volunteers since 1991. Tomales Bay is one of several locations along the Point Reyes Peninsula where harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardsi) congregate onshore. Resting areas or "haul-out" sites in Point Reyes are found in remote areas on tidal sand bars, sandy pocket beaches, and offshore tidal ledges or islands (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Climate and Weather
    Point Reyes National Seashore Protection for your Cultural and Natural Heritage Climate and Weather While Point Reyes’ climate is generally described as a Mediterranean climate with cool rainy winters and warm dry summers, the peninsula’s weather can vary considerably from the headlands of the Na- tional Seashore to the inland areas of the Olema Valley. Visiting Point Reyes, you can experience extremes in weather within a few short miles. The key to the contrasts in weather is the Inverness Ridge. It sepa- rates the Headlands, dominated by the oceanic influences of the Pacific Ocean, from the Olema Valley, which is dominated by the terrestrial influences of the continental mainland. Leaning into the Wind You’ll often need to lean into the wind to keep your balance on the windiest place on the West Coast! Near the ocean on the western side of the Inverness Ridge, constant winds of moderate to strong velocity sweep the exposed headlands and outer beaches. During most of the year, particularly in summer, prevailing winds blow from the Northwest. In November and December, the winds shift to the south bringing some of the fiercest winds during southerly gales. Over the course of the year the average maximum wind velocity is 43 miles per hour. These strong winds are a faint breeze compared to the highest wind speed recorded at the point of 133 miles per hour. However, east of the Inverness Ridge, extremes are much less com- mon. Sheltered from the open ocean, winds are much lighter in veloc- ity, but it is an unusual day that does not bring some breezes to the Olema Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolinas Lagoon Is One of Marin County's Most Significant Natural
    "The lagoon is one of Marin County's most significant natural resources. The lagoon tidelands are publicly-owned. ... Along with Drake's Estero and Tomales Bay, Bolinas Lagoon provides an important coastal environment for fish, birds and mammals that is unparalleled along the northern California coast between San Francisco and Humboldt Bays. Open water, mudflat and marsh provide productive and diverse habitats for marine fishes, waterbirds, and marine mammals. Bolinas Lagoon is part of a much larger protected natural habitat complex that is part of or adjoins the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary (GFNMS, Pt. Reyes National Seashore, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Central California Coast Biosphere Preserve, Mt. Tamalpais State Park, and the Audubon Canyon Ranch Bird Sanctuary." Bolinas Lagoon. Located in California, less than 20 kilometers up the coast from San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge, Bolinas Lagoon is a tidal embayment of open water, mudflat, and marsh which provides productive and diverse habitats for marine fishes, waterbirds, and marine mammals, and it is also part of a much larger protected natural habitat complex in the region. The site is located on the Pacific Flyway, which makes the Lagoon an ideal staging ground and stopover site for migratory birds, and the temperate climate provides wintering habitat for a wide array of ducks, geese, and shorebirds. The area supports a number of recreational uses, including the use of manually-powered watercraft. Bolinas Lagoon Open Space Preserve Marin County Open Space District Bolinas Lagoon is one of Marin County’s most significant natural resources. Its 1,100 acres, known as the Bolinas Lagoon Open Space Preserve and managed by the Marin County Open Space District, was designated a Wetland of International Importance by the Ramsar Convention in 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • MARIN COUNTY LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Land Use Plan
    MARIN COUNTY LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Land Use Plan Board of Supervisors Adopted August 25, 2015 & April 19, 2016 1. The changes approved by the California Coastal Commission on May 15, 2014 agreed to by the County have been “accepted” (i.e. not shown in track changes) 2. Modification to LUP text approved by the Marin County Board of Supervisor on August 25, 2015 and April 19, 206 are shown in blue text (double-underlined for additions and italized strike out for deletions). Marin County Board of Supervisors Judy Arnold, President, District #5 Kathrin Sears, Vice-President, District #3 Katie Rice, 2nd Vice President, District #2 Susan L. Adams, District #1 Steve Kinsey, District #4 Prepared by the Marin County Community Development Agency Brian C. Crawford, Director This report is funded in part with qualified outer continental shelf oil and gas revenues by the Coastal Impact Assistance Program, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement, U.S. Department of the Interior. Marin County Local Coastal Program Project Staff Tom Lai, Assistant Director Jack Liebster, Principal Planner Kristin Drumm, Senior Planner Christine Gimmler, Senior Planner Jeremy Tejirian, Principal Planner Alisa Stevenson, Assistant Planner Suzanne Thorsen, Planner Steve Scholl, Consulting Planner Copies of this report may be obtained by contacting the Marin County Community Development Agency 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 308 San Rafael, CA 94903 Phone (415) 499-6269 [email protected] www.MarinLCP.org ii Land Use Plan Amendments Marin County Local Coastal Program Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Interpretation of the Land Use Plan ......................................................................................................... 5 Natural Systems and Agriculture Agriculture (AG) ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnohistory and Ethnogeography of the Coast Miwok and Their Neighbors, 1783-1840
    ETHNOHISTORY AND ETHNOGEOGRAPHY OF THE COAST MIWOK AND THEIR NEIGHBORS, 1783-1840 by Randall Milliken Technical Paper presented to: National Park Service, Golden Gate NRA Cultural Resources and Museum Management Division Building 101, Fort Mason San Francisco, California Prepared by: Archaeological/Historical Consultants 609 Aileen Street Oakland, California 94609 June 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report documents the locations of Spanish-contact period Coast Miwok regional and local communities in lands of present Marin and Sonoma counties, California. Furthermore, it documents previously unavailable information about those Coast Miwok communities as they struggled to survive and reform themselves within the context of the Franciscan missions between 1783 and 1840. Supplementary information is provided about neighboring Southern Pomo-speaking communities to the north during the same time period. The staff of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) commissioned this study of the early native people of the Marin Peninsula upon recommendation from the report’s author. He had found that he was amassing a large amount of new information about the early Coast Miwoks at Mission Dolores in San Francisco while he was conducting a GGNRA-funded study of the Ramaytush Ohlone-speaking peoples of the San Francisco Peninsula. The original scope of work for this study called for the analysis and synthesis of sources identifying the Coast Miwok tribal communities that inhabited GGNRA parklands in Marin County prior to Spanish colonization. In addition, it asked for the documentation of cultural ties between those earlier native people and the members of the present-day community of Coast Miwok. The geographic area studied here reaches far to the north of GGNRA lands on the Marin Peninsula to encompass all lands inhabited by Coast Miwoks, as well as lands inhabited by Pomos who intermarried with them at Mission San Rafael.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Level Rise Adaptation Report Marin Ocean Coast
    Marin Ocean Coast Sea Level Rise Adaptation Report Marin County Community Development Agency February 2018 Collaboration: Sea-Level Marin Adaptation Response Team Marin County Community Development Agency February 2018 | Marin County, CA | marinslr.org A Call to Action for West Marin Residents West Marin is abundant with natural resources that are integral to its cultural identify as demonstrated by the long heritage of open space preservation and appreciation. Federal, state and local parklands abutting the Pacific Ocean provide a retreat from the hustle and bustle of Bay Area living. Coastal bluffs, beaches, wetlands, and more draw millions of international visitors for surfing, birding, kayaking, hiking, picnicking and more. Protected ranchlands are stewarded by multi-generation family farming operations which feed the region with milk, cheese, yogurt, butter, ice- cream and other products. Nestled within these vast swaths of open space are small but mighty communities that serve as both visitor hubs and homes to residents who cherish and value the unique sense of place. Climate change presents unprecedented threats to West Marin. Wetlands and beaches could be drowned with rising waters, and native plants and animal populations could plummet from changes in temperature and precipitation, ocean acidification, invasive species, and more. Coastal flooding and erosion threaten homes, roads, and utilities that are critical to the long- term sustainability of West Marin. Spearheaded by the Marin County Community Development Agency in 2014, Collaboration: Sea Level Rise Adaptation Response Team (C-SMART) is a partnership based community planning approach to solve some of these challenges. The Marin Ocean Coast Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment analyzed the vulnerabilities of natural and built assets from near- to long-term combined sea level rise and storm scenarios.
    [Show full text]