Participants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Participants International Consultation of Jewish Parliamentarians Jerusalem, 27-29 June 2011 PAR TICIPANTS PARLIAMENTARIANS Rep. Gary Ackerman - House of Representatives, United States M.K. Rachel Adatto - The Knesset, Israel Mr. Mark Adler - House of Commons, Canada Mr. David Alcolumbre - Câmara dos Deputados, Brazil M.K. Chaim Amsellem - The Knesset, Israel Mr. Franck Attal - Ville de Gournay-sur-Marne, France M.K. Doron Avital - The Knesset, Israel Ms. Luciana Berger - House of Commons, United Kingdom Mr. Jean Boccara - Ville de Charenton-le-Pont, France Senator Samuel Cabanchik - Senado de la Nación Argentina, Argentina Mr. Boriss Cilevics - Saeima, Latvia Prof. Irwin Cotler - House of Commons, Canada Senator Alberto Couriel - Cámara de Senadores , Uruguay Mr. Michael Danby - Federal Parliament, Australia Baroness Ruth Deech - House of Lords, United Kingdom Mr. Tamás Deutsch - European Parliament M.K. Yuli Edelstein - The Knesset, Israel Senator Péter Eckstein-Kovács - Senate, Romania Senator Alexandru Radu Feldman - Senate, Romania Mr. Oleksandr Feldman - Verkhovna Rada, Ukraine Mr. Emanuele Fiano - Chamber of Deputies, Italy Mr. Luis Fishman Zonzinski - Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica, Costa Rica Mr. János Fónagy - Ministry of National Development, Hungary Senator Linda Frum - Senate, Canada Mr. Bernard Gahnassia - Association of Elected Friends of Israel, France Mr. Oleg Geyman - Verkhovna Rada, Ukraine M.K. Shai Hermesh - The Knesset, Israel M.K. Itsik Herzog - The Knesset, Israel M.K. Nitzan Horowitz - The Knesset, Israel Lord Greville Janner - House of Lords, United Kingdom Prof. Dr. Daniel Jositsch - Nationalrat / Conseil National, Switzerland Mr. Zarko Korac - National Assembly, Serbia Dr. Tamás Kovács - Ministry of National Development, Hungary M.K. Limor Livnat - The Knesset, Israel Rep. Nita Lowey - House of Representatives, United States Mr. Claude-Gérard Marcus - Assemblée nationale, France M.K. Avraham Michaeli - The Knesset, Israel Rep. Jerrold Nadler - House of Representatives, United States Mrs. Fiamma Nirenstein - Chamber of Deputies, Italy Mrs. Gergana Passy - National Assembly, Bulgaria Dr. Solomon Passy - National Assembly, Bulgaria Mr. Antonio Pereira Pesaro - House of Representatives of São Paolo, Brazil Ms. Sandra Piszk - Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica, Costa Rica M.K. Yohanan Plesner - The Knesset, Israel Mr. Claudio Presman - Parliament of Buenos Aires, Argentina M.K. Reuven Rivlin - The Knesset, Israel Mrs. Beatriz Rojkes de Alperovich - Senado de la Nación Argentina, Argentina Mr. Alessandro Ruben - Chamber of Deputies, Italy M.K. Gideon Sa’ar - The Knesset, Israel Ministry of Transport and Telecommunication, Czech Mr. Jaromir Schling - Republic M.K. Nachman Shai - The Knesset, Israel M.K. Meir Sheetrit - The Knesset, Israel Mr. Gabriel Silber - Congreso Nacional de Chile, Chile Dr. Pál Steiner - National Assembly, Hungary Senator John Sudarsky Rosenbaum - Congress of the Republic of Colombia, Colombia Dr. Tibor Szanyi - National Assembly, Hungary M.K. Moshe Ya’alon - The Knesset, Israel Mrs. Masha Taitelbaum Yoselewich - Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica, Costa Rica Mrs. Viviane Teitelbaum-Hirsch - Parliament of the Brussels Capital Region, Belgium Ms. Elena Tevdoradze - Parliament of Georgia, Georgia Dr. Aurel Vainer - Chamber of Deputies, Romania Rep. Henry Waxman - House of Representatives, United States M.K. Einat Wilf - The Knesset, Israel Dr. Emanuelis Zingeris - Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, Lithuania GUESTS Mr. Khaled Abu Toameh - The Jerusalem Post, Israel Mrs. Alcolumbre - Brazil Mr. Yitzhak Avidani - World Jewish Congress Israel Mr. Avi Balashnikov - Israel Mr. Mitchell Barak - Office of the President of Israel Amb. Rafael Barak - Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Israel Mr. Nir Barkat - Mayor of Jerusalem Mr. Ran Bar-Yoshafat - World Jewish Diplomatic Corps Dr. Haim Ben Yakov - Euro-Asian Jewish Congress H.E. Ms. Maria Elisa Berenguer - Embassy of Brazil to Israel Institute of the World Jewish Congress Mr. Nir Boms - & World Jewish Diplomatic Corps H.E. Mr. Rodrigo Xavier Carreras Jiménez - Embassy of Costa Rica to Israel Mr. Daniel Chertoff - World Jewish Congress Israel Mr. Chanan Cohen - Institute of the World Jewish Congress Ms. Linor Deutsch - The Knesset, Israel Mr. Howard Diamond - United States of America Mr. Michael Dickson - Stand With Us Israel Mr. Daniel Diker - World Jewish Congress Mr. Eduard Dolinsky - Ukrainian Jewish Committee Ms. Betty Ehrenberg - World Jewish Congress North America Mrs. Clara Fassler - Uruguay Ms Julie Feinberg - World Jewish Congress Mr. Lior Gabay - World Jewish Congress Israel H.E. Mr. & Mrs. Isaac Gilinski Sragowicz - Embassy of Colombia to Israel World Jewish Congress Mrs. Helena Glaser - & Women’s International Zionist Organization Mr. Elhanan Glazer - Knesset Forum on International Relations, Israel Mrs. Perla Gilinski - Colombia Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Goldberger - Embassy of the United States of America to Israel Ms Michal Grayevsky - Israel Mr. Michael Gribov - Knesset Forum on International Relations, Israel Mr. Sam Grundwerg - World Jewish Congress Ms. Simone Hartmann - Stop the Bomb World Jewish Congress Dr. Lior Herman - & World Jewish Diplomatic Corps Mr. Pinchas Inbari - Jerusalem Centre for Public Afairs H.E. Mr. Edward Iosiper - Embassy of Romania to Israel Mrs. Ruth Kaplan - International Council of Jewish Parliamentarians Mrs. Flo Kaufmann - World Jewish Congress Mr. Herb Keinon - The Jerusalem Post, Israel Prof. Aharon Kleiman - Israel Council on Foreign Relations International Association of Jewish Lawyers Mrs. Irit Kohn - and Jurists Amb. Ronald S. Lauder - World Jewish Congress Office of Lord Janner of Braunstone, House of Lords, Mr. Adam Langleben - United Kingdom Prof. Ruth Lapidoth - Israel Council on Foreign Relations Mr. Howard Liebman - Office of Prof. Cotler, House of Commons, Canada Prime Minister’s Office / Ministry of Strategic Affairs, Mr. Shalom Lipner - Israel Ms. Lisa Levy - World Jewish Diplomatic Corps Mr. Stephen Lowey - United States of America Mr. John Malkinson - World Jewish Congress Ms. Lilach Meir - National Union of Israeli Students Ms. Maureen Meyer-Adiri - World Jewish Diplomatic Corps H.E. Mr. Joaquín Montes Larraín - Embassy of Chile to Israel Minister Ya’akov Ne’eman - Ministry of Justice, Israel Mr. Terry Newman - World Jewish Diplomatic Corps Amb. Mordechai Palzur - Institute of the World Jewish Congress Mr. Ashley Perry - Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Israel H.E. Mr. Martin Perts - Embassy of Latvia to Israel Mr. Peleg Reshef - World Jewish Diplomatic Corps Mr. Jorge Riccombeni - Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Argentina Mr. Eyal Raviv - World Jewish Diplomatic Corps Mr. Avraham Roet - Institute of the World Jewish Congress, Israel Mr. D.J. Schneeweiss - Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Israel Mr. Jay Schultz - World Jewish Diplomatic Corps Mr. Udi Segal - Channel 2, Israel Mr. Ariel Seidler - World Jewish Congress Latin America Ms. Tamar Shchory - World Jewish Congress, Israel Ms Yvette Shumacher - Institute of the World Jewish Congress Mr. Itzik Shmuli - National Union of Israeli Students, Israel Mr. Gábor Simon - Embassy of Hungary to Israel Mr. Tamara Sous - World Jewish Diplomatic Corps Mr. Milutin Stanojevic - Embassy of Serbia to Israel Prof. Gerald Steinberg - NGO Monitor, Israel H.E. Mr. Yuri Sterk - Embassy of Bulgaria to Israel Dr. Maram Stern - World Jewish Congress Ms. Margot Stern - World Jewish Diplomatic Corps H.E. Mr. Zoltán Szentgyörgyi - Embassy of Hungary to Israel Mr. Mendy Tal - Office of Mr. Pesaro, Brazil Ms. Esther Tjepkema - Platform Israel Prof. Alfred Tovias - Israel Council on Foreign Relations Mr. Yigal Tzahor - World Jewish Congress Israel Mrs. Waxman - United States of America Mr. Laurence Weinbaum - Israel Council for Foreign Relations Mrs. Edna Weinstock-Gabay - World Jewish Congress Mr. Avi Widerman - World Jewish Congress Israel Ms Oranit Wiener - World Jewish Congress Mr. Yevgen Zvonkov - Verkhovna Rada, Ukraine .
Recommended publications
  • Eudo Citizenship Observatory
    EUDO CITIZENSHIP OBSERVATORY COUNTRY REPORT: ICELAND Gudni Th. Jóhannesson, Gunnar Thór Pétursson, Thorbjörn Björnsson Revised and updated January 2013 http://eudo-citizenship.eu European University Institute, Florence Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies EUDO Citizenship Observatory Report on Iceland Gudni Th. Jóhannesson,Gunnar Thór Pétursson, Thorbjörn Björnsson Revised and updated January 2013 EUDO Citizenship Observatory Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies in collaboration with Edinburgh University Law School Country Report, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-CR 2013/8 Badia Fiesolana, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI), Italy © Gudni Th. Jóhannesson,Gunnar Thór Pétursson, Thorbjörn Björnsson This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. Requests should be addressed to [email protected] The views expressed in this publication cannot in any circumstances be regarded as the official position of the European Union Published in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Research for the EUDO Citizenship Observatory Country Reports has been jointly supported, at various times, by the European Commission grant agreements JLS/2007/IP/CA/009 EUCITAC and HOME/2010/EIFX/CA/1774 ACIT and by the British Academy Research Project CITMODES (both projects co-directed by the EUI and the University of Edinburgh). The financial support from these projects is gratefully acknowledged. For information about the project please visit the project website at http://eudo-citizenship.eu Iceland Gudni Th. Jóhannesson,Gunnar Thór Pétursson and Thorbjörn Björnsson 1 Introduction Historically, Iceland has been among the world’s most homogenous countries.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting B8-0415/2017 13.6.2017 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law pursuant to Rule 135 of the Rules of Procedure on the case of Afgan Mukhtarli and the situation of media in Azerbaijan (2017/2722(RSP)) Ulrike Lunacek, Rebecca Harms, Heidi Hautala, Ignazio Corrao, Fabio Massimo Castaldo on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group RE\P8_B(2017)0415_EN.docx PE605.528v01-00 EN United in diversity EN B8-0415/2017 European Parliament resolution on the case of Afgan Mukhtarli and the situation of media in Azerbaijan (2017/2722(RSP)) The European Parliament, - Having regard to its previous resolutions on Azerbaijan and Georgia, particularly the ones concerning the human rights situation and the rule of law, - having regard to its previous resolutions on the European Neighbourhood Policy and in particular to the ones on the Eastern Partnership, - Having regard to Association Agreement with Georgia which entered into force on 1 July 2016, - Having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement with Azerbaijan of 1996 and to the adoption by the Council on 14 November 2016 of a mandate to the European Commission and the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the European Commission (HR/VP) to negotiate a comprehensive agreement with Azerbaijan, - having regard to the statement by the Spokesperson of the HR/VP on the “reported abduction and illegal detention of Azerbaijani nationals residing in Georgia”, - having regard to the statement of the HR/VP on the sentencing of Mehman Huseynov in Azerbaijan of 7 March 2017, - having regard to the Council conclusions on the Eastern Partnership of the Foreign Affairs Council of 14 November 2016, - having regard to Rules 135(5) and 123(4) of its Rules of Procedure, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Film Festival Features a Short Film by 'Hometown Girl' Talia Osteen
    Back to School Section B WWW.HERITAGEFL.COM YEAR 44, NO. 49 AUGUST 7, 2020 17 AV, 5780 ORLANDO, FLORIDA SINGLE COPY 75¢ Patricia Sigman runs for state Senate By Christine DeSouza Longwood resident Patricia R. Sigman is a Democratic candidate on the primary ballot for state Senate, Dis- trict 9. There is one opponent running against her for the seat and she is hopeful voters will turn out for the Aug. 18 primary elections to get her name on the ballot for the elections on Nov. 3. Sigman is a long-standing member of this community. She and her husband, Phil, have been affiliated with Temple Israel and also Con- gregation of Reform Judaism. Patricia Sigman “Seminole County is our home and our roots here run tive. She is a small business The Jewish Foundation for the Righteous will air from July 27 to Aug. 31, 2020 one of its award-winning documentaries deep,” she told Heritage. “The owner (Sigman & Sigman, highlighting Righteous Gentiles who saved Jews during World War II and the Holocaust. Sigman family has been here P.A. in Altamonte Springs), since the early 1960s.” a voter protection leader, Sigman, a board-certified community volunteer, and Labor & Employment lawyer with her husband, Phil, has Online movie series to feature rescuers and a civil mediator for 26 raised three children — all years, has seen all aspects of of whom attended Seminole law from the business, com- and rescued during years of Holocaust munity and personal perspec- Sigman on page 14A (JNS) — The Jewish Foundation for the to themselves and their families—to save goal was two-fold: to share stories Righteous is launching a Monday-night Jews,” said JFR executive vice president of heroism and raise awareness of movie series, from July 27 to Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia: Background and U.S
    Georgia: Background and U.S. Policy Updated September 5, 2018 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45307 SUMMARY R45307 Georgia: Background and U.S. Policy September 5, 2018 Georgia is one of the United States’ closest non-NATO partners among the post-Soviet states. With a history of strong economic aid and security cooperation, the United States Cory Welt has deepened its strategic partnership with Georgia since Russia’s 2008 invasion of Analyst in European Affairs Georgia and 2014 invasion of Ukraine. U.S. policy expressly supports Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders, and Georgia is a leading recipient of U.S. aid in Europe and Eurasia. Many observers consider Georgia to be one of the most democratic states in the post-Soviet region, even as the country faces ongoing governance challenges. The center-left Georgian Dream party has more than a three-fourths supermajority in parliament, allowing it to rule with only limited checks and balances. Although Georgia faces high rates of poverty and underemployment, its economy in 2017 appeared to enter a period of stronger growth than the previous four years. The Georgian Dream won elections in 2012 amid growing dissatisfaction with the former ruling party, Georgia: Basic Facts Mikheil Saakashvili’s center-right United National Population: 3.73 million (2018 est.) Movement, which came to power as a result of Comparative Area: slightly larger than West Virginia Georgia’s 2003 Rose Revolution. In August 2008, Capital: Tbilisi Russia went to war with Georgia to prevent Ethnic Composition: 87% Georgian, 6% Azerbaijani, 5% Saakashvili’s government from reestablishing control Armenian (2014 census) over Georgia’s regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, Religion: 83% Georgian Orthodox, 11% Muslim, 3% Armenian which broke away from Georgia in the early 1990s to Apostolic (2014 census) become informal Russian protectorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Response to Terrorism
    Effective solidarity among states has become a prerequisite for ultimately succeeding in the war of the West against jihadist terrorism. A cohesive military strategy is needed for the West, the Arab states that are threatened, and Israel. It stands to reason that, just as all three face similar threats, the JERUSALEM models developed in Israel for dealing with terror merit attention in Europe and beyond. BERLIN Amb. Dore Gold President, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs ISRAEL’S RESPONSE TO TERRORISM FROM LESSONS LESSONS FROM ISRAEL’S RESPONSE TO TERRORISM FIAMMA NIRENSTEIN (ED.) AMB. DORE GOLD | BRIG.-GEN. (RES.) YOSSI KUPERWASSER AMB. ALAN BAKER | PROF. ASA KASHER | AMB. FREDDY EYTAN Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs DR. IRWIN MANSDORF | DAN DIKER | JENNIFER ROSKIES Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs LESSONS FROM ISRAEL’S RESPONSE TO TERRORISM Fiamma Nirenstein (ed.) Amb. Dore Gold | Brig.-Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser Amb. Alan Baker | Prof. Asa Kasher | Amb. Freddy Eytan Dr. Irwin Mansdorf | Dan Diker | Jennifer Roskies Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs Read this book online: http://jcpa.org/lessons-israels-response-terrorism/ Cover photo: AP Photo/Sebastian Scheiner, AP Photo/Michael Kappeler © 2017 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 13 Tel Hai St., Jerusalem, 92107 Israel Email: [email protected] Tel: 972-2-561-9281 | Fax: 972-2-561-9112 Jerusalem Center Websites: www.jcpa.org (English) | www.jcpa.org.il (Hebrew) www.jcpa-lecape.org (French) | www.jer-zentrum.org (German) www.dailyalert.org The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs is a non-partisan, not-for-profit organization. ISBN: 978-965-218-136-7 Contents Executive Summary 5 Is the Terror against Europe Different from the Terror against Israel? Amb.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Chambers: Unicameral Or Bicameral?
    Legislative Chambers: Unicameral or Bicameral? Legislative Chambers: Unicameral or Bicameral? How many chambers a parliament should have is a controversial question in constitutional law. Having two legislative chambers grew out of the monarchy system in the UK and other European countries, where there was a need to represent both the aristocracy and the common man, and out of the federal system in the US. where individual states required representation. In recent years, unicameral systems, or those with one legislative chamber, were associated with authoritarian states. Although that perception does not currently hold true, there appears to be a general trend toward two chambers in emerging democracies, particularly in larger countries. Given historical, cultural and political factors, governments must decide whether one-chamber or two chambers better serve the needs of the country. Bicameral Chambers A bicameral legislature is composed of two-chambers, usually termed the lower house and upper house. The lower house is usually based proportionally on population with each member representing the same number of citizens in each district or region. The upper house varies more broadly in the way in which members are selected, including inheritance, appointment by various bodies and direct and indirect elections. Representation in the upper house can reflect political subdivisions, as is the case for the US Senate, German Bundesrat and Indian Rajya Sabha. Bicameral systems tend to occur in federal states, because of that system’s two-tiered power structure. Where subdivisions are drawn to coincide with other important societal units, the upper house can serve to represent ethnic, religious or tribal groupings, as in India or Ethiopia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ultra-Orthodox Political Parties in Israeli Democracy
    Luke Howson University of Liverpool The Role of Ultra-Orthodox Political Parties in Israeli Democracy Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy By Luke Howson July 2014 Committee: Clive Jones, BA (Hons) MA, PhD Prof Jon Tonge, PhD 1 Luke Howson University of Liverpool © 2014 Luke Howson All Rights Reserved 2 Luke Howson University of Liverpool Abstract This thesis focuses on the role of ultra-orthodox party Shas within the Israeli state as a means to explore wider themes and divisions in Israeli society. Without underestimating the significance of security and conflict within the structure of the Israeli state, in this thesis the Arab–Jewish relationship is viewed as just one important cleavage within the Israeli state. Instead of focusing on this single cleavage, this thesis explores the complex structure of cleavages at the heart of the Israeli political system. It introduces the concept of a ‘cleavage pyramid’, whereby divisions are of different saliency to different groups. At the top of the pyramid is division between Arabs and Jews, but one rung down from this are the intra-Jewish divisions, be they religious, ethnic or political in nature. In the case of Shas, the religious and ethnic elements are the most salient. The secular–religious divide is a key fault line in Israel and one in which ultra-orthodox parties like Shas are at the forefront. They and their politically secular counterparts form a key division in Israel, and an exploration of Shas is an insightful means of exploring this division further, its history and causes, and how these groups interact politically.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and Development of Taiwan's Policies Toward The
    The Origins and Development of Taiwan’s Policies toward the Overseas Citizens’ Participation in Homeland Governance and Decision-Making Dean P. Chen, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Political Science Ramapo College of New Jersey Presentations for the Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law Stanford University February 28, 2014 How International Relations (IR) Theories Matter? • Second-image reversed (Peter Gourevitch, 1978) – International systemic changes affect domestic politics – Domestic political actors and institutions filter the effects of international conditions, resulting in changes of interests, coalitions, norms, ideas, identities and policies • Constructivist theory of argumentative persuasion (Thomas Risse, 2000) – Interests and identities can be changed through the social interactive processes of argumentation, deliberation, and persuasion Main Argument • The Republic of China (ROC)/Taiwan’s policies toward overseas constituents have always been closely aligned with the government’s diplomatic objectives – From KMT’s pan-Chinese nationalism to Taiwan’s desire for a greater international space and political autonomy • Transformations of international politics inevitably shape the domestic political situations in ROC/Taiwan, which, then, impact policies toward the overseas community • Despite facing a rising People’s Republic of China (PRC), Taiwan’s democratization and rising Taiwanese consciousness have fostered a new set of identities, interests, and arguments that compete with Beijing’s “one China” principle
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA (Acting Through the Ministry of Finance of Georgia) U.S.$500,000,000 2.750% Notes Due 2026 ISSUE PRICE: 99.422%
    GEORGIA (acting through the Ministry of Finance of Georgia) U.S.$500,000,000 2.750% Notes due 2026 ISSUE PRICE: 99.422% The U.S.$500,000,000 2.750% Notes due 2026 (the "Notes") to be issued by Georgia, acting through the Ministry of Finance of Georgia (the "Issuer" or "Georgia"), will mature on 22 April 2026 (the "Maturity Date") and, unless previously purchased and cancelled, will be redeemed at their principal amount on that date. The Notes will bear interest from, and including, 22 April 2021 at the rate of 2.750% per annum payable semi-annually in arear on 22 April and 22 October in each year, commencing on 22 October 2021. This Offering Circular comprises neither a prospectus for the purposes of Part VI of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended) (the "FSMA"), a prospectus for the purposes of Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 as it forms part of domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (the "UK Prospectus Regulation"), nor listing particulars given in compliance with the listing rules made under Part VI of the FSMA by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (the "FCA") pursuant to the FSMA. Application has been made for the Notes to be admitted to the official list of the FCA (the "Official List") and to trading on the main market (the "Market") of the London Stock Exchange plc (the "London Stock Exchange"). The Notes are being offered (i) in offshore transactions in reliance on, and as defined in, Regulation S (the "Regulation S Notes") under the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster Seminar on Effective Parliaments 2019
    Westminster Seminar on Effective Parliaments 2019 DELEGATE BIOGRAPHIES AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES AUSTRALIA MR STEPHEN FRAPPELL Stephen Frappell is the Clerk Assistant of Committees in the NSW Legislative Council. He has held the position of Clerk Assistant since February 2012. Prior to working in the NSW Legislative Council, he worked in the Australian AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY (ACT) Senate. He holds a B Ec (Soc Sci), BA (Hons) and postgraduate LLM. MR MICHAEL PETTERSSON MLA Prior to being elected as Member for Yerrabi in the ACT Legislative Assem- bly in 2016, Michael worked for the Construction and General Division of the CFMEU. In this role, he helped local construction workers who had been underpaid by their employer. Prior to working for the CFMEU, Michael was o an elected official of the National Union of Students where he advocated for AUSTRALIA TASMANIA the welfare of students across Australia. HON TANIA RATTRAY MLC Tania Rattray was first elected in 2004 and re-elected unopposed in 2010 and 2016. She was Deputy Chair of Committees from 2008 to 2014 and from 2016 to the present. This role encompasses chairing Government AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES Administration and GBE Scrutiny Committees. She is also Chair Subordinate of the Legislation Committee (Joint House), Chair of the Government Admin- THE HONOURABLE COURTNEY HOUSSOS MLC istration Committee B, and Member and President of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, Tasmanian Branch. Prior to becoming an Elected Courtney was elected to the NSW Legislative Council in March 2015. She Member for McIntyre, Tania was the Legislative Council Deputy Mayor for is a member of a number of parliamentary committees, covering a diverse Dorset Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Þingvellir National Park
    World Heritage Scanned Nomination File Name: 1152.pdf UNESCO Region: EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA __________________________________________________________________________________________________ SITE NAME: Þingvellir National Park DATE OF INSCRIPTION: 7th July 2004 STATE PARTY: ICELAND CRITERIA: C (iii) (vi) CL DECISION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: Excerpt from the Report of the 28th Session of the World Heritage Committee Criterion (iii): The Althing and its hinterland, the Þingvellir National Park, represent, through the remains of the assembly ground, the booths for those who attended, and through landscape evidence of settlement extending back possibly to the time the assembly was established, a unique reflection of mediaeval Norse/Germanic culture and one that persisted in essence from its foundation in 980 AD until the 18th century. Criterion (vi): Pride in the strong association of the Althing to mediaeval Germanic/Norse governance, known through the 12th century Icelandic sagas, and reinforced during the fight for independence in the 19th century, have, together with the powerful natural setting of the assembly grounds, given the site iconic status as a shrine for the national. BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS Þingvellir (Thingvellir) is the National Park where the Althing - an open-air assembly, which represented the whole of Iceland - was established in 930 and continued to meet until 1798. Over two weeks a year, the assembly set laws - seen as a covenant between free men - and settled disputes. The Althing has deep historical and symbolic associations for the people of Iceland. Located on an active volcanic site, the property includes the Þingvellir National Park and the remains of the Althing itself: fragments of around 50 booths built of turf and stone.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Foundations, Structures and Institutions of Autonomy in Comparative Law
    Legal Foundations, Structures and Institutions of Autonomy in Comparative Law Markku Suksi 1 Introduction Autonomies around the world1 as a form of organization at the sub-national level show a number of common features or dimensions that offer a basis for comparisons. The comparisons, in turn, can be used for the purposes of explaining the legal effects of various forms of autonomy and for outlining the reasons for differences and similarities. What are the key features of autonomy, how could different autonomies be compared with each other and what is the future of autonomy as a form of organization? How could the different autonomies and their relations to each other be illustrated in the visual form, as a chart, so as to make it possible to identify the mul- titude of different models of autonomy on the basis of their normative features? For such a comparative exercise to take place, a common framework or platform of comparison should be designed. In other words, a so-called tertium comparationis should be developed. For the purposes of our discussion of autonomy, it is proposed that this tertium comparationis is created against the background of the right to participation in a broad sense, encompassing both the general right to participation as identified in article 25 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights on the one hand and the right to self-determination as a meta-right of participation as pointed at in article 1 of the same Covenant. 2 Participation and Self-Determination Article 25 of the CCPR deals with participation and covers participation not only at the national level but also at the sub-national and local government level.
    [Show full text]