DOCSLIB.ORG

Clinton County Natural Heritage Inventory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clinton County Natural Heritage Inventory CLINTON COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY Updated 2002 Jeffrey D. Wagner, Natural Heritage Ecologist Paul G. Wiegman, Director, Natural Science and Stewardship Department Charles W. Bier, Associate Director, Natural Science and Stewardship Department Lisa L. Smith, Natural Heritage Ecologist Norma L. Kline, Natural Heritage Ecologist Chris J. Boget, Data Manager Bernice K. Beck, Data Handler Western Pennsylvania Conservancy 316 Fourth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 (412)288-2777 March 1993 Printed on CLINTON COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was developed in part with financial assistance provided through the Recreational Improvement and Rehabilitation Act Program (RIRA Grant # RIRA-TAG-6-2), as administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Recreation and Development. Financial assistance was also provided by the Clinton County Planning Commission, the Pennsylvania Chapter of The Nature Conservancy, and the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy. The Western Pennsylvania Conservancy would like to thank all those who contributed to this inventory. Special thanks to Jann Chapman and the staff at the Clinton County office of the USDA Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (ASCS) for the use of their aerial photographs; to Ellen Dietrich at the Clinton County office of the USDA Soil Conservation Service for the use of older series aerial photographs and for her consultation on local soils; to Sue Foust and the Clinton County Conservation District for their help in making contacts in the county; to Robert Davey, Rich Kugel, Jeff Prowant, Wayne Wynick and the staff at the Bureau of Forestry's Sproul District for the use of their facilities, their time and the field trips through District #10; to Dan Devlin and the staff at the Forest Advisory Services Office for maps and advice; to Tim Holladay, Ivan McElwain and Barb Criss at the Clinton County planning office for the many resources they furnished, including office space, and for their time and good advice; to John Hancock at the Pennsylvania Game Commission for providing access to Game Lands in the county; to Jack Paulhamas for the numerous and always productive field trips on the Appalachian Plateau; to Gary Hinkle and Jim Decapria for their skillful and calm flying; and to Bill and Vicki Smedley for their hospitality and contacts in the region. The cover design and graphics were created by John Blumen, Blumen and Associates. 1 i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................... 4 DEDICATED AREAS............................................................................................................................. 21 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 24 NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS CLASSIFICATION......................................................................... 25 COUNTY OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................................... 33 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY................................................................................................... 33 SOILS.................................................................................................................................................... 36 VEGETATION ..................................................................................................................................... 37 PENNSYLVANIA NATURAL DIVERSITY INVENTORY ............................................................... 42 NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY METHODS........................................................................... 43 GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS ..................................................................................................................................................... 45 LAND-USES AND POTENTIAL THREATS TO NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS........................ 47 BUFFERS.............................................................................................................................................. 54 RESULTS................................................................................................................................................. 55 LITERATURE CITED ........................................................................................................................ 152 APPENDIX I: Status of Species........................................................................................................... 155 A. FEDERAL STATUS................................................................................................................. 155 B. PENNSYLVANIA STATUS.................................................................................................... 156 C. GLOBAL AND STATE RANKING: GLOBAL ELEMENT RANKS.................................... 160 APPENDIX II: County Significance Ranks ....................................................................................... 163 APPENDIX III: NHI Site Survey Form............................................................................................... 164 APPENDIX IV: NHI Site Recommendation Form.............................................................................. 166 APPENDIX V: Classification of Natural Communities in PA ......................................................... 167 LIST OF FIGURES Page Physiographic Provinces of Clinton County ..................................................................................................... 35 Clinton NHI Summary Map............................................................................................................................... 56 2 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1: Summary of Natural Heritage Areas in order of relative county significance.................................... 4 Table 2: Summary of Natural Heritage Areas by Municipality ...................................................................... 14 Table 3: Important managed lands protecting biotic resources in Clinton County. ........................................ 21 Tables summarizing USGS quadrangles: BEECH CREEK...................................................................................................................................... 115 CARROLL .............................................................................................................................................. 145 FARRANDSVILLE ................................................................................................................................ 112 GLEN UNION ........................................................................................................................................ 109 HAMMERSLEY FORK............................................................................................................................ 70 HOWARD NORTHWEST........................................................................................................................ 96 HOWARD................................................................................................................................................. 94 JERSEY MILLS...................................................................................................................................... 131 JERSEY SHORE..................................................................................................................................... 134 KEATING ................................................................................................................................................. 65 LINDEN.................................................................................................................................................. 149 LOCKHAVEN ........................................................................................................................................ 129 LOGANTON........................................................................................................................................... 137 MADISONBURG ................................................................................................................................... 118 MILL HALL ........................................................................................................................................... 122 MILLHEIM............................................................................................................................................. 120 POTTERSDALE....................................................................................................................................... 61 RENOVO EAST..................................................................................................................................... 100 RENOVO WEST...................................................................................................................................... 82 SINNEMAHONING................................................................................................................................. 56 SLATE RUN........................................................................................................................................... 107 SNOW SHOE NORTHEAST ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pennsylvania Nonpoint Source Program Fy2003 Project Summary
    Rev.1/30/03 PENNSYLVANIA NONPOINT SOURCE PROGRAM FY2003 PROJECT SUMMARY Base Program/District Staff Project Title: Conservation District Mining Program Project Number: 2301 Budget: $ 125,000 Lead Agency: Western Pennsylvania Coalition for Abandoned Mine Reclamation (WPCAMR) Location: Western Pennsylvania bituminous coal region Point of Contact: Garry Price, BWM or Bruce Golden, Regional Coordinator, Western Pennsylvania Coalition for Abandoned Mine Reclamation The purpose of the WPCAMR is to promote and facilitate the reclamation and remediation of abandoned mine drainage (AMD) in western Pennsylvania. Through this project the Regional Coordinator will continue to develop an education program, coordinate AMD remediation activities, generate local support for remediation efforts, and assist watershed associations and conservation districts in the development of watershed management plans and in securing funding for AMD remediation. The Watershed Coordinator will continue to assist with the development and implementation of funded projects. Project Title: Conservation District Mining Program Project Number: 2302 Budget: $ 118,000 Lead Agency: Eastern Pennsylvania Coalition for Abandoned Mine Reclamation (EPCAMR) Location: Anthracite and northern bituminous regions of Pennsylvania Point of Contact: Garry Price, BWM or Robert Hughes, Eastern Pennsylvania Coalition for Abandoned Mine Reclamation EPCAMR was formed to promote and facilitate the reclamation and remediation of land and water adversely affected by past coal mining practices in eastern Pennsylvania. EPCAMR is a complimentary organization to the Western Pennsylvania Coalition. The EPCAMR Regional Coordinator will continue efforts to organize watershed associations, develop an education program, coordinate AMD remediation activities, generate local support for remediation efforts, and assist watershed associations and conservation districts in the development of watershed management plans and in securing funding for AMD remediation.
    [Show full text]
  • December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 33 (2003) Repository 12-20-2003 December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2003 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "December 20, 2003 (Pages 6197-6396)" (2003). Volume 33 (2003). 51. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2003/51 This December is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 33 (2003) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 33 Number 51 Saturday, December 20, 2003 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 6197—6396 Agencies in this issue: The Governor The Courts Department of Aging Department of Agriculture Department of Banking Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Department of Revenue Fish and Boat Commission Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Public School Employees’ Retirement Board State Board of Education State Board of Nursing State Employee’s Retirement Board State Police Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 349, December 2003 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents).
    [Show full text]
  • Hammering the Hammersley
    Summer 2013 Hammering the Hammersley By Wands Shirk, President, Susquehannock Trail Club deck for Saturday's work detail, plus six boys from Boy One of the ways the Keystone Trails Association benefits Scout Troop 538 in Lewisburg, PA. Scout leader Steve hiking trail clubs is assisting with trail maintenance when Everson last winter had read about the planned trail care Mother Nature gets ahead of us on trails from time to weekend on the KTA website and brought six hard- time. After KTA's Ed Lawrence hiked a section of the working teenagers along with himself and a co-leader to Susquehannock Trail System (STS) in Potter County last camp in the Hammersley overnight and do trail work on summer with his wife Cathy and good friend (and former Saturday and Sunday. The Scout troop was preparing to KTA executive director) Paul Shaw, Ed offered to let the go to Philmont in July, and needed to do some shakedown Susquehannock Trail Club (STC) host a KTA trail care this backpacking to get in shape for their High Adventure trip. May to "Hammer the Hammersley." The KTA volunteers separated themselves into specialized Pennsylvania has 16 designated "Wild Areas," in which teams. Tom Bastian began Saturday early and carried out a timber harvesting, resource development, and motorized day-long attack on the big woody items. He hiked a chain transport of all sorts is prohibited. At 30,253 acres, the saw the entire ten-mile length of the Hammersley section Hammersley Wild is second in size only to the Quehanna and cleared all the blowdowns from south to north.
    [Show full text]
  • Jjjn'iwi'li Jmliipii Ill ^ANGLER
    JJJn'IWi'li jMlIipii ill ^ANGLER/ Ran a Looks A Bulltrog SEPTEMBER 1936 7 OFFICIAL STATE September, 1936 PUBLICATION ^ANGLER Vol.5 No. 9 C'^IP-^ '" . : - ==«rs> PUBLISHED MONTHLY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA by the BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS HI Five cents a copy — 50 cents a year OLIVER M. DEIBLER Commissioner of Fisheries C. R. BULLER 1 1 f Chief Fish Culturist, Bellefonte ALEX P. SWEIGART, Editor 111 South Office Bldg., Harrisburg, Pa. MEMBERS OF BOARD OLIVER M. DEIBLER, Chairman Greensburg iii MILTON L. PEEK Devon NOTE CHARLES A. FRENCH Subscriptions to the PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER Elwood City should be addressed to the Editor. Submit fee either HARRY E. WEBER by check or money order payable to the Common­ Philipsburg wealth of Pennsylvania. Stamps not acceptable. SAMUEL J. TRUSCOTT Individuals sending cash do so at their own risk. Dalton DAN R. SCHNABEL 111 Johnstown EDGAR W. NICHOLSON PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER welcomes contribu­ Philadelphia tions and photos of catches from its readers. Pro­ KENNETH A. REID per credit will be given to contributors. Connellsville All contributors returned if accompanied by first H. R. STACKHOUSE class postage. Secretary to Board =*KT> IMPORTANT—The Editor should be notified immediately of change in subscriber's address Please give both old and new addresses Permission to reprint will be granted provided proper credit notice is given Vol. 5 No. 9 SEPTEMBER, 1936 *ANGLER7 WHAT IS BEING DONE ABOUT STREAM POLLUTION By GROVER C. LADNER Deputy Attorney General and President, Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen PORTSMEN need not be told that stream pollution is a long uphill fight.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGH ALLEGHENY PLATEAU ECOREGIONAL PLAN: FIRST ITERATION Conservation Science Support—Northeast and Caribbean
    HIGH ALLEGHENY PLATEAU ECOREGIONAL PLAN: FIRST ITERATION Conservation Science Support—Northeast and Caribbean The High Allegheny Plan is a first iteration, a scientific assessment of the ecoregion. As part of the planning process, other aspects of the plan will be developed in future iterations, along with updates to the ecological assessment itself. These include fuller evaluations of threats to the ecoregion, constraints on conservation activities, and implementation strategies. CSS is now developing a standard template for ecoregional plans, which we have applied to the HAL first iteration draft report, distributed in 2002. Some of the HAL results have been edited or updated for this version. Click on the navigation pane to browse the report sections. What is the purpose of the report template? The purpose of creating a standard template for ecoregional plans in the Northeast is twofold: — to compile concise descriptions of methodologies developed and used for ecoregional assessment in the Northeast. These descriptions are meant to meet the needs of planning team members who need authoritative text to include in future plan documents, of science staff who need to respond to questions of methodology, and of program and state directors looking for material for general audience publications. — to create a modular resource whose pieces can be selected, incorporated in various formats, linked to in other documents, and updated easily. How does the template work? Methods are separated from results in this format, and the bulk of our work has gone into the standard methods sections. We have tried to make each methods section stand alone. Every section includes its own citation on the first page.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRE COUNTY Recreation & Greenway Plan
    )" (! kh " (! ¤£ " ¨¦§ jg " (! ¨¦§ jg )" " )" ! jg (! ( jg (! jg jg jg " · )" ¨¦§ jg (! )" !|!M¾Ð " jg " jg )" " jg ²³ · " (! ÆQ ¤£ jg (! ¨¦§ jgn " (! (!jg jg jg jg jg · )" × ²³â kh!|â ²¸ " â !M n ·â (! â Greenways â jg ¨¦§ â ! â â ( jg !Mâ â â jg (! â CENTRE COUNTY Recreation & Greenway Plajgn: C×eâ ntre Reg¤£ ion â â â â â C7 - Spring Creek Canyon Greenway â !M â â â !| â â )" ÆI â · !M STATE GAME LANDS 103 · ù C30 - Halfmoon Wildlife Corridor(! Greenway T7 â (!(! (!â " C19 â â " C31 - Musser Gap Greenway T7 BOGGS TWP â jg jg (! â (! Pâleasant View â â WALKER TWP (! â R2 - Lewisburg and Tyrone Railroad Greenway â · ⠾Рjg â " !| Þ Þ R10 - Bellefonte Central Rail Trail Greenway ¾Ð Sunnyside n 550 jg !y ·××¾ÐnÆc × )" jg S-119 ¾Ð × kh ×n T3 !y ²¸²¸T××6 × j UNION TWP ÞÆc·(!ײ³Bellefonte (! Conservation Cojgrridors !( )" !M jg ²¸ · (! ²³kh¾Ð· Colevill·e × · C6 - Spr(!ing C·r·eek n !Ï!y · )" C8 - Buffal¾Ðo Run !y S-71 Unionville × jg ×C6 !M (! BLACK MOSHANNON SjTATE PARK Þ (! C28 - Spkh×ruce× Creek Valley View (! C29 - Slab Cabin Run RUSH TWP n C10 " n · ! C32 - Roaring Run !M( · kh SPRING TWP C33 - Gailbrlaith Gap jg jg Sp!kring Creek Axemann (! × Recreation Corridors !( ¤£220 · · × (! C27 !M )"26 R1 - Mid State Trail (! BENNER TWP Þ R9 - Colyer Lakjge to Tussey Mountain ¤£ R10 !k · MOSHANNONSTATE FOREST HUSTON TWP jg BALD EAGLE STATE FOREST R24 - Patton Woods/Haugh Farm ·! n )" ( Pleasant Gap × jg R25 - Arboretum Section of the Bellefonte Central Rail Trail R19 jg²³ )"150 )"144 (! (! Julian R26 - Musser Gap Greenway Connection · 99 !M
    [Show full text]
  • Pine Creek Headwaters Hemlock Plan: Thermal Refuge Prioritization
    PINE CREEK HEADWATERS HEMLOCK PLAN: THERMAL REFUGE PRIORITIZATION Plant a Tree, Shade a Trout Plant a Tree, Shade a Trout Plant a Tree, Shade a Trout Pine Creek Watershed Council 118 Main Street PlantPineWellsboro Creek, PA a 16901 Tree,Watershed 570Shade- 723Council-8251 a Trout 118 Main Street WellsboroPine Creek, PA 16901 Watershed570- 723Council-8251 Pine118 Main Creek Street Watershed Council Wellsboro, PA 16901 570-723-8251 118 Main Street 1 2 Acknowledgements: This plan was financed in part through a grant from the Coldwater Heritage Partnership on behalf of the PA Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (Environmental Stewardship Fund), the PA Fish and Boat Commission, the Foundation for Pennsylvania Watersheds and the PA Council of Trout Unlimited. This project was spearheaded by the Pine Creek Watershed Council’s Water and Biological Committee consisting of a collaboration of several agencies, non-profit organizations, and local community members. The Committee consists of the following individuals/organizations: Kimberlie Gridley, Tioga County Planning, committee co-chair and editor Jared Dickerson, Potter County Conservation District, committee co-chair and field lead Steve Hoover, PA DCNR BOF Sarah Johnson, PA DCNR BOF Chris Firestone, PADCNR BOF Erica Tomlinson, Tioga County Conservation District Eric Kosek, Tioga County Conservation District Will Hunt, Potter County Planning and GIS Jim Weaver, PCWC Chair Art Antal, Trout Unlimited Jere White, Trout Unlimited Greg Hornsby, Retired, Forester Others that offered support
    [Show full text]
  • PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014
    PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014 What is Primitive Camping? Primitive camping is a simplistic style of camping. Campers hike, pedal or paddle to reach a location and spend the night without the presence of developed facilities. This primitive camping experience takes place off the beaten path, where piped water, restrooms and other amenities are not provided. You pack in all you need, exchanging a few conveniences for the solitude found in the back country setting. Fresh air, fewer people and out-of-the-way natural landscapes are some of the benefits of primitive camping. Once off the beaten path, however, additional advantages begin to surface such as a deeper awareness and greater appreciation of the outdoor world around you. Primitive camping also builds outdoor skills and fosters a gratifying sense of self-sufficiency. Where to Camp Pennsylvania has 2.2 million acres of state forest land with 2,500 miles of trails and 5,132 miles of Camping at rivers and streams winding through it. Hiking, biking and multi-use trails traverse most state forest districts and six districts have designated water trails that transect state forest land. Forest Districts State parks are not open to primitive camping. However, with the exception of William Penn State Forest, all state forest districts are open to this activity. Camping is not permitted in designated STATE FOREST DISTRICTS: natural areas or at vistas, trail heads, picnic areas and areas that are posted closed to camping. Bald Eagle State Forest (570) 922-3344 Contact a forest district office for specific information, maps and Camping Permits (if needed).
    [Show full text]
  • FALL FOLIAGE REPORT October 1 – October 7, 2020
    Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry PENNSYLVANIA WEEKLY FALL FOLIAGE REPORT October 1 – October 7, 2020 TIOGA CAMERON BRADFORD To predict peak season from the colors, use these guidelines: ➢ Dark Green/No Change= peak is three weeks to a month away ➢ Light Green/Starting to Change= peak is approximately two to three weeks away ➢ Yellow/Approaching Best Color= peak is approximately one week away ➢ Orange/Best Color= foliage is peaking this week ➢ Red/Starting to Fade= still some nice color but won’t last more than a few more days ➢ Brown/Past Peak= all or nearly all color is gone Statewide Fall Foliage Overview What a difference a week makes! Cold and frosty nights and very dry conditions have ushered in marked changes across the northern tier, where foliage is at its spectacular peak. Sugar and red maples are the stars of the show, contrasting beautifully with the still-green oak canopies. Another cold snap could jumpstart much of the Appalachian and Allegheny mountain regions, setting the table for back to back weeks of fantastic fall foliage viewing opportunities across wide swaths of the commonwealth. Northwestern Region The district manager in Cornplanter State Forest District (Warren, Erie counties) reports that cooler nights have spurred fall colors in northwest Pennsylvania. Many oaks are still quite green, but maples (sugar and red) are displaying brilliant colors. Aspen, hickory, and birch are continuing to color the landscape with warm yellow hues. Route 6 to Chapman State Park is a recommended fall foliage corridor in Warren County. Exciting fall color can be found at Chapman State Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy
    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hammersley: Can You Dig
    Spring 2014 The Hammersley: Can You Dig It? By Bill Boyd The Susquehannock Trail System was established in 1967 Digging side hill trail by linking up a network of existing trails, woods roads, and old railroad grades with short stretches of new construc- tion. Most of the sections linked together are fire trails built by the Civilian Conservation Corps in the 1930s. In 1967 the CCC trails were about thirty years old, and still in moderately good condition. The only significant recrea- tional activity in the forest in those days was hunting, and most of the trails saw little use. The deer population was very high during those decades, and their annual browsing kept woody brush from invading the trail. The trails incorporated into the STS have been repeatedly cleared of fallen debris, and the foot traffic has increased many fold. (But it’s still not very much.) And by now there have been nearly eight decades of annual leaf fall and Photo by Tom Fitzgerald hillside erosion. On top of that, the Pennsylvania Game Commission’s efforts to reduce the size of the deer herd We plan to walk in on the Bunnell Ridge Trail, which cuts to within the carrying capacity of the habitat, has been about a mile and a half off the distance to the work area. successful enough that woody brush is springing up in But that trail needs some clearing, too, and we hope to be many areas of the forest, and invading the trail. able to do that as soon as the weather allows.
    [Show full text]
  • A Decade of Progress for the West Branch Susquehanna Restoration
    WestA DECADE OF PROGRESS Branch FOR THE Susquehanna Restoration Initiative 2004–2014 A. WOLFE 1 Foreword PA Fish and Boat Commission Executive Director, John Arway In 2012, Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) staff surveyed the upper reaches of the West Branch Susquehanna River in Cambria County and discovered a naturally reproducing wild trout population. The abandoned mine drainage (AMD) remediation efforts, including the Lancashire 15 treatment plant, have improved water quality to PA FISH AND BOAT COMMISSION FISH AND BOAT PA the point where there are now wild trout in the West Branch! With the recently funded Twomile Run project in the lower Kettle Creek watershed and proposed remediation at the abandoned Fran Contracting site in the Cooks Run watershed, there is a great potential to recover significant miles of naturally reproducing brook trout streams in the near future. Another major recent accomplishment is the AMD remediation work that improved water quality in more than forty miles of the Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek. The partnership between government, industry and the public working together on reclamation activities and AMD treatment has allowed PFBC cooperative nurseries to stock a portion of the Bennett Branch in 2013, and the PFBC will be adding a preseason stocking to a 4.5 mile reach in the Medix Run/Benezette area for 2014. Additionally, a 2.8 mile section of the West Branch near Curwensville will receive a preseason trout stocking for the first time in 2014. A. WOLFE These are some exciting times in the West Branch Susquehanna watershed and we look forward to more improvements in the coming years.
    [Show full text]